Loading...
4. NPDES MS4 Permit, Annual Report and Public Hearing4 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site wwadchanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM rr�� V. To: Paul Oehme, Director of Public Works /City Engineer From: Terrance Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator Date: June 28, 2010 pkP Re: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit 2009 Annual Report — SWMP15 ACTION REQUIRED Staff is requesting the City Council: 1. Receive public comment on the City's NPDES Phase II MS4 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program and 2009 Annual Report; and 2. Approve the Annual Report for 2009; authorize mayor's signature and submittal to Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (simple majority). PROPOSED MOTION The Chanhassen City Council authorizes the Mayor to sign the City's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II Annual Report, as attached to this memorandum, and authorizes the distribution of the Annual Report to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. BACKGROUND In June 2002, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) issued a MS4 general permit for cities discharging stormwater into waters of the state. Shortly after the permit was issued, the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy (MCEA) filed an appeal for the permit indicating that it was inappropriate to issue a general permit in place of individual permits and because they believed the MPCA failed to address non - degradation and education as part of the permit. In May 2003, the Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the MCEA. The MPCA has since revised their permit to address additional requirements. As part of the revised permit, Chanhassen and 29 other communities must address the non - degradation of all waters. This requirement has been added to determine if any new or expanded discharges beyond 1988 baseline conditions exist within the selected communities (MR 7050.0815). The City of Chanhassen submitted a revised application for permit coverage on May 26, 2006. Chanhassen completed`the Non - degradation Plan in February of 2007 and submitted it to the MPCA for review and comment. The City's permit coverage was extended on April 22, 2008. The MPCA is going to reissue the permit in 2011. Attachments: 1. Draft 2009 Annual NPDES MS4,Report 2. MCPA Reporting Form G:\ENG \Terry\NPDES Phase II\MS4 Permit\2009 Annual Report \061410 2009 NPDES Council Memo_final.doc Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 2009 ANNUAL NPDES MS4 REPORT CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Objective This report has been prepared in order to meet the requirements of NPDES (National Pollution Discharge Elimination System) Permit for Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4). Background The NPDES program began in 1990 as a means to protect surface water from pollutant loading. Phase II was implemented in March of 2003 to extend to small MS4 communities located in urbanized areas as defined by the US Census Bureau. This included the City of Chanhassen. As a regulated MS4, Chanhassen is required to design our program to reduce discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable (MEP); protect water quality; and satisfy the appropriate water quality requirements of the Clean Water Act.' Each MS4 must have six program elements known as "minimum control measures" (MCM). It is expected that these 6 MCMs, taken in concert, will result'in significant reductions of pollutants discharged to receiving waters. In Minnesota, the Pollution Control Agency is responsible for administration of the NPDES Permit program. In Chanhassen, the Water Resources Coordinator takes the lead role in developing and administering the permit but ultimately it requires the involvement of all City Departments to assure that the elements of this permit are met. 2009 Summary PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH Chanhassen continues to offer educational materials on the City website, through written brochures and pamphlets and through mailings in utility bills. The City met with Carver County Planning and Chaska to begin collaborating and sharing educational materials and outreach media. Carver County has a fulltime education coordinator and the materials and resources created by this department have added dramatically to the resources available to Chanhassen. Further educational programming is achieved through the City's membership in, or collaboration with, Metrowater, Minnesota Cities Stormwater Coalition, Blue Thumb and others. 'EPA 833 -F -00 -002, Stormwater Phase II Final Rule, United States Environmental Protection Agency, January 2000 (revised December 2005) PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND PARTICIPATION The City of Chanhassen held a public meeting on the NPDES Permit on June 28, 2010. This was noticed in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, June 3, 2010. XXXX comments were received from the public. The NPDES Permit and SWPPP is available on the City's website at all times and contact information for the Water Resources Coordinator is also located on the website. ILLICIT DISCHARGE DETECTION AND ELIMINATION All known outfalls were located, inspected and incorporated into the City's stormwater map in 2006. These are to be inspected on a five year rotating schedule-011 tfalls are maintained or replaced, and illicit discharge issues are addressed as needed. On February 12, 2007, Section 19 -101 & 102 of the Cha# ass'en Ca Code were adopted with the purpose of regulating the use of the storm sewer systems aatd declare the discharge of pollutant waters to any storm sewer unlawful. To aid in the City's regulatory enforcement efforts, the City of Chanhassen has established a Surface Water Tel h he Hotline that residents and witnesses can call to report any illicit discharges that may be dete website, along with information on illicit discharge d. This hotline is also.gsted on the City's City employees are educated annually on illicit dis focuses specifically on illicit discharge throlgh nei and education program, and the City's webst f c education teleph CONSTRUCTION SITE RUNOFF CONTROL During 2009 there were ,14 active.:constructio sites were inspected on,a regular bay includi rainfall event. As a result of ;these inspections including one (1.) stop work "order., es, a volunteer storm -drain marking (1) acre in size. All of these and within 48 hours of a -one (21) Notices of Violation were issued Prior to:,g4tl prizing earth work,the City eng king department reviews all grading and erosion controh3lns and, if requareie under fit -PDES Rules,' Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP) as.ell. Any sites trite more than fifty (50) yards of material are displaced requires a grading permt This requires an erosion ceptrol plan to be developed and implemented. Training is provided to City staff as it pertains to the NPDES permit for small construction sites. Chanhassen continues tea contract with the Carver County Soil and Water Conservation District for inspections of constructian,sites: It is the intention of the City to employ Cartegraph'" in the future for site inspections. No timeframe has been established for this implementation. POST- CONSTRUCTION RUNOFF CONTROL The City of Chanhassen has reviewed existing code and has found it to be generally adequate to address post- construction site runoff. It may be necessary to clarify the Bluff Creek Overlay District to eliminate any ambiguities as to what characteristics are needed to be included in the Overlay District and whether the land should be considered primary or secondary in classification. C: \Documents and Settings \karene \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \Content.Outlook \R21S4KN2 \2009 Annual NPDES MS4 Report.docx STORM SEWER 0 &M Through proper maintenance and operation of the City's storm sewer infrastructure the discharge of pollutants to surface water can be minimized. The Streets Department, and when necessary, private contractors made numerous repairs to the infrastructure including adjustment of casting elevations, replacement of castings, replacement of pipes, cleaning culverts, adjustment of grades and vegetation management on non - structural best management practices (BMPs). A total of 678 man hours were devoted to storm sewer repairs and maintenance in 2009. POLLUTION PREVENTION AND GOOD HOUSEKEEPING The City of Chanhassen continues to sweep streets in the spring.and`as needed. In 2009 the streets department swept nearly 27 miles of streets between Marclsnd April 16 and removed 236 tons of material. Additional sweeping occurred throughout the year p Fticularly in areas where there were on -going construction projects or where resident ie were made. STRUCTURAL CONTROLS 0 &M Among the various components of the storm sewer and treatrneratsystem, the structural controls that effect system discharge rates and the c Wl)ty of water discharged. Structural controls can include retention and detention ox>ds, control weirs, skimmer structures, sump manholes, environmental manholes, and storm dram�taglets and outfalls. The City of Chanhassen is required to inspect all 11IS,! outfalls d a : rotating 5 year schedule. The City of Chanhassen has identified and mapped 64 MS4 ctxfalls. Du the 2009 calendar year, 21 were inspected includini scrq "ng for dry weather dls A e. m It is yet to be determltle'd the exact frequency of pond.cleaning necessary but it generally appears to be between 5 years and ZQ'Years. Thefrequency o:`needed pond dredging is dependent upon a number of factors including pond de' land use; watershed size, and climatological factors and will vary from ore pond to the =next. There aroe,�74 stormwater fonds in'the City of Chanhassen. These are scheduled to be inspected on a five yea�rgtating schedule 2009, 45 ponds were inspected. The majority were found to be performing per design with a few minor issues in some of the ponds. The City has not yet completed evahk on of the data gathered but will use this information to aid in the development of a pond maintenance- .chedule. In addition to the 45 p6nds,whieh'were inspected, six ponds were dredged. Prior to dredging, the sediment materials from e1l'ede4411) ponds were tested for copper, arsenic and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and f6u =td to be below Soil Resource Value 1(SRV1) in all instances. This allowed for the materials to be fully recycled. It is the hope of the City that the current battery of PAH tests will be narrowed done to those most likely to be present as this will offer a significant reduction in cost. We are slightly behind schedule on these inspections but with the hire of an intern in 2010 it is anticipated that 100% of the inspections shall occur by the end of this permit cycle. In addition, all structural control devices C: \Documents and Settings \karene \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \Content.0utlook \R21S4KN2 \2009 Annual NPDES MS4 Report.docx NEW PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY A number of the City's permit requirements were met with the completion of the new Public Works maintenance facility. The new facility has provided enclosures for the stockpile of soils materials as well as sand. In addition, the new facility has a dedicated indoor carwash which is physically separated from the municipal storm sewer system. A new spill response program specific to this facility will need to be developed but should not differ significantly from the current program. In 2009, the City of Chanhassen recycled 1,225 gallons of waste oil. All spills are cleaned with floor dry and absorbent pads. If the spill is greater than five (5) gallons it is reported to the State Duty Officer. No spills over 5 gallons occurred in 2009. 2010 Objectives The City of Chanhassen has recently begun working with-f],otegra hTM to develop an asset management tracking program. This program will allow for efficient.data acquisition, storage, management and retrieval of stormsewer infrastructure. This same program will be used for water and sanitary sewer where it will aid in the Ipflow and Infiltration program and Illicit Discharge and Elimination program among other things. 4 '_ _ In addition, in 2010 the City of Chanhas en accommodate the 2011 reissuance of the N include pond maintenance and coal tar "bass developing a matrix for determining pond -t location, size of watershed year of condition of receiving w t r b "Al ,J, esident Bluff Creek Total M completed in 2010. Water Pollution Pr( will need to `valuate. what changes will _ e needed to PDES MS4 Permit Two items of particular interest --d asphalt sealants ;°City staff is in the process of aeanNC: chedules This will be based upon pond onstrucd4msual inspection, results of P8 Model, Daily Load (TMDL) study and implementation plan should be tDL will n6cessitate chAri to our NPDES MS4 Permit and our Storm We are currently worki to redesign and update the City Website to make it easier to locate and retrieve�information as we)J,as to offer a more robots listing of resources and educational materials. The city is= working with a con�ltant to develop a complaint tracking system that will be web based and will allow for the dissemin;at�on of cop,ints to the appropriate staff. The City will cont fige to offer the same educational materials and will continue to partner with other agencies. Weh ,p tactical to* so, the City will seek to form new partnerships. This concludes the City of Chaihassen 2010 NPDES MS4 Annual Report. Please direct any questions to Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator, 952.227.1168. C: \Documents and Settings \karene \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \Content.0utlook \R21S4KN2 \2009 Annual NPDES MS4 Report.docx J ���to srq� 5 Q Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 100, Minnesota Pollution 0 ! PR NPDES /SDS Small MS4 Report Form Control Agency , Ot t � The purpose of this report is to contribute information to an evaluation of the NPDES small municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) permit program. Consistent with 40 CFR §122.37 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is assessing the status of the program nation -wide. A "no" answer to a question does not necessarily mean noncompliance with your permit or with the federal regulations. In order to establish the range of variability in the program it is necessary to ask questions along a fairly broad performance continuum. Your permitting authority may use some of this information as one component of a compliance evaluation. 1. MS4 Information City of Chanhassen Name of MS4 Terry Jeffery Water Resources Coordinator Name of Contact Person (First) (Last) (Title) (952) 227 -1168 tjeffery@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Telephone (including area code) Email 7700 Market Blvd, PO Box 147 Mailing Address Chanhassen City What size population does your MS4 serve? 24,500 What is the reporting period for this report? (mm/dd/yyyy) 2. Water Quality Priorities MN 55317 State ZIP code From 01/61/2009 t 12/31/200 9 A. Does your MS4 discharge to waters listed as impaired on a state 303(d) list? ® Yes ❑ No B. If yes, identify each impaired water, the impairment, whether a TMDL has been approved by EPA for each, and whether the TMDL assigns a wasteload allocation to your MS4. Use a new line for each impairment, and attach additional pages as necessary. Impaired Water Impairment Approved TMDL TMDL assigns WLA to MS4 Ann Lake Mercury ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No Bluff Creek Turbidity, Fish IBI ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No Christmas Lake Mercury ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No Lotus Lake Mercury, Eutrophication ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No Lucy Lake Mercury ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No Minnewashta Lake Mercury ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No Riley Lake Mercury, Eutrophication ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No Susan Lake Mercury ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No C. What specific sources contributing to the impairment(s) are you targeting in your stormwater program? Nutrients, Erosion and sediment D. Do you discharge to any high - quality waters (e.g., Tier 2, Tier 3, outstanding natural resource ® Yes ❑ No waters, or other state or federal designation)? E. Are you implementing additional specific provisions to ensure their continued integrity? ® Yes ❑ No Small MS4 Annual Report Form (cont) 2 3. Public Education and Public Participation A. Is your public education program targeting specific pollutants and sources of those pollutants? ® Yes ❑ No B. If yes, what are the specific sources and/or pollutants addressed by your public education program? Nutrients (fertilizers, yard waste, etc.), Sediment, Hazardous waste /dumping C. Note specific successful outcomes (e.g., quantified reduction in fertilizer use; NOT tasks, events, publications) fully or partially attributable to your public education program during this reporting period. D. Do you have an advisory committee or other body comprised of the public and other ® Yes ❑ No stakeholders that provides regular input on your stormwater program? 4. Construction A. Do you have an ordinance or other regulatory mechanism stipulating: Erosion and sediment control requirements? ® Yes ❑ No Other construction waste control requirements? ® Yes ❑ No Requirement to submit construction plans for review? ® Yes ❑ No MS4 enforcement authority? ❑ Yes ® No B. Do you have written procedures for: Reviewing construction plans? ® Yes ❑ No Performing inspections? ® Yes ❑ No Responding to violations? ® Yes ❑ No C. Identify the number of active construction sites > 1 acre in operation in your jurisdiction at anytime during the reporting period. 16 D. How many of the sites identified in 4.0 did you inspect during this reporting period? 16 E. Describe, on average, the frequency with which your program conducts construction site inspections. MEEK F. Do you prioritize certain construction sites for more frequent inspections? ® Yes ❑ No If Yes, based on what criteria? Known violations G. Identify which of the following types of enforcement actions you used during the reporting period for construction activities, indicate the number of actions, or note those for which you do not have authority: ® Yes Notice of violation # 21 No Authority ❑ ❑ Yes Administrative fines # No Authority ❑ ® Yes Stop Work Orders # 1 No Authority ❑ ❑ Yes Civil penalties # No Authority ❑ ❑ Yes Criminal actions # No Authority ® Yes Administrative orders # 0 No Authority ❑ ❑ Yes Other # H. Do you use an electronic tool (e.g., GIS, data base, spreadsheet) to track the locations, ® Yes ❑ No inspection results, and enforcement actions of active construction sites in your jurisdiction? I. What are the 3 most common types of violations documented during this reporting period? Lack of P erimeter Control or maintenance needed, Vehicle Tracking, and Exposed Soils J. How often do municipal employees receive training on the construction program? 1/YEAR Small MS4 Annual Report Form (cont) 5. Illicit Discharge Elimination A. Have you completed a map of all outfalls and receiving waters of your storm sewer system? B. Have you completed a map of all storm drain pipes and other conveyances in the storm sewer system? C. Identify the number of outfalls in your storm sewer system. 39 ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No D. Do you have documented procedures, including frequency, for screening outfalls? ® Yes ❑ No E. Of the outfalls identified in 5.C, how many were screened for dry weather discharges during this reporting period? 21 F. Of the outfalls identified in 5.C, how many have been screened for dry weather discharges at any time since you obtained MS4 permit coverage? 39 G. What is your frequency for screening outfalls for illicit discharges? Describe any variation based on size /type. 20% Annually H. Do you have an ordinance or other regulatory mechanism that effectively prohibits illicit ® Yes ❑ No discharges? I. Do you have an ordinance or other regulatory mechanism that provides authority for you to ® Yes ❑ No take enforcement action and/or recover costs for addressing illicit discharges? J. During this reporting period, how many illicit discharges /illegal connections have you discovered? 0 K. Of those illicit discharges /illegal connections that have been discovered or reported, how many have been eliminated? L. How often do municipal employees receive training on the illicit discharge program? Annually 6. Stormwater Management for Municipal Operations A. Have stormwater pollution prevention plans (or an equivalent plan) been developed for: 3 I. If so, how frequently and/or under what circumstances? - 1 /year and as updates arise. All public parks, ball fields, other recreational facilities and other open spaces ® Yes ❑ No All municipal construction activities, including those disturbing less than 1 acre ® Yes ❑ No All municipal turf grass /landscape management activities ® Yes ❑ No All municipal vehicle fueling, operation and maintenance activities ® Yes ❑ No All municipal maintenance yards ® Yes ❑ No All municipal waste handling and disposal areas ® Yes ❑ No Other B. Are stormwater inspections conducted at these facilities? ® Yes ❑ No C. If Yes, at what frequency are inspections conducted? 1/WK for construction sites, otherwise as needed. D. List activities for which operating procedures or management practices specific to stormwater management have been developed (e.g., road repairs, catch basin cleaning). Street sweeping (2x/yr and as needed), road reconstruction, catch basin cleaning (as needed), etc. E. Do you prioritize certain municipal activities and/or facilities for more frequent inspection? ® Yes ❑ No F. If Yes, which activities and/or facilities receive most frequent inspections? Construction sites, sensitive sites G. Do all municipal employees and contractors overseeing planning and implementation of ® Yes ❑ No stormwater- related activities receive comprehensive training on stormwater management? H. If yes, do you also provide regular updates and refreshers? ® Yes ❑ No 3 I. If so, how frequently and/or under what circumstances? - 1 /year and as updates arise. Small MS4 Annual Report Form (cont) 7. Long -term (Post- Construction) Stormwater Measures A. Do you have an ordinance or other regulatory mechanism to require: Site plan reviews for stormwater /water quality of all new and re- development projects? ® Yes ❑ No Long -term operation and maintenance of stormwater management controls? ® Yes ❑ No Retrofitting to incorporate long -term stormwater management controls? ❑ Yes ® No B. If you have retrofit requirements, what are the circumstances /criteria? C. What are your criteria for determining which new /re- development stormwater plans you will review (e.g., all projects, projects disturbing greater than one acre, etc.) All projects D. Do you require water quality or quantity design standards or performance standards, either directly or by reference to a state or other standard, be met for new development and ® Yes ❑ No re- development? E. Do these performance or design standards require that pre- development hydrology be met for: Flow volumes ® Yes ❑ No Peak discharge rates ® Yes ❑ No Discharge frequency ❑ Yes ® No Flow duration ® Yes ❑ No F. Please provide the URL /reference where all post - construction stormwater management standards can be found, or e-mail to MS4PermitProgram .PCA @state.mn.us an electronic copy of the ordinance or other regulatory mechanism as specified in Part V.G.5 of the permit. http: / /www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /inside /code.htmi G. How many development and redevelopment project plans were reviewed during the reporting period to assess impacts to water quality and receiving stream protection? H. How many of the plans identified in 7.G were approved? I. How many privately owned permanent stormwater management practices /facilities were inspected during the reporting period? 12 J. How many of the practices /facilities identified in I were found to have inadequate maintenance? 3 K. How long do you give operators to remedy any operation and maintenance deficiencies identified during inspections? No deadline L. Do you have authority to take enforcement action for failure to properly operate and maintain ® yes ❑ No stormwater practices /facilities? M. How many formal enforcement actions (i.e., more than a verbal or written warning) were taken for failure to adequately operate and/or maintain stormwater management practices? 0 N. Do you use an electronic tool (e.g., GIS, database, spreadsheet) to track post - construction ❑ Yes ® No BMPs, inspections and maintenance? O. Do all municipal departments and/or staff (as relevant) have access to this tracking system? ❑ Yes ® No P. How often do municipal employees receive training on the post - construction program? Annual 8. Program Resources A. What was the annual expenditure to implement MS4 permit requirements this reporting period? 411,125 B. What is next year's budget for implementing the requirements of your MS4 NPDES permit? 406,200 4 Small MS4 Annual Report Form (cont) C. This year what is /are your source(s) of funding for the stormwater program, and annual revenue (amount or percentage) derived from each? Source: Surface Water Fee Source: Connection Charges Amount $ 450,000 OR % 56 Amount $ 200,000 OR %25 Source: Other Revenue (Interest, utility penalties, permit Amount $ 159,000 OR % 19 D. How many FTEs does your municipality devote to the stormwater program (specifically for implementing the stormwater program; not municipal employees with other primary responsibilities)? 2 E. Do you share program implementation responsibilities with any other entities? ® Yes ❑ No Entity Activity/Task/Responsibility Your Oversight/Accountability Mechanism Carver SWCD Construction Inspections Co- inspections, enforce City ordinances 9. Evaluating /Measuring Progress A. What indicators do you use to evaluate the overall effectiveness of your stormwater management program, how long have you been tracking them, and at what frequency? These are not measurable goals for individual management practices or tasks, but large -scale or long -term metrics for the overall program, such as macroinvertebrate community indices, measures of effective impervious cover in the watershed, indicators of in- stream hydrologic stability, etc. Indicator Lake Water Quality (CAMP) Bluff Creek Monitoring Data & TMDL Number of Frequency Locations Weekly for duration of open water 6 Varies up to continuous. 1(4) B. What environmental quality trends have you documented over the duration of your stormwater program? Reports or summaries can be attached electronically, or provide the URL to where they may be found on the Web. http://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/serv/nresourc/camp.html Began Tracking (year) 2001 1992 http: / /www. pca.state. mn. us /i ndex. php /water /water- types- and -prog ramslminnesota -s -im paired- waters - and - tmdls /tmdl - projects /m innesota- river -basi n -tmd I- projects /underway -tmdl -bl uff- creek -tmdl— turbidity-and - fish - biota. html Small MS4 Annual Report Form (cont) 10. Additional Information In the space below, please include any additional information on the performance of your MS4 program. If providing clarification to any of the questions on this form, please provide the question number (e.g., 2C) in your response. Certification Statement and Signature I certify that all information provided in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. E] Yes Federal regulations require this application to be signed as follows: For a municipal, State, Federal, or other public facility: by either a principal executive or ranking elected official. Name of Certifying Official, Title Date (mm/dd/yyyy) 0