The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-03_PLANNING CASE NO. 2021-03Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 at 7„00 p.m. rnis near ng' start until later in the even', de ndin on the order of the agenda Location: Cit Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. - .. 4, - Consider Consider a request for a Wetland Alteration Permit Proposal• Interim Use Permit for excavation of existing wetland a ng with excavated borrow being placed on a location within the arcel. Zoned A ricultural Estate (A2). Applicant: Black Cherry Development, LLC Property West of Great Plains Blvd., south of the Foxwood Location: Development, and north of W. 96th Street. A bcition map Is on the reverse side of this notice. ' The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the appll %:req! lest and to ob In input from the neighborhood about this proj.' buring the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following What Happens steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. a. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the city's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2021-03. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous Questions & by email at baenerous(fti.chanhassen.mmus or by phone Comments: at 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, please send one copy to staff in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online at the city's Agendas & Minutes webpage the Thursday prior to the Plannin Commission meletin . NEWT Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhasr>en.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! Ciry Review Procedure: • Subdivision; Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses. Wetland Alterations, Re tonings, Comprehensive Pen Amekdrients and Code Amendments require a public hewing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be nolfied of the application in writing. Any interested party Is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on Me subject applicatron that includes all pertinent information and a recommembabon. These reports are availableby request At the Planning Commission meeting, stag will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a partof Me hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss Me item and make a recommendation to the City Counctl. The City Council may reverse, aKrm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation Rewrim , land use and bode amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Counul except rezanings and lard use amendments from residential to commerciaVmdustnal. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 clays unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications clue to their complexity may take several months to complete Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Counll meeting. • A neighborhood spokemersiddrepresen enure is encouraged to provide a corral for the crty. Often devebpws are encourzged to Moet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Ste is alar available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Counal. If you wish to have something to be inducted in the report, lease contact the Planning Stag pension named on the notification. This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. rhe City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnity, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the user's access or use of data orm�Vr+ S.S386-3 ;1112'i-sf. 553i7>0i47 553 e °SEs POs;, N• > nrwer sown 02 IP $ 000.500 0000939643 DEC 21 2020 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 55317 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 NIXIE 553 DE 1 0012/26/20 RETI]RN TO SENDER NO SLIC4 NUMBER UNABLE TO FORWARD BC: 55317014747 *2378-12246-21-39 „il!;!!r!!i!nll iiiiliHlidii!ii'miii1,11!!;I!IIJIli.i THE EICHER FAMILY TRUST 700 OVERLOOK LN VICTORIA, MN 55386 III�III,I,�Ill�l�lrl,Il�ilr��L�rr�rll��llllLl��l�lrJl�l�lrr I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CI'T'Y OF C�NgASSEN Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1100 I Fax: (952) 227-1110 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW / Submittal Date: ='L `) L PC Date: CC Date:I I :-� I 60 -Day Review Date: D i (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ......................... $600 ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers..... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) ❑ Single -Family Residence ................................ $325 ❑ All Others ......................................................... $425 ❑• Interim Use Permit (IUP) ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 F) All Others ......................................................... $425 ❑ Rezoning (REZ) *Additional escrow may be required for other applications ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 ❑ ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD ................. $100 ❑ All Others ......................................................... $500 ❑ Sign Plan Review ................................................... $150 ❑ Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑ Administrative ..................................................$100 $150 ❑ Commercial/Industrial Districts*......................$500 $275 ❑ Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: ❑ thousand square feet) $500 Include number of existi employees: Include number of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts ......................................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit (_ units) ❑✓ Notification Sign (City to install and remove) .......................... ❑ Subdivision (SUB) NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. ..................... $200 ❑✓ Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generate atter pre -application meeting) .................................................. $3 per address ( 70 addresses) ❑� Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply) ........................ .......... $50 per document .................................... ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑1 Interim Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation ❑ Variance ® Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) ❑ Easements (_ easements) ❑ Deeds TOTAL FEE: $1,210.00 Section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal: Proposed excavation of an existing wetland with borrow excavation placed on existing adjacent property. Property Address or Location: Parent Parcel is, E of Powers Blvd, W of Great Plains Blvd, S of Foxwood Development, N Parcel #: 251550022 Legal Description: _ Total Acreage: 112.78 Wetlands Present? 0 Yes ❑ No See Attached Present Zoning: Single -Family Residential District (RSF) Requested Zoning: Not Applicable Present Land Use Designation: Residential Low Density Requested Land Use Designation: Not Applicable Existing Use of Property. Wetland and residential ❑Check box if separate narrative is attached. ❑ Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $300 ❑ Create over 3 lots.......................$600 + $15 per lot i lots) ❑ Metes & Bounds (2 lots)..................................$300 ❑ Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment.........................................$150 ❑ Final Plat ..........................................................$700 (Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)* *Additional escrow may be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 ❑� Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... $150 E All Others ....................................................... $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ...................................................... $100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)................. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. ..................... $200 ❑✓ Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generate atter pre -application meeting) .................................................. $3 per address ( 70 addresses) ❑� Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply) ........................ .......... $50 per document .................................... ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑1 Interim Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation ❑ Variance ® Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) ❑ Easements (_ easements) ❑ Deeds TOTAL FEE: $1,210.00 Section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal: Proposed excavation of an existing wetland with borrow excavation placed on existing adjacent property. Property Address or Location: Parent Parcel is, E of Powers Blvd, W of Great Plains Blvd, S of Foxwood Development, N Parcel #: 251550022 Legal Description: _ Total Acreage: 112.78 Wetlands Present? 0 Yes ❑ No See Attached Present Zoning: Single -Family Residential District (RSF) Requested Zoning: Not Applicable Present Land Use Designation: Residential Low Density Requested Land Use Designation: Not Applicable Existing Use of Property. Wetland and residential ❑Check box if separate narrative is attached. Section 3: Property . Applicant APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. 1 agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Black Cherry Development, LLC Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Signature: Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Black Cherry Development, LLC Contact: Tim Erhart Address: 14500 Martin Drive, Ste. 3000 Phone: City/State/Zip.. Eden Prairie, MN. 55344 Cell: (612) 963-0733 Email: terhart@riekor.com Fax: Signature: Date: 11/30/20 This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the speck ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Alliant Engineering, Inc Contact: Mark Rausch Address: 733 Marquette Ave. Ste. 700 Phone: (612) 767-9339 City/State/Zip: Minneapolis, MN. 55402 Cell: Email: mrausch@alliant-inc.com Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? *Other Contact Information: ❑✓ Property Owner Via: ❑✓ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: Dan Blake ❑ Applicant Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: Engineer Via: 0 Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: Q Other* Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: danblake(d_)pemtom.com INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing. SAVE FORM PRINT FORM SUBMR FORM CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 12/03/2020 3:03 PM Receipt No. 00457280 CLERK: ashleym PAYEE: DPB Properties LLC 16831 Cedercrest Drive Eden Prairie MN 55347 - Erhart WAP and IUP PC 2021-03 ------------------------------------------------------- Interim Use Permit 425.00 Notification Sign 200.00 Recording Fees 100.00 Wetland 275.00 GIS List 210.00 Total Cash Check 1048 Change 11210.00 0.00 1,210.00 0.00 Erhart WAP and IUP PC File No. 2021-03 (BG) $0.00 Consolidate Lots $425.00 Interim Use Permit $0.00 Lot Line Adjustment $0.00 Subdivision ($600 + $15 per lot) $0.00 Final Plat $275.00 WAP $210.00 Property Owners List ($3.00 x 70) $0.00 Variance $0.00 Rezoning $200.00 Notification Sign $0.00 Deeds $100.00 Attorney's Fees $0.00 Recording Fees $1,210.00 TOTAL $1,210.00 Ck #1048 from DPB Properties, LLC $0.00 Balance Owed $0.00 Adjustment SCANNED • • PC- 26>01-03 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION II ' Application of Black Cherry Development LLC for an Interim Use Permit for excavation of existing wetland along with excavated borrow being placed on a location within the parcel. On January 5, 2021, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Black Cherry Development LLC for an Interim Use Permit for the property located at Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Addition, (PID 25.1550022) and Outlot E, Foxwood (PID 25.29905 10, city -owned) and 9197 Eagle Ridge Road PID 250240811. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed conditional use and was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The property is currently zoned Agricultural Estate District, A-2. 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density use. 3. The legal description of the property is: Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Addition and Outlot E, Foxwood Addition. 4. Section 20-232: a. The proposed use will not be detrimental to or enhance the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. The proposed grading will enhance the aesthetics of the area. b. The proposed use will be consistent with the objectives of the city's Comprehensive Plan and the zoning ordinance by preserving and enhancing the wetland function and value. c. The proposed use will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. The proposed pond will enhance the appearance of the area. d. The proposed use will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. The proposed use will enhance the planned neighboring uses. scmwo 0 0 e. The proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. f. The proposed use will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. The storage capacity of the wetland will improve stormwater management for the area. g. The proposed use will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. h. The proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. i. The proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. j. The proposed use will be aesthetically compatible with the area. k. The proposed use will not depreciate surrounding property values. 1. The proposed use meets standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in Chapter 20, Article IV of the City Code. 5. The Planning Commission shall recommend an Interim Use Permit and the City Council shall issue an Interim Use Permit only if it finds, based on the proposed location, that: a. The use meets the standards of a Conditional Use Permit set forth in Section 20- 232 of the City Code. b. The use conforms to the zoning regulations. c. The use is allowed as an interim use in the zoning district. d. The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty upon completion of the grading and restoration. e. The use will not impose additional costs on the public if it is necessary for the public to take the property in the future. f. The user agrees to any conditions that the City Council deems appropriate for permission of the use. 6. The planning report #2021-03 dated January 5, 2021, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. 0 0 RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Interim Use Permit to permit the excavation of the wetland and storage of soil on the property in anticipation of the eventual development of the site subject to the conditions of the staff report. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 5' day of January, 2021. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: l/ /� Steven Weick, hairman gip1an\2021 planning cases\21-03 erhart wap and iup\findings of fact erhart.docx Roger N. Knutson Elliott B. Knetsch Joel J. Jamnik Andrea McDowell Poehler Soren M. Mattick David S. Kendall Henry A. Schaeffer, III Alina Schwartz Shana N. Conklin James J. Monge, BI Jerome M. Porter Leah C.M. Koch Meagan K. Kelley Thomas J. Campbell* *Retired Vlain:1 ll-+S_'-;iain k- FU PROFESSIONAL* ASSOC I AT I ON February 9, 2021 Ms. Jean Steckling City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Miscellaneous Recordings Dear Ms. Steckling: Please find enclosed, for the City's files, the following documents which have been erecorded with Carver County: C 1. Interim Use Permit 2021-03 recorded February 3, 2021 as document number A716938; 2. Interim Use Permit 2021-02 recorded February 5, 2021 as document number A717108; 3. Variance 2021-07 recorded February 2, 2021 as document number T217799; 4. Variance 2021-06 recorded February 2, 2021 as document number A716771; 5. Variance 2021-05 recorded January 20, 2021 as document number T217577; 6. Variance 2021-01 recorded January 20, 2021 as document number A715721. Thank you. Very truly yours, CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association ijmo Enclosures 200786v5 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED FEB 12 2021 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT =s z"j CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES INTERIM USE PERMIT #2021-03 1. Permit. Subject to the terns and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants an interim use for grading per the plans dated December 4, 2020 prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc. 2. Property. The permit is for the following described properties ("subject properties") in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota: See attached Exhibit "A" 3. Conditions. The permit is issued subject to the following conditions: Engineering 1. The applicant and their engineer shall work with city staff in amending the Erosion and Sediment Control Plans, dated December 4, 2020, prepared by Mark Rausch, PE with Alliant Engineering, Inc., to fully satisfy Sec. 19-145 of City Ordinance and address any staff concerns. 2. All erosion control reviewed and approved in conjunction with Condition No. 1 shall be installed prior to the initiation of any site grading. Inspection and approval by the city of the installed erosion control measures must be had prior to grading operations. 3. The applicant shall supply a cash escrow or letter of credit in the amount of $27,517.50 prior to grading operations. 4. A survey of the proposed stockpile location shall be provided before grading operations and after grading operations to delineate the total area and volume of material stockpiled in conjunction with this Interim Use Permit. 5. Permitted hours of operation will be 7:00 am. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturday, with no work permitted on Sunday or public holidays. 6. The Interim Use Permit shall be approved for a period of one (1) year from the date of City Council approval. The applicant will need to request a formal extension 60 days prior to the expiration date of the Interim Use Permit. 7. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, as necessary, i.e. Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District, Carver County, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Army Corps of Engineers, etc. and comply with their conditions of approval. Environmental Resources 1. Wherever erosion control measures are not present, the applicant shall install tree protection fencing at the edge of grading and hauling limits throughout the haul route and stockpile area prior to any work being done. 2. Unless there are frozen soil conditions as determined by the city, the applicant shall install ground protection mats with an underlayment of shredded wood mulch on the entire length of the haul route. The mats will require an inspection by the city prior to use. 3. The applicant is required to submit a restoration plan that includes the replacement of trees within the buffer area and the haul route. The quantity shall be determined to match the existing density occurring in the forest outside of the construction limits. 4. Soil compaction tests shall be taken and levels documented post construction. If soil bulk density exceeds limits to plant growth (1.Og/cc), then appropriate restoration methods shall be employed such as aeration as directed by the city. 5. No vegetation outside of the wetland boundary shall be removed on city property. 6. No access to the project site shall be allowed through city property. 7. The removal of the wooded areas for the dredging of the pond shall not be permitted on the city -owned parcel and should be preserved on the other two parcels. Water Resources 1. The applicant must limit all grading to the wetland boundary. No grading or vegetation removal is allowed beyond the wetland into the upland. 2. The wetland boundary must be completely flagged and walked with the city's Water Resources Coordinator before any construction activities can begin. 3. Erosion and sediment control measures must be adequately in place before construction begins. 4. No grading is permitted in the Type 3 portion of Wetland 2 (see plans for further details). Area of non -disturbance must be flagged prior to construction and approved by the city's Water Resources Coordinator. 5. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits through the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Overlay District, including dredging, floodplain. 4. Termination of Permit. The City may revoke the permit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. 5. Lapse. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 6. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. Dated: January 26, 2021 CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: qtti Elise Ryan, Mayor By: H er Johnston, In im City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COu COUNTY OF CARVER ) 1 r" The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this itday ofr, 2024, by Elise Ryan, Mayor, and Heather Johnston, Interim City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 El - iu ' - - mom KIM T. MEUWISSEN Notary Public -Minnesota My c„„MW EY*" Jen 91, 2025 EXHIBIT "A" TO INTERIM USE PERMIT #2021-03 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF CITY PROPERTY: Outlot E, Foxwood, Carver County, Minnesota LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ERHART PROPERTY: Parcel 2: Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Addition, Carver County, Minnesota. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following: Tract A: Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Addition, Carver County, Minnesota; which lies westerly and northwesterly of Line 1 described below: Line 1: Commencing at the north quarter corner of Section 26, Township 116 North, Range 23 West; thence run east on an azimuth of 89 degrees 58 minutes 40 seconds along the north line of said section for for 523.29 feet to the point of beginning of Line 1 to be described; thence on an azimuth of 230 degrees 31 minutes 30 seconds for 125.85 feet; thence on an azimuth of 251 degrees 33 minutes 26 seconds for 423.16 feet; thence on an azimuth of 173 degrees 19 minutes 17 seconds for 594.73; thence on an azimuth of 180 degrees 48 minutes 53 seconds for 493.70 feet to a point on the south line of said Tract A and there terminating. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following: That part of Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Addition, Carver County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the westerly right of way line of Trunk Highway No. 101, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 10-46, AND 1047, according to the recorded plats thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, and easterly of the following described line: Commencing at point B7 of said right of way plat; thence South 89 degrees 34 minutes 41 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the south line of said Outlot A 32.22 feet to the point of beginning of a line to be described; thence northerly 200.91 feet along a non tangential curve, concave to the west, central angle 20 degrees 11 minutes 41 seconds, radius 570.00 feet, chord bearing North 09 degrees 18 minutes 16 seconds West; thence northwesterly 435.88 feet along a compound curve, concave to the southwest, radius 703.00 feet, central angle 35 degrees 31 minutes 29 seconds; thence North 54 degrees 55 minutes 36 seconds West, along tangent, 516.07 feet to a point on said westerly right of way line and said line there terminating. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following: That part of Oudot A, Butternut Ridge Addition according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota lying westerly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the South comer of Lot 2, Block 4, Foxwood, according to the recorded plat thereof Carver County, Minnesota; thence on an Assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 02 minutes 05 seconds West along the East line of said Lot 2 a distance of 189.51 feet to the Northeast comer of said Lot 2 and the point of beginning of said line; thence South 48 degrees 05 minutes 58 seconds East 61.09 feet; thence South 41 degrees 54 minutes 02 seconds West 134.40 feet to the Southwesterly line of said Lot 2 and said line there terminating. am That part of Lot 2, Block 4, Foxwood, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota lying easterly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the Southerly comer of Lot 2, Block 4, Foxwood, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota; thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 02 minutes 05 seconds West along the East line of said Lot 2 a distance of 189.51 feet to the Northeast comer of said Lot 2 and the point of beginning of said line; thence South 48 degrees 05 minutes 58 seconds East 61.09 feet; thence South 41 degrees 54 minutes 02 seconds West 134.40 feet to the Southwesterly line of said Lot 2 and said line there terminating. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF 9197 EAGLE RIDGE RD: TRACT A: That part of the south 732.28 feet of the north 762.28 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 24, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, lying east of the west 271.79 feet thereof and westerly of the centerline of State Highway No. 101 EXCEPT that part thereof described as follows: That part of the north 180 feet of the east 16.00 feet of the west 287.79 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 24, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, lying south of the north 30.00 feet thereof. That part of the west 271.79 feet of the north 762.28 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 24, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, and that part of the north 30.00 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, lying east of the west 271. 79 feet thereof and westerly of the centerline of State Highway No. 101 described as: That part of the north 330.00 feet of the east 16. 00 feet of the west 271. 79 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 24, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, lying south of the north 180 feet thereof. EXCEPTING from the above Tracts A and B the following: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, shown as Parcel 718 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat Numbered 10-19 as the same is on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Carver County, Minnesota. And also excepting: That part of the South 732.28 feet of the North 762.28 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the westerly right of way line of Trunk Highway No. 101, Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-19,10-46 and 10-47 according to the recorded plats thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, and easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the intersection of the South line of said North 762.28 feet and said westerly right of way line; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds West for a distance of 16.48 feet along said south line to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence northerly 360.89 feet along a non-tangential curve, concave to the east, central angle 23 degrees 12 minutes 25 seconds, radius 891.00 feet, chord bearing North 02 degrees 01 minutes 29 seconds West; thence North 09 degrees 34 minutes 44 seconds East 36 1. 10 feet; thence North 10 degrees 37 minutes 41 seconds East 18.22 feet to the North line of the South 732.28 feet of the North 762.28 feet and said line there temunating. And also excepting: Parcel 271 Bon Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat Numbered 10-47, Carver Document Number: A716938 Filed and/or Recorded on Feb 3, 20213:58 PM Office of the County Recorder/Registrar of Titles Carver County, Minnesota Kaaren Lewis, County Recorder Deputy KL Document Recording Fees $ 46.00 Document Total $ 46.00 Requesting Party: City of Chanhassen Pages: 8 This cover page has been added to this document by Carver County Land Records and is now an official part of this recorded document CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES INTERIM USE PERMIT #2021-03 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants an interim use for grading per the plans dated December 4, 2020 prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc. 2. Pro . The permit is for the following described properties ("subject properties") in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota: See attached Exhibit "A" 3. Conditions. The permit is issued subject to the following conditions: Engineering 1. The applicant and their engineer shall work with city staff in amending the Erosion and Sediment Control Plans, dated December 4, 2020, prepared by Mark Rausch, PE with Alliant Engineering, Inc., to fully satisfy Sec. 19-145 of City Ordinance and address any staff concerns. 2. All erosion control reviewed and approved in conjunction with Condition No. 1 shall be installed prior to the initiation of any site grading. Inspection and approval by the city of the installed erosion control measures must be had prior to grading operations. 3. The applicant shall supply a cash escrow or letter of credit in the amount of $27,517.50 prior to grading operations. 4. A survey of the proposed stockpile location shall be provided before grading operations and after grading operations to delineate the total area and volume of material stockpiled in conjunction with this Interim Use Permit. 5. Permitted hours of operation will be 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m, to 5:00 p.m. on Saturday, with no work permitted on Sunday or public holidays. 6. The Interim Use Permit shall be approved for a period of one (1) year from the date of City Council approval. The applicant will need to request a formal extension 60 days prior to the expiration date of the Interim Use Permit. 7. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, as necessary, i.e. Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District, Carver County, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Army Corps of Engineers, etc. and comply with their conditions of approval. Environmental Resources 1. Wherever erosion control measures are not present, the applicant shall install tree protection fencing at the edge of grading and hauling limits throughout the haul route and stockpile area prior to any work being done. 2. Unless there are frozen soil conditions as determined by the city, the applicant shall install ground protection mats with an underlayment of shredded wood mulch on the entire length of the haul route. The mats will require an inspection by the city prior to use. 3. The applicant is required to submit a restoration plan that includes the replacement of trees within the buffer area and the haul route. The quantity shall be determined to match the existing density occurring in the forest outside of the construction limits. 4. Soil compaction tests shall be taken and levels documented post construction. If soil bulk density exceeds limits to plant growth (1.Oglec), then appropriate restoration methods shall be employed such as aeration as directed by the city. 5. No vegetation outside of the wetland boundary shall be removed on city property. 6. No access to the project site shall be allowed through city property. 7. The removal of the wooded areas for the dredging of the pond shall not be permitted on the city -owned parcel and should be preserved on the other two parcels. Water Resources 1. The applicant must limit all grading to the wetland boundary. No grading or vegetation removal is allowed beyond the wetland into the upland. 2. The wetland boundary must be completely flagged and walked with the city's Water Resources Coordinator before any construction activities can begin. 3. Erosion and sediment control measures must be adequately in place before construction begins. 4. No grading is permitted in the Type 3 portion of Wetland 2 (see plans for further details). Area of non -disturbance must be flagged prior to construction and approved by the city's Water Resources Coordinator. 5. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits through the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Overlay District, including dredging, floodplain. 4. Termination of Permit. The City may revoke the permit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. 5. Lapse. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 6. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. Dated: Janu tar COUNTY OF CARVER (ss The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of� br 2024, by Elise Ryan, Mayor, and Heather Johnston, Interim City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. _ Notary Publi CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: &� &A --Q Elise Ryan, Mayor By: H then Johnston, In City Manager DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen ICKIM T. MEUWISSEN 7700 Market Boulevard ary publlc-MP.O. Box 147 MM awe o dn. Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 4 EXHIBIT "A" TO INTERIM USE PERMIT #2021-03 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF CITY PROPERTY: Outlot E, Foxwood, Carver County, Minnesota LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ERHART PROPERTY: Parcel 2: Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Addition, Carver County, Minnesota EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following: Tract A: Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Addition, Carver County, Minnesota; which lies westerly and northwesterly of Line 1 described below: Line 1: Commencing at the north quarter comer of Section 26, Township 116 North, Range 23 West; thence run east on an azimuth of 89 degrees 58 minutes 40 seconds along the north line of said section for for 523.29 feet to the point of beginning of Line 1 to be described; thence on an azimuth of 230 degrees 31 minutes 30 seconds for 125.85 feet; thence on an azimuth of 251 degrees 33 minutes 26 seconds for 423.16 feet; thence on an azimuth of 173 degrees 19 minutes 17 seconds for 594.73; thence on an azimuth of 180 degrees 48 minutes 53 seconds for 493.70 feet to a point on the south line of said Tract A and there terminating. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following: That part of Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Addition, Carver County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the westerly right of way line of Trunk Highway No. 101, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 10-46, AND 10-47, according to the recorded plats thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, and easterly of the following described line: Commencing at point B7 of said right of way plat; thence South 89 degrees 34 minutes 41 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the south line of said Outlot A 32.22 feet to the point of beginning of a line to be described; thence northerly 200.91 feet along a non tangential curve, concave to the west, central angle 20 degrees 11 minutes 41 seconds, radius 570.00 feet, chord bearing North 09 degrees 18 minutes 16 seconds West; thence northwesterly 435.88 feet along a compound curve, concave to the southwest, radius 703.00 feet, central angle 35 degrees 31 minutes 29 seconds; thence North 54 degrees 55 minutes 36 seconds West, along tangent, 516.07 feet to a point on said westerly right of way line and said line there terminating. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following: That part of Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Addition according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota lying westerly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the South comer of Lot 2, Block 4, Foxwood, according to the recorded plat thereof Carver County, Minnesota; thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 02 minutes 05 seconds West along the East line of said Lot 2 a distance of 189.51 feet to the Northeast comer of said Lot 2 and the point of beginning of said line; thence South 48 degrees 05 minutes 58 seconds East 61.09 feet; thence South 41 degrees 54 minutes 02 seconds West 134.40 feet to the Southwesterly line of said Lot 2 and said line there terminating. Also: That part of Lot 2, Block 4, Foxwood, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota lying easterly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the Southerly comer of Lot 2, Block 4, Foxwood, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota; thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 02 minutes 05 seconds West along the East line of said Lot 2 a distance of 189.51 feet to the Northeast comer of said Lot 2 and the point of beginning of said line; thence South 48 degrees 05 minutes 58 seconds East 61.09 feet; thence South 41 degrees 54 minutes 02 seconds West 134.40 feet to the Southwesterly line of said Lot 2 and said line there terminating. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF 9197 EAGLE RIDGE RD: TRACT A: That part of the south 732.28 feet of the north 762.28 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 24, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, lying east of the west 271.79 feet thereof and westerly of the centerline of State Highway No. 101 EXCEPT that part thereof described as follows: That part of the north 180 feet of the east 16.00 feet of the west 287.79 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 24, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, lying south of the north 30.00 feet thereof. TRACT 8: That part of the west 271.79 feet of the north 762.28 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 24, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, and that part of the north 30.00 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, lying east of the west 271. 79 feet thereof and westerly of the centerline of State Highway No. 101 described as: That part of the north 330.00 feet of the east 16. 00 feet of the west 271. 79 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 24, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, lying south of the north 180 feet thereof. EXCEPTING from the above Tracts A and B the following: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, shown as Parcel 718 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat Numbered 10-19 as the same is on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Carver County, Minnesota. And also excepting: That part of the South 732.28 feet of the North 762.28 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the westerly right of way line of Trunk Highway No. 101, Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 10-19, 10-46 and 10-47 according to the recorded plats thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, and easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the intersection of the South line of said North 762.28 feet and said westerly right of way line; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds West for a distance of 16.48 feet along said south line to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence northerly 360.89 feet along a non-tangential curve, concave to the east, central angle 23 degrees 12 minutes 25 seconds, radius 891.00 feet, chord bearing North 02 degrees 01 minutes 29 seconds West; thence North 09 degrees 34 minutes 44 seconds East 36 1. 10 feet; thence North 10 degrees 37 minutes 41 seconds East 18.22 feet to the North line of the South 732.28 feet of the North 762.28 feet and said line there terminating. And also excepting: Parcel 271 Bon Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat Numbered 10-47, Carver s 0 Affidavit of Publication Southwest News Media State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) PLANNING CASE NO, 2021-M NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly swom, on oath says that she is the General Manager the news - hearing on Tuesday, January 5 papers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Villager and has full knowledge of the 2021 at 7:00 P.M. in the Council facts herein stated as follows: Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal purpose of this hearing is to newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as consider a request for a Wetland amended. Alteration Permit and Interim Use Permit for excavation of (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No.. existing wetland along with excavated borrow being placed was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice d said on a location within the parcel Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cu[ from the columns of located west of Great Plains the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both Blvd., south of the Foxwood inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition Development, and north of W. and publication of the Notice: 96th Street. Zoned Agricultural Estate (A2). Applicant: Black abedefghUkhnnopgrstuvwxyz Cherry Development, LLC. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the city's web site at www.ci.chanhassen. Laurie A. Hartmann mn.us/2021-03 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing Subscribed and sworn before me on and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Bob Generous Senior Planner this I day of 2020 Email: bgenerousQ ci.chanhassen.mmus Phone: 952-227-1131 (Published in the Chanhassen JYMMEJEANNETTE BARK Pillager on Thursday December NOTARY PUBLIC MINNESOTA No lic MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 01131123 tee, RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $14.03 per column inch CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 12/03/2020 3:53 PM Receipt No. 00457280 CLERK: ashleym PAYEE: DPB Properties LLC 16831 Cedercrest Drive Eden Prairie MN 55347 - Erhart WAP and IUP PC 2021-03 ------------------------------------------------------- Interim Use Permit 425.00 Notification Sign 200.00 Recording Fees 100.00 Wetland 27 .00 GIS List 210.00 Total Cash Check 1048 Change 1,210.00 0.00 1,210.00 0.00 LADeAZ'4 ,t"T . Mrs CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 2021-03 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, January 5, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for a Wetland Alteration Permit and Interim Use Permit for excavation of existing wetland along with excavated borrow being placed on a location within the parcel located west of Great Plains Blvd., south of the Foxwood Development, and north of W. 96th Street. Zoned Agricultural Estate (A2). Applicant: Black Cherry Development, LLC. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the city's web site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2021-03 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Bob Generous Senior Planner Email: beenerous&ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1131 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on December 24, 2020) S W;NNED gAp1an\2021 planning ca \21-03 erhart wap and iup\ph notice to villager - erhartwapiup.docx CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ( ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on December 21, 2020, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of a Public Hearing to consider a request for a Wetland Alteration Permit and Interim Use Permit for excavation of existing wetland along with excavated borrow being placed on a location within the parcel. Zoned Agricultural Estate (A2), Planning Case No. 2021-03 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. I/Wl� 71, Kim T. Meuwissen, Depu k Subscribed and om to before me this 4 day of: C c ( , 2020. (Seal) Notary PublicJEAN M STECKLING M, � ar SC:4%7!0 This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records. information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnity, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arse out of the user's access or use of data provided. This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the CM shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims. and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User. its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the users access or use of data provided. «TAX NAME» ((TAX—ADD—L1» «TAX ADD L2a (<Next Record))((TAX NAME)) <JAX_AD D_L U ((TAX—ADD—L2)) Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time•' Tuesday, January 5, 2021 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start ' until later in the evening, depending on the order of thea enda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Consider a request for a Wetland Alteration Permit and Interim Use Permit for excavation of existing wetland along Proposal: with excavated borrow being placed on a location within the parcel. Zoned Agricultural Estate (A2). Applicant: Black Cherry Development, LLC West of Great Plains Blvd., south of the Foxwood Property Location: Development, and north of W. 96mStreet. A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following What Happens steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the city's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2021-03. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous Questions & by email at baenerous(Mci chanhassen n us or by phone Questions & at 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, Comments: please send one copy to staff in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online at the city's Agendas & Minutes webpage the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWI Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! City Review Proceduro: • Subdivisions. Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Inform Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezoning., Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. My interested party is Invited to attend the meeting • Stan, prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation, These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezoningsland use and code amendments take a simple majority vole of the City Council except rezorings and land use amendments from residential to commerciallindusVial. • Minnesota State Statute 519 99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard Some applications due to their complexity may take sevefal months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersonlrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. ff you wish to have something to be included in the report lease contact the Plan ing Stag person named on the noblicarcn. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date &Time Tuesday, January 5, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start ' until later in the evening, depending on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Consider a request for a Wetland Alteration Permit and Interim Use Permit for excavation of existing wetland along Proposal: with excavated borrow being placed on a location within the parcel. Zoned Agricultural Estate (A2). Applicant: Black Cherry Development, LLC West of Great Plains Blvd., south of the Foxwood PropeLocation: Development, and north of W. 961h Street. A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following What Happens steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the city's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2021-03. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by email at bgenerousg-)ci chanhassen.mn.us or by phone Questions & at 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, Comments: please send one copy to staff in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online at the city's Agendas & Minutes webpage the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWI Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign u I City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonirgs, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission City ordinances require all property, within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing Any interested pony is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report an the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will Gose the public hearirg and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or pertly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard Some applications due to their complexity, may lake several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersonlrepresenlative is encouraged to provide a torted for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Sten is also available to review the project with any interested persons). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public heanrg, the City Council does not Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council, ff you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Planning Stall person named on Me notiGrallon. TAX—NAME TAX _ ADD _Ll TAX _ ADD _L2 SITEADD PIN FOXWOOD LLC 1000 BOONE AVE N No. 400 GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427-4473 252990520 GONYEA HOMES INC 1000 BOONE AVE N STE 400 GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 9140 EAGLE CT 252990020 JOHNNIE 1 & ELAINE A MEYERING 1050 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8634 1050 HOMESTEAD LN 256100080 LINDA M BLOUDEK REV TRUST 1171 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8613 1171 HOMESTEAD LN 256100180 JOHN JENSEN II 1181 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8613 1181 HOMESTEAD LN 256100190 JAMES L BROWNELL REV TRUST 1190 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8612 1190 HOMESTEAD LN 256100090 WILLIAM G & ELIZABETH M AHERN 1191 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8613 1191 HOMESTEAD LN 256100200 ROBERT GALVIN 1451 BETHESDA CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9295 EAGLE RIDGE RD 252990420 G&M LAURENT FAMILY LTD PTRSHP 23655 ZINN AVE PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372-8885 1371 PIONEER TRL 250260600 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 631 TRAN ST PAUL, MN 55155-1801 250260620 WILLIAM J O'NEILL 40 LAKE RILEY DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4541 9411 KIOWA TRL 250251300 JEFFREY SNEGOSKY 54178TH ST W No. 212 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9245 EAGLE RIDGE RD 252990370 JESSE MCATEE 600 94TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8600 600 94TH ST W 250920070 ROGER A & KIMBERLY A LEE 600 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8601 600 96TH ST W 250253300 TIMOTHY J LOWE 60196TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8602 0 96TH ST W 250251510 ESEOGHENE ABOKEDE 601 E 3RD ST N LADYSMITH, WI 54848 9215 EAGLE RIDGE RD 252990330 THE BOECKER FAMILY TRUST 610 W 96TH ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 610 96TH ST W 250253100 JAMES & ARLENE 1 CHURCH 61196TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8602 61196TH ST W 250251600 ANDREW T RIEGERT 620 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8601 620 96TH ST W 250253500 STEPHEN J & COLEEN M WILKER 62196TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8602 62196TH ST W 250251700 THEODORE B & KAREN K HASSE 630 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8601 630 96TH ST W 250253800 KEVIN L & LORI A BOGENREIF 63196TH 5T W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8602 63196TH ST W 250251800 AMY C KROLL 6321 SUMMIT CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9441 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 250251200 PAUL G GASKIN 660 BAY RD BAY CITY, M148706 9275 EAGLE RIDGE RD 252990400 JAMES M & TERESA A BYRNE 700 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8603 700 96TH ST W 250253600 THE EICHER FAMILY TRUST 700 OVERLOOK LN VICTORIA, MN 55386 9200 EAGLE RIDGE RD 252990080 DOUGLAS L & PAULA JO STEEN 70196TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8603 70196TH ST W 250252000 DANIEL G ARLIG ETAL 710 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8603 710 96TH ST W 250253200 SPRINGFIELD HOMEOWNERS ASSN 7100 NORTHLAND CIR N SUITE 300 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55428-1583 257800390 RICHARD A & BETTY A DERHAAG 71196TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8603 71196TH ST W 250251900 GREGORY M FALCONER 720 W 96TH ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8603 720 96TH ST W 250253210 WILLIAM F & MARY E HEINLEIN 72196TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8603 72196TH ST W 250252100 WESLEY & CAROL DUNSMORE 730 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8603 730 96TH 5T W 250253400 GARY J & MARY LANE BENDZICK 73196TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8603 73196TH ST W 250252400 CARISSA E HAVERLY 750 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8603 750 96TH ST W 253650010 CHARLES E & SANDRA R WORM TRUSTS 760 W 96TH ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8603 760 96TH ST W 253650020 MATTHEW JOHN SWANSON 901 XENIA AVE S No. 415 GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55416 9305 EAGLE RIDGE RD 252990430 JACOB C WILSON 9122 BRECKENRIDGE LN EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347 9267 HAWKCREST CT 252990240 THOMAS JUDE BEUTZ 9150 EAGLE CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9150 EAGLE CT 252990030 CARLOS A CARLOS 9160 EAGLE CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9160 EAGLE CT 252990040 RYAN BOWLDS 9170 EAGLE CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9170 EAGLE CT 252990050 MATTHEW 1 RITZ 9180 EAGLE CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2709 9180 EAGLE CT 252990060 KEVIN JOSEPH MALONEY 9190 EAGLE CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9190 EAGLE CT 252990070 SCOTT LUEDKE 9195 EAGLE RIDGE RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9195 EAGLE RIDGE RD 252990460 DAVID R & MARY B BLANSKI 9197 EAGLE RIDGE RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9197 EAGLE RIDGE ROG 250240811 PAUL D PAULSON 9199 EAGLE RIDGE RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9199 EAGLE RIDGE RD 252990361 DAVID A VIUASTE 9205 EAGLE RIDGE RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2707 9205 EAGLE RIDGE RD 252990320 JEFFREY F KRAUTKRAMER 9210 EAGLE RIDGE RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9210 EAGLE RIDGE RD 252990090 GEORGEANNA KIMM 9220 EAGLE RIDGE RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2707 9220 EAGLE RIDGE RD 252990100 MICHAEL HAWKINS 9235 EAGLE RIDGE RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9235 EAGLE RIDGE RD 252990350 RICARDO HRUSCHKA 9265 EAGLE RIDGE RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9265 EAGLE RIDGE RD 252990390 NATALIE B PEARSON 9277 HAWKCREST CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9277 HAWKCREST CT 252990250 ANTHONY P RYAN 9285 EAGLE RIDGE RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9285 EAGLE RIDGE RD 252990410 RYAN JONES 9287 HAWKCREST CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9287 HAWKCREST CT 252990260 STEPHEN JAPUNTICH 9297 HAWKCREST CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9297 HAWKCREST CT 252990270 MATTHEW E HOTCHKISS 9307 HAWKCREST CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4859 9307 HAWKCREST CT 252990280 JASON PAUL HOLTHUS 9315 EAGLE RIDGE RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2708 9315 EAGLE RIDGE RD 252990300 JONATHAN NYKANEN 9317 HAWKCREST CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9317 HAWKCREST CT 252990290 VINOD VARMA 9325 EAGLE RIDGE RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9325 EAGLE RIDGE RD 252990313 RYAN STEWART 9390 KIOWA TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8616 9390 KIOWA TRL 252660040 CHERYL LJESSEN REV TRUST 9570 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8681 9570 FOXFORD RD 254080160 RYAN DAVID OLSON 9590 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9590 FOXFORD RD 254080170 WILLIAM DENNIS JOHNSON 9600 FLINTLOCK TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8605 9600 FLINTLOCK TRL 256100050 KEVIN 1 & PATRICIA A ELLSWORTH 9601 FLINTLOCK TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8605 9601 FLINTLOCK TRL 256100040 DANIEL D & KATHERINE HORSFALL 9610 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8688 9610 FOXFORD RD 254080180 TIMOTHY A & DAWNE M ERHART 9611 MEADOWLARK LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8695 251550022 DOUGLAS & REBECCA DUCHON LIVING TRUST 9630 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8688 9630 FOXFORD RD 254080190 RONALD L & KOLLEEN M BROWN 9650 FLINTLOCK TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8605 9650 FLINTLOCK TRL 256100060 KAREN KAY HENRICKSON 9651 FLINTLOCK TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8605 9651 FLINTLOCK TRL 256100030 MEGAN A STEWART 9700 FLINTLOCK TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9700 FLINTLOCK TRL 256100070 MARK A METZ 9701 FLINTLOCK TR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8637 9701 FLINTLOCK TRL 256100020 l<A / LI; --A CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 12/03/2020 3:53 PM Receipt No. 00457280 CLERK: ashleym PAYEE: DPB Properties LLC 16831 Cedercrest Drive Eden Prairie MN 55347 - Erhart WAP and IUP PC 2021-03 ------------------------------------------------------- Interim Use Permit 425.00 Notification Sign 200.00 Recording Fees 100.00 Wetland 275.00 GIS List 210.00 Total Cash Check 1048 Change 1,210.00 0.00 1,210.00 0.00 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard CITY OF CRMNSEN Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1130 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 AGENCY REVIEW REQUEST LAND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL Please review and respond no later than the review response deadline Agency Review Request Date: Agency Review Response Deadline: Date Application Filed: December 7, 2020 December 23, 2020 December 4, 2020 Contact: Contact Phone: Contact Email: Robert Generous, AICP 952-227-1131 bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Senior Planner Planning Commission Date: City Council Date: 60 -Day Review Period Deadline: January 5, 2021 at 7:00 .m. Janua 25, 2021 at 7:00 .m. February 2, 2021 Application: Request for a Wetland Alteration Permit and Interim Use Permit for excavation of existing wetland along with excavated borrow being laced on a location within the parcel. Zoned: Agricultural Estate. Applicant: Black Cherry Development, LLC Planning Case: 2021-03 Web Pa e: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2021-03 In order for staff to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, stormwater drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. City Departments: Federal Agencies: Adjacent Cities: ❑ Attorney E Army Corps of Engineers ❑ Chaska ❑ Building Official ❑ US Fish & Wildlife [:1 Eden Prairie E Engineering ❑ Jackson Township ❑ Fire Watershed Districts: ❑ Minnetonka E Forester E] CarverCountyWMO C-] Shorewood E Park Director ❑Victoria E Water Resources ❑ Lower River a ❑ Law Enforcement ❑ Minnehha Creek Adjacent Counties: E Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek E] Hennepin Carver County Agencies: Utilities: El Scott ❑ Community Development ❑Cable TV — Mediacom ElEngineer School Districts: ❑ Environmental Services ❑ Electric — Minnesota Valley ❑ Electric — Xcel Energy ❑ Eastern Carver County 112 ❑ Historical Society ❑ Magellan Pipeline ❑ Minnetonka 276 El Parks ❑ Natural Gas — CenterPoint Energy E Soil & Water Conservation District ❑ Phone — CenturyLink Other Agencies: State Agencies: ❑ Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority E Board of Water & Soil Resources ❑ MN Landscape Arboretum ❑ Health ❑ SouthWest Transit ❑ Historical Society ❑ TC&W Railroad ❑ Natural Resources -Forestry ❑ Natural Resources -Hydrology ❑ Pollution Control ❑ Transportation SCANNED Erhart WAP and IUP PC File No. 2021-03 (BG) $0.00 Consolidate Lots $425.00 Interim Use Permit $0.00 Lot Line Adjustment $0.00 Subdivision ($600 + $15 per lot) $0.00 Final Plat $275.00 WAP $210.00 Property Owners List ($3.00 x 70) $0.00 Variance $0.00 Rezoning $200.00 Notification Sign $0.00 Deeds $100.00 Attorney's Fees $0.00 Recording Fees $1,210.00 TOTAL $1,210.00 Ck #1048 from DPB Properties, LLC $0.00 Balance Owed $0.00 Adjustment COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT nnniimmttTT Planning Division - 7700 Market Boulevard 1 1'11 Mailing Address - P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 1 1 Phone: (952) 227-1100 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Submetal Date: ! a Lf 26" PC Dale: OF CHANHASSEN CC Date._ � i � 60 -Day Review Date: -� (Refer to the appopiate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ......................... $600 ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ..... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) per lot ❑ Single -Family Residence................................$325 ❑ All Others ......................................................... $425 ❑� Interim Use Permit (IUP) $150 ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 ❑� All Others ......................................................... $425 ❑ Rezoning (REZ) ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD)..................$750 through the development contract. ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD ................. $100 Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ ❑ All Others ......................................................... $500 ❑ Sign Plan Review...................................................$150 ❑ ❑ Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑v Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Administrative ..................................................$100 ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... ❑ Commercial/IndustrialDistricts'......................$500 R1All Others ....................................................... Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: ❑ thousand square feet) $100 ❑ 'Include number of eristi employees: $500 NOTE: 'Include number of new employees= the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. ❑ Residential Districts.........................................$500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit (— units) Q Notification Sign (city to install and remove) ......................... ❑ Subdivision (SUB) ❑ Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $300 F1 Create over 3 lots .......................$600 + $15 per lot lots) ❑ Metes & Bounds (2 lots)..................................$300 ❑ Consolidate Lots .............................................. $150 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment. ...................................... . $150 ❑ Final Plat._ ._._..._..._.........._ ................._._...$700 (Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)' -Additional escrow may be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 (Additional recording fees may appy) ❑ Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 ❑v Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... $150 R1All Others ....................................................... $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ...................................................... $100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)................. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. _...._................................................................... .._. _.._ $200 ❑ Property Owners List within 500' (city to generate after lr awlicatwn neeV).... - ........ ........................... $3 per address ( 70 addresses) Escrow for Recording Documents check all that apply) ........................ $50 per document F1 Conditional Use Permit ,r❑ Interim Use Permit L] Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation ❑ Variance ® Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) ❑ Easements( easements) ❑ Deeds $1,210.00 TOTAL FEE: Section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal: Proposed excavation of an existing wetland with borrow excavation placed on existing adjacent property. Property Address or Location: Parent Parcel is, E of Powers Blvd, W of Great Plains Blvd, S of Foxwood Development, N Parcel #: 251550022 Legal Description: - Total Acreage: 112-78 Wetlands Present? e Yes ❑ No b � : t :,.r.-..1 Present Zoning: Single -Family Residential District (RSF) Requested Zoning: Not Applicable Present Land Use Designation: Residential Low Density Requested Land Use Designation: Not Applicable Existing Use of Property: Watlarvt and rn_aufantial ❑Check box rf separate narrative is attached. Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Black Cherry Development, LLC Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Signature: Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Black Cherry Development, LLC Contact: Tim Erhart Address: 14500 Martin Drive, Ste. 3000 Phone: City/Slate/Zip: Eden Prairie, MN. 55344 Cell: (612) 963-0733 Email: terhart@riekor.com Fax Signature: v Date: 11/30/20 This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Alliant Engineering, Inc Contact: Mark Rausch Address: 733 Marquette Ave. Ste. 700 Phone: (612) 767-9339 City/Slate/Zip: Minneapolis, MN. 55402 Cell: Email: mrausch@alliant-inc.com Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? 'Other Contact Information: Property Owner Via: ❑� Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: Dan Blake ❑ Applicant Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: ❑� Engineer Via: Z Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other' Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: danblakeppemtom.com INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing. SAVE FORM PRINT FORM SUBMR FORM BOARD OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit: City of Chanhassen County: Carver County Applicant Name: Timothy A& Dawne M Erhart Applicant Representative: The Pemtom Land Company c/o Dan Blake Project Name: Erhart Property Wetland Delineation LGU Project No. (if any): 2020-07 Date Complete Application Received by LGU: 07/07/2020 Date of LGU Decision: 08/07/2020 Date this Notice was Sent: 08/07/2020 NCA Decision Type - check all that apply N Wetland Boundary/Type ❑ Sequencing ❑ Replacement Plan ❑ Bank Plan (not credit purchase) ❑ No -Loss (8420.0415) ❑ Exemption (8420.0420) Part:❑A❑B ❑C❑D❑E OF ❑G ❑H Subpart:021-13❑405 ❑607 0809 teplacement Plan Impacts (replacement plan decisions only) Total WCA Wetland Impact Area: Wetland Replacement Type: ❑ Project Specific Credits: ❑ Bank Credits: Bank Account Number(s): Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendations (attach if any) ® Approve ❑ Approve w/Conditions ❑ Deny ❑ No TEP Recommendation LGU Decision N Approved with Conditions (specify below)' ❑ Approved' ❑ Denied List Conditions: Decision -Maker for this Application: N Staff ❑ Governing Board/Council ❑ Other: Decision is valid for: N 5 years (default) ❑ Other (specify): rvu rmn uppruvur n nut vuuu unur awa ounprrm urr wnnuruwur uJ urry rryuncu wcumm wren r.rcoru. rm prurcr.r specific replacement a financial assurance per MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 and evidence that all required forms have been recorded on the title of the property on which the replacement wetland is located must be provided to the LGU for the approval to be valid. LGU Findings — Attach document(s) and/or insert narrative providing the basis for the LGU decision' N Attachment(s) (specify): N Summary: Four wetlands were delineated on the property. The wetland types areas follows: Wetland 1— Type 1, Seasonally flooded basin; Wetland 2 — Type 6/2/3, Shrub -carr, wet meadow, shallow marsh; Wetland 3 —Type 2/3/5, Wet meadow, shallow marsh, open water; and Wetland 4—Type 6/3/5, Shrub -carr, shallow marsh, open water. In addition to those wetlands, one constructed stormwater basin was delineated along with a small tributary that connects Wetland 2 and Wetland 3. The delineation boundary and type will be approved upon receipt of the wetland boundary shapefile. ' Findinas must consider any TEP recommendations Attached Project Documents 13VANNED BWSR NOD Form — November 12, 2019 1 L • N Site Location Map ❑ Project Plan(s)/Descriptions/Reports (specify): Appeals of LGU Decisions If you wish to appeal this decision, you must provide a written request within 30 calendar days of the date you received the notice. All appeals must be submitted to the Board of Water and Soil Resources Executive Director along with a check payable to BWSR for $500 unless the LGU has adopted a local appeal process as identified below. The check must be sent by mail and the written request to appeal can be submitted by mail or e-mail. The appeal should include a copy of this notice, name and contact information of appellant(s) and their representatives (if applicable), a statement clarifying the intent to appeal and supporting information as to why the decision is in error. Send to: Appeals & Regulatory Compliance Coordinator Minnesota Board of Water & Soils Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 travis.aermundson(la state.mn.us Does the LGU have a local appeal process applicable to this decision? M Yes' ❑ No 'If yes, all appeals must first be considered via the local appeals process. Local Appeals Submittal Requirements (LGU must describe how to appeal, submittal requirements, tees, etc. as applicable) Send $50.00 to 7700 Market Boulevard, PO Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Notice Distribution (include name) Required on all notices: ® SWCD TEP Member: Aaron Finke M BWSR TEP Member: Ben Carlson ❑ LGU TEP Member (if different than LGU contact): R DNR Representative: Melissa Collins ® Watershed District or Watershed Mgmt. Org.: Terry Jeffery, Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District ® Applicant: Timothy A & Dawne M Erhart ® Agent/Consultant: The Pemtom Land Company c/o Dan Blake; Adam Cameron Optional or As Applicable: ® Corps of Engineers: ❑ BWSR Wetland Mitigation Coordinator (required for bank plan applications only): ❑ Members of the Public (notice only): ❑ Other: Signature: Date: 08/07/2020 This notice and accompanying application materials maybe sent electronically or by mail. The LGU may opt to sena a summary of the application to members of the public upon request per 8420.0255, Subp. 3. BWSR NOD Form — November 12, 2019 ERHART / BLANSKI / CITY PROPERTY WETLAND ALTERATION AND INTERIM USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA December 4, 2020 SITE INFORMATION Work Area Location: E of Powers Blvd, W of Great Plains Blvd, S of Foxwood Development, N of W 96"' St. PID & Acreage: Parcel 1: 251550022 - 112.78 acres - Tim and Dawne Erhart Parcel 2: 250240811 - 3.67 acres - David & Mary Blanski Parcel 3: 252990510 —1.66 acres — City of Chanhassen DESCRIPTION OF INTERIM USE PERMIT REQUEST The request for interim use permit is for the proposed excavation of an existing wetland along with excavated borrow being placed on a location within the Erhart parcel. The proposed request is to complete the excavation of an existing wetland (Wetland 2) during winter months to create a basin for a permanent water storage area. The applicant is proposing the work to enhance the visual appearance of the existing wetland, but the work will additionally provide hydrologic flood storage in excavated basin as well. The excavated borrow material from the wetland will be placed on the Erhart parcel property. The wetland modification will not result in a net increase or decrease in the size of the wetland. The propose wetland alteration is simply adding depth to the wetland to create a water storage pool. The application provides a proposed grading plan that shows the maximum grading work possible, with no excavation or permanent impact outside of the wetland delineation limits. The actual grading work will be completed as `field fit' construction process to allow flexibility in deviating from plans based on existing conditions. At no point will the proposed grading limits exceed what is shown in the civil engineering plans. Contractor to work with the applicant, landowner representatives, wetland scientist and relevant regulatory authorities when completing grading activity to provide the desired result for all. Wetland Management The wetland (Wetland 2) to be modified exists partially within three parcels noted above. The wetland limits have been delineated by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company May 12, 2020. The City of Chanhassen approved the delineation on August 7, 2020. Wetland 2 was classified as a manage 2 as previously reviewed by the City and Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District with the Foxwood subdivision approval and as defined in the City's Surface Water Resource Plan. Interim Use Permit December 4, 2020 Wetland Alteration — Chanhassen, MN Page 1 of 3 ScAi4K23 Local Governmental Unit City of Chanhassen I Riley Pur ato Bluff Creek Watershed District Wetland Buffer Strip Principal Accessory Structure Wetland Average Base Min. Avg Base Classification Requirement Structure Setback to Classification Buffer Width Buffer Width Setback to Buffer Required' Required' Buffer MANAGE 2 20 30 1 15 MEDIUM 40 20 Notes: 1.) The wetland buffer calculations for future subdivision will be provided with the subdivision application. INTERIM USE PERMIT 12 GENERAL STANDARDS JUSTIFICATION Check to City findings for granting an Interim Use Permit (pursuant to City Subdivision Code Section 20-321): a. The wetland alteration will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. The excavation of the wetland is following all SWPPP regulations and guidelines. The wetland is being graded with a 10' 10:1 slope of the edge to ensure future safety of the public. The alteration of the wetland will not be an inconvenience to the neighborhood or the city. The wetland alteration will provide more value to surrounding neighbors as the visual appearance of the wetland will be more appealing to the public and visitors to the city. The construction will be during winter months as to have minimal impact. b. The wetland alteration has no effect on the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan. c. The wetland has been designed and will be constructed and maintained to be compatible to the surrounding existing wetlands. d. The existing wetland does not have a planned use in the neighborhood. The wetland alteration will not be hazardous in any way to the neighborhood. e. The wetland will visually serve all travelers along Great Plains Blvd (TH 101). The Wetland is also visible from Eagle Ridge Road. The city will maintain access with the owned City owned Outlot in the Foxwood Development. New property owners in the proposed conceptual development will have an enhanced view of the altered wetland. f. The wetland has no requirements for any public facilities. The alteration of the wetland is being privately funded and will increase the value of homes in the area. g. The wetland alteration will not be detrimental to any persons or property because of noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. The contractor will complete all activities in accordance with City code. h. The wetland currently does not have any approaches. The wetland alteration will not be adding any approaches that may alter traffic in any manner. i. The wetland is currently not of historic significance. j. The altered wetland will have a very similar aesthetic look of surrounding wetlands. k. The wetland alteration will not depreciate surrounding property values. 1. The wetland alteration is will meet all city requirements and standards. Interim Use Permit December 4, 2020 Wetland Alteration — Chanhassen, MN Page 2 of 3 CONCLUSION The applicant respectfully concludes that the request for interim use permit will maintain existing total wetland area. The proposed modification will result in a wetland classification consistent with the existing wetland, not reduce hydrologic capacity in the wetland and fits within the City's goals and objectives for this area. Interim Use Permit December 4, 2020 Wetland Alteration — Chanhassen, MN Page 3 of 3 KJoLHAuG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY PwiftSound,B-1-n.d, Comp.hensiue NaNml Remum Solutions MEMORANDUM To: Matt Unmacht, City of Chanhassen Regulatory, US Army Corps of Engineers Taylor Huinker, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources CC: Tim Erhart, Project Applicant Dan Blake, Pemtom Land Company Ben Carlson, Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Ben Datres, Carver Soil and Water Conservation District Terry Jeffrey, Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District From: Adam Cameron, Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company Date: November 19, 2020 Subject: Erhart Property WCA No -Loss Application (KES Project # 2020-041) USACE Project Number MVP -2007 -02785 -MAD Wetlands on the Erhart Property were delineated by Kjolhaug Environmental Services on May 12, 2020. The Erhart Property is located in Sections 23, 24, 25, and 26, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota. The site was situated east of County Road 101, south of County Road 18 (Figure 1). The proposed pond excavation project on the Erhart Property corresponds with portions of the following Carver County PID#'s: 251550022, 250240811 and 252990510. A Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) meeting was held onsite on July 29, 2020 with representatives from Kjolhaug Environmental Services, the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), the Carver Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD), and City of Chanhassen. The delineated wetland boundaries were subsequently approved by the City and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Copies available upon request). This memorandum and the following information is submitted on behalf of the project applicant who requests to excavate open water areas within two wetlands onsite. Proiect Descriution: The project applicant is proposing to excavate open water ponds within the fringe of Wetland 2 and Wetland 3 (Figure 2). The proposed ponds would be located within Type 1, Type 2 and Type 6 wetland, and would be excavated to a depth not exceeding 6.5 feet (Figure 3). Soils excavated from the wetland would be permanently stored on the upland. Therefore, the proposed activity will not result in the discharge of any fill material within the wetland. The current plant community within Wetland 2 (within the area of proposed excavation) consists of reed canary grass and willow shrubs transitioning to green ash and boxelder trees along the wetland fringe. The current plant community 2500 Shadywood Road, Suite #130, Minnesota 55331, Phone: 952-401-8757 S0ii)1P:S0 within Wetland 3 (within the area of proposed excavation) consists of reed canary grass, with a lesser amount of stinging nettle. We expect that the excavated areas will consist of open water in the center, with a narrow fringe of shallow marsh dominated by cattail The existing seed bank is expected to revegetate the excavated area naturally without intervention. Both areas proposed for excavation are dominated primarily by reed canary grass, and excavation to open water would provide waterfowl habitat. Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act: The proposed activity appears to be unregulated based upon WCA 8420.0105 Scope. Subpart 1., which states the following: "Scope; generally. Wetlands must not be impacted unless replaced by restoring or creating wetland areas of at least equal public value. This chapter regulates the draining or filling of wetlands, wholly or partially, and excavation in the permanently and semipermanently flooded areas of type 3, 4, or 5 wetlands, and in all wetland types if the excavation results in filling, draining, or conversion to nonwetland." Considering that the applicant only proposes excavation within Type 1/2/6 wetlands, and that the excavation would not exceed a depth of 6.5 feet, we believe that this activity would be unregulated by WCA. The Joint Application Form including the No -Loss request has been included as Appendix A. U.S. Army Corps of Enaineers: The project applicant is requesting an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) from the US Army Corps of Engineers to confirm the extent of Corps jurisdiction. This application assumes no Corps jurisdiction. However, if the Corps does have jurisdiction over Wetland 2 and/or Wetland 3 we anticipate that the proposed activity would not be regulated under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act, as long as the proposed project is implemented with an excavator or backhoe bucket and does not discharge fill material into the wetlands. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources: An approximate Ordinary High Water Level (OHW) was determined by identifying the extent of cattail (Type 3 wetland) along the fringe of Wetland 3/DNR Public Wetland (Unnamed 10-215 W). The western fringe of Wetland 3 was observed during the May 12, 2020 wetland delineation field visit, and consisted of cattail -dominated shallow marsh, transitioning to reed canary grass -dominated wet meadow. The estimated OHW is shown on Figure 3. Reaulatory Approvals Requested: We are requesting a Notice of Decision under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act confirming this No -Loss Application on behalf of the project applicant. From the US Army Corps of Engineers we are requesting an AID to confirm the extent of Corps Jurisdiction. From the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, we are requesting confirmation of the OHW within the subject Public Waters Wetland, as well as confirmation that the proposed project would not require a permit. If you need additional information do not hesitate to contact KES staff. Thank you. Erhart Property No -Loss Application Figures: • Figure 1 — Site Location Map • Figure 2 — Existing Conditions, Estimated OHW and Wetland Types • Figure 3 — Proposed Pond Excavation Areas r; b r ` d 49,• J, � fa,b.voy Cowt at'•, � � is � o9i _ ___-_ P n Cw n CR -101 ~ ---= © OpenStreetMap (and) ea'n_ttibufors, CC: B' Figure 1- Site Location N 0 800 Erhart Property (KES 2020-041) Chanhassen, Minnesota Feet Q Site Boundary .. ; Note: Boundaries indicated _u— KT on this figure are approximate joLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an Vv Source: ESRI Streets Rasemap official survey product. r r; b r ` d 49,• J, � fa,b.voy Cowt at'•, � � is � o9i _ ___-_ P n Cw n CR -101 ~ ---= © OpenStreetMap (and) ea'n_ttibufors, CC: B' Figure 1- Site Location N 0 800 Erhart Property (KES 2020-041) Chanhassen, Minnesota Feet Q Site Boundary .. ; Note: Boundaries indicated _u— KT on this figure are approximate joLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an Vv Source: ESRI Streets Rasemap official survey product. Figure 2 - Existing Conditions, Estimated OHW and Wetland Types (2016 MNGEO Photo) N 0 350 jL A I Feet lLJOLL AUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons Erhart Property (KES 2020-041) Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Figure 3 - Proposed Pond Excavation Areas (2016 MNGEO Photo) 0 350 Feet 1LJOLL AUGENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons Erhart Property (KES 2020-041) Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Erhart Property No -Loss Application Appendix A: Joint Application Form Project Name and/or Number: Erhart Property PART ONE: Applicant Information If applicant is an entity (company, government entity, partnership, etc.), an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent (consultant, lawyer, or other third party) and has authorized them to act on their behalf, the agent's contact information must also be provided. Applicant/Landowner Name: TIMOTHY A& DAWNE M ERHART Mailing Address: 9611 Meadowlark LN, Chanhassen, MN 55317-8695 Phone: 612-963-0733 E-mail Address: terhartOxiekor.eom Authorized Contact (do not complete if same as above): Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail Address: Agent Name: Adam Cameron Mailing Address: 2500 Shadywood Road #130, Orono MN 55331 Phone: 952-401-8757 Ext. #106 E-mail Address: Adam@kjolhaugenv.com PART TWO: Site Location Information County: Carver City/Township: Chanhassen Parcel ID and/or Address: 251550022,250240811,252990510 Legal Description (Section, Township, Range): S:23,24,25,26 T:116N R: 23W Lat/Long (decimal degrees): - Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets, roads, highways. Approximate size of site (acres) or if a linear project, length (feet): 49.7 If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you must provide the names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatoryDocs/engform 4345 2012oct.pdf PART THREE: General Project/Site Information If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination, jurisdictional determination, or other correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. Describe the project that is being proposed, the project purpose and need, and schedule for implementation and completion. The project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements that effect aquatic resources (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing the location, character, and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 3 of 5 Project Name and/or Number: Erhart Property PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource Impact" Summary If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) identify each impact in the table below. Include all anticipated impacts, including those expected to be temporary. Attach an overhead view map, aerial photo, and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the project area and the location(s) of the proposed impacts. Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table. Aquatic Resource Aquatic q Resource Type ID ( as noted on overhead view (wetland, lake, tributary etc.) Type of Impact (fill, excavate, drain, or remove vegetation) Duration of Impact Permanent (P) Size of Impactz or Temporary (T)1 Overall Size of Aquatic Resource a Existing Plant Community Type(s) in Impact Area' p County, Major Watershed #, and Bank ServireArea #, of Impact Areas 'if impacts are temporary; enter the duration of the impacts in days next to the "T". For example, a project with a temporary accessfill that would be removed after 220 days would be entered "T (220)". =Impacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre. Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating first the linear feet of impact along the flowline of the stream followed by the area impact in parentheses). For example, a project that impacts 50 feet of a stream that is 6 feet wide would be reported as 50 ft (300 square feet). 1This is generally only applicable if you are applying for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules 8420.0420 Subp. 8, otherwise enter "N/A". ,Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin V Ed. as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp. 2. sRefer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp. 7. If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred, identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated with each: PART FIVE: Applicant Signature ❑ Check here if you are requesting a pre -application consultation with the Corps and LGU based on the information you have provided. Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked. By signature below, I attest that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further attest that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein. Signature:f �4 1; Date: / - , a r) I hereby authorize Kjolhaug Environmental to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this application. Project Name and/or Number: Erhart Property Attachment A 1 The term "impact" as used in this joint application form is a generic term used for disclosure purposes to identify activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to indicate whether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 4 of 6 Project Name and/or Number: Erhart Property Attachment B Supporting Information for Applications Involving Exemptions, No Loss Determinations, and Activities Not Requiring Mitigation Complete this part if you maintain that the identified aquatic resource impacts in Part Four do not require wetland replacement/compensatory mitigation OR if you are seeking verification that the proposed water resource impacts are either exempt from replacement or are not under CWA/WCAjurisdiction. Identify the specific exemption or no -loss provision for which you believe your project or site qualifies: The proposed activity appears to be unregulated based upon WCA 8420.0105 Scope. Subpart 1., which states the following: "Scope; generally. Wetlands must not be impacted unless replaced by restoring or creating wetland areas of at least equal public value. This chapter regulates the draining or filling of wetlands, wholly or partially, and excavation in the permanently and semipermanently flooded areas of type 3, 4, or 5 wetlands, and in all wetland types if the excavation results in filling, draining, or conversion to nonwetland." Provide a detailed explanation of how your project or site qualifies for the above. Be specific and provide and refer to attachments and exhibits that support your contention. Applicants should refer to rules (e.g. WCA rules), guidance documents (e.g. BWSR guidance, Corps guidance letters/public notices), and permit conditions (e.g. Corps General Permit conditions) to determine the necessary information to support the application. Applicants are strongly encouraged to contact the WCA LGU and Corps Project Manager prior to submitting an application if they are unsure of what type of information to provide: Please see attached memo. An AID has been requested from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to determine the extent of their jurisdiction. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page S of S Erhart Property Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report Prepared for Tim Erhart by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES Project No. 2020-041) July 7, 2020 gi„Awao! Erhart Property Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page 1. WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY..........................................................................1 2. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................1 3. METHODS..............................................................................................................................2 4. RESULTS................................................................................................................................ 3 4.1 Review of NWI, Soils, Public Waters and NHD Information ........................................... 3 4.2 Wetland Determinations and Delineations......................................................................... 4 4.3 Other Areas........................................................................................................................ 5 4.4 Request for Wetland Boundary and Jurisdictional Determination .................................... 6 S. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION.............................................................................. 7 FIGURES 1. Site Location 2. Existing Conditions 3. National Wetlands Inventory 4. Soil Survey 5. DNR Public Waters Inventory 6. National Hydrography Dataset APPENDICES A. Joint Application Foran for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota B. Wetland Delineation Data Forms C. Precipitation Data Erhart Property Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report 1. WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY • The 46.76 -acre Erhart Property was inspected on May 12, 2020 for the presence and extent of wetland. • The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map showed three wetlands, one PFOIA/PEM1A/PEMIC, one PFOIA/PEMIA/PEM1C/PSS1C,/PEM1F/PUBG and one PEM1A/PEM1C/PABG within the site boundaries. • The soil survey showed Hamel (Partially Hydric), Muskego and Houghton (Hydric) and Essexville (Hydric) as the hydric soil types mapped within the site boundaries. • The DNR Public Waters Inventory showed one DNR Public Water (Unnamed 10-215 W) within the eastern portion of the site. • The National Hydrography Dataset showed one Lake/Pond within the eastern portion of the site. • Four wetlands were delineated onsite as shown in Table 1 below: Table 1. Wetlands delineated on the Erhart Property Wetland Wetland T e Area Circular Cowardin Eggers and ID Dominant Vegetation (Acres 39 Reed Onsite 1 Type 1 PFOA Seasonally Green ash canopy, sparsely 0.05 flooded basin vegetated concave surface Type PFOA/PEM1A/ Shruh-carr, wet American elm tree, boxelder tree 2 6/2/3 PEM1C meadow, reed canary grass, jewelweed, 3.39 shallow marsh cattail, various sedges 3 Type PEM1A/PEM1C meadow, hallow marsh shallow s Reed canary grass, stinging 19.29 2/3/5 /PUBG , nettle, cattail, bulrush en water 4 Type PFOIA/PEM1B/ Shrub -carr, shallow marsh, Green ash, redosier dogwood, 0.43 6/3/5 PABG willow, reed canary grass, cattail open water Erhart Property 2. OVERVIEW Wetland Delineation Report The 46.76 -acre Erhart Property was inspected on May 12, 2020 for the presence and extent of wetland. The property was located in Sections 23, 24, 25, and 26, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota. The site was situated east of County Road 101, south of Country Road 18 (Figure 1). The property corresponded to Carver County PID#: 251550022. The Erhart Property was primarily woodland throughout the site with a pond on the eastern portion. Topography of the site sloped from 942 ft MSL on the western portion of the site down to 874 ft MSL within the wetland on the southwestern portion and 878 ft MSL within the wetland on the northern portion. Surrounding land use consisted of rural residential, woodland, agriculture and wetlands. Four wetlands were delineated within the site boundaries. The delineated wetland boundaries and existing conditions are shown on Figure 2. Appendix A of this report includes a Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota, which is submitted in request for: (1) a wetland boundary and type determination under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), and (2) delineation concurrence under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. 3. METHODS Wetlands were identified using the Routine Determination method described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Waterways Experiment Station, 1987) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region (Version 2.0) as required under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Wetland boundaries were identified as the upper -most extent of wetland that met criteria for hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology. Wetland -upland boundaries were marked with pin flags that were located using a Trimble RI GNSS Receiver GPS Unit. Soils, vegetation, and hydrology were documented at a representative location along the wetland - upland boundary. Plant species dominance was estimated based on the percent aerial or basal coverage visually estimated within a 30 -foot radius for trees and vines, a 15 -foot radius for the shrub layer, and a 5 -foot radius for the herbaceous layer within the community type sampled. Soils were characterized to a minimum depth of 24 inches (unless otherwise noted) using a Munsell Soil Color Book and standard soil texturing methodology. Hydric soil indicators used are from Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA Natural Resources Erhart Property Wetland Delineation Report Conservation Service (NRCS) in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils, Version 8.1, 2017). Mapped soils are separated into five classes based on the composition of hydric components and the Hydric Rating by Map Unit color classes utilized on Web Soil Survey. The five classes include Hydric (100 percent hydric components), Predominantly Hydric (66 to 99 percent hydric components), Partially Hydric (33 to 65 percent hydric components), Predominantly Non -Hydric (1 to 32 percent hydric components), and Non -Hydric (less than one percent hydric components). Plants were identified using standard regional plant keys. Taxonomy and indicator status of plant species was taken from the 2016 National Wetland Plant List (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2016. National Wetland Plant List, version 3.3, Engineer Research and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH). 4. RESULTS 4.1 Review of NWI, Soils, Public Waters, and NHD Information The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) (Minnesota Geospatial Commons 2009-2014 and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) showed three wetlands within the site boundaries (Figure 3). The Soil Survey (USDA NRCS 2015) showed Hamel (Partially Hydric), Muskego and Houghton (Hydric) and Essexville (Hydric) as the hydric soil types mapped within the site boundaries. Soil types mapped on the property are listed in Table 2 and a map showing soil types is included in Figure 4. Table 2. Soil types mapped on Erhart Property Symbol Soil Name Acres A of Ar %ea Hydric Hydric Category EX Essexville sandy loam 4.8 10.20 100 Hydric HM Hamel loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 7.1 15.30 90 Predominantly Hydric Lester -Kilkenny loans, 2 to 6 2.1 4.40 0 K132 percent slopes, eroded Non -Hydric Lester -Kilkenny loams, 6 to 12 7.6 16.20 0 KC percent slopes Non -Hydric Lester -Kilkenny complex, 6 to 10 0 0.00 5 KC2 percent slopes, moderately eroded Predominant) Non -Hydric Lester -Kilkenny complex, 10 to 16 1.6 3.50 5 KD2 percent slopes, moderately eroded Predominant) Non -Hydric Lester -Kilkenny complex, 16 to 22 5.5 11.70 5 KE2 ercent slopes Predominant) Non -Hydric Lester -Kilkenny complex, 22 to 40 0.4 0.80 0 KP percent slopes _ Non -Hydric Muskego and Houghton soils, 0 to 1 11.8 25.20 100 MKercent slopes Hydric Erhart Property Wetland Delineation Report The Minnesota DNR Public Waters Inventory (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2015) showed one DNR Public Water (Unnamed 10-215 W) approximately 30 feet south of the site (Figure 5). The National HydroUgphy Dataset (U.S. Geological Survey 2015) showed one Lake/Ponds within the eastern portion of the site boundaries (Figure 6). 4.2 Wetland Determinations and Delineations Potential wetlands were evaluated during field observations on May 12, 2020. Four wetlands were identified and delineated on the property (Figure 2). Corresponding data forms are included in Appendix B. The following descriptions of the wetland and adjacent upland reflects conditions observed at the time of the field visit. Herbaceous vegetation was actively growing at the time of the wetland delineation. Precipitation conditions were drier than the normal range based on available 30 -day rolling total precipitation and typical based on the three-month antecedent precipitation data (Appendix Q. Wetland 1 was a Type 1 (PFOIA) forested seasonally flooded basin with a canopy dominated by green ash trees and a sparsely vegetated understory. The wetland was saturated approximately 10 inches below the soil surface along the wetland fringe. Adjacent upland consisted of woodland with a canopy dominated by basswood, bur oak and American elm trees with an understory of common blue violet, common buckthorn, and black cherry shrubs. Primary and secondary hydrology indicators were not observed on the upland. The wetland boundary corresponded with a slight topographic rise along a transition from sparsely vegetated concave surface to upland woodland vegetation. The wetland was not shown on the NWI map, and fell in an area mapped as Lester -Kilkenny complex (Non -Hydric) on the soil survey. Wetland 1 was located in the center of the site and discharged down slope into Wetland 3 located in southern portion of the site. Wetland 2 was a Type 6/2/3 (PFOA/PEM1A/PEM1C) shrub -carr, wet meadow and shallow marsh wetland dominated by an American elm and boxelder tree canopy with an understory of jewelweed that transitioned into reed canary grass, giant goldenrod and unknown sedge species with a center dominated by cattails. The wetland was inundated with approximately 1-2 feet of water in the center and was saturated at the surface along the fringe. Adjacent upland consisted of woodland with a canopy dominated by sugar maple, boxelder and green ash trees with an understory of prickly gooseberry, Virginia waterleaf and scattered garlic mustard. Primary and secondary hydrology indicators were not observed on the upland. The wetland boundary corresponded with a slight topographic rise along a transition from shrub - carr to upland woodland vegetation. The wetland was shown as a PFOIA/PEM1A/PEMIC wetland on the NWI map, and fell in an area mapped as Hamel consociation (Hydric) and Erhart Property I Wetland Delineation Report Muskego Houghton complex (Hydric) on the soil survey. Wetland 2 extends north of the site and drains to the south into Wetland 3. Wetland 3 was a Type 2/3/5 (PEM1A/PEM1C/PUBG) open water wetland with a fringe of shallow/wet meadow and was dominated by cattail and bulrush with a gradual transition into reed canary grass and scattered stinging nettle. The open water wetland was inundated within the center and was saturated to an approximate depth of 18 inches along the wetland fringe. Adjacent upland to the southwest consisted of woodland dominated by a canopy of white pine and silver maple trees with an understory of burdock, wild red raspberry, ground ivy and Canada goldenrod. Adjacent upland to the west consisted of woodland dominated by a canopy of bur oak and American elm trees with an understory of common buckthorn and black cherry shrubs. Primary and secondary hydrology indicators were not observed on the upland. The wetland boundary corresponded with a slight topographic rise along a transition from wet meadow to upland woodland vegetation. The wetland was shown as a PFO IA/ PEM1A/ PEM1C/PSS1C,/PEM1F/PUBG wetland on the NWI map, and fell in an area mapped as Hamel consociafion (Hydric), Muskego and Houghton complex (Hydric) and Essexville consociation (Hydric) on the soil survey. Wetland 3 extends offsite to the southeast. Wetland 4 was a Type 6/3/5 (PFO I A/PEM 1 B/PABG) shrub -can, shallow marsh and open water wetland dominated by Green ash trees and redosier dogwood shrubs that transitioned into reed canary grass, willow, cattails and various sedges. The wetland was inundated in the center with a water depth of 14 inches below the soil surface along the wetland fringe. Adjacent upland consisted of woodland with a canopy dominated by bitternut hickory with a mix of boxelder, sugar maple, and American elm trees with an understory of prickly ash, buckthorn, Pennsylvania sedge and wild black currant. Primary and secondary hydrology indicators were not observed on the upland. The wetland boundary corresponded with a slight topographic rise along a transition from shallow marsh/shrub-carr to upland woodland vegetation. The wetland was shown as a PEM1A/PEM1C/PABG wetland on the NWI map, but fell in an area mapped as Lester -Kilkenny Complex (Predominately Non -Hydric) on the soil survey. Wetland 4 extended offsite to the north and drained east into Wetland 2. 4.3 Other Areas Other areas were investigated because they were: (1) observed to support a hydrophytic plant community, (2) had visible wetland hydrology indicators, (3) were shown as wetland on the NWI map, or (4) were depressional and mapped as hydric soil. Field investigation led to the conclusion that these areas were not wetland as shown on Figure 2 and documented in data sheets located in Appendix B. Sample Point A (SP -A) was taken near a swale that drained east towards Wetland 3. This area was dominated by reed canary grass, was not shown as a wetland on the NWI map, and fell in an Erhart Property Wetland Delineation Report area mapped as Hamel (Hydric) on the soil survey. This area was determined to be upland based on a lack of wetland hydrology because it did not meet one primary or two secondary hydrology indicators. Sample Point B (SP -B) was taken within a foot -slope that drained northeast towards Wetland 4. This area was disturbed by recent fire and was void of vegetation. This area was not shown as a wetland on the NWI map, and fell in an area mapped as Hamel (Hydric) on the soil survey. This area was determined to be upland based on a lack of hydric soil indicators and primary or secondary wetland hydrology indicators. No other areas with hydrophytic vegetation or wetland hydrology were observed on the site. No other areas were shown as hydric soil on the soil survey or as wetland on the NWI map. 4.4 Request for Wetland Boundary and Jurisdictional Determination Appendix A of this report includes a Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota, which is submitted in request for: (1) a wetland boundary and type determination under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), and (2) delineation concurrence under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. Erhart Property Wedand Delineation Report 5. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION The procedures utilized in the described delineation are based on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual as required under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. This wetland delineation and report were prepared in compliance with the regulatory standards in place at the time the work was performed. Site boundaries indicated on figures within this report are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Delineation completed by: Adam Cameron, Wetland Ecologist/GIS Snecialist Minnesota Certified Wetland Delineator No. 1321 Will Effertz, Natural Resource Technician Report prepared by: Will Effertz, Natural Resource Technician Report reviewed by: Date: July 7, 2020 Mark Kjolhaug, Professional Wetland Scientist No. 000845 Erhart Property Wetland Delineation Report FIGURES 1. Site Location 2. Existing Conditions 3. National Wetlands Inventory 4. Soil Survey 5. DNR Protected Waters Inventory 6. National Hydrography Dataset Figure 1- Site Location 0 800 Erhart Property (KES 2020-041) Chanhassen, Minnesota Feet Site Boundary Note: Boundaries indicated Kl on this figure are approximate Jo�,t�uG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an ►w �►.ry Source: ESRI Streets Basemap official survey product. : i ww t m Community .• ------ P Park y t +„n.ny 101 a Uj �1] Weu 9N�S�aee {'• 3: a� i�J r�^"+aieaJ(rK �� 'f P•" vYw C4vr1 Y- CR -101 ©OpenStreetMap (and)contributors, CC-BLY;,SF] Figure 1- Site Location 0 800 Erhart Property (KES 2020-041) Chanhassen, Minnesota Feet Site Boundary Note: Boundaries indicated Kl on this figure are approximate Jo�,t�uG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an ►w �►.ry Source: ESRI Streets Basemap official survey product. Figure 2 - Existing Conditions N 0 300 L A Feet KJOLHAUGENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY �+v Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons Erhart Property (KES 2020-041) Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. �-1 Figure 4 - Soil Survey N 0 300 Feet KJOLHAUGENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY �►�+v Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, USDA, MRCS Erhart Property (KES 2020-041) Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Figure 5 - DNR Public Waters Inventory N 0 800 =� " - A � Feet 4. \ j[' i iiA1T _ui lIJOLHA GENVIRONMENTALSERVICESCOMPANY Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, MN DNR Erhart Property (KES 2020-041) Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. • •Junction66 .ter ' w 1 .i •• M 1 • !J Artificial Path Connector • M M `T w 9 � r i' Erhart Property Wetland Delineation Report Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota This joint application form is the accepted means for initiating review of proposals that may affect a water resource (wetland, tributary, lake, etc.) in the State of Minnesota understate and federal regulatory programs. Applicants for Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Public Waters permits MUST use the MPARS online permitting system for submitting applications to the DNR. Applicants can use the information entered into MPARS to substitute for completing parts of thisjoint application form (see the paragraph on MPARS at the end of the joint application form instructions for additional information). This form is only applicable to the water resource aspects of proposed projects under state and federal regulatory programs; other local applications and approvals may be required. Depending on the nature of the project and the location and type of water resources impacted, multiple authorizations may be required as different regulatory programs have different types of jurisdiction over different types of resources. Regulatory Review Structure Federal The St. Paul District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is the federal agency that regulates discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States (wetlands, tributaries, lakes, etc.) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and regulates work in navigable waters under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. Applications are assigned to Corps project managers who are responsible for implementing the Corps regulatory program within a particular geographic area. State There are three state regulatory programs that regulate activities affecting water resources. The Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) regulates most activities affecting wetlands. It is administered by local government units (LGUs) which can be counties, townships, cities, watershed districts, watershed management organizations or state agencies (on state-owned land). The Minnesota DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources issues permits for work in specially -designated public waters via the Public Waters Work Permit Program (DNR Public Waters Permits). The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPGA) under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act certifies that discharges of dredged or fill material authorized by a federal permit or license comply with state water quality standards. One or more of these regulatory programs may be applicable to any one project. Required Information Prior to submitting an application, applicants are strongly encouraged to seek input from the Corps Project Manager and LGU staff to identify regulatory issues and required application materials for their proposed project. Project proponents can request a pre - application consultation with the Corps and LGU to discuss their proposed project by providing the information required in Sections 1 through 5 of this joint application form to facilitate a meaningful discussion about their project. Many LGUs provide a venue (such as regularly scheduled technical evaluation panel meetings) for potential applicants to discuss their projects with multiple agencies prior to submitting an application. Contact information is provided below. The following bullets outline the information generally required for several common types of determinations/authorizations. • For delineation approvals and/or jurisdictional determinations, submit Parts 1, 2 and 5, and Attachment A. • For activities involving CWA/WCA exemptions, WCA no -loss determinations, and activities not requiring mitigation, submit Parts 1 through 5, and Attachment B. • For activities requiring compensatory mitigation/replacement plan, submit Parts 1 thru 5, and Attachments C and D. • For local road authority activities that qualify for the state's local road wetland replacement program, submit Parts 1 through 5, and Attachments C, D (if applicable), and E to both the Corps and the LGU. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 1 of 5 Submission Instructions Send the completed joint application form and all required attachments to: U.S Army Corps of Engineers. Applications may be sent directly to the appropriate Corps Office. For a current listing of areas of responsibilities and contact information, visit the St. Paul District's website at: htti)://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory.aspx and select "Minnesota" from the contact Information box. Alternatively, applications may be sent directly to the St. Paul District Headquarters and the Corps will forward them to the appropriate field office. Section 401 Water Quality Certification: Applicants do not need to submit the joint application form to the MPCA unless specifically requested. The MPCA will request a copy of the completed joint application form directly from an applicant when they determine an individual 401 water quality certification is required for a proposed project. Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit: Send to the appropriate Local Government Unit. If necessary, contact your county Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) office or visit the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) web site (www.bwsr.state.mn.us) to determine the appropriate LGU. DNR Public Waters Permitting: In 2014 the DNR will begin using the Minnesota DNR Permitting and Reporting System (MPARS) for submission of Public Waters permit applications (httos•//webaopsll dnr state mn us/moars/public/authentication/login). Applicants for Public Waters permits MUST use the MPARS online permitting system for submitting applications to the DNR. To avoid duplication and to streamline the application process among the various resource agencies, applicants can use the information entered into MPARS to substitute for completing parts of this joint application form. The MPARS print/save function will provide the applicant with a copy of the Public Waters permit application which, at a minimum, will satisfy Parts one and two of this joint application. For certain types of activities, the MPARS application may also provide all of the necessary information required under Parts three and four of the joint application. However, it is the responsibility of the Applicant to make sure that the joint application contains all of the required information, including identification of all aquatic resources impacted by the project (see Part four of the joint application). After confirming that the MPARS application contains all of the required information in Parts one and two the Applicant may attach a copy to the joint application and fill in any missing information in the remainder of the joint application. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 2 of 5 Project Name and/or Number: Erhart Property PART ONE: Applicant Information If applicant is an entity (company, government entity, partnership, etc.), an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent (consultant, lawyer, or other third party) and has authorized them to act on their behalf, the agent's contact information must also be provided. Applicant/Landowner Name: TIMOTHY A & DAWNE M ERHART Mailing Address: 9611 Meadowlark LN, Chanhassen, MN 55317-8695 Phone: 612-963-0733 E-mail Address: terhart ,riekor.eom Authorized Contact (do not complete if same as above): The Pemtom Land Company c/o Dan Blake Mailing Address: 7697 Anagram Dr, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 612.282.5482 E-mail Address: danblake@pemtom.com Agent Name: Adam Cameron Mailing Address: 2500 Shadywood Road #130, Orono MN 55331 Phone: 952-401-8757 Ext. #106 E-mail Address: Adam@kjolhaugenv.com PART TWO: Site Location Information County: Carver Parcel ID and/or Address: 251550022 Legal Description (Section, Township, Range): Lat/Long (decimal degrees): - City/Township: Chanhassen S:23,24,25,26 T:116N R: 23W Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets, roads, highways. Approximate size of site (acres) or if a linear project, length (feet): 46.7 If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you must provide the names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: hhtt p://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatorVDocs/engform 4345 2012oct odf PART THREE: General Project/Site Information If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination, jurisdictional determination, or other correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. Describe the project that is being proposed, the project purpose and need, and schedule for implementation and completion. The project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements that effect aquatic resources (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing the location, character, and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 3 of 5 Project Name and/or Number: Erhart Property PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource Impact' Summary If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) identify each impact in the table below. Include all anticipated impacts, including those expected to be temporary. Attach an overhead view map, aerial photo, and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the project area and the location(s) of the proposed impacts. Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table. Aquatic Resource ID (as noted on overhead view) Aquatic Resource Type (wetland, lake, tributary etc.) Type of Impact (fill, excavate, drain, or remove vegetation) Duration of Impact Overall Size of Permanent (P) Size of Impact' Aquatic or Temporary Resource 3 (T)' Existing Plant Community ype Tpact A e Im act Area ° p County, Major Watershed #, and Bank Service Area # of Impact Areas 'If impacts are temporary; enter the duration of the impacts in days next to the "I". For example, a project with a temporary access fill that would he removed after 220 days would be entered 'T (220)". 'Impacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre. Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating first the linear feet of impact along the flowline of the stream followed by the area impact in parentheses). For example, a project that impacts 50 feet of a stream that is 6 feet wide would be reported as 50 ft (300 square feet). 3This is generally only applicable if you are applying for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules 8420.0420 Subp. 8, otherwise enter "N/A". 4LIse Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3'd Ed. as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp. 2. sRefer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp. 7. If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred, identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated with each: PART FIVE: Applicant Signature ❑ Check here if you are requesting a pre -application consultation with the Corps and LGU based on the information you have provided. Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked. By signature below, I authority to undertal Signature: that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further attest that I possess the work described herein. Date: ._2ulyd I hereby authorize Kjolhaug Environmental to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this application. 1 The term "impact" as used in this joint application form is a generic term used for disclosure purposes to identify activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to indicate whether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 4 of 5 Project Name and/or Number: Erhart Property Attachment A Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or Jurisdictional Determination By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District (Corps) and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit (LGU) provide me with the following (check all that apply): ® Wetland Type Confirmation ® Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU concurring, not concurring, or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone, the Corps will not address the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property, only the boundaries of the resources within the review area (including wetlands, tributaries, lakes, etc.). ❑ Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination. A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) is a non-binding written indication from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements, a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. P1Ds are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. ❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination. An approved jurisdictional determination (A1D) is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property. A1Ds can generally be relied upon by the affected party for five years. An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request, the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual, and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota (2013). http://www mvo usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatorV/DelineationJDGuidance aspx Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 5 of 5 Property Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX B Wetland Delineation Data Forms I WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Proiect/Site Erhart Property City/County. Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date: 05/12=20 Applicant/Owner: See Joint Application Forth State: MN Sampling Point: SP1 -1U Investigator(s): Adam Cameron R Will Effertz Section, Township, Range: S:23,24,25,26 T:116N R:23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Linear Slope (%): 2 to 4 Lat: 44°49'59.0"N Long: 93"3225.8"W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Lester -Kilkenny Complex VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain anv answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Absolute % Cover 70 30 Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) 30 -day precipitation rolling total drier than normal range. Precipitation from gridded database method is typical. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of Dlants. Tree Stratum (Piot size: 30 ft Radius ) 1 Ulmus americana 2 Acer negundo Absolute % Cover 70 30 Dominan t Species Y Y Indicator Staus FACW FAC Dominance Test Worksheet Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 3 4 5 Sapling/Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15 It Radius 1 Rhamnus cathartica 100 ) 10 =Total Cover Y FAC Prevalence Index Worksheet Total % Cover of: OBL species 0 x 1= 0 FACW species 70 x2= 140 FAC species 40 x3= 120 FACU species 0 x4= 0 UPL species 0 X5= 0 Column totals 110 (A) 260 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.36 2 3 4 5 t0 Tot Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 it Radius ) 1 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% X Prevalence index is 53.0' Morphogical adaptations" (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' (explain) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. unless disturbed or problematic 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 0 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 It Radius ) 1 2 Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y 0 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP1 -1U Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (Inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc" Texture Remarks 0 to 6 10YR 2/1 1 100 Surface Water (At) Loam 6 to 17 10YR 2/1 70 10YR 2/2 30% Clay Loam 17 to 28 10YR 2/1 30 10YR 5/2 20% D M Clay Loam Dry -Season Water Table (C2) 10YR 4/3 50% RM M Clay Loam Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2) (C3) Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _Saturation Stunted or Stressed Plants (137 ) Algal Mat or Crust (84) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) (C6) -Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. "Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Histisol (A1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) —Sandy Redox (S5) _Black Histic (A3) _Stripped Matrix (S6) _Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) —Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _Depleted Dark Surface (F7) —Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) _Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ Other (explain in remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS) _Thin Gauge or Well Data (D9) Hydric soil present? N Depth (inches): Remarks: Field Observations: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (At) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (B14) _Surface Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (Bt) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2) (C3) Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _Saturation Stunted or Stressed Plants (137 ) Algal Mat or Crust (84) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) (C6) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS) _Thin Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Erhart Property City/County. Chanhassen/Caner Sampling Date: 05/12/2020 Applicant/Owner: See Joint Application Form State: MN Sampling Point: SP1 -1w Investigator(s): Adam Cameron & Will Effertz Section, Township, Range: S:23,24,25,26 T:116N R:23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0 to 2 Let: 44°49'59.0"N Long: 93"32'25.8W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Lester -Kilkenny Complex VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Absolute Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: Wetland 1 Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) 30 -day precipitation rolling total drier than normal range. Precipitation from gridded database method is typical. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of Dlants. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius ) % Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanlca 35 Y FACW that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species 2 3 4 5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (AIB) 35 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub straturc (Plot size: 15 ft Radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: OBL species 0 x 1= 0 FACW species 35 x2= 70 FAC species 0 x3= 0 2 3 4 5 FACU species 0 x4= 0 UPL species 0 x5= 0 0 = Total Cover Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 R Radius ) Column totals 35 (A) 70 (B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.00 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% X Prevalence index is 53.0" Morphogical adaptations' (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' 0 =Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ftRadius ) Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present, unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic vegetation 0 =Total Cover present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Sparsley vegetated concave surface. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP1 -1W Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (Inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc" Texture Remarks 0 to 6 10YR 211 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Loam 6 to 13 10YR 211 30 10YR 4/6 5 C M Loam Drainage Patterns (1310) 10YR 4/1 65 RM M Loam Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B7) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2) (C3) _Crayfish Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) (C6) 'Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. "Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: _Histisol (A1) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) —Sandy Redox (S5) —Black Histic (A3) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) —Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _2 cm Muck (At 0) X Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) Redox Depressions (F8) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L. R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2) _ Other (explain in remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Hydric soil present? Y Depth (inches): Remarks: Field Observations: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required7 check all that aooly) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Surface Soil Cracks (136) High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (1314) Drainage Patterns (1310) 7 -Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B7) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2) (C3) _Crayfish Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) (C6) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) Thin Muck Surface (C7) X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 10 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Erhart Property City/County: Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date: 05/1212020 Applicant/Owner: See Joint Application Form State: MN Sampling Point: SP2-1U Investigator(s): Adam Cameron & Will Effertz Section, Township, Range: S:23,24,25,26 TA 16N R:23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Linear Slope (%): 2 to 4 Lat: 44°49'59.0"N Long: 93"32'25.8W Datum: --- Soil Map Unit Name Lester -Kilkenny Complex VW I Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? N Absolute Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) 30 -day precipitation rolling total drier than normal range. Precipitation from gridded database method is typical. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of olants. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plat size: 30 ft Radius ) % Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Acersaccharum 35 Y FACU that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 6 Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.00% (A) (B) (A/B) 2 Acernegundo 15 Y FAC 3 4 5 50=Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratun (Plot size: 15 It Radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Zanthoxyfum americanum 15 Y FACU Total % Cover of: OBL species 0 x 1= 0 FACW species 10 x2= 20 FAC species 20 x3= 60 2 Rubus idaeus 15 Y FACU 3 Ribes ameriranum 5 N FACW 4 5 FACU species 65 x4= 260 UPL species 0 x5= 0 35 ;Total Cover Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ft Radius ) Column totals 95 (A) 340 (B) 1 Afffaria petiolata 5 Y FAC Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.58 2 Impatiens capensis 5 Y FACW 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation Dominance test is >50% Prevalence index is 53.0' Morphogical adaptations' (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 4 5 6 ? 8 9 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 it Radius ) _(explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1present, unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic vegetation 0 =Total Cover present? N Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP2-1U Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (Inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc" Texture Remarks 0 to 6 N 2.5/ 100 Fauna (1313) Sift Loam 6 to 20 N 2.5/ 100 _Aquatic _Surface True Aquatic Plants (B14) Clay Loam 20 to 36 N 2.5/ 95 10YR 4/2 5% D M Sandy Clay Loam Water Marks (81) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (82) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) of Reduced Iron (C4) or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (84) _Presence _Stunted Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) 'Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. —Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Histisol (A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Histic Epipedon (A2) _Sandy Redox (S5) _Black Histic (A3) _Stripped Matrix (S6) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 2 cm Muck (A10) _Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) Redox Dark Surface (F6) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _Depleted Dark Surface (F7) —Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) _Very Shallow Dark Surface (fF12) _Other (explain in remarks) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: _Thin or Well Data (D9) Hydric soil present? N Depth (inches): Remarks: Field Observations: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1) Fauna (1313) Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) _Aquatic _Surface True Aquatic Plants (B14) Drainage Patterns (810) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (81) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (82) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) of Reduced Iron (C4) or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (84) _Presence _Stunted Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _Thin or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _Gauge _Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 24 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 22 hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Erhart Property City/County. Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date: 05/12/2020 Applicant/Owner: See Joint Application Form State: MN Sampling Point: SP2-1 W Investigator(s): Adam Cameron & Will Effertz Section, Township, Range: S:23,24,25,26 T:116N R:23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0 to 2 Lat: 44"49'59.0"N Long: 93°32'25.8"W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Hamel Consociation VWI Classification: PF01A Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances' Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Absolute Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: Wetland 2 Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) 30 -day precipitation rolling total drier than normal range. Precipitation from gridded database method is typical. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 it Radius j % Cover t Species Stabs Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 1 Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A) (B) (AIB) 2 3 4 5 0 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratun (Plot size: 15 ft Radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: OBL species 0 x 1= 0 FACW species 50 x2= 100 FAC species 5 x3= 15 FACU species 0 x4= 0 UPL species 0 x5= 0 2 3 4 5 0 = Total Cover Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ft Radius j Column totals 55 (A) 115 (B) 1 Impatiens capensis 30 Y FACW Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.09 2 Solidago gigantea 10 N FACW 3 Cardamine pensylvanica 10 N FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 4 Alliaria petiolata 5 N FAC 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is 53.0' 7 Morphogical adaptations' (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic hydrophylic vegetation' 8 9 10 55=Total Cover Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 It Radius ) _(explain) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present, unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic vegetation 0 =Total Cover present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP2-1W Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0 to 16 N 2.5/ 100 Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Mucky Loam Aquatic Fauna (1313) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) T High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (614) Drainage Patterns (B10) 7 -Saturation (A3) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (Bt) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2) (C3) _Crayfish Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (63) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils XGeomorphic Position (02) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Histisol (Al) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) X Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) X 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) X Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) _Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) _Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _Other (explain in remarks) *Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: or Well Data (D9) Hydric soil present? Y Depth (inches): Remarks: Field Observations: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required7 check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (1313) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) T High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (614) Drainage Patterns (B10) 7 -Saturation (A3) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (Bt) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2) (C3) _Crayfish Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (63) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils XGeomorphic Position (02) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _Gauge _Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 2 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Erhart Property City/County: Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date: 05/12/2020 Applicant/Owner: See Joint Application Fonn State: MN Sampling Point: SP3-1U Investigator(s): Adam Cameron & Will Effertz Section, Township, Range: S:23,24,25,26 TA 16N R:23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Linear Slope (%): 2 to 4 Lat: 44'4959.0'N Long: 93'3225.8W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Hamel Consociation VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances' Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? N Absolute % Cover 35 Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain aRemative procedures here or in a separate report.) 30 -day precipitation rolling total drier than normal range. Precipitation from gridded database method is typical. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of Dlants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius ) 1 Acersaccharum Absolute % Cover 35 Dominan t Species Y Indicator Staus FACU Dominance Test Worksheet Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.00% (AB) 2 3 4 5 Sapling/Shrub straturt (Plot size: 15 It Radius 1 Zanthoxylum americanum 35=Total ) 15 Cover Y FACU Prevalence Index Worksheet Total % Cover of: OBL species 0 x 1= 0 FACW species 0 x2= 0 FAC species 0 x3= 0 FACU species 80 x4= 320 UPL species 0 x5= 0 Column totals 80 (A) 320 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.00 2 3 4 5 15 = Total Cover Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 It Radius j 1 Rubus idaeus 10 Y FACU 2 Glechoma hederacea 10 Y FACU 3 Solidago canadensis 10 Y FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation Dominance test is >50% Prevalence index is 53.0` Morphogical adaptations' (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' _(explain) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed w problematic 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 30=Total Cover Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius ) 1 2 0 =Total Cover Hydrophytic; vegetation present? N Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP3-1U Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (Inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0 to 24 1 GYR 2/1 100 Surface Water (Al) Loam 24 to 48 10YR 2/1 90 10YR 4/2 5% D M Clay Loam Drainage Patterns (1310) 10YR 4/6 5% C M Clay Loam Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (132) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Histisol (At) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Histic Epipedon (A2) _Sandy Redox (S5) _Black Histic (A3) _Stripped Matrix (S6) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) —Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Redox Dark Surface (F6) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) _Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ Other (explain in remarks) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) _Thin Gauge or Well Data (D9) Hydric soil present? N Depth (inches): Remarks: Field Observations: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (813) Surface Soil Cracks (136) High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (1314) Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (132) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) _Thin Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (139) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes No__T_ Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Erhart Property City/County. Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date: 05/12/1020 Applicant/Owner: See Joint Application Form State: MN Sampling Point: SP3-1 W Investigator(s): Adam Cameron & Will Effertz Section, Township, Range: S:23,24,25,26 T:116N R:23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0 to 3 Let: 44°49'59.0"N Long: 93"32'25.8"W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Essexville Consociation SWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed. exolain anv answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Absolute % Cover Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: Wetland 3 Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) 30 -day precipitation rolling total drier than normal range. Precipitation from gridded database method is typical. VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 It Radius ) 1 Absolute % Cover Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Dominance Test Worksheet Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (AB) 2 3 4 5 Sapling/Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15 ft Radius 1 0 ) =TOtal Cover Prevalence Index Worksheet Total % Cover of: OBL species 0 x 1= 0 FACW species 85 x2= 170 FAC species 0 x3= 0 FACU species 0 x4= 0 UPL species 0 X5= 0 Column totals 85 (A) 170 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.00 2 3 4 5 0 = Total Cover Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ft Radius ) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 80 Y FACW 2 Urtica Dioica 5 N FACW 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% X Prevalence index is 53.0' Morphogical adaptations' (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' (explain) •Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 85 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius ) 1 2 Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y 0 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP3-1W Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (Inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc" Texture Remarks 0 to 20 10YR 211 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Clay Loam 20 to 23 N 2.5/ 100 High Water Table (A2) Sapric Muck 23 to 30 N 2.5/ 100 Saturation (A3) Clay Loam 30 to 33 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Clay Loam Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) (C6) 'Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. "Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matra Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Histisol (Al) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _Histic Epipedon (A2) _Sandy Redox (S5) _Black Histic (A3) _Stripped Matra (S6) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _Stratified Layers (A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) X Redox Dark Surface (F6) X Thick Dark Surface (Al2) —Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _Redox Depressions (F8) —5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K. L, R) _Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) —Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _Other (explain in remarks) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) or Well Data (D9) Hydric soil present? N Depth (inches): Remarks: Field Observations: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aooly) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (At) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) (C6) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (139) _Gauge _Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 20 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 18 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Erhart Property City/County. Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date: 05/12/2020 Applicant/Owner: See Joint Application Form State: MN Sampling Point: SP4-1 U Investigator(s): Adam Cameron & Will Effertz 3edion, Township, Range: S:23,24,25,26 TA 16N R:23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Linear Slope (%): 2 to 4 Let: 44°49'59.0"N Long: 93"32'25.8°W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Hamel Consociation VWI Classification: None Are dimaticlhydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed. exolain anv answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? N Absolute % Cover 30 Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) 30 -day precipitation rolling total drier than normal range. Precipitation from gridded database method is typical. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius ) 1 Acernegundo Absolute % Cover 30 Dominan t Species Y Indicator Staus FAC Dominance Test Worksheet Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40.00% (A/B) 2 Carya cordifornis 30 Y FACU 3 4 5 Sapling/Shrub stratur (Plot size: 15 ft Radius 1 Rhamnus carhartica 60 ) 20 =Total Cover Y FAC Prevalence Index Worksheet Total % Cover of: OBL species 0 x 1= 0 FACW species 0 x2= 0 FAC species 50 x3= 150 FACU species 45 x4= 180 UPL species 0 x5= 0 Column totals 95 (A) 330 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.47 2 Zanthoxylum americanum 5 Y FACU 3 4 5 25 =Total Cover Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ft Radius ) 1 Arctium minus 10 Y FACU 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation Dominance test is >50% Prevalence index is :53.0' Morphogical adaptations' (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a _separate sheet) Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' (explain) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius ) 1 2 Hydrophytic vegetation present? N 0 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP4-1U Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (Inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc" Texture Remarks 0 to 10 10YR 2/1 100 Surface Water (At) Loam 10 to 20 10YR 2/1 90 10YR 4/3 5% D M Clay Loam Drainage Patterns (1310) 10YR 4/6 5% C M Clay Loam 20 to 36 10YR 2/1 70 10YR 4/3 25% RM M Clay Loam Crayfish Burrows (C8) 10YR 4/6 5 C M Clay Loam Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. "Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Histisol (Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) —Sandy Redox (S5) —Black Histic (A3) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) —Loamy Mucky Mineral (171) _Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _Redox Depressions (F8) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _Other (explain in remarks) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) _Thin Gauge or Well Data (D9) Hydric soil present? N Depth (inches): Remarks: FieldObservations: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required& check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (At) Fauna (1313) Soil Cracks (136) High Water Table (A2) _Aquatic _Surface True Aquatic Plants (814) Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (82) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (05) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) _Thin Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (89) Other (Explain in Remarks) FieldObservations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No —Depth (inches): hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Erhart Property City/County. Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date: 05/12/2020 Applicant/Owner. See Joint Application Form State: MN Sampling Point: SP4-1 W Investigator(s): Adam Cameron 8 Will Effertz Section, Township, Range: S:23,24,25,26 T:116N R:23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1 to 2 Let: 44'49'59.0'N Long: 93"32'25.8"W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Lester -Kilkenny Complex VWI Classification: PEM1A Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Absolute % Cover Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: Wetland 4 Remarks: (Explain altemative procedures here or in a separate report.) 30 -day precipitation rolling total drier than normal range. Precipitation from gridded database method is typical. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 It Radius ) 1 Absolute % Cover Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Dominance Test Worksheet Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (AB) 2 3 4 5 Saplinc/Shrub stratur (Plot size: 15 ft Radius 1 0 ) =Total Cover Prevalence Index Worksheet Total % Cover of: OBL species 0 x 1= 0 FACW species 85 x2= 170 FAC species 0 x3= 0 FACU species 0 x4= 0 UPL species 0 x5= 0 Column totals 85 (A) 170 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.00 2 3 4 5 0 =Total Cover Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ft Radius ) 1 Phalarfs arundmacea 80 Y FACW 2 Urtica Dioica. 5 N FACW 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% X Prevalence index is s3.0' Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' _(explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be unless disturbed or problematic 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 85 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius ) 1 Ipresent, 2 Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y o Total Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP4-1 W Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (Inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc" Texture Remarks oto 18 10YR 2/1 100 Surface Water (A1) Clay Loam 18 to 36 10YR 3/1 100 High Water Table (A2) Clay Loam 36 to 40 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Clay Loam Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (CB) Sediment Deposits (B2) (C3) Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _Saturation Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position (132) Iron Deposits (B5) (C6) 'Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. —Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Histisol (Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Histic Epipedon (A2) _Sandy Redox (S5) —Black Histic (A3) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) —Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) X Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _Redox Depressions (F8) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2) Other (explain in remarks) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _Thin or Well Data (D9) Hydric soil present? Y Remarks: _Gauge Other (Explain in Remarks) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1) Fauna (B13) Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) _Aquatic True Aquatic Plants (B14) _Surface Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (CB) Sediment Deposits (B2) (C3) Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _Saturation Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position (132) Iron Deposits (B5) (C6) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _Thin or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _Gauge Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 14 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 13 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/She Erhart Property City/County. Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date: 05/12/1020 Applicant/Owner: See Joint Application Form State: MN Sampling Point: SP -A Investigator(s): Adam Cameron & Will Efferiz Section, Township, Range: S:23,24,25,26 TA 16N R:23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1 to 2 Lat: 44"49'59.0"N Long: 93"3225.8"W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Hamel Consociation VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY CW FINDINGS (If needed. explain anv answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Absolute % Cover Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland she ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) 30 -day precipitation rolling total drier than normal range. Precipitation from gridded database method is typical. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of'Dlants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius ) 1 Absolute % Cover Dominan Indicator t Species Staus Dominance Test Worksheet Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (AB) 2 3 4 5 Saolinc/Shrub stratur (Plot size: 15 ft Radius 1 0=Total ) Cover Prevalence Index Worksheet Total % Cover of: OBL species 0 x 1= 0 FACW species 90 x2= 180 FAC species 0 x3= 0 FACU species 0 x4= 0 UPL species 0 X5= 0 Column totals 90 (A) 180 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.00 2 3 4 5 0 = Total Cover Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 ft Radius ) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 90 Y FACW 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% X Prevalence index is 553.0' Morphogical adaptations' (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' (explain) •Indicators of hydric sail and wetland hydrology must be 1present, unless disturbed or problematic 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 ft Radius 1 2 90 ) 0 =Total Cover = Total Cover Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP -A Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (Inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc" Texture Remarks 0 to 4 IOYR 2/1 100 Surface Water (A1) Loam 4 to 8 1 OYR 2/1 55 10YR 4/3 45 RM M Loam 8 to 22 1 OYR 2/1 97 10YR 4/3 3 D M Clay Loam 22 to 36 10YR 211 75 10YR 4/3 25 D M Clay Loam 36 to 48 10YR 2/1 70 10YR 413 30 D M Clay Loam Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (83) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) 'Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS =Masked Sand Grains. "Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Histisol (Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Histic Epipedon (A2) _Sandy Redox (S5) _Black Histic (A3) _Stripped Matrix (S6) _Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _Stratified Layers (A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Redox Depressions (F8) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) _Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2) _Other (explain in remarks) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Hydric soil present? N Depth (inches): Remarks: Field Observations: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (1313) Surface Soil Cracks (136) High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (Bt) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits (B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (83) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) (C6) X FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (139) _Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Project/Site Erhart Property City/County. Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date: 05/12/2020 Applicant/Omer: See Joint Application Form State: MN Sampling Point: SP -B Investigator(s): Adam Cameron & Will Effertz Section, Township, Range: S:23,24,25,26 TA 16N R:23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1 to 2 Let: 44°49'59.0"N Long: 93'32'25.8W Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Hamel Consociation VWI Classification, None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation X , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed. explain anv answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? N Dominan Indicator t Species Staus Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) 30 -day precipitation rolling total drier than normal range. Precipitation from gridded database method is typical. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 It Radius ) % Cover 1 Dominan Indicator t Species Staus Dominance Test Worksheet Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 0 Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.00% (A) (B) (A/B) 2 3 4 5 o Sapling/Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15 it Radius ) 1 = Total Cover Prevalence Index Worksheet Total % Cover of: OBL species 0 x 1= 0 FACW species 0 x2= 0 FAC species 0 x3= 0 FACU species 0 x4= 0 UPL species 0 X5= 0 Column totals 0 (A) 0 Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) 2 3 4 5 0 = Total Cover Herb stratum (Plot size: 5 I Radius ) 1 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation _ Dominance test is >50% Prevalence index is 53.0' Morphogical adaptations' (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' (explain) 9ndirators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30 it Radius ) 1 2 Hydrophytic vegetation present? N 0 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Sample point was void of vegetation, was observed to be burnt and scraped US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: SP -B Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (Inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc" Texture Remarks 0 to 24 10YR 2/1 100 Aquatic Fauna (1313) Surface Soil Cracks (86) 24 to 44 10YR 2/1 93 10YR 4/1 5% D M Clay Loam Saturation (A3) 10YR 416 2% C M Clay Loam Water Marks (81) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish BprOWS (C8) Sediment Deposits (132) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) or Stressed Plants (Ot) Algal Mat or Crust (84) _Stunted Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (85) (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) 'Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. "Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Histisol (Al) —Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) —Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6) —Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _Stratfied Layers (A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Redox Dark Surface (F6) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _Depleted Dark Surface (F7) —Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (rF12) _Other (explain in remarks) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Gauge or Well Data (D9) Hydric soil present? N Depth (inches): Remarks: Field Observations: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that amply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (1313) Surface Soil Cracks (86) High Water Table (A2) True Aquatic Plants (814) Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (81) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Crayfish BprOWS (C8) Sediment Deposits (132) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) or Stressed Plants (Ot) Algal Mat or Crust (84) _Stunted Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (85) (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth (inches): hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Drainage tile observed US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Erhart Property Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX C Precipitation Data 6/24/2&20 Precipitation Documentation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Minnesota State Climatology Office State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources home I current conditions I journal I past data I summaries I agriculture I other sites I about us 0 Precipitation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Carver township number: 116N township name: Lake Minnewashta range number: 23W nearest community: Chanhassen section number: 23 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 Score using 1981-2010 normal period values are in inches A'R' following a monthly total indicates a provisional value derived from radar -based estimates. first prior month: April 2020 second prior month: March 2020 third prior month: February 2020 estimated precipitation total for this location: 1.68R 2.51 R 0.61R there is a 30% chance this location will have less than: 1.91 1.17 0.40 there is a 30% chance this location will have more than: 2.89 2.05 0.97 type of month: dry normal wet dry wet normal monthly score 3* 1= 3 2* 3= 6 1* 2= 2 multi -month score: 6 to 9 (dry) 10 to 14 (normal) 15 to 18 (wet) 11 (Normal) Other Resources: ■ retrieve daily precipitation data ■ view radar -based precipitation estimates ■ view weekly precipitation maps ■ Evaluating Antecedent Precipitation Conditions (BWSR) climateapps.dnr-state.mn.us/gridded data/predplwetandhvorksheet.asp?passXutm83=456391&passYutm83=4965441 &passcounty=Carver&passcou... 1/1 r: Erhart property, Chanhassen MN: Precipitation Summary Source: Minnesota Climatology Working Group Monthly Totals: 2020 Target: 116N 23W S221 mon year CC tttN rrw Tan 2020 10 116N 23W 23 Feb 2020 10 116N 23w 15 Mar 2020 10 116N 23w 15 Apr 2020 10 116N 23w 15 May 2020 10 116N 23W 15 (latitude: 44.84104 longitude: 93.55178) ss nnnn 00000000 BYRG DatePrecip. Feb Mar NWS CHAN_NWS Precip. Date NWS CHAN_NWS Feb 2. NWS CHAN_NWS Mar 1. NWS CHAN NWS 5. pre (inches) 80 59 88 84 12 February/march/April/may Daily Records Date Precip. DatePrecip. Feb Mar Date May Precip. Date Aug Precip. Feb 1, 2020 0 Mar 1, 2020 0 Apr 1, 2020 0 May 1, 2020 T Feb 2, 2020 0 Mar 2, 2020 0 Apr 2, 2020 .03 May 2, 2020 0 Feb 3, 2020 0 Mar 3, 2020 T Apr 3, 2020 .02 May 3, 2020 0 Feb 4, 2020 0 Mar 4, 2020 T Apr 4, 2020 0 May 4, 2020 0 Feb 5, 2020 0 Mar 5, 2020 T Apr 5, 2020 T May 5, 2020 0 Feb 6, 2020 T Mar 6, 2020 0 Apr 6, 2020 0 May 6, 2020 0 Feb 7, 2020 .05 Mar 7, 2020 0 Apr 7, 2020 .01 May 7, 2020 0 Feb 8, 2020 0 Mar 8, 2020 0 Apr 8, 2020 0 May 8, 2020 0 Feb 9, 2020 .40 Mar 9, 2020 0 Apr 9, 2020 .01 May 9, 2020 .22 Feb 10, 2020 T Mar 10, 2020 .08 Apr 10, 2020 0 May 10, 2020 T Feb 11, 2020 T Mar 11, 2020 0 Apr 11, 2020 0 May 11, 2020 0 Feb 12, 2020 T Mar 12, 2020 .07 Apr 12, 2020 .49 May 12, 2020 0(site visit) Feb 13, 2020 0 Mar 13, 2020 0 Apr 13, 2020 .02 Feb 14, 2020 0 Mar 14, 2020 0 Apr 14, 2020 T Feb 15, 2020 0 Mar 15, 2020 0 Apr 15, 2020 T Feb 16, 2020 0 Mar 16, 2020 .01 Apr 16, 2020 0 Feb 17, 2020 .14 Mar 17, 2020 T Apr 17, 2020 0 Feb 18, 2020 0 Mar 18, 2020 T Apr 18, 2020 0 Feb 19, 2020 0 Mar 19, 2020 .48 Apr 19, 2020 0 Feb 20, 2020 0 Mar 20, 2020 0 Apr 20, 2020 .01 Feb 21, 2020 0 Mar 21, 2020 T Apr 21, 2020 T Feb 22, 2020 0 Mar 22, 2020 .05 Apr 22, 2020 T Feb 23, 2020 0 Mar 23, 2020 .09 Apr 23, 2020 0 Feb 24, 2020 0 Mar 24, 2020 0 Apr 24, 2020 .01 Feb 25, 2020 0 Mar 25, 2020 .19 Apr 25, 2020 0 Feb 26, 2020 T Mar 26, 2020 0 Apr 26, 2020 .04 Feb 27, 2020 T Mar 27, 2020 .03 Apr 27, 2020 .08 Feb 28, 2020 T Mar 28, 2020 1.57 Apr 28, 2020 1.12 Feb 29, 2020 T Mar 29, 2020 .31 Apr 29, 2020 0 Mar 30, 2020 0 Apr 30, 2020 0 Mar 31, 2020 0 1981-2010 Summary Statistics qJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec WARM ANN WA 3OY,0.47 0.40 1.17 1.91 2.56 3.27 2.94 3.11 2.48 1.22 1.02 0.63 17.17 29.12 27.76 70% 1.02 0.97 2.05 2.89 4.35 5.27 4.23 5.25 4.35 3.40 1.86 1.36 22.15 33.30 34.31 mean 0.85 0.73 1.69 2.61 3.55 4.24 4.07 4.44 3.46 2.43 1.74 1.10 19.76 30.92 30.74 ERHART/BLANSK!/CITY WETLAND ALTERATION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA �\ VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE SHEET INDEX NO. COVERSHEET 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2 SITE PLAN 3 WETLAND EXCAVATION/GRADING PLAN 4 SPOIL PILFJGRADING PLAN 5 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 6 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS 7 RESTORATION PLAN 8 DEVELOPER BLACK CHERRY DEVELOPMENT, LLC 14500 MARTIN DRIVE, SUITE 3000 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 CONTACT: TIM ERHART PH: 612-963-0733 CONSULTANT ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. 733 MARQUETTE AVENUE SUITE 700 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 PH: 612-759-3080 FX: 612-758-3099 ENGINEER MARK RAUSCH LICENSE NO. 43480 EM: nurausch@aWant-inc.com SURVEYOR N PETER GOERS LICENSE NO.44110 EM: pgceTs@alliant-inc.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MARK KRONBECK LICENSE NO. 26222 EM: mkEonbeck@a[Iiant-inc.com WETLAND SCIENTIST ADAM CAMERON KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY EM: adam@Iqulhaugmv.com FORK � �L.V ? 00 P tto� "` ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.756.3080 wvnv.alliant-inc.com Z N O 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE SHEET INDEX NO. COVERSHEET 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2 SITE PLAN 3 WETLAND EXCAVATION/GRADING PLAN 4 SPOIL PILFJGRADING PLAN 5 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 6 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS 7 RESTORATION PLAN 8 DEVELOPER BLACK CHERRY DEVELOPMENT, LLC 14500 MARTIN DRIVE, SUITE 3000 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 CONTACT: TIM ERHART PH: 612-963-0733 CONSULTANT ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. 733 MARQUETTE AVENUE SUITE 700 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 PH: 612-759-3080 FX: 612-758-3099 ENGINEER MARK RAUSCH LICENSE NO. 43480 EM: nurausch@aWant-inc.com SURVEYOR N PETER GOERS LICENSE NO.44110 EM: pgceTs@alliant-inc.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MARK KRONBECK LICENSE NO. 26222 EM: mkEonbeck@a[Iiant-inc.com WETLAND SCIENTIST ADAM CAMERON KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY EM: adam@Iqulhaugmv.com FORK � �L.V ? 00 P tto� "` ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.756.3080 wvnv.alliant-inc.com Z O a W F J a Z F g � LU Is W W 3 a O V h Y ¢ to W 5 z a m i 93 Irw Jcc W W Q W 3 0 is I N.nN a.rRe tW this plan, .p.caka9,n. nW . pn"'a b-- ,a., ;n, dimai .."'i ane ,at 1 o aar uc.a..a PRORM=ltsL EMINEER Umi M. bw. of IF. SM. .r . R... K 4a1. u.«. R.. QUAII7Y ASSUaANCE/CONTROL r, O. DATE SUE [CalpNED; slits I sNEEE 1 of 8 it ` , • ' ! P ti/ ✓ � � l � ' � � -^ � �` \ 6i', 1•\'1 I / ' `` \ \ \' III � // . /�i.�•>�// - / � � � g/�� !— tea � _ _ � ^sa � �' \��qtl i I A .V � \ �AAAti\�\� � � �/ l i l��IC} �, 1Ln /� P`!'%%i f. 1 � +� • � � \' 'it'll`+, \ ,, � � \\�� ✓�� y `I z{ JII„aj�� /l/�f// //.{,If I}�' 11111Jp1' \ r \\ �\ fV. OUTLOTE a i/ It j !y1 ; rl6 `n L}'•I /-� i/!':./� I\�{}�1' I '�!n11 le 1 sWM LNE Oi M NfATI 1 -' `\ I `� /: __FEET OF sw l ♦ aF sw 1p � ♦ + I f 12I1�I'''zp, � /` \v\;8♦C� 7-7 —'i�� +} � / is i^— � ,rup•� ♦'I'11I{m=1 I fes/ / �. \ y- \\� � � /”; / // .. � — —�..� {''?� m . � !•I 17 /// u` J l J J IJ -/z , \\\`s•%^�_ — \ \•. \\ � 1 %I7 11!il�/'i/ %1/l i f z t I 1 \ / N/A"A'%////////ice l' l \ // \ 1\11/ r1 q it I1 I l 11111111111i1111�111�)�<�I �� %"�� 1%I / j lllllllllllhL\\C'��.�•'�%i/;/i/�/,�y/, J III} II ✓ / 11 `�-,�-_�_--��--� � //iii— �� 1 f —� �\ � i\) r `\�_�—�/J�I111 \1,I\1("f� r/.i/�.%!/%b !i��Ir��)vJ•1`'_'�t\_ '\ � ` i 1 `—iJ �,... �,p.,,, _��------ LP �r 11r1`..�/� It EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND - 0 SET CAP IRON MONUMENT I8425 —D— CAS R FOLNO IRON MONUMENT —1 SANITARY SEWER Q CARVER C"TY CIM —w --n— FORCE MAIN X WATER VALVE —I— WATERMAIN TELEPHONE BOX — - - WETLAND DELNEADON pM IJ SANITARY MANHOLE ------- EDGE OF WATER a SIGN gYti O FIRE HYDRANT ON\� Q ® CLEAN OUT ELECTRIC BOX �li\N ® tamm,oRLIER l°ja J/Hw WNWLA. zp iN N € gYti I I ON\� Q \NIS, �li\N ' W \ �GONSiaUv o®o o I SCALE IN FEET 11 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliantanc.com F- 2 cc w a O Z a o c ~ LU 0 J p a z z z z w N 3 w I n.rter d•nily ma mI• plod. •D•.ilieallon. . rtpa•I ro• p.•p .. ev '.• o, d lin. mY omaI, Ucan�Nlw dna mol d Bury Ddevtl GR0fE540NAL ENGINEER urNp , lav m m• slat• dl NINNCSOTA .RAI DIIAIfIT ASSURANCE/CONTROL A, DATE PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR OFAWN: T/5 PROJECT ND: uD-oosD 2 SNEET 2 of 8 \ IL� EXiSTNG FOXWOOD l DEVEUX%ENT�EIOSIDIG METLMD BLCCK5 E2 A 1 i II OUTLOT D / WETVND 4 jorrW uecw A. m... e. j1P PAflLE1 1D: D. � MARY a aUN9(I 11 MR r Air. :fOUTLOTE PARCEL 252990510 / OW OF CHANHASSEN I SOUTH LME or THE xaRTX Bz.za �— _FEET Cr Se 1/4 M SW 1/4 c 24. !\1 PMC[ 10: 2515WO22 d oNNEA: nuonlr A T OAMNE N ERNARi p �w�zmA:mu.�mu.,i — 1111}� j •! I 11 I' __j I If EELIMINARY FUTURE 1BOIVISON CONCEPT I 1 T( f ilr T IIT :� 111 III A1,. U f ttll !! Iy/i„ 1 L__ 1✓II m j I STOCKPILE AREA / I ATEA w I II 11 I I I I I A" 7L A LLA LL 11 ILO r I,t II LIQ .A r� r� 11 1 L11.A 1 r A L ILi , 1 WETLAND3 �`e 1�i almwvAMAm urnl@�. mY..4oner. MKv/o RNvmals mLw.a�w.m MM-wcw EXISTING SITE DATA: PMCELS PARTWIY PTO: 250210 811 DAVID k MARY GUASKI I INCLUDED IN WET VND 252990510 CUY OF CHMHASSEN ALTERATION CONSTRUCTION. 251550022 TIMOTHY A: DAWNE ERHPAE W os DEPICTED PER KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL DEUNEATION SITE LEGEND: _ _ _ _ - _ PROPOSED EASEMENT OMwu: PROPERTY UNE - — - SET8ICK UNE LOT UNE - RIGHT -CF -WAY W- { \ \ PREIIMNNRY FUTURE HWL ROAD EXISTING WETIAND BUFFER FUTURE WEIWNO BUFFER' ere BE PROVIDED WRH PVTTNG F— of FUTURE DEVELOPMENT O O EXISTING WETAND BUFFER MONUMENT — 1111}� j •! I 11 I' __j I If EELIMINARY FUTURE 1BOIVISON CONCEPT I 1 T( f ilr T IIT :� 111 III A1,. U f ttll !! Iy/i„ 1 L__ 1✓II m j I STOCKPILE AREA / I ATEA w I II 11 I I I I I A" 7L A LLA LL 11 ILO r I,t II LIQ .A r� r� 11 1 L11.A 1 r A L ILi , 1 WETLAND3 �`e 1�i almwvAMAm urnl@�. mY..4oner. MKv/o RNvmals mLw.a�w.m MM-wcw EXISTING SITE DATA: PMCELS PARTWIY PTO: 250210 811 DAVID k MARY GUASKI I INCLUDED IN WET VND 252990510 CUY OF CHMHASSEN ALTERATION CONSTRUCTION. 251550022 TIMOTHY A: DAWNE ERHPAE W os DEPICTED PER KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL DEUNEATION SITE LEGEND: _ _ _ _ - _ PROPOSED EASEMENT OMwu: PROPERTY UNE - — - SET8ICK UNE LOT UNE - RIGHT -CF -WAY W- WEOANO BOUNDARY HWL ROAD EXISTING WETIAND BUFFER FUTURE WEIWNO BUFFER' ere BE PROVIDED WRH PVTTNG F— of FUTURE DEVELOPMENT O O EXISTING WETAND BUFFER MONUMENT EDGE OF HAUL RN [COSTING TREE CANOPY MIN 15' MAX 20' (FIELD FIT) A' -A' HAUL ROAD SECTION NOT TO SCALE BUFFER LIMIT WETLAND EDGE -00 NOT DISTURB WETLAND six OF SLT FENCE FENCE A ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612 758 3080 wwW.alllant inc.com Z DESIGIIEo: O OMwu: 1. PNarecr I,. Q W n J Q Z F— J 3 w LL � o U Q Y to w w 5a3 m a 5 ¢ a "g a a W cc ¢ F LU 53 w I n.r.ey ..mf, mcN In. I.n, pecir-m-, er m,rl e 'rap.. M n neer 1 of p nblon end n-1 IP am c c0 Llc.n..d P.nCs IOWL MINEER under Ilu Were eI e. MINNESOTA Sloe 0 NMR MUiCt PE Ynb Lbw Me. DUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGIIEo: MPR OMwu: 1. PNarecr I,. no -mo 3 n 3 of i EXISTING FOXWOOD DEVELOPMENT Tll --- r -- J A Iful _ CONTRACTOR TO CLEAR j.H VEGETATION AS REQUIRED i 1 WITHIN GRADING LIMITS.- ' / �.. OU7L TE i 1 DO NOT DISTURB. KJOLHAUG REP TO FLAG -2 WETLAND4 11� II /� / A / OU E %I WETLAND 2 CLASSIFICATION ASSUMED: MANAGE 2 - CIN, MEDIUM - RPBCWD BUFFER REQUIREMENTS: 20' MIN.,40' AVG., BO' MAX - RPBCWD 20' MIN. +30' SBK - CIN (\��17- 1 IIi11,id_ `:11� s_ = PRELIMINARY FUTURE SUBDIVISION CONCEPT I0 Idliil II CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE Nt77 �' DEWATERING PLAN I" !.(AS NECESSARY) �i 1 'I 1 I nIgII i L'll•lq I, " ' ' .1 ' ,� / J' (L'I lips l-- , I rllplihlll l• I AF /r l IV- //.'-//I'lll lll'III�IIhlli I 1 ! I r WETLAND GRADING SHOWN IS I \ \ \ 1 ; MAXIMUM EXTENTS POSSIBLE. ACTUAL GRADING WORK TO BE \ FIELD CONSTRUCTED BASED ON \� \ EXISTING CONDITIONS OF WETLAND. CONTRACTOR TO .COORDINATE WITH PROPERTY — \ \ OWNER AND WETLAND SCIENTIST FOR FINAL GRADING. e l; y ( 1.1 I' �gl\ \\ B 1,\`\\\'\\?�,1)\�1,,/IIIIIII�iIlll�ll;+!`'111 1' !�\'' \TRANSITION FROM 5 1 TRANSITION ��\` `! \\'SLOPETO 10:1.` FROM 5:1 \\\\ SLOPE TO 10:1. 1 \\. * a C \ �\ 1 \L \z1, `\\\ \ \ COMPLETE MINOR .974 / / 1 GRADING AS / 1c, NECESSARY TO 7' !INSTALL TEMPORARY \ � 1 ¢HAUL ROAD 'Ar 1 EXISTING YrETAND EDGE DO NOT DISTURB OUTSIDE OF WETLAND LIMIT SBO' -879'3 NORMAL WATER LEVEL 879' GRADING NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP ME ADJACENT ROADWAYS FREE OF DEBRIS AND PREVENT THE OFF -SIRE TRACKING OF SOIL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CRY. 2. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT (800)252-1166, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 3. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAKE SURE THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPRWALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS RECEIVED AND THOROUGHLY REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY ALL OF THE PERMTmNG AUTHORmES. 4. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST DISCUSS DEWATERING PIANS WITH ALL SUBCONTRACTORS TO VERIFY NPDES REQUIREMENTS. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR SHOULD CONSULT VTI EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR AND ENGINEER TO DETERMINE APPROPRIATE METHOD. 5. REFER TO EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE LOCATIONS. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK: CUT: 21,216 CUBIC YARDS 3 Fl<L ASSUMED 0 DISTURBED AREA 3.668 ACRES 4 GRADING LEGEND: n2A3 EXLSING TREE EXISTING EXISTING —789— EXISTING WETLAND WETLAND PROPERTY UNE YPE 3 TWE 3 DO NOT MGD EDGE EDGE DISTURB WiTELNRD BOUNDARY I �T� 10' 15'3 FUTRUE WETALD BUFFER' DD NOT DISTURBSLOPE 1EElANDOD OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT a TYPE 3 WERANO-DO ROT DISTURB UNIT HAUL ROD z F- 0 I0 Idliil II CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE Nt77 �' DEWATERING PLAN I" !.(AS NECESSARY) �i 1 'I 1 I nIgII i L'll•lq I, " ' ' .1 ' ,� / J' (L'I lips l-- , I rllplihlll l• I AF /r l IV- //.'-//I'lll lll'III�IIhlli I 1 ! I r WETLAND GRADING SHOWN IS I \ \ \ 1 ; MAXIMUM EXTENTS POSSIBLE. ACTUAL GRADING WORK TO BE \ FIELD CONSTRUCTED BASED ON \� \ EXISTING CONDITIONS OF WETLAND. CONTRACTOR TO .COORDINATE WITH PROPERTY — \ \ OWNER AND WETLAND SCIENTIST FOR FINAL GRADING. e l; y ( 1.1 I' �gl\ \\ B 1,\`\\\'\\?�,1)\�1,,/IIIIIII�iIlll�ll;+!`'111 1' !�\'' \TRANSITION FROM 5 1 TRANSITION ��\` `! \\'SLOPETO 10:1.` FROM 5:1 \\\\ SLOPE TO 10:1. 1 \\. * a C \ �\ 1 \L \z1, `\\\ \ \ COMPLETE MINOR .974 / / 1 GRADING AS / 1c, NECESSARY TO 7' !INSTALL TEMPORARY \ � 1 ¢HAUL ROAD 'Ar 1 EXISTING YrETAND EDGE DO NOT DISTURB OUTSIDE OF WETLAND LIMIT SBO' -879'3 NORMAL WATER LEVEL 879' GRADING NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP ME ADJACENT ROADWAYS FREE OF DEBRIS AND PREVENT THE OFF -SIRE TRACKING OF SOIL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CRY. 2. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT (800)252-1166, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 3. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAKE SURE THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPRWALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS RECEIVED AND THOROUGHLY REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY ALL OF THE PERMTmNG AUTHORmES. 4. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST DISCUSS DEWATERING PIANS WITH ALL SUBCONTRACTORS TO VERIFY NPDES REQUIREMENTS. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR SHOULD CONSULT VTI EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR AND ENGINEER TO DETERMINE APPROPRIATE METHOD. 5. REFER TO EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE LOCATIONS. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK: CUT: 21,216 CUBIC YARDS 3 Fl<L ASSUMED 0 DISTURBED AREA 3.668 ACRES 4 GRADING LEGEND: n2A3 EXLSING TREE —799— EXISTING CONTOUR —789— PROPOSED CONTOUR - - - - - - - PROPOSED EASEMENT PROPERTY UNE — — -- SETBACK UNE LU LOT UNE RIGHR-OF-WAY —a— WiTELNRD BOUNDARY J EXISTNG WETLAND BUFFER FUTRUE WETALD BUFFER' M BE PRDIRDED WNH PUTTING a OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT a TYPE 3 WERANO-DO ROT DISTURB HAUL ROD ow ��\.MA s UOGIO P 003 FOP 0' 0' 10' —T-BENC WETLAND a ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 w•Nw.alliantinc.com z 0 cc LU w zg J a a Z z F- 0 Q 2 3 a 0 0 0 U 4 a jr (Yp Q 5 a W CID w o 0 cc " g 5 a Q z F r ¢w w LU MU 3 3 I nenb/ onlh mul Inb min, Vr.Per.e n,e erV, o, „a.1 n,y mreN Pemelon e.e One, l doh u=. alEssloENGINEER FFo -d.1,M lana el, t ,b StOl.SIN' of ulxxE50TA MARK NMfOI. ME QUALM ASSURANCE/CONTROL DESN'NFY: MPR DMWN: TAS PRJJER N6 nG-W90 B''B' 11 4 TYPICAL GRADING CROSS SECTION NATURAL WETLAND OUTLET CROSS SECTION NOT TO mai R NOT TO SCALE SxER 4 Of 8 - r � `\'ice:. — �r PRELIMINARY FUTURE 1�1' ;!•Il lI SUBDIVISION CONCEPT '- 1., •� - is 1 11,21 • WETLAND EXCAVATION!Af/��i�///; , ;•"� SPOIL PILE LOCATION.,1d//I/t' PLACEMENT TO BE 1 % FIELD FIT WITH OWNER Y\ DIRECTION.ik�liii'/sk / —`t/ I/ IJ 17- _j wls'�(//,///lI/tll�tjlt�itttt�t 1■t �,� 1\ ! y�r �u� \ �g� HAUL ROA � Zz J r J NO GREATER THAN g ♦ 8:1 SLOPE \ ! TREES MAY HAVE TO It/ WETLAND 3 — / 1 ti ',I I BE REMOVED FOR,: > ' 1 I I i /' CLASSIFICATION ASSUMED: ✓/ I l 1 1 1 1 j MANAGE 2-CI\1',MEDIUM\RPBCWD SPOIL GRADINGC' . BUFFER REQUIREMENTS, _ J \ 1i t,\\�l41 I 1 t 20'MIN.AO' AVG., W MAX - RPBCWCi -2KMIN.+3O'S-u\C \ / --61 \.ill III � �/ Il 1!�1�\\ \\\ `'!Ill \ ,y t `\ \ _ —__ '�� ' •� \ J 10 /\ %\ ! 1hr 1 ,\ \ \ \ -\ •� \` `. ,, ! //// / / ✓. i. ii}\1i t ilt�— \\; \ 11 ! Illll/�/�///�� .\\\`' \� 1 l \ 1 i l!I!�/t � / / / �'��--r •��-J`f�lllll � / t t I ��—�%�_—�—= f -- \\\\ \`'�`\ �` '\\\\�:��'�\_\�•;�;:�:\\\\\�:.�\��,�\\ \\ � \ `!ill � �—/II r �//�\\�,/ / moi_ \-\`•.�'! I I I \� I\ -- ..... \.. .\ 1.. 1, � � I r � - /.�•.�/i✓ � \.:I, t/lll, \,-.- ESTIMATED EARTHWORK: SIOCKPBE BORROW: 21,216 CUBIC YARDS t OISNRBED MFA: 1.147 ACRES 3 POTENTIALLY IMPACTED TREES 332 18 Amertm Elm 335 22 Black Che 341 10 Hackberry 392 24 AmedwnElm 393 18 BlacliCherry 3% 13 American Dm 351 is Barelder 353 15 Green Ash 354 13 Green Ash 355 11 Bocelder 389 12 Bwelder 350 10 B elder 398 10 rMaple GRADING LEGEND: e24 al5rING TREE —R# EOSONG CONTd/R —768— PROPOSED CDMDIIR _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PROPOSED EASEMENT PROPERTY UNE —. — — SETBACK LME LOT UNE RIGHT-OF-WAY —�— WERAND BOUNDARY =-ZA NIRUE WETurvD BUFFER• ��1iCC KG BE PRGJIDEO WITH PurnNG OF HfTURE DEVELDPMENF HAUL ROAD RP�NENV &VY p,OE�\Ml�'0014 01 SCN.E IN FEET ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 WYAW.alliam-inc.com Z 3 Ic W = 0. o a Q 2 W a a p J ga J_ Foo O 3 w I I:.nbr carate aha IN. pbn. .p.clNcnxcn. ,r rsp 0 .n. prepar.tl by ma o do, my m:..+ pmrl.l— and rnn+ I Me ash L ..a DiE410f a Sted.cp under W b..1 . �,nl..l YIMNCSOiA an. „wm. x.. 0UA1/1Y ASSURANCE/CONTROL n "Te DATE LSM MIG.Ebe MPR 5 aRc 5 of 8 N 0 25 50 100 SCN.E IN FEET ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 WYAW.alliam-inc.com Z 3 Ic W = 0. o a Q 2 W a a p J ga J_ Foo O 3 w I I:.nbr carate aha IN. pbn. .p.clNcnxcn. ,r rsp 0 .n. prepar.tl by ma o do, my m:..+ pmrl.l— and rnn+ I Me ash L ..a DiE410f a Sted.cp under W b..1 . �,nl..l YIMNCSOiA an. „wm. x.. 0UA1/1Y ASSURANCE/CONTROL n "Te DATE LSM MIG.Ebe MPR 5 aRc 5 of 8 EXISTING FOXWOOD a X ,c d/ SRT �\ I%_�f FENCE/WM RTA U`�."\\TO PROTECT \ \ . -�-DMD WETLANDS •"DMD \ \'` CLOS IunoN AUUMED: MANAGE 2 DIY, MEDIUM-pPOLWp II� BUFFER REQUIREMENTS: 2U MIN.,W AVG-, BY M. PP.. wob...WSBX-I3TY I, . II� F= 1 DEWATERING PLAN I IN WETLAND 2 ' '�-DND-�.• CIASSIFIunON ASSUMED: MANAGE2-CITY, MEDIUM -RFGC WLFFA 0.EOVIREMFNR: m Mw., Aw,5VMAfI-RpBCWD mMIM..30•YX-Ott m0®©000000©��© i WOROLLS 5' H DEUNEA ! WETLAND PROTECT R !oMMI HAUL RI / (SmWOLr iRAt6PORr ,\ i " (BRla 17 ' \ _ 1 N APPROPRIATE 1 1`1110 i ,r8 %^ — VICINITY MAP �� N(1TT0 SCAT£ � T F nm. r/ Ir til i r I \ \* / II \\`\ or W60NDy i \ DAmNunw AvuMED: IMANMF2-VT•MEwMENTS: O \ Imo. BURGER REQUIREMENTS: 2a MIN.,AO�AW., SY MAx-RPBCN9 \ m tNN.. W SNt OVER \ OtOSON GONERS BLANKET OVER GRADED SLOPE USE ASBIOROLLS NECESSARY. IF--GRADED PARAl1E1 TO POPE AS NECESSARY. YIvcw TO BE COMPLETED IN f ' WINTER CONDITONS. SPOIL PILE AREA NEEDS TO BE STABILIZED AFTER GRADING COMPLETED. SEED C 1 AND DISC IN STAW. OR APPROVED EOUAL \IIORK TO BE COMPLETED T IN WINTER CONDMONS. SPOIL PILE AREA MAY 1 l \ P 'LNEED TO BE RE -SEEDED \ DISCHARGE POINT TO LAKE Pa -1,\, ,`\'I I //P \ \ ` AT TIME OF SPRING - \ I i L.1\I(I\ 1 `tTHAW. SEE RESTORATION RILEY VIA WETLAND PLAN FOR SEEDING 0.AIE HEr4xEMPILE) EBTLs OETAl3 \ r- \ \ vATTMw+uMLT 1 '�•- - E L 4Mi aN n16) EROSIO\ CONTROL BLANKET OVER GRADED SLOPE ,\11,\,'1\\\ �l3Y m i WOROLLS 5' H DEUNEA ! WETLAND PROTECT R !oMMI HAUL RI / (SmWOLr iRAt6PORr ,\ i " (BRla 17 ' \ _ 1 N APPROPRIATE 1 1`1110 i ,r8 %^ — VICINITY MAP �� N(1TT0 SCAT£ � T F nm. r/ Ir til i r I \ \* / II \\`\ or W60NDy i \ DAmNunw AvuMED: IMANMF2-VT•MEwMENTS: O \ Imo. BURGER REQUIREMENTS: 2a MIN.,AO�AW., SY MAx-RPBCN9 \ m tNN.. W SNt OVER \ OtOSON GONERS BLANKET OVER GRADED SLOPE USE ASBIOROLLS NECESSARY. IF--GRADED PARAl1E1 TO POPE AS NECESSARY. YIvcw TO BE COMPLETED IN f ' WINTER CONDITONS. SPOIL PILE AREA NEEDS TO BE STABILIZED AFTER GRADING COMPLETED. SEED C 1 AND DISC IN STAW. OR APPROVED EOUAL \IIORK TO BE COMPLETED T IN WINTER CONDMONS. SPOIL PILE AREA MAY 1 l \ P 'LNEED TO BE RE -SEEDED \ DISCHARGE POINT TO LAKE Pa -1,\, ,`\'I I //P \ \ ` AT TIME OF SPRING - \ I i L.1\I(I\ 1 `tTHAW. SEE RESTORATION RILEY VIA WETLAND PLAN FOR SEEDING 0.AIE HEr4xEMPILE) EBTLs OETAl3 \ r- \ \ vATTMw+uMLT 1 '�•- - L RM6�(1LM! m) L 4Mi aN n16) M. O _ PROPOSED ODROLS (POST GRADING) on U x HED z Gd) SMFM ------- PTOOSEDEASEMENT DND L Sfp�1I/1V. HMDYIII' UlE \ L.C) a .iRASYE °IWI WMI/TIIYWi WAFiNCIMld 1 ER®CM CWlR0. R.WiT 1 A ar sAAx OAIDDT T+FE N oxor eAc /MNID meq Moor LAT. a > RmAVXaG � / YIII-TRANIO OxRM1 Yt01 111£ 5 A 111E PEY.iIX.41EN1 Y.Li - — _ � Y oesm OBN RDG RSD xSRrx AMFAIGJI HAEDI bZO QAIp IEypOI[xn CR EBLLL-W WT GT ` 11 CL L �T-m w L ODM 6 — BY (Grz]0.m Ml STA°LPATAM) MMOK Mw A .DS E YA9gJf FNONwL C9fI1fE0 - z u(Fa YEAR SfIHUL,MtI) mT-m Pv lFE 5Y3RY AND NNAIE fMMACIVI. U EROSION CONTROL 4 Q RESPONSIBLE PARTY: le x ¢ BUCK CHERRY DEVELOPMENT o 5 a 145OD MARTIN DRIVE, i STE 3000 w EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 Z M a g CONTACF.TIM ERHART CELL -612-983-0733 W NOTE: 1. SEE SHEET J FDR ALL piMDN AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS. NOTE TO CONTRACTOR: TME MAGE Q NG CONMACTOR IS RESPDIdeI£ FOR NSTALLAnax OF ALL RUACN AND SEIMMENT CON IRA BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTCES (BMPS) AS SFp'M w THE SUNNI PRESERVE NAMES GRADING SRMW ("®T FOR PMT OUCf BIDS NEEDED AFTER UDUDY lDNeTRUfnd AMVI MF IMPS ARF TO BF INSAI AT A MINIMUM AS SHORN IN SIR AND UTILITY CG6IRIICTIIXI AMI HOE BUILDING. AT ME XMPIFTCN OF MASS GRADING MWK AND SATISFACTORY SIE SOL STABIRAMIN, ME DLVELWER AND MASS GNADING CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATEMEIBNISFA OF NT9E5 PERMIT RESFOISINUMS TD ME STREET AND UnI2TY CONTRI AND nQ Ott. TIRE STREET ANO U1uT' CMIRACTOR AND aw MRL THEN ASSIME ME IESFWSHBRIIY TO PROVIDE INSPECTOR AND MNNIENNICE OF ANY IN -PI -AM B -PS AS MIIL AS INSTALL THE ADOMO AL BMPS REWIRED IN TIE SME17 AND UnUTY CONSTRUCTOR DOCUMENT SMAIUPON COMPLETION OF STREET AND UTUTY CIDNFRUCTON, THE STREET AND UT.TY CONTRACTOR SAUL RELOYE ANY BMPS INSTALLEDDURING TIE STREET AND U", PRASE MAT NE NO LONGER REAMED AID OTMONATE TE TRANSFER O NPIDES PERMIT RESFOl9BRIT6 BAD! TO THE DEVELOPER OR TERMINATE THE PORTION OF THE NPDES PERMIT 1RAT8EPoED TO TIE OUT AND MOR COITRAO . IMPAIRED WATER REQUIREMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION: A ALL E E OdO SOL AREAS MUST BE WAG,, As BOON AS POSSIBLE TO RIOT SCY EROSION BUT IN NO CASE LATER MAN! SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER COEs11wrnCN K11NTY IN MAT PORTION O TIE SHE HAS TEMPOBARr OR PERMAXII CEASED- B. EA ED.B. TBPMMY GD,Mo, BASO FEWEYNis DIESIBEED IN PMT N. U1.5 MUST SHE USED FOR COMMON DRAINAGE LOCATIONS MAT SRVE M AREA NM FTE (5) OF MORE ACRES AT A TME LEGEND: ---7- 5---- BONING COMOIR _ M. S _ PRolvsm MGxRl.1 tym, o, Me XXIR:U TB9 PROP® GONION M. O _ PROPOSED ODROLS (POST GRADING) GE DRA.MGE ------- PTOOSEDEASEMENT DND WNDT DIBTHAD ARF/5 HMDYIII' UlE EML90N WNINOL BIAWET — S.TMOI MINE (1,3190 Y S) — IN UNE - BOHT-O- ~ HAUL ROAD p2A3 OmTNG TREE — _ CONSTRUCTION ACCESS N PVIONCIA`II RY P EfC�MlNP°" D .® Z SCALE IN FEET fib ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758-3080 vAVAv.allimt-Inc.com PROJECT TEAM DATA pF511:X0): Z of TAS PI NO: a30-0020 J 6 D_ 6 of 8 J a O Z ~ z bZO U 3 CL z O w U Q � le x W o 5 a Z< i IM w z Z M a g y W M a Q W v �: W H n.nby TIED, ,Iml INT aloe, ,,-41-11.n, n, nme,1 ... prepoM by me o ntle, my mnn pemaon one mm I o e.N U.—d! PROITSSIONAL ENGINEER untln Me Mn. of he State of MINNESOTA MAH W6OI. FE Deb Lead— No QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DAT PROJECT TEAM DATA pF511:X0): WR DRAWN: TAS PI NO: a30-0020 6 GHEET 6 of 8 nrnwinn name: K\2020\200090\elan sM•e[•\Wetland Rehah\2nnn9nascn. dwn Dec n3. 2n2n — 6�ttnm P P P l,Y Y m fi 9Mp YI pp6e �e ° �€ €�g j9$mm a f y3•a^ 9n $ �P 1Py � �I 1 gE' 3Il R €g3p gtl pFa Prp P Y mp P2jle (n 1 1 331"19 Yym 6C�p i dY f iAY 111i: dY�sPP �iPf �AN9F Op lit 1 0 `N R•4R g� z z I $p a° R m ssq > u $g $ R a °' g g ! Z 1 I �g a ^� � €g{i 1p' � gg !{ 4$ i € g� i! �� z g¢r�R D >! lgi 1 a s z a z A R ai n P w P° rA I g O R F i O s w k " u zi s s R ti� gg �g�a� geg1 Ii { am 1 a g a s sA @ g i8 s� IN T a iga i Z R i€ '� p 8� a s y a� i m i I Rn � yR d I O s9 i d E s O i �,q° R fiR , ) � 0 as gSg yay S°S 1 q € m �g 1 g p � ° i ° €4y!C q { g 8 y g g Tag @'y° $5 °€i �� a 9Li $g p is i c' i A i 4A 6€ d P z A € i€ Z a 3ge 9 yD n p M ,_ 45pp5 9d 5 Aw S 4 m �� 3# 7! 8` D a a"�fi R6il R1• gf4 C 4M 4 $ a 2 Z ,� .. o D € 4 D 99 g PIII 6"s w siR A R € m a§ag € Zy gE gg�g3j 8 _ Al yy§�g , p g I O° �1, R I XbXiB 1 L J] � 9 Y i R� p fTl W �1,� 9 i -NJ � p� � R q! i� q � Z '"aa a a a ° g eii a m€ [4 :! ; a� A �� V ao G PPS 9 a igig o g3 Cgs g a: ° ys�rill LI ii qgq FF1 q Z 4q € FFp�3Rai� F�F gp Rs g �i I pgR� " 92. a IES Id A! A @xp a gp �4 gpi 7epA ni qa0� .iy IngyR 6�g$g 49 a� aL R9"F i R a g II Z �A94 d€4pJ� $A4p a pR fl9 A$3i A PSS IF gg,, g3g3'" kpA eQ° R gg7R7 R m •� 9 X55 �Mygg9999� R 3sya gzg C�! ip SAS g�T pi1 4i 4 @g@93 LF qg8/A P LAP '� : �a ~�p B 4ggFp ��A C �4 ��iapap P•e8 YB € Alg A 4pe Ig 6 i m :�gp ; sE i€! i 4 iI 9€ ,A IN y 11 1 s € AR�ii n= 3• v x y � ° 11up, 13 I 119X110, 151111 i yzy R 0i d 2 Q �r �1 P �sp3 I• 11 77 A L r � IT mo loll gill A9A Aiq. g. d$A AO .i' gill ~ �A i3f 11E 44Iglg iia O 11G11m !41 Z fd"Is€i€ l•qR 3a a ail! ielE Iltl a ° ii ! i{ s! ,I,EAin ✓l +R a !E•Aii 1 i II I sl i i; I a 'a!{ it Ph s0, S jI n A arP •• ps pS � 1 , !I;{!° In II{ ; ,. �;! 1; P g�yg�piEi � as i Pt 1 I EI'a iiti;ss lila {! ! A R EIO{ i ,plfi l = { g I�• ! . AI Ii: a P 14.4 41 ,a�All,alfa ~+l+II11, Illi•+j9 '9 it';IEI� a It �,s � III"@ +a .I•, , a a a i .Alii � ; � Ida;�i, �1 iil,ll� i illi A� A i6;ii I ji !fl04 i + p a illiau� i � � fa 1,6 l;° s a 1 • iaa;i H, lig l a Pin a �� 9 � ! F �l�Ag!•nii i° ,,11! 9 fit! I;fE l e M-., t i !! ! • 11 -Pp. lip! r e' g!j!p M jjb� jal lip Al II jl�g ti, II ° II ; 111 Pil A �lA A a T.. i r"•r R � ,,11! 9 fit! ERHART/BLANSKI/CITY WETLAND ALTERATION D CHANHASSEN, MN u' u °} : r LVAi \ gy WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT z 8 > Z i ➢ a' A g EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTOL NOTES AND DETAILS P I;fE l e M-., t i !! ! • 11 -Pp. lip! r e' g!j!p M jjb� jal � f 0,i ° t'II II jl�g ti, II ° II ; iS I Pil A �lA A a All, i � R � � s ° iiil ;if afla ,10 g sli ERHART/BLANSKI/CITY WETLAND ALTERATION D CHANHASSEN, MN u' u °} : r LVAi \ gy WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT z 8 > Z i ➢ a' A g EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTOL NOTES AND DETAILS P T . uq'•, .iJ. WEPLAND4 N CIASWNGTpR--- II MANAGE 2 CITY. MEDIUM -FREEING BUFFER REOUMEMENR: I J M MIN.,AP AVG., W MAX R. 2VMN.13a SBN-01 /I JAI Ie r r 1 Ill lll]ll/j �l/l�lf IJ JI IIJI111111111A\\�\� ��al•� b� l /lillll/ \ f TWE 3 M E) TO REMAIN UNDISTINIPAR WETLAND 2 DDDRIli Ilili'I NMI - It t M- N Y7 1 `l 1. CUTE f+9P11ER siATE CIES WL AT C51-ISIiUT3 FT1R LaUnNG NL _ ,1 yJii,�pp' 1 � OF n1E WgiK. T4E /m /' / � I�I SEI ;113 3 TWE 3 M E) TO REMAIN UNDISTINIPAR WETLAND 2 DDDRIli Ilili'I NMI - It t M- N PLANTING NOTES: `l 1. CUTE f+9P11ER siATE CIES WL AT C51-ISIiUT3 FT1R LaUnNG NL x UNDERGROUND MUTTER ND N.GD OYYGE 10 UPIEB DUMB THE COURSE � OF n1E WgiK. T4E 8 SUBSgLS TO BE USED W WEIRTON AREAS. NET TOPSOIL CONTAINING ORGANIC 8 of 8 PAZ OR A SLID HW" • J. COMPIEMLY GWWPR ALL MONS EOR A PETtlW OF ONE YEAR BEGNMG AT t n1E DAM OF MCEPWICE. MYZ NL REflACEIEN(5 P6OEbTLY (FS PEN Be ' I CLASSIFiunoN ASSUMED: NRECTNIN OF 06mm. \ 4. MVRNN ALL PVM whiWS. NCLUNNG MORNING. UNIL THE TINE OF A6.f➢uIICE :NANA M PPoCRD 5, CCORgNATE NL LANDSCAPE YSLWAIION WITH GENERAL CCMP/LTgi. �\I V„ 6. SHEEP AM MASH NL PAHO SURFACES NO RFLUS HL DEBRIS RF9hnNO - f. I BUFRPREDWNUCB-R: RU'FFRTEQUIRE TR(M VNDSCAPE OPERATIONS. \-` �p PO-'C,•\NPR >, BELONG. PWFTNG. RACEMEM CF STRAW WLCH. AND MNEIF)NHCE WILL BE _ -/// / 30'M1NllF NW3p'SBN-OIYRRNNPD CONDUCTED BY A CONTMLTOR SPECUdLOBIG N ESTABUSHMENT AND [[\ WINME ANCE OE NATNE PLANT COMMUNITIES. POSSIBLE BRAS INCUAE MINNESOTA NAtWE LM➢nTJFE 09 PPNME RESTORATIONS. MSSIFIGTON ASWMEp; MAXAGEFFERFE UIREJIM-RPNCWD BUFFED Awl. FMFN2 2V MIX,W' AW., BD' MAX-RPKWp '\ �-��SLIBDI\n ON CONCEPT �_PRELMINARY Fl1NRE � � R�� I� J —\ 1 1 .nom / -.'Fb, \.�R9.� 1\\ SEED DISTURBED ARE \ \ Jp I t\ `�,� i l l / ALONG HAUU RO at 1\ \ �\\�4.�}I^�yI(, I(ll •�\ .'`9DE ADRESEE LEG SEED �PRELIMINARY FUTURE SUBDIVISION EP IK \ IRU RIRI+�, \;€60 ,T'`1\\�\ .,-,\ \\ \ !.• `�`� - �./ ,L� .` .., ,\ 1 j l` \ 0 I 10 eIN T JIT / I SCALE® P. PV NC COMML'TCR TO PROACED MMNIW.VCE (WOWING. SPOT SPRAYING. HAND FUWNG OF WEEDS) WRING EPSF THREE YEARS CF TIE DREIER. 8. CONTRACTOR TO PRWTDE WARRMHY OF SEEING AND PU NG ENSURING A SUDCESEF1JL ESTAI811RM ARO PR GAN E ALIXTN AL PINT . SNOI MM PONTOON OF THE PROJECT NOT MEET PETFORWANCE CRTFAM BELOW. SEED PLANTING NOTES: WET uFACdI SEED TAR w STATE 5® Mx 31-111 (FEET HEREON NH EST) SQA W SEEDING RATE TO 4 12 UBS/AAE (PURE UVE RB O ESD_9I+S�Nxv w STATE S® MIX $241 (EESIC PMIS GENERAL) SEEDING RATE TO BE Y.5 UBS/AOM (RUPEE UH SEED) Mln-, ST.E1In.Tw Mrc w STATE SEED IR( =-112 MW YEAR SFABl1zATOOX) SEIDNIO RATE TO W W LBS/AAE (RIE UVB SEED) APPLY SEED PER THE FtlILWRR MLW S"B", AREAS WITH WADOT iYl£ J (YdA CERT ME) WEED FREE) MLIE R F AT A RATE W 1-2 TOP PER ACRE N HAAS OF SEEDING uuCH SNOOD THEA BE DISC ANOEAm TO Hffi IT PROM EL— AWAr. SEEDING SHALL NOT BE APRIED W W RO-SILBBR MONTHS M .WE M - AUGUST L DORMANT (SOWNG/FN) OR MOST BODONG SHNL BE ACCEPTAHE WTTF LSI� OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES F HHIRC9£➢IMG ImU7E MRHm1AlRY BOB GALLOWS 6 WATER PER .1 BUYER TO MN/OOT OPEC 38134 FOR PROPER LASTµ TION DF NT1No-4fD. Au NATIVE SEEDS USED M TINS PROJECT SINE BE CERTIFIED TO SE OF NIRESOTA ORION BY TE MIMMTA O WHOVEIQIT ASSWATN (NCAA), 511E TD W PEPAREO BY LOOSENING TCPSIL TO A MRMW DEPTH OF J INCN6. THE ATE TO BE HARROWED OR RAKED FO LOVING SEEDING. NID THEN PAOEG USING A CLLTFPACK R OR E0.FVA ENT, SEE MNWT SEEDING NAHUµ FOR REfFAfNCE MNNTNN REFOLD MEAS BY WATEION& FEMLLOIING AND IMPLANTERS AS NECESSARY TO ESTAIWSH A UAFIBEY DENSE STAID OF TIE SOEOF® BIASSES wR ACCEPTED. ANY AREAS FINING TO ESTA4191 A STAND MALL BE RESEEDED. IEiFFT61IID ADO REWURCHED RIENEVER TOS VEGETATVE COVER 15 NOT ACHENE➢. SING. SNAIL CI6CRN IN ALL RESPECTS TO THESE SPECIFICATIONS THE CCORRAGM11 SNAIL WAR ANY DMMGE TO TIE WOR( AREAS RE4LTNG FRpF EP09UA NID/W EIi1FTIT. 11E CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR DNIAGE. INCU.gNG REGRADING, Rte'. ETG AS NECESSARY, BEFORE SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE OCCIAS REFER TO MN STATE SEED NIL NMVN, MINNESOTA WEBAID RESTORATION GIDE AND NATW VI£TATCN EST191411ENT EMIANf£LEFR IIDF3IES E H -noun. ems_••.. ••ems .w ME . NE OETflDPXEM ]PENCIL ............. AnaRDmure R,, ROW elRDrxY WEIINRD MIFFER RNXWRY ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Su Re 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.759.3080 w .alliarR-inc.com z DESIGNED: Mx O x PROJECT NO: 22o-DO90 8 SHEET 8 of 8 l \ LuQ Be ' I CLASSIFiunoN ASSUMED: \ :NANA M PPoCRD ; \ �\I V„ - f. I BUFRPREDWNUCB-R: RU'FFRTEQUIRE /— J \-` �p PO-'C,•\NPR 1 _ -/// / 30'M1NllF NW3p'SBN-OIYRRNNPD [[\ _-^ im W W 3 ME) -TEAM STABBJZATioN I SET) Mlx SEE IEEiFID - `•Y `� O z l � i i , ,1 J ` I a \ 5 o a IK \ IRU RIRI+�, \;€60 ,T'`1\\�\ .,-,\ \\ \ !.• `�`� - �./ ,L� .` .., ,\ 1 j l` \ 0 I 10 eIN T JIT / I SCALE® P. PV NC COMML'TCR TO PROACED MMNIW.VCE (WOWING. SPOT SPRAYING. HAND FUWNG OF WEEDS) WRING EPSF THREE YEARS CF TIE DREIER. 8. CONTRACTOR TO PRWTDE WARRMHY OF SEEING AND PU NG ENSURING A SUDCESEF1JL ESTAI811RM ARO PR GAN E ALIXTN AL PINT . SNOI MM PONTOON OF THE PROJECT NOT MEET PETFORWANCE CRTFAM BELOW. SEED PLANTING NOTES: WET uFACdI SEED TAR w STATE 5® Mx 31-111 (FEET HEREON NH EST) SQA W SEEDING RATE TO 4 12 UBS/AAE (PURE UVE RB O ESD_9I+S�Nxv w STATE S® MIX $241 (EESIC PMIS GENERAL) SEEDING RATE TO BE Y.5 UBS/AOM (RUPEE UH SEED) Mln-, ST.E1In.Tw Mrc w STATE SEED IR( =-112 MW YEAR SFABl1zATOOX) SEIDNIO RATE TO W W LBS/AAE (RIE UVB SEED) APPLY SEED PER THE FtlILWRR MLW S"B", AREAS WITH WADOT iYl£ J (YdA CERT ME) WEED FREE) MLIE R F AT A RATE W 1-2 TOP PER ACRE N HAAS OF SEEDING uuCH SNOOD THEA BE DISC ANOEAm TO Hffi IT PROM EL— AWAr. SEEDING SHALL NOT BE APRIED W W RO-SILBBR MONTHS M .WE M - AUGUST L DORMANT (SOWNG/FN) OR MOST BODONG SHNL BE ACCEPTAHE WTTF LSI� OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES F HHIRC9£➢IMG ImU7E MRHm1AlRY BOB GALLOWS 6 WATER PER .1 BUYER TO MN/OOT OPEC 38134 FOR PROPER LASTµ TION DF NT1No-4fD. Au NATIVE SEEDS USED M TINS PROJECT SINE BE CERTIFIED TO SE OF NIRESOTA ORION BY TE MIMMTA O WHOVEIQIT ASSWATN (NCAA), 511E TD W PEPAREO BY LOOSENING TCPSIL TO A MRMW DEPTH OF J INCN6. THE ATE TO BE HARROWED OR RAKED FO LOVING SEEDING. NID THEN PAOEG USING A CLLTFPACK R OR E0.FVA ENT, SEE MNWT SEEDING NAHUµ FOR REfFAfNCE MNNTNN REFOLD MEAS BY WATEION& FEMLLOIING AND IMPLANTERS AS NECESSARY TO ESTAIWSH A UAFIBEY DENSE STAID OF TIE SOEOF® BIASSES wR ACCEPTED. ANY AREAS FINING TO ESTA4191 A STAND MALL BE RESEEDED. IEiFFT61IID ADO REWURCHED RIENEVER TOS VEGETATVE COVER 15 NOT ACHENE➢. SING. SNAIL CI6CRN IN ALL RESPECTS TO THESE SPECIFICATIONS THE CCORRAGM11 SNAIL WAR ANY DMMGE TO TIE WOR( AREAS RE4LTNG FRpF EP09UA NID/W EIi1FTIT. 11E CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR DNIAGE. INCU.gNG REGRADING, Rte'. ETG AS NECESSARY, BEFORE SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE OCCIAS REFER TO MN STATE SEED NIL NMVN, MINNESOTA WEBAID RESTORATION GIDE AND NATW VI£TATCN EST191411ENT EMIANf£LEFR IIDF3IES E H -noun. ems_••.. ••ems .w ME . NE OETflDPXEM ]PENCIL ............. AnaRDmure R,, ROW elRDrxY WEIINRD MIFFER RNXWRY ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Su Re 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.759.3080 w .alliarR-inc.com z DESIGNED: Mx O x PROJECT NO: 22o-DO90 8 SHEET 8 of 8 LuQ Be ' I CLASSIFiunoN ASSUMED: \ :NANA M PPoCRD ; \ �\I V„ - f. I BUFRPREDWNUCB-R: RU'FFRTEQUIRE /— J \-` �p PO-'C,•\NPR 1 _ -/// / 30'M1NllF NW3p'SBN-OIYRRNNPD [[\ E,, .. im W W 3 ME) -TEAM STABBJZATioN SET) Mlx SEE IEEiFID - O z 5 ` I a \ 5 o a IK \ IRU RIRI+�, \;€60 ,T'`1\\�\ .,-,\ \\ \ !.• `�`� - �./ ,L� .` .., ,\ 1 j l` \ 0 I 10 eIN T JIT / I SCALE® P. PV NC COMML'TCR TO PROACED MMNIW.VCE (WOWING. SPOT SPRAYING. HAND FUWNG OF WEEDS) WRING EPSF THREE YEARS CF TIE DREIER. 8. CONTRACTOR TO PRWTDE WARRMHY OF SEEING AND PU NG ENSURING A SUDCESEF1JL ESTAI811RM ARO PR GAN E ALIXTN AL PINT . SNOI MM PONTOON OF THE PROJECT NOT MEET PETFORWANCE CRTFAM BELOW. SEED PLANTING NOTES: WET uFACdI SEED TAR w STATE 5® Mx 31-111 (FEET HEREON NH EST) SQA W SEEDING RATE TO 4 12 UBS/AAE (PURE UVE RB O ESD_9I+S�Nxv w STATE S® MIX $241 (EESIC PMIS GENERAL) SEEDING RATE TO BE Y.5 UBS/AOM (RUPEE UH SEED) Mln-, ST.E1In.Tw Mrc w STATE SEED IR( =-112 MW YEAR SFABl1zATOOX) SEIDNIO RATE TO W W LBS/AAE (RIE UVB SEED) APPLY SEED PER THE FtlILWRR MLW S"B", AREAS WITH WADOT iYl£ J (YdA CERT ME) WEED FREE) MLIE R F AT A RATE W 1-2 TOP PER ACRE N HAAS OF SEEDING uuCH SNOOD THEA BE DISC ANOEAm TO Hffi IT PROM EL— AWAr. SEEDING SHALL NOT BE APRIED W W RO-SILBBR MONTHS M .WE M - AUGUST L DORMANT (SOWNG/FN) OR MOST BODONG SHNL BE ACCEPTAHE WTTF LSI� OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES F HHIRC9£➢IMG ImU7E MRHm1AlRY BOB GALLOWS 6 WATER PER .1 BUYER TO MN/OOT OPEC 38134 FOR PROPER LASTµ TION DF NT1No-4fD. Au NATIVE SEEDS USED M TINS PROJECT SINE BE CERTIFIED TO SE OF NIRESOTA ORION BY TE MIMMTA O WHOVEIQIT ASSWATN (NCAA), 511E TD W PEPAREO BY LOOSENING TCPSIL TO A MRMW DEPTH OF J INCN6. THE ATE TO BE HARROWED OR RAKED FO LOVING SEEDING. NID THEN PAOEG USING A CLLTFPACK R OR E0.FVA ENT, SEE MNWT SEEDING NAHUµ FOR REfFAfNCE MNNTNN REFOLD MEAS BY WATEION& FEMLLOIING AND IMPLANTERS AS NECESSARY TO ESTAIWSH A UAFIBEY DENSE STAID OF TIE SOEOF® BIASSES wR ACCEPTED. ANY AREAS FINING TO ESTA4191 A STAND MALL BE RESEEDED. IEiFFT61IID ADO REWURCHED RIENEVER TOS VEGETATVE COVER 15 NOT ACHENE➢. SING. SNAIL CI6CRN IN ALL RESPECTS TO THESE SPECIFICATIONS THE CCORRAGM11 SNAIL WAR ANY DMMGE TO TIE WOR( AREAS RE4LTNG FRpF EP09UA NID/W EIi1FTIT. 11E CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR DNIAGE. INCU.gNG REGRADING, Rte'. ETG AS NECESSARY, BEFORE SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE OCCIAS REFER TO MN STATE SEED NIL NMVN, MINNESOTA WEBAID RESTORATION GIDE AND NATW VI£TATCN EST191411ENT EMIANf£LEFR IIDF3IES E H -noun. ems_••.. ••ems .w ME . NE OETflDPXEM ]PENCIL ............. AnaRDmure R,, ROW elRDrxY WEIINRD MIFFER RNXWRY ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Su Re 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.759.3080 w .alliarR-inc.com z DESIGNED: Mx O x PROJECT NO: 22o-DO90 8 SHEET 8 of 8 LuQ 1" J Q 0 z E,, .. im W W 3 IL O z 5 a 5 o a F W Z 2 RIC 5 W v 3 2 7-.e.mo ^W mlv pl... P.em11N1h. ' w "-J 6I M. Ponas O e., -, mntl p.,W— -d 11.1 1 dJN u.....B JIDSCA.PE ARCHITECT l/o u,d,r IM1. 1— ai IR. Slcie u1 MINNESOTA MARX NBRON& . Pu QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: Mx OPAR.: x PROJECT NO: 22o-DO90 8 SHEET 8 of 8 ERHAR TIBLANSKIICITY WETLAND ALTERATION CHA NHA SSEN, MINNESOTA t » EXISTING FOXWOOD DEVELOPMENT t Ir I 0 ..-- --- - �. _... W o d I i ,L I / �. _ i i , PRELIMINARY FUTURE SUBDIVISION CONCEPT WETLAND 2 ti HERON OREJ�P� ROSE-� P G DOVE CT. J O� MALT ARD c) �FQ'GPG�' °1 SUSAN V1' TERN CTN 4 G. O� .HILLS DR.2 THRUSH qy y z N( CT. e s q'�^✓C Q� cT BARBARAv� J�PN DR. O CT. 6— c,� n a 65. JERSEY WAY 08. BETHESDA CIR. FRANKLIN LA. MADISON DR. JEFFERSON D 7- ?t0 O 17 VHOMES�TEAD' PIONEER N 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET L I DEVELOPER x CT. N �� GG 117. TOFT COVE ' kh5 126� , a 9 9 118. WALDORF CT. U ST. 119. LONG MEADOW PT. U 132' M RICE CT. 120. HEMLOCK CIR. Zl. PRF i0crr/��— ,l \ELD 14( su� NNJ DEERF00T TR. C— d� 2 a W. 96th ST. k 4� i 5 a � o BRAMBLE QPp� Q` SEE x Z VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE S 0 � r t ` Q � w t f m I J Q co e I Z e Q L k z f � 1.V W W 146. PARKLAND WAY z 147. SHOREVIEW CT. 11 148. GREENVIEW DR. of t LLI i a ry' z W f J f t 'r E ti HERON OREJ�P� ROSE-� P G DOVE CT. J O� MALT ARD c) �FQ'GPG�' °1 SUSAN V1' TERN CTN 4 G. O� .HILLS DR.2 THRUSH qy y z N( CT. e s q'�^✓C Q� cT BARBARAv� J�PN DR. O CT. 6— c,� n a 65. JERSEY WAY 08. BETHESDA CIR. FRANKLIN LA. MADISON DR. JEFFERSON D 7- ?t0 O 17 VHOMES�TEAD' PIONEER N 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET L I DEVELOPER x CT. N �� GG 117. TOFT COVE ' kh5 126� , a 9 9 118. WALDORF CT. U ST. 119. LONG MEADOW PT. U 132' M RICE CT. 120. HEMLOCK CIR. Zl. PRF i0crr/��— ,l \ELD 14( su� NNJ DEERF00T TR. C— d� 2 a W. 96th ST. k 4� i 5 a � o BRAMBLE QPp� Q` SEE x Z VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE S s 1—CT a OLA � 4 STWOOD MEADOWLARK SHEET INDEX NOe COVER SHEET 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2 SITE PLAN 3 WETLAND EXCAVATION/GRADING PLAN 4 SPOIL PILE/GRADING PLAN 5 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 6 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS 7 RESTORATION PLAN 8 1�'1416 BLACK CHERRY DEVELOPMENT, LLC 14500 MARTIN DRIVE, SUITE 3000 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 CONTACT: TIM ERHART PH: 612-963-0733 CONSULTANT ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. 733 MARQUETTE AVENUE SUITE 700 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 PH: 612-758-3080 FX: 612-758-3099 ENGINEER MARK RAUSCH LICENSE NO. 43480 EM: mrausch@alliant-inc.com SURVEYOR N PETER GOERS LICENSE NO. 44110 EM: pgoers@alliant-inc.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MARK KRONBECK LICENSE NO. 26222 EM: mkronbeck@alliant-inc.com WETLAND SCIENTIST ADAM CAMERON KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY EM: adam@kjolhaugenv.com .zr V ' a ovs � ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com 0 Q ti w m > W J Q co e Q Z Q L k z Rile/a_ 1.V W W 146. PARKLAND WAY z 147. SHOREVIEW CT. LL 148. GREENVIEW DR. _ s 1—CT a OLA � 4 STWOOD MEADOWLARK SHEET INDEX NOe COVER SHEET 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2 SITE PLAN 3 WETLAND EXCAVATION/GRADING PLAN 4 SPOIL PILE/GRADING PLAN 5 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 6 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS 7 RESTORATION PLAN 8 1�'1416 BLACK CHERRY DEVELOPMENT, LLC 14500 MARTIN DRIVE, SUITE 3000 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 CONTACT: TIM ERHART PH: 612-963-0733 CONSULTANT ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. 733 MARQUETTE AVENUE SUITE 700 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 PH: 612-758-3080 FX: 612-758-3099 ENGINEER MARK RAUSCH LICENSE NO. 43480 EM: mrausch@alliant-inc.com SURVEYOR N PETER GOERS LICENSE NO. 44110 EM: pgoers@alliant-inc.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MARK KRONBECK LICENSE NO. 26222 EM: mkronbeck@alliant-inc.com WETLAND SCIENTIST ADAM CAMERON KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY EM: adam@kjolhaugenv.com .zr V ' a ovs � ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com I hereby certify i specification, or prepared by me direct supervisior am a duly Licen PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA F- 0 Q W Q Q W Z Q Z 1.V V W N U z LLI Q a 2 z W v I hereby certify i specification, or prepared by me direct supervisior am a duly Licen PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA F- hat this plan, report was or under my and that I ;ed GINEER under State of MARK RAUSCH, PE Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 12-4-2020 ICITY SUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: TAS PROJECT NO: 220-0090 I SHEET 1 of 8 I.I. a O Q W Q Z 1.V W �i U hat this plan, report was or under my and that I ;ed GINEER under State of MARK RAUSCH, PE Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 12-4-2020 ICITY SUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: TAS PROJECT NO: 220-0090 I SHEET 1 of 8 p �D' 7 rx 13 LI OUTLOT E A ;4 A X, ii I f I f N 01 Sk x it v(l f ��,�; � � ��I�,�!�I �� 111 ` � � � � � ,-� __ _ -� � ' t )6� Iiii - — I I" ill I 1;� 4 OF SW 1 4 EC. �?4.� C. SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 62.8 FEET OF SW I/ Af, Z jjjl1,11111;11 1 wl� !J, 60 T j .896'. X WETLAND #2 21V x if x, 4�\ OUTLOT D k, 23 Of23 -0-- 0 TEM�WAW CUL-DEQkCOIZ2 1-7 AkiR•D6 fZ 1111T I < \A jX j_._ _.,_.. — f..'�� v 01 (Z IWI REFERENCE LINE FOR FT. TELEPHONE EASM r �d 9 11 1 BU kq -1 il 1. 0 PER DOC. 40� It Q A, J C-3 '7F SE COR. L b 50 9-Y TSEC. 2J I 1 4849,0 9 o44 Do 1 \-\ W00e ST Yd o52 o14 075 2 -4 1 Po I -3420 1 � 43 V) -0 8 1 C4. o97k t,- -48b WETLAND #4 -�-)-o482- X , , I, , & 953 '054 01, W�Ezr V 48k �f , to ,,A62 OCATED BY f ?99 0 GINEERIN yl '057 IN 065 1 o66 'A 9/2020 3 W23�- 467 -96� UM 4 lk iil�ll 'Il o6 Nk o58" 056._, 9%96 07 -07 `ft22� \ .0 ) - , '00 2.1, � 233 -, tff, ),1 1, ql - - .... f --- 231 022 5 326 j 0 41?S- lk459- JW �l �ETLAND #3 , E A202; \ Uj 2230Q�2�4 204 jif 11,1, 1p 82 9-t) 77t q20' OJOS t� 85,04, - 3,6 k) If 0 -221 IJ it Q8�6% -220 ol�,Y r' 1111if 219 4- Cti24 Its, I, 1-204" 0 40 - I CO I P -273 0218 6378.7 -2121 00 0�12 a2,13 - I �'ol 90193 ��44 5 It �O IV //, - - -, no -J- 472 2� 0i - go', /1 /44,6 5 03 6r //04�4 i j 9 Z IJ W4 12 to f1l 0 \0_183_ ol97 o449 oca 0 1 1 0450 If Z61 0414 .'3p 701 3 1 d7 0 )tItt X FOR �J�J/0442 I- 57,6/7// _--182 6 //Z --- 3 1 1 1 11 A 3 114-4-9 64 j 7 5 11 It 6'�2 '92 04 6 V 0 it t\ �54 '04 1, 3 3 0247 440' 1 If Al A/ 2 d, ro 06 o"170 �2796 _7'� ;Y 3 /� t -_� f f � � � : �f I � ,}�� \vvv '�`��r w 41 0-352 "C77 Iji A _0 /ogee!4 f hKR[COUTLFT o A/ Z 49 2 YR�AININ S 5 ARA 4 r.j 4 f 1. 4 Ile 4 If SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT PEF L If DOC. NO. 6763 Ln 0 f /Ii. al Cc i Cc 1\ I V, If i'l TILIfY EASEMENTS 4R - PL T OF BUTTERNUT RIDGE1 AD N LINE OF 'THE IS \d OA DRjINAGE & U L 0 OF NW OF `NW N11 0, l- Lo N 25 -T, F- Cj -4 00 C3 N 00 0 0 V) LO 00 (n If Z /AR/Y/A ��'R C S T�MP E Z 0 0 0 0 LLI z \ 11 - � QLr) z W Z ✓ 2: Z 8 W Z , ---------- - EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND: 0 SET CAP IRON MONUMENT 18425 9 FOUND IRON MONUMENT (j) CARVER COUNTY CIM X WATER VALVE M TELEPHONE BOX (S) SANITARY MANHOLE SIGN FIRE HYDRANT @ CLEAN OUT E ELECTRIC BOX FT R1 TRANSFORMER -G- GAS SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN I WATERMAIN WETLAND DELINEATION — — — — — — — EDGE OF WATER 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612,758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com z 0 LLj a. LLI U) 0 z .j 0 LLI z z 0 LLI a Z z U C/) W W U) Z Ld 3: W C) I hereby certify i specification, or prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licem PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA MARK RAUSCH, PE F- LLj a. Z U) 0 z 0 LLI z 0 o a Z z F- C/) W W hat this plan, report was or under my and that I led GINEER under 3tate of Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 12-4-2020 ICITY SUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: TAS PROJECT NO: 220-0090 SHEET 2 of 8 CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE DEWATERING PLAN (AS NECESSARY) 1 -1_ � 1 1 r � � 1 WETLAND 3 CLASSIFICATION ASSUMED: MANAGE 2 - CITY, MEDIUM - RPBCWD BUFFER REQUIREMENTS: 20' MIN.,40' AVG., 80' MAX- RPBCWD 20' MIN. + 30' SBK - CITY EXISTING GRADE SITE DATA: PARCELS PARTIALLY PID: 250240811 DAVID & MARY BLANSKI INCLUDED IN WETLAND 252990510 CITY OF CHANHASSEN ALTERATION CONSTRUCTION. 251550022 TIMOTHY & DAWNE ERHART WETLANDS DEPICTED PER KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL DELINEATION SITE LEGEND: -WL- FEW L C PROPOSED EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE LOT LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY WETLAND BOUNDARY HAUL ROAD EXISTING WETLAND BUFFER FUTURE WETLAND BUFFER* *TO BE PROVIDED WITH PLATTING OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT EXISTING WETLAND BUFFER MONUMENT N 0 50 100 200 SCALE IN FEET EDGE OF HAUL ROAD EXISTING O TREE H CANOPY MIN 15' LU MAX 20' J (FIELD FIT) W SLOPE w x FUTURE BUFFER LIMIT DELINEATED WETLAND EDGE DO NOT DISTURB WETLAND SIDE OF SILT FENCE A' -At SILT FENCE HAUL ROAD SECTION NOT TO SCALE ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Z O H Q Z LU J Q W Z J Q LU Z z g CL U H Y N Z z CIO z LLJ aa = z oC a W 0 I hereby certify t specification, or prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licen: PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA MARK RAUSCH, PE Fn iat this plan, 'sport was or under my and that I ed 'INEER under ;tate of Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 12-4-2020 ICITY SUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: TAS PROJECT NO: 220-0090 �J o '-'- F � � SHEET 3 of 8 a Z O Q W H J Q p Z z g CL w H Fn iat this plan, 'sport was or under my and that I ed 'INEER under ;tate of Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 12-4-2020 ICITY SUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: TAS PROJECT NO: 220-0090 �J o '-'- F � � SHEET 3 of 8 "PEI HWL , BASIN, BASIN 2 891 r ®`mss"1 -`� r .- ..s- �C'..-wxa_ �_ .� i l y: t iti 'i —.I ' (11 V i ji Y t a ;t(`�` �f` f r,/ �� /� "" `""`�-^",.-""n -''. - _ / '"'"� �✓'-„"' :.%^"-,," Y.Y _v-._� _.�- �� , atv�� V, 4- L;8I I I rtl i ;r r� / , eo2 ` � .-., i^-' � ! ! r �.� � �—._ � '/''..-�»� _, � '"..-.•."'•, r� "" H � ,.-,-� "�'" - --" .__.— _-.—....- ~�. ..... � t °� � 1 I� i. � �'� � Ili �I �� I i f 1 EXISTING FOXWOOD t CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE DEVELOPMENT r r 1 / ✓, r rYt t l t / I/VI j 1/ i tr L' �� "� 0111 ,C)I i��, �j�,'I �� I�,��i/fir/f��'• .� `•.�� 74, yl L I�!E X11 �l • �r•j�� CO TO CLEAR VEGETAT NTRAS ACTOR REQUIRED, I� WITHIN GRADING LIMITS. ' WETLAND o CLASSIFICATION ASSUMED: f��"-�� MANAGE 2 - CITY, MEDIUM - RPBCWD t • • a, Ot1TL T -E -BUFFER REQUIREMENTS: ... • • • • r� 20' MIN.,40' AVG., 80' MAX - RPBCWD 20' MIN. + 30'SBK - CITY i It t{ 892/ ti i ii It @{\t 877 ; DEWATERING PLAN (AS NECESSARY) ,,% I } l �,P l .l �J� �llll�� ..._. �� II�IIIIIIIi ` 1 `V \} •� III I'M 1 1111 1 % t II I A { WETLAND GRADING SHOWN IS MAXIMUM EXTENTS POSSIBLE. ACTUAL GRADING WORK TO BE FIELD CONSTRUCTED BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS OF WETLAND. CONTRACTOR TO \ COORDINATE WITH PROPERTY OWNER AND WETLAND SCIENTIST FOR FINAL GRADING. 9 x�tt, 't ' I it B' l ' �1\' TRANSITION FROM 5 1 i II i I � � � � � � � � � 1 � T F'f 3 W 1 All, r DO NOT DISTURB. I ,. D KJOLHAUG REP TO FLAG WETLAND 4 i I l � i pit 1 f i 1 t � ' lir. � !• r "— r r ;ro4 1�.1 deo •/ .. i 3 I I f' jj - / I 1.078.1. EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING WETLAND WETLAND WETLAND TYPE 3 TYPE 3 DO NOT EDGE EDGE EDGE DISTURB 10' 15'± OUTSIDE OF I DO NOT DISTURB 10:1 SLOP WETLAND E LIMIT 880'-879'± S<OpF CF \� 023 0120 4 -1 Y} \ - s PRELIMINARY FUTURE SUBDIVISION CONCEPT P240 [5[ 030 9(j" TRANSITION FROM 5:1 31 SLOPE TO 10:1. m SLOPE TO 10:1. XV��k,\'\\\\ COMPLETE MINOR 879 GRADING AS C� �j� % NECESSARY TO INSTALL TEMPORARY HA ' UL ROAD -44!♦ 11- p V 012 f� 123 l 'x122 9S \ 0 13 Ip 46 1 B1_1131 TYPICAL GRADING CROSS SECTION NOT TO SCALE EXISTING WETLAND EDGE 15'± T 10' DO NOT DISTURB 1 SUOPE OUTSIDE OF 10: WETLAND LIMIT 5� OP- 880'-879'± NORMAL WATER LEVEL 87� GRADING NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE ADJACENT ROADWAYS FREE OF DEBRIS AND PREVENT THE OFF—SITE TRACKING OF SOIL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 2. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, AT (800)252-1166, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 3. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAKE SURE THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS RECEIVED AND THOROUGHLY REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY ALL OF THE PERMITTING AUTHORITIES. 4. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST DISCUSS DEWATERING PLANS WITH ALL SUBCONTRACTORS TO VERIFY NPDES REQUIREMENTS. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR SHOULD CONSULT WITH EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR AND ENGINEER TO DETERMINE APPROPRIATE METHOD. 5. REFER TO EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE LOCATIONS. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK: CUT: 21,216 CUBIC YARDS t FILL: ASSUMED 0 DISTURBED AREA: 3.669 ACRES ± GRADING LEGEND: 0243 EXISTING TREE 1 -, EXISTING CONTOUR 789 PROPOSED CONTOUR — — PROPOSED EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE W — — SETBACK LINE — LOT LINE — — RIGHT—OF—WAY WETLAND BOUNDARY EXISTING WETLAND BUFFER WL FUTRUE WETLAND BUFFER* *TO BE PROVIDED WITH PLATTING OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT U TYPE 3 WETLAND—DO NOT DISTURB V HAUL ROAD \vv 0lV� No, 1401 C 10' 10' 10' —BENC OP 879'± C1_C1 NATURAL WETLAND OUTLET CROSS SECTION NOT TO SCALE CARIES N 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET NATURAL EXISTING GRADE TO DOWNSTREAM WETLAND ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com I hereby certify t specification, or prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licen: PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA MARK RAUSCH, PE O QZ a.J a a 0 W J a LU � Z O Q LU W U V Q w 0 0 Z 5 F_ Z m W a a = Z � a W U I hereby certify t specification, or prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licen: PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA MARK RAUSCH, PE hat this plan, report was or under my and that I ed GINEER under hate of Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: TAS PROJECT NO: 220-0090 SHEET 4 of 8 QZ a.J a 0 � oc a LU � O O Q W U Q w 0 0 5 5 F_ IIII- hat this plan, report was or under my and that I ed GINEER under hate of Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: TAS PROJECT NO: 220-0090 SHEET 4 of 8 r f .` .` '.-,-__. ,s -"`^..ate.: y,;yf,�y .T. .. .-. '"'�" .,_ .' y-: �✓'�_..•-..•.' , i � I ,: ttt 0481 ° 77 �� e �� O —/' =��` •1, \� � ...._..__Jj/`/f�w�.,My � e•""+..�.ax, 71 _.._..... v4ro '---.. `�.-_.•."" t'-- �..y. I- - • .{ "."" i '"�--"' �% .,,^^'. �y o 33 8�. �f./r a� 'o��$.. ```-'�`•. 307....- I� k,kA p241 3Q0 -02jg 0. ---- --` '--...} 5'0.w`-« 2 1 ---... _�,., SN,.•9 .,,,, .,,�• �-- ///I?o sT ^� t -. _ f-- { ;} ` i 2 4\ 'p 23 _._4 90 - ,�•..-..-�`"- bl i-- ,�,,,� 4 1 l _ ° �I 847$ 4"'"- 5l�/" .,4a\`a ��."•.. g 7�,-�- „_ ®._--03+2-e31 _ j.j 1-.. - .:L +—•~ 3e�•+..L'122 /..-"'"f "�� .✓/ oaq '. -•J,_ ,y'-.-...,'..ym_.,'''�"i �`'•0 st\1221 I - 41— O l 1\ \ °as3 i } ~ ~� -� '�•'•.,. ,yam - ,r r--�`-'-'- L ` ®r, r" '�-}..\ '`' I ;� a,� 1'i �``... \ �� \ °._ A275 ? �, 47—�r f� 04 0320.__... - J ✓.057 1i TPTIV �, { o1 U3 o94 j204� i ��82 i � { 1 02 // 0206 W I 85 J4 4cl 55 ,i i { I t t {{{ I t1 T 111t..{ ■ -4L/ � f j_`�''��'�if' • 11jjl��1'7 ,/t1 r t f ~� T i 274.. 219. _e�.. 59.'�•• \-`-==�"'- ,r"" € �°t _--- �..�i.,. ...-... ; �\\4� \ \�`` �."`_ L.. i\ t.. - !i , ` �!' i t_._ t._7 I�-+ Ar s \ i 77 af+ f/' •�� \ 1 .,` .. {j 4` . f ) f ' oi9B,_--} i ,�"rt . 1 J f f ^...�\ \•^�r382.._..._-,-.." s'" �--.. -i j.•.0 .-m....—_ - .'- .�._....w .�_._... ..,,,,, ---� -`' • h_"". `�\ \. 1 o20a A. Deo f'"9! �/`� �;`-,. / t r TJi' �-t 'r i 1, err /ri 1 �° I20t , ,..= 1 i ' +t iI 2 �J 1 1 3 L� l` + t 1 � I � f I� y1 !f tj/ /j 1i1 j /% ,111ej , t 0I4. i j6j 7+rjlj / it/ f +i t11/{1r 1 1/j/2ff,/ fI ;`f,t jy/% �I "�..i`'�•.^,".. 'y.\'-�, , ._0`"4_?`s\"\ =c��\ �.ti\'�"3-..gy�—m�'-'�_r'' _ '`° 1_0��'^_3'"".'9". -.5-.." ",M�.,-",",._`r_ ^ �._..-„'.`.,,.0'"_`'-”-_ 9�...- _....�..,.-�.,.•_,=�._� - __" --,__„; -_0°-_„-3.3”�_9.9_"2 3 ^-"'�"._ 3.`6."_w.�.,_'�,'",Yr_r:�.'.-�� --.-i`�� y _'^\�_ -�-`.. \-�\`. . \�l-�\��X�o1827z-3a-. ."3� _•'. �0'a$7,\i �.�-_;\ t\! - 7i +At 1 Foicy ,- 2t{rfl p7 f/!I/ % p °21 f�lfJ j J% (� `rya {/ ° 1 E �„/_) 7 - { 66 0384 02 �t,619� -` , 8 j°296 z1T7' 5s„37 2 2132_ 46CI °214d}2�J PRELIMINARY FUTURE $ k, 1 f0 F/6� j ��63/ 1 / / J �.'x- - 04451...'- ik2 ��1!If z f F, f1f t' t/t /, 1�(J i i�f !�f// ' '"f�"2/ Y/ {/.-_/ .-'•�" .,/-"`.�!i {!' / , _/�i l�/3i'¢D_ i„ +; -0x44r-_-"o4t-/ 68f 1_= DSUBDIVISION CONCEHAUL ROA 1,413\ ! t01 ;, 31ar 191 ('450 V /YJf f ` 7: 4i1 Io236It 43676Pf0157'o '" "--4 a2 1 -90442i�4}7 X4t03 6 024 12?1, £ 793 29`, 2520 z 0441 !! .� f pZi5�1 0'279407, 444 1�0y/ fa{ j. } jt , _ �� 11\ �\�\ \\ \\� ��\`;\\. _•-=--,- -- �I\b,-�$'�4i ; 9 $44- — 3 °. \1 2797 1__0_1 WETLAND EXCAVATION, 251 949 0 �°�S17 -4 _� SPOIL PILE LOCATION. 1) J ,1 1 o .`87,ck �, 9 -- 42'798`. - _ -T�` < ��" PLACEMENT TO BE �/!f ° �� ` 817 9 0976.._..",.- _. Q� _'�.., , 95 0 ! ! Y...'_"� o i. S^i. `' F'e985 "� {=' '�" T. ' ` !i ry,'; i ...tae o3z¢.-.__ ` �._..._ ---- r'- `�..a 02796 t t 1 !O 99 FIELD FIT WI TH OWNER f'/j �,.. 0 ♦r \``. `. �. ..�\.�'• `�-- � � �`�977�`��,;�, ��-- f DIRECTION. ; .f,�� j�,'�� • �, �f F 45 \Q4 `,,,, '^. \'".•'.,, _lt \ \ .,'' '� •" l ; 1 .r' °49 ,/ x4K 'i 'xi--`"`� ssn'r�°ers�_ �.�1, .�° _" i �'✓, / a'' ,`C" `�d3/ r/, %.,�-,e� / �° - '"' >� ,� , r }r lei 4 2l`5 � C f /. j / , f 3 3 00 r NO GREATER THAN 3 goo = 8:1 SLOPE ---. I t _— \,, WETLAND 3 BasTREES MAY HAVE TO t r r CLASSIFICATION ASSUMED: F '� ) BE REMOVED OR �,; r I � r�• �` �� 1 ' SPOIL GRADING. -i' � � MANAGE 2 -CITY, MEDIUM`,,RPBCWD I 1 k f r , BUFFER REQUIREMENTS. 4 1Yl1 i R! j ' / \ # 20' MIN.,40' AVG., 80' MAX - RPBCWD �. � 0' IN. + 30' SBK CITY t k yy --2 M -.. � ` Di I l � 1 � I �- _ � � � ! t f f 1 � n,� '� � 1 \ �` I i I � I l � � I ! i ' r � 4 ✓ "�� `""'" n-"--- ; if if It It � � � � � � i I � .� / � � � (7` `� /� • ~ 1 I't ' 1 j y. � l � R `; i � 'L \ `� -'r- _ _ __ �� \ � "Nt � __l e.. _ / ESTIMATED EARTHWORK: STOCKPILE BORROW: 21,216 CUBIC YARDS t DISTURBED AREA: 1.147 ACRES t POTENTIALLY IMPACTED TREES 332 18 American Elm 335 22 Black Cherry 341 10 Hackberry 342 24 American Elm 343 18 Black Cherry 351 13 American Elm 352 18 Boxelder 353 15 Green Ash 354 13 Green Ash 355 11 Boxelder 389 12 Boxelder 390 10 Boxelder 398 10 Sugar Maple GRADING LEGEND: 0243 769___ 789 69__—'- 789 OF EXISTING TREE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE LOT LINE RIGHT—OF—WAY WETLAND BOUNDARY FUTRUE WETLAND BUFFER* *TO BE PROVIDED WITH PLATTING OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT 11 = � = HAUL ROAD N 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Z a. V ID W a O a. Zn I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA MARK RAUSCH, PE Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 12-4-2020 CITY SUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: TAS PROJECT NO: 220-0090 5 SHEET 5 of 8 EXISTING FOXWOOD /` _..a te ,f,,',d/. _- - <i as - __ l!' �If �� G DEVELOPMENT r , �� ' �� ( ` I / — ra ,w, wl h I L_.- -- - - -- = - - --- - T 1,✓ f . ,� � er/� f� �rrr'�,� °,.J r ��- � } i } I ! �� \ 1 ( �I3 ` { a_z%� CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ; '� Illlll i II I 1 DEWATERING PLAN r t (AS NECESSARY) , it -- .� / � I i1 i� f��'II�� ) i � r it ,�/;y�I' �i � �>• - � � t / / ,, x ! ,� I yi%r /dfl: j I 71 WORK PROPOSED TO BE ii i v f 7 l ON ` COMPLETED DURING FROZEN CONDITIONS. HOWEVER, ` 1 + �� it� r F CONTRACTOR MAY NEED TO t i �`t s -- j „ y. BLOCK UPSTREAM WETLAND ACTIVE SWPPP LEGEND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MULCH BERM Z z O LU FIBER ROLLS / MULCH SOCKS U � Q Z Q Z Z SILT FENCE N 0 \ Z LSI � a ZQ TEMPORARY MULCH COVER W C) TEMPORARY HYDROMULCH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ROCK DRIVEWAY / ROCK PADS INLET PROTECTION DEVICES PAVEMENT (DRIVEWAY/ROADS) SOD STOCKPILES NOTE: CONTRACTOR, GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR SWPPP INSPECTOR TO COMPLETE TABLE AS GRADING PROGRESSES FROM FLOWING IN DURING WORK. \� r, 1 t�ti,l�t :r� � , I} � I i � {ill 00 ll`,I,{I�i } SEDIMENT BARRIERS PERMANENT SEED MIX/STABILIZATION _� TYPE 3 WETLAND, AREA NOT TO BE :,,tl '„ tl� ',' �+rl I111 �k'11 lil f I't�tl ,U' ., I. SILT FENCE (MnDOT 3886) I. MnDOT 270 (RESIDENTIAL TURF) sLvt� - -?• DISTURBED. KJOLHAUG REPRESENTATIVE11 1 L ;li.I �I Icyy n z. CURB Loc z. so0 1., 11 S 1'III,4 i i :oxi 3. ROCK WEEPER TO FLAG AREA OF NON -DISTURBANCE 1111 ; 'j;{I I , „_• STABILIZATION BMP'S �-•- ;r'^31f-, /°� 1 LIMITS. ` 444 i i, I slt, 3 r INLET PROTECTION DEVICES I. STRAW/HAY . I. WIMCO (MnDOT TYPE A k C) MnDOT TYPE I MULCH ,th l i i l ' � � � � 11i !� ~�• 2. INFRASAFE STORM DRAIN/CULVERT 2. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET Y— ._---- ��r r, l f�''1 .! f� /✓ •�ri' - 0" oa I-},. II ; ;' Sg4 �r• \ r„\_ !, t 1,. II ` 17,11. 3. SILT SACK (MnDOT TYPE A) MnDOT CAT. 3 ///�� \ _ %y ' \ t ,ti-, 4. DANDY BAG MnDOT TYPE B 3. HYDROMULCH t `, \ &g WETLAND 2 EROSION CONTROL i11}�,` \ , �= y ( ) BLANKET OVER MnDOT TYPE 5 /',: \. \, .�; `l 1 \ , J° t ANTI -TRACKING CONTROL 4. TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT �// ; 1 \ \,..y. \ -' -�-- ND--- CLASSIFICATION ASSUMED: , GRADED SLOPE. ` ,,,' I. 2” CRUSHED CLEAR ROCK SC250 NORTH AMERICAN GREEN SILT\�� , `� MANAGE 2 -CITY, MEDIUM -RPBCWD l \vitt\`1X'd (LAND DEVELOPMENT) OR EQUAL-MNDOT CAT 6 �j' / 1} FENCE CURTAIN 1 t \1 ; ��, \i1 \ GRADING AcnwrY 91 ��'r \ ( .{ TO PROTECT 20' MINU40EAVG.,8V MAX NT PBCWD �• �- ti.. ��\` ` ,,,, ,, ,:' TEMPORARY SEED MIX I. CONCRETE WASHOUT IS DONE BY 'i .G -•- .r'"e��- ,�!� „ .%..� /✓ �� a ° 1 '`e �l� \ 1. MnDOT-100 -,�� }• �'- '-%%'\V�, UP -STREAM W \� TRUCK WITH A MOBILE WASHOUT -f-,,,�' - /- ,, y//�°/.,,r;r,,r' /�•' i ` .. 20'MIN.+30'SBK-CITY ;. r �� t (OATS 20-120 DAY STABILIZATION) _ .•� ✓r''f'✓'' /,.- ` `� • E% a ` 'WETLAND. a+ 1 —` \ - 2. MnDOT-150 I 2 YEAR STABILIZATION SYSTEM PROVIDED AND COMPLETED \ \V" _.i F ' _. (- ) BY THE CONCRETE CONTRACTOR. 1 EROSION CONTROL A;,,''\ RESPONSIBLE PARTY: BLACK CHERRY DEVELOPMENT \�� <�%%k / t SILT FENCE/CURTAIN .,\ 14500 MARTIN DRIVE, DND, �� J g1 1 .\a.. 1 / ' c,, \ STE 3000 ` TO PROTECT DO �, inn i 2 �► 'v z STREAM WETLAND VICINITY MAP i 8� EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 r I� ...yso._ I 8r�°.__-__ ,,:,.•.• �'�....``-' �=5�� ^�' i .J i+4 _. -a L- - - ° .-.. �' � �°�.�` �� . CONTACT. TIM ERHART ° t ✓=• =x /„ i NOT TO SCALE CELL: 612-963-0733 ^—DND-ti• ` , s�ji1 _ W ETLAN D 4 i lrl. ; }'a r`1 - 1•,✓ � CLASSIFICATION ASSUMED: �. '\ ✓ 't'i, _`a,g ��._,....- _ T �, .� 6,& - MANAGE . MANAGE2-CITY,MEDIUM-RPBCWD .v� . - BIOROLLS 5 FROM - I f3 t I BUFFER REQUIREMENTS: 1 N - ---.._ -^"' -- DELINEATED' fl 7.s , p, T - '�6fV1i©N g°°`�ICT✓ ''_ WETLAND TO 20' MIN.,40' AVG., 80' MAX -RPBCWD _ i i i t t -z -a _ ° a Ila...,•-^� .,..... - — r �?a _— P 20 MIN. + 30 SBK - CITY i as j r t _—} -✓ PROTECT FROM �. - --a HAUL ROAD o1,�. ✓ / - j - 3 ` �. , a r — •^905'' i �+4 1'`= 4s,- i 11,1i f!1 t l ° 4 aso b9s 1 ,if \ 6 - ESTIMATED HAUL R AD�a,11041 } -Iy•.l. I p75''..�.-t o4?3'3 1- LOCATION Ii (TO BE FIELD FIT) rI` I 01 r 1' ° ° ! 'Vun97,oa85 r 1 \ `\ \.'C.�.... 3 t DB2 / I ,..I6�°' �t j r� ��\38/411-re! rj \ o71i' 1 54 I I t�{'iVll, 01 Ba, bq or, f 6z o of a '19�fI �1II{�CI 11�°,' I t V �,� � t � \-''�.`� "�,�`---- _ti�'Tit r�� m wry: ,- �,✓ /'�"') `,,..,,m„..--•-� � .,. � ' /j�J \ -4810697S,aUal 1 I 1 1�{ ,„ Il;r k'a t e �z ^-DND �-- -- --- e 67 ,. \_ �- \ Y32 -`o"� +l 1 (^ -90s, 1 13I }y , tl={ '1 I d> �f^ _"":\�` `� ti .,03+5- '"�L._...``='-.".. .,.moi® ,�.--- -2'3 . �_r I \ 1 \, ; \ o / �'�"- 1 1 I 1 1�t {Ii �4� 4i } t� �, �°I 3 .,.t _ 4305 -..._ ^,�,�� , 60' / p5B` 056 096 ( y tr7 i sjr BNB.B o\ ~ a 03 729 / ll jt .- _ _ _- ::._014 - .. _".._!^;.-0 4� 0233 \\ 2300 ° . 026 !'}, `\ \.`, 3.0,,.��. , _t 'I,I. ,riti3f i f ? ,{ r I .-..--- 04"P9d66d76- /�� ...._ i / / ar -1 ...� ``":,ts3 ia.716-"<'-.._'-- ..'^'.s ^_,�_;�-- ..- .y ,`"^ ... � °231 °�25! ,i t 0202 - - 3_w i , ; \ t f 1tj,;lr,, tr it ]3]o - '1„ 1`' l 1jf �jl 1 !!/”!( (i l /i1/ j / J - �r j�/t r% 1! 1r ��Ir1'/ 1 ) l�( 1 /t lr ;l !It/ff(fd/f l %1i `% I / Iff,iJ j J 1 =jr( i1J 1%%�1 f � lr/1�1�jIi ' l '1ttt Ji1 ( /'I1 t !t/ /J',j Il// /I j Jr //// j frl ij %f�1f�I/1/t!f,� /Il!fjr7t1t (//t ✓ � // 7/I;(�/ /� ! I r . /or��lrr/1 P�trldjI{,/ "//I/1l�/t I {r fJj!fiIgi fJ/--t,j//"/�,i(r//��I-/1� i(�s`yf"— Jrs!�/l-4-1aJ1/ s ! . / J ///' r,��1{ j//Ir%rr/')r/J1/J 1�! j!y%/1I f �/_/ _ro/4�o54/.0O,� �c_`_ �a'a=�,g-" '-�'�,'—'1\.--0--''TM4`�.`5.....2\..; �.\.`\.�.Q0-"47a. 0-"3_2. 3/�_l0..:.8.'"..1.,�"..'.0�:'f:.__'`,1�,y_= ...-.-~.,.--:..t:,�.ar^`_qI..�s-....r - "- " = '` 43` .-.- r"-- I—'I.i-.:- :._�5 o, I 7s_.iI_.s_ v._a�__--...,..� .._— l...�_\..... - �.`.__wlo � ` .,:.Q..4-0,_s,8.j3,3�+.�,11'.2°.-.-"23"-3 ,°- '.�X-�'31,�0„ 2C%-13i�4.°fi_8.'...e._..1...F,_...a,-.'...-+__-,/.:- -"''. . . / .-•'.�-�.E.-ma...,.\ 2,/�,}.icL.-_`-�-"5.v.'•N,{�.`,{,,°n_' . 'T ,"-. '\ j�.., ,.3. .I � �°'\o`i 2_f �-,,-Ti'9_.A��3'>`^,.:1l, �� \._' ,..°_\ FP,j...q d~/�r'3 ?t ` i`�X�{-6�°a1\? t,t j�/ ! i �.i�b !p tiij_ +/lJt_oL� 1`"%^-.I...//.�0 -✓rfo} .=-.s.0>'°+215^\-'°Yw_10.\8``-"a.�g. o"{,1f��_ / 3 r --.,._.;....-.—. va•1"_-,_/7oY �f r 094 / s/1't-5�i 13zaa23oo�mo" g ° g'�ir/_ 7t� `�.,_-I /i%.9/a11./ ��/ g/�A,'y�s3-I '•�•/� '`/�I\!/'i �\O�.l✓.f! �r/ /p i3s�z CPB o°5 .as� - .t }�✓! '�If/IiIj/ , r 1� /rf 1%l1�_� /ir'1`bJr1 ' <}7.n .��t7frj/iatljt/7�r/,l� ; 'ftJ�e(J,`/tJ 17/t■�i1,. ^ 1^ ' \ ^ -\r- -- !•1 �D'ii1D � I Diz7s 7 iii2 to6to zo2 2 07n° 0§, 0 2 2 219 , _ . d�/ U 0020"4 138 2 0218L.` "oil -' / i' —azlz-^01 /jBa '2019j/Y 1 ;" °r4g5 o 0zz87 11213 u: ;t `21, �ter w °rlDM -1✓R =JUb VI'Sj©Nf ©C!3 f t r > j r,'.,/' {116 I /-448't ' 0440 37 o //6 04147 B'i pa7 fYj4 442 [,��) /1 oIB2AA%69 9/ 0444L4F (r 53 f- 091 4 r , 364 / / sSt� / o92 { 45 j n2Q 41 5 ozsz of74` ( "q—t I ' 1 t - 'i 440- s t f I / /r APPROXIMATE POS36 T' t ( f GRADING RADINGa_SILT`oz797 /o 4FENCE. e //• r /i%/�\ 1,fI /rI 1/ I �i .-.. : DND •2�r/ !yj u0 9 e77,"Zt4e405 l \ 1l' CONTRACTOR �1 \ _ _. I arm i , /� '�+►; !I WETLAND a - ACCESS. ff — 32 A z? t✓ -r�a.�"a32�:`"�'" 'j/�r"'f /'.(�z" f ;.', t CLASSIFICATION ASSUMED: 0 r9zs ... r._- r ^'% e �/✓ p/��CP ' ° MANAGE 2 - CITY, MEDIUM - RPBCWDAPPROXIMATE 2 /r DN1BUFFER REQUIREMENTS: GRADED SPOIL\ \ \ � fiPILE LOCATION 0`AVG., 80' MAX RPBCWD O O \ 20 Yd�:j 20'MIN.+30 SBK CITY I� I '(_ - "'Iy7A `J/'� EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OVER �` GRADED SLOPE. USE BIOROLLS i j 1 / d �� / WORK PARALLEL TO SLOPE AS NECESSARY. 1 � r .�'�� E COMPLETED IN r �� WINTER CONDITIONS. SPOIL PILE V 9.-�. ft' / f. AREA NEEDS TO BE STABILIZED AFTER GRADING COMPLETED. SEED AND DISC IN STAW. OR APPROVED t ` ` EQUAL. CONTRACTOR ACCESS. 1 i t WORK TO BE COMPLETED r 1 / PREVENT OFFSITE rt t CONDITIONS. / t " L f I SEDIMENT TRANSPORT SPOILN PILE AREA MAY E ' 1 ! f + A WITH APPROPRIATE NEED TO BE RE—SEEDED r, v I t- DISCHARGE POINT TO LAKE 1 1 I ti \ V AT TiME OF SPRING t THAW. SEE RESTORATION RILEY VIA WETLAND '- --_ 1 �.\ % \ - (LAKE RILEY IS AN IMPAIRED WATERS L!i `�� \`�,1 FOR SEEDING WITHIN 1 MILE) DETAILS 1 NOTE: 1. SEE SHEET 7 FOR ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS. NOTE TO CONTRACTOR: THE MASS GRADING CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION OF ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES BMPS AS SHOWN IN THE RAHR PRESERVE MASS GRADING SWPPP (EXCEPT FOR POST GRADE BMPS NEEDED AFTER UTILITY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY). THE BMPS ARE TO BE INSTALLED AT A MINIMUM AS SHOWN IN THE PLAN, IF CONDITIONS ARISE, ADDITIONAL BMP SUPPLEMENTATION TO PREVENT SITE EROSION OR SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MAY BE NECESSARY. THE MASS GRADING CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL BMPS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE MASS GRADING ACTIVITIES AND SUBSEQUENT TEMPORARY SOIL STABILIZATION NECESSARY TO PREPARE SITE FOR STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AND HOME BUILDING. AT THE COMPLETION OF MASS GRADING WORK AND SATISFACTORY SITE SOIL STABILIZATION, THE DEVELOPER AND MASS GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE TRANSFER OF NPDES PERMIT RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE STREET AND UTILITY CONTRACTOR AND THE CITY. THE STREET AND UTILITY CONTRACTOR AND CITY WILL THEN ASSUME THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ANY IN-PLACE BMPS AS WELL AS INSTALL THE ADDITIONAL BMPS REQUIRED IN THE STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT SWPPP. UPON COMPLETION OF STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION, THE STREET AND UTILITY CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ANY BMPS INSTALLED DURING THE STREET AND UTILITY PHASE THAT ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AND COORDINATE THE TRANSFER OF NPDES PERMIT RESPONSIBILITIES BACK TO THE DEVELOPER OR TERMINATE THE PORTION OF THE NPDES PERMIT TRANSFERRED TO THE CITY AND THEIR CONTRACTOR. IMPAIRED WATER REQUIREMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION: A. ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. B. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN PART Ill, B.1.5 MUST BE USED FOR COMMON DRAINAGE LOCATIONS THAT SERVE AN AREA WITH FIVE (5) OF MORE ACRES AT A TIME. LEGEND: - EXISTING CONTOUR � PRE � SF � PROPOSED BIOROLLS (PRE GRADING) 789 PROPOSED CONTOUR � PST � SF � PROPOSED BIOROLLS (POST GRADING) DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE - — - — — — - PROPOSED EASEMENT D N D DO NOT DISTURB AREAS --`-- PROPERTY LINE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET - - SETBACK LINE (CATEGORY 3) -- LOT LINE -- - --- RIGHT-OF-WAY HAUL ROAD o243 EXISTING TREE CONSTRUCTION ACCESS 0 , ggig}�5 `ut � a ! t k 1C,t a N 0 40 80 160 SCALE IN FEET I�N ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com I hereby certify t specification, or prepared by me direct supervislon am a duly Licen: PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA MARK RAUSCH, PE Z O MPR DRAWN: IL a J IxW O SHEET 6 of 8 J Z Z z O LU W U � Q Z Q Z Z Z N 0 \ Z LSI � a ZQ W C) I hereby certify t specification, or prepared by me direct supervislon am a duly Licen: PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA MARK RAUSCH, PE hat this plan, report was or under my and that I led GINEER under State of Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE PROJECT Z DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: IL PROJECT NO: 220-0090 J O SHEET 6 of 8 Z a z O Q W J � Q Z Q Z Z 'O N 0 LU / IM W hat this plan, report was or under my and that I led GINEER under State of Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: TAS PROJECT NO: 220-0090 6 SHEET 6 of 8 EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES: 1. NO LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY SHALL OCCUR UNTIL A GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED FROM THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN AND THE WATERSHED DISTRICT. UNLESS EXPRESSLY EXTENDED BY A PERMIT. 2. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) REFER TO EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES DEFINED IN THE MPCA PROTECTING WATER QUALITY IN URBAN AREAS AND THE MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION SITE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING HANDBOOK. 3. ALL BMP'S SELECTED SHALL BE APPROPRIATE FOR THE TIME OF YEAR, SITE CONDITIONS, AND ESTIMATED DURATION OF USE. 4. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLANS. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED PLANS SHALL REQUIRE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. 5. A COPY OF THESE PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. 6. THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE CLEARLY FLAGGED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NO DISTURBANCE BEYOND THE DISTURBED LIMITS. 7. WHEREVER POSSIBLE, PRESERVE THE EXISTING TREES, GRASS AND OTHER VEGETATIVE COVER TO HELP FILTER RUNOFF. 8. ESTABLISH A PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER ON ALL EXPOSED SOILS WHERE LAND IS COMING OUT OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION. PLANT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO ESTABLISH DENSE GRASS FILTER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND TO MINIMIZE WEED GROWTH. 9. ALL TREES NOT LISTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED. DO NOT OPERATE EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE DRIPLINE, ROOT ZONES OR WITHIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE AREAS. 10. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES (BMP'S) SHALL BE INSTALLED AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO LAND DISTURBANCE ACTIVITIES AND THEY SHALL BE SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND THE POTENTIAL FOR EROSION HAS PASSED. 11. SILT FENCE IS REQUIRED AT DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETER OF DISTURBED AREAS AND STOCKPILES. PROTECT I WETLANDS, WATERCOURSES AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES FROM SEDIMENTATION AND STORMWATER RUNOFF. 12. THE BMP'S SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND UNEXPECTED OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS DICTATE, THE PERMITTEE/CONTRACTOR SHALL ANTICIPATE THAT MORE BMP'S WILL BE NECESSARY TO ENSURE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ON THE SITE. DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE/CONTRACTOR TO ADDRESS ANY NEW CONDITIONS THAT MAY BE CREATED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND/OR CLIMATIC EVENTS AND TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL BMP'S OVER AND ABOVE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, AS MAY BE NEEDED TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE PROTECTION OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES. 13. THE BMP'S SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE PERMITTEE/CONTRACTOR AND MAINTAINED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THEIR CONTINUED FUNCTIONING. SILT FENCES CLEANED OR REPLACED AT SEDIMENT BUILDUP OF 1/3 OF THE FENCE HEIGHT. 14. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL OCCUR IN INCREMENTS OF WORKABLE SIZE SUCH THAT ADEQUATE BMP CONTROL CAN BE PROVIDED THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. THE SMALLEST PRACTICAL AREA SHALL BE EXPOSED OR OTHERWISE DISTURBED AT ANY ONE TIME. 15. OPERATE TRACK EQUIPMENT (DOZER) UP AND DOWN EXPOSED SOIL SLOPES ON FINAL PASS, LEAVING TRACK GROOVES PERPENDICULAR TO THE SLOPE. DO NOT HACK -BLADE. LEAVE A SURFACE ROUGH TO MINIMIZE EROSION. 16. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STABILIZED FROM EROSION WITHIN 7 DAYS OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF GRADING IN THAT AREA. TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH SHALL COVER ALL EXPOSED SOILS IF GRADING COMPLETION IS DELAYED LONGER THAN 7 DAYS. PERMANENT SEED AND MULCH OR SOD IS REQUIRED WITHIN 3 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF FINAL GRADING. 17. GENERAL TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE MNDOT MIX 190 O 100 LBS. PER ACRE OR APPROVED EQUAL. PERMANENT SEED SHALL BE MNDOT MIX 270 O 120 LBS. PER ACRE OR APPROVED EQUAL (PLANTING DATES PER SPEC 2575) MULCH SHALL BE MNDOT TYPE 1 (CLEAN OAT STRAW) O 2 TONS PER ACRE AND DISK ANCHORED IN PLACE OR APPROVED EQUAL FERTILIZER SHALL BE 80-80-80 NPK PER ACRE (UNLESS P RESTRICTIONS APPLY) AND INCORPORATED INTO THE SEED BED. 18. POND, BASIN AND WETLAND AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LANDSCAPE PLAN. 19. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED OR AFTER THE TEMPORARY MEASURES ARE NO 'DO NOT CONSTRUCT wipl i.1 DIVERSION MOUND DESIGN GUIDEUNES: SIMM FREWENDW 10 YEAR - 24 HOUR MA101UM DRANAQ AREA: 5 ACRES MACAW DIVERSION: MME BW WT CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY < ROADWAY IN IEYPMARY BERM _- I INE Ir TE FTFIONE y -- PI TWO II ORAIXAIE WIPE N1RE PPE m TWO 2• X 2• WOOD) STAVES E,MYOOm 10• MIN. W THE DIAMOND W MIN. SMART • S' - MATS _I!XEAVATI&N�' IAEA*i-MR E OF KOREAN, '•••'•'•'•'•AT 4' INIFAVN3 A!'STREW RM+ OF ENTpMATSIFOR CH Ft.GEG G VELWIY OF sYW AREA PLAN NEW 6• INH CKHOBI -- -- MWS L_ KiREAY BED 15• YW. DEPTH POSTMAN NSOMBNNE SECTION A -A SEDIMENT MAT(9) TYPICAL STREAM MO INSTNIATON DESIGN GUIDELINES: YAW W ROW AELOOTf: S fT./3G NORMAN Row IxPnR: 2 WINTER STABLIZATION: LONGER NEEDED. FLOW OF WATERWAY OsiRMBm SOL GRADING CONTRACTOR REQUIREMENTS IN THE CASE WHERE THE 20. AN ALTERNATE EROSION IN, SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR LAND DISTURBANCES ON EACH ONSET OF WINTER DOES NOT ALLOW FOR COMPLETION OF FINAL LOT AS PART OF ANY FUTURE BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF STRUCTURES AND DRIVEWAYS. SOIL STABILIZATION: TY: 7R./SEc. ODMSEMNGn 1. MASS GRADING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PUNNED AND PHASED IN - VARIABLE LENGTH CONTAIN FABRIC o-° A MANNER TO AVOID ANY UNNECESSARY SOIL DISTURBANCE. EROSION CONTROL SCHEDULE: 2. BY FINAL GRADED AREAS SHALL E STABILIZED NG, BLANKET, BY GRADING CONTRACTOR WITH SEEDING, MULCHING, BLANKET, \ -0 AhYNOR ETC. IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS PRIOR TO CONTRACTOR 1. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION OR DEMOLITION, SILT FENCE AND FILTERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN TO LEAVING THE SITE. INTERCEPT RUNOFF. ROCK SO CONSTRUCTED FROM THE RIPRAP CAN BE USED TO PROVIDE A0091MAL PROTECI 'AID 3. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE THAT 2. ALL EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATIONS SHALL REMAIN IN PUCE AND BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD CONDITION BY ALL TEMPORARY OR INCOMPLETE GRADING AREAS INCLUDING THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL THE SITE HAS BEEN RE -VEGETATED. CONTRACTOR MAY REMOVE NECESSARY SILT ALL STOCKPILES ARE STABIUZED BEFORE LEAVING THE SITE. FENCING/FILTERS TO CONSTRUCT ROADWAYS, WHILE MAINTAINING ADEQUATE EROSION CONTROL IN ADJACENT AREA. 4. ALL SIGNIFICANT DRAINAGE SWALES (TEMPORARY OR 3. SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL SHALL BE STOCKPILED TO ALLOW FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF 6" OF TOPSOIL FOR PERMANENT) SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH MNDOT CATEGORY 3 DISTURBED AREAS TO BE RE -VEGETATED. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET BY GRADING CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO LEAVING THE SITE. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE SITE GRADING, UTILITY INSTALLATION AND PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION SO YPofIX APPA THAT THE GENERAL SITE CAN BE MULCHED AND RE -SEEDED SOON AFTER DISTURBANCE. AREAS THAT WILL NOT BE - < SUBJECT TO CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SHALL BE SEEDED (MnDOT MIX 190 O 100 /AC AND MULCHED OR SODDED FINAL STABILIZATION: WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF BEING DISTURBED. PLASTIC CABLE 1F1- iCN51LE 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AS INDICATED ON THIS EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE FINAL STABILIZATION OF _ ANY ADDITIONAL REQUIRED BASED ON MEANS, METHODS AND SEQUENCES OF CONSTRUCTION. THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF WITH CLEAN SAND ON TERMINATION NO WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL TERM (n ROCK, SUFFICIENT i0 STABILIZATIO` IS COMPLETE, OR ANOTHER V SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES: OWNER/OPERATOR (PERMITTEE) HAS ASSUMED CONTROL OWNER/OPER \ OF ALL AREAS OF THE SITE THAT HAVE NOT UNDERGONE 1. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST MINIMIZE SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING CURB AND FINAL STABILIZATION. FINAL STABILIZATION CAN BE GUTTER SYSTEMS AND STORM SEWER INLETS. ACHIEVED IN THE FOLLOWING WAY: 2. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERMITERS BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT ALL SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AT THE SITE HAVE BEEN LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. THESE PRACTICES SHALL REMAIN IN PUCE UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND ALL SOILS MUST BE STABILIZED BY A ESTABLISHED. UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER WITH A DENSITY O OF 70 PERCENT OVER THE ENTIRE PERVIOUS SURFACE J 3. THE TIMING OF THE INSTALLATION OF SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE AREOR OTHER EQUNA NECESSARY TO SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES. ANY SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY MUST RO PREVENT SOIL FAILURE UNODERDER EROSIVE CONDITIONS AND; BE COMPLETED AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE AND THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY A. ALL DRAINAGE DITCHES, CONSTRUCTED TO AFTER THE ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. HOWEVER, SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE THE NEM DRAIN WATER FROM THE SITE AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IF THE ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE. COMPLETE, MUST BE STABILIZED TO CMTRW�TNNC ELMEFLOW AREA 3MIECM AME! PRECLUDE EROSION; 4. ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED BY APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL ALL SOURCES B. ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC, AND J WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. STRUCTURAL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT y CONTROL BMPS (SUCH AS SILT 5. TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCES OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS, AND CANNOT BE FENCE) MUST BE REMOVED AS PART OF THE SITE FINAL PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORM WATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, OR STABILIZATION; AND CONDUITS AND DITCHES. C. THE CONTRACTORS MUST CLEAN OUT ALL 6. SITE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES WILL BE AS SHOWN ON THE PN. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE U SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCES AND FROM TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS THAT ARE TO O INSTALLED AT EACH ENTRANCE. BE USED AS PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT (j 7. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL COMMON DRAINAGE LOCATIONS WITH 5 OR MORE ACRES BASINS. SEDIMENT MUST BE STABILIZED TO PREVENT FT FROM BEING WASHED BACK ;n DISTURBED AT ONE TIME. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS SHOULD MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 14 OF NPDES A INTO THE BASIN, CONVEYANCES OR 3) PERMIT DRAINAGE WAYS DISCHARGING OFF-SITE OR TO SURFACE � WATERS. THE CLEAN OUT OF POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES' PERMANETBASINS MUST BE SUFFICIENT TO RETURN THE BASIN To DESIGNNCAPACITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES ON THE V SITE: C) 1. SOLID WASTE: COLLECTED SEDIMENT, ASPHALT AND CONCRETE MILLINGS, FLOATING DEBRIS, PAPER, PLASTIC, DEWATERING: FABRIC, CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS AND OTHER WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY WITH MPCA DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS. 2. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL- OIL, GASOUNE, PAINT AND ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES MUST BE PROPERLY STORED, INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT. TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANDALISM. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPGA REGULATIONS. 3. CONCRETE WASHOUT IS DONE TRUCK BY TRUCK WITH A MOBILE WASHOUT SYSTEM PROVIDED AND COMPLETED BY THE CONCRETE CONTRACTOR. RUNOFF MUST BE CONTAINED AND WASTE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF. 4. NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM: 1. INSPECT SILT FENCES IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL IMMEDIATELY REPAIR FAILED OR FAILING SILT FENCE. 2. REPLACEMENT - FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY WHEN IT DECOMPOSES OR BECOMES INEFFECTIVE BEFORE THE BARRIER IS NO LONGER NECESSARY. 3. SEDIMENT REMOVAL - SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. THEY MUST BE REMOVED WHEN DEPOSITS REACH APPROXIMATELY ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE BARRIER. ANY SEDIMENT REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE SILT FENCE OR FILTER FABRIC IS NO LONGER REQUIRED SHALL BE DRESSED TO CONFORM WITH EXISTING GRADE, PREPARED, AND SEEDED WITH THE APPROPRIATE SEED MIX, OR SODDED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 4. REMOVAL OF SILT FENCE - SILT FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED THEIR USEFUL PURPOSE, BUT NOT BEFORE THE UPWARD SLOPING AREA HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. IF THE UPWARD SLOPING AREA IS TO BE EXPOSED LONGER THAN SIX (6) MONTHS, THAT AREA SHALL BE COVERED WITH TEMPORARY VEGETATION WHEN FIRST EXPOSED. 5. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ROUTINELY INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS. 6. ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION MUST BE RECORDED IN WRITING AND THESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP RECORDS OF EACH INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY SHALL INCLUDE: A. DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONS; B. NAME OF PERSON(S) CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS; C. FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS; D. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTMES. E. DATE AND AMOUNT OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 1/2 INCH (0.5 INCHES) IN 24 HOURS: F. DOCUMENTS OF CHANGES MADE TO THE SWPPP AS REQUIRED IN PART IIIA.4. 7. WHERE PARTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE HAVE UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION, BUT WORK REMAINS ON OTHER PARTS OF SITE, INSPECTIONS OF THE STABILIZED AREAS MAY BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH. WHERE WORK HAS BEEN SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS, THE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE MUST TAKE PLACE AS SOON AS RUNOFF OCCURS AT THE SITE OR PRIOR TO RESUMING CONSTRUCTION, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A PAM! TO THE CITY AND PROJECT ENGINEER FOR REVIEW. THE PUN AT MINIMUM SHALL BE A DEWATERING PUN INCLUDING WATER ROUTING, STORAGE, AND DISCHARGE LOCATION. 2. IF ANY TEMPORARY DEWATERING IS REQUIRED ONSITE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF STORMWATER OR GROUND WATER BY USE OF PUMPS AND HOSES TO ACCEPTABLE DISCHARGE POINTS APPROVED BY THE CITY AND PROJECT ENGINEER. DUST CONTROL: OPERATIONS SHALL UTILIZE ALL PRACTICAL MEANS TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF DUST CAUSED BY THE OPERATION. IN NO CASE SHALL THE AMOUNT OF DUST OR OTHER PARTICULATE MATTER EXCEED THE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY. NO OPERATIONS SHALL BE ALLOWED WHEN WIND GUSTS EXCEED 30 MPH. NO" RIPRM AT WRIT TEMPORARY DOWN DRAIN ON FILL SLOPE DESIGN GUIDELINES: STORM FRECURI 2 YEAR - 24 WAR MAXIMUM MANAGE AREA: 3 AGREES BALE BARRIERS TO BE USED FM CwnGLL PERIMETER CONTROL AREAS FLOW L a. s STAPLES AT r -o C. EMBEDMENT MUNI BLANKET METHOD BALE BARRIER DETAIL APNOx BALI SIZ ,.• X IB' % b' LONE. FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN OR SILT FENCE TYPE TO STEEL FENCE ANCHOR TO L 1 PLAN VIEW FOR STREAMOS FLOW OF WATERWAY OsiRMBm SOL fit LEKS TWN 1/3 THE SWAHILI WIDTH TY: 7R./SEc. ODMSEMNGn GAVE - VARIABLE LENGTH CONTAIN FABRIC o-° ' BET FExa• ' RIVER BAN ' \ -0 AhYNOR EwMMY Q ROCK GEM POINT WHERE FILL MEETS WATER SURFACE ROCK SO CONSTRUCTED FROM THE RIPRAP CAN BE USED TO PROVIDE A0091MAL PROTECI 'AID I ANT t0 i /UNDERWATER rtTP. OF FLOTATION ' / / slit uwutR GRADE 2 I G_X:ABI1MENi. CULVML EXT.. I PLASTIC LIP ilE3 HEMP RI IF M I LB. TENSILD YPofIX APPA -ROY ITYPdQ FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN OR SILT FENCE TYPE TO STEEL FENCE ANCHOR TO L 1 PLAN VIEW FOR STREAMOS ENTTOSLLOE FAULT OVER POST OsiRMBm SOL , CARRIER FLOAT a r STEEL TORSION CABLE .-WATER SINKAGE • • TY: 7R./SEc. ODMSEMNGn • - VARIABLE LENGTH CONTAIN FABRIC o-° ' BET FExa• ' A. -[ABLE §�~ SEE SPECS. 2573.3886.3681 A MIX. \ -0 AhYNOR T'TV WEIGHT- BOTTOM CONTAIN WEIGHT ' ROCK SO CONSTRUCTED FROM THE RIPRAP CAN BE USED TO PROVIDE A0091MAL PROTECI FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN STEEL FENCE •r POST ° 4 6 FT. MAX SPACING i -WTI\ / wUMCABLE-' _ GRADE 2 I 3fi p <H PLASTIC LIP ilE3 3= LB. TENSILD V iLOCATED IN TG B II wATEA SURF LO - < TURNING POSSIBLE a MININW WATER DEPTH APPLIES i0 THE OECPESi PoWL ALONG THE FLOTATION SRT CMTA OOfl GECMEM& ANE FABRIC, 72 IN. WIDE PLASTIC CABLE 1F1- iCN51LE TURNING RANDS 10.1 s'Y+ PLACE HOCK LOGSOR-,- SANDBAGS FILLED , WITH CLEAN SAND ON ROCK, SUFFICIENT i0 \ HOLD FLAP IN PLACE BOTTOM AT EACH FENCE POST ,L i� SILT FENCE TYPE TB M LfTMIM U019E j mlOm ¢AARs NL ARIWW 9N, PIE® AIp ON FTAP POOE18 FILTER BAG INSERT (DAM, INE INSTALLED IN MY INLU TYPE WIN OR WTHLXI AOwB E W TYPE B 8888 it MOUND •• "e°e"e'ei4%-.W.WWWWW. 1 W W°W°W°w°w°O=WRBW R.A11ZS DUTCH BASO/ YAYHaE SEDIMENT CONTROL INLET HAT Nolo TE SEDIMENT CONTROL GIIIWM iNNL Y A MUM M PLVTC/PW11:TN11ITE WSM B2m TO PIT WOE THE MTON =g=HAVE PERPoRAD m ALLOW FOR WATER YNf1L llgk NAVE M OAMWLDIF MDONG MOOS WHO A UD/NIA WIN M BOTH BUS LENGTH VARUS Y m MUTE WY YE M R TCAs ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE O � <DR.WHAGE WAY }� INE PLAN ROW IW WN.oRRERBE LT SECTION B -B SEDIMENT TRAP DETAIL NOTES: SSE SPECS 2371 302 It 351 ] TRUCKS ROCKS AT ENTRANCE CLEAR WpIXBTE MUD CFF OF ROCK YANG BEFORE DAMAGE AND YAC NOAO, KION SEDIMENT KIND OILY TXO RDRAI AGE PRENN7 AUTO DMNE S. KEEP TUE MAY BE ACEDUER M ROCK OE SYSIKEEP ROCKS AND SEPARATE EW SMILE MAY BE RACED UNDER THE ROCK m KFEP RGX(S $ERARAm iR011 SOIL (I m R. WIN., Mr. MAKI Q3D-2 R. QTWJ B A. X S N. NOW STAKES M NARROWING BMS N GM BALI EMBEDDED 10 NOES MUM W THE GROUND. MPIACE A CATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, a R. WOE MINIMUM. OVER THE BALE WSIEAD OF TRENCHING (I DETAIL MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE FOR NARK ON PUBLIC WATERS, SEE GENERAL PUNIC WATERS POINT [GP) 2004-0001. LOCATOR OF MAINSTREAM TEMPORARY SEGMENT CONTROL DEVICE. PERIMETER CONTROL TOE OF SLOPE -r{ BLT FENCE NEAR TOE OF < ROADWAY 91OPE MD 00190E O CIONSIRUCTON UWR vA1BABlE LOCATION OF SILT FENCE AT TOE OF ROADWAY EMBANKMENT e R. YIN. IINOM CADGE AT B FI. MISPAOMO C(Orfyylll( FABRIC, ]e MCE ROADWAY SHOULDER_______ j_ ---------- PLASTe DP GEM ccccsca==c ce=_=_z (N La 1ENsaI) -------------- LOCATED W 1M a W COPACDW ZONE GRIDGEEND SICPE Row >rc M aTO E O Nr �< now f SET PENCE MAPPED MOUND TIDE U EMBANKMENT bai I' -MACHINE BICE IN II r - t2" DEPTH BRIDGE FILL SILT FENCE, MACHINE SLICED DESIGN GUIDELINES: DESIGN GUIDEUNES: WATER COURSE ROW VELOCITY. STAONMT TO PROTECT AREAS MON BEP! RUNS CONTRIBUTING GUAM AREA 1/2 ACRE YAWN CCN1RIwI MEA 1 AME FAIIOADWAY 9 UADM r NNRC BPoDOE NG b" NOME AGGREGATE BFT. W. IMUn Po -� fMAM4EllT -'\ _______�� E10 SLOPE B R. MAX SAAMN GEOIEXIRE FABWG W. 'WIDE PLASTIC M TIESAY (Y LL TEH9LE J FARPoC ARCXOiAU iPFNCIL 7X6 LOCI N ILIA I ^ BAAGML WITH TAXI SILT PENILE m MEET NINE FORD NATURAL SOL. SEE M1cI1N SAND BM BARRIER -.. METHOD IN INSET. TOE a !APF OPT044AL METHOD FOR SILT FENCE, HEAR DUTY SILT TERM ENTTOSLLOE FAULT OVER POST OsiRMBm SOL , IBDI.MIN, BELOW WATT SURFACE) r Ltl0( AREA DRAWN snxAY • • TY: 7R./SEc. ODMSEMNGn • / ' BET FExa• ' X SEE SPECS. 2573.3886.3681 A MIX. T'TV WEIGHT- Own UTIs ' ROCK SO CONSTRUCTED FROM THE RIPRAP CAN BE USED TO PROVIDE A0091MAL PROTECI / 23• WIN. WITH • -WTI\ / O-2AT MORE GRADE Q] OR U.S COAST WAW M OTTER MOTIXUZCD WATERWAYS, BUOYS IAC REWIRED i0 MARK ENE CABLE-- t •. IFOLOFD V "POSES. FABRIC TURNING POSSIBLE a MININW WATER DEPTH APPLIES i0 THE OECPESi PoWL ALONG THE FLOTATION SRT CMTA OOfl ,HEY PLASTIC CABLE 1F1- iCN51LE TURNING RANDS 10.1 • • , (GAY BE LMS WITH / , \ LARGO EQUIPMENT) ,L \ / MURGEDP05T INTO COTTON A MINIMUMOF MOX OF THE RATER DEPTH (INCLUDING HAVE WIG/ BUT W NO CASE SHALL EMBWMENT BE LESS THAN 2 FEET. TDE M SLOPE _ _____1_ MAN`ON FLOAT NMI BE CONNECTED SECURELY TO SLEEVE WITH A MINIMUM TENSILE STORE CONSTRUCTION mn FABRIC/CABLE/POST CONNECTION STRUNG RNe! M TOE G sLarc EMBANKMENT OR WORN ROAD FILL 8y (DPROVME SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF POST ANCHORS 10 MAINTAIN SILT CURTAIN POSITION. SRx,W BANK M IDE M SLOPE PLAN NEW S1DE VIEW SILT FENCE, J -HOOK INSTALLATION PTH �OW 3 WATTER %ANMMs W WArMM jy •-�-suT cLRTAw OR PM FCONTAIN 0 SRT FENCE TYPE IS SILT CONTAIN ! 6 FT. MAX ^N\ � .M ni - BUDY ITYPJ( iv TEMPORARY ROCK BERM FLOTATION SILT CONTAIN FDA SEDIMENT CONTROL Oft TERMSRi TERM TYPEYPETP INSTALLATION GUIDEUNES LIVE ow MARSH SILT FENCE TYPE TO MAXIM WATER DEPTW I Fr, MAXIMUM XIMUM WATER DEPTW ) FT. MAXIMUM WATER VELOCITY, 5 FTJSEC. PERDIETEfl CONTR4 INSTALLATION GUIDELINES M INSTALLATION GUIDELINES PLAN VIEW FOR LAKE OR MARSHIS) FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN TYPE: STILL MATER TYPE. MOVING WATER MINIMUM WATER DEI 3 Fi. MINIMUM WATER OEPTN I R. rCARRIM FLOAT,YA%IYIN WATCH DEPTH 10 FT, / CONNECTED TO MAXIMUM WATER DEPTW 10 Fi, MAXIMUM WATER VELOCITY, 5 FL/SEC. QT SLEEVE MAXIMUM WATER VELOCITY, 2 Fi./SEC MAXIMUM WAVE HEIGHT 2 FT, STEEL TENSION CABLE WATER SURFACE MAXIMUM WAVE HEIGHT MFT I _ _ I7MANTC STEEL TENSION [ABLE -. BUOY IiYP.1© a A0 CARRIER FLOAT IS . SCN 10 PVC SLEEVE M 3/181 THICK (MIN.) STEEL COVER r DIAMETER POLYETHIIENE O X21/2 D-rteO ro O �Y i°4 TUBE FIBER GRADING SILT FENCE RING AND ROCK FILTER BERM USE WHERE INLET MAN$ N M AREA WITH SLOPES AT 1:3 ,= LEEK 0 0 TYE NNEW SP PN) (DDI (URIGHTER) POP-UP HEAD INET MITH MUTE NOTES: 3EE IN EM 074 3137. SYN IN 301. MATWPAUINED MORN M LOGGED ON TyDOTS APPROVED PRODUCTS HST MY Y 91RT1UIED, O NL YmRXIE u® FM YIr manneD6M BWL Y YMORNENT N BONN IWECIIOX; LEEONO SEG SW. ® FYSNED SIZE INCLUDING POCKED NESE REQINm SHAH SODDED A MUCO G 10 NOES AROUND THE PERIMaER TO FAMOTAM MAINTENANCE M RNEDVN- ® NQTNLAT I NDN@ Do NOT INSTALL FETOR BAD INSERT N INLETS YAUaPER THAN M NMR MEA9Mm SIASHALL THE BOTTOM M THE INMET TO THE G TTTHIS WAVE. TIE INSTALLED M L HAVE A MYON BM CIEMNCE OF 3 NC1C YTVBeNN THE YET WIVES AM THE BM, MAWIRED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE CAMPAIGN HOER NRIE NEO55ARY INE COHIMCT011 INCOIL MINOR TIE OAA uion PLASTIC DP TFI3. m AOMAE TSE 3 NOR RANCIF.4RAIIR © AP Pd=E18 WALL IE LARGE ENWM m ODOR NDOD R WON X A WON M 1Mf A RaM YDr M BANIG NA6 N Pulz v TIE LVP PaN1E74 Q wEL NDaer MIMBr xm Y Y IBOH M m aaW DOIw Mlel nLTMT10H m CMI4 rtooMb G 11E RMDWAY. ® 6A1E%OE calx eellrw 4-10 FER 111X0 AICA 4-R NM OILLTEL YAB m E ,calm Y TARO ROY 6 6111OY0 r1M A PIASTC 101 BADIMO M PAOVDE A HGT artuD SEM (M APPRWD EORYI3ELIT} ELL ROIX LN WnN OPeN MIDm AIXTEDAO CON98Y0 K 8011Xn31137. a PAR11OE6 G C641H MGFPMAiE NIWaIWYo m sPrSPIELST3137TASE 37-7 G-3 MAOATwx. ENTTOSLLOE FAULT OVER POST BRIDGE FILL 1.1/$ IBDI.MIN, BELOW WATT SURFACE) DESIGN GUIDEUNES: jj:� NGTH TY: 7R./SEc. ODMSEMNGn ALTERNATE FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN RICC LOW � WXI�RI I ACRE X SEE SPECS. 2573.3886.3681 A MIX. T'TV WEIGHT- Ip FOR ANCHOR SPACING AND WEIGHT REQUIREMENTS. SEE SPEC, 2511 MIN AREAS WHERE THE PLAN CALLS FOR RIPRAP AT A BRIDGE.CULVMT.O %OR.A TONI 3/181 THICK (MIN.) STEEL COVER r DIAMETER POLYETHIIENE O X21/2 D-rteO ro O �Y i°4 TUBE FIBER GRADING SILT FENCE RING AND ROCK FILTER BERM USE WHERE INLET MAN$ N M AREA WITH SLOPES AT 1:3 ,= LEEK 0 0 TYE NNEW SP PN) (DDI (URIGHTER) POP-UP HEAD INET MITH MUTE NOTES: 3EE IN EM 074 3137. SYN IN 301. MATWPAUINED MORN M LOGGED ON TyDOTS APPROVED PRODUCTS HST MY Y 91RT1UIED, O NL YmRXIE u® FM YIr manneD6M BWL Y YMORNENT N BONN IWECIIOX; LEEONO SEG SW. ® FYSNED SIZE INCLUDING POCKED NESE REQINm SHAH SODDED A MUCO G 10 NOES AROUND THE PERIMaER TO FAMOTAM MAINTENANCE M RNEDVN- ® NQTNLAT I NDN@ Do NOT INSTALL FETOR BAD INSERT N INLETS YAUaPER THAN M NMR MEA9Mm SIASHALL THE BOTTOM M THE INMET TO THE G TTTHIS WAVE. TIE INSTALLED M L HAVE A MYON BM CIEMNCE OF 3 NC1C YTVBeNN THE YET WIVES AM THE BM, MAWIRED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE CAMPAIGN HOER NRIE NEO55ARY INE COHIMCT011 INCOIL MINOR TIE OAA uion PLASTIC DP TFI3. m AOMAE TSE 3 NOR RANCIF.4RAIIR © AP Pd=E18 WALL IE LARGE ENWM m ODOR NDOD R WON X A WON M 1Mf A RaM YDr M BANIG NA6 N Pulz v TIE LVP PaN1E74 Q wEL NDaer MIMBr xm Y Y IBOH M m aaW DOIw Mlel nLTMT10H m CMI4 rtooMb G 11E RMDWAY. ® 6A1E%OE calx eellrw 4-10 FER 111X0 AICA 4-R NM OILLTEL YAB m E ,calm Y TARO ROY 6 6111OY0 r1M A PIASTC 101 BADIMO M PAOVDE A HGT artuD SEM (M APPRWD EORYI3ELIT} ELL ROIX LN WnN OPeN MIDm AIXTEDAO CON98Y0 K 8011Xn31137. a PAR11OE6 G C641H MGFPMAiE NIWaIWYo m sPrSPIELST3137TASE 37-7 G-3 MAOATwx. r BRIDGE FILL 1.1/$ INCH WNO sTEFL MORED DESIGN GUIDEUNES: jj:� FRONT VIEW FOR FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN TY: 7R./SEc. ODMSEMNGn ALTERNATE FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN NOTES, LOW � WXI�RI I ACRE X SEE SPECS. 2573.3886.3681 A MIX. "T' Ip FOR ANCHOR SPACING AND WEIGHT REQUIREMENTS. SEE SPEC, 2511 MIN AREAS WHERE THE PLAN CALLS FOR RIPRAP AT A BRIDGE.CULVMT.O %OR.A TONI 3/181 THICK (MIN.) STEEL COVER r DIAMETER POLYETHIIENE O X21/2 D-rteO ro O �Y i°4 TUBE FIBER GRADING SILT FENCE RING AND ROCK FILTER BERM USE WHERE INLET MAN$ N M AREA WITH SLOPES AT 1:3 ,= LEEK 0 0 TYE NNEW SP PN) (DDI (URIGHTER) POP-UP HEAD INET MITH MUTE NOTES: 3EE IN EM 074 3137. SYN IN 301. MATWPAUINED MORN M LOGGED ON TyDOTS APPROVED PRODUCTS HST MY Y 91RT1UIED, O NL YmRXIE u® FM YIr manneD6M BWL Y YMORNENT N BONN IWECIIOX; LEEONO SEG SW. ® FYSNED SIZE INCLUDING POCKED NESE REQINm SHAH SODDED A MUCO G 10 NOES AROUND THE PERIMaER TO FAMOTAM MAINTENANCE M RNEDVN- ® NQTNLAT I NDN@ Do NOT INSTALL FETOR BAD INSERT N INLETS YAUaPER THAN M NMR MEA9Mm SIASHALL THE BOTTOM M THE INMET TO THE G TTTHIS WAVE. TIE INSTALLED M L HAVE A MYON BM CIEMNCE OF 3 NC1C YTVBeNN THE YET WIVES AM THE BM, MAWIRED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE CAMPAIGN HOER NRIE NEO55ARY INE COHIMCT011 INCOIL MINOR TIE OAA uion PLASTIC DP TFI3. m AOMAE TSE 3 NOR RANCIF.4RAIIR © AP Pd=E18 WALL IE LARGE ENWM m ODOR NDOD R WON X A WON M 1Mf A RaM YDr M BANIG NA6 N Pulz v TIE LVP PaN1E74 Q wEL NDaer MIMBr xm Y Y IBOH M m aaW DOIw Mlel nLTMT10H m CMI4 rtooMb G 11E RMDWAY. ® 6A1E%OE calx eellrw 4-10 FER 111X0 AICA 4-R NM OILLTEL YAB m E ,calm Y TARO ROY 6 6111OY0 r1M A PIASTC 101 BADIMO M PAOVDE A HGT artuD SEM (M APPRWD EORYI3ELIT} ELL ROIX LN WnN OPeN MIDm AIXTEDAO CON98Y0 K 8011Xn31137. a PAR11OE6 G C641H MGFPMAiE NIWaIWYo m sPrSPIELST3137TASE 37-7 G-3 MAOATwx. r BRIDGE FILL 1.1/$ INCH WNO sTEFL MORED DESIGN GUIDEUNES: M EWrvALEXT POST Q FRONT VIEW FOR FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN TY: 7R./SEc. ODMSEMNGn ALTERNATE FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN NOTES, LOW � WXI�RI I ACRE X SEE SPECS. 2573.3886.3681 A MIX. "T' Ip FOR ANCHOR SPACING AND WEIGHT REQUIREMENTS. SEE SPEC, 2511 MIN AREAS WHERE THE PLAN CALLS FOR RIPRAP AT A BRIDGE.CULVMT.O %OR.A TONI P05T ROCK SO CONSTRUCTED FROM THE RIPRAP CAN BE USED TO PROVIDE A0091MAL PROTECI / WHEN THE WERE IS COMPLETE THE RIPRAP CAN THEN BE MOVED TO THE PERNMERT LOCATU -WTI\ INDICATED IN THE PLANS. THE TEMPORARY ROCK BAN IS INCIDENTAL. -_ W THE Q] OR U.S COAST WAW M OTTER MOTIXUZCD WATERWAYS, BUOYS IAC REWIRED i0 MARK ENE CABLE-- ENDS 44D SPECIAL AREAS FOR VISIBILITY. PLACE BURM AS REWIRED FOR NAVIGATIONAL IFOLOFD WIRE TIE' "POSES. FABRIC WINE 50 LB. a MININW WATER DEPTH APPLIES i0 THE OECPESi PoWL ALONG THE FLOTATION SRT CMTA OOfl ,HEY PLASTIC CABLE 1F1- iCN51LE SRi FENCE TYPE TB FOR DETERMINING APPLICABILITY M PLOi1TIM SILT CURTAIN M VOCKET A TIES , SILT FENCE TYPE T0. `I QSILT CURTAIN SHOULD BE REMOVED WHEN THE AREA CONTRIBUTING DIRECT RUNOFF HAS SEEM \ / 1 P. TEMPORARILY M PERMANENTLY STABLLIZED. SILT CONTAIN SHOULD ALSO 0 REMOVED BUM WINTER IF ICE IIP M ICE FLOW IS ANT6RATER, \ / MURGEDP05T INTO COTTON A MINIMUMOF MOX OF THE RATER DEPTH (INCLUDING HAVE WIG/ BUT W NO CASE SHALL EMBWMENT BE LESS THAN 2 FEET. TDE M SLOPE _ _____1_ MAN`ON FLOAT NMI BE CONNECTED SECURELY TO SLEEVE WITH A MINIMUM TENSILE STORE FABRIC/CABLE/POST CONNECTION OF 100 LBS. CONNECTION METHOD MUST ALLOW FOR REEVE TO MOVE FREELY ON POST. EMBANKMENT OR WORN ROAD FILL 8y (DPROVME SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF POST ANCHORS 10 MAINTAIN SILT CURTAIN POSITION. 3/181 THICK (MIN.) STEEL COVER r DIAMETER POLYETHIIENE O X21/2 D-rteO ro O �Y i°4 TUBE FIBER GRADING SILT FENCE RING AND ROCK FILTER BERM USE WHERE INLET MAN$ N M AREA WITH SLOPES AT 1:3 ,= LEEK 0 0 TYE NNEW SP PN) (DDI (URIGHTER) POP-UP HEAD INET MITH MUTE NOTES: 3EE IN EM 074 3137. SYN IN 301. MATWPAUINED MORN M LOGGED ON TyDOTS APPROVED PRODUCTS HST MY Y 91RT1UIED, O NL YmRXIE u® FM YIr manneD6M BWL Y YMORNENT N BONN IWECIIOX; LEEONO SEG SW. ® FYSNED SIZE INCLUDING POCKED NESE REQINm SHAH SODDED A MUCO G 10 NOES AROUND THE PERIMaER TO FAMOTAM MAINTENANCE M RNEDVN- ® NQTNLAT I NDN@ Do NOT INSTALL FETOR BAD INSERT N INLETS YAUaPER THAN M NMR MEA9Mm SIASHALL THE BOTTOM M THE INMET TO THE G TTTHIS WAVE. TIE INSTALLED M L HAVE A MYON BM CIEMNCE OF 3 NC1C YTVBeNN THE YET WIVES AM THE BM, MAWIRED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE CAMPAIGN HOER NRIE NEO55ARY INE COHIMCT011 INCOIL MINOR TIE OAA uion PLASTIC DP TFI3. m AOMAE TSE 3 NOR RANCIF.4RAIIR © AP Pd=E18 WALL IE LARGE ENWM m ODOR NDOD R WON X A WON M 1Mf A RaM YDr M BANIG NA6 N Pulz v TIE LVP PaN1E74 Q wEL NDaer MIMBr xm Y Y IBOH M m aaW DOIw Mlel nLTMT10H m CMI4 rtooMb G 11E RMDWAY. ® 6A1E%OE calx eellrw 4-10 FER 111X0 AICA 4-R NM OILLTEL YAB m E ,calm Y TARO ROY 6 6111OY0 r1M A PIASTC 101 BADIMO M PAOVDE A HGT artuD SEM (M APPRWD EORYI3ELIT} ELL ROIX LN WnN OPeN MIDm AIXTEDAO CON98Y0 K 8011Xn31137. a PAR11OE6 G C641H MGFPMAiE NIWaIWYo m sPrSPIELST3137TASE 37-7 G-3 MAOATwx. STAPLE PATTERN/DENSITY SHALL FOLLOW MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS TAPLE !VALE. LONGITUDINAL MINIMUM OF 6" ANCHOR TRENCH L DIG 6° X 6" TRENCH BRIDGE FILL 9 YN.-•9T�1-.� DESIGN GUIDEUNES: .. 4. BACKFILL WITH NATURAL SOIL AND COMPACT S. BLANKET LENGTH SHALL NOT EXCEED 100' TY: 7R./SEc. ODMSEMNGn b !AAAAB• V LOW � WXI�RI I ACRE X EROSION CONTROL BLANKET INSTALLATION SILT FENCE, HEAVY DUTY (HAND INSTALLED) DESIGN GUIDEUNES: TO PROTECT AREAS FROM SHEET FLOW. MAXIMUM IXMl1NWnYC MEN 1 ACRE. WAY SH M BPoDZ EMBNRKIAENT M XOR( ROAD ENII SME B FT. YX. VENDOR PM -:^ EMRBMgEENr �� TEMPORARY SHEETINGAW. AT B iL YAX SPAOIO CEORMTLE FABPoG SEB• WDE M TO WAIFR COURSE. MI P n BAIX MW TOE G MO SET FENCE TO FABRIC AxMMAG NEEP SWUNG 111ENCH BAAGPILL wrX rnNPm NATURAL SCE TDE M SLOPE _ _____1_ FLOWN now EMBANKMENT OR WORN ROAD FILL 8y Y DESIGN GUIDELINES: ■ B- WATER 16 R./SEG MW. CMTRW�TNNC ELMEFLOW AREA 3MIECM AME! b SILT FENCE AT BRIDGE EMBANKMENT ADJACENT TO WATER SILT FENCE, PREASSEMBLED DESIGN GUIDEUNES: TO PROTECT AREAS FROM SWEET MM. MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTING AREA I AME NOTES: SE SPECS 803. 3,Q k b . (D COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE (SEG 3149) SHALL BE NOONTN. STAPLE PATTERN/DENSITY SHALL FOLLOW MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS TAPLE !VALE. LONGITUDINAL MINIMUM OF 6" ANCHOR TRENCH L DIG 6° X 6" TRENCH „T„ .,, 2. LAY BLANKET IN TRENCH 3. STAPLE AT LT INTERVALS .. 4. BACKFILL WITH NATURAL SOIL AND COMPACT S. BLANKET LENGTH SHALL NOT EXCEED 100' ` ;;, ;..{ j WITHOUT AN ANCHOR TRENCH 1 NOTE: SLOPE SURFACE SHALL BE FREE OF ROCKS, SOIL CLUMPS, SACKS, VEH[ClE IMPRTNI5, AND GRA55. &NNKETS SHALL HAVE GOOD SOIL CONTACT. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET INSTALLATION UNDISTURBED VEGETATION TRACKED EQUIPMENT TREADS CREATE GROOVES - PERPENDICULAR TO SLOPE DIRECTION. NOTE: ALL SLOPES WITH A GRADE EQUAL TO OR STEEPER THAN 3:1 REQUIRE SLOPE TRACKING SLOPES WITH GRADE MORE GRADUAL THAN 3:1 REQUIRE SLOPE TRACKING IF THE STABILIZATION METHOD IS EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR MYDROMULCH. I SLOPE TRACKING µONO YO3-C �,_e ROCK-6°MINIMUM DEPTH v \ WOOD/MULCH- 12• MINIMUM DEPTH \\\Y WASHED ROCK OR O(N WOOD/MULCH PER SPECIFICATIONS 1p MANAMJM� 18" MINIMUM CUT OFF BERM TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF FROM SITE NOTES: 1. MnDOT 3733 TYPE 4 FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER ROCK OR MULCH TO STOP MUD MIGRATION THROUGH MATERIAL. 2. FUGITIVE ROCK OR MULCH WILL BE REMOVED FROM ADJACENT ROADWAYS DAILY OR MORE FREQUENTLY AS NECESSARY, 3. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MUST BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF GRADING OPERATIONS ON THE SITE, 4. THE ENTRANCE MUST BE MAINTAINED IN PROPER CONDITION TO PREVENT TRACKING OF MUD OFF THE SITE. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOPDRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL ROCK(, WOOD/MULCH, OR REMOVAL AND REINSTALLATION OF THE PAD. 5. THIS ENTRANCE WILL BE USED BY ALL VEHICLES ENTERING OR LEAVING THE PROJECT. 6. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WILL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF BITUMINOUS SURFACING. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE i .'_H•MING00* L ALLIANT ENGINEERING 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Z O �� LV J LU Q Z 5 ANNEW V Y Z Z -j La LnN 2 z W 0 I hereby certify 1 specification, or prepared by me direct supervisior am a duly Licen PROFESSIONAL Eh the laws of the MINNESOTA MARK RAUSCH PE N J_ LQ r W Z CnQ W O Z J O Z 5 p a z Z rW `O 7 r Q � W W Cn J � Z Oct a Z Z /O Ir O W W hat this plan, report was or under my and that I ;ed GINEER under State of Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE 12-4-2020 ICITY SUBMITTAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: TAS PROJECT NO: XXX-XXXX 7 SHEET 7 Of 8 fjft;' EXISTING FOXWOOD DEVELOPMENT J !f �t t t \ r r // f irtp it _ - t ly / f {Iplt == Ifl i i" ...£'36- _ ...�-_-•°1�'+: `' ", it`�fi ..r �. rn j 1 'S i 1 5 1 ( I � I t 1 } 1 i 11 5 I. F i. ; WET MEADOW SEED MIX, y �,jjlljll,. SEE LEGEND 1 / I ; ,�', t V 1 � tit"+�t�tiijtl � � � -.✓ J - - `.--' lli �;`� ,!`iat� �t t � ►,� lillll,�s41SII',' l ' / _ "_ � f ..`x,1,0`` -j-' I. �, I TYPE 3 WETLAND TO ' REMAIN UNDISTURBED, _ SEE EROSION AND ice' .`"" ` �, \ ;it"� fiU4 fl?Skti i. 1 ( _ _ .✓. �A. , i .. ... ��\ i f' SEDIMENT CONTROL 1 7. PLAN 1 896 I 516--- ; ' ,-�•',�/,'''� ','%�'`/'�/' '' ``�,�� "�i x� '1 L i� �� , , WETLAND 4 CLASSIFICATION ASSUMED: MANAGE 2 -CITY, MEDIUM-RPBCWD BUFFER REQUIREMENTS: • .Lr.�f�:f -1 - 20' MIN.,40' AVG., 80' MAX - RPBCWD WETLAND 2II�� CLASSIFICATION ASSUMED: MANAGE 2 - CITY, MEDIUM - RPBCWD BUFFER REQUIREMENTS:\i / 20' MIN.,40' AVG., 80' MAX - RPBCWD �� \ 20' MIN.+30'SBK-CITY x 0}7°� cz3 z - ' -882 _ ° a _� a„�,,,�9 S, --°5. �""`""'.`". --'.. �91 �-m48,,,,,..�f"? 12 �~ -" � _ �.-o,ofi `.^'��\� � ia�l. _ Gu �. „��, ,�•.. 4",.`�"`--�'-.�� , ti�� `��''"....._' __,.. "__.PRELIMINARY FUTURE - � 1 .SUBDIVISION CONCEPT 11 20'MIN.+30 SBK-CITY o37 9D5"r,.f/,',la//I/ l / 1Ir'f, i. It,$ "`^-•..,__--'--.,. ``'- \ "'^-� i t 'i I i \ � �. �.—°44 4✓ d50 b 9 ! �'ftt : tflf a' 100 rl , 04 52 � it t�tl��Gi 1W t 075 0, \ ,. 043 ,``,I 11� 097 ¢ae2 ��L r S "fir 1S7 1 \ f ✓ T ; S'�;: o 7 f r tl ��\\ .`•• ._. _._-_ '_"_.- ` ,J �Y/'-@rf"r7 f 73 3/o54 :i / jt r -....,,..1 \ .\ .,��.i _�_ i .+/�•°23i+' "` 1 o71 � � ly F�62 d„r^ / �0I54�19� I II I ��II IIII taa i _ ael _ aa74 _ , 5� if s% !E�s .8 k. t_ '1 a O67@ 32 .60", 30)y° '} 0233 SEED DISTURBED AREAS 0 028230- 04"d � 0zaz02310?zs;' t i 1, ALONG HAULING ROAD w+ 4 7 a (l\ _, } j// �t %/ 1!/ 1 /!1 / r�i / ��yaoia d�o-7//B4-r,4'Sla4-7r8'4`�^8f,'ir.,'.f% /6//,;/r",a'-_s_=-.•-,,..°..g�,�,`�. �-�X-,.:_ .. _''-",^_'_�9-,64--~.. .- -' "`~^1+7.,-.'":..=i. =_..v -- 'y - �^,- .✓! 4--7-;Y�P` )-°„,- _...._=Bf3 r./ar'a''i".-w-' _'-'.,.-....- " _t " t` " ,3,`2. ` 4' ^<";_'._�vY 3 + ' t,tiI7�,:ci.i» +t1 •i tjitl,17 J+ o94i z23°3F .° V3 0 7 o 0 p 2 221"23 5 s I a2oaf a-, 7oz SIDE SLOPE SEED MIXf�z2� 20°� 11 '°zl ¢2ztX�_ ` i, } t? - l 1a SEE LEGEND : / / + i ff ('03(� II�� j� j� /Q", \'Y\ �.•-^" r^-" ice^'.._ ^�..-.. ✓"' 24 yo219 j ! \ \ I 89 %f xiso \ o \ �(' 020a o5o�6? ` ozoa r r f 9 / I / to �.o2:I 1 j / ti, z1s 1 tom' r3 1 f C�J , �tlt�r \ 0378 I r} A �,- m212- r^r ! t / `'.-.,,\ "�..`�.:„. �.Al gt4.5 f 1 i .. ��.�--�- �:= - I i r t --Y.- - , , P-37 ":, t� 1 I, ,z�a 122 :287 llY % 13 l ./ 2f °�i ; /7 , {j/f I 'F �' jT �1;�l��z��f� .14� =< - a PRELIMINARY FUTURE �f� I`I V2' i / f / f� Ott I 4o44A0j( /II.d37 `3 o;3/oHt8t4 t,/{ o.0 .ti9 ,tSUBDIVISION f%3,� I t ©45 1 I °414>° , P * , Y�I'a•',itI ic ^Q'ji t ii 1 Jz � , I /r i 1 f1 ljt117I ';F i�'t',r,(j;pjltlf;t/J f1) )/ �, ,�; tItt ��;�".�\-o_. - `"`"�` _- ti_' ��; �t .- --7- I��-'✓��o'j.j /�//g4;4y617%11r6/1 /pr $,._�. f�'. �!/t /0r,364q 7 fi'(io(Q`$79i,f( �z7,{jt -.-��__ -•.DtBI J/ ` ��% �// a� I1 13 Va ' X0 °442 ?153//,,, 41 I, J-279,�qg 4A5 I ! 52 of --a '\ !1 76g o4 `` f ON9 t( 4 4 J1 797 /f ,711 r1Yz 17t f' jlJ{ 1 4 s 4 pm3- �f �l 1 w.°�dg 9Is gg g / / �' _{�.. i .✓'_`�,/ � 1 f s e. d / J 2z jj i✓�Jy j '4,437 436 ''.rb4 �,dq - /tf}/ '1 03 Q7 •,-,._ �j,yc� y _ f /'. ,r 4 "/" / 7 IYY / !r %. --3302 032+J �t 0 \ ... `0 } if q3�j a4ia / /rr'r''r9.fA/' / rt / } b 235,1 ` `".. �+/ °/ �• �' ' - / t --97 500, >32.,r�j,/�r',//% l _ a ' 426%} Y z"rIl/ y4"f ww �- j III _ 03 � 1 r" 43 1 A!40 to i — -- — 1 �o WETLANDQ 0z ;r CLASSIFICATION ASSUMED: MANAGE 2 CITY MEDIUM - RPBCWD a Nj �f BUFFER REQUIREMENTS: R v I f 20' MIN.,40' AVG., 80' MAX - RPBCWD�i 20 MIN.+30'SBK-CITYJ�) I MID—TERM STABILIZATION N ! SEED MIX, SEE LEGEND 1 I � , `✓ t � 7 , SF � � 0 40 80 160 V-3— — % " I 1 s tit v � �v 1 1 v A � SCALE IN FEET PLANTING NOTES: I. VMLL OVrnI!A JIMIL VIYC VMLL MI 001-408—VVVL rVR LV VHIIIVV HLL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND AVOID DAMAGE TO UTILITIES DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK. 2. SUBSOILS TO BE USED IN MITIGATION AREAS, NOT TOPSOIL CONTAINING ORGANIC MATTER OR A SEED BANK. 3. COMPLETELY GUARANTEE ALL WORK FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR BEGINNING AT THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE. MAKE ALL REPLACEMENTS PROMPTLY (AS PER DIRECTION OF OWNER). 4. MAINTAIN ALL PLANT MATERIALS, INCLUDING WATERING, UNTIL THE TIME OF ACCEPTANCE. 5. COORDINATE ALL LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 6. SWEEP AND WASH ALL PAVED SURFACES AND REMOVE ALL DEBRIS RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE OPERATIONS. 7. SEEDING, PLANTING, PLACEMENT OF STRAW MULCH, AND MAINTENANCE WILL BE CONDUCTED BY A CONTRACTOR SPECIALIZING IN ESTABLISHMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF NATIVE PLANT COMMUNITIES. POSSIBLE FIRMS INCLUDE: MINNESOTA NATIVE LANDSCAPE OR PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS. 8. PLANTING CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDED MAINTENANCE (MOWING, SPOT SPRAYING, HAND PULLING OF WEEDS) DURING FIRST THREE YEARS OF THE PROJECT. 9. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE WARRANTY OF SEEDING AND PLANTING ENSURING A SUCCESSFUL ESTABLISHMENT AND PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PLANTINGS SHOULD ANY PORTION OF THE PROJECT NOT MEET PERFORMANCE CRITERIA BELOW. SEED PLANTING NOTES: WET MEADOW SEED MIX: MN STATE SEED MIX 34-271 (WET MEADOW SOUTH & WEST) SEEDING RATE TO BE 12 LBS/ACRE (PURE LIVE SEED) SIDE SLOPE SEED MIX: MN STATE SEED MIX 35-241 (MESIC PRAIRIE GENERAL) SEEDING RATE TO BE 36.5 LBS/ACRE (PURE LIVE SEED) MID-TERM STABILIZATION MIX MN STATE SEED MIX 22-112 (FIVE YEAR STABILIZATION) SEEDING RATE TO BE 40 LBS/ACRE (PURE LIVE SEED) APPLY SEED PER THE FOLLOWING: MULCH SEEDED AREAS WITH Mn/DOT TYPE 3 (MCIA CERTIFIED WEED FREE) MULCH AT A RATE OF 1-2 TON PER ACRE THIN WI 48 HOURS OF SEEDING. MULCH SHOULD THEN BE DISC ANCHORED TO KEEP IT FROM BLOWING AWAY. SEEDING SHALL NOT BE APPLIED DURING MID -SUMMER MONTHS OF JUNE 30 - AUGUST I. DORMANT (SPRING/FALL) OR FROST SEEDING SHALL BE ACCEPTABLE WITH USE OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. IF HYDROSEEDING UTILIZE APPROXIMATELY 500 GALLONS OF WATER PER ACRE. REFER TO MN DOT SPEC 3884 FOR PROPER INSTALLATION OF HYDRO -SEED. ALL NATIVE SEEDS USED ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CERTIFIED TO BE OF MINNESOTA ORIGIN BY THE MINNESOTA CROP IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION (MCIA). SITE TO BE PREPARED BY LOOSENING TOPSOIL TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 INCHES. THE SITE TO BE HARROWED OR RAKED FOLLOWING SEEDING, AND THEN PACKED USING A CULTI-PACKER OR EQUIVALENT. SEE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL FOR REFERENCE. MAINTAIN SEEDED AREAS BY WATERING, REMULCHING AND REPLANTING AS NECESSARY TO A UNIFORMLY ESTABLISHDENSE STAND OF THE SPECIFIED GRASSES UNTIL ACCEPTED. ANY AREAS FAILING TO ESTABLISH A STAND SHALL BE RESEEDED, REFERTILIZED AND REMULCHED WHENEVER 70% VEGETATIVE COVER IS NOT ACHIEVED. RESEEDING SHALL CONFORM IN ALL RESPECTS TO THESE SPECIFICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE TO THE WORK AREAS RESULTING FROM EROSION AND/OR EQUIPMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR DAMAGE, INCLUDING REGRADING, RESEEDING, ETC. AS NECESSARY, BEFORE SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE OCCURS. REFER TO MN STATE SEED MIX MANUAL, MINNESOTA WETLAND RESTORATION GUIDE, AND NATIVE VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT ENHANCEMENT GUIDELINES LEGEND: WET MEADOW SEED MIX, MN SEED MIX #34-271 WET MEADOW SOUTH & WEST + + + ++ SIDE SLOPE SEED MIX. + + + + + MN SEED MIX #35-241 MESIC PRAIRIE GENERAL SIDE SLOPE SEED MIX. - - - - - - MN SEED MIX #35-241 MESIC PRAIRIE GENERAL SF � PRE PRE DEVELOPMENT BIOROLL APPROXIMATE HAUL ROAD BOUNDARY --------- ____ WETLAND BUFFER BOUNDARY —"—WL— WETLAND BOUNDARY ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com I hereby certify f specification, or prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licen: LANDSCAPE ARCH the laws of the MINNESOTA hat this plan, report was or under my and that I ;ed TECT under hate of MARK KRONBECK, PLA Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MK DRAWN: JG PROJECT NO: 220-0090 SHEET 8 of 8 0 I LY. LU J a 0 Z w II U Y N Z Z Cal W I� N Q ZQ w 0 I hereby certify f specification, or prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licen: LANDSCAPE ARCH the laws of the MINNESOTA hat this plan, report was or under my and that I ;ed TECT under hate of MARK KRONBECK, PLA Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MK DRAWN: JG PROJECT NO: 220-0090 SHEET 8 of 8 ALLIANT Letter of Transmittal DATE: December 4, 2020 TO: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attn: Bob Generous FROM: Mark Rausch JOB NO.: 220-0090 SENT BY:Mail Hand Delivered HX Courier RE: Erhart/Blanski/City Wetland Alteration — Wetland Alteration Permit/Interim Use Permit Copies Date Description 5 12-4-2020 Wetland Alteration - Plan Set 22x34 1 12-4-2020 Wetland Alteration - Plan Set 11x17 1 12-4-2020 Wetland Delineation Report 1 12-4-2020 Notice of Decision 1 124-2020 No Loss Application 1 12-4-2020 Wetland Existing Condition Exhibit — (Figure 2 — Final) 1 12-4-2020 Interim Use Permit/Wetland Alteration Permit—Application 1 124-2020 Interim Use Permit - Narrative 1 12-4-2020 Fees Check — Delivered Separately by Applicant REMARKS: On behalf of Black Cherry Development LLC, Alliant Engineering is providing the enclosed plan sets, wetland reports and exhibits for Wetland Alteration Permit and Interim Use Permit application. The fees check will be delivered separately by applicant. Please contact applicant, Tim Erhart or myself should you require any additional information or have and questions. Thank you, Mark COPY TO: Tim Erhart, Dan Blake 733 Marquette Ave Ste 700 612.758.3080 MAIN Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3099 FAX www.alliant-inc.com