Loading...
10. Metes and Bounds Subdivision Request, Rice Lake Manor Estates, barry McKeei 1 1 1 1 1 1 f � CITY OF CHANHASSEN 1 0 PC DATE: May 15, 1996 CC DATE: June 10, 1996 CASE #: 96 -8 SUB STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: Metes and Bounds approval to subdivide a 7.05 acre parcel into two single family lots of 2.87 acres, and 4.18 acres, Rice Lake Manor Estates LOCATION: Lot 1, Block 1, Rice Lake Manor. East of Tigua Lane and southwest of Rice Marsh Lake APPLICANT: Barry McKee 324 South Main Street Suite 260 Stillwater, MN 55082 (612)430 -1717 PRESENT ZONING: RSF, Residenti Brenda Schaeffer 27306 County Road A Spooner, WI 54801 (612(635 -9545 al Single Family ACREAGE: 7.05 acres action by cny Adminl3fTeme Endoro- ✓ DW A DENSITY: 0.28 Units per Acre Moditi -d fieject�+ ADJACENT ZONING AND S" LAND USE: N - RSF; and Rice Marsh Lake Date submitted to Commission S- RSF; and R-4, Vacant Land - E - RSF; City owned Open Space Date Submitted to Council W - RSF; Residential Single Family WATER AND SEWER: Sewer and water are available to the site. PHYSICAL CHARACTER.: The site contains a single family residence and a shed. It is heavily wooded and contains wetlands. 2000 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density C k �tem te State ` J m — °= Chanhaeaen BoAt mInI p I Lak& Susan Hwe Yarsh Lake C I P (D X LU 0 & e cl e wn Is F&rk T B"di mere Heights r P"Jk 'BAndimere nu Lake Riley 0 Park 0 c C: R > I I Rice Lake Manor Estates June 10, 1996 Page 2 PROPOSAL /SUMMARY The applicant is requesting approval for a metes and bounds subdivision to subdivide a 7.05 acre ' site into 2 single family parcels. Parcel A will be available for future construction. Parcel B contains a single family home. The site is located southwest of Rice Marsh Lake and west of Tigua Lane. The site will be accessed via Tigua Lane off of a private driveway which will be shared by three homes. The proposed lots meet the minimum requirement of the Zoning Ordinance. The site generally slopes to the northeast. The natural drainage of the site will be maintained with this subdivision. ' The Park and Recreation Commission is recommending that park and trail fees be paid in lieu of park land. Staff believes that this plat request is a reasonable one and consistent with guidelines established by the city Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. We find it to be well designed. We are recommending that it be approved with conditions as outlined in the report. BACKGROUND On June 26, 1980, the City Council approved a subdivision of 39.8 acres into 8 single family lots, Rice Lake Manor. With this proposal, the applicant is proposing to subdivide Lot 1, Block 1, Rice Lake Manor, into two lots. SUBDIVISION The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 7.05 acre site into 2 single family lots. The density of the proposed subdivision is 0.28 units per acre. Both lots far exceed the minimum 15,000 square foot ' of area. Parcel A is proposed to have an area of 2.87 acres, and Parcel B, 4.18 acres. Parcel A will be reserved for future development. A shed is located on proposed Parcel A and needs to be removed prior to recording of the final plat. I I I A section of the existing home which is located on proposed Parcel B, straddles the property line and encroaches onto the parcel to the east (City owned land - Open Space). This section was added on sometime after the building permit was issued for the main structure. Staff does not have a record of this addition (a lean-to and a kennel) but we recommend that the applicant remedy the situation by removing these structures. F Rice Lake Manor Estates June 10, 1996 Page 3 A fence which appears to belong to a neighbor is shown on the north property line. There is no record of a permit for this fence. Permits are required for fences (CCC 20- 1017), and a fence may not be built on adjoining property (CCC 20- 1019). Staff has no way of determining when the fence was built or if the applicant was aware of the encroachment. The property to be split must meet code requirements, necessitating, at a minimum, removal of the section of fence violating the code. The applicant may wish to work with the neighbor in the removal of the noncomplying portion of the fence. What appears to be a deck is shown on the northwest corner of the house. Although the original permit appears to include a deck, it was not shown in its current location. It may have been built differently at the time of original construction or added later. A deck added later would have required a building permit. The applicant should determine when the deck was built and obtain an after the fact permit if a permit would have been required at the time of its construction. A structure is shown extending over the east property line. No structure regulated by the building code may cross a property line. This structure was not shown on the original survey, nor is there a record of a building permit for its construction. Any structure regulated by the code will require a permit and must be altered to comply with the building code and city code. Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. WETLANDS According to the wetland delineation performed by William Engelhardt and Associates, three wetlands have been identified on -site and they are described as follows: North Basin is part of the Rice Marsh Lake wetland basin and is Type 1, 2, 3 at different points along the shoreline. This wetland is on the Chanhassen Wetland Classification Map, the NWI Map, and the DNR Protected Waters Map. West Basin is an ag/urban wetland located along the western boundary of the site. The wetland extends off -site to the southwest; approximately 3/4 acres of wetland is on site. This wetland is part of City Wetland A24 -3(1) and is mapped as PEMCd. This wetland has been delineated as Type 1/2 and drains to a ditch wetland that eventually drains into Rice Marsh Lake. Southeast Basin is also an ag/urban wetland part of the drainage system that connects the West Basin to Rice Marsh Lake. It has also been identified as Type 1/2. I _ J 1 0 n 7 0 [J 11 Rice Lake Manor Estates June 10, 1996 Page 4 Reffulations The City administers the 1991 version of the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). It does not appear that a wetland replacement plan will be necessary for this project; however, improvements or changes to the existing drainage ditch will require mitigation and permits. In addition to the requirements of the WCA, the City also requires a buffer strip and buffer strip monumentation around the wetlands. The buffer strip width required for natural wetlands is 10 to 30 feet with a minimum average width of 20 feet and the buffer strip width required for an ag/urban wetland is 0 to 20 feet with a minimum average width of 10 feet. The principal structure setback for these wetlands is 40 feet measured from the outside edge of the buffer strip. GRADING AND DRAINAGE Only minor grading is anticipated for utility installation and driveway construction for the new home site. This work will most likely occur when a building permit is issued for the new lot. Staff recommends that a detailed grading, drainage, erosion control and tree removal plan be submitted for review and approval by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. The site contains wetlands and drainage swales which conveys runoff from the surrounding parcels through this site. A drainage easement should be dedicated over the wetlands and drainage ditches on both parcels to preserve the neighborhood drainage pattern. The drainage easement shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide. The City's Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) proposes a trunk storm sewer system in the future (24 -inch RCP) to replace portions of the drainage ditch. There are currently some existing storm sewers /culverts, as well as a small sediment basin, in place. According to records, this system was constructed in the early 1980s in an attempt to pretreat runoff prior to discharging into Rice Marsh Lake. In conjunction with the Mission Hills development directly east of the site, a series of storm water ponds were constructed to pretreat some of the runoff prior to discharging into the site. Staff is not recommending at this time that any new improvements be constructed with this subdivision proposal. Therefore, the applicant shall be responsible for SWMP fees pursuant to City ordinance. Currently, the SWMP fees for water quality and quantity are $800 and $1,980 per acre, respectively. Wetlands are subtracted out from the gross acreage. These fees are payable to the City at the time of final plat recording. UTILITIES Municipal sewer and water service is available to the site. The water service is located in the east boulevard of Tigua Lane. The water service will have to be extended from the main line to the home by the applicant or future property owner. Sanitary sewer will have to be extended up from the existing main adjacent to Rice Marsh Lake to service the home. This will also be 7 Rice Lake Manor Estates June 10, 1996 Page 5 required in conjunction with the building on the new lot. A permit will be required for the extension of sewer and water service to the house through the City's Building Department. The new lot will be subject to sanitary sewer and water hookup charges in accordance to City ordinances. Currently, these hookup fees are $1,115 for sewer and $1,460 for water (per unit). These fees are payable to the City at time of building permit issuance. STREETS Staff has been working with the applicant to look at future development potential of this site. Given the sensitive nature of the site, i.e. trees, wetlands, drainage ditches, future development may be limited to a private driveway until such time as the parcel to the south develops. At that time the easterly portion of the site may have the potential to access a public street. During the interim, a private driveway is proposed to be shared with Lot 2, Block 1 and the existing resident on Lot 1, Block 1 in addition to the new proposed lot. The existing driveway is proposed to be upgraded to meet the City's private driveway ordinance. Cross - access easements should be prepared and recorded. PARK AND RECREATION The Park and Recreation Commission recommended the City Council require full park and trail fees be paid as a condition of approval. COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE - RSF DISTRICT Lot Lot Home Home Wetland Area Width Depth Setback Setback + Buffer Ordinance 40,000 sq. ft. 125' 125' 30' front/rear 40' + (0 -20) 10' side /150'lake Parcel A 125,262.84 sq. ft. 186.95' 1007.93' 30' front/rear 40' + (0 -20) 10' sides /150' Parcel B 182,169.97 sq. ft. 137' 1099.67' 30' front/rear 40' + (0 -20) 10' sides /150' I ' Rice Lake Manor Estates June 10, 1996 ' Page 6 LANDSCAPING/TREE PRESERVATION ' The applicant has submitted a tree inventory for the Rice Lake Manor development and according to plans tree removal for the proposed building pad and utilities will be within maximum removal allowed for a large lot residential site. The development has about an 85% ' existing canopy coverage and approximate removal for the development is 7,100 sq. ft. including building site and sewer installation. ' PRIVATE STREETS - FINDINGS ' The applicant is proposing the use of an existing private street to provide access to the new parcel in this development. City Code, Section 18 -57 (o) permits up to four (4) lots to be served by a private street if the city finds the following to exist: ' (1) The prevailing development pattern makes it infeasible or inappropriate to construct a public street. In making this determination, the city may consider the ' location of existing property lines and homes, local or geographic conditions, and the existence of wetlands. ' (2) After reviewing the surrounding area it is concluded that an extension of the public street system is not required to serve other parcels in the area, improve access, or to provide a street system consistent with the comprehensive plan. ' (3) The use of a private street will permit enhanced protection of wetlands and mature ' trees. FINDING: The prevailing development makes it infeasible for the construction of a ' public street. It is heavily wooded and contains wetlands. There is an existing private street that does not meet ordinance requirements. The shared portion of that driveway must be built up to a 7 ton design and meet all requirements of the private street ' ordinance. Staff is recommending that the private streets as proposed by the applicant be approved for reasons outlined above. n Rice Lake Manor Estates June 10, 1996 Page 7 PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE On May 15, 1996, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved this application unanimously. The one condition that was amended at the meeting was #10 relating to the location of a fence that encroaches onto the subject property. Staff had recommended the fence be removed, and the Planning Commission amended the condition to require the applicant to bring the fence into compliance with City Code. Also, following the meeting, staff received a letter from the Department of Natural Resources pointing out that Rice Marsh Lake is classified as Natural Environment and all structures must maintain a setback of 150 feet from the Ordinary High Water mark of the lake. The applicant is showing a lake setback line located 125 feet from the Ordinary High Water mark of the lake. This can easily be corrected and will still allow a large building pad. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council approve Metes and Bounds Subdivision #96 -8, Rice Lake Manor Estates, as shown on the plans dated received April 12, 1996, subject to the following conditions: 1. Tree Preservation fencing must be installed around the perimeter of the building site, 20 feet from the proposed pad, before grading or excavation begins. No trees will be permitted to be removed except those within the building pad and 20 feet from the pad. Also one tree will be required in the front yard setback area. 2. 3 4. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit on Parcel A, a detailed grading, drainage, erosion control and tree removal plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The applicant shall dedicate to the City drainage easements over all wetlands and drainage ditches. The drainage easements shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide. The applicant shall be responsible for Surface Water Management fees pursuant to City ordinance. Extension of sewer and water service to the new lot will require a permit from the City's building department. I ' Rice Lake Manor Estates June 10, 1996 ' Page 8 I 6. The new lot will be subject to sanitary sewer and water hookup charges pursuant to City ordinance. I 7. The private driveway should be upgraded to meet City ordinance. Cross - access easements shall be conveyed to benefiting properties. ' 8. Full park and trail fees be paid in accordance with City ordinance. 9. The applicant shall remove all structures that encroach onto the city property located east of the subject site. ' 10. The neighbor's fence located north of the subject property which encroaches onto Parcel A must be r-erneve brought into compliance with City Code. ' 11. Building Official's conditions: a. Determine construction period for structure at the northwest corner of the property and work with Inspections Division staff to obtained permits and inspections, if any are required. ' b. Remove the structure on the east side of the dwelling, or obtain a permit to alter the structure to meet building and zoning code requirements. ' 12. All structures shall maintain a 150 foot setback from the Ordinary High Water mark of Rice Marsh Lake." ATTACHMENTS 1. Application 2. Public hearing and property owners list. 3. Memo from Dave Hempel, Assistant City Engineer and Phillip Elkin, Water Resources ' 4. Coordinator, dated May 8, 1996. Memo from Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal, dated April 26, 1996. 5. Wetland report prepared by William R. Engelhardt Associates Inc. ' 6. 7. Memo from Steve Kirchman dated May 6, 1996. Letter from DNR dated May 16, 1996. 8. Planning Commission minutes dated May 15, 1996. ' 9. Preliminary plat dated received April 12, 1996. C CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (612) 937 -1900 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION APPLICANT: Barry McKee OWNER: Brenda Schaeffer ADDRESS: 324 S. Main St., Suite 260 ADDRESS: 27306 County Road A Stillwater, MN 55082 (612) 430 -1717 TELEPHONE (Day time) Spooner, WI 54801 (715) 635 -9545 TELEPHONE: 1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2. Conditional Use Permit 3. Interim Use Permit 4. Non - conforming Use Permit 5. Planned Unit Development 11. Vacation of ROW /Easements 12. Variance 13. Wetland Alteration Permit 14. Zoning Appeal 15. Zoning Ordinance Amendment 6. Rezoning 7. Sign Permits 8. Sign Plan Review 1/ Notification Signs it ISO 9. Site Plan Review X Escrow_& Filing Fees/Attorney Cost" CUP /SPRNACNAR/WAP /Metes and Bounds, $400 Minor SUB) 10. x Subdivision $ (SO TOTAL FEE $ 350.00 A list of all property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must Included with the application. Twenty -six full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted. 8Ys" X 11" Reduced copy of transparency for each plan sheet. NOTE - When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract I PROJECT NAME Rice Lake Manor Estates LOCATION 8591 Tigua Circle, Chanhassen ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 1, Block 1, Rice Lake Manor ' PRESENT ZONING Residential REQUESTED ZONING Same PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION Low density residential REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION Lora density residential ' REASON FOR THIS REQUEST To allow this lot split so that this acreage may be split into two lots (versus just the existing one). ' This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. ' This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party ' whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. ' I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorizatiori;tb proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best ' of my knowledge. Signatur Pf ,� licant Date x- az � c ' Signature of Fee C ner Dat� ' Application Received on `/� /.� — �� Fee Pa ,� �� Receipt No. a The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting. If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address. 0 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Wednesday, MAY 15, 1996 at 7:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers 690 Coulter Drive Project: Rice Lake Manor Estates Developer: Barry McKee Location: 8591 Tigua Circle Y� �' J Lake Pmrk', Rice arsh Lak a��f 'wtaM. a D 1 .' �pe,1p/l e Rile✓B/ Notice: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a development proposed in your area. , The applicant, Barry McKee, is requesting preliminary plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Rice Lake Manor into two single family lots on property zoned RSF, and located at 8591 Tigua Circle, Rice Lake Manor 1 Estates. What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the 1 developer's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Commission Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: 1 1. Staff will give an over view of the proposed project. 2. The Developer will present plans on the project. 1 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses project. The Commission will then make a recommendation to the City Council. 1 Questions or Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to 1 someone about this project, please contact Sharmin at 937 -1900, ext. 120. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff 1 will provide copies to the Commission. Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on May 2, 1996. e C 1 1 i I Kimberly Jones & Stafford Nelson 8571 Tigua Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 David & Corrine Nagel 8550 Tigua Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 Klingelhutz Development 350 Hwy. 212 E. P. O. Box 89 Chaska, MN 55318 ' Mission Hills Limited Partnership c/o Tandem Properties 7808 Creekridge Ct., #310 Bloomington, MN 55439 I 11 I 1 0 Joseph & Gayle Hautman 8551 Tigua Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 Richard & Joanne Larson c/o MGM 8590 Tigua Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 Charles Adelmann, et al c/o Dependale Well Co. 1411 W. 97th Street Bloomington, MN 55431 Beverly Fiedler 8521 Tigua Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 The Rottlund Company, Inc. 2681 Long Lake Road Roseville, MN 55113 James & Sandra Jonasen 8581 Mission Hills Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT AND TITLE CO., INC. C=+ I CARVER COUNTY (612) 448 -5570 201 Chestnut St. N. FAX (612) 448 -5155 ABSTRACT 6 TITLE. P.O. Box 106 / Dale B. Kutter Chaska, MN 55318 David E. Moonen April 15, 1996 Kevin LaCasse Greystone Real Estate Group 324 So Main St. Suite 280 Stillwater, MN 55082 According to the 1996 Tax Books in the Carver County Treasurers office the following persons are listed as owners of the property within Carver County, Minnesota, which lies within 500 feet to the following described property: Lot 1, Block 1, Rice Lake Manor 1. Kimberly A. Jones & 6. The Rottlund Company, Inc. Stafford Nelson 2681 Long Lake Rd 8571 Tigua Ln Roseville, MN 55113 Chanhassen, MN 55317 7. Klingelhutz Development Co 2. Joseph & Gayle Hautman 350 Hwy 212 E 8551 Tigua Ln PO Box 89 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chaska, MN 55318 3. Beverly A Fiedler 8521 Tigua Ln Chanhassen, MN 55317 4. David T & Corrine A Nagel 8550 Tigua Ln Chanhassen, MN 55317 5. Richard & Joanne Larson C/o MGM 8590 Tigua Ln Chanhassen, MN 55317 8. Charles Adelmann, etal C/o Dependale Well Co 1411 W 97th St Bloomington, MN 55431 9. James C & Sandra A Jonasen 8581 Mission Hills Ln Chanhassen, MN 55317 10. Mission Hills Limited Partnership c/o Tandem Properties 7808 Creekridge Cir. #310 Bloomington, MN 55439 arver County Abstract & Title Co., Inc. This company does not assume any liability for the accuracy of this report. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 MEMORANDUM TO: Sharmin Al -Jaff, Planner II ,�J � FROM: Dave Hempel, Assistant City Engineer }J"` Phillip Elkin, Water Resources Coordinator DATE: May 8, 1996 SUBJ: Review of Lot Split for Lot 1, Block 1, Rice Lake Manor File No. 96 -14 LUR WETLANDS According to the wetland delineation performed by William Engelhardt and Associates, three wetlands have been identified on -site and they are described as follows: North Basin is part of the Rice Marsh Lake wetland basin and is Type 1,2,3 at different points along the shoreline. This Wetland is on the Chanhassen Wetland Classification Map, the NWI Map, and the DNR Protected Waters Map. ' West Basin is an ag/urban wetland located along the western boundary of the site. The wetland extends off -site to the southwest; approximately 3/4 acres of wetland is on site. This wetland is part of ' City Wetland A24 -3(1) and is mapped as PEMCd . This wetland has been delineated as Type 1/2 and drains to a ditch wetland that eventually drains into Rice Marsh Lake. Southeast Basin is also an ag/urban wetland part of the drainage system that connects the West Basin to Rice Marsh Lake. It has also been identified as Type 1/2. Regulations The City administers the 1991 version of the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). It does not appear that a wetland replacement plan will be necessary for this project; however, improvements or changes ' to the existing drainage ditch will require mitigation and permits. In addition to the requirements of the WCA, the City also requires a buffer strip and buffer strip monumentation around the wetlands. The buffer strip width required for natural wetlands is 10 to 30 feet with a minimum average width of 20 Sharmin Al -Jaff Lot 1, Block 1, Rice Lake Manor Lot Split May 8, 1996 Page 2 feet and the buffer strip width required for an ag/urban wetland is 0 to 20 feet with a minimum average width of 10 feet. The principal structure setback for these wetlands is 40 feet Treasured from the outside edge of the buffer strip. GRADING AND DRAINAGE Only minor grading is anticipated for utility installation and driveway construction for the new home site. This work will most likely occur when a building permit is issued for the new lot. Staff recommends that a detailed grading, drainage, erosion control and tree removal plan be submitted for review and approval by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. The site contains wetlands and drainage swales which conveys runoff from the surrounding parcels through this site. A drainage easement should be dedicated over the wetlands and drainage ditches on both parcels to preserve the neighborhood drainage pattern. The drainage easement shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide. The City's Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) proposes a trunk storm sewer system in the future (24 -inch RCP) to replace portions of the drainage ditch. There are currently some existing storm sewers /culverts, as well as a small sediment basin, in place. According to records this system was constructed in the early 1980s in an attempt to pretreat runoff prior to discharging into Rice Marsh Lake. In conjunction with the Mission Hills development directly east of the site, a series of storm water ponds were constructed to pretreat some of the runoff prior to discharging into the site. Staff is not recommending at this time that any new improvements be constructed with this subdivision proposal. Therefore, the applicant shall be responsible for SWMP fees pursuant to City ordinance. Currently, the SWMP fees for water quality and quantity are $800 and $1,980 per acre, respectively. Wetlands are subtracted out from the gross acreage. These fees are payable to the City at the time of final plat recording. UTILITIES Municipal sewer and water service is available to the site. The water service is located in the east boulevard of Tigua Lane. The water service will have to be extended from the main line to the home by the applicant or future property owner. Sanitary sewer will have to be extended up from the existing main adjacent to Rice Marsh Lake to service the home. This will also be required in conjunction with the building on the new lot. A permit will be required for the extension of sewer and water service to the house through the City's Building Department. The new lot will be subject to sanitary sewer and water hookup charges in accordance to City ordinances. Currently, these hookup fees are $1,115 for sewer and $1,460 for water (per unit). These fees are payable to the City at tiTne of building permit issuance. ' Sharmin Al -Jaff Lot 1, Block 1, Rice Lake Manor Lot Split ' May 8, 1996 Page 3 i STREETS ' Staff has been working with the applicant to look at future development potential of this site. Given the sensitive nature of the site, i.e. trees, wetlands, drainage ditches, future development may be limited to a private driveway until such time as the parcel to the south develops. At that time the easterly portion of the site may have the potential to access a public street. During the interim, a private driveway is proposed to be shared with Lot 2, Block 1 and the existing resident on Lot 1, Block 1 in addition to the new proposed lot. The existing driveway is proposed to be upgraded to meet the City's private driveway ordinance. Cross - access easements should be prepared and recorded. ' RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ' 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit on Tract A, a detailed grading, drainage, erosion control and tree removal plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. ' 2. The applicant shall dedicate to the City drainage easements over all wetlands and drainage ditches. The drainage easements shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide. I 3. The applicant shall be responsible for Surface Water Management fees pursuant to City ordinance. I 4. Extension of sewer and water service to the new lot will require a permit from the City's building department. 5. The new lot will be subject to sanitary sewer and water hookup charges pursuant to City ordinance. ' 6. The private driveway should be upgraded to meet City ordinance. Cross - access easements shall be conveyed to benefiting properties. ktm ' c: Charles Folch, Director of Public Works g:�en&ave��celaAe. spr WETLAND IDENTIFICATION AND BOUNDARY DELINEATION REPORT PROJECT: TIGUA LANE PROPERTY, KEVIN LACASSE CHANHASSEN ,MINNESOTA, #95 -214-44 PREPARED BY: WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT ASSOCIATES INC. Executive Summary The implementation of the Wetland Conservation Act has made the identification and delineation of wetlands vital in areas designated for development. A wetland identification and delineation for the Tigua Lane Property was completed in November of 1995. Jurisdictional wetlands were identified and delineated on the property. Objective The objective of this report is to identify any jurisdictional wetlands that may be potentially impacted during the development of the Tigua Lane Property and to delineate the boundaries of these wetlands. Project Location And Site Description The property is located in the City of Chanhassen in the S1 /2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 13, Township 116N, Range 23W of Carver County, Minnesota. The property is East of Tigua Lane (figure 1). Off -Site Analysis Methods The Tigua Lane Property off -site analysis was conducted using the following materials; 1989 National Wetland Inventory Map(NWI), USGS Topographical Quadrangle Map, 1986 DNR Protected Waters Map(PW), 1994 Carver County Soil Survey(CCSS), 1991 U.S. Hydric Soils List(HSL) and the Carver County Hydric Soils List. t 1 1 1 1 5! R Y �` 101 nn wt d oJ, • i R 0 V j Y f a a � n n f^4 ee., � Suwn pn r 0 Q v au 86TH ST. W. — � •� rn_ o V �6H1A Hy FIGURE 1: LOCATION MAP Off -Site Anaivsis The Chanhassen Wetland Classification Map(figure 2) identifies 2 wetlands(A13 -15(2) (A),A11- 7(1) (A)) within the property. Both of these wetlands are part of the Rice Marsh Lake wetland basin. The NWI Map(figure 3) identifies 2 wetlands(both PEMC) within the property. The DNR Protected Waters Map(figure 4) identifies Rice Marsh Lake as a protected water(1P). The Carver County Soil Survey(figure 5) indicates several areas of hydric soils within the property. The existence of hydric soil conditions(particularly Hm -Hamel Loam, Ex- Essexville Sandy Loam, Gl- Glencoe Clay Loam) combined with mapped wetlands indicated that potential wetland conditions existed on -site. The following hydric soils were identified during the off -site analysis; Hm(Hamel Loam) The HSL and Carver County Soils lists classify Hm as hydric. Ex(Essexville Sandy Loam) The HSL and Carver County Soils lists classify Ex as hydric. Gl(Glencoe Clay Loam) The HSL and Carver County Soils lists classify GI as hydric. Organic Muck soils are present in Rice Marsh Lake Other site soils; Kb, Kc and Kf have Gl and Hm hydric inclusions. On -site Analysis Site Conditions The site was visited on November 24, 1995. The site was dry, no substantial precipitation had occurred recently. The ground was frozen so no boring information is available. Figure 6 shows the original topography of this site. Figure 7 shows that the site topography and hydrology were altered significantly during utility construction. Previously existing wetlands were altered permanently. A dike containing utilities was placed along the shoreline and culverts were installed. Methods All wetland determinations and delineations are done in accordance with the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands(Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation 1989) and the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual(U.S. Army Corp of Engineers 1987). The wetlands are classified according to the Cowardin System(Cowardin et. al 1979) and the Circular 39(Shaw & Fredine 1956). RACE -WR LAKE All wx.yi FIGURE 2: CHANHASSEN WETLAND CLASSIFICATION MAP 1 1 F.A.P. ' InJp 13 Rice .ran k ' ake V . r ' • ' FIGURE 4: DNR PROTECTED WATERS 1 1 1 i r FIGURE 3:.NW1 MAP FIGURE 5: SOIL SURVEY The three mandatory technical criteria are evaluated in the field using the following methods; Vegetation is identified using field guides and hydrophytic classification is determined using the National List Of Plant Species That Occur In Wetlands: Minnesota(USDI 1988). Soils are identified using the Carver County Soil Survey and hydric potential is characterized using the 1991 Hydric Soils of the United States and applicable county hydric soils lists. Field samples are taken to verify hydric soil conditions and are characterized using Munsell Soil Color Charts(1992). When site soils are sandy or coarse - textured alternative indicators are used to verify hydric soil conditions. Hydrology is determined using field indicators as listed in the 1987 and 1989 manuals. Site history and topography are also considered in hydrology determinations along with recent hydrology records. On -Site Determination The following areas were determined to be jurisdictional wetlands(figure 7 shows the approximate location and boundaries of these wetlands, consult the property boundary survey or plat for accurate wetland boundary locations); W #1 is part of the Rice Marsh Lake wetland basin and is Type 1,2,3 at different points along the shoreline. The dominant vegetation includes Reed Canary Grass(FACW), Red Osier Dogwood(FACW), Box- Elder(FACW ) and Green Ash(FACW). Hydrology is indicated by surface water along the shoreline and it is reasonable to assume that this fringe receives sufficient hydrology during the growing season. No direct hydrology was observed along the edge due to the frozen ground. The source of hydrology for W #1 is runoff from the surrounding area Rice Marsh Lake. W #1 drains to Rice Marsh Lake. Hydric soils are mapped throughout the area. Questionable Areas: PI: The low area behind the dike identified as P1 in Figure 7 has been greatly disturbed. Storm sewer brings water in and out of this area. This area is a utilized ponding area that has developed wetland characteristics. This low area is part of the storm water system and if properly maintained would not be considered a wetland. Several areas south of the driveway have hydrophytic vegetation(Reed Canary Grass) and must investigated further when the ground is not frozen if any substantial construction is to take place south of the driveway. These areas are at best Type 1 wetlands resulting from storm water drainage. % I I _ , 611 te , LK __ +'.*., • "C ". _ _ _ - ~nH -'�... jam^ � -_ - � 1� •f r� ye s 1 -. _^ � r .., .. ,,. °:. -a. :,, .n��.;,,; •.. r . -s� - .s•'• ;,r:: 'S; :41:1 � •-1,: -- iv. :1 ��}s. +z +'Jn' �' +t °r. _� "{, Cc+,.r �':i: e•wt�`ti:. i.��_ - .. - s: .: :1i -r��. � - 5i, w "a ''`�. '�1: . r5��3'.'- • �'_�} t' +C}-'. -"� �: a: - � h ri: {:_ �^•te ,q s - �, �� .j L .y + .. < _ ... t " ri' Y�.y k$%•i o. U4ei s+ -xxr _. �'�. f .�°�'� .lu.?i+j%'t - iF' " % ?. •T { "N '. F,�qe.:+,�,:. -k �'' - Yj`. ia' °.,`.:'T -,.. _. �•'L -1, r i s f(. �'3' F.^•.C'. +{ 1 jt iS ,- {.�..•- ` .: �� 4 � _ :.. t._ c . �.• µy1,'�, `t -F,'i_ �'�'' i, �� �+.e - rn�xT.�� { +''< �¢f•�C�, tlM' � � �t� =4. 'rf° .., "'";y� .:vi,� f, y• -m.a3t�. . .:ey '.` °--� -. 1�,, _,Cwt- c {[Sjt....: i � r -..r f...rw`S"�•dr�.' 'y,. _ {�'t t +E.iY -sre, �.' 1 ' a i;rF •� � -� r �,F'i �i"�iae�r iTn' •- - � L44S' .%r-- hi•�./.Ti.�..'�,r'��_ s..' ,, _L y ,AP ie ,t 1 Y �� 1 I IP A LL $ .:=L 3 vi 3.t An lei Vj 3t T / f ICA 'g 4l �p I' ol POP ci IE S '• '�- � \ .:f� Y \Oa ,��� acv _• / `�' k11�� 7 q 7� WFTI� �RAUNDAI 1 1 1 On -site Delineation Note: All transition zones are established with upland and wetland points(see Appendix A for on -site determination forms). These upland and wetland points form a line called a transect. Vegetation, soils and hydrology are analyzed at these points and along the transect. Once a transition zone is established, vegetation, soils and hydrology(potential hydrology, topography) are used to establish the actual wetland boundary. The transition zone is the area along a given transect where a wetland becomes non - wetland. In most cases the wetland boundary is in the transition zone. The wetland boundary for W #1 was delineated only within the property boundary. Wetland W #1 was delineated using 3 transects(figure 7). Tl has a 2' transition zone. This area is along the utility dike and the wetland boundary is along the lower edge of the embankment. The edge is staked where hydrophytic vegetation ceases to be dominant and normal hydrology can no longer be assumed do to elevation. Subsurface soil and hydrology evaluations were not feasible do to frozen ground, but the boundary along the dike is apparent. T2 has a 15' transition zone. The dominant vegetation is Red Osier Dogwood, Box -Elder and Buckthorn(FAC -). The wetland boundary is along the toe of the utility dike where wetland vegetation is no longer dominant and reasonable hydrology can't be assumed. T3 has a 15' transition zone. The dominant vegetation is Dogwood, Box -Elder and Buckthorn in the transition zone. The wetland boundary is along the Buckthorn, White Oak(FACU) and Dogwood interface. Staking: The stakes delineating the edges of wetlands were marked as follows: (wetland ID) WB (# Stake sequence) Wetland W #1 was staked 1 -10 Summary And Recommendations All information and forms concerning the field delineation can be found in Appendix A. The delineated edges must be surveyed and tied into the existing property survey. All projects must follow all applicable wetland ordinances. If any project impacts areas inside or near wetland boundaries mitigation may be required by the Local Governmental Unit(LGU -City of Chanhassen), Department of Natural Resources, Army Corps of Engineers or other state and city agencies. All concerned agencies must be notified and the appropriate applications must be completed, so permits can be issued prior to any projects that will impact or mitigate any jurisdictional wetlands. This delineation report was completed by Stephen A. Albrecht, Agricultural Engineer, Training Certified Wetland Delineator, on December 13, 1995. Stephen A. Albrecht William R. Engelhardt Associates Inc. Consulting Engineers WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS *Wetland Services* Field Conditions Record Field Investigator. L/N Date: ��/ ;f Project/Site Location: 4 Ha State: A0 County: Project Name: L cass Applicant/Owner: Time: JP Temp: M c> Conditions: r AJ d us{a r,/ Precipitation(recent): /b n A Soil Conditions: ro 'z� .--) Comments: 06 o %,nJ 1107 Hazeltine Boulevard, Suite 480 Chaska, NIN. 5 5318 1 I WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS *Wetland Services* Wetland Observation Record ' Offsite Information Wetland #: Field Review: Location: T; R; Section USGS NWI: Yes No / ' Type(Cowardin): a Type(Circ.39): DNR Protected Waters: Yes No ' Site Soils: County Survey eport: yea: Soil )J Hydric List Inclusion unit H!i, yc� S G L r . - 17 K vsS ' ' v�P lies i L C P P Location: a IOn �` c4 � ° rrA L/ Watershed Characteristics: Wetland size: _>.'V acres # wetlands in basin: Total drainage area: acres Direct drainage area: acres Open water area: acres Onsite Information Field Observer: �� Date Vi sited: /�/ /9j Vegetation Plant Species Status Plant Species Status Plant Species o� Plant Diversity: �GL % Open Water: % Status ' 1107 Hazeltine Boulevard, Suite 480 Chaska, MN. 55318 (612) 448 -8838 Hvdroloev: Water Source: /h ! �Jno Outflow: /„ !Ce Artificially Drained: Artificially Created or Altered: V1*6 4-11/ 1 (explain) Land Use Influences: Surrounding Land Use( %): rn /1,7�c�� �aCa., �6/ axts��'• W f�...� Previous Land Use( %): Sketch/Pictures: ' Scientific Name Indicator Status Stratum Dominant Plant Soeces : f ) har& n ' o , to Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: �� e ' Is the a hvtic vegetation colter on met? Yes C- No — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Ratione: ale: . f l��i., f,'r --- ------- - - - - -- - SOILS ' Series r Subgroup: Is the soil on the hydric soils list'? Yes No _ Undetermined _ ' Is the soil a Histosol7 Yes _ No Histic epipedon present? Yes _ No � ' 1 YO2sn Is the soil mottled ?_ Yes No _ Gieyed? Yes _ No i Matrix Color. - - T_ i+iottle Colon: other � c oil indicators' the hydric soil citcrioa met? Yes A No aS rw. cal Rationale: Soul rYn ?c.-. — ----------------- HYDROLOGY v Surface water depth: • 17'07- , 5 r StJY�a� Wain Is the groun surface inundated. Yes _ No Is the soil saturated? Yes ____ No _ ' Depth to free standing water in soil observation hole: — List other field evidence of surface inundation n or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met ? Yes No Rationale: �(- rr>2Hv� l CJI�'fAC — ' — — — — — — — — J P— JSDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AiYD RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Yes - ,?f N l r�ai',a �� Go" �,J� ' phir. iy�� Rationale for jurisdictional decision: ' 1107 Hazeltine Boulevard, Suite 480 Chaska, VIN. 55318 (612) 448 -8838 ' WILLIAM? R. rjNGELHARDT ASSOC.&�TES INC. CONSULTL tG ENGINEERS ' *Wetland Services' /d�b(e�� Date: t FddInvestigat ( s): '�' w State: No?I County: Project Site: ILt„ L Plant Community Name :_ y ApplicandOwnerr: fa.- ��-------------------- - - - - -• Do normal environmental conditions e:tist at the plant community? Yes ' 10 Vfi - 4y ' �enSfYutf7eh ��I�� (e if no) ology been S i gn ifi can tly disturbed. ? Yes �_ — — No — — — h Vc Has as ve veigetation ,soils, and/or hydr G�,Yhr(as� St}++ (e xplanatiou if no) — — — — — — — — es — — — — — — — — VEGET?.TION ' Scientific Name Indicator Status Stratum Dominant Plant Soeces : f ) har& n ' o , to Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: �� e ' Is the a hvtic vegetation colter on met? Yes C- No — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Ratione: ale: . f l��i., f,'r --- ------- - - - - -- - SOILS ' Series r Subgroup: Is the soil on the hydric soils list'? Yes No _ Undetermined _ ' Is the soil a Histosol7 Yes _ No Histic epipedon present? Yes _ No � ' 1 YO2sn Is the soil mottled ?_ Yes No _ Gieyed? Yes _ No i Matrix Color. - - T_ i+iottle Colon: other � c oil indicators' the hydric soil citcrioa met? Yes A No aS rw. cal Rationale: Soul rYn ?c.-. — ----------------- HYDROLOGY v Surface water depth: • 17'07- , 5 r StJY�a� Wain Is the groun surface inundated. Yes _ No Is the soil saturated? Yes ____ No _ ' Depth to free standing water in soil observation hole: — List other field evidence of surface inundation n or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met ? Yes No Rationale: �(- rr>2Hv� l CJI�'fAC — ' — — — — — — — — J P— JSDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AiYD RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Yes - ,?f N l r�ai',a �� Go" �,J� ' phir. iy�� Rationale for jurisdictional decision: ' 1107 Hazeltine Boulevard, Suite 480 Chaska, VIN. 55318 (612) 448 -8838 ■ WILLIAM R. vGELHARDT ASSOC '.TES INC. CONSULTING ENI GINEERS *Wetland Services* Field Investigator(s):c�c Date: ty: State: N4 Conn �onKr ' Project Site: T . 1 �_ - --rr Phut Community Name R: — 1� / Applicaar/Q - - -- --A---------------°---------- Do normal environmental conditions e=t at the plant community? Yo NO Uf 1 ity ConSfrue�iati C��� ' (explanation if no) h. vc d rbr - last SA% Has vegetanon , soils, and/or hydrology been sj=fficandy d'is'turbed. Yes >< No _ (e-v ' lanation if no) — — — — — — — — — VEGETATION — — — — — ° — — — — — — — — — Dominant Plant Species Scientific Stratum e Indicator Status Stratum ' �� /����t r f v � yr r �F 1 e ' 0 Pe c �t of dominant �oecies that are OBL. FACW, and/or FAC. Is the hydroohytic vegetation criterion met? Yes ? s Rationale: ----- - - - - - ° - -- ----------- - - - - -• ' - -- SOILS Series: Ckr,-� C/a 1 -6 d i//0 lf", Subgroup: Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes _ No ,_ Undetermined _ Is the soil a riis tosol? Yes No _ llistic ecpipedon present`? Yes No Is the soil mottled? Yes No _ Gieyed? Yes No_ - Matrix Color. i +idttle Colors: Other hydric soil indicators: Is the hydric Soil c:;te: ion met? Yes _ No /f /` Rationale: GTID UW f I - Z, v --------- - - - - -- HYDROLOGY - - - - -- Is the ground surface inundated? Yes _ No _— SucFace water depth: Is the soil saturated? Yes _ No _ Devth to free standing water in soli observation hole: List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology crte ion met? Yes _ No e / 6 t n -4c.) r _ ,� f- as<v r.--c !� �'br.• ca !/'N .^ 1� Rationale: ' — — — — — — — — JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATION — — — — — Is the plant cotnmuaity a wetland? Yes — No Rationale for jurisdictional decision: hours 1107 Hazeltine Boulevard, Suite 480 Chaska, -MN. 55318 (612)"143-8838 I WILLIAM R. �NGELH_ARDT ASSOC7-�,TES LNC. CONSULTNG ENGINEERS *Wetland Services �f t Date: �.�� /� Feld Investigator(s): utncr fit �'rr ' State: Mn Co C ommun ity l.�'y - - - - - -- Project Site: I' L f�r ^ - —r Plant Cooamuni Name T: ----------- - - - - -- ApplicaIIrlCrwner. (s� — N� nC�I�J ' Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes o U };�j { conSfrue�";'e (e:cplanation if IIo) Ilan vegetation, So t15, and/or hydrology bcen s - igaMcaudy di,turbcd? Y es � No -- — — — — (e:rolanationjfno) --- - - - - -- yEGET.t ------ - - - - -- Scientific (time Indicator Staius Stratum ' Dominant Plant Soccies e- ' 1 1 Q ° P -cent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: Is the hydrophytic vegetadoa �itc on met? Yes NO F-ad nale: ��/ `iy- - - - -- ' --------------- TOILS ' Series: �X �M�� Subgroup: Is the soil on the aydnc soils list? Yes NO ____ Undefetmined Is the soil a t Iistosol? Yes No _ Histic eoipedon present'? Yes _ N Is the sail mottled? Yes No _ Gieyed? Yes— No -Ma= Color. - l:idnle Colors. Other hydric soil indicators: / Ls the hydric soil cItc ion met? Yes _� No Rationale: Grout - ------ - - - - -• ' ------ --- • - - - - -- IiYDROLOGY ' Is the ground surface inundated? Yes _ No Surface water Is the soil saturated? Yes _ No Deudh to free standing water ja soil observation hole: ' List othcr field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: — Is the wedand hydrology criterion met? - Yes -? - c �. Radoaalc: A , : � 1, fl ✓J �r_r f — — — — — — — — — — — — — — JUB.ISDICTIONAI. DETERMLVATIOI`l �tYD R�TIOI`I ' Is the plant community a wetland? Yes X NO Rationale for jurisdictional decision: a// /v' 1107 Hazeltine Boulevard, Suite 480 ' Chaska, Y NI . 56318 (612) 448 -8838 WILLIAM R. - N GELHARDT ASS0C \TES INC. CONSULTNG ENGNEERS '*Wetland Services' Field Investigator(s):` °° Date: Project Site: State: Mn o County: lAr' Applieaar/Gwnez �.r-rS. Plant Community Name ■ v� Do normal environmental e:onditioas exist at the plant community? Yes N Ufi Iff ConS> ��'�� ' (explanation if no) Has vegetation ,soils, and/or hydrology beep significantly disturbed? Yes X_ No h. v� r��Ylur Sifb (expl -- - - - - - — anation if no) - - - - -- — — — — — — — - , ------- VEGETATION Dominant Plant Soecies I.1 vto t t 7 Scientific Name n/ � I Vt ✓s �Tr �/ ✓a .,,c�'F,'nr. la s, c Fo I11 KsN �S'/e/ !/o i..hn� Perccat of dominant svc es that are 01 FACW, and/or FAC: �nl� htS is tae hydropaytic vegetati on cite oa met? es No Rationale: l r', i I Fac — s� Sti r , ----------------- --------- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- SOILS Se es �- 1 f /fY - )IE �- Is the soil on the aydric soils list? Yes Is the soil a i7istosol? Yes _ No Is the soil mottled? Yes No — -_M - atrix Color. _ - t:idale Is the hydric soil cntcioa met? Yes- Rationale: Subgroup: _ No _ Undetermined _ Histic epipedon prescSt7 Yes _— NO _ Gleyed? Yes No -olors: Other aydric soil indicators: No —_ ---------------- -------- - - - - -- H --- - - - - -- YDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Yes _ No _ Surface water depth: Is the soil saturated? Yes _ No _ Depth to free standing water is soil observation hole: List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrolog y c: tenon met? Yes _ No Rationale: S 1 F \J ra I r y C. )4Z. r r a - he G eJwts /10 v ----------------------------- - - - - -- JURISDICTIONAL DETERMPTATION A-ND RATION Is the plant c.ommunity a wetland? Yes _ NO / Rationale for jurisdictional decision: Indicator Status Stratum 1107 Hazeltine Boulevard, Suite 480 Chaska, MN L. 353 is (012) -8833 WILLIAM R. 0 vGELHARDT ASSOC'`-TES INC. CONSULT�i tG ENGR EERS i'Wedand Services' g .vc r6�� Date: Feld Investigatoc(s): County: State: Nn , Project Site: I� 1 �� " Plant Community Name 4: A lieant/Owner. L. eosf Gl� / pp - - - - -- Y3 U ' Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes No -2 L )ti? Ii4 ak) (explanation if no) N o Has vezctation .soils. and/or hydrology b eea significantly disturbed? Y es t (exnlaaation if no) — — — — — — — — — VEGETATION ' C: Scientific Name Indicator Stars Stratum Dominant Plant SDCCJ /to. U - �.s t �1,it& 0ax mar �G r 1 Q u n o pccrot of dominant sDe•.aes that are OBL, FACW, and/or i•AC:_ is the hydrovhyric vegetaaon cicetion met'? Yes No —<- Rationale: isn/� 42e- t � i� {far✓' -------- - - - - -- ---- ----------- -- SOIIS ' Scies: F Subgroup: ,:1 avS�o s Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No _ Undetermined Yes — No Is the soil a Histosol? Yes _ No _ liistic eoipedon preseaC? ' Is the soil mottled?_ Yes_ No _ Gleyed? Yes _ No -Matrix Color. - -_ i:idttie Colors: Other hydric soil indicators: / is the hydric soil critcrion met? Yes _ No Ratio nale : --- --- ----- - -- --- - ------ ----- '-c —c` n � n` - - ------ ---- •- - - - - -• // __ HYDROLOGY ' Is the ground surfacz inundated? Yes— No Surface water depth: Is the sots saturated? Yes— No Depth to free standing water in soil observation hole: ' List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil santraa0n: Is the wetland hydrology crite t mrre --t? Yes _ No Rationale: ' — — — — — — — — JURISDICTIONAI. DE- I-ER AiYD Rd,TION Is the plant community a wetland? Yes ' Rationale for jurisdictional detiian ' 1107 Hazeltine Boulevard, Suite 480 Chaska, VL`l. »318 (612) -48 -8838 L J WILLIAM R.' NGELHARDT ASSOQ LTES E3 C. T ' CONSULTNG ENGNEERS lJo *Wetland Services* ''11 ieldlavesti ator(s): Date: / 7� F g County: �r project Site: ) (__• State: �'/n. Applicandowner: [.C. , -r^ — — — — — Plant Communiry Name ----- - ---- ------- _ � r � Do normal environmental conditions e- st at the plant communiry? YQ NO V }i Ii3y ConStrue�l'e ti ��' J (explanation if no) Has vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes X_ No h• (e.TLWationifno) --- - - - - -- --------------- - - - - -' VEGETATION Scientific Name Indicator Sta= Stratum Dominant PiaatSoecies F�GW Anam, 51. l rae Q � o , sn of dominant spz es that are OBL. FaCw, and/or FAC: Is the hydroohytic vegetation eriteaoa met? Yes � No Rationale: ------------- - - - --- -------- - - - - -- SOILS Se cs: �X Subgroup: Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes N _, o Undetermined _ Is the soil a tlistosol? Yes _ No _ Histic epipedca present`? Yes No Is the soil mottled? Yes No _ Gleyed? Yes _ No_ _Matrix Color. : z - _ LAottle Colors: - Other hydric soil indicators: Is the hydric soill eriten met? Yes � No Rationale: OnorJ� z GC ,1-4ri.( --------- - - - - -- HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Yes _ No Sudace water depth: i h 14 �e Is the soil saturated? Yes _ No Death to free staa diag water is sod observation hole: List other field evidence of surface inundation or sod sattsnaon: Is the Overland hydrology criterion met? Yes No _ ee s Rationale: - -, & 90— r ot , ,J g J' ---------------- — — — — — — JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Al RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Ycs �& No _ Rationale for jurisdictional decision: /'Y'r <'� '�""' L 1107 Hazeltine Boulevard, Suite 480 Chaska, -' 55318 (612) 443 -8838 1 1 1 1 11 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MEMORANDUM CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 TO: Sharmin Al -Jaff, Planner II FROM: Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal DATE: April 26, 1996 RE: Request for preliminary plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Rice Lake Manor into two single family lots on zoned property RSF, and located at 8591 Tigua Circle, Rice Lake Manor Estates, Harry McGee. Planning Case: 96 -8 SUB and 96 -1 WAP I reviewed the site plan for the above project. In order to comply with Chanhassen Fire plans or changes are submitted the appropriate code or policy items will be addressed. 1. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention policy No. 29 -1992 Premise Identification (copy enclosed). gJsafety/ml/96 -8 -1 CITY OF CHANHASSZK General 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 e CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 0 FAX (612) 937 -5739 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY PREMISES IDENTIFICATION Numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. Size and location of numbers shall be approved by one of the following - Public Safety Director, Building Official, Building Inspector, Fire Marshal. Requirements are for new construction and existing buildings where no address numbers are posted. Olhw Reaulrements - General 1. Numbers shall be a contrasting color from background. 2. Numbers shall not be In script 3. If a structure Is not visible from the street, additional numbers are required at the driveway entrance. Size and location must be approved. , 4. Numbers on mall box at driveway entrance may be a minimum of 4 ". However, requirement *3 must still be met 5. Administrative authority may require additional numbers H deemed necessary. ReskSmtlal Requirements (2 or less dweipna LmM 1. Minimum height shall be 5 1/4 ". 2. Building permits will not be flnaled unless numbers are posted and approved by the Building Department Commercial Reouirements 1. Minimum height shali'be 12 ". 2. Strip Mails a. Multi tenant building will have minimum height requirements of 6 ". b. Address numbers shall be on the main entrance and on all back doors. 3. If address numbers are located on a directory entry sign, additional numbers will be required on the buildings main entrance. Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy #29 -1992 Date: 06 /15/92 Revised: Approved - Public Safety Director Page 1 of 1 % PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 MEMORANDUM TO: Sharmin Al -Jaff, Planner II V FROM: Steve A. Kirchman, Building Official I` DATE: May 6, 1995 SUBJECT: 96 -8 SUB and 96 -1 WAP (8591 Tigua Cir., Rice Lake Manor Estates, Barry McKee) I was asked to review the site plan proposal stamped "CITY OF CHANHASSEN, RECEIVED, APR 12 1996, CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT." for the above referenced project. Background: Inspections division records indicate the building was originally constructed in 1980. The building was setback 12 feet from the east property line. There are no records of additional building permits after 1980. Analysis: The proposed lot split survey shows three structures not shown on the 1980 survey. 1. A fence which appears to belong to a neighbor is shown on the north property line. There is no record of a permit for this fence. Permits are required for fences (CCC 20- 1017), and a fence may not be built on adjoining property (CCC 20- 1019). Staff has no way of determining when the fence was built or if the applicant was aware of the encroachment. The property to be split must meet code requirements, necessitating, at a minimum, removal of the section of fence violating the code. The applicant may wish to work with the neighbor in the removal of the noncomplying portion of the fence. 2. What appears to be a deck is shown on the northwest comer of the house. Although the original permit appears to include a deck, it was not shown in its current location. It may have been built differently at the time of original construction or added later. A deck added later would have required a building permit. The applicant should determine when the deck was built and obtain an after the fact permit if a permit would have been required at the time of its construction. 3. A structure is shown extending over the east property line. No structure regulated by the building code may cross a property line. This structure was not shown on the original survey, nor is there a record of a building permit for its construction. Any structure Sharmin AI -Jaff May 6, 1996 Page 2 regulated by the code will require a permit and must be altered to comply with the building code and city code. Recommendations: 1. Remove fence or portion of fence which is noncomplying with city code. 2. Determine construction period for structure at the northwest corner of the property and work with Inspections Division staff to obtained permits and inspections, if any are required. 3. Remove the structure on the east side of the dwelling, or obtain a permit to alter the structure to meet building and zoning code requirements. g \safety\sak\memos \plan \McKee 1 1 SWMP FEE WORKSHEET DATE May 14, 1996 FILE NO. 96-8 PROJECT Rice Lake Manor Estates SITE AREA IN ACRES 1.63 ZONING CLASSIFICATION Single Family Residential FEES Rate per Acre Acres Total WATER QUALITY $ 800.00 1.63 $ 1,304.00 Rate per Acre Acres Total WATER QUANTITY $ 1,980.00 1.63 $ 3,227.40 CREDITS ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL PRICE PRICE NURP Ponds ACRE N/A N/A Trunk Storm Sewer Line N/A N/A Special Structures EA. N/A N/A SWMP FEE $4,531 SWMP CREDITS $ - N/A TOTAL SWMP FEE $4,531 2.87 - 1.24 wetlands Minnesota De of Natural Resources Metro Waters, 1200 Road, St. Paul, MN 55106 -6793 Telephone: (612) 772 -7910 Fax: (612) 772 -7977 RECEIVE® Ms. Sharmin AI -Jaff, Planner II City of Chanhassen Planning Department 690 Coulter Drive, P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 MAY 16 RECD CITY OF CHANHASSEN RE: Rice Lake Manor Estates, Rice Marsh Lake (10 -1P), City of Chanhassen, Carver County (City No. 96 -8 SUB and 96 -1 WAP) Dear Ms. AI -Jaffa We have reviewed the plans (received April 23, 1996) for Rice Lake Manor Estates (SWl /4 SE1 /4 Section 13, TI 16N, R23W) at 8591 Tigua Circle and have the following comments to offer: Rice Marsh Lake, a DNR Protected Water, occurs on the Rice Lake Manor Estates site. Any activity below the ordinary high water (OHW) elevation of 877.0' (NGVD, 1929) for Rice Marsh Lake, which alters the course, current or cross - section of Rice Lake, is under the jurisdiction of the DNR and may require a DNR permit. The OHW of 877.0' should be shown on the plat since minimum lot sizes and structure setbacks are measured from the OHW. There are wetlands on the site that are not under DNR Public Waters Permit jurisdiction. The project will be subject to federal and local wetland regulations. The Department may provide additional comments on the project through our review of applications submitted under these other regulatory programs. 2. There should be some type of easement, covenant or deed restriction for the wetlands and lakeshore areas. This would help to ensure that property owners are aware that the DNR, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the City of Chanhassen have jurisdiction over the areas and that the wetlands and lake cannot be altered without appropriate permits. 3. The building sites are well above the 100 -year flood elevation of 879' for Rice Marsh Lake, which is good. The landowners should be told that all the work that is done on the properties must comply with the applicable floodplain regulations of both the City of Chanhassen and the Riley- Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District. 4. Rice Marsh Lake has a shoreland classification of Natural Environment and a shoreland district extending 1000 feet from the OHW. Rice Lake Manor Estates must comply with the shoreland management regulations of the City of Chanhassen. In particular, the City should note : DNR Information 61'_ -?96 -6157, 1 -800- 766 - 6000 - TTY: 612-296 -5484. 1-800 - 657 -39_'O \n Equal (Ipponunm I illplmcl 4% Pilled `11 Re' - �"C" Pdpct ( "'WXnmu a \%%h,, \dlu ) r. Di(n�in V4s \1lnlnwm ul 10" P1111 (lmwlnm N'.nlr I ' Ms. Sharmin Al -Jaff May 15, 1996 Page 2 ' a. The plan shows a setback of 125' from what appears to be a delineated wetland line. However, the City's minimum structure setback is 150' from the OHW. This should ' be corrected. b. Steep slopes (slopes exceeding 12 %) exist on the Rice Lake Manor Estates site. ' Section 20481(ex5) of the Chanhassen ordinance requires the evaluation of possible soil erosion impacts and development visibility from Rice Marsh Lake and the addition of conditions to City permits to prevent erosion and preserve screening. ' C. Section 20482 (b)(2)b. of the Chanhassen Ordinance requires that only limited clearing of trees and shrubs be allowed within the shore impact zone of Rice Marsh ' Lake. The shore impact zone is an area within 75' of the OHW of Rice Marsh Lake. d. Section 20484(a) of the Chanhassen Ordinance states that "private roads shall be designed to take advantage of natural vegetation and topography to achieve maximum screening from view from public waters." It is not clear if the proposed driveway for Rice Lake Manor Estates will be adequately screened. If necessary, Chanhassen should require landscaping to adequately screen the driveway. 5. The following comments are general and apply to all proposed developments: a. A large percentage of the new site is wetland. Therefore, it is likely that construction ' dewatering will be needed when structures are constructed on the lot. If construction involves dewatering in excess of 10,000 gallons per day or one million gallons per year, the contractor will need to obtain a DNR appropriations permit. It typically ' takes approximately 60 days to process the permit application. b. The comments in this letter address DNR - Division of Waters jurisdictional matters ' and concerns. These comments should not be construed as DNR support or lack thereof for a particular project. ' Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please contact me at 772 -7910 should you have any questions regarding these comments. ' Sincerely, -V,� J e Richter ' Hydrologist t JR/cds ' c: Robert Obermeyer, Riley- Purgatory-Bluff Creek WSD Joe Yanta, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Chanhassen Shoreland File Planning Commission Meeting - May 15, 1996 a. Revise the preliminary grading plan to show the location of proposed dwelling pads, using standard designations and indicate the lowest level floor, entry level floor and garage floor elevations. This should be done prior to final plat approval. b. Obtain demolition permits. This should be done prior to any grading or construction on the property. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING: REOUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LOT 1. BLOCK 1. RICE LAKE MANOR INTO TWO SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON PROPERTY ZONED RSF. AND LOCATED AT 8591 TIGUA CIRCLE. RICE LAKE MANOR ESTATES. BARRY MCKEE. Sharmin Al -Jaff presented the staff report on this item. Mancino: Any questions for staff at this point? Peterson: The only question I would have is, do you have any sense of Parcel A that is reserved for future development, how many lots can go on there actually? Al -Jaff: Our ordinance requires 15,000 square feet per lot. There is an issue of frontage. How do you serve those properties? And you have a limit of four homes off of a private driveway. Now in this case we already have two homes that are served from that driveway. This entire subdivision there are a total of 8 lots and they're steep, wooded. They back up to a lake. Really the only way you see those parcels served, as they split, is probably private. This is a perfect case when a private driveway would be used. Mancino: Any other questions for staff? Is the applicant here? Do they wish to make a presentation? Kevin Thompson: My name is Kevin Thompson... Just a little background. Initially the conceptual plan for this division was actually a 4 or 5 lots to the existing home. After review and went over it with staff, we decided that for aesthetics reasons, in order to keeping with the character and the nature of the neighborhood, and also for economic reasons, that putting a public road in ... probably would not be very advantageous. We decided to go with ... simple lot split. Just divide it into a simple two lots. Into two very sizable pieces ... sell that lot as a single family home .... If this is approved... Basic lot split. There's a number of conditions. Quite a number of conditions... The only question ... is on item number 11. The removal of the I1 I Planning Commission Meeting - May 15, 1996 I fence or portion of fence that is non - complying with city code. That's the neighboring ' property and ... We had a difficult time connecting with them prior to this meeting... I suspect that would be... Mancino: May I ask a question about that? Isn't that people who own the fence that's encroaching, isn't that house up for sale? So it would be new neighbors that move in there and a lot of times, this has personally happened that the new neighbors who move in think ' that that's their property line and they get used to it and in the future there, kind of sometimes down it would be a problem because they look at it as their own because it's in their fence. ' Kevin Thompson: ...showing their outline that it crosses the property line ... they actually brought it up to see what we could do so I suspect we're not going to have any problems... ' Mancino: Thank you. Any questions for the applicant? No. Thank you. May I please have a motion to open this for a public hearing, with a second. ' Conrad moved, Peterson seconded to open the public hearing. The public hearing was opened. ' Mancino: This is open for a public hearing. Anyone wishing to address the Planning Commission on this preliminary plat, on this metes and bounds. Seeing none. ' Conrad moved, Peterson seconded to close the public hearing. The public hearing was closed. ' Mancino: Comments from commissioners. Don. t Mehl: Yeah, I agree with staff. The private drive is the only logical way. There's no other way to really access the property. It's kind of boxed in. I guess I really don't have anything else. I guess I personally wouldn't have a problem with saying he'll show, or the staff condition shall remove the fence. I think it could be changed or as an option to move it to a location that would be in compliance. Mancino: Move the property line? Mehl: Pardon? ' Mancino: It would be in compliance with? ' Mehl: With the codes. I assume that would be off of the property. 1 12 Planning Commission Meeting - May 15, 1996 Mancino: Jeff. Farmakes: Pretty straight forward. No comments. Mancino: Okay. Bob. Skubic: I support it. Mancino: Kevin. Joyce: I'm fine. Conrad: Nothing new. Mancino: Craig? I have nothing new either. I do think that this is the opportune time to put the fence in the right place and at the property line because it can create in the future problems and I just think that it would be much easier to have it resolved for the applicant. I think it's clean, straight, and this is the best time to do it. So I do support the staff report and all the conditions. May I have a motion please? Conrad: Yeah, I'd like to motion Planning Commission recommends approval of the metes and bounds subdivision #96 -8, Rice Lake Manor Estates as shown on the plans dated Received April 12, 1996, subject to the conditions 1 through 11 of the staff report. Mancino: Is there a second please? Joyce: I'll second that one, yeah. Mancino: Any discussion? Conrad moved, Joyce seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Metes and Bounds Subdivision 996 -8, Rice Lake Manor Estates, as shown on the plans dated Received April 12, 1996, subject to the following conditions: 1. Tree preservation fencing must be installed around the perimeter of the building site, 20 feet from the proposed pad, before grading or excavation begins. No trees will be permitted to be removed except those within the building pad and 20 feet from the pad. Also one tree will be required in the front yard setback area. 13 I I Planning Commission Meeting - May 15, 1996 ' 8. Full park and trail fees be paid in accordance with city ordinance. 9. The applicant shall remove all structures that encroach onto the city property located east of the subject site. 10. The neighbor's fence located north of the subject property which encroaches onto Parcel ' A must be removed. 11. Building Official's conditions: a. Remove fence or portion of fence which is non- complying with city code. ' b. Determine construction period for structure at the northwest corner of the property and work with Inspections Division staff to obtain permits and inspections, if any are required. ' c. Remove the structure on the east side of the dwelling, or obtain a permit to alter the structure to meet building and zoning code requirements. ' All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously. t 1 14 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit on Tract A, a detailed grading, drainage, erosion ' control and tree removal plan shall be submitted to the city for review and approval. 3. The applicant shall dedicate to the city drainage easements over all wetlands and ' drainage ditches. The drainage easements shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide. 4. The applicant shall be responsible for Surface Water Management fees pursuant to city ' ordinance. 5. Extension of sewer and water service to the new lot will require a permit from the city's ' building department. ' 6. The new lot will be subject to sanitary sewer and water hook -up charges pursuant to city ordinance. ' 7. The private driveway should be upgraded to meet city ordinance. Cross - access easements shall be conveyed to benefitting properties. ' 8. Full park and trail fees be paid in accordance with city ordinance. 9. The applicant shall remove all structures that encroach onto the city property located east of the subject site. 10. The neighbor's fence located north of the subject property which encroaches onto Parcel ' A must be removed. 11. Building Official's conditions: a. Remove fence or portion of fence which is non- complying with city code. ' b. Determine construction period for structure at the northwest corner of the property and work with Inspections Division staff to obtain permits and inspections, if any are required. ' c. Remove the structure on the east side of the dwelling, or obtain a permit to alter the structure to meet building and zoning code requirements. ' All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously. t 1 14