Loading...
CAS-04_RESIDENTIAL PUD AMENDMENTS FILE 1 OF 2 - GROUP 20 4 The contents of this file have been scanned. Do not add anything to it unless it has been scanned. • CITY OF CHANHASSEN NO HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 534 ANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE :ITY CODE, THE CUTS ZONING ORDINANCE, REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY rNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: ,ter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the city's zoning y amended by rezoning all property within Chanhas- sen Vista 2nd Addition, Cha t; Vista 3rd Addi- en Vista 4th Addition to Planned Unit Development rezoning of this property incorporates the following r standards: ata Zoning Standards thiszoneis to create a PUD fora single-family detached nt The use of the PUD zone is to allow for mom flex - Is while creating a higher quality and more sensitive requires that the development demonstrate a higher ural standards and site design. Except as modified by to PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with f the Single -Family Residential, RSF, District. I Uses uses in this zone shall be single-family detached icillary uses. If them is a question as to whether or e definition, the Planning Director shall make that aements and Setbacks size: 11,000 squaw feet. Must average 15,000 square Chanhassen Vista development. Yidtr: 76 feet )epth: 125 feet ance requiressetbacks from roadways and exterior following table displays those setbacks. Standards 30 feeP to feet 30 feet 30% lots have 25 -foot front yard setbacks: k 3, and Lots 1 -10, Block 4, Chanhassen Vista 2nd ick 1, Chanhassen Vista 3rd Addition. k 2, and Lots 2 and 3, Block 3, Chanhassen Vista 4th zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be v the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropri- ng map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of ting hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and references, and other information shown thereon are d by reference and made a part of this ordinance, i ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its rtion. DOPTED this 29th day of May, 2012, by the City Coun- tanhassen, Minnesota r Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor hanhassen Villager on Thursday, June 14, 2012; No. Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No./ was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abedefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz Laurie A. Hartrnann Subscribed and swom before me on this day of 2012 N blit JYK41AE JEANNEiTE BARK WJTABY PUBUC - MiN'NE$OTA "+1YW�!nlcil"h$h^.NEXP�AE$C7131113 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space .... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................. $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter .............................................. $12.59 per column inch SCANNED 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 534 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property within Chanhas- sen Vista, Chanhassen Vista 2nd Addition, Chanhassen Vista 3rd Addi- tion and Chanhassen Vista 4th Addition to Planned Unit Development - Residential Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Chanhassen Vista Zoning Standards a. Intent Thepurposeof this zone is to createa PUDforasingle-familydetached housing development. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flex- I ible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Chanhassen Vista PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the SingleTamity Residential, RSF, District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be single-family detached houses and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks Minimum Lot size: 11,000 square feet. Must average 15,000. square feet over the entire Chanhassen Vista development. Minimum Lot Width: 76 feet Minimum Lot Depth: 125 feet The PUD ordinance requites setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Setback Sbederds Front lot line 30 feet' Side lot line 10 feel Rear lot U 30 fee[ Fiord swfice Cov a 30% `The following lots have 25 -foot front yard setbacks: Lots 1 - 6, Block 3, and Lots 1 - 10, Block 4, Chanhassen Vista 2nd Addition. Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Chanhassen Vista 3rd Addition. Lots 1- 9, Block 2, and Lots 2 and 3, Block 3, Chanhassen Vista 4th Addition. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropri- ately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance - Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 29th day of May, 2012, by the City Coun- cil of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furiong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, June 14,2012; No. • C' CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property within Chanhassen Vista, Chanhassen Vista 2"d Addition, Chanhassen Vista P Addition and Chanhassen Vista 4d' Addition to Planned Unit Development - Residential. Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Chanhassen Vista Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for a single-family detached housing development. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Chanhassen Vista PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the Single -Family Residential, RSF, District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be single-family detached houses and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks Minimum Lot size: 11,000 square feet. Must average 15,000 square feet over the entire Chanhassen Vista development. Minimum Lot Width: 76 feet Minimum Lot Depth: 125 feet SCANNED 0 0 The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Setback Standards Front lot line 30 feet* Side lot line 10 feet Rear lot line 30 feet Hard Surface Coverage 30% *The following lots have 25 -foot front yard setbacks: Lots 1 — 6, Block 3, and Lots 1-10, Block 4, Chanhassen Vista 2nd Addition. Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Chanhassen Vista 3`d Addition. Lots I — 9, Block 2, and Lots 2 and 3, Block 3, Chanhassen Vista 4d' Addition. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 29d day of May, 2012, by the City Council of the City of Ch sen, Minnesota Z�Ij L j" Gerhardt, City Manager V-1 L Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on June 14, 2012) PA 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN - AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 535 DIANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE I CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, X REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY ]iUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: iapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning eby amended by rezoning all property within Chapar d Addition and Chaparral 3rd Addition to Planned Unit sidential. re rezoning of this property incorporates the following ign standards: ming Standards Of this zone is to create a PUD for 169 single-family, 98 i quad units. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for ign standards while creating a higher quality and more d. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate Of architectural standards and site design. Except as haparral PUD ordinance, the development shall comply nents of the R-4, Mixed Low Density Residential District ally and duplex units and W8, Mixed Medium Density ict for the quad units. ted Uses duses in this zone shall be 74 single-family, 98 dupl'exand tial units and their ancillary uses. If there is a question not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director nterpretation. luirements and Setbacks it Size: y-10,000 square feet ) square feet square feet d Width: y - 80 feet 'et t it Depth: y-120 feet eet t thiance 'he followintable displays tSetbacks thhoosesesetbacks.and exterior Setback Standards 30 feet 10 red 10 fat end BwlBoulevard 30 feet e 308• oaaem,,.r au a� ro wit k.a oner.�. In&vidud un mryacvdde roved for the quad units a variance to permit decks and 18 -foot front setback. Decks/porches may not exceed he zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be row the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropri- ming map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of zoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and is, references, and other information shown thereon are tied by reference and made a part of this ordinance. his ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its ication. ) ADOPTED this 29th day of May, 2012, by the city coun- Chanhassen, Minnesota Yty, Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor a Chanhassen villager on Thursday, June 14, 2DV4 No. 0 Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full -knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. V -4 - was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Nott a and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specked. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz nn * : �q� Laurie A. Hartmann Subscribed and sworn before me on this day of 2012 2 z s . AYMME JEANNME BMK NOTARY F! BDC - IdiNNESOTA No �blic +, I+1v0,l'r6'1�"Si0,4FUPIRES01fd1113 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ................. -........................... $12.59 percolumn inch SCANNED • 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 5535 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property within Chapar- ral, Chaparral 2nd Addition and Chaparral 3rd Addition to Planned Unit Development - Residential. . Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Chaparral Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for 169 single-family, 98 duplexes and 156 quad units. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Chaparral PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the R4, Mixed low Density Residential District for the single-family and duplex units and R$, Mixed Medium Density Residential District for the quad units. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be 74 single-family, 98 duplex and 156 quad residential units and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks Minimum Lot Size: Single -Family -10,000 square feet Duplex -4,300 square feet Quad - 3,400 square feet Minimum Lot Width: Single -Family - 80 feet Duplex - 35 feet Quad-35feet Minimum Lot Depth: Single -Family -120 feet Duplex -120 feet Quad - 70 feet The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. -T .4r dn<bgrcni vny int a 30 pm^ MN roving. IMivi las may resod the 30pean[rre� The City approved for the quad units a variance to permit decks and porches with an 18 -Coot front setback. Decks/porches may not exceed depth of 12 feet Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropri- ately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of tbis ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 29th day of May, 2012, by the City Coun- cil of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, June 14, 2012; No. 4WA Setback Standard. Front 30 feet Side IO feet Rear 10 feet Kerber Boulevard and Powers Boulevard 30 feet Hard surface Coverage 30%- -T .4r dn<bgrcni vny int a 30 pm^ MN roving. IMivi las may resod the 30pean[rre� The City approved for the quad units a variance to permit decks and porches with an 18 -Coot front setback. Decks/porches may not exceed depth of 12 feet Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropri- ately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of tbis ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 29th day of May, 2012, by the City Coun- cil of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, June 14, 2012; No. 4WA 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 535 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property within Chaparral, Chaparral 2°d Addition and Chaparral 3rd Addition to Planned Unit Development - Residential. Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Chaparral Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for 169 single-family, 98 duplexes and 156 quad units. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Chaparral PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the R-4, Mixed Low Density Residential District for the single-family and duplex units and R-8, Mixed Medium Density Residential District for the quad units. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be 74 single-family, 98 duplex and 156 quad residential units and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks Minimum Lot Size: Single -Family —10,000 square feet Duplex - 4,300 square feet Quad — 3,400 square feet Minimum Lot Width: Single -Family — 80 feet Duplex - 35 feet Quad — 35 feet SCANNED 0 Minimum Lot Depth: Single -Family —120 feet Duplex - 120 feet Quad — 70 feet The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. *The entire development may not exceed 30 percent hard coverage. Individual lots may exceed the 30 percent site coverage. The City approved for the quad units a variance to permit decks and porches with an 18 -foot front setback. Decks/porches may not exceed depth of 12 feet. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 29`" day of May, 2012, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on June 14, 2012) 2 Setback Standards Front 30 feet Side 10 feet Rear 10 feet Kerber Boulevard and Powers Boulevard 30 feet Hard Surface Coverage 30%* *The entire development may not exceed 30 percent hard coverage. Individual lots may exceed the 30 percent site coverage. The City approved for the quad units a variance to permit decks and porches with an 18 -foot front setback. Decks/porches may not exceed depth of 12 feet. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 29`" day of May, 2012, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on June 14, 2012) 2 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 4ND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 536 SANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF TRE CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, f REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY UNCI.OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: tpter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning iy amended by rezoning all property within Fox Hollow, ddition, Fox Hollow 3rd Addition and Fox Hollow 9th ed Unit Development -Residential. e rezoning of this property incorporates the following Mstandards: ming Standards .f this zone is to createaPUDforsingle-family detached of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design seating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. i that the development demonstrate a higher quality of [dards and site design. Except as modified by the Fox mace, the development shall comply with the require, Single Residential Zoning District red Uses I uses in this zone shall be Single-FamilY Residential and as. If there is a question as to whetheror nota use meets a Planning Director shall make that interpretation. tuirements and Setbacks finance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior he following table displays those setbacks. ithin the conservation easement area: mment and erection of buildings, structures and docks ration of vegetation in any manner or form. wation or filing or the easement area. lication of fertilizers, whether natural or chemical lication of chemicals for the destruction or retardation wit of waste or debris. ction of paths, hails and service toads except as con- y lication of herbicides, pesticides and insecticides. age of watercraft, boat hailer, ice fishing houses, snow - d and non motorized vehicles. aring or storage of watercraft, including seaplanes, in Was lake. to zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be w the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately tap onfile in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicat- ereinaboveprovidedforintbisordinance,andallof the tees, and other information shown thereon are hereby eference and made a part of this ordinance. its ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its .cation. ADOPTED this 29th day of May, 2012, bythe CityCouncil tnhassen, Minnesota ity Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, June 14, 2012; No. Ll Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly swom, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers (mown as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached N ' e an d Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefgbijklmnopgrsluvwxl'z Laurie A. Hartmann Subscribed and swom before me on this day of 2012 No tic r.Ms�rv�.vvvvv s _ aYF,�I�C SEANNEfTE BARK s, -. ` h'OTPRYFUBl1C-iAINNESOTA ilY COi+1NIaSION E>L°IRES OtpJt113 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $3120 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $12.59 per column inch Standards 20 feet 10 feet k 5 feet 30 feet m between buildings 15 feet t width at building setback 67 fed th 100 fed 7.400 xrnate fed =ge %et ouire dere 25! 75 fed atim Fasermnt' _ Below the 902 Elevatim ithin the conservation easement area: mment and erection of buildings, structures and docks ration of vegetation in any manner or form. wation or filing or the easement area. lication of fertilizers, whether natural or chemical lication of chemicals for the destruction or retardation wit of waste or debris. ction of paths, hails and service toads except as con- y lication of herbicides, pesticides and insecticides. age of watercraft, boat hailer, ice fishing houses, snow - d and non motorized vehicles. aring or storage of watercraft, including seaplanes, in Was lake. to zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be w the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately tap onfile in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicat- ereinaboveprovidedforintbisordinance,andallof the tees, and other information shown thereon are hereby eference and made a part of this ordinance. its ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its .cation. ADOPTED this 29th day of May, 2012, bythe CityCouncil tnhassen, Minnesota ity Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, June 14, 2012; No. Ll Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly swom, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers (mown as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached N ' e an d Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefgbijklmnopgrsluvwxl'z Laurie A. Hartmann Subscribed and swom before me on this day of 2012 No tic r.Ms�rv�.vvvvv s _ aYF,�I�C SEANNEfTE BARK s, -. ` h'OTPRYFUBl1C-iAINNESOTA ilY COi+1NIaSION E>L°IRES OtpJt113 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $3120 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $12.59 per column inch 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTESS, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 536 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning 0 Fox Hollow 2nd Addition, Fox ifollow 3rd Addition and Fox Hollow 4th Addition to Planned Unit Development - Residential. Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Fox Hollow Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for single-family detached homes. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Fox Hollow PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the regtrire- ments of the RSF Single Residential Zoning District. b- Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be Single-FarnilY Residential and theirancillaryuses. If there is aquestion as to whether ornota use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. *Prohibited within the conservation easement area: a. The placement and erection of buildings, structures and docks and walkways. b. The alteration of vegetation in any manner or form. C. The excavation or tiling or the easement area. d. 'The application of fertilizers, whether natural or chemical. e. The application of chemicals for the destruction or retardation of vegetation. - f. The deposit of waste or debris. g. Construction of paths, trails and service toads except as con- structed by the city. h. The application of herbicides, pesticides and insecticides. i. The storage of watercraft, boat hailer, icefisbinghouses, snow- mobiles, motorized and non motorized vehicles. j. The mooring or storage of watercraft, including seaplanes, in abutting water of Lotus lake. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shallappropriately mark thezoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicat- ing the rezoningheminaboveprovided for inOils ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its PASSEDANDADOPTEDthis29thdayof May, 2012, bythe City Council of the Cityof Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, Jund 14, 2012; No. 4643) Staedards Front mback 20 feel House side setback 10 feet G=ge side setback 5 fed Rear setback 30 fed Minimum amrion bdween bWldings 15 feet Minimum front lot width a building setback 67 feel Minimum Lot dcMh I I00 fed Mhthntw la size '1400 fed Herd Smfece Covera a 25 %ova entire deve WNend: adback 75 feet P Cwservetion Easement• Below the 902 Elevation *Prohibited within the conservation easement area: a. The placement and erection of buildings, structures and docks and walkways. b. The alteration of vegetation in any manner or form. C. The excavation or tiling or the easement area. d. 'The application of fertilizers, whether natural or chemical. e. The application of chemicals for the destruction or retardation of vegetation. - f. The deposit of waste or debris. g. Construction of paths, trails and service toads except as con- structed by the city. h. The application of herbicides, pesticides and insecticides. i. The storage of watercraft, boat hailer, icefisbinghouses, snow- mobiles, motorized and non motorized vehicles. j. The mooring or storage of watercraft, including seaplanes, in abutting water of Lotus lake. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shallappropriately mark thezoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicat- ing the rezoningheminaboveprovided for inOils ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its PASSEDANDADOPTEDthis29thdayof May, 2012, bythe City Council of the Cityof Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, Jund 14, 2012; No. 4643) 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City s zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property within Fox Hollow, Fox Hollow 2"d Addition, Fox Hollow 3nd Addition and Fox Hollow 4d' Addition to Planned Unit Development — Residential. Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Fox Hollow Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for single-family detached homes. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Fox Hollow PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the RSF Single Residential Zoning District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be Single -Family Residential and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. SCANNEC Standards Front setback 20 feet House side setback 10 feet Garage side setback 5 feet Rear setback 30 feet Minimum separation between buildings 15 feet Minimum front lot width at building setback 67 feet SCANNEC 0 *Prohibited within the conservation easement area: a. The placement and erection of buildings, structures and docks and walkways. b. The alteration of vegetation in any manner or form. c. The excavation or filing or the easement area. d The application offertilizers whether natural or chemical. e. The application ofchemicals for the destruction or retardation of vegetation. f. The deposit ofwaste or debris. g. Construction of paths trails and service toads except as constructed by the city. h The application of herbicides, pesticides and insecticides. L The storage of watercraft, boat trailer, ice fishing houses, snowmobiles, motorized and non motorized vehicles. j. The mooring or storage of watercraft, including seaplanes, in abutting water of Lotus Lake. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 29's day of May, 2012, by the City Council of the City of Cas_senf , Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on June 14, 2012) Standards Minimum Lot depth 100 feet Minimum lot size 7,400 square feet Hard Surface Coverage 25 % over entire development Wetland: setback 75 feet Perpetual Conservation Easement* Below the 902 Elevation *Prohibited within the conservation easement area: a. The placement and erection of buildings, structures and docks and walkways. b. The alteration of vegetation in any manner or form. c. The excavation or filing or the easement area. d The application offertilizers whether natural or chemical. e. The application ofchemicals for the destruction or retardation of vegetation. f. The deposit ofwaste or debris. g. Construction of paths trails and service toads except as constructed by the city. h The application of herbicides, pesticides and insecticides. L The storage of watercraft, boat trailer, ice fishing houses, snowmobiles, motorized and non motorized vehicles. j. The mooring or storage of watercraft, including seaplanes, in abutting water of Lotus Lake. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 29's day of May, 2012, by the City Council of the City of Cas_senf , Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on June 14, 2012) CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 537 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN OR- DAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amend- ed by rezoning all property within Laredo Lane Addition to Planned Unit Development- Residential. Section 2. The rezoningof this property incorporates the following development design standards: Laredo Lane Zoning Stan- dards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for single-family detached dwelling units and their ancillaryuses. Theuseof the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Laredo Lane PUD ordinance, the development shallcomply with the requirements of the Single -Family Residential (RSF) District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be single family detached dwelling units and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the defi- nition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks Minimum Lot Area: 6,000 square feet Minimum Width: 50 at the building setback line Minimum Depth: 90 feet Minimum setbacks: feet Front yard: twenty (20) Rear yard: thirty (30) feet Side yard: five/ten(5/10) feet garage and house with 15 feet minimum building separation. Hardcover: 30 percent site coverage. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall ap- propriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purposeof indicatingtherezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorpo- rated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. Thisordmance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 29th day of May, 2012, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, June 14, 2012; No. 4644) 0 0 Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly swom, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. t was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notiee and saill Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghiJklmnopgrstuvwxyz 4 Laurie A. Hartmann Subscribed and sworn before me on this_&_!day of 2012 I c T .. JWME JEANNETTE BARK NOTARY PUBUC-MINNESOTA Wf COMMISSION EMPIRES GIM/13 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter .............................................. $12.59 per column inch SCANNED 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 537 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property within Laredo Lane Addition to Planned Unit Development — Residential. Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Laredo Lane Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for single-family detached dwelling units and their ancillary uses. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Laredo Lane PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the Single -Family Residential (RSF) District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be single family detached dwelling units and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks Minimum Lot Area: 6,000 square feet Minimum Width: 50 at the building setback line Minimum Depth: 90 feet Minimum setbacks: Front yard: twenty (20) feet Rear yard: thirty (30) feet Side yard: five/ ten (5/10) feet garage and house with 15 feet minimum building separation. SCANNED 0 Hardcover: 30 percent site coverage. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 29th day of May, 2012, by the City Council of the City of Cinnesota 7 Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on June 14, 2012) Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly s�com, an oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the ne%%spapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (13) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. yrr L s/ was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefg"klmnopgrstuvwzyz Subscribed and sworn before me on this day of V `yLi/v-'� , 2012 No blit i ��, C -4 l4Laurie A. Hartmann A9-9-"vJ Y M M E JEAhNl BARK NOTARYP!E1C-MINIVTA 3+PCOM 1l5SION OTIRES01/91113 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter .............................................. $12.59 per column inch SCANNED • CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 538 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property within the follow- ing plats to Planned Unit Development -Residential: • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 2nd Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 3rd Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 4th Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 5th Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 6th Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 7th Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 601 Addition Summit at Near Mountain, Summit at Near Mountain 2nd Ad- dition • Trappers Pass at Near Mountain • Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 2nd Addition • Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 3rd Addition • Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 4th Addition Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Near Mountain Zoning Standards a. Intent Thepurposeof this zone is to createaPUD for 236single-family dwell. ing units. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Near Mountain PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the require- ments of the Single -Family Residential District. RSA b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be single-family homes and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The Housing Types are as follows: AA Summit at Near Mountain and Summit at Near Mountain 2nd Addition A Trappers Pass at NearMountain,TrappersPassatNearMmm- tam 2nd Addition, Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 3rd Addition and Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 4th Addition B Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 5d, Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 6th Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 7th Addition and Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 6th Addition C Near Mountain, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 2nd Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 3rd Addition and Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 4th Addition The following table displays the minimum lot requirements and setbacks: Type u.W Ana WWH DepLL Pnsl Side Rau Neta R R` R R R R Co % hl � AA 42 20000 115 I50 30 10 l0 25 Wa A 51 17 100 125 30 10 l0 29 W.i B 46 1%90D 75 125 25 10 30 30 A11.3 Che C 57 9,no 68 105 23 10 30 30 M, I, 3&4 C 40 7,100 67 110 25 10 30 35 N. Welland Setbacks: 75 feet. `Required width at the building setback line - Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropri- ately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 29th day of Max 2012by the CityCouncil of the Cityof Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, June 14, 2012; No. 4645) lJ 0 L CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property within the following plats to Planned Unit Development — Residential: • Near Mountain • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 2nd Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 3'd Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 4th Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 5th Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 6th Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 7th Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 8th Addition • Summit at Near Mountain, Summit at Near Mountain 20d Addition • Trappers Pass at Near Mountain • Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 2•d Addition • Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 3`d Addition • Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 0 Addition Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Near Mountain Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for 236 single-family dwelling units. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Near Mountain PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the Single -Family Residential District, RSF. SCANNED 9 b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be single-family homes and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The Housing Types are as follows: AA Summit at Near Mountain and Summit at Near Mountain 2"d Addition A Trappers Pass at Near Mountain, Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 2"d Addition, Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 3`d Addition and Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 4d' Addition B Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 5d' Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain bd' Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 7d' Addition and Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 80' Addition C Near Mountain, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 2"d Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 3`d Addition and Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 0 Addition The following table displays the minimum lot requirements and setbacks: Type Units Area Width Depth Front Side Rear Hard Misc. . ft (ft.)* ft ft ft ft. Cover % AA 42 20,000 115 150 30 10 30 25 Wetland A 51 17,200 100 125 30 10 30 25 Wetland B 46 10,900 75 125 25 10 30 30 Alt. 5 Chestnut C 57 9,730 68 105 25 30 30 Ridge 1, and 10 2,3&4 C 40 7,400 67 110 25 Alt. 5 30 35 Near and 10 Mountain Wetland Setbacks: 75 feet. *Required width at the building setback line. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 29a' day of May, 2012 by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager TAiomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on June 14, 2012) 0 AND 13ENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA CITY CODE, 1THE CTTYONINGOF THE ORDINANCE, I REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY UNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANH IN ORDAINS; apter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zon- rereby amended by rezoning all Property within Oak 2nd Addition, Oak Ponds 3rd Addition and Oak Ponds urrred Unit Development -Residential. t rezoning of this property incorporates the following ri standards: ung Standards 'this zone is to create a PUD for Oak Ponds. Theuseof ulowformore flexible design standards while creating Id more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the mstrate a higher quality of architectural standards ,xcept as modified by the Oak Ponds PUD ordinance, hall cemply with the requirements of the R-12, High d District. d Uses uses in this zone shall be townhouses and multifamily r ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether the definition, the Planning Director shall make that itements and Setbacks t nce requires setbacks from roadways and exterior ' wing table displays those setbacks. Standard. freer. 50 feet d Lines 30 feet 0 feet -of-w 30 feet crate fretatsite) SOY. m 1,300 feet z4 feet di 54 feet zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shy not be v the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropri- ng map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of ring hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and references, and other information shown thereon are I by reference and made a part of this ordinance, ordinance shall be effectir, immediately upon its ition. DOPTED this 29th day of May, 2012bythe City Council hassen, Minnesota 'Manager Mayor hanhassen Villager on Thursday. June 14, 2012; No 0 Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A-02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Noti and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and sin of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghukhnnopgrstuvwxyz Y. Q 1 t (fit R > ✓ Laurie A. Hartmann Subscribed and sworn before me on this ��day of 2012 n Not lic i 7e?MME JEMlNEiTE BARK NOTr'.RY PIMIX -MINNESOTA OOMMISSIONU FIES0113i113 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter .............................................. $12.59 per column inch SCANNED 0 CARVER AND HENHASSEN NNEPIN OF CODUNNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 539 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE mrs ZONING ORDINANCE, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OFREZOVTHE CITY OFCCERTAINROHANHA3SEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zon- ing rty within Oak Pon Oak Ponds 2nd Additioamended Oak Ponds 3rdAddition and Oak Ponds 4th Addition to Planned Unit Development - Residential. Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Oak Ponds Zoning Standards a. Intent Theuseof le creating lily of architectural standards the Oak Ponds PUD ordinance, requirements of the R-12, High b. me permitted uses in this zone shall be townhouses and multifamily dwellings and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether'. or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior' Property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropri- ately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its Passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 29thdayof May 2012 by the City Council Of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, June 14, 2012: No. 46 0 0 0 CITY OF CHANIIASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 539 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANIIASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property within Oak Ponds, Oak Ponds 2nd Addition, Oak Ponds 3`d Addition and Oak Ponds 0 Addition to Planned Unit Development — Residential. Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Oak Ponds Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for Oak Ponds. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Oak Ponds PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the R-12, High Density Residential District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be townhouses and multifamily dwellings and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation- C. nterpretation c. Lot Requirements and Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Building Setbacks: Standards From Collector Street 50 feet From Exterior Lot Lines 30 feet Interior Lot Lines 0 feet Interior Public Right -of -Way 30 feet Hard Surface Coverage (Total site) 50% Lot Requirements: Minimum Lot Size 1,300 Square feet Minimum Lot Width 24 feet Minimum Lot Depth 54 feet Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 29h day of May, 2012 by the City Council of the City of CChhan�hassen, Minnesota A �- Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on June 14, 2012) 2 CITY OF CHfANHASSEN AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 590 NANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE ORDAINS: !by amended by rezoning al Its2ndAddition, PheasantH tion to PLmned Unit Devek e rezoning of this property �n standards: s Zoning Standards I thiszone is to create a PUDfor Single Family detached 'the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design stan- ing a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The t the development demonstrate a higher quality of ar- rds and site design. Exceptas modified by the Pheasant e, the developmentshall comply with the requirements Family Residential District. ed Uses I uses in this zone shall be Single Family Residential and s. If there is a question as to whetheror not a use meets Planning Director shall make that interpretation. uirements and Setbacks mance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior to following table displays those setbacks. T.d.rde 30 faf 30 red 10 fwr to0oo red 30% 'GWS Indsetbah 7o2d To red e zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be 3w the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall approprt- ungmap onfile in the Clerk's O1Bce for the purpose of ming hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and 3, references,andotherinformation shown thereon are dby reference and made apart of this ordinance. ion. .is ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its cat ADOPTED this 29th day of May, 2012 by the City Council nhassen, Minnesota ty Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, .lune 19, 2012; No. 0 Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Nott and'saW Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to 2, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abodefgbijklmnopgrstuvwxyz I - e - r Laurie A. Hartmann Subscribed and sworn before me on this i � -day of 2012 JYM�MIE JEANNETTE BARK 5 NOTARY PUBUC-MINNESOTA MY COMMISSION E)MRES 01131113 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................. $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $12.59 per column inch SCANNED 11 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 540 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE iHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHAJJGN Uwnuva: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property within Pheasant Hills, Pheasant Hills 2nd Addition, Pheasant Hills 3rd Addition and Pheas- ant Hills 4th Addition to Planned Unit Development - Residential. Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Pheasant Hills Zoning Standards a. Intent Thepurposeof this zone is to create aPUDfor Single Family detached homes. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design stan- dards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of ar- chitectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Pheasant Hill PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the RSF SingleBamily Residential District. D. Permitted Uses The pemitted uses in this zone shall be Single Family Residential and theirzurg114 Yuses.If there isaquestion astowhetherornotausemeets the detinAwn, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property Imes. The following table displays those setbacks. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropri- ately marls the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and allof the notations, references, and other information shown thereonare hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED ANDADOPTED this 29th dayof May, 2012by the City Council of the Cityof Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, June 14, 2012; No. 464T n U S audarda Fant Selma 1 30 feet Rea � 30 fed Side Sdbak 10 fed Minimum Wt sre 10.Om Had Surface Cor a 30% Minimum width m 30 furor ad setback 70 feel Minimum lot de 105 fed Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropri- ately marls the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and allof the notations, references, and other information shown thereonare hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED ANDADOPTED this 29th dayof May, 2012by the City Council of the Cityof Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, June 14, 2012; No. 464T n U 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 540 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property within Pheasant Hills, Pheasant Hills 2nd Addition, Pheasant Hills 3`d Addition and Pheasant Hills 0 Addition to Planned Unit Development - Residential. Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Pheasant Hills Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for Single Family detached homes. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Pheasant Hill PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the RSF Single -Family Residential District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be Single Family Residential and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. c. Lot Requirements and Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. SCANNEC Standards Front Setback 30 feet Rear Setback 30 feet Side Setback 10 feet Minimum lot size 10,000 square feet Hard Surface Coverage 30% Minimum width at 30 front yard setback 70 feet Minimum lot depth 105 feet SCANNEC 0 0 Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 29's day of May, 2012 by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Z\Alk 7 �L A rfE �� � � To erhazdt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, May (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on June 14, 2012) 1 U' 0 S4+ Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly swom, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No.A was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghijklmnopgrstu a Y: Laurie A. Hartmann Subscribed and sworn before me on this�day of 2012 No 'blit 1 w t`PvWUEANNEUE BARK NCTARYPUBUC-UNNESorA W Cr'WI QSiQN EXPIRES0113 tib RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................. $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $12.59 per column inch SCANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND BEPIN CO[7NTQ+S. OTA ORDINANCEAN NO. 541 _ CHANHASSENRCITY COANCE DE, THE CITY'SNDING CHAPTER ORDINANCE, r BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CtIANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all prUPertywithin Lxd 2, Block 1, Saratoga 3rd Addition to Planned Unit Development -Residential. Section 2 The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Saratoga 3rd Addition Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD high density residential development. The useof the PUDzone is to allowfor moreflexibledesim below ThePDrequires that thede elopm addemonshate a higherqual. Ay of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the standards below, the development shall comply with the requirements of the R-1$ High Density Residential District b Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be limited to multi -family resi- dentiuluses. A total of 46 units are permitted on the site. Multi -family Residential - This shall be defined asmultistoriedapart- ments or condominium unit, C. Prohibited uses Townhouses • Detached Townhouses Defamed Single -Family Homes d. Setbacks street Fm.tw me m.. SOWA s.aday ,iti.x final Snag Drive Sam Sevin Ddve saso sena vu.Dme saso ttu AAXLlie IN" The PUD standard for hard surface coverage is 65% e. Building Materials and Design 1. The PD requires that the development demonstrate a higher qualityof architectural standardsand site design. An mechanical equip- ment shall be screened with material compatible to the building. 2. Anmaterialshan be of high qualityanddurable. Majorexterior surfacesof an wells shallbe face brick, stucco with metal, wood, rockface block and stone accents. The structure shall have a pitched roof. 3. Block shall have aweathemdface orbepolished, fluted or broken face. 4. All accessory structures shall be designed tobecompatible with the primary structure. 5. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened by walls of compatible appearing material or camouflaged to blend into the building or background. Wood screen fences are Prohibited. All exterior Process avnloauaar interest UUMUgn Di uamg design or appropriate tanasrap- ing. The building(s) shall have varied and interesting detailing. The use of a solid wall Unrelieved by architectural detalline such as rhanee in S. Them shall be no underdeveloped sides of building. All eleva- d one visible from the street shall receive nearly equal treatment and visual qualities. f. Site Landscaping and Screening I. Landscaping along sheets shall comply with buffer yard Stan. dard B. Interior lot lines shallcomply with buffer yard, 10 feet in width. A landscape plan most bepresented for approval with the site phm review Process. 2. Storage of materials outdoors is prohibited unless it has been approved under site plan review g. Signage 1. Signage shall comply with the sign ordinance for residential districts. 2. All signs shall squire a sign permit. h. Lighting 1. Allightfixtures shall beshielded. Lightlevels shallbeno more than % candle at the property line Light fixtures shall not be more than 20feet in height This does not apply to street lights. 1. Alternative Access 1. Separate pedestrian access shall be provided from the site to the Public sidewalk and trail system. Section 3. The wrung map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be veprovidedfor in thisordmance, andan of the other information sbown thereon are hereby and made a part of this ordinance. an" shall be effective immediately upon its M this 29th day of May, 2012 by the City Council , Minnesota (Published in the Chanhassen Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor 4648) Villager on Thursday June 19, 20124 No. 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 541 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property within Lot 2, Block 1, Saratoga P Addition to Planned Unit Development — Residential. Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Saratoga Yd Addition Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD high density residential development. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be underground. The development shall proceed through the site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the standards below, the development shall comply with the requirements of the R-12, High Density Residential District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be limited to multi -family residential uses. A total of 46 units are permitted on the site. Multi family Residential — This shall be defined as multi -storied apartments or condominium units. C. Prohibited uses • Townhouses • Detached Townhouses • Detached Single -Family Homes d. Setbacks SCANNED Street Fronta a Minimum Setback Buildin arkin feet Laredo Drive 50/50 Saratoga Drive 50/50 Santa Vera Drive 50/50 Interior Lot Line 15/50 The PUD standard for hard surface coverage is 65% e. Building Materials and Design 1. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building. 2. All material shall be of high quality and durable. Major exterior surfaces of all walls shall be face brick, stucco with metal, wood, rock face block and stone accents. The structure shall have a pitched roof 3. Block shall have a weathered face or be polished, fluted or broken face. 4. All accessory structures shall be designed to be compatible with the primary structure. 5. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened by walls of compatible appearing material or camouflaged to blend into the building or background. Wood screen fences are prohibited. All exterior process machinery, tanks, etc., are to be fully screened by compatible materials. 6. Acceptable materials will incorporate textured surfaces, exposed aggregate and/or other patterning. All walls shall be given added architectural interest through building design or appropriate landscaping. The building(s) shall have varied and interesting detailing. The use of a solid wall unrelieved by architectural detailing, such as change in material, change in color, fenestrations, or other significant visual relief provided in a manner or at intervals in keeping with the size, mass and scale of the wall and its views from the public ways shall be prohibited. 7. Space for recycling shall be provided. 8. There shall be no underdeveloped sides of building. All elevations visible from the street shall receive nearly equal treatment and visual qualities. f. Site Landscaping and Screening 1. Landscaping along streets shall comply with buffer yard standard B. Interior lot lines shall comply with buffer yard A, 10 feet in width. A landscape plan must be presented for approval with the site plan review process. 2. Storage of materials outdoors is prohibited unless it has been approved under site plan review. g. Signage 1. Signage shall comply with the sign ordinance for residential districts. 2. All signs shall require a sign permit. 0 h. Lighting 1. All light fixtures shall be shielded. Light levels shall be no more than''/2 candle at the property line. Light fixtures shall not be more than 20 feet in height. This does not apply to street lights. i. Alternative Access 1. Separate pedestrian access shall be provided from the site to the public sidewalk and trail system. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 29' day of May, 2012 by the City Council of the City of n, Minnesota Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on June 14, 2012) Chanhassen City Council — May 29, 2012 Assistant Chief Coppersmith: Absolutely sir. Recreational fire is defined as a fire that is attended, number one. It should be either in a manufactured fire ring or in a fire pit and the fire should be no larger than 3 feet by 3 feet and 1 will say 3 feet high because I have seen people that have stacked wood well over 6 feet, big teepee style and light it because it's within a 3 foot ring and it should be no closer than 25 feet from any structure or combustibles. Councilman Laufenburger: Like a tree. Assistant Chief Coppersmith: Like a tree or a deck and the key is you should have, should be attended and you should, as long as you're having a fire there's no big deal. You know hook up a garden hose to the spigot out back and have it stand by you just in case. Councilman Laufenburger: Okay. Thanks for that reminder. Assistant Chief Coppersmith: Thank you sir. Mayor Furlong: Good question. Anything else? Very good. Thank you for the update. Appreciate it. RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD -R) AMENDMENTS: REQUEST TO AMEND THE FOLLOWING RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS: Kate Aanenson: Thank you Mayor, members of the City Council. At your last meeting you approved the first series of the PUD's. I just want to again briefly describe kind of the process. We do have a number of them tonight so we'd like to go through each of them separately but have you make one motion because each of them has unique characteristics. So again the City's requesting to amend the PUD's. Make sure they incorporate the unique attributes of each PUD as they were established. The City references an underlying zoning district so that was determined what the appropriate district would be. The City has prepared these ordinances so those are a part of your attachments that you are approving tonight and again in researching these PUD's we discovered that some houses may not meet the standards of the development and if any structures that are non -conforming, they're grandfathered in. If someone was to, we're not forcing somebody to come into compliance today but if they were wanting to do something additional then we would work with them at that time but I just want to make sure that that's clear. The Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on May 15'h. There was one person in attendance and I will go through that when we get to it. It's actually the last PUD but the Planning Commission did recommend at their meeting on May 15'h 7 to 0 to recommend to you the approval of those. Again 1 just wanted to reiterated with each of the neighborhood groups, we've had neighborhood meetings and those have been very positive so we had approximately 50 people attend with this group and actually met with somebody again today who attended the meeting so it felt very positive about the information that was provided and our website too has a lot of information. So with that I'll go through each of the PUD's before you tonight. We tried to break these into groupings. This is kind of we're doing it by geographical area so this is kind of it's a quadrant in here so these are the ones we'll be going through. Pheasant Hills, Chaparral, Chan Vista, Fox Hollow, Saratoga, Oak Ponds, Fox Hollow and Near Mountain. So the first one is the Chan Vista PUD and there's actually four additions to that and the subdivision was created or this PUD was created back in 1986. It covers approximately 70 acres. There's 123 housing units in this development. The smallest lot in that PUD was 11,700 so that then became the minimum. We also looked at each of the houses on the lot to find the narrowest lot which would be 80 feet and then to establish from that the setback. The 30 foot and the 10 on the sides so with that we did recommend the zoning ordinance which would be the underlying zoning district would be the residential RSF but for those unique characteristics which 1 just described which would be the minimum lot so really • Chanhassen City Council — May 29, 2012 nobody has the opportunity to further subdivide. Those are captured in where they are today and again with the neighborhood meetings we did find that there's some, you know some things that might be very close to the property line and they are what they are so it's not our intent at this time to make any of those changes but to create those standards going forward. Mayor Furlong: Ms. Aanenson a question for you. Kate Aanenson: Yes. Mayor Furlong: When you say there are some things close to the property line Kate Aanenson: Maybe a deck. Maybe an accessory structure that wouldn't meet the current setbacks Again when these were put in place back in 1986, maybe a yard barn wasn't checked for a setback or someone put a deck on in the weekend and maybe didn't get a permit and those are all legal non- conforming at this point but if someone was to come in and try to screen it in we might check at that point. Mayor Furlong: Okay, and 1 guess that's my question. They're legal non -conforming so they're effectively grandfathered in with any changes here. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: These changes won't necessarily require a change in the structurejust by making this, the changes to the ordinance. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: But if somebody's looking to expand a deck or change it or relocate or something then these standards that we're looking at tonight would come into play. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. So the minimum lot width as opposed to what would be a 90 foot for RSF, they get the, because they're all smaller, and the lot depth would be similar to what we already have in the Residential Single Family so with this then you go back to the residential single family zoning district for the setbacks for an accessory structure. Anything else like that would speak to that so these are the unique attributes and then the ordinance would cite, as is attached in here, the underlying zoning district would then be the Residential Single Family and that's what's attached here. Your ordinance. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Kate Aanenson: Any questions on that one? Okay. And then Chaparral. There's actually two additions. Chaparral 2"d. Excuse me, three additions and the third and this was done in 1978. And I want you to know in some of these neighborhood meetings we did find original owners and spoke with them so that was very interesting to get history of the city and how they've enjoyed living in their home and seeing all the changes so. So the Chaparral again is 106 acres. The entire. There was a park dedication with this. That Meadow Green Park was a dedication with this project so the residential acreage is actually 64 and they also dedicated some right-of-way and some additional for Kerber Boulevard so the total number of units in that is 423. And this is a little unique because there's actually three different types of products in there. You have some single family. You have some duplexes and you have some fourplexes in there so with that we had to come up with different standards for each of those developments so it's a little easier maybe to see on here where you can see the attached product. The fourplexes and the like so we had to come up with different standards for each of these. So the minimum lot size for each type of product is ` Chanhassen City Council —May 29, 2012 • identified in there. Again for the single it's 10,000 and then this would be the lot size. The duplex would be 4,300 and the quad would be 3,400 and that's for their lot. Now again, maybe I say this too many times but the least flexible product you have is an attached product. Most of the times those aren't changed. We did a number of years ago give a blanket variance for people to screen in their porches on these but we did that as a PUD amendment and that would be a way to accomplish that but the single family home is more where you have the most changes because some people's lifestyle change. They may not want to move. They may want to add on. They may want to put a yard but most people living in a fourplex or a twin home there's not as much change. People may move out of that type of a unit but we've established all the minimum lot widths and lot depths for all of these. Again the underlying zoning district then would be, it's an R district. Thank you. Yeah, thank you. R4 and. Laurie Hokkanen: R-8. Kate Aanenson: R-8 so that would be our attached. R-4 you can have a 10,000 square foot lot minimum and then the R-8 is for the attached projects so again those would be the supplemental or the underlying zoning districts. Any questions on that one? Mayor Furlong: Questions? Thank you. Kate Aanenson: Okay, Fox Hollow. Fox Hollow is four additions and this was done in 1984 and this one had a wetland and also has a park adjacent to it. The park wasn't taken with this one but at a different date but this one does have wetland setbacks and there were specific contour line established with this. Now as we've moved through the history of the city we've changed how we look at wetland setback and wetland buffer so what we did is we didn't change what was originally in the development contract. We left what they were built with in place so people that had an existing setback based on a contour line, we left that in place. It would be very difficult to say you know if a house was set at a certain point to say now you can go to within the wetland setback so I think we've tried to make that clear. We've had some cases where we've had people ask to have their property rezoned. It's not our intent. It's really just to clarify what the underlying zoning district is on that. So this one it's all single family. The average lot size in this area was 12,100 but the smallest lot was actually 7,400 so there was some, a few smaller lots in there. At that time the zoning was PL Because it is close to the lake it does have the 25% hard cover on there but they're also averaged out, some of those with the park. So the 95 single family lots have the minimum, the smallest lot is 7,400 with a minimum lot of 67 feet and a minimum lot depth of 100. Again it'd be very difficult for anybody in these subdivisions to subdivide but some people have the flexibility to add on, which is what people do over time which we like when people reinvest in their homes. So the front setbacks, again because of the lot sizes are 20 feet and that's pretty standard and 10 and 5 which I know we, that's how we do it now but there were a lot of subdivisions built back then that also had the 10 and the 5 and I think you may not notice it as much in that neighborhood when you have maturation of the homes and the landscaping over time, you know it becomes less obvious so they do have a setback of 75 feet which is kind of our old standard, or there's a perpetual easement there below that elevation which is along that wetland there, and that was also to exclude people from putting structures out there like docks. So what helps us on these if someone calls in and says can I put a dock out there, we've got that codified into the code what you can and cannot do. That's some of the simplicity. And we did have a few people from that neighborhood show up to the open house too. Mayor Furlong: And what was their, if I can ask a question, what was their comments and concerns? Kate Aanenson: I think some people were concerned if they were non -conforming what would be their circumstances and I think that we resolved that issue and clarified our position on that. This is just what was prohibited in the easement. We carred that forward. That was the original contract with the development. It's alteration of vegetation which I think is pretty standard how we do it now. So with that • 0 Chanhassen City Council —May 29, 2012 I'll move onto the Laredo. The Laredo actually had 21 single family lots and it's just a little small subdivision. We learned in this part of town there was, they came in with a large preliminary plat and it was broken down into, depending on what was left on that piece, how they subdivided it up so the average lot size was 11,200 but you can see in this area right in here that these lots are 6,000 square feet. Those are some of the smallest single family lots we found in the city in that timeframe. So again the 21 lots. We did reference the underlying residential single family district and the minimum lot size, we went with the 6,000 because that's the smallest one there. Again the way the houses are placed on the lot they really are unable to further subdivide so they had the 50 at the building setback line and the minimum depth of 90. Again because of the lot size, the front setback was shorter. 30 is standard and they also had the 5 and the 10. The 15 and then they got the 30% hard coverage because of the small lots. Yes. Mayor Furlong: Question on the lot size. Since the average is 11,200 with a minimum being stated here now at 6,000. I'm assuming that there are some lots that are greater than 12,000 in this development. Kate Aanenson: Yes. Mayor Furlong: Okay, and so you said because of the placement of the house but if somebody wanted to raze the house, would they be able to subdivide with two lots 6,000 or more? Kate Aanenson: I don't think so because they'd still have to meet the 50 and the 90 so there isn't, you have to meet the 50 and the 90. Not one or the other. Mayor Furlong: Okay. I guess let me rephrase. Have you looked through with any of these requirements specifically looked at these properties. Kate Aanenson: Yes we did. Mayor Furlong: And determined whether or not anybody would be able to subdivide based upon the criteria. Kate Aanenson: Yes. Now if somebody was to assemble, buy 3 lots and maybe try to get 2 additional ones out that potentially could happen but it would be difficult again to meet the 50 and the 90 because. Mayor Furlong: It would require some assemblage of existing. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Correct. Mayor Furlong: Does that concern you at all from a planning perspective? Kate Aanenson: No, I think if you look at, if you go back at how these were laid out, if you look at off of Laredo Lane, those houses in there and even on these, it would be very difficult to, because they're at the minimum 50 so you couldn't get a, or maybe some of those are at 60 so you would take quite a few lots to get to the minimums. Todd Gerhardt: Nobody has 100. Kate Aanenson: No, No. They're all pretty small and you know if you go up. Mayor Furlong: At 100 you're saying 100 feet. r Chanhassen City Council —May 29, 2012 • Kate Aanenson: At the building setback, yeah. Yeah, and even if you go up at the other end of the Laredo Lane up in this area here, you just don't have that much frontage to make that and typically now if you look at, trying to do at least a 2 car garage you are you know, it would be difficult. And some of the other lots, back to your point mayor, most of those narrow lots are maybe deeper. If you were to go over off of some of the other ones coming forward, they're still very narrow but they're deeper to get the acreage. Mayor Furlong: Sure. Kate Aanenson: So I think to the City Manager's point, when you look at that narrowness it's difficult to try to assemble that to get additional lot yield. Mayor Furlong: How are comer lots treated with these requirements? Kate Aanenson: They would have the two fronts. That was the one place we did note that there was some, they didn't meet a standard of the you know the 30/30. They may have been treated with a 20/20 so we wouldn't allow someone to continue to add on on that side and that's where, in our meeting with the neighbors, if you're not conforming on one side but you still have room under the hard cover and you can meet the requirements on the back side and you meet all the setbacks, then you would be able to proceed based on that and. Mayor Furlong: To expand there. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Correct. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Kate Aanenson: And certainly at any point someone always has a right to apply for a variance and we look at the reasonableness of that and the circumstances. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Would a corner lot be able to subdivide and claim two. Kate Aanenson: 1 don't think they have, 1 just don't think they have enough to make it work, yeah. There's not in this circumstance. Both of those are the smaller ones, at least on this Laredo one. Mayor Furlong: I'm looking off Del Rio. Kate Aanenson: Yeah. Todd Gerhardt: Del Rio and Laredo. Kate Aanenson: Yeah. Yeah. Todd Gerhardt: But by the time you got the 30 foot setback in the front and the side. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, actually 1 believe this map is slightly off because this is, this should be right through here. This is part of a different subdivision which has a little bit different standards and 1 apologize for that. Mayor Furlong: Oh okay. So the home. 10 0 0 Chanhassen City Council — May 29, 2012 Kate Aanenson: This is the actual subdivision. Mayor Furlong: That's actual. Kate Aanenson: Yep, so this was done as another subdivision and their standards are a little bit bigger. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Kate Aanenson: They're a little closer to the traditional. Mayor Furlong: That answers the question, thank you. Kate Aanenson: You're welcome. Near Mountain. Near Mountain has a lot of phases in it and interesting to note, when we pulled out the original plans, in one of the phases it was actually intended to be condos. Actually the last phase so I'm not going to read through all the different phases but in putting this together, in order to, because there's different standards in there, we actually created kind of, you can see the smaller lots here on the eastern side and the western side's where they get the largest but what we had to do in order to make this work is to go to AA, A, B and C and with each of those, if you look at your zoning ordinance there's different standards. So if you look at, let me just give you the total number of lots that were put in here. So in 1979 they were actually looking at 120 condominiums, 144 single family, 36 quadraminiums. I'm not sure that terminology's still used, and for a total of 300 units. Okay. So obviously it was changed quite a bit from that so when they came back for a revised plan the lots in A were the larger lots. Kind of almost like an acre lot. Now if you go back in time and look at this we included wetland acreage in lots, which we don't do anymore. We only count the upland so these lots, while they show larger acreage, some of that is also encumbered with a wetland so the upland area isn't actually quite that big. So for the AA standard, which is the Near Mountain and the Summit at Near Mountain, which is this area here, those lots are all, there's 42 and those are at 20,000 so those are the biggest lots and that was actually the last phase where they were looking at doing the condominiums. So those are 150 foot in depth. 115 in width so again those wouldn't be split and the topography's a little bit challenging up there too. Then in area A there's 51 units and the minimum lot size there is 17,200. Again a standard RSF would be the 15,000 so those are slightly larger and those come closer to our standard 90 and this is 100 by 125 which is RSF standard. They also are encumbered by the shoreland and so there's wetland also in there. So then B right here is the 46 units, and those are a little smaller at 10,900. When I says smaller again I don't want to, some of that is included in the wetlands. While the other ones may appear larger they may also have a significant amount of wetland, and again 75 by 125. That's pretty close to a standard RSF. And then C has a couple different areas of lot sizes. 57 at 9,730 and 40 at 7,400 so there's two different lot sizes within there. And with that we are using the RSF district as the underlying zoning district in that again looking at that, because of the wetlands and the setbacks, it'd be very difficult for somebody to, you'd have to really assemble quite a few to make it work to further subdivide. Again at the time that these were put in place we've looked at wetlands a lot different than was done at that time. So with that I'd be happy to answer any questions that you may have on the Near Mountain so here's the chart that we went through. Mayor Furlong: Any questions on this? Councilman Laufenburger: None here. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. y - y Chanhassen City Council — IGiay 29, 2012 • Kate Aanenson: Alright. Then Oak Ponds, this actually had four additions. Oak Ponds as you may be aware is where we have the senior housing project and this one also came in with a couple different types of product so within that, we just codified. Councilman Laufenburger: Kate. Kate Aanenson: Yep. Councilman Laufenburger: You said the senior housing. That's Centennial, is that right? Kate Aanenson: Centennial, I'm sorry. Thank you. We do have a couple senior housing. Centennial Hills. Our first senior housing project. So with that what we did is just put the standards, codified them and that was really just the minimum lot sizes for each of those product. They all share common open spaces between the Oak Ponds development so that one is actually pretty straight forward as far as the underlying zoning district which is R12 which is our high density zoning district and that's what that is. That is the units per acre. I'm not sure if I have the total number. k's 27 acres and 211 units total in that whole PUD. So here's our senior housing and then we've got the townhouses and then the attached. Alright. Any questions on that? Mayor Furlong: No. Kate Aanenson: Okay. And then Pheasant Hills is four additions done in 1983. Consists of 33 lots. Again some of these are encumbered by wetlands in the back so while the average may be slightly skewed because that's how it was calculated at the time so the 38 single family lots, minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Minimum lot width at the front yard is 30 and the setback is 70. Then the minimum depth 105 feet so again we would go with the 30% hard surface coverage and the underlying zoning district would be the RSF. Question on that one? And then finally Saratoga. This is right behind City Hall here and that one has a lengthy history. There's 18 units built there and the zoning on that allows for 46. At this hearing Mr. Hansen, who owns the property did show up and spoke with the Planning Commission regarding pursuing his plan that had some entitlements so the Planning Commission did a good job explaining to him at this time it is not our intent to give any standing to any plans that maybe have. That would be a separate process to go through. He actually wanted to get a density bonus on that and this isn't the process. They'd have to submit a plan and then for the staff and the Planning Commission to hold the public hearing on and weigh those merits and then give a recommendation to the City Council so with that we did recommend that he pursue that in a different option so we are recommending the R12 as the underlying zoning district. Again this one had a little bit, you can see how much of that is built. The City did purchase some of that for some additional ballfields but this is the property here off of Santa Vera. Mayor Furlong: So there is more development out there? Kate Aanenson: There is more development opportunities, yes. He explained to the Planning Commission he'd like to maintain what he thought he had approval on. He never presented anything but he has been busy and wasn't able to pursue those plans and so he would really need to start over with pursuing a development proposal. 1 think he understood that and then the Planning Commission did a good job explaining that. So with that you know you could have a total of 46 and I explained there's already 16 on there so this is what with the underlying zoning district put in place. Again it's not an R at this time too. This is what the development contract said. No townhouses. No detached townhomes. No detached townhomes and no detached single family homes. They wanted apartments so that's how we left it. If they wanted to change for that he could come forward, or any owner of the property could come through and request a change at that time and amend the PUD but we didn't want to start doing that with 12 0 0 Chanhassen City Council — May 29, 2012 each of these because then we'd be negotiating all of them and our goal at this time is really just to codify them. Mayor Furlong: As they exist today Kate Aanenson: Yes because you'll see there's some that are getting more complex that if people want changes then it would become a slippery slope to kind of go through that process. Our goal is to put everything into the development contract that was approved with the council minutes to the best of our understanding is to codify what was the intent at that time. Certainly you could revisit those issues under an application but I think it's important to have an application in front of you to decide whether or not that would be the appropriate use. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Any questions on that? No? Todd Gerhardt: Park and Rec Director promised him 16 more units if he sold him a baseball field. Kate Aanenson: Well I think too if you were to say you could have the townhomes but there was an expectation that you could still get 40, they might not fit on there so I think you have to look at that on a project or a case application as opposed to just you know going ahead and waiving your authority on that. So with that we gave the setbacks. Again this would be standard with the PUD. The hard cover, surface coverage gives them a lot of leeway on that but I think when you look at the product type, you know when you need to provide so much parking it does require to go more vertical so if there's a expectation of so many units, you'd have to weigh that on how many they could get on the site. There's also specifics regarding architecture which we also included. Again they're willing to look at that at the time an application was submitted but for now we'rejust codifying it. So with that we recommend that the City Council approve the following attached ordinance and adopt the Findings of Fact and I'd be happy to answer any of the questions that you have. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Any questions for Ms. Aanenson. Very comprehensive analysis and recommendation and thank you for that and your staff, please extend our thanks to them and to the Planning Commission and certainly for all the residents that have been involved, appreciate your outreach there as well to, not only do you get the chance to meet some people that have been here a long time, which is kind of fun, but you get to answer their questions and make sure that they understand what the process is too so we appreciate that. If there are no other questions there is a motion that has been recommended. Would somebody like to make a motion? Councilman Laufenburger: I'll do so Mr. Mayor. Mayor Furlong: Mr. Laufenburger. Councilman Laufenburger: I move that the Chanhassen City Council approves the attached ordinances rezoning the following Planned Unit Developments: Chanhassen Vista, Chaparral, Fox Hollow, Laredo Lane, Near Mountain, Oak Ponds, Pheasant Hill, Saratoga 3's Addition and adopt the Planning Commission Findings of Fact. Councilwoman Ernst: Second. Mayor Furlong: Motion's been made and seconded. Any discussion on that motion? Councilman Laufenburger moved, Councilwoman Ernst seconded that the Chanhassen City Council approves the attached ordinances rezoning the following Planned Unit Developments: 13 Chanhassen City Council — Nlay 29, 2012 • Chanhassen Vista, Chaparral, Fox Hollow, Laredo Lane, Near Mountain, Oak Ponds, Pheasant Hill, Saratoga 3d Addition and adopt the Planning Commission Findings of Fact. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Mayor Furlong: Thank you and thank you again. I think there are some more of these coming forward as well. Kate Aanenson: You'll be seeing a few. We'll be sprinkling them in. Mayor Furlong: Alright, that sounds good. Thank you. Appreciate your good work F41 9013 Q Mayor Furlong: Earlier this year we made appointments to all four of our commissions that serve the City Council. The Park and Rec, the Planning Commission, Senior Commission and Environmental Commission. Because of the number of applicants and for other reasons there was one opening that remained on the Park and Rec Commission. Earlier this evening the City Council interviewed two applicants. Two candidates for the opening on the Park and Rec Commission. Jeff. Councilman Laufenburger. Boettcher. Mayor Furlong: Boettcher, thank you. Councilman Laufenburger: Jim, excuse me. Mayor Furlong: It's Jim. Todd Gerhardt: Yeah Jim. Mayor Furlong: And Todd Neils. Both candidates were certainly qualified and bring different skills and abilities and were both showed definite passion towards improving our park and recreation programs and system here in the city and we appreciate that. It's the council this evening I believe, and I would certainly place in nomination Jim Boettcher's name for the appointment to the Park and Rec Commission and ask for a second. Councilwoman Ernst: I'll second that Mayor Furlong: Thank you. As I said, as with always the case if we had 2 positions we'd be appointing both this evening I believe. Both were very qualified candidates. As it is there's one position so we have to make a choice but we certainly appreciate all the work that Todd has done with the City and the CAA over the years and know that he'll continue to be involved and will continue to work with our staff and the Park and Rec Commission for issues as he discussed. With that is there any other discussion or comments? If not, as there's been a motion to appoint Jim Boettcher to the Park and Rec Commission. It's been seconded. We'll proceed with the vote. Mayor Furlong moved, Councilwoman Ernst seconded to appoint Jim Boettcher to a 3 year term beginning April 1, 2012 to the Park and Recreation Commission. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. 14 CITY OF C9ANAA3EN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner DATE: May 29, 2012 O SUBJ: Request to Amend Planned Unit Development — Residential (PUD -R) Planning Case #2012-04-2 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the attached ordinances rezoning the following Planned Unit Developments: • Chanhassen Vista • Chaparral • Fox Hollow • Laredo Lane • Near Mountain • Oak Ponds • Pheasant Hill • Saratoga 3`d Addition and adopt the Planning Commission Findings of Fact." City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City is requesting an amendment to the Planned Unit Development — Residential (PUD -R) zoning on the properties to incorporate the unique development standards for the individual project as well as referencing an underlying standard zoning district in the zoning ordinance. The City references an underlying standard zoning district to address issues that are not covered within the specific PUD -R zoning of the property. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 15, 2012 to review the Chanhassen Vista, Chaparral, Fox Hollow, Laredo Lane, Near Mountain, Oak Ponds, Pheasant Hill and Saratoga 3`a Addition Planned Unit Developments. The Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 to recommend approval of the PUD ordinances. The Planning Commission minutes are item la of the May 29, 2012 City Council packet. Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SCANNED Todd Gerhardt • Residential PUD Amendments — Group 2 May 29, 2012 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the ordinances rezoning the following Planned Unit Developments for Chanhassen Vista, Chaparral, Fox Hollow, Laredo Lane, Near Mountain, Oak Ponds, Pheasant Hill and Saratoga 3rd Addition and adoption of the Planning Commission Findings of Fact. ATTACHMENT Planning Commission Staff Report Dated May 15, 2012. g:\plan\2012 planning cases\2012-04 residential pud amendments\group 2 -may 15, 2012 public hearing\executive summary.doc • MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission CITY OF FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner CHMNSEN DATE: May 15, 2012 7700 Market Boulevard SUBJ: Planned Unit Development — Residential PO Box 147 Planning Case #2012-04 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Staff brought this issue to the Planning Commission on June 21, 2011, September 6, 2011 and Administration January 3, 2012. The following discoveries were made after researching the different ordinances: Phone: 952.227.1100 * The more recent ordinances may omit language that ties the standards to the rest of the City Fax: 952.2271110 Code. Building Inspections • The PUD subdivisions created in the 1980s and early 1990s reference the Design Standards Phone: 952.227.1180 as part of the Development Contract or approved development plan, rather than with the Fax: 952.227.1190 adoption of the Design Standards in the PUD Ordinance. • During the 1970s, any Residential Single -Family development exceeding 25 lots was Engineering required to be processed as a Planned Residential Development, even if the development Phone: 952.227.1160 complied with all requirements of the standard zoning regulations. Fax: 952.227.1170 Senior Center Approximately 1,200 cards were sent out to affected residents. Staff estimates that 50 people Phone: 952.227.1125 attended the open house. Additionally, staff received numerous phone calls and email Fax: 952.227.1110 requests for information regarding the change. Many individuals were directed to the City's web page at http://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/sere/plan/12-04.html to view additional Web Bile information and follow the process. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff Reports (8) dated May 15, 2012 for Planning Case #2012-04 (Group 2). g1plan\2012 planning cases\2012-04 residential pud amendments\group 2 -may 15, 2012 public hearing\pc cover mcmo.doc Chanhassen is a Community for Life -Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow The City has prepared ordinances for each development that incorporates a reference to an Finance underlying standard zoning district to address issues that are not covered within the unique PUD Phone: 952.227.1140 standards for the development zoning of the property. It is important to reference the underlying Fax: 952.2271110 standard zoning district so as to incorporate additional City requirements that are located within other portions of the code such as home occupations, accessory structures, driveway design and Park & Recreation parking standards, etc. that may otherwise not be addressed. Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 9522271110 In researching the PUDs, staff has discovered that some houses may not meet the standards of the Recreation Center development. If there are any structures that are non -conforming, then they will be 2310 Coulter Boulevard "grandfathered in". It is not our intent to bring everyone into compliance. We are trying to clarify Phone: 952.227.1400 and codify the standards. The number of lots that are in PUDs that we are codifying is around Fax: 952.227.1404 3,000 so is not practical to obtain compliance at this time. If someone does any further alterations or additions, we will work with them at that time. Planning & Natural Resources Staff held a neighborhood meeting on April 24, 2012 at the Chanhassen Recreation Center to Phone: 952.227.1130 discuss the proposed changes with residents of the following subdivisions: Fax: 952.227.1110 a. Chanhassen Vista e. Near Mountain Public Works b. Chaparral f. Oak Ponds 7901 Park Place c. Fox Hollow g. Pheasant Hills Phone: 952.227.1300 d. Laredo Lane h. Saratoga 3d Addition Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Approximately 1,200 cards were sent out to affected residents. Staff estimates that 50 people Phone: 952.227.1125 attended the open house. Additionally, staff received numerous phone calls and email Fax: 952.227.1110 requests for information regarding the change. Many individuals were directed to the City's web page at http://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/sere/plan/12-04.html to view additional Web Bile information and follow the process. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff Reports (8) dated May 15, 2012 for Planning Case #2012-04 (Group 2). g1plan\2012 planning cases\2012-04 residential pud amendments\group 2 -may 15, 2012 public hearing\pc cover mcmo.doc Chanhassen is a Community for Life -Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow PROPOSED MOTION: The Planning Commission recommends City Council approve the attached ordinance rezoning the Planned Unit Development — Residential to incorporate the development standards for Chanhassen Vista and adopt the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The City is requesting an amendment to the Planned Unit Development — Residential (PUD -R) zoning on the property to incorporate the unique development standards for the project as well as referencing the Single -Family Residential District (RSF) in the zoning ordinance. The City references an underlying standard zoning district to address issues that are not covered within the specific PUD -R zoning of the property. LOCATION: Chanhassen Vista, Chanhassen Vista 2"d Addition, Chanhassen Vista 3'd Addition and Chanhassen Vista 0 Addition APPLICANT: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 CHANHASSEN VISTA RESIDENTIAL PUD PRESENT ZONING: Planned Unit Development — Residential (PUD -R) 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density (net density 1.2 — 4.0 units per acre) ACREAGE: 70 acres DENSITY: net: 2.69 units per acre LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings, PVDs and amendments to PUDs because the City is acting in its legislative or policy-making capacity. A rezoning or PUD, and amendment thereto, must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. APPLICABLE REGULA'T'IONS: Except as modified by the specific Planned Unit Development — Residential ordinance, the property shall comply with the requirements of the City of Chanhassen City Code. 0 0 Chanhassen Vista Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 2 of 4 BACKGROUND The City approved a development plan as the controlling document for this development. • July 21, 1986 — Approved preliminary and final Development Plan. • February 23, 1987 — Approved final plat for Chanhassen Vista 2nd Addition. • April 6, 1987 — Approved final plat for Chanhassen Vista 3`d Addition. • August 17, 1987 — Approved final plat for Chanhassen Vista 4d' Addition. REZONING The City is requesting to rezone approximately 70 acres amending the existing Planned Unit Development -Residential (PUD -R) zoning on the property. The project consists of 123 dwelling units. The review criteria are taken from the intent section of the PUD Ordinance. Section 20-501. Intent Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD in this instance is to accommodate existing natural features on the property. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the other more standard zoning districts. The proposed development provides a compatible development with the surrounding development. The proposed rezoning assists in the furtherance of the following land use goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • Development will be encouraged within the MUSA line. • The plan should seek to establish sufficient land to provide a full range of housing opportunities. • The city will seek opportunities to provide transitions between different uses of different types. • Development should be phased in accordance with the ability of the city to provide services. CHANHASSEN VISTA, PUD #86-1 Single Family Lots 123 Minimum Lot Size11,700s uare feet Minimum Lot Width 180 feet at building setback line Setbacks: • Front 30 feet, except the lots on the north adjacent to creek and on the south overlooking the pond which shall be 25 feet • Side 10 feet • Rear 30 feet • July 21, 1986 — Approved preliminary and final Development Plan. • February 23, 1987 — Approved final plat for Chanhassen Vista 2nd Addition. • April 6, 1987 — Approved final plat for Chanhassen Vista 3`d Addition. • August 17, 1987 — Approved final plat for Chanhassen Vista 4d' Addition. REZONING The City is requesting to rezone approximately 70 acres amending the existing Planned Unit Development -Residential (PUD -R) zoning on the property. The project consists of 123 dwelling units. The review criteria are taken from the intent section of the PUD Ordinance. Section 20-501. Intent Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD in this instance is to accommodate existing natural features on the property. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the other more standard zoning districts. The proposed development provides a compatible development with the surrounding development. The proposed rezoning assists in the furtherance of the following land use goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • Development will be encouraged within the MUSA line. • The plan should seek to establish sufficient land to provide a full range of housing opportunities. • The city will seek opportunities to provide transitions between different uses of different types. • Development should be phased in accordance with the ability of the city to provide services. • Chanhassen Vista Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 3 of 4 The proposed rezoning assists in the furtherance of the following housing goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: A balanced housing supply with housing available for people of all income levels. A variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life -cycle. Housing development that respects the natural environment of the community while striving to accommodate the need for a variety of housing types and costs. Staff is proposing the following standards regulate the development of the property: Chanhassen Vista Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for a single-family detached housing development. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Chanhassen Vista PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the Single -Family Residential, RSF, District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be single-family detached houses and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks Minimum Lot size: 11,000 square feet. Must average 15,000 square feet over the entire Chanhassen Vista development. Minimum Lot Width: 76 feet Minimum Lot Depth: 125 feet The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Setback Standards Front lot line 30 feet* Side lot line 10 feet Rear lot line 30 feet Hard Surface Coverage 30% *The following lots have 25 -foot front yard setbacks: Lots 1 — 6, Block 3, and Lots 1 — 10, Block 4, Chanhassen Vista 2vd Addition. Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Chanhassen Vista 3d Addition. Lots 1 — 9, Block 2, and Lots 2 and 3, Block 3, Chanhassen Vista 4" Addition. 0 0 Chanhassen Vista Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 4 of 4 Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Chanhassen Vista Planned Unit Development — Residential ordinance and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. ATTACHMENTS 1. Chanhassen Vista PUD Ordinance. 2. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 3. Reduced Copy Plats: • Chanhassen Vista • Chanhassen Vista 2nd Addition • Chanhassen Vista 3rd Addition • Chanhassen Vista 40' Addition g9plan12012 phuming cases@012-04 residential pud amendments\group 2 - may 15, 2012 public hearin&hanhassen vistalstaff repos chanhassen vism.doc 0 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property within Chanhassen Vista, Chanhassen Vista 2"d Addition, Chanhassen Vista 3d Addition and Chanhassen Vista 4d' Addition to Planned Unit Development - Residential. Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Chanhassen Vista Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for a single-family detached housing development. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Chanhassen Vista PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the Single -Family Residential, RSF, District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be single-family detached houses and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks Minimum Lot size: 11,000 square feet. Must average 15,000 square feet over the entire Chanhassen Vista development. Minimum Lot Width: 76 feet Minimum Lot Depth: 125 feet The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. 0 0 Setback Standards Front lot line 30 feet* Side lot line 10 feet Rear lot line 30 feet Hard Surface Coverage 30% *The following lots have 25 -foot front yard setbacks: Lots 1— 6, Block 3, and Lots I — 10, Block 4, Chanhassen Vista 2"d Addition. Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Chanhassen Vista 3`d Addition. Lots 1 — 9, Block 2, and Lots 2 and 3, Block 3, Chanhassen Vista 4`" Addition. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 20_, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on 2 a 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of the City of Chanhassen for rezoning of Chanhassen Vista, Chanhassen Vista 2nd Addition, Chanhassen Vista Yd Addition and Chanhassen Vista 4'" Addition to Planned Unit Development — Residential. On May 15, 2012, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of the City of Chanhassen for amending the Planned Unit Development — Residential zoning of the property to incorporate references to the Chanhassen City Code and minimum lot standards. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning preceded by published notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development — Residential. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density use. 3. The legal description of the property is: Chanhassen Vista, Chanhassen Vista 2nd Addition, Chanhassen Vista 3`d Addition and Chanhassen Vista 4d' Addition. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan by implementing the land use and housing goals of the city. a 0 b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. C) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. I) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The planning report 412-04 dated May 15, 2012, prepared by Robert Generous is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 15th day of May, 2012. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION 110 Its Chairman 2 a 0 a i s ll ,. � • = e ed % all �A9 ddd s €3`4 3 @ f l � _ • gy a�zsaC pe as Y`�s g.1J s E i (� ai !8 a $1$4x5 f i4` " hIl !$! gs.e1'3r b€xf Ff d3 �`pJ x . • �4iy! lilts a F c1=$ $ � s e pE�jl 3 �..,..� gE. _?.4�i � ie 33a_? y_ zE $ s!E'a g a` � e i =F ` f e ai list ` ;3 5l4igaa I"E� �E ggg1 #_ s1lgl�sna4.il ..� �j ll 5b 1:1 Fp��gif3 V d 4! F3 E_ J `. 'cs zF^ $. ag$ • s "g In 3a18 q3 t13! 47E 1ff ° _ E at fe isc 8 E E 8 "a rzYY ::3 < W 3f �315"p�-,'$i 4� 3(z7 a �,$ w WIN .%:_l 61 &iE1 4z_ 3 � � Sz E e? .� a' r4 z � �.. •$ $33 - m_ 5gE N 51sFa g�q 9 5(�gEeqSal 13 0' z !x s$"s �jxs:fi ": �13a �a 3� : 3E I5e•:5'Sa�°81gg83H egS 5a5 p a Y�i_ �gi •ar3 z Q 43 = 3 -.;!!iY rq $rsisn^ ai '8 2 fe 3i�159E if pg.;Q 1433 ;j'p" p 3f4 4 Syfa in eQlaY ' 2.7a E3=' s 7 3. ling 71 7 b. s. 3 •� 'f 3 fi lE 3• 7s: Z �a aXs"-�H�3=8$:?e5's`l �a li is a�^! �1g it =-IININH �eE-; 11 C 11 ?° z:f 'esg"a�l m= Z.:@@ g, i.•$:.a gg_.. =t � 9. 9H 1s� :.: 14aa4 ® i 3 s 1nEg !:a- E' -YH 1s;1: a o^ ] a s1fF•�$ _� s•a -z E, 1,A lull gel $_ {4 _ p 12e. .s. e, 3 Pz7s s" Se �„ e -33-c i1. 1.3 a 3`.'_ 3 gill if 3r;_3$" - Y :"...s f•f :aa { s 3[`N, hill Q Fa Fys ^As. sje.s5{3 es sa = �, :a"" Se : g'd:^'Q l"fas j ez$!�g �3 >d i{ 3 Sasx F aR 3"e: =g 7 3i 83 E3- HIM _e fs aq?•s^j$°i _p$zd"a.e 7 "_$:_a °a3H ipea $gji @: e$ e5 ,1 e8 a aJeg == € j3 •e� 5 t•f HIS 3'. •4a _ %8a $`+ a 3'• $ PENN :s-cl E sS' f33 3: �• 3�3:"�� c li yy=1' @ a. Fl �: ^1 s zF ` g 4 3'-0$e@{: pf'"_.31 S E 41g! .5 4sgF• &s.:"9$ i3 ' ¢p g111•e a : A "E•z.. .38 f, ��ze_ y2 i'$��, e$ pOMP-10, s �.. is gf5;; E1a .1� ! '_a 41E •l 4 za aE9'. s164 c4 isl ie y 8;1528 e` :i1b: gsi '°1@ sigp'! - 8 Ys s ; Q-5 akg 3�f iy`"{5!?�3:gas ep. 'sa"s e'a'pp a$S Se7' Hn S.a$ gSa�^le3se5 .l+Y.. s p,. 3 pa!5^4 Yet i �: 'Sg` p{ p WIN! 4•-.g f§ {x.. @� B{{ 33 i ` 1+ ice$ 91b1Asi$is14le3:3aiH 51a j�1sss+•+� F741 11 ifj4_ �SAo4k:��31N:a$ 191h1E6e� iss 1�15a �14is1E4 'fee SsF MIN E13 55� 3951111 Y!e Epp f; '4 1gs3 "{lle gs� e4��s$35818e F&f_i{;4$Ss �%l�•gi 3g�3 s.i 61 iilvaz.a s.sE S .a 'Sa:s xe -� ?a $' f 1'� $ �§ �' .1,:lsa g:�ejlss :i_ 7's �,"{l�f�g Sc:a{� 3 48 5lcp ^i,: s_ " fr $5--__ 2 S.s' _$ f$ -a fe ep a4l §7g$l3:Sz { :C€C z$' 3aCi ggfEi$d f3 �3i �j gl9" Se�e3 Es4s3$i3�i� 7$ei elle %lad gsO !; I'% s- iis3'es 18 8 3 3:a 1." e4l "$ i' 3-":�s $ 4F:;S:fi :s y E'{_,a3 °• Y -`p e1 $4* ii�sfa%" 85 esg9ai3pg13 „F4ga54-4ss=p $ _ -e fag 8ge esA ige ae 4aga Z' l e 1f_b4:3s 7p1 a 3.14 &"a?S $3".3#e3 x56538 `fix 13fslc g z$1s � � i�s •p�s to 1111$g'a i'aJul Hill s`8"-8 _.a s€ -s ' a" sf 5 g 35818 341Efe 5=8 a4 Ai_134131_A' HOW = Eats6SY i all i.l Aa: ja a 3 -i1 ;agp 3 @E 4 _ 33' ppps; z a s$e f. 3¢ b a1$! a 844-ps Lg lBasa�igi?4g� � 5x1^sQgfe es 24p sGfB! :g 468 s5=ilea fS MUNI gg 1 54; essfsa.gxjjR3esBgs13a3 13j3e:a a¢pa4 1= f ess,:�+5• i^ 4ss,°F'P_aifl �S Hai 3 pmI '.Eel i=a'$t .s 14 3 " 1d3iE a:3g - 1 M 3 $ •1 NOW -:;1 •.4 !14 g�s gt M ie a ni :YYi3_.. i s esE c=lzg sz' gz iis4 $ g;x1s4 g" S -g f0. �SS:R •x4a 11e eSg�g sF lssz _51 ge'z 4r:g�§9311 a:'Sge a=133 Es f$siE B-"%s1s'3= ? 484e 11e a §14 51'`s5$s 3i �fi Y$ig8%51Ele iE_a 8• $11:133x -.$3;z_$:3' %sa Biala 3.-&a if�::. a aS_a f8 agi 1xa &a_a 8..x7 p= %xa8a sssaa 4�F�57 S�Sa$ i [3! Si 0 0 M \.• N H M F N a; .; p a . n No u,. B `•i! a" V w i Z u� _' UQ Oo N• m N a M \.• N H M F N a; .; p a . No u,. a" u� N• _ a z o� N F• Ye 3� N� m+ a O� V� a f N 22� Y Y 1NtlSe i R na Q _ F- !; OD J S i La N1 Q -- ________ I, 3 — VM3d W $w co a met ti a v, OD Q ix F Z ' Y M \.• N H M F No u,. a" u� N• _ a z o� N F• Ye o N� m+ O� V� f ' 22� Y Y 0 0 e aC Ci n fi F?fi i s FS Y % �iI it e gE 1Kt) is Elf z iA MS' z gw s3.4,I5 3 aps B F gs I kxa Fy e E $eajs a s s a il ?�" z' %a "6 Z %s3 a° ca 5 3g` cF: E'c3 �a eP�ga �.Es�3 Ri3�i @ t� f i�3 'ar aaaaa� �� It g.age Ne ' 1= a2 i L < y [ 2 Q 2F � �•�� 5 Q. Qj ,i is Z €g Fp is p cil $pEa r' z � N i�ti F� g� ° fa[ yL§a fy JyJi z� a tl 0is� i:ELI Ei �=� EF g.z "n � p IF �' C� �. g '""s 4I 5 f pF `s' • -J Ifi' S 3 fi�-° m, f i^ •s %� it a i' a Q sv: sit s c 9. t s1 H yg9 j ^6g 'x i �fe efig �yai Y ¢ 8• � fill §iJ"e 4a s' Ips § F. -lis sg fgs fiig.5d3$ 'F 5: s�g•"e$°s 9'-• E Ifo x nat g I' EW �xY{% grE5 F .y3ff_IsY% E%' x2. %ja_ ..4s Sr as j `g' a' enaRgE �g�gg Fy?fi Z i�& FF%¢�j F%s a%3 €FIJI Uai 4e e63 °;ii .1 i%JFY I - fF%ig (I.x i'IBza fs >%si 3 a L{{•c age @"g °Ft isle I. F ?,fpas a e g Ff p W g' Ii%$:as%%Iz II a9$ei.�k L F°: Iia d3jd @"3_ s sz i'a 4dsaa C$gg"a �E ers3 x Iz "ez: YIf A ers¢¢ %a g_ 7,zs "He 3' V� Ise I- 9 —sate ° !:. IdF`.x_ ^ �- $ee• 3 .. - F e.Fgf3 F g $ x: e• a e p H Isk^; Y Ia a •L . I Ix Iz sal:q � RssI3z4-d'-i F%s s� a{ziziaapns ai I�:F{}�etcizaE Iisne i;;I ag g3?�FaI% 7x 35s:apj yes ._ gSeyaxEg-Eag Se jga.aa"j>eof::i a{%s is as 8.l, 'is Ye at as �3e@ijaiEs fEi i 6j �%es££ a3ij 'e3 s iF-iie-"�I"3TTS Ejg3 Qgis e ^ Asa g$ a:_SE3e II y I 9 4 dF1, x3 fYfi's a.i i }iF'j_pl" gg?6. L % E-@ fs i- g 6 E .gE@ •g$fa I ni-....a fiaFs @ aa. Yi �a -.F A , yyF E' IZ:36IFA:s b QsI YEg f.=€ a44$ a•^ .a,kE @. ®Ia:I..§% ,: c_%_ yya yj 'Si s. ra%ya�%Bz z33g Six° s�e�g a I5a ai SayaE; i3 a ei -.I .4 t ;Ss aFe iy �iag� lis g !g fae^yFg'ig: a3:ai xi slla gpgap°x:�i its gj�S�IIg4a%Ipg �jxS t ori�T py., g• s.'..a E..sa a �' p IIi I? ��ci%a�j��i ag 11 ��si�3$%B�I 3•I Ig ' �. Fi%a$%%%F 3F� dI �. Ff�ey SaF:6Fze4E3 Ep V alre ? Z Z JFK 9s ss ds � 3J i xb Re O :t H R-3 c Q Ott a rie is i .y _:• of / �� m^ •~N l- � ��=:1 2 ,a'y Q it •' .:� :5 " aft `vf IYr;asean. a' S: x� �LLL999 I_� =gJ.:aLi. • .a�J t a ql• �.rc � E� ��� o y8 i j .a= b'E Oz �. — ::4Hi:A.Y.:i �qq4 waw SA RS �TVdJ •C FbE ' _ �:Yi 6 a q a • y S •: • @{ � � fy�� � t � It S W S• wva. b � � �a Rg �1 z a v 0 0 a:a:sesFx::ee:eG:axxvxeea s xlhkt-��4§464§A96§§§55�siA PCa SPii P.P.PP:i�5��449-kf� y.GFuaec •�^; • •xrgPPPPP Cil m N B - _ a1P �i ,P C4 B 0 0 y��,�-� 0. b o'� �jl1y m m �f i �Z i gg ss } Hit UP �L 3iS 38 i3p��� i f5 i b^3 ba f( S$ Fas E ?4a: i: s 35 r I pis A n 9 �'$a@ 5 Y 194 3 s s3 f3S 5 •� a .9 9 . _, �SE �ah 5g� H5 ippppd gTjj l' ° $ E_ 1F fig{Kai Q 3�� S •S i 9x" i�x � E� S •fi 's$��rd9 a u a fey 9E a 9fC d ,' E°E sa 2 Q iia a �}• Vd•ds a ¢a 3 ii�Yd he d eIv a>i a a i �•p i $°•i•� 55g e' ^ t� '+$ a e' a3 � � �S8 ea a• PHg i�e;� H a z Msax�d9Fa Rx a.aR yR .. g a iea a fix _? d a®a�' a. Rx a aR Ya j a ia'ga fi5 fi Saaa2aaRE� Bad .9 i Alm A[l i,i g�`�Rs§�'i5�a-H(ja3R_?i Ria?�n 9i; I. E"� a s-fi i°fsy 3 �1 na {ai°i R i d Sis g ^�y• -ti.. f g# 5_'EP1 s a Syoy�ai i5 33 i ip pp aa3"p ,.:aa sii _ R� 3: x9n 3A i's^py 3 •:%lp a A!§Ex �a i g 5s9 3g is3 d �. a 3 �pq i syy3 sssi.¢si•:y'.g d3�3i Y R ° 3 3i •• s� S fiR a�alii aiia9�°�P3 �_a�A•R 'S RI �B� R= dl5R3.-ii3�ai aiifilli E"'9�°dx3 8ERi�3a �$'$sE 3Yiais u` p j psa e a Y:p x_ is• p e s E a 9 @d•$ "aie II Q e'L 5333p9 d., iipp s3 ! i P11%,;% aei p53 yesi�•rri a�gg•A aga i5' i f k fy �•a s5 �'^3s 3 3 �i g i. si9„•�- $ - !$ � s 3ii....� `3n -i " � X jg a i --i a 3• se a i e n 5" Fae a x 3 a'z$ id_..¢ 9 S 3A a ai fi_ x as. 3i- i S$ S sSs a g ss a. -it --- a. � -add gia.�3p j-bn e is a -aa y3xai3"'e 3_318 5g aA5 is aapa N fiE^d9; adfi V3 iR of C aA QA ��a 4E ! �] 3-59;3 a.9 a. •aR LEi iC a iaFpp9 a § °Y 3 a f 33 335 ' lal�2a3ggP i5 44 cQQgg sEd5aY i3 - i ! � ai:� t��� Y3�� �5�x"4� d• 3 4 3 5 -i:1%11 agiia 3t 9a 4i id =..:.._ .�a. 9. gnRn aas •a pp a,:ax aaafax ��s�5fi '?feiS ? ; 3d ra§sips-a i� 3paaaaYg za?iaa�ls iibi i4ia,1 3�gai 3 33• sisapSlj•E t 3,�•pgg $i s x_n{qppp3^a asd is ns Sd. gsop ga 3:'� t (�s sa:{ p a dgt yE; It, JON �!is2033�@?�8$31i1�$1iI$ie{39�d3iif�'3�3t E s F i5�N W 4 ! N x i _5° s5x3i5-z d9§ aag•s5 3[3a ad3 z!s-a3 3a 9d is3`g ii t era 3 fi N iSial bSi ��! �F-8i3fi � #aa �^l{ �p:Fr=o3�•' §•J�g5 �! �'833�9x•a; � a �5 ia5 Qa9 RSS' ii9S3JP,aa$a�pa9g inab: 353.... 3 eA aj'^s s siai3 dssA3 aj'Sa s iS_ d?s aof X35 as R s� E x666 ed: y i3 aP dpi -d- R�3_R�dffS 391WH� nK 53d 1-a§ay afla?€i 53"i 3R3 a %d�3vi §"E S d�a..e Sa� �_i�54 .3st_a 33a6a Et a aa4ii eis a �§ 5 d;i�^Fi pp S'a;.^ i 9113 ^ ZFd3^S.'a E3?3 e3[s is5-ds 3gi gEa. 36iaiy ((s Egs i :a tis 33d ..i ails: da; s3? S -lilg- iv3l!is ; 9j?: 3 Ices pH a$' S aitfiski� d� S . .iEi:r�•Yp3 x3"j° 'Si ag e:y sai:s •a_ iai MY! z:i a3.z sa@� ass�3� r,"es g^;Fl-a@.ppS i �s�-: 't is Si ydgBi 3�i"a `�dx {{siza @_i,!66 p -c 3•s r°@ j3= i Saxias i3aRs�5:d Siena 93:i?s f3 taRa9a� i�yf5 $ 31dsi3ixI4sid i s S 3ai55 a#is� Si. iif5i Ftliii 0 0 Z2006 dr° - - - J55�� 62 U J- x. o • ;i F e O Q •sw via � Y / �-- �• •� C 2 A f'H • j/ �bi•i W e l ii •Ex o 8 m• qy.... ., yYY 'iE EE hod $><E geeti x•s Q o } . r �'• � . s` 'I iW I Eel: �.. I � LIU Q i Z Z a v 0 TA sp 0 Ig:.e:aeacaap�oee:EcocEEEEnEEEEEEsEE??E5?"9?aEE?fi?53EEc II \ /� �.? �'" �.YS886E-3a:8f4B=8a48=0i8i8466Y82a8 •y. 5 � - f� :89199- ai:399C9'•LF"19#SYO9iY Ilk sY5c;.a99AAi§9'ek4k 5kbhbbbkhbhkbII3h �,,y` � � �Y3.3al99k§1iY'_SSY33i#44_:1l4gIYy3! + `.: _ Sive:i????3E?2?ii!i??i3ia21e;EE9�i .-ee:eer:e_eee-_,eeEEEEEEEEEMPH I TS �.n...r•� ,- i 1i _ Sa I `•+ a s _ .`.�9o 5 0 e / IF :, e r /W I .`.�9o 5 :, e I 0 0 0 - �., �1.11 I - � � LLI Oct 54 r, 7 L-A CITY OF CHANHASSEN PROPOSED MOTION: PC D)W: May 15,2012 CC DATE: May 29,2012 REVIEW DEADLINE: NA CASE #: 2012-04 BY: REG The Planning Commission recommends City Council approve the attached ordinance rezoning the Planned Unit Development — Residential to incorporate the development standards for Chaparral and adopt the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The City is requesting an amendment to the Planned Unit Development — Residential (PUD -R) zoning on the property to incorporate the unique development standards for the project as well as referencing the Mixed Low Density Residential District (R4) for the single-family and duplex units and Mixed Medium Density Residential District (R-8) for the quad units in the zoning ordinance. The City references an underlying standard zoning district to address issues that are not covered within the specific PUD -R zoning of the property. LOCATION: Chaparral, Chaparral 2d Addition and Chaparral 3rd Addition APPLICANT: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. 0. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 CHAPA J_L CHAPARRAL RESIDUMALPLID P foLw i Rc PRESENT ZONING: Planned Unit Development — Residential (PUD -R) 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density (1.2 — 4.0 units per acre) and Residential Medium Density (4.0 — 8.0 units per acre) ACREAGE: 64.92 acres DENSITY: net: 6.52 units per acre LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAIUNG: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings, PUDs and amendments to PUDs because the City is acting in its legislative or policy-making capacity. A rezoning or PUD, and amendment thereto, must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 0 0 Chaparral Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 2 of 5 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Except as modified by the specific Planned Unit Development — Residential ordinance, the property shall comply with the requirements of the City of Chanhassen City Code. BACKGROUND The City approved a development contract as the regulating document for this development. CHAPARRAL, PUD#78-01 Total Site Acreage 106.18 • Residential Acreage 64.92 • Park Acreage 20.75 • Local Right-of-way Acreage 10.96 • Kerber Boulevard Acreage 7.35 Total Housing Units 423 April 3, 1978 and November 20, 1978 — Approved rezoning to P-1 and Development Plan and plat for Phase I, 95 single-family units north of Kerber Boulevard. • April 23, 1979 and July 2, 1979 — Approved the Development Plan and plat for phase II, 328 units in 2nd, 3rd and 4d' Additions of Chaparral (74 single-family, 98 duplexes and 156 quads —162 buildings). • August 22, 1988 —Approved addendum permitting the following: o Decks cannot extend from building further than 10 feet o Decks must be 10 feet by 20 feet o Decks must maintain 20 -foot front yard setback • June 28, 1999 — Approved amendment to development contract to allow screened patios and enclosed porches on the quad units subject to the following conditions: o Screened patios and porches cannot extend from the building farther than 10 feet o Screened patios and porches must maintain a 20 -foot front and rear yard setback o Screened patios and porches may not exceed 10 -foot by 20 -foot dimension. • April 27, 2001 —Approved variance to permit decks and porches with 18 -foot setback. Decks/porches may not exceed depth of 12 feet. REZONING The City is requesting to rezone approximately 106 acres amending the existing Planned Unit Development -Residential (PUD -R) to incorporate the unique development standards and referencing the Mixed Low Density Residential District (R-4) for the single-family and duplex units, and Mixed Medium Density Residential District (R-8) for the quad units. The project 0 0 Chaparral Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 3 of 5 consists of 423 housing units incorporated in 257 structures. The review criteria are taken from the intent section of the PUD Ordinance. Section 20-501. Intent Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD in this instance is to permit a mix of housing types including single-family detached, twin homes and quad units. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the other more standard zoning districts. The proposed development provides a compatible development with the surrounding development. The proposed amendment and rezoning assist in the furtherance of the following land use goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • Development will be encouraged within the MUSA line. • The plan should seek to establish sufficient land to provide a full range of housing opportunities. • The city will seek opportunities to provide transitions between different uses of different types. • Development should be phased in accordance with the ability of the city to provide services. The proposed amendment and rezoning assist in the furtherance of the following housing goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • A balanced housing supply with housing available for people of all income levels. • A variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life cycle. • Housing development that respects the natural environment of the community while striving to accommodate the need for a variety of housing types and costs. Staff is proposing the following development standards regulate the development of the property: Chaparral Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for 169 single-family, 98 duplexes and 156 quad units. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Chaparral PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the R-4, Mixed Low Density Residential District for the single-family and duplex units and R-8, Mixed Medium Density Residential District for the quad units. 0 0 Chaparral Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 4 of 5 b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be 74 single-family, 98 duplex and 156 quad residential units and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks Minimum Lot Size: Single -Family —10,000 square feet Duplex - 4,300 square feet Quad — 3,400 square feet Minimum Lot Width: Single -Family — 80 feet Duplex - 35 feet Quad — 35 feet Minimum Lot Depth: Single -Family —120 feet Duplex - 120 feet Quad — 70 feet The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. *The entire development may not exceed 30 percent hard coverage. Individual lots may exceed the 30 percent site coverage. The City approved a variance for the quad units to permit decks and porches with an 18 -foot front setback. Decks/porches may not exceed depth of 12 feet. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Chaparral Planned Unit Development — Residential ordinance and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. Setback Standards Front 30 feet Side 10 feet Rear 10 feet Kerber Boulevard and Powers Boulevard 30 feet Hard Surface Coverage 30 %* *The entire development may not exceed 30 percent hard coverage. Individual lots may exceed the 30 percent site coverage. The City approved a variance for the quad units to permit decks and porches with an 18 -foot front setback. Decks/porches may not exceed depth of 12 feet. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Chaparral Planned Unit Development — Residential ordinance and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. • 0 Chaparral Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 5 of 5 1. Chaparral PUD Ordinance. 2. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 3. Reduced Copy Plats: • Chaparral • Chaparral 2nd Addition • Chaparral 3`d Addition. g:\plan\2012 planning cases\2012-04 residential pud amendments\group 2 - may 15, 2012 public hearing\chapwal\statr report chaparml.doc 0 0 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property within Chaparral, Chaparral 2nd Addition and Chaparral 3`d Addition to Planned Unit Development - Residential. Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Chaparral Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for 169 single-family, 98 duplexes and 156 quad units. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Chaparral PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the R-4, Mixed Low Density Residential District for the single-family and duplex units and R-8, Mixed Medium Density Residential District for the quad units. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be 74 single-family, 98 duplex and 156 quad residential units and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks Minimum Lot Size: Single -Family —10,000 square feet Duplex - 4,300 square feet Quad — 3,400 square feet Minimum Lot Width: Single -Family — 80 feet Duplex - 35 feet Quad — 35 feet Minimum Lot Depth: Single -Family —120 feet Duplex - 120 feet Quad — 70 feet 0 0 The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. *The entire development may not exceed 30 percent hard coverage. Individual lots may exceed the 30 percent site coverage. The City approved for the quad units a variance to permit decks and porches with an 18 -foot front setback. Decks/porches may not exceed depth of 12 feet. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager day of , 20, by the City Council of the City (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Setback Standards Front 30 feet Side 10 feet Rear 10 feet Kerber Boulevard and Powers Boulevard 30 feet Hard Surface Coverage 30%* *The entire development may not exceed 30 percent hard coverage. Individual lots may exceed the 30 percent site coverage. The City approved for the quad units a variance to permit decks and porches with an 18 -foot front setback. Decks/porches may not exceed depth of 12 feet. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager day of , 20, by the City Council of the City (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of the City of Chanhassen for rezoning of Chaparral, Chaparral 2nd Addition and Chaparral 3`d Addition to Planned Unit Development — Residential. On May 15, 2012, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of the City of Chanhassen for amending the Planned Unit Development — Residential zoning of the property to incorporate references to the Chanhassen City Code and minimum lot standards. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning preceded by published notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development — Residential. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density and Residential Medium Density use. 3. The legal description of the property is: Chaparral, Chaparral 2"d Addition and Chaparral P Addition. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan by implementing the land use and housing goals of the city. 0 0 b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. c) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property- 5. roperty5. The planning report #12-04 dated May 15, 2012, prepared by Robert Generous is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 150' day of May, 2012. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION Its Chairman I Q3 S 3 8 !• a >a ] �E 3: � I a w a f Iles 8�f,• � i �''- a^y�' a 3 33if j 3 SSS 3.3 3_l gg'3 z3s S �•'$ e$ es y a s ! .. 9 -S _-E RFS '"� • 3 4 •! �S I'8_ ?•5 .^ l? a. 1.?lf5 f e =?'•__• --e""l'` zSa s = ie i:3'-::S:i:S Sa ?S:3 - = 'a�g3R 10 Ss .J.. �:•2 t ":3s3^'.` `:: � :E F 8:' :R3R. 2 e3? .y 5 SR ....E3 3c i::; a::?s3 : z? _ 3">.Fl ?::_....533 s=�3A >•:� as{:4^-: Ig 35aF5? 328 �. §3 :36?i--�•8::. •'>.. '� ? s??i°ice 5:a_f cea a' i- :� '?:°^?a€ •?:"°�3§�e� 3 :?� 3 eS:3 - C ?:3:}?? :i?_ s 3q�q;a-_3g;<s-S3tz?3 1FBzS-F ea_ F, -aS a 11, e= :?SscSy�?:_%2?3_ 3 : <i :a3 F • 3^•i 9 •e: y4 Fl 3a °y SS :: 2_ �} ;s R Dli E_. ;, a� �i 3's_i•3 eF_?;?i} t.5e 1;`Ea E'A I:2_• Z HIP �' ^"F '` '-':S .Sa3.:6�:�g'.33y1 RE 1R�Sq;gj W ?3"?c ' E?a 33: ?? e� sl �. sa. i3:S?!•.e;"73:1:63 LE_}. }!LF 3:111:1Z R? fi3 a e°Sed?i a ea Ss- R3 eas,? 3" •? .:SS°a:SzVs3t�s'`: Ti3_S 2M Will 3: 1:18:$3 r (SaQ, H. 3; s' ;=?e'.ri°3 }:S:E:S.3? i +�a 3 Nfl : ::R :-3•: .g• q. ? `s:§113i3:i x}`st?l =?t3'.. : nz !-S , ! s'}se:•io e3:e3imy� }ts'?j SE?l'3 a•]s'lt'Sea. 3: $'d e: °S�c'E"'F :13 " F:•a>�' 3 !} "e aa:�a-•.R�..q 53? WN an-•]: a_i3aa-3=}7 ^iia=! :Q rr%tx a_ �• ??sR E ::iii.g; }R_ 3^ i:Ss; a' }.z�35S ' :a: :•_ - a:a ��- lE [" i; r s'e};?sSC x }a a•r}'E •3a '? ;: �3ii7_C•r ^dig:}i` ::z 3}[:: sRR a Ft::2 �?=i� : e'e: i33 ass: is 5t s7 B€°s:aaa a"ea ds?iiq S; l ll ;�§ i'S: a 3s:S `";•ip13 3 i �.?:_:: ' �•L 31?3 �: tb g:al^ss ta;_}r:::�3e � 'a:-: �: •a� ai.". sS 2sa:•:-• ! d3-�"•_ =: 3 -t;a ag.z^• 5: a 4:•'l _• :-':Si +` 3_e>: .v •a ..S hEl'-•-• ..43;: ga_r j oil s g sR'l:a AST lie $ >f }^:s z•p 8'=E'3s. 11 !Hqi S 9F• Sal.:€. _ zF •`-_•Ss:'!ts^te._� i3__i: .•-}_ 3:: s3R �a.•3:??q 3 _ •-t°a:=? a? 5 - %a Ss a: ".9y 331 a a PUT L Ste 13 3j �*•}:£IEEd'g'??a3 ?ma y 1 HIP P11 al ? A i.s3 =a! ! a :;!}is '?: `•�a_ •i[ al3c:i?S a�e?s:gin ii t ?'C 3lR'=a3?s`i Pi MIR. 1% ! a ssi?3.i: Is° ?5iS �:}-'se>s e9{t t3i a a a-3 ?lf Sl:?sa Aa3 47?a �3i a '- ?3::a:Fys S ?=.ilg Sf 3a}3�?} a:3 ?3?ei°ib4�gai '3�e i� ? e��i°= ii d� ieil si�ja� } >,5 ' :31 F l} 3}5•.�3 9Ha s. E31a :3 a }a }�: R6r:j�'Fa r%: L99 tI18.L.Elea V;o z3 l3 "r g: if g3?gzs s.g 3gSR y?a•33] 5 _� 3 S 4:?3 i?'3 3 3x ia?:3�S3S13�s: �•s3 3?Fi333S<s?5::3�338'.?E: S s}' ? .• ? a a a - E F � � .&�p$e � L; g,g� 3`_.1E'`'ae`.y_- L' �Ma• CC� ' ct��l±p� E� n �'wj,�ri� v�� Y3 � �3 a �3• .� J 1 traL L Y •m 'T �+n �'�'�� I:w.i �rl�,�gil Ir 1'*ya �rt__ mor�r =pd.y 'R+.- ��.� _I Ir0 Qll\`\z 9 I� /; '•ti � a/ _1 ��; �—,.,.s'ri:i • .o '.r'i ° yl'-.,4.� x/ ra ,;.t€ :I Ise % ,ess R 4,>; JY I �; :n.NXJi ' e YJ •�••. � 'Y il'TYO�'.v,=F L G¢n `''SMR.. � � 4S y � I i q �. ali ^ --, y�^`, $: ' ..i s° �; • �l` `� ''pq g • ` , s I .4�� a � ° � `3 xe, , kw : n��' > �S' w � �•.i fi,e9 i Ar - 10 `e 49\ v. J iiA� p� < •r�\ \ .ice wMJ Lww' "sir; 18i II •tog kdl�yFfa p�w�'d.+ \�= t -ss^, Hl�° �i1 n' s I :, �� oexrmwJ Lm9J L= � r r r� 4 a •. t" : a�g\ � -_J L�_� c s d Q I f:oMT1 fwr.-� �__ f+n p qw`'�' *r' `.D-.`�.•` `% S. r�ra-, (`) 1'• I tlI }II X11` a W p$ � � Ro:. o , �:'*��, I I ' F _,fie YYY 18 ?i l8 Rl lg SII •rIF2 s .\G• a 4�• I_ �Ip« y^ai8 �"I=i^€\rd'+� '��k+C��as o^a6+"� c��_ z �ya 6I yr y I- kirk aY� 0 :.mil r z\� 91 s l v I A 'i ly � }i i3 & � � ^ ?i W ^ ai �o C •\\\.•t"n )v � > '� �N�L"9 �',s � ,ate..' i' = I L_J L•_JLJ a,r VJs xll co3 �Y.) ry o 6`R: t p F { y • ml ..}..�. R. Y ^ (�}��4 � Egg'^ n.��''y IY� � r�� I --m,. ; Ir -n-.-. i i zo.rl � esa � I a� \ � \\ p519• � �q Y 4a � �+ � et, i I: I I al t11adJ 11 \\ •I '5\v% �i/� F,x I` �C bLh 814j nla.V .^�'2 e'.tl/ "^`j Y x ;�'y 9r+ei Lxrwe_lLm.zJLe-mJ L"1LsJL_ea'.-!L •'G'tM KYF 8 A2fl/— `T 1------ sw>.wYu(uanrrYr�J r "^"M M+'%OKb tlpTllRiN 11..3 Iei i t' \ | | ; a \ { � . A -- , / %)!/¥ % ei \; �z � V, 4 , AI- / y \�. elm .! T w m ..__ . m , g 0 3, � � ^ k i| ! b � :zj "",w 0 • 141 ]:s r CL f Y: N Qaa �3g E Yi: ? i Ff�bJ • Y % a ?f• ?? . ee . 3 :@ § ! [^ i d. Y y sp3�a F: Ny L S. g o 8 8 t in 9 F.. �s eY S•L. ;• ° ef. 3 e e -- i •'� " +yam 1T ! 9 °i \ :3 ! �]�°]� rA r8 � [� •yam' �� ' ii •' Ie�_ °y � • a y� I ,"„_, _ •a a f`3' s f��. y! f E4 e k .I is @�� 5 { 6° "�. f .! 6[[ yid {? ( ] FP' t i._ ��k � _P % x •pi : � it;p %]•a � > : a`'y{I 'n-y'Jil� €i !' F3 dt <3 �J f9 @�igiiaaI ] s a ] g g i f��m i .t.i ..... ., ia; •B i@ 8-.a �=:'?5t�•4Y ] •• 3? W?a aI6 �......"YC ` 5."ei � �asiS a'3 g e_ e•t ? a s p s 3 i g s i!•s •3] a1 [ f e a a epi ANy s` —9p pp daz tl:i�j] i Y1' 6q �L t;rae@ i E 6C5• 6• °a hi^ ae5. g$ E 3 .11 �M i ss8 a _ SIB EEE x 5 E 9 2 a E D aa � 4!jj Q SEE E eg •tEt Q 5�:9 :IIS all zSZ5 M, ps E^ Y J s is+e i <i Q •g F€..'. va aEi [€ YE a li 3 of aE F^a Q e_ ;-ti :38 � AS F is > � Viz_. � i s • �:, 5.' [ e = - 5 igg6-T5� ` � � 31`� e �r � ® fl. •• a'�e3 EE �9 i�t E' d a:5:=igo 292 [ iee y3( "cc99 923fi ! j �a9 d UN a'Its • iii YeZ. : s: `sc iia �C�II ae .a at 0 M SW SI 20= _ JS: J■ Y 52-016 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PROPOSED MOTION: PC DA May 15, 2012 CC DATE: May 29, 2012 REVIEW DEADLINE: NA CASE #: 2012-04 BY: REG The Planning Commission recommends City Council approve the attached ordinance rezoning the Planned Unit Development — Residential to incorporate the development standards for Fox Hollow and adopt the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The City is requesting an amendment to the Planned Unit Development — Residential (PUD -R) zoning on the property to incorporate the unique development standards for the project as well as referencing the Single -Family Residential District (RSF) in the zoning ordinance. The City references an underlying standard zoning district to address issues that are not covered within the specific PUD -R zoning of the property. LOCATION: Fox Hollow, Fox Hollow 2nd Addition, Fox Hollow 3`d Addition and Fox Hollow 4d' Addition APPLICANT: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 PRESENT ZONING: Planned Unit Development — Residential, PUD -R 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density (1.2 — 4 units per acre) ACREAGE: 47.5 acres DENSITY: net: 2 units per acre LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings, PUDs and amendments to PUDs because the City is acting in its legislative or policy-making capacity. A rezoning or PUD, and amendment thereto, must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Except as modified by the specific Planned Unit Development — Residential ordinance, the property shall comply with the requirements of the City of Chanhassen City Code. IYC 0 0 Fox Hollow Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 2 of 4 BACKGROUND The City approved a development plan as the regulating document for this development. The final development includes up to 95 single-family homes. FOX HOLLOW, PUD#84-01 Single Family Lots 95 Average Lot Size 12, 100 square feet Smallest Lot 7,400 square feet Total Acreage 47.5 acres Hardcover for entire development (project noted it would meet DNR standard 25% Zoning P-1 • April 6, 1984 —Approved final development plan with 20 -foot front yard setbacks, 10 - foot side yard on house side and 5 -foot side yard setback on garage side. Minimum lot width at building setback is 67 feet. • July 10, 1978 — Rezoned from R -IA to P-1. Lotus Lakes Estates I" Addition was approved on August 7, 1978. Preliminary plat for 45 single-family lots and concept plan for an additional 49 single-family lots was approved on October 1, 1979. Total area 83 acres which include Lotus Lake Acres. • August 2, 1982 — Approved final development plan for 140 four-plex and eight-plex units on the northern two-thirds of the property. The southern third is wetland. Not developed and superseded by 95 -lot single-family development in 1984. REZONING The City is requesting to rezone approximately 47.5 acres to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD -R) incorporating the unique development standards and referencing the Single -Family Residential District (RSF). The project consists of 95 single-family units. The review criteria are taken from the intent section of the PUD Ordinance. Section 20-501. Intent Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD in this instance is to preserve natural features. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the other more standard zoning districts. The proposed development provides a compatible development with the surrounding. The proposed amendment and rezoning assist in the furtherance of the following land use goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: 0 0 Fox Hollow Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 3 of 4 • Development will be encouraged within the MUSA line. • The plan should seek to establish sufficient land to provide a full range of housing opportunities. • The city will seek opportunities to provide transitions between different uses of different types. • Development should be phased in accordance with the ability of the city to provide services. The proposed amendment and rezoning assist in the furtherance of the following housing goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • A balanced housing supply with housing available for people of all income levels. • A variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life cycle. • Housing development that respects the natural environment of the community while striving to accommodate the need for a variety of housing types and costs. Staff is proposing the following development standards regulate the development of the property: Fox Hollow Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for single-family detached homes. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Fox Hollow PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the RSF Single Residential Zoning District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be Single -Family Residential and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Standards Front setback 20 feet House side setback 10 feet Garage side setback 5 feet Rear setback 30 feet Minimum separation between buildings 15 feet Minimum front lot width at building setback 67 feet 0 • Fox Hollow Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 4 of 4 *Prohibited within the conservation easement area. a. The placement and erection of buildings, structures and docks and walkways. b. The alteration of vegetation in any manner or form. c. The excavation or filing or the easement area. d The application offertilizers, whether natural or chemical. e. The application of chemicals for the destruction or retardation of vegetation. f. The deposit of waste or debris. g. Construction ofpaths, trails and service toads except as constructed by the city. h. The application ofherbicides, pesticides and insecticides. i. The storage of watercraft, boat trailer, ice fishing houses, snowmobiles, motorized and non motorized vehicles. j. The mooring or storage of watercraft, including seaplanes, in abutting water of Lotus Lake. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Fox Hollow Planned Unit Development ordinance and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. ATTACHN ENTS 1. Fox Hollow PUD Ordinance. 2. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 3. Reduced Copy Plats: • Fox Hollow • Fox Hollow 2nd Addition • Fox Hollow 3" Addition • Fox Hollow 0 Addition g:\plan\2012 planning eases\2012-04 residential pud amendments\group 2 - may 15, 2012 public hearing\fox hollow\slaff report fox hollow.doc Standards Minimum Lot depth 100 feet Minimum lot size 7,400 square feet Hard Surface Coverage 25 % over entire development Wetland: setback 75 feet Perpetual Conservation Easement* Below the 902 Elevation *Prohibited within the conservation easement area. a. The placement and erection of buildings, structures and docks and walkways. b. The alteration of vegetation in any manner or form. c. The excavation or filing or the easement area. d The application offertilizers, whether natural or chemical. e. The application of chemicals for the destruction or retardation of vegetation. f. The deposit of waste or debris. g. Construction ofpaths, trails and service toads except as constructed by the city. h. The application ofherbicides, pesticides and insecticides. i. The storage of watercraft, boat trailer, ice fishing houses, snowmobiles, motorized and non motorized vehicles. j. The mooring or storage of watercraft, including seaplanes, in abutting water of Lotus Lake. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Fox Hollow Planned Unit Development ordinance and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. ATTACHN ENTS 1. Fox Hollow PUD Ordinance. 2. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 3. Reduced Copy Plats: • Fox Hollow • Fox Hollow 2nd Addition • Fox Hollow 3" Addition • Fox Hollow 0 Addition g:\plan\2012 planning eases\2012-04 residential pud amendments\group 2 - may 15, 2012 public hearing\fox hollow\slaff report fox hollow.doc 0 0 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CffY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property within Fox Hollow, Fox Hollow 2"d Addition, Fox Hollow 3rd Addition and Fox Hollow 4dr Addition to Planned Unit Development — Residential. Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Fox Hollow Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for single-family detached homes. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Fox Hollow PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the RSF Single Residential Zoning District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be Single -Family Residential and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Standards Front setback 20 feet House side setback 10 feet Gara a side setback 5 feet Rear setback 30 feet Minimum separation between buildings 15 feet Minimum front lot width at building setback 67 feet Minimum Lot depth 100 feet Minimum lot size 7,400 square feet Hard Surface Coverage 25 % over entire development Wetland: setback 75 feet Perpetual Conservation Easement* Below the 902 Elevation 0 • *Prohibited within the conservation easement area: a. The placement and erection of buildings, structures and docks and walkways. b. The alteration of vegetation in any manner or form. c. The excavation or filing or the easement area. d. The application offertilizers, whether natural or chemical. e. The application of chemicals for the destruction or retardation of vegetation. f The deposit of waste or debris. g. Construction of paths, trails and service toads except as constructed by the city. h. The application of herbicides, pesticides and insecticides. i. The storage of watercraft, boat trailer, ice fishing houses, snowmobiles, motorized and non motorized vehicles. j. The mooring or storage of watercraft, including seaplanes, in abutting water of Lotus Lake. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 20, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on �J rj CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION WE= Application of the City of Chanhassen for rezoning of Fox Hollow, Fox Hollow 2nd Addition, Fox Hollow 3`d Addition and Fox Hollow 4d' Addition to Planned Unit Development — Residential. On May 15, 2012, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of the City of Chanhassen for amending the Planned Unit Development — Residential zoning of the property to incorporate references to the Chanhassen City Code and minimum lot standards. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning preceded by published notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development — Residential. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density use. 3. The legal description of the property is: Fox Hollow, Fox Hollow 2nd Addition, Fox Hollow 3rd Addition and Fox Hollow 4d' Addition. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan by implementing the land use and housing goals of the city. 0 0 b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. C) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. t) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The planning report #12-04 dated May 15, 2012, prepared by Robert Generous is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 15s' day of May, 2012. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION IM Its Chairman 0 • 2/2 W ng i Z • h W Z P7 J I0O F0 !j x 6•: .$I i�'• aE Pg i•? P€ FAi?i .j � - JE4 d 3 U1 6.3 4 FEaa Z. kf b Fd. a2. ?_ ii�YSi C t CEbe ...+ YFi q jxE-jE Fxc gi:? is #.iE-FP - ^�'}•'� � Eip ���� •?_ 2?�(E( gi' - it' 8• i^'3 :iv °4:Pray rr [ fii €Se, f;p_s3 fi% P c ig4 4n • -gtt 9 Sfi?.•PdpI8 i p : PEfi jig a'. F a? ^af d?. 4a 7e 2?$ Ei`Y Y .3, ' She id. � Ai :f&•?E iAE Ei � dsa. '4$ L?FEy, 5 iY4. is ii? is Fca_a °°#A is ics:5t 'gf f2 Y ;•f=%tA•i. 2•• z?a f1tf; s { �j`°Y�$i CYg• sa i`.i .1J $g =s PiaSf3S °E§ R-1 =4Pir rs ;f ? °S Jziz$ f,g, f. :sii?.? 4 Y z t� O (3Y'fnf •,?Y •: rsxKP.v MJI = 101 AtlMN9iH 'V31tl15 s amror-s wm• Y[YW da'au \ ... v ;q2� w Y✓ '8 3 .Yrs Is a" x... pR a LL PC 4 ra i : EPfi 2✓ ,✓.rl � Yid - yY2 .E i• _jII1 \ yw � ``E 11YA...sq•2)�r\S �tl�. .r is. f(+ P \ � y3✓� NfR� .+F ✓ LOP JCteAIIO YbaF� s cL ig. P��y �ino.Fo.ln A snto7 0 0 X 0 LL 0 ri \a 34 Ya }i \ e 1 5' �PKE LO1 U ti}IP 6� t e i�i•gg ?_ � i � � N /��tA p-_ 5 g i� d b 5e € a, •�\4� \ kyr + cn .,:'. $ � = 2 ,} \a 34 Ya }i \ e 1 5' �PKE LO1 U � . $101 n,LI,fB.dN Ok AtlMkJiHQ � n•YIARBN -- 31tl15 = Z O .� �sfzr Q sr u r4u i t f,tt� r. Z�� a_3Y C i > IL0 r` 0'e^ Q,x (- !•a Moi e� uzn Ng iN e I i lg –01 al u. •' N11.f0.aN it 3/ J �c CYF c Y � r• 3AItlO %O! _ 4��•� �� 5 I GiG szn a n.w,,d.dN r_ OWE f0•a+�°>,S �fu--�• . r g\ \e_ u' MI I: \\ wr'l+sOi•l�tA.�- Y6�J �i I9 — �I y°°/ gse: 1=" le•ts � z? M � 7 \ �'ro'�' aa� Oia RI Qsy a a� 4"� ., \ '%� \ `I, li ..•sF^d\\ teu'/ .nm LC L��r...., g $ N �-` ^. `' n 'tu.0/,f B6•rTi TdW goo s PV Ea.r 1 Mx.`..s•+^eo:,alT y- wCU rttl-� F�^ -A bt< �4reto In I z.r�Jl� \¢ t, — \AGNjai O a J /�. ��L / r F-"'- = J andw J gip x \ �r`hr'.y v., W'* $ : +al l$ �I J z L— , • aw.' � �a� \yam, � : p1 I a m'c I • I. § �• d Nperery y, Tdf\��4m✓\ '' s �� ~ I I^ Ii h' Ig gd1 W Ir (0 � .ss.�a •i �i � �! Q� � si.r �,g e•M l � @ I// n_z[z>svl(w"3aara'AA�.•3'l.rl" m g ^ fl MuAl� ca 0 I // NdY dY•MtRt/��6BNJ I$_ l.Mld./N _ J •"•.'1<[6/Y.i lii`i�� IgPd Nd I $ X amJL� _-7F an'a mra z )\ N r.r6 a �$ i \'rsiZ $ 7a r I N `I I8 i � s ya• O \� to 'll� IL) .1; \\�•r�, j@Y/ ,a� •. `�.vy� \II : A ml: \\\�i Jl� `>+��j 1•- q \ \� ��+ /s�q; e`� ssTi� Wim.-w.�5�" ` i d r �'Y..r t,*ky.."�M/i�\+a �•+r`q> `4 N ti \\a to s: BA,L rrndn•v a � • 8� l 9R P+ X11 t� \`t R,�y¢`w' .41r'� w+r, / IQ� it P� °r MSM e.\y¢',e p At•' w aey `�\eNw ,,r /A� 1� x� • .� tp?" ��rbL ��� tl nuw fT'zzi-�m\ s 8g u r p� •d i 's �N��/ fa, V//A]I $//�H'If' I a9Y9�•F�[vT[-- �i 79 �_NaS%LI Ig O$I wQ1 YI 3 I idY ��/E `e4 •e'a� J NIle I N a del < I a LLa I � • y xoA / _ydAr__ Avve r�\a! •ti ter.-/ b�'as..'iL_ _ Naawosu-- s�'z• N C` \ ^ +baa v I P� ,[tl'F9 I �,IA 1. NIf 1 F—"—1 _ ^ N � r' O k a y i S N �1\\ Illae N IC 2- I'"N `I I N` yNVNI �Nnv Ns wn rnrro n.s Rw- )_zs.N.dN /B%LB ••'I 9 • „ o. •s � }F':a=: i 4?9.�.i €€�fr i 00 eF ?l 01 a i x'a `<. a' ' ._s as h>-' '• ai_Fd^3 �e}e3 e P €.C',• a •-• 1•.= F E iE t.Y h§ S { LL p ja is r:'i:f` t % it-ij°•'. ce yl ;€}f b.l ea�i>i? t � } 4; ' .Ali% Ff?: } _3;a q. t ;3 �� °�i}j§° .br 1' } y MA is c -61 g!-,V;l }F }i!•€8f8 E a_ TEM.-, , } a.tiga iaY a ai libe 1 •�:<bE�i y j[ i€ aar• {i '! i- g• -;=x€ r - if :en:< bxjU. fit, "I£ 1b tcF Yx Fs €-3.eF:i €€ F=a:;-s. Y:� a` €i iC {.-S aa� i2 ° i� 'ki�iSi x is %aa -}=[e§ r 3@' 'ri'fr ! feI a;:'a ` a8 2;1!,ia ` f_;..8'g 2" •a t2 {�g i a.a.:'n $}=•S'}f-^ a f• Q :. }F.}€f:z _ gf:�"Y:_ .g t., ab'.''Ydi1il-;i ' is ;�i€. Y€:?Y_i_:sA-'iS=:a of ycs f"iJaM- n.;V ii ' s U a?r -e 7€ a'i£ At s:EF s`}.E_ssa-§ d? €:a ._. i' Ar Z� W N O,•suras i�+sr<4ENn 4srnm n.s />n>. -s .>-s._ f ? 8 iu� iMa ti v € in n: $ SN}I 'ON AMON 31VLSi9 $ g >irnsn+r>)Y ._ O T—� 1•K. iya`��i E Y• 3 X a f'c. I kk gI as ARI l Nast--� sa O �� 0'ii IIH� o aleLL :• 3 ,ar.ot ti,.•M a iin tr b•s �urlrrta�w _a x .• YP•; ! ^_ iy f_'c 3a / 5' -`moi' E<ts•�K� •2'i MrRYOAN $ Ay. g �a f is 5i L I k _" / �b�aiarronro J = Fi.i a y Bf Y3 v it i pis Ng :$dei ._il_ 0 • i ! n • P _, pie } , Z SIV. F fa I a= gig 3 y .1 !3i r V S i f ib 3 N'I ! Z $a a a ssg 3ai _ t 15 5; }P fg �� i3 F i O iY g aY ii iie IGi ; Y } � P Is gr r_� 4 Gli •_ i3°s i a ! ✓i r cj 4 !( �'. � B' 'z3 3S rsri •'° E- _ !� T a3 Y �' a ! Pyl, i��y3l Eby 11 1I EG e P G FF 7 r ;tlr P: `e� ? 1.V M I �� y it .4 - °:+ I. ori... 1 ,=',� ? r� sQs __'• -- ! �� � i � P is G _— 1 °^�8 I /C g3 0, :a' g•': � .� MY 'bR e's � �° Y � if ji }}�� - tiV -Li i < 8 € QQQ a y Y Ya }} A 8 3 e 9 . S6Yt `L—L J Y p M:8 C 2 ![ _� ?yam=•;•'Sky��S_a• $ •� UugyL X Yge ga4se3s°jss pp p N LL t a3 s i2�%r;Sf ee3vaz �� aE � = _ s i too WW ;r Vii[: �o33p.%�%i3�tz of ;� "c g II ii9fy� ? gs Z o ccco2 gf $s!`�=5 iai a.i_ES ss ;; i � ` � 3 �Ss•ji [7az at :yxg_sa_P g_s3_$? 8 <• a a - ii»w �i�Y Sfi igg�BY`�PbE51 E: :J 8 F^S ZW< it $3C$EEFi1�s3V az gs gF [i Buz �d Ecsg_Six�i3s3gYF to tl� Y� s $:ted i 0 • CITY OF CHANHASSEN PROPOSED MOTION: PC D*E: May 15, 2012 2d CC DATE: May 29, 2012 REVIEW DEADLINE: CASE #: 2012-04 BY: REG The Planning Commission recommends City Council approve the attached ordinance rezoning the Planned Unit Development — Residential to incorporate the development standards for Laredo Lane Addition and adopt the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The City is requesting an amendment to the Planned Unit Development — Residential (PUD -R) zoning on the property to incorporate the unique development standards for the project as well as referencing the Single -Family Residential District (RSF) in the zoning ordinance. The City references an underlying standard zoning district to address issues that are not covered within the specific PUD -R zoning of the property. LOCATION: Laredo Lane APPLICANT: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 LAREDO LANE RESIDENTIAL PUD PRESENT ZONING: Planned Unit Development — Residential, PUD -R 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density (1.2 — 4 units per acre) ACREAGE: 5.61 acres DENSITY: net: 3.74 units per acre LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings, PUDs and amendments to PUDs because the City is acting in its legislative or policy-making capacity. A rezoning or PUD, and amendment thereto; must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Except as modified by the specific Planned Unit Development — Residential ordinance, the property shall comply with the requirements of the City of Chanhassen City Code. Laredo Lane Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 2 of 4 BACKGROUND The City approved a development contract as the regulating document for this development. The final development includes up to 21 single-family homes. LAREDO LANE(formerly Western Hills PUD -1 PUD #75-02 Single Family Lots 21 Average Lot Size 11,200 square feet Total Acreage 5.61 Approved via site plan review and subdivision — Ordinance 47, Section 14. Approved via PUD agreement which is referenced in the rezoning ordinance. Plat of former concept plan for Western Hills PRD (36 -unit townhouse project) into conventional single-family subdivision. Evaluating Planned Community Development according to Ordinance 47, Section 14. REZONING The City is requesting to rezone approximately 5.6 acres to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD -R) to incorporate the unique development standards and referencing the Single -Family Residential District (RSF). The project consists of 21 single-family units. The review criteria are taken from the intent section of the PUD Ordinance. Section 20-501. Intent Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD in this instance is to permit development on smaller lot sizes. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the other more standard zoning districts. The proposed development provides a compatible development with the surrounding development. The proposed amendment and rezoning assist in the furtherance of the following land use goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • Development will be encouraged within the MUSA line. • The plan should seek to establish sufficient land to provide a full range of housing opportunities. • The city will seek opportunities to provide transitions between different uses of different types. • Development should be phased in accordance with the ability of the city to provide services. The proposed amendment and rezoning assist in the fiirtherance of the following housing goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: 0 • Laredo Lane Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 3 of 4 • A balanced housing supply with housing available for people of all income levels. • A variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life cycle. • Housing development that respects the natural environment of the community while striving to accommodate the need for a variety of housing types and costs. Staff is proposing the following development standards regulating the development of the property: Laredo Lane Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for single-family detached dwelling units and their ancillary uses. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Laredo Lane PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the Single -Family Residential (RSF) District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be single family detached dwelling units and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks Minimum Lot Area: 6,000 square feet Minimum Width: 50 at the building setback line Minimum Depth: 90 feet Minimum setbacks: Front yard: twenty (20) feet Rear yard: thirty (30) feet Side yard: five/ ten (5/10) feet garage and house with 15 feet minimum building separation. Hardcover: 30 percent site coverage. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Laredo Lane Planned Unit Development ordinance and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 0 • Laredo Lane Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENTS 1. Laredo Lane PUD Ordinance. 2. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 3. Reduced Copy Plat: Laredo Lane. g:\plan\2012 planning cwes\2012-04 residential pud amendments\group 2 -may 15, 2012 public hearing1mcdo lane\staff report laredo lane.doc AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property within Laredo Lane Addition to Planned Unit Development — Residential. Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Laredo Lane Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for single-family detached dwelling units and their ancillary uses. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Laredo Lane PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the Single -Family Residential (RSF) District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be single family detached dwelling units and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks Minimum Lot Area: 6,000 square feet Minimum Width: 50 at the building setback line Minimum Depth: 90 feet Minimum setbacks: Front yard: twenty (20) feet Rear yard: thirty (30) feet Side yard: five/ ten (5/10) feet garage and house with 15 feet minimum building separation. Hardcover: 30 percent site coverage. 0 rj Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 20_, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on ) �J CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of the City of Chanhassen for rezoning of Laredo Lane to Planned Unit Development — Residential. On May 15, 2012, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of the City of Chanhassen for amending the Planned Unit Development — Residential zoning of the property to incorporate references to the Chanhassen City Code and minimum lot standards. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning preceded by published notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development — Residential. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density use. 3. The legal description of the property is: Laredo Lane Addition. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan by implementing the land use and housing goals of the city. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. 0 • C) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. The planning report #12-04 dated May 15, 2012, prepared by Robert Generous is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 15a' day of May, 2012. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION Its Chairman ny aFp �z c^ F3� „ -M dog=€ ae��s 4 $ s m pill f $ gg ae i u i'es E 3a� s a`cg gdTxx xzge s`� 3� n SIR 5g $LSE us=e en C£c Sr U <. : t �•�} Y O0 z U pis N 01 D as W = -- ONWO � /d w : t �•�} i aha \ J ONWO pp w ONWO /d Wa== w z 3Mow > w crx Mo. nFQi fi', Q d1(i,�\ NNzmN W- w f J =owyo awauw W ON�o m -Na N CITY OF CHANHASSEN PROPOSED MOTION: PC DOE: May 15, 2012 2e CC DATE: May 29, 2012 REVIEW DEADLINE: NA CASE #: 2012-04 BY: REG The Planning Commission recommends City Council approve the attached ordinance rezoning the Planned Unit Development — Residential to incorporate the development standards for Near Mountain and adopt the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The City is requesting an amendment to the Planned Unit Development — Residential (PUD -R) zoning on the property to incorporate the unique development standards for the project as well as referencing the Single -Family Residential District (RSF) in the zoning ordinance. The City references an underlying standard zoning district to address issues that are not covered within the specific PUD -R zoning of the property. LOCATION: Near Mountain, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 2"d Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 3`d Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 4d' Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 5d' Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 6d' Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 7" Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 8d' Addition, Summit at Near Mountain, Summit at Near Mountain 2"d Addition, Trappers Pass at Near Mountain, Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 2"d Addition, Trapjers Pass at Near Mountain 3'd Addition and Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 4 Addition APPLICANT: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 PRESENT ZONING: Planned Unit Development — Residential (PUD -R) 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density (1.2 — 4.0 units per acre) ACREAGE: 147 DENSITY: gross: 1.6 units per acre LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings, PUDs and amendments to PUDs because the City is acting in its legislative or policy-making capacity. A rezoning or PUD, and amendment thereto, must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Except as modified by the specific Planned Unit Development — Residential ordinance, the property shall comply with the requirements of the City of Chanhassen City Code. r 0 Near Mountain Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 2 of 6 NEAR MOUNTAIN RESIDENTIAL PUD Hennepin County a I d _.- BACKGROUND Near Mountain, PUD #79-02 The City approved a development plan as the regulating document for this development. The final development includes 236 single-family homes. • November 19, 1979 — Approved preliminary development plan for 120 condominiums, 144 single-family and 36 quadraminium units for a total of 300 units for the Near Mountain project at a gross density of 2.04 units per acre. • May 11, 1981 —Approved Near Mountain Final Development Plan and rezoned property to P1, Planned Residential Development— 194 single family units. o Type A lots average 33,263 square feet o Type B lots average 19,263 square feet o Type C lots average 13,709 square feet (smallest lot 7,600 square feet) 0 Near Mountain Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 3 of 6 • February 27, 1984 — Approved final development plan amendment for Near Mountain Planned Residential Development. • May 7, 1984 —Approved final plat for Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 15`, 2"d, 3`d and e Additions. February 4, 1985 — Approved preliminary plat: 42 Type AA lots (1989 Amendment), 51 Type A lots, 46 Type B lots and 97 Type C lots. Area, Width and Setbacks Type Units Area Width Front Side Rear Misc. (square feet feet feet feet feet AA 42 20,000 115 30 10 30 Wetland, Summit at Near Mountain A 51 17,200 100 30 10 30 Wetland B 46 10,900 75 25 10 30 C 57 9,730 68 25 Alt. 5 30 Chestnut Ridge 1, 2, and 10 3&4 C 40 7,600 67 25 Alt. 5 30 Near Mountain and 10 'At building setback Wetland setback: 75 feet • April 1, 1985 — Approved final Phase I, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 5d' Addition. • June 3, 1985 —Approved Phase II, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 6d' and Trappers Pass at Near Mountain. • August 19, 1985 —Approved Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 2nd Addition. • February 24, 1986 —Approved Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 7d' &8 th and Amended Planned Development Plan. • April 20, 1987 — Approved Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 3`d Addition. • September 13, 1989 —Approved PUD amendment to replace 114 condominium units with 45 single-family lots and preliminary plat. • March 23, 1992 — Approved The Summit at Near Mountain for 23 of 42 single-family lots. • February 8, 1993 — Approved The Summit at Near Mountain 2nd Addition for 19 single- family lots. 0 Near Mountain Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 4 of 6 The City is requesting to rezone approximately 147 acres amending the existing Planned Unit Development -Residential (PUD -R) to incorporate the unique development standards and referencing the Single -Family Residential District, RSF. The project consists of 236 housing units. The review criteria are taken from the intent section of the PUD Ordinance. Section 20-501. Intent Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD in this instance is to permit a variety of lot sizes for single-family housing. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for more efficient utilization of public infrastructure. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the other more standard zoning districts. The proposed development provides a compatible development with the surrounding development. The proposed amendment and rezoning assist in the furtherance of the following land use goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • Development will be encouraged within the MUSA line. • The plan should seek to establish sufficient land to provide a full range of housing opportunities. • The city will seek opportunities to provide transitions between different uses of different types. • Development should be phased in accordance with the ability of the city to provide services. The proposed amendment and rezoning assist in the furtherance of the following housing goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • A balanced housing supply with housing available for people of all income levels. • A variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life cycle. • Housing development that respects the natural environment of the community while striving to accommodate the need for a variety of housing types and costs. Staff is proposing the following development standards regulating the development of the property: Near Mountain Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for 236 single-family dwelling units. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more 0 Near Mountain Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 5 of 6 sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Near Mountain PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the Single -Family Residential District, RSF. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be single-family homes and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The Housing Types are as follows: AA Summit at Near Mountain and Summit at Near Mountain 2"d Addition A Trappers Pass at Near Mountain, Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 2nd Addition, Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 3`d Addition and Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 4d' Addition B Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 5d' Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 6d' Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 7d' Addition and Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 8d' Addition C Near Mountain, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 2"d Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 3'd Addition and Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 0 Addition The following table displays the minimum lot requirements and setbacks: Type Units Area Width Depth Front Side Rear Hard Misc. (sq. ft (ft.)* ft. ft. ft. ft. Cover % AA 42 20,000 115 150 30 10 30 25 Wetland A 51 17,200 100 125 30 10 30 25 Wetland B 46 10,900 75 125 25 10 30 30 Chestnut C 57 9,730 68 105 25 Alt. 5 30 30 Ridge 1, and 10 2,3&4 C 40 7,400 67 110 25 30 35 an( Mountain Wetland Setbacks: 75 feet. *Required width at the building setback line. Near Mountain Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 6 of 6 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Near Mountain Planned Unit Development Ordinance and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. ATTACHMENTS 1. Near Mountain PUD Ordinance. 2. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 3. Reduced Copy Plats: • Near Mountain • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 2"d Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 3rd Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 4th Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 5th Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain Oh Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 7th Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 8th Addition • Summit at Near Mountain • Summit at Near Mountain 2"d Addition • Trappers Pass at Near Mountain • Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 2°d Addition • Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 3rd Addition • Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 0 Addition. g1plan\2012 planning cases\2012-04 residential pud amendments\group 2 - may 15, 2012 public hearing\nem momtain\staff rept near momtain.dm 0 0 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY`S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property within the following plats to Planned Unit Development — Residential: • Near Mountain • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 2"d Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain P Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 4`h Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 5th Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 6`h Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 7`h Addition • Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 8`h Addition • Summit at Near Mountain, Summit at Near Mountain 2°d Addition • Trappers Pass at Near Mountain • Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 2"d Addition • Trappers Pass at Near Mountain Yd Addition • Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 4th Addition Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Near Mountain Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for 236 single-family dwelling units. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Near Mountain PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the Single -Family Residential District, RSF. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be single-family homes and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks 0 0 The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The Housing Types are as follows: AA Summit at Near Mountain and Summit at Near Mountain 2`d Addition A Trappers Pass at Near Mountain, Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 2'd Addition, Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 3d Addition and Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 4'h Addition B Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 5s' Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 6m Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 7" Addition and Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 8h Addition C Near Mountain, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 2'd Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 3" Addition and Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 0 Addition The following table displays the minimum lot requirements and setbacks: Type Units Area Width Depth Front Side Rear Hard Misc. (sq. ft. ft. * ft. ft. ft. ft. Cover % AA 42 20,000 115 150 30 10 30 25 Wetland A 51 17,200 100 125 30 10 30 25 Wetland B 46 10,900 75 125 25 10 30 30 Alt. 5 Chestnut C 57 9,730 68 105 25 30 30 Ridge 1, and 10 2,3&4 C 40 7,400 67 110 25 35 Near andt'10 30 Mountain Wetland Setbacks: 75 feet. *Required width at the building setback line. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerks Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager day of 20, by the City Council of the City Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on ) 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of the City of Chanhassen for rezoning of Near Mountain, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 2nd Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 3`d Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 4'h Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 56' Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 6'" Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 7d' Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 8d' Addition, Summit at Near Mountain, Summit at Near Mountain 2"d Addition, Trappers Pass at Near Mountain, Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 2"d Addition, Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 3`d Addition and Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 0 Addition to Planned Unit Development — Residential. On May 15, 2012, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of the City of Chanhassen for amending the Planned Unit Development — Residential zoning of the property to incorporate references to the Chanhassen City Code and minimum lot standards. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning preceded by published notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development — Residential. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density use. 3. The legal description of the property is: Near Mountain, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 2"d Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 3`d Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 4d' Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 5d' Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 6d' Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 7d' Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 8`l' Addition, E Summit at Near Mountain, Summit at Near Mountain 2nd Addition, Trappers Pass at Near Mountain, Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 2nd Addition, Trappers Pass at Near Mountain Yd Addition and Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 4d' Addition. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan by implementing the land use and housing goals of the city. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. C) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The planning report # 12-04 dated May 15, 2012, prepared by Robert Generous is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 15th day of May, 2012. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION Its Chairman • 0 Siit 6 O ': T P t RJR 2a 5 x E11t @ ep D= a fis a x L 4 E= r8 a r8 6 ES[ d a �J q((• 3 J e � `dI � ��- 4€ E@ • g d_, �P ai ��� ° i i � s D' � � a 3 qc a D F` a`�16 F a Ss a 0 is Z .92 N C Om Qo �w R¢ j0 Qy eYF a Jz W5aa spDR°pe: ia�ia PiT .e S[a kn ail f i E E d. 0Z Zs�E ak°k P: 4m%:"i3 PFu�� pY; tP36n E €4E a F� `%nS IW NI '4 F4i R§iFg: ge 9E& 3•Q. ?Fn n; i 0 F3a D aGESi % •4aa: d { :•{.° : a:Y ; e¢ ¢s ' ;;n �xaPFY gP iYY�➢6iY awt'F A. � 4•^ E iii P Pa f sflpg agg�;�F€jos% �d°'-gF n8 tafi_ SES •F as• g �•a 5 p x E o. e eia ns?eg ass":g a�f WPI e PP $4d;E i q , 3F E d F g"i#"F g[eg[Ffpi ;f"ar,• L§ 5 .8 ail Fp se: G. %'s t z ae••8il F• -F flifYQ b�Sa inF. L QF• a ;iy as f = �7y s fi,FE ;i iE",Gi: $sE q.a tis t4 yaa g of S = s a€S b :Fy Qa;_a;n ii dap 3Qe 334a a £s €755 Pa g c j };€ aiy e5` k € �f.a t =i-• fi.b�$ ° 4d x Fa � F ��� F.d 4 P 6•f � � s� t a e 4 ���E ft sE; FS• ' 4 e i3-gaa fire � s;;aL P �fi E �t� :a&n @ 6�ore ��F� g € { ^ 1 L pg . Y=ja;'.e". Ss eFiE �Q$z'` •p9"g sa aFr n: a-. 4 ggp fgea m 4 1 :�� D•b§4a.ga �i�.a.§ [:=s.i �ga{� SLa: P; ::S � P �b�. � Epe '.8. Rai-•. i=Q ,;3; 2LF c -,.e §4p§• ."9 a a E= g 4 F ; :E"� ; �ri WJ,!.$1a EEsa? 3 ?eF to ii�F P els %ea? z "b ui',R4�4; iF 4 g E3 b eiFiL of 6' fi fiNf i 6 D i °4 a.= aJg!• 3 ' iiP F at€D68f iES nFa �FQ a�aiG � Gt43 ci bii F C �•ii K 4e a ;_ a m m m €kF E�JF: "sse S's: Z?aEs �a:es3 !ai�n S:Fa=& 9? F9de 1i> ��@� a 3da jS@ _ 3: r 0 0 Z zm _z Z z= o� a D N �m p cQ0 LW R _ �y Li $W Jm JW WW Q z of W OW N r-'SPArw'wP A.ar ^tlP+v n. e �rvs's M1'°9J°�3 §jf '1 � b IJ P w ,'� { it W - i (4 $034 37 i (4 5 A 0 • Q do y 43 a 3HS 711l 0 V Z, � siiiS � i '°AVMH9IH 1tlMX91X -, 31tl15 �'SP Aiv rylP i�rP M3� 1 Q ��� qr Q do y 43 a 3HS 711l 0 V Z, 0 0 0 6 N F _ W ZZ wo 16 w O Q� 1 vi; : I £a} cP � [ F Viip«•r+i,,Fp+ b.e i �"' zm4a � � Y f d0 "^. N.Ff.NJN W°k a '63. bx /661. \ g73Y/ a 56%6 � e•1F•FaxQ'e ✓ �n'� I f ��� � Y '_ YL, �iN 3YL°. it � rG• 85x3° �. CY Ok +•::1 Q N L Z qA ( I o0 IS 2•x. � yY d i �'' P6 xf SeY �xiPS S' Q° F �Y i F l5 • { S 2. Yf x556 ix i 11 rill:i ea - ti it Ai 4 4! 4 Px j • ••f4 xF ®x a i, 3' •F . if a $ $ a a W F s .6{ EE F— Yi tyy qi 64i'.f RYl� _•F .. i L • i! Z F!: s•E : 903 °;fe..s�} g 5 s isfs; g f $tis ei :=F %�0 .4 �P I a i zg0s£ r 4Ee •??e°c•.ja. € % ) f 6{`, i`: a°s o �I / )�.6_ { .xB. Y.:Y 5 :P• 4'.t�[.€': 5. 5 E i- 1. W�_ ' t Y%z� ` x= �! tl•i3.i { S � Fi y Y.: � f=ii $£%� iex' ? ;5• "£f- s 3,"ii3871 d_%s€ : is p R'! hit $y3j' r e e° tisa {s (tZ °gt��i_'gg hit IM iy {se $XPi 3bpRs iit $-iEFqi!iUN's£t .. _ ... a a EA alio $t ES $� iii ${:- f�6fs RUNS a' CHESTNUT RIDGE AT NEAR MOUNTAIN • • I�> I CLEAR VIEW TERRACE �x N,.. .r ew<x?nme ecy of rm4rxr,nrr Ru t` ____ ___ •on. -w /rrr. rs �xnrvvj TOWN LINE ROAD 4 Herr rrxro nr _____ y I, OUTLOT 8 .. _ ._-ASGPDES CIRCLE J PS a G+ Sd"' Po� • \� OUTLOT A i LO iY E 5w N --- r -- a I xr1'rIN rrrr � ,ersrry .I.s A FQ All rIM •1 \I � .J NIWb1Y � pd 'vaSEE 'n 151 rvtY INSET FOR LOT P p. t< DIMENSIONS y9 ENP 6NASIFe-'H::LE __ ___ arc `,�`1.� OUTLOT C A Y L^=,N I NT's r� yr oo -- _ Do •t lu IIP Y...• _ . \ e°�� rM. � I (p �.,,, `=-t-,,� •,.... �q� Y I ,, y5�'�t, t e'°'°° eI,�N�NI � � [� i �{, S Ilyx' �yH{:w:f � ��•yyG \\�' C9iCC'i[1//rp��j [ Pa�0.ti I OLYMRS..OIRCLF � cP� 3V• a $ i al m t. aql� KIS urr w rrri° ° x"+.y,' /.b / CNESTNU"I- RIDGE rhxi �Ntq \\ AT NEAR MOUNTAIN 2ND ADDITION S.TNNE-SENDDOIST, INC. z WEST 64TH £TPFET • • 0 0 Z N r W U b a ^ 31t1S n. i4 }L b yxa. fall e 4 5d[• A € H L:p f d �Y fi u ZZ ¢0 F— r ZO C� Q G cc cc Q M W Z Q W 0 0 cc l ys. FR ffiF. a :• =atf'?? p 3 E"s Y _ iti E -d i SR-: 6� '�6 `� 6 t 0( SII y 'ES• is tvp. g .III_ '. ?t P_�4 P � _9 % � .� Ld B B •, Y g r ? ! .at �t� f�a� I� � s .. �e ';d 66 - ?�:?ZS tib <: _ [_ � �Y ��J J J f p� � b •€eJ ' bIt §id ea ik it Y 3 gi'l. a5 b k Pr G3} .YE ZZ ¢0 F— r ZO C� Q G cc cc Q M W Z Q W 0 0 cc l ys. 0 • n Z wm O Iter) rrl d Y2 �sull / Z o L $ l 0 Z LLQiE I a CASTLE % W. cc • }y� �c ar I3 % NIV1Nf0 n 1 HVIN a [r Q ` o IQ aw,Jy,J,:. rr xtl sb aovoa � �14�° I av»ii I 'fib '• �@ :i i �F I of'sr,% • +uCsm..__ I v v1 :• V i _ b i zZ IE is •L€ va }NsFa •s ° j-- s �. 9 Z I M - yry t• s6 .a i Tip if i}� § If i. 5'• ° •a t3 t6�" [j pPS S `R3C 3 I� 1p .r - ms •i /xxAa' , y.1 3 Z Q � er P S°s Je �q t' ti[ e W ;aA OD L__ nzsr__J I osssi P%x% `f' /W V ii P �an is '�$i$ y f A ii:+e ( W// igs a2 t�n4eCt i IY ¢tb Eiiyli Sia_ f6 1 62: e 1: exp @ I t ieg It cS . i;! Eni U 0 0 s :$ 0) Nil at Z d_!ii Z b � wU <� L'i il� - w till:d,,s � q�y id ii i �eF! 9"s %c ile• i i 3 i _ iiF •ic rr-F I E s i s i.:€ � % �i s i • N9- a:� i�f`s[C • � ! _ ! ` b iiia i'e} E ta! fa j tl a S!S !t v [6 !b' �p fI !!n 2 6; 6 E 1 Ost 4`' s 5O Q!! i�z .FF%s e e `e E:I Fs % !ra Fr _s¢ Fts w f3 sr e s i e G � " Y• is ; F! : a i• laaaaa is 3s iLO n o W s i •`YYT�r e a! s !. ' � � s•� s e i�E� o TTe. Q a W C) 3Nn Hoon ,/ r� I wre9w aru O�"a s+ @ 4 i� � ,FgF fi� 4'� I • i Z i - pt Z S G E I 2 OR uw.s K4'etvs drn LU l W 21 ✓ ; s � psr.sF \� _ i= LLO Z ~� O¢F /eAi'' I a¢ iI =€ �? 6pdn Q`♦��P �`yI Iw Z G� LLO Z ~� O¢F /eAi'' I a¢ Iw Z C Z F- l z w< z Z w a G ~ IA Y� I F Z Z F N o O I = F o U a g a a k I ;tl K✓x S c i w a W a x:44 4` xa yOy i s Q � U W v Iff �dV� Na•W�M WI 0 = R ws �// e xrKmv Z J p � f 4 W tii s3F y� atsv /KK /r V � �.\ 2 z Iii � W �kim5 � 3Nn N=Lvvl /eAi'' I h W.nM O w s ! ` ' >�� '\\ O v Iff �dV� Na•W�M WI 9 W s3F y� atsv /KK �.\ 2 z 'u HPoypKv � �kim5 Iti s"� / W LQ fI,W.4VM `�J I § I 0 3Nn N=Lvvl s , PS zz F' ? O Z af Z '\P\\ \\ 8� I8 Z • S'R ,l N 1 0 to fipaP�,y! $ a'2.�1'`J'.�' ZiR=.,,� xY `� �Jrr_ N.w•ro1' i I LLLIT, r p I ♦': first `_ i+e�'aa�` \\ �`- �ys% F L'�1`♦'xxrz J �{ /.n •, � n a:.\\ \ ei �� •, / 4 ux-ww-r q.,,..,01 nvn Al Q .g\ '.. ��u -q`9\\ \\.•„�% \N � °.d a4T-.\—rte_--- � :+w^ N i x 6\s8� \ �. ,yp°P 4; ° / �W ; I r�� -.,:\� \ r"�P �re,a >” s < W° �� m > ay oa � Nm'M°'•+ 13 Ji ¢fi/ IVA fg L '•yoa.. /�..P _ � �^�. 1 J4• /�yF u,N —1 3p =a } � Y�� 4' \�^ 8,�' Wicllry2�llg8�\\��/\° §a[ W6 0 0 i aed : a_i z 0, 7 Ss i jF €se 1 LU�j O N i r 0z T% Y iF i - J F E y Y'gi r e xF [�i #.• e -i: a � Z '^ y FT g ss:' is i£F - f ss 3 Fri E b aF 3 rig y 6 i V _ F- Y.� �ca ifi P -1P - • s Ed tae Yr F� 2r: Fr -Eg% si if W �y�Npplb p�£ Ni LU g Z lJ � 39p/y b1NnpW / � e l \ i ,pa \ads* ani y' i L.L 2 P la ayr�\``J� �a ♦t�. ter: / � '� \ 6 t i S87 Ilk W OZlu !: s �� �Y z �a x� ate,' fig.; il3 2 f= t y F _ _ P 3 FQr • 5, i ia3 � • I as _ e 3�, •E 1_� p � �sqYq FFa 3 " ►J 2 W Z a W Ma cc 'r : S � a I E I Y 9 3 E _I E T S gg 6 d f a Y It F g= a S? e - p: •s' P e=s Ti e 4: 3F§ Vii' 1 I - ,`➢i aE E.F i a"s A •i FS Eti �p s• Fx :5 F r° IE rT �sei , F � •si � !i E'i e pc s�"E� 't pT •f _t i02F ' ��i 3a •�S- f i G G C iF: G f -sit 0 0 F I N7 IKy I Iw Y 1IJ r /� �%,' i '�'�Hjv3Ni E) _ ililvi JJFI --I /\�$ t3 8j ii 2 n � I a '_ E•- � ': °1..89."y � .J \ - cr __ �—naoaeraN—�.'�aI W W L S O PT u � 0 14 zoeafro — ke q F; n 1F - cm 'r l 'ge � S` �r .s air, QF �•g=^ � l8 C) NrCN�W_t I`Y Y _ f)4L O 0 F C, I Iw Y _ �L y I I /\�$ t3 8j ii 2 n � I a - cr W W W L S O 0 »I� QLrl /\�$ t3 8j ii - cr W W W L S O 0 'r l 'ge �d � l8 V/I O LU ^a Vn 8Ei; A\ d I »I� • 0 2 OI rf LEi i1�+VJ I-li)`f / " 'g E EII Naa- :.. arra Z ^.OhI0NItl1Nf10Wi,_�..rx��: .rrliY 8 r? . i• � I I^ I i? � 1 u) r 6, it �~�J !j it a :.. :l r] o :r i i i Cj it Cl E i ¢Q4.' l �? �i 962 _ 'S E•. O z �. Ls `p jig § f• x '(5 6 I e 3% sxE Q i21 it s +3 $F •? ES _'a U '• •__' rig $ gi ez; 8 . £ e x s E° -ag .. ft ?Fa r 0 J U . ,W ♦.A Yy$—xrra'err S.TY-.. 4�Pcf f IE'a '"1,cYd C! j •T -- nwY -' Q Z) LLJ o F. 6 `z .4 w (�r • r i?. � I [0..x1'[ sit{[ / e Nzzd m \ � t Fti LL \ > O \•� � m i-) w H (r)w e z g <r - w �T[ • tr p 3A N `la . - CL UJI Qn- Lr Co IE'a '"1,cYd Z) LLJ o F. 6 `z / e Nzzd Lr Co IE'a '"1,cYd \� 00cZ 2 i_•b�i a+ `� r j\.\w r)'yy "�.�I •e•''° �j a W ^ W � ci /uc; � : R 0'. BOW ��% e-rYn•s1 ', -�' O'�`f,*°A'� - b ' ~ OQ \�I`JC�r xM1..- - rza)iia«r"'-•Y.'Oq fi x P f I °ed �. f:l .l4 .11 /SS» 4NN•/)'77 E 1§ 3e --• TIB J H gtyy i' ^IAII.yaD%/Ylf.'4'vC b Yn-. a R R � ;q Tii i<aR I nc� / / Bt T M -�• VO"' O f•�%) -, : 2 \\ C� ii errner� D. � Q CI $' �� k °t Jba'� •;i - K^ O f x; I c i1 W�l Z ,p `k i' /� i! ei •wap lzz •2 1 .J/ / •'r,`� r i.} gcF,b __ wePre'e_fE___ I mpg /C'� /yam Qfi� l ad�'i 1, -:�� � / O , •S �__ ). I NR'_ it \,J�� `V °'"moi .F `•'� -e7�¢+ �$,.;'1 :#/_•�- '✓-°` ;R� m ng N ^ ear d'\ LLJ L• � F- 1 ii T \ 'Rp W � \-a _ 6:.�.� � ,��a � la.� \ \ . S z W R :'\ m t \6 ¢rY . st±`^. i.) t:`/zi i• Nri'n!rE,-`� m c� o i �^ .E res a,__ i \y- • y+ -s4H`` iy�'J A, `}s -_ias °i Z'1� J i] L' V "•� �b ` 4`�e , V ,a>i' r� 4ir L �'14tiu /i • 2 r � .V } T 3 UZ�.n.;yE rr• .$ \�.., o'. -w-,. •/ f;4<' ,;,� g\`\ \ }�:/ �'i A+^ L . r / ^ •� a/i'-'c � L•t ai ¢/,•� /L^�i' a � L�� _"x ,wi ib ol�.t '• Y ¢ �,_a a1w •^,le.rrn'n, �M •' rf4l' ^' is • LAli 1'`gg 1 r i% i tl�� i• e�Tter.r ri' -il» P -e x °OXB W it M 1 F, ?yI�A ` i;1°// N ii/ .'� �y ��A 3+a><,,. s.a ee•'�� IT •Y �, \-1' 1. i i/. '// \ / V /� \Q ooe: - --ef o xz LLI \? 4wtd d � 3i�c.y .'�.rea'¢- 'r+.,^-z� Za yf 'h O .1y o o•: 0 0 1; • s3e 3,: q m, rr, o r:�r,��•yhnhM�CY .x.•,F.sa mow.. � ryzv tc � � �<. E EE { �. �� E pElra # � •d Fi€ i i i3aE #sL F Tit f S S' i ai e Ij Z €sis; ➢ 3 ap:t i'€p?i 'is; '�-�(ta! `az st ,! al'. OL— cc ii O S1S YS-' x � n @ 'n• ills ! F- gg�ps� cr EA i 9§i�s S I •., 6 �''� \ L, N liars i � �86L 6 E � � �<. E EE { �. �� E pElra # � •d Fi€ i i i3aE #sL F Tit f S S' i ai e Ij Z €sis; ➢ 3 ap:t i'€p?i 'is; '�-�(ta! `az st ,! al'. OL— cc ii O S1S YS-' x � n 5 @ 'n• ills g � gg�ps� cr EA i 9§i�s S I •., 6 �''� \ L, N liars i � uj 6 5 @ 'n• ills g � gg�ps� cr EA i 9§i�s lf� 11i�V i Q zz 1L- <Milli � eJy ! S ?§! = a E 3= V � 85 F F� Fid 3 :� p SE �i}1fi ISS.i S i P= A P S 1 e is - Ott• s ii � � - 3�E !_ � jU za % € Ya s g }g 5'F_ .i� �3.• S 31 4�3 '_qq b i� £ f Yfi i� Pi `i :�! �a �'£ .f ��� .. L � ! � . Y§_ 's ,! !-!� � 9 l 66 a 2' S6 F` •j }Y� '�� as f G� � '--£1 ii � �$ ! ie e - W \ Z 3 Z lC X /€ aIIa o Q i �Ij: co o\$ Q J ^01 P^ p-0,1P 0 4I ' i' %�-s•.=n ��q cG t Co �.v NIViN(:OV4 y 3 S 4 of -� ,..nom,• ��"� � : ` - � 3 I YYS ' N W 'VO, w 1 yb3 fo pb zZ 1 ly y4 �\ w wz 1 -1b,2161 b f61Niy,Af PJV tb a Y. lb e` p? I // ` Spx is''2'. is w p - Dh Z 2%� F`•! ie.esNa�ro4lr,•'•a.9:y��^/ ~"'ten /E'F/1-" s.B•r{�%4 \�O _. ��+ ` ° ""`�" WI tlV3N roerx �� P �4��� •�ao`%p a r. �rzra �Ip loaf \ .. pyy II it W !Sm MMUJ n gi? rzn_nn� .I 0y✓ a eg 831 $ �5`r"r° , 8 i �� ,�\� m L�� � yyy"•, .xzama� Z g II ' OXB� 899��8 ): o� jMb rn.m fi � sr11r g � aiaarru �• !taij<i \\ .: �•� n.>x `- _-max-. � , 1 � — R4/ \ Ih$ Bras _zo>_- : •� Iqft V / T C Ql° • I xi 1p 3I W ; �_ 29LN.iM 'i, / CC�Ii r� 7F,Iq ^W a -----1 :rz sr• y �V \ I'j ep¢41j / Z- ZW r16ra e! F6a E' { 0 • N t4 LGY• e .• 2 .. E' IZs01 • .P Y4't sF .x F#41 Vii= I zo- wV s^ 121 ;isit ajIpIt : a Ft FE E ei� a, 8G -ta a i L•_ 4tda I s s it IG 4➢ E 4G If e• i .' % g v y 5 Y2 2 _ 7 8 w F_3 _ /\ c:t ?s i a 5 $ a a� G- F3 `� a o Gsi _s _ - a fI ? �a :; Yb o- i \ e fi i= iEG i ae F 'a }2 �t i_''''n`�+v N.oxnna'i"?i �f :• iP -IF : � s g_ c ?•s. E c ?; iE 1 aG 'e'a ``�� 2sco9t� \ W y Y 4.OX x ' w array =t4 hi 12 I 2Ya4EL •. .,1 Y�tyP hs A. 3 , cc WL f?l O F lY y . LT/ yYntns.fyYi Y` J Lcc 0 • MC'MW u FIS 4116 4 � m � 9 -04b.0 o YFt.. -YW LOO NI l,I I�� V C4 = Ili kF,/ =• � I O 6. Z O Lna _U P. E _ O sg Za IZ a ¢ Qaw3e M08x r�MM i 200. _. -IFX.. . y.,iPonr -Zf pb' 1 7 1 '09 LL 0 c I LL � 1 -903Y! Q M W I Z vs yu e W�y F 1 SfYB6 ib Ifpyy W WYE, W F nv v Q a° W 1 MMMT � y — LFY— ?0.BL I MC'MW u FIS 4116 4 � m � 9 -04b.0 o YFt.. -YW LOO NI l,I I�� V C4 = Ili kF,/ =• � I - c f rzs�,B Ytn l.r yp�. f+lr `rl+ta, oX.r.r ti Lr.____1' 6iY5 t � � e`!q's• �. IT / w W W P. E _ i i pb' 1 7 1 '09 LL � I �Yyk aw �qY pw Y e W�y - c f rzs�,B Ytn l.r yp�. f+lr `rl+ta, oX.r.r ti Lr.____1' 6iY5 t � � e`!q's• �. IT / w LL 00, Zz ° Y; E E e S S a e a —f H 4 cff g g , j E 0,11k S_WF. oil aE .� r z 1! a i-11 a I �� a it � 11 a 1.3E �� t— � Z 9 S 6 8c9arlb' fi;8y ;'j'jb d 8e8698 J'JSYp• j;y� ;@'���a 5 5gi •�i �i�gj�g gl�.a,��fyyf���9ap_e ! � H}�}°�a Rj�da i. ��$e a!, i +j7 ,a� 3 •�R"" �ai ylf 'fi�!iaa }' ! 3 9roF yI5 ij�j�a9 a7�� Ee H jjFro •�pl4pi:e g° �ra�'Sa e 35a ��:' sya�a �a gY➢ ^ Q 4a j Sroa 533"�iiat 3d 3.�Hg aaga Fl ada� 11M a S {a 3 a_ a 379 s a 4a_3{ _ d19 •" 3._-• y is s a 14 -c9;T.aa 1a�. + i y5 ii a9dT.a? ! }a �/'� �y a ol" e1ro �. MN e1ro• �. s 4 V / I.L. H a c.pia}eg3jiiryy441p ej{�d !j)}i-" a{3�}!a j 13 F jE� F e190a�i9Y a='�RSS1'jp��gi3 i;S3�a''T7da�9�99f9r 4eli LL ii• 5 j{��• 5�'i'gig�_ Sj e j ¢ ii g �+9��. gQl� j� �3TS(('d' ill e11F 33 4 6 g a Rab-: 1 Spp a 9 Ra sg §-• _Ed ' d�Fi i N {q s - ra. W Fr 5s�pp�5roi !r':!'j; 3 pHIs a j gg 5 t} a5':�pp QS. g jd R•a E� a. qsi j. 6a }}4 9 j 33l1g �t9 R..jca 6}aa LL. 41aE k ai;H6a�_a=!•s3d. }.1F e d aE-j :Rg;aHa�sa-a�3s 154jP !ji i !9 A f s "Te psglsi; �8 yj{3�j1j p } all aro�•.y4a'a ppa� a3�e�a¢ t �:d �Sgf j -!: pp a! 7p4p5�jj``Pa e [ j Ere'a�i���Ei sbna5G��1 � �a •@e � 3 11aj��e?jHdi��sd3$7�'6q$ss5i��, j i� � eg 3 LL dji'. e tpijjyj5a ° 4�°�i ;� j3j a 11mi.Igjiijj3i�1e �.lt j.:111 ajJ1T-,; 'ppi" 555 a g�;s 8 ;eg{[ S3f_la jS53gjS�:S g E aii Sa E t'a l$y.. gsaa^ yHa��ae � �j ° � I. x'a {�a..3;x�s'^3 'S Sas t�•8a5jF�s •p.,i! �e?S iiia �'sr95 j 6f¢ d" �'aa Has!°p•a-A5:9���SS � a4 i p!g }Sg i a ``aj asaaj a ;§§ Ei ag j!fsa{9{{ari3e °I g ljrotdl�'Haia9�5g�}�sl j s S""ii Ftjaj73 i9_'daia 111 is ! y!1j9S! t' � i3( gs a �ey( gg�g IEE 4a j9 Hil i. P o ? d�, 1111 0 • n a o •j� y $ defit� °e :g iZ 1 a" gl s54"e -y. insLL an I o S�:' I9i §' C 8 KED' ddJJ � Li 5i l{ •,>Y � \ \\ - L � r: z � el� • • "' �w v. R e I W / i d ,,� F0� G Z S ���''3d l°x i s a♦ ♦ r.♦. ad°' � 9 Al IL '/fir/ $ u' Yti wrrsadw °-rt♦ �.9 `p �al4p.!a X W9 I51>ixs ♦ 90 £ 13316 3351 as Ry Ma `" 1+� 4, i` a 3NI-1 H:)iVW47 \\ 9 r c! �'►Q� a Li. � � ees7 .. ;R?,J. F_ pfd`! 6 � ♦•'i e p� � L �8 d p2 tom` 1 ���,� > j ♦' s5 tali :a NY o+ K eel °e :g 1 a" gl s54"e an C 8 KED' ddJJ � Li 5i l{ •,>Y � \ \\ - L � r: z � el� • • "' �w v. R e I W / i d ,,� F0� G Z S ���''3d l°x i s a♦ ♦ r.♦. ad°' � 9 Al IL '/fir/ $ u' Yti wrrsadw °-rt♦ �.9 `p �al4p.!a X W9 I51>ixs ♦ 90 £ 13316 3351 as Ry Ma `" 1+� 4, i` a 3NI-1 H:)iVW47 \\ 9 r c! �'►Q� a Li. � � ees7 .. ;R?,J. F_ pfd`! 6 � ♦•'i e p� � L �8 d p2 tom` 1 ���,� > j ♦' s5 tali :a NY o+ K °e :g -s a" gl s54"e > S�1J+ ® se \ S? C 8 KED' ddJJ � Li 5i l{ •,>Y � \ \\ - L � r: z � el� • • "' �w v. R e I W / i d ,,� F0� G Z S ���''3d l°x i s a♦ ♦ r.♦. ad°' � 9 Al IL '/fir/ $ u' Yti wrrsadw °-rt♦ �.9 `p �al4p.!a X W9 I51>ixs ♦ 90 £ 13316 3351 as Ry Ma `" 1+� 4, i` a 3NI-1 H:)iVW47 \\ 9 r c! �'►Q� a Li. � � ees7 .. ;R?,J. F_ pfd`! 6 � ♦•'i e p� � L �8 d p2 tom` 1 ���,� > j ♦' s5 tali :a NY o+ K 0 • iz F� WsR V W: il, Ws V, 1 a0x' O� W w 0 LL Hw W NEAP a a c 0 a a �' a Q cc _= Q Z M gfi •\Y $P y55 .. : Y YD • x83 Vl, - Hrfu � _ 4_ pain` CJ P4. L g 5 re`y �`+ ~•� �\ yard {'� X11 II'- 1 {2lM 41sT 1 /•i�O I • NKA M e Jly 0 • Z Q O V Q YlN roV.' r \ •i% *a 39C�b +ry V U J'gi� \XO A i £k juel Mr1. t Y TRAPPERS PASS AT NEAR 4TH ADDITION .�,,.. d�: a:0� r::r"+' n. � i "'.'�iSi,:.: �.:...:n....,....:•.�:.:, s .:..i u.. «...,. b r .u.e n ::. wm.. (pr MOUNTAIN ITIaM-..4.nlc�u�...Irj.�marLat � .+ya �`n �...",�•`Z`t� .. ... :..r,....b .:.md r, riw w. �y m r �� i.4/. « /7'�io •ATMII1.211164u15T. INC. CWFFT 1 nF 9 11 •' mj .....u...he.e rtr. r u.. s"'m « �.�'f.� r9L r Tw_ x. rn.:b.. � •..... m'"' • d••r m"w. x..d. �r w .0 u ..:u. iaxu. am .une:d n... •ATMII1.211164u15T. INC. CWFFT 1 nF 9 11 •' N m W l7 N O :' •A�"P �^ CCS $3u .ti �� C Q�� s.w n-w.u.wrr • o pSEMEtR K » /r LL 8b ¢a§ a-1 �� n\ «• Ro ,9 Al a 261=3 it I'' 'l1. 1 PIE1, i 1� I l: i99� 1: � h'i's � 9: 4• �i [ �W' 1 1 r tom. '• \ ! e' , r„ / , FRI OD Z,: SIN W. u LL LA_ Yt (',`` dj► s •. �'a:� e.M.''r��'. �:i >� \� "_C,r+i!_-_� Ld Lj `t ' /�� .• ' �` Iii "'/ -4 �3� ` ' I i •ys --fo'M a{n-- .4 .^ .: ��.�.' Y: r PROPOSED MOTION: The Planning Commission recommends City Council approve the attached ordinance rezoning the Planned Unit Development — Residential to incorporate the development standards for Oak Ponds and adopt the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The City is requesting an amendment to the Planned Unit Development — Residential (PUD -R) zoning on the property to incorporate the unique development standards for the project as well as referencing the High Density Residential District (R-12) in the zoning ordinance. The City references an underlying standard zoning district to address issues that are not covered within the specific PUD -R zoning of the property. LOCATION: Oak Ponds, Oak Ponds 2nd Addition, Oak Ponds 3'd Addition and Oak Ponds 0 Addition APPLICANT: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 c.xm-curia. cmm�..�rbro v.n cuM OAKPONDS RESIDENTIAL PUD m \ 3 0 a W / ,P Nbs�Ylbge PRESENT ZONING: Planned Unit Development — Residential, PUD -R 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential High Density (8 —16 units per acre) ACREAGE: 27.04 DENSITY: gross: 7.80 units per acre LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings, PUDs and amendments to PUDs because the City is acting in its legislative or policy-making capacity. A rezoning or PUD, and amendment thereto, must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Except as modified by the specific Planned Unit Development — Residential ordinance, the property shall comply with the requirements of the City of Chanhassen City Code. Oak Ponds Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 2 of 4 BACKGROUND The City approved a development contract and site plan permit as the regulating document for this development. The final development includes townhouses and multi -family homes. • May 22, 1995 — City Council approves Oak Ponds 0 Addition. • April 10, 1995 — City Council approves Oak Ponds 3`s Addition. • May 23, 1994 — City Council approves Oak Ponds 2'd Addition. • April 1995 — Development contract was amended to permit internal density transfer within the development and the conversion of 70 townhouse units into 70 multi -family senior units. • On June 14,1993 — City Council approves the final plat for Oak Ponds. • On December 14, 1992 — City Council approved rezoning of the property to PUD -R and site plan approval for 217 townhouse units. REZONING The City is requesting to rezone approximately 27 acres to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD -R) incorporating the unique development standards and referencing the High Density Residential District (R-12). The project consists of 211 residential dwelling units. The review criteria are taken from the intent section of the PUD Ordinance. Section 20-501. Intent Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD in this instance is to permit a mix of multi -family housing types. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for preservation of common features. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the other more standard zoning districts. The proposed development provides a compatible development with the surrounding development. The proposed amendment and rezoning assist in the furtherance of the following land use goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • Development will be encouraged within the MUSA line. • The plan should seek to establish sufficient land to provide a full range of housing opportunities. • The city will seek opportunities to provide transitions between different uses of different types. • Development should be phased in accordance with the ability of the city to provide services. The proposed amendment and rezoning assist in the furtherance of the following housing goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • A balanced housing supply with housing available for people of all income levels. • A variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life cycle. Oak Ponds Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 3 of 4 • Housing development that respects the natural environment of the community while striving to accommodate the need for a variety of housing types and costs. Staff is proposing the following development standards regulating the development of the property: Oak Ponds Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for Oak Ponds. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Oak Ponds PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the R-12, High Density Residential District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be townhouses and multifamily dwellings and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Building Setbacks: Standards From Collector Street 50 feet From Exterior Lot Lines 30 feet Interior Lot Lines 0 feet Interior Public Right -of -Way 30 feet Hard Surface Coverage Total site 50% Lot Requirements: Minimum Lot Size 1,300 Square feet Minimum Lot Width 24 feet Minimum Lot Depth 54 feet RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Oak Ponds Planned Unit Development ordinance and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 0 • Oak Ponds Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENTS 1. Oak Ponds PUD Ordinance. 2. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 3. Reduced Copy Plat: • Oak Ponds • Oak Ponds 2"d Addition • Oak Ponds 3`d Addition • Oak Ponds 4h Addition. giplan\2012 planning cases\2012-04 residential pud amendments\group 2 - may 15, 2012 public hearing\oak ponds\staff report oak ponds.doc 0 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property within Oak Ponds, Oak Ponds 2"d Addition, Oak Ponds 3`d Addition and Oak Ponds 0 Addition to Planned Unit Development — Residential. Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Oak Ponds Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for Oak Ponds. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Oak Ponds PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the R-12, High Density Residential District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be townhouses and multifamily dwellings and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Building Setbacks: Standards From Collector Street 50 feet From Exterior Lot Lines 30 feet Interior Lot Lines 0 feet Interior Public Right -of -Way 30 feet Hard Surface Coverage Total site 50% Lot Requirements: Minimum Lot Size 1,300 Square feet Minimum Lot Width 24 feet Minimum Lot Depth 54 feet Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 20, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor rJ CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of the City of Chanhassen for rezoning of Oak Ponds, Oak Ponds 2nd Addition, Oak Ponds 3`d Addition and Oak Ponds 40' Addition to Planned Unit Development — Residential. On May 15, 2012, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of the City of Chanhassen for amending the Planned Unit Development — Residential zoning of the property to incorporate references to the Chanhassen City Code and minimum lot standards. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning preceded by published notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development — Residential. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential High Density use. 3. The legal description of the property is: Oak Ponds, Oak Ponds 2"d Addition, Oak Ponds Yd Addition and Oak Ponds 4a' Addition. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan by implementing the land use and housing goals of the city. r 0 b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. C) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. I) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. The planning report #12-04 dated May 15, 2012, prepared by Robert Generous is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 15`s day of May, 2012. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION Its Chairman 2 0 ---qqqO� LI ;a a 9 a � a h $ I x a m am a,. am a g �j I- m mx i s J I�aY I 1 I m, - {- 3 d., Odl L A➢ . 1 AYNk91X C.Y 31::5 A.,,n,_ w m I i A e m 1 e.N JI f I 1 0 9 a h $ I x a m am a,. am a g �j I- m mx i s J l I 1 I m, - {- 3 d., Odl L A➢ AYNk91X C.Y 31::5 A.,,n,_ 0 9 � � I 122 ts •° .92 ci 5 = ® 3c Imo... ieai _• i • 9 •: .E S 9� •. •E it a5 �' E .:••= aec :••I i 6 id ¢ �i i" :: C: _9249 86 8CC i;: a 12; 122 ts •° .92 ci c 1! ® 3c Imo... ieai _• i Kt it a5 .:••= 9C :: i. i9 "• 6 id ¢ �i :: C: _9249 86 8CC 0 • 4 a A �2 '3 I fwa r_` I O •'C QS yr I i I i r p • v`� 1 {av• • S _ F. ^ -; — �•� 'sem• ; YA I s - _ 1 a e e+ • � I ------------------------- I 4 � I I 4 i L ♦ I le .. r .n 1.ky .... Ai ..... - ________________-__-______-_______________________-______ a A 4 Ss fwa r_` I O •'C QS yr I I i r p � I I 4 i L ♦ I le .. r .n 1.ky .... Ai ..... - ________________-__-______-_______________________-______ — |• ;�� � | ƒ ƒ - . �! \ )� •� » |f|)� , ) ' !• EL I Z # ® N i's Its t||! |� Z |; �! ! |% • ! • !! O |i it |`;! . �: . k; :� .$� !: |� :� !| • .. .. !|�! \\ .h. } . IL ,. . !. �;�; .� ! ;! '` ;! : `• !}>|! /� • ` � | � �� !� 1;,., �| |;! � |� � �! � |}�� ��|� ��•,.. 0 • i m m _ O F N • \\\rev, � � / YYy' `,J, Y \ �J OO OO J S a'F-_ e 1eJ�S O 3 - •Si _ iq �'� - LL -S yO C ani i`s; $! � a 32 C • cwm.o v..um ...•n m•a� e `s 3 H i m m _ O F N • \\\rev, � � / YYy' `,J, Y \ �J • 0 m R I • �• b� 5��. � w i i O__________ \'��, J.¢I I \•fit � S�a. ,\ t I ,c \ •° \\\ • NI N :i �T \ I\ \ I \ / 0 0 �■ � :!: . - � - d ! - • ! �. ' � . _ ' |§_ _ - ;. 6 t): .��: - -�• |� ! ri| IL � • :;;;� | . .. ! |!| � �� ) | D y � ! � .. . --•-• Z |; : - � ] �" •, � {| �` � �� � '} �: �� �� �)� i�||� ©!• • '� ! ! | ■! • ;!!• �! m }, !!!!! �_- :: i!'!! , all . m` |;!;!!)i!| � �|} �•` _: � 0 rJ s4se• r � s \ - n dye• b 81 \ Q� 4 S•• p at- \� ne �_ Q a sb Pi �yV• 'an ••� �_ �� I rein me ei:.� $ :., a r4 • •- � \ le Ovnr;•e •b •,f �: B r4.a 4 4/'P Pam `'yh� \ g � v � •r �aV e n �� \ 4,` fww e,•Q•� •^ � fee •'qT� / ; v; e�/ \I • B y N i •n y ,^.� � e • 1 I J sjsli I o ea •'ii ne e • ^ Ir61 I • ''� t'• e I _ I n _ •F a fat ti r es"e'•w s ♦ P tl' I_ a � 4^drnN Nr b �N � I ` •_ •i J I - WnPN 'f .ai1M I` Wl�aaa !� y I I e 9 sT 1 9 Y 1 r ES Sid Big i ee� r ;i g; r" 33 RRR333 5� a::= Ilk 6' IAF ® :•.33 � � S 3_ !3 hil alit 2 93' •D .:% !'l:j ' E ' 8E"3 -• ki•m �• 3 i EaE % 0 °ai J3 ?= E: •g° _= r� �-.� 33!21 3 "� � �?: 3 �-_ .c? E aa3. g � � jc• s3 �° a° k, a x:i:a% a = • U ` LL r O � / \ y 3 r Z / i S� _ 11 __ � T� e•x a f 1 1 ♦ •TJ dao 01 _"i � __r �1 1 1 ♦1 \ i � \\ � e 'J �� ( i1�Jn�1 L�♦1-� 111 \\ �$ N $ 1 \\ \ E ° ie E CITY OF CHANHASSEN PROPOSED MOTION: PC DOE: May 15, 2012 2 CC DATE: May 29, 2012 REVIEW DEADLINE: NA CASE #: 2012-04 BY: REG The Planning Commission recommends City Council approve the attached ordinance rezoning the Planned Unit Development — Residential to incorporate the development standards for Pheasant Hill and adopt the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The City is requesting an amendment to the Planned Unit Development — Residential (PUD -R) zoning on the property to incorporate the unique development standards for the project as well as referencing the Single -Family Residential District (RSF) in the zoning ordinance. The City references an underlying standard zoning district to address issues that are not covered within the specific PUD -R zoning of the property. LOCATION: Pheasant Hill, Pheasant I -fill 2°d Addition, Pheasant Hill 3`d Addition and Pheasant Hill 0 Addition APPLICANT: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 _ V 'µ I PHEASANT HILL RESiDENT1AL PUD 4 ' PRESENT ZONING: Planned Unit Development — Residential (PUD -R) 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density (1.2 — 4 units per acre) ACREAGE: 42.46 Acres DENSITY: gross: 1.93 units per acre LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings, PUDs and amendments to PUDs because the City is acting in its legislative or policy-making capacity. A rezoning or PUD, and amendment thereto, must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Except as modified by the specific Planned Unit Development — Residential ordinance, the property shall comply with the requirements of the City of Chanhassen City Code. 0 0 Pheasant Hill Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 2 of 4 BACKGROUND The City approved a development contract as the regulating document for this development. The final development includes 84 single-family units. PHEASANT HILL, PUD 83-1 • July 23, 1984 — Approved Pheasant Hill consisting of 33 lots. Rezoned from R -I to PUD -R. • May 5, 1986 — Approved Pheasant Hill 2°d Addition consisting of 23 lots. • June 2, 1986 — Approved Pheasant Hill Yd Addition consisting of six lots. • April 20, 1987 — Approved Pheasant Hill 4h consisting of 22 lots. REZONING The City is requesting to rezone approximately 42 acres to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD -R) incorporating the unique development standards and referencing the Single -Family Residential District (RSF). The project consists of 84 single-family units. The review criteria are taken from the intent section of the PUD Ordinance. Section 20-501. Intent Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD in this instance is to permit single- family homes on smaller. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for preservation of wetlands. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the other more standard zoning districts. The proposed development provides a compatible development with the surrounding development. The proposed amendment and rezoning assist in the furtherance of the following land use goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • Development will be encouraged within the MUSA line. • The plan should seek to establish sufficient land to provide a full range of housing opportunities. • The city will seek opportunities to provide transitions between different uses of different types. • Development should be phased in accordance with the ability of the city to provide services. The proposed amendment and rezoning assist in the furtherance of the following housing goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • A balanced housing supply with housing available for people of all income levels. • A variety of housing types for people in all stages of the lifecycle. • 0 Pheasant Hill Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 3 of 4 • Housing development that respects the natural environment of the community while striving to accommodate the need for a variety of housing types and costs. Staff is proposing the following development standards regulating the development of the property: Pheasant Hill Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for single-family detached homes. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Pheasant Hill PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the RSF Single -Family Residential District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be Single Family Residential and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Pheasant Hill Planned Unit Development ordinance and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. Standards Front Setback 30 feet Rear Setback 30 feet Side Setback 10 feet Minimum lot size 10,000 square feet Hard Surface Coverage 30% Minimum width at 30 front yard setback 70 feet Minimum lot depth 105 feet RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Pheasant Hill Planned Unit Development ordinance and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 0 Pheasant Hill Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENTS 1. Pheasant Hills PUD Ordinance. 2. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 3. Reduced Copy Plat: • Pheasant Hill • Pheasant Hill 2"d Addition • Pheasant Hill Yd Addition • Pheasant Hill 0 Addition 0 gdplan\2012 planning cases\2012-04 residential pud amendments\group 2 - may 15, 2012 public hearing\pheasant hill\staff report pheasant hills.doc Ll • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property within Pheasant Hills, Pheasant Hills 2id Addition, Pheasant Hills 3`d Addition and Pheasant Hills 0 Addition to Planned Unit Development - Residential. Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Pheasant Hills Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for Single Family detached homes. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Pheasant Hill PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the RSF Single -Family Residential District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be Single Family Residential and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Standards Front Setback 30 feet Rear Setback 30 feet Side Setback 10 feet Minimum lot size 10,000 square feet Hard Surface Coverage 30% Minimum width at 30 front yard setback 70 feet Minimum lot depth 105 feet 0 0 Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this _ day of , 20_, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on ) 2 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION II ' Application of the City of Chanhassen for rezoning of Pheasant Hill, Pheasant Hill 2"d Addition, Pheasant Hill 3`d Addition and Pheasant Hill 4d' Addition to Planned Unit Development — Residential. On May 15, 2012, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of the City of Chanhassen for amending the Planned Unit Development — Residential zoning of the property to incorporate references to the Chanhassen City Code and minimum lot standards. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning preceded by published notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development — Residential. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density use. The legal description of the property is: Pheasant Hill, Pheasant Hill 2"d Addition, Pheasant Hill Yd Addition and Pheasant Hill 4"' Addition. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan by implementing the land use and housing goals of the city. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. C) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city s service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. The planning report #12-04 dated May 15, 2012, prepared by Robert Generous is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 15a' day of May, 2012. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION Its Chairman - i - , O ' • I - a Z i s a Z. i� --------------- Q- - ----------- -=- - -_ _ _ ^ _ W -- e= - _ a = _ - ............_------------ _ __ - =.I x x __ - - , -=- = - -- - - - - - C� -3 ....... Y'e ---- - -_ _ - _- = -_f._ _ =.p s - --znzz- _ = -� Z. - - - - _ -_-- - -Ct— -- -- - -- - - lz --------- T �a L, `4h J was• cern i _ ' „ � •�� g � Q 259f 0 f Y x r _t J O .•, 1 q 0 M U. W / a; f was• cern i _ ' „ � •�� g � Q 0 0 f _ J r _t J O 1 W / a; f 1�- •t gr�rB si_�' _ 8�a K• was• cern i _ ' „ � •�� Q I N _ !p Z b- - W Z J — U e _ a Z .. . I G� ❑ o= ON Z - .p •� W 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PROPOSED MOTION: PC D* May 15, 2012 CC DATE: May 29, 2012 REVIEW DEADLINE: NA CASE #: 2012-04 BY: REG The Planning Commission recommends City Council approve the attached ordinance rezoning the Planned Unit Development — Residential to incorporate the development standards for Lot 2, Block 1, Saratoga 3rd Addition and adopt the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The City is requesting an amendment to the Planned Unit Development — Residential (PUD -R) zoning on the property to incorporate the unique development standards for the project as well as referencing the High Density Residential District (R-12) in the zoning ordinance. The City references an underlying standard zoning district to address issues that are not covered within the specific PUD -R zoning of the property. LOCATION: 621 Santa Vera Drive APPLICANT: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 SARATOGA y� 3RD ADDITION b4i4boa RESIDENTIAL PUD Drive Drive City Center Park PRESENT ZONING: Planned Unit Development — Residential (PUD -R) 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential High Density (8 —16 units per acre) ACREAGE: 3.58 DENSITY: net: 12 units per acre. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings, PUDs and amendments to PUDs because the City is acting in its legislative or policy-making capacity. A rezoning or PUD, and amendment thereto, must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Except as modified by the specific Planned Unit Development — Residential ordinance, the property shall comply with the requirements of the City of Chanhassen City Code. 0 0 Saratoga 3`d Addition Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 2 of 5 BACKGROUND The City approved a development contract as the regulating document for this development. The final development includes up to 46 multi -family homes. SARATOGA THIRD ADDITION, PUD #98-2 August 10, 1998 — Approved rezoning from R-12 to PUD -R for the 3.58 acres of residential land (Ordinance #284), REZ #98-3 to rezone the parkland west of the residential site to Office Institutional, subject to the plans and specification of the final plat approval. The final plat (SUB 98-7) approval requires that the development comply with the development design standards and the wetland be delineated at the time of site plan review. Total of 46 units on 3.58 acres (16 existing and 30 additional). REZONING The City is requesting to rezone approximately 3.58 acres to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD -R) incorporating the unique development standards and referencing the High Density Residential District (R-12). The project consists of up to 46 multi -family units. The review criteria are taken from the intent section of the PUD Ordinance. Section 20-501. Intent Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD in this instance is to establish the future develop density of the site. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for specific development criteria. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the other more standard zoning districts. The proposed development provides a compatible development with the surrounding development. The proposed amendment and rezoning assist in the furtherance of the following land use goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • Development will be encouraged within the MUSA line. • The plan should seek to establish sufficient land to provide a full range of housing opportunities. • The city will seek opportunities to provide transitions between different uses of different types. • Development should be phased in accordance with the ability of the city to provide services. The proposed amendment and rezoning assist in the furtherance of the following housing goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: 0 0 Saratoga 3`d Addition Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 3 of 5 • A balanced housing supply with housing available for people of all income levels. • A variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life cycle. • Housing development that respects the natural environment of the community while striving to accommodate the need for a variety of housing types and costs. Staff is proposing the following development standards regulate the development of the property: Saratoga 3`d Addition Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD high density residential development. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be underground. The development shall proceed through the site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the standards below, the development shall comply with the requirements of the R-12, High Density Residential District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be limited to multi -family residential uses. A total of 46 units are permitted on the site. Multi family Residential — This shall be defined as multi -storied apartments or condominium units. C. Prohibited uses • Townhouses • Detached Townhouses • Detached Single -Family Homes d. Setbacks Street Frontage Minimum Setback Building/Parking( feet Laredo Drive 50/50 Saratoga Drive 50/50 Santa Vera Drive 50/50 Interior Lot Line 15/50 The PUD standard for hard surface coverage is 65% 0 0 Saratoga 3`d Addition Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 4 of 5 e. Building Materials and Design 1. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building. 2. All material shall be of high quality and durable. Major exterior surfaces of all walls shall be face brick, stucco with metal, wood, rock face block and stone accents. The structure shall have a pitched roof. 3. Block shall have a weathered face or be polished, fluted or broken face. 4. All accessory structures shall be designed to be compatible with the primary structure. 5. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened by walls of compatible appearing material or camouflaged to blend into the building or background. Wood screen fences are prohibited. All exterior process machinery, tanks, etc., are to be fully screened by compatible materials. 6. Acceptable materials will incorporate textured surfaces, exposed aggregate and/or other patterning. All walls shall be given added architectural interest through building design or appropriate landscaping. The building(s) shall have varied and interesting detailing. The use of a solid wall unrelieved by architectural detailing, such as change in material, change in color, fenestrations, or other significant visual relief provided in a manner or at intervals in keeping with the size, mass and scale of the wall and its views from the public ways shall be prohibited. 7. Space for recycling shall be provided. 8. There shall be no underdeveloped sides of building. All elevations visible from the street shall receive nearly equal treatment and visual qualities. f. Site Landscaping and Screening 1. Landscaping along streets shall comply with buffer yard standard B. Interior lot lines shall comply with buffer yard A, 10 feet in width. A landscape plan must be presented for approval with the site plan review process. 2. Storage of materials outdoors is prohibited unless it has been approved under site plan review. g. Signage 1. Signage shall comply with the sign ordinance for residential districts. 2. All signs shall require a sign permit. It. Lighting 1. All light fixtures shall be shielded. Light levels shall be no more than '%2 candle at the property line. Light fixtures shall not be more than 20 feet in height. This does not apply to street lights. Saratoga 3rd Addition Residential Planned Unit Development Amendment May 15, 2012 Page 5 of 5 Alternative Access 1. Separate pedestrian access shall be provided from the site to the public sidewalk and trail system. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Saratoga Yd Addition Planned Unit Development ordinance and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. ATTACHMENTS 1. Saratoga Yd Addition PUD Ordinance. 2. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 3. Reduced Copy Plat: Saratoga Yd Addition g:\plan\2012 planning cases\2012-04 residential pud amendments\group 2 - may 15, 2012 public hearing\saratoga 3rd addition\staff report saratoga 3rd.dcc • i AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property within Lot 2, Block 1, Saratoga Yd Addition to Planned Unit Development — Residential. Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: Saratoga Yd Addition Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD high density residential development. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be underground. The development shall proceed through the site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the standards below, the development shall comply with the requirements of the R-12, High Density Residential District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be limited to multi -family residential uses. A total of 46 units are permitted on the site. Multi family Residential — This shall be defined as multi -storied apartments or condominium units. C. Prohibited uses • Townhouses • Detached Townhouses • Detached Single -Family Homes d. Setbacks Street Frontage Minimum Setback Building/Parking( feet Laredo Drive 50/50 Saratoga Drive 50/50 Santa Vera Drive 50/50 Interior Lot Line 15/50 0 0 The PUD standard for hard surface coverage is 65% e. Building Materials and Design 1. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building. 2. All material shall be of high quality and durable. Major exterior surfaces of all walls shall be face brick, stucco with metal, wood, rock face block and stone accents. The structure shall have a pitched roof. 3. Block shall have a weathered face or be polished, fluted or broken face. 4. All accessory structures shall be designed to be compatible with the primary structure. 5. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened by walls of compatible appearing material or camouflaged to blend into the building or background. Wood screen fences are prohibited. All exterior process machinery, tanks, etc., are to be fully screened by compatible materials. 6. Acceptable materials will incorporate textured surfaces, exposed aggregate and/or other patterning. All walls shall be given added architectural interest through building design or appropriate landscaping. The building(s) shall have varied and interesting detailing. The use of a solid wall unrelieved by architectural detailing, such as change in material, change in color, fenestrations, or other significant visual relief provided in a manner or at intervals in keeping with the size, mass and scale of the wall and its views from the public ways shall be prohibited. 7. Space for recycling shall be provided. 8. There shall be no underdeveloped sides of building. All elevations visible from the street shall receive nearly equal treatment and visual qualities. L Site Landscaping and Screening 1. Landscaping along streets shall comply with buffer yard standard B. Interior lot lines shall comply with buffer yard A, 10 feet in width. A landscape plan must be presented for approval with the site plan review process. 2. Storage of materials outdoors is prohibited unless it has been approved under site plan review. g. Signage 1. Signage shall comply with the sign ordinance for residential districts. 2. All signs shall require a sign permit. 0 h. Lighting 0 All light fixtures shall be shielded. Light levels shall be no more than'/2 candle at the property line. Light fixtures shall not be more than 20 feet in height. This does not apply to street lights. Alternative Access 1. Separate pedestrian access shall be provided from the site to the public sidewalk and trail system. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this _ day of 20_, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of the City of Chanhassen for rezoning of Saratoga 3`d Addition to Planned Unit Development — Residential. On May 15, 2012, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of the City of Chanhassen for amending the Planned Unit Development — Residential zoning of the property to incorporate references to the Chanhassen City Code and minimum lot standards. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning preceded by published notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development — Residential. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density use. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 2, Block 1, Saratoga 3`d Addition. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan by implementing the land use and housing goals of the city. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. 0 0 C) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. The planning report 412-04 dated May 15, 2012, prepared by Robert Generous is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 150'day of May, 2012. CHANHASSEN PLANNING I Its Chairman 0 0 {{ yy } CLI CA byi. $1 +j }; a ss i = a its°c of I f ggE Si;I 13$ {E y 1a tC a if .. d all !4e:3 ull No, n �i� � �{a � $t's — -. --- �.... ,�... ..... 1 J `L V - 9 p 1 " A -1 ..E (----- v f I -` I I 1 .s I $ I I r 'R G9 g I I I T g F a5 i ;is --- I L------------------=1 • 6 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of the City of Chanhassen for rezoning of Chanhassen Vista, Chanhassen Vista 2nd Addition, Chanhassen Vista 3`d Addition and Chanhassen Vista 4d' Addition to Planned Unit Development — Residential. On May 15, 2012, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of the City of Chanhassen for amending the Planned Unit Development — Residential zoning of the property to incorporate references to the Chanhassen City Code and minimum lot standards. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning preceded by published notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development — Residential. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density use. 3. The legal description of the property is: Chanhassen Vista, Chanhassen Vista 2nd Addition, Chanhassen Vista Yd Addition and Chanhassen Vista 0 Addition. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan by implementing the land use and housing goals of the city. SCANNED b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. C) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The planning report 412-04 dated May 15, 2012, prepared by Robert Generous is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 15a' day of May, 2012. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION B Its Chairman 2 Ll 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of the City of Chanhassen for rezoning of Chaparral, Chaparral 2nd Addition and Chaparral 3`d Addition to Planned Unit Development — Residential. On May 15, 2012, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of the City of Chanhassen for amending the Planned Unit Development — Residential zoning of the property to incorporate references to the Chanhassen City Code and minimum lot standards. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning preceded by published notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development — Residential. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density and Residential Medium Density use. The legal description of the property is: Chaparral, Chaparral 2"d Addition and Chaparral 3`d Addition. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan by implementing the land use and housing goals of the city. SCANNED b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. C) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The planning report #12-04 dated May 15, 2012, prepared by Robert Generous is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 15`h day of May, 2012. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION I Its Chairman 2 0 • CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION RUR Application of the City of Chanhassen for rezoning of Fox Hollow, Fox Hollow 2nd Addition, Fox Hollow 3`d Addition and Fox Hollow 0 Addition to Planned Unit Development — Residential. On May 15, 2012, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of the City of Chanhassen for amending the Planned Unit Development — Residential zoning of the property to incorporate references to the Chanhassen City Code and minimum lot standards. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning preceded by published notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development — Residential. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density use. 3. The legal description of the property is: Fox Hollow, Fox Hollow 2nd Addition, Fox Hollow 3`d Addition and Fox Hollow 4d' Addition. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan by implementing the land use and housing goals of the city. SCANNED E b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. c) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The planning report #12-04 dated May 15, 2012, prepared by Robert Generous is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 15s' day of May, 2012. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: Its Chairman 2 • CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION Application of the City of Chanhassen for rezoning of Laredo Lane to Planned Unit Development — Residential. On May 15, 2012, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of the City of Chanhassen for amending the Planned Unit Development — Residential zoning of the property to incorporate references to the Chanhassen City Code and minimum lot standards. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning preceded by published notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development — Residential. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density use. 3. The legal description of the property is: Laredo Lane Addition. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan by implementing the land use and housing goals of the city. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. SCANNED a 1 0 • C) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. The planning report #12-04 dated May 15, 2012, prepared by Robert Generous is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 15a' day of May, 2012. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: Its Chairman 2 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of the City of Chanhassen for rezoning of Near Mountain, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 2"d Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 3`d Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 4d' Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 5`h Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 6`h Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 7th Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 8h Addition, Summit at Near Mountain, Summit at Near Mountain 2"d Addition, Trappers Pass at Near Mountain, Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 2nd Addition, Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 3`d Addition and Trappers Pass at Near Mountain Oh Addition to Planned Unit Development — Residential. On May 15, 2012, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of the City of Chanhassen for amending the Planned Unit Development — Residential zoning of the property to incorporate references to the Chanhassen City Code and minimum lot standards. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning preceded by published notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development — Residential. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density use. 3. The legal description of the property is: Near Mountain, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 2"d Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 3`d Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 4`h Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 5`h Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 6`h Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 7'h Addition, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 8h Addition, 0 SCANNED 0 Summit at Near Mountain, Summit at Near Mountain 2"d Addition, Trappers Pass at Near Mountain, Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 2nd Addition, Trappers Pass at Near Mountain P Addition and Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 4d' Addition. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan by implementing the land use and housing goals of the city b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. C) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. The planning report #12-04 dated May 15, 2012, prepared by Robert Generous is incorporated herein. 2 r RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 15d day of May, 2012. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY. Its Chairman CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION nuAW Application of the City of Chanhassen for rezoning of Oak Ponds, Oak Ponds 2nd Addition, Oak Ponds 3`d Addition and Oak Ponds 4d' Addition to Planned Unit Development — Residential. On May 15, 2012, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of the City of Chanhassen for amending the Planned Unit Development — Residential zoning of the property to incorporate references to the Chanhassen City Code and minimum lot standards. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning preceded by published notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development — Residential. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential High Density use. 3. The legal description of the property is: Oak Ponds, Oak Ponds 2nd Addition, Oak Ponds 3`d Addition and Oak Ponds 4d' Addition. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan by implementing the land use and housing goals of the city. 0F0,21111:4 • 0 b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. C) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. The planning report #12-04 dated May 15, 2012, prepared by Robert Generous is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 15ei day of May, 2012. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION Its Chairman 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of the City of Chanhassen for rezoning of Pheasant Hill, Pheasant Hill 2nd Addition, Pheasant Hill 3`d Addition and Pheasant Hill 4`h Addition to Planned Unit Development — Residential. On May 15, 2012, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of the City of Chanhassen for amending the Planned Unit Development — Residential zoning of the property to incorporate references to the Chanhassen City Code and minimum lot standards. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning preceded by published notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development — Residential. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density use. 3. The legal description of the property is: Pheasant Hill, Pheasant Hill 2"d Addition, Pheasant Hill 3`d Addition and Pheasant Hill 4'h Addition. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan by implementing the land use and housing goals of the city. SCANNED 0 0 b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. C) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The planning report #12-04 dated May 15, 2012, prepared by Robert Generous is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 15`" day of May, 2012. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: Its Chairman 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION Application of the City of Chanhassen for rezoning of Saratoga 3`d Addition to Planned Unit Development — Residential. On May 15, 2012, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of the City of Chanhassen for amending the Planned Unit Development — Residential zoning of the property to incorporate references to the Chanhassen City Code and minimum lot standards. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning preceded by published notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development — Residential. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density use. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 2, Block 1, Saratoga 3`d Addition. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan by implementing the land use and housing goals of the city. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. SCANNED C) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. The planning report #12-04 dated May 15, 2012, prepared by Robert Generous is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 15`s day of May, 2012. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: Its Chairman CHANHASSEN PLANNING REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES MAY 15, 2012 Due to technical difficulties, recording of this meeting did not occur. Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Mark Undestad, Kathleen Thomas, Lisa Hokkanen, Kim Tennyson, Bill Colopoulos, and Kelsey Nelson STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Bob Generous, Senior Planner; and Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer PUBLIC PRESENT: Doug Hansen Lisa Thompson Peter Rocheford 11969 No. Shore Drive, Spicer, MN 56288 6780 Lotus Trail 6780 Lotus Trail PUBLIC HEARING: ROCHEFORD/THOMPSON VARIANCE: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO ALLOW TWO DRIVEWAYS ON ONE PROPERTY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RSF) AND LOCATED AT 6780 LOTUS TRAIL. APPLICANT: PETER ROCHEFORD/LISA THOMPSON. PLANNING CASE 2012-05. Alyson Fauske presented the staff report on this item. Peter Rocheford outlined the reasons for their variance request. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. Commission members had no questions or comments. Colopoulos moved, Thomas seconded that the Planning Commission grant the variance to allow two driveways on a property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) lot, located at 6780 Lotus Trail subject to the following conditions and adopt the attached Findings of Fact and Decision: 1. The applicant must obtain a driveway permit and install any necessary erosion control measures prior to proceeding with the driveway installation. 2. Tree protection fencing as approved by the City Forester must be installed around the trees within the right-of-way. No further trees shall be removed with the right-of-way. 3. Demonstrate the recording of the three PID's (25-1601640, 25-1601580, and 25-1601590) into one zoning lot. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the garage, the applicant must demonstrate that it meets the standards of the Residential Single Family zoning district. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD -R) AMENDMENTS FOR THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENTS: SCANNED Chanhassen Planning Commission Summary — May 15, 2012 0 CHANHASSEN VISTA. Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. CHAPARRAL: Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. FOX HOLLOW: Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. LAREDO LANE: Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. NEAR MOUNTAIN: Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. OAK PONDS: Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. PEASANT HILL: Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. SARATOGA 3RD ADDITION: Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. Doug Hansen, owner of property in Saratoga 3d Addition, expressed concern about the number of units allowed for development on his property. Chairman Aller closed the public hearing. After comments and discussion from commission members, the following motion was made. Thomas moved, Colopoulos seconded that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the attached ordinances rezoning the Planning Unit Development -Residential to incorporate development standards for and adopt the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation for the following developments: • Chanhassen Vista • Chaparral • Fox Hollow • Laredo Lane • Near Mountain • Oak Ponds • Pheasant Hill • Saratoga Yd Addition All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Thomas noted the Verbatim and Summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated April 17, 2012 as presented. CITY COUNCIL ACTION UPDATE: Kate Aanenson noted that the City Council approved the final plat extension for The Arbors development, reviewed upcoming agenda items for the June 5h Planning rl Chanhassen Planning Commission Summary — May 15, 2012 Commission meeting and provided an update on the following new companies in town: RoadRunner Truck Repair, EWA Group and PSG Powder Solutions Group. Thomas moved, Hokkanen seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim L] CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 2012-04 IEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commis - public hearing on Tuesday, May 15, 2012, at 7:00 p.m. in tubers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The hearing is to consider a request to amend the following med Unit Developments (PUD -R): nd ClunM1assen Visor 2n°, 3`a & 4'" Additi mal 2 a3 Additions Hollow 2" , 3 &4 Addidoos xf smut Ridge a<Near Mountain and ear Mountain 2itl, 3 .4a, Sm b'", T° & e Additions mt & Summit at Nwr Mountain 2" Addition v Mowlam and Tr ers Passat Nem Mauomin 2'. 3 & 4 Additions h.t Hills .3 & 4 AddW. PnAddition 2tat3 &4 Additions of Chanhassen. ing the location of the proposal is available for public re- 's web site at wwwci.chanhassen.mn.us/sere/plan/12-04. aBdurtgregularbusinesshours. All interested persons tend this public hearing and express their opinions with roposal. Robert Generous, Senior Planner Email: bgenerous&i.chanhassen.mmus Phone: 952-227-1131 in Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, May 3, 2012; No. Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly swom, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 33IA.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and 'd Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghijkhnnopgrstuvwxyz //;; &YWI —a- Laurie A. Hartmann Subscribed and sworn before me on Z f'da this day of zolz =NOTARY RKi13 N mbhc RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter .............................................. $12.59 per column inch SCANNED 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 2012-04 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, May 15, 2012, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request to amend the following Residential Planned Unit Developments (PUD -R): Chanhassen Vista and Chanhassen Vista 2" , P & 4d Additions Chaparral and Chaparral 2" & 3d Additions Fox Hollow and Fox Hollow 2nd, P & 0 Additions Laredo Lane Addition Near Mountain, Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain and Chestnut Ridge at Near Mountain 2"d, 3rd, 0, 5d, 6"', 7"' & 8d' Additions Summit at Near Mountain & Summit at Near Mountain 2" Addition Trappers Pass at Near Mountain and Tra ers Pass at Near Mountain 2" , 3` & 4 Additions Pheasant Hills and Pheasant Hills 2"', 3` & 4 Additions Lot 2, Block 1, Saratoga Addition Oak Ponds and Oak Ponds 2nd, Id & 4 Additions Applicant: City of Chanhassen. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the City's web site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/sere/plan/12-04.html or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Robert Generous, Senior Planner Email: beenerous(a)ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1131 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on May 3, 2012) SCANNED Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD -R) Amendments April 24, 2012 Name BEST WAY TO CONTACT YOU COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS Li ��.tik i L. � 1-l- i o G u� a SCANNED • 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD -R) OPEN HOUSE Tuesday, April 24, 2012, 6-7 pm Lake Susan Room Chanhassen Recreation Center • 2310 Coulter Boulevard Dear Property Owner: City staff would like to invite you to an open house to discuss a proposed amendment to the zoning on your property. Over the past year, staff has been investigating the approximately 50 Residential Planned Unit Developments (PUD -R) throughout the City. Staff has discovered the following after researching the different projects: • The more recent ordinances reference the underlying zoning districts; however, they may not adequately reference the Chanhassen City Code. • The PUD subdivisions created in the 1980's and early 1990's reference the Design Standards as part of the Development Contract, ratherYhan with the adoption of the Design Standards in the PUD Ordinance. • Prior to 1980 no design standirrds or development contracts exist. Rather the project references a development plan. • During the 1970's, any Resid*,ntial Single -Family development exceeding 25 lots was required to be processed as a Planned Residential Developo*ent, even if the development complied with all requirements of the standard zoning regulations. The goal of the proposed amendments is to codify the developments as they exist today and to provide clarity as to the • standards for your neighborhood. The purpose of the open house is to allow you an opportunity to discuss the proposed changes with City staff prior to this item going forward for a public hearing. Your comments will be greatly appreciated. Additional information can be found on the City's web site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/serv/plan/12-04.htmi. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Bob Generous, Senior Planner, at (952) 227-1131 or by email at bgenerous(ccbci chanhassen mn us. SCANNED 1- Canyon Curve Curve b OAK PONDS .o RESIDENTIAL PUD m u, N 3 0 a ` gx1E GurW Wn Paa1PaM l CITY OF CHANAA33EN 7700 Market In l^ PO D- YMeal Vllage 00 pal p7/12 5317 SENO `1 VoAOWN roRwAR39 o 2q4, � ?Q x0270 p0 .7014-147\\,\n\\,n\�\„ Disclaimer 5531 This map is neither a leg. EIC ° used as one. This map is a el \ „\,\„` located in various city, county, state and fedr \,\ . yarding the area shown, and �, be usetl far referee . , ne City does not warrant that the graphic Information Sys .ter rata used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent mat the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features- If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnity, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arse out"tt"af"%ptill use of data provided. 049382036654 $ 00.450 04/0612012 Matted From 55317 US POSTAGE OAK PONDS HOMEOWNERS ASSN 2815 WAYZATA BLVD AN MINNEAPOLIS MN 55405-2125 Iflliffillf 1111111 ff11111f1fliifffliffill fill fl ffilfifllfili li SCANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD -R) OPEN HOUSE Tuesday, April 24, 2012, 6-7 pm Lake Susan Room Chanhassen Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard • Dear Property Owner: City staff would like to invite you to an open house to discuss a proposed amendment to the zoning on your property. Over the past year, staff has been investigating the approximately 50 Residential Planned Unit Developments (PUD -R) throughout the City. Staff has discovered the following after researching the different projects: • The more recent ordinances reference the underlying zoning districts; however, they may not adequately reference the Chanhassen City Code. • The PUD subdivisions created in the 1980's and early 1990's reference the Design Standards as part of the Development Contract, rather than with the adoption of the Design Standards in the PUD Ordinance. • Prior to 1980 no design standards or development contracts exist. Rather the project references a development plan. • During the 1970's, any Residential Single -Family development exceeding 25 lots was required to be processed as a Planned Residentiai Development, even if the development complied with all requirements of the standard zoning regulations. The goal of the proposed amendments is to codify the developments as they exist today and to provide clarity as to the standards for your neighborhood. The purpose of the open house is to allow you an opportunity to discuss the proposed changes with City staff prior to this item going forward for a public hearing. Your comments will be greatly appreciated. Additional information can be found on the City's web site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/serv/plan/12-04.htmt. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Bob Generous, Senior Planner, at (952) 227-1131 or by email at bgenerous&Dpi.chanhassen mn us. SCANNED NIXSE 958 DE 1 TO RETVRN in SVERABLE CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 www.ci.chan hassen.nnn. us 12 SE140"R EgSED Thi: NOr OEVNAELE TO FORWPRD 06-30 as r se0279-05707_- City, BO: 99317014747 C 1.,a errorfr`, and ve used for navigational, tracking or any o „..:ung measurement of distance or direction or precision in the _-,,—. n of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise ouse of data provided. 049J82036654 $ 00.450 04/06/2012 c Mailed From 55317 US POSTAGE ROBERT J & SANDRA A KENDALL 7310 PONTIAC CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9455 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RESIDENTIAL PL�NED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PU - ) OPEN HOUSE Tuesday, April 24, 2012, 6-7 pm Lake Susan Room Chanhassen Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Dear Property Owner City staff would like to invite you to an open house to discuss a proposed amendment to the zoning on your property. Over the past year, staff has been investigating the approximately 50 Residential Planned Unit Developments (PUD -R) throughout the City. Staff has discovered the following after researching the different projects: • The more recent ordinances reference the underlying zoning districts; however, they may not adequately reference the Chanhassen City Code. • The PUD subdivisions created in the 1980's and early 1990's reference the Design Standards as part of the Development Contract, rather than with the adoption of the Design Standards in the PUD Ordinance. • Prior to 1980 no design standards or development contracts exist. Rather the project references a development plan. • During the 1970's, any Residential Single -Family development exceeding 25 lots was required to be processed as a Planned Residential Development, even if the development complied with all requirements of the standard zoning regulations. The goal of the proposed amendments is to codify the developments as they exist today and to provide clarity as to the standards for your neighborhood. The purpose of the open house is to allow you an opportunity to discuss the proposed changes with City staff prior to this item going forward for a public hearing. Your comments will be greatly appreciated. Additional information can be found on the City's web site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/serv/plan/12-04.html. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Bob Generous, Senior Planner, at (952) 227-1131 or by email at bgenerousCDci.chanhassen.mn.us. CITY OF CHANHASSEN RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD -R) OPEN HOUSE Tuesday, April 24, 2012, 6-7 pm Lake Susan Room Chanhassen Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Dear Property Owner City staff would like to invite you to an open house to discuss a proposed amendment to the zoning on your property. Over the past year, staff has been investigating the approximately 50 Residential Planned Unit Developments (PUD -R) throughout the City. Staff has discovered the following after researching the different projects: • The more recent ordinances reference the underlying zoning districts; however, they may not adequately reference the Chanhassen City Code. • The PUD subdivisions created in the 1980's and early 1990's reference the Design Standards as part of the Development Contract, rather than with the adoption of the Design Standards in the PUD Ordinance. • Prior to 1980 no design standards or development contracts exist. Rather the project references a development plan. • During the 1970's, any Residential Single -Family development exceeding 25 lots was required to be processed as a Planned Residential Development, even if the development complied with all requirements of the standard zoning regulations. The goal of the proposed amendments is to codify the developments as they exist today and to provide clarity as to the standards for your neighborhood. The purpose of the open house is to allow you an opportunity to discuss the proposed changes with City staff prior to this item going forward for a public hearing. Your comments will be greatly appreciated. Additional information can be found on the City's web site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/serv/plan/12-04.htmi. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Bob Generous, Senior Planner, at (952) 227-1131 or by email at bgenerousaci.chanhassen.mn.us. SCANNED