Loading...
3. Community Development Block Grant (CBDG).CITY OF 3 CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 MEMORANDUM TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager FROM: Kate Aanenson, AICP, Planning Director DATE: February 19, 1997 SUBJ: 1996 -1997 Community Development Block Grant Funding Request BACKGROUND The 1997 -98 allocation for CDBG funding is $50,729. The last two years, the city designated the CDBG funding towards senior congregate dining. This year's allocation will be used for a home buyer's assistance program. The program will be targeted for home buyers that are in the 50 percent median income for the metropolitan area. The median income amount for 1996 was $27,300. The maximum housing price would be $95,000. The assistance program would work by placing an advertisement in the local paper announcing this program. Applicants would be screened for eligibility and the grant would be used to make up the difference in the affordability of a unit. For example, someone with a median income of $27,300 could probably only afford a mortgage of $80,000, and therefore the block grant would be used to make up the difference of the purchase price. With $50,729 available, only 2 -5 loans could be issued. The block grant money acts as an interest free loan. The loan will appear on the title of the property as a lien. When a home is sold, the money would be returned and used to assist another home buyer. Staff will be working with local banks to provide this assistance and the processing of these loans. WAS- K As you are aware, CDBG dollars have national objectives that each activity must meet including: • benefit low and moderate income persons • aid in the prevention of slum or blight • meet community development needs having a particular urgency Don Ashworth February 20, 1997 Page 2 Hennepin County has given the following priorities that should be used as a guide for the use of CDBG funds. These priorities include: Housing Rental and Supportive Housing: planning, site acquisition, related infrastructure for development of new units and rehabilitation of existing units for low - income households (less than 50 percent of median income). Home Ownership: planning, site acquisition, related infrastructures, down payment assistance for low - income, first -time home buyers, and rehabilitation of existing units occupied by low- income households. Community Development Neighborhood redevelopment /revitalization, senior centers, removal of architectural barriers /ADA compliance, lead -based paint abatement and planning activities to address community revitalization needs. Public Services Services to senior citizens, disabled persons and youth, child care assistance and transportation services. The Senior Center remodeling will meet the Community Development and Public Services priorities of the county. In addition, the allocation will benefit low and moderate income persons. RECOMMENDATION Attached is a resolution for the Council's consideration that allocates the $50,729 for home buyer assistance program. Attachment: Resolution \ \cfs I \vo12 \p1an \ka \cdbg.97.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: MOTION BY: RESOLUTION NO: SECONDED BY: RESOLUTION APPROVING PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FOR 1997 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is cooperating in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen has developed a proposal for the use of Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds made available to it, and held a public hearing on February 24, 1997, to obtain the views of the citizens and local and Urban Hennepin County housing and community development needs and the City's proposed use of $50,729 from the 1997 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant. BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Chanhassen approves the following project for funding from the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant program and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County for review and inclusion in the 1997 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds. Project Home Buyer Assistance Butt $50,729 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and City Manager to execute the Subrecipient Agreement and any required Third Party Agreement on behalf of the City. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this day of 1997. ATTEST: Don Ashworth, City Clerk/Manager Nancy K. Mancino, Mayor YES NO ABSENT Fth e 'Jb 10:11HN HENNbf'1N CO Resolution No. 96 -2 -150 The following resolution was offered by Commissioner Johnsons seconded by Commissioner Tambornino: 0 200 wsREAs, members of the Hennepin County Board have received staff reports and recommendations regarding county housing policy and have discu®sed housing needs and potential county housing roles with municipal officials, BS IT TIRMWORE RESOLVED, that the Hennepin county Board supports the following housing policies and program directims: 1. Hennepin county's housing policies and activities should be consistent with the following goals and assumptions% �-0 a. Housing is primarily a municipal responsibility. b. county involvement in housing should complement, not supplant, existing municipal responsibilities and resources. c. Consistent writs the county board' vision and mission, county housing activities should achieve one or more of the following goals: - Reduce county service costs or improve service results - Reduce reliance on county services and promote self- reliance - stabilize neighborhoods and strengthen the tax base. d. No additional federal, state or county funds are expected to become available in the foreseeable future to support housing activities. e. Puture county and municipal access to state and federal funds for housing, community development and transportation purposes are likely to be linked to affordable housing performance. 2. Hennepin County's current supportive role for housing be continued, in cooperation with municipalities, in promoting neighborhood and tax base stabilization and furthering affordable housing. 3. Hennepin County will utilize and seek to maximize existing resources to assist communities in achieving locally established goals under the Livable Communities Act, including the preservation of existing housing units_ 4. County staff are authorized to prepare proposals for strengthening the county's coordinating Tole and establishing countywide programs to address housing and tax base concerns identified by communit3.ss subject to county funding constraints and county Board approval, as required. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that staff are authorized to present to suburban eammunitias proposed revisions in the method of allocating County CDEO funds. The goal of such revisions should be to promote administrative efficiencies and assist communities in addressing housing and community development needs. The following provisions for the 1997 -99 Joint cooperation Agreement should be included among the proposed revisions: 1. communities qualifying as entitlements (having populations of at least 50,000) will receive annual funding allocations equal to the HUD formula entitlement or the Hennepin County formula allocation, which ever is greater. FEB 20 IM Af FEE 23 'So 10 :12AM HENNEPIN CO COMMISSI p,2 Page 2 ReSo. /nA No. 96 -2 -15� 2. Non - entitlement communities with county formula allocations of 050,000 or more will receive planning allocations. 3. Mon- entitlement Communities with formula allocations of less than $50,000 Will have their funds Consolidated in a pool for award on a competitive basis. Representatives of these communities will participate in a review Committee to make frAnding recommendations to the County Board. Only the communities whose funding has been pealed will be eligible to compete for these funds. The estion was on the adoption of the resolution, and there were Six YEAS and MAYS as follows= COMITY OF HENNEPIN BOARD OF COUNTY Cab ilssio PRS YEA Milne Opat X Sandra Hilary ABSEN Mark Andrew X Randy Johnson x Mary Tambornino _x Penny Steele x Peter McLaughlin, Chair _x RESOLUTION ADOPTED. arTBST; 4, �_ C e k U the CIA4 Haard FEB 20 1996 City Council Meeting - January 27, 1997 Councilman Mason: Yeah, I'm pretty sure that's the way it works but yeah. Yeah, it'd be good to get his input as well. Councilman Berquist: Well then my presentation is complete. I'm a little bit surprised at Don's numbers. Don Ashworth: I think that they're high. Councilman Berquist: I think they are too. Don Ashworth: ...probably divide them by 4. Or a fourth of that. Mayor Mancino: Let's have those ready for the work session. Okay, good. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS: SENIOR CENTER CONGREGATE DINING PLANNING DIRECTOR, Kate Aanenson: I wanted to bring this to your attention because we're getting close to go out to bid. We have prepared, had them draw up the kitchen itself. As you recall, Hennepin County has changed the regulations for what we can use our Community Development Block Grant. We were able to put the $100,000.00 towards congregate dining in the future. Any money that we allocate now has to go towards effectuating affordable housing so we've gotten confirmation that we're in the $50,000.00 adl plus bracket. You may not recall, if we're under 50 we're in this pool that other communities could apply for so we are kind of our own entitlement where we can apply that money. So we felt this was our best opportunity to take this money and use it towards congregate dining because any time in the future we wouldn't have that large of a pool money. In putting the bid package together, we're excited about the designer that we had in laying out the space and using the existing seating area that's in there now. It's going to cause some complications. The good news is that the senior center is just continuing to grow in it's use and demand, which is exciting. With the housing that's fully rented out. So in putting this together we were hoping that we would actually come under the $100,000.00 and we may be able to finish off some additional space down there to tie into the congregate dining. As it turns out, the demand for the heating and ventilating, because we do have to have air conditioning down there, and that air conditioning is actually going to carry a larger area. It's really added a large expense to it so it really pretty much took the $100,000.00 and some. That's just their estimate. Obviously you'll have to approve the bid package. I've spoken to the City Manager and we're hoping that that number will come closer and that there will be an opportunity for the City to bridge that gap in order to make this accomplished because this again is our only opportunity to apply this money so we will come back to you with the bid package. I want to give you an opportunity to see the space laid out. There are some members of the Senior Commission here if you had any questions. If any one of you wanted to kind of walk through the space as it's laid out and how that whole system works, I'd be happy to do that with you but I just wanted to let you know, this is for your information and we'll be bringing back the, well we'll need to award the bids so we can see that. Mayor Mancino: Okay. Any questions for Kate at this point from Council members? Councilman Mason: Just a real quick comment. I know it's not always possible but it's nice to see this stuff ahead of time. To be able to digest it and have some time to think about what's happening before we get the shock. No, thanks. Thank you. 30 City Council Meeting - January 27, 1997 Mayor Mancino: Councilman Berquist. Councilman Berquist: Where'd the mechanical numbers come from? Kate Aanenson: ...was the, I paid them to do the design so they're the ones that came up, and they did the City Hall design so we incorporated it into that. Councilman Berquist: Who was it? Kate Aanenson: Kasamme and Associates. It's the same one that did the design, or the bid package for City Hall. Councilman Berquist: 100 grand was the budget right? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Councilman Berquist: We're about 190. Kate Aanenson: No. Mayor Mancino: 117. Kate Aanenson: 117. Councilman Berquist: That's just for the kitchen. Didn't that 100 include the dining and the rest rooms as well? Kate Aanenson: No, that was just additional. We wanted to finish off. Originally, I didn't realize that the heating and ventilating would be so much so I asked them to see what we could finish off additional space because there's so much demand on the senior center. That seating area right now. If we could provide some other seating area or some other rooms that the seniors could be using that weren't used in the congregate dining. So that was just for your information. If we want to finish off additional space, what it would cost. Councilman Berquist: Where have you got, I'm looking at Kate Aanenson: First column. Councilman Berquist: Yeah, I know that but I'm looking at the numbers and I'm seeing a different, appliances, including the exhaust hoods. Is that all in, all in the equipment? Kate Aanenson: That's just your equipment bid. Councilman Berquist: Okay, but the exhaust bids and what not are in equipment. Kate Aanenson: That's all equipment. Councilman Berquist: I think the mechanical number is real steep. 31 CITY OF O/Cf' CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 February 3, 1997 Mr. Paul J. Murphy Vice President for Development Family Hope Services 3315 Fernbrook Lane Plymouth, MN 55447 Dear Mr. Murphy: The Community Development Block Grant funds the City of Chanhassen receives is from Hennepin County. The Hennepin County Board passed a resolution dated February 20, 1996 regarding the use of block grant dollars. The outcome of the resolution is that suburban communities receiving less than $50,000 allocation have the opportunity to pool monies from other communities. In addition, block grant requests shall be used only for assisting housing and community development needs. Because your request for S 15,000 for transportation and outreach programs doesn't meet the county's new criteria, your request cannot be submitted. If you have additional questions regarding the use of block grant dollars, I would suggest you contact Barb Hayden at Hennepin county Office of Planning Development. Sincerely, Kathryn R. Aanenson, AICP Planning Director c: City Council '\\cfs I \,�•o12`.plan\ka \murphy.Itr.doc M emo P-7CUP111W DATE: January 21, 1997 TO: Urban Hennepin County Cooperating Communities go FROM: Barbara Hayden, Administrative Manager Hennepin County Office of Planning and Development SUBJECT: 1997 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM Accompanying is the 1997 Urban Hennepin County CDBG Program planning packet. The following items have been included to assist communities in the process of selecting activities for CDBG funding: 1997 Consolidated Plan Schedule Planning Allocations by Community Five -Year Priority Needs Summary Sample Notice of Public Hearing Sample Resolution Request for Funding Form List of CDBG Eligible Activities The 1997 Urban Hennepin County CDBG Program allocation is $3.593 million. This is approximately 2 percent less then the 1996 grant. Recaptured 1994 CDBG funds totaling $8,455 have been added to the community planning allocations. All cities that had funds recaptured have been notified. This is the first program year under the 1997 -99 Joint Cooperation Agreement. Under the agreement, planning allocations to communities that would receive $50,000 or less have been placed into a consolidated pool. A separate notification of funding availability has been sent to communities contributing to the pool. Only communities contributing to the pool are eligible to compete for these funds. As in previous program years, the formula for determining the planning allocations is based upon your community's share of the Urban County total population, people with incomes at or below poverty level and overcrowded housing units. Poverty data is a double - weighted factor in the formula. Population figures have been updated to 1994. All other data have been derived from the 1990 U.S. Census. Hennepin County Office of Planning & Development, Development Planning Unit, Suite 260, Minnetonka, MIST 55305 Mail Code: 604 Phone: (612) 541 -7080 10709 Wayzata Boulevard, Fax: (612) 541 -7090 CONSOLIDATED PLANNING This is the third year the CDBG Program is being developed under the Consolidated Plan process. HUD instituted this process as a replacement for the independent planning and submission for the CDBG, HOME, Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) Programs and the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS). The plan is intended to guide communities in the preparation of a comprehensive vision of housing and community development. HO ME PR AND EMERG ENCY SHELTER GRANT (ESG) PROGRAM Using a separate solicitation process, the County is currently requesting proposals for the use of $1.808 million in HOME funds and $150,000 in ESG funds. All cities received a separate notification for the HOME program. The ESG solicitation will be sent to nonprofit organizations serving the homeless in Hennepin County. If your city is interested in applying for ESG funds, please contact Mark Hendrickson at 541 -7084. The ESG solicitation is limited to funding transitional housing for homeless families with significant housing barriers. COUNTYWIDE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES Below is a summary of the countywide priorities identified in the Consolidated Plan. The priorities were developed using the results of the survey of participating communities (surveys were received from twenty - six cities, representing more than 85 percent of the Urban County population), 1990 housing and demographic data and comments from housing providers and advocates. A detailed list of priorities by type of activity is enclosed. The countywide priorities should be used as a guide when you consider the use of CDBG funds to address local needs. The County will consider the relationship of proposed projects to countywide priorities in the evaluation of projects for CDBG funding. If you propose to use CDBG funds for a project that does not have a high countywide priority, you must clearly demonstrate why the project has a higher priority in your community. HOUSING Rental and Supportive Housing: planning, site acquisition, related infrastructure for development of new units and rehabilitation of existing units for low- income households (less than 50 percent of median income). Homeownership: planning, site acquisition, related infrastructures, downpayment assistance for low- income, first -time homebuyers and rehabilitation of existing units occupied by low - income households. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Neighborhood redevelopment/revitalization, senior centers, removal of architectural barriers /ADA compliance, lead -based paint abatement and planning activities to address housing and community revitalization needs. General planning activities and the removal of architectural barriers will be considered a low CDBG funding priority, unless the activity is directly related to an otherwise eligible housing and /or community development activity. This is a change from previous years; the purpose is to focus funding on activities consistent with CDBG priorities. PUBLIC SERVICES Services to senior citizens, disabled persons and youth, child care assistance and transportation services. ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS No more than three activities should be undertaken in one community and each activity should have a budget of at least $7,500. When funds are committed jointly with other participants to carry out a single activity, these limits do not apply. Communities are strongly encouraged to develop joint initiatives to address mutual needs by consolidating their resources. LOW/MODERATE- INCOME BENEFIT Seventy percent of the CDBG funds must be utilized for activities benefiting very low and low - income residents. HUD allows Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds to be used for eligible area benefit activities in census tracts where the percent of low and moderate - income persons are 37 percent or more. This is an exception to the requirement that a majority of persons in an area must be low and moderate - income. Maps have been provided to communities with qualifying census tract block groups. Please contact your CDBG representative if you need a map or have a question about eligible low and moderate - income benefit activities. FUNDING PUBLIC SERVICES Communities will continue to have the flexibility, initially, of using up to 20 percent of their CDBG planning allocation to fund public services. Proposals that exceed 20 percent will be reduced. Please be sure to utilize the 1997 allocation for calculating the 20 percent public service cap. Once all proposals have been submitted, county staff will determine if the 1997 program has exceeded the HUD required 15 percent cap on public services. If we have exceeded this amount, communities budgeting over 15 percent of their allocation may have to make reductions. AFFORDABLE HOUSING As identified in the Consolidated Plan and other studies, there is a significant need in suburban Hennepin County for affordable low- income households. Affordable housing, appropriate to the needs of different types of households, has been identified as a high priority for the use of HUD resources in the Consolidated Plan. Activities are encouraged that will develop or improve housing for low- income households, assist persons who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless, persons with disabilities, families with children and the elderly. The CDBG Program is an important resource to assist communities in addressing the critical need for affordable housing. AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHER FAIR HOUSING As recipients of HUD funds, Hennepin County and each subrecipient community has agreed to affirmatively further fair housing. HUD has initiated measures encouraging recipients to become more pro- active in addressing conditions that create impediments to fair housing choice. As a potential condition to receiving future funds, HUD expects recipients to undertake specific activities that will serve to further fair housing choice. Hennepin County allocated $50,000 of its administrative budget, from the FY96 CDBG and HOME Programs, for fair housing services including: fair housing choice outreach, counseling and referral services, training and education programs and enforcement of fair housing laws and ordinances. We anticipate allocating a similar amount from 1997 program administrative funds. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS PUBLIC HEARING Prior to March 7, 1997, each community must conduct a local public hearing and adopt a council resolution on the proposed use of CDBG funds. A sample public hearing notice and resolution are enclosed. The resolution includes language authorizing the signature of 1997 subrecipient and third party agreements. PROJECT PROPOSALS Please complete one funding request form for each project. Hennepin County staff will review each project to determine CDBG eligibility, program benefit and the relationship to countywide priorities. Please submit the following by March 7,1997: • Request for Funding Form(s) • Council Resolution • Public Hearing Notice (affidavit of publication) • Minutes from the Public Hearing ASSISTANCE Please contact me or your CDBG representative if you have any questions or need assistance with the 1997 planning process. In order to accommodate changing work loads, we have made some revisions to the cities assigned to County staff. The CDBG Program representatives for each city are listed below. Jim Ford - # 541 -7091 all Consolidated Pool communities Rod Waara - #541 -7088 Brooklyn Park Minnetonka Mark Hendrickson - #541 -7084 Brooklyn Center Maple Grove Champlin Mound Crystal New Hope Eden Prairie Richfield Edina Robbinsdale Golden Valley St. Louis Park Hopkins I look forward to working with you again in 1997. Enclosures HENNEPIN COUNTY 1997 CONSOLIDATED PLAN SCHEDULE s,5ys,vov $1,508,000 $95,000 nua,ry_. Application Materials Distributed to Cities NOFA/Request for Proposals Distributed Solicitation of Interest X. att:. .... Local Public Hearings Begin e ry Hold Tw o Community Informational Meetings for Consolidated Pool Communities Funding Proposals Due to Hennepin County Application Submittal Date Funding Proposals Due to Hennepin County Hennepin County Staff Review of Applications Hennepin Count Staff PP P y Review of Applications Hennepin County Staff Review of Applications Annual Action Plan for Bloomington and <> P I mou th Submitted Y Consolidated Plan /One -Year Action Plan Consolidated Plan /One -Year Action Plan Consolidated Plan /One -Year Action Plan Published for Public Comment Published for Public Comment Published for Public Comment ; Z ;.;.;.; Consolidated Pool Advisory Committee Selection Committee Reviews and Formulates Hennepin County/Mpls Homeless Task Force Reviews and Formulates Funding Funding ecommendations for County 9 ty Funding Recommendation . Recommendation ton for Coun ty Board y.. a nepin County Public Hearing on Hennepin County Public Hearing on Hennepin County Public Hearing on Consolidated Plan /One -Year Action Plan Consolidated Plan /One -Year Action Plan Consolidated Plan /One -Year Action Plan May 13! Hennepin County Board Authorizes Submittal Hennepin Count Board p y Authorizes Submittal of Hennepin County Board Authorizes Submittal - e of Consolidated Plan /On Year Action Plan to Consolidated PI / an One - ear Action coon Plan t 0 of Consolidated Y o - sol da Plan/One-Year ted Plan /On .. Ye r Action Plan to HUD HUD H UD . .1;<; Consolidated Plan /One -Year Action Plan Consolidated Plan /One -Year Action :;;::;.;;: :::::.. n Plan Consolidated Plan /One -Year Action Plan Submitted to HUD Submit I ted to HUD I Submitted to HUD II u1jt1 >; HUD Authorization to Implement the 1997 HUD Authorization to Implement p ent the 1997 HUD Authorization to Implement the 1997 <ss ii< Program I Proqram I Prnnram II U: \CONPLN97 \SCHEDU.WPD 1997 CDBG ALLOCATIONS BY COMMUNITY COMMUNITY ALLOCATION* Brooklyn Center 247,856 Brooklyn Park 515,070 Champlin 79,985 Chanhassen 50,729 Crystal 139,149 Eden Prairie 189,472 Edina 188,011 Golden Valley 107,212 Hopkins 152,852 Maple Grove 156,096 Minnetonka 216,558 Mound 67,178 New Hope 167,862 Richfield 253,543 Robbinsdale 86,441 St. Louis Park 286,343 Subtotal: $2,904,356 Consolidated Pool (27 communities) 337,800 Subtotal: Community Allocation Total: Administration (Hennepin County): County Total: *Includes recaptured funds of $8,455. $337,800 $3,242,155 $359,300 $3,601,455 1/21/97 U ACDBG 1 997\ 1997CDBG. ALL fi memo Paper DATE: January 3, 1997 TO: Urban Hennepin County Subrecipients and HOME Participants FROM: Mark Hendrickson, Office of Planning and Development SUBJECT: 1997 Section 8 Income Limits (Effective December 27, 1996) Below are the current Section 8 income limits for low- income (80% of median) and very low income (50% of median) households. In addition, income for households at 60% and 30% of median income are provided. These income limits are based on HUD estimates of 1997 median household income. The U.S. median family income increased to $43,500. The Minneapolis /St.Paul MSA median income increased from $54,600 to $57,300. The U.S. median family income is used as a "cap" in calculating income for households at 80% of median income. These income limits must be used in calculating household income eligibility for all HUD funded activities which need to document low /moderate income benefit. These income limits are effective until further notice. MSA: MPLS. /ST. PAUL FY 1997 MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME: $57,300 Household Size (80 %) Low Income (60 %) (50 %) Very Low Income (30 %) 1 Person 30,450 24,100 20,050 12,050 2 Person 34,800 27,500 22,900 13,750 3 Person 39,150 30,950 25,800 15,500 4 Person 43,500 34,400 28,650 17,200 5 Person 47,000 37,150 30,950 18,600 6 Person 50,450 39,900 33,250 19,950 7 Person 53,950 42,650 35,550 21,350 8 Person 57,400 45,400 37,800 22,700 For reference only, the FY96 Federal Poverty Guidelines are as follows: One person- $7,740, Two person- $10,360, Three person- $12,980, Four person- $15,600, Five person- $18,220, Six person- $20,840, Seven person- $23,4.60, Eight person - $26,080. NOTE: THESE HAVE NOT BEEN UPDATED FOR 1997 AT THIS TIME. UACDBGISECBINC.MEM Hennepin County Office of Planning & Development, Development Planning Unit, 10709 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 260, Minnetonka, MN 55305 Mail Code: 604 Phone: (612) 541 -7080 Fax: (612) 541 -7090 PRIORITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS Priority Need Level Health Services Low Other Public Service Needs Medium ACCESSIBILITY NEEDS (when related to other eligible housing and /or community development activity) High RESIDENTIAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION NEEDS Low NON - RESIDENTIAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION NEEDS Low ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEEDS Commercial - Industrial Rehabilitation Medium Commercial - Industrial Infrastructure Medium Other Commercial - Industrial Improvements Low Micro - Business Medium Other Businesses Low Technical Assistance Low Other Economic Development Needs Medium OTHER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS Energy Efficiency Improvements Medium Lead Based Paint/Hazards High Code Enforcement Medium PLANNING (when related to other eligible housing and/or community development activity) Medium Defining Need Levels The level of need is defined as follows: High priority Funding for these activities will be heavily pursued during the five year period. Medium priority If funds are available, activities to address this need may be funded by the city during the five year period. Low priority The city will not fund activities to address this need during the five year period. No such need The city finds there is no need or that this need has already been substantially addressed. PRIORITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS Priority Need Level PUBLIC FACILITY NEEDS Senior Centers High Youth Centers Medium Neighborhood Facilities Medium Child Care Centers Low Parks and /or Recreation Facilities Medium Health Facilities Low Parking Facilities Low Other Public Facilities Low INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT Solid Waste Disposal Improvements Low Flood Drain Improvements Low Water Improvements Low Street Improvements Low Sidewalk Improvements Low Sewer Improvements Low Asbestos Removal Low Other Infrastructure Improvement Needs Low PUBLIC SERVICE NEEDS Senior Services High Handicapped Services High Youth Services High Transportation Services High Substance Abuse Services Low Employment Training Low Crime Awareness Medium Fair Housing Counseling Medium Tenant/Landlord Counseling Medium Child Care Services High URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY Five Year Priority Needs Summary PRIORITY HOUSING NEEDS (Households) Priority Need Level Percent of Median Household Income 0-30% (very- low income) 31 -50% (low income) 51 -80% (moderate income) Renter Small Related Cost Burden > 30% High High Medium Cost Burden > 50% High High Low Substandard High High Medium Overcrowded Medium Low Low Large Related Cost Burden > 30% High High Medium Cost Burden > 50% High High Medium Substandard High High Medium Overcrowded High High Medium Elderly Cost Burden > 30% High Medium Low Cost Burden > 50% High Medium Low Substandard High High Medium Overcrowded Low Low Low Owner Cost Burden > 30% Medium Low Low Cost Burden > 50% High Medium Low Substandard High High Medium Overcrowded Low Low Low PRIORITY HOMELESS NEEDS Priority Need Level Assessment/Outreach Families Individuals Persons w /Special Needs Medium Medium Medium Emergency Shelter High Medium Medium Transitional Housing High High High Permanent Supportive Housing High High High Permanent Housing High High High