Loading...
1.Carver County HRA Housing Opportunities Discussion.1 Memo To: Mayor and the Chanhassen City Council From: Julie M. Frick, Carver County HRA Executive Director CC: City Administrator Date: 05/14/97 Re: Carver County Housing Program I am requesting support from the City of Chanhassen for a countywide affordable housing program. Information on the funding of this program is attached. The HRA is proposing a neighborhood revitalization program through the rehabilitation of existing housing units. I am proposing to purchase single family homes and duplexes and substantially rehabilitate them. We would rent them out for a period of time with the hopes they would turn into a homeownership situation. The funds from the sale of the properties would then be recycled into another unit. 0 Page 1 MAY -01 -1997 14:19 FROM MPHA 1001 WASHINGTON AV N TO 94486506 P.02 April, 9.997 - Metropolitan Housing Opportunities Program. MHOP FACT SHEET What is MHOP? MHOP is a rental housing program that was created as a result of a l Holtman Consent Decree. As one of the defendants i the lawsuit, the Minneapolis Public . Housing Authority (MPHA) agreed to expand affordable housing opportunities r for lowe income residents in areas where there has traditionally not been a supply of public housing, { in both the City of Minneapolis and is suburban locations. The MPHA will develop and operate the Hollman replacement units in the City, but a new kind of approach was needed for the MPHA to provide Hollman funds for the development of public housing in the suburbs. MHOP is this tool. Who can live in M14,OP housing? Families (a household comprised of two or more people) whose income when they move in does not exceed 50 percent of the metropolitan area median income Allowable income limits range from $21,850 for a two person family to $36,050 for eight or more family members. How are families selected for MHOP? For 30% of the units, families can be selected from a local waiting list without respect to Hollman priorities. For the remaining 70%, the consent decree requires that prospective residents are invited to apply in the following order: 1. Those displaced by demolition of public housing. 2. Families on the MPHA waiting list who live in minority or poverty concentrated areas. 3. Any other &&dies on the MPHA; waiting list. Aire :here standards for selecting far_nilies Only eligible and suitable &milies will be selected for MHOP housing, regardless of whether they are on a Hollman priority list. Stringent admission and eligibility standards will be applied to all applicants. For example, families in which any member has a criminal or drug use history can be rejected for admission. Selection standards for MHOP -- - -- - -- - - - -- _ _ - - - -- . . MHOP Fact Sheet page 2 housing will be the same as those used by private companies: credit histories, landlord history, criminal and drug background, and any other relevant data will be checked. The local housing agency will determine the screening criteria and manage the selection process. Hour do suburban families get on the Minneapolis public dousing waitin_q list? The MPHA will automatically place all families who apply from suburbs who are participating in MHOP on its waiting list, thus making Minneapolis and suburban residents equally eligible for the third priority listed above. As of this writing, the MPHA`s waiting list includes over 220 suburban families. How much rent will farnifies pay? Thirty percent of their income or $25.04, whichever is greater. Who pays the rest of the rent? The U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). HUD will provide Operating subsidies for MHOP units for forty years, subject to Congressional appropriation. The subsidy is the difference between operating costs and rent. Do families have to move if their income goes up? No, but they must continue to pay 30% of their income_ Where can MHOP developments take place? MHOP- funded new construction homes can be built anywhere outside Minneapolis and Saint Paul, but within the MUSA (metropolitan services) line. Rehabilitation of existing homes with MHOP can be done anywhere in the seven - county area, outside of Minneapolis and Saint Paul. Sites will be selected which meet public housing Site and Neighborhood Standards, and the MPHA will strongly encourage the development of MHOP units in places that are accessible to jobs, transportation, and other amenities important to families with children What kind of homes will be built? MHOP housing can b single family homes, duplexes, townhouses, smaller rental MA`f -01 -1997 14 =20 FROM MPHA 1001 ,.,.. AV N TO 94486506 P.04 s MHOP Fact sheet page 3 buildings, or buildings which are constructed as part of a larger mixed income development. The housing can be newly constructed or existing houses can be acquired and rehabilitated. All developments must comply with local building standards. When will they be built? Anytime between now and April 1, 2002. Who wilt own the units? The units can be owned by a private developer, the suburb or its Housing and Redevelopment Authority, or the MPHA, and the suburb agreeing to own the property jointly. Who will maintain the units? A management company will be hired to manage and maintain the property. This company can be a private property management firm; a non -profit housing management organization; or a Iocal public housing authority, lice a Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Why &,e Holtman consent decree encourage creating public housing in the suburbs? Because there are many people already living in the suburbs who need affordable rental housing and because suburbs are creating jobs at twice the rate cities are. Lower income residents will have greater opportunities to find employment if they have greater choice in where to live. More questions about MHOP? PIease contact Dave Engstrom, Minneapolis Public Housing Authority, at 342 -1478. kehm GiiT�►�I�I� GUIDELINES FOR THE METROPOLITAN HOUSING OPPOR T UNITIES Background This document sets forth the guideiines for the administration of the Metropolitan Housing Opportunities Program (i'vNOP). The document outlines the key policies, procedures, and requirements for MHOP and describes how the program operates. MHOP's purpose is to provide opportunities for lower income families to liyP in ottractive and well serv iced suburban locations in the Twin Cities Metrnprnlitap AT ca in places where to data there has been a limited supply of -4r--,4 'Z a v }ivu.7ii'y. TF« �r�� um y it n�nand npY,^rf�in;+;aC fYr iI1WPr inP�nle il . N-ve • p lo . t .. i..i.i,..� ^'�G$ ar"d n t2ke $dt of 1a i1"Elaica a �V arc in a brus�Cl G l I�i�,e 1 �, , .$.y, �,.., f ,.,.. .... �.. ... + a r •1f •J.. f..,.wl ..I....i.. . ♦. hnr. suburban job oppolluni it also 1111111 Provi IVla1 iGSfuc/ 1w iviu f i �a�V I ~u 1 i 4y opportunities in their home communities_ For participating jurisdictions, MHOP will provide new resources to heip meet housing objectives, such as the acquisition and improvement of substandard homes and apartments, construction of scattered site and in -fill residential development, development of innovative mixed finance rental housing r±ayalnnmontc anri the conversion of MHOP units to homeownership. MHOP can ,EEO F,nln it u attract nee w who ot herwise cnllld not afford ho � 41..x. ____.. • 4I I IV4Jil ly i n 1110 wf 11114 ILy. Funding The US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is providing grants for the capital costs of up to 690 units of MHOP housing to be used in the suburban portions of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Funding will also be provided to pay for annual operating costs so that the housing is affordable to louver income families at no more than 30 percent of their income or i MH OP , J .t t f 1 �..{ n..iFl.......n4 4•i�c LJnI1rM+^�rn MHOP flits Ueeri created as a pall UI a larger fcya/ ocauG...Ct.t, .. . w...•• Consent Decree. Minneapolis Pubiic Housing Authority (MPHA) agreed, along with several other defendants, to settle a iaw suit brought to provide greeter opportunity for Minneapolis public housing residents and other families, who live in areas of minority and poverty concentrations, to live in non - impacted locations. The full Hollman Consent Decree has several parts, of which only one, MHOP, is -I- 7A ' I-q gAgqRR n1 N O Nn19NTHgHM TPAT HHHL-1 wnrla F,Z:PT 2AFT -R -MW 10/29/96 relevant here. The settiemer'It sets ut 11 a S iiC yisar pet v d sir, Nr ogJ ant implementation, untii April 1, `00 At the end of that pec ail units im be completed and occupied or available for occupancy. In addition to development funds operating subsidies will be provided for MHOP units for 40 years. subject to annual Congressional appropriations and the Wntinuing eligibility of the administering housing authority. Subsidies are awzrda± by HUD through an Annual Contributions Contract (ACC). The ACC for •t. - rni..h.h i.o t+ enr, �. ��j r,a,orf +� IUPWA nme„i i+ may ha mall - tea to other local 11 1fJ '/I Vy. QU 1 . A %V t.I�r v.. G��G. --- y — � and regional public housing authorities. Additionai funds are provided as part of the Holtman settlement for the development of housing in nonconcentrated areas within the City of Minneapolis. These funds are not included as part of MHOP. Eligible Applicants rJV 4Ji1 i� Pr�4 t'\V •V � tv�/TOn+ &tt+sm^ri +ieC /wPac) Inral nnvemments and t• a La 1 J.... i nt l iht nn1iM + IliTt _J lLou pr Vlll tx II 1 V IIV r lNIV 6 111 u C�C1VNtiIGt 1 � en Uai us art e ti�.ti.� Regardless of the type o f part c :itiiy, wi icu ici Puuiitv W, N1 1va4'c, hvus" funded by this program may be deveioped, owned andlor managed by private entities. An HRA is, however, always required, either to own the housing directly or if ownership is privatized, to administer the ACC and provide general oversight and monitoring of the MHOP units. E.l.g b e Are aV & n .ten s.. 't..t.t� a, t... J '.. 1! n..F,...3. :I ari r+114 r% c t f in tvlrl%jr Iu s are avail ndable tu UG UZad iJ/ QJ1 su •v�.vtw �. the Twin Citi M Ajea. 1 14 C w cons1d ULAIVI l ut I IVUaJt IV ut Juct I11I1 must be within the Metropolitan urban Service Area or within Free S tandin g Growth Centers, as defined by the Metropolitan Councii. Rehabilitation and scattered site acquisition programs can be undertaken anywhere within the suburban seven county area. MHOP funds may not be used in some portions of cnma cl lht lrhnn it iricr{i&ie)ns which are deemed to have concentrations of poverty nr A1. nnnit 1 nnn! t�^� +tr1r1 vt .1 ul.�ll• YvYu. wv.. t-+ .._r -_ a__ _a..J .J'.... t.....�.+.. AA'.ync�nrlim in nnn- UCVCIU4JCI J Il lL=J CJI=U it t Eat Vvivii tJ .IVUau latj if I .9ail .I .�..rrv.... .. v.. Concentrated areas should contratd Funds }+iv'vivcu uilucJ utc Holtman settlement are not available for use in St. Paul. -9- 20'd 9OS99b'C6 01 N 00 NOiONIHSHM TOOT dHdld W08A 62:OS L66T- ec -zldw 10!29/96 Eiigibie Housing MHOP is a rental housing program. All housing must be integrated into the neighborhood of which it is a part. Housing provided under this program must be on scattered sites, in townhouses or other low density developments, or as part of a lamer development using a mix of financial resources. Conversion of MHOP t,:nits to homeownership may be possible. H:,using developed under ;.his p _gra.^t co^ be siuhsr sirg!s family or multifamily housing and includes t`te following: • Acquisition, with or without rehabilitation, of existing scattered site single family homes, duplexes or townhouses. • New construction of scattered site single family or duplex homes. Af-rn +icifinn wifh or withoI it re-habilitation, of townhouses in a single �c;oln�rnenf nr �rr� imYmr ganf hr of 10 units or less or a higher L. .iL. } VVG I GNf+ ±vvai. Tiii� �.c'sii irivlVVr wn��4n;i�n �f nnln_rAgi�inrlt;al ! t1.ilittXr wtu t t t uses. such as schools, to residential uses. * New construction of townhouses in a single development or small apartment buildings of 10 units or less, or a higher number of MHOP units with local approval_ New rorstn.rction or rehabilitation of rental housing developments of more than 1 u nits Which involve a mix of financial resources_ In these larger �iGr ylV l/m Vi /iJ 4 i yrV4fVr of I n P finite nr 1 rI r ncr�ont r4 the tAtPI I Inif. not to t_ G.,.,,... �h A. n Gre 4 �er r C�l6.CC n� lti•a_ RAUnD t it�, t uC ut tat r.2d ,ut iva, yr a y. �.2M. rumba. •r,_ r _ _ _ _ t nor,-M' t n •., a "- L........ .4 wiih iccai approval. I nz biala of , i.iifita }Tfi.ist uc itttaftv�v with other public or private resources. Such resources may include federal Housing Tax Credits, HOME, CDBG, State and local funds Metropolitan Council Livable Communities funds, Federal Home Loan Bank Affordable Housina Proaram. Family Housing Fund and other foundation funding, and tax - exempt and taxable revenue bonds. d c nn •n? 1_4hnr ri of hnti mine rnmAn availab by • 11V�4i Jr�i V , v.N. V, rr.0 .vv• rv•...y•.•w. -.., •' -� D a f e de ra l t _ ,._1„ r ..., 'I'm g ih .......fir♦.. ,his ^L'sition ,j HUD tJ atiV V i�ic'r tG4�rdt vi 3�ntir .rrt,Cn$S a tr vr.r a Ier. td w �� p. or foreclosed properties programs. Conversion of MHOP rental units to homeownership for saie to residents. The federal public housing program permits rental units to be sold to residents_ Althouch not elioible as an initial use of MHOP funds, rrinyarcinn to r,r,maownPrship is allowed after one year provided that the w ^� Unit Sv rs yyith an eqI„ iva!ent MHO rental unit within the u jiiit awt,uvr't. - t10 ' d 9099et•te 01 N ()H NOiON I HSHM TOOT UHdW WOzi Oc : Ot L66Z- eZ - 2JUW 10/29/96 Ht present the Hoilman settlement that created iviHv? permits only 10 units or less or 10 percent of the units in a iarger devel opmerii up to 35 %o late MHOP units. A request is pending and is expected to be approved which will permit as many MHOP units as the jurisdiction will approve. These Guidelines are written in expectation of approval and developers are encouraged to begin planning developments now assuming the unit limitations will be lifted. Thera mav ha come instanCes in which more than 10 MHOP units in a J1 ~�iV IVY Vl n ,iit�.i it yr ��.�i u�iv nit bMrildirlA t� t10ra� 4 �h� - pro. - P1PTa ;�1 Tl. goal of i'WiHQP is is avoid u to iirf iC.ei u auvr'i of iG'ri8r ii+wi ii2 1iOLiSing. In deveiopments with prtrllariiy mu ddle or up per iricome residents wM staurC arlu well maintained housing and good access to services and facilities, a higher number of MHOP units may be appropriate. There may be times, such as when MHOP funds are used to enable a deteriorated buildina of over 10 units to be rehabilitated, that Permitting a greater number of MHOP units will be deemed highly beneficial by the local jurisdiction. hAwnp initc ?ro onrn, irmnori to ho r tcari in nrAafar nP v mham i ri PVP lopments v. ti Je k dui ts'i�.t + feee .i is ar —rn -date and -smr% 4� t ir�. d nu m ber. ueveiopers are advised to pian an MHOP deveiopment based on the needs and wishes of the local jurisdiction and what is appropriate for the development and the neighborhood rather than on any program caps or set limitations. So long as concentration is avoided, the number of MHOP units can be as flexible as the local jurisdiction and developer wish to make it. ppr iv o�vo in :,on;+c m7%s h e gra nt by t local governing body I GL{UW IUU M appi U V C U IC wCjrcrativ+ � o y+ c ^cr; 62r1 i fir it ..- pot r J W 6. Eligible Residents All housing provided under MHOP must be for families. Families are defined as households comprised of two or more persons, which can include an elderly head of household with one or more minor children. f.! hnlrl i.+nnr+an �f iniiio1 ^en" ". t� rr1M �'t�t o1��oc/� r,0 dement of the t 1V N , V , f ury�ia,,V afa. onus., vwa, ," c •v C R_a__ Po t'a_. ncv-neni of 1vICU W lital l area I l teV84tt t a lt.AJt l tc, auiuowv , V+ --. t i r Nom w. - the units may have Incomes up to du percent Cif tree rtraa rmt8uian income. Because this is a very smail number and wouid be diffcuR to administer on a project by project basis the 80 percent of median income limit would be allowed only in jurisdiction which elect to become Local Administering Jurisdictions, as detailed in a later section. -4- S ©'d 90S9evre Oi N OU NOigNIHSUM TOOT HHdW WO�Id 0Z:0Z L66T-K -8 dW 1 0/29/96 The MHOP allowable income limits are as follows: Household Size Maximum Annual Income 50 percent 80 percent 2 Persons $21,850 $33,300 3 Persons $24,550 $37 ; 400 A Por $?7 'Ann say 600 S 02 1—�nS $44,9 .• 6 Persons ate+ am .PJ+,VVV Q A C �cn %"V, JV Persons �J a ,CJU 0� I,ODU 8 or More Persons $36,050 $54,900 Household income may increase above the income limits after initial occupancy. Rents are set based on each family's ability to pay, but may not exceed 30 percent of the household income. Under federal rules families may remain in the housing regardless of income however the rent is increased to m9in +gin +he q0 nsrr+on+ e%f ir:cmmn gtonf,10M Onara+insr c1 lhcidies will be reduced gly by HUD. ^�^ r'�caticn is undertaken annually. accordin +i+Cu ++se r^v-C2+u+ The federal government is expected to make charges to liberaii<e ii e income limits and the 30 percent of income standard. if the income limits are increased by HUD, MHOP standards are not expected to be changed. It is desirable to use MHOP resources to serve lower income households- Selection of Residents RAUnM ka, 4.4. ,�ii+inll 7rn O¢ frnlinwc- 11) ine HMLISlrlg V VGJ •� � {w � a... u.. ,v„v.•v. � � ..y ,.,,,� choice for lannf lies 11 ill IYtli nea}pVIiJ i,JkA Ulil. i J%JUJII + Ne +itJ iv L. uZI Ii+`vii.S ed alnd famiiies living in areas which have concentrations of povc l ai lu rniii lot i y populations and; (2) serving iocai priorities in participating jurisdictions ., There are special priorities to accomplish these goals. The local HRA will generally maintain the waiting list for ail MHOP units, Cl Ihil?rt to thPsiz sner.ial oriorities. Administration of resident selection and the a s ala r ti on o f -n kAl400 rasidents will he c{lnt and managed by the llo c a! .....:...,i.... ,n.,i:i., - 4 -AADUA Decir,=r4e •k .4i1 ;-%a Mrafi illu er -m=nM nntl ocal Nat - Lidpa ing anuq is v" +ru { u--.. I \VJ {UV I- ••... av w.... —J seiec : ted by the participating eriiait`y i0 ciiisurc u at all vii 1%.45 +'$Siv2ntS 368 good members of the community. Depending upon the preferences of the local entity actual MHOP resident screening and selection can be done by the lava1 jurisdiction, the HRA or by a private management firm. In addition, administration by a private entity of a cannn2to wai t inn ligt in miYgri finanr.- deve lopments might with HUD approval be �VJJtUIV. l r1 J\iV i ~ivaJ t�r rr+ir -i on+ifir will hnv+_+ recnnnc ihiliti es for reporting and providing all necessary in urination+ tV the respCJnsible HP%A -5- 90' 9099etre 01 N OH NOlnNIHSW TOOT HHAW W08A iF:OL L66Z- 2ir -�HW 1 Local Priorities The local participating entity can reasonably be expected to wish to serve local residents as part of MHOP participation and are permitted to do so. Under MHOP, 30 percent of the MHOP units filled can be based on local priorities. The Inwl it in u,hi ^h fha heviclnn ie Ir.r-a/aMi rr►a 510M try reserve up i.. ?� .. l -4 Eke 11R�lJr1D r•iir tnr in n) r%r;#%rO;es 'I+nrr Ir♦inn f —il; who percen. �I 4A 0 I I I V ( vl Il Awl .,,,,a t 0# I%06 4V , :..,.,...., . , S. . have local routs, sud` a6 ii `u`Ieji cu y ii'vc, wwK, V - 1 - V w �iVVi '16 u at jurisdiction or are on the iocai waiting list. Admission standards and selection preferences may be established in any manner whicn is consistent with federal and state laws and regulations. Minneapolis Residents and Families on Minneapolis Waiting Lists 1 ^r liha rrornMininn 7n mare-ant of thom i Irvitc Cneo+ifiea rlrinritiPs mu be A10 in th8 ' rid S2l Wl l cif w:d•Q...n.t.Ci. TFtxn nrinrit- gre r ............. C$lC1L�IISI Itzu lU C11:i 11CVC U IC IVIr VL VG v uiGaur-I LI .�` . &%A + "U"I frr Minneapolis residents in speciai circurnstanc es. These priorities in he order they must be followed are: 1) Families displaced by the demolition of Minneapolis public housing units. ?) FamiliPC nn Minneapolis waiting lists who live in minority or poverty nr.nnnn+r�tn� �rasc vii. .v�...0 �✓� � wv. 3 f ram on t e IV11ri ieapol pubil - IC 1 ou st g Af l I ., , 4." .Al! include ail families wishing to parti cipate in ivi i"vIPHA will place all applicants from participating suburban jurisdictions on its waiting list, thus making both Minneapolis and local residents equally eligible for this priority. AS not each participating entity will administer the waiting lists for the ail nayr)o 11 PHA %Mil iriantify f9a rriprity pf Minneapolis applicants consistent 4M. 46 .i .in +nrV";ne i},a oI11., rV+ h Iri artie4iAn ta) to which t h e MYIUI 11 IC. U II C.C. e,H.VI IUGJ C214-4 4G�G. �•.u.v .- J\1✓V.✓Y.• t�...r..•vuv..w� - Minneapolis famil is i nterested in relocating. r app" ouvns are +.3L &A MPuq will provide information on interested applicants with ivirivP p oiiles tG LiC appropriate local participating entity for inclusion on the waiting list. Local preferences which are normally permitted by HUD may be applied, including such preferences as working or attending school in the jurisdiction. These Inral nrafr_ronrac, however, mev only be used to establish the rank of the .,....r. r,+c ..n+hin o nti of tF,o 4F�raa ohnya nrinritiRa They may not be used to override any of the three priorl't;es. LO'd 9OS99rrG 01 N roll NOlONIHSUM TOOT HHdW WO'IH T G:O T L66T- 8Z -6dW 10129/96 up to 70 percent of the residents seiected couid meet one of the three MHOP Minneapolis priority selection criteria, but the actual number will be based on several factors. The first priority group. which involves families displaced by demolition, will he offered Section 8 C_ertificaatej as wP11 as MHOP participation. They will 4hercfnro� 1 M - 2 yi -hlc ,n other than MHOP, which many families may 1A .. -nc +F. ,. n 1 - no a vG+ aru-as.3 .. " .. V0 + �... v. u .- ..0 + priority. Among the second and third priority groups It is unknown !tow many Minneapoiis famines living in concentrated areas or on the iviinneapoiis public housing waiting list will desire or be able to undertake a suburban move. Lastly, inclusion of local suburban residents on the Minneapolis waiting list also makes the outcome less clear, since both Minneapolis and suburban residents on waiting lists will receive equal priority as part of the third Minneapolis priority group. do rtn +cri Inrw! nnti+io¢ Hayo fall! Mnrl rnmnla Mr1tTAl over the r .v .v.,...., , r ...: �.v.f...... .� r ...... t i+anaga,mient t a.. IL I: t Ia of re .' � ; S o I r: 3 h v+ 1 c �Vaiul + .1St a nu a •l u +c i21 2cttvl / v+ � s.. O S t a • • IVIr1Vr' F7riU elf's and all f tede a1 a n d statle l aw n GLIC Vi . The follVVVlll are key aspects of the local selection process: Minneapolis applicants may not be treated differently or more stringently than are local or other suburban applicants. If there are insufficient eligible and suitable applicants from the three priority ratannriAC fhm In P1 nariirinatinn entity may fill all rPmainina available units based on loco. preferences. o Since aii Minneapolis applicants wiii be pla ced on the waltili list 0f cite local participating entity, there will be no need to wail Tor Minneapolis referrals and units can be filled immediately from the focal waiting lists. Resident Selection Standards nn,Ixt oiinihlc onr4 et vi+ahla rociricntc will hg sPIPrtP_d fcgr MHOP regardless +, F �v" i." iI. ti .n RA'nr.n n lin nr Ir.r•2 nrinni�r Theca O►'G {�TiIieS which meet JI Yfi, U 1Gr ll l$�� a% ILI{1 IG a1..C 11 J v1 V .,...I �/1 •V•: \�. n L- j I J + - -..1 J�:...�'�.- J 1:..'L.'t'6, a.,.. J....i.. C.JI in all lCUC:d! dllu IuLwal aUtIIISJ1Utt GItV irttyiuilily JlQ11VGiIVJ- / Ivv �cll.uw .a.r...yv.+. admission and eiigibiiity standards, aii of which may to applied to all Ib4HOP applicants. For example, families in which any member has a criminal or drug use history can be reiected for admission and/or promptly evicted if such problems 2 rise. Other eligible local preferences include families who are paying a large nnrfinn n-F +heir ino -n►rlo fnr rnn+� iiwinn in ci►hctaneiard ho �ainn, an( are veterans or Pw, military pe! sontnei pr ej cr el ices among eligible W.C.01mnS nrricr t0 haVe a range .VI :,..,.,... ., .,:...., t -7- 80'd 90S9817tr6 01 N Od NOION1HSUM T OOT HHdW W0'tld cc:0T L66T- eC -8dw 10129/96 of incomes in each development and preferences for connections to the local community through work or school are permitted. Admission standards and preferences cannot, of course, violate fair housing laws and result in discriminatory practices against families based on their race, color, religion, sex, national origin, marital status, disability, receipt of public assistance, or other matters governed by federal and state fair housing laws or HUD regulations. 0--a ..a•...1..... ,.a1.. .......a., u1 1n --br ,...ra........., ........ — , h.dreb uil,uit,uvlfJ bvficlw� v}�cfaac 1av✓ xu- .7uafftNGfw�/ Y1vylcalf, �iraa a �� residents are assisted with empl oyment tra an d provided o ther as sistance aimed at moving them toward seif sufficiency and out of government ass is ted mousing. Self-sufficiency programs would be extremely helpful for MHOP residents and are encouraged, although they must be voluntary and cannot be used as a tenant selection criteria. Local Administering Jurisdictions with a separate MHOP ACC should resolve with HUD directly how the costs of such programs can be included for MHOP units. i ics i i i0'v'cv a are 11 v1 i i 1 viilil ica�iit5, a sii Iii IV4-ai Sal yr a%.A 1i ivf i unL Se12CtiCn standards viii ensure that aii MHOP residents are positive contributing members of the community. Locai participating entities wiii make that evaluation and be responsible for all resident selections and for fair and equal treatment of Minneapolis priority applicants. The federal government is expected to eliminate all federally mandated Preferen If thiC Flange is made, MHOP will also eliminate all federal nrnferanroc In +fn!2+ �w�o nnly iho KAinnaanniic nrinnfv eplartinn criteria and local r, e , � .. ., r j Nr a cr ences Nil app Maximum Costs Funding is provided as grants for 100 percent of the cost of acquisition, construction, rehabilitation and related development costs of the MHOP rental housing units. Total Development Costs ( "TDCs ") funded by MHOP may not e ce e�ar thg fOila wing HUE) p unit iimitwtion — s: T_s_1 r', _.. r.._.., s r....� 1 ' 'a.. 1 uaal LJGVe1t.+i.1111an.t vest 1 6—A I, By Number of Bedroom$ 2 3 4 5 Detached & Duplex 98,850 120,750 145,750 158,500 Row Dwelling_ 88,200 107,750 130,450 141,900 Walkun 75 98,550 121,500 136,750 TL. i 1'.++itn --- +.. r.linnF.1� 1n -11 4 rmee rf ;4r%v teinn nCrm lt?Ari 1 TnAar this f f.c7c .iu..w ".r p ......... program, including acquisition, new construction and rehabil ►ation. a >z 60 'd 90S93rr6 01 N OH N019NIHSHM TOOT tfHdW WO�JA 2Z:OT L66T- ez -80W 10/29/96 It is important to emphasize that while these are the federal cost limitations, the funds provided by HUD for MHOP are not sufficient to fund ail of the 690 MHOP units at the allowable TDCs. The funding provided generally will cover only about 90 percent of the allowable federal TDds. _ MPHA will have to adminictor MNr)P cn that all of tho i rnitc ran be C.OMNgtau within availat?ie fi;,r+i.,g. MPPA res eias the right t c t h ol i i (s u nt n typ es, Iccatc. - M and to Via a• a Iv N V +• o s ele • \..� a. u 1 u+ • yp • •+ ,. riv � w uM uc v GivjlCl ailU ivsr,cti 1 if�A u l ai k.al i pt Odu►.r. t iWUS11 ly , ui %A Me^- whir. the available resources. Local governments may fund costs in excess of funding provided through MHOP. All costs detailed under the eligible cost section above must be included within the TDC and must be demonstrated to be necessary and valid based on costs for comparable housing. All proposed costs will be subject to HUD review and app roval for app and reasonab Upon completion of the rfeve(onmenf construction must b documented and c ction and deveinrment costs mu M♦ VVl �I vV. 1 110 1H PLA is %.%I -i VV \V %1 �► I II JiG ll Vf GV♦1J41 VrrVr,V r..Tent r•. tv H Th e Stateril @'it iS rc'vieweu uy i�'uv ailu file 1i1o1:1ififulif ucVc cost is estabiisheu, subje<;t to auJiL Ab par o► the ne.4 yeai'S isc al audit for tie HRA, there will be an audit for the development. For developments involving a mix of MHOP and non -MHOP units, the maximum cost for MHOP units may not exceed the lesser of the per unit limits set forth above or the proportion of development costs applicable to the MHOP units. The prop ortional development cost is the amount equal to the number of MHOP Ifnitc Akfir4MA F1v the tn+01 n1 of ritnitc in fhe eiielyofnmmamt timae this intal rOCt ..r' �...1 A t.. E ;a b t L... IIAUI'1D l mite- in nrnnnrtinn to th n n � l QNJNJIr_V IVr 11 /G 114 / /IIiJGI VI yGdIVV /IaJ ii cull 1\/l 1il lllJ Ia rll vt.vl •I V+I v uaV L .ii r t bedrooms _.. ,..__ C.- �R1 N1P its 1' x'1...1 �.• Vf bedr ooms V1S rion U1f1L5. f I., LI in}�J IVI IYlftiVr UI 11LJ a 1G 111111 LGU Lu MHUP funding, other sources of funds may also be used for ivi' OP units and are not subject to T DO. Eligible Casts Piiinihla e4cvlaln CaStc Whirrh mo r Ct be included within the TQr1 Cost .�.\.\n •+�r.� �c inllnuac• \..Cir J, y1 V c.•. Ivuv �..�. The cost of necessary studies, Sul veys, d; fu Preparation of Plans and specifications, including environment assessments; Fees for architectural, engineering, legal and other specialized services: Cner ial cti IrrIGC inr•Ir lrlinn annrnitalC rmmpartion t1?¢tc tPSt hnrihas marke r% �i .� n•1,.n�.� nr..d I %,U % W 1 I %, — e`t GCt1T7tpC 7nr{ /•C/•t� Aral ket anal an WI I.7ll 1JVl /VI f Wv• vv►II rIM •vv w. w• N•.V�.\I V..�, Acquisition of land and existing buildings; Site preparation costs and infrastructure costs; Oi'd 90998VVG 01 N nd NOlONIHSHM TOOT HHdW W08=J EZ:OZ L66Z -K -�M 10/29/98 Cost of labor and materials for new construction or rehabilitation and installation of improvements set forth in the plans and specifications; Acquisition of necessary machinery, equipment and furnishings installed at the development; Indemnity and surety bonds; • Premiums on hazard and iiabiiity insurance during the construction or rehabilitation period; • Operating reserves related to initial occupancy of the development, replacement reserves, and reserves for extraordinary expenses. • Marketing and advertising costs. • u i0,e, U, ,, Wn,st, 4.4-0.iO a Gi,V Wiuy6 ur ,a,iw,iy wJrw -- I 4 VU i2, „vtui„1 costs. The costs of relocating, either temporarily or permanently, existing tenants in rehabilitation projects. Such costs may also be paid from funds available from other sources. The costs of making developments accessible for persons with dicah-Rities in romrii nom with feaderal req uirements, specifically Section 504 of the Housing Rehabilitation, Act of 1973 and the Fair Housing Act of 1 588. It Development fees Other costs permitted by HUD and necessary to undertake the project- Davis-Bacon Requirements I�I UV iJuVM '1 iJ �iy4� ��i fVr Uii tin; r AIircm#-+1% , v /F9r4CLr4 ky AAW D inels. In Vases Vr uCVCivfJTi$illJ involving Only i "v1140P fii,anCea i mitt - 0 1 ✓aviS - vaw i requirements wouid apply to aii the units. in cases invoiving a mix of WHOP financed units and units financed with other resources, Davis - Bacon applies only to the specific units which are designated as MHOP units. If the development has MHOP units which "float' as a proportion of the development and units are not soecificaliv designated for MHOP. Davis -Bacon applies to the entire development.' HU15 has made this determination because all of the units at the devel opment might at any time ha considered public housing, which makes the — iv — TT'd 90S98bt6 01 N 00 NOiONIHSHM TOOT HHdW WO�Id bG:0T L66T 8Z -8HW 10/29196 entire development subject to applicable federal requirements including Davis - Bacon. These distinctions between when Davis -Bacon requirements apply are the same regardless of whether the MHOP units are owned by an HRA or by a private owner. If an MHOP development uses FHA in surance, Davis -Bacon applies to the �i i�1r rinf .rainnlwpn+ Da il; -4 ni..►n :n rf laar l.a• ro.+1 l:rari %SAIN CH IA r.f� I.<A�..1�1D a v Gv �fafV1f4 �+ •f w4avvff f3 CA �� Y10 f..4f vu a of ua 1w. 'A HOP mixed finance devel that use H ViviG and CuBG `ands also will be subject to the Davis -Bacon requirements that apply to those programs. Distribution of Units by Number of Bedrooms The total 690 units provided under this program must achieve the following distribution of units by number of bedrooms: Number of Bedrooms 2 bedrooms 3 bedroom 4 bedrooms 5 bedrooms Percent of (hits 44 39 10 7 1.. ♦4." i 1111) P1 4i... Fi...f f.. n hi . 4i. n 7�� F� rn u 1 u lc ii liti$I Y ea rs V 1 1r1+ lv� a lc el rv1 , w 3Cl �fe J@ a fG f,SG.a.x�r3 b ..f m J•�a. •L..a' -.. L - 17 tl_ •il. J'. .'J.....f J.. ...I.....,.,....L,. uiitributtuil W - 1 1 1 1 1 � as lexibl as possiutC iii app oving i11U1vidual u CY GIUkJU IGIIl.7 in the later years if the needed distribution is not being achieved, set asides for certain unit sizes or other policies to insure proper distribution may be necessary. Eligible Sites MHOP housing must meet federa! site and neighborhood standards. Ci:�ii.ln n:4ne� :n.+lf e.�:nn gvi 4inrr �f fiir♦ inn n� fnr rahvhiii }.1. }i^m T! - fit• • Not be located in minority or poverty Coilii CeiltML L W-d a, 6a, Be suitable residential locations for family housing, for example not isolated by freeways and not located in industrial or other non- residential areas. e RAM r f adetil•!nt° 4ziZ10 _ ay,MnIZiIirA and contour to accommodate the N �'.r...S - A ­^;­4 .�nii �n� f r4iii }iCC at1� rOGt.C. t� CIIn.i."o +h&Z CitP' f �Nvac. Nf vjc..f• of w.. i 1c.aJI, u►u.f..v u. ..... w Se adequate to faciiitaie and Compiy wi%ii api3 iit�cwie prUVisions iJfiiie Civil Rights Acts; ;1- ZT'd 90998bb6 01 N nd NOiONIHGUM TOOT dHdW WO�JJ V Z:O T L66T- 8G -�IdW 0 Al29/96 Be free from adverse environmental conditions; Be accessible to public transportation, social, recreational, educational, commercial and health facilities and services that are at a minimum equivalent to those typically found in neighborhoods consisting largely of Similar unassisted housing; i QG WW U 1441 rGQ ,301620 C uavci ulTic uitu w;.w iv aTipiojiTivilt Opportunities; • Not involve reiocabon, uniess the developer will meet all relocation _ requirements; • Comply with federal flood insurance requirements; Design Standar ds Design standards include the foiiowing: Be of reasonable density to accommodate children; - Be non - elevator buildings, scattered site, or other types of low density housing. Elevators may be provided When they are needed for disabled persons and for freight in low rise buildings. a 60 of att arc,titacA,ulai S an C a uansit'Jr WiilG calends with the �J - - t- -,J Si.irTvi.il wir I� r + t yr iuu++ wuu. Have characteristics of privacy and space suitabie for famiiies such as individual entrances, private or semi- private open space, avoiding doubled loaded condor design. • Meet HUD Minimum Property Standards or Minimum Design Standards fnr P=h7hW+n#inn fnr PociAznti!ni Prnnorfiac inr•ir viinn i icp of nl I2lity MG .C�pi • Meet requirements for persons with disabilities as provided for in of - Section 504 and the Fair Housing Act. • Meet HUD noise abatement and control requirements. Comply with applicable State and local laws, codes, ordinances and ron1 citrons m� It L _..I J I - a J at. t t >1 R:— ...- - .t... l ' r A .... ... �' tL.. It `s Iuuld Ue noted a at ll ie IVIII U IeJULGI Housin11J. Finanrce AV r i Y Ill U lG award of Tax Credits and state funds requires townhouses or housing of similar -12- £T'd 90998bb6 01 N nd NOiONIHSUM TOOT dHdW WOCId SZ:OT L66T- 8Z -aUW 10/28/96 design when the housing is intended for families. This makes MHOP and MPHA's design standards for family housing consistent and facilitates using these programs together. Development Fee Tlh develop it ee perm; led or units `nanced under 1�IH wi ll depen on the type of development and the standards are as follows: When part of a larger mixed finance development, the development fee permitted by other funding agencies or lenders will be allowed for units financed under this Program. When the units financed under MHOP ate not used in combi nation with other fn�n�inn +ho alln���ul�lq 4q.�alnnmpn+ foq ;c 4;oh+ n$rn of +n +oi �, wv�/u.v. e♦ .e.v w wyu� perc w.a. yr .v w. uevelvp, m ten" wet, leas u 2 ,c8. T, he development fee is °cam tie lac `t ai Li a un s are uwried `by d ior:ei autiwriy; clot u 1e developer and that the developer bears no rent -up or long term market risk. Taxes All c housing funded under MHOP is exempt from real estate tw3tio and S Jlrii.�iri w, i . , . ut rii u. governmen't it lieu of t2xas (PILOT). The P ILO T paymiert is an amount equaling iVC lU [e(1 - OZLC11 V f ct UCVeiUE11 l tCi Il J Ji ICiLCi f CI I15, c IUi(It� Upon it le at i tUii, u agreed upon by the local government and H UD. Shelter rents are the total rents of a development, exclusive of charges for utilities or speciai services. In the case of developments which are funded in part with these funds, PILOT oavments would be made for that portion of the development which is represented by the ratio of units which are funded under MHOP to the total nrifmhar of r en;+c in fhb Uo,�oin�mont Tho hYlYnnw of +hn rinyotnnman+ wnri dri him r taxed ,bill; ri rally or wculu quail fyr l +L,-Z.- tmeat arnl Ti.a PILOT f.nrC. of T a I ♦ tan u�.au�� ,►. „r , � v v fii �� +Z v A te_ J_.._r__,_ -a r_ a_ L-_ a -A ,.--• r....._�_ 'ice c......�........ L1IC UtVVC1UPff1Ct+l 1J tU UV (- ;UUtIICU cJ ww atWtttc U11iES wt puip0ses vi +ruc „ percentage thresholds. The PiLGT provision applies to partiaily financed developments which are under housing authority control, including management as well as ownership. w � tT'd 90998tt6 01 N nd NOIONIHSHM TOOT HHdW W08A Sc :OT L66T- 8G -�IdW 10/29!86 Relocation Occupied units to be acquired under MHOP must comply with all rl;cnl .nncmon+ mi�r� +:nn �nrf =r-m ►icifinn =r4hM;0Q rwn- mkfartt wifh ti�P Uniform ..... .. ..- .. -...1. Reloral;on Assistance and ,Real Property A; ^,u:si;io^ Policies Ac: and HUD regulations. Relocation costs are an eligible program cost under the MHOP program. HRA Involvement Although public housing has traditionally been owned by HRAs, other 4rra nyvi'i °vn.�.+ frrr Nr ovme;- rhl of 1111HOP rani ►c �nr fcaaible and are enccu agcv. Di -ate riw ic l sh.lp requires HLID Headquarters approval for ea& VCYCiVp[1 (IL. f7UW/CYC1, 11Y11C11 LId�J1UVItGi1 pu1N1411Vtdaltty lJwttcIJ111F/ i$ jiivFwse�., approval will be by the HUD field office and should be quite routine. MHOP generally seeks to make maximum use of the development and management expertise of the private sector. Turnkey approaches to the develoDment of MHOP housing are highly encouraged as this method typically _ permits maximum flexibiiity and timeliness for both the developer and jurisdiction. A �U,b111c- 1 %. u L{..,;.,ic +r•�+;ng or,+; �r Is al�►ra;s ram u li r even with private �fY44V VV 1 4 II4114V V4 y4y.• V4.M♦ /�I�� VVY it ci JI IIP O f �w i"Ivp ui1114,12. Tiia t dic Ming as v j.s u ivvw+ �4r�Vdivuvri rrM participate and satisfy the need to have art HRA involved_ Through a local HRA. Through a local Economic Development Agency {EDA} exercising the _ bowers of an HRA. - Thr a local HRA or EDA, b with a joint powers arrangement with 'YIPHr, or aned er H RA. • Through the ivPHA which can vperaie Qui5ide Ui f (Aii a teapoliS w 4an, authonzed by the local jurisdiction. MPHA may commonly serve as the housing authority when private ownership is used. Throuch a county or metropolitan HRA which is authorized by the local jurisdiction to operate within it -: — 60.1-4 .- �n� +cr+ -2nA wnt by a i nr�l NPA and r • t t u �uy11 a lvii4 Nvww another HRH. 1 4 ST 90S98"G 01 rl nd N019NIHSOM TOOT dHdW WO�JA 9c:0I L66T -83-�M 1 0/29/96 Since NiHOP requires iocai approvai and requires the invoivement of an HRA, a private developer or nonprofit sponsor will need to work in close cooperation with the local governments to secure support for MHOP participation. As described in a later section, private developers and nonprofit sponsors can make direct aooiication to MPHA or to MHFA, without the necessity of making application through the local participating entity unless the local government has agrged to take ov er total program administration and is a Local Administering v uri�uivvi�tn. In a ll , u =ses, 1 v +�r, e4ri� and C- lvwl wvt.�.. 4hnn 4nii consultation is essential. MPHA has overall responsibility for the program as funding was provided to it by HUD. MPHA's role will vary depending on how a local participating entity elects to participate and how the ACC is structured. When MPHA continues to administer the ACC for a local project or program, MPHA will have the continuing oversight responsibilit When a local participating entity takes over the ACC, MPHA has no further role. HUD will perform all oversight of the MHOP program when ;# is admi^istered by : !c :al '-! l? a . Management of Units MHOP units may be managed, at the option of the participating entity, by a local, regional or joint powers public housing authority, a private fior- profit property management firm, or a nonprofit housing management organization. Management fees are established b negotiation and competitive pricing. There is no fixed amounts for fees as part of MHOP; however, management fees must ho 1�rrrer }ha ferrlerally vetMt,+li�ha� mwvirnlYrrtC f1A?non�+mAnt f�c nair� by MPHA Wil Provide a useful stcandor u tvr evalua ic. i ' cf tite appropr . ne o management fees proposed for INIH developments. in general in a mixed finance development when MHOP units are used in conjunction with other units, the management of all the units is expected to be undertaken by a single management entity, typically a private firm. This is desirable both for efficiency as well as to make MHOP units treated and perceived as no different from other units in the development. pC1a1.lny µµ,idiC7 Since MHOF units will be primariiy on scattered sites or will be a iimited number in a single location management capabilities, scale and efficiencies wiii be important considerations. HUD's Performance Funding System which is used to establish the amount of operating subsidies provided to a housing authority in its ACC can be disadvantageous for an HRA receiving only a few MHOP ..'-- in __ 11 nininn fh _-..- . - of 11JI} participation a local HRA will need to e _ ... 'a " &M%_ - . — ,, - f V, ,WID - nit s n fit irerd cn anc to have an efficiently co ls4%jer µV1.11 U t6 , 1µt ILLler %d t 1 tvt tl� .iW Vr 1 u�.,+ .ry e.v 9T'd 9999e"G 01 N OH 1 TOOT HHdW W02J=J 9c:OT L66T 8c - �11dW 10t29f96 sized program and the impact on the ACC funding that would be received by the HRA. A local participating entity may need to make application for at least 10 MHOP units or more in order for it not to have a negative impact on the HRA's operating subsidies. 4 y t�1G 11Ai -i(10 � r �r� iv IT i l iv re I V I' I j MV V1V'/GV ft 111 v2 if lG yV"A + V r �\/lllV rey :Vl l a! .,. Juv Imlanag opt iii which ;aversl jurisdictions czuiu pool 11 It UI It leir propel tics to achieve economies of scale M is also wilting to allow a local program to be a part of the MPHA ACC. This can provide cost efficiency for a small local program. However, MPHA reserves the right to require a local program to be of sufficient size so as to achieve reasonable operating costs for MPHA's total ACC. The administrative fees provided with the ACC for the administrating entity will be transferred with the ACC. - il uteu, ��2 atiilly �uuSiuie.S are P u r1U ii Vr IM1i iii tits 1Vr d pCrit'id i f 40 years, subject to Congressional appropriation and PHA eligibility. The MHOP operating subsidy is attached to the unit and if a resident moves, the unit continues to receive the operating subsidy, a benefit to subsequent families who live in the unit for up to 40 years. This is in contrast to most federal assistance available today (Section 8 Certificates and Vouchers) which is tenant based and moves with the tenant to a new unit. If the fc_ieral government tines not ccntinue to provide adequate operating VVVV<Vir.�I fvr AA{•1vD �iiii i°a iii u'� DCV u �v�.ci! fV�J4/l ii'uJ iiCcr� . � op as ullcrvs= Raise the rents on the MHOP units to ieveis permiiied by HUD. r=ederai law is likely to permit public housing to serve households at 80 percent of median area income. Increasing the incomes of residents served will permit higher -. rents for MHOP units if necessary. A newly enacted federal law now allows mixed finance developments this flexibility if the ACC declines_ In such instances the !aw allows, with HUD approval, changes in income eligibility, rents and other areas of nl rw;^ hv::.ci'•nn myn —ment 4n the extent necessary to }ircScjVe u Ie viabi of the utitt$. TO 1 0 le eXic IcsL':cial ieCJ. i�tatiOn :_..__ — .0 i;s win-Or Ct1SU d11UW lL Sell or demolish the MHOP units, with HUD approval_ If ACC support declined to such a degree that an MHOP development is no longer viable, is outdated or is in ill repair, HUD can and does grant permission to terminate a development's use as public housing. In such an instance the MHOP development could be so ld for an alternative residential use, demolished, or A^ Flo' LT 'd 90S98rh6 01 N riH N019NIHSHM TOOT HHJW W08=j Lc :OT L66T- 8c -bHW 10/2M6 converted to another use. These MHOP units wilt be low density, of attractive design and in good suburban locations. As a result, there will be viable ootions for reuse of the land and or property in the event that operating funds dedine substantially and it is no longer viable to maintain MHOP units as public housing- a1-.- ■AUrNM 4 - +.. {....wn . h'n ..r1nr 0--e% U1 iM At tl�iir �1 ^11 Ing • VVi1VCil 411Ci [Wig 8 WIND \V IIVI,IpV �tlfGl Jfur %,, Sw-L �I ter a6�v r��t.v program. • Provide operating support for the MHOP units using local funds. Process for Participating in MHOP 'M . +i,.. i� ., r .'. +n .� t.nrlgrlatie �ct,nlnnrrtpnf of RAWr)P si�nitQ 1 1 ar c + „ t .. c/� .. ..., .f V . v...r....v. ..•.•, depending on the type of housing devel opment being uncle taken and the role the locai government has elected i Have its the managesTieift ui 1'V'I' 10P. BecaauSO of the diversity of housing activities able to be undertaken with MHOP funds, altemative administrative approaches are necessary and desirable. The three ways include: securing MHOP funds through a coordinated funding process when undertaking mixed finance developments that involve using resources provided through the MHFA Super RFP process- wonting directly with MPHA ,m., ►indertaieir►g rravelnntngntc urhich do not involve using the funds available +h n, inn AAL2CG• anr4 wnrk;nn with Inwl if Iricr+ir•finnc WhAn thpv have elected to (an age ii f 2 � pi vg nn i %A 2c Ti less uh.rrea an.,rnMnf'.oc wrA ?S fCl�owS: rj ­ .. The MHFA Super RFP Process for Mixed Finance Developments Developers wishing to undertake rental developments which include a mix of MHOP and other units should seek their MHOP funding through the comoetitive process which offers the pooled housing resources of metropolitan area housing f inders. The Metropolitan? Housing implementation Group (MHIG) is a ^s.^, u`.i^' c f A inr ine-h w4in^ +ha AAinnocnta Hot isinrg Finance Aaency IIA � t �►... e Ai. a........t•+.,.. r..t .,..�1 +h Il A'.+nao nnliefC+ 0-31 �l pa►„iiv Wet tying Fund �rvlHFA), Dire IYlcu vNvu06cu , VVt6A 1, u,�...L.. a d NIFr'1A. These entities have ponied their resources which inciude Slate ftinds, federal funds administered by the State, private foundation funds and - Metropolitan Council Livable Communities funds, to provide a more orderly and - efficient process for funding housing development in the metropolitan area. Th f are made available by MHFA through a peeriodic Super RFP .^.rss DraFcronno fnr fYinefing in +ha+ process is for developments that include A�t nn s. TL... sp+ ..... OCD ff +h fL'nds in ^^' an c, rounds and tvtnVt' W1,4a. The JiiN�! 1" c off em •r•••• t- -�___ �., • Jam. .�t�- �.....+.. q.. l.-.. F.. -r; -- - tf7(.�'' various fun ders Select devcfuNlflcila,a joinuY �VI Iw,Vi,.y. MHFA's Housing Tax Credit Ajiccation Tian aiso provides 1 0 points for developments which are proposing to undertake at least five MHOP units. -17- 87 ' d 9099Srr6 01 N nN N019N I HSHM I00T HH,=1W WO�jj 8c' : 0i L66T- 8c -8HW 10/29/96 MHOF units quaffy for four percent Tax Credits when !hey are included as part o; a mixed finance development with Tax Credits. For funds awarded under both the MHFA Super RFQ process and Tax Credit allocations, MHOP participation provides a dear competitive advantage in securina these resources. Preference is given to developments which include MHOP either when: (1) MHOP is included as part of a mixed finance rlo.ialnrmanf u!! }h a wmrr►nn r nfan of inan�nm Ark `'�� 7 frYx�c�,nl�irg bllildf�'ig is VV rY.v finance saps otely by MHQP, but includes: as kart of a larger development in 'Which ou er bu9I'dir,cgs on `I I sama pro ie% - .,t site are see I rd g MHiG U - A 4C!inG or Tar: Credits. In either case, aithough units funded under MHOP may be a relatively small part of a larger development, participation in MHOP is vaivabie in securing _. these other resources. MPHA Developer Qualification Process u/;cfiinM f� 4ndort 11�i.lna fi�nrl�i rlov�lnrnr»antwc which do not involve r esv ces 1 � ade avaRabie a uirou;G' 1 the MHFA coordinated dinated funding, will need to work with ivli'rvy to be designated as a qualified sponsor. Housing developed using MHOP funding and resources other than those available through MHFA is expected to be an important, and perhaps the major way, in which MHOP housing is developed. - The following are the ways in which MHOP housing might be undertaken which would be covered by the MPHA qualification process: A�c ui$itiv n v �Suny iivl"i�s funded by ��i. OP IV Construction and rehabilitation of scattered site and townhouse units which are funded by MH Smaller rental buildings which are funded only by MHOP. This could include newly constructed or rehabilitated buildings which are a part of an existing neighborhood. It could also include separate buildings or townhouse units fi - by MH Op, which oro incJuded as part of a larger development While L. nrl'.,id.. 1 1 .iiiinn /�1 .• n1 r� M IBC nniy HOP fUn ed the 111 11141 4L •.41..�`7, •JVV.d VV V...� �YV .r!v gold be included .."L- _aL__ t�........ _ �s ,t lar ger, F...�..i.a �Ic.elnnrnenf ft In�� W1U I VU ICI Uri Nki MigS az Putt UI a larger, 111MGV ......a .v...YY with other resources. This is an alternative way to undartake mixed finance developmen that could be an attractive ai ternative to combining several funding sources in a building(s) such as is done with MHFA resources. -1 .- GT'd 90S98bt75 01 N nO NOIONIHSH I00T UHciW L10�-4=1 8G:0T L65T 8c - �J1JW 10/29/96 Housing funded using MHOP and other funds not included in the MHFA process, such as locally administered HOME and CDBG funds, other local funds, Federal Home Loan Bank Board Affordable Housing Funds, Fannie Mae funds. and MHOP funds used in conjunction with Tax Credits which are allocated separately from the state in Washington and Dakota CountieS. An de veloper undertaking haLsing tina with, MHIOP as described above, must be designated as a qualified S} nsor by "riPvA as a result of selection in a Request for Qualification process. Under this process developers present their q and are designated as an MHOP sponsor Designated developers would agree to undertake a specific number of units within an agreed upon time schedule. MPHA will set aside an allocation of MHOP units so they may proceed with assurance that MHOP resources are available. Developers would then undertake ail normal develcomental activities, such as site control, seeking all local approvals, project design and construction. T.. .+. ♦ Blt.11lC - f ♦., +�.+.. +hr� ��.� -� +�♦ IIRr� +rnnnii +fin I V (ui .♦h ul le assist Ilfff IV/1 ; iMP f eMGl flGlIV11, to %.0 %, •w V!/vu 1, Minneapolis i- lousing Corporation (GIVINIVIC) w >ii Make available u p to $500 in predeveiopment funds. Eiigibie deveiapers , both nonpro and for - profit, can receive loans to cover planning and development costs for MHOP projects. The loans would be repaid no later than the commencement of construction. Developers will make application for predevelopment funds will be made separately to GMMHC, after selection by MPHA in the RFQ process. GMMHC will award funds based on their own criteria. but expects to provide funds to the developers selected by .MPHA.. GMMHC predevelopment loans will also be �uvviiuuiv iv V VIV t/e a i.�i/ i .�i'� thQJ �t vn v�r .�. �.WnP mime -ts through the Super Ri=P and /or through Loca Adrninlste Junsdictivns. Deveiopers will need to work cioseiy with MFHA in carrying out NIHOP, essentially working on behalf of NIPHA to implement MHOP. MHOP is a new program unfamiliar to suburban jurisdictions and MPHA wishes to be sure that experienced developers will be representing MPHA. MPHA will provide the developers which are selected technical assistance that will enable them to be knowledgeable representative of the program in suburban jurisdictions. t �� . "PH R , a,,...,, +., +.. + /, +� . u,,p +�.,+ tk MHOP fund in addittGfi, wl n t,ILISl uc LV u . 1. • K .'�. ", which are Tederai pubiic housin funds, ella awaiucd u- develvNc+a ba-M off al/ open, competitive process. i this RFQ and the process of designating sponsors will provided that competitive process. A developer will be deemed an MHOP sponsor when MPHA selects the developers based their qualifications and the developers have participated in a training session r n - rnviricd by MPHA.. Rath for -pmf+t and non - profit developers are ins,, ri1n� in +++ie. n�nnr�e -o {nin+ l�Gn�11rGC � T�r1n r•iat /e(/1T1R1P+1t A11t1I1PC bath non - I..v . uvcv 111 u,w rl..w.,..,. .v... v ......v.. •a �^ - - r --- - --- - - oLi - :u ..J e .3 . +.,,,.�•,... ...cu �� 1- 41lisit:on and profs and for p o =t, are Petri Ilitcu. Ircw WlIJU 6b-. 1 �.S 4Vy V. rehabilitation development activities are included in this process. -fy- O�'d 90S9�bb6 Ol N ()o N019NIHSHM TOOT UHdw WOdd 6Z:OZ L66Z- 8z -6dw 10129196 Local Administering Jurisdictions Process Local iurisdictions are encouraged to enter into arrangements which establish a multi -year MHOP commitment and to be designated as a Local Administering Jurisdiction.. This allows a jurisdiction to reach agreement on what .�r.nrr.nr:��4 fnr ♦h�tv► F�t hn��i +f+� lift of +ho 4�UnD , $n 4r ila v t0 plan fo 'u � ciN�, vN, aa. w, u � „ a v g, c a u u, of a► ,w a n 6--fa , ,. av and manage that participation, and to have control over MHOP in their area. When a jurisdiction is designated as a Local Administering Jurisdiction developers seeking to undertake MHOP only developments would deal directly with the jurisdiction, not MPHA for their funding. A Local Administering Jurisdiction may be a municipality or a county in cases where the authority to operate public housing exists at the county level. C°`l°ral �'.:r: *A!'ti0. ^.S j0ir;in� sn�+c�hor t r-„rcata _ inint_ pM.gerc board CO ld also I —. �... w co llectively be a' Local Ate'^^:^: ^•2 ^g ' , ^s ^'~o^ A' ^cal AIrrinisterrig ai a-v w „u upa ri, � vZ... v..... ... w Jurisdiction may allocate all MHOP responsibilities to its HRA. Such a muiti -year commitment allows a jurisdiction to work with the Metropolitan Council in setting affordable housing goals that are consistent with the Livable Communities Act. The Metropolitan Council's Investment Plan which distributes MHOP units by county will provide guidance for a jurisdiction on an appropriate MHOP share. Mph to w.!! r and _ 1 0—cal AdminiSterrg Jurisdictions upon pr esentatio� �� of u e 1 i ng_ a generai statement of housing need which can include maleiial prepared for the local submission for Livabie Communities. a requested amount for a multi -year MHOP allocation . a plan and time schedule for use of the MHOP allocation .r..,a:r....,�:..., ssc. �..., ^1 • IU tUlt%. ,..M.. ,..:1! iw+s�lrarnon� fhc IIAlJ(1D m«iiti - vf�ar Ci iU%44 1 VI U I� ncy Pcr.7V� it G, ... .v ssu6 u ,.Y.v, w• •♦ v .�/ J v• plan. agreement to submit an annual progress report to MPi iA Ic'd 90S98tt6 01 N 00 NO1nNIHSON TOOT dHdW woaj 0£:0Z L66Z- ez -�Jdw 1 0129 /96 Being a Locai Administering Jurisdiction wiii allow f3exibiiity and control in several ways as follows: The Jurisdiction would deal directly with developers interested in developing projects in the Jurisdiction and would have control over all MHOP funding provided to the jurisdiction. The local government will have to onaw,ro ±f,orc was an open anri r�mro4i iva nrne-pcc for awarding MHOP funds. • T he jurisdiction could allow five percent of the NIHOP units to have higher incomes, up to 80 percent of the area median income. • The jurisdiction could have more flexibility as to the bedroom mix of the MHOP units. The bedroom distribution could be for the program activities as a whole and bedroom mix could, therefore be more flexible on a project by project basis. • Tl;a �u�i,�viwivri w ^ u iu iicib`c .i�vr i��n,uii j` v�8 ui$.i�i rrsrf am priorities. As with tie bedroom mix requirements, a jurisdiction would need to achieve the required standards, but for the WrIUCI program as a whole not for each project or activity. Although it would have fiexioiiity, a jurisdiction would have to achieve the Minneapolis priorities in a proportional manner. It would not be acceptable to provide ail or most of the 30 percent local residents before serving the Minneapolis priorities. s D.;urig dict�on would he ab!e to cperate its MHOP program faster and with rrnro p�riGnr•\P i+.rie �irlinn gun ++iii for avmm�io iVo -=-H= fr1 }?ke 1&1%0, , a II_'_' .-Y. A jiurisdiV i cr % , \�VyIV, a Virs.. rr.v, .t. ,....�...... r lan .r .+.. ..:�P.... i..,.,, rY a . nnnnrh +n o au van n a u, land an proper ny acq „uv, A u . 1.. /8 u3�i� el,r as vi.t✓v. w..3t3..S arose since resources are within local control. The multi-year commitment amount would be viewed tlexibiy and not be a cap on participation. If a local administering jurisdiction decided it desired greater MHOP participation than originally agreed to, more MHOP units Could be provided, subject to funding availability. n^+ . t ^L'�iv °d in ra%r;a% , .�. $Yrrn :r71 r an dertsi�ns ab out the use of MHOP funds wher, a J u risdiction has its co, wn., ACC. T h,e Local Administering Jurisd iction would receive the adi i it n u a fin I + ceS avaiiavia u1ni -i the ACC. A Locai Administering .jurisdiction wouid typicaily be expected to involve a separate ACC, but it need not rf the jurisdiction preferred to have a joint ACC. in cases where a jurisdiction is unable or unwilling to enter into its own multi -year ACC but joins with a larger entity with HRA authority, these flexibiliities will be provided to that entity. The focal iurisdiction would negotiate how it will par*.:C:r^.a�e ;,, 1< .J ►Z,gfrins with t},at amity. In such rases MPHA would also have no further role or project a pproval. Each proposal seiecied TO MrIv fundir � g wiii always be auuje�i to approval by HUD even with local administration.. -2 - cc 'd 9099etrG 01 N OH NOiDNIHSHM TOOT HHdw w0�l-� 02:OT L66T- 9Z -aIdW . C . 10/29/96 Where to Apply Developers The application process for developers is as follows: When MHOP units are to be used in a development to be financed on ::nju^ w�o- -� State fi.'rds, Uvable Ccrn .,unifies or Family H ousing Fund resources, application should be made to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency as part of its Super RrP Process. 1*v*IM"V funds as well as these other funds will be awarded. in a single application process. When developments include MHOP units only, application should be made to MPHA. MPHA has established a qualification process for developer participation. 11tfi,cn � ;t Incrli�4inn is a I n.+7f drink ; ^.:Sf£' ^?� �:.'r!a�lG`t:L�n �lcyai��ar5 Si?4uld � IVI y1 �41• VM. MVI V VVVMI .MI .l apply directly to the jurisdiction. Jurisdictions • Jurisdictions wishing to be Local Administering Jurisdictions should Contact MPHA • Jurisdictions wishing to undertake proiects without becoming a Local Administering Jurisdiction should Contact MPHA. For More Information " ontact: All general information questions should be addressed to MPHA which has overall administrative responsibility for MHOP. Charles T. Lutz Mi- neapolis Public Housing Authority I A " %Al n +ten At I�-- A�nr4M+ tVV 1 •to I i&.V%VI1 r 11V I VIat1 iV1ii i ieapo 1 1 innesota 55401- (612).342-1471 -22- 22 'd 9OS98VVG Ol N 6H NOiDNIHSHM TOOT dHdW WOad T£:OT L66T- 8c - b1dw CERTIFICATE L Susan E. Seel, Assistant to the Executive Director and Board of Commissioners of the Minneapolis Public Housing Authority in and for the City of Minneapolis, do hereby certify that the attached RESOLUTION was duty adopted at a regular meeting ofthe Board of Commissioners of ssid Az ihflr:ity, held on March 25, 1997 and is a trr- -e and cor.xt copy of the RESOLUTION adopted at said meeting and on file and of record in the off,cial Minutes of said Authority. IN WITNEM E 'hE ®F, I have hereunto set my hand and the seal of said Authority this 27th day of March, 1997. I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT IAM DULYAUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THIS CERT IFICA TIE. /j iJ n E. Seel' (SEAL) tz'd 90S98ttr6 01 N nd N019NIHSHM TOOT UHdw WOaj i2:OL L66i- 8c -bdw gh i Revi� Item No. 2 MI NNEAPOLIS PUBLic H ous iNC A umoRrnr March 26, 1997 REPORT TO THE COMMISSIONERS FROM: Cora McCorvey, Executive Director SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Execution of Cooperation Agreement with Carver County HRA for 54 Units Replacing Previous Resolution Passed by the Board APPROVED .wious Directives In October 1996 the Board of Commissioners passed a resolution a Cooperation and Initial Agreement with Carver County for two units in the East ek Carriage Homes development in Chaska_ is action. 1 V � " adcn tV a r esid nt cou11cL Is n, applicable ►.V KI: All costs associated with this project will be paid out of Hollman funds. native Action Complianc Th Carver County HRA and Duffy Development Co. written affirmative action plans. ,TNMN D A 11'Q V It is r ecomm ended tha'a the B o ard of Commissione the attached resolution authorizing the Board Chairperson and Executive • or her designee to enter into a Cooperation Agreement with the Carver Housing and Redevelopment Authority for 54 Hollman replacement units in Staff has been working with Carver County and John Duffy for the past several. months and :n October 1 996 rec arYrCva; +.,,. Bcarw for the Cooperation and ^ dtital Agreements for rwo Metmpolitan Housing Opportunities Program (1ViiOP) units in East Creek C"rldge iiUmcs in Chaska. Two events have occurred, since that time, necessitating a change in the original Cooperation Agreement approved by the Board: 1) MHOP units in the Duffy development have been increased to four, and 2) the Executive Director of the Carver County HRA has made the decision to change the Agreement to reflect the total number of MHOP units committed to Carver County. The outcome of Board approval for the new Cooperation Agreement will be that the Carver County HRA will hold the ACC for development of 54 l�fiH-OP units, + "cludi_ng the units in the East Creek Carriage Homes in Chaska. This report was prepared by Dorothy Jacobs. For further information, call 342 -1215. DOCUMENT NO. � SE 90998tb6 01 N r1d NOiONIHSOM TOOT dHdW W08J Z£:OT L66t- 8Z - 2JHW ;AE MLNIN OLIS PUBLIC HOUSING AL"M Pi AND FOR THE CTTY OF NnNT_VEAPOLIS RESOLUTION NO. 4 7 - 47 Ft SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF THE COOPERATION AGREEMENT WHEREAS the Minneapolis Public Rousing Authority in and " for the City of Minneapolis( the "MPHA ") holds an Annual Contributions Contract ( "MPHA ACC ") from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Project ( "HUD " for finding the capita! and operating costs of low rent public housing units and projects throughour the Minneapolis -SL Paul Twin Cities metropolitan area prow -- - to ! =, cert::: c-,== decre =.:^-ed is Umwd States District Court (the "Consesu Dr-c-ee "); and V4EMAS, the - has c stabu3ltcri the ivMctropoliun Rousing OppottunitY Program ( "N IHOP ") pur to which it will cooperate with subuioan. counties and muaicipauties in the construction and operation of qualified housing units ( the "MHOP Units "); and WHEREAS, the Carver County Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA ") has applied to the MPHA to locate fifty -four (54) MHOP Units to be constmcmd or acquired by private developers and/or the MLA in various scattered housing developments (the "Developtueuts " w be located witluu the County of Carver (the "County "); and WHEREAS, the 14RA proposes to seek aY pro`JSI from the Cou nty for the exemPtion of the _M_HOP Ut+12S from nrrsr,P •,g.. ; * ;.. .,..a i.• tile... nz t�...o.,.., ..re rates t . _, -.. v :l s..... :.v� ttt�.��� w w tK'�w�ra�a iu u v: pnr.-U=t to Mix3res0tr7 Statutes, §469.040; and %'l:MREAS, the vehicle I p ro p os i ng such tax tteBXtneai i5 a Cooperation Agreernem between and among the 11�i'ir HA, HR.A and County. and NOW, i REREs=OR.E. BE i"I' RL,SOLVED: 1. That the MPHA shall enter into a Cooperation Agreement in substantially the attached form. 2. That the Chairman and Executive Director of the ?PHA arc authorized to execute said Cooperation Agreement on behalf of said MPHA. 3. That the ChaiT:n - -- . d Exec --":e D irector ore authorised m make such changes is said Cooperuior. Ag-: = .r :t as are ,-lot ;nconsistcnt with the spirit and purpose thereof. 4. . That this Resolution shall take effect immediately. Dated: 9c ' d 9099evr•6 Ol rj ()o NOJON I HSHM TOOT ldHdw w0aj c2 : of L66t- 8Z -8UW 02/26/97 11:27 HOLMMES & GALEY, LTD. (612) 288 -9400 P. 005 ESC u s 0 C G Y Mirth 26.199 COOPERATION AGREEMENT This Agreement made and entered into this day of _ .1997, by and between the Minneapolis Public Housing Authority in and for the City of Minneapolis ("MPHA "), ( "HRA") (collectively sometimes known as the "Local Authorities ") and Carver County, Stale of Minnesota (the "County") WIT'11 in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, and c o n ditioned upon approval of local developments by the appropriate local officials ( "City Officials ") la accordance with law and in the normal course, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Whenever used in this Agreement: (a) The term "Units" means up to fifty -tour (54) units of low -rent housing in one or more developments hcrcaftxs acquired or developed, or caused to be acquired or developed by the Local Authorities with financial assistance of-the United Staics of America a�ting r1;rpL the S c��P��.3T�f pf T- 7o�_.Sine ind T T-rba» DevPlors (tag ,. Government ") in the County. (b) The term "Taxing Body" or 'Taxing Bodies" means the State of Mituiesota and any and all political subdivisions or taxing units thereof in which the Units are situated and which would have authority w assessor Ievy real or personal property taxes, or to certify such taxes to a taxing body or public officer, u) be levied for its use and benefit with respect to the Units if they was not exempt from such taxation, and on whose behalf the County is authorized to act pursuant to Mimwsora Srarutes, Section 469.012 subdivision 1, clause (10). (c) The te*_?n "Shelter Rent the ro of all charges to all tenants of the Units for dwelling rents and nondweiling rents (excludinb all othtr income of the Units), less the cost to the Owner of all dwelling and nondwelling utilities. (cif IIe tern "owner" meariL the tile.~ 0i a pF'vai2 own Pu Lizril tO "A i 941, Subpart F ( "Mixed Finance Development Regulations "). The Local Authorities shall endeavor. (a) to secure a contract with the Government for capital grants and antutal contributions for the Units and an agreement with the Government to reformulate 17: tAiNN1 '_5`•1wr.A(JCJ�000DnC,2.[XX 1 COOPERATION ACRL•L 0- Jr MPK4JC:ARVf R (XltJN'I'Y I lIt ` V OF CARVER Lc'd 90S98tr6 01 N nd NOigNIHSUI TOOT UHdw woad cz:01 L66i- 8Z -aUw an existing MPHA Annual Contributions Contract ("ACC ") and execute an ACC L for capital grants and annual contributions for a part or all of the Units; and ,^ 1 (b) to develop or acquire, or assist in the development or acquisition, and administer the Units. 3. (a) Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes. Section 469.040, the Units are ° tempt from a!1 real and personal property taxes !evied or imposed by ary Taxing Body for so long as (i) the Units are owned by a public body or governmental agency and are used for public housing purposes, (ii) the Units are subject to the requirements of Section 5 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (the "Act' }, (iii) the contract be - tween the Local Authorities and the Government in connection with the Units continues to obiigare them to assist the Units as a public housing project, or (iii) the contracts between the Local Authorities and an Owner in connection with the Units continues to obligate the Owner to operate the Units as public housing (the "Exemption Period "). (b) During the Exemption Period, *_he County, on behalf of the Taxing Bodies, agrees that it will not levy or impose .+:y -"l or pers.^.r,al pro ,►y taxes upon the Units or upon. the Owner with respect thereto. In the case of developments consisting of pubic Rousing unit; located within and under common private ownership, the property tax taxes and property tax exemption shall be determined as follows: (1) the tax capacity of the total development shall be multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which equals the total number of public housing Units in the development and the denominator of which equals the total number of housing units in the development and (ii) the product thereof shall be deducted from said tax capacity. Y(c) During the Exemption Per_od, the Owner shall t^..ke, or cz::se to trade, annual payments in liet, of t„. Yeo ( "DTT OT ") it p8�j i, eit ,ur th pu bl :c services and facilities f,;, from time to time without other cost or charge for or with re Yect M dhe Units. Each PILO shall be made at the time when real property taxes are paid, and shall be in an amount equal to either (i) five percent (5 %) of the Shelter Rent actually collected but in no event to exceed five percent (5 %) of the Shelter Rent charged with respect to the Units during the preceding calendar year, or (ii) the amount permitted to be paid by ap p licable State law in effect on the date such payment is made. (d) Pursuant to Minnesota Start es, S 46-9.040, r ty shall distribute the ML OT Amon the Taxing- Bodies in •�•° '7+iiiCh tie feel ••� C v$ Me yrOYvu,uu n�nnP � tovoo ,Ahi`� Wo'd h &vc been paid to each 7 1 1 axing $ody or such year if 'he "' ^..:5 were not exempt `rota taxation; provided; however, dud no payment for ai ►y year shall be made to any Taxing Body in excess of the amount of the real property taxes which wouid have been paid to such Taxing Body for such year if the Units were not exempt from taxation. TXWNN 12S=7%D0CSC(X)PAC2. DOC Bc'd 90999tt6 2 COOPfAAMN AGAF.FWNT 01 N 00 N019NIHSUM TOOT dHdW WOad 22 :OT L65T- 8c - ?IUW (e) In the event the PILOT is not paid, no lien against the Units or assets of the Local Authorities shall attach, nor shall any interest or penalties accrue or attach on account thereof 4. During the Exemption Period, the County, or other appropriate Taxing Body, without cost or charge to the 01.11ner or tenants of the Units (other than PILOT ), but consistent with plans approved by the City Officials in accordance with law and in the normal course, shall: (a) Furnish or cause to be furnished to the Units public services and facilities of the same character and to the same extent as are furnished from time to time without cost or charge to other dwellings and inhabitants in the County; (b) Vacate or sup the vacation of such streets, roads, and alleys within the area of the Units as may be necessary in the development thereof, and convey wi:ftut charge to the Owner such interest as the County, or other Taxing Body may have i such vaC3tet_l «re.°.. °Q; ?aa ^.C:, tr. S fit as it is iawtully able to do so without cost or expense to the Owner, cause to be removed or support the removal from such vacated areas, in so far as it may be necessary, ail public or private utility lines and equipment; (c) In so far as the County or other Taxing Body may lawfully do so, (i) grant or support the granting of such deviations from the building code of the County or other Taxing Body as are reasonable and necessary to promote economy and efficiency in the development and administration of the Units, and at the saute time safeguard health and safety, and (ii) make or support. the making of such changes in any zoning of the site and surrounding territory of she Units as are rs'wonable and recc wy r the d a r ess�.., f......., yy an �rot2C«On o the U nits and the surrounding territory; (d) Accept or support the acceptance of grants of easements necessary for the Units; and (e) Cooperate with the Owner by such other lawful action or ways as the County or other Taxing Body and the Owner may find necessary in connection with the development and administration of the Units. S. In the initial development of :%e Units, the County further agrees, on behalf of all Taxing Bodies, that within a reasonable time after receipt of a written request therefor from the Owner: (a) That it will accept or support the acceptance of the dedication of all inteiior streets, roads, alleys, and adjacent sidewalks within the area of the Units ( "Unit Site "), together with all storm and sanitary sewer mains in such dedicated areas, after the Owner of the Units, at its own expense, has completed the grading, improvement, pavine. and installation thereof in accordance Nvith specifications acceptable to the County or other Taxing $ody; 0 - N125\007DOCS�CO0PAGZ.D0C 6Z•d 9OS99rrG COOPF.RATlON AGRF.F.MFNT MVMA/CARVF.R COUNTY MRA /COLWN Of CARVER 01 N O1j N019NIHSHM TOOT HHdW Woa-i b2:OT L66Z- 8c -aUW 10. In the event an Owner is other then the Local Authorities, the Local Authorities shall cause the duties and responsibilities of an Owner described herein to be set forth in various contractual agreements between, the Local Authorities and the Owner and to be binding upon the Owner as though it was a signatory hereto. D: \MNN I2S\OOTDOCS.CQOPA02.r= 5 COOPSIAMON AGRF.F.%4FNT MWAICARVER COUNTY HRAicoVNTYOFCARVER OD'd 9OS98bb5 01 N Ad N019NIHSOM TOOT dHdW W0? V2:OT L65T 8c -�JdW THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CARVER By Its And by Its CARVER COUNTY, !MINNESOTA By Its And by Its This Document Drafted by: Holmes & Galey, Ltd. 1200 One Financial Plaza 120 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 612-298-9300 612 - 288- 9400(Fax) D:' 123 W o7tir"S%CC)OPAG2.iXK TZ'd 90S9817b6 7 COOPMAT70N AGRF.F.MFW COUN INPHAiCARVER TY MAXOUNTYOf CARVER 01 N nd NOiONIH8dM TOOT dHdW WOd--J S£:OT L66T- 8r -60W Carver County Housing & Redevelopment Authority Board of Directors Appointments not to exceed three five-year tem 5 District I Term Expiration Stan Hamerski, Chairman Third 12 -31 -00 7668 South Shore Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 (612) 934 -8905 District II c;aroi Unmtn, secretary / 505 Angle Ave NW Watertown, MN 55388 First 12 -31 -98 (612) 955 -1331 District III Bob Lano, Member 809 Martingale Drive Young America, MN 55397 (612) 467 -4353 District VI Kenneth Frey, Vice Chairman 204 Main Street East Carver, MN 55315 First First 12 -31 -01 12 -31 -97 (612) 448 -5353 District V First 12 -31 -99 Cal Haasken, Member 9840 County Rd 43 Chaska, MN 55318 (612) 448 -3344 05/t4/97 WED 15:38 FAX 6 544 0 999 1000 WAYZATA BLVD Memorandum V 4 FAX 937 -5739 TO. Don Ashworth From: Mark Senn Date. 0511411997 Subject: city Hall Expwsion Some of the questions I have area as follows: 1) What specifically has increased General Conditions by $6,000 and when did Council take specific action to increase the expenses by that sum as required by the conditions of our original approval? 2) Y thought the Construction Management was a set fee ( a tnax amount ) under our approval ? Why has it increased and please provide the Council action increasing it previously as referenced because I don't recall any such review or authorization to increase? 3) This update seems to indicate that $40,000 of the contigency has been spent. Council, in their approval specifically required any use of the contingency to be approved in advance by the Council and to date Council actions have not been taken on anything that I can recall to provide such authorization. Could you please provide the documentation ? Please provide a detailed and specific list of expenses included in the proposed $40,000 ? 4) Please provide all the detail on the $34,000 Council Chamber renovation as well as any Council actions approving a plan, a level of expense, or any such thing ? 5) Please provide the full detailed expenses associated with the project regardless of whether or not they were part of the Anncon contract ? ie; the $100,000+ of added FFE expenses, the retaining wall, the kitchen etc_ 1ilso, please provide the documentation and minutes where the Council agreed to and authorized these additional expenses ? 6) Is the City Hall expansion fund a seperate fund and is a seperate acccount at the bank? If there is any question that you don't understand please don't hesitate to ask me for any clarifications. la 002 noL AMCO/V CM 200 West Highway 13 Burnsville, MN 55337 Voice: 612- 890 -0439 Fax: 612 -890 -0064 City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter `Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attention: Don Ashworth, City Manager Subject: Councilman Senn Memo 5/14/97 Dear Mr. Ashworth: May 15, 1997 I have reviewed the request for additional information as requested. Attached is an itemized breakdown of the changes since the original contracts were approved by the Council. While we have kept this list up to date from the start, I have added the two columns labeled "Contingency" and "Council Chambers" in order to provide the detail requested. In doing this, I find that the summary I presented the other night was in error. The total changes of $74,000 was correct, however, the breakdown between the two categories was not. We have not kept track of contract changes by budget category until this request, and I had presented my assumed split without verifying the actual amounts. I apologize for the incorrect information. Regarding item 1, the general conditions was an estimate, not a contract or fixed amount. It was based upon our original discussions and assumptions that we could complete the entire project in December. Once we started, it became clear through our discussions with staff of various departments that there was simply not enough room to move people around to accommodate the renovations. We had to wait until the addition was completed and moved into prior to starting the renovations. This added about two months to the overall schedule which increased supervision costs. Regarding item 2, at a previous council meeting prior to construction, we had presented an analysis of the original schedule and the revised schedule for the project. Based on the delay in starting construction from Fall 95 to Spring 96, we had requested that increase. During that extended period, we continued to meet with staff and Council to review options for the project. This request was discussed in the Council meeting although no formal action was initiated. We do not intend to request an increase in the Fee due to the construction schedule extension noted above. I hope that the information is adequate. If not, or if you have any questions, please let me know and I will address them. Sincerely Amcon CM J - Professional Construction Management