A. 2030 Comprehensive Plan
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Administration
Phone: 952.227.1100
Fax: 952.227.1110
Building Inspections
Phone: 952.227.1180
Fax: 952.227.1190
Engineering
Phone 952.227.1160
Fax: 952.227.1170
Finance
Phone: 952.227.1140
Fax: 952.227.1110
Park & Recreation
Phone: 952.227.1120
Fax: 952.227.1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone: 952.227.1400
Fax: 952.227.1404
Planning &
Natural Resources
Phone: 952.227.1130
Fax: 952.227.1110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone: 952.227.1300
Fax: 952.227.1310
Senior Center
Phone: 952.227.1125
Fax: 952.227.1110
Web Site
'INffl.ci .chan hassen.mn.us
A
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Todd Gerhardt, City Manager
FROM:
Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director
DATE:
January 28, 2008
o~.
~
SUBJ:
2030 Comprehensi ve Plan
After three months ofreview and five public hearings; on Tuesday January 15,
2008 the Planning Commission recommended approval of the 2030
Comprehensive Plan with the following motion:
"The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council
approve the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as modified with the revisions to Chapter
7, Transportation, to designate Dell Road from Highway 5 north to the City limits
as a Major Collector and Dell Road from Highway 5 south to the City Limits a B
Minor Arterial, and the Minor Collector narrative shall include Lyman Boulevard
east of Highway 101 to the east City limits; Sanitary Sewer, Chapter 8, to
incorporate language regarding the reason for the changes to the MUSA phasing
plan; Chapter 9, Water, to incorporate additional language on water conservation;
and Capital Improvements, Chapter 10, incorporating the revised CIP table and
authorize submittal of the Plan to the Metropolitan Council for review."
The City Council will not be making a recommendation on the plan until the six-
month comment period ends on April 1 st. I would like to share with the City
Council the comments that were raised at the public hearing as well of the
Planning Commission issues. Attached is a Power Point presentation that will
guide the discussion.
g:\plan\2008 camp plan\draft camp plan\cc 1-28-08.dac
The City of Chanhassen · A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play.
2030
Comprehensive Plan
Planning Commission and
Public Hearing
Summary
Overview of Comprehensive Plan
Process
•Summary to date
–McComb Study -June 2006
–SRF Study –April 2007
–Open houses -June 2007
–Draft of Plan available on City’s Web site
–Articles in Maple Leaf -2006-07
–Articles in Chan Connection -2006-07
–Distributed for Jurisdictional review 10/01/ 2007
–Neighborhood meeting –11/6/07
–Mailed notices on land use changes 11/20 -12/4/07
•Land Uses
•MUSA Phasing
•Recommendations for Land Use Change
•Planning Commission recommendation 1/15/08
•Comment period open until April 1, 2008
1
Land Comparison
Use
2020 Land Use Plan2030 Land Use PlanChange 2020-2030
Land UseAcresPercentAcresPercentAcres
Commercial 212 1.4% 3282.2% 116
Office/Industrial 1,2088.2% 8836.0% (325)
Office 117 0.8% 3392.3% 222
Parks & Open Space 1,4669.9% 1,3919.4% (75)
Public/Semi-Public 1,2428.4% 1,2138.2% (29)
Residential Large Lot 2,24715.2% 9716.6% (1,276)
Residential Low Density 5,51537.4% 4,70231.9% (813)
Residential Medium Density 648 4.4% 4002.7% (248)
Residential High Density 398 2.7% 2181.5% (180)
Mixed Use 134 0.9% 1150.8% (19)
Undevelopable 1,57310.7% 4,20028.5% 2,627
TOTAL 14,760 14,760 0
Undevelopable
Lakes, Floodplain, Rivers, Streams 2,059
Road Right-of-Way 1,237
Agriculture904
TOTAL -
Chanhassen
Retail, Office and Residential Market Analysis
And
Development Potential
Findings:
•Existing downtown very successful
•With new Highway 212, potential exists for new
retail/office buildings without harming existing
businesses
•Very high incomes in our trade area
•Continued growth of residential base very attractive
to retailers
.
McComb Group, Ltd
June 2006
2
3
SRF Development of the Commercial
Section of the Comprehensive Plan
•Commercial Land Use Study now and
into the future
•City Strengths and Weakness related to
commercial and retail growth
•Stakeholders focus groups
•Work sessions with the Planning
Commission and City Council
•Develop Map for Commercial locations
and Categories
April 2007
Commercial
Land Use
Recommendations
4
2.7.1 Central Business District
Definition/Vision: A business, commercial, office and residential district that provides a comprehensive
range of services at higher development densities and with greater variety of uses in a compact, walkable
environment.
The Central Business District has the greatest concentration of jobs, services, housing and civic uses found in
the City. Generally, the City’s highest density development is found in the Central Business District area.
Other development-supportive infrastructures such as parking garages are more likely to be found downtown
than in other land use districts.
A combination of convenience commercial, civic uses and attractive walking paths promote interaction and
multiple trips among shoppers, visitors and residents. New development in this district is encouraged to
complement the mix and contribute to activity over an extended day, and provide attractive, comfortable
walking environments between varied uses.
Goods and Services Examples
Residential
?
Office
?
Entertainment (Restaurants, Theaters, Music Venues)
?
Retail, Grocery, Household Goods and Services
?
Fitness Activities
?
Hotels
?
Health Services (Clinics)
?
The zoning districts in this land use will be CBD (Central Business District) and BH (Business Highway).
2.7.4 Regional/Lifestyle Center Commercial
Definition/Vision: A mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that
serves a regional market. The physical environment emphasizes an attractive comfortable walking experience for
shoppers and visitors and is designed to serve trail users and mass transit as well as automobile traffic. Centers of
this type have at least two major retail anchors and are characterized by the diversity and mix of retail and service
uses within their boundaries. Uses within this district should complement existing retail users in the other
commercial districts.
Development of these centers shall be planned as a group of organized uses and structures to accommodate a
sensitive transition between commercial activities such as loading, parking of automobiles, lighting and trash
collection and surrounding residential uses. Such centers shall be designed with one theme, with similar
architectural style, similar exterior building materials, and a coordinated landscaping theme
Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system.
The maximum building area of any single use within this district is 250,000 square feet.
Goods and Services Examples
Entertainment
?
Department Store
?
Comparison Shopping
?
Specialty Retail/Boutique
?
Restaurants
?
Hotels
?
Residential
?
A new zoning district RC (Regional Commercial) will be created in the City Code to implement this land use.
The City has given a dual land use of the 160 acres at the southeast corner of Powers and Lyman Boulevards to
accommodate this use
.
5
2.7.3 Community and General Commercial
Definition/Vision: A large-scale commercial and office district with a need for high visibility along
arterial roads. This type of development has a moderate impact on the surrounding environment, including
but not limited to lighting, noise and traffic.
Location criteria for Community Commercial uses are: access to arterial streets, preferably at
intersections with collector and arterial streets; moderate to large-sized sites; public water and sewer
service; environmental features such as soils and topography suitable for compact development; and
adequate buffering by physical features or adjacent uses to protect nearby residential development.
The total building area for an individual use within any area designated Community Commercial should
be no more than 150,000 square feet.
Goods and Services Examples
Furniture and Home Furnishings
?
Electronic and Appliance Stores
?
Building Material and Garden Supplies
?
Auto Parts and Accessories
?
Sporting Goods
?
A new zoning district CC (Community Commercial) will be created in the City Code to implement this
land use.
2.7.2 Neighborhood/Convenience Commercial
Definition/Vision: A neighborhood/convenience commercial district is intended for businesses that meet daily
needs for the consumption of goods or services, by residents or nearby employees.
Neighborhood/convenience commercial districts are mapped for smaller sites with direct access to collector
streets and preferably found close to intersections of collector or arterial roads.
The scale of these uses should be compatible with surrounding land use patterns, which are typically residential.
Neighborhood/convenience commercial uses should have a limited impact on surrounding areas, measured in
terms of hours of operation, noise and light impacts, signage and odor.
No single use in a neighborhood/convenience commercial district should exceed 10,000 square feet in gross
built area.
Goods and Services Examples
Small to medium sized restaurants (no drive through windows)
?
Dry Cleaning
?
Health/Fitness Services (size limit)
?
Office
?
Day Care
?
Neighborhood Scale Convenience Store
?
Gas Stations
?
Personal Services
?
The zoning application for this land use would be BN (Neighborhood Business District).
6
Fire Station
Potential commercial
7
Industrial
2020
2030
8
Proposed
Sewer
Plan
Gedney Property
9
Land
Use
Amendments
Land Comparison
Use
2020 Land Use Plan2030 Land Use PlanChange 2020-2030
Land UseAcresPercentAcresPercentAcres
Commercial 212 1.4% 3282.2% 116
Office/Industrial 1,2088.2% 8836.0% (325)
Office 117 0.8% 3392.3% 222
Parks & Open Space 1,4669.9% 1,3919.4% (75)
Public/Semi-Public 1,2428.4% 1,2138.2% (29)
Residential Large Lot 2,24715.2% 9716.6% (1,276)
Residential Low Density 5,51537.4% 4,70231.9% (813)
Residential Medium Density 648 4.4% 4002.7% (248)
Residential High Density 398 2.7% 2181.5% (180)
Mixed Use 134 0.9% 1150.8% (19)
Undevelopable 1,57310.7% 4,20028.5% 2,627
TOTAL 14,760 14,760 0
Undevelopable
Lakes, Floodplain, Rivers, Streams 2,059
Road Right-of-Way 1,237
Agriculture904
TOTAL -
10
Re-guide to
More
Substantive
Use
11
12
Re-guide
to
Residential
Low
Density
13
Staff’s
Recommendation
14
Applicant’s Request -Office
15
Developer’s Request-Commercial
2030 Draft Comprehensive Plan
Housing Chapter
16
Net Residential Density
Worksheet
Table Calculating Net Density of Residential Development
Acres Acres
Acres Public Acres Other Net
Multi Acres Wetland Parks & Arterial UndeveNet Density
Single Family Family # Gross & water-Open Roads l-oped Residential Units/A
Land Use # of Unitsof UnitsResid. bodies SpaceROW land* Acrescre
ABCDEFGH=C-D-E-F-G(A+B)/H
Residential -Large Lot388 971 156 97 718 0.54
Residential -Low Density9,447 4,702 757 169 705 3,070 3.08
Residential -Medium
Density2,268 400 89 27 40 244 9.30
Residential -High Density2,182 218 48 15 22 133 16.41
-
TOTAL9,835 4,450 6,291 1,051 211 864 -4,165 3.43
Table 17
Demand for Additional For-Sale Housing
2005 to 20152015 to 2030
Projected Household Growth 2,1352,300
Estimated Homeownership Rate78%75%
Total New Homeowners1,6601,720
Ratio Single Family/Multifamily30/7025/75
No. of Single Family/Multifamily498430
Single Family <$325,00000
percent0%0%
Lakeside
Single Family <$325,000-$525,0005043
percent10%10%
Single Family <$525,000+ percent448387
90%50%
Multifamily –General Occupancy808575
<$225,000 percent75%50%
Multifamily $225,000+ percent269575
25%50%
Multifamily Senior <$225,00085140
Source Maxfield Research Inc.
17
Table 18
Demand for Additional Rental Housing
2015 to 2030
2005 to 2015
Projected Household Growth 2,1352,300
Estimated Percent Renters22%25%
Total New Renters475580
Ratio General Occupancy/Senior63/3740/60
No. of Units General 300/175230/350
Occupancy/Senior
General Occupancy32%35%
Percent Subsidized 5040
50-80% Median 4540
50% of Median9580
Total 68%65%
Percent Market Rate Number205150
Senior Rental Housing 31%34%
Percent Affordable Adult 55120
Number69%66%
Percent Market Rate6570
Gateway
Adult2070
Congregate2055
Assisted Living1535
Memory Care120230
Number
Source Maxfield Research Inc.
Table 6
Single-Family Home Average Resale Price(Selected Communities)
Cities
Average Resale Price
200120022003200420052006
Carver$216,661$213,109$254,759$266,321$293,810$311,243
Chanhassen$340,497$342,620$388,634$427,609$430,560$441,861
Chaska$243,934$853,844$272,069$303,066$338,825$330,400
Victoria$323,386$350,151$353,666$368,666$368,967$481,239
Waconia$201,410$209,136$239,918$246,941$276,954$304,460
Carver County Total $270,598$281,533$299,884$326,371$345,663$355,570
Sources: Regional Multiple Listing Service, Maxifield Research Inc.
Pinehurst
18
Liberty at Bluff Creek
Table 7
Multifamily Home Average Resale Price(Selected Communities)
Average Resale Price
Cities
200120022003200420052006
Carver$230,000
Chanhassen$167,745$178,806$193,949$196,573$198,784$194,011
Chaska$142,572$159,346$166,075$185,863$194,424$191,657
Victoria$283,475$270,350$326,350$283,680$300,531$359,394
Waconia$144,328$145,152$148,492$170,574$161,574$176,117
Carver County Total $160,268$172,661$182,717$193,163$196,755$194,607
Sources: Regional Multiple Listing Service, Maxfield Research Inc.
Final PlatGROSSROWWETLAND/MISC.PARKNETTOTALGROSS
CASE PROJECT NAMEApprovedACRESACRESPRIMARYACRESLANDACRESUNITSDENSITY
POND
SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHEDACRES
98-1 PUDLynmore Addition7/12/19996.390.832.120.642.88 1.25
98-10 SUBEric Peterson19996.3203.5902.732 0.32
Residential
99-3 SUBNickolay19993.700.9102.792 0.54
99-4 SUBBrozorick19991.440001.442 1.39
99-5 SUBSmith Hill Addition5/10/19991.330001.332 1.50
99-10 SUBArrowhead Development10/23/20000.910000.912 2.20 Density
99-11 SUBSandy Point12/13/19991.470001.472 1.36
00-1 SUB Marsh Glen 7/24/200013.411.451.91010.0519 1.42
00-2 SUBLucas Igel Addition7/23/20011.090001.092 1.83 1998-2006
00-3 PUDSummerfield 2nd Addition10/23/200050.95004.0510 2.00
00-8 SUBArvidson's Addition11/27/20002.470002.474 1.62
00-9 SUBWhite Oak Addition10/9/20003.40.6002.85 1.47
2000-15Ashling Meadows4/9/200140.036.394.780028.8651 1.27
2001-3Big Woods8/27/20016.31.10005.29 1.43
2001-6Tristan Heights6/11/20011.1500001.152 1.74
2001-10Lake Lucy Ridge5/28/200218.572.47.169.0117 0.92
2002-2Knob Hill 2nd7/22/20027.591.220.57005.89 1.19
2002-4 Hidden Creek Estates7/22/200222.2838.50010.7820 0.90
2002-2 PUDVasserman Ridge7/22/200268.768.6927.921.94030.2184 1.22
2002-6Boyer Lake Minnewashta Add.8/26/200213.591.262.343.256.7410 0.74
2002-7Willow Ridge 3rd Addition5/28/20022.0900002.092 0.96
2003-7Coutryside6/14/20045.931.020.584.3310 1.69
2003-12Burlewood12/8/20035.171.753.429 1.74
04-10Walnut Grove 2nd6/14/20043.090.51.11.494 1.29
04-05Settlers West7/12/200444.564.17016.1324.2648 1.08
04-03Kenyon Bluff4/12/20042.160.240.371.553 1.39
04-23Lotus View Addition1/10/20052.832.832 0.71
04-26Frontier 2nd Addition8/23/20042.61002.615 1.92
04-31Hidden Creek Meadows6/13/200519.242.025.9611.2621 1.09
04-36Pinehurst3/14/200527.624.280.1423.241 1.48
04-43Yoberry Farm (Highcrest)4/11/200535.795.544.530.3925.3357 1.59
05-02Crestview5/9/20053.360.62.765 1.49
05-05John Henry4/11/20051.191.193 2.52
05-08Fox Den4/25/20052.770.642.136 2.17
05-14Lake Harrison7/12/2005626.1720.91.534.4228.9838 0.61
05-21Frontier 3rd Addition7/25/20050.770.772 2.60
05-25Minnewahsta Creek Hills8/22/20051.41.43 2.14
05-26Harvieux Addition9/29/20051.9900001.993 1.51
05-37Stonefield4/10/200617.632.2315.430 1.70
05-44Christianson Sub #05-444/10/20061.051.052 1.90
Lake Harrison
06-02Eidness Metes & Bounds1/23/20062.182.182 0.92
06-09Peterson Property (Pioneer Pass)9/25/2006120.7457.2120.739.974.7228.1181 0.67
06-10Boulder Cove9/25/200613.691.951.2310.5139 2.85
07-02The Arbors4/9/200719.833.050.915.8822 1.11
07-07Gauer4/23/20071.091.092 1.83
07-09Lotus Woods7.60.90.290.55.91111.45
SUBTOTAL 633.58 120.16 116.53 16.69 26.80 353.40 713
PERCENT 19.0%18.4%2.6%4.2%55.8%AVG 1.13
19
Multifamily
99-9 SPRLake Susan Apartment Homes6/28/19999.90009.9162 16.36 16.36mixed
99-19 SPRPowers Ridge Apartments 12/11/200021.3401020.34344 16.12 16.91high
99-2 PUDArboretum Village 5/14/2001120.9321.5926.292.916.953.25342 2.83 6.42medium
2001-13 SPPresbyterian Homes10/14/20025.1100.3004.81161 31.51 33.47Mixed Use
2002-7 SPBuilding C Villages on the Ponds10/14/20023.1900102.1945 14.11 20.55Mixed Use
2003-3 PUDHighlands on Bluff Creek6/15/20046.520.861.83.8616 2.45 4.15low density
05-11Liberty on Buff Creek3/27/200691.0211.4540.0639.51444 4.88 11.24medium
06-14The Preserve6/26/200679.8610.8534.310.3534.35153 1.92 4.45low/medium
06-05Gateway Place2/27/20066.20.250.3805.5748 7.74 8.62mixed
06-26Lakeside10/23/200626.291.740.9523.6231 8.79 9.79high
SUBTOTAL370.36 46.74 105.09 4.25 16.90 197.38 1,946
PERCENT12.6%28.4%1.1%4.6%53.3%AVG 5.25 9.86
TOTALS1,003.94 166.90 221.62 20.94 43.70 550.78 2,659
4.83
PERCENT16.6%22.1%2.1%4.4%54.9%AVG 2.65
Presbyterian Homes
Table 19
Livable Communities Act
BENCHMARKGOAL
CITY INDEX
Affordability
Ownership37%60-69%30%
Rental44%35-37%35%
Life-cycle
Type (non-single19%35-37%34%
Family detached)1991 Comp
Plan
Owner/Renter Mix85/15%67-75 / 25-33%80-90 / 20-10
Density
Single family 1.5 units / 1.8-1.9 units 1.8 units / acre
detachedacre/acre
Multifamily11 units / acre10-14 units / 9-10 units /acre
acre
3.3
Overall Average
Source: City of
Chanhassen
20
Affordability
The Metropolitan Council defines affordable
ownership housing as housing that is affordable to
buyers earning 80% of the area median income or a
home price at $201,800 in 2006. In the Housing
Choice Voucher program, units must have rents
below the Metro HRA Payment Standard ($729 for
one-bedroom units, $933 for two-bedroom units).
Summary of
Demographics &
Housing Finding
Source Maxfield Research Inc
21
Affordable Housing Requirements
Affordable Housing Requirements
22
Historic Preservation
GOAL
•Promote the preservation and
protection of valuable historic and
cultural resources through
community partnerships and
collaborations with citizens, non-
profits, state, federal, public and
private entities.
POLICIES
•Carver County was awarded a grant and
hired The 106 Group, Ltd. to identify
historically significant sites.
•Work with Carver County to Identify
Historically significant Sites.
–Listed on the National Register of Historic
Places
–Eligible for NRHP
–Photo of Property
23
Encourage Developers to save
historic structures
Shenandoah Ridge 8565 Alisa Ct
Bluff Creek Estates 8640 Audubon Rd
Encourage Development of buildings
that complement historic buildings
24
•
Recognize structures on
voluntary basis
–Encourage property owners to apply for
historic designation.
–City display and recognize historic sites
Transportation
2030
Functional
Classification
25
Proposed
Water
Plan
Future Park
and Trails
26