7a. Autumn Ridge 3rd Addition: Preliminary & Final Plat.CITY OF
C
PC DATE: August 20, 1997 -----
CC DATE: September 8, 1997
CASE M 93-5 PUD
By: Generous : v
STAFF. REPORT
PROPOSAL: Preliminary and Final Plat to Replat of Lots 1 -9, 16 and 17, Block 1, Autumn Ridge
2nd Addition into •21 Lots, Autumn. Ridge 3rd Addition.
i
LOCATION: Northwest corner of Galpin Boulevard and Coulter Boulevard
APPLICANT: Ray Brandt Scenic Enterprises
1600 W. 143 St. #206 18033 Cedar Avenue
Burnsville, NN 55306 Farmington, MN 55024
(612) 751 -7479
PRESENT ZONING: PUD, Planned Unit .Development
ACREAGE: 9.57 acres
DENSITY: 7.5 3 units per acre
ADJACENT ZONING
AND LAND USE: N - PUD and A2, Highway 5
S - Autumn Ridg e I s ' and 2 nd Additions
E OI, Galpin Blvd., Bluff :Creek Elementary School
W - PUD and A2 Autumn Ridge 2 nd Public Open Space
ace
p
WATER AND SEWER:' Installed on site.
PHYSICAL CHARACTER.: The site has been prepared for development as part of the Autumn
Ridge 2nd Addition.
2000 LAND USE PLAN: Medium Density Residential
Autumn Ridge 3 rd
g Addition`
August 20, 1997
Page 2
PROPOSAL/SUMMARY
The applicant is requesting a replat of Lots 1 -9, 16 and 17, Block 1, Autumn Ridge 2 nd Addition
i pp into 21 lots, Autumn Ridge 3 d Addition, creating two lots for each one lot previously platted except
for Lot 4. The applicant is proposing this replat so they do not have to fire sprinkler the buildings,
rather fire protection/delay will be provided through the use of longer fire -rated walls. In addition,
the applicant is proposing the extension of the berming to the north along Galpin Boulevard to
provide additional screening for the development. The extension of the berming eliminates one tree
which shall be replaced at a two to one ratio. Except for the replatting and the extension of the
berming, the development will be the same as was originally approved including nine 8 -unit, one 6-
unit, and one 4 -unit townhouse on these lots.
BACKGROUND
On February 26, 1996, the Chanhassen City Council approved the Planned Unit Development
(PUD #93 -5) for the 12.34 acres rezoning the property from A2 to PUD and final plat approval for
Autumn Ridge 2 nd Addition creating 25 lots. On October 23, 1995, the City Council approved a
site plan for a residential medium density development containing one 2 -unit, two 3 -unit, two 4-
unit, one 6 -unit, and nine 8 -unit townhouses with the preliminary plat for Autumn Ridge 2nd
Addition subject to final development approval for the PUD.
STREETS /ACCESS
All roadways and private streets have been installed. Roads still require the installation of a wear
coat.
LANDSCAPING/TREE PRESERVATION
The proposed extension of the berming along Galpin Boulevard eliminates one tree. This tree shall
be replaced by two conifers with a minimum height of seven feet.
GRADING/DRAINAGE
The proposed grading plan extends the berming along Galpin Boulevard approximately 100 feet to
the north. The developer shall execute an addendum to the development contract for the Second
Addition to incorporate the Third Addition.
UTILITIES
All utilities have been installed as part of the Second Addition.
Autumn Ridge 3 rd Addition
August 20, 1997
Page 3
FINDINGS
1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance;
• 'vision meets all the indm .The subdivision requirements of the PUD district. i q
with all applicable city, 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent pp county and regional plans
p
includin g but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan;
Flndm :The proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable plans.
3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils,
vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water
p tY
drainage are suitable for the proposed development;
• is suitable for development Finding: proposed site subject to the conditions p
specified in this report.
4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage,
sewage disposal, streets , erosion control and all other improvements required by this
chapter;
ed subdivision is served. b adequate urban infrastructure.
Finding: The proposed Y
5 The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage;
. p
• The proposed subdivision will not
. cause p p . cause environmental damage.
proposed 6. ro
The osed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record.
F The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but
lndln :
rather will expand and provide all necessary easements.
7. The proposed
subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the
.
following exists:
a q
. Lack of adequate' storm water drainage.
b. Lack of adequate roads.
C. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems.
d. Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems.
Autumn Ridge PAddition
August 20, 1997
Page 4
Findin : The proposed subdivision is provided with adequate urban infrastructure.
PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE
On August 20, 1997, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to discuss the item. The
Planning Commission voted four in favor and none against a motion recommending approval of the
plat for Autumn Ridge 3 rd Addition subject to the conditions of the staff report.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following motion:
"The Ci ty approves Council a preliminary and final plat for PUD 93 -5 for Autumn Ridge 3rd
p rY
Addition, to re p lat Lots 1 -9, 16 and 17, Block 1, Autumn Ridge 2 nd Addition into 21 Lots, as shown
on the plans prepared by Brandt Engineering and Surveying, dated July 18, 1997, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The proposed extension of the berming along Galpin Boulevard eliminates one tree. This tree
shall be replaced by two conifers with a minimum height of seven feet.
2. The developer shall execute an addendum to the development contract for the Second Addition
to incorporate the Third Addition.
3. The applicant shall provide a copy of the final soils report for the subdivision as well as a copy
of the final grading plan for the entire subdivision prior to issuance of any building permits.
4. The building designer should meet with the Inspections Division review staff to discuss design
and permit requirements before finalizing building plans."
ATTACHMENTS
1. Development Review Application
2. Memo from Mark Littfin to Robert Generous dated August 6, 1997
3. Letter From Robert Generous to Joe Miller Dated March 7, 1996
4. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List
5. Planning Commission Minutes of August 20, 1997
6. Plans dated July 18, 1997
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
(612) 937.1900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
APPLICANT Qf
ADDRESS: )6UD
R�IZNSti�ILLE. /Y1A S
TELEPHONE (Daytime) / S( 7 q 7a
�VRCtti�5f2t D;I�I- wW?J�,i�;Gli
3 q s d WAO)W&N
Ct�N,r�t� SSI22-
OWNER: 5c 1 C GPI ER
ADDRESS: lc 7 TU� -
Fj��Gl il1,ti' S SDz4
TELEPHONE: `1'b9 4066
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Temporary Sales Permit
Conditional Use Permit
Vacation of ROW /Easements
Interim Use Permit
Variance
Non conf ormin 9 Use Permit
Wetland Alteration Permit
Planned Unit Development
Zoning Appeal
Rezoning nin
_____ Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Sign Permits
Sign Plan Review
Notification Sign So . f- tvj)
_ Si Plan Review*
� Escrow for Filing Fees /Attorney Cost *� _
�� r
($50 CUP /SPR /VAC /VARIWAP /Metes 0,
and Bounds, $400 Minor SUB)
... . -� �
Subd�v�s�on ���- ` �- ,� �.�.
TOTAL FEE $
A list o property
f all owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the
application.
Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews.
*Twenty-six full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, Including an 8' /z" X 11 " reduced copy of
transparency for each plan sheet.
** Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract
NOTE - When multip app lications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application.
PROJECT NAME
LOCATION J
LEGAL DESCRIPTION 7 "
t q
:,'�.- �.� DAD l 1
TOTAL ACREAGE
WETLANDS PRESENT YES )< -NO
PRESENT ZONING
REQUESTED ZONING
PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION
REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION Is
REASON FOR THIS REQUEST '7 �� V1
�_ --
LOT
- his application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied b II
City Ordinance provisions. Before Ellin p Y a information
Ind plans required by applicable Cit p g this application, you should confer with the Planning
)eparfinent to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements 'applicable to PP
our application.
Y
determination of completeness of the application shall be made within ten business days of application submittal.
once of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within t pp A written
pp en business days of application.
'his is to certify that I am making application for the described action b the Ci n
y y a d that I a m responsible for complying with
ll City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in m name and i am the a
to this ' application. i Y p whom ie City should contact regarding any matter pertaining pp have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either
spy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or i am the authorized erson to mal<
its application and the fee owner has also signed this application. p e
will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the ro ress of this application. I
ed for consulting f p g pp further
�derstand that additional fees may be charged g ees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any
ithorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of
y knowledge.
ie city hereby notifies the applicant that development
quirements and agency review. Therefore, the city is
;tension for development review. Development revie
;tensions are approved by the applicant.
gnature I Applicant
xz
5nature of Fee Owner
review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public hearing
notifying the applicant that the city requires an automatic 60 day
�w shall by ,completgd within 120 days unless additional review
t Ai V
-� ` /7
Date
Date
r .
C7 ,
)placation Received on Fee Paid ,..
Receipt No.`
ie applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting.
p e a pplicant's address
not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to th a y p 9
.
C T IY OF
SSE
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937 -1900 0 FAX (612) 937 -5739
MEMORANDUM
TO: Robert Generous, Senior Planner r
FROM: Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal
DATE: August 6, 1997
SUBJECT: preliminary CT: Re uest for relimina plat to re -plat Lots 1 -9, 16, & 17, Block 1, Autumn Ridge 2nd
Addition into 21 lots located at the southwest corner of Highway 5 & Galpin Boulevard, Autumn Ridge
3r Addition, D R Horton, Inc.
Planning Case 93 -5 PUD
I have preliminary e reviewed the relimiplat review for the above project. In order to comply with the
Y p
Chanhassen Fire Department /Fire Prevention Division, I have the following fire code or city re reliminary plat review was done based on the available information
ordinance/policy requirements. The p i
submitted at t p g
his time. If additional plans or changes are submitted, the appropriate code or policy items
will be addressed.
No comments or concerns at this time.
ML /be
g As afety \ml \pl rev93 -5
CITY OF
C SSEI�
690 COULTER DRIVE 0 P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937 -1900 0 FAX (612) 937 -5739
March 7, 1996
Mr. Joe Miller
Scenic Enterprises
18133 Cedar Avenue South
Farmington, MN 55024
Dear Mr. Mi ller:
Mr. Joe Miller
March 7, 1996
Page 2
6. Re p
Revise the landscaping plan to provide a more equitable distribution of trees, specifically 20
gp p
percent ornamentals, 30 p primary percent rim and secondary and 50 percent, conifers, and provide
additional rou in s of evergreens along the northern project boundary to prepare for the
g p g
possible future removal of the evergreens with the widening of Highway 5. Conifer trees
shall average seven feet with a minimum height of six feet.
hall be responsible for water quantity 7. The applicants p q tY and quality connection fees based on the
Surface Water Management Plan. Staff has calculated that the proposed development is
responsible for a water quantity feet of $33,092.00 and $12,000.00 for the use of the city's park
r
land for a stormwater pond.
8. The wetlands and wetland buffers shall be delineated on the grading and drainage plans. A
native buffer strip 10 feet in width should be maintained around the natural wetland. The buffer
strip for Wetland A shall be 18 to 38 feet wide with an average width of 28 feet. Wetland
buffer areas shall be surveyed and staked in accordance with the city's wetland ordinance. The
city will install wetland buffer edge signs before accepting the utilities and will charge the
applicant $20.00 per sign.
9. The developer shall construct an 8 foot wide asphalt trail per city specifications within a 20 -foot
wide trail easement. This construction shall be completed in conjunction with street
construction. Final alignment of this trail shall be staked by the developer and approved by the
Park and Recreation Director and City Engineer. The legal description of the trail easement
shall be prepared by the applicant after the trail location has been determined in the field.
10. The applicant may commence site grading after final plat approval and the applicant entering
into the Planned Unit Development Agreement and supplying the city with a financial security
to guarantee site grading, erosion control, and site restoration.
11. A condition shall be placed in the PUD/Development Contract notifying residences that
Coulter Boulevard will be extended in the future.
12. The applicant shall be responsible for the installation of street lights along the private streets
and Coulter Boulevard. The applicant and City staff shall work together to prepare a street
lighting plan to be incorporated into the street construction plans. The street lights along
Coulter Boulevard shall match the street lights placed along Coulter Boulevard east of Galpin
Boulevard. Spacing shall be 300 feet apart staggered on both sides of Coulter Boulevard.
13. The applicant will be required to enter into a PUD /development contract with the City and
provide the necessary financial security and administration fees to guarantee compliance with
the conditions of approval.
Mr. Joe Miller
March 7, 1996
Page 3
14. The applicant shall design and construct the street and utility improvements in accordance to
the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction
plans and specifications for the public improvements shall be submitted to City staff for review
and approval.
15. The applicant shall provide a copy of the covenants for review and approval by the City and
shall be filed at the County with the final plat documents.
16. The applicant shall provide "as- built" locations and dimensions of all corrected house pads or
other documentation acceptable to the Building Official.
17. The applicant shall apply for and obtain all necessary permits from the regulatory agencies such
as the MPCA, Health Department, Watershed District, DNR, Army Corps of Engineers,
MnDOT and Carver County Highway Department. The applicant shall also get the necessary
permits from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development to make sure that with the upgrading of Highway the development does
Y p
not exceed the noise standards established by those agencies.
18. The applicant shall report to the City Engineer the location of any drain tiles found during
construction. The applicant will comply with the City Engineer's direction as far as
abandonment or relocation of the drain tile.
19. Type III erosion control fencing will be required around the wetlands. The site may also
require additional erosion control fence on the slopes and/or temporary sediment basins.
20. Drainage and conservation easements shall be dedicated over all wetland areas within the
subdivision including outlots. Wetland mitigation measures shall be developed and subject to
approval by the City. The mitigation measures shall be completed in conjunction with the site
grading and restoration.
21. The final plat shall be contingent upon MnDOT's State -Aid office approving the construction
plans for Coulter Boulevard.
22. The private streets /driveways shall be constructed in accordance with the City's private
driveway ordinance for medium density zoning. Private driveways shall be a minimum of 24
feet wide (face -to -face) that serve more than four units. Driveways that serve four units or less
may be 20 feet wide (face -to- face).
23. The applicant shall provide a plan that assures that the variations in siding colors are in fact
implemented.
Mr. Joe Miller
March 7, 1996
Page 4
is ersed guest 24. The applicant shall provide d parking spaces within the project. p g p
25. A native seed mix shall be required where the stormwater pond is created.
' d Addition are not buildable and shall 6. Lots 15 and 18, Block 1, Autumn Ridge 2n be maintained for
• •
on open ace for the residents of Autumn Ridge 2nd Addition.
access and as comet p p
•
. The developer should assess the noise situation and take t he action deemed necessary to minimize the
27 p
impact of any traffic noise.
' two (2) 1 " Two m lars should be submitted, along with t equals 200' and 1 " equals 5 00' scale q
Y
• signatures. The executed Planned Unit Development contract
reduction mylars, for city g final
administration fees and an
document, security, admini Y easements should also be included with the
currents. Should ree to contact me.
plat do you have any questions, please feel f
Y
Sincerely,
Robert Generous, AICP
Senior Planner
BG:v
PC: Hempel, c: Dave H el, Asst. City Engineer
Steve Kirchman, Building Official
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PLANNING COMMISSION
Wednesday, August 20,1997
at 8:30 p.m.
City Hall Council Chambers
690 Coulter Drive
;UBJECT: Autumn Ridge 3rd Addition
Preliminary Plat Request
APPLICANT: D. R. Horton, Inc.
.00ATION: Southwest Corner of
Hwy. 5, and Galpin Blvd.
P AZIN1.
NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a proposal in your area. The
applicant, D. R. Horton, Inc., is requesting preliminary plat to replat Autumn Ridge 2nd
p
Addition into 21 lots located in the southwest corner of Hwy. 5 and Galpin Blvd., Autumn
Ridge 3rd Addition, D. R. Horton, Inc.
What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
developer's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the
meeting, the Commission Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps:
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
2. The Developer will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.
4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses project. The commission will then
make a recommendation to the City Council.
Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City
Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to
someone about this project, please contact Bob at 937 -1900 ext. 141. If you choose to submit
written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff
will provide copies to the Commission.
Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on August 7, 1997.
MID AMERICAN BAPTIST SOCIAL
SERVICES CORPORATION
2600 ARBORETUM BLVD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
LARRY & ELIZABETH VANDEVEIRE
4890 CO RD 10 E
CHASKA, MN 55318
J P'S LINKS INC
C/O JOHN PRZYMUS
642 SANTA VERA
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
C/O CITY TREASURER
690 COULTER DR P BOX 147
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
LUNDGREN BROTHERS CONST
& JAY DOLEJSI
935 WAYZATA BLVD
WAYZATA, M N 55391
JAMES L & LINDA J LEIRDAHL
2350 TIMBERWOOD DR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
STEVEN TAINTOR
2320 TIMBERWOOD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
Dale Wanniger
8170 Galpin Blvd.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Scenic Enterprises
18133 Cedar Ave. S.
Fannington, MN 55024
James Avis
8190 Galpin Blvd.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Jay Dolej si
6961 Chaparral Lane
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Lawrence Raser
8210 Galpin Blvd.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 20, 1997
Chairman Peterson called the meeting to order at 8:30 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Alison Blackowiak, Craig Peterson, LuAnn Sidney and Kevin Joyce
MEMBERS ABSENT: Ladd Conrad, Allyson Brooks and Bob Skubic
STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Planning Director; Bob Generous, Senior Planner; Dave
Hempel, Assistant City Engineer; Cynthia Kirchoff, Planner I; Jill Sinclair, Environmental
Resource Specialist; and Phillip Elkin, Water Resources Coordinator
PUBLIC HEARING:
PRELIMINARY PLAT TO REPLAT OF LOTS 1 -9,16 AND 17, BLOCK 1, AUTUMN
RIDGE 2 ND ADDITION INTO 21 LOTS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
OF HWY. 5 AND GALPIN BLVD. ., AUTUMN RIDGE 3" ADDITION D.R. HORTON
INC.
Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item.
Peterson: Any questions by commissioners?
Joyce: The question I have is why they don't need fire sprinklers.
Generous: The building code I believe is the number of units on the lot.
Joyce: So they're not adding anything?
Generous: They're not adding anything. They put the lot line down the common wall between
the back to back units.
Joyce: Oh, okay. So there's not as many units per lot.
Generous: Per individual lot.
Joyce: I see.
Peterson: Bob, we talk about extending the berm, and also as we talk about extending Highway
5 down the road, is that going to be affected at all?
Generous: No. It won't even be close to...
Plannin g Commission Meeting - August 20, 1997
Peterson. Okay
• . Othe r questions? Is the applicant or their designee wish to address the
q pp
Planning Commission?
with D.R. Horton. We a preciate the staff s support
Don Patton: Yes. My name is Don Patton w p
• clarification. It is really more of a square footage rather than number of
on this. Just a word of clarifica y .
• putting a I don't know what, 2 or 3 hour wall between this, but it
units in doing this, and by p g � .
it is an accepted method of dividing it. The other reason that this is
creates a separate entity so p
important, one of the
• State Statutes in setting up townhouses and condominiums, there are
different laws and regulations so the 2 Addition had I think it was 1.5 townhouses and 82
is also a way of clar condominiums in it so this y those association documents. Were there
any other questions for me?
Peterson: Questions?
Don Patton: Thanks very much.
. r a public hearing. May Peterson. Thank you. This item is open for p g Y I have a motion to open it so
and a second please?
owiak seconded too en the public hearing. The public hearing was
Joyce moved, Black p _
opened.
• wishing Peterson: This is a public hearing. Anyone g to address the Planning Commission, please
and address
come forward and state, your name lease. Seeing none, may I have a motion to p
close and a second, the public hearing please.
Joyce moved, Blackow
iak seconded to close the public hearing. The public hearing was
closed.
Peterson: Kevin, any thoughts?
Joyce. Ah no. It looks pretty straigh t forward. I don't see any problems with it.
• m. I'm ha to o along with the staff report.
Sidney. No proble happy g
Blackowiak: No comments.
' may I have.. a motion and a second please.
Peterson: I have no comments either. With that, y
• e Planning Commission recommends approval of PUD #93 -5
Sidney. Ill make the motion. Th g
rd ' ' re plat Lots 1 through 9, 16 and 17, Block 1, Autumn Ridge 2 nd
for Autumn Ridge 3 Addition to p g .
• • plans prepared b Brandt Engineering and Surveying dated
Addition into 21 lots as shown on the p p p y
July
18 1997 , subject ect to the following conditions 1 through 4.
�
Joyce: And I'll second that.
2
Planning Commission Meeting - August 20, 1997
Sidney moved, Joyce seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of
PUD #93 -5 for Autumn Ridge 3 rd Addition to replat Lots 1 through 9,16 and 17, Block 1,
Autumn Ridge 2 "d Addition into 21 lots as shown on the plans prepared by Brandt
Engineering and Surveying dated July 18, 1997, subject to the following conditions:
1. The proposed extension of the berming along Galpin Boulevard eliminates one tree. This
tree shall be replaced by two conifers with a minimum height of seven feet.
2. The developer shall execute an addendum to the development contract for the Second
Addition to incorporate the Third Addition.
3. The applicant shall provide a copy of the final soils report for the subdivision as well as a
copy of the final grading plan for the entire subdivision prior to issuance of any building
permits.
4. The building designer should meet with the Inspections Division review staff to discuss
design and permit requirements before finalizing building plans.
All voted in favor and the motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING:
AMEND A CONDITION OF THE INTERIM USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR A 32 SQ.
FT. MONUMENT SIGN AND AN 8 SQ. FT. VARIANCE FROM THE 24 SQ, FT,
MONUMENT SIGN REQUIREMENT, 850 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, DICK HENNING.
Cynthia Kirchoff presented the staff report on this item.
Peterson: Questions of staff?
Blackowiak: Sure, I have one question. There's a statement in here talking about the interim use
Terminating one year after the availability of water and sewer. When is that estimated
termination date?
Aanenson: That's something that will be discussed as part of the comprehensive plan update.
The staging of sewer and water improvements. This area will probably be the last area to be
brought in as far as sewer and water. If you looked at the consultants growth strategy, 2020. Our
city will probably be developed by then. So it could be 10 -15 years out.
Blackowiak: Okay, so then it still would be considered an interim use even though it's 10 to 15
years?
Aanenson: Correct. Yeah.