The URL can be used to link to this page

1b Prelim & Final, Schroederii:, /700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 AdmlnlstmUon Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Bulldlnll Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax:. 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax:. 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone:. 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site v~v^,tci.chanl~.mn.us ~O~UM To: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Sharmeen A1-Jaff, Sellior Planner Date: May 30, 2003. Re: Executive Summary for Preliminary and Final Plat to Rcplat Two Lots with an Area of 1.35 acres, into Three Single Family Lots with variances. The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide 1.35 acres into three single family lots. Proposed Lots 1 and 2 contain existing single family homes. Proposed Lot 3 wiU be reserved for furore development of a single family home. The site is zoned Single Family Residential District and located southwest of thc intersection of Pleasant View Road and Pleasant View Lane. Access to Lots 1 and 3 is gained via Pleasant View Road. Access to Lot 2 is through Pleasant View Lane. All lots will exceed the minimum 15,000 square foot lot area requirements. There are existing nonconforming setbacks for the existing homes that will require variances. There is also an existing lot width variance on Lot 1. Staff is recommending approval of the variances since they am existing and the subdivision will not result in an intensification of the nonconforming situation. The average lot size is 19,468 square feet with a resulting density of 2.2 units per acre. Staff is recommending approval of thc subdivision with variances subject to conditions outlined in the staff ropon. Planning Commigsion UWIA~e ~nnmmry. mlnnLes were not avnilnhle) On May 2ffh, 2003, the Planning Commission reviewed and tmazfimoualy approved this application. A question was raised by thc owner of the ~ to the west regarding drainage. It was sugges~ that a drainage swale be included on thc grading plans to better drain this ama. A condition was added that stated "The applicant shall work with en~neering to cnmne adequate drainage from the parcel." STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION The City Council approves thc preliminary and final plat for Subdivision g03-6 for Schro~d~r Addition for 3 lots with variances as shown on the plans received April 18, 2003, subject to thc following conditions: The City of Chanhassen · ^ growing community ~;'ith clean ia~es, quaJity schools, a charming domtom, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A omar place to live, work, and play. Todd Gerhardt May 27, 2003 Page 2 1. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. Fencing shall protect trees on proposed lots as well as trees in neighboring properties located next to the grading limits. 2. Any Uees lost due to construction that are not shown aa such on plan~ shall be replac~ at a rate of 2:1 diameter inches. 3. Extend silt fence along the east aide of Lot 3 toward the north and remove all silt fence when development is completed. 4. Show City Detail Plate Nos. 5300 and 5301. 5. Add a 75 foot minimum rock construction entrance. 6. All disturbed areas shall be resodded or reseed~ within two weeks of grading completion. 7. The proposed driveway must be installed with a paved surface. 8. If fill is imported or exported, the applicant will need to supply the City with a haul route plan for approval. 9. The property is subject to sanitary sewer and water hookup charges. The 2003 tnmk utility hookup charges are $1,~.~.0 per unit for sanitary sewer and $1,876 per unit for water. The 2003 SAC charge is $1,275 per unit. These charges are collected prior to building permit issuance and are based on the number of SAC tmits for the new building addition. 10. Show the existing 2 foot contours. 11. Dedicate typical drainage and utility easements. 12. The total SWMP fees of $4,451 are due and payable to the City at time of final plat recording. 13. Building Official conditions: a. Soil reports must be submitted to the inspections Division before building permits will be issued for any building pad corrections, or if poor soils are encountered at excavation. b. The new lot must be provided with sepamm sewer and water services. 14. The applicant shall work with engin~g to ensure adequate drainage from the parcel. ATTACHMENTS lo Staff report. Resolution approving the final plat. CITY OF PC DATE: May 20, 2003 CC DATE: June 9, 2003 REVIEW DEADLINE: 6-17-03 CASE #: 200345 SUB By:. A1-Jaff STAFF REPORT Z -<1: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: APPLICANT: Preliminary and Final Plat to RePlat Two Lots with an Area of 1.35 m,. into Three Singl6 Family Lots with variances. 185 Pleasant View Road and 6430 Pleasant View Lane- Southwest of the intersection of Pleasant View Road and Pleasant View Lane Iam'y Schroeder Linda Petemon Doug Schroeder 2040 West 65m Street Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 474-3327 or (952) 474-2833 Arnold & Marie Schroedea' Carl McNutt 6430 Pleasant View Lane 185 Pleasant View Road Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 474-8911 (952) 474-9148 .W Single Family Residential District - RSF 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Low Den~ty Residential ACREAGE: 1.35 Acres (58,405 Square Feet) DENSITY: 2.2 Units per Acm SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Request to replat two parcels, each containing a single family home, into three single family lots. The existing homes have nonconforming setbacks. Variances am required for these setbacks. Staff is recomm~ approval of the subdivision with vacfia~ subject to conditions. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to aH ~ om within 500 feet. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City' s discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these. standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a-variance is li~nlted to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for variance. The City has a Schroeder Addition ~,sn.. ~n June 9, 2003 Page 2 relatively high level of discretion with a variance because of the bmdon of proof is on the applicant to show that they meet the standards in the ordinance. BACKGROUND On August 28, 1989, the owner of 185 Pleasant View Road appeared before the Board of Adjustments and Appeals requesting approval to subdivide his parcel into two single family lots. The Board denied the application unanimously because it resulted in two non-conforming lots. On September 11, 1989, the application was appealed to the City Council. The City Council denied the request unanimously. On March 28, 2000, this application was resubmitted. The owner of 185 Pleasant View Road was informed that staff intends to recommend denial of the application. On April 17, 2000, the applicant withdrew his application. On June 18, 2002, the owner of 185 Pleasant View Road reappemvxt before the Planning Commission requesting approval to subdivide his parcel into two single family lots. The Planning Commission denied the application unanimously because it resulted in two non- conforming lots. The current application combines the parcel located at 185 Pleasant View Road with 6430 Pleasant View Lane and subdivides them into three single family lots. Schroeder Addition 1,.~my.-.-,"n June 9, 2003 Page 3 SITE ANALYSIS The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide 1.35 acres into three single family lots. Proposed Lots 1 and 2 contain existing single family homes. Proposed Lot 3 will be reserved for furore development of a single family home. The site is zoned Single Family Residential District and located southwest of the intersection of Pleasant View Road and Pleasant View Lane. Access to Lots 1 and 3 is gained via Pleasant View Road. Access to Lot 2 is through Pleasant View Lane. All lots will exceed the minimum 15,000 square foot lot area requirements. There are existing nonconforming setbacks for the existing homes that will require variances. There is also an existing lot width variance on Lot 1. Staff is recommending approval of the variances since they are existing and the subdivision will not result in an intensification of the nonconforming situation. The average lot size is 19,468 square feet with a resulting density of 2.2 units per acre. Staff is recommending approval of the subdivision with variances subject to conditions outlined in the staff report. PREL_IMINARY AND FINAL PLAT The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 1.35 acre site into 3 ~ingle family lots. The density of the proposed subdivision is 2.2 units per acre. All the lots exceed the minimm~ 15,000 square feet of area, with an average lot size of 19,468 square feet. Lots 2 and 3 meet the minimum width, and depth requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Lot 1 has a lot width of 87 feet. The ordinance requires 90 feet. This is an existing nonconformity. The existing structures on Lots 1 and 2 encroach into the required setbacks. This is another existing nonconformity. Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance subject to approval of the existing variances. No wetlands exist on site. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT ~ (SWMP) The proposed project should not alter existing overland storm water drainage patterns or rates. Water Quality Fees The SWMP established a water quality connection charge for each new subdivision based on land use. Dedication is equal to the cost of land and pond volume needed for treatment of the phosphorus load leaving the site. The water quality charge for single family resident developments is $949 per acre. SWMP fees for this proposed development are based on a total developable land area of 1.35 acres. Therefore, the applicant is required to pay $1,281 in water quality fees. Water Quantity Fees The SWMP has established a connection charge for the different land uses based on an average citywide rate for the installation of water quantity systems. This cost includes land acquisition, Schroeder Addition ~.,,, ~n June 9, 2003 Page 4 proposed culverts, open channels, and storm water ponding areas for runoff storage. Single-family residential developments have a connection charge of $2,348 per developable acre. The total net area of the ~ is 1.35 acres. Therefore, the water quantity connection charge is $3,170. The total SWMP fees of $4,451 are due payable to the City at time of final plat recording. GRADING~ DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL There are two existing houses on the two lots that are to be subdivided into three proposed lots. The grading plan proposes to grade approximately 25% of the site to develop the house pad and driveway. If importing or exporting materials for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will need to supply the City with a haul route for review and approval prior to the site grading commencing. The site sheet drains to the west and southwest toward the existing private storm sewer connected with existing catch basins on the west and south sides. The addition of the home site will not require any stormwater management improvements and will not result in any increase of stormwater runoff from the site to the neighbors. Erosion control measures and site restoration shall be developed in ~ce with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Staff recommends the rock construction entrance be used. The silt fence shall be extended to the nor~ along the east side of proposed Lot 3. In addition, tree preservation fencing shall be denoted on the grading plan. No public utility Unes have been proposed with this project. The lot will be service~ with a private sewer and water line from the existing public sanitary sewer and water service on the northerly property line of the site from Pleasant View Road. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable for Lot 3. The 2003 tnmk sanitary sewer hookup charge is $1,440 and the mink watermain hookup charge is $1,876. Sanitary sewer and water hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. STREETS The site is proposed to be accessed via an existing private street to Lots 1 and 2 along the east side and a new private drive ~s to LOt 3 off of Pleasant View Road from the nor~. PARK DEDICATION Park and trail fees shall be paid as required by ordinance. TREE PRKSERVATION/I. ANDS CAPING Tree canopy coverage and preservation calculations have been submitteA for the Schroeder Addition. They are as follows: Total upland area (excluding wetlands) Baseline canopy coverage Minimum canopy coverage allowed 5s.0o4 sy 40-59% (not given in phms) 35% or 20,616 Sir Schroeder Addition ~"" '~"~ June 9~ 2003 Page 5 Proposed tree preservation 37% or ~ SF Developer does meet minimum canopy coverage allowed. There are several significant oaks and maples in the wooded area on the north side of the lot. The entire area should be fenced at the grading limits in order to protect the trees. Any trees lost due to construction that are not shown as such on plans shall be replaced at a rate of 2:1 diameter inches. Tree protection fencing shall also be installed at the ~g limits near neighboring There are no buffer yard requirements for this subdivision. COMPIJANCE WITH ORDINANCE - RSF DISTRICT Lot Lot Lot Home Area Width Depth Setback Ordinance 15,000 90' 125' 30' front/rear 10' sides BLOCK 1 Lot 1 Lot 2 LOt 3 15,050 87'* 173' 20'/5'* 100'/20' 17,222 100' 173' 30'/112'* 5'/32' 26,623 141' 187' 30'/30' 10' * There are existing setback variances and a lot width variance on Lots 1 and 2. This subdivision will not impact these existing nonconformities. SUBDIVISION. FINDINGS, 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; Finding: The subdivision meets all the requirements of the RSF, Residential Single Family District with the exception of existing nonconformities. . The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the subdivision ordinance with the exception of the lot width for Lot 1. This is an existing nonconformity that will not be impacted by this subdivision. . The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Schroexler Addition ~_, ~n June 9, 2003 Page 6 Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report , The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; Finding: The proposed subdivision is served by adequate urban infiasmactum. 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Finding: The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage subject to conditions of approved. The proposed subdivision contains adequate open areas to accommodate a house pad. 6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necess~ easements. , The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: a, Lack of adequate storm water drainage. Lack of adequate roads. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. Finding: The proposed subdivision will have access to public utilities and streets. The Planning Commission shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts: That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the ~ cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, phy~cal surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-exi~g standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing downward from them meet these criteria. Finding: The existing structures have nonconforming setbacks. The only way to e 'hminate these setbacks is by demolishing the s~. This is not a reasonable solution. The subdivision is not intensifying these setback variances. The same holds true for the lot width variance. If the lot line between Lots 1 and 2 was shifted to the south, the side yard setback variance on Lot 2 will intensify. Again, these are pre-existing standards. This subdivision will not depart downward from them. Schroeder Addition ~., ~,n June 9, 2003 Page 7 b= The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, gen~y, to other property within the same zoning classification. Finding: The conditions upon which this variance is based are applicable to ~es in thc RSF zoning district. Ce The purpose of thc variation is not based ulxm a ~ to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. Finding: These are existing variances that have no bea~g on the value or income potential of the parcel of land. d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship. Finding: These are existing s~. The only solution is to demolish them. These nonconformities will not impact the subdi~~ The haxdship is not serf eremed. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is 1~ Finding: Approval of the variances will not be detrimental to the public welfare. The ~ variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially dimini~ or impair ~ values within the neighixn'hood. Finding: Thc proposed variation will not impair an ~_~ supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of thc public streets. Based upon these findings, staff is recommending approval of thc existing variances. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT "The 1~1,-,....,.,.,:...~,.,,. O,~--:,~l ...... ,4 ...... 1 ,-,.~ Clb7 Cotmdl approves the preliminm3t and flnnl pint for Subdivision g03-6 for Schroeder Addition for 3 lots with variances as shown on the plans received April 18, 2003, subject to the following conditions: Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. Fencing shall protect trees on proposed lots as well as trees in neighboring properties located next to the grading limits. 2. Any trees lost due to construction that are not shown as such on plans shall be replaced at a rote of 2:1 diameter inches. 3. Extend silt fence along the east side of Lot 3 toward the north and remove all silt fence when development is completed. Schroeder Addition ~sn.. mn June 9, 2003 Page 8 4. Show City Detail Plate Nos. 5300 and 5301. 5. Add a 75-foot minimum rock construction entrance. 6. All disturbed areas shall be res.dried or res~ within two weeks of grading completion. 7. The proposed driveway must be installed with a paved surface. 8. If fill is imported or exported, the applicant will need to supply the City with a haul route plan for approval. . The property is subject to sanitary sewer and water hookup charges. The 2003 trunk utility hookup charges are $1,440 per trait for sanitary sewer and $1,876 per unit for water. The 2003 SAC charge is $1,275 per unic These charges are collected tnior to building permit issuance and are based on the number of SAC units for the new building addition. 10. Show the existing 2-foot conwurs. 11. Dedicate typical drainage and utility easements. 12. The wtal SWMP fees of $4,451 are due payable to the City at time of final plat ~g. 13. Building Official conditions: a. Soil reports must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued for any building pad corrections, or ff poor soils am encountered at excavation. b. The new lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. 14. The applicant shall work with engin~g to ensure adequate drainage fi'om the parceL" AITA~NTS 0 2. 3. 4. Application and Notice of Public I-Ie. adng Memo from Mak Sweidan dated May 1, 2003. Planning Comminslon minute8 dated May 20, 2003. Plans dated received April 18, 2003. CITY OF CHANHASSEN- 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 Larry Schroeder Linda Peterson APPLICANT: Doug Schroeder ADDRESS: 2040 West 65th Street Exce 1 s i or. MN, 55221 TELEPHONE (Day time) ( q R ~ ) zt 7 4 - .3 .3 ~ 7 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Arnold & Marie Schroeder 6430 Pleasant View Lane OWNER: r ~ ~ ~. .... ~ u ~, 5531 7 ADDRE.=.Carl & Margaret McNutt Chanhassen, MN. 55317 (952) 474-8911- Schroeder TELEPHONE: (gfi2) 474-g14fl- McNutt (q6P) 474-PR33 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Interim Use Permit Non-conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development* Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Site Plan Review* X X Subdivision* Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of ROW/Easements Variance __ Wetland Alteration Permit Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attomey Cost** ($50 CUP/SPRNACNAR/WAP/Metes, and Bounds, $400 Minor SUB) TOTAL FEE $ 7 0 0.0 0 A list of all property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be Included with the ' application. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. *Twenty-slx full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, Including an 8½" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet. ** Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract NOTE - When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. April 18, 2003 Ms. Sharmeen A1-Jnff Chanhassen City Hall 690 City Center Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Sharmeen: Confirmin~ our phone conversation of April 9th, enclosed find the following: I I Sixteen copies of ]:~limh'lfl~ Plat of Schroeder Addition Completed Development Review Application Check #6880 in the amount of $700.00 to cover the Subdivision, F. scmw for Filing ~_nd Attorney Costs List of 57 people who need to be informed about the Subdivision Please let us know the next step in this process. You can reach us at the following numbers: Larry Schroeder Linda Peterson Doug Schroeder home: 934-6190 home: 474-2833 home: 401-4334 cell: 612-867-9639 ceU: 612-940-9206 cell: 952-451-0363 Yours truly, CITYOF CHANHA EN T~O0 ~rl~t Boulev~ PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Admlnl~:ratlon Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspection= Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952..227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Re=oumu Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax:. 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site ww, v,,.ci.chanhassen.mn.us ~OR.AJ'qD~ TO: Sharmeen A1-Jaff, Senior Planner FROM: Mak Swcidan, En~neer DATE: May 1, 2003 SUB J: Preliminary Plat Review of Schroeder Addition File No. 03-08 LUR Upon review of the preliminary plat prepared by Schoell & Madson, Inc. received April 18, 2003, I offer the following comments and recommendations: GRADING~ DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL There are two existing homes on the two lots that are to be subdivided into three proposed lots. The grading plan proposes to grade approximately 25% of the site to develop the housepad and driveway. If importing or exporting materials for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will need to supply the City with a haul route for review and approval prior to the site grading commencing. The site sheet drains to the west and southwest toward the existing private storm sewer connected with existing catch basins on the west and south sides. The addition of the home site will not require any stormwater management improvements and will not result in any increase of stormwater runoff from the site to the neighbors. Erosion control measures and site restoration shall be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice I-hn~k (BMPH). Staff recommends a rock construction entrance be'med. The silt fence shall be extended to the north along the east side of proposed Lot 3. In addition, tree preservation fencing should be denoted on the grading plan. No pubUc utility lines have been proposed with this project. The lot will be serviced with a private sewer and water line from the existing public sanitary sewer and water service on the northerly property line of the site from Pleasant View Road. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable for Lot 3. The 2003 trunk sanitary sewer hookup charge is $1,~.~.0 and the trunk watermain hookup charge is $1,876. Sanitary sewer and water hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. The City of Chnnhaalen · A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, it]riving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A gnat place to live, work, and play. Sharmeen Al-$aff May 1, 2003 Page 2 STREETS The site is proposed to be accessed via an existing private street to Lots 1 and 2 along the east side and a new private drive access to Lot 3 off of Pleasant View Road from the north. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Extend silt fence along the east side of Lot 3 toward the north and remove all silt fence when development is completed. 2. Show City Detail Plate Nos. 5300 and 5301. 3. Add a 75-foot minimum rock construction entrance. 4. All disturbed areas shall be resodded or reseeded within two weeks of grading completion. 5. The proposed driveway must be installed with a paved surface. 6. If fill is imported or exported, the applicant will need to supply the City with a haul route plan for approval. . The property is subject to sanitary sewer and water hookup charges. The 2003 mink utility hookup charges are $1,440 per mt for sanitary sewer and $1,876 per unit for water. The 2003 SAC charge is $1,275 per unit. These charges are collected prior to building permit issuance and are based on the number of SAC units for the new building addition. 8. Show the existing 2-foot contours. C: Teresa J. Burgess, Public Works Director/City Engineer Matt Saam, Assistant City Engineer CITYOF CHANHA EN PO ~ 147 O~ltm.~, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1188 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone:. 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952~7.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recre~ion Center 2310 C~II~ Boolevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax:. 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www. ci.cl'mnl~.mn.us FROM: DATE: SUBJ: Sharmeon A1-Jaff, Senior Planner Lori Haak, Water Resoumes CoordinatorJ~ May 5, 2003 Schroeder Addition Upon review of plans prepared by Schoell & Madson, Inc. dated April 8, 2003, I offer the following comments and recommendations: No wetlands exist on-sim. SURFACE WATER MANAG PLAN ($WMP} The proposed project should not alter existing overland storm water drainage patterns grates. Water Quality Fees The SWMP established a water quality connection charge for each new subdivision based on land usc. Dedication is equal to the cost of land and pond volume needed for ~t of the phosphorus load leaving the site. The water quality charge for single-family resident developments is $949 pea' acre. SWMP fees for this proposed development are based on a total developable land area of 1.35 acres. Therefore, the applicant is required to pay $1~281 in water quality fees. Water Quantity Fees The SWMP established a connection charge for the different land uses based on an average citywide rate for the installation of water quantity systems. This cost includes land acquisition, proposed culverts, ~en channels and storm water ponding areas for runoff storage. Single-family residential developments have a connection charge of $2,348 per developable acre. The total net area of the property is 1.35 acres. ~ore, the water quantity connection charge is $3,170. The total SWMP fees of $4,451 are due payable to the City at time of final plat recording. The City of Chanhaasen, A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a channing downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A 0K place to live, work, and play. DATE FII.I~. NO. PROJECT May 5, 2OO3 2003-6 SUB Schroed~ Addition SWMP ~ WORKSHEET Site Area in Acres Assesssble ~ ZONING CLASSIFICATION 1.35 1.3~ WATER QUALITY WATER QUANTITY Ram l~r Ac~ A~"es Total $ 949.00 1.35 $ Rat~ pex Acm Acres To~l $ 2~348.00 1.35 $ 3r169.80 ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL PRICE PRICE S~zm water pond acre - $ 800.00 $ - Oufle~ s~cVz~ eac~ - $ 2,500.00 $ - SWMP FEE $ 4r450.95 SWMP CREDITS $ - TOTAL SWMP FEE $ ~450.95 MEMORANDUM FROM: Shnnneen Al-Jaff, Senior Plnnner St~on Torell, Building DATE: May 7, 2003 SUB J: Review of proposed Subdivision: Schroeder Addition, loc. zted at 185 Pleasant View Road and 6430 Pleasant View Lane. Planning Case: 2003-6 SUB I have reviewed the plans for the for the above development and have the following' conditions: 1. Soil reports must be submitted to the In.gpections Division before building permits will be issued for any building pad ~ons, or if poor soils are 2. The new lot must be provided with sepmzte sewer and water services. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, MAY 20, 2003 AT 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7700 MARKET BLVD. PROPOSAL: Schmeder Addition APPLICANT: Larry Schroeder, Doug Schroeder and Linda Peterson. LOCATION: 185 Pleasant View Road and 6430 Pleasant View Lane NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a proposal in your area. The applicants, Larry Schroeder, Doug Schroeder and Linde Peterson am requesting to replat two lots with an area of 1.35 acres into three single family lots with variances on property zoned Residentiai Single Family and located at 185 Pleasant View Road and 6430 Pleasant View Lane, Schroeder Addition. What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to Inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain Input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments am received from the public. 4. Public hearing Is dosed and the Commission discusses the project. Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hail during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmean at 952-227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, It is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on May 8, 2003.) Smooth Feed SheetsTM BRIAN J GRUNDHOFER 195 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LEONARD F & ROSEMARY' MARQUART 101 ~ RIDGE CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Use template for 5160® WILHELMINE M SEBEK ~GH~ 6390 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD C'HANHA,.~ . MN 55317 ARNOLD E & MARIE C SCHROEDER 6430 PLEASANT VIEW LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL P & JAMIE L MANNING 99 ~ RIDGE CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KEVlN S COOPER 6380 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MAR~ A NELSON 135 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ' MARK L & EAURA L LARSON 97 CAST1.E RIDGE CT CHANHASSEN MN IGAR~ A WEIGEL 6370 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD CHANf-IASSI~ MN HERBERT J & ELLA KASK 115 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TROMAS J & JAYNE M AU.EN 95 CASTLE RIDGE CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MATTHEVIir KEEN 6360 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD C, HAIG'tASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL D & JULIE M DOUGLAS 65 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LEE & KAREN BORE. 93 CASTLE RIDC-.-.-~ CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ' THOMAS J & GL=RI- L I~LI~ 201 MOUNTAIN WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 GARY J & VICTORIA t3 ALEXANDER 55 PLEASANT VIEW RD Ci-IANHASS~ MN 5,5317 ERICJ ZORN 91 CASTLE RJDC-.-.-~ CT CI-'IANHAE, SEN MN 55317 ' KFI ~ y D HEIKKILA & RACHEL M LYNN 200 MOUNTAIN WAY CHANHA,SSEN MN 55317 CARL F & MAR~ A MCNUTT 185 PLEASANT VIEW RD C41ANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMF_.8 & JOYCE NICHOLLS 6451 PL.EASAJcr VIEW ClR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MAURICE P & CYNTHIA M' WARD 6230 CASTE PASS CHANHA,SSEN MN 55317 ' NORMA R KEIVES 6232 C, ASC, ADE PA,.gS CHANHASSEN MN 55317 · DAVID S & SUSAN S REISS 6391 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD · llllARK F & SUSAN R BRADY 6371 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 55317 TIMOTHY J MCNEILL 6441 PLEASANT VIEW ClR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CRRISTOPHER D BIXLER & ALEXANDRA K BDg. E~ 6340 ~ RDG CHANHAS~EN MN 55317 · EOREN E & DEBORAH H GORDON 6351 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVO CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ROGER B BONGARD 18195 CO RD 30 NEW GERMANY MN 55367 BRIAN P & SARA B' MUENCH 6400 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD CHANHA,..~DEN MN 55317 77OO PO BOX 147 MN 55317 C-4~EN AVERY® Address Labels Laser 5260® Smooth Feed Sheets TM KARL J & KAREN M BICKLER 230 MOUNTAIN WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ANDREW J & UNDA M HOFMEISTER 70 HUNTERS CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Use template for 5160® BRi~rr J & ~m~Y M-POUVANY 181 FOX HOLLOW DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JOSEPH C & KAREN A CASEY 220 MOUNTAIN WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DANIEL J BUJOLD 80 HUNTERS CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 · ~ B & MICHEr I; M STORK 200 FOX HOLLOW DR ~EN MN 55317 BRUCE C & MARTHA $ 8CHULTZ 210 MOUNTAIN WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HUGO R MORALES & CARRIE L TROG 251 MOUNTAIN WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RICKJ'L & ~B ~N 140 BLUFF RIDGE CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KEVIN'& CHERYE PETERSON 150 BLUFF PJDC-.-.-~ CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHET A OUNGER 180 FOX HOLLOW DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BRADLEY & DENISE MORRIS 170 FOX HOLLOW DR CHAN~EN MN 55317 CRARLES B & DEANNA L BAUER 241 MOUNTAIN WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ROBERT & EDNA-PE'rERSON 160 BLUFF RIDGE CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 - KELLY P BOWE 190 GREY FOX LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK A & UNDA P MCKENZlE 231 MOUNTAIN WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JEFFREY M & DE1DRE L BISHOP 170 BLUFF RIDGE CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ' JOSEPH D'& TRACY'J-DEZIEL 170 GRAY FOX LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 THOMAS J & JANE E HOGAN 221 MOUNTAIN WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PATRICL~ K NlCOL 150 BLUFF RIDGE CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 'WA~ A & JUME K SIEBER 150 GRAY FOX LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RICHARD E WILUAMSON & EUZABE'rH A WILLIAMSON 211 MOUNTAIN WAY CHANI-IASSEN MN ARLENE F ARNOLD & ROBIN L ARNOLD 50 HUNTERS CT CHANHASSEN MN STEVEN W & K;I I y K LEN 50 HUNTERS CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 55317' 55317 MICHN~L & MARGARET SCHRJEBER 150 FOX HOLLOW DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 "STEPHENT JANSEN & ANN MORIN JANSEN 161 FOX HOLLOW DR CHANHA..~SEN MN 55317 CHRISTINE A TISD~:I r 171 FOX HOLLOW DR CHAN~EN 55317 STEPHEN G & ~ THEISSEN 130 GRAY FOX LN CHANHA,?~EN MN 55317 · MICHAEL E O'CONNOR & MARCIA L O'CONNOR 110 C-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-~AY FOX LN CHANHA~EN MN 55317 ' DENNIS W & CHRISTINA ~ 6450 PLEASANT VIEW CIR CHANHA88EN MN 55317 Address Labels kBsef 5160® Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5160® PHILIP B SAJLOR & WENDY M LANIGAN 6430 PLEASANT PARK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DARRELL DUANE & UNDA CRANDALL 240 FOX HOLLOW DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BRET T ABBOTT 6420 PLEASANT PARK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ANDREW B & JUUE S ROTHMAN 220 FOX HOLLOW DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 'MICHAEL A & MARY JANE NAROG 6410 PLEASANT PARK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CITY OF CHAN~EN CIO BRUCE 7700 PO BOX 147 ~55317 SAMUEL R JR & KATHLEEN ERWlN 6400 PLEASANT PARK DR CHANHASSEN MN 5,5317 BRIAN J & SUSAI~ M VOE1.KER " 300 TIMBER HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KATHERINE A BERDAHL 6411 PLEASANT PARK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL R & DORIS ANDERSON 205 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ERIC M & KERRY A SFI I MAN 6421 PLEASANT PARK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JOSEPH E & NANCY F' LEHMAN 6431 PLEASANT PARK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 s"rEVEN M & KARMIN L CORKERY 6441 PLEASANT PARK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LEN J & COl i FEN M GROSCHEN 6451 PLEASANT PARK DR CHANHASSEN MN 5.5317 Address Labels Laser 5~.60® Planning Commission Meeting - May 20, 2003 is not happy with the decisi~ because right now the decision stands unless it's appealed. Then it would go to the City Council. Sacchet: Thanks Kate. Did you all get that? You can appeal. In a nutshell. Alright, we'll take a 5 minute recess and then we continue. PUBLIC ~:WARING: CONSIDER A REQ~ FOR REPLAT OF TWO LOTS WITH AN AREA OF 1.35 ACRF.~ INT0 THREE ~INQLE FAMH.Y LQT~ WI'IH VARIAN~F_.~ ON PROPERTY ZONED RF~qlDENTIAL SINGLE FA_MH.Y AND LOCATp-~ AT 185 FLEASANT VIEW ROAD AND 6430 PL~:ASANT YH~W LAND~ ~¢HROEDER ADDrHQN~ LARRY SOm0 .n .R, OOU $Cn OEOE Sharmeen AI-Jaff presented the staff report on this item, Sacchet: Thank you Sharmeen. Questions from staff. Feik: I have one. Sacchet: Go ahead Bruce. Feik: When this was befc~e us a few months ago, I remember discussions regarding how low this parcel is. Do you have any concerns regarding drainage7 Sweidan: What the drainage may be for the proposed lot is going to be concern from the roof of the new house towards the west and towards the south_ There's an existing hindrance, h looks like it's a storm sewer...the length and within the eastern portion of the lot. So but the new proposal is for, is to accumulate with the mainly with the service drainage in four directions and this storm sewer's connecting to our existing storm sewer too. Feilc So you're comfortable? Sweidan: Yes. Fei~ Thankyou. Sacchet: Any other questions? I definitely share the same concern because I remember when this was last time in front of us there was definitely concern that it was rather wet, which probably would be about the garage area of the new house pad the way it's drawn in that area. So that them would be some build-up for the pad, is that the idea? Sweidan: Yes, it's approximately about addition about 2 feet build-~ for the house pad and that's...the drainage. Saeehet: That should solve the drainage aspect And then the aspect of the access from Pleasant View to have a driveway off of Pleasant View Road. That there's no concern about that7 Sweidan: Because the sight distance is safe and there's... Sacchet: Okay. And all the variances are pre-existing, okay. That's the comments I have. Steve, do you have a question? 33 Planning Commission Meeting - May 20, 2003 Lillehaug: Since we're talking about the drainage. If you look on the preliminary plat here, on the very east side, in the southwest comer of the house, are those arrows there that are split in the different directions, does that mean part of the water's going to the northwest and then part is going to the southeast? Is that kind of the divide7 Are you kind of following me where we're at7 So there's water going up north and then to the east onto the adjacent ~ which cunently, it really wasn't directed that way. Sweidan: Seeing it go to the north? Sacchet: Steve are you, the arrows on the southwest comer? Lillehaug: Right in here, yeah. Can I point to them on the map? Right here. Does this water go this way? Sweidau: Yes. This is the point where there's an existing. Sacchet: Yeah, let's look at that because we're all definitely concerned about it. Lillehaug: And then just comment on the concerns. I know previously the adjacent landowner had concerns with water going onto his property and it appears that instead of all the water being directed more towards the south, it looks like the divide is going to make it go directly on his Sacchet: Can you point out where, what we're talking about Mak please. Sweidan: Okay. You talk about thi. area hem? Lillehaug: Yep. Sweidan: Okay, now it's shooting or splitting actually at thi~ point here towards the west mainly. Now maybe you can't see this line here. Here is the existing storm sewer and he is going to eliminate about 15 feet so he can make the opening here. There's another opening also south of it where it's going to take or service the southexn drainage with that existing here. And ~ for storm sewer and is connecting the existing catch badn in the cul-de-sac. Sacchet: Okay. Thank you very much Mak Okay, this is a public hearing. If anybody want to come forward. Address this item. Please do so now. Or the applicaut, excuse me. Thanks. The applicant please come forward and make a presentation. State your name and address for the record. Doug Schroedec Hi, I'm Doug Schroeder. Address is 2181 Majestic Way, which is in no relationship close to this but my parents live at 6430 Pleasant View Lane. And Sharmeen covered everything I think just excellenL We're not going to do anything with iL My mom and dad were just concerned that they didn't want a house built in the back yard while they owned the property and we thought this was a good solution for both Curly and my parents so I guess that's where we're at. Any questions? Sacchet: Any questions of the applicant? Doug Schroeder: Okay, thank you. 34 Planning Commission Meeting - May 20, 2003 Sacchet: Thank you very much. Appreciate it. Okay, try agaim This is a public hearing so if anybody wants to address this item, please come forward. State your name and address for the record please. This is your turn to address this. Seeing nobody. Yep, there's somebody. Please come forward. Brian Gnmdhofe~. My name is Brian Gmndhofer and I reside at 195 Pleasant View Road, which happens to be right on the west side of that prope~. And I mean I know they're probably not going to do anything with this so that's not an issue right now but sometime the~ will be and my garage is, as you can see, is clearly about a foot from the ~ line right thom. And right now my foundation on there is pretty much gone due to water damager and Fm still very conce~xL I have a low spot in my driveway as well and I'm just very conce~xi about ~ bringing more water onto my prolx~. That would be my only real conce~ because now you're taking away, you know if you're putting in a hardscape in an area that's already very wet and that would be my only real concern, lust for future. Sacchet: And it was a concern that was raised last time that it came in front of us and engineering assures us that this is mitigated reasonably, ~? Okay. Thank you for pointing that out. Anybody else? If not, I'll close the public hearing. Bring it back to commissioners. Comments. Discussion on this. We already have discussion over there. Claybaugh: We were hoping you wouldn't notice. Feilc No sign of disrespect. Claybaugh: I would like to, Mak to m-address what the neighbor just stated he~. Is that catch basis, is the sizing of that catch basin sufficient? Sweidan: The existing is not a catch basin. Yeah, it' s a stm~... Could be from a plastic... Claybaugh: Is it 6 inch? 8 inch? What is it's capacity? Sweidan: I think it's about 8 inch. Audience: 12 inch. Claybaugh: 127 Well my concern was, just to dove tail the gentleman's comments is that it's in place right now, correct? And there's still standing water. He still has damage to his foundatiom Sweidan: And it will help. Overall the...his garage is maybe very flat area and that's why maybe his like concern about the water being around there. It's a very flat area. Claybaugh: Yeah, my concern is that what this sizing of whether it's an inlet or a catch basin or whatever term you want to use, is not going to be change& Sweidan: Oh no. Clayhaugh: Okay. And currently there's cause for concern. The introduction of a new residence there and the hard surface coverage is going to intensify that, okay. So it would seem natural to me that that would he a primary concern to address that and certainly i ,reprove it because it's 35 Planning Commission Meeting - May 20, 2003 going to be under a greater burden once a new residence is placed there. So is there, in your mind a way to address that? Sweidan: There' s no i ,m!m~vement to the storm sewer. It's going to stay as it is. Claybaugh: I know there's nothing proposed on here but just from what you know about the situation, what would be a reasonable remedy or is there a way to upgrade what's there? Or is that a substantial endeavor. Sweidan: There could be a...in front of the garage on the property line. Somehow to raise the elevation to avoid the water going to his garage. To keep it maintained within the property line. The proposed property line. Slagle: So is it going to pond then? Sweidan: As a gathering point but as like a ponding. Clayhaugh: So we haven't looked at what the capacity is for that inlet and what the bunten is on it. Okay. Do you feel that we should be looking at that? Sweidan: We could look at it. Clayhaugh: I would very much like you to take a look at thaC Sweidan: Yeah, we could look for the calculations to see that... Claybaugh: That's all my comments. Sacchet: Thanks. Feiic Let me follow up on that. We are looking at a proposed replaL Prelim~ry plat. We're not looking at a house plan. We're not looking at any i ,mprov~ts. To my knowledge at this Aanenson: Correct. The nexus here would be is there adequacy of these systems correct. Feilc I understand thaL So the grading change that we're looking at this plan isn't going to happen unless, until they build a house. Aanenson: Con'ecL But when they come in for a building permit you can attach conditions. If you want to attach them, as Craig was indicating, if you want the staff to review to make sure there's adequate drainage or somebody to make sure that there's no ponding. Feik: I understand that so I guess what I'm just clm'ifying is, nothing is in front of us now is going to change the existing conditions. Aanenson: That's correct. Feilc Thank you. Aanenson: But could they build a house tomorrow and change their mind? Yes. 36 Planning Commission Meeting - May 20, 2003 Feik: Yes, understand that. Okay, thank you. Sacchet: Bethany? Tjomhorn: Nothing. Sacchet: Kurt? Rich? Steve? Lillehaug: Real quick. Congratulations Curly... Maybe a possible solution that we could add here is, it appears the low...maybe we could gra_de a swale back to that point and alleviate that problem on the west side. Other than that I fully support it, thank you. Sacchet: Thanks Steve. I don't have much to add. I mean I'm glad to see you found a solution. I remember when you were here Mr. Curly. Mr. McNutt Get it straight eventually. Yeah I reme~ when you were here last time and we had to turn you down and you found a solution that I believe works and that's good. I do have a concam~ about this drainage. I would say something like applicant work with staff to mitigate and i .mpwve the drainage issues to the west and have it be at that. With that I would like to have a motion please. Feilc I'll make a motion the Planning Commission recommend approval of Preliminary Plat for the subdivision #03-6 for the Schroeder Addition for 3 lots with variances as shown on the plans received April 18, 2003, subject to the following conditions 1 through 13. And an addition number 14. The applicant shall work with engineering to ensure adequate drainage fi'om the parcel. Sacchet: We have a motion. Is there a second? Lillehaug: Second. Feik moved, lJllehaug seconded that the Planning Commission re~omme, nds approval of the preliminary plat for Subdivision ~03-6 for Sehroeder Addition for 3 lots with variances as shown on the plans _rec~_ -Aved April 18, 2003, subject to the following conditions: Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. Fencing shall protect trees on proposed lots as well as trees in neighboring properties located next to the grading limits. 1 Any trees lost due to construction that are not shown as such on plans shall be replaced at a rate of 2:1 diameter inches. 1 Extend silt fence along the east side of Lot 3 toward the north and remove all silt fence when development is completed. 4. Show City Detail Plate Nos. 5300 and 5301. 5. Add a 75 foot minimum rock construction entrance. All disturbed areas shall be resodded or reseeded within two weeks of grading completion. 7. The proposed driveway must be installed with a paved sudan. 37 Planning Commission Meeting - May 20, 2003 . If fill is import~ or exported, the applicant will need to supply the City with a haul mute plan for approval. The property is subject to sanitary sewer and water hookup charges. The 2003 trunk utility hookup charges are $1,440 per unit for sanitary sewer and $1,876 per unit for water. The 2003 SAC charge is $1,2'75 per unit. These charges are collected tn'ior to building permit issuance and are based on the number of SAC units for the new building addition. 10. Show the existing 2 foot contours. 11. Dedicate typical drainage and utility easements. 12. The total SWMP fees of $4,451 are due and payable to the City at time of final plat recording. 13. Building Of~ial conditions: Soil reports must be submitted to the inspections Division before building permits will be issued for any building pad corrections, or if poor soils are encountered at excavation. b. The new lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. 14, The applicant shall work with engineering to ensure adequate drainage I~tzm the All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to O. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER A COMPRli:HRN~RVE IRAN LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT FROM QFFICE UNDU~TRIAL TQ RF~IDENTIAL M]~IUM D~ AND (~)N~ PLAN~.D UmT DWV-E~~ A~mOVAL FOR A 427 UMT TOWNHOME P~OPJEC~ OS 9~S ACRES LOCATED ~)UTH Or ~ TMN (Xfl~ AND W~~ RAn,ROAD EAST OF LYMAN BOUI.~VARD AND WEST OF BLUFF CREEK ON PROPERTY ZONED AGRICULTURAL ESTATE DISTRICT~ A2~ TOLLEFSQN DEVEI~~~ INC~ AND (~IHARLI~ M_A~ON. Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Sacchet: Questions from staff. Lillehaug: Yes I had one. If you could turn to page, let's go to page 3 first. Your table at the bottom there. I don't have a previous table in front of me and it was for the Town and Country Bemardi prope~ but does this, it seemed to me that the table that was prepared for that property was kind of flip flopped and is that an accurate ~t? And if it is accurate, would that be due to the fact that these are based, that this PUD represents basically all residential townhouses rather than more of a mix? Aanenson: Well I think it's pretty consistent. 38 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND IW~NNEPIN COUNTI~, MINNESOTA DATE: ~2003 RKSOLUTION NO: 03- MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT CREATING SC'q:IROEDER ADDmON, ARNOLD & MARI~ SCHROEDER AND CARL MC3qUTY WttEREAS, Arnold & Marie Schroeder and Carl McNutt have requested a subdivision of their property into three single family lots of 15,050, 17,222, and 26,623 square feet; and WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision complies with all requirements of the Chanhassen City Code with the approved existing variances; and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 20, 2003, and found the plan consistent with the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan and Zoning ordinance with the approved existing variances and recommended approval of the subdivision. NOW, THRREFORE, BE IT RF~OLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby approves the final plat for Schroeder Addition (Subdivision g03-6) for the Arnold & Marie Schrocder and Carl McNutt ~ legally described as the newly created lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Schroeder Addition as shown on the plans prepared by Schoell and Madsen, Inc., signed April 8, 2003, and as mended by the City, subject to the following conditions: 1. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. Fencing shall protect trees on proposed lots as well as trees in neighboring properties located next to the grading limits. 2. Any trees lost due to construction that are not shown as such on plans shall be mplac~ at a rate of 2:1 diameter inches. 3. Extend silt fence along the east side of Lot 3 toward the north and remove all silt fence when development is completed. 4. Show City Detail Plate Nos. 5300 and 5301. 5. Add a 75 foot minimum rock construction entrance. 6. All disturbed areas shall be msoddeA or reseeded within two weeks of grading completion. 7. The proposed driveway must be installed with a paved surface. 8. ff fill is imported or exported, the applicant will need to supply the City with a haul route plan for approval. 14. 9. The property is subject to sanitary sewer and water hookup charges. The 2003 trunk utility hookup charges are $1,440 per unit for sanita~ sewer and $1,876 per unit for water. The 2003 SAC charge is $1,275 per trait. These charges are collected prior to building permit issuance and are based on the number of SAC units for the new building addition. !0. Show the existing 2 foot contours. 11. Dedie~ typical drainage and utility easements. 12. The total SWMP fees of $4,451 are due and payable to the City at time of final plat recording. 13. Building Official conditions: a. Soil reports must be submitted to the inspections Division before building permits will be issued for any building pad corrections, or if poor soils are encountered at excavation. b. The new lot must be provided with separate sewer and water service~. The applicant shall work with engineering to ensure adequate drainage fa'om the parcel. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 9~ day of June, 2003. ATYF~T: Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor YES NO ABSENT