Loading...
1k. Well No. 14: Approve Consultant Contract CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952,227,1100 Fax: 952,227,1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952,227,1180 Fax: 952,227,1190 Engineering Phone: 952,227,1160 Fax: 952,227,1170 Finance Phone: 952,227.1140 Fax: 952,227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952,227,1120 Fax: 952,227,1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227,1400 Fax: 952,227,1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952,227,1130 Fax: 952,227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952,227,1300 Fax: 952,227,1310 Senior Center Phone: 952,227,1125 Fax: 952,227,1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 1~ MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: {), Paul Oehme, Director of Public Works/City EngineerY' DATE: November 9,2009 ()~ SUBJ: Well No. 14 Project 10-03: Approve Consultant Contract for Design of Well Improvement PROPOSED MOTION "The City Council approves a professional service contract with Barr Engineering Company in the amount of$48,200 for engineering services for Well No. 14." City Council approval requires a simple majority vote of the City Council present. BACKGROUND At the January 12,2009 Work session, staff discussed the Well No. 14 improvements along with the Well No.4 water quality improvements. DISCUSSION Well No. 14 is recommended to be constructed to keep pace with peak summer water demand of the community. Well No. 14 will be the 11th well for the City and is proposed to be a Jordan aquifer production well. The water for this well will be treated at the East Water Treatment Plant. The well would be located on north side of Lake Drive across from Lake Susan Park. The well would use the proposed raw watermain that Well No.4 would use to convey the water to the plant for treatment. Staff is proposing this well for several reasons: 1. To address the failure of Well No. 11 to yield adequate water supply to the plant. Well No. 11 is in the same drift aquifer as the failed2007 Well Nos. 5 and 6. Since those failures, Well No. 11 has not preformed consistently as a production well. The . well currently has only 20 feet of static water level cover which is not adequate to keep air from vortexing into the pump causing a damaging condition known as cavitation. It is not practical to lower the pump-set in this compromised aquifer. 2. If approved the addition of Well No. 14 will add approximately 1000 GPM of treated water into the City's distribution system. During the peak summer months, untreated water must be used to augment the treatment plant's production of finished water. The addition of Well No. 14 will allow staff to maximize our treatment plant investment, increasing treated water capacity from 6,100 GPM to 7,100 GPM. (6,100 GPM includes Well No.4 production). Chanhassen is a Community f!lr Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Paul Oehme Well No. 14: Approve Consultant Contract November 9, 2009 Page 2 3. The Jordan aquifer on which much of the Twin Cities metro relies on is experiencing a downward trend in static levels. Chanhassen's Well No.2 has seen a 30-foot drop in pumping level since 1984. The new Well No. 13 has a 10-foot seasonal drop this summer. Well No.3 on the west side of the city has seen a similar static level drop. Lower static levels means less water available to pump. With seasonal well capacity diminishing more wells are needed to keep pace with demand. 4. Even with great efforts by staff over the last two years to educate the community on water conservation, 2009 will be another record breaking year for water use. In the 10 months of2009, Chanhassen has pumped 1.202 billion gallons, more than all 12 months of 2008 (1.176 billion gallons). It is the City staff s opinion that our production should continue to keep pace ahead of city demand with a small allowance for mechanical failure and routine maintenance. 5. The City continues to grow and add additional irrigation demand. The addition of the Chanhassen High School, additional residential/commercial developments and existing residents adding irrigation systems is expected to add to the summer peak demand. This demand will be exacerbated if we continue to see below average summer rainfall totals. SCOPE OF WORK The scope of the proposal includes design and bidding services and part-time construction observation. The scope also includes working with the DNR and Minnesota Department of Health on securing the appropriate permits. Also included in this proposal is design work for construction of a monitoring well that the DNR is anticipated to require for this well. City staff will still be needed for construction observation. PROPOSAL On October 2,2009, staff received a professional service contract proposal for the well improvement from Barr Engineering. Barr Engineering Submitted riar to the deadline Pro osal format Transmittal letter submitted with re uired information Members of the consultant team identified Understandin Fee v" v" v" ./ ./ $48,200 Barr Engineering was the firm that completed the groundwater model study for the City after the 2007 wells failed and was the design firm that completed the Well Nos. 12 and 13 improvements. Their work for the City was acceptable. Staff is requesting to use Barr Engineering for the well improvements because we believe they have the experience and the background of the City system and water production issue to successfully complete the g:\eng\public\_2010 projects\10-03 well no. 14\110909 approve consultant contractrev1.doc Paul Oehme Well No. 14: Approve Consultant Contract November 9, 2009 Page 3 project and give the best recommendations to the City. Barr Engineering has extensive knowledge in well design and construction experience. They have shown to have extensive knowledge in Minnesota on well project for both municipal and commercial clients. Barr Engineering works with the Met Council on the metro wide groundwater model. The firm comes highly recommended. Staff has reviewed the design services contracts for the last four wells put into production. The Barr Engineering proposal is in line with the engineering fees charged for the other wells. Staff has also reviewed the hourly service charge and they are in line with other firms. The consultant contract work will be contracted on a time and materials bases with a not-to- exceed amount. As with all City engineering contracts, the consultant must submit periodic invoices that staff will review before processing. The consultant will be required to submit timesheets verifying the hours worked on the project and expense sheets. Staff will review the invoices and expense sheets for accuracy and conformance to the contract. SCHEDULE Staff anticipates the following project schedule: Bid Opening Award Construction Contract Substantial Completion December, 2009 January, 2010 June, 2010 Attachments Location Map CIF c: Brian LeMon, Barr Engineering Kevin Crooks, Utility Superintendent g:\eng\public\_2010 projects\10-03 well no. 14\110909 approve consultant contractrev1.doc lJ :::0 0 lJ 0 .j:::.. D lJ I (f) 0 a m 0 l:l ()o 0 (J) ::r:2: '" CD OJ m 0 lJ --" 0.. m :J r 0 OJ '" (J) :2: ~. ~r ..... () :J :J OJ ~. (J).j:::.."T1 ~ () () CD :J ill S(O <6- ~ ::r ::r "T1 OJ ..... to :J --" C CD 0 0 0 0 :3 - .j:::....... ~ C OJ. OJ. OJ (J) ~ CD :J :3 :3 :J -- ::2: co 0.. (J) :J :J )> OJ CD CD () CD ...... :J -i :::l. CD ::r ~ m CD ..... ..... :2: (J) o :::0 OJ ro~ CD )> ..... z .j:::.. :3 0 OJ :::0 0 :J 0 C -i m I Capital Improvement Program 2009 thru 2013 Contact Paul Oehme City of Chanhassen, MN Department Water System Improvements I Project # W-043 Type Improvement Useful Life ., Project Name Well #14 Improvements Category Utilities I Account # 1 Account # 3 Priority n/a Account #2 Total Project Cost $750,000 I Description I This well is proposed to meet the water needs of the growing community. I . I Justification I To meet the growing water needs ofthe City. I j Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total I Construction 750,000 750,000 Total 750,000 750,000 I I Fundhig Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Water UtilitY Fund 750,000 750,000 I Total 750,000 750,000 I Operational Impact/Other I I I , I I I ,. 138 I