The URL can be used to link to this page

1e Lakeside PUD Amendment CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1.140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site WIVW.ci .chanhassen.mn. us .J..e 11 ~. MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner DATE: November 26,2007 ~~. SUBJ: Lakeside PUD Amendment, Planning Case #07-23 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Development Design Standards for Lakeside Planned Unit Development to allow a IS-foot, rather than a 20-foot separation between the townhouse units and to adjust the wetland setback consistent with current wetland setback requirements. No additional dwelling units are being proposed, nor will the change substantially alter the approved site plan. ACTION REQillRED City Council approval requires a majority of City Council present. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 6,2007. The Planning Commission voted six for and one against a motion recommending approval of the PUD design standard amendment. Commissioner Keefe, in his vote against the amendment, raised two issues. Staff is responding in an issues/response format. Issue: Hard surface coverage We still don't know whether the 50% hard surface coverage requirement allowed under the PUD will be met for this development. I don't suspect the amendment (variance) will affect the outcome of this question. But it is important to limit the development to this standard, prior to the completion of the project. A lot of latitude has been given to this developer in the form of relaxation of zoning standards. I am concerned general market and economic pressures on this particular developer may cause them to cut comers on this development. The City may not get the level of design it sought in exchange for relaxation of The City 01 Chanhassen . A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play Todd Gerhardt November 26,2007 Page 2 standards. It may also not get any condo building as financing for these types of projects is virtually non-existent. This should be monitored closely. It doesn't appear that monitoring is happening as we still don't yet know whether the plans meet the 50% hard surface coverage requirement, and construction is well underway. Response: Is the development exceeding the impervious surface coverage? Maximum site coverage is 50 percent over the entire development. Following is the breakdown of site coverage for Lakeside: Total Site Area Right-of-Way 26.29 acres 1. 74 acres Net Development Area 24.55 acres Impervious Surfaces: Drives and Sidewalks Twin Units Townhouse Units Condominiums Pool Building 4.09 acres 2.58 acres 1. 84 acres 2.37 acres 0.15 acres Total Impervious Surface 11.03 acres Site Coverage is calculated by dividing the total impervious surface by the net development area (11.03/24.55 = 45 percent). The 45 percent site coverage is less than the 50 percent coverage permitted by the PUD. Issue: Variance or Amendment The change in the PUD was brought forth as an amendment to the PUD. It should have been brought forth as a variance to the wetland buffer and buffer setback. The difference is subtle; however, variances require meeting hardship requirements. I don't believe hardship requirements would be met with this request. And we wouldn't know unless the case is brought forth correctly. Side setbacks The amendment (variance) has the affect of narrowing the space between buildings. Although the IS-foot separation is the same as townhomes in the same development, I am concerned we have a consistency issue for building spacing as compared to other zoning classifications. I Todd Gerhardt November 26, 2007 Page 3 understand in PUDs we make offsets in exchange for higher design standards. It is still a concern and deserves attention. Response: The setback to the wetlands simply reiterated the wetland setback of City Code in place at the time of initial project approval. The proposed amendment is consistent with the City Code, which was amended. If we deleted the wetland setback standard included in the PUD and required compliance with the wetland standards in the City Code, we would be following these new wetland standards. Section 20-508 of the PUD standards in City Code only address setback requirements from the perimeter of the project to structures within the project and from public streets. Other setbacks are established by the PUD agreement. Interior setbacks are not addressed, but are developed in conjunction with the individual development plans. Usually within a PUD, interior lot line setbacks are zero. In this instance, the setback is established between buildings, not to the lot line. The setbacks between structures are generally a function of building and fire codes. Building and fire codes address the required fire separation between structures and between a structure and the property line. With greater fire rating and protection, the structures may be closer to the property line or to other structures. The Lakeside PUD standard currently has a IS-foot separation requirement for the twin homes. Approval of the revision would make the required separation between the attached units (twin and townhouses) the same throughout the development. The setback to the wetlands simply reiterated the wetland setback of City Code in place at the time of initial project approval. The proposed amendment is consistent with the City Code, which was amended. If we deleted the wetland setback standard included in the PUD and required compliance with the wetland standards in the City Code, we would be following these new wetland standards. In both instances, these are changes in the standards, rather than requesting a variance from the standard. Therefore, an amendment to the PUD is appropriate. RECOMMENDA TION Staff recommends adoption of the motion as specified on page 8 in the staff report dated November 6, 2007 approving the amendment to the PUD standards for Lakeside. ATTACHMENTS I. Reduction of the Cover Sheet for Lakeside at Bearpath. 2. Ordinance Amending the PUD Design Standards. 3. Planning Commission Staff Report dated November 6,2007. g:\plan\2007 planning cases\07-23 lakeside pud amendment\executive summary. doc PRELIMINARY of LAKESIDE AT CHANHASSEN, PLAT BEARPATH MINNESOT A BE.!.RP/.TH JIIC ;. DC t r: 0 ,.: ,*,"111 Lltl,.~ SOO~O'OO"E 2188.01 \) ;~ ~~~ ';' ,. ., ~~ ~'" <: ~ \ ~~ ~'< h '\ ~. ~~ :::" r'I 'i"~ ~~ l,~ 'y~~ ~l c.~~~;; -;\~,-,:,:,;:,~ !:,,::fi:il- 1~'-'i"'t1"j Cr"'i'1.~1 C:--(':11 ;' 8' !. 71 ! I 1,.8 ,. 6: /. I 4; 2! f 3! r , -.:.. \ I c'~.O 'i':" I'd iI, r" I;.. r;j,...W"J . _-1_..r..J !_:;'i~.",~l.-.~-_.:"',_. '-1'-'T-- I I ~T-~. ~--1,.-'.1"~! _....~~- ...~..., -~ :..~--J:-j d;::."! b _ -,~~_~~~~t AtJ '.~.~'~E.~--] .;:~~ ., i... .L qUI..,..., ;::.1'--'-';:"1 P lj~l I~( ; rJ F'Tt'. --- l-L.-.Ll~t I :...1..: I ~ L4."r j I ..;..-. I . :"_-:--,_J I . 8' J' I 6: " I I I _ 1 'I 2, . L:\..I.....r.. l.t;..:....c <J-"..l.",n 1..1..'. _.J l.r:..L..d 3 I LEGAL DESCRIPTION ---7~ All thot port at thl ~t OIlorter of !tI1 North"st 0iI0rt..... ond Go"terlV\Wlt lot 1. of SectioQ 24. TownaJ-ojp 110, RClng' 23. which Ii.. East 01 CII I... dllllr.l 0.'.17 '-t Wut of, ~cI ot <I riqht anQlI to ond pardllel with u" lint fln, of ,old North-.t OlIart.. 01 th Noru-t ~tf. and wnldl I'" SOVth of the 10Ikl1"'"9 dlKrlb'd lnr. Comm.wl:'\9 at tt.1 NOl'thttCI.t com... of e;cj tlllll"th<<l.t Quort.,. 0' thl -Northeast o..ort...; 1"'_1 South 00 ~. 20 rNnllt.. 00 MCOll~ E"It. ohUmed b10rlnll GlOrlIl the [ast :-';':l!t':':fN::I't::tl~b':~':; \~::'~th~;' d::;': ;7.~t:~: ~'.:lId' W"t. 656.93,.... to II(lld ",..1 Y..., ofEott 6+1.67 ,..1 th....eof. OlIO Midline th.,.. t...",lnctln;. m. ~~~~ NORnt !AY. oceordlng to thl recordf:d plat thereof, Corwr Cour.ty. r.'..'..'..'..', i~! I John Vogelbacher I i s(~;;) ~~o~6~n ~ L......,.......J t[ II, ~; 111 r -':'-':~';;=:;'~: -.::.-.:.:'-,.::;:'--', i Iooatlcul 01 ~ uoUlJoIMJ Wldlfl'l"'Ulld .uuu. IIIId I L:''':.:::.:~ _~,~~_~:~~_~::,:~~j BEARINGS SHO~ ARE ASSUI.I!D GRAPHIC SCALE h.......LJ-4' f 1M n:a) 1 iMIl_ 10 IHt // !,I.t:ffi~~~ne:.n~ :T:::"~-='=~ ~~,.. '- _"'_of"'_".I' ....""'~ ~ ~". :~Zt= ~,- '" ::D1JWo.\....),',... n..~loU<iU,IJ O*l>1U-;Nll",'7U-IUJ COVER SHEET SIENNA CORPORATION 4906OVlkJMl8LVD..SUTTl!.O EDTh.'A..loIlNNaoTA.S.s.U Coon ItlpidI Ol'fkl LOCA.nON MAP Ilfili.fi:fW"J---! : ':tfr..'r~ 'V:.... : I -,1'\ '" ! \;\~'", ! f--- ,2-__+ ---'::'--~ i ':~" : '<:;-. : , '?,_! '%. I Ln_h.L_..j SCCnOH 24, TI4P. 116. ROC 23 ~~ SITE DATA TOTAL BOUNDARY AAEA-%26.29 At. TOTAL R.O.W. AREA ..t.1.7-4 AC. (LYMAN BLVD &I: lAKE R1L.(Y ROAD E.) TOTAL OUtlOT AREA-i:.....7J At. CUllOT /II, D.22 At. OUTLOT B .1:1.51 At. TOTAl YtETLAND AREA-i:O.71!1 "C. TOTAL LOT AREA :.t.19.82 AC. TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS 29 lWlN HQJ.4ES lOTS 15 THREE UNIT ROW LOTS II FOUR UNIT ROW LOTS ... CONDOMINIUM LOTS J CO~MUNITY BUILDING LOT 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS 234 MUlll-FAMll Y UNITS e4 CONDOMINIUM UNITS H~O COMMUNITY BUILDING UNIT 1 DOSTlNG ZONINe R-'2 PROPOSED lONINC PUD UlIUTlES AVAILABLE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE DATA TOTAL DRIVES &l: SIDEWAlkS ::1:4.011 AC. TOTAL TWIN UNITS ::U.58 AC. TOTAL ROW UNIT!: :tl.84 AC. TOTAl. CONDOMINIUM BUILDINGS---i2.J7 AC. TOTAL POOl. BUILDING AREA-:i:O.1!5 At. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURF'ACE :t11.03 AC. PERCENTAGE Of' IMPERVIOUS SURF'ACE-:l:::42.~ IMPERVIOUS SURFACE WITHIN 1000 FF.ET OF OHW TOTAL AREA 'NrnilN '000 FEET OF OHW-:t17.1l8 AC. TOTAL DRIVES a: SIDEWALKS :1;J.07 AC. TOTAl. TWIN UNITS. :1:1.70 AC. TOTAL ROW UNITS %1.21 AC. TOTAl. CONDOMINIUM BUILOINC5-:tU58 AC. TOTAL POOL BUILDING AREA-:tO.15 AC. ~~~ 1~6:~i o~~~CE_*7.71 AC. PERCENTAGE OF Il,IPERVlOUS SURF'ACE-:tJ9.4X Vl1n-lIN 1000 FrET or OHW SHEET INDEX ,. COVER SHEET 2. EXlSnNO CONDITIONS J. PR(UMINARY PLAT 4. PRElIMINARY PlAT !. PREUMINARY SITE &l: UllUTY PlAN 8. PRELIMINARY SITE a: UTlUTY PLAN 7. PRElll,llNARY GRADINO &: EROStON CONTROl PLAN a. PREUl,IlNARY GRACING &: EROSION CONTROL PlAN 9. DETAILS l1-7 PREUUINARY lANDSCAPE PLAN TR1-J TREE PRESERVAllON PLAN LAKESIDE AT BEARPATH OfA);HASSEN.lomIh1i!f1I'A 1 Of 9 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. ----- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by amending the Lakeside Planned Unit Development Design Standards Section c Setbacks, as follows: c. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Setback Standards Highway 212 50 feet East(Perimeter) Lot Line 50 feet -townhouses/twin homes; Building Height of the Condominiums with a minimum of 30 feet Lyman Boulevard 50 feet/30 feet for beach lot West(Perimeter) Lot Line 50 feet Twin Home separation between buildings IS feet Townhouse separation between buildings IS feet Minimum Driveway length (to back of curb, trail or sidewalk) 25 feet Hard Surface Coverage 50%* Wetland: Buffer and buffer setback 20 feet and 30 feet Lake Riley 75 feet #Decks, patios, porches, and stoops may project up to seven (7) feet in to the required yard. *The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 50 percent hard coverage. Individual lots will exceed the 50 percent site coverage. Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 26th day of November, 2007. 1 ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, Clerk/Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on , 2007) g:\plan\2006 planning cases\06.26 Lakeside\pud amendment ordinance,doc 2 ~ z < u ~ ~ ~ ~ < < ~ < ~ ~ ~ ~ rL1 PC DATE: 11/6/07 [!] CC DATE: 11/26/07 CITY OF CHANHASSEN REVIEW DEADLINE: December 30, 2007 CASE #: 07-23 BY: AF, RG, ML, JM STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: Request for Minor PUD Amendment to adjust internal setback requirements from 20 feet to 15 feet and adjust the wetland setback consistent with current wetland setback requirements. LOCATION: Northwest comer of Lyman Boulevard and Lakeview Road East APPLICANT: Sienna Corporation Attn: John Vogelbacker 4940 Viking Drive, #608 Minneapolis, MN 55435 (952) 994-2646 jvogelbacher@siennacorp.com o~. ,/ PRESENT ZONING: Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD-R) 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential - High Density ACREAGE: 26.3 acres DENSITY: Not Applicable SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The developer is proposing an amendment to the Development Design Standards to allow a IS-foot side yard setback between the townhouse units within the project. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving amendments to PUD's because the City is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A PUD amendment must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. nCAUtIED Lakeside PUD Amendment Planning Case 2007-23 November 6,2007 Page 2 of8 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Development Design Standards for Lakeside to allow a IS-foot, rather than a 20-foot separation between the townhouse units and adjust the wetland setback consistent with current wetland setback requirements. No additional dwelling units are being proposed, nor will the change substantially alter the approved site plan. The net result is shown in the preliminary site plan for Lakeside below. \ ~uand , ____n______ _______ _n_n___ __n -lu .+. -~-I!--i='-~=&Jl'..OT." . · I , ______ -.... - ... r - "'- -'I.- -'I.- 4- -....... -'I.- 4- 4- '"\ f.- / \...~.{'IlO~- .-- "'\' -I I -,._, .) ..",' ..)._\ ._1 .) ..) .",1 .) /; -,..... .../1. ~""""/.-- -~..-'\ X \ _",\\I"''''"''I:\r''' ,\r , ~ ,\f '\~,' ,.\r \\; \~~ .~I. \\~ \\r '\ 1'4..,/ I.. fq 'fOj .-:,....-v / f"'\~ \\\ \\ 'I'. II, \'. \' I' I' " \' I' I' ,/!!!/ / Jlj'-(- \ ^ ,,\ \ I \ \ ' I I \ I \ I \ \ V '/ / ). \ / v: .. \ \ .J- ______ -.... - ..\~ - "'- 4- 4- -'I.- -'I.- -'I.- -'I.- 4- -t... t'i / K/'-- \ \ J- /.,~, y"'" \----' / \ / ",~, Y \ The proposed amendment, which would permit the development as originally proposed and which was found consistent with the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan, is, therefore, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Throughout the development review approval process, the concentration of the developer was on the issue related to the impacts ofthe development on the eastern side ofthe project, adjacent to Bearpath golf course. Originally, the developer had requested a variance to permit a 30-foot setback for the twin homes to the eastern project boundary. However, this variance was denied. The developer did not review the implications ofthe townhouse separation requirement relative to the wetland setback. By amending the setback between townhouses, the developer will be able to comply with the required wetland setback. A revised grading plan depicting the IS-foot setback must be submitted. Staff does not anticipate any grading or drainage issues associated with the setback modification. Lakeside PUD Amendment Planning Case 2007-23 November 6, 2007 Page 3 of8 There are no public utilities between these buildings. The developer is responsible for ensuring that any private utility between the building pads affected by the reduced setback are relocated accordingly. There are no apparent building code issues with this proposed PUD amendment. It should be noted, however, that building walls within five (5) feet of a property line must be of one-hour fire-resistive construction. The development already has this setback standard for the twin homes within Lakeside. Staffis recommending approval of the amendment to the Lakeside Development Design Standards. APPLICABLE REGUATIONS Chapter 20, Article 2, Division 2, Amendments Lakeside Design Standards BACKGROUND On August 13,2007, the Chanhassen City Council approved the Final Plat for Lakeside Third Addition creating five outlots. Two outlots will be further developed (C and E), which must be submitted for final platting with lots and blocks prior to development. The remaining outlots (A, B and D) will be common open space. On January 8,2007, the Chanhassen City Council approved the Final Plat for Lakeside Second Addition creating 39 lots and 3 outlots. The second phase of Lakeside consisted of 41 lots and I outlot. Seven of the lots were for Wooddale Builders, 32 ofthe lots were for Charles Cudd Company, 2 lots were for common open space and Outlot A was for future platting for building sites. On October 23, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council approved the Final Plat for Lakeside. The final plat approval for the first phase of Lakeside consisted of 18 lots, 10 outlots and right-of- way for public streets. The first phase of the development included the community building and storm water pond, II lots for townhouses on the west side of the development (W ooddale Builders, Inc.), 4 lots for twin homes on the east side ofthe development (Charles Cudd Company), Outlot A which will contain the private street and utilities for the project, and Outlots I and J, the recreational beach lot site. The balance ofthe outlots will be platted in the future for additional residential development. The developer performed all the subdivision improvements as part of the original plat. On July 24, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: A. Rezoning of the property located within the Lakeside development, from High Density Residential District (RI2) to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD-R) incorporating the development design standards contained within the staff report subject to the final plat approval for the Lakeside development. Lakeside PUD Amendment Planning Case 2007-23 November 6, 2007 Page 4 of8 B. Preliminary Plat for Lakeside. C. Site Plan for 231 housing units and a community building with pool, with a Variance for building height for the condominium units consistent with the Building elevations prepared by Harriss Architects. D. Conditional Use Permit for a recreational beach lot with a Variance from the requirement that 80 percent of the units be within 1,000 feet of the recreational beach lot Throughout the development review process, the City provided the developer with wetland requirements. The following information was included in the staff report for the subdivision. WETLANDS The wetland delineation for the subject site showed two wetland basins on site. The applicant applied for wetland exemptions on December 22, 2005 for both Wetland Basins A in the southwest comer of the development and B in the northwest comer of the development. On January 10, 2006, the City of Chanhassen issued an exemption decision for Wetland Basin A, a 0.03 acre, Type 3 wetland basin on the Lakeview Hills site. An incidental wetland exemption was issued for Wetland Basin A because the basin was found to be a constructed basin to maintain the drainage through the culvert under the historical driveway to Lakeview Hills and previous farm field. City staff reviewed the as-built plans of record and determined that the structure near Wetland Basin B in the northwest comer of the development was an inlet and therefore was not contributing to the hydrology ofthe wetland. Review of the HIG photographs submitted and Farm Service Agency (FSA) photographs at the Carver Soil and Water Conservation District revealed that the wetland area existed prior to the construction of the apartment complex (1963 HIG Photo). The berm on the south side ofthe wetland allowed the City to rule out the possibility that storm water from the complex was being directed into Wetland Basin B. The berm on the north side ofthe wetland appears to have formed in the early I970s with the excavation of part of Wetland Basin B to open water. In examining the photos, it appears the ditch to the north of the property stopped functioning between 1951 and 1957, about the time the wetland signatures in the photos become visible. Wetland Basin B has been in existence for more than 25 years and is therefore jurisdictional wetland that cannot be considered for incidental or drainage exemptions. City staff concluded that Wetland Basin B was not eligible for incidental or drainage exemptions. The application for an exemption for Wetland Basin B was denied on January 10,2006. Wetland Basin B is a 0.75 acre, Type 3, agiurban wetland in the northwest comer of the site. The wetland is dominated by sedges, reed canary grass, willow, red osier dogwood, and quaking aspen. The City, on May 14, 2007, amended the wetland protection ordinance to adopt revised standards for wetland classification and setback requirements. The wetland classification for the wetland located in the northwest comer of the development is a Manage 2. A minimum buffer of Lakeside PUD Amendment Planning Case 2007-23 November 6, 2007 Page 5 of8 20 feet should be preserved around the perimeter of the wetland. All structures (including parking lots) should maintain a 30-foot setback from the wetland buffer. The plans have been revised to reflect the required wetland buffer and wetland buffer setback. Wetland buffer areas should be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant should install wetland buffer edge signs before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. A minimum buffer of 20 feet shall be preserved around the perimeter of the wetland. All structures (including parking lots) shall maintain a 30-foot setback from the wetland buffer. All trails and retaining walls shall be modified to remain outside the wetland buffer. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. REZONING Changes to design standards are similar to an amendment to zoning district standards, since the PUD is the zoning of the property. DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS Lakeside Development Standards a. Intent The purpose ofthis zone is to create a PUD for a mix housing type multi-family development. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Ancillary uses may be permitted as listed below once a primary use has occupied the site. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be twin homes, townhouses, and three condominium buildings and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. The type of uses to be provided on common areas shall be low-intensity neighborhood-oriented accessory structures to meet daily needs of residents. Such uses may include a bus shelter, community building, development signage, fountain, garden, gazebo, maintenance shed, picnic shelter, pool, playground equipment or tennis courts. Lakeside PUD Amendment Planning Case 2007-23 November 6, 2007 Page 6 of8 c. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Setback Standards Highway 212 50 feet East(Perimeter) Lot Line 50 feet -townhouses/twin homes; Building Height - Condominiums with a minimum of 30 feet Lyman Boulevard 50 feet/30 feet for beach lot West(Perimeter) Lot Line 50 feet Twin Home separation between buildings IS feet Townhouse separation between buildings 20 feet Minimum Driveway length (to back of curb, trail or sidewalk) 25 feet Hard Surface Coverage 50% * Wetland: Buffer and buffer setback 16.5 feet and 40 feet Lake Riley 75 feet # Decks, patios, porches, and stoops may project up to seven (7) feet in to the required yard. * The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 50 percent hard coverage. Individual lots will exceed the 50 percent site coverage. d. Building Materials and Design I. Townhouses . Building height shall be limited to 35 feet. . Building exterior material shall be a combination of fiber-cement or vinyl siding or shake and brick or stone. . No two adjacent structures shall be ofthe same color scheme. . Colors used shall be varied across color tones. . All units shall utilize minimum timberline 30-year asphalt shingles. . Each unit shall have a minimum of one overstory tree within its front landscape yard. . All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building, landscaping or decorative fencing. . Garage doors shall be decorative and have windows. 2. Community Clubhouse . Building height shall be limited to 35 feet. . Building exterior material shall be a combination of stone and stucco and fiber- cement. Lakeside PUD Amendment Planning Case 2007-23 November 6, 2007 Page 7 of8 . Natural cedar shakes roofing. 3. Condominium Building . Building height shall be limited to 48 feet. . Building exterior material shall be a combination of 80 percent or greater stone and brick. Accent and trim areas in fiber-cement lap siding and shake. . Roofing shall be a minimum timberline 30-year asphalt shingles (pitched roofs). e. Signage Signage shall comply with city standards for Residential Districts. f. Landscaping Landscaping shall comply with the landscaping plan prepared by Pioneer Engineering, dated May 19,2006, revised June 7, 2006. AMENDMENT Highlighted below (changes are shown in bold and strikethrough format) is the proposed change to the development design standard. c. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Setback Standards Highway 212 50 feet East(Perimeter) Lot Line 50 feet -townhouses/twin homes; Building Height - Condominiums with a minimum of30 feet Lyman Boulevard 50 feet/30 feet for beach lot West (Perimeter) Lot Line 50 feet Twin Home separation between buildings 15 feet Townhouse separation between buildings ;W 15 feet Minimum Driveway length (to back of curb, trail or sidewalk) 25 feet Hard Surface Coverage 50% * Wetland: Buffer and buffer setback ~ 20 feet and 4{} 30 feet Lake Riley 75 feet # Decks, patios, porches, and stoops may project up to seven (7) feet in to the required yard. * The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 50 percent hard coverage. Individual lots will exceed the 50 percent site coverage. Lakeside PUD Amendment Planning Case 2007-23 November 6,2007 Page 8 of 8 RECOMMENDA TION Staff and the Planning Commission recommends that tfl0 City Council PlaNNiNg C0mmi88i€lN adopt the following motion, adopt the attached findings of fact and recommendation and require that a revised grading plan depicting the IS-foot setback be submitted: "The Chanhassen PlaNNiNg C0mmi88iElR re80mm0N8S tRg City Council approves the amendment to the Planned Unit Development (PUD 06-26) development design standards section c. Setbacks, to read as follows: c. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Setback Standards Highway 212 50 feet East(Perimeter) Lot Line 50 feet -townhouses/twin homes; Building Height - Condominiums with a minimum of 30 feet Lyman Boulevard 50 feet/30 feet for beach lot West(Perimeter) Lot Line 50 feet Twin Home separation between buildings IS feet Townhouse separation between buildings 15 feet Minimum Driveway length (to back of curb, trail or sidewalk) 25 feet Hard Surface Coverage 50% * Wetland: Buffer and buffer setback 20 feet and 30 feet Lake Riley 75 feet # Decks, patios, porches, and stoops may project up to seven (7) feet in to the required yard. * The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 50 percent hard coverage. Individual lots will exceed the 50 percent site coverage. ATTACHMENTS I. Findings of Fact and Recommendation 2. Development Review Application 3. Reduced Copy Preliminary Site Plan 4. Reduced Copy Proposed Lakeside Fourth Addition Plat Exhibit S. Hearing Affidavit, Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List g:\plan\2007 planning cases\07.23 lakeside pud amendment\staff report lakeside pud amendment.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION INRE: Application of Sienna Corporation for an amendment to the Planned Unit Development Design Standards. OnNovember 6, 2007, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Sienna Corporation for an amendment to the Planned Unit Development Design Standards to allow a IS-foot setback between townhouses and adjust the wetland setback consistent with current wetland setback requirements. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Planned Unit Development preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT I. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development - Residential, PUD-R. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential - High Density. 3. The legal description of the property is Lakeside, Carver County, Minnesota. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. b. The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. c. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance with the granting of the variances outlined in the staff report. d. The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. I f. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. s. The planning report #07-23 dated November 6,2007, prepared by Robert Generous, et ai, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDA TION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the amendment to the Planned Unit Development Design Standard section c. to allow a IS foot setback between townhouses and adjust the wetland setback consistent with current wetland setback requirements. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 6th day of November, 2007. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: Its Chairman g:\plan\2007 planning cases\07.23 lakeside pud amendment\findings of fact.doc 2 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard - P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 - (952) 227-1100 Planning Case No. Of-ct~ e\1V OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED AUG 3 1 2007 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CHANHASSEN PLANNING DE?T PLEASE PRINT Applicant Name and Address: 5JeVl-k..~ Cor-p. s'u:-fc.. <pc>6 4crl..fu u;k I~cr /':)..fi..r<. M p i~ MA./ S S4->~ Contact: :}ok"" vo')cl bl"....c...k.c..\I" Phone:4G'z- qq~- "ZG.'tb Fax: 952- s:~:3.~- 7DD8 Email: Jvu "1c./Io('o...c...ker @ ~ie.......c....c.o".~. c.O'......... Owner Name and Address: ~'... """--"- Contact: Phone: Email: Fax: NOTE: Consultation with City staff is required prior to submittal, including review of development plans Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements 0/AC) Interim Use Permit (IUP) Variance (VAR) Non-conforming Use Permit Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) y:. Planned Unit Development* ;11i~ oj/" n It A !Nt e......&- t<<.e....A: Zoning Appeal Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits Sign Plan Review X Notification Sign - $200 (City to install and remove) Site Plan Review (SPR)* X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost** - $50 CUP/SPRNACNARIWAP/Metes & Bounds - $450 Minor SUB TOTAL FEE $ .It 350 02 Subdivision* An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. *Sixteen (16) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8%" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a diQital copy in TIFF-Group 4 (*.tif) format. **Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNED LOCATION: L~k L c-c., /4.. ~ ,. 8 e... 12,. {-e '-j L4.L s;~ L 4. k c- s.:ve.... 2 4.,,( Ae/.rl, {,o'-.. L.4. /~Sl'~ PROJECT NAME: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1~,f A tdvt.:-t, ~ ___ TOTAL ACREAGE: "2. c.. ~ PRESENT ZONING: X YES eU 1J NO WETLANDS PRESENT: REQUESTED ZONING: Pu iJ PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: REASON FOR REQUEST: ,/C/l I;"".u..- 0. i-vt e..... ~ I4-L. <.. ~ -(.0 Pur] -+"" c... II 0 c....v- ,... I' C\. /~ ~~ ~ ~C"~v~ S e..{ b&.. Co !<- ~c..... C e V"" .{ "- ( ...... u..jA.,'{~ c:... ~ ~ L...o"--' "'- o v.. +~ a. .f{ a...c.. ~ OJ I~......, This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowl"4., ignature of Appli ~ r $ Sep~ 'b/"!07 Dat 15)61)0) ~ ifate SCANNED G:\pLAN\forms\Development Review Application.DOC Rev, 12/05 !I 'I !, II .1 iI " i! ::.r ~..~ g ... !l~ !,I.~E!engi~~ )oI:El_DoM ___5~lla !UllioIHII__I_ CooIl Rapich Office .... :z: LJ-.7 'j GRAPHIC SCAlZ IN FELT '-.ll'==l' 8 \ I \ I I I I I I ~,-- -f I ~ , '-c"'---'-- -I -"\.-- -\... - -' r - '-- ""-- ""-- ""-- ~..-- ""-- ""-- ""-- --""\' / ~'"",.(\to~~ ,/ --I _\ _J __ I .J _",I _",I .",1 .....' _J _....' _",I _",I /1;' "'7'-- '1/I/~'''::~':- - ~/\ .<' I _",\r- "Ir ilf , r '1\ II',' 'If' 'I' 'I~ 'I"~ '1', \.I~ 'I ,,- / '",f /'-^V ./ \..... ..- \ . 1 \ \ \ \ \' \ '. '\ \ \ \ \' \ . \ 'I ~ - "'/~ / ,/ /' ~\--'.I' \1, '11 'I' ' I' I \ I' \' I' I' \ I/',.~ / ~ ( \ ;( .... \ 'I I I I I I I I I I I \ I Y: / / --./ /). \ / .,.: '\ \.J.- -"\.-- -\... - ...\.. - '-- ""-- ""-- ""-- ""-- ""-- ""-- ""-- --L f-li / /,/ \ \ / r" ,.;-- r------' / K \ 1'/', Y I / '-"", Y \ I ' OUTLOT A SCANNED lIDIrw.~_)I. C-__>>OJ no.JlJU.,__1D-lm 1_-,.--...--""'" :~~.::_=_Ef - "" SIENNA CORPORATION .\Io&O~DRl'VE.SurTE~ EDtNA. MINNESOTA SS435 t OF 1 LAKESIDE 4TH ADDmON ~.:..o:HNESOTA -, ~----""'- PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN PROPOSED LAKESIDE FO URTH ADDITION PLAT EXHIBIT I-- I I I " I L f, " I '/ < "- "- "- '- '- I t_ . ,., f( E _ ,.... LI r L. T f1 D n 1\ LI . ,., ,.... LI ,.... LI T I /"\ V .. IV ,--- /, ^ /--- '- r, If r I - - - / I C S II ,.... r- 7 / S r- /~, I U C / C /1...0 0 ./ / / ^ ,.... I ',(] I I r, u "', I / L 4' , , 'r-, / -__ / / V " -J.___L IV I ---...I l...1.../ - /' r '''''' r -~--------------~ 1---1---1---'1---1 I"~ L. :; I LI L. II / ^\ 1/ c Ie: / ,.... I c \ L rI r\ L- _ I U L- \ II - I I I II I:- r' ,...,1 "' ,.... \ I II ~ t v vI I ~ L/ I I II I I I \ I ^ r:. ,.... / TI / /"\ ,"/ \ I ,., i..I LI I I v ,v IL___L__~___~___~ ---__ A [) [) J T / 0 t: I _ ------_______ _____L _______ ___ - - -- T / , , r1 D 1\ ,.... LI '( --- --- -------........ , t...'J 7 , soc~O'OO"E I I I I I I NOO~O.OO-YI 178.00 L. I A l( E ~ 1 ______~___________L;________ - - - --- -- - -- - - - -- - -- - - - - -- - ---- -- ----1---- ---- - - --- -~~; -; -- - - --- --- - - - - ;------ -\:-~:ie~~~~a~:-::~.: ~O~OO:f ~~~;:~~~s. I (::.g~I6:0~~it.~~~)ent :;g;~.Jge-J99. GIW modlfi&d by Doe. NO.-_\ 3 2 4 3 2 w 08 'i 5 ~ " ~ "", 8 W'P/-? WP~ W'ff1,! >~~J :li rnJ ~ I ~ W~ ~ wi " "" ~~ I ?J7;;;; I' ;0/;;;; ~ " ~ _ ,tic. .., ,fiG 1 ~ ,,~\ ~ "",'r ~ .v'~' , ~ ~~I ~~~ ~EE##U"U"tU'$EEE#~U"U'U'.w'~ ~!i: ~~ N00"'20'OO-W : ~~~ I 136.00 I --------,-,-/~~~)ff~ '. "- ~ , , - ~:q!.,SS ..'1.. 0 4"of~00 ~~';)':I~\". ...,/ O''f6_ :;,ff-o \\ t"... \ \,e \-~\\..~ c:.\ ,. {... v t.f'-' ',.r" " ') r~() r" ..... .. /' /' '- "- ..... "- "- , \ \ \ \ I L.J I / / I <.) " lI.-12'lJY27- rrtB.~r /"\ V , . U T / I t. ,..., V T I ^ ,., 5OO'03'30"W 244.96 ~~ilJr 101.94 _-----_ /7~~_---S~O'OO'"E .... ......' +-- 125.28 Cj ",,-,rn':'tIn4~ , ,~ c i c 2 i .:: 8 II 1/\[:)" I '''VI\ I f1 ,-. ^ \/ rJfI I ~Dr"\ ...,"\U ;, nnITII\t-., nLlL-ll1 IVI V \ \ \ \ 716.<42 NOO"20'OO.W I^..,'OF~TI-l ...... ^ \/ Dr; / 0'" In L-IVU ^ nn,T//l,., I "LILlI I IVI v / / / / / XI '1.5 JO ~ (DfnEl') 1 blell- 1IlfMt. SCANNED DRAINAGE AND UTlUTY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: . '~r . ____1___ ___1____ I I b....9 10 fut In width Dl'Id odjolnln9 .tr..t Un.. unl... Cltherwl.. IndleClt.cl ontheplol.. PLATTING NOTES ~~ ,. Replot lota 8-12, Block. 2 and auROl E. LAKESIDE. o. loh 1-7, Block 1, LAKESIDE FOURTH ADDITION. !,I.~EE~~~~ 2. Vocate on Dralnoge & Utility Easements over lot 12. Block 2. LAKESIDE. 3. lot. 1-7. Block 2. LAKESIDE. will not be r_plotted In LAKESIDE FOURTH ADDl110N. GRAPlfiC SCAlE CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE ST ATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on October 25,2007, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Lakeside Minor PUD Amendment - Planning Case 2007-23 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. 1 "LJr Subscribed and sworn to before me this~day of ~-\-o1Y:>r ,2007. ~ '-r~ J. J{V\ _I . u.J~ '-' Notary blic. , ~~1J:"J!t\~~ KIM T. MEUWISSEN ) ... \~ o. . "-'.:$ Notary Public~Minnesota ~<',i'.;;;;/., My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2010 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, November 6, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the eveninQ, dependinQ on the order of the aQenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Minor PUD Amendment to adjust internal setback Proposal: requirements from 20 feet to 15 feet and adjust the wetland setback consistent with current wetland setback requirements in the Lakeside Subdivision Applicant: Sienna Corporation Property North of Lake Riley Boulevard at Lake Riley Drive Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.cLchanhassen.mn.us/serv/plan/07-23.html. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Robert Questions & Generous by email at boenerous@cLchanhassen.mn.us or by Comments: phone at 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: . Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a publiC hearing before the Planning Commission, City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing, Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting, . Staff prepares a report on the SUbject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation, These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation, The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process, The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. . Minnesota State Statute 519,99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete, Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting, . A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city, Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s), . Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council, If you wish to have somethinQ to be included in the report, please contact the Plan nino Staff person named on the notification, Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, November 6, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the eveninQ, dependinQ on the order of the aQenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Minor PUD Amendment to adjust internal setback Proposal: requirements from 20 feet to 15 feet and adjust the wetland setback consistent with current wetland setback requirements in the Lakeside Subdivision Applicant: Sienna Corporation Property North of Lake Riley Boulevard at Lake Riley Drive Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the proiect. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.cLchanhassen.mn.us/serv/plan/07-23.html. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Robert Questions & Generous by email at boenerous@cLchanhassen.mn.us or by Comments: phone at 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: . Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews. Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing, Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting, . Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation, These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation, The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation, Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciallindustrial. . Minnesota State Statute 519,99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard, Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete, Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting, . A neighborhood spOkesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city, Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s), . Because the Planning Commission holds the publiC hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have somethino to be included in the reoort olease contact the Plannino Staff oerson named on the notification, w W 0: ~ ;c .. g: ~ ffi :z: 0 o w ... ... o 0 >- >- ... t: U 0 l1lke Rley Disclaimer This map Is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one, This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only, The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational. tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features, If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107, The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 9466,03, Subd, 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims. and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User. its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the use~s access or use of data provided. Lake Rley Disclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one, This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown. and Is to be used for reference purposes only, The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free. and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features, If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227.1107, The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 9466,03. Subd, 21 (2000). and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User. its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the use~s access or use of data provided. WALTER E KOTCH 8757 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7624 TONY A L BATES 8755 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7624 ALLEN C & SHARON R LINDNER 8753 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317.7624 MELISSA KAY BROWN 8751 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7624 CRAIG M SHAFFER 8768 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -7624 SCOTT B & SHANNON MCWHITE 8772 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 .7624 RENEE M EVANS 8776 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 .7624 TERI R HELLING 8780 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN. MN 55317.7624 LEE N GOLDSTEIN 8747 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 .7624 JEREMY LAUGHLIN & KRISTIN SEAL 8784 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7624 LYNN A BUCHHOLZ 8744 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317.7624 JEFFREY R MALLOW 8743 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 .7624 DIANE E HOFF 8740 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7624 EDWARD M RYAN & ANDREA R SCHEFFLER 8732 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7624 ROBERT MORROW & BEVERLY MORROW 8731 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 .7624 THOMAS C WITHAM 8727 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7624 RYAN A & JANE M WENNING 7284 ROLLING ACRES RD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 .7745 KATHLEEN M LUCE 165 LAKEVIEW RD E CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7625 CESAR C BECERRA & LEONARDA L LEDESMA 8712 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7624 BRANDY CHRISTENSEN 8711 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 .7624 VICTORIA MARIA MORENO 8708 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 .7624 ROBERT & SUZANNE JANSSEN 162 LAKEVIEW RD E CHANHASSEN ,MN 55317 .7625 SALLY O'HALLORAN 8707 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 .7624 TIMOTHY R GILPIN 8704 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7624 DANIEL R & APRIL M WEIR 8703 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7624 KENTON C EXNER & ROXY R MICKELSON 8701 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 .7624 MARGERY G SCHEIE TRUSTEE OF M G SCHEIE TRUST 142 LAKEVIEW RD E CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 .7625 JAMES BENSON & DEAN R BENSON 122 LAKEVIEW RD E CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7625 NANCY G EVENSEN TRUSTEE OF K R EVENSEN TRUST 17683 BALLANTRAE CIR EDEN PRAIRIE. MN 55347 .3435 DAVID & LORI FREE 5885 SEAMANS DR SHOREWOOD. MN 55331 -8989 THOMAS W & JOANNE C CHAN 110 LAKEVIEW RD E CHANHASSEN ,MN 55317 .7625 JODY L ROGERS 106 LAKEVIEW RD E CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7625 NANCY A SAMPSON 8765 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7624 JASON R EIDE 8761 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7624 CAROLYN V MORIMITSU 8769 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317.7624 TINA A PENN 8759 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7624 GARY R DEVAAN 8773 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 .7624 SUSAN M LETNER PO BOX 220 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317.0220 LESLIE M BERGSTROM 8781 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7624 MARK W LINDNER 8785 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7624 RACHEL WIDMER 8791 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317.7624 JOYCE A BENNETT 8789 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7624 MATTHEW J THILL 8790 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN ,MN 55317 .7624 MITCHELL S & CINDY L VENESS 8794 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7624 TIMOTHY P AMLlE 8796 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7624 MARY J BACHEL 8739 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7624 STEVEN L HAAGENSON 8736 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 .7624 JONATHAN D MUSBERGER 8735 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 .7624 NORTH BAY ~WNERS ASSN INC 2681 LONG LAK RD ROSEVILLE, 113.1128 WAYNE E ANDERSON 181 LAKEVIEW RD E CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 .7625 DONNA M LEONARD 8728 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 .7624 CAROLE K BASTASZ 179 LAKEVIEW RD E CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 .7625 ANDREW & SARAH PUNCH 8724 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 .7624 BARBARA BERTRAM 177 LAKEVIEW RD E CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7625 NATHAN & HILARY TREGUBOFF 8720 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 .7624 TERRI LYNN BAUMBERGER 8719 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -7624 JUDD C & SHIRLEY R MORGAN 161 LAKEVIEW RD E CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 .7625 ANTHONY C BELL 8716 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -7624 CATHI M LEE 8715 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 .7624 KAREN L BRIGGS 157 LAKEVIEW RD E CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 .7625 BEVERLY ANN SPORRE 166 LAKEVIEW RD E CHANHASSEN ,MN 55317 .7625 DAVID C MAJOR 158 LAKEVIEW RD E CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7625 TARY JANE ADAMS 154 LAKEVIEW RD E CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7625 MARY BETH MAKI 150 LAKEVIEW RD E CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7625 JANET L NYDAHL 146 LAKEVIEW RD E CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7625 DONALD L & ESTHER EGGEBRECHT TRUSTEES OF TRUST 138 LAKEVIEW RD E CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7625 ALBERT S & DOROTHY I KOCH 134 LAKEVIEW RD E CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7625 GRACE B & MICHAEL J HAZZARD TRUSTEES OF G B HAZZARD TRUST 130 LAKEVIEW RD CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7625 JOHN D & MELANIE L RINGSTROM 126 LAKEVIEW RD E CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 .7625 STATE OF MINNESOTA. DOT METRO RIGHT OF WAY 1500 W COUNTY ROAD B2 ROSEVILLE , MN 55113 .3174 SIENNA CORP 4940 VIKING DR #608 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435 .5318 CHARLES CUDD LLC 275 MARKET ST #445 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55405 -1608 WOODDALE BUILDERS INC 5435 FEL TL RD MINNETONKA, MN 55343 -7983 BEARPATH GOLF/COUNTRY CLB LP 4940 VIKING DR #608 EDINA MN 55435 DANIEL L & DARCI 0 MONSON 18707 BEARPATH TR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 JOHN A BUSHEY 9000 LAKE RILEY RD EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 MARK T WAGNER/JANE E WAGNER 18743 BEARPATH TR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 MID & WARREN BIELKE 18719 BEARPATH TR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 ROBERT & NANCY COHEN 18683 BEARPATH TR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 SCOTT & HEIDI FREDERIKSEN 18626 BEARPATH TR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 BEARPATH HOMEOWNERS ASCN INC C/O COMMUNITY DLVPT INC 7100 MADISON AVE W GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55427 DAVID H & SUSAN E ROBERTS 18671 BEARPATH TR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 JULIE MARIE TOLLEFSON 8964 ENGLISH TURN EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 MARY JO & BRUCE E CARLSON 8988 ENGLISH TURN EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION DIRECTOR - RIGHT OF WAY ST PAUL MN 55155 RODNEY S WALLACE 18662 BEARPATH TR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 THOMAS & STEPHANIE DREES 14727 BOULDER POINTE RD EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 8080 MITCHELL RD EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 DONALD G & VIRGINIA A EAMES 18755 BEARPATH TR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 KENNETH M ROSS 8976 ENGLISH TURN EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 MICHAEL S MCVAY 18650 BEARPATH TR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 ROBERT & NANCY A COHEN 18683 BEARPARTH TR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 RONALD E & VIRGINIA A LUND 9002 RILEY LAKE RD EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 MR. PAUL BOZONIRE NORTH BAY HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC C/O NEW CONCEPTS MGMT GROUP 4915 WEST 35TH STREET #102 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) Lakeside PUD Amendment Planning Case 07-23 City of Chanhassen ~~ '-.J ~""""''''\"" "'<:.' Rice Marsh Lake "\ . ------ - ~c. \ll ~ -?~ ~I nt . . . . . ,,: '. U .. "'~~~,., '. _r"::;;:::;"::;;'::;:~::'~~:'~ . ......' .....,..' ":c:,, _N''" ",..",.y,,",:,::':~:~~:::'::::;:::~;;::;;;:::::;:~;:: "''''''''~i~'''''''~~~E~ .~ ",;"'~;:.;:::::':::':>:.:;,,,.::,;;:: :~;:::,::~::::,:::::::::::::::::::": . <~;.,< <:~/ :::~::::,:,,:.;,~~:~::,~:~'~~~"" ~ -- / ::i:..}.'~ . - .~~ ~ f~ I ..-,..",..,~ '~, ~ ., <' ~v"OI1->i, 'ro~ .)i: (.f $'Zf:. \ \ . \ ; \\ SUBJECT ~ I . . PROPERTY .. i.. · ..:.....:..........:.:.:."......:.......[ .........y-La\<.~eV 8/ /' ~............~VCi v ~R' 1:) Q Siln ~~~ ! f) f)~ \J~(" () J~P. ~ ~ Lake Riley U"1 ~~~ . . . . ---::;---- 7 ~lJ ~ I \ ~ .' 'J .' ..' . ii ~ . ~ ........ ( ~~. ~~ '- /\-- .. II ~ .. Jl~ ~ I 0. . \ .... .. .... / ~/ .- ....-: . ~