The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-11_WALMART CONCEPT PUD/REZONING IOP TO CCTraffic Impact Analysis Walmart (Store #5949-00) Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared for: Walmart Stores, Inc. Bentonville, Arkansas Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. St. Paul, Minnesota ©Kimsey-Hom and Associates, Inc. May 2011 116199062 C=" Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CITY 0, CHA;VHASSEN R-L,_-," MAY 2 6 2011 ENGINEERING DEPT. re �_a z I`x W In O �� 00 X m t �X z 6DD 00 cn z 0 X_ o{ Kcn m Q, z 0 m� m_ mV laroae 3NYl DWYNI UNiiSIX3 3Nvl OUJ3 bl 03SOd 8a 83 M v earn a ve a3soeoae Nria3N 313a3Nn GMO0 as ON3031 I 1 I I 1 I I I I / / a / O 1 � I I I 1 I I 1 1 / / I / 0 / / z, z, �'j �V ii UT 0 3 Z-4 d3HMnN 133N5 A f N 3 TO I IOZ Z 60 1 31Y0 7 / 00 �! CA �D a OEM 6DD $ m z 0 3 _ 2 z 0-0 i r m � z� m> x� = 1 7 • s MIS, (7d06I .Yfi4'd ggg i — — — — CDb�� IEs a 8 4 I , n , �a s F s s ia3uro A e8n3 ease 03soeoae Ip uv aYns NY103N M280NOO 03SOdOdd W OC U ON3031 [ N3aoru � � k s Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113-3174 August 11, 2011 Robert Generous, Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: Wal-Mart, Mn/DOT Review # Sll-036 SW Quad of TH 5 (Arboretum Blvd.) and Powers Blvd. City of Chanhassen/Carver County Control Section 1002 Dear Mr. Generous: Thank you for the opportunity to review the Wal-Mart Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). Because of the general nature of this plan Mn/DOT is not able to provide comments concerning issues such as drainage or design. As plans are developed, we would like the opportunity to meet with our partners and to review the updated information. Mn/DOT's staff has reviewed the document and has the following comment: Traffic: The traffic impact analysis only examines the PM peak period. The AM peak period is more critical for this location since there is a heavy westbound left turning movement opposing a high eastbound volume heading inbound in the morning. Additionally, congestion in the AM peak period may become more significant when Wal-Mart begins operating 24 hours per day. Mn/DOT conducted turning movement counts at TH 5/Powers Blvd. on 9/25/08. The turning movement counts completed for this traffic impact analysis have a date of 2/8/11. Mn/DOT's counts were significantly higher, especially the PM eastbound turning movement - 916 vehicles versus 715. This can likely be attributed to the time of year in which the counts were taken. In the 2030 build options the intersection falls into an unacceptable LOS E. Indeed, queues for motorists turning left, block both the northbound and westbound approaches. The TIA recommended monitoring the surrounding growth in the long term in consideration of a dual left for both eastbound and westbound traffic. As stated previously, our concern is for westbound motorists turning left. Based on our 9/25/11 turning movement counts, this problem should be addressed in the short term. Mn/DOT would like to meet with the City of Chanhassen to discuss possible funding options for the needed improvements. An equal opportunity employer Mn/DOT agrees with the TIA recommendation of installing a signal at Powers Blvd and Park Rd (when it is warranted). Along with the signal installation at Park Rd. the three signals on Powers (at Park Rd, TH 5 and W 78' St.) should be interconnected and have cross coordination plans implemented with the current TH 5 system. For questions concerning these comments, please contact David Sheen (651-234-7824) of Mn/DOT Metro's Traffic Section. Permits: Any use of or work within or affecting Mn/DOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's utility website at httn://www.dot.state.mn.us/utility/ Please include one 11 x 17 plan set and one full size plan set with each permit application. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-234-7911) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. Standard Submittal Statement: As a reminder, there are four submittal options. Please submit either: 1. One (1) electronic pdf version of the plans. Mn/DOT can accept the plans via e-mail at metrodevreviews.dot(a),state.mn.us provided that each separate e- mail is less than 20 megabytes. 2. Three (3) sets of full size plans. Although submitting seven sets of full size plans will expedite the review process. Plans can be sent to: Mn/DOT — Metro District Planning Section Development Reviews Coordinator 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113 3. One (1) compact disk. 4. Plans to Mn/DOT's external FTP Site. Please send pdf. files to: ft�://ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/incomins/MetroWatersEdge/Plannine Internet Explorer doesn't work using ftp so please use an FTP Client or your Windows Explorer (My Computer). Also, please send a note to metrodevreviews.dotC�state.mn.us indicating that the plans have been submitted on the FTP site. If you have any questions concerning this review please feel free to contact me at (651) 234-7794r - Planning Supervisor Copy sent via E-Mail: Arash Moin, Water Resources Buck Craig, Permits Nancy Jacobson, Design Nicole Peterson, Area Engineer David Sheen, Traffic Ann Braden / Metropolitan Council Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen - poehmeOci.chanhassen.mn.us LID I ENGINEERS PEANNEpS (I ESIGNEpS Consulting Group, Inc. SRF No. 7534 DRAFT MEMORANDUM TO: Paul Oehme, Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Chanhassen FROM: John Hagen, PE, PTOE, Senior Associate Carla Stueve, PE, PTOE, Associate DATE: July 19, 2011 SUBJECT: REv1Ew OF TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR A CHANHASSEN WALMART As requested, we have completed a review -of the Traffic Impact Analysis that was completed in May 2011 by Kimley-Horn and Associates. Based on our review, we offer the following comments for your consideration: Trip Generation/Background Traffic Assumptions • A 1.8 percent yearly growth rate was used to account for background growth in the area. In reviewing historical daily traffic volumes from MnDOT flow maps, this seems slightly low for traffic on TH 5 (Arboretum Boulevard). A review of traffic levels on CSAH 17 (Powers Boulevard) showed considerable fluctuation in daily traffic volumes from year to year, so the assumed growth rate seems reasonable for this facility. • Page 7 of the study documents the pass -by trip reduction factor used (28 percent). Based on data in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, this pass -by trip reduction factor seems reasonable. • Table 2 (Off -Site Trip Generation - P.M. Peak Hour) in the traffic study documents the trip generation estimates used for the analysis. Overall, the trip generation estimates seem reasonable. However, for land use 210 (single family detached housing) these trips should be shown in parenthesis with a footnote added for the table to indicate that these trips were subtracted from the total. • For the additional future development, the square footage for the land use (LU) 630 is inconsistent between Table 2 (28,980 square feet) and Figure 6 (28,000 square feet). In addition, the future shopping center use should be shown as LU 820, instead of LU 220, in Figure 6 for consistency with Table 2. www.srfconsulting.com One Carlson Parkway North, Suite ISII I Minneapoli, MN S5"713 1763.47S.IRYIO Fav: 763475.2429 An Equnl Opporruuiry Empinyvr Paul Oehme, PE City of Chanhassen Directional Distribution July 19, 2011 Page 2 • A review of the directional distribution was completed to assess the trips that would travel to/from the proposed development on the adjacent roadway system. Based on typical trip distribution patterns for retail land uses during the p.m. peak hour, the trips loaded to Arboretum Boulevard appear low. Based on the percentages shown in Figure 10, 53 percent of the total trips distributed to/from the proposed retail site are assumed to travel on Arboretum Boulevard (35 percent from the east, 18 percent from the west). Based on localized traffic patterns, particularly during the peak periods when many motorists commute to/from work using the regional system, this percentage appears somewhat low. Operations/Capacity General Comments on Synchro/SimTraffic Models • The heavy vehicle percentages differ for the southbound through and right -turn movements at the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard (1 percent versus 2 percent). The difference is minor. Was there a reason for the difference? • The northbound right -turn lane at the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard does not feed into its own lane (no add lane) on Arboretum Boulevard; however, it is shown this way in the model. This may have an impact on the traffic operational results of the northbound right turn as well as the merge point with Arboretum Boulevard. The City may wish to have the model revised to match existing conditions in order to verify any changes to the results included in the report. • Pedestrian timing at the signalized intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard was not included in the model; however, existing crosswalks are installed in the field. • The modeled speed limits on the Arboretum Boulevard links on either side of the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard are 30 mph versus the existing 55 mph in the field. While this is not likely a major issue, it could impact how vehicles enter and exit the traffic model. • No model was provided that included the recommended westbound and eastbound dual left -turn lanes at the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard. Paul Oehme, PE City of Chanhassen Year 2013 Analysis July 19, 2011 Page 3 Page 25, under the build analysis, the bullets which identify the delay per movement for the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard, the fourth bullet should read southbound through, instead of southbound left. For 2013 build conditions at the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard, the improvements documented in the study include optimization of the signal timing to reduce traffic delay and queuing at this intersection. With this improvement, the study documents that queuing and blocking issues are eliminated for the northbound and westbound left -turn movements. However, one concern is the deceleration distance in the remaining left -turn lane for those movements. For the northbound left turn, the 95th percentile queue will utilize the entire storage length available (230 feet), providing no distance for left -turning vehicles to decelerate. Lengthening of the westbound left -turn lane or construction of a dual left -turn lane would provide a safer design. In addition, for the westbound left -turn movement, with a 95th percentile queue of 340 feet, there is 290 feet remaining for vehicles to decelerate. Based on updated MnDOT turn lane design guidelines, the recommended deceleration length for turn lanes, based on a 55-mph roadway, is approximately 515 feet, with no deceleration in the through lane, and 350 feet, with a 10 mph deceleration in the through lane. If an opportunity allows for the construction of a westbound dual left-tum lane with the proposed development, it would be beneficial from a traffic safety and operations standpoint. 0In the traffic analysis, the installation of a traffic signal is recommended for the intersection of Powers Boulevard and Park Road for 2013 build conditions. Based on our review of the traffic operations analysis, the installation of this traffic signal is needed based on the new trips generated by the proposed development. A review of the Synchro model showed that split -phasing is assumed for the eastbound and westbound approaches for the proposed signal at the intersection of Powers Boulevard and Park Road. It appears that the split -phasing of the eastbound and westbound approaches may have been assumed in order to maintain the existing lane configurations on the Park Road approaches to the intersection. Split -phased signal operation is not typically the most efficient way to operate a traffic signal. Was protected/permissive left - turn phasing considered at this location? The volumes shown in Table 11 for Warrants 2 and 3 do not appear to be correct. The text of the memo references that Tables 11, 13, and 14 present the results of Warrants IA and I (Eight -hour Vehicular Warrant) only; however, Tables I and 14 include partial information for Warrants 2 (Four-hour Vehicular Warrant) and Warrant 3 (Peak Hour Warrant). The text and tables should be revised in order to be consistent. Paul Oehme, PE City of Chanhassen Year 2030 Analysis July 19,2011 Page 4 • The current storage for the northbound left -turn lane on Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard is shown as 230 feet. With the proposed development, this movement is shown to have a 95th percentile queue of approximately 350 feet during the p.m. peak hour, which will significantly exceed the current storage capacity. The study indicates that lengthening this turn lane is not feasible due to the southbound left -turn lane at Park Road and Powers Boulevard and the close proximity between these two intersections. A northbound dual -left turn lane should be considered to meet the future traffic volume demands for this movement. In addition, there is currently a southbound dual left -turn lane at this intersection that would allow for proper alignment through the intersection. • The 2030 operations analysis for build conditions shows a definite need for eastbound and westbound dual left -turn lanes on Arboretum Boulevard at Powers Boulevard. Conclusions Based on the analysis results documented for the Walmart Traffic Impact Study, the key intersections will continue to operate at overall acceptable levels of service. However, many of the individual turning movements experience high levels of delay, with 95th percentile queues that extend beyond the available turn lane storage. The traffic mitigation measures in the study address the majority of these issues, with the exception of the need for dual left -turn lanes on Arboretum Boulevard at Powers Boulevard. Based on our review, dual left -turn lanes are needed for the northbound, eastbound and westbound approaches. In addition, as noted, with the lower percentage of traffic that was distributed to Arboretum Boulevard, the operational and queuing results at this intersection may be understated, which would further indicate the need for these geometric improvements at this intersection. H:\ProjecisV53ADRAF! Walm nT/AReview_071911.doc r- n 'bFh'bFZmFl Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. RETAININGWALLB`` DECORATIVE FENCE 70'MINIMUM BUILDING BAMAXIM��TBUA'I oOU`EVARD7S rA re H1@Nw4Y N05 150 W NOTES )[K 1. NLfAIf:NUTION58C9Fll ONlOTK tl1�S I K SULLWEPWTM£CF BULLNF ICpMIXR.ILFS tsK KCF59BIE SV[/SSNO EY.OII1IESlPILES L6E0 TRgP 2PMgNG 511gN1CCNTNXB BP PMpNG5PME5 rKEs sTuuno n[�NSIONs xwTN:or o mk to �g COLPKT pME1SIIXb N101K CEP11 TK tY WALMART SITE PLAN CHANHASSEN, MN SEPTEMBER 2011 Traffic Impact Analysis Walmart (Store #5949-00) Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared for: Walmart Stores, Inc. Bentonville, Arkansas Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. St. Paul, Minnesota I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my dir ct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Pr fessional Engineer under the laws of the Sta Mi nesma. By: _ Brian R. malkoski, P.E. License No. 47531 Date: S ?�2 2.011 I 1 1 1 1 1 LI 1 1 1 I ! Kimley-Horn and Associates. Inc. Introduction Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis Wahnart Stores, Inc. is proposing the construction of a new store, number 5949-00, near the southwest quadrant of the Arboretum Boulevard ("Trunk Highway 5) and Powers Boulevard (CSAH 17) intersection in Chanhassen, Minnesota (see Figure 1). The project is anticipated to be completed by the year 2013, and will include retail and grocery land uses on a vacant industrial parcel. The proposed development site plan is shown in Figure 2. The purpose of this report is to document the anticipated traffic impacts that the change in land use at the proposed Walmart site will have on the surrounding roadway network intersections. This traffic impact analysis (TIA) represents a review of traffic impacts of the project, based on land use and site plan information, and is intended to identify the key traffic issues associated with the project. This TIA documents the existing traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site, estimates the traffic anticipated to be generated by the project, distributes and assigns these trips to the adjacent roadway system, and evaluates the traffic operations of key intersections near the site and those providing access to and from the site. In order to have a basis of comparison, a "no -build" analysis was completed for each future scenario that includes the general background growth on the adjacent roadways as well as traffic generated by other possible development adjacent to the project. Based on the analysis, the TIA evaluates roadway and/or traffic control mitigation measures to accommodate future traffic levels in the system and whether these mitigation measures are triggered by background growth or the proposed project. May 2011 t i as a Aj t. s • "�.. ,ram !n 1 waimart ��• e store , h Frr { e , s act N FIGURE 1: Site Location o (oo ma aoo �� Krcnley-Horn , t 0 F,t and Associates, Inc. 1 P ~ArborteumBoulevd�y(High -. k'aY sJ a �r I F, Kimle -Horn WaTrart (Store t Analy00) sis , y Traffic Impact Malysis `� and Associates, Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota ' Study Area ' The project site is bounded by Arboretum Boulevard (TH 5) on the north, Powers Boulevard on the east, and Park Road on the south. The proposed development will include an up to 120,209 square -foot Walmart store. Current nearby land uses are a mix ' of office and industrial. Access to the site will be provided via the two existing driveways on Park Road, with a southbound turn lane constructed on the west driveway. The segment of Park Road between Powers Boulevard and the west driveway will be ' reconfigured to accommodate westbound right turn lanes at the driveways as well as an eastbound left turn lane at the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard and a westbound left turn lane at the west driveway. A center median will divide the two directions of travel. 1 Data Collection 1 PM peak hour turning movement counts were collected on Tuesday, February 8, 2011 and Wednesday, February 9, 2011 for the following study intersections: , • Arboretum Boulevard (TH 5) & Powers Boulevard • Park Road & Powers Boulevard (12-hour count) ' • Park Road & East Driveway • Park Road & West Driveway , Figure 3 displays the existing lane geometry and traffic control for the intersections in the study area. Figure 4 summarizes the existing turning movement volumes for the PM peak hour conditions; volumes were balanced among the four intersections. See ' Appendix A for the raw turning movement count data. 1 1 May 2011 4 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 LJ 1 7 I 1 1 1 1 1 I = F, Kimley-Horn �_ - =3 and Associates. Inc. Trip Generation Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis ' The Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, 8`4 Edition, was used to calculate the anticipated net new external project trips for the proposed development. A 120,209 square -foot free-standing discount superstore (land use code 813) was used to ' determine the total number of trips generated by the site. Total pass -by trip reduction was determined to be 28%. Of the total calculated pass -by trips, 70 percent, 20 percent, ' and 10 percent were assumed to originate on Arboretum Boulevard, Powers Boulevard, and Park Road, respectively. 1 1 1 1 1 1 Existing non -vehicular travel was examined in the TMCs and determined to be negligible; therefore, no reductions were made for transit use or pedestrian travel. The trip generation for the proposed project with adjustments for pass -by trips is shown in Table 1. The proposed site is anticipated to generate 554 trips (271 entering, 283 exiting) for the PM peak hour. May 2011 1 r Table 1 Trip Generalion PM Peak Hour Land Use# Land Usc'lype Size Units Formula Total Trips Dater Wt P.ss-by Net New &ternal Tri % Pass -by Total Pass -by Trips Pass -by Trips Etter Pass -by Trip Exit Total I Etter E7dt 813 Free-Stundin Discount Su erstore 120,209 KSF T-4o1(X) 554 271 283 28.IP/„ 155 76 79 399 195 204 I I PP` 61111., and Assmiates. Inc. Future Traffic Projections Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis ' Project buildout is expected to be in 2013. Linear growth of 1.8 percent per year was applied to the counts to obtain background traffic for the year 2013. This growth is based on historical annual average daily traffic (AADT) on Powers Boulevard and Arboretum ' Boulevard since 2001. The 2013 no build peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 5. ' To obtain background traffic estimates for 2030, however, it was determined that 1.8 percent linear growth per year was an unreasonable estimate over a 17 year period. Instead, average annual growth on Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard was ' obtained from the Carver County Travel Demand Model over the 30 year period from 2000 to 2030 due to its basis in census data, local comprehensive plans, and established estimates. A linear growth of 0.5 percent per year was determined and then applied to the balanced 2013 estimates to establish a baseline estimate for 2030. ' Growth from demand model largely represents long term regional trends, however, and does not provide reliable estimates for traffic growth at individual intersections due to the development of specific parcels. Based on discussions with the City of Chanhassen, it was determined that traffic from five nearby parcels, using square -footage and development type estimates, would be added to the 2030 baseline estimate to establish a final estimate for 2030 background traffic. One development, located near the Powers Boulevard / TH 212 interchange, represents a revision to the original estimates used within the Carver County Travel Demand Model. The assumed PM peak period trips ' based on single family residential were subtracted from the total trips calculated based on the revised land use scenario (commercial and office), to represent a land use change from the regional demand model rather than an entirely new development. Peak trip ' generation estimates for each parcel is provided in Table 2, with the location of each site shown in Figure 6. The net trips anticipated to be generated in the PM peak hour by the surrounding development were calculated and distributed onto the roadway network (discussed ' below), and added to the 0.5% per year background growth from 2013 to 2030. The resultant total background growth in the study area therefore varies by intersection, ranging from 1-6 percent per year linearly on Arboretum Boulevard up to 4.1 percent per ' year linearly on Powers Boulevard Total off -site trips are shown in Figure 7. The 2030 no build peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 8. 1 ■ May 2011 17 �I Table 2 OR -Site Trip Generation PM Peak Hour Pass -by Net New % Total Pass -by Pass -by External Land Total Pass -by Pass -by Trips Trips Trips Total Natter Exit Use# Land Llse Type Size Units Formula Trips Natter Exit Tri Enter Brit 814 Specialty Retail Center 22.350 KSF T=2.40(X)+21.48 75 33 42 0% 0 0 0 75 33 42 814 Specialty Retail Center 32.800 KSF T = 2.40(X) f- 21.48 100 44 56 0% 0 0 0 100 44 56 110 General Light Industrial 221.000 KSF T=0.97(X) 214 26 188 0% 0 0 0 214 26 188 630 Clinic 28.980 KSF T=5.18(X)' I50 62 88 0% 0 0 0 150 62 88 710 General Office 948.000 KSF T - 1. 12(X) 1 78.81 1,141 194 947 0% 0 0 0 1,141 194 947 820 Shopping Center 406.000 KSF Lm(T)=0.67 Ln(X)+3.37 1,627 797 830 0% U 0 0 1.627 797 830 210 Sin Ic-Famil Detached Housing132.000 Acres T=2.74(X) 362 .'„) 123 0% U 0 0 362 239 121 1. 'Using Jiree� Iooal di,M.iun from trips enes vs. employees PM peak rate 2,945 917 2,028 0°% 0 0 0 2,945 917 2,U28 0 P -50 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I� LEI 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 bb" = Project Trip Distribution Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis The project trip distribution is based on selected zone analysis from the Carver County Travel Demand Model, which represents a refined version of the Metropolitan Council's demand model for the Twin Cities region. As shown in Figure 9, the proposed site is located in TAZ 142.3, which includes a region bounded by Hazeltine Boulevard on the west, Arboretum Boulevard on the north, and Powers Boulevard on the east. After assigning trips to the network, vehicles originating from or heading to the TAZ on each of the 10 roadways (or centroid connectors) shown in the figure were measured to calculate a daily distribution for both the 2000 and 2030 analysis years. Results were then interpolated between the two base years to estimate distribution for the 2013 analysis year. By adding trips to and from the north (lines 1, 2, 9, and 10), to and from the east (line 3), to and from the south (lines 4, 5, and 6), and to and from the west (lines 7 and 8), the final directional distribution was established for the site. Figure 10 shows the final assumed trip distribution for the project, with 35 percent to the east, 20 percent to the north, 20 percent to the west, and 25 percent to the south. 10 percent of the trips to the west and 10 percent of the trips to the south were assumed to use Park Road west of the site. Trip distribution for the four surrounding off -site parcels contained within TAZ 142.3 was assumed the same as for the Walmart site, with slight assignment modifications based on location. For the modified parcel located near TH 212, trip distribution was analyzed for TAZ 146, which contains the proposed development, showing that approximately 11% of the trips to and from the development utilized Powers Boulevard. Estimated project trips, shown in Figure 11, were then added to 2013 and 2030 no build traffic conditions, along with corrections for pass -by trips, as shown in Figure 12. The final traffic estimates for the build condition are shown in Figures 13 and 14 for 2013 and 2030, respectively. May 2011 15 f 41 t t f J t f _ 142.3 142.1 142.2 \s➢ r� FIGURE 9: Selected Zone Analysis 0 Soo 1,000 2,000 _ m/M" Kimley-Horn 0 Cenhoid Connector Feet n Boundary and Associates, Inc. i -- LS X 36% r - : 73%.#41Will t r = X Ml m 2t%i e �v id walmart g Lore �.7� �`.. � � • .� .L -fir \ 'nM 1 t32% t63% Jt r NaaE 96%ly i 1 b a x N FIGURE 10: Site Trip Distribution f o too zoo aao y Ut n KimleyHorn [ O Feet xx Trip Distribution Percentage _>� , and Associates, Inc. Cl 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 [] 1 1 1 1] 11 1 i 1 I 1] I I I I I I I I i I I 11 I [1, I I I I P71- 7 � 5111111111111111Kimley-Horn it..= and Associates, Inc. Level of Service Analyses Walmart (Stare #5949-00) —Traffic Impact Malysis Intersection level of service (LOS) analyses were performed for each of the intersections within the study area using the signalized analysis methodology found in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCAI) and Trafficware's Synchro/SimTraffic version 7. Each intersection was analyzed for PM peak hours for the following scenarios: • 2011 existing traffic conditions, • 2013 no build (without project trips) conditions, • 2013 build (with project trips added) conditions, • 2030 no build (without project trips) conditions, and • 2030 build (with project trips added) conditions. One of the primary measures of effectiveness used to evaluate intersection traffic operations, as defined in the HCM, is level of service (LOS�—a qualitative letter grade (A through F) based on seconds of vehicle delay due to the traffic control device at an intersection. By definition, LOS A conditions represent high -quality operations (i.e., motorists experience very little delay or interference) and LOS F conditions represent very poor operations (i.e., extreme delay or severe congestion). This study used the LOS D/E boundary as an indicator of satisfactory traffic operations. Figure 15 displays the LOS thresholds for signalized and unsignalized intersections. 100 90 80 20 10 Figure 15. Highway Capacity Manual Level of Service Criteria S gnalixed Unsig nalixad ■ May 2011 22 PPI®Kimle) and Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis It was assumed that for the future scenarios an intersection with unsatisfactory operations should be addressed through signal timing modifications, or if that was not possible, through implementation of an intersection or roadway improvement. In order to determine the impacts of the project on the transportation network, a traffic operations analysis was performed on the internal and surrounding roadway network. The analysis process included determining level of service and queue lengths at each of the study intersections for existing, no build and build conditions. Supporting SitnTraffrc reports are included in Appendix C. For each scenario, five one -hour simulations were conducted in SimTraffic. ' In each of the following sections, a description of potentially unsatisfactory operational characteristics is summarized for each scenario modeled. For each scenario a table is included where the intersection level of service and delay is summarized. The SimTraffic ' reports were reviewed to identify individual movements that experience unsatisfactory level of service and delay or queue lengths that are anticipated to extend beyond available ' storage lengths. Only in instances where an individual movement experiences an unsatisfactory measure of effectiveness will the movement information be summarized. 2011 Existing Operations Table 3 provides 2011 level of service (LOS) results for the existing conditions. All ' intersections within the study area operate at LOS D or better during the PM peak period, with the three unsignalized intersections operating at LOS A. A total of six movements operate at LOS E, with average delays per vehicle summarized as follows: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 63 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 75 seconds ' • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound left: 74 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound through: 68 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 73 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound through: 66 seconds ' At the Arboretum Boulevard intersection, the signal is timed such that the through movements on Arboretum Boulevard are maintained at LOS C, with lower LOS on Powers Boulevard, the lower volume side street. All left turn queues are contained ' within the available storage lengths and no blocking by queues in adjacent lanes is expected. The delays associated with the LOS E or F movements are not associated with ' operational problems at the signal, but are due to relatively low demand and long cycle lengths. May 2011 23 I /, Kimley-Horn / and Associates, Inc. Table 3 - 2011 Existing Conditions Walmart (Store #5949-00) ' Traffic Impact Analysis Chanhassen, Minnesota 2011 PM Peak Hour Left T.. rues 0P 1.m b9 Abw M AP h O,erf bterae Lek ITMw Interaetlbe G M AP,veaA 95tn Oela, Del" Deb, Deb• DJar Perumse IaeJ.enl Los IaeJa<nl Los 4eJveM Los uebl LDS segeeAl Los 0 310' 63.0 219 C 4.A A 301 C MbOreNm )5.0 34.8 a 3.9 A 33.0 C WB 225' NW& signal 36.0 0 Ne 130' Powerz&W 73.9 68.1 3.2 A 5D4 D 50 100' 73.1 9.9 A 66.3 11.5 29 0 5.1 A A 41.6 71 D A EA D Park RO& we D 10A B 13.1 0 5.1 A 2.3 A 32 A Powers WA 11NX tW 40 2.5 A 09 A 5.1 A 1.9 A 56 15' 4.6 A 31 A 3b A 3.3 A E6 D - - 0A A 0.1 A 0.6 A Pah Rd& We D 1.6 A OA A - - 0.3 A Fau IVPSC 09 A �• D 51 A 3A A 3.3 A Dri., SB D ES 0' - - 01 A 03 A 0.2 A Park Ra& we D 2.0 A 05 A - - 0.9 A IA A west 1145< eB D 55 A 29 A 3b A 3.4 A D.i �y 5B I D 1 2.1 A - >.3 A 2013 No Build Operations Table 4 provides 2013 level of service (LOS) results for the 2013 no build scenario, using background linear growth from 2011 to 2013 of 1.8 percent per year. The simulation assumes the same signal timing plan at the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard as under existing conditions. All intersections within the study area are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during PM peak period, with the three unsignalized intersections operating at LOS A. A total of six movements are expected to operate at LOS E, with average delays per vehicle summarized as follows: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 65 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 76 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound left: 74 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound through: 68 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 74 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound through: 70 seconds At the Arboretum Boulevard intersection, the through movements on Arboretum Boulevard are maintained at LOS D or C, with lower LOS on Powers Boulevard, the lower volume side street. All left turn queues are accommodated within the available storage lengths and no blocking by queues in adjacent lanes is expected. The delays associated with the LOS E movements are not representative of operational problems at the signal, but are due to relatively low demand and long cycle lengths. May 2011 24 1 1 CI �J 11 1 1 1 1 1 i� I I I 1 1 1 J ®' Kimley-Horn and Associates. Inc. Table 4 — 2013 No BuBd Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis 2013 No Build - PM Peak Hour Lak T. Pera W.bYAtovemant APPruxh Overall lntersenlon Lek Thra h t lft..GkN Control APP Oaby LOS Delay LOS War LOS May LOS OelaY LOS IkaJaahll.,j.hl (aW.a aedY )EB 64.5 22A C e6 A 31.5 C we 25A 3Y.8 D 4.1 A 35.5 D •M& y I Do 325 D P.81 dSO as 94.2 68.1 33 A ".a D I 33.6 0.9 30 A 42.9 D ES130 B 10.0 A 51 A Y.9 A ParkBd& WB 9.7 A 11.5 B 53 A 2.1 A3) A Powers Nvd 3WX NB2.3A]0A55A2.0A SB 5.4 A 33 A 36 A 3.4 A E8 - - 0.6 A 0.1 A 0.6 A ParkU& WB 1.2 A 05 A - - O6 A 10 A NB 0 63 A - 3O A 35 A ON., SB 0 EB V 03 A - 03 A P.rtU& WB P 2.2 A DA A - - 0.9 A 0.9 A WW N0 P 5.2 1 A I62 A 2.7 A 3.2 A OriveweY SB 0 69 1 A 1 4.9 A 2013 Build Operations Table 5 provides 2013 LOS results for the 2013 build scenario, based on background traffic plus trips associated with the Walmart parcel. The simulation assumes the same signal timing plan at the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard as under existing conditions. All intersections within the study area are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during the PM peak period, with the three unsignalized intersections operating at LOS C or better. A total of eight movements are expected to operate at LOS E or F, with average delays for the LOS E movements summarized as follows: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 66 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound through: 74 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 75 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 75 seconds The following movements are expected to operate at LOS F under the 2013 build scenario: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 174 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound left: 260 seconds • Park Road & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 55 seconds • Park Road & East Driveway northbound right: 494 seconds Operations at the Arboretum Boulevard intersection are expected to remain around the 2013 no build levels, with increased delay to the westbound left and northbound left movements. The northbound left turn queue is anticipated to extend beyond the 230 foot • May 2011 25 I PP' =„ Kimley-Horn � = - and Associa Walmart (Stone A5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis Chanhassen, Minnesota left turn lane, with a 95"percentile queue of 396 fed. The adjacent through lane will also block access to the left turn lane, with a 95" percentile queue of 563 feet. The westbound left turn queue is expected to fit within the turn lane, however, with a 95th percentile queue of 598 feet and 630 feet of storage length, and a posted speed of 55 mph, left turning vehicles will need to begin decelerating in the adjacent through lane, delaying vehicles making the westbound through movement. At the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard, the eastbound left turn movement is expected to operate at LOS F, due to increased volumes during the PM peak hour. Queuing from this movement is expected to block vehicles exiting the east driveway from the south, leading to LOS F on the northbound approach. As a low volume side street approach, it is likely that most vehicles will reroute and utilize the west driveway during the PM peak hour. No turn lane spillback or lane blocking is anticipated from any of the left turn lanes at the intersection. Table 5 — 2013 Build 2013 HILdId - PM Peak Hour Len Twn 0,akinlaae69htovement Approach 0,,erall lnteeetton Leh Thou h t Orues Weraetlbn Central Appreeh 95th 0ele, �� D!� oPL*W Why hrwmie (.,/.hl LOS aee/Whl LOS laerhe LOS Weed) l03 aahl LDS ES 320' 65.6 25.5 C 50 A 319 C Ar",.Wm WB 600' 1)<A 3).1 D CO A A9.3 D Blvd& Signal 51A 0 P.k d NB 395' 260.1 )3.6 3A A as's W 105' )A3 )A.9 32 A "A D 0 2W44 553 16.5 c 4.2 A 390 Park Rd& WB 0' 20A c 22.7 c 130 B 1C.A B Pow NW 1WK NB 65' 110 B 15 A 53 A 33 A 13.0 B sa W' ).0 A 3.6 A 53 A 4.6 A ES 0' 23.5 c 13 A 23A c Park Rd & We 0' 0A A 0A A 0J A 266 C fast TWSC NB 0' -OFW7 A933 0riveraa9 CJ A O ESO32 A2.) A Park Rd& WB TV 2.1 A0.9 A Wet TWSC NB 0' 6.1 A6A A 8.6 A SB 200- 189 C 18.4 c 2013 Build Operations with Signal Installation and Optimization Table 6 provides LOS results for the 2013 build scenario, assuming the installation of a signal at the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard, as well as optimization of splits at the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard. The simulation assumes an optimized timing plan Park Road and Powers Boulevard, with the signal operating with an 80-second cycle length, half that of the 160-second cycle at Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard, to allow for coordination with the optimized splits at the major intersection. Although signal optimization removes approximately 6 seconds from the major street approaches, the signal remains coordinated along the TH 5 corridor, with minimal increases in delay. May 2011 26 I 1 LJ [1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 M ❑Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis All intersections within the study area are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during PM peak period, with the two unsignahzed intersections on Park Road operating at LOS A. Similar to the no build scenario, a total of six movements are expected to operate at LOS E or F, with average delays for the LOS E intersections summarized as follows: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 71 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 71 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound left: 69 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound through: 62 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 71 seconds The following movement is expected to operate at LOS F under the 2013 build scenario with signal installation: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound through: 87 seconds Operations at the Arboretum Boulevard intersection are expected to remain around the 2013 no build levels, with increased delay to the southbound through movement. With the signal timing modified, queuing and blocking issues are eliminated. The 951h percentile queue for both the northbound left turn and through movements is reduced to 232 feet, which is easily accommodated within the taper of the 230 foot storage length. The 95th percentile westbound left turn queue is reduced to 340 feet, which leaves nearly 300 feet in the turn lane for vehicles to decelerate. At the signalized intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard, all movements are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better. With the signal in place, queues are anticipated to clear during most cycles, allowing the northbound right-tum movement at the east driveway to operate at LOS A. The delays associated with the LOS E or F movements are not associated with operational problems at the signal, but are due to relatively low demand and long cycle lengths. No geometric improvements are recommended, and the cycle length at Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard is expected to remain at 160 seconds to maximize the coordinated westbound and eastbound through movements. ■ May 2011 27 I _„ Kimley-Horn hill =and Associates. Inc. Table 6 - 2013 Build with Improvements Walmart (Store 05949-00) ' Traffic Impact Analysis Chanhassen, Minnesota 2913 Build with S' ny - PM Peak Hour Left Twn Dwee4 O hna In 1,49wwent APprOad Oerall hnerrecHA, Lail I Mau R haernead. Control ApproaN 95th Dehry LOS mu, LO& Deiq LOShad/ Dehe L06 DNw l06 Penaad ge aea/wh raee/vehl (And-14 �, a 315' 708 30.6 c 5.1 A 364 D ArboreWm we )3.3 41.4 D A 39.E D 34p' 4.1 DM& Signal 41.2 D W 230' PP. ii • e 6&2 62.1 4A A 43.2 D 58 305' J1.0 87.1 33 A 52.e D Ell Iss. 273 c 27.3 c 3.7 A 20.0 B Park Ad& we O 40.2 D 37.4 0 12.2 8 21.2 C B Pman, 91vd Signal All115' 27.0 c 9.6 A 6D A 33.4 B 33.2 58 50' 133 B 6A A 64 A 6.9 A EB O - 23 A as A 2.3 A Park Rd& WB 0' - 05 A 0A A 0.6 A 1J A FAs[ 1WX NB 0 - - 8a A 9.6 A OrivevnV SB 0' 23 A 2.3 A Ea O 2.9 A 0.6 A 0.2 A 098 Pah Rd& w8 25- 2.1 A 0.2 A 0.6 A 0.9 A 41 A West TWS< W W5.9 A ]A A 3.9 A 6.] A prlvewaY SB 95' a5 A - 25 A 8.3 A ImpN-da: sign sfwl i9nal6PlindApnalrxnal HwM mwaKa�ama s9w malalne� g van amvaa.ra 2030 No Build Operations Split optimization was assumed under the 2030 no build scenario due to the significant increase in volume from surrounding off -site development, although the cycle length was assumed to remain at 160 seconds. Without split optimization, the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard is anticipated to operate at LOS F, with queues propagating throughout the network Table 7 provides 2030 LOS results for the no build scenario, using background linear growth from 2013 to 2030 of 0.5 percent per year, plus additional traffic associated with five parcels within the study area. All intersections within the study area are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during the PM peak period, with the three unsignalized intersections operating at LOS C or better. A total of 13 movements are expected to operate at LOS E or F, with average delays per vehicle for the LOS E movements summarized as follows: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 66 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound through: 71 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 76 seconds • Park Road & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 43 seconds • Park Road & Powers Boulevard eastbound through: 37 seconds • Park Road & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 48 seconds • Park Road & Powers Boulevard westbound right: 41 seconds The following movements are expected to operate at LOS F under the 2030 no build scenario: May 2011 28 I 1 C] L LJ 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 F, Kimle -Hom WaTrart (Slope t Analysis y Traffic Impact Malysis -7 ' _ and Associate% Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 96 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound left: 116 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound through: 96 seconds • Park Road & Powers Boulevard westbound through: 61 seconds • Park Road & East Driveway northbound left: 115 seconds • Park Road & East Driveway northbound through: 102 seconds • Park Road & East Driveway northbound right: 100 seconds At the Arboretum Boulevard intersection, the through movements on Arboretum Boulevard are maintained at LOS D or C, with lower LOS on Powers Boulevard, the lower volume side street. The northbound left turn queue is anticipated to spillback from the 230' left turn lane with a 95 h percentile queue of 332 feet. Access to the left turn lane is also anticipated to be blocked, with a 95a' percentile queue of 394 feet in the adjacent through lane. Lane blocking may also occur on the westbound approach, with a 630 foot left rum lane and a 673 foot 95`s percentile queue in the adjacent through lane. The 95`s percentile queue for the eastbound left turn is 470 feet, compared to a storage length of 550 feet. While the 95'h percentile queue is contained within the storage length, there is little length remaining in which vehicles can decelerate. This results in left turning vehicles decelerating in the adjacent through lane, causing additional delay. Table 7 - 2030 No Build 2030 No Build -PM Peak Haar LeR Turn ueuaa 0,erati0nb Maaamant AOn9adl M,a'AlntelNdbn Left Va, 1 INeraadkx CunUM A,raadl 95tb Peraent9a Daka, .,/.h LOS Way IleJwbl LOS Daley Jaw LOS wk, -Wq LOS ONay (.W.hl LOS ER 4M' 956 35.9 0 49 A a s 0 Ar o.M WB 3M' 65.9 M.i 0 44 A 41.1 D NW 6 SNnal 47.4 D P.MW a• 3m� 115) )1.0 46 A 50.) D 58 120' )fi.3 955 3.4 A 589 Ea 0' 42.fi Us "A 0 36.8 Park Rd& Wa 0 4).) 05 405 43.1 I3.6 B Ptmera BlW� R8 45' B6 A 19 A 5.2 A 2.7 A 58 60' 8.4 A 3 3 A 3.7 A 4.1 A EB 0 - 25.5 D I61 C 253 D Park 0.da WB O 1.9 A 0.5 A - 0.7 A East lM/SC NO 0' 115.4 102.0 10.3 18.6 C Or�a�gy SB O' E8 0 2A A 2.6 A Park Rd& WB 0 2.6 A OS A - - 0.9 A Wnt 1WSC 2.2 A All D 6A A 35 A 73 A I C A Orivev4y Ss 0' 6.2 I A 6.2 A 6iPuambaA W6n:aayarMSyallVita ®ANaaMiN� 2030 Build Operations Table 8 provides 2030 LOS results for the build scenario, using the previously calculated 2030 background traffic volumes plus trips associated with the Watmart site. As with the 2030 no build scenario, split optimization was assumed at the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard, with coordination maintained using a 160-second cycle. May 2011 29 1 I M„ Kimley-Horn M __ and Associa Inc. Walmart (Stare #5949-00) Traffic Impact Malysis Chanhassen, Minnesota While the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Power; Boulevard is anticipated to operate at LOS D, as under the 2030 no build scenario, both of the driveways on Park Road are expected to operate at LOS F. This is the result of queuing on the eastbound approach at the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard, as in the 2013 build scenario. With the increase in traffic volumes between 2013 and 2030, the eastbound Park Road queue at Powers Boulevard is anticipated to block both the east and west driveways on Park Road. At the Arboretum Boulevard intersection, LOS is maintained at a similar level to the 2030 no build scenario, but the travel demand at this intersection is, in effect, metered by the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard. A total of 20 movements are expected to operate at LOS E or F. Table 8 - 2030 Build 2030 Build - PM Peak Hour Left Turn Dueuei Operallaln by Moeeme at A,,.h pert NlerspM 4h Anough IN he Intersedion control Approatls 9511, nale, Delay Del, oe6Y entry ftmark (ser/seh) Los ,I-kl l03 (uniaah) Los (ser/eah) LDS (ser/eeh) LOS Ee 190' 1059 47.1 D 55 A Ss.6 Arboretum We 635- 75.6 56.3 50 A 52.3 D Power`s Nd Signal fO 325' 86.0 590 35 A 60A 0 S1.V D $B ES 115' l90' 76.6 1913 91.1 2&S D 35 A 9A A 11, 121.9 Park RES TWS� WB o 1551 173.1 119.6 138.E 293 D Powers WA Re BO 12.7 B 24 A 5.5 A 4.0 A SB 70' 10.1 0 3A A 5.2 A 4.8 A Ea D - Lear 405 1855 Park Rd We o 04 A I.1 A 0.1 A East 1WSC 929.1 50925 125.7 Mannar 93 A SB o EB o' 183.7 253.9 298.9 255.1 Park Rd& WB 20' 2.2 A 01 A OS A o9 A 2515 W,�t )'N50 AH 0' 6))3 - - 965.0 899.1 Drieewa, 24 1 A 1 1436.3 58 500 1 14689 /ngorenweA: 00nieak. &led $Vile@AN. aniPowra 2030 Build Operations with Signal Installation Table 9 provides 2030 LOS results for the build scenario, assuming the installation of a signal at the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard. The simulation assumes an optimized timing plan at Park Road and Powers Boulevard, with the signal operating with an 80-second cycle length, half that of the 160-second cycle at Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard, to allow for coordination with the optimized splits at the major intersection. All intersections within the study area are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during PM peak period, with the two unsignalized intersections on Park Road operating at LOS A. Similar to the 2030 no build scenario, a total of six movements are expected to operate at LOS E or F, with average delays per vehicle for the LOS E intersections summarized as follows: May 2011 30 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 ► VI Kir hih.- and Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis Chanhassen. Minnesota • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 72 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound through: 65 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 79 seconds The following movements are expected to operate at LOS F under the 2030 build scenario with signal installation: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 104 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound left: 122 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound through: 113 seconds As with the 2030 build scenario, operations at the Arboretum Boulevard intersection are expected to remain around the 2030 no build levels. Left turn lane spillback is anticipated on the northbound approach, where the 95`s percentile queue is 395 feet. The left turn lane will also be blocked by the 479 foot queue in the adjacent northbound through lane. Some blocking will also occur on the westbound approach, which has a 630-foot left turn lane but the 95`s percentile queue in the adjacent lane is 795 feet. Also, there is little space for deceleration in the eastbound and westbound left turn lanes. The 95th percentile queues for the westbound and eastbound left turns are 605 feet and 465 feet, respectively, compared to storage lengths of 630 feet and 550 feet, respectively. At the signalized intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard, all movements are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better. With the signal in place, queues are anticipated to clear during most cycles, allowing the northbound right -turn movement at the east driveway to operate at LOS A. Table 9 — 2030 Build 2030 Build with Signal - PM Peak Hour Left T. Oetratiom br Movement AppraaN Orval btenenbn 1M1w , uesIt MerzeGbn rpatr9l ah Dclw Oebr Deal Od" aue LOS lar/.eh 1OS wr/wh bos rea/ l05a.1Wh LD5 5'46,0 D 55 A 55.7 Arb9r9tam 5'52.6 D 4.9 A 490 D8W & Silnal 53.3 D PSPaez •�5'621 6.6 A 50.3 D JEB465' 0'11]9 90 A fi8.3 'c 19.2 B 4.2 A 21.2 c hrkMS, D 50.6 0 264 c 32.6 c Powers BlM LOa10'D I5.) B 65 A 191 B1].3 B 'c T.3 A 6.5 A 9.3 A O- 26 A 03 A 2.6 A PahAaa A Ob A 0.6 A TWScO02 rr - 181 C 18.1 c 21 A Driveoar SB O sD A 5.0 A Cr 23 A 03 A 1.4 A 05 A Park Ad6 WB 40' 2.5 A 03 A 0.5 A 05 A A Wet TWSc SB 0' T2 1 A i 65 i A I So A I 58 I A 51 Orirewar SB 145 12A B 3.0 1 A 1 13.1 1 e LspsswneM A-OPtinu[almd'" y5pli(s �ANomwnartl)Erwe MpmanasX B &1. Mrt.1. ®FarkW Poyeis May 2011 31 11 Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Walmart (Store 95949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis Chanhassen, Minnesota 2030 Build Operations with Signal Installation and Dual Left Turn Lanes Table 10 provides 2030 LOS results for the build scenario, assuming the signal installation, split optimization, and the construction of double left turn lanes on both the eastbound and westbound approaches on Arboretum Boulevard. All intersections within the study area are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during PM peak period, with the two unsignahzed intersections on Park Road operating at LOS A. Similar to existing conditions, a total of six movements are expected to operate at LOS E, with average delays per vehicle for the LOS E intersections summarized as follows: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 80 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 67 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound left: 77 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound through: 57 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 76 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound through: 76 seconds As with the 2030 build scenario, operations at the Arboretum Boulevard intersection are expected to remain around the 2030 no build levels. Left turn lane spillback and blocking is still anticipated on the northbound approach, with a 95`h percentile queue of 347 feet for the left turn movement and 333 feet for the through movement. The left turn lane is 230 feet long and could not be lengthened without shortening the southbound left turn lane at the Park Road and Powers Boulevard intersection. Lane blocking is also anticipated on the westbound approach where the left turn lane is 630 feet long and the 95rh percentile queue in the adjacent through lane is 709 feet. With the addition of the turn lanes, approximately 300 feet of storage length is available for deceleration in the eastbound and westbound left turn lanes. May 2011 32 J 1 1 1 1 Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis Chanhassen. Minnesota Table 10-2030 Build with Improvements 2030 Build with Signal -PM Peak Hour Left Tum Dmuea Operation by Movement Apprpzh OyeraB lnterwdvn Left TNw M1 R' nt fteo'etlion Control Approatll 95tn perremBe Delay aeJwnl LOB Del" ae4yen LOS :<Jyenln Oelyj4B LLOS " Oelry aeJyenl l05 EB IN 79.5 39.8 O SA 0 D Mborewm Wa 340' 667 a3.8 D 46 1 D 81W& A F�ai A3.0 D P.r BNd 3A5' 767 5].2 6A 9 D SB IN- 763 76.4 33 D EB 20' 31.1 C 1aJ 0 4.1 6 C Park Rd& WB 0' 436 D 49.5 0 25.1 3 C Porters Blyd Si nal B NB 135' 348 C 160 B 66 6 BSB 1].3 9 1D5' 2J6 C )6 A D APerk EB 0'28 A 1.1 AWa Rd& 0'0) A 0.6 ] A 22 A NB 0' 218 .9 <58 Oriyeway 0'a3 3 A ER D E9 A OJ A 05 A 0.9 A Park Rd& WB 35' 24 A 03 A 06 A 0.9 A wet TYWK NB 0' 66 A ].2 A 5l1 A 5.6 A a] A Oriv[way 50 130' 114 8 26 A ll.l a n/p'OWIIMNP: Upnm�aenm dYS L.k'nfa®ANdBlum eM I9NMP Irryowmenf a syid nmdmbw ®pan anaw..ers Irrymq�rerf C: EarNcutl GbW k IAf ®AkdeMnBrq Pdnra Inpaanmf 0: WefrooNOv4leW @ Arbdetun daf iMm May 2011 33 PP'MFI Kimle -Horn Walmart (Store #5949-00) y Traffic Impact Analysis �.. and Associates. Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota Signal Warrant Analysis As demonstrated in the previous section, signal installation has the potential to significantly improve operations on Park Road, and the following section discusses signal warrant analysis methodology using the 13-hour count conducted at Park Road and Powers Boulevard. Under the 2013 build scenario, which includes background traffic plus Walmart trips, a total of six hours are met for Warrant I and two hours are met for Warrant 1B. Additionally, two analysis hours are within 20 vehicles of satisfying Warrant IA. In all cases, the heaviest side street approach is the eastbound approach to the intersection, excluding right -turning vehicles. Table 11 presents the results for Warrants I and 1B. Table 11 — 2013 Signal Warrant Analysis nme Verb0 VawersWMc N8. S8 TnM (klaj.,A rwcke Pak Road TnIIc Minor roackt W.RaMI WanaM2 I WaMM3 1A 18 Mxor Vd. MMor Vol. Mal? Major Vol. M1np Vol. MeY! N.Vd. McY1 M1ncr Vol. MeY) 600-100 400 81 600 200 900 100 S11 2'00-a00 869 59 BOO 200 900 100 274 18i 800-a.w 261 84 6CO 200 900 100 026 540 9:00 -10:0 526 98 600 200 900 100 "1 1000-11:00 4% 157 ON) 200 900 100 11'00-12'O0 631 222 600 20o ws 900 100 604 12W-1300 806 219 6CO 200 M No 1W -14 W 649 180600 200 900 100 604 1400-1500 682 180 fi00 200 900 too boa1:OU-1 ;22 882 230 600 200 VB 900 100 MV413.W 482 t8:0,e 500 20o VES 900 100 YES427 1T:00-lam 11W 2]3YEB900100332 18'00-1900 654 235 fi00 200 YB 2 1 100 604 Rows MN (burs Re w C Mltion Mel? 5 2 0 0 8 8 4 4 NO NO NO NO In order to add in the additional trips associated with the surrounding parcels, daily trip generation values were calculated based on each site's anticipated ITE Land Use code, as shown in Table 12. Hourly distribution assumptions were then applied to each rate, and the calculated trips were then added to the appropriate approach at the Park Road and Powers Boulevard intersection based on the trip distribution values previously discussed By 2030, including all background traffic associated with general regional growth as well as the five parcels identified, both Warrants IA and I B are anticipated to be met, as shown in Table 13. May 2011 34 'rabic 12 OD=Site Trip Generation Daily Pas Net New % TOW Pao -by Pas -by External Land Total Pass -by Pass -by Trip I Trip Trips ToW Fytter Eslt De N land lke Tvpe Size Units Formula Trips Filter Edt Trim Filter Exit 813 Frec-Standing Discount Superstore 120.209 KSF UM= 1.35 Ln(X)+2.11 5,300 2,650 Z650 N/A 0 0 0 5,300 2,650 2,650 814 Specialty Retail Center 22.350 KSF T=44.32(X) 991 496 495 N/A 0 0 0 991 496 495 814 Specialty Retail Center 32.800 KSF T-44.32(X) 1,454 727 727 N/A 0 0 0 1,454 727 727 110 General Light industrial 221.000 KSF T=7.47(7q-101.92 1y49 775 774 N/A 0 0 0 1,549 775 774 630 Clinic 28.980 KSF T=31.45(X) 911 456 455 N/A 0 0 0 911 456 455 710 General Office 948.000 KSF Ln(T)= 0.77 Ln(X)+ 3.65 7,539 3,770 3,769 00/6 0 0 0 7,539 3,770 3,769 820 Shopping Center 406.000 KSF ln(T)=0.65 La(X)+5.83 16,884 8,442 8,442 0% 0 0 0 16,884 8,442 8,442 210 Singic-Fanily Detached Housing 132.000 I Acres T = 26 3,437 1,719 1,718 0^/O 0 0 0 3,437 1,719 1.718 31,191 15,597 15,594 N/A 0 0 0 31,191 15,597 15,594 N In F, Kim M _ and Table 13 — 2030 Signal Warrant Analysis Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis Chanhassen, Minnesota Time Period Powers Blvd NB+SB Traffic (Major Approaches) Park Road EB Traffic (Minor Approach) WarrantI 1A 1B Major Vol. Minor Vol. Met? Major Vol. Minot Vol. Met? 6:00-7:00 480 93 600 200 900 100 7:00 - 8:00 1090 73 600 200 900 100 8:00-9:00 1176 105 600 200 900 100 YES 9:00 -10:00 841 126 600 200 900 100 10:00 -11:00 856 198 600 200 900 100 11:00-12:00 1060 279 600 200 YES 900 100 YES 1200-13:00 1309 273 600 200 YES 900 100 YES 13.00 -14:001 1129 229 600 200 YES 900 100 YES 14:00-15:00 1098 231 600 200 YES 900 100 YES 15:00-16:00 1322 292 600 200 YES 900 100 YES 16:00-17:00 1353 327 600 200 YES 900 100 YES 17:00-18:00 1672 345 600 200 YES 900 100 YES 18:00-19:00 1034 291 600 200 YES 900 100 YES Flours Met Hours Required Condition Met? 8 9 8 8 YES YES In order to identify the sensitivity of the signal warrants to the timeline of surrounding development, a 2015 analysis was conducted including all traffic associated with the two additional parcels on Park Road (Land Use Code 814). By adding the trips associated with these parcels to the trips generated by the Walmart site and general background growth of 0.5 percent between 2013 and 2015, it is anticipated that Warrant IA will be met, as shown in Table 14. Table 14 — 2015 Signal Warrant Analysis nme ftf P..ers MWa M-S8 Traffic iorA roache Park Road EB Traffic r Minor oac0 Warrant Warrard2 W... 3 1A Is w MaVat. MM Vol. Nett M,dar Vd. Wr ca Vd. McVr ienorVd. Yeti Mimr Vol. Mett 600-7:00 415 a 600 200 900 I loo 7:Oo-8:W W2 72 600 200 999 I 100 8:00-eOo B04 104 600 200 900 I too 900-la00 579 125 600 200 9m loo lo00-1100 sm 1% 600 200 9m 100 1100-1200 708 275 600 200 YB 900 100 12:00-13:00 881 269 600 200 YES 900 100 11Oo-14:M 718 as 600 200 1S 9m 100 1400-1SOo lm ZM 900 200 M 9m 100 is:0o-1800 977 288 600 200 YES 900 100 YES 1500-17:00 1013 323 800 200 YES 900 1m YES 17m-t8:00 1213 341 600 200 Y6 900 100 YES 18:Oo-1900 728 288 add Zed M 900 im llolae Mel Mors Ree4md conslm Men 1 3 8 8 4 4 YFS rq Given that trips associated with the Walmart site will nearly satisfy Warrant 1 A in 2013, that additional development on Park Road will likely generate sufficient traffic to satisfy Warrant IA in the short term, and that a signal at the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard will significantly improve local operations with additional traffic on Park Road, signal installation is recommended as part of the development of the Walmart site. May 2011 36 1 1 PPI11111h,�, Klmley-Horn Walmart (Store t Analysis Traffic Impact Mesota _ and Associates. Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota i RECOMMENDATIONS ' With the construction of Walmart Store #5949-00 near the southwest quadrant of the Arboretum Boulevard (Trunk Highway S)/Powers Boulevard (CSAH 17) intersection in Chanhassen, Minnesota, it is recommended that the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard be converted from side street stop control to signal control. Without stopping the northbound and southbound traffic on Powers Boulevard, there will not be enough gaps for the eastbound traffic on Park Road to enter the intersection. Queues on Park Road will, in turn, prevent vehicles from exiting from the east driveway onto Park Road. In addition, the splits at the signal for the Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard intersection should be retimed to efficiently serve the new turning movement distribution. By incorporating the recommended modifications, the street network will operate at ' similar levels to existing conditions. In the long term, the City should monitor the growth of the surrounding area. If the area develops as anticipated by the City, consideration should be given to adding a second left turn lane on the eastbound and westbound Arboretum Boulevard approaches to Powers Boulevard. Queues for these movements are not expected to spill out of the turn lane, but with the forecasted growth and development, would result in left turning drivers decelerating in the adjacent through lane and causing delays for through movements. Dual left turn lanes would shorten queues as well as delays. I 1 t May 2011 37 I 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX 1 I ] 1 1 L� 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Appendix A Raw Turning Movement Volume Counts 1 ✓,� Y� Traffic Data Inc. rxarrtr Sara fvr. 3268XenwoodAvenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 Arboretum Blvd & Powers Blvd Chanhassen, MN r_.,.�,... od�re,t_ r•t..� � _ ue�� ueH��tee File Name : 1241131 Arboretum & Powers Site Code : 1241131 Start Date : 2/8/2011 Page No : 1 Powers Blvd Arboretum Blvd Powers Blvd Arboretum Blvd Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Rght Thfu Laft Pads App. Total R9M ThN Left Pees App. Total R9h1 Thru Lee Pees App. Total Rght Thu Lert Pees App, Total Int. Total Fedor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 53 45 16 0 114 52 256 21 0 329 41 69 12 0 122 7 191 43 0 241 806 04:15 PM 80 39 22 0 121 54 253 27 0 334 28 64 13 0 105 2 166 46 0 214 774 04:30 PM 52 39 19 0 110 57 285 24 0 366 41 51 12 0 104 6 184 29 0 219 799 04:45 PM 48 43 21 0 112 67 293 31 0 391 30 69 18 0 117 6 146 41 0 193 813 Total 213 166 78 0 457 230 1087 103 0 1420 140 253 55 0 448 21 687 159 0 867 3192 05:00 PM 59 56 28 0 143 78 266 31 0 395 55 79 24 0 158 9 218 72 0 299 995 05:15 PM 63 45 25 0 133 60 319 29 0 408 36 60 15 0 111 9 178 55 0 242 894 05:30 PM 44 59 37 0 140 64 344 46 0 454 29 65 16 0 110 5 173 52 0 230 934 05:45 PM 54 45 30 0 129 82 298 27 0 407 29 44 14 0 87 8 160 38 0 206 829 Total 1 220 205 120 0 545 1 284 1247 133 0 1664 1 149 248 69 0 468 1 31 729 217 0 977 1 3652 Grand Total 433 371 198 0 1002 514 2334 236 0 3084 289 501 124 0 914 52 1416 376 0 1844 6844 Apprch % 43.2 37 19.8 0 16.7 75.7 7.7 0 31.6 54.8 13.6 0 2.8 70.8 20.4 0 Total % 6.3 5.4 2.9 0 14.6 7.5 34.1 3.4 0 45.1 4.2 7.3 1.8 0 13.4 0.8 20.7 5.5 0 26.9 Class 430 364 195 0 989 511 2304 230 0 3045 278 496 123 0 897 50 1378 372 0 1800 6731 % Class 1 99.3 98.1 98.5 0 98.7 99.4 98.7 97.5 0 98.7 96.2 99 99.2 0 98.1 96.2 97.3 98.9 0 97.6 98.3 Heavy Vehicles %Hefty vehicles 0.7 1.9 1.5 0 1.3 0.6 1.3 2.5 0 1.3 3.8 1 0.8 0 1.9 3.8 2.7 1.1 0 2.4 1.7 LIE TRAFFIC DATA INC. Arboretum Blvd & Powers Blvd Chanhassen, MN Traffic Data Inc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241131 Arboretum & Powers Site Code : 1241131 Start Date : 2/8/2011 Page No : 2 Powero Blvd ul Tot 1378 989 2388 12 13 26 1 430 384 195 0 3 7 3 0 33 3 98 0 Rpht Thru Left Pads —yP�eJ NO C ♦ y� p In�l Ct 1 L0 N N q0 n 2 Nonh N N } _ r-� 2/8/2011 05:45 PM 2/8/2011 05:46 PM 3 L r N O 7 c rc� Class i r PP m$ 3! � e Heaw Vehicles a py N O S 1L1 b N W n a • o 0 o m P r+ Left Thru Rohl Pads 123 496 278 0 1 5 1t 0 4 844 887FT5471 15 858 573 Out In Total _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __•" Mf TRAFFIC DATA JKC. Arboretum Blvd & Powers Blvd Chanhassen, MN Traffic Data Inc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241131 Arboretum & Powers Site Code : 1241131 Start Date : 2/8/2011 Page No : 3 �Start Powers Blvd Southbound 11 Arboretum Blvd Westbound Powers Blvd Northbound Arboretum Blvd Eastbound Time Rght I Thru j Left I Pads I App. Total ROht I Thru Left I Peds App. Total Rpht I Thru Left Pads I App. Total ROM I Thru Len Pads App. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 011 Int. Total yea..,w101�� o........, . 78 288 31 0 395 55 79 24 0 158 9 218 72 0 299 995 05:0PMu�o.o...,.,oya 05:15 PM 59 63 58 45 28 25 0 0 143 133 60 319 29 0 408 36 60 15 0 111 9 178 55 0 242 894 05:30 PM 44 59 37 0 140 64 344 46 0 454 29 65 16 0 110 5 173 52 0 230 934 05:45 PM 54 45 3o 0 129 82 298 27 0 407 29 44 14 0 87 8 160 38 0 206 829 Total Volume 220 205 120 0 545 284 1247 133 0 1664 149 248 69 0 466 31 729 217 0 977 3652 % ADD. Total 40.4 37.8 22 0 17.1 74.9 8 0 32 53.2 14.6 0 3.2 74.8 22.2 0 PHF .873 .869 .811 .000 .953 .866 .906 .723 .000 .918 .677 .785 .719 .000 .737 .881 .836 .753 .000 .817 .918 ter Y/ TRAFFIC DATA INC. Arboretum & Powers (Heavy Vehicles) Chanhassen, MN Traffic Data Inc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241131 Arboretum & Powers Site Code : 1241131 Start Date : 2/8/2011 Page No :1 Powers Blvd Arboretum Blvd Powers Blvd Arboretum Blvd Souhbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Rght ThrU I Left Peda App.Total Rght TnN LeM1 Peda App. Rght Thru Left Peds App. Total Rght Th.0 LeM1 Pede App. Total Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 1 3 1 0 5 0 7 0 0 7 1 1 0 0 2 0 8 2 0 10 24 0415 PM 1 1 2 0 4 1 4 1 0 6 1 1 1 0 3 0 7 1 0 8 21 04:30 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 3 0 5 0 0 5 13 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2 0 7 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 10 Total 2 6 3 0 11 2 18 3 0 23 5 3 1 0 9 0 22 3 0 25 68 05:00 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 05:15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 5 3 0 0 0 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 4 1 2 0 0 Grand Total 3 7 3 0 13 3 30 6 0 39 11 5 1 0 Apprch % 23.1 53.8 23.1 0 7.7 76.9 15.4 0 64.7 29.4 5.9 0 Total % 2.7 6.2 2.7 0 11.5 2.7 26.5 5.3 0 34.5 9.7 4.4 0.9 0 1 0 5 0 0 5 11 3 2 3 0 0 5 14 3 0 5 0 a 5 12 1 0 3 1 0 4 8 81 2 16 1 0 19 45 17 2 38 4 0 44 113 4.5 86.4 9.1 0 15 1.8 33.6 3.5 0 38.9 14: Y� Traffic Data Inc. raaFFl[ nara INC. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241131 Arboretum &Powers Site Code : 1241131 Arboretum & Powers (Heavy Vehicles) Start Date : 2/8/2011 Chanhassen, MN Page No : 2 Powers Blvd o� In Total Rpht Th Left Peds ti OS allNorth w 2/8/2011 04:00 PM ' 3 c 2/8/2011 05:45 PM r m m rW gnlHeaw Vehicles dLJI e g �e < 4-, ? r Leff R M Ped 5 7 Out In Total aka s 1 #j i TRAFFIC DATA INC. Arboretum & Powers (Heavy Vehicles) Chanhassen. MN Traffic Data Inc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241131 Arboretum & Powers Site Code : 1241131 Start Date : 2/8/2011 Page No : 3 Powers Blvd arboretum Blvd I Powers Blvd I Arboretum Blvd _ Souhbound I Westbound Northbound E_a_s_thound_ Start Time I Rght I Thru I Left I Pads I App. Totes Rght I Thru Left I PeaB j App. Total I Rght Thru Lett I Peea Lq Total I Rght I Thru I LeR I Pede I App. Total I Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for En re Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 1 3 1 0 5 0 7 0 0 7 1 1 0 0 2 0 8 2 0 10 24 04:15 PM 1 1 2 0 4 1 4 1 0 6 1 1 1 0 3 0 7 1 0 8 21 04:30 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 3 0 5 0 0 5 13 _ 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2 0 7 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 10 Total Volume 2 8 3 0 11 1 23 5 3 1 0 9 1 0 22 3 0 251 68 i Traffic Data Inc. rearrfc oara IN(. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 Park Rd & Powers Blvd Chanhassen, MN File Name : 1241132 Park & Powers Site Code : 1241132 Start Date : 2/8/2011 Page No 1 Powers Blvd Souhbound Park Rd Westbound v Powers Blvd Northbound Park Rd Eastbound Start Time Rght ThT LBR Peds App.Total Rahl Thry Loll Pads App.Tolal R9ht Thru Lea Pada App. Total R9ht Thru Left Pace App.Total Inf.Tolal Fedor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 06:00 AM 2 30 0 0 32 23 0 15 1 39 1 10 4 0 15 15 2 35 0 52 138 06:15 AM 4 27 4 0 35 4 0 7 0 11 3 32 9 0 44 4 1 13 0 18 108 06:30 AM 8 33 4 0 45 2 0 0 0 2 5 26 9 1 41 2 0 2 0 4 92 06:45 AM 13 54 5 0 72 2 1 2 0 5 10 40 22 0 72 2 0 5 0 7 156 Total 27 144 13 0 184 31 1 24 1 57 19 108 44 1 172 23 3 55 0 81 494 07:00 AM 17 44 9 0 70 0 1 1 0 07:15 AM 14 56 5 0 75 2 0 1 0 07:30 AM 17 56 6 0 79 0 0 0 0 07:45 AM 20 121 18 0 159 2 0 1 0 Total 1 68 277 38 0 383 1 4 1 3 0 08:00 AM 13 81 17 0 111 3 1 0 0 08:15 AM 16 70 12 0 98 5 0 2 0 08:30 AM 15 49 9 0 73 4 1 2 0 08:45 AM 8 43 9 0 60 4 1 2 6 Total 1 52 243 47 0 342 1 16 3 6 6 09:00 AM 26 28 9 0 63 5 0 1 0 09:15 AM 10 34 5 0 49 5 0 1 0 09:30 AM 9 26 3 0 38 8 3 0 0 09:45 AM 12 18 8 0 38 7 0 1 0 Total 1 57 106 25 0 1881 25 3 3 0 10:00 AM 6 21 5 0 32 7 3 0 7 10:15 AM 6 30 8 0 44 6 0 3 1 10:30 AM 9 26 5 0 40 6 1 1 2 10:45 AM 11 29 3 3 46 7 3 2 0 Total 1 32 106 21 3 162 1 26 7 6 10 11:00 AM 9 25 2 5 41 4 1 2 0 11:15 AM 6 25 3 3 37 4 1 3 0 11:30 AM 11 38 4 0 53 10 0 6 0 11:45 AM 9 36 10 0 55 13 0 2 0 Total 1 35 124 19 8 1861 31 2 13 0 12:00 PM 21 49 2 0 72 15 1 9 0 12:15 PM 15 69 5 0 89 5 0 1 0 12:30 PM 23 65 8 0 96 5 5 2 0 12:45 PM 19 50 7 0 76 6 3 4 0 78 233 22 0 333 1 31 9 16 0 2 6 55 13 0 74 2 0 1 0 3 4 74 21 1 100 4 0 6 0 0 7 85 18 1 111 3 0 3 0 3 13 67 32 3 115 7 0 5 0 8 1 30 281 84 5 4001 16 0 15 0 4 13 55 24 0 92 8 0 6 0 7 5 50 24 2 81 2 0 2 0 7 7 29 12 2 50 2 2 6 0 13 6 56 17 3 62 3 1 2 0 31 1 31 190 77 7 305 1 15 3 16 0 6 2 35 10 1 6 1 29 11 5 11 4 51 6 1 8 3 39 5 2 31 1 10 154 32 9 17 2 33 4 0 10 0 17 5 3 10 3 25 1 0 12 7 32 6 4 49 1 12 107 16 7 7 1 36 9 6 8 1 59 2 1 16 2 62 0 3 15 3 67 5 2 461 7 224 16 12 25 5 67 1 3 6 3 53 5 1 12 2 56 10 1 13 5 41 10 2 56 15 217 28 7 48 1 1 4 0 46 2 1 0 0 62 3 0 3 0 49 1 1 3 0 05 1 7 3 10 0 39 2 2 6 0 25 0 0 4 0 29 4 0 7 1 49 3 3 8 0 42 1 9 5 25 1 52 3 0 6 0 63 7 0 20 0 67 12 1 15 0 76 4 1 20 0 62 5 1 8 0 69 6 2 17 1 58 8 3 5 0 85 23 7 50 1 31 149 10 188 6 196 12 289 31 822 141 221 4 190 10 140 6 101 34 712 8 123 3 104 6 117 10 98 4 83 12 91 91 109 27 135 28 164 25 1911 14 171 26 203 TRAFFIC DATA INC. Park Rd & Powers Blvd Chanhassen. MN Traffic Data Inc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 ( -.- DnnlnA_ t 1- I File Name : 1241132 Park & Powers Site Code : 1241132 Start Date : 2/8/2011 Page No :2 Powers Blvd Park Rd Powers Blvd Park Rd Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Rght Thru Left Peda APPTotal Rght Thru Lag Pada App,Total Rght Thru Left Pods App. Total Rght Thru Lee Peda App. Total Int.Totel Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 1.0 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 01:00 PM 17 61 11 0 89 4 2 1 0 7 3 49 4 3 59 5 1 13 1 20 175 01:16 PM 9 41 5 0 55 1 1 1 1 4 3 43 10 4 60 5 3 3 0 11 130 01:30 PM 15 50 10 0 75 2 2 2 0 6 1 36 8 2 47 4 0 5 0 9 137 01:45 PM 4 35 6 0 45 2 2 0 0 4 2 32 3 1 38 2 1 a 0 11 98 Total 45 187 32 0 264 9 7 4 1 21 9 160 25 10 204 16 5 29 1 51 540 17 141 02:45 PM 10 55 8 0 73 6 4 2 0 12 1 34 5 2 42 4 1 5 0 134 Total 1 26 205 21 0 252 1 22 7 8 1 38 1 7 164 16 6 193 1 15 9 19 0 431 526 03:00 PM 6 48 3 0 57 4 0 0 0 4 1 101 8 1 109 14 2 14 0 30 200 03:15 PM 11 54 5 0 70 7 1 4 0 12 3 72 3 0 78 7 1 5 0 13 173 03:30 PM 4 56 4 0 64 6 1 1 0 8 1 83 10 0 94 8 1 9 0 18 184 03:45 PM 2 55 7 0 64 3 0 5 0 8 2 77 3 3 85 8 4 9 0 21 178 Total 1 23 213 19 0 255 1 20 2 10 0 32 1 7 333 22 4 3661 37 8 37 0 82 1 735 04:00 PM 10 52 6 0 68 7 1 8 0 16 4 78 5 2 89 13 0 17 0 30 203 04:15 PM 3 58 3 0 64 4 1 4 0 9 2 68 6 0 78 13 1 9 0 23 172 04:30 PM 8 55 5 0 68 5 2 5 0 12 2 95 7 0 104 17 0 13 0 30 214 04:45 PM 17 65 3 0 85 18 1 5 0 24 1 88 8 2 99 16 1 14 0 31 239 Total 1 38 230 17 0 2851 34 5 22 0 61 1 9 329 26 4 368 1 59 2 53 0 1141 828 05:00 PM 15 73 6 0 94 27 2 8 0 37 2 115 14 0 131 24 1 17 0 42 304 05:15 PM 9 64 14 0 87 15 3 16 0 34 4 88 11 0 103 15 1 18 0 34 258 05:30 PM 27 73 11 0 111 8 0 7 0 15 6 93 29 1 129 17 1 10 0 28 283 05:45 PM 16 50 4 0 70 8 1 7 0 16 4 76 16 0 98 14 1 9 0 24 206 Total 1 67 260 35 0 362 j 58 6 38 0 102 1 16 372 70 1 459 1 70 4 54 0 1281 1051 06:00 PM 4 42 6 0 52 31 1 20 0 52 0 69 2 0 71 33 2 46 0 81 256 06:15 PM 3 43 1 0 47 9 1 6 0 16 2 53 2 0 57 13 0 12 0 25 1 145 06:30 PM 2 46 1 0 49 3 0 3 0 6 1 45 7 1 54 11 1 4 0 Is 125 06:45 PM 11 49 0 0 60 2 0 1 0 3 1 52 10 0 63 4 0 7 0 11 137 Total 20 180 8 0 208 1 45 2 30 0 77 1 4 219 21 1 245 1 61 3 69 0 1331 663 Grand Total 568 2508 317 11 34041 352 55 183 19 609 176 2858 475 74 3583 384 55 487 3 929 8525 Apprch % 16.7 73.7 9.3 0.3 57.8 9 30 3.1 4.9 79.8 13.3 2.1 41.3 5.9 52.4 0.3 Total % 6.7 29.4 3.7 0.1 39.9 1 4.1 0.6 2.1 0.2 7.1 2A 33.5 5.6 0.9 42 4.5 0.6 5.7 0 10.9 Y% TRAFFIC DATA JNC. Park Rd & Powers Blvd Chanhassen. MN Traffic Data Inc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241132 Park & Powers Site Code : 1241132 Start Date : 2/8/2011 Page No : 3 Powers Blvd n r01 Rqht Thru Left Poch T p s North 2I812011 08:00 AClue 1 a 2/8/2011 06:45 PM �3 n 9 ~ N ? rr ft Thru R ht 1_161Peda 741 70 5 758 88 8 Out In Total -- 1 TRAFFIC DATA INC. Park Rd & Powers Blvd Chanhassen, MN Traffic Data Inc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241132 Park & Powers Site Code : 1241132 Start Date : 2/8/2011 Page No : 4 Powers Blvd Southbound Park Rd I Westbound ==_Northbound Powers Blvd Park Rd I Eastbound Start Time Rght I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Total I Rght I Thru I Lee I Peds 1 App. Total I Rght I ThN I Left I Peds I App. Total I Rght I Thru ILefl Pads qpp, Total reaK pour Analysis rrom oo:Uo AM TO WAD AM - reaa r or r Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 17 44 9 0 70 07:15 AM 14 56 5 0 75 07:30 AM 17 56 6 0 79 0 1 1 0 2 6 55 13 0 74 2 0 1 0 3 2 0 1 0 3 4 74 21 1 100 4 0 6 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 7 85 18 1 111 3 0 3 0 6 2 0 1 0 3 13 67 32 3 115 7 0 5 0 12 4 1 3 0 8 30 281 84 5 4001 16 0 15 0 31 Int. Total 149 188 196 289 822 Traffic Data Inc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South TRAFFIC DATA /NC. St Louis Park, MN 55416 Park Rd & 1001 Park Rd, East Driveway Chanhassen, MN File Name : 1241133 Park & East Driveway Site Code : 1241133 Start Date : 2/8/2011 Page No : 1 Park Rd East Driveway Park Rd Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Rght Thru Left Pods App.Total ROM Thru Lea Pads App. Total R911 Th. LM Peda App.7Wel Rght Thru Len Pods App. Total Int. Total Fedor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1. 1.0 1.0 1.0 1. 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 1 0 19 4 0 1 1 6 0 25 0 0 25 50 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 10 5 0 0 0 5 1 16 0 0 19 34 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 3 0 16 3 0 0 0 3 0 26 0 0 26 45 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 3 0 29 6 0 1 2 9 1 29 0 1 31 69 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 7 0 74 18 0 2 3 23 2 98 0 1 101 198 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 2 0 30 9 0 1 0 10 0 36 0 0 36 76 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 9 0 23 5 0 1 0 6 0 25 0 0 25 54 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 18 0 57 4 0 1 0 5 0 26 0 0 26 88 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 9 0 32 7 0 1 0 8 1 18 0 0 19 59 Total 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 104 38 0 142 1 25 0 4 0 29 1 1 105 0 0 106 1 277 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 171 45 0 216 43 0 6 3 52 3 203 0 1 207 475 Approh % 0 0 0 0 0 79.2 20.8 0 82.7 1 0 11.5 5.8 1.4 98.1 0 0.5 Total °A. 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 9.5 0 45.5 9.1 0 1.3 0.6 10.9 0.6 42.7 0 0.2 43.6 mwI % TRAFFIC DATA JMC. Park Rd & 1001 Park Rd, East Driveway Chanhassen, MN Traffic Data Inc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241133 Park & East Driveway Site Code : 1241133 Start Date : 2/8/2011 Page No : 2 Out n Total 0 o a Rght Thru Left Peds 30 O �S North 2/8/2011 04:00 PM a 21812011 05:45 PM r m n e Qlasl 1 .� a u o +1 T r Left Thr R 1 Pods 3 ® 5 100 out In Total Traffic Data Inc. WON TRAFFIC gAr�� 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 Park Rd & 1001 Park Rd, East Driveway Chanhassen, MN File Name : 1241133 Park & East Driveway Site Code : 1241133 Start Date : 2/8/2011 Page No : 3 Southbound Park Rd Westbound East Driveway I Northbound Park Rd I Eastbound Start Time I Right I Thru I Left I Pods I App. Total I Rght I Thru I Lent I Pads I App. Total I Rght I Thru I Lea I Pods I App. Total I Rght I Thru I Len I Peda I App. Total Peak Hour Analysis Prom 04:00 PM to 00:40 PM - P88k 1 Or l Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 3 0 29 6 0 1 2 9 1 29 0 1 06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 2 0 30 9 0 1 0 10 0 36 0 0 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 9 0 23 5 0 1 0 8 0 25 0 0 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 18 0 57 4 0 1 0 5 0 26 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 32 0 1391 24 0 4 2 30 1 116 0 1 Int. Total 31 69 36 78 25 54 �4 �� a 9! Y I TRAFFIC DATA 1NC. Park Rd & 1001 Park Rd, West Driveway Chanhassen, MN Traffic Data Inc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241134 Park & West Driveway Site Code : 1241134 Start Date : 2/9/2011 Page No 1 -- - Park Rd --- -. _..--- ---- West Driveway Park Rd Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Rght I Thru I Left I Pads App. Total R9ht Thru I Leh Petla App. Total R9ht I Thru I Left I R9ht Thru Lea Petls App, TOW Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 13 1 0 2 0 3 0 25 0 0 25 41 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 13 3 0 1 0 4 1 14 0 0 15 32 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 4 0 14 2 0 0 0 2 0 31 0 0 31 47 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 4 0 19 5 0 0 0 5 1 18 0 0 19 43 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 8 0 59 11 0 3 0 14 2 88 0 0 90 163 05:00 PM 0 0 0 05:15 PM 0 0 1 05:30 PM 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 0 1 Apprch % 0 0 100 Total % 0 0 0.3 0 0 0 23 5 0 29 4 1 3 0 80 20 0 0 20 57 0 1 0 17 10 0 27 4 0 1 0 5 0 21 0 0 21 54 0 0 0 22 12 0 34 5 0 2 0 7 3 18 0 0 21 62 0 0 1 12 2 0 15 2 0 0 0 2 0 10 0 0 10 27 0 1 1 1 74 30 0 105 1 15 1 6 0 22 1 3 69 0 0 721 200 0 1 1 125 38 0 164 28 1 9 0 36 5 157 0 0 162 363 0 1 0.6 76.2 23.2 0 72.2 2.8 25 0 3.1 98.9 0 0 0 0.3 0.3 34.4 10.5 0 45.2 7.2 0.3 2.5 0 9.9 1 A 43.3 0 0 44.6 rL/% TRAFFIC DATA INC. Park Rd & 1001 Park Rd, West Driveway Chanhassen, MN Traffic Data Inc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241134 Park & West Driveway Site Code : 1241134 Start Date : 2/9/2011 Page No : 2 I- n Total 0 Ryhi Th Left Pods North c� 2/9/2011 04:00 PM wt n 2/812011 05:45 PM p 9 a $0 r Left ThaL R ht Peds out in Taal TRAM( DATA IN(. Park Rd & 1001 Park Rd, West Driveway Chanhassen, MN Traffic Data Inc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241134 Park &West Driveway Site Code : 1241134 Start Date : 2/9/2011 Page No 3 Park Rd I West Driveway Park Rd Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time R9ht Thru Left I Pads I App Total Raht I Thru Len I Pads I App. Total Raht I Thru Left Pees I App. Total I R9ht I Thm Len I Pads I App. Total I Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for En re Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 4 0 19 5 0 0 0 5 1 18 0 0 19 43 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 6 0 29 4 1 3 0 8 0 20 0 0 20 57 05:16 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 17 10 0 27 4 0 1 0 5 0 21 0 0 21 54 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 12 0 34 5 0 2 0 7 3 18 0 0 21 62 Total Volume 0 0 1 0 1 0 77 32 0 109 18 1 6 0 25 1 4 77 0 0 81 1 216 i M= M M = = = M= M M M = = M M Appendix B Volume Development Sheets SUMMARY OF TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Arboretum Blvd & Powea Blvd 2013 Build Conditiom Nortbbmna Smthhouna Etu leund Wallmnd NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SEIR SBU ML MT MR ®U WBL WBT WEIR WBII 2011 Tuming Moutmet Count 16 282 ISS 0 111 208 214 0 22a 715 30 D I41 1242 269 0 Initial Beck round Gamh Rate 002 002 002 D02 002 002 002 0m 002 002 0m 002 002 002 002 002 Year, ofGrowth to Emw Y 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Trd6r TOW 19 292 161 0 115 216 222 0 228 741 31 0 146 1287 279 0 Future Bnck round Oomh Rate 0110 000 000 0w 000 0On 00D 010 0. 0lel 0111 0on 00o 000 000 Ono Years of Gu.wh to Bum,tut 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Future Background Traffic Teed 59 292 I61 0 115 2t6 223 0 228 741 31 0 146 1287 219 0 Pmat Dutnbution n WA I8. "% Ro a, A.. mmnl 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 0 11 35 n IA 0 n n Root Dutnbution Out 18. W6 35. Boat Ate -norm Out 31 41 11 0 0 n 0 0 o 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 Pr aTA )1 0 0 39 0 0 a 0 35 0 68 0 0 0 Dmbution n -30°e 30. 4WeArr,,nt rt 0 u 0 n00 0 0 -23 J 0 30n Ass-B Dutnbution Out YM Ace- M, mmnt Out ]37141 0 24 0 0 n o 0 o 0 0 0 0 n n 0 Psse-B Tri D 24 0 00 0 0 0 .23 23 0 30Diverted Tr a Redvrcibman FutureTreflic Tdd 333 256 0 115 153 223 0 22A 118 89 0 244 135'I 319 0 SUMMARY OF TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Park Rd & Pow n, Blvd 2013 Build Canditiom Norrohelnd Smmmnne D fleauud Wertbelna NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU ML MT MR MIT WBL WBT WBR WBII 2011 Turah M1lme erntC t 63 384 13 0 34 215 00 0 61 4 75 0 36 6 68 0 Innid Rack round Gomh Rate 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 n02 002 Yore ofGovdh to Eenlu 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 l 2 2 2 2 2 2 Traffic Total 65 399 13 0 35 265 13 0 63 4 18 0 31 6 50 0 Fut...Mc rouodf .hRate 000 0w 0110 Ono nW 0w 0On our 0m an(, 0m Oro OM 0no 000 000 Yan 6fG9w1h to BYlldaYl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Future Back round Traffic T" 65 399 IJ 0 35 285 U 0 63 4 18 D 31 6 10 0 Root Distribution n 22. m/. n 0. P ,tuo M. ttmnt 43 0 0 0 0 0 142 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 n n ftlmt Dutnbution Out n0'' u.m. Pro tAv, nrmt Out 0 0 n D 0 0 0 0 149 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 Pr'ed TrI 43 D a 0 0 0 142 D 149 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 Aseb Dutnbution n Im5 4TI. •m. S0. hm- Afe...t n 8 -9 0 0 0 .8 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fuss- Dutnbution Out B� 10% Fuss- Ass' n rent Out 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 a 8 0 0 0 0 0 Pre-B bi A -A 0 0 11 2 nl 0 fi3 0 A n 0 0 11 11 Divened T e Pro 9s ed Redutr03ulpn Future TrafIr T9tei 116 391 13 0 J.9 111 E16 0 115 4 131 n 11 711 n : _ _ : __ =■�z / 7 \\\\\\\\ \ \\\ \\ \ ) !!!!)!!I/2z�!!!!!!!! 3 m _ - 3 3 mIf - s = _ _ 8 Y F Z _ m - g c 'e Z = m c S o O} $ ~ m _ _ _ _ _ f _ _ i - m B z _ _ o' oo a_=aa --a� yY G c � t c- � y? m m c z- p p 5 c E a E 3 m _ a3 e - 3 s 4 m � 7 a m _ � � o � y r 5 a m - B z - - z - - a ua � m` f m' e. ." Y '�' •�' .Y w S m m m o t 01 ! -t c \\AA III -qmI )}))) - ) \\),}\{\\\\\\It /IUD \!!!)!§}/!!2 I I I 1 1 LJ 1 1 1 1 1 1 Appendix C SimTraffic Reports 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SimTraffic Performance Report 2011 Existing - PM 41612011 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 9.8 11.5 5.1 10.4 13.1 5.2 7.4 0.9 5.1 4.6 3.1 3.6 Vehicles Entered 62 3 77 -' 38 7 75 64 377 11 32 279 76 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 33 Vehicles Entered 1101 Denied Entry Before 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay I Veh (s) 63.0 21.9 4.4 75.0 34.8 3.9 73.8 68.0 3.2 73.1 66.3 2.9 Vehicles Entered 209 730 30 135 1225 274 74 293 148 106 210 223 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 36.0 Vehides Entered 3657 Denied Entry Before 0 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement ®nrrriinri ru caecnro� a7 ` Delay / Veh (s) 0.2 0.3 2.0 0.5 5.5 7.9 2.6 7.1 1.0 Vehicles Entered 96 4 33 81 7 1 24 2 248 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 0.6 0.1 1.6 0.4 5.7 3.0 0.9 Vehicles Entered 122 1 34 112 3 21 293 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SirnTraffic Report Page 1 1 SimTraffic Performance Report 2011 Existing - PM 4/6/2011 Total Network Performance ' Vehicles Entered 3884 Denied Entry Before i OR 1 1 SimTraffic Report , Page 2 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2011 Existing - PM 4/6/2011 Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard T R Directions Served LTR LTR L T L Maximum Queue (ft) 86 83 48 4 39 3 23 Average Queue (ft) 35 35 13 0 7 0 1 95th Queue (ft) 67 65 38 3 26 2 9 Link Distance (ft) 99 166 1152 674 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 225 225 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T T L T T R L T T L L Maximum Queue (ft) 337 270 296 274 550 578 36 160 201 217 112 119 Average Queue (ft) 183 129 156 128 340 358 2 69 127 139 48 60 95th Queue (ft) 309 220 253 225 492 512 33 130 187 209 90 102 Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 871 871 674 674 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 630 600 230 250 250 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Directions Served T T Maximum Queue (ft) 198 183 ' Average Queue (ft) 88 104 95th Queue (ft) 149 158 ' Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (°�) 473 473 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) ' Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) I I SimTraffc Report Page 3 Queuing and Blocking Report 2011 Existing - PM ' 416/2011 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West Driveway ' Directions Served LTR LTR LR ' Maximum Queue (ft) 29 39 30 Average Queue (ft) 2 19 2 95th Queue (ft) 14 43 15 ' Link Distance (ft) 292 412 357 Upstream Bilk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) ' Storage Bilk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) ' Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Drivewav Directions Served LTR LR Queuing Penalty (veh) ' Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 1 t t 1 1 1 1 SimTratfic Report ' Page 4 1 I 1 SimTraffic Performance Report 2013 No Build - PM 416/2011 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL' ' SBT SBR Delay / Veh (s) 11.0 10.0 5.2 9.7 11.5 5.2 7.3 1.0 5.5 5.5 3.2 3.6 Vehicles Entered 57 4 76 36 8 73 66 413 14 28 288 79 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay I Veh (s) 3.7 Vehicles Entered 1142 Denied Entry Before 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Delay/ Veh (s) 64.5 22.4 4.6 759 37.8 4.1 74.2 68.4 3.3 73-6 69.5 3.0 Vehicles Entered 226 740 28 138 1298 273 79 295 171 112 221 239 ' Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 1 1 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement 0 0 Movement AU ' Delay / Veh (s) 37.5 Vehicles Entered 3820 Denied Entry Before 0 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR ML WBT NBL NBT " NBR SBL A8 Delay / Veh (s) 0.3 0.0 2.2 0.4 5.2 6.7 2.7 4.9 0.9 Vehicles Entered 91 4 32 88 4 1 24 1 245 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement Delay I Veh (s) 0.6 0.1 1.7 0.5 6.7 3.0 1.0 Vehicles Entered 114 2 37 117 4 22 296 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SinnTraffic Report Page 1 SimTraffic Performance Report 1 2013 No Build - PM 4/6/2011 Total Network Performance ' { i'' �'.�! "i.i k3FM1 �"yM1 � ��. 'i+i ^�5�� u" M V� "'ti iY{r•�� ' S Yj� 4�' .y TN""1 Delay �. y�i.. t FiiM1 �' �� 4 Vehides Entered 4050 Denied Entry Before 1 1 1 lJ 1 1 1 1 SimTraffic Report ' Page 2 [l Queuing and Blocking Report 2013 No Build - PM 41612011 Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Movement ES WB NB NS SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L T L R Maximum Queue (ft) 101 94 48 4 50 12 Average Queue (ft) 38 34 11 0 7 1 95th Queue (ft) 71 64 37 4 29 5 Link Distance (ft) 99 166 1152 Upstream Blk Time (°%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 225 225 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard ' Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB WB B4 B4 NB NB NB Directions Served T T L T T R T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 345 314 330 347 672 686 209 16 34 156 225 235 ' Average Queue (ft) 193 145 171 132 368 393 14 1 1 77 132 139 95th Queue (ft) 307 242 268 264 598 624 184 11 25 143 207 207 Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 871 871 2220 2220 674 674 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 ' Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 630 600 230 ' Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1 1 3 0 0 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Directions Served L L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 123 142 186 199 ' Average Queue (ft) 52 65 95 111 95th Queue (ft) 108 118 160 174 Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) 473 473 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 I 1 I SimTraffic Report Page 3 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2013 No Build - PM 4/6/2011 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West Driveway , Directions Served LTR LTR LR ' Maxknum Queue (ft) 30 35 12 Average Queue (ft) 3 19 1 95th Queue (ft) 17 43 9 ' Link Distance (ft) 292 412 357 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) ' Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) ' Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Driveway Directions Served LTR LR Maximum Queue (ft) 62 36 Average Queue (ft) 7 17 95th Queue (ft) 34 42 ' Link Distance (ft) 99 387 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) , Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) ' Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 4 I 1 [J SimTraffic Report ' Page 4 I I [] SimTraffic Performance Report 2013 Build - PM 4/6/2011 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance movement 11.0 11.0 1.5 5.3 7.0 3.6 5.3 77 121 406 17 34 285 282 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 movement Delay / Veh (s) 13.4 Vehicles Entered 1666 Denied Entry Before 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Delay / Veh (s) 65 6 25 5 5.0 1744 37.1 4 0 260.1 73.6 3.8 74 7 74 9 3 2 Vehicles Entered 214 715 100 227 1275 287 149 343 263 108 265 222 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movement All Delay / Veh (s) 51.4 Vehicles Entered 4168 Denied Entry Before 0 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBR " A8 Delay / Veh (s) 3.2 2.7 1.9 2.1 0.2 0.5 6.1 8.9 6.4 18.9 3A 8.6 Vehicles Entered 12 106 6 65 85 88 12 1 22 267 10 674 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement EBT T Delay / Veh (s) 23.5 1 3 0.6 0.8 493.5 4.7 24.6 Vehicles Entered 389 1 234 175 24 2 825 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SimTrafic Report Page 1 1 SimTraffic Performance Report 2013 Build - PM 4I612011 Total Network Performance ' 1 I 1 I t SimTraffic Report ' Page 2 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2013 Build - PM 416/2011 Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Directions Served L TR LTR L T T R L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 189 94 103 92 6 25 4 56 4 46 ' Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) 144 218 33 62 44 88 30 64 0 1 4 7 0 3 12 41 0 3 3 24 Link Distance (ft) 104 104 166 1147 1147 669 Upstream Blk Time (%) 55 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 112 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 350 225 225 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard ' Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB WB B17 B17 NB NB NB Directions Served L T T L T T R T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 345 266 296 593 596 601 27 208 207 336 507 452 Average Queue (ft) 187 155 179 367 360 377 1 7 7 260 272 226 95th Queue (ft) 318 248 275 598 533 541 20 152 151 396 563 456 Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 871 871 1035 1035 669 669 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 2 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 630 600 230 ' Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 8 0 0 0 0 40 66 1 2 0 0 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard 1 Mo4emeiit � ' SB SB" SB ` SB Directions Served L L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 114 123 187 262 ' Average Queue (ft) 50 61 98 151 95th Queue (ft) 93 103 164 229 Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) 473 473 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 1 ' SimTraffic Report Page 3 Queuing and Blocking Report 2013 Build - PM 4/6/2011 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West Drivewav Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) LTR L R LTR 73 30 8 55 8 7 0 21 42 27 4 48 883 291 406 Intersection: 9: Park Road & East LT R T T 219 88 26 26 82 10 3 2 202 75 34 27 339 339 116 116 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Directions Served T TR T TR R R Maximum Queue (ft) 140 227 27 56 232 30 Average Queue (ft) 65 71 1 4 82 2 95th Queue (ft) 176 271 14 32 247 14 Link Distance (ft) 291 104 104 376 339 Upstream Blk Time (°�) 5 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 19 1 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) 29 Queuing Penalty (veh) 55 Network Summa Network wide Queuing Penalty: 267 SimTraffic Report ' Page 4 1 tSimTraffic Performance Report ' 2013 Build (Improvements A-B) - PM 5l6/2011 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 27.3 27.3 3.7 40.2 37.4 12.2 27.0 9.6 6.0 13.3 6.8 6.0 Vehicles Entered 279 5 129 30 7 77 121 406 17 34 280 277 ' 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movement A8 ' Delay I Veh (s) 13.2 Vehicles Entered 1662 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement ' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Delay / Veh (s) 70.8 30-6 5 1 71 3 41.4 4.1 68.7 62.1 4.4 71.0 87.1 33 Vehicles Entered 215 713 99 224 1265 287 150 344 265 107 269 223 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movement Delay / Veh (s) 41.2 ' Vehicles Entered 4161 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 2.9 0.6 0.2 2.1 0.2 0.6 5.9 7.4 3.9 8.5 2.5 4.1 Vehicles Entered 13 105 5 63 85 91 11 1 22 266 10 672 t9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 2.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 8.6 2.3 1.7 Vehicles Entered 391 1 235 175 23 3 828 Total Network Performance ' Delay I Veh (s) 53.7 Vehicles Entered 4522 1 ' SimTraff c Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2013 Build (Improvements A-B) - PM 5i6/2011 Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Directions Served L Maximum Queue (ft) 185 Average Queue (ft) 129 95th Queue (ft) 195 Link Distance (ft) 104 Upstream Blk Time (%) 18 Queuing Penalty (veh) 38 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) TR LTR L T T R L T T R 105 136 134 98 136 28 66 90 95 75 32 53 57 43 62 4 17 16 26 35 68 103 114 85 115 21 48 55 68 69 104 166 1147 1147 669 669 350 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard K1t1111*Ai I I t 225 ' Directions Served L T T L T T L T T L L T Maximum Queue (ft) 376 304 318 387 689 700 263 257 268 106 123 197 Average Queue (ft) 185 173 192 208 404 423 140 149 155 50 63 104 95th Queue (ft) 313 270 292 340 590 602 232 232 239 97 106 176 Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 871 871 669 669 473 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 630 230 250 250 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 1 2 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 2 3 1 0 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Movement '� __ Sg _ �, -_-" - Directions Served T Maximum Queue (ft) _ 288 Average Queue (ft) 166 95th Queue (ft) 248 Link Distance (ft) 473 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 1 I 1 1 [1 LJ SimTratBc Report t Page 2 ' Queuing and Blocking Report 2013 Build (Improvements A-B) - PM 5/612011 1 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West Driveway Directions Served LTR L R LTR LT R Maximum Queue (ft) 26 37 7 51 118 22 Average Queue (ft) 2 5 0 21 95th Queue (ft) 14 25 4 47 58 97 6 22 Link Distance (ft) 883 291 406 339 339 Upstream Blk Time (%) ' Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Driveway Movement EB EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served T TR T TR R R Maximum Queue (ft) 103 42 14 39 52 30 Average Queue (it) 12 2 1 2 18 2 95th Queue (ft) 55 28 11 18 45 15 Link Distance (ft) 291 104 104 376 339 Upstream Blk Time (%) ' Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1 Network Summary ' Network wide Queuing Penalty: 51 1 1 ' SimTraffic Report Page 3 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 No Build (Improvement A) - PM 5/4/2011 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay I Veh (s) 42.6 36.8 30.6 47.7 60.5 40.5 8.6 1.9 5.2 8.4 3.3 3.7 Vehicles Entered 113 5 105 64 6 15187 767 30 86 415 122 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movervent All ' Delay / Veh )s) 11.6 Vehicles Entered 1951 Denied Entry Before 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement htove> t� EB1 .� E$T:.:EBR _ L ,YVBT� : VdBR. �TIBL_ .,NBi - dBE3 �SBL .t.SBTe._,SBI Delay / Veh (s) 95.6 35.9 4.9 65.9 44.1 4.4 115.7 71.0 4.6 76.3 95.5 3.4 Vehicles Entered 261 803 51 267 1390 292 164 437 427 120 294 236 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 47.4 Vehicles Entered 4742 Denied Entry Before 0 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement Wayi eht EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL All Delay / Veh is) 2.6 00 2-6 0-5 64 3-5 72 6.2 2.2 Vehicles Entered 171 4 36 147 7 1 25 2 393 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement . 'NBA' : Al Delay / Veh (s) 25.5 16.2 1.9 0.5 115.4 102.0 18.6 Vehicles Entered 198 1 34 178 4 25 440 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SirnTraffic Report Page 1 ' SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build (Improvement A) - PM 5i412011 Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Directions Served LTR LTR T L T R L R Maximum Queue (it) 119 237 54 57 20 14 69 22 Average Queue (ft) 90 116 3 18 1 0 28 3 95th Queue (ft) 135 218 23 43 7 8 62 14 Link Distance (ft) 99 166 223 1152 Upstream Blk Time (°ro) 27 10 Queuing Penalty (veh) 63 0 Storage Bay Dist (it) 350 350 225 225 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Directions Served L T T L T T R T T L T T Maximum Queue (it) 498 369 409 412 726 728 209 81 94 320 408 402 Average Queue (ft) 279 215 239 238 442 467 21 4 5 187 234 226 95th Queue (ft) 469 335 358 370 673- 697 228 61 72 332 394 350 Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 871 871 2220 2220 674 674 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (it) 550 630 600 230 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 2 2 14 4 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 4 7 30 7 3 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Directions Served L L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 130 135 282 301 Average Queue (ft) 61 69 152 170 95th Queue (it) 111 119 247 265 Link Distance (ft) 473 473 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 Storage Blk Time (%) 2 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 8 SimTraffic Report ' Page 3 II 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build (Improvement A) - PM 5/412011 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West Driveway Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LR Maximum Queue (ft) 60 47 49 31 ' Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) 7 54 7 31 21 46 2 14 Link Distance (ft) 894 292 412 357 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Drivewav 1 11 1 1 1 11 1 Movement EB WB NB Directions Served LTR LTR LR Maximum Queue (ft) 217- 63 136 Average Queue (ft) 63 7 39 95th Queue (it) 212 37 117 Link Distance (ft) 292 99 387 Upstream Blk Time (°%) 4 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Bilk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 133 SimTraffic Report Page 4 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A) - PM 5/5/2011 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 191.3 26.5 9.4 155.1 173.1 Vehicles Entered 144 4 74 56 8 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance b� Movement All Delay / Ve- Vehicles Entered 2161 Denied Entry Before 0 1 129.6 12.7 2.4 5.5 10.1 3.4 5.2 , 136 137 764 33 84 403 318 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 movement 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 105.0 47.1 5.5 75.6 56.3 5.0 86.0 59.0 4.5 76.6 91.4 3.5 Vehicles Entered 246 782 108 378 1395 304 192 405 444 121 307 235 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay I Veh (a) 51.4 Vehicles Entered 4917 Denied Entry Before 0 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement �i EBT- EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBR All Delay / Veh (s) 283.7 253.9 298 9 2.2 0.2 05 677 3 965.0 1468.9 20 251.2 Vehicles Entered 11 167 3 73 136 88 13 1 24 47 1 564 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR< WBT WBR NBR , SBR All Delay / Veh (a) 186.2 40.5 0.6 1.1 5729.1 9.2 125 Vehicles Entered 222 1 295 166 17 3 704 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SinnTraffic Report Page 1 SimTraffic Performance Report ' 2030 Build (Mitigation A) - PM 5/5/2011 Total Network Performance ' Delay / Veh (s) 199.1 Vehicles Entered 5317 ' Denied Entry Before 4 n u II 1 1 1 I 1 ' SirnTraffic Report Page 2 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A) - PM 5l5/2011 Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard , Directions Served L TR LTR T L T R L T R isms ' Maximum Queue (ft) 206 115 253 225 107 8 13 91 4 57 Average Queue (ft) 178 38 207 119 36 0 1 35 0 5 95th Queue (ft) 190 89 304 295 81 4 7 71 3 30 Link Distance (ft) 104 104 166 223 1147 669 ' Upstream Blk Time (°h) 99 1 69 30 Queuing Penalty (veh) 244 1 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 350 225 225 ' Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) ' Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Directions Served L T T L T T R T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 486 405 419 779 864 874 690 312 342 330 347 363 Average Queue (ft) 280 255 277 374 530 550 64 20 27 195 180 185 95th Queue (ft) 488 370 390 635 832 852 430 174 226 323 316 310 ' Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 871 871 2220 2220 669 669 Upstream Bilk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 2 0 0 0 ' Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 630 600 230 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 0 1 5 7 10 2 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 0 7 19 21 23 4 3 ' Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Movement SB SB SB SB SB Directions ServedI - T R Maximum Queue (ft) 124 138 260 308 219 Average Queue (ft) 57 67 141 188 16 95th Queue (ft) 107 117 234 299 137 Link Distance (ft) 473 473 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 250 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 15 SimTraffic Report Page 3 I 11 1 1 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A) - PM 5/5/2011 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West Driveway Movement EB B15 WB WB NB B13 SB SB B14 B14 Directions Served LTR T L R LTR T LT R T T Maximum Queue (ft) 592 54 35 9 359 58 420 82 136 131 Average Queue (ft) 355 26 5 0 190 17 389 19 117 91 95th Queue (ft) 862 149 22 6 424 119 500 149 168 181 Link Distance (ft) 883 257 291 406 277 339 339 116 116 Upstream Blk Time (%) 12 6 10 4 94 0 93 63 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 4: Bend Movement EB Directions Served T Maximum Queue (ft) 370 Average Queue (ft) 13 95th Queue (ft) 194 Link Distance (ft) 871 Upstream Blk Time (°k) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Directions Served T TR T TR R T R Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) ' Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 150 307 12 75 447 149 290 0 4 293 154 363 6 30 526 291 104 104 376 74 0 45 344 1 0 75 97 226 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 914 180 30 34 2 138 15 257 339 0 SimTralfic Report Page 4 17 SimTraffic Performance Report ' 2030 Build (Mitigation A-B) - PM 5/5/2011 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement ' Delay / Veh (s) 30.6 19.2 4.2 45.0 50.8 26.4 35.2 15.7 6.5 29.0 7.3 6.5 t Vehicles Entered 310 5 168 ` '63 8 146 136 769 32 85 399 314 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement All / Veh (s) 'Delay Vehicles Entered 2435 Denied Entry Before 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement ® NBT _N _._ NBR SBL SBT SBR Delay / Veh (s) 104.0 48.0 5.5 72.0 52.6 4.9 122.1 64.5 6.6 78.5 112.9 5.0 Vehicles Entered 243 787 108 372 1385 311 224 476 526 119 312 238 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) Vehicles Entered Denied Entry Before All 53.3 5101 0 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement ® " EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBR All Delay i Veh (s) 2.7 0.7 1.4 2.5 0.3 0,5 T2 6.5 5 0 128 3.0 5.1 Vehicles Entered 11 169 3 73 138 88 12 1 26 267 10 798 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9: Park Road & East Drivewav Performance by movement Movement . EBT EBR WBT "WBR ` NBR SBR . All Delay / Veh (s) 2.6 0.9 0.7 0.6 18.1 5.0 2.1 Vehicles Entered 459 2 297 165 24 2 949 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SimTraffic Report , Page 1 I 1 1 ' SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A-B) - PM 5/5/2011 Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Directions Served L TR LTR T L T T R L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 182 92 225 25 158 190 273 45 134 314 78 107 Average Queue (ft) 143 38 109 1 72 90 140 11 52 25 30 52 95th Queue (ft) 199 71 196 13 142 162 223 35 101 164 66 93 Link Distance (ft) 104 104 166 223 1147 1147 669 669 Upstream Blk Time {%) 26 0 3 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 65 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 350 225 225 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard NB Directions Served L T T L T T R T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 500 398 420 758 873 882 423 84 132 350 522 492 Average Queue (ft) 267 255 277 368 518 545 22 3 7 265 268 250 95th Queue (ft) 463 360 382 605 795 832 229 37 62 395 479 435 Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 871 871 2220 2220 669 669 Upstream Bik Time (%) 0, 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 630 600 230 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 4 6 30 4 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 15 18 72 10 6 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time(%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) NB SB SB SB SB SB 66 66 R L L T T R T T 82 123 148 355 382 148 39 64 3 57 66 170 222 24 1 3 60 107 119 311 369 172 16 40 473 473 1834 1834 1 1 0 0 300 250 250 250 3 13 3 32 SimTraffic Report Page 3 I I 1 1 1 1 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A-B) - PM 5/5/2011 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West Driveway Directions Served LTR L R LTR LT R Maximum Queue (ft) 32 34 9 54 195 22 Average Queue (ft) 2 13 0 24 75 6 95th Queue (ft) 16 38 6 50 146 21 Link Distance (ft) 883 291 406 339 339 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 4: Bend Movement EB Directions Served T Maximum Queue (ft) 372 Average Queue (ft) 13 95th Queue (ft) 195 Link Distance (ft) 871 Upstream Bilk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Bilk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Driveway Directions Served T T TR R R Maximum Queue (ft) 110 10 22 63 30 Average Queue (ft) 17 1 1 20 2 95th Queue (ft) 71 9 9 51 16 Link Distance (ft) 104 104 376 339 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Bilk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 225 SimTraftic Report Page 4 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A-D) - PM 515/2011 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement ' Delay / Veh (s) 31.1 18.7 4.1 43.6 49.5 25,1 34,8 16 0 6.6 276 7 6 Z3 Vehicles Entered 308 5 167 62 9 146 138 765 32 86 397 31.9 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement M4v6ment• .:. All Delay / Veh (s) 17 3 Vehicles Entered 2430 Denied Entry Before 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR VVBL WBT 'vVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SET SBR Delay / Veh (s) 79.5 39.8 5.4 66.7 43.8 4.6 76.7 57.2 6.4 76.2 76.4 3.3 Vehicles Entered 244 787 106 373 1385 311 223 471 525 120 312 235 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement mamas Delay / Veh (s) 43.0 Vehicles Entered 5092 Denied Entry Before 0 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement MoWfient EBL EBT IBR WBL WBT WBR NEL NBT NBR SBL SBR All Delay / Veh (s) 2,9 0-7 0-5 24 0-3 0.6 6.6 7.2 5.0 11.4 2.6 4.7 Vehicles Entered 11 167 3 74 137 88 12 1 26 266 10 795 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBR All Delay / Veh (s) 2.8 1.1 0.7 0.6 21.9 4.3 2 2 Vehicles Entered 456 2 297 166 24 2 947 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SinnTraffic Report ' Page 1 1 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A-D) - PM 515/2011 Total Network Performance ' Delay / Veh (s) 59.6 Vehides Entered 5542 Denied Entry Before 0 I 1 `J ' SirnTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A-D) - PM 5/5/2011 Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard , Directions Served L TR LTR T Maximum Queue (ft) 187 86 223 17 Average Queue (ft) 147 37 106 0 95th Queue (ft) 198 69 193 6 Link Distance (ft) 104 104 166 223 Upstream Blk Time (%) 27 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 67 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers L T 157 212 71 94 133 174 1147 350 Boulevard T 274 144 233 1147 R 44 11 35 350 L 124 53 104 225 T 78 17 56 669 T 112 32 77 669 R 109 47 93 225 ' ' ' Directions Served L L T T L L T T R T T L Maximum Queue (ft) 201 220 359 383 257 500 775 835 728 22 27 349 Average Queue (ft) 115 118 234 259 148 194 457 482 29 1 1 218 95th Queue (ft) 183 192 337 356 226 338 709 744 269 16 19 347 , Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 870 870 2220 2220 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 0 0 , Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 550 630 630 600 230 Storage Blk Time (%) 2 3 10 Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 9 24 ' Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard ' Directions Served T T L L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 397 374 126 139 241 307 143 Average Queue (ft) 202 202 59 70 128 175 5 , 95th Queue (ft) 333 317 113 119 207 270 75 Link Distance (ft) 669 669 473 473 Upstream Blk Time (%) ' Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 250 Storage Blk Time (%) 3 0 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 2 0 7 ' I 11 Ire LJ SimTraffic Report ' Page 3 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A-D) - PM 51512011 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West Directionsi Maximum Queue (ft) 27 34 4 61 166 22 Average Queue (ft) 2 10 0 24 70 6 95th Queue (ft) 13 34 3 51 130 21 Link Distance (ft) 883 291 406 339 339 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 4: Bend Directions Served T Maximum Queue (ft) 531 Average Queue (ft) 19 95th Queue (ft) 231 Link Distance (ft) 870 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Driveway Movement EB J B WB WB NB SB Directions Served T TR T TR R R Maximum Queue (ft) 124 35 23 42 75 30 Average Queue (ft) 20 1 1 1 21 2 95th Queue (ft) 81 26 9 16 55 16 Link Distance (ft) 291 104 104 376 339 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 Network Sum Network wide Queuing Penalty: 127 SimTrafhc Report Page 4 r E m o 6 F � r EX61N9 f 6r acuvn z eEu L § E meµ. 7Z EwsnxG =•1 - 9" CONCRETE 6' CU 5 AGGREGATE 1 8xH aw H3e OM • rn • j ,� -_ BASE. 100% CRU%MD { bOTGRA 3149.20 K CT BORROWdtMIUTAR 1 TYPICAL SECTION A -A € ARBORETUM BLVD. oil E INSET A CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION Y � E K b G a ■G Nswaw r r arr r �gLg3Rp � 3 ea r4`€E 3 5 € i B�Et: ! EM91�ID t NY 2x Ewsszc TACK COAT - 2J 7 ' F Y-YN/DOT 23 MVNEJ50358 TACK COAT - 2552 _ 6 p z F ERINB rH a*rtn�irof A wz�a �+e s ns-r CMW t artv ) (*rol E6nN e6N Y-YN/DOT 2350 YVNWS50]50 1 qw6 a pyllr z m E€ TYPICAL $ECTIDN B-B 2r-MN/D0T 23M MVNW55D3 5 i POWERS BLVD. 12" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE K N a a c Yvc<.v5=fg<z'isF:n��,_ BASE. 100%CRUSHED y w r< 21' MN/DOT 01e9.2B SELECT BORROW a F U f Z ' H U r rW 6oe 2i w zr INSET B W BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION LL O Q yb { A 0911r�e ue ` nuD.0lsj UrnN Y1e tW • anw ru aw r1a OW7 TYPICAL SECTION C-C PARK ROAD Z z W i Q Q o e z Of f `1 = D_ n o Uaw a of p f •! C s' rn aeW• me 1 `Hr��A) � g i rrnz ) DAM .6 LlM • 3 TYPICAL SECTION D-D PROJECT NO. i PARK ROAD 11619 2 9 T NUMBER i D-3 K " 6 f � Y EpSM g aow scum f r nE.A i 5 T ` ' EL¢yR' 3 FIND 's 9• CONCRETE _ �MSi 6' CUSS 5 AG ELATE BASE. )OOZ CRUSHED M]. 4r a e.z. ar ♦ A anWRlmm) amER(mm) - 24 YN/DDT A SELECT GRANULAR e g BORROW 'I• TYPICAL SECTION A —A ARBORETUM BLVD. �l�e E q pa e # INSET A CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION ❑ SSE 8 S fh ..LU3V aEi, i d$z x C o Sy yDeeelq aw T aE I raw =`g S to P4'"e 6 Uia�3 T I Eck E�szec a E�-��U TACK COAT - 235) s i 1 \ 2--MN/DOT 23W Mw 35O35B TACK COAT - 235T fig: yyw _adFh 3 0 q s eaz. �. nEM aJ `rx. aw • e�T a /}/ - aes a MIDI WEIR Dev) rTr (ny FrrC ri.J 2--M/DOT 2350 MSNwMO0 i ar • ezrx TYPICAL SECTION B—B 2j--4N/DOT 2350 MVNW}5p}5B z . 4 POWERS BLVD. 12" cuss 5 AOORECAM a a a CRUSHED S - BASE. RUSHED Y t }t{9.28 SEIECT S GRANULAR GR _ GRANULAR Bg2ROW U) Z s O f z F LU wux ma: BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION LL O J e # O caJ ESINL E,r�D ca � e C � \ f EMSINL r�s m `ry aw a pepe r�s aw a alDu � wTRw Ox) a rNfe re ar a F TYPICAL SECTION C—C PARK ROAD Z W 3 Qao z v Z f Y Lo = O it er V d W 0 .0 CD 0 LASILL /\ CDU) a g y g _ esa are - Wtrtx IMI e6[T a 1 `ra. a� • wmx (M) V DATE n e 1 - rie are msWc r+e or arrtR fmm) a amu PRO. CT NO. 3 TYPICAL SECTION D—D 's PARK ROAD 11612 $MEET XUY F D-3 E a 0 0 N O M !1 N CONCEPTUAL PUD PLAN SUBMITTAL FOR : ;: 1frm%Walmart949-00 LOCATED AT COUNTY RD 17 (POWERS BLVD) & PARK ROAD - C Nub QNb CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA _ mw Y SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 023_" am PARCEL ID# = 255660010 ©6 0 w s $ i = Harrison (�'\� Lake ga ;4 K l 1 e 3 C a L CASCADE CIR. pppp �N �r 49. S A CIR. V. �. HLLLI CT. T m SD. SNASTA CIR. E. M, OLYMPIC CIR. M. CASTLE RIME CT. GLWL[NT RED FOX M. CASTLE RIDGE CT. 64. NAVAJO DR. CIR 67. CHA" N ARROM DR. 66 RE➢ VM CT. ia°R' 6a PD/A ER Lake Ann 6R. NEZ PERCE CT. G Lot Lak t a) U9� CIR. Cr, \ j O SAD )fi LE s DR L CIR. Si, d nm. CT. , TRIDGE CIR UT qx V O n TETAIL Dw CIRR[DGE CT. CIIIIER �. SHAN ASSEN m SANTA FE ASANT CIR. 4.� 1990 POP, 11,732 iz% �V. 76tiS ST. TR. NGTON CT. ➢➢..�� TT^^ ' V P� Y WAY 13 • WATER SLE LA �Ld ^ ^ MATER LEAF PL a �! NJ V. L AGE SANT J ST. GlY 'DR < VI < N > ST. V, CH FdZ80RETU4 COITIER > y 9 PICNA IN wt I A,c na�a cAN Ev Iza SPOVERS➢PPLL•. � aD� L 11 . OWNER/DEVELOPER DAVID COX, AIA WAL-MART STORES INC. SAM WALTON DEVELOPMENT CENTER, DEPT. 8703 2001 S.E. 1OTH STREET #0550 BENTONVILLE, ARKANSAS 72716-0550 (479)273-4000 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER STEVE MARTIN, PE BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 1826 BUERKLE ROAD SAINT PAUL, MN 55110 (651) 487-3245 FAX (651) 487-1812 Lake S VICINITY N.T.S. NORTH PROJECT TEAM ARCHITECT JACKOLYN COOK-HAXBY, AIA BENHAM COMPANIES 60 EAST PLATO BLVD., SUITE 300 SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55107 (651)209-2873 FAX (651) 778-3911 ENVIRONMENTAL/HAZARDOUS MATERIALS JIM DELUCA / GREGG KRUSE BRAUN INTERTEC COPRORATION 11001 HAMPSHIRE AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOILS, MN 55438 (952)995-2000 FAX (952) 995-2020 PREPARED BY: DR, PROJECT LOCATION CIVIL ENGINEER WILLIAM D. MATZEK, P.E. KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 345N SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114 (651)645-4197 FAX (651) 645-5116 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TODD HALUNEN, RLA KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 345N SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114 (651)645-4197 FAX (651) 645-5116 Sheet List Table 6010 COVER SHEET 6040 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED SEP 3 0 2011 CHANHASSEN PLAOININO DEpT ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE SITEWORK FOR THE WALMART PORTION OF THIS PROJECT SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE "SITE SPECIFIC SPECIFICATIONS." 2. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO CONTRACT COMPLETION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE CALL ONE MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 w ¢ 0 In z 0 Cn w Ir Q o� N U W ~ Ol 05 FQ}pO In � U_ V w [ C W � VI w W W U_ Q Q EL0JJ nZ Jw W o <00� z r [Lwow < (N p gym¢= o Q W Q w �� JN J_ �aQ zw ?'10 � J Q WV ZQF UQ z0 0)r3��w � m� jwz Wofd'wZ W =w Z)O_ Q _wvl(Lo p w U U 0 Z m > > m U) p m p w ¢ z z y Q N Q w (n p p U Z Lu Q =O z� Q Y 2 � U 0 I% CD it r— L m E DATE 09/30/2011 PROJECT NO. 116199062 a H 0 LLJ z z G SHEET NUMBER 6010 2 I 3 4 I 5 I 6 1 7 I 8 I 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 Fj m C I E F NORTH I ' � - se34O¢4 E X C E P T/ON ��- oe, "E ' 149.75''—" 75.8E S8B79?4"E 19B.7% _ _ _ �- / — — — -__ _- _ 8B N 0444 F _ 0 50 100 1--_-------_L--/r--_-__-_ _._--------��. // �// // a. BALE &PALLET SCALE FEET I // // / / rn RECYCLE AREA / /• // ° .va :• __--- / / /• / ° e $ ° s• - a p'<A .a� ;. 45. — — — 1 -z _---�` / '� COMPACTOR TRUCK _--- TYP I'\ 4ETAINING WALL I II \ 31 / I \ 11 30' 1 i •I / i TYP L ITS OF WETLAND COMPRESSOR 1 EXISTING D\ INAGE AND ' \\ / ENCLOSURE 1 '', UTILITY ER EMENT \• \ / 26' I / / (TYP.) f i Z I \\ 1 1 y 337.9' I — i 26- I I 4 / 1 x 18, / TYP / \It \ \\ 12 LIMITS OF Wk LAND \ 1 \ / cli 00 Z \ \ \\ 1 \\ l \ _-rrrr ....-r_.rZ.— 0,6 '\� �\� 10. UFFE YARD WITH \\ �100%\\ CRE ING (TYP.) r• r _~~ P l PAMK nVAw arrrrrr-------v ----s ----w —i lI 'I _ I � yY r %J ♦,ii~i VICINITY MAP SITE NOT TO SCALE SECTION 114, TOWNSHIP 116N, RANGE 23W SITE PLAN NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF ALL PROPERTY CORNERS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER, CONCRETE, AND PAVEMENT TO EXISTING IN GRADE AND ALIGNMENT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT & CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS (SEE DEMO PLAN). 4. THE EARTHWORK FOR ALL BUILDING FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ACTUAL BUILDING AND SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS, PORCH AND RAMP LOCATIONS. 6. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, ADJUSTMENT, OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS DESIGNATED ON PLANS. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PIPE BOLLARDS FOR PROTECTION OF ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES IN DRIVE AREAS. B. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ACTUAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITY ENTRANCES, TO INCLUDE, SANITARY SEWER LATERALS, DOMESTIC AND FIRE PROTECTION WATER SERVICE, ELECTRICAL, AND TELEPHONE SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO AVOID CONFLICTS AND ASSURE PROPER DEPTHS ARE ACHIEVED, AS WELL AS COORDINATE WITH ANY UTILITY COMPANIES FOR APPROVED LOCATIONS AND SCHEDULING OF TIE-INS/CONNECTIONS TO THEIR FACILITIES. 9. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING THE DAMAGE DONE TO ANY EXISTING ITEM DURING CONSTRUCTION, SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DRAINAGE, UTILITIES, PAVEMENT, STRIPING, CURB, ETC. REPAIRS SHALL BE EQUAL TO, OR BETTER THAN, EXISTING CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO DOCUMENT ALL EXISTING DAMAGE AND NOTIFY WAL-MART CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION START. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL TOUCH-UP PAINT (EX. COLOR) ON ALL FIRE HYDRANTS AND CURBS WHICH ARE CURRENTLY PAINTED. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BASE BID. 12. SITEWORK FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE "WALMART SITEWORK SPECIFICATIONS", UNLESS SPECIFIED ELSEWHERE. 13. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE OR RELOCATE, WHEN APPLICABLE, ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS, FOUNDATIONS, BASEMENTS, CONNECTING IMPROVEMENTS, DRAIN PIPES, SANITARY SEWER PIPES, POWER POLES, AND GUY WIRES, WATER METERS AND WATER LINES, WELLS, SIDEWALKS, SIGN POLES, UNDERGROUND GAS, SEPTIC TANKS, AND ASPHALT, SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN, WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AND WHERE NEEDED,TO ALLOW FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN. 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS IN DISPOSING OF DEMOLISHED MATERIALS REMOVED FROM THIS SITE. 15. ALL PAINT USED FOR PARKING STRIPING SHALL BE PER WALMART SPECIFICATIONS. 16. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 17. CART CORRALS TO BE PROVIDED BY WALMART. ASSEMBLY AND INSTALLATION TO BE DONE BY CONTRACTOR. 18. PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING SHALL MEET THE CITYS CODES AND ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES IN EFFECT AT THE TIME. 19. THE MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE DICTATES STANDARD ACCESSIBLE AND VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE 8' WIDE WITH AN 8' WALKWAY. 20. REFER TO ARCH. PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ELECTRICAL PLANS. i LOCATION: SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23W 1 1 ADDRESS: tODO PARK ROAD 1 CHANHASSEN, MN 1 t ZONING DISTRICT: IOP, INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK DISTRICT LAND USE: COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT tiTOTAL SITE AREA: 14.11 AC. �! MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT: 4 STORIES/OR 50' (WHICHEVER IS LESS) PROPOSED HEIGHT: 1 STORY/35' REQ'D MIN. BUILDING SETBACKS PROVIDED MIN BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT (HWY 5): 70' FRONT (HWY 5): 70' FRONT (POWERS): 50' FRONT (POWERS): 100' REO'D MAX. BUILDING SETBACKS PROVIDED MAX BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT (HWY 5): 150' FRONT (HWY 5): 70' FRONT (POWERS): 100' FRONT (POWERS): 100' REQUIRED LANDSCAPE: 20,951 SF (8% OF VEHICULAR USE AREA) PROVIDED LANDSCAPE: 34,195 SF (13% OF VEHICULAR USE AREA) THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE CALL ONE MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 01 ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: ALL WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS, LEGEND 15 PROPOSED STANDARD PARKING SPACES 15 PROPOSED COMPACT PARKING SPACES CART CORRAL (SEE DETAIL SHEET) — - - PROPERTY LINE — — — — BUILDING SETBACK LINE - - - - - - - - EXISTING CURB PROPOSED CURB HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT COMPACT PARKING STALLS (7.5'08') ARCHITECTURAL APRON WALMART PARKING DATA TABLE PROPOSED WALMART BUILDING AREA 117,278 S.F. STANDARD PARKING 399 COMPACT PARKING 116 ACCESSIBLE PARKING 13** CART CORRALS(10) 20 SPACES WALMART PARKING 528* PARKING RATIO* 4.50/1000 S.F. *EXCLUDES CART CORRALS ** # OF ADA STALLS WAS CALCULATED USING A MEDIAN AGE OF 35 = 2%+2 cn Z _O Cn W a C a� OyT� }�YY x�m Wiz€ ®¢a �O V O zw = O� o F U�V)O w�w3 LJ aQJJ d ulDjw W O ¢ 00� FN- z JO Q U d W Q W J in z �mQ= p awaW <� FS E L J >_N J_ Fw Cl azw 3P0 C-)3a000 o > m F-�)(nz 5 w0Ww? Waaor I' � (n(L0 0 U U O z m >_ m V) m o Q z w J U Y Q n Quj of W V) M 0 U ui I..L v) Ll Z_ G NW I..L Q f- O (n Z Ld z z W Z_ ``^^ vJ `! O IY T�T ]zN LL T F it CU < W O �CD f 0 I% O y LL IT-, U) m EW a U DATE 09/30 2011 PROJECT NO. 116199062 SHEET NUMBER 6040 PRE -CAST PANEL tSLtNU bT ULULAJI LC Front Elevation PRE -CAST PANEL 1 Right Elevation i PRE -CAST PANEL bLtNU- by ULUI:AJI Lt EIFS SW 2823 UMU bF'LI I f-AUL J IANUAKU COLOR #192 bLCNU DT ULULAJI LC PRE -CAST PANEL AWNING TO MATCH "BROWN PRE -CAST PANEL "RED BRYAN" BRONZE_ BY BERRIDGE r BUFF" INTEGRALLY COLORED SPLIT CMU OLDCASTLE"OAK" QUIK-BRIK "PROMENADE BLEND" BY OLDCASTLE SPANDREL GLASS PRE -CAST PANEL "BUFF" I I : ': Walmart f June 21, 2011 From Science to Solutions EIFS SW 7689 PANELSYSTEM TRESPAMETEON METALLIC EIFS SW 6095 "TOASTY" PRE -CAST PANEL "RED BRYAN" AWNING TO MATCH "BROWN I—' BRONZE" BY BERRIDGE L-SPANDREL GLASS INTEGRALLY COLORED SPLIT FACE CMU OLDCASTLE "OAK" PRE -CAST PANEL "RED BRYAN" PANELSYSTEM TRESPAMETEON "COBBLE BROWN" COLOR #192 i -r Ir1, 1 . - �- xx:-xx�x��xxxs�- ss�a ass. ^ Chanhassen, MN 5949-00 QUIK-BRIK "PROMENADE BLEND" BY OLDCASTLE PRE -CAST PANEL "BUFF" QUIK-BRIK "PROMENADE BLEND" BY OLDCASTLE F PRE -CAST PANEL "BUFF" PRE -CAST PANEL "BUFF" 1 DOC CMICUCM RA=AI CI AT t-Af-t I:MU ULUL AJ I Lt "ULUAK- COLOR #192 INTEGRALLY COLORED SPLIT FACE CMU OLDCASTLE "OAK" Sign PRE -CAST PANEL "RED BRYAN" `-SPANDREL GLASS INTEGRALLY COLORED SPLIT FACE CMU OLDCASTLE "OAK" Qty Height Sq.Ft Total Sq.Ft almart Spark 2 2 5'-6" 8'-0" 298.00 596.00 Market & Pharmacy 1 2'-6" 102.58 102.58 Total: 698.58 DESIGN REPRESENTATION ONLY -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION The building images shown area representation of the current design intent only. The building images may not reflect variations in color, tone, hue, tint, shading, ambient light intensity, materials, texture, contrast, font style, construction variations required by building codes or inspectors, material availability or final design detailing. lmart :,: Wa, ---- -- June 21, 2011 Chanhassen, MN 5949-00 Perspectives 2 GAF— ■■...(I From Science to Solutions DESIGN REPRESENTATION ONLY -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION The building images shown area representation of the current design intent only. The building images may not reflect variations in color, tone, hue, tint, shading, ambient light intensity, materials, texture, contrast, font style, construction variations required by building codes or inspectors, material availability or final design detailing. %1i Walmart *,% June 21, 2011 Chanhassen, MN 5949-00 Perspective 3 ae411111111M �B) From Science to Solutions DESIGN REPRESENTATION ONLY -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION The building images shown area representation of the current design intent only. The building images may not reflect variations in color, tone, hue, tint, shading, ambient light intensity, materials, texture, contrast, font style, construction variations required by building codes or inspectors, material availability or final design detailing. v ,: Walmart, June 21, 2011 From Science to Solutions Chanhassen, MN 5949-00 Perspecth DESIGN REPRESENTATION ONLY -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION The building images shown area representation of the current design intent only. The building images may not reflect variations in color, tone, hue, tint, shading, ambient light intensity, materials, texture, contrast, font style, construction variations required by building codes or inspectors, material availability or final design detailing. *% Walmart , June 21, 2011 From Science to Solutions Chanhassen, MN 5949-00 Perspective 5 DESIGN REPRESENTATION ONLY -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION The building images shown area representation of the current design intent only. The building images may not reflect variations in color, tone, hue, tint, shading, ambient light intensity, materials, texture, contrast, font style, construction variations required by building codes or inspectors, material availability or final design detailing. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i i I -�- - eTw i A ANY EXCEPTION wwDi �qP ~M'Ay 1 '%-f'y BIISLN YR1IX _ r � W YIMYIw 9 R 1 � / �•• �� AST - �`�`�� OJ 1 E _ I t\ \ \ • 'x a \T�,z��:: rN,O(',91 u -_ -_- a _-__-__--_-_� RUa xvE • { i f CRaMIG AsxE � / / - - Walmart "x I I rs:v EnAxo 1 1 i/ STORE # 5949-00 / C-020-NOR-NOR 117,278 SF i F.F.E.=932DDt / •y 1 E EM1N Iw1•I MD 1 1 \I W/ll/I, s / / uw A � 25z9' / ' 1 E SETAST \ \ / sMYARR / t b ',n l US IT,o I n)SE 1 N VWA = HAT ' a �YYY^ •y " T 2s' r'aar WEFEa y / smN�M[rNATAp n E ANA✓ on- / / _ $?6%t27W 1.11Y o •ter'``_ wa w sD• wE 26. 2.17 /A NK f� IT IT f F a � 8 3 s 3 F F 91 K g E [ a 10 11 12 HOSAAAAS a 13 1 14 1 15 I 16 . vmn EnNe Mn I 9 � CHAN ASSEN S ES 1. PR. Y.I32 1 O •.�� iv ®n O4 �f�". AL VICIINITTYVMAP SITE SECTION 114. TOWNSHIP 116N, RANGE 23A SITE PLAN NOTES � E\ ,, cpmAc. Is razPurlsARE Fw NroRCTa 6 NE NmNRT` rowans {ry ]. CAI TR RIFT EIIIA,T YATCa Pap04Y QN9 NN WMR, IXORY ER. MO 9.gOlr N M. w / mME Mo Al2EENr. a GME MART zaNE EPIa.E ENsrxc ..war E mwcTE N Acmmxw Erx sNorArlws a urn RK aTawa PVT ru dwmlc FawASK) . saidIT a A.AAKE Nm w SNGD,CAT(NS. NU R4N LDUMNS MC TECMAL NAYS FORACNAL 91Xs wtl 91EWMX (A Ea9MS cas�iwN,cna, w. ,TSEYIS i. q AEL. laDF NiITTSS,, aV�.miAlE, SSE i1Nls r h u A caxla oa sVu NroNDE wrt 9awms Fm awTscla rc ll .BaE warn wTrcs MD MNwIFNUKFs w ESSE AM. CdTMIrtl, 5N41 MEER m NgY1EC1YRK NNIS NU .ray FM MN4 LDGIXN 6 A 20 Tun drYANCES, ro Npl4 .1.1 SEEP mlr CMFmC . ME .R. r YAIEA SEPMQ. EIFCIA SAA Aw RI. A. splNRI la ASSES ISKSER ON S NSA.. / ff UTYTES w ap A YNNEa AS 10 AWU NIRICR wIJ ASSESS NiCVDi DFI+MS ARE AW[`hD. S r AS C AAWAR Ynl Mr UTIITY W VANES NI MVP. LDGT.E ANII WIEWIMC 6 nE-Ns/ORIECIpY2 r0 . FACumS / % a. mISTNM:rIW p.Vl caaLr Nw Au uvvwe v¢s No c m¢m,clm ro sAYE MSR Z Is.E FW PMTET .0 AAdAS OVE ro Mr EffiT, IIEY 4 WISRNCnp. RE As RUT ISE WTFD rA. ME. UTUrEs PAwplr . IS ar®. Elt. cnsnX6 oIAIAR /M�RVT- ... AL�Y.r .sRSXn� . YARA� F! . RE. ro / DWsmucnW sTMI. 91N1 Ma-,i P.Wr (EK G0.p1) m Au ME aRNMn MD D Ewl Na yp ll. G1EaRV IRA., COSr .. S NRIpD N Ta .A 9A =6 I3 SIEnVw . TR NMEET V. SEET PI ES® nE -.ARr SNEEJwt MEOFICATRW. V1152 �l MAE. E'SE.. ri 5 mI... ro IEYDIE a Rlaum . wMIUBE ALL sRSMG B `KM Fp `R RS. BAw41TS, .,,TYC Wq\OEIIT% M.W PYFS. SANrM. SERP Nos Po,AER PLIES wO ar EEs 'RATER ASTERS YO YAl[P \YEC EILS 9EYw%i 9Vl PU6. ✓UERTPPO fAS SEA. 21" U ARK G iMNS, wID IS 1 91Uw Mp YDT 9rpvl N1lN CdSIRUCMI WR SAID SSE4 ME(D,TO A w1011 Fp SEA CpsIRIKMN AS ASKSIT t • A 6alRALTW Vx FaPIN ALL uCM. STATE MD.. ISaIT. w gWTInKI6 c£ya9lEp W1EAw5 RESKA4p iPbl MS 9M, IS 41 PAST USED FIST PNNE 5mR16 sMMI E r4R Y4YMT MIV MATRNS I., DEIASIpS srIOM ME IS FA¢ 6 aa9 LNE4 NDrEO Dn4rM5E i ' E NNI9 9.BYIRD FOR NTNTnrID SPOUT MEET ♦T 0" RlL5u ALLNAWroUCSEME B9EIYIC m'6 • NORTH N ETECT AT RE lYc 19. SSSE II I M e MIX911" LLWAS W EP SSAY, SIwY.VE ACCESBE NO VW AC255oIL PMRING AA2S —Ta ...YUS I 0 SO I, V.. N MCX. NMS FOR SITE ..E fE .. Pl.W1 WREAK, SEMA S . _W_w .ADPIG sEI ) _ REIMN •� SITE DATA LEGEND LKAIa: m:� Ia nAN9AP TIe RMR 2. gpSEgp srMpNw PllglE EPA¢5 ID' SURER rwp NTN I �, ...R SN. MI II]', N16A'ISED CPBAR A. EPu£5 IaoE soEEaxc (lm.) xwxc Nsan: IS, wasmAi mu vNM asmcr GPT mNAL (ME ¢rw sxEr) 1 uIo YSE' tlEEPxT' tlENFA04 PSrwCT w.RAR UrE _ _ _ - 9aDN4 sEIBAIX IRE Y pYi NE 57 ACC 6 rorN 9 ) ASIM w 1 S"ADI. AEA: Ex AG fl TK 92) 1 Yllt WIDPG rEq,T: • ET./p W (NSPEA(P TV P.LVI@ �p NCPoYD IET , 6 bDlci I S.,/" SFTBAIXs � AGN ar. EDTgEIE EPPOED AEI 9nIME dlXJb .1 C. I2 Q NwrozD GWaErt saRAix MAaa D i rxar I.F w FISAIT POYFRS). I. —— O EDb Y.l R•, PPMOSD u sTNO.Vw an A9NMr iRpr (rIF SY I , MY FRPIr D. 2 s'yf RI' •. MY RXV -----------_-'---� 1 M1OIr(PNdEx l flar(POEFPSr O ,EAIN aN'.N T • wSgE D9i ARE, M. M IEaRD W9AME 2D.2N Y AM R M wAO,WI USE AREA) O C,IPACI P.STNI. QS.G, IPGS.S sNtlYllE 21Dm SF (El] [ E, wAP,Wf DY AIEA) AlAwrzcvRr APRs O .AAT PANC•IC WTA TAME II ear — 7.2m sF- RRIASIIARS PAMRIG�A m.Acr P. .TI. r mMAs(I(l) m mAas nE PARD' E aF muIrQYA1FR AEKAV s ryTaPAIFD rills PRD{cr MARAGrM1's TE SINE SI4YMT PARKAS; 5w P. RAra SDA..1 EwE arlsnEPnra vaa ADMEsaAc na mVE M RRaTus uRr amAEs usiwA rotas I, AEMM.DEEF21u2n ls a s-zw2 ALL CONR E ALERT CONTRACTOR: GUNNER STATE CALL ONE STATE C LL O UN TOLL I166 S, AM MI, CPlRACTMI 8o ro a CMREED (EARM T F CS UWTq Np A4 CIMNE] Rv AE rYESrOE DAE N PRDECr 9E(zIGM,S 00N CTRD BEGINS E CCREA SM a IEx att AREA 6s-ua-D002 651-4 4-G,00 m 0§111 Z W Q<o Z m U QW W EL :700 DAIS 6040 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I 10 13 I 14 1 15 16 17 0 M. C E F O 0 O 0 U c - O m 0 T o G 0 o - N 0 r+7 a O N o H 0 3 O - Z Q 0- 0_ H o I O In H w w 2 (n - Z Q J CL in Q U j / O I rn O r H Q J Q w o K J U Y N - E D c 01 D - � F NORTH I - - N931' 834p44�E E X CEP T l O N SqB ea�yl 149.75'' q y 5. / �- S8B7924 E 198.77 / N88'0444 2O7.28 - -- -- 70' MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK `"'^�-•.. - 0 50 100 1 - -- - - - - - - - - - i / / 150' MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK SCALE FEET` -70 -� .,�'p.11¢ C E - -• e A. d ems- - - - - /� -'`/ - •_ a d-a- -a- - •-4 a ,#1 3`� S•J.r A. COMPACTOR QO TRUCK WELL �1- TYP - s .a I'I 4ETAINING WALL TRUCK WELL, 1061 31 1 II 111/r• 30' \�� / I I \ 1 \ TYP Walmart:': ' I I / 48 STORE # 5949-00 / I L ITS OF WETLAND C-L120-NOR-NOR / 117,278 SF ± / / COMPRESSOR I ENCLOSURE F.F.E. = 931.00 ± \ EXISTING D INAGE AND I \ / / \\ UTILITY Ell EMENT R (TYP.) \ N I \ \/ - 09/22/11 B E / I / I1 1 / 0 PEDiSTRIAN S2EWALK 36_ - - - / -� ^• '' 30' 3' CONCRETE ( \\ \\ A \ 1• V ! t / BUFFER (TYP.) / \ \, X \ •1 , \' TYP / ti � "� / ti fl CART CORRAL / 1 12 / I� (TYP.) I \\ p LIMITS pF Wk LAND 9.5 _ / TYP _ - Q P co 26' 26' TYP `♦. / O 6p' 62' �® 62' ' PEDES RIA 12.34' 6 1 • r ` ` .`,t,,- / C OSS OVER 9.5 18, TYP 16 TYP I T 11 TYP TYP YP RAISED-... �/ CONCRETE WALK 26' 7.5' / / / /7 / TYP / • %2. Q�' \ - 1O�UFFE ING YARD (TYP.) \\\ •• / 4 (TYP 100i\ CRE \ - '-"'a,,,.--i N-�6y�-- \'`• J >� / EXSTN DRAINAGE ,--' ?OiY AND UTILIT EASEMENT k- • / I �- - - - _-120 -- -- - -- - -- 884227"W 459.52~ J R50' t_ R50' R' jjj�� -`•` R50' r , / / ill { (JJ O '` t RETAINING WALL '♦� EXISTING {\ \ \ DRAINAGE & ♦♦ \ UTILITY EASEMENT 26 ti 7.5' / TYP /I •i 9 18 N 18' /ryti TYP / Ilk l �I J ' t 7 �r r { 1 r t t i P I 1 t I I 1 4t 1 0' AMA MU 1 j UIL ING SE K 1 i i 1 I t i ( 0' INI UM UIL ING SE K ! i 1 11 I I 11 1 i i 8 - ' i ET ININ i AL t 1 / • r SITE r `♦ VICINITY MAP SITE 1� NOT TO SCALE PYL N SECTION 114, TOWNSHIP 116N, RANGE 23W t SIGN SITE PLAN NOTES r 1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF ALL PROPERTY CORNERS. 1 444 1 i 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER, CONCRETE, AND PAVEMENT TO EXISTING IN i GRADE AND ALIGNMENT. { f 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT & CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS { d (SEE DEMO PLAN). { 4. THE EARTHWORK FOR ALL BUILDING FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH JJ J 5. SPECIFICATIONS. . CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ACTUAL BUILDING AND SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS, J PORCH AND RAMP LOCATIONS. w { 6. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, ADJUSTMENT, OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS DESIGNATED ON PLANS. d g 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PIPE BOLLARDS FOR PROTECTION OF ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES AND { APPURTENANCES IN DRIVE AREAS. r { 8. { CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ACTUAL LOCATION OF O• ` ALL UTILITY ENTRANCES, TO INCLUDE, SANITARY SEWER LATERALS, DOMESTIC AND FIRE PROTECTION WATER SERVICE, ELECTRICAL, AND TELEPHONE SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION c { / { OF UTILITIES IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO AVOID CONFLICTS AND ASSURE PROPER DEPTHS ARE ACHIEVED, AS WELL AS COORDINATE WITH ANY UTILITY COMPANIES FOR APPROVED LOCATIONS AND SCHEDULING OF {{ { TIE-INS/CONNECTIONS TO THEIR FACILITIES. { 9. { CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. �• 1 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING THE DAMAGE DONE TO ANY EXISTING ITEM DURING { { CONSTRUCTION, SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DRAINAGE, UTILITIES, PAVEMENT, STRIPING, CURB, ETC. * ' { REPAIRS SHALL BE EQUAL TO, OR BETTER THAN, EXISTING CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO DOCUMENT ALL EXISTING DAMAGE AND NOTIFY WAL-MART CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO / CONSTRUCTION START. �•! { / { { 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL TOUCH-UP PAINT (EX. COLOR) ON ALL FIRE HYDRANTS AND CURBS WHICH ARE / CURRENTLY PAINTED. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BASE BID. / 12. SITEWORK FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE "WALMART SITEWORK SPECIFICATIONS", UNLESS SPECIFIED ELSEWHERE. { 13. 1 CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE OR RELOCATE, WHEN APPLICABLE, ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS, FOUNDATIONS, BASEMENTS, CONNECTING IMPROVEMENTS, DRAIN PIPES, SANITARY SEWER PIPES, POWER POLES, AND GUY { - WIRES, WATER METERS AND WATER LINES, WELLS, SIDEWALKS, SIGN POLES, UNDERGROUND GAS, SEPTIC TANKS, AND ASPHALT, SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN, WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AND WHERE NEEDED,TO / ALLOW, FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN. / 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS IN DISPOSING OF I DEMOLISHED MATERIALS REMOVED FROM THIS SITE. / 15. ALL PAINT USED FOR PARKING STRIPING SHALL BE PER WALMART SPECIFICATIONS. / 16. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 1 17. CART CORRALS TO BE PROVIDED BY WALMART. ASSEMBLY AND INSTALLATION TO BE DONE BY ' CONTRACTOR. 18. PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING SHALL MEET THE CITY'S CODES AND ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES 1 IN EFFECT AT THE ME. TIME. 1 THE MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE DICTATES STANDARD ACCESSIBLE AND VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES I19. SHALL BE 8' WIDE NTH AN 8' WALKWAY. 1 20. 1 REFER TO ARCH. PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ELECTRICAL PLANS. I 1 DATA LEGEND LOCATION: SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23W 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ADDRESS: 1000 PARK ROAD j j j CHANHASSEN, MN t ZONING DISTRICT: IOP, INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK DISTRICT kli LAND USE: COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TOTAL SITE AREA: 14.11 AC. J. ROAD __-_-----------------PARK-__--------------_i6_ - ---------- 7 1 JtT V 1 1 t It, MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT: 4 STORIES/OR 50'- (WHICHEVER IS LESS) PROPOSED HEIGHT: 1 STORY/35'"\ REQ'D MIN. BUILDING SETBACKS PROVIDED MIN. BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT (HWY 5): 70' FRONT (HWY 5): 70' OFRONT (POWERS): 50' FRONT (POWERS): 100' PROPOSED REQ'D MAX. BUILDING SETBACKS PROVIDED MAX. BUILDING SETBACKS ` I SIGNAL FRONT (HWY 5): 150, FRONT (HWY 5): 70' FRONT (POWERS): 100' FRONT (POWERS): 100' ♦♦ REQUIRED LANDSCAPE: 20,951 SF (87 OF VEHICULAR USE AREA) ♦` PROVIDED LANDSCAPE: 34,195 SF (qN5bF VEHICULAR USE AREA) f� 1j •p4� 1 1 ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE CALL ONE MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: ALL WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 15 PROPOSED STANDARD PARKING SPACES 15 PROPOSED COMPACT PARKING SPACES -. CART CORRAL (SEE DETAIL SHEET) - - - - PROPERTY LINE - - - BUILDING SETBACK LINE - - - - - - - - EXISTING CURB PROPOSED CURB HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT COMPACT PARKING STALLS (7.5'x18') ARCHITECTURAL APRON 12 [ ..T14 WALMART PARKING DATA TABLE PROPOSED WALMART BUILDING AREA 117,278 S.F. STANDARD PARKING 11 399 COMPACT PARKING (1Tv ACCESSIBLE PARKING TS** CART CORRALS(10) 20 SPACES/ WALMART PARKING 528* PARKING RATIO* 4.50/1000 S.F. *EXCLUDES CART CORRALS ** # OF ADA STALLS WAS CALCULATED USING A MEDIAN AGE OF 35 = 29+2 In z 0 w Of z C a^ �• 6UNp �mmiS NV, U mW 13�x T Y�m �Z$ ®mod Om V V) O w = n 00 U-) F ¢ Y W O U Cn z LEI \`mw3 WW�g a EL (n LYLI a6o Z H aW¢w m m¢D o m <w<w <- x�1< -0 d�(Z-7 JN yy J wzw 3:0 wa-< M wrnZ¢� v302,n in 5;EnZ W¢ww? Waaa0� wVo 0 )(La 0 U m I- U U 0 Z m m N m o w ¢ w Z Z 2 3 Y ¢ yr ¢ w n O 0 U L.L Lu VJ 1..1- Z G W IIIICL H O (A Z W Z W < Q q I Z rn TZ it U � LL1 %t CDCD c:) V� U) y r L w LLJ U DATE 09 30 2011 PROJECT NO. 116199062 SHEET NUMBER 6040 ME T J7 E 0- O O O 0 N F- w w 0A CONCEPTUAL PUD PLAN SUBMITTAL FOR Walmart:;: #594911111111111111100 LOCATED AT COUNTY RD 17 (POWERS BLVD) &PARK ROAD CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 023 PARCEL ID# = 255660010 OWNER/DEVELOPER DAVID COX, AIA WAL-MART STORES INC. SAM WALTON DEVELOPMENT CENTER, DEPT. 8703 2001 S.E. 10TH STREET #0550 BENTONVILLE, ARKANSAS 72716-0550 (479)273-4000 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER STEVE MARTIN, PE BRAUNINTERTEC CORPORATION 1826 BUERKLE ROAD SAINT PAUL, MN 55110 (651)487-3245 FAX (651) 487-1812 VICINITY NORTH N.T.S. PROJECT TEAM ARCHITECT JACKOLYN COOK-HAXBY, AIA BENHAM COMPANIES 60 EAST PLATO BLVD, SUITE 300 SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55107 (651)209-2873 FAX (651) 778-3911 ENVIRONMENTAL/HAZARDOUS MATERIALS JIM DELUCA / GREGG KRUSE BRAUNINTERTEC COPRORATION 11001 HAMPSHIRE AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOILS, MN 55438 (952) 995-2000 FAX (952) 995-2020 PREPARED BY: PROJECT LOCATION CIVIL ENGINEER WILLIAM D. MATZEK, P.E. KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 345N SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114 (651)645-4197 FAX (651) 645-5116 C❑ Kimley-Horn m and Associates, Inc. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TODD HALUNEN,RLA KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 345N SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114 (651)645-4197 FAX (651) 645-5116 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED SEP 3 0 2011 CHANHASSEN PLA14MNG DEPT Sheet List Table 6010 COVER SHEET 6040 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: THE SITEWORK FOR THE WALMART PORTION OF THIS PROJECT SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE "SITE SPECIFIC SPECIFICATIONS." 2. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO CONTRACT COMPLETION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE, ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE CALL ONE MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 (10 z 0 W > W I n :tea a �'m V sn�4Z <NnW �FNz ❑ ibex b Y <E F- O~ U O W zw = ~ Cr) n O� l0 F ¢ } w O � U_ 'w �w3 W d wwc)¢ ape nZ, Jw IY o 2 JOp~ z mw¢W < U nmgZ z Im-mUJI ¢� o Of Q ON Q F z J r w p zw J w �.Z W 1L ¢ J ¢ 3o N� O<OzO O) O r3u52w m5; z woof w =w�0w ¢ —af 0m 0 p I-- 3 0 m r r m V) W Q p w z m ZZ O Y ¢ N W N p U U w Lu U Of LI Q U DATE 09/30/2011 PROJECT NO. 116199062 SHEET NUMBER 6010 CCI1 NORTH- WETLAND AND UPLAND Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 0 75 150 PRESERVATION AREAS Feet Z-a i M3 mm 133N5 y E90681911 ` ON 193 IIOL Bl 1/4 ll - 31Y0 y > 9 (.n O \I 3 O o iC d 1 CID# D 03M 1 A X Z s o O = y o D � O (1) s m Z > Z ! � y A i m m T I v ] mA I V o z O I I m D I i O I � 3 WN`JIS : I 03SOdOad g m R N� I � � � � ,� ,�• � .T JOL JOa — o dod Yd VC/ 'gill — -------- — --� U...1%' —-----4�v2iz�i— h 3 � S !s%� ❑ I I I � ¢eG I l 9NI M 1N3N Vd MI"M J y SNOWN INO"Vd 0350dJtld _ iN311O0 H BNfq O350dOLd� wmm A MONO3 6£OdOw ON3031 HO1ON ' i i ul L-1 � OBI ,Y1 m X_ 7 A ;o z 10 0 = 6 > > 00(j) m Z Z m m m O X_ W D Z �o D m m Ito i `nyy 99 �g $.F' � F _ $� (rmr sn xrroo, n z cis) s uozi xrsurn mmun musses (rsx an mows n s ao e) s xz oz 3msuln enxux muva d�9� s inzse vwr an Sou. tl1tlO 311S ui+ ins / r 0 11 m� 3wavm crasx ��\ gig � y sn Sou NI}lON 3n u1pSYt €e a GN3S31 1 Mfg 3ONY8'N911 dI WOl '*it NOM33S I...... Ll 91 91 u r) i R ' � 9 i " R 8 O 9 91K-SN (l99) ON '%Yd L511-919 (1S9) 'ON 'l31 1LL99 Yl0S3NNM '1nVd '1S N9TZ Ml% 41SW '3NV Ai6NWNn OSSZ 'oul `salupossy pue uaOH-AalwiN �1f ool os sz o l LOZ 819MAON NW LN3SS`dHNVHD Nbld 31lS 00 1 . liewlem fT MOl/OSY -029 SLv� 02 KI n ur ss 9u'ul NIVW38 0133M1 ONUSIX3 u aunt, XIW 13NV3AIIVN - SIVINN3H3d/SBnaHS 33811tl1N3WtlNa0 33u1 SnonaIOMlWWS 331l1 N3380a3A3 >tf 33N1 ANO1Sa3AO ONID11 I I1 I IS ONlalin8 Nnw N W .Os I III IS ONlallne lwnfvW .Oo L r/ M f' • t I J- A - J J y! ly S s$10OVlnolHal8 NI 1HOla o3SOdOad OVOiI )4ul/d -? - - y 1 t �s; LEI10 � i9 r 1 oa sMZCS.-aid O / % T-S OLZ'LLL bON-NON-OM J m 00-6665 Al DUMS liewlem C / NOIS NOIAd - - - O.usn....9,01vitll 7110 aroaab, . r�� (dAl) SllV1S ONINaVd 10Vd W00 / `\7 \ NOV913S 9M(nna WnWI"Vl ffiI NOV8I3S ONIOIInS WOWINIW .OL - y 3loNtllal lHOls SS300tl lln3 a3SOdOad is ID GaVA — C a3adns1Noa39z�.� t' 1 I\ (dAl) 30N3 e' C S IIVM ONINIV138 C Y� 1 . ^) C (a11) 31nOa NOna1 \—� 833lne aNv113M.OZ to NOVe13S GN i3AA SL I� -NOIIV3NI130.,4,,,M ( \ 1 CC II 1 i70 IC 0 1 1 I _ eCJ � :JJ• I r -10 0 0 PnEL TPuIEt _. _,. ...__.. Froni tievaiuon Real urvauvu Rlynt uevauvn Lett Elevation WaImart ��■■tee November 21, 2011 Chanhassen, MN 5949-00 Flom science to stvtmata Sign Qtv Heiaht Sn Ft Tre�l H Ft Imart rk z 2 5'-6• 8'-V 298.00 — ;59;6rket & Pharmacy 1 2-W 10258 Total: 69"6 DESIGN REPRESE NTNT ION ONLY NOT t OR CONSTR LIC TION The hill Id images shown area representation of the current design intent only. The building images may not 191, variations in coloc Wine, hue, tint shading, ambient light intensity, materials, texture,contrast, hunt style. construction variations required by building codes or inspectors. material availability or final design deRnIng. _ Walmart:;: Market & Pharmacy 17 Walmart:;: WaImart:;"fto °' November 21, 2011 Chanhassen, MN 5949-00 A�AF--■M�O From Science fo Solut ons Perspective DESIGN REPRESENTATION ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION The budihn,noges shown are a representation of the current design intent only. The buildng images may not reflect variations in color tone. hue. Ind. shading. ambient light intensity, malenals.te[ture,contrast. font style. construction variations reignited by building codes or inspectors, material availability or final design detailing. WaImart �r�; r® November 21, 2011 Chanhassen, MN 5949-00 Perspective 4 From Science to Solutions DESIGN REPRESENTATION ONLY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION The building images shown ore i representation of the current design intent only. The building images may not reflect variations in color. tone. hue, tint shading, ambient light Intensity, nuterials, texture, contrast, font style, construction variations required by building codes or Inspectors. material availability or final design detailing. WaImart:;% ��■■�® November 21, 2011 Chanhassen, MN 5949-00 From Scietrce to Solutions Perspective DESIGN REPRESENTATION ONLY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION The building images shown area represeneaoon of the current design intent only.ihe Wlldmg images .,WI reflect variations in color. tone, hue, tint. shading. ambient light intensity, materials. Wriere, contrast, font style, construction variations required by building codes or inspectors, material availability or final design detailing. Walmart:;: =' November 21, 2011 Chanhassen, MN 5949-00 Perspective 6 �A■.�® From Sdenoe to solutions DESIGN RE PRESENTATION ONLY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION the bmldmg Images shown are a representation of the current design intent only. The building images may not reflect vanatcro In color, tone, hue, tint, shading, ambrent fight Intensity, materials, texture, contrast, font styli construction variations required by building codes or inspectors. material availability or final design detailing, • �.• r I f e J- �� 4• r ,i .I, Acres %of Site Site 14.1 I Existing Tree Canopy' 1.93 14% Existing Tree Canopy to Remain 0.96 7% Proposed Tree Canopy Replacement 4.5 32% 15, Required Tree Canopy per City Code 1.41 10%Total Onsite Tree Canopy' 5.46 39% .'-Tree Canopyexcludes wetland area per City Code CMII NORTH NATURAL RESOURCES Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 0 75 150 Feet AA E O 0 N M CL In 0 0 CONCEPTUAL PUD PLAN SUBMITTAL Walmart:;: #594911111111111100 In Z O N W D_ LOCATED AT z COUNTY RD 17 (POWERS BLVD) & PARK ROAD =d a�m CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA_� �w O yNyY� 3� SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 023 " 6 PARCEL ID# = 255660010 ®` TK s of 1 r, �„ _ b^ ir. -.r ......➢ \y� / y¢= V� o Hnrrlson EPGLE R .� b�, WG" GLo- Lnke a SEH eLA. J KE W�� A. Ln L t c 76.{Hy y, AR. CASCADE CIR. bqc D ]] L' ,. A9. StbSTA CIR. E. rT t p ]K g d+ HARRI U yD, 5lNSTA CIR. E. �`T HRITIAG V7 HILL 51. DLYNPIC CIA. �L1L 13 ➢R, 52. CASTLE RIDGE CT. LmcA LA. GUNFLINT RED FOR 53. CASTLE RIDGE �j9' c 9 FRONIIfR CT. ti' G CIA. 6A. BROKENAVAJDR 'l�O`N�TIAG ]L CQlC ,7 Y 9P" R K W. BROKE ARROW DR. Y " CT, 66. RED WING CT. CKAPARRAL ➢q. 69. PDM eZ c � Lake Ann SSE15 Ac z cr b R.� JAY CIR. Y8 CT, >'i� L� SADp' C?� f a 1 b UDDN COAL �CCHIPPEW '7 m OR.CIR. TRCI➢Ff tlR. RwS D. CHAN ASSEN GG 90. U INE CI RIDGE CT, A IASANT CIA. ]A.CICLEte 1990 POP 11,732 ip1 J PL W. 76VTg ST. MANTA FE TF y•u V. GAGE ,yJ w NGFON CT. - y pR. CM�1p@i�Y, WAY Q SAN 4 s < a W WATTERS LE ST. Gr F A-, ARDORETUN QI y Si. C p6W e 4 '10� `$�yt }CENJER 71 t ice' dtLLYNN PARKR F Sr H qe, CT. �VQ PICHA OR Ad PAM Y M. S[. GULTER ➢LW� CSC C DLV➢. <r (SNHER-0OD !�fV III E SEXLNQ➢R• pL` I23. POVERS PL P d f LUK `OD DR. qr�D I e'` �'`� ➢R I = o r TR •'. `Y i u ,p VIEW 25k .�' r y♦ LM(E CT. CRE iR. CJRC'pfEK RENAi `ANCE CT. `Rl �' Yl �' �!% u x Lake Sus i 44 •�g5 0C S� HERON 4t. 'a LAKE 109, c C MIVE CT. ,� ]P NISSDRY ; 1GL vr* J NACLAR➢,q GT. 19uNy� o J4 4'qt CT.�i n�Q�yyDGE T. 1 J �v cin A+T. < '�' ^� e6th ST OWNER/DEVELOPER DAVID COX, AIA WAL-MART STORES INC. SAM WALTON DEVELOPMENT CENTER, DEPT. 8703 2001 S. E. 10TH STREET #0550 BENTONVILLE, ARKANSAS 72716-0550 (479) 273-4000 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER STEVE MARTIN, PE BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 1826 BUERKLE ROAD SAINT PAUL, MN 55110 (651) 487-3245 FAX (651) 487-1812 VICINITY N.T.S. �oPTH PROJECT TEAM ARCHITECT JACKOLYN COOK-HAXBY, AIA BENHAM COMPANIES 60 EAST PLATO BLVD., SUITE 300 SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55107 (651)209-2873 FAX (651) 778-3911 J I M DELUCA / GREGG KRUSE BRAUN INTERTECOOPRORATION 11001 HAMPSHIRE AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOILS, MN 55438 (952)995-2000 FAX (952) 995-2020 PREPARED BY: 1 AL w PROJECT LOCATION CIVIL ENGINEER WILLIAM D. MATZEK, P.E. KIM LEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 345N SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114 (651) 645-4197 FAX (651) 645-5116 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TODD HALUNEN, RLA KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 345N SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114 (651)645-4197 FAX (651) 645-5116 Sheet List Table 6010 COVER SHEET 6040 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: 1. THE SITEWORK FOR THE WALMART PORTION OF THIS PROJECT SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE "SITE SPECIFIC SPECIFICATIONS." 2. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO CONTRACT COMPLETION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE CALL ONE MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 H_ � U V) w O 01 oz - it Lo In w rw3 LL a 0u Lu ILOJ In j Jw x LLJY D Z aoo� � OL_ W Q W < J n Z Z �mQ Q Q O Q W Q ON —1 Fa<z 30 of Z¢ r III 3Cj0 \ } vI y w GO H S n Z w K K W � U-1 0f (n ofao 0 U U � O Z m } } m V) o m o ¢ w w z S n Q o Q F- 0 f/I Z W Z Lu Z U Q 2 O /C:) vi Z q Lr 2 � � C) < U�/JJ LL Q O /% O ddd/ Nm r m Ea: a U DATE 09 30 2011 PROJECT NO. 116199062 SHEET NUMBER 6010 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 J 7 601 10 12 13 1 14 1 15 1 16 17 021 i C u E F E G 0 0 po O — N a rn N N a H O O r 0 50 100 T I � SCALE FEET I 4V- I� EXCEPT/0N `'-1 a��, -'� ��— 14s.7s' . — SM7924or 19f j7 N88174 j 44 207.28 _ oo, BALE & PALLET / / /• / Qp RECYCLE AREA / /. rn /i•/ 4. i ` '• '• _-------_---T / / l COMPACTOR TRUCK 'A TYP _ I RETAINING WALL ,I I (I / II I I `� / 1 I 1 I•. `II 3 1 I TYP I L ITSIOF WETLAND / COMPRESSOR 1 I \ I \ \ EXISTING D INAGE AND \ \ / ENCLOSURE 1 I \\ UTIUTY EA EMENT ` \\ \ / zs' (TYP.) 337.9' I \ \ R RZO, — — I > ` TYP / �! / \\\\ \\\ p LIMITS Q W1 LAND 1 i \\\\ \\\. 12 9.5' -' I \ Z y' 1 1 v10' UIFE YARDWITH \\ 100% CRE NG (TYP.) \\1 •• N&ram- �1.,. 1 �3 s 8Tw TE PARK ROAD ------- -• 41 --•—`%•---' J 1 1� / , , , IW I IU DUHLt SECTION 114, TOWNSHIP 116N, RANGE 23W SITE PLAN NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF ALL PROPERTY CORNERS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER, CONCRETE, AND PAVEMENT TO EXISTING IN GRADE AND ALIGNMENT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT & CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS (SEE DEMO PLAN). 4. THE EARTHWORK FOR ALL BUILDING FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ACTUAL BUILDING AND SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS, PORCH AND RAMP LOCATIONS. / 6. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH APPROPRIATE UTIUTY COMPANIES PRIOR TO / CONSTRUCTION, ADJUSTMENT, OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS DESIGNATED ON PLANS. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PIPE BOLLARDS FOR PROTECTION OF ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES IN DRIVE AREAS. B. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ACTUAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITY ENTRANCES, TO INCLUDE, SANITARY SEWER LATERALS, DOMESTIC AND FIRE PROTECTION / WATER SERVICE, ELECTRICAL, AND TELEPHONE SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO AVOID CONFLICTS AND ASSURE PROPER DEPTHS ARE ACHIEVED, AS WELL AS COORDINATE WITH ANY UTILITY COMPANIES FOR APPROVED LOCATIONS AND SCHEDULING OF TIE-INS/CONNECTIONS TO THEIR FACILITIES. / 9. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. • t/ 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING THE DAMAGE DONE TO ANY EXISTING ITEM DURING / CONSTRUCTION, SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DRAINAGE, UTILITIES, PAVEMENT, STRIPING, CURB, ETC. ' REPAIRS SHALL BE EQUAL TO, OR BETTER THAN, EXISTING CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO DOCUMENT ALL EXISTING DAMAGE AND NOTIFY WAL-MART CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO • / CONSTRUCTION START. / / • j 11, CONTRACTOR SHALL TOUCH-UP PAINT (EX. COLOR) ON ALL FIRE HYDRANTS AND CURBS WHICH ARE CURRENTLY PAINTED. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BASE BID. 12. SITEWORK FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE "WALMART SITEWORK SPECIFICATIONS", UNLESS SPECIFIED ELSEWHERE. 13. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE OR RELOCATE, WHEN APPLICABLE, ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS, FOUNDATIONS, BASEMENTS, CONNECTING IMPROVEMENTS, DRAIN PIPES, SANITARY SEWER PIPES, POWER POLES, AND GUY WIRES, WATER METERS AND WATER LINES, WELLS, SIDEWALKS, SIGN POLES, UNDERGROUND GAS, SEPTIC TANKS, AND ASPHALT, SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN, WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AND WHERE NEEDED,TO / ALLOW FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN. 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS IN DISPOSING OF / DEMOLISHED MATERIALS REMOVED FROM THIS SITE. / 15. ALL PAINT USED FOR PARKING STRIPING SHALL BE PER WALMART SPECIFICATIONS. / 16. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. / 17. CART CORRALS TO BE PROVIDED BY WALMART. ASSEMBLY AND INSTALLATION TO BE DONE BY ' CONTRACTOR. 18. PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING SHALL MEET THE CITYS CODES AND ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES / IN EFFECT AT THE TIME. r 19. THE MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE DICTATES STANDARD ACCESSIBLE AND VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE 8' WIDE WITH AN 8' WALKWAY. / 20. REFER TO ARCH. PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ELECTRICAL PLANS. I I I 01-= rkATA LOCATION: SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23W ADDRESS: 1000 PARK ROAD CHANHASSEN, MN ZONING DISTRICT: IOP, INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK DISTRICT LAND USE: COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TOTAL SITE AREA: 14.11 AC. MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT: 4 STORIES/OR 50' (WHICHEVER IS LESS) PROPOSED HEIGHT: 1 STORY/35' REO'D MIN, BUILDING SETBACKS PROVIDED MIN. BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT (HWY 5): 70' FRONT (HWY 5): 70' FRONT (POWERS): 50' FRONT (POWERS): 100' REO'D MAX. BUILDING SETBACKS PROVIDED MAX. BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT (HWY 5): 150' FRONT (HWY 5): 70' FRONT (POWERS): 100' FRONT (POWERS): 100' REQUIRED LANDSCAPE: 20,951 SF (8% OF VEHICULAR USE AREA) PROVIDED LANDSCAPE: 34,195 SF (13% OF VEHICULAR USE AREA) THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE CALL ONE MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 00, ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: ALL WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. \r ' LEGEND 15 PROPOSED STANDARD PARKING SPACES 15 PROPOSED COMPACT PARKING SPACES CART CORRAL (SEE DETAIL SHEET) PROPERTY LINE — — — — BUILDING SETBACK LINE - _ - EXISTING CURB PROPOSED CURB HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT COMPACT PARKING STALLS (7.5'x1B') ARCHITECTURAL APRON WALMART PARKING DATA TABLE DDAD^crn WALMART BUILDING AREA 117,278 S.F. STANDARD PARKING 399 COMPACT PARKING 116 ACCESSIBLE PARKING 13** CART CORRALS(10) 20 SPACES WALMART PARKING 528* PARKING RATIO* 4.50/1000 S.F. *EXCLUDES CART CORRALS ** # OF ADA STALLS WAS CALCULATED USING A MEDIAN AGE OF 35 = 2%+2 a a In z 0 rn w Of �N jug! N �NY'y ic his i ®q� n a 0 U O z w Io o - In UmTV10 w 0w3 d w w U g ape 0 Q0O IV z �� Q U d 2 Q Ld J Noma z rma� awaW <� � ¢ O JN 6 p J Faaw 3:0 �i<vzo 3 — p w tn O m F s N z Wmcir irinao U U � U U p O 3 z m } > m fn p m o Q w w z w U ¢ N ¢ w Z CL V / I..V Z �wN 1..1� H Z W Z_ Q Q 0 ZLo LL _ W U < W %I Q O v ) V � L r Q U DATE 09 30 2011 PROJECT NO. 116199062 SHEET NUMBER 6040 PRE -CAST PANEL "RED BRYAN" _ QUIK-BRIK "PROMENADE BLEND" BY OLDCASTLE Front Elevation PRE -CAST PANEL Rear Elevation RiCJ, 11l C1eVdlIV11 AWNING TO MATCH "BROWN PRE -CAST PANEL "BUFF" BRONZE" BY BERRIDGE '. NONE ■ iii ONE iii iii iii iii iii DDF_CAAT PANFI INTEGRALLY COLORED SPLIT FArF rw I nl nrARTI F YAK" Left Elevation Wa I m a r t .�f,.� - rr BE r® From Science to Solutions GLASS �*SPANDRELGLASS DLtNU UT ULUUHJ I LC PRE -CAST PANEL r* ^DI I=, June 21, 2011 EIFS SW 2823 "ROCKWOOD CLAY" INTEGRALLY COLORED CMU SPLIT FACE STANDARD COLOR #192 DLDNU DT I_)LUUNJ I LC Chanhassen, MN 5949-00 QUIK-BRIK "PROMENADE BLEND" BY OLDCASTLE EIFS SW 7689 F"ROW HOUSE TAN" A PRE -CAST PANEL PANEL SYSTEM TRESPA M ETEON METALLIC "DARK BROWN" EIFS SW 6095 "TOASTY" PRE -CAST PANEL "RFn RPVAN" PANEL SYSTEM TRESPA METEON "COBBLE BROWN" INTEGRALLY COLORED CMU SPLIT FACE STANDARD COLOR #192 PRE -CAST PANEL r "BUFF" QUIK-BRIK "PROMENADE BLEND" BY OLDCASTLE PRE -CAST PANEL PRE -CAST PANEL F"BUFF" PRE -FINISHED METAL SLAT AWNINGS SW6258 "TRICORN BLACK" PRE -CAST PANEL "RED BRYAN" INTEGRALLY COLORED SPLIT INTEGRALLY COLORED FACE CMU OLDCASTLE "CEDAR" CMU SPLIT FACE STANDARD COLOR #192 INTEGRALLY COLORED SPLIT FACE CMU OLDCASTLE "OAK' Sign VItz L--- *SPANDREL GLASS INTEGRALLY COLORED SPLIT FACE CMU OLDCASTLE "OAK" Qty Height Sq.Ft Total Sq.Ft almart Spark 2 2 5'-6" 8'-0" 298.00 596.00 Market & Pharmacy 1 2'-6" 102.58 102.58 Total: 1 698.58 DESIGN REPRESENTATION ONLY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION The building images shown are a representation of the current design intent only.The building images may not reflect variations in color, tone, hue, tint, shading, ambient light intensity, materials, texture, contrast, font style, construction variations required by building codes or inspectors, material availability or final design detailing. Market & PharmaCy f .m Exit J � _ a %140 Walmart #,% _AMbmr.:. From Science to Solutions June 21, 2011 Chanhassen, MN 5949-00 Perspective 5 DESIGN REPRESENTATION ONLY -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION The building images shown area representation of the current design intent only. The building images may not reflect variations in color, tone, hue, tint, shading, ambient light intensity, materials, texture, contrast, font style, construction variations required by building codes or inspectors, material availability or final design detailing. �!!'ti �a4�n.rxrar11A1��F Market & Pharmacy y -v =Exft rIL . ,.�pw r i Y Walmart%.k.'* Aw .k v it p ai J ! 'es t s S n Wa "In Front Elevation Hear tlevation 11911k OCVdtiUll Lett tlevation WaImart June 21, 2011 Chanhassen, MN 5949 00 rmisawo rosakm>x Sin Q Htl M 5 .Ft Taal 5 .FI Iman 2 5'6' 29800 598.00 102.58 10258 Te k m" Walmart>;: L�1 rr June 21, 2011 I Chanhassen, MN 5949-00 Perspectives 2 Ra1HlNpbBlYm RYLnpfVd5LN1Ai CA!NI'.1 I(I IJY::IyC:[INln1,r.:.1.rW riYo`4�.w�nen..enm4vn�f'bu.... ,"yn m,mrcM.lrvl :IM.r'M-�rry�n .'F r: ..n�r�r .rr.i..rr.v r�i..�r L riii .i �Y �r..i .ir. rt i. r.r:ir i. � r...n r.nr :i Ylr��l�ir..i�i.. nr�. ii .- Walmart Fa a.rvm msaua. June 21,2011 Chanhassen, MN 5949-00 Perspective ilUx xn lwtl„ uw.v ..r vrerarru v.u., re...� Jenur rn rrvr rW r.�+,m rry +r inr.++r.n.,w v.. n,Wr awl v4 u, W.�u4u rrrr nr. r r, ar .. ,y r...r.a.x. u+ +rw.. lrluJ x,. iln. uwa r.,,,ev yr vin rv+ WaImart :;: _ nom sow roxmmr. June21,2011 Chanhassen, MN5949-00 R INIIrcCUNrVrrwnY.umreeravownLu, _, w�.Jn.wr�.nw r�N.�o LEI Perspective q .........n♦. ..r.U+o-v oJbr Lr Nrnr.rJnn rynt w+ ..wJ rnl lr lr. v.nr, JeYY�r��r Walmart r;L ;�. June21,2011 Chanhassen, MN5949-00 Perspective n.. .I -I , I,,I,I , ,r .,.. , ., y ,, ,WL. a.n, L. X1, vv,e, --� . -1 u.e — I, p , .,n.n ,.: n, Wu.,Ntu0 uvrc, v, v,i Ovn Ja l'aulu u, ■ Traffic Impact Analysis Walmart (Store #5949-00) Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared for: Walmart Stores, Inc. Bentonville, Arkansas Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. St. Paul, Minnesota ©Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. May 2011 116199062 C = Fj Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CITY Orr}IANHASSEN r MAY 2 6 2911 ENGINEERING DEPT. SCANNED [1 Traffic Impact Analysis I ' Walmart (Store #5949-00) Chanhassen, Minnesota 1 1 1 Prepared for: Walmart Stores, Inc. Bentonville, Arkansas ' Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ' St. Paul, Minnesota ' I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my difZct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State f Annesota. ' By: Brian K malk , P.E. ' License No. 47531 Date: S 610 I7A l 1 ' Kimle -Horn y and Associates, Inc. Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis Chanhassen, Minnesota Introduction Walmart Stores, Inc. is proposing the construction of a new store, number 5949-00, near the southwest quadrant of the Arboretum Boulevard (Trunk Highway 5) and Powers ' Boulevard (CSAH 17) intersection in Chanhassen, Minnesota (see Figure 1). The project is anticipated to be completed by the year 2013, and will include retail and E2Eery land uses on a vacant industrial parcel. The proposed development site plan is shown in Figure 2. The purpose of this report is to document the anticipated traffic impacts that the change in land use at the proposed Walmart site will have on the surrounding roadway network intersections. ' This traffic impact analysis (TIA) represents a review of traffic impacts of the project, based on land use and site plan information, and is intended to identify the key traffic ' issues associated with the project. This TIA documents the existing traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site, estimates the traffic anticipated to be generated by the project, distributes and assigns these trips to the adjacent roadway system, and evaluates the traffic operations of key intersections near the site and those providing access to and from the site. In order to have a basis of comparison, a "no -build" analysis was completed for ' each future scenario that includes the general background growth on the adjacent roadways as well as traffic generated by other possible development adjacent to the project. Based on the analysis, the TIA evaluates roadway and/or traffic control mitigation measures to accommodate future traffic levels in the system and whether these mitigation tmeasures are triggered by background growth or the proposed project. 1 1 1 May 2011 h ri f N FIGURE 1: Site Location ^ f o zoo zoo aoa C I 1 Kinley-Horn r{ 0 Feet and Associates, Inc. G c 0 SO LOD ft FIGURE 2: Site Plan ft 0 Y4 f EM" KWq-Ho; m and Assocales, Inc '' _ FIy Kimle -Horn Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis and Associates, Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota Study Area The project site is bounded by Arboretum Boulevard (TH 5) on the north, Powers Boulevard on the east, and Park Road on the south. The proposed development will include an up to 120,209 square -foot Walmart store. Current nearby land uses are a mix of office and industrial. Access to the site will be provided via the two existing driveways on Park Road, with a southbound turn lane constructed on the west driveway. The segment of Park Road between Powers Boulevard and the west driveway will be reconfigured to accommodate westbound right turn lanes at the driveways as well as an eastbound left turn lane at the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard and a westbound left turn lane at the west driveway. A center median will divide the two directions of travel. Data Collection PM peak hour turning movement counts were collected on Tuesday, February 8, 2011 and Wednesday, February 9, 2011 for the following study intersections: • Arboretum Boulevard (TH 5) & Powers Boulevard • Park Road & Powers Boulevard (12-hour count) • Park Road & East Driveway • Park Road & West Driveway Figure 3 displays the existing lane geometry and traffic control for the intersections in the study area. Figure 4 summarizes the existing turning movement volumes for the PM peak hour conditions; volumes were balanced among the four intersections. See Appendix A for the raw turning movement count data. ■ May 2011 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lJ 1 11 1 Kimle Horn Walmart(Stora#5949-00) y Traffic Impact Analysis and Associates. Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota ' Trip Generation The Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, a Edition, was used to calculate the anticipated net new external project trips for the proposed development. A 120,209 square -foot free-standing discount superstore (land use code 813) was used to ' determine the total number of trips generated by the site. Total pass -by trip reduction was determined to be 28%. Of the total calculated pass -by trips, 70 percent, 20 percent, ' and 10 percent were assumed to originate on Arboretum Boulevard, Powers Boulevard, Park Road, and respectively. Existing non -vehicular travel was examined in the TMCs and determined to be negligible; therefore, no reductions were made for transit use or pedestrian travel. The trip generation for the proposed project with adjustments for pass -by trips is shown in ' Table 1. The proposed site is anticipated to generate 554 trips (271 entering, 283 exiting) for the PM peak hour. 1 1 1 1 V3y 2011 1 Table I Trlp Generation PM Peak Hour Land Use 0 land Use Size Units Formula Total TripsEnter Exit P"S-bv Net New EKmrnal Tri Puts by Tohl Pass -by TripsEnder Pass -by Trtps Pass -by Tripe Endt Total Ender Eiit 813 Free-StandingDiscount Superstore 120.209 KSF T-4.61X 554 271 1 283 28.IP/ 155 76 79 399 195 20a 0 chi I L 1 [] 1 3 ;' Kimle y Horn Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis and Associates. Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota Future Traffic Projections Project buildout is expected to be in 2013. Linear growth of 1.8 percent per year was applied to the counts to obtain background traffic for the year 2013. This growth is based on historical annual average daily traffic (AADT) on Powers Boulevard and Arboretum Boulevard since 2001. The 2013 no build peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 5. To obtain background traffic estimates for 2030, however, it was determined that 1.8 percent linear growth per year was an unreasonable estimate over a 17 year period. Instead, average annual growth on Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard was obtained from the Carver County Travel Demand Model over the 30 year period from 2000 to 2030 due to its basis in census data, local comprehensive plans, and established estimates. A linear growth of 0.5 percent per year was determined and then applied to the balanced 2013 estimates to establish a baseline estimate for 2030. ' Growth from demand model largely represents long term regional trends, however, and does not provide reliable estimates for traffic growth at individual intersections due to the development of specific parcels. Based on discussions with the City of Chanhassen, it ' was determined that traffic from five nearby parcels, using square -footage and development type estimates, would be added to the 2030 baseline estimate to establish a final estimate for 2030 background traffic. One development, located near the Powers Boulevard / TA 212 interchange, represents a revision to the original estimates used within the Carver County Travel Demand Model. The assumed PM peak period trips 1 1 1 1 based on single family residential were subtracted from the total trips calculated based on the revised land use scenario (commercial and office), to represent a land use change from the regional demand model rather than an entirely new development. Peak trip generation estimates for each parcel is provided in Table 2, with the location of each site shown in Figure 6. The net trips anticipated to be generated in the PM peak hour by the surrounding development were calculated and distributed onto the roadway network (discussed below), and added to the 0.5% per year background growth from 2013 to 2030. The resultant total background growth in the study area therefore varies by intersection, ranging from 1.6 percent per year linearly on Arboretum Boulevard up to 4.1 percent per year linearly on Powers Boulevard. Total off -site trips are shown in Figure 7. The 2030 no build peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 8. May 2011 Table 2 Off -Site Trip Generation PM Peak Hour Pus -by Net New % Total Pass -by Pass -by External Lead 'Total Pass -by Pats -by Trips Trips Trips Total Easter Blot Use # Land Use Type Size Units Formula Tri Enter Fait Trips Enter Exit 814 Specialty Retail Center 22.350 KSF T=2.40(X),21.48 75 33 42 0% 0 0 0 75 33 42 814 Specialty Retail Center 32.800 KSF T = 2.40(X) + 21.48 100 44 56 00/. 0 0 0 100 44 56 110 General Ughl Industrial 221.000 KSF T=0.97(X) 214 26 188 00/. 0 0 0 214 26 188 630 Clinic 28.980 KSF T=5.18(X)' 150 62 88 0% 0 0 0 I50 62 88 710 General Office 948.000 KSF T=1.12(X)+78.81 1,141 194 947 00/0 0 0 0 1,141 194 947 820 Shopping Center 406.000 KSF Ln(T)=0.67 Ln(X)+3.37 1,627 797 830 0% 0 0 0 1,627 797 830 210 Singic-Fansly Detached Housing 132.000 Acres T=2.74(X) 362 'I', I ' � 00/ 0 0 0 362 239 123 'Using dircmionel diaribution from trips ends vs. employees PM peak rare Z945 917 2.028 00/a 0 0 0 Z945 917 2,028 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L 1 I I 1 M �,R t■j �� t �r y F f p! A ' I 1l 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I t I 1 1 C _„ Kimley -Horn Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Malysis and Associates, Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota Project Trip Distribution The project trip distribution is based on selected zone analysis from the Carver County Travel Demand Model, which represents a refined version of the Metropolitan Council's demand model for the Twin Cities region. As shown in Figure 9, the proposed site is located in TAZ 142.3, which includes a region bounded by Hazeltine Boulevard on the west, Arboretum Boulevard on the north, and Powers Boulevard on the east. After assigning trips to the network, vehicles originating from or heading to the TAZ on each of the 10 roadways (or centroid connectors) shown in the figure were measured to calculate a daily distribution for both the 2000 and 2030 analysis years. Results were then interpolated between the two base years to estimate distribution for the 2013 analysis year. By adding trips to and from the north (lines 1, 2, 9, and 10), to and from the east (line 3), to and from the south (lines 4, 5, and 6), and to and from the west (lines 7 and 8), the final directional distribution was established for the site. Figure 10 shows the final assumed trip distribution for the project, with 35 percent to the east, 20 percent to the north, 20 percent to the west, and 25 percent to the south. 10 percent of the trips to the west and 10 percent of the trips to the south were assumed to use Park Road west of the site. Trip distribution for the four surrounding off -site parcels contained within TAZ 142.3 was assumed the same as for the Walmart site, with slight assignment modifications based on location. For the modified parcel located near TH 212, trip distribution was analyzed for TAZ 146, which contains the proposed development, showing that approximately 11 % of the trips to and from the development utilized Powers Boulevard. Estimated project trips, shown in Figure 11, were then added to 2013 and 2030 no build traffic conditions, along with corrections for pass -by trips, as shown in Figure 12. The final traffic estimates for the build condition are shown in Figures 13 and 14 for 2013 and 2030, respectively. May 2017 15 jr � z 41 �. { , , 10 t = 6 142.3 142.1 142.2 I i f N 0 Soo 11000 2,000 Feet FIGURE 9: Selected Zone Analysis Tn2 Boundary -- Centroid Conneaor 5;I !„ Kimley-Horn m and Associates, Inc. I 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 H I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 r 1 t e ry IL303 A e 142 Mbortum l ti 326 1 l r 62 Roukwb 7 ' 1, jr R49 a .�, _ v, 4y 61 160 3 r i t Walmart R �B6 A _ _ ��• 171 OM 299 Park J IL 0 i 23 to fro + 0 Park Of ' RE 10+ ■ +` 0 • Road Ill ry 466 ^i ' i; 1r 1iE ' ' N FIGURE 14: 2030 Build Turning Movement Counts ' 0 100 200 400 pl!""" Kimley-Horn . N F=u xx PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ` and Associates, Inc. I 1 _,®Kimley-Hom and Associa Level of Service Analyses Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis Intersection level of service (LOS) analyses were performed for each of the intersections within the study area using the signalized analysis methodology found in the Highway Capacity Manual (HC" and Trafficware's Synchro/SimTraffic version 7. Each intersection was analyzed for PM peak hours for the following scenarios: • 2011 existing traffic conditions, • 2013 no build (without project trips) conditions, • 2013 build (with project trips added) conditions, • 2030 no build (without project trips) conditions, and • 2030 build (with project trips added) conditions. One of the primary measures of effectiveness used to evaluate intersection traffic operations, as defined in the HCM, is level of service (LOS)--a qualitative letter grade (A through F) based on seconds of vehicle delay due to the traffic control device at an intersection. By definition, LOS A conditions represent high -quality operations (i.e., motorists experience very little delay or interference) and LOS F conditions represent very poor operations (i.e., extreme delay or severe congestion). This study used the LOS D/E boundary as an indicator of satisfactory traffic operations. Figure 15 displays the LOS thresholds for signalized and unsignalized intersections. 100 90 80 20 10 Figure 15. Highway Capacity Manual Level of Service Criteria. Signalized Unsignalized May 2011 22 I 1 L1 IClmley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis It was assumed that for the future scenarios an intersection with unsatisfactory operations should be addressed through signal timing modifications, or if that was not possible, through implementation of an intersection or roadway improvement. In order to determine the impacts of the project on the transportation network, a traffic operations analysis was performed on the internal and surrounding roadway network. The analysis process included determining level of service and queue lengths at each of the study intersections for existing, no build and build conditions. Supporting SimTraffic reports are included in Appendix C. For each scenario, five one -hour simulations were conducted in SimTraffic. ' In each of the following sections, a description of potentially unsatisfactory operational characteristics is summarized for each scenario modeled. For each scenario a table is included where the intersection level of service and delay is summarized. The SimTraffic 1 reports were reviewed to identify individual movements that experience unsatisfactory level of service and delay or queue lengths that are anticipated to extend beyond available ' storage lengths. Only in instances where an individual movement experiences an unsatisfactory measure of effectiveness will the movement information be summarized. 1 1 1 L 1 I 2011 Existing Operations Table 3 provides 2011 level of service (LOS) results for the existing conditions. All intersections within the study area operate at LOS D or better during the PM peak period, with the three unsignalized intersections operating at LOS A. A total of six movements operate at LOS E, with average delays per vehicle summarized as follows: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 63 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 75 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound left: 74 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound through: 68 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 73 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound through: 66 seconds At the Arboretum Boulevard intersection, the signal is timed such that the through movements on Arboretum Boulevard are maintained at LOS C, with lower LOS on Powers Boulevard, the lower volume side street. All left turn queues are contained within the available storage lengths and no blocking by queues in adjacent lanes is expected. The delays associated with the LOS E or F movements are not associated wit]5 operational problems at the signal, but are due to relatively low demand and long cycle lengths. May 2011 23 1 I Kimley-Horn and Associa Table 3 — 2011 Existing Conditions Walmart (Store N5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis Chanhassen. Minnesota 21111 PM Peak Hour Lae T. IeueL 0P iomby Moeemera �,yy, Omraa N[erLetlbl Lee RW Imerntlbn Can[td AWruaGr 95th Delay wa, O by Dda, Peruntk Ised.h) Los s W.h LOS bed l 305 aW h) L� EB 31W 63.0 4A A 30.2 C Mbare[um Wo 225' 25.0 33 A 33o C BIM& S�Nd 3fiA 0 ,• 130' Pawwrs B M 233 32 A 50.4 0 SB l00' 23.3 29 K!3D A 11.6 0 Es P 93 A 5.1 A 2.2 A Park AEA WB 0' 10A B A 5.1 A 2.3 A Powers MW 1W5C IA 40' 2.5 A A 5.1 A 1.9 A 3J A 59 2s' 4.6 A 36 A 3.3 A ® Cr - - 03 A 0.6 A Park Ad & WB 0 1.6 A A - - OJ A 0.9 A bn TWSC Cr S] A 3A A 3.3 A Driy y se I 0 0' - 0.2 A 03 A 0.2 A Park Ad& WB o' 2.0 A 05 A - - 0.9 A West TWSC fB 0 I 5.5 A 2.9 A 2.6 A 3.4 A lA A O.i �4Y 58 0' 1 2.1 A - 3.1 A 2013 No Build Operations Table 4 provides 2013 level of service (LOS) results for the 2013 no build scenario, using background linear growth from 2011 to 2013 of 1.8 percent per year. The simulation assumes the same signal timing plan at the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard as under existing conditions. All intersections within the study area are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during PM peak period, with the three unsignalized intersections operating at LOS A. A total of six movements are expected to operate at LOS E, with average delays per vehicle summarized as follows: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 65 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 76 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound left: 74 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound through: 68 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 74 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound through: 70 seconds At the Arboretum Boulevard intersection, the through movements on Arboretum Boulevard are maintained at LOS D or C, with lower LOS on Powers Boulevard, the lower volume side street. All left turn queues are accommodated within the available storage lengths and no blocking by queues in adjacent lanes is expected. The delays associated with the LOS E movements are not representative of operational problems the signal, but are due to relatively low demand and long cycle lengths. ■ May 2011 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 Kimley-Horn 1 and Associates. Inc. Table 4 — 2013 No Build Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis 2013 No Build - PM Peak Hour left Tun Qmue95tA, Operation Or Abr. M APPr°sM1 Owrap Metutlbn left ENau MusMbn l'mRq ApproaN Permntk Ortq fwaw05 lOs DNar wr/w61 los w, I. Los Dea i wr ) 1O5 Oelry (serywR los EB 3' WS 22A C 4.6 A 3L5 C M6prebm WB 265' )SA 378 D 4A A 353 D pMa Spin 3).5 D Pw.ai pN W O 74.2 66.1 33 A as D so 120' 73.6 Ws 3A A 42.9 0 EB 0' 114 B 10.0 A 52 A 7.9 A PahWB WB O 9.7 A 13.5 a 53 A ).1 A F.pM 1WSC M 35' 7.3 A lA A 5S A 2.0 A 3.) A SB 30' 5.4 A 32 A 34 A 3.4 I A EB 0 0.6 A 0.1 A 0.6 1 A Park W a WB O 1.) A OS A - OB A la East TWSC EB V 6) A 3A A 3.5 A A Mwua) 58 O 0' 21 A - - 03 A Pah W R WB 0' 2.2 A 0.4 A - - 0.9 A Wa TWSC AR 0' S.2 A 6.7 A 2.1 A 3.2 A 03 A Maven) 50 Q 4.9 A 4.9 A 2013 Build Operations Table 5 provides 2013 LOS results for the 2013 build scenario, based on background traffic plus trips associated with the Walmart parcel. The simulation assumes the same signal timing plan at the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard as under existing conditions. All intersections within the study area are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during the PM peak period, with the three unsignalized intersections operating at LOS C or better. A total of eight movements are expected to operate at LOS E or F, with average delays for the LOS E movements summarized as follows: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 66 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound through: 74 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 75 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 75 seconds The following movements are expected to operate at LOS F under the 2013 build scenario: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 174 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound left: 260 seconds • Park Road & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 55 seconds • Park Road & East Driveway northbound right: 494 seconds Operations at the Arboretum Boulevard intersection are expected to remain around the t 2013 no build levels, with increased delay to the westbound left and northbound left movements. The northbound left turn queue is anticipated to extend beyond the 230 foot ■ May 291t 25 1 I PPP- �„ ICmley-Horn � M and Associates, Inc. Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis left turn lane, with a 95 ° percentile queue of 396 feet. The adjacent through lane will also block access to the left turn lane, with a 951s percentile queue of 563 feet. The westbound left turn queue is expected to fit within the turn lane; however, with a 95t° percentile queue of 598 feet and 630 feet of storage length, and a posted speed of 55 mph, left turning vehicles will need to begin decelerating in the adjacent through lane, delaying vehicles making the westbound through movement. At the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard, the eastbound left turn movement is expected to operate at LOS F, due to increased volumes during the PM peak hour. Queuing from this movement is expected to block vehicles exiting the east driveway from the south, leading to LOS F on the northbound approach. As a low volume side street approach, it is likely that most vehicles will reroute and utilize the west driveway during the PM peak hour. No turn lane spillback or lane blocking is anticipated from any of the left turn lanes at the intersection Table 5 — 2013 Build 2013 Build - PM Peak Hour LA Tum 0,ar,r0on by W.emeet AeWoftR Overt InteraGbn LeR TNov n luda Queues InaeruQun fontrW APpoatl, 9Ab oeM Oeh] Oelar Dekry 0elry Pereeaee laey.ebl Los IreJ.ebl km I,eJ.e LO6 +ed.ekl tot tsery.ebl 306 EB 320' 656 25.5 C 5M A 31.9 C Arboretum WB 600' 1]4.4 32.1 0 Ao A 49.3 0 01W& Agnal SIA 0 POw s Po tl W 395• 2601 B3.6 39 A B5.5 5B 305' ]l.] ]l.9 3.2 A 49A 0 16 5 c 4.2 A 39.0 Ea 220' 55 3 Park Rd& Wa Cr 204 C 23] c 110 B 14.4 a Powers Blvd � a0 65' l3a B 1.5 A 53 A 39 A 13A a 58 Q. ].0 A 3 6 A 5 3 A 4.6 A 0 P - 23.5c 13 A 23.4 CWB O 0.6 A 08 A 03 A CaH O 493.5 4935 dl6 Ekad. 58 0' 4.] A 4.] A EB 0'3.2 A 2] A 19 A 2J ATMC WB 25' 2.1 A 02 A OS A 0.9 A O 6.1 A 8.9 A 64 A 6.l A 66 At6 58 200' 249 C 34 A 19.4 C 2013 Build Operations with Signal Installation and Optimization Table 6 provides LOS results for the 2013 build scenario, assuming the installation of a signal at the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard, as well as optimization of splits at the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard. The simulation assumes an optimized timing plan Park Road and Powers Boulevard, with the signal operating with an 80-second cycle length, half that of the 160-second cycle at Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard, to allow for coordination with the optimized splits at the major intersection. Although signal optimization removes approximately 6 seconds from the major street approaches, the signal remains coordinated along the TH 5 corridor, with minimal increases in delay. May 2011 26 Kimley Horn Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis _— and Associates, Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota t All intersections within the study area are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during PM peak period, with the two unsignalized intersections on Park Road operating at LOS A. Similar to the no build scenario, a total of six movements are expected to ' operate at LOS E or F, with average delays for the LOS E intersections summarized as follows: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 71 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 71 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound left: 69 seconds ' • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound through: 62 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 71 seconds ' The following movement is expected to operate at LOS F under the 2013 build scenario with signal installation: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound through: 87 seconds 1 Operations at the Arboretum Boulevard intersection are expected to remain around the 2013 no build levels, with increased delay to the southbound through movement. With ' the signal timing modified, queuing and blocking issues are eliminated. The 95 h percentile queue for both the northbound left turn and through movements is reduced to 232 feet, which is easily accommodated within the taper of the 230 foot storage length. ' The 95`h percentile westbound left turn queue is reduced to 340 feet, which leaves nearly 300 feet in the turn lane for vehicles to decelerate. 1 1 1 1 At the signalized intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard, all movements are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better. With the signal in place, queues are anticipated to clear during most cycles, allowing the northbound right -turn movement at the east driveway to operate at LOS A. The delays associated with the LOS E or F movements are not associated with operational problems at the signal, but are due to relatively low demand and long cycle lengths. No geometric improvements are recommended, and the cycle length at Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard is expected to remain at 160 seconds to maximize the coordinated westbound and eastbound through movements. ■ May 2011 27 I PPF"- ! ®l Kimley-Hom bib,and Associates, Inc. Table 6 — 2013 Build with Improvements Walmart (Stare #5949-00) t Traffic Impact Analysis Chanhassen. Minnesota 2013 Build with Signal - PM Peak Hour LA T. aPeaam a, Movement APpPaN Overa3Nters d.n Leh rw Ifighat urges heenecbn Gai AgpPMr 951h ""' Dal, Debt DRAW Pe.amk LOS laeyaxi l l05 aedaehl LOS -wiagh LOS ,,I-hl LOS ® 315' 70A C 5.1 A 36.4 D M6or.Nm Via 340' ]1.3 0 01 A 39.2 D BIW& Signal 41.2 0 s• 230' POyvs Blvd 68.0 4.4 A 433 0 50 SOS' ]L0 33 A SEA D ES 195' 273 C [ 3J A 20.0 B Pa rk Rd wa 0 402 0 0 12.2 B 21.2 C Powers &vd Signal N3 115' 2]0 C A N25 6.0 A 13.4 9 132 0 SB SO 133 a A 6O A 6.9 A EB V - A OS A 23 A Part Rd6 Will 0 A 0.6 A 06 A Ease lw'SC I• 0 8.6 A 9.6 A 1.7 A OrivepY SB 0 23 A 2.3 A EB 0 E3 A A 0.2 A 0.9 A Park Rd6 we 25' 2A A A 06 A 0.9 A A west ]WSC k8 0 5.9 A A N A 4.] A 41 DrNewaY SB 9s' as A25 A 8.3 A Inpo'.empnl A Oyrm,Eatim al5p,a' $�✓a � ANarelun stl R.aa Inpwemmf B Signal MfIaYaAa� QPwk a4 ibawa 2030 No Build Operations Split optimization was assumed under the 2030 no build scenario due to the significant increase in volume from surrounding off -site development, although the cycle length was assumed to remain at 160 seconds. Without split optimization, the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard is anticipated to operate at LOS F, with queues propagating throughout the network. Table 7 provides 2030 LOS results for the no build scenario, using background linear growth from 2013 to 2030 of 0.5 percent per year, plus additional traffic associated with five parcels within the study area. All intersections within the study area are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during the PM peak period, with the three unsignalized intersections operating at LOS C or better. A total of 13 movements are expected to operate at LOS E or F, with average delays per vehicle for the LOS E movements summarized as follows: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 66 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound through: 71 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 76 seconds • Park Road & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 43 seconds • Park Road & Powers Boulevard eastbound through: 37 seconds • Park Road & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 48 seconds • Park Road & Powers Boulevard westbound right: 41 seconds The following movements are expected to operate at LOS F under the 2030 no build scenario: May 2011 28 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IJ 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 949-00) PPP' Kimle -Horn WaTrart (Smpacttm malysis Y Traffic Impact Malysis i� and Associates. Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 96 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound left: 116 seconds Is Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound through: 96 seconds • Park Road & Powers Boulevard westbound through: 61 seconds • Park Road & East Driveway northbound left: 115 seconds • Park Road & East Driveway northbound through: 102 seconds • Park Road & East Driveway northbound right: 100 seconds At the Arboretum Boulevard intersection, the through movements on Arboretum Boulevard are maintained at LOS D or C, with lower LOS on Powers Boulevard, the lower volume side street. The northbound left turn queue is anticipated to spillback from the 230' left turn lane with a 951s percentile queue of 332 feet. Access to the left turn lane is also anticipated to be blocked, with a 95 h percentile queue of 394 feet in the adjacent through lane. Lane blocking may also occur on the westbound approach, with a 630 foot left turn lane and a 673 foot 95t' percentile queue in the adjacent through lane. The 95th percentile queue for the eastbound left turn is 470 feet, compared to a storage length of 550 feet. While the 95th percentile queue is contained within the storage length, there is little length remaining in which vehicles can decelerate. This results in left turning vehicles decelerating in the adjacent through lane, causing additional delay. Table 7 — 2030 No Build 2030 No Build - PM Peak Hour Left Turn O9eratioie WV Movement ,IPB� Overa6 klteroeMen Len Oe sWt rues let.aw 6oMm1 APpondt 951k Decry Delay Dal, asIW Delay : Pernt9e l06 (reJ.ekl (.,I.h LD6 IaeJaeN LOS Ir.JNek LOS -4-h) LOS E9 e70' 95.6 35.9 D 4.9 A e8.5 1 0 Mb., W. WO 370- 653 da.l D 6d A 41.1 D NW & Signal 41.e D Powers o W NB 33P 115) )1.0 66 A SOJ 0 SO 120' 76.3 95.5 3A A 588 EB 0' e26 36.8 LOS D 36.8 PsM Rd& TWSC WB 0' 02.7 Gas e05 e3.1 11.6 8 Powers Blvd NO aS' S6 A 1.9 A 5.2 A 2.7 p 5B 6tl 9.4 A 33 A 3.7 A 4.1 A EB tl - 25.5 D 162 C 2S.3 0 Park Rd■ WO tl 1.9 A as A - 0.7 A Bat TV/SC NB tl I15.A - 102.0 lOD3 is's C Orivevny SB tl EB tl 2.6 A Park Rd& W. tl 1 41 A OS A - - 0.9 A Wal 1WSC NO 1 tl 1 fie 1 A 1 35 1 A 1 72 1 A 6.9 A 22 A Oriveavay SB 1 tl 1 6.2 1 A 62 A I^Pm�r�eA'ty6rrelaeT Fe fao'tla®ANaYunaM( 2030 Build Operations Table 8 provides 2030 LOS results for the build scenario, using the previously calculated 2030 background traffic volumes plus trips associated with the Walmart site. As with the 2030 no build scenario, split optimization was assumed at the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard, with coordination maintained using a 160-second cycle. May 2011 29 I Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Walmart (Store 45949M) Traffic Impact Analysis While the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard is anticipated to operate at LOS D, as under the 2030 no build scenario, both of the driveways on Park Road are expected to operate at LOS F. This is the result of queuing on the eastbound approach at the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard, as in the 2013 build scenario. With the increase in traffic volumes between 2013 and 2030, the eastbound Park Road queue at Powers Boulevard is anticipated to block both the east and west driveways on Park Road. At the Arboretum Boulevard intersection, LOS is maintained at a similar level to the 2030 no build scenario, but the travel demand at this intersection is, in effect, metered by the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard. A total of 20 movements are expected to operate at LOS E or F. Table 8 — 2030 Build 2030 Build - PM Peak Hour Lea UP. Queues Operation BY Movement ApprOrB Ovarad M..s L<a M t hat.l.Ripn CP.,d4 Apprnatl, 9StA Percem9e -ky pea/.hl l05 DSW Is akahl LOS Rita LOS IMti wB Ott Itea/aeNI LOS WW .4.hl LOS ES 490' 105.0 47.1 D 55 A s5.6 Ar M.. WB 635' 25.6 %3 5A A 523 D B^a L I 51d a NB 325 Powers MW $6.0 59A 43 A a0.8 D 58 115, 26.6 91 A 35 A 50.2 ES 190' 191.3 16.5 0 9A A 122.9 Park Rd& WB 0' 1581 173A 129.6 138.E Powers Mvd 1M'SC Ha BO 12.7 B 2A & 55 A 4.0 R 29.3 0 SB 2M 10.1 a 3.4 A 5.2 A 68 A EB W - 1861 405 1855 Park Rd & WB o' 0.6 A 11 A 02 A East MC NO 0' - - 5219A S092.S 125.7 DrlvmtaY SB 0' 93 A 9.2 & Park ed& Ea O 293.2 2539 2989 2551 WB 20 2.1 A 0.2 A OS A 01 A WRd tWSC 0' 611.3 - 965A 899.1 251.E Dfivew9Y 5B SOD' 14689 2A A 1A36.3 InpowrriwYA DptimiaeOanNSy M$�rta�ANwe(um erMPoxera 2030 Build Operations with Signal Installation Table 9 provides 2030 LOS results for the build scenario, assuming the installation of a signal at the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard. The simulation assumes an optimized timing plan at Park Road and Powers Boulevard, with the signal operating with an 80-second cycle length, half that of the 160-second cycle at Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard, to allow for coordination with the optimized splits at the major intersection. All intersections within the study area are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during PM peak period, with the two unsignalized intersections on Park Road operating at LOS A. Similar to the 2030 no build scenario, a total of six movements are expected to operate at LOS E or F, with average delays per vehicle for the LOS E intersections summarized as follows: May 2011 30 1 1 1 1 1 1] 1 1 �L I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 t 1 I 111111110 F, Kimley-Horn _ and Associates, Inc. Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 72 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound through: 65 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 79 seconds The following movements are expected to operate at LOS F under the 2030 build scenario with signal installation: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 104 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound left: 122 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound through: 113 seconds As with the 2030 build scenario, operations at the Arboretum Boulevard intersection are expected to remain around the 2030 no build levels. Left turn lane spillback is anticipated on the northbound approach, where the 95rh percentile queue is 395 feet. The left turn lane will also be blocked by the 479 foot queue in the adjacent northbound through lane. Some blocking will also occur on the westbound approach, which has a 630-foot left turn lane but the 95th percentile queue in the adjacent lane is 795 feet. Also, there is little space for deceleration in the eastbound and westbound left turn lanes. The 951s percentile queues for the westbound and eastbound left turns are 605 feet and 465 feet, respectively, compared to storage lengths of 630 feet and 550 feet, respectively. At the signalized intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard, all movements are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better. With the signal in place, queues ate anticipated to clear during most cycles, allowing the northbound right -turn movement at the east driveway to operate at LOS A. Table 9 — 2030 Build M30 BuRd with Signal - PM Peak Now Lea Twn OPcationahMP,e,nent MPrPad. Oreri lOexrObn lea Ttaw IMbwOinn uauek Untrq ARpnatll g5thent Dew ORIaB Delve 0e� OWw hrwnt4 ve LOS w wn Ise4ken LOS sex/w LOS Ite4aan LDS sar/ven2 LOS EB 465' 104D 48.0 D 55 A 55) r NnoreWm WB 605' )2.0 52.6 D 49 A 49.0 D 01 & vo ers a d y I �a 1b 395' 122A 64.5 66 A 50.2 D 533 D 50 EB IHI' 200' )BS 306 c 1129 19.2 8 SD 43 A A 6fl3 21.2 C Park Rd& WB D 450 D SOA D 26A c 32.6 C P. akd S•n1 M I40' 35.2 D 15] 0 65 A SB.2 B I).2 0 5B 300' 294 c )3 A 65 A 9.3 A EB D - 26 A 09 A 2.6 A Park Rd& WB 0' - - 0.) A O6 A O6 A East TWSc NB D - - - 18.1 C 18.1 C 2.1 A Dri., 50 0 SO A 5.0 A EB D 2.) A 0.) A lA A 0.9 A Part Rd& WB 4P 2.5 A 03 A OS A 0.9 A A WePt TWSC NB D ).2 A 65 A 54 A SA A 5.1 dlveoaY 5B 14T'- 1 129 B 3.0 A 12.4 0 IrrpvymerMADbmixatim d Signy Sp'dx ®ANwefvnaMEEwa InPNBaN/afl 9qd b¢lallal,o", Q Fah aM Pouers May 2011 31 _ Traffic Impact Malysis Ft 1Gmley-Hom WaTrart (Store tAnal Analysis Inc. ' i and Associates, Chanhassen, Minnesota Lanes 2030 Build Operations with Signal Installation and Dual Left Turn Table 10 provides 2030 LOS results for the build scenario, assuming the signal installation, split optimization, and the construction of double left turn lanes on both the ' eastbound and westbound approaches on Arboretum Boulevard All intersections within the study area are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better ' during PM peak period, with the two unsignalized intersections on Park Road operating at LOS A. Similar to existing conditions, a total of six movements are expected to operate at LOS E, with average delays per vehicle for the LOS E intersections ' summarized as follows: ' • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 80 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 67 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound left: 77 seconds ' • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound through: 57 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 76 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound through: 76 seconds ' As with the 2030 build scenario, operations at the Arboretum Boulevard intersection are ' expected to remain around the 2030 no build levels. Left turn lane spillback and blocking is still anticipated on the northbound approach, with a 95 s percentile queue of 347 feet for the left turn movement and 333 feet for the through movement. The left turn lane is ' 230 feet long and could not be lengthened without shortening the southbound left turn lane at the Park Road and Powers Boulevard intersection. Lane blocking is also anticipated on the westbound approach where the left turn lane is 630 feet long and the 95t° percentile queue in the adjacent through lane is 709 feet. With the addition of the turn lanes, approximately 300 feet of storage length is available for deceleration in the eastbound and westbound left turn lanes. t 1 May 2011 32 Pill/, Kmley Horn 111111111 and Assoaatm Inc. Table 10-2030 Build with Improvements Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis Chanhassen, Minnesota 2=Buikl with Signal - PM Peak Hour Left Turn a.... OPerrtiemhyM ment APWPadI Oaeral lnterwnbn Left t951h APpealk 0 * S Delry LO6 bhyPerwatle LOB Y Mh w wh w whLOS EB 190' >9.5 5A A 45.0 0 Flmemd�tuntM W8 340' 66.) 4.6 A 42.1 0 430 D !8 345' )&) 6.4 A 3&9 D 50 120' )6.2 K3915A 33 A 50.4 D 31.1 c 43 A 21.6 c fB 200' WB 0' 416 D 0 25.1 c 31.3 c 1).3 B P.n Bad Si/nal N0 135' 34S c 0 6.6 A W 8 5B 104 2)6 c A >3 A 9.) A EB 0 - A 2.1 A 23 A Parkm& WB0- A o6 AO)A230' fast TWSC - 219 [ 219 c 5B 0• 43 A 43 A O' 2.9 A 0.> A OS A 09 A Perk BE& A 03 A oS A 0.9 A 47 A Wct 3W�2.4 NO O 6.6 A 71 A S2 A SA D'Iae�wY 5B 130' 11A B 1 1 23 A 11.1 8 Inpvvnenl A: Optimizatim NSgnY $lih Q9AmP'zVVaa+ORrx ///p'V.H/nanlfl SgnL Mafa�INWn®PaM anEiM9 Irr{mwmenl C: EaafbaM Dadle LM ®Abaeawn mlMva l/rryormleMD: WnMaazl Dq®lele4�N6m(un rd Powa May 2,11 33 J Kimley-Horn 1 and Associates. Inc. Signal Warrant Analysis Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis As demonstrated in the previous section, signal installation has the potential to significantly improve operations on Park Road, and the following section discusses signal warrant analysis methodology using the 13-hour count conducted at Park Road and Powers Boulevard. Under the 2013 build scenario, which includes background traffic plus Wahnart trips, a total of six hours are met for Warrant I and two hours are met for Warrant 1B. Additionally, two analysis hours are within 20 vehicles of satisfying Warrant IA. In all cases, the heaviest side street approach is the eastbound approach to the intersection, excluding right -turning vehicles. Table 11 presents the results for Warrants I and IB. Table 11 — 2013 Signal Warrant Analysis Time Padod Poweraelcd M+Sa Traffic nfi,J rA ,cltea) Park Road MTraM, (Minor efmchl warrantI W..M2 warmnt3 to to Macr Val. Mina,Vol. Mats Mat. rVol. Mince Vol. Men Mrlce Va. Met? MinceVol. Mat? BM-1M 4M at 6MRM 9M 1M 511 - 1:M-SM BM 59 6M 9M 1M V4 482 8:M-9M 761 84 8M 9M iM 326 540 9:M-10M 526 98 6M 9M 1M 44? larw-llm 496 157 MO 9M iM 11:M-12:M 01 222 6MYES 9M 1M 603 12M-13'M 8p4 218 600Y6 9M 1M 224 462 13M-14:M 649 1M SM 9M iM - site 14:M-15:M M2 1M 6M 9M iM 604 15'M-18:M B82 230 6MM 9M top 182 1SM-1?'M 916 250 600TES 9M 100 YES 427 11M-16:M 110, 2" aMVES 9M 1M YES 332 18'M-19M 854 235 6M YES 9M 1M site Hours Mel lours R cared C ftt. n Met, 6 2 0 0 8 8 4 4 MO W — ND In order to add in the additional trips associated with the surrounding parcels, daily trip generation values were calculated based on each site's anticipated ITE Land Use code, as shown in Table 12. Hourly distribution assumptions were then applied to each rate, and the calculated trips were then added to the appropriate approach at the Park Road and Powers Boulevard intersection based on the trip distribution values previously discussed By 2030, including all background traffic associated with general regional growth as well as the five parcels identified, both Warrants 1A and I B are anticipated to be met, as shown in Table 13. May 2011 34 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I m m m m m m m m s m s m m m m m m m m Table 12 OR -Site Trip Generation Daily Pass -by Net New % Total Pass -by Pass -by External L9nd Total Pass -by Pass -by Trips Trips Trips Total Fitter Fkit 11aeA Land Use Size Units Forrla m TripsFaster Exit TripsEnter Exit 813 Free -Standing Discount Superstore 120.209 KSF Ln(T)=1.35 Ln(X)+2.11 5,300 2,650 2,650 N/A 0 0 0 5,300 2,650 2,650 814 Specialty Retail Center 22.350 KSF T=44.32(X) 991 4% 495 N/A 0 0 0 991 496 495 814 Specialty Retail Center 32.800 KSF T = 44.32(X) 1,454 727 727 N/A 0 0 0 1,454 727 727 110 General Light Industrial 221.000 KSF T=7A7(X)-101.92 1,549 775 774 N/A 0 0 0 1,549 775 774 630 Clinic 28.980 KSF T=31.45(X) 911 456 455 N/A 0 0 0 911 456 455 710 General Office 948.000 KSF Ln(T)=0.77 Ln(X)+3.65 7,539 3,770 3,769 000/ 0 0 0 7,539 3,770 3,769 820 Shopping Center 406.000 KSF In(T)=0.65 LA(X)+5.83 16,884 8,442 8,442 0°/ 0 0 0 16,884 8,442 8,442 210 Singlc-Fanidy Detached Housing 132.0001 Acres I T=26.04X 3,437 1,719 1 1.71n 1 0% 1 0 1 0 0 3,437 1,719 1,718 31,191 15,597 15,594 N/A 0 0 0 31,191 15,597 15,594 UWi N 0.3 M 7 1 Kimley-Horn bAh.- ®and Associates, Inc. Table 13 — 2030 Signal Warrant Analysis Walmart (Store #5949-00) Traffic Impact Analysis Time Period Powers Blvd NB*SB Traffic (Major Approaches) Park Road EB Traffic (Minor Approach) Warrant 1A 1B Major Vol. Minor Vol. Met? Major Vol. I Minor Vol. Met? 6:00 - 7:00 480 93 600 200 900 100 7:00 - 8:00 1090 73 600 200 900 100 8:00 - 9:00 1176 105 600 200 900 100 YES 9:00 - 10:00 841 126 600 200 900 100 10:00 - 11:00 856 198 600 200 900 100 11:00 - 12:00 1060 279 600 200 YES 900 100 YES 12:00 - 13:00 1309 1 273 600 200 YES 900 100 YES 13:00-14:00 1129 229 600 200 YES 900 100 YES 14:00-15:00 1098 231 600 200 YES 900 100 YES 15:00-16:00 1322 292 600 200 YES 900 100 YES 16:00-17:00 1353 327 600 200 YES 900 100 YES 17:00-18:00 1672 345 600 200 YES 900 too YES 18:00-19:00 1034 291 600 200 YES 900 100 YES Fours Met Hours Required Condilion Met? 8 9 8 8 YES YES In order to identify the sensitivity of the signal warrants to the timeline of surrounding development, a 2015 analysis was conducted including all traffic associated with the two additional parcels on Park Road (Land Use Code 814). By adding the trips associated with these parcels to the trips generated by the Walmart site and general background growth of 0.5 percent between 2013 and 2015, it is anticipated that Warrant IA will be met, as shown in Table 14. Table 14 — 2015 Signal Warrant Analysis lnM Period Powerz BlM nB ♦ SB TnMc (M.jo A .aa Q Park Bmd ® Tram. Minor M) WaeaM1 WanaM2 Warrant 1A 18 MawVW. MMor Vol. Mar) Haar VW. Mires VW. Me17 Mnor VW. Merl MimrVW. Merl 5:00-7-00 415 N 00o = 1 10) 700 - 600 " n M 200 1 900 100 B-m-9.m e]4 104 W ma I We 100 0.M-1000 57B 125 a00 200 9M 1M iaw0 iiw 570 im 600 200 900 1W 11.00-1200 M275 H00 200 We 900 169 1200-13W 881 269 600 MO YB 9W 100 13:00-WOO 715 M6 BW 200 YES 900 1M 14:00-1S:W 770 228 fiM An YES 900 100 15:00-1600 9n 2M Boo 200 WS 9M 100 WS 15:00-17.00 1013 323 WO 200 M 9M 100 YES 17:00-18:00 1213 341 800 200 YES 9M 100 M 18:00-1e00 I2B 2B6 H00 200 YES 900 100 Hwa MW Ilpes (RWiretl COr,diiwl MW� B ] B 9 4 6 YE9 n0 Given that trips associated with the Walmart site will nearly satisfy Warrant I in 2013, that additional development on Park Road will likely generate sufficient traffic to satisfy Warrant I in the short term, and that a signal at the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard will significantly improve local operations with additional traffic on Park Road, signal installation is recommended as part of the development of the Walmart site. May 2011 36 I L� I 1 I 11 L� 1 I 1 ' 5949-00) � ®�� K'nn -Hom WaTrart(Store tAnalsis Traffic Impact Ma and Associates, Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota ' RECOMMENDATIONS 1 With the construction of Walmart Store #5949-00 near the southwest quadrant of the Arboretum Boulevard (Trunk Highway SyPowers Boulevard (CSAH 17) intersection in Chanhassen, Minnesota, it is recommended that the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard be converted from side street stop control to signal control. Without stopping the northbound and southbound traffic on Powers Boulevard, there will not be enough ' gaps for the eastbound traffic on Park Road to enter the intersection. Queues on Park Road will, in turn, prevent vehicles from exiting from the east driveway onto Park Road. In addition, the splits at the signal for the Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard ' intersection should be retimed to efficiently serve the new turning movement distribution. By incorporating the recommended modifications, the street network will operate at similar levels to existing conditions. In the long term, the City should monitor the growth of the surrounding area. If the area ' develops as anticipated by the City, consideration should be given to adding a second left turn lane on the eastbound and westbound Arboretum Boulevard approaches to Powers Boulevard. Queues for these movements are not expected to spill out of the turn lane, but with the forecasted growth and development, would result in left fuming drivers decelerating in the adjacent through lane and causing delays for through movements. Dual left turn lanes would shorten queues as well as delays. 1 1 1 I May 2011 37 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 i 1 1 i i APPENDIX 1 Appendix A Raw Turning Movement Volume Counts Traffic Data Inc. 7RAfF1[ DA1�� 3268 Xenwood Avenue South Arboretum Blvd & Powers Blvd Chanhassen, MN St Louis Park, MN 55416 n....... e.:..4.4. ri... 4 _ u..,,., veh�.ae. File Name : 1241131 Arboretum & Powers Site Code : 1241131 Start Date : 2/8/2011 Page No : 1 Powers Blvd Southbound Arboretum Blvd Westbound Powers Blvd Northbound Arboretum Blvd Eastbound Start Time Rght Thru Left Ped9 App. Total Rght Thru Left Pals App. Total Rght Thru Left Pads App, Total Rghf Thai Left Pods App. Total Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 04:00 PM 53 45 16 0 114 52 256 21 0 329 41 69 12 0 122 7 191 43 0 241 806 04:15 PM 60 39 22 0 121 54 253 27 0 334 28 64 13 0 105 2 166 46 0 214 774 04:30 PM 52 39 19 0 110 57 285 24 0 366 41 51 12 0 104 6 184 29 0 219 799 04:45 PM 48 43 21 0 112 87 293 31 0 391 30 69 18 0 117 6 146 41 0 193 813 Total 213 166 78 0 457 230 1087 103 0 1420 140 253 55 0 448 21 687 159 0 867 3192 05:00 PM 59 56 28 0 143 78 286 31 0 395 55 79 24 0 158 9 218 72 0 299 995 05:15 PM 63 45 25 0 133 60 319 29 0 408 36 60 15 0 111 9 178 55 0 242 894 05:30 PM 44 59 37 0 140 64 344 46 0 454 29 65 16 0 110 5 173 52 0 230 934 05:45 PM 54 45 30 0 129 82 298 27 0 407 29 44 14 0 87 8 180 38 0 208 829 Total 1 220 205 120 0 5461 284 1247 133 0 1664 1 149 248 69 0 466 1 31 729 217 0 9771 3652 Grand Total 433 371 198 0 1002 514 2334 236 0 3084 289 501 124 0 914 52 1416 376 0 1844 8844 Apprch % 43.2 37 19.8 0 16.7 75.7 7.7 0 31.6 54.8 13.6 0 2.8 76.8 20.4 0 Total % 6.3 5.4 2.9 0 14.6 7.5 34.1 3.4 0 45.1 4.2 7.3 1.8 0 13A 0.8 20.7 5.5 0 26.9 Class 430 364 195 0 989 511 2304 230 0 3045 278 496 123 0 897 50 1378 372 0 18001 6731 % Class 1 99.3 98.1 98.5 0 98.7 1 99.4 98.7 97.5 0 98.7 96.2 99 99.2 0 98.1 96.2 97.3 98.9 0 97.61 98.3 Heavy Vehicles 3.8 1 0.8 0 1.9 3.8 2.7 1.1 0 2.4 1.7 % Heavy Vehicles 0.7 1.9 1.5 0 1.3 0.6 1.3 2.5 0 1.3 TRAFFIC DATA INC. Traffic Data Inc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 Arboretum Blvd & Powers Blvd Chanhassen. MN File Name : 1241131 Arboretum & Powers Site Code : 1241131 Start Date : 2/8/2011 Page No : 2 Powers Blvd Out In Total 1379 988 2368 12 13 25 430 384 185 0 J 7 3 0 4 3 188 R9ht Thruhru Left Pede ® ro 0 aa� gN�S g n 2 Nonh H N N 3 w r-4 W812011 04:00 PM ~Q g � 0812011 05 45 PM E rN N ma m Gass i ea Veole9 hiyyst 0 y 9 p� �lem a �000 Left Thu Rohl Pad 123 496 278 0 1 5 11 0 4 5 544 897 1541 5 3 9 57 Out In Total M Traffic Data Inc. rggeilr gars W.3268XenwoodAvenueSouth St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241131 Arboretum &Powers Site Code : 1241131 Arboretum Blvd & Powers Blvd Start Date : 2/8/2011 Chanhassen, MN Page No 3 Powers Blvd Souhbound Arboretum Blvd Westbound Powers Blvd Northbound Hmoretum nlvc _ Eastbound Start Time Rght Thru Left Pads App Total Rght Thru Left Peds App Total Rght Thru Left Pods App. Total ROM Thru Left I' Peds App. Total I Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 59 56 28 0 143 78 286 31 0 395 55 79 24 0 158 9 218 72 0 299 995 05:15 PM 63 45 25 0 133 60 319 29 0 408 36 60 15 0 111 9 178 55 0 242 894 05:30 PM 44 59 37 0 140 64 344 46 0 454 29 65 16 0 110 5 173 52 0 230 934 05:45 PM 64 45 30 0 129 82 298 27 0 407 29 44 14 0 87 8 160 38 0 206 829 Total Volume 1 220 205 120 0 5451 284 1247 133 0 16641 149 248 69 0 466 31 729 217 0 977 3652 71J TRAFFIC DATA INC. Arboretum & Powers (Heavy Vehicles) Chanhassen, MN Traffic Data Inc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241131 Arboretum & Powers Site Code : 1241131 Start Date : 2/8/2011 Page No : 1 Powers Blvd Arboretum Blvd Powers Blvd Arboretum Blvd Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Rght Thru Left Pods App. Total Rght Thru Left Peda App. Total Rght Thru LeR Pods App, Total Rght Thu Len Pede App, Total Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 1 3 1 0 5 0 7 0 0 7 1 1 0 0 2 0 8 2 0 10 24 04:15 PM 1 1 2 0 4 1 4 1 0 6 1 1 1 0 3 0 7 1 0 8 21 04:30 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 3 0 5 0 0 5 13 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2 0 7 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 10 Total 2 6 3 0 11 2 18 3 0 23 5 3 1 0 9 0 22 3 0 25 68 05:00 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 05:15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 5 3 0 0 0 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 4 1 2 0 0 Grand Total 3 7 3 0 13 3 30 6 0 38 11 5 1 0 Apprch % 23.1 53.8 23.1 0 7.7 76.9 15.4 0 64.7 29.4 5.9 0 Total % 2.7 6.2 2.7 0 11.5 2.7 26.5 5.3 0 34.5 9.7 4.4 0.9 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 5 11 3 2 3 0 0 5 14 3 0 5 0 0 5 12 17 2 38 4 0 44 113 4.5 86.4 9.1 0 15 1.8 33.6 3.5 0 38.9 I ' M M M M M M �a, WI TRAFFIC DATA INC. Arboretum & Powers (Heavy Vehicles) Chanhassen, MN Traffic Data Inc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241131 Arboretum & Powers Site Code : 1241131 Start Date : 2/8/2011 Page No : 2 Power! Blvd Out In Total 0 1 Rphl Thru Lab Pads F J W �O o North NS E c 2/8/2011 04.00 PM 2/8/2011 05:45 PM r rya w Heow Vehicles v go ti n m� a Left ThrlL Rlht Peds Out In Total TRAFFIC DATA 1RC. Arboretum & Powers (Heavy Vehicles) Chanhassen, MN Traffic Data Inc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241131 Arboretum & Powers Site Code : 1241131 Start Date : 2/8/2011 Page No :3 Powers Blvd Southbound Arboretum Blvd I Westbound Powers Blvd I Northbound Arboretum Blvd Eastbound Start Time Rght I Thru I Left I Peds App. Total I Rght I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Total I Rght I Thru I Left I Pods I App. Total I Rght I Thru I Left I Peds gpp,Tolef reaK moor Analysts rrom u4:vu rM 10 U0:40 vm - veaK 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 1 3 1 0 5 04:15 PM 1 1 2 0 4 04:30 PM 0 2 0 0 2 Int. Total 0 7 0 0 7 1 1 0 0 2 0 8 2 0 10 24 1 4 1 0 8 1 1 1 0 3 0 7 1 0 8 21 0 3 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 3 0 5 0 0 5 13 1 4 2 0 7 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 10 2 18 3 0 23 1 5 3 1 0 9 0 22 3 0 25 88 Traffic Data Inc. Z YI reaFrrc Dara INC. 3266XenwoodAvenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 Park Rd & Powers Blvd Chanhassen, MN File Name : 1241132 Park & Powers Site Code : 1241132 Start Date : 2/8/2011 Page No 1 Powers Blvd Park Rd Powers Blvd Park Rd �Strt outhbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Time Rght I ThrU LeftI Peds App. Total Rght Thru I Leo I Pods App. Total Its Thu Leff Pods Apo. Total Rohl Thu Lea Petla App. Total 11 Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 06:00 AM 2 30 0 0 32 23 0 15 1 39 1 10 4 0 15 15 2 35 0 52 138 06:15 AM 4 27 4 0 35 4 0 7 0 11 3 32 9 0 44 4 1 13 0 18 108 06:30 AM 8 33 4 0 45 2 0 0 0 2 5 26 9 1 41 2 0 2 0 4 92 06:45 AM 13 54 5 0 72 2 1 2 0 5 10 40 22 0 72 2 0 5 0 7 156 Total 27 144 13 0 184 31 1 24 1 57 19 108 44 1 172 23 3 55 0 81 494 07:00 AM 17 44 9 0 70 0 1 1 0 2 6 55 13 0 74 2 0 1 0 3 149 07:15 AM 14 56 5 0 75 2 0 1 0 3 4 74 21 1 100 4 0 6 0 10 168 07:30 AM 17 56 6 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 7 85 18 1 111 3 0 3 0 6 196 07:45 AM 20 121 18 0 159 2 0 1 0 3 13 67 32 3 115 7 0 5 0 12 289 Total 1 66 277 38 0 383 1 4 1 3 0 8 1 30 281 84 5 400 1 16 0 15 0 31 1 822 08:00 AM 13 81 17 0 111 3 1 0 0 4 13 55 24 0 92 8 0 6 0 14 221 08:15 AM 16 70 12 0 98 5 0 2 0 7 5 50 24 2 81 2 0 2 0 4 190 08:30 AM 15 49 9 0 73 4 1 2 0 7 7 29 12 2 50 2 2 6 0 10 140 08:45 AM 8 43 9 0 60 4 1 2 6 13 6 56 17 3 82 3 1 2 0 6 161 Total 52 243 47 0. 3421 16 3 6 6 31 1 31 190 77 7 305 1 15 3 16 0 341 712 09:00 AM 26 28 9 0 63 5 0 1 0 6 2 35 10 1 48 1 1 4 0 8 123 09:15 AM 10 34 5 0 49 5 0 1 0 6 1 29 11 5 48 2 1 0 0 3 104 09:30 AM 9 26 3 0 36 8 3 0 0 11 4 51 6 1 62 3 0 3 0 6 117 09:45 AM 12 18 8 0 38 7 0 1 0 8 3 39 5 2 49 1 1 3 0 5 100 Total 1 57 106 25 0 188 25 3 3 0 31 1 10 154 32 9 205 1 7 3 10 0 20 1 444 10:00 AM 6 21 5 0 32 7 3 0 7 17 2 33 4 0 39 2 2 6 0 10 96 10:15 AM 6 30 8 0 44 6 0 3 1 10 0 17 5 3 25 0 0 4 0 4 83 10:30 AM 9 26 5 0 40 6 1 1 2 10 3 25 1 0 29 4 0 7 1 12 91 10:45 AM 11 29 3 3 46 7 3 2 0 12 7 32 6 4 49 3 3 a 0 14 121 Total 1 32 106 21 3 1621 26 7 6 10 491 12 107 16 7 142 9 5 25 1 401 393 11:00 AM 9 25 2 5 41 4 1 2 0 7 1 36 9 6 52 3 0 6 0 9 109 11:15 AM 6 25 3 3 37 4 1 3 0 8 1 59 2 1 63 7 0 20 0 27 135 11:30 AM 11 38 4 0 53 10 0 6 0 16 2 62 0 3 67 12 1 15 0 28 164 11:45 AM 9 36 10 0 55 13 0 2 0 15 3 67 5 2 77 11 2 14 0 27 174 Total 1 35 124 19 8 188 1 31 2 13 0 46 1 7 224 16 12 259 1 33 3 55 0 91 1 582 12:00 PM 21 49 2 0 72 15 1 9 0 25 5 67 1 3 76 4 1 20 0 25 198 12:15 PM 15 69 5 0 89 5 0 1 0 6 3 53 5 1 62 5 1 8 0 14 171 12:30 PM 23 65 8 0 96 5 5 2 0 12 2 56 10 1 69 6 2 17 1 26 203 12:45 PM 19 50 7 0 76 6 3 4 0 13 5 41 10 2 58 8 3 5 0 16 163 Total 1 78 233 22 0 3331 31 9 16 0 56 1 15 217 26 7 2651 23 7 50 1 81 1 735 ''a ' yid � ■ TRAFFIC DATA INC. Park Rd & Powers Blvd Chanhassen. MN Traffic Data Inc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241132 Park & Powers Site Code : 1241132 Start Date : 2/8/2011 Page No :2 Powers Blvd Park Rd Powers Blvd Park Rd Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Rght ThrU Leff Pods App. Total Rghl Thra Lol Pad3 App. Total R9ht Thu Lef Pads App. Total R9h1 Thu Loll Peda App. Total Int. Total FEW 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 01:00 PM 17 61 11 0 89 4 2 1 0 7 3 49 4 3 59 5 1 13 1 20 175 01:15 PM 9 41 5 0 55 1 1 1 1 4 3 43 10 4 60 5 3 3 0 11 130 01:30 PM 15 50 10 0 75 2 2 2 0 6 1 36 8 2 47 4 0 5 0 9 137 01:45 PM 4 35 6 0 45 2 2 0 0 4 2 32 3 1 38 2 1 8 0 11 98 Total 45 187 32 0 264 9 7 4 1 21 9 160 25 10 204 16 5 29 1 51 540 02:00 PM 6 48 6 0 60 5 1 3 0 9 4 41 2 1 411 4 1 4 0 9 126 02:15 PM 6 46 5 0 57 5 1 3 0 9 1 42 4 0 47 6 4 2 0 12 125 02:30 PM 4 56 2 0 62 6 1 0 1 8 1 47 5 3 56 4 3 8 0 15 141 02:45 PM 10 55 8 0 73 6 4 2 0 12 1 34 5 2 42 1 1 5 0 7 134 Total 26 205 21 0 252 1 22 7 8 1 38 1 7 164 16 6 1931 15 9 19 0 431 526 03:15 PM 6 3 0 57�0 0 4 1 172 6 1 109 14 2 14 0 30 03:15 PM 11 54 54 5 0 70 7 1 4 0 12 3 72 3 0 78 7 1 5 0 13 173 173 03:30 PM 4 56 4 0 64 6 1 1 0 8 1 83 10 0 94 8 1 9 0 18 184 03:45 PM 2 55 7 0 64 3 0 5 0 8 2 77 3 3 85 8 4 9 0 21 178 Total 23 213 19 0 255 20 2 10 0 32 7 333 22 4 366 37 8 37 0 82 735 04:00 PM 10 52 6 0 68 7 1 8 0 1 4 78 5 2 89 13 0 17 0 30 203 04:15 PM 3 58 3 0 64 4 1 4 0 9 2 68 6 0 76 13 1 9 0 23 172 04:30 PM 8 55 5 0 68 5 2 5 0 12 2 95 7 0 104 17 0 13 0 30 214 04:45 PM 17 65 3 0 85 18 1 5 0 24 1 88 8 2 99 16 1 14 0 31 239 Total 38 230 17 0 2851 34 5 22 0 61 1 9 329 26 4 368 1 59 2 53 0 114 1 828 05:00 PM 15 73 6 0 94 27 2 8 0 37 2 115 14 0 131 24 1 17 0 42 304 05:15 PM 9 64 14 0 87 15 3 16 0 34 4 88 11 0 103 15 1 18 0 34 258 05:30 PM 27 73 11 0 111 8 0 7 0 15 6 93 29 1 129 17 1 10 0 28 283 05:45 PM 16 50 4 0 70 8 1 7 0 16 4 76 16 0 96 14 1 9 0 24 206 Total 67 260 35 0 362 1 58 6 38 0 102 1 16 372 70 1 4591 70 4 54 0 1281 1051 06:00 PM 4 42 6 0 52 31 1 20 0 52 0 69 2 0 71 33 2 46 0 81 256 06:15 PM 3 43 1 0 47 9 1 6 0 16 2 53 2 0 57 13 0 12 0 25 145 06:30 PM 2 46 1 0 49 3 0 3 0 6 1 45 7 1 54 11 1 4 0 18 125 06:45 PM 11 49 0 0 60 2 0 1 0 3 1 52 10 0 63 4 0 7 0 11 137 Total 1 20 180 8 0 208 1 45 2 30 0 771 4 219 21 1 245 1 61 3 69 0 1331 683 Grand Total 1 568 2508 317 11 3404 1 352 55 183 19 609 176 2858 475 74 3583 1 384 55 487 3 929 11525 Apprch % 16.7 73.7 9.3 0.3 57.8 9 30 3.1 4.9 79.8 13.3 2.1 41.3 5.9 52.4 0.3 Total % 1 6.7 29.4 3.7 0.1 39.9 4.1 0.6 2.1 0.2 7.1 2.1 33.5 5.6 0.9 42 1 4.5 0.6 5.7 0 10.9 r�r� ■ Traffic Data Inc. TRAFFIC DATA �N� 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241132 Park &Powers Site Code : 1241132 Park Rd & Powers Blvd Start Date : 2/8/2011 Chanhassen, MN Page No : 3 Powers Blvd Out n 7® 317 RpM Thru Left Pods 9G� � N 5 �r North 2/8/2011 ONO AM e � n 2/8/2011 08:45 PM Class t � T r eft Mu R M Ped 3® 3 83 8858 Out In Total a , i!!� ■ err TRAFFIC DATA JNC. Park Rd & Powers Blvd Chanhassen, MN Traffic Data Inc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241132 Park & Powers Site Code : 1241132 Start Date : 2/8/2011 Page No : 4 Powers BNd I Park Rd Powers Blvd Park Rd _ Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Rght ThrU Left Peds App. Total Rght Thru Len I Peda I App, Total Rght I Thru Len I Pods I App. Total Rght I Thm Left I Pods I App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 07:46 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for En re Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM - 07:00 AM 17 44 9 0 70 0 1 1 0 2 6 55 13 0 74 2 0 1 0 3 149 07:15 AM 14 58 5 0 75 2 0 1 0 3 4 74 21 1 100 4 0 6 0 10 188 07:30 AM 17 56 6 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 7 85 18 1 111 3 0 3 0 6 196 07:45 AM 20 121 18 0 159 2 0 1 0 3 13 67 32 3 115 7 0 5 0 12 289 Total Volume 1 68 277 38 0 383 4 1 3 0 8 30 281 84 5 400 16 0 15 0 31 822 = = M IIIIIIIIIII= = M = M IIIIIIIIIII= M = M IIIIIIIIIIIM = M M M Traffic Data Inc. TRAFFIC DATA 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241133 Park &East Driveway Site Code : 1241133 Park Rd & 1001 Park Rd, East Driveway Start Date : 2/8/2011 Chanhassen, MN Page No : 1 n_......... M.-.w. r 1... 4 Park Rd East Driveway Park Rd Souhbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Rght Thru Left Peds App. Total Rohl Thu Leff Pods App. Total Rght Thu Len Peds App. Total RgM Thu LM Peds App. Total Int. TOtel Factor 1. 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 1 0 19 4 0 1 1 6 0 25 0 0 25 50 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 10 5 0 0 0 5 1 18 0 0 19 34 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 3 0 16 3 0 0 0 3 0 26 0 0 26 45 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 3 0 29 6 0 1 2 9 1 29 0 1 31 69 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 7 0 74 18 0 2 3 23 2 98 0 1 101 198 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 2 0 30 9 0 1 0 10 0 36 0 0 36 76 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 9 0 23 5 0 1 0 6 0 25 0 0 25 54 06:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 18 0 57 4 0 1 0 5 0 26 0 0 26 88 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 9 0 32 7 0 1 0 8 1 18 0 0 19 59 Total 1 0 0 0 0 01 0 104 38 0 142 1 25 0 4 0 29 1 1 105 0 0 106 1 277 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 171 45 0 216 43 0 6 3 52 3 203 0 1 207 475 Apprch % 0 0 0 0 0 79.2 20.8 0 82.7 0 11.5 5.8 1.4 98.1 0 0.5 Total % 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 9.5 0 45.5 9.1 0 1.3 0.6 10.9 0.6 42.7 0 0.2 43.6 �„ lit TRAFFIC DATA INC. Park Rd & 1001 Park Rd, East Driveway Chanhassen, MN Traffic Data Inc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241133 Park & East Driveway Site Code : 1241133 Start Date : 2/8/2011 Page No : 2 ut n Total a o Rght Thru Left Pads o 5 � rz Nth 2/8/2011 04:00 PM 4 1p a 2/8/2011 05:45 PM rC 3 m Class 1 a 9 gy +1 T r Loll Thru ht Peds 48 52 0 Out In Total _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Y% Traffic Data Inc. TRAFFIC DATA vc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 Park Rd & 1001 Park Rd, East Driveway Chanhassen, MN File Name : 1241133 Park & East Driveway Site Code : 1241133 Start Date : 2/8/2011 Page No : 3 Southbound Park Rd Westbound East Driveway Northbound Park Rd Eastbound Start Time I Rght I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Total I Rght I Thru Left Pads I Apo. Total Rght I ThM Len 1 Pods I App. Total Rght I Thru Len I Pods I App. T Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 3 0 29 6 0 1 2 9 1 29 0 1 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 2 0 30 9 0 1 0 10 0 36 0 0 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 9 0 23 5 0 1 0 6 0 25 0 0 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 18 0 57 4 0 1 0 5 0 26 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 32 0 139 24 0 4 2 30 1 ire 0 1 Total Int. Total 31 89 36 78 25 54 TRAFFIC DATA INC. Park Rd & 1001 Park Rd, West Driveway Chanhassen, MN Traffic Data Inc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241134 Park & West Driveway Site Code : 1241134 Start Date : 2/9/2011 Page No 1 Park Rd West Driveway Park Rd Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Rght Thru Left Ped9 App. Total Rght Thu LeR Peda App. Total Rght Thu LeM1 Pads App. Tutel Rght Thu Left Palo App. Total Inl. Total Factar 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 13 1 0 2 0 3 0 25 0 0 25 41 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 13 3 0 1 0 4 1 14 0 0 15 32 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 4 0 14 2 0 0 0 2 0 31 0 0 31 47 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 4 0 19 5 0 0 0 5 1 18 0 0 19 43 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 8 0 59 11 0 3 0 14 2 88 0 0 90 163 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 6 0 29 4 1 3 0 8 0 20 0 0 20 57 05:15 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 17 10 0 27 4 0 1 0 5 0 21 0 0 21 54 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 12 0 34 5 0 2 0 7 3 18 0 0 21 62 Grand Total 0 0 1 0 1 1 125 38 0 164 26 1 9 0 36 5 157 0 0 162 3113 Approh °h 0 0 100 0 0.6 76.2 23.2 0 72.2 2.8 25 0 3.1 96.9 0 0 Total % 0 0 0.3 0 0.3 0.3 34.4 10.5 0 45.2 7.2 0.3 2.5 0 9.9 1.4 43.3 0 0 44.6 M M M M M M M M M M a M M M M M M M i TRAFFIC DATA lNC. Park Rd & 1001 Park Rd, West Driveway Chanhassen, MN Traffic Data Inc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241134 Park & West Driveway Site Code : 1241134 Start Date : 2/9/2011 Page No : 2 0In Total Rpht Th Left Pods North 2/9/2011 04:00 PM $ 2/9/2011 05:45 PM o. r Class v � 4, T rr Left Th ht Pods 26, ®7 Out In Total TRAFFIC DATA JNC. Park Rd & 1001 Park Rd, West Driveway Chanhassen, MN Traffic Data Inc. 3268 Xenwood Avenue South St Louis Park, MN 55416 File Name : 1241134 Park & West Driveway Site Code : 1241134 Start Date : 2/9/2011 Page No : 3 Park Rd West Driveway Park Rd Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time I Rght I Thru I Left I Pads I App. Total I Rght Thu Left Peds App. Total Rght Thru Left I Pads App. Total Rohl Thru Left I Pedt I App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:46 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for En Bre Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 4 0 19 5 0 0 0 5 1 18 0 0 19 43 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 6 0 29 4 1 3 0 8 0 20 0 0 20 57 05:15 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 17 10 0 27 4 0 1 0 5 0 21 0 0 21 54 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 12 0 34 5 0 2 0 7 3 18 0 0 21 62 Total Volume 0 0 1 0 1 0 77 32 0 109 18 1 8 0 25 4 77 0 0 81 218 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 k 1 11 1 [1 1 Appendix B Volume Development Sheets 11 SUMMARY OF TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Arboretum Blvd & Ponem Blvd 2013 Build Condition I'lorNhouod Southbound b dlould Wealb9end NBL MT MR MIT SBL SBT SBR SBD ML RIT OR ®11 WBL WBT WBR WBU 2011 Turnins lHommentG nl 06 232 155 0 111 200 214 0 220 915 30 0 141 1242 269 0 Initial Beckmund 09w9h Rate 002 0.(12 002 002 0.02 002 GY 002 0@ 0.02 002 ON 0.02 0.02 002 002 Yam ofCrowth to tvlg 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 ".2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Trdfic Tmd 19 292 161 0 115 21e 222 11 226 741 31 0 146 1280 279 0 NtumW.k round Cmwth l4lt a00 OW 01) Oc91 Ora Om nro Oro I'm 0Q) nffl off) 000 0W 0M 000 Yea. of Oowth to Btawaut 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nome ll,kluround4,M, Total 79 292 161 0 115 216 222 0 221 741 31 0 146 1207 279 0 Rota Duttibutwn ti OA 10% 35% R9 at Ata mmnt 0 0 d 0 n 39 n 0 n 0 35 a G9 0 a 0 P iocl Dulnbution MI IM M. 35% Prow, A., nmenl Out A 41 ]I a 0 n a 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ft tl Trl 37 41 ]1 0 0 39 a 0 0 a 35 0 66 a 0 0 haa-b D.Inbu119n 1 Jm 30•A e� hu- Aes n em n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -23 23 n ul -in a 0 h»- DALribuuon Out d0% 3W'. hY- Al nolent W it 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 Pre-B Trl 31 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 .13 23 0 30 .30 0 0 P9.rmdTM, Pm Oe ed Rothe tributnn PuNrt TfI1111t Tt1Y 14] 333 2<6 0 115 255 222 0 23fl ]IM fl9 0 244 125'I 2]9 0 SUMMARY OF TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Park Rd & Pouem Blvd 2013 Build Condition, narmbaund Swmmund Bnawnd WNtbennd "L MT MR MIT SBL SBT STIR SBU ML BIT EBR all Will, WBT WBR WBU 2011 Tomlin ub,emrnt Ctunt 63 384 13 9 34 205 70 0 61 4 15 0 36 6 6A 0 W1.113ack mund(lowth Rate 002 om 002 002 002 002 002 1102 002 002 002 n02 002 002 002 002 Yn. of 6owth 1. [Nuto,g 2-: 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Trdnc Tetd 65 13 0 35 205 73 0 63 4 70 0 39 6 00 0 Futum Backamund Oawh Rate 000 Ono 000 Oro 0M 011(1 0ra 000 001 000 000 Oro 0w 0m) 000 000 Y.. of('rowth to 80ddb.t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 loom, Back..dTn.M,Total 65 399 13 0 35 285 73 0 63 4 '/A 0 30 6 00 0 Pm aDwrthm.n n U(I% ]109. Rd I Aaf . t&l 41 0 n a 0 n 142 0 0 0 O 1 a 0 a 0 a R9'ect Dlanbulo,.Out) n0% Z20% P ,.,Ata' nment Oul a n n 0 0 0 0 0 149 0E11435L 0 0 0 0 a Pr ettbi 43 0 a 0 0 0 142 0 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 hreb Dutnbutwn n I(P. -IOY. -IP: BMIa has-B Aae' n enl n 8 -A 0 0 0 -8 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 hao-B Dnmbnnun Du1 00% Pass43 Aesi nnent Oul a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pt,-B Tri A -fl 0 0 0 -9 fin 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 a Diraned Tr r Pro aced Rsdistrdrunon 6hture Trtllie Tad 116 391 13 0 35 277 2'16 0 275 4 0 3] 6 70 0 \, - � %!! ! - � .;.;,.1.. _ .. , .. . 1..:_,.. I HE /! I 1 1 Lei 1 1 1 1 1 1 SLIM MARV OF TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Park Rd & Ease Drivemy 2030 Build C'ondiliom Northhound Soutbbamd tiulMnntl Werlbound NBL NBT NBB NRO SBL SBT SHR SBII t]II. EBT IXR FAII WBL WRT WBR WBII 2011Turnin IS1osa'senl Count to 4 0 24 0 0 0 a 0 0 116 1 0 3I 107 0 0 huhno Back mend Onmh Rate 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Ong 002 002 002 Ong 002 002 Years o f Qo.0 h o. Izata, 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Traffic Taal 4 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 1I1) 1 a 33 111 0 0 Future Roc round Qonth It 001 Oal 001 not 001 001 061 001 001 Got 001 001 001 001 001 001 Year, of Crnwb to Holdout 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 Ml OoTn n 0 n o 0 0 0 0 0 n 71 0 0 0 59 0 0 Mature B..1 ronndl'ra1Br TOtal J 0 27 11 a 0 0 0 0 201 1 0 36 L'10 0 0 Project Distribution In 320% 63.0% Pmbct Assi'nnenl In 0 1) 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 j 0 0 0 0 62 1 123 0 Pm act Distribution (Qa) 20!. 95.0% Protect Assi mnenl Out O n 0 0 a 0 4 0 0 IN n 0 0 0 0 0 ProemTri 0 0 0 a 0 0 4 0 0 194 u 0 0 62 123 0 Pass-b DlStribulion N 2T/. 0%.. Piu-By Assimnent In 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 48 0 Pus-R Dislnbalnn Out 90P.1. Pear-B AaaG.Gu nt Qn 0 n O B n n a 0 n n n o n n n a Paso-B Tr1 0 0 a a a a a 0 0 71 a 0 a II 49 0 ms Pmcd Rcdistnbubnn 4 .36 16 fna're'fraRcuad 0 0 27 0 0 0 4 0 11 466 1 0 0 299 171 II SUMMARY O]"I URNINC MOVEMENT VOLUMES Park Rd & NVI m Drivewnv 2030 Build Cnndilions Not SombLoand Fnslbonna Westhound N01, NBT N'HR NRO SRI, SRI' SBR SRII to 1. EBT 1LR EHI; WBL WBT WBR WBII 2011 Turning6laemenl Count 6 1 22 II 1 0 0 0 a 94 4 0 33 78 0 0 Inmal B.ik,mund Qo.h M¢ 002 002 007 002 ON nn2 002 Ong 002 002 602 Ong 002 Ong 002 002 Yeen ofGowh to Rrstin 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 TraHir Toad 6 1 23 a 1 0 0 0 0 97 4 0 34 81 0 0 Future Hackgmund Qowh lime out It 01 Got 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 not 00it 0ol 0.1 Gnl 001 Yeen nfGo.ah to Buddoul 17 17 17 17 17 17 ❑ 17 ❑ 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 (RLSheTons o 0 a a O 0 n n n 71 0 0 0 59 0 0 hurt Back routed TraPr Total 7 1 25 9 1 0 0 0 0 176 4 0 37 147 0 a Project Distribution In 5n°[ 320Y. Pm ect Assi rroau n o n 0 n n n n a In 0 n n 0 0 62 0 Pmect Distribution MI 95 fP. 3P16 2WS, Pmect .A ssl •nnenl Out 0 0 n 0 194 0 6 0 0 n 0 0 0 4 0 0 PrOext Trl 0 0 0 0 194 0 6 0 to 0 0 0 0 4 62 0 Pass-B Dounbounn In 511. .5% .5% 32N, Paes-B Assl ratut In 0 II n n 0 0 n 0 4 4 0 n n 24 0 Pass -By Dntubutian Dot 95% 1% PesnB Assl nnent Coo 0 n n 0 75 0 4 n 0 n n 0 0 a 0 n Pare-B Tri 0 a 0 0 75 0 J 0 4 4 0 0 0 J II a Pm osed Redotnhalnu d 36 4 Future Traffic Total II 1 25 0 2711 0 10 0 u 17I J 1 0 73 144 86 0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ r I I Appendix SimTraffic RE 1 1 1 LJ I t 1 1 1 I SimTraffic Performance Report 2011 Existing - PM 4/6/2011 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay I Veh (s) 9.8 11.5 5.1 10.4 13.1 5.2 7.4 0.9 5.1 4.6 3.1 16 Vehicles Entered 62 3 77 38 7 75 64 377 11 32 279 76 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 3.7 Vehicles Entered 1101 Denied Entry Before 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 63.0 21.9 4.4 75.0 34.8 3.9 73.8 68.0 3.2 73.1 66.3 2.9 Vehicles Entered 209 730 30 135 1225 274 74 293 148 106 210 223 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement r_. =---_E_�� , Delay / Veh (s) 36.0 Vehicles Entered 3657 Denied Entry Before 0 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 0.2 0.3 2.0 0.5 5.5 7.9 2.6 7.1 1.0 Vehicles Entered 96 4 33 81 7 1 24 2 248 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 0.6 0.1 1.6 0.4 5.7 3.0 0.9 Vehicles Entered 122 1 34 112 3 21 293 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SinnTraffic Report Page 1 SimTraffic Performance Report 2011 Existing - PM 4/6/2011 Total Network Performance Delay 1 Veh isj 44.5 Vehides Entered 3884 Denied Entry Before 0 SirnTraffic Report ' Page 2 IJ ' Queuing and Blocking Report ' 2011 Existing - PM 4/6/2011 Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Directions Served LTR LTR L T L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 86 83 48 4 39 3 23 Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) 35 67 35 65 13 38 0 3 7 26 0 1 2 9 Link Distance (ft) 99 166 1152 674 Upstream BIk Time 0 ' Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 225 225 Storage Bilk Time (%) ' Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard ' Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T T L T T R L T T L L Maximum Queue (ft) 337 270 296 274 550 578 36 160 201 217 112 119 ' Average Queue (ft) 183 129 156 128 340 358 2 69 127 139 48 60 95th Queue (ft) 309 220 253 225 492 512 33 130 187 209 90 102 Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 871 871 674 674 Upstream Blk Time (%) ' Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 630 600 230 250 250 Storage Bilk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard .Y= Directions Served T T Maximum Queue (ft) 198 183 Average Queue (ft) 88 104 95th Queue (ft) 149 158 ' Link Distance (ft) Upstream BIk Time (%) 473 473 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) - Storage Bilk Time (%) ' Queuing Penalty (veh) ' SimTratfic Report Page 3 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2011 Existing - PM 4/6/2011 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West D Directions Served LTR LTR LR Maximum Queue (ft) 29 39 30 Average Queue (ft) 2 19 2 95th Queue (ft) 14 43 15 Link Distance (ft) 292 412 357 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Directions Served LTR LR Maximum Queue (ft) 49 45 Average Queue (ft) 5 19 95th Queue (ft) 26 45 Link Distance (ft) 99 387 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summa Network wide Queuing Penalty: 1 SimTraffic Report ' Page 4 1 SimTraffic Performance Report 2013 No Build - PM 4/6/2011 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR " NBL ' NBT NBR SBL ' SBT SBA Delay / Veh (s) 11.0 10.0 5.2 9.7 11.5 5.2 7.3 1.0 5.5 5.5 3.2 3.6 Vehicles Entered 57 4 76 36 8 73 66 413 14 28 288 79 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 3.7 Vehicles Entered 1142 Denied Entry Before 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SSL SBT SBR Delay / Veh (s) 64.5 22.4 4.6 75.9 37 8 4.1 74.2 68.4 3-3 73 6 69-5 3.0 Vehicles Entered 226 740 28 138 1298 273 79 295 171 112 221 239 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 37.5 ' Vehicles Entered Denied Entry Before 3820 0 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR 'SBL All Delay / Veh (s) 0.3 0.0 2.2 0.4 5.2 6.7 2.7 4.9 0.9 Vehicles Entered 91 4 32 88 4 1 24 1 245 ' Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement EBT EBR Delay / Veh (s) 0.6 0 1 1.7 0.5 6.7 3.0 1.0 ' Vehicles Entered 114 2 37 117 4 22 296 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ' SirnTraffic Report Page 1 SimTraffic Performance Report 1 2013 No Build - PM 416/2011 Total Network Performance , 1 1 1 1 1 1 SnTraffic Report ' Page 2 1 I t t 1 1 I 1 1 �I Queuing and Blocking Report 2013 No Build - PM 416/2011 Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L T L R Maximum Queue (ft) 101 94 48 4 50 12 Average Queue (ft) 38 34 11 0 7 1 95th Queue (ft) 71 64 37 4 29 5 Link Distance (ft) 99 166 1152 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 225 225 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB WB 94 B4 NB NB NB Directions Served L T T L T T R T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 345 314 330 347 672 686 209 16 34 156 225 235 Average Queue (ft) 193 145 171 132 368 393 14 1 1 77 132 139 95th Queue (ft) 307 242 268 264 598 624 184 11 25 143 207 207 Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 871 871 2220 2220 674 674 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 630 600 230 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 3 0 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard rarnent'- SB SB I` SB SB Directions Served L L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 123 142 186 199 Average Queue (ft) 52 65 95 111 95th Queue (ft) 108 118 160 174 Link Distance (ft) 473 473 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 SimTraffic Report Page 3 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2013 No Build - PM 41612011 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West Driveway ' Directions Served LTR LTR LR M MazQnum Queue (ft) 30 35 12 Average Queue (ft) 3 19 1 95th Queue (ft) 17 43 9 , Link Distance (ft) 292 412 357 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) ' Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) ' Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Driveway Directions Served LTR LR Ma)dmum Queue (ft) 62 36 Average Queue (ft) 7 17 , 95th Queue (ft) 34 42 Link Distance (ft) 99 387 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) ' Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) ' Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 4 ' 1 I 1 IJ SimTraffic Report Page 4 SimTraffic Performance Report 2013 Build - PM 4/6/2011 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 55.3 16.5 4.2 20.4 22.7 11.0 11.0 1.5 5.3 7.0 3.6 5.3 Vehicles Entered 276 5 125 31 7 77 121 406 17 34 285 282 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 13.4 Vehicles Entered 1666 Denied Entry Before 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 65.6 25.5 5.0 174.4 37.1 4.0 260.1 73.6 3.8 74.7 74.9 3.2 Vehicles Entered 214 715 100 227 1275 287 149 343 263 108 265 222 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 51.4 Vehicles Entered 4168 Denied Entry Before 0 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 3.2 2.7 1.9 2.1 0.2 0.5 6.1 8.9 6.4 18.9 3.4 8.6 Vehicles Entered 12 106 6 65 85 88 12 1 22 267 10 674 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 23.5 1.3 0.6 0.8�493.5 4.7 24.6 Vehicles Entered 389 1 234 175 24 2 825 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SimTraffic Report Page 1 SimTraffic Performance Report 1 2013 Build - PM 4/6I2011 Total Network Performance ' Delay I Veh (s) 67.7 ' Vehicles Entered 4538 Denied Entry Before 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SirnTraffic Report ' Page 2 1 I 1 1 1 t 1 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2013 Build - PM 4/6/2011 Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Movement EB EB WB NB NB NB NB ` SB SB SS Directions Served L TR LTR L T T R L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 189 94 103 92 6 25 4 56 4 46 Average Queue (ft) 144 33 44 30 0 1 0 12 0 3 95th Queue (ft) 218 62 88 64 4 7 3 41 3 24 Link Distance (ft) 104 104 166 1147 1147 669 Upstream Blk Time (%) 55 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 112 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 350 225 225 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB WB B17 B17 NB NB NB Directions Served L T T L T T R T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 345 266 296 593 596 601 27 208 207 336 507 452 Average Queue (ft) 187 155 179 367 360 377 1 7 7 260 272 226 95th Queue (ft) 318 248 275 598 533 541 20 152 151 396 563 456 Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 871 871 1035 1035 669 669 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 2 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 630 600 230 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 0 0 40 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 0 0 66 2 0 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Directions Served L L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 114 123 187 262 - ' Average Queue (ft) 50 61 98 151 95th Queue (ft) 93 103 164 229 ' Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) 473 473 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 ' Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 1 IJ SimTraffic Report Page 3 Queuing and Blocking Report 2013 Build - PM 416/2011 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West Drivewav Directions Served L R LTR LT R T T LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 73 30 8 55 219 88 26 26 Average Queue (ft) 8 7 0 21 82 10 3 2 95th Queue (ft) 42 27 4 48 202 75 34 27 Link Distance (ft) 883 291 406 339 339 116 116 Upstream Blk Time (%) 3 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Directions Served T Maximum Queue (ft) 140 Average Queue (ft) 65 95th Queue (ft) 176 Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) 29 Queuing Penalty (veh) 55 Network Sum Network wide Queuing Penalty: 267 TR T TR R R 227 27 56 232 30 71 1 4 82 2 271 14 32 247 14 291 104 104 376 339 5 0 2 19 1 0 SimTraffic Report Page 4 ' SimTraffic Performance Report 2013 Build (Improvements A-B) - PM 5/612011 1 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement ' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBTWBR NBL NBT NBR SBL_ _ SBT SBR Delay / Veh (s) 27.3 27.3 3.7 40.2 37.4 12.2 27.0 9.6 6.0 13.3 6.8 6.0 Vehicles Entered 279 5 129 30 7 77 121 406 17 34 280 277 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movement All Delay / Veh (s) 13.2 Vehicles Entered 1662 1 1 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBC NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Delay I Veh (s) 70.8 30.6 5.1 71.3 41.4 4.1 68.7 62 1 4A 71.0 87.1 3.3 Vehides Entered 215 713 99 224 1265 287 150 344 265 107 269 223 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay I Veh (s) 41.2 Vehicles Entered 4161 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement ... Wver en - EBL EBT ` EBR WBL WBT WBR'' NBL ;_ NBT NBR' S13L SBR Ap Delay / Veh (s) 2.9 0.6 0.2 2,1 0.2 0.6 5.9 7.4 3.9 8.5 2.5 4.1 Vehicles Entered 13 105 5 63 85 91 11 1 22 266 10 672 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBR All Delay I Veh (s) 2.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 8.6 2.3 1.7 Vehicles Entered 391 1 235 175 23 3 828 Total Network Performance Delay 1 Veh (s) 53.7 Vehicles Entered 4522 SimTraffic Report Page 1 F Queuing and Blocking Report 2013 Build (Improvements A-B) - PM 5/6/2011 Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) I L TR LTR L T T R L T T R ' 185 105 136 134 98 136 28 66 90 95 75 T=, 129 32 53 57 43 62 4 17 16 26 35 195 68 103 114 85 115 21 48 55 68 69 ' 104 104 166 1147 1147 669 669 18 0 0 38 1 0 350 350 225 225 ' Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard F ri" _gip �8b ,e.'ce£-4+ y R�`. # -"_LD 'Yh/'?ry.y. :-�..�"'_.i'�`` .Y � ��p - ` 1VJ-"� `.^=r�Q,;,,_ cXYi� Directions Served L T T L T T L T T L L T Maximum Queue (ft) 376 304 318 387 689 700 263 257 268 106 123 197 Average Queue (ft) 185 173 192 208 404 423 140 149 155 50 63 104 95th Queue (ft) 313 270 292 340 590 602 232 232 239 97 106 176 Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 871 871 669 669 473 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 630 230 250 250 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 1 2 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 2 3 1 0 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Movement Directions Served T Maximum Queue (ft) 288 Average Queue (ft) 166 95th Queue (ft) 248 Link Distance (ft) 473 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) �. Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 SimTraffic Report Page 2 ' Queuing and Blocking Report 2013 Build (Improvements A-B) - PM 5/6/2011 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West Driveway ' Directions Served LTR L R LTR LT R Maximum Queue (ft) 26 37 7 51 118 22 ' Average Queue (ft) 2 5 0 21 95th Queue (ft) 14 25 4 47 58 97 6 22 Link Distance (ft) 883 291 406 339 339 Upstream Blk Time (%) ' Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time (%) ' Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Driveway ' Movement EB EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served T TR T TR R R Maximum Queue (ft) 103 42 14 39 52 30 ' Average Queue (ft) 12 2 1 2 18 2 95th Queue (ft) 55 28 11 18 45 15 Link Distance (ft) 291 104 104 376 339 Upstream Blk Time (%) ' Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1 Network Summary ' Network wide Queuing Penalty: 51 [1 r ' SimTraffic Report Page 3 1 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 No Build (Improvement A) - PM 5/4/2011 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement t�d`vemenf ESL EBT' EBR ``WBL WBT WBR' NBL NBT' ' NBR SB,_ft Delay, Veh (s) 42.6 36.8 30,6 47.7 60.5 40.5 8.6 1.9 52 8A 3.3 3.7 Vehicles Entered 113 5 105 64 6 151 87 767 30 86 415 122 Denied Entry Before 0 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement All.:: Delay / Veh (s) 11.6 Vehicles Entered 1951 Denied Entry Before 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movement v ,......EBL i BT ,EBR ,-,-WBL-,- WST : WBR - NBL NBT, NBR _ SBIL . SBT ..SBR Delay / Veh (s) 95.6 35.9 4.9 65.9 44.1 4.4 115.7 71.0 4.6 76.3 95.5 3.4 Vehicles Entered 261 803 51 267 1390 292 164 437 427 120 294 236 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 47.4 Vehicles Entered 4742 Denied Entry Before 0 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement O&eirieiit BT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL All Delay i Veh (s) 2.6 0.0 2 6 0-5 6.4 3.5 T2 6 2 2.2 Vehicles Entered 171 4 36 147 7 1 25 2 393 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL . NBR All Delay / Veh (s) 25.5 162 1.9 0.5 115.4 102.0 18.6 Vehicles Entered 198 1 34 178 4 25 440 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SirnTraffic Report Page 1 SimTraffic Performance Report ' 2030 No Build (Improvement A) - PM 5/4/2011 Total Network Performance Delay I Veh (s) 61.7 Vehides Entered 5065 ' Denied Entry Before 0 H 1 I 1 1 I 1 t SirnTraffic Report Page 2 11 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build (Improvement A) - PM 5i412011 Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Directions Served LTR LTR T L T R L R Maximum Queue (ft) 119 237 54 57 20 14 69 22 Average Queue (ft) 90 116 3 18 1 0 28 3 95th Queue (it) 135 218 23 43 7 8 62 14 Link Distance (ft) 99 166 223 1152 Upstream Blk Time (%) 27 10 Queuing Penalty (veh) 63 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 350 225 225 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Directions Served L T T L T T R T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 498 369 409 412 726 728 209 81 94 320 408 402 Average Queue (ft) 279 215 239 238 442 467 21 4 5 187 234 226 95th Queue (ft) 469 335 358 370 673 697 228 61 72 332 394 350 Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 871 871 2220 2220 674 674 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (it) 550 630 600 230 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 2 2 14 4 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 4 7 30 7 3 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard t ' SB SB SB SB Directions Served L L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 130 135 282 301 Average Queue (ft) 61 69 152 170 95th Queue (ft) 111 119 247 265 Link Distance (ft) 473 473 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (it) 250 250 Storage Blk Time (%) 2 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 8 SimTraffic Report Page 3 tQueuing and Blocking Report ' 2030 No Build (Improvement A) - PM 5/412011 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West Driveway ' Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LR Maximum Queue (ft) 60 47 49 31 t Average Queue (ft) 7 7 21 2 95th Queue (ft) 54 31 46 14 Link Distance (ft) 894 292 412 357 Upstream Bilk Time (%) ' Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) ' Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Driveway ' Movement EB WB NB Directions Served LTR LTR LR Maximum Queue (ft) 217 63 136 Average Queue (ft) 63 7 39 ' 95th Queue (ft) 212 37 117 Link Distance (ft) 292 99 387 Upstream Blk Time (%) 4 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Bilk Time (%) ' Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 133 I I 11 SimTraffic Report Page 4 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A) - PM 5/5/2011 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement ' Delay / Veh (s) 191.3 26.5 9.4 155.1 173.1 129.6 12.7 2.4 5.5 10.1 3.4 5.2 ' Vehicles Entered 144 4 74 56 8 136 137 764 33 84 403 318 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement _ . °` Delay / Veh (s) 293 Vehicles Entered 2161 Denied Entry Before 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT- EBR _WBL ,WBT WBR NBL :'NBT "NBR SBL = SBT SBA Delay / Veh (s) 105.0 47.1 5.5 75.6 56.3 5.0 86.0 59.0 4.5 76.6 91 A 3.5 Vehicles Entered 246 782 108 378 1395 304 192 405 444 121 307 235 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 51.4 Vehicles Entered 4917 Denied Entry Before 0 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance bV movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL 'SBR All Delay / Veh (s) 283.7 253.9 298.9 2.2 0.2 0.5 677.3 965.0 14689 20 251.2 Vehicles Entered 11 167 3 73 136 88 13 1 24 47 1 564 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement Movement- , EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBR All Delay / Veh (s) 186.2 40.5 0.6 1.1 5729.1 92 125.7 Vehicles Entered 222 1 295 166 17 3 704 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SimTrafric Report ' Page 1 J SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A) - PM 5/5/2011 Total Network Performance Delay / Veh (s) Vehicles Entered Denied Entry Before 199.1 5317 4 r Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A) - PM 5/512011 Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard r Directions Served L TR LTR T L T R L T R , Maximum Queue (ft) 206 115 253 225 107 8 13 91 4 57 Average Queue (ft) 178 38 207 119 36 0 1 35 0 5 95th Queue (ft) 190 89 , 304 295 81 4 7 71 3 30 r Link Distance (ft) 104 104 166 223 1147 669 Upstream Blk Time (%) 99 1 69 30 Queuing Penalty (veh) 244 1 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 350 225 225 r Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) r Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard r Directions Served L T T L T T R T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 486 405 419 779 864 874 690 312 342 330 347 363 Average Queue (ft) 280 255 277 374 530 550 64 20 27 195 180 185 95th Queue (ft) 488 370 390 635 832 852 430 174 226 323 316 310 r Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 871 871 2220 2220 669 669 Upstream Bilk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 2 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (it) 550 630 600 230 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 0 1 5 7 10 2 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 0 7 19 21 23 4 3 r Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Movement SB SB SB SB SB r Directions Szroec L L 7 R Maximum Queue (it) Average Queue (ft) 124 57 138 67 260 141 308 188 219 16 r 95th Queue (ft) 107 117 234 299 137 Link Distance (ft) 473 473 Upstream Blk Time (%) r Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 250 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 15 r r r lJ SimTraffic Report r Page 3 r I [l 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 I 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A) - PM 5/5/2011 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West D T Directions Served LTR T L R LTR T LT R T Maximum Queue (ft) 592 54 35 9 359 58 420 82 136 131 Average Queue (ft) 355 26 5 0 190 17 389 19 117 91 95th Queue (ft) 862 149 22 6 424 119 500 149 168 181 Link Distance (ft) 883 257 291 406 277 339 339 116 116 Upstream Bilk Time (°%) 12 6 10 4 94 0 93 63 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Bilk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 4: Bend Movement EB Directions Served T Maximum Queue (ft) 370 Average Queue (ft) 13 95th Queue (ft) 194 Link Distance (ft) 871 Upstream Bilk Time (°k) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Bilk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Driveway Directions Served T TR T TR R T R Maximum Queue (ft) 150 307 12 75 447 180 30 Average Queue (ft) 149 290 0 4 293 34 2 95th Queue (ft) 154 363 6 30 526 138 15 Link Distance (ft) 291 104 104 376 257 339 Upstream Bilk Time (%) 74 0 45 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 344 1 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) 97 Queuing Penalty (veh) 226 Network Summ Network wide Queuing Penalty: 914 SimTraffic Report Page 4 1 SimTraffic Performance Report I 2030 Build (Mitigation A-B) - PM 5/512011 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement r Delay / Veh (s) 30.6 19.2 4.2 45.0 50.8 26.4 35.2 15.7 6.5 29.0 7 3 6.5 Vehicles Entered 310 5 168 63 8 146 136 769 32 85 399 314 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movern"ll All Delay / Veh (s) I-: Vehicles Entered 2435 Denied Entry Before 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Delay / Von (s) 104,0 48.0 5.5 72.0 52.6 4.9 122.1 64.5 6.6 78.5 112.9 5.0 Vehicles Entered 243 787 108 372 1385 311 224 476 526 119 312 238 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement AN Delay / Veh (s) 53.3 Vehicles Entered 5101 Denied Entry Before 0 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBIL NBT NBR SBL SBR All Delay/ Veh (s) 2.7 0.7 1A 2 5 03 M 72 6.5 5,0 12,8 3,0 5.1 Vehicles Entered 11 169 3 73 138 88 12 1 26 267 10 798 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBR All Delay / Veh (s) 2.6 0.9 0.7 0.6 18.1 5.0 2.1 Vehicles Entered 459 2 297 165 24 2 949 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sinn-Fraffic Report Page 1 SimTraffic Performance Report ' 2030 Build (Mitigation A-B) - PM 5/5/2011 Total Network Performance Delay / Veh (s) 69.3 Vehicles Entered 5551 Denied Entry Before 0 I 1 1 1 1 I I SimTraffic Report Page 2 r Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A-B) - PM 5/5/2011 Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Directions Served L TR LTR T L T T R L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 182 92 225 25 158 190 273 45 134 314 78 107 Average Queue (ft) 143 38 109 1 72 90 140 11 52 25 30 52 95th Queue (ft) 199 71 196 13 142 162 223 35 101 164 66 93 Link Distance (ft) 104 104 166 223 1147 1147 669 669 Upstream Bilk Time (%) 26 0 3 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 65 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 350 225 225 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Directions Served — L T T L T T R T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 500 398 420 758 873 882 423 84 132 350 522 492 Average Queue (ft) 267 255 277 368 518 545 22 3 7 265 268 250 95th Queue (ft) 463 360 382 605 795 832 229 37 62 395 479 435 Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 871 871 2220 2220 669 669 Upstream Blk Time (°k) 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 630 600 230 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 4 6 30 4 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 15 18 72 10 6 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard OW mend' gem NB SB SB SB SB SB B6 86 Directions Ser ed R L L T T R T T Maximum Queue (ft) 82 123 148 355 382 148 39 64 Average Queue (ft) 3 57 66 170 222 24 1 3 95th Queue (ft) 60 107 119 311 369 172 16 40 Link Distance (ft) 473 473 1834 1834 Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 250 250 250 Storage Blk Time (%) 3 13 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 32 SimTraffic Report Page 3 ' Queuing and Blocking Report ' 2030 Build (Mitigation A-B) - PM 515/2011 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West Drivewav Movement EB WB WB NB SB SB ' Directions Served LTR L R LTR LT R Maximum Queue (ft) 32 34 9 54 195 22 Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) 2 16 13 38 0 6 24 50 75 146 6 21 Link Distance (ft) 883 291 406 339 339 Upstream Blk Time (%) ' Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time (%) ' Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 4: Bend tMovement .: _ l E, e 4 - Directions Served T Maximum Queue (ft) 372 ' Average Queue (ft) 13 95th Queue (ft) 195 Link Distance (ft) 871 Upstream Blk Time 0 ' Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) ' Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Driveway Directions Served T T TR R R Maximum Queue (ft) 110 10 22 63 30 ' Average Queue (ft) 17 1 1 20 2 95th Queue (ft) 71 9 9 51 16 ' Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) 104 104 376 339 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 ' Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 225 l J' ' SimTraffic Report Page 4 1 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A-D) - PM 5/5/2011 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement ' Delay / Veh (s) 31.1 18.7 4.1 43.6 49.5 25.1 34.8 16.0 6.6 27.6 7.6 7.3 ' Vehicles Entered 308 5 167 62 9 146 138 ;M 0;,3, 86 397 315 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movement Delay / Veh s _ Vehicles Entered 2430 Denied Entry Before 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 79.5 39.8 5.4 66.7 43.8 4.6 76.7 57.2 6.4 76.2 76.4 3.3 Vehicles Entered 244 787 106 373 1385 311 223 471 525 120 312 235 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement 06vement All Delay I Veh is) 43-0 Vehicles Entered 5092 Denied Entry Before 0 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement Nvernent- EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NET NBR SBL SBR Ad Delay/Veh is) 2.9 0.7 0-5 2.4 0-3 0-6 6-6 72 5.0 11-4 2-6 4.7 Vehicles Entered 11 167 3 74 137 88 12 1 26 266 10 795 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement e ent EBT - EBR. W$T 1.-,YJBR ,.NBR SBR, All Delay / Veh (s) 2 8 1 1 0.7 0.6 21.9 4.3 2 2 Vehicles Entered 456 2 297 166 24 2 947 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SirnTraffic Report ' Page i I SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A-D) - PM 5/5/2011 1 Total Network Performance ' Delay / Veh (s) 59.6 Vehicles Entered 5542 Denied Entry Before 0 1 1 1 1 1 SimTraffic Report Page 2 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A-D) - PM 5i5i2011 Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Movement EB Ebi NB 88 NB NB ' N13 NB SB SB, "' SB ` SB Directions Served L TR LTR T L T T R L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 187 86 223 17 157 212 274 44 124 78 112 109 Average Queue (ft) 147 37 106 0 71 94 144 11 53 17 32 47 95th Queue (ft) 198 69 193 6 133 174 233 35 104 56 77 93 Link Distance (ft) 104 104 166 223 1147 1147 669 669 Upstream Bilk Time{%) 27 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 67 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 350 225 225 Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Directions Served L L T T L L T T R T T L Maximum Queue (ft) 201 220 359 383 257 500 775 835 728 22 27 349 Average Queue (ft) 115 118 234 259 148 194 457 482 29 1 1 218 95th Queue (ft) 183 192 337 356 226 338 709 744 269 16 19 347 Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 870 870 2220 2220 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 550 630 630 600 230 Storage BIk Time (%) 2 3 10 Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 9 24 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Movement NB NB SB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T T L L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 397 374 126 139 241 307 143 Average Queue (ft) 202 202 59 70 128 175 5 95th Queue (ft) 333 317- 113 119 207 270- 75 Link Distance (ft) 669 669 473 473 Upstream Bilk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist(ft) 250 250 250 Storage Bilk Time (%) 3 0 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 2 0 7 SimTraffic Report Page 3 I 1 I 1 i Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A-D) - PM 5/5/2011 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West Directions Served LTR L R LTR LT R Maximum Queue (ft) 27 34 4 61 166 22 Average Queue (ft) 2 10 0 24 70 6 95th Queue (ft) 13 34 3 51 130 21 Link Distance (ft) 883 291 406 339 339 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 4: Bend Directions Served T Maximum Queue (ft) 531 Average Queue (ft) 19 95th Queue (ft) 231 Link Distance (ft) 870 Upstream BIk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Driveway Directions Served T TR T TR R R Maximum Queue (ft) 124 35 23 42 75 30 Average Queue (ft) 20 1 1 1 21 2 95th Queue (ft) 81 26 9 16 55 16 Link Distance (ft) 291 104 104 376 339 Upstream BIk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage BIk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 Network S Network wide Queuing Penalty. 127 SimTraffic Report Page 4 Wetland Delineation Report 1000 Park Road City of Chanhassen Carver County, Minnesota Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N St. Paul, MN 55114 June 2011 SCANNED ou,� :�- _ ,} mley-Hom m❑ Ki and Associabs, Inc. Wetland Delineation Report for 1000 Park Road City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota Contents Executive Summary SiteLocation..............................................................................................................................................1 ProjectDescription....................................................................................................................................1 Purposeof Delineation..............................................................................................................................1 SiteDescription.........................................................................................................................................1 PreliminaryInvestigation...........................................................................................................................1 FieldInvestigation.....................................................................................................................................2 WetlandCharacteristics .............................................................................................................................8 RegulatoryRequirements........................................................................................................................10 ReportPreparation..................................................................................................................................11 References..............................................................................................................................................12 Figures Figure 1—Project Vicinity....................................................... Figure 2— Project Study Area ................................................... Figure 3— USGS Topographic Map ........................................... Figure 4—Delineated Wetland Boundaries ............................... Figure S—Wetalnd Area Types ................................................ Appendices Appendix A— National Wetlands Inventory Appendix B— Hydric Soils Information Appendix C — Precipitation Data Appendix D—MN DNR Public Waters Inventory Appendix E — Field Data Sheets Appendix F — Site Photos KHA Project No. 116199062.1.140 ................................................................ 3 ................................................................4 ................................................................5 ......7 Copyright ID 2011 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only far the specific purpose and client for which It was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Klmley- Horn and Associates, Inc., shall be without liability to Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc Wetland Delineation Report I 1000 Park Road June 2011 ❑_❑ ��,IrE. Executive Summary Wetland scientists Beth Kunkel (CWD #1084) and Ashley Payne (CWD-IT#5104) with Kim ley -Horn and Associates, Inc. conducted a wetland investigation and delineation for the 1000 Park Road site in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota. Field reconnaissance was performed on October 2o`n 2010. Based on the field evaluation and review of available background information, the following findings/conclusions/recommendations are made: • Two wetland areas were determined to be wetland; • Area A met the federal definition of wetland. o Area A was classified as a Type 6 — Shrub -Carr Wetland. Area A was located west of the parking lot and east of Area B. • Area B met the federal definition of wetland. o Area B was classified as a Type 2 — Fresh (wet) Meadow and Type 6 — Shrub -Carr Wetland. Area B was west of Area A and west of the side parking lot of the existing building. • The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) should review the delineation to determine whether the identified wetlands are jurisdictional (i.e., Waters of the United States). • If construction activities are proposed within any of the identified wetlands, approvals/permits from the ACOE, MnDNR, and/or Local Government Unit may be required. Coordination with these agencies should be conducted prior to construction. • Best Management Practices (BMPs) for erosion and sediment control should be implemented during and after construction to protect the quality of the wetlands. The BMPs should be outlined in a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Wetland Delineation Report II 1000 Park Road June 2011 Site Location The Park Road site is located south of Minnesota State Highway 5 and west of County State -Aid Highway (CSAH) 17(Powers Boulevard) in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota (Figure 1). The project is located in Section 14, Township 116 North, Range 23 West. Project Description The project site at 1000 Park Road is currently being considered for redevelopment as a retail center. The project study area can be found in Figure 2. Purpose of Delineation This delineation is intended to identify the extent of wetlands within and adjacent to the site. The information will be used to facilitate site design and to determine if wetland impacts are avoidable and/or if minimization of impacts can result from design modifications. Site Description Land use within and adjacent to the project area included commercial, roadway right-of-way and undeveloped property. Essentially, the site is a parcel developed on the east side with a commercial building and adjacent parking lot and to the east side The ground surface elevation of the study area ranged from 1030 feet to 1052 feet above sea level. The topography is generally flat and mostly developed. Preliminary Investigation Prior to field reconnaissance, potential wetland areas within the project area were identified through review of National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) mapping, aerial photography (2009), site topography, and the soil survey for Carver County. NWI mapping, maintained by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, shows one wetland within the study area (Appendix A). The Shakopee, Minnesota 7.5-minute topographic map (U.S. Geological Survey) shows a blue line which indicates there is a channel running through the project study area and two purple hatched spaces which identifies two excavated ponds near the project study area (see Figure 3). According to the Natural Resources Conservation Service's (NRCS) Web Soil Survey, one soil mapping unit within the project area was considered to be hydric (Hamel Loom). Maps and information obtained from the NRCS online soil survey are included in Appendix B. Precipitation data for the project vicinity were obtained from an online data retrieval system, created and maintained by the Climatology Working Group at the University of Minnesota (available at http://climate.umn.edu/doc/historical.htm), to determine the wetness conditions in the surrounding area. Rainfall levels for the three months (July, August, September 2010) leading up to the field investigation were compared to historical data. The comparison indicates Wetland Delineation Report 1 1000 Park Road June 2011 �❑ �, IrE. that all three months had "wetter than normal" conditions. The precipitation data can be found in Appendix C. The Department of Natural Resources Public Waters Inventory Map (PWI) was reviewed. One public water was identified on the inventory map. This public water is a stream that flows in the southwestern corner of the study area. The Inventory Map is included in Appendix D. Field Investigation Wetland scientists, Beth Kunkel (CWD #1084) and Ashley Payne (CWD-IT #5104) with Kimley- Horn and Associates, Inc. (KHA), conducted a field investigation and delineation on October 20tn 2010. The weather was generally clear and sunny. No rainfall fell during the week prior to the delineation. A routine level 2 wetland delineation, as outlined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (ACOE) along with the Midwest Regional Supplement was performed. Vegetation, soil, and hydrologic characteristics were evaluated at each potential wetland area within the project study area. A transect, including at least one upland sample point and one wetland sample point, was completed and documented for each wetland area. Wetland boundaries were flagged with numbered pin flags where one or more of the three criteria were no longer present. The flag and sample point locations were surveyed and are shown in Figure 4. The field data sheets are included in Appendix E. Wetland Delineation Report 2 1000 Park Road June 2011 LAKE ANNE #12P NR Pubtic W N2 0 a>' 'a m� rc: S a 0 m w —.8i„.STREEi m w Y A90R UFI,BOUI'EVA O ]BTH-STREEi w rc Y K a n °RETCH. vmm-] PROAD BO(i C� 9R0 w R PROJECT STUDY AREA 0 n �K�p1yNE 1 o�NcEp0. i 0 m 0 0 a LAKE SUSAN #13P 0 s0 ci�aR 1000 Park Road �=n NOWTH Wetland Delineation Report Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 0 500 1,000 Figure 1. Project Vicinity mmmmmp Feet TORMPON Ij DELINEATED WL _ STRUCTEU '..y TOPMPONL f I t' ? Lake Ann 955 10 - 1000 Park Road C=� NOffrH Wetland Delineation Report U 500 1•000 Figure 3. USGS Topographical Map - Shakopee Quadrangle Kimley-Horn and Associates. inc. Feet V t , - tu/ ► AWWs+i_T' a W" ; ❑—❑KffnboW and Assod*s, InG. Wetland Characteristics The field investigation identified two wetland areas within the project study area; these boundaries are described below. The wetland boundaries, as flagged and surveyed, are shown in Figure 4. The field data sheets are included in Appendix E. Area A: Wetland Area A was located western edge of the back entrance road to the existing (west) side parking lot (Figure 4). This area is a ditch area/storage pond with steep bank slopes on all sides of the wetland. Two old weir structures were abandoned within this basin. Area A was not identified on NWI, but was identified as having hydric soil (Hamel Loam). Dominant vegetation within Area A at sample point A-N-1 included box elder (Acer negundo), black willow (Salix nigra), smooth sumac (Rhus glabra), and reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinaceo). Other notable hydrophytic vegetation found within the wetland area was giant goldenrod (Solidago gigantea), blue vervain (Verbena hostata), and a smartweed species (Polygonum sp.). The vegetation within the upland area adjacent to Area A (sample point A-N-2) had a dominance of box elder, smooth sumac, reed canarygrass, and burdock (Arctium minus) which was not considered hydrophytic vegetation. The soil within the wetland area met the field indicator of F6 (Redox Dark Surface). Hydrology within the wetland area was determined by saturation (A3) at 13 inches and by drainage patterns (1310), and geomorphic positions (D2). Eleven flags were placed around the perimeter of Area A. The wetland boundary determination was generally based on the steep changes in topography (steep bank slopes) and changes in vegetation from reed canary grass and black willow to sumac and burdock. Area A was considered a Type 6—Shrub-Carr wetland (Figure 5) Area B: Wetland Area B was located along the western edge of the property line (Figure 4). This area is in a low topographic position with steep slopes on the northern, eastern, and southern sides. Area B has a DNR public water channel flowing through the southwestern corner of the parcel. To the west of the parcel and Area B, two created stormwater ponds area present. Area A and Area B share the same upland area so A-N-2 was used as the upland point for Area B. Area B was identified on NWI as PEMC, and was identified as having hydric soil (Hamel Loam). Dominant vegetation within Area B at sample point B-N-3 included reed canarygrass which was considered hydrophytic vegetation. Other notable hydrophytic vegetation found within the wetland area was blue vervain, sandbar willow (Salix exigua), green bulrush (Scirpus atrovirens), and narrow -leaved cattail (Typha angustifolia). A second wetland sample point was used to determine the wetland boundary along the south side of the property. The dominant vegetation at this point included Canada goldenrod (Solidago canadensis) and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) which was not considered hydrophytic. Wetland Delineation Report 8 1000 Park Road June 2011 The soil within the wetland area met the field indicator of F6 (Redox Dark Surface). Hydrology within the wetland area was determined by oxidized rhizospheres on living roots (0), and saturation (A3) (at 22 inches, but assumed to get within 12 inches of surface during spring). Thirty flags were placed around the eastern and south sides of Area B. The wetland boundary determination was generally based on the changes in vegetation from reed canary grass to Canada goldenrod and changes in topography. Wetland flags B-1 to B-8 along with flags B-20 to B-24 were along the side channel flowing through the site, with B-1 to B-3 and B-25 to B-30 along the DNR Public Waters channel. Area B was considered a Type 2 — Fresh (wet) meadow, and a Type 6 —Shrub-Carr (Figure 5). Wetland Delineation Report 9 1000 Park Road June 2011 ❑—❑ On and,, kic. Regulatory Requirements The following provides a general summary of the permit requirements that may pertain to the 1000 Park Road Project site. Any activity planned within areas identified as wetland must be coordinated with and approved by the appropriate agencies prior to commencement of such activities. Agencies representing three levels of government in Minnesota regulate certain activities that affect lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands: • Federal — U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE): Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. • State — Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR): Public Waters Work Permit Program. • Local — Local Government Units (including cities, counties, watershed management organizations, soil and water conservation districts, and townships): Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). The City of Chanhassen is the LGU for this site. The WCA applies to nearly all wetlands not regulated by the MnDNR. The regulatory authority of the ACOE generally covers Waters of the United States, including those that are regulated by the MnDNR or subject to WCA. Generally, the ACOE reviews delineations to determine whether wetlands are jurisdictional (i.e., Waters of the United States). In Minnesota, a joint application process has been developed for projects with anticipated wetland impacts. Applications are coordinated between the ACOE, MnDNR, and Local Government Unit. Wetland Delineation Report 10 1000 Park Road June 2011 ❑:❑ rkc. Report Preparation The procedures followed for this wetland delineation are in accordance with the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (ACOE 1987) and the Midwest Regional Supplement (ACOE 2010). This report describes site conditions for a specific date -in -time, and is generally valid for a period of three years from the date of the field investigation and delineation — October 20, 2010. Wetland Delineation Report 11 1000 Park Road June 2011 Kn Wiom and Associates, Inc. References Climatology Working Group, University of Minnesota. Historical Climate Data Retrieval: Daily or Monthly Temperature, Precipitation, Snow Data by Target Location. Available at http://climate.umn.edu/doc/historical.htm, accessed October 2010. Minnesota Climatology Working Group. Historical Climate Data Retrieval: Wetland Delineation Monthly Precipitation Data Retrieval from Gridded Database. Available at http://climate.umn.edu/doc/historical.htm, accessed October 2010. Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources. Information regarding Minnesota wetland regulations (includes links to other regulatory websites). Available at http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/index.htm1, accessed October 2010. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Protected Waters and Wetlands, Carver County, Minnesota. Public Waters Inventory Map. Available at http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/watermgmt section/pwi/maps.html, accessed October 2010. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Available at http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov, accessed October 2010. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1. January 1987. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual: Midwest Region (Version 2.0). August 2010. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Wetlands Online Mapper. National Wetland Inventory mapping. Available at http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html, accessed October 2010. Wetland Delineation Report 12 1000 Park Road June 2011 Appendix A National Wetlands Inventory s,,.,�r . µ f Y'N Chanhassen U.S. Fish 1 National WildlifeService Wetlands Inventory - Oct 20. 2010 Wetlands Freshwater En ergenl r it Freshwater ForestetllShmb Eswanne and Marine Deetwater — Esruanne and Marine r Freshwater Pond - Lake - Rlverine Other r' . '4 lay ' tr ia �3d5r .lit Soo It Ac, Tills map I. for general reform— only. The us Fish and Abi all I. not responalLk for the a-uracr or cunwnmess of the base data shown on this m.p. An will sale barred eau moult be bunt In acconlance with the layer m Mar b. mend on me weeand. M.pwr w.b.M1.. User Remarks: Appendix B Hydric Soils Information Hydric Rating by Map Unit —Carver County, Minnesota 4 51. w "' 5120' Map Stele. 1 5,360 R pnMW m A size (8 6 x 11") sheet N Meters m 0 50 100 200 300 u Fee 0 200 400 800 1,200 [EI I A UHIW/] Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/11/2010 IM Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 5 Hydric Rating by Map Unit -Carver County, Minnesota MAPLEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) O Area of Interest(AOI) Soils I Soil Map Units Soil Ratings 0 All Hydric 0 Partially Hydric . Not Hydric Q Unknown Hydric Not rated or not available Political Features Cities Water Features Oceans Streams and Canals Transportation +++ Rails ,N Interstate Highways N US Routes Major Roads Local Roads MAP INFORMATION Map Scale: 1:5,360 if printed on A size (8.5' x 11') sheet. The soil surveys that comprise your ACI were mapped at 1:12,000, Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: hftp:/twebsolisuwey.nrm.usda.gov Coordinate System: UTM Zone 15N NAD83 This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version dates) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Carver County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 8, Aug 2, 2010 Cate(s) aerial images were photographed: 7/18/2003 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/11/2010 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 5 Hydric Rating by Map Unit -Carver County, Minnesota Hydric Rating by Map Unit Hydric Rating by Map Unit— Summary by Map Unit— Carver County, Minnesota Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI CW Cordova -Webster complex Al Hydric 3.9 3.2% 3.1 2.5% GL Glencoe Gay loam All Hydric HIM _ _ Hamel loam Hydric 24.3 19.8% 16.4 13.4% .All KB Kilkenny -Lester loams, 2 to 6 Not Hydric percent slopes 14.0 11.4% KB2 Lester -Kilkenny loans, 2 to 6 Not Hydric percent slopes, eroded KC2 Lester -Kilkenny loams, 6 to 12 Not Hydric 26.2 21.3% percent slopes, eroded KD Lester -Kilkenny loams, 12 to 18 Not Hydric 3.1 2.6% percent slopes KD2 Lester -Kilkenny loams, 12 to 18 Not Hydric 6.8 5.5% percent slopes, eroded KE2 Lester -Kilkenny learns, 18 to 25 Not Hydric 3.8 3.1 % percent slopes, eroded KF Lester -Kilkenny hams, 25 to 40 Not Hydric 0.5 0.4% percent slopes ND3 Lester -Kilkenny day loams, 12 Not Hydric 18.0 14.7% to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded NE3 Lester -Kilkenny clay loams, 18 Not Hydric 1.8 1.5% to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded PM Klossner muck All Hydric 0.7 0.6% Totab for Arw of Interest 122.8 100.0% Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10111/2010 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5 Appendix C Precipitation Data Hlgh DENsity radius retrieval 071210 Page 1 of 1 'Closest Station' Climate Data Retrieval The data matching your request is at the bottom of this page or should appear there within one minute. Target location is Lat: 44.85556 Lon: 93.55160 set location retrieve only this station: 1211448 CHANHASSEN WFO years: F2010 -:]to 2010 number of missing days allowed per month: N retrieve data from the following data sources: F Precipitation from High Density Network F Precipitation from National Weather Service F Temperature from National Weather Service F Snow from National Weather Service get monthly get daily Target: lat 44.85556 Ion 93.55160 man year CC tttN rr1v ss nnnn ee000000 pre aaaaaa Jan 2010 211448 .S5 Feb 2010 211448 .87 Mar 2010 211448 1.14 Apr 2010 211448 2.99 May Jun 2010 2010 211448 3.03 Jul 2010 211448 211448 4.53 ug 2010 211448 6.91 ep 2010 211448 5.96 Oct 2010 211448 1.99 Nov 2010 211448 1.87 Dec 2010 211448 2.91 Tmx Tmn aaaaaa sno SnD dis 0 mi. 0 mi. 0 mi. 0 mi. 0 mi. 0 mi. 0 mi. 0 mi. 0 mi. 0 mi. 0 mi. 0 mi. Where indicated: Missing values are shown as'm'. Days on which precip accumulated in the gage are shown as'-'. 'TTTT RR SS' is the 'public land survey(PLS)' or'legal' location of the observed data. Section values greater 36 are SECTIC'TIC' locations plus 100.'NWS ID' the National Weather Service Cooperative station number. Note that the'PLS' will always be correct for precipitation data while the'NWS ID' will always be correct for the temperature data. If no PLS info is supplied the the 'NWS ID' number applies to all shown data. return to retrieval selection ' State Climatology Office - MnDNR - Waters, 1996-2002 You can send e-mail to the State Climatology Office. http://climate.umn.edu/MDradius/radius.asp 5/12/2011 Hlgh DENsity radius retrieval 071210 Page 5 of 7 Aug 28, 2010 0 Aug 29, 2010 0 Aug 30, 2010 0 Aug 31, 2010 .41 Sep 1, 2010 0 Sep 2, 2010 .75 Sep 3, 2010 .06 Sep 4, 2010 .01 Sep 5, 2010 0 Sep 6. 2010 0 Sep 7, 2010 .20 Sep 8, 2010 .01 Sep 9, 2010 0 Sep 10, 2010 T Sep 11, 2010 .28 Sep 12, 2010 0 Sep 13, 2010 0 Sep 14, 2010 0 Sep 15, 2010 .14 Sep 16, 2010 .91 Sep 17, 2010 .01 Sep 18, 2010 .05 Sep 19, 2010 0 Sep 20, 2010 0 Sep 21, 2010 .57 Sep 22, 2010 0 Sep 23, 2010 1.26 Sep 24, 2010 1.69 Sep 25, 2010 0 Sep 26, 2010 .02 Sep 27, 2010 0 Sep 28. 2010 0 Sep 29, 2010 0 Sep 30. 2010 0 Oct 1, 2010 0 Oct 2, 2010 T Oct 3. 2010 0 Oct 4, 2010 0 Oct 5, 2010 0 Oct 6, 2010 0 Oct 7, 2010 0 Oct 8. 2010 0 Oct 9, 2010 0 Oct 10, 2010 0 Oct 11, 2010 0 Oct 12. 2010 Oct 13, 2010 0 Oct 14, 2010 0 Oct 15, 2010 0 Oct 16, 2010 0 Oct 17, 2010 0 Oct 18, 2010 T Oct 19, 2010 0 t Oct 21, 2010 0 Oct 22, 2010 0 Oct 23, 2010 0 Oct 24, 2010 .41 Oct 25, 2010 T Oct 26, 2010 1.18 Oct 27, 2010 .32 Oct 28, 2010 .08 Oct 29, 2010 0 Oct 30, 2010 0 Oct 31, 2010 0 Nov 1, 2010 0 Nov 2, 2010 0 Nov 3, 2010 0 Nov 4, 2010 0 Nov 5. 2010 0 211448 5.96 211448 1.99 211448 1.87 0 mi. 0 mi. 0 mi. http://climate.umn.edu/HIDradius/radius.asp 5/12/2011 Appendix D MN DNR Public Waters Inventory PROJECT STUDY AREA I i/ov , j ??Ak z- 11 J, ti NORTH 0 500 1,000 MMMMMMME7--= Feet DNR PUBLIC WATERS INVENTORY F WETI AND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region ProjartlSite: 100n Q3AVL DaAV2 _ Cdy'coudy,CX'Ou nossCn Samplingoate• 101 Wt 20(1 AppkenVOwner. ` State: M KI Sampling Point,t- I\{ - I Imvasgator(s):8mth K1Ar1t!Fit, Acy%j& 4�1k4ne Secbm,Townsh P.Range:SCC- 14, T1I6N) Q-2zyy Landform tMlalope. terrace, etc.): Loral refief (concave. rdrves, none} C,0nCAVn°, Slope My Let Long: Dalum: Spit Map Unit Name: tTCkVv10-'L LAU. VVI NWl classdication, NONe, Are climatic I hydrologic mnd(Bons on the site typical for this time of year? Yee _ .- No _ of no, explain in Remarks.) Am Vegetation Soil or Hydrology _ signifxanfly disturbed? Are'Nomtal Cimomstanced present? Yes _A- No Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, eta. Hydmphyk Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area y Welland Hydrology Present? Yes A No xAthin a Wetland? Yes /\ No — Remarks: VEGETATION -Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot sae: 2D f+ ) L.&e2. j0[epLUnc10 k Cover Species? Slatus .10 X f;G 2A' 11A5 Tr;tC V LLIDIae vn 1G Ifll.A —� n 4. 5, SaoBroShrub Stratum (Plot size: 1 T -P} ) 1.12-Irius, E)kr-IoRLt, ZS = Total Cover Pi-.- 2. _LA 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot site: 5 �- ) � _ = Total Cover 3. Ve_aA0e/Aa haSStCLta 2- 1 4. 5401 irAogQ Zt!�3CXnfeeA 5 f: tJjl J 5.� II int rn0 G'AV1AC)PVI AI\ e. Poty�vyurn �Q_ r/y- A 7. B. 10. l 1 h = Total Cover Woody Vine Sintum (Plot tees I5 �- ) I. 2. =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on A separate sheet.) Number of Dominant Species That Am 081.- PACK or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant {,+. Species Across Ali Strata: (0) Percent of Dominant Species 3 ThalAre 001., FACW, or FAC: - 4 (AB) Tofal%Coverot. Naiaioh 1W, OBL species x t = FACW species x2 = FAG species x 3 = FACU specks x4 = UPL species xS= Column Totals: (A) (B) Preyalence Index =BIA= _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytio Vegetation A 2 - Dominance Test is >50% _ 3 - Prevalence Index is S1A` _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problemalk Hydrophyt(c Vegetation' (Explain) Indicators of hydric soil and wefiand hydrology must he present. unless disturbed or problematic. HydrophAlc Vegetation pretant? Yee X No — US Any Corps of Engineers Midwest Regan -Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Pant: A- N—I— Profile Description: (Describe to the depth deeded to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators) Depth Matix Redoz Features (arches) Color knoistl �° _ color [moist) %_ TYRe, Lae Texture Remarks O-S 1Oja'2-1I Io0 sia10 toio-211 60 lD`iwsla.S +Q_ _L_ I d I o m -7 - I I (04a- 513.5 LO 1 W'L6 / 1 20 :�Si G 1 O Marti 4 "6f F9t3an - 11 -ZI tJ ?-1 o too U to sy n (eh(t3 'T C=Conoentratfon, D--Depletiw, RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains. 11-ocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Mahtx. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosd (All _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A18) _ Histic Fyipedon (A2) _ Sandy Redo: (S5) _ Dark Swfaos (S7) _ Black HKstic (A3) _ Stripped Matra (SG) _ Icon -Manganese Messes (F12) _ Hydrogen Sulfde tA4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ Sualieed Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ 2 cm Muds (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) v_ +� Redox Darr Surface (F6) _ Thick Dark Surtace (Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophy is vegetation and •_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (81) _ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present _ 5 cm Mucky Peal or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (it observed): Type: Depth (inches): _ Hydric Soil Present? Yes -'4-- No_ Remarks. HYDROLOGY Weiland Hydrology indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum crone k recuired. check all that eooN) Secondary Indicators (minimum of Iwo reduired) _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water -Stained Leaves(89) _ Surface Soil Cracks (06) High Water Table (A2) - _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) - Drainage Patterns (810) S"Aretion (A3) _ True Aquatlo Plants (014) _ OrySeason Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks(81) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI) T, Crayfish Burrows(Ce) _ Sedanent Deposits (82) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Rods (03) _ Sahrnfion Visible art Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Dnft Deposits (83) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (CA) -. _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Algal Mal or Cru51(84) _ Recent Iron Reduction ten Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2) _ fro" Deposits (05) _ Thin Muni Surface (C7) _ FAC•NeutralTest (D5) ._ Inoodadon Visible on Aerial imagery (87) _ Gauge or Well Data (09) Sparsely Vegeleled Cgrrave Surface (88) _ Other (Explain in Reenafks) . Mid Observaams,. Surface Water Present? Yes _ No Depth (inches): Water Table Present'? Yes _ Na _ Depth cmhl y.. Sabxafion Present? Yes. _ No _ Depth (klches): 13 a Wetland Hydrology Presets? Yes _'J—, No_ urclu lea via Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous hsspecllons), it avallable: kem:asr. L�plJa(�o1.�c. Gt.V1xA It �tA9s anp�� weir-Iwv-.d a.w.-eon too 5Cd o r t/ TD Pt7- �1 10-1�ftv 5 ft �T R US Army Corps of Engineers - Midwest Region - Version 2.0 R WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Prgec7sdc I:QCY) 4iA4;t-K 12I21V?. Cny/Coumy:C.i/YPYIk=zfv n1.�SampgngOate•.LQ��(�� Aptlir_r cantlOwr:_ Stale:J _ Sampling Pant A -N—L vnre gemr(si- +3. Y--L1 v,\y-r-L- VYG Section, Township, Range. SEC, 14, T I I6N 1 2.23VV Larndfam lTtiflsiope. lemce. etr.r local re5ef roorrave. 'ax•norne} CQV-)C0LVe. Slope(%): tat Long: Datum: Sod Map Unit Name: tTCAVY�CJ_ LOULYYI NWI classdcaborn: '(Jt')N'e- Are climatic, f hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this lime of year7 Yes,-__ No (if no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation_ Sopor Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circamslances present? Yes _ No Are Vagetaion Sal _, or Hydrology _ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydmphytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes ' NO Is the Sampled Aras WetlerM Hydrology Present? Yes_ No within a Welland? Yea_ No, VEGETATION - Use staenlific names of plants Tree Stratum (Plotsmr -3L'7F ) i.n=V)Pc Amlidfl %Cover Species? Status 30 _X___E9rA 2 3. 4. 5. SaoM1nolShrub i aim&& 2 Stratum (Prot size: I J'- F4- ) �i IG fonck 9D =Total Cover 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot sus: t. �JI�o �l �tfA.v�tL. =TatelGwer I PS z+�1'Y�duIWS Gt2uv�di nc([Xa 40 X E/lidol 3.AV1r,1'lum I0nIf%US HIS X UPL 4. 5_ Y. 8. 9. t0. Woody Vfne Sln(um (Plot s¢a: f S'� ) ��= Total Cover 2 US Army Corps or Engineers here or on a 0=Towcover Number of Dominam Species 2 That Am O&_, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: + (a) Percent of Dominant Species 2 Thal Am OBL, FACW, or FAC: - WSJ Total % Cover of: MUltioN by: OBLspedes Q x t = ��Q�� FACWspecss__ x2= /�!�.(.S.L..� FAC species _.y,1x 3 = _y FACUspecies 0 r4- 0 UPL species 95 x5= LV1 15 Column Totals: '(A) 6ti's (B) Prevalerxelndex =BlA= 3=G$ _ t - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation _ 2-Dominance Test Is a50% _ 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0r _ 4- Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a sepamle sheet) _ Pnoblemetic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and welfand hydrology Rust be present, unless disturbed or prabtematic. Hydraphyl)o vegetatium Present? YesV No, X hAdwest Regan - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point --N—Z PrMle Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or Confirm the absence of iMicatore.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Colerlmowl , % Color (moist) % Twe Tndnae Remarks 0-6 104R�/I �00 -- _ S( UD —t Z 10'VR 231 1 -1 E5 p 3.6 :ZD C__ — S CA I wE Ttft' w ncr ct 10`10- (01 1 _si 2_ — SI U (y2 oeN' IZ�IS 1OVt25(36�0 IO` Ilz_311 S b Sw(o ,Type C=ConCentration D=Da tion. RM=Reduced Matrix MS --Masked Send Graima. 'Location: PL=Pore Unin , M=Matdx. Hydrie Soil Indicators: Indicators for probtamade Hydrie Sogs : _ Hstoad (AI) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Sally Redox (S5) _ Dark Surface (97) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Shipped Matrix (S6) _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) — Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TFi 2) _ Stralifled Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gieyed Matrix (F2) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) — Redox Dark SurfaCe (F6) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ,2 Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophyic vegetation and — Sandy Mucky Mineral (131) _ Redox Depressions (Fe) wetland hydrology must be present, . _ 5 Cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (If observed): Type: :J; t Depth (Inches): ric Soil present? Yes /` No ftemarts SDiL,S �Vr) '1C . HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Pdmary Indicators (minimum of one Is reouired' check all that aooly) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired), _ Surface Water (A1) _ WaterStai ed Leaves (091 _ Surface Sol Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) - — Aquatic Fauna (813) _ Drainage Patterns (Bl0) _ Saturation (A3) _ Ton Aquatic plants (B14) - _ Dry -Season Wafer Table (C2) _ Water Marks(Bl)n _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _, Crayfish Burrovrs(Cli) Sediment Deposits.(87) _ Oxidized Rhizospheras on Living Roots (C3)- _ Saturation Visible art Aerial Imagery (09) Drift Deposits (83) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shorted or Stressed Plards (Di) _ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geonorphie Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) _ Thin Muck Surface (CT) _ FAG -Neutral Test (D5) _ _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) _ Gauge or Welf Data (D9) _ Spanrefy Vegetated Concave Surface IN) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Fwid Obsetvations: Striate Water Present? Yes _ No Depth (Inches): Water Table Present? Yes_ Ido- Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes _ No _X Depth (Inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No urcludes as frl e Describe Recorded loll (stream gauge, Ironilodrtg way, credal photos, previous krspec0orel, g avarable: RemarKs: US Army Caps of Engineers Midwest Region -version 2.0 s WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region pmjecuslte: I dCO Pay-K- Dw V'- CitylCounty:Ck)C . OVn-& 1/l Sampling Date* 1012-012-0 t AppticantfOvmer- .. - - _ - —� . t . - �. State: /r IN _ Sampling Point: INN 3 J Imesfigatm(sk Qi.IGU.V�)•=P_� t >4.J�% Section, Township, Range: Landform (hilislope, knace, eta): local relief (conesue, rmvex, none}. _C0YlCL1N`% Slope rA): Lat Long: Datum:r-�� MVYIPA _ I I.�=-n Scif Map Unit Name: In NWI classification: Pf-M(J Are climatic I hydrologic mru itlons on the site typical for Bls lime of year? Yes-,_ No — Of W. explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation _. Soil m Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? Are'Nomal Cxcumslancee present? Yes -4— No_ Are Vegetation _ $oil _, or Hydrology _ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transeds, imporfantfeatures, etc. Hydroptrylfc Vegetation Presets? Yes K No Hydnc Sod Present? Yes _l(_ No Is the Sampled Area Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes,_ No within a Welland? Yes NO�� VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plotsize: i. 2. 3. 4. 5. SaodnolShrub Stralum (Plot size: 1 3. 4. 5. o Cover Species? Stakus Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �,� (A) ()_= Total Cover =Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: 6 � ) i.Pir-ci xa-is, $s .Y_FVlL zCAV-&WLVV-% a 3 SAiDiCCA 4. 5. 8. 7. e. 9. 10. _ II Total Cover Woody Vine Slralum (Plot size: 16 f:I- ) 1. 2. Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (8) Percent of Dominant Specks .My� That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AIB) Total %Cover pr. MUdioN by: 081 species K t = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x3= FACU species x4 = UPL species KS= Column Totals- (A) 18) Prevalence Index = EVA= _ t - Rapid Testtar Hydrophybc Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is -50% 3- Prevalence Index is-0.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptafionss (Prov(de supporting data at, Remarks or on a separate sheet) __.. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Ezplein) 'I dicalon, of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. unless dishubed orproblematic, Hydrophyt(o Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes_�L_ No_ K�emaTn�xs�: (mw cne pinto numoers nere or on a separate sneer.)-- - JTYi2 'Ell c res Io1TMi—I F1TQ In WC Q.ir�Ot 0.yLFA: - L-jl1Ae -e VUtr I .Jt2-eG� P=tn(rLtnS 11t sl1..0\,-kc Ccx-F�i.�.4q (-ALL�v-� inrt nh t!2 , -2(-GJ US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-Verem, 2.0 SOIL Sampl'utg Point Profits Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (ached Colrfrrxist) % Color (moist) ,� Type, we Tndtse Remarks Q-12 10412211 yQ� � T 5410 12-1-1 Vig-211 �t�. �.h`{p-'+�(� 5 C 010 wgd.;&W.oliii-(r`ct. 10VIa- 614 2 C-_ (•I 0 R-W hv.2 CkiLh\,-(A 'Type: C=Conctntradon, D--Deplatim, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Uning,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indictors= Indicators for Problematic Hydrie Sas': _ Histosd (At) _ Sandy Gleyad Matrix (Sid) _ Coast Prairie Red" (A16) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Dark Surtace (S7) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Stripped Matrix (136) _ ton-Mangartese Masses (F12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mudry Mineral (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface CW12) _ Snalified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Greyed Matrix (F2) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ 2 cm Murk (A10) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At t) Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of trydmphytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) Redox Depressions (F8) "bland hydrology must be present, _ 5 an Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (it observed): Type - Depth (Inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes —91— No— Remarks - HYDROLOGY Welland Hydrology Indicators: _ Pdmw Indicators (minimum of one Is reau'red check all that apply) Secondarr Indicators (minimum of two reouiredl _ Surface Water (AI) _ WrderStained Leaves (BB) _ Surface Soil Cracks (86) High Water Table (A?) - _ Aquatic Fauna (8t3) �A_ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ _ Saturation(A3) _ True Aquatic Plants(814) - _ Dry-S ason Watcr Talle(02) _ Water Marlks(81) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Crayfish Burrows(C8) - - Sediment Deposits (82) _ Oxidized Rhaospherr s on Living Roots (C3)- _ Saturation Visible :in Aerial imagery (Cg) Drift Deposits (83) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) -. _V, Stunted or Shessed Plants (D1) _ Aigal Mat or Crust (134) _ Recent Imn Reduction in Tilled Sots (CS) Gegnmrphk Position (D2) _ Wn Deposits (85) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ FA"eutral Teat (D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Geuge or W44 Date (Dg) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) _ Otter (Explain in Remadi s) rwid Observationv.. - Surface Water. Present? Yes _ No Depth Qnches): _Y Water Table Present? Yes_ No X Depih(whes): Saturation Present? Yes C No_ Depth (Inches): _22 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No -- mctsdea Capillary h a Describe Receded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aedaf photos, previous l spectbns). if available: Remarks' 4�ydYaO w v.tol +o act 1 tr, 12'( in SP2t ioatS�c1 " C° Z2r1 )(n W f-t�ss. 11S Army Cops of Engineers - Midwest Region - Version 2.o P WETLAND DATA FORM - Midwest Region Projewsite: I OW C> Mlvf— Chvico nty-c V Now) V)XG (Pi4'1 Sampling Date 1ooTl ZI stale: M I'{ sampling Point: [>- )'J-4 Appicantrovmrx. _. Im es5gabr(sk Oz. K-I_L1�1 k=2; L� Y4- . Ptll:v) Liz Section, Township, Range: C{G. 14' F I g .R? &A/ Lardlomn (Mllslope. terrace, etc.): Local relief (c mcave, copves, none): 0-V1C_C A/'Q_ slope(%1: Let Long: _ Datum: Sod Map Unit Name: tVD1,V'1'Y�L- � � L-c)C&V" NW classification: Are Climatic; hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ,lQ_ No _ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil m Hydrology _ signifxarely disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances present? Yes _�(__ No_ Ale Vegetation Sod or Hydrology _ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hytimphym Vegetation Present? Yes_ No_ Hyoric Soil Present? Yes _ No Is tine Sampled Area Welland Hydrology Resent? Yes— No within a Wetland? Yes_ No_„_ VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. noswue uemnwm mve:ami ,,,,wnw ,cam. o..,eo„oo,. Tree Slmhrm (Plot s¢e: wj1 + • ) % Cover Soeries?,N� a�fus Number of Domi a t Species 1, X h (0jg0.. `J Xy� Thal Are OBL, FACW. or PAC: Z (A) 4. 5. �= rotal cover SapWaStaub Stratum (Plot size: ! ro IF-+ ) I. 21ni ) ICUo✓ ck E� >L LA L 2 3. 4. 5. _=Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: � 'F+• ) t.00.i�--P7C >y�- � �. z. 'A iloo.4n 41t.r -ecru,_ 3.ioacan�f�Mrie�nSic -X.—�4GU 4. P(eNrk OnadP-- X f_ 5.�i"CQ1Q-.lC Q(2UY�d1Y10C., 2- FAiAA 6. 7. B. 9. 10. Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot slza: (5 f-4- ) US Army Corps of Engineers of on a Total Cover Ufa! Number of Dominant Lt Species Across All Strata' (B) Pe l of Domirwnl Species 2-1 4 That Are 08L, FACW, or FAC: (AIB) Total %Cover of hMdlipN hr. 061_species �_ x 1 = 5 FACW species 1-2- x 2 = 21�t— FAC species 1 x 3 = FACIJ species -70 x 4 = UK species S x 5 = ZA— Column Totals 1 io'7 (A) S (a) Prevalence Index -BIA= >3•at`t _ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophy0e VegetaGm _ 2- Dominance Test is 150% _ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0s 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Rohde suppodirg data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophylicvegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology most be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic . Vegetation Present? Yeses No _X_ Midgrest Region -Version 2.0 =1 Sampling Point 0- N- Proffle Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document lhehrdicator oroonfirml the absence of Indicators,) Depth Matrix edox Fedu (mches) Cotorlmowl _% Color fmasll �_ Tjgi Texture Remarks 0-10 10'412-2(a L,0D 0-I f.t7-10 100 1'1-20 ln`iR 31 I S!! (_wbk? y1 SG c 1. Cc(iUuvn CW_PXitt 20-2b f2 2 1QN9-Gf& Z'jn vAu, 'Type! C=Concentration D=De lotion. RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masted Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore linln , IA -Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicaoril: Indicators for problematic Hydric Sofls : _ Histesd (Al) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (134) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) His is Epipecion (A2) _ Sandy Redox (SS) _ Dark Surface (S7) _ Black Hisfic (A3) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ ton -Manganese Masses (F12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ loamy Mucky Mineral (F7) — Very Shallow Dark Surface (TFl2) Shetdled Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Thick Dark Surface (At2) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indmators of hydrophylic vegetation and Sandy Mucky Mineral (31) J_ _ Redox Depressions (Fe) Wetland hydrology mus(be present . 5 cm Mucky Peat or peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (If observed): Type_ Depth (kchesr Hydric Soil Present? Yes No& — Remarks Catuuw) o)L- 14WFe, ppgr SNotts t�rx&evt4 ®{"1 i �C�1gp HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minfmum of we is required' check all that aoDly) Becondary Intlicalrxe frrdnimum of two required) _ Stuface Water (At) _ Water -Stained Leaves(Be) _ Surface Soil Cracks(86) High Water Tale (A2) - - ^ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage patterns IB1G) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (814) - _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (81) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (Ca) - _ Sediment Deposit (132) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (CS) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced Oat (CA) -_ _ Slurried or Stressed Plants (07) Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soil (ce) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (B5) Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ FAC-Neutral Test (135) Inundation Valve on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Gauge or Weil Data (Dg) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) t-ield Observatlons: Surface Water Present? Yes_ No Depth (inches): Wakr Table present? Yes _ No Depth (inches); Saturation present? yes— No Depth (Inches); Wetlanxl Hydrology Present? Yes— Nox_ Cncludes ca ilia fringe) es Dcribe Recorded Daly (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial pholos, previous k¢pectfons), :f avaitabfe:. Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Wdwaal Region - Version 20 Appendix F Site Photos �' r' . - iR'. �r -, `� `' ' � 'i �S ;`�� 1, �r'� .. ,•y. .. � A At sample point B-N-3 facing east. Wetland flag B-8 facing northeast. Appendix F At A-1 facing north. At B-12 facing northwest. Appendix F 01709 w O 0 X m acX= A m Z LO 0 = 0D� v03 m Z V x m r Z D m T 5. L=0 ql-ls9 V3 A D N SNp30 NW�IYIISHDJ 3 sulrao3o5 U3ow N ],YO 9N5]tl 3u .B IW Wp Mu on 5alun 'IrOEWtlA) 9911-ES i N ibl NM NW m,>MVa S LL, 1[qY WIMLLIRI IYYiW M. Th 3 gi IS NO TYS 31V1SUWOd Ol 12131b' L3r)No3 )snw sNOL3rwxo� nV V z.Yx - tt A Ar wml Y awl2101'Jtl211N0'J aarY[rna sr. sYwss ror A r . swim ,aYv snmYL. � sYu aNssmar um IourmWlm aomx fS OSl/gY .p,Ytl a1CYryd Th16 W SyJ1aVWMa '11 SflLL MJ Wrtld KS >wwtl lM'I[NM sLYdt ai (OlryTy1[y ,yYJ 3N a Ord6 m,YMOaYIm A YINETY Xl KI ytpre awn a awwa cram Lx >xwre arvawss fS V[L'[II Y3N aN]1'B,Ww1Y. az aw 3va nw awaYd ,wwwn xova: rwuau9ow O an YrIRMIa AY [[9) S 9LOE :>{q:a11.Y1 aYy.OW N. N L9 V,G L) S1w15 >KW Ve 1]YJpa � (rL1Y all n9pp A Y Da9) S KLTZ �iRE0LI1 aTfq;l i a xaxsz rsw an >wu 1 ,N146'uM MrL Lpl (stliw.y),xJtlL O wl (sm V),lpm 1 .a (s Lwu),xuw p[1 .(s uN),low ,nxwV um mnxxrs O ypyay �y®-ypw� xw.aW vumoa aanAYe O ^a' ismNoa)uow .0 (s uq LMY° � iYsp�) iro�w 1 � aumrm um Ural EJ 1RIYBm"aH10-IBfR.E3B _... tt/nm,s I um aanwu (ssn u m wr) zs tlo .s • aloes odso alml axvwu 9rN 1 x[p y915p3 (3l6 lma, A i,9) T r.9 l Y3w $lpNlpf9 M. T,al fd YBC) T LSS Yaw yWpi — >II LLYIAW 1%LLsx AWAIYO] LIM•p0 :Sn IX°1 l kvo T"A m) rum ,wa ,xusc Ywe alLn rmsnox'a aarum aroz sAYa axxna ,cram aabow l aou�iare m�ol :sz9mY 1 S3]YS aMBItl pwUwa aapgNli ®1 l .fL LMtl 911 A6V W ll 1[Ml:la .MYr]pl ON3931 viva 3i13 I tax 3TNY SM'L r]Wa]p aIYNYI Lw Itlf SMYL'gW Ol miY LL 040 arYrnn 9 xr xx Ax 9 a ThS sAva oxowYd zYmmr xrn Ln Y�wY Lwvuwa surulo Am aw90 ROYxM Lw 9, I awL 9u Lr Ud°fl x zAm >xvrla zera,ar: Th Les s>ma suo 90 L3# ThMt axurm° wd oauraY swu n H1L0N ' 1 tY alov a m wurrn,sx Lir .,rev awnv9 Le aau�,ux a a srwm ,m 'u I SY)Yo Wpl ss]WI xIp A DId Ol 3w IxC16 sW61A9a'.l l slmr]11oM ,wwxw me x Tmw aruLLs 9ln d we aan axrd Tr SI / 'L6 SXLL lYtlf QY.aw3tl srY3lrl1 Q)61i1pa A araoalo n swunmul rrAz° aw 'aru Tam rn YOYod Tmo nL>rtl,lo] YI raols sY louxuuum Yax w ro.w al'mOLI aix Ow uwl Wu>MILOa curl awns iax dY wp6 ',rxav Ow 3xxi / rn LNnamaiZrl zzoe los SMwYAY 9rrs. 9rn ma ww smlal uvrY 9v9 ralwa . oxY 9rne r99oa s»l tlraa .n,wx sxa Nwm z,xY¢rrotlall axu>uwa 9uaware 's>Hplre Yxouraxroe ax15a] m'ivrxuc° Nyw,'yraom xo 3raR3tl w uuarwxw SI � 55]YYl'.SlLLl,r]lAM M[iL6IM'TY.. lLL ai[R3 m l3# TM6I]lOWs�°°9LL�mL 1� 21 ® aY9 3iL x LWRON a TNl6 15IXI 'pLNre .Llpyp ar. wlr vwo axr uwm.x uw Th w pow n) ,xre n-wm, mmu 'u auarxrm ',wu xouarvusxm u mw morwn xoualwm ,wN-wY aAax ow rrlwo awma Th ,x9Yvoa u rdoml si maarw,oa vouo90 oxssm wrra mus Yo 9, rma a rnr sway, i Tr'uro'alm,s YYVurre b,lun'Arlrrlo'u mlrn ,ax ,ra tv wls tou>lw,soo area wal axssw.xr w droo AYwvo au axwea w z�loesa a w>rmlm v 'arrs j a oauWswa a wr sAm >urm°m Th xN avw ThM xauzrvusrm 'r r xrN w slollaauVzx-su A axYmos on sxouYxl mown wd sawam uluft ANr mN arxmom s m[ w 'mraw aw zxma mmw 9rmr aw uarorm our a s mwN r wla x sAlun A rourm,sw nrxuom ThN: wLavmlm zw,ms aoNesv, au Tawam'Awra tlarY % xouanaw ua au ausaoo srw,rl mna awLrm'aortow o, 9Almlm unun rn A rooram rlu>r and sxouramaa arN sxru rxuas,wm w tivul Thxs w,arow 9 O? � svan axo x sAwxuwuw ow sruY,n prom >IaeY Th A rouanLvu me smw°or aad auwtld ThM uva.oxoa r / SM'L N) Qllrg6a SY sa1411 aILLSm A NOLLrblb w'lx3wlsx'aY'lULL]1wl5xp m mux s>xrdm> ulvn uremtlen lux vrrdowm w si ao,arowa rs+W -, b slouraor ellYtl on lcroa •SMLdI#] YM$ OLI >M16 rILLT IOl SXYb M/LL>LpN Ol mLH 1M6 MLTWMJ S j `\ Wx DIXWRSY N a Thl6 5%6 Nlr 91dlYYNV.1 9WYi Try iOe xYxMltlr3 31LL Y � � � / LGIYJlp36 WE 11x•Y61r x a101m a alAplyd 9WSY3 aCIW lwl6 1p1arY,XM i M ^JLLSCi a1 ,IUO\W IX/ 313pD> Y311[O Ox YO PaOmW M>lr� T1LLIm 2 � . 9a9om uaYow Th A rwavaw uu aemoatu sl louroxm 'I \. 83LON NVld 3LS MCZ 30W8'N9ll dlHSNM01'9{t NOUO3S .ave 3LSjyl apl3LC s ♦ ' m e y�� x.r Y N3SSV NVH7 l _ f e. i r s 'rx 9 r rlw Yyv� LI 9l SI 4l fl 1 � I loaf YYYI 4q�Su1PPp .w'cz .LI .l l / /Y3F al[#1Y3tl1 YaYMpIIS .%'�•% 1��^ `1��tY dui ran ,N9uvau mLrxxo,s — i;ryj/yy-r•----a26— / — �1�A, taM) >xums Yml I J Il \ \ \ \ SL � /✓ Ib p p / / Il i �. i� 1 A uvn � ``\ li \ Ll \_ 1 LNLmY3 Y M� axuma �` Th. KiA`�d9D h`� "maw\ eoyA ON t r~yam/N m e l/zziso s0 LCB='3'i'i +jS OLZ'LLl NON-210WGUI-3 09-6469 # 321OiS IoraLa YNOwa ISrIXr9 ncl �-� IOYYLa owwe 9....1 6 1 9 1 L --------- — — — — °one N0/Ld30X3 9 1 S I 1 I t I Z I I 3 j t' s 'f_ 9 I - i 9 I q J 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 1 10 1 11 1 12 13 R! 15 1 16 17 .• i C I Fm F 0 O O U _ 0 0 U O T E G 0- CD FM o - N L6 0 z o Fi O o - Z 0- a Ld o O 10 H W w N - Z Q J to to Q i J O I rn 0 r` H D: - Q J Q 3 w of K U 3 H 1' ui - E 0 c 0 0 I 1419 O� eb�l S834p44' E X C E P �.x �, E � 149.75' 75.88 -I __ ��__---5887924_E_ 1987, / _N88b4'44"E-- 207.28 _ .- ` _ _ =-c -----------/' f .1-�~/'_l_%_ _�------------� i /' /' /• / / BALE & PALLET 1� RECYCLE AREA a .. a. ..d TRUCK WELL COMPACTOR 30' WETLAND 9. II BUFFER II 1) 7 TYP --_ 1 I\I 4ETAINING WALL •\ �i 1 I 24 PEDESTRIAN PEDESTRI)I; I AIN TRAIL EA,EMENT LTOIS`F TYP WETLANDCOMPRESSOR I\\, I •/ ENCLOSURE SITE TRIANGLE � I r 0 N I w � i t f -SITE TRIANGLE FA HA /7 V ~ v y/Dy --7_*q r 61. CHRPRRRAL' CT. DR. 6& REL PERCE LT. LakeAnn 6% PIIM HAY I 1 I ( TR. FgyA, MLLL MAJESTIC VAT CT. g 6� / I �NI(ER ST. ' uT"_w`9 JP clCHAN ASSEN 1990 POP, 11,732 r� CMICA'ORY WAY i)I fJII I ' VA 13 v BWE SAW U. f�LQ ^ VATER LEAF PL. ARBOW" —. McGLYNN pm CT. 4 4] ` OLK O \�+.�'`-� 'O4/TIMB�ER1-Qp�D C) 11L ES E. R.!& l O " 14 � 123. POVERS PL. u sARA ` Q Q{ S 1B1• J V. 76tin R ST. t, © ST. AC/h IHa kc <E� cqJ E BR o d PICMA PAMEY OR. "ter' 'ale, l etT yy - 1e?x VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE SECTION 114, TOWNSHIP 116N, RANGE 23W SITE PLAN NOTES J m 1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF ALL PROPERTY CORNERS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER, CONCRETE, AND PAVEMENT TO EXISTING IN GRADE AND ALIGNMENT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT & CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS (SEE DEMO PLAN). 4. THE EARTHWORK FOR ALL BUILDING FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ACTUAL BUILDING AND SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS, ; / PORCH AND RAMP LOCATIONS. 6. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO / CONSTRUCTION, ADJUSTMENT, OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS DESIGNATED ON PLANS. �ryN. / / 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PIPE BOLLARDS FOR PROTECTION OF ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES IN DRIVE AREAS. • 1 / 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ACTUAL LOCATION OF O / ALL UTILITY ENTRANCES, TO INCLUDE, SANITARY SEWER LATERALS, DOMESTIC AND FIRE PROTECTION WATER SERVICE, ELECTRICAL, AND TELEPHONE SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO AVOID CONFLICTS AND ASSURE PROPER DEPTHS ARE ACHIEVED, AS WELL ASCOORDINATE WITH ANY UTILITY COMPANIES FOR APPROVED LOCATIONS AND SCHEDULING OF TIE-INS/CON,NECTIONS TO THEIR FACILITIES. a t / 9. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. `• I / 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING THE DAMAGE DONE TO ANY EXISTING ITEM DURING / CONSTRUCTION, SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DRAINAGE, UTILITIES, PAVEMENT, STRIPING, CURB, ETC. �.• I / REPAIRS SHALL BE EQUAL TO, OR BETTER THAN, EXISTING CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO DOCUMENT ALL EXISTING DAMAGE AND NOTIFY WAL-MART CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO f CONSTRUCTION START. /� i r,• I 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL TOUCH-UP PAINT (EX. COLOR) ON ALL FIRE HYDRANTS AND CURBS WHICH ARE r v / CURRENTLY PAINTED. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BASE BID. 12. SITEWORK FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE "WALMART SITEWORK SPECIFICATIONS", UNLESS I/J / SPECIFIED ELSEWHERE. 13. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE OR RELOCATE, WHEN APPLICABLE, ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS, FOUNDATIONS, BASEMENTS, CONNECTING IMPROVEMENTS, DRAIN PIPES, SANITARY SEWER PIPES, POWER POLES, AND GUY WIRES, WATER METERS AND WATER LINES, WELLS, SIDEWALKS, SIGN POLES, UNDERGROUND GAS, SEPTIC TANKS, AND ASPHALT, SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN, WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AND WHERE NEEDED,TO / ALLOW FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN. 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS IN DISPOSING OF DEMOLISHED MATERIALS REMOVED FROM THIS SITE. / 15. ALL PAINT USED FOR PARKING STRIPING SHALL BE PER WALMART SPECIFICATIONS. i� t / 16. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 1 t 17. CART CORRALS TO BE PROVIDED BY WALMART. ASSEMBLY AND INSTALLATION TO BE DONE BY ' CONTRACTOR. t 18. PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING SHALL MEET THE CITYS CODES AND ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES NORTH IN EFFECT AT THE TIME. 1 I 19. THE MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE DICTATES STANDARD ACCESSIBLE AND VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES t SHALL BE 8' WIDE WITH AN 8' WALKWAY. t MA MU t ING SE i K j t 0 50 100 20.REFER TO AFCH. PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ELECTRICAL PLANS. It II tlNl UM j1 1 t I SCALE FEET )IN SE K t 11 1 1 NIN I ; I 1 I SITE DATA LEGEND 1 LOCATION: SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23W 19 PROPOSED STANDARD PARKING SPACES FE Y 1 1 WI j 1 ADDRESS: 1000 PARK ROAD ;R NI I TYP) 1 CHANHASSEN, MN 15 PROPOSED COMPACT PARKING SPACES I ZONING DISTRICT: IOP, INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK DISTRICTCART CORRAL (SEE DETAIL SHEET) 11 1 1 I LAND USE: COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT — - - — PROPERTY LINE TOTAL SITE AREA: 14.11 AC. — — — — BUILDING SETBACK LINE 11 It 1 1 ! MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT: 4 STORIES/OR 50' (WHICHEVER IS LESS) -------_ EXISTING CURB 1 — ®`\ i PROPOSED HEIGHT: 1 STORY/35' PROPOSED CURB go REQ'D MIN. BUILDING SETBACKS PROVIDED MIN BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT (HWY 5): 70' FRONT (HWY 5): 70' HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE I FRONT (POWERS): 50' FRONT (POWERS): 100' 1 PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED 1 REQ'D MAX BUILDING SETBACKS PROVIDED MAX. EUILDING SETBACKS SIGNAL r+�w\� FRONT (HWY 5): 150' FRONT (HWY 5): 70' FRONT (POWERS): 100' FRONT (POWERS): 100' STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT 1 ; I 1 VEHICLE USE AREA: 253,570 SF HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT 11 1 t 1 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE: 20,286 SF (8% OF VEHICULAR USE AREA) PROVIDED LANDSCAPE: 20,925 SF (8% OF VEHICULAR USE AREA) COMPACT PARKING STALLS (7.5'x18') REQUIRED TREES: 82 TREES (1 PER 250 SF OF REQ'D LANDSCAPE) I!� 1 PROVIDED TREES: 107 OVERSTORY 48 EVERGREEN ARCHITECTURAL APRON 39 DECIDUOUS 28 ORNAMENTAL 222 TREES THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE CALL ONE MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: ALL WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. WALMART PARKING DATA TABLE PROPOSED WALMART BUILDING AREA 117,278 S.F. STANDARD PARKING 416 COMPACT PARKING 99 ACCESSIBLE PARKING 13** CART CORRALS(10) 20 SPACES WALMART PARKING 528* PARKING RATIO* 4.50/1000 S.F. *EXCLUDES CART CORRALS ** # OF ADA STALLS WAS CALCULATED USING A MEDIAN AGE OF 35 = 27+2 (n Z O N w 2' G z N O • ��tl 2 �yNIS ZmY g�m Y 1 1 fy<F5 N~O ®K� o r O o to O w O zz 00 Lo < r w w0 1`mz W ww Ug a W,wo N�)-w W d < H z aw<W n o < z �m<7 p < w < <� �¢Fz QO a 0 JN FazW Sin < J < 0 Q p z 0 30nOW m to V) w mrSrnz w0 ECMm K V)a0 0 U U O Z m } m 1n w m Q z w J V Y < W < W 0 W 'If_ In 0 U I..L Lu V ) Z _ c G L/yu I..L� O 0 Z W Z W Z Q Q q 1 Z 2 IL U< yWN I O _% 1 I♦ 0 C5 co L r Ld W Q U DATE 11 15 2011 PROJECT NO. 116199062 SHEET NUMBER 6040 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 5 1 6 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 111 1 12 1 13 1 14 15 16 17 a; o_ 0 O U c 0 0 ,o T E r T� T7 0 N 00 0 Z O O U 3 a Z Q J a w F- N O d 0 N I- w w 2 N Z a J Q U 0 01 O / H (r Q J Q 3 w JI V 3 H Y E 0 c a, c 3 Q L Q N _ Io U _ < q A I `_'� 149.75' I '��-� �'93jo „ y/ `o S83VO' E X C E P T I O N 20' Pt PARKIN '� - Qe Qyirq y x 75, 44 E i • 9 88 i 4 eE v 58879 24 "E 198 V N88*044 E \ S TBACK -� -- / 2072 70' MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK z 1 - - - - - / - - - - \ \ 150' MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK r 1 / e3O� "a °�° . BALE &.PALLET B \ \`�:4838 7 /• / g dFOC,(CLE AREA ° e \ 6 44 e. - / e d a \ l4 <1° u • °w I \ e d \ $ m p m I I _. 15' ACCESORY \�` " ��j'� 9• COMPACTOR TRUCK WELL ¢ I STRUCTURE-) /TfP / 13 TYP P o _ - - - - -SETBACK -- - / DETAINING WALL / 20 ( .... TRUCK WELL \ T-; E ( 1 5 \ Y 1 \ \ d `o I PEDESTRIAN TRAIL I 1 TYP / 14 \ \ \ (' P�} a � EASEMENT 8 TYP IT Walmart:: v DRMWA I NT STORE # 5949-00 T A �a ° I L ITS��OF WETLAND I I C-020-NOR-NOR I I / 17 117,278 SIF ± i% COMPRESSOR ENCLOSURE F.F.E. = 932.00 ± / R ` / 28' /PE,HES,T r 3I i \\ #� / (TYP.) ~ , SIR E I I EXISTING DRAINA E AND 1 ' 09/22/11 'u O I UTILITY EASEM NT {1 1 11 B E / ? ' / R1 i c 337.9' / 20/ t `o Oman 0 a 0 o I 20' WETLAND 9 / E I I D ! BUFFER / _ _ _ _ �[ _ _ STORM WATER_ / F I 1 \ \ / 32_ 26 - TREATMENT -AREA v I v 16 / ` I AO \ •\ � � TYP � % / o , ° I x i±t. 2Y CART m •� 1 I `, I / 18- c)' 'Q CORRAL (TYP. l _ i 17 ,. 2-�� y ° I p LIMITS OF LAND 1 9' ' / TYP Q- i j \I •� / 14 26' 31 TYP i G y �. \ I �. \ /2. 18 (TYP.) 18 17 i I/ u \ Z 62' 62' 62' 62' 62' 62' / 61, \ m ` \ / / II / PEDE CROSS OVER 18' TYP / TYP ' v ' d 1 '� / 18' RAISE �� 14 ° 1 1 18, 18, TYP / n ,1 \ \ 1,�' TYP TYP CONCRETE WALK I ri / TYP / I _ H 1 ` XIS NGiI DR NAGE NO v \ \ I I 12' >J I' Y�AS E \ l 1 1 RETAINING WALL 9' f�% / 26' TYP 9I / / / / TY `o � \ \�\ \, 25' FRONT BUFFER �ARD N767¢30ay' ?� ?S .`•-•, \ - _ -\T �'I✓/,O /� - STORMWATER TREATMENT AREA STORMWATER TREATMENT AREAIY;,jf' N 85 - S88 4227 W- _i_pR a .00 R50' R50'-J AL ` inn 1 7' 231.06' u I 1 L � a , c v N n N C P N m a 0 0 \ 1 1 I m 0 u K ° Y s v L 0 0 c E 0 0 e L F Aw - RETAINING WALL 7.5' TYP SE 67. CWPARRAL�CT. Ba 6a NEZ PERCE CT: Lake Ann 69. POM BAY TR. eAV IMJESTZC WAY WLL ,rvu'T aerc °.. CHAN ASSEN 1990 POP. 11,732 MMORY WAY EXISTING DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT NUumm -100' MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK 50' MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK RETAINING WALL 1*01\N�s N W. L AGE © Clty sT, cj� Hat CON ER a J PSCHA ppp> �1 O t��aEa`a° lie.SUFF7IK BR F CT, ILL ESSE% Ra D. O ]e3. POWERS PL p0- OR. c'P� �Cfy " A R• ' N EXISTING�W�°t i c SIGNAL 71L LAM T. VICINITY MAP SITE NOT TO SCALE t SECTION 114, TOWNSHIP 116N, RANGE 23W SITE PLAN NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF ALL PROPERTY CORNERS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER, CONCRETE, AND PAVEMENT TO EXISTING IN GRADE AND ALIGNMENT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT & CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS (SEE DEMO PLAN). 4. THE EARTHWORK FOR ALL BUILDING FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ACTUAL BUILDING AND SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS, PORCH AND RAMP LOCATIONS. 6. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO / CONSTRUCTION, ADJUSTMENT, OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS DESIGNATED ON PLANS. / 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PIPE BOLLARDS FOR PROTECTION OF ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES IN DRIVE AREAS. O• / 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ACTUAL LOCATION OF / ALL UTILITY ENTRANCES, TO INCLUDE, SANITARY SEWER LATERALS, DOMESTIC AND FIRE PROTECTION / WATER SERVICE, ELECTRICAL, AND TELEPHONE SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO AVOID CONFLICTS AND ASSURE PROPER DEPTHS ARE ACHIEVED, AS WELL AS COORDINATE WITH ANY UTILITY COMPANIES FOR APPROVED LOCATIONS AND SCHEDULING OF / TIE-INS/CONNECTIONS TO THEIR FACILITIES. / 9. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING THE DAMAGE DONE TO ANY EXISTING ITEM DURING / CONSTRUCTION, SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DRAINAGE, UTILITIES, PAVEMENT, STRIPING, CURB, ETC. / REPAIRS SHALL BE EQUAL TO, OR BETTER THAN, EXISTING CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO / DOCUMENT ALL EXISTING DAMAGE AND NOTIFY WAL-MART CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION START. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL TOUCH-UP PAINT (EX. COLOR) ON ALL FIRE HYDRANTS AND CURBS WHICH ARE / CURRENTLY PAINTED. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BASE BID. / / 12. SITEWORK FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE "WALMART SITEWORK SPECIFICATIONS", UNLESS SPECIFIED ELSEWHERE. / 13. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE OR RELOCATE, WHEN APPLICABLE, ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS, FOUNDATIONS, / BASEMENTS, CONNECTING IMPROVEMENTS, DRAIN PIPES, SANITARY SEWER PIPES, POWER POLES, AND GUY / WIRES, WATER METERS AND WATER LINES, WELLS, SIDEWALKS, SIGN POLES, UNDERGROUND GAS, SEPTIC TANKS, AND ASPHALT, SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN, WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AND WHERE NEEDED,TO ALLOW FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN. / 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS IN DISPOSING OF / DEMOLISHED MATERIALS REMOVED FROM THIS SITE. / 15. ALL PAINT USED FOR PARKING STRIPING SHALL BE PER WALMART SPECIFICATIONS. 16. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. '/ 17. CART CORRALS TO BE PROVIDED BY WALMART. ASSEMBLY AND INSTALLATION TO BE DONE BY CONTRACTOR. 1 18. PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING SHALL MEET THE CITY'S CODES AND ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES 1 NORTH IN EFFECT AT THE TIME. I 19. THE MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE DICTATES STANDARD ACCESSIBLE AND VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE 8' WIDE WITH AN 8' WALKWAY. 1 0 50 100 20. REFER TO ARCH. PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ELECTRICAL PLANS. 1 ISCALE FEET I I SITE DATA ILOCATION: SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23W 10' BUFFER YARD WITH ADDRESS: 1000 PARK ROAD 100% SCREENING (TYP.) I CHANHASSEN, MN ZONING DISTRICT: IOP, INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK DISTRICT 1 LAND USE: COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT _ TOTAL SITE AREA: 14.11 AC. PERVIOUS AREA: 5.57 AC. (39% OF TOTAL SITE) IMPERVIOUS AREA: 8.54 AC. (61% OF TOTAL SITE) I MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT: 4 STORIES/OR 50' (WHICHEVER IS LESS) O PROPOSED HEIGHT: 1 STORY/35' O REQ'D MIN. BUILDING SETBACKS PROVIDED MIN BUILDING SETBACKS 4 I FRONT (HWY 5): 70' FRONT (HWY 5): 70' PROPOSED I FRONT (POWERS): 50' FRONT (POWERS): 100' SIGNAL 1 jl REQ'D MAX BUILDING SETBACKS PROVIDED MAX. BUILDING SETBACK FRONT (HWY 5): 150' FRONT (HWY 5): 70' FRONT (POWERS): 100' FRONT (POWERS): 100' VEHICLE USE AREA: 252,981 SF IREQUIRED LANDSCAPE: 20,238 SF (8.00 % OF VEHICULAR USE AREA) PROVIDED LANDSCAPE: 22,076 SF (8.73 % OF VEHICULAR USE AREA) i THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE CALL ONE MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: ALL WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. LEGEND 15 PROPOSED STANDARD PARKING SPACES 15 PROPOSED COMPACT PARKING SPACES CART CORRAL (SEE DETAIL SHEET) - - - - PROPERTY LINE - - - - BUILDING SETBACK LINE EXISTING CURB PROPOSED CURB HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT COMPACT PARKING STALLS (7.5'x16') ARCHITECTURAL APRON WALMART PARKING DATA TABLE PROPOSED WALMART BUILDING AREA 117,278 S.F. STANDARD PARKING 417 COMPACT PARKING 98 ACCESSIBLE PARKING 13** CART CORRALS(10) 20 SPACES WALMART PARKING 528* PARKING RATIO* 4.50/1000 S.F. *EXCLUDES CART CORRALS ** # OF ADA STALLS WAS CALCULATED USING A MEDIAN AGE OF 35 = 2%+2 1n Z O N W 0_ Y N x <Ne 6N „s 2tLL ¢<�n, o V✓w3 W ®ca wa �O~ on O U W 01 W O Ln U } w 00 wMV) W W W0 a aozi 0 N Z <0 a. Lj Ln m Z � m o� ¢wQW JCL �o FazW J Sao < J < W N Z < f O<Ozo// Y N0w wwwz w wow? wouj w (1) 0- 0 0 0 O }3 Z m m in W m O < w w W Z Z 0 co < N a O 1 U Q V ) _Z 2 �W�/ I^I- I..L H O 0 z W z 'w V ) Q Q q Z Lo 2 � � U w o O O O y t v J ct Q U DATE 11 18 2011 PROJECT NO. 116199062 SHEET NUMBER 6040 1 I 2 I 3 1 4 1 5 6 1 7 8 1 9 10 1 11 1 12 1 13 1 14 15 [IN 17 •• F1 A C E F I c ' 49 qr _ 149.75' 58340'44" E X C E P 7'1 O N 20 PARKIN' N9o8ye"yA �'4y*4 �► E i'\ 75.88 / SETBACK S8879240E 198..77 / N8804 441E - 207.2 70' MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK 1 - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 150' MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK - - - - - - - - \ e \ 9- da 1 / / / 30' a- d a♦BALE & PALLET ♦. d 19 .? 9 $ .. d ♦ ° rn }�6CyC�LE . AREA ♦ + •:' \ \ ��5 %j S r�---- - - - ?. ° a- GG ♦ a 41 22 P \ / 8 / .% COMPACTOR TRUCK WELL \ tea' ° 1 15' ACCESORY 7. 9' ° - - - STRUCTURE yPP i 13 TYP - - - - - ♦ \ d� a SETBACK I� \ \ RETAINING WALL �''� � 20 26' ' ( TRUCK WELL \ \ I \ 16' / vvv 26' PEDESTRIAN TRAIL / v v TYP 94 v v 11 12 EASEMENT TYP Walmart *.* v ILO T RM ATN% STORE # 5949-00� 18, 1 L ITS'OF WETLAND 11 ( � � / C-L120-NOR-NOR / TYP I / 17 COMPRESSOR 117,278 SF t /% / I I ENCLOSURE F.F.E. = 932.00 ± gg R I 26' /PE,O'ES,1121AN (TYP.) S�IRWAY \ / EXISTING DRAINA E AND O UTILITY EASEM NT I I 11 B E / I I / R1� 1 337.9' / II / I 20' WETLAND \ \ / _ _ _ STORMWATER_ BUFFER /'� / _ 32_ _ _ _ 26' TREATMENTAREA /V 1 o \ TYP cN / CART /� 14 / 0" CORRAL i (TYP. I 17 / a � I � y- `"` � LIMITS OF LAND / / TYP �,• "*�� I I o I 14 �Y6' / (TYP.) 31 TYP 18 17 '262, 62' 62' sz• 62' sz' ,/6�, / 12.34' ' I D CROSS OVER 9' / TYP TYP / \ / 18' 18' T8F CONCRETE WALK / 14 TYP TYP TYP / /I XIS N �16R NAGE ND 1 / 1 AS E 1 12 RETAINING WALL 26, TYP 9� Y/�g / /�/ / / Np• J RETAINING WALL EXISTING DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 15 7.5' TYP / / ; (ry .le' / R�72 07 i 3 15 d� `S 25' FRONT t�,UFFER ARD k j STORMWATER TREATMENT AREA, 1 STORMWATER TREATMENT fREA1�j,;,; / � Ly'085 .7,7! ..... '�R50' �1 S88 4227"W 459.52 R50'-J A& 1'_ 231. / /rM.W1 -100' MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK 50' MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK RETAINING WALL 10' BUFFER YARD WITH 100% SCREENING (TYP.) jR. 67. CHAPARRALCT. 6& NEZ PERCE CT. 69. PIMA DAY Lake CHANHASSEN 12 1990 POP. \_11,732 W n v6r u O J Ad (IM9ERI,mD C' V LL ESSE% S 123 POVERS EXISTINGLIl. SIGNAL CT. 3,1 Y n SAN ,A E V. City Hail OR, PICHA 5 I ../ .:,i/✓/. %i� I/ice \\\\\ VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE PYLON SECTION 114, TOWNSHIP 116N, RANGE 23W SIGN SITE PLAN NOTES J, 1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF ALL PROPERTY CORNERS. 47P 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER, CONCRETE, AND PAVEMENT TO EXISTING IN GRADE AND ALIGNMENT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT & CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS (SEE DEMO PLAN). 4. THE EARTHWORK FOR ALL BUILDING FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ` / \ SPECIFICATIONS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ACTUAL BUILDING AND SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS, PORCH AND RAMP LOCATIONS. A /' 1�• / 6. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO / CONSTRUCTION, ADJUSTMENT, OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS DESIGNATED ON PLANS. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PIPE BOLLARDS FOR PROTECTION OF ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES AND / APPURTENANCES IN DRIVE AREAS. • 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ACTUAL LOCATION OF O ALL UTILITY ENTRANCES, TO INCLUDE, SANITARY SEWER LATERALS, DOMESTIC AND FIRE PROTECTION WATER SERVICE, ELECTRICAL, AND TELEPHONE SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION / OF UTILITIES IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO AVOID CONFLICTS AND ASSURE PROPER DEPTHS ARE ACHIEVED, AS WELL AS COORDINATE WITH ANY UTILITY COMPANIES FOR APPROVED LOCATIONS AND SCHEDULING OF / TIE-INS/CONNECTIONS TO THEIR FACILITIES. / 9. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. �• 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING THE DAMAGE DONE TO ANY EXISTING ITEM DURING • / CONSTRUCTION, SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DRAINAGE, UTILITIES, PAVEMENT, STRIPING, CURB, ETC. / REPAIRS SHALL BE EQUAL TO, OR BETTER THAN, EXISTING CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO DOCUMENT ALL EXISTING DAMAGE AND NOTIFY WAL-MART CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO ' / CONSTRUCTION START. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL TOUCH-UP PAINT (EX. COLOR) ON ALL FIRE HYDRANTS AND CURBS WHICH ARE / CURRENTLY PAINTED. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BASE BID. 12. SITEWORK FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE "WALMART SITEWORK SPECIFICATIONS", UNLESS / SPECIFIED ELSEWHERE. / 13. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE OR RELOCATE, WHEN APPLICABLE, ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS, FOUNDATIONS, / BASEMENTS, CONNECTING IMPROVEMENTS, DRAIN PIPES, SANITARY SEWER PIPES, POWER POLES, AND GUY WIRES, WATER METERS AND WATER LINES, WELLS, SIDEWALKS, SIGN POLES, UNDERGROUND GAS, SEPTIC / TANKS, AND ASPHALT, SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN, WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AND WHERE NEEDED,TO ALLOW FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN. / 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS IN DISPOSING OF / DEMOLISHED MATERIALS REMOVED FROM THIS SITE. / 15. ALL PAINT USED FOR PARKING STRIPING SHALL BE PER WALMART SPECIFICATIONS. / 16. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 17. CART CORRALS TO BE PROVIDED BY WALMART. ASSEMBLY AND INSTALLATION TO BE DONE BY '1 CONTRACTOR. 1 18. PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING SHALL MEET THE CITY'S CODES AND ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES NORTH IN EFFECT AT THE TIME. 1 19. THE MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE DICTATES STANDARD ACCESSIBLE AND VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES I SHALL BE 8' WIDE WITH AN 8' WALKWAY. 1 0 50 100 20. REFER TO ARCH. PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ELECTRICAL PLANS. 1 ISCALE FEET I I SITE DATA LEGEND LOCATION: 1 SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23W 15 PROPOSED STANDARD PARKING SPACES ADDRESS: 1000 PARK ROAD CHANHASSEN, MN 15 PROPOSED COMPACT PARKING SPACES ZONING DISTRICT: I IOP, INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK DISTRICT CART CORRAL (SEE DETAIL SHEET) LAND USE: COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT - - - - PROPERTY LINE TOTAL SITE AREA: 14.11 AC. - - - - BUILDING SETBACK LINE PERVIOUS AREA: 5.57 AC. (39% OF TOTAL SITE) IMPERVIOUS AREA: 8.54 AC. (61% OF TOTAL SITE) EXISTING CURB MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT: 4 STORIES/OR 50' (WHICHEVER IS LESS) PROPOSED CURB PROPOSED HEIGHT: 1 STORY/35' HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE REO'D MIN. BUILDING SETBACKS PROVIDED MIN BUILDING SETBACKS 1 FRONT (HWY 5): 70' FRONT (HWY 5): 70' PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK FRONT (POWERS): 50' FRONT (POWERS): 100' REO'D MAX. BUILDING SETBACKS PROVIDED MAX BUILDING SETBACKS STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT FRONT (HWY 5): 150' FRONT (HWY 5): 70' FRONT (POWERS): 100' FRONT (POWERS): 100' 1 HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT I VEHICLE USE AREA: 252,981 SF REQUIRED LANDSCAPE: I 20,238 SF (8.00 % OF VEHICULAR USE AREA) COMPACT PARKING STALLS (7.5'x16') PROVIDED LANDSCAPE: 22,076 SF (8.73 % OF VEHICULAR USE AREA) 1 ARCHITECTURAL APRON THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE CALL ONE MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: ALL WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. WALMART PARKING DATA TABLE PROPOSED WALMART BUILDING AREA 117,278 S.F. STANDARD PARKING 417 COMPACT PARKING 98 ACCESSIBLE PARKING 13** CART CORRALS(10) 20 SPACES WALMART PARKING 528* PARKING RATIO* 4.50/1000 S.F. *EXCLUDES CART CORRALS ** # OF ADA STALLS WAS CALCULATED USING A MEDIAN AGE OF 35 = 2%+2 to Z O W •� �I I �I �II Z S s g'� u i y�y� aw ONa� Y NF() o a O v O zw = n 05 u0 F «w o L) V) L I 1iXwEn WwL) 0 a0� nZ Jw W z <00~ F- a. LLJ < f Z z <z o awaw < - Q F: Z EL 0J O Y wc)z J N `irzw 3w Fa<�< O<Ozo 3-0 n(7w m1nz wIrwwz rr V) a. 0 0 0 :2U U U U 0 O Z m > m m 0 m 0 Q z w J 29 U Q (n < w m C] n U Q I..L. 'F_ V ) Of Z_ w Q. H O In Ld Z W Z_ ��//�� VJ Q Q o Z Lo U < Lu c)p ♦/ c:) '^ v J 1V r E uj 3 W U DATE 11 18 2011 PROJECT NO. 116199062 SHEET NUMBER 6040 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 1 10 1 11 1 12 13 1 14 1 15 1 16 17 0 C E F E 0 m s834oq E X C E P T I ON � 08°8``yl 4 E i ' 149.75'6 `4 7S88 S887924'E 198J7 ` / — -- N88�4'44"E 207.2 1 ----------- -L—� - l T------------= — t// BALE & PALLET m RECYCLE AREA 12 _ _ / / y', •.e 'ems .y. -` __--f="'"--y I / COMPACTOR TRUCK WELL I 30' WETLAND 9' I BUFFER II 'I 7Y TYP ---------_Ti —----- I� kETAINING WALL I 1 fN',PEDE 1 I N TRAILENT cl TYP OF WETLAND , \1 EXISTING DR'41NA E AND 1 \ UTILITY EASEM NT \ 1 337.9'/ \t / 2/0, r 20' WETLAND BUFFER \\ / \ 1 D \\\ \\\ \\\ A \ TYP / iA t\ LIMITS pF VA LAND /c 25' FRONT BUFFER YARD t� .yam �/` • \ ♦ } r,�;r 1? 5't ;.'4 vf, .�# o i�ss tia{ r'r k. .............. -, SITE TRIANGLE 8T'4 TF r _ SITE TRIANGLE PA RK ROAD -------- i .m I a W. rL 44 \\ VICINITY MAP SITE NOT TO SCALE SECTION 114, TOWNSHIP 116N, RANGE 23W -� SITE PLAN NOTES J .. J rr J rr 1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF ALL PROPERTY CORNERS. J f 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER, CONCRETE, AND PAVEMENT TO EXISTING IN GRADE AND ALIGNMENT. t r� 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT & CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS (SEE DEMO PLAN). 4. THE EARTHWORK FOR ALL BUILDING FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS. - 6 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ACTUAL BUILDING AND SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS, PORCH AND RAMP LOCATIONS. 6. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO - / CONSTRUCTION, ADJUSTMENT, OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS DESIGNATED ON PLANS. J 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PIPE BOLLARDS FOR PROTECTION OF ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES AND / APPURTENANCES IN DRIVE AREAS. fr 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ACTUAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITY .ENTRANCES, TO INCLUDE, SANITARY SEWER LATERALS, DOMESTIC AND FIRE PROTECTION J WATER SERVICE, ELECTRICAL, AND TELEPHONE SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO AVOID CONFLICTS AND ASSURE PROPER DEPTHS ARE ACHIEVED, % AS WELL AS COORDINATE WITH ANY UTILITY COMPANIES FOR APPROVED LOCATIONS AND SCHEDULING OF J / TIE-INS/CONNECTIONS TO THEIR FACILITIES. J / IJ 9. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL. GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. / J 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING THE DAMAGE DONE TO ANY EXISTING ITEM DURING / CONSTRUCTION, SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DRAINAGE, UTILITIES, PAVEMENT, STRIPING, CURB, ETC. �. ! / -- REPAIRS SHALL BE -EQUAL TO, OR BETTER THAN, EXISTING CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO DOCUMENT ALL EXISTING DAMAGE AND NOTIFY WAL-MART CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO J ( CONSTRUCTION START. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL TOUCH-UP PAINT (EX. COLOR) ON ALL FIRE HYDRANTS AND CURBS WHICH ARE JAr CURRENTLY PAINTED. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BASE BID. r / 12.. SITEWORK FOR. THIS PROJECT SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE "WALMART SITEWORK SPECIFICATIONS", UNLESS SPECIFIED ELSEWHERE. / 13. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE OR RELOCATE, WHEN APPLICABLE, ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS, FOUNDATIONS, - BASEMENTS, CONNECTING IMPROVEMENTS, DRAIN PIPES, SANITARY SEWER PIPES,. POWER POLES, AND GUY / WIRES, WATER METERS AND WATER LINES, WELLS, SIDEWALKS, SIGN POLES, UNDERGROUND GAS, SEPTIC TANKS, AND ASPHALT, SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN, WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AND WHERE NEEDED,TO ALLOW FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN. / 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL LOCAL, STATE,. AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS IN DISPOSING OF 1 DEMOLISHED MATERIALS REMOVED FROM THIS SITE. I15. ALL PAINT USED FOR PARKING STRIPING SHALL BE PER WALMART SPECIFICATIONS. J 16. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 17. CART CORRALS TO BE PROVIDED BY WALMART. ASSEMBLY AND INSTALLATION TO BE DONE BY '1 CONTRACTOR. 1 18. PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING SHALL MEET THE CITY'S CODES AND ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES NORTH IN EFFECT AT THE TIME. / 19. THE MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE DICTATES STANDARD ACCESSIBLE AND VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES I SHALL BE 8' WIDE WITH AN 8' WALKWAY. 1 0 50 100 1 20. REFER TO ARCH. PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ELECTRICAL PLANS. ISCALE FEET I SITE DATA LEGEND LOCATION: SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23`N 15 PROPOSED STANDARD PARKING SPACES 1 ADDRESS: 1000 PARK ROAD CHANHASSEN, MN 15 PROPOSED COMPACT PARKING SPACES ZONING DISTRICT: I OP, INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK DISTRICT CART CORRAL (SEE DETAIL SHEET) LAND USE: COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT — - - — PROPERTY LINE TOTAL SITE AREA: 14.11 AC. — BUILDING SETBACK LINE r MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT: 4 STORIES/OR 50' (WHICHEVER IS LESS) - - - - - - - - EXISTING CURB PROPOSED HEIGHT: 1 STORY/35' PROPOSED CURB ^�--^->v®- --•�--- REQ'D MIN. BUILDING SETBACKS PROVIDED MIN. BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT (HWY 5): 70' FRONT (HWY 5): 70' HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE FRONT (POWERS): 50' FRONT (POWERS): 100' 1 - O PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK REQ'D MAX. BUILDING SETBACKS PROVIDED MAX. BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT (HWY 5): 150' FRONT (HWY 5): 70' =1' $ FRONT (POWERS): 100' FRONT (POWERS): 100' STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT VEHICLE USE AREA: 253,570 SF 1 / HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT REQUIRED LANDSCAPE: 20,286 SF (8% OF VEHICULAR USE AREA) PROVIDED LANDSCAPE: 20,925 SF (8% OF VEHICULAR USE AREA) I COMPACT PARKING STALLS (7.5'x18') REQUIRED TREES: 82 TREES (1 PER 250 SF OF REQ'D LANDSCAPE) PROVIDED TREES: 107 OVERSTORY 48 EVVERGREENERGREEN ARCHITECTURAL APRON 39 DECIDUOUS 28 ORNAMENTAL 222 TREES THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE CALL ONE MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: ALL WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. �00 WALMART PARKING DATA TABLE PROPOSED WALMART BUILDING AREA 117,278 S.F. STANDARD PARKING 416 COMPACT PARKING 99 ACCESSIBLE PARKING 13** CART CORRALS(10) 20 SPACES WALMART PARKING 528* PARKING RATIO* 4.50/1000 S.F. *EXCLUDES CART CORRALS ** # OF ADA STALLS WAS CALCULATED USING A MEDIAN AGE OF 35 = 2%+2 .; z O (n > W C z =;m c a� <N'.0 �8W ffH+� 1 � SOU O wof w O) 0 In P= w o It 0:2 V) W E; Z 3 WW2g CL 0 z 5�D~ N aw¢W Nms0 z xmaD o <w<W Q �Q�K �o ofzW 3L0 K d 4 J Q '''V'zzo V3p0In > n-w m�S nz wmmw? fowL,m =wn�W _mV)IL0 0 U U � U U � O ' 3 Z m � m 1n o m o Q z w a v� ¢ w U W � I- V) O I U Q a_ F____ U) I� Z_ G W�/ L^J� I..L Q O (n Z W Z W Z U Q O CD Z LL - 2 U < mow// IJ- CD 0 _% 1 Q I� O L y L T_ m E ct U DATE 11 15 2011 PROJECT NO. 116199062 SHEET NUMBER 6040 R 0C WETLAND DELINEATION I 30' PARKING SETBACK - I've; • i I 20' WETLAND BUFFER ' \ TRUCK ROUTE (TYP.) cc RETAINING WALL ETA 1 FENCE (TYP.) \I ' 25' FRONT BUFFER _ WARD A. ®_PROPOSED FULL ACCESS _ T F !w\ i► SIGHT TRIANGLE 4 R, RECYCLING AREA 70' MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK __: 150' MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK COMPACT PARKING STALLS (TYR ) �\ M got R gv ) lur / S ]EXISTING \ IN \ SIGNAL \ V \> 1_ / Ik I N ACCESS Nit,� YARD ~ 9 _.for,. It 11 11 I II I 11 ` • PEDESTRIAN ACCESS PROPOSED SIGNAL rl'I o.; LEGEND IOVERSTORY TREE EVERGREEN TREE ® SMALL DECIDUOUS TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE . SHRUBS/PERENNIALS ® NATIVE/WET MIX 0 TURF C EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN WALMART PARKING DATA TABLE PROPOSED WALMART BUILDING AREA 117,278 S.F. STANDARD PARKING 416 COMPACT PARKING 99 ACCESSIBLE PARKING 13** CART CORRALS(10) 20 SPACES WALMART PARKING 528* PARKING RATIO* 4.50/1000 S-F. *EXCLUDES CART CORRALS ** / OF ADA STALLS WAS CALCULATED USING A MEDIAN AGE OF 35 = 2%+2 Walmart E SITE PLAN CHANHASSEN. MN NOVEM BER 2011 0 25 50 100 FT G=I1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2550 UNIVERSITY AVE. WEST, SUITE 238N ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114 TEL. NO. (651) 645-4197 FAX. NO. (651) 645-5116 2 3 0 5 7 0 9 10 13 1 14 1 15 1 16 17 F i Fo L E F a� a O 0 U — c O N 0 T E G 0 r'l o - N 0 Z 0 H 0 co CD 3 o - z Q J a w F- o I 0 / N H w w _ cn Z J a Q U j / 0 1 rn 0 O r H of - Q J Q 3 w 0I K U 3- Y E 0 c 3 0 a S834044 E E X C E P T O N I 75.88 11� � 1a`� \ 8)o �_-- 5887924"E 198.77 / N880444"E 207.28 ``^fix 70' MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK -- -- - — — -- _ _-- _.—_----_ —� Try--_—_ — =`�`., ` - - - - - - - -' - 150' MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK - - - BALE &PALLET RECYCLE AREA / 10, FT A 4 ---/'/— /�/ /' • _ ^•1_ der. • d .. •.•, a.� \ ;, ° '',.� �' 1-+ _ \ G;B `i• ° a R % / COMPACTOR TRUCK WELL - -_ 30' WETLAND g' - �'� II BUFFER 1 I i 7 TYP c �13 \ e • (/ 1 I 1ETAINING WALL T 13 \ 26 RETAINING WALL EXISTING DRAINAGE & s_ UTILITY EASEMENT ��7 " TRUCK WELL - �_ I 11 i • 1 / \ 7.5' \ \ TYP I I \ 26'/ �� PEDESI�RIAN TRAIL I \ \ Tye IIII EASEMENT I ` tll / 1s' ♦�♦ / / / / ' i TYP WaImart I,♦ / // 9 // / ^ /;; I I / STORE # 5949-00 i L IjS;OF WETLAND \\ I / C-L120-NOR-NOR / TYP COMPRESSOR 117,278 SF ± / �/ \ ENCLOSURE F.F.E.= 932.00 ± oo R I(TYP.) P SIR IAY Q 1 \ \\ EXISTING DR}11NA E AND UTILITY EASEM NT \\ / 11 B E zt 337.9, / / ✓ �/ I I / 2 / 0 / 1 1 \ /• \ / a o / / 0 1 ; ; 20' WETLAND BUFFER I _ — — _ 1 A AV l A. V 18, TYP t I \; CART \ ` \ / CORR :L (TYP. b, .k ' ,rt / E 4. LIMITS pF W LAND cot ! ! I , \ -, \ 1 �• I '`\ / TYP _:.: ,�!- 1 N I \\ o \ , \\\ / 12 26' 31 I -TYP 913 17 / g 1,4 ' t ! \ /T1 77 (TYP.) f 1 ! / I t • T\� A\V �30' PEDES -- 12.34' COVER g J I \ \ ; \ , / ., 18' TYP I ! 1 ! UIL ING SE AOK V •�, A , TYP 1 \V A\\\ / ....., T18 YP �. RAISED / I I UIL IN G SE ! ! K ! �1 10' INI UM t \\ l• 18' 18' CONCRET WALK 26'E �/ I I t ET ININ 1 ! ! TYP 1 1 A RG/N DC MENT2' STORMWATER TREAT9' 25' FRONT BUF RD AREA (TYP) 26' i I 1I t1 F 1E t TYP r' / / i` �Y / / I I 10 BRIE Y Wil Ij 10 % CR NI TYP) ! 15 I ! 19 d2 Er Cie SITE • ' + --- - S8_842270W 459_52 1 SITE TRIANGLE VICINITY MAP SITE NOT TO SCALE SECTION 114, TOWNSHIP 116N, RANGE 23W SITE PLAN NOTES / r"1 J rr 1.- CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF ALL PROPERTY CORNERS. rr 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER, CONCRETE, AND PAVEMENT TO EXISTING IN GRADE AND ALIGNMENT. i �O 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT & CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS (SEE DEMO PLAN). r` 4. THE EARTHWORK FOR ALL BUILDING FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS. Z / 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ACTUAL BUILDING AND SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS, PORCH AND RAMP LOCATIONS. A �.• d / 6. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO - / / CONSTRUCTION, ADJUSTMENT, OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS DESIGNATED ON PLANS. J 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PIPE BOLLARDS FOR PROTECTION OF ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES AND / APPURTENANCES IN DRIVE AREAS. 0* / 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ACTUAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITY ENTRANCES, TO INCLUDE, SANITARY SEWER LATERALS, DOMESTIC AND FIRE PROTECTION / WATER SERVICE, ELECTRICAL, AND TELEPHONE SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO AVOID CONFLICTS AND ASSURE PROPER DEPTHS ARE ACHIEVED, j AS WELL AS COORDINATE WITH ANY UTILITY COMPANIES FOR APPROVED LOCATIONS AND SCHEDULING OF TIE-INS/CONNECTIONS TO THEIR FACILITIES. 1 9. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH .ALL GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. a / \q / � 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING THE DAMAGE DONE TO ANY EXISTING ITEM DURING CONSTRUCTION, SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DRAINAGE, UTILITIES, PAVEMENT,- STRIPING, CURB, ETC. I / REPAIRS SHALL BE EQUAL TO, OR BETTER THAN, EXISTING CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE. TO DOCUMENT ALL EXISTING DAMAGE AND NOTIFY WAL-MART CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO / r CONSTRUCTION START. / 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL TOUCH-UP PAINT (EX. COLOR) ON ALL FIRE HYDRANTS AND CURBS WHICH ARE f / CURRENTLY PAINTED. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BASE BID. 12. SITEWORK FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE "WALMART SITEWORK SPECIFICATIONS", UNLESS / SPECIFIED ELSEWHERE. f/ f 13. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE OR RELOCATE, WHEN APPLICABLE, ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS, FOUNDATIONS, f BASEMENTS, CONNECTING IMPROVEMENTS, DRAIN PIPES; SANITARY SEWER PIPES, POWER POLES, AND GUY WIRES, WATER METERS AND WATER LINES, WELLS, SIDEWALKS, SIGN POLES, UNDERGROUND GAS, SEPTIC TANKS, AND ASPHALT, SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN, WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AND WHERE NEEDED,TO ALLOW FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN. / 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS IN DISPOSING OF / DEMOLISHED MATERIALS REMOVED FROM THIS SITE. / 15. ALL PAINT USED FOR PARKING STRIPING SHALL BE PER WALMART SPECIFICATIONS. / 16. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 17. CART CORRALS TO BE PROVIDED BY WALMART. ASSEMBLY AND INSTALLATION TO BE DONE BY ' CONTRACTOR. 18. PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING SHALL MEET THE CITY'S CODES AND ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES NORTH IN EFFECT AT THE TIME. I 19. THE MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE DICTATES STANDARD ACCESSIBLE AND VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES I SHALL BE 8' WIDE WITH AN 8' WALKWAY. I 0 50 I 100 20. REFER TO ARCH. PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ELECTRICAL PLANS. ISCALE FEET I I SITE DATA LOCATION: ADDRESS: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE: r- - - - - TOTAL SITE AREA: MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT: PROPOSED HEIGHT: "-®-""`•""" REQ'D MIN. BUILDING SE1 FRONT (HWY 5): 70' FRONT (POWERS): 50' REQ'D MAX. BUILDING SE �,,,„.+•^"'°'----..,„v FRONT (HWY 5): 150' 'I FRONT (POWERS): 100' VEHICLE USE AREA: REQUIRED LANDSCAPE: I PROVIDED LANDSCAPE: REQUIRED TREES: PROVIDED TREES: ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE CALL ONE MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23W 1000 PARK ROAD CHANHASSEN, MN IOP, INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK DISTRICT COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 14.11 AC. 4 STORIES/OR 50' (WHICHEVER IS LESS) 1 STORY/35' PROVIDED MIN BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT (HWY 5): 70' FRONT. (POWERS): 100' PROVIDED MAX. BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT (HWY 5): 70' FRONT (POWERS): 100' 253,570 SF 20,286 SF (8% OF VEHICULAR USE AREA) 20.925 SF (8% OF VEHICULAR USE AREA) 82 TREES (1 PER 250 SF OF REQ'D LANDSCAPE) 107 OVERSTORY 48 EVERGREEN 39 DECIDUOUS 28 ORNAMENTAL 222 TREES ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: ALL WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. i LEGEND 15 PROPOSED STANDARD PARKING SPACES 15 PROPOSED COMPACT PARKING SPACES CART CORRAL (SEE DETAIL SHEET) — - - — PROPERTY LINE - - - - BUILDING SETBACK LINE - - - - - - - - EXISTING CURB PROPOSED. CURB HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT COMPACT PARKING STALLS (7.5'x18') ARCHITECTURAL APRON WALMART PARKING DATA TABLE PROPOSED WALMART BUILDING AREA 117,278 S.F. STANDARD PARKING 416 COMPACT PARKING 99 ACCESSIBLE PARKING 13** CART CORRALS(10) 20 SPACES WALMART PARKING - 528* PARKING RATIO* 00 S.F. *EXCLUDES CART CORRALS ** # OF ADA STALLS WAS CALCULATED USING A MEDIAN AGE OF 35 = 2%+2 a L O • iym 8$�$m9 6 Xp E .y z �_> �NWaj 13� zL a w Q, z_ n 0 o kn F ¢}V) U v, w ui w WWc,g a ao1 .D J W z JU0� I-- U aw¢W o �m-D o aw¢w �- �a�� JN J_ Fwz wzw L0 ¢ J ¢ wwz<¢ c,3p2vvw r vyw z mwS,n wm�w? wd ILOg w ct m (7n d O O 0 :2U U U U 0 U r Z m m (n w m o w a Z Z y 3 U ¢ in ¢ w V) m 0 U 0- v J I..1- z LU L.L Q H O (1) z W Z W�/� Z � VJ Q Q c) z LL 0) T . _ NN Lf- 4t U<NW L[_ „oO ) U >V W U DATE 11 15 2011 PROJECT NO. 116199062 SHEET NUMBER 6040 Non4mnnable Item s.: _... , C on Pit w. U J ' 010 4 � Folder Number �� J Folder Name Job Number 2 Box Number O rJZ, 'Date /9Terp/acyCiestep.��,� j 0, Oce/p, / p�be� ' tke X, '�` pnkC/larye°UeC°�r!/gesw�at,° 4 de ��aybe °h /h eel 6 hp rej; pryh/ i' OrOv/eyH°ie5ts atpr�0"e7�brgyt�e�hiy°se e y / �`r e� of ery Ci tat a �ejhp9 eih Lek �6 W6), e� c o �a��Utep� ep es� a kith at 9 °hiia . c� qh S jpr'°n �o yte ' arter 9r °4t whati�io hOti p them aa;a�tUsbt�y' � on Of So O o R�`e �k � a��/k'ry��scy°��i. 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 10 1 11 1 12 1 13 1 14 1 15 1 16 17 P. . n S u I E F cu a o 0 U - 0 0 (n .0 T a G r M M o - N CCT z CDH d 0 CD O - Z Q J a Li U) o 0 c0 N H Li Li z n Q U j / 0 I rn O r / H Q J 3 w 0 K J I U 3 `1 ai - E 0 c .3 0 L 0 149.75' I_ S8340' E X C E P T I ON ` 20 PARKI�� 089Ba�1 �Q�` *4 y 754.884E 58879 24 E 198.77 / \ N88 r74 44 "E sET 207 2 \ _ ` --- 70' MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK 1 -- - - - - - - - - / - - - - - - - - - - - - \ 150' MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK 1r--------------- t-� ------ \\ B I,T' e 19 \\\\\\ ��,QRaft¢ 1 0 'ro d. ALE & PALLET � \ 1 \ � B3 36 / / 9 • « ° J7ECYCLE .AREA ': • r ! Q I° ° ° d °° °44 \ .° 4 2•fas e 481 �I \ < 1 1 15' ACCESORY \ 7 •% 9, TRUCK WELL \ �q: + COMPACTOR j STRUCTURE i P / 13 TYP + 1 _ _ SETBACK �I� / °e / 9 6 RETAINING WALL •'I / / TRUCK WELL . T. \ 1 � s• 5 \ \ v v v /26' PEDESTRIAN TRAIL TYP % / 14 v 11 I / 12 EASEMENT \ \ TYP almart �� v ORMWATN �T STORE # 5949-00� L ITS OF WETLAND I' / C-L120-NOR-NOR TYP 17 1 � - �)I 117,278 SF f i/ I 1 COMPRESSOR I ENCLOSURE F.F.E. = 932.00 t �/ R Ilk / 26' P TgSkRIAN - (TYP.) ~ S/..IRW O I 1 � EXISTING DRhINA E AND � 09/22/11 O UTILITY EASEM NT 1 1 / 11 B E / i / / 1 R�o / ' / 337.9'4 /�( L 0 /-0 y A ono o a o Iowa 1 1 20' WETLAND _ _ _ STORM WATER_ BUFFER / _ 32_ _ - - 26' TRFATMEN'1-AREA 1 o TYP i b- �, 14 CORRAL I I,, (TYP. i co- _ 2 1 p LIMITS OF W LAND�� TYP ,�1 I 14 2s 0 (TYP-) 31 1`TYP 18 97 �/ • \ 7-I \• /2 18 62, 62' 62' �•�•, a 12.34'� CROSS OVER 18' TYP �• 1 ` TYP ' �•� �' / 8 RAISLP / 14 1 `• 1 1 1 / TYP CONCRETEWALK TYP TYP I_ TYP // / it 1 1 1 / XIS NG1'DR NAtE NO 12 RETAINING WALL 26' TYP / / / / /�TY / 101 Y�AS E(J �: 1 *0. d RETAINING WALL EXISTING DRAINAGE & �1 UTILITY EASEMENT 15 7.5' TYP 3 \ / of � ry �2w / 20' FU ARK 1�. SET A 1� I� 17 1 I _ 7 \ 15 1 R�7? QS \ \-`. � 3 /1`Jy= --` �� \• 25' FRONT PUFFER YARD x4 P50 STORM WATER TREATMENT AREA, 1 rr�� n %1 STORMWATER TREATMENT AREA/ S88 42 270W 459.52 - - - - - - - � .00 R 50' RIN A11111h. _ - Ak�_ I �a I I 200.1 PARK RO 1.06 .100' MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK 50' MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK RETAINING WALL 10' BUFFER YARD WITH 100% SCREENING (TYP.) D(O NG SIGNAL INUI IU ZIUALL PYLON SECTION 114, TOWNSHIP 116N, RANGE 23W SIGN SITE PLAN NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF ALL PROPERTY CORNERS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER, CONCRETE, AND PAVEMENT TO EXISTING IN GRADE AND ALIGNMENT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT &CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS (SEE DEMO PLAN). ` 4. THE EARTHWORK FOR ALL BUILDING FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH / \ SPECIFICATIONS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ACTUAL BUILDING AND SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS, A PORCH AND RAMP LOCATIONS. 6. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO / CONSTRUCTION, ADJUSTMENT, OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS DESIGNATED ON PLANS. / 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PIPE BOLLARDS FOR PROTECTION OF ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES IN DRIVE AREAS. O. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ACTUAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITY ENTRANCES, TO INCLUDE, SANITARY SEWER LATERALS, DOMESTIC AND FIRE PROTECTION / WATER SERVICE, ELECTRICAL, AND TELEPHONE SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO AVOID CONFLICTS AND ASSURE PROPER DEPTHS ARE ACHIEVED, AS WELL AS COORDINATE WITH ANY UTILITY COMPANIES FOR APPROVED LOCATIONS AND SCHEDULING OF / TIE-INS/CONNECTIONS TO THEIR FACILITIES. / 9. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING THE DAMAGE DONE TO ANY EXISTING ITEM DURING / CONSTRUCTION, SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DRAINAGE, UTILITIES, PAVEMENT, STRIPING, CURB, ETC. / REPAIRS SHALL BE EQUAL TO, OR BETTER THAN, EXISTING CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO / DOCUMENT ALL EXISTING DAMAGE AND NOTIFY WAL-MART CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION START. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL TOUCH-UP PAINT (EX. COLOR) ON ALL FIRE HYDRANTS AND CURBS WHICH ARE / CURRENTLY PAINTED. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BASE BID. / 12. SITEWORK FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE "WALMART SITEWORK SPECIFICATIONS", UNLESS SPECIFIED ELSEWHERE. / 13. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE OR RELOCATE, WHEN APPLICABLE, ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS, FOUNDATIONS, / BASEMENTS, CONNECTING IMPROVEMENTS, DRAIN PIPES, SANITARY SEWER PIPES, POWER POLES, AND GUY / WIRES, WATER METERS AND WATER LINES, WELLS, SIDEWALKS, SIGN POLES, UNDERGROUND GAS, SEPTIC TANKS, AND ASPHALT, SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN, WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AND WHERE NEEDED,TO ALLOW FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN. -/ 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS IN DISPOSING OF / DEMOLISHED MATERIALS REMOVED FROM THIS SITE. / 15. ALL PAINT USED FOR PARKING STRIPING SHALL BE PER WALMART SPECIFICATIONS. / 16. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. I1 17. CART CORRALS TO BE PROVIDED BY WALMART. ASSEMBLY AND INSTALLATION TO BE DONE BY CONTRACTOR. 1 18. PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING SHALL MEET THE CITY'S CODES AND ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES 1 NORTH IN EFFECT AT THE TIME. I 19. THE MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE DICTATES STANDARD ACCESSIBLE AND VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE 8' WIDE WITH AN 8' WALKWAY. 1 0 50 100 20. REFER TO ARCH. PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ELECTRICAL PLANS. 1 ISCALE FEET I I SITE DATA LEGEND LOCATION: SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23W 15 PROPOSED STANDARD PARKING SPACES ADDRESS: 1000 PARK ROAD I CHANHASSEN, MIN 15 PROPOSED COMPACT PARKING SPACES ZONING DISTRICT: IOP, INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK DISTRICT CART CORRAL (SEE DETAIL SHEET) 1 LAND USE: COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT - - - - PROPERTY LINE 1 _ TOTAL SITE AREA: 14.11 AC. - - - - BUILDING SETBACK LINE PERVIOUS AREA: 7 C. (39% OF TOTAL SITE) J IMPERVIOUS AREA: 8.54 (61% OF TOTAL SITE) EXISTING CURB MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT: 4 STORIES/OR 50' (WHICHEVER IS LESS) PROPOSED CURB I PROPOSED HEIGHT: 1 STORY/35' HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE REO'D MIN. BUILDING SETBACKS PROVIDED MIN. BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT (HWY 5): 70' FRONT (HWY 5): 70' PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK 1 FRONT (POWERS): 50' FRONT (POWERS): 100' RE0'D MAX. BUILDING SETBACKS PROVIDED MAX. BUILDING SETBACKS STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT FRONT (HWY 5): 150' FRONT (HWY 5): 70' FRONT (POWERS): 100' FRONT (POWERS): 100' 1 HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT I VEHICLE USE AREA: 252,981 SF REQUIRED LANDSCAPE: 20,238 SF (8.00 % OF VEHICULAR USE AREA) COMPACT PARKING STALLS (7.5 A6') PROVIDED LANDSCAPE: 22,076 SF (8.73 % OF VEHICULAR USE AREA) 1 ARCHITECTURAL APRON THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE CALL ONE MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: ALL WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 11*1 i WALMART PARKING DATA TABLE PROPOSED WALMART BUILDING AREA 117,278 S.F. STANDARD PARKING 417 COMPACT PARKING 98 ACCESSIBLE PARKING 13** CART CORRALS(10) 20 SPACES WALMART PARKING 528* PARKING RATIO* 4.50/1000 S.F. *EXCLUDES CART CORRALS ** # OF ADA STALLS WAS CALCULATED USING A MEDIAN AGE OF 35 = 2%+2 LJ F_ 0 w z O w a ice= a 6N�Z mw 13YY Y m 0 v N O W zuj n F_ n F U}(Wn0 Li W uj < a z n=JW W 2 JU F U Ilw<W J N 2 Z z �m<M p awaw a - � ce=W 300 a�Q v3oOEEn m�5;Wz Lj wows al Livoia`� o 3 O } z 'm m U) o m o < z w J V U < n < w N 0 0 U Q Q Z w F- O (n Ld Z w Z_ /� V ) Q Q c) Z W 4t U W %� Q �% O y � V)'O^ 3 U DATE 11 18 2011 PROJECT NO. 116199062 SHEET NUMBER 6040 PRE -CAST PANEL PRE -CAST PANEL "RED BRYAN" AWNING TO MATCH "BROWN r' "BUFF" BRONZE" BY BERRIDGE I t x' QUIK-BRIK"PROMENADE SPANDREL GLASS BLEND" BY OLDCASTLE Front Elevation PRE -CAST PANEL CLtNU by ULUUASI Lt Rear Elevation DREL GLASS EIFS SW 2823 "ROOKWOOD CLAY" INTEGRALLY COLORED CMU SPLIT FACE STANDARD COLOR #192 bLENU" by ULUUASILE /PRE -CAST PANE t,'RED BRYAN' �• AWNING TO MATCH "BROWN PRE -CAST PANEL V' BRONZE' BY BERRIDGE r "BUFF" Right Elevation INTEGRALLY COLORED SPLIT FACE CMU OLDCASTLE "OAK" Left Elevation ,: Walmart:, �r::41111111111111111'® From Science to Solutions QUIK-BRIK "PROMENADE BLEND" BY OLDCASTLE SPANDREL GLASS June 21, 2011 PRE -CAST PANEL r' "RI IFF" U j. , Chanhassen, MN 5949-00 QUIK-BRIK "PROMENADE BLEND" BY OLDCASTLE EIFS SW 7689 "ROW HOUSE TAN" 0 PANELSYSTEM TRESPA METEON METALLIC "DARK BROWN" EIFS SW 6095 "TOASTY" PRE -CAST PANEL "RED BRYAN" AWNING TO MATCH "BROWN I� BRONZE" BY BERRIDGE I-SPANDRELGLASS INTEGRALLY COLORED SPLIT FACE CMU OLDCASTLE "OAK" PRE -CAST PANEL "RED BRYAN" PANELSYSTEM TRESPA METEON "COBBLE BROWN" INTEGRALLY COLORED CMU SPLIT FACE STANDARD COLOR #192 PRE -CAST PANEL "BUFF" QUIK-BRIK "PROMENADE BLEND" BY OLDCASTLE PRE -CAST PANEL "BUFF" PRE -CAST PANEL "BUFF" PRE -FINISHED METAL SLAT AWNINGS SW6258 "TRICORN BLACK" PRE -CAST PANEL "RED BRYAN" INTEGRALLY COLORED SPLIT INTEGRALLY COLORED FACE CMU OLDCASTLE "CEDAR" CMU SPLIT FACE STANDARD COLOR #192 INTEGRALLY COLORED SPLIT FACE CMU OLDCASTLE "OAK" Sign L--SPANDRELGLASS INTEGRALLY COLORED SPLIT FACE CMU OLDCASTLE "OAK' Qty Heiqht Sq.Ft Total Sa.Ft almart Spark 2 2 5'-6" 8'-0" 298.00 596.00 Market & Pharmacy 1 2'-6" 102.58 102.58 Total: 1 698.58 DESIGN REPRESENTATION ONLY -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION The building images shown area representation of the current design intent only. The building images may not reflect variations in color, tone, hue, tint, shading, ambient light intensity, materials, texture, contrast, font style, construction variations required by building codes or inspectors, material availability or final design detailing. (mart Wa , rAF__■Er® From Science to Solutions June 21, 2011 Chanhassen, MN 5949-00 Perspectives N DESIGN REPRESENTATION ONLY -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION The building images shown area representation of the current design intent only. The building images may not reflect variations in color, tone, hue, tint, shading, ambient light intensity, materials, texture, contrast, font style, construction variations required by building codes or inspectors, material availability or final design detailing. Walmart:,: �� -- ■■ ... From Science to Solutions June 21, 2011 Chanhassen, MN 5949-00 Perspective W DESIGN REPRESENTATION ONLY -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION The building images shown area representation of the current design intent only. The building images may not reflect variations in color, tone, hue, tint, shading, ambient light intensity, materials, texture, contrast, font style, construction variations required by building codes or inspectors, material availability or final design detailing. , Walmarto,'% June 21, 2011 Chanhassen, MN 5949-00 Perspective 4 From Science to Solutions DESIGN REPRESENTATION ONLY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION The building images shown are a representation of the current design intent only. The building images may not reflect variations in color, tone, hue, tint, shading, ambient light intensity, materials, texture, contrast, font style, construction variations required by building codes or inspectors, material availability or final design detailing. �: Walmart� —`-- - - AMMMiAr__ an From Science to Solutions June 21, 2011 Chanhassen, MN 5949-00 Perspective 5 DESIGN REPRESENTATION ONLY -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION The building images shown area representation of the current design intent only. The building images may not reflect variations in color, tone, hue, tint, shading, ambient light intensity, materials, texture, contrast, font style, construction variations required by building codes or inspectors, material availability or final design detailing.