The URL can be used to link to this page

1c. Municipal Consent and Review Plans for TH 5 Improvement Project; Call for Public HearingCITY OF CHMNSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building_lnspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Paul Oehme, Public Works Director /City Engineer DATE: February 28, 2011 SUBJ: Municipal Consent and Review Plans for TH 5 Improvement Project: Call for Public Hearing PROPOSED MOTION "The City Council is requested to approve a resolution calling a public hearing for April 11, 2011 for the Municipal Consent process on the TH 5 Improvement Project." City Council approval requires a simple majority vote of the City Council present. BACKGROUND )proved a resolution for application for a Und grant for a pedestrian underpass of TH 5 at the pproved a resolution for an HSIP funding application 41nnewashta, Can June 22, 2010 a neighborhood meeting was held; at Victoria City Hall to discuss the proposed 2012 TH 5 improvements planned for the summer of 2012. On February 14, 2011 staff updated Council at the Work Session on the Municipal Consent process. Web Site • Resurface the entire four-mile stretch. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us . Reconstruct the bridge over the recreational trail west of Rose Street i ' g eet n Victoria. Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Todd Gerhardt TH 5 Improvement Project February 28, 2011 Page 2 • Reconstruct an 800 -foot sink hole /settlement section of road west of 78th Street in Victoria. • Add capacity, efficiency and safety through turn lane improvements, signal modifications, ADA improvements, access modifications and drainage improvements. • Improve pedestrian mobility and safety with a new pedestrian underpass east of Minnewashta Parkway near the Arboretum. • Add safety edge and rumble strips and stripes to the center lane and shoulders at various locations along the project. Over the past several years, MnDOT has promoted and included rumble strips /stripes on reconstruction and overlay projects. These improvements are thought to reduce the amount of lane departure crashes on rural roadways. MnDOT is planning to include these improvements on TH 5; however staff does not have a drawing that shows exactly where MnDOT is proposing these improvements. MnDOT has indicated the desire to include these improvements on TH 5 from approximately the east entrance drive of the Landscape Arboretum to Lone Cedar Lane. Staff is concerned about the noise impacts these improvements may have and has asked MnDOT to include information at the public hearing regarding the need for the improvements and address staff s noise concerns. Two segments of TH 5 are anticipated to be closed between the Memorial Day and Labor Day holidays. One location is for the replacement of a bridge over a recreation trail west of Rose Street and another is for the reconstruction of pavement west of 78 Street. Loth of these closures are in the City of Victoria. Other shorter impacts may occur throughout the construction for various pipe replacements under TH 5 and a pedestrian underpass east of Minnewashta Parkway. MnDOT is not planning to construct a signal at the intersection of TH 5 and Minnewashta Parkway with this project because it currently does not meet their minimum threshold, or warrant, for installing a signal. However, a signal is the number one improvement people who live in this area have requested. MnDOT's response to this issue is as follows: Numerous studies conducted around the nation continue to show that traffic signals cause more overall delay and often result in an increase in the total number of crashes at an intersection. Studies also show that the rate of red light running at unjustified signals is higher than at justa zed ones. This is why the crash rates at unjustified signals are higher than at justified ones. In the past three years, at signalized intersections in the Metro area, there have been 54 fatal and 503 "A " injury crashes ( "A " is the most severe injury). Signal justification warrants were created to limit the installation of signals to locations where their benefits will be higher than their negative effects. Signal justification is based on criteria that was developed by the Federal Highway Administration and adopted as policy by MnDOT. This criteria looks at traffic volumes, crash history, pedestrians, school crossings, etc. The seriousness of a crash is not a factor in the crash criteria used in the justification of a traffic signal. MnDOT is concerned by and work to minimize all crashes. The traffic volume criteria are based on volumes on the major street and minor street. The major and minor streets both have to meet minimum volumes in order for these criteria to be met. For the major streets (on State Highways) in the Metro area, the minimum volumes are usually always met, which leaves the minor road volumes as the determining factor if a signal can be justified or not based on volumes of traffic. The traffic volumes at the gAeng \public \pw067b2 th 5 corridor study - 41 to 212 \022811 th 5 munc consent call ph.doc Todd Gerhardt TH 5 Improvement Project February 28, 2011 Page 3 intersection of TH 5/Minnewashta Parkway do not meet the minimum volumes at this time. As stated above, crash history is one of the criterion of signal justi lcation. This intersection has had 7 reported crashes in the past three years, of which zero are considered to be "correctable " with a traffic signal. "Correctable " crashes are right angle crashes. The crash criteria states that a signal warrant can be met if there are S "correctable " crashes per year. Based on all of the above, the installation of a traffic signal at this intersection is not justified at this time. The Landscape Arboretum is considering adding a south leg to the intersection of TH 5 and Minnewashta Parkway in the near future. If this leg is constructed and most of their daily trips to the Arboretum are directed to this intersection, it is anticipated a signal may be warranted at that time. Currently, there is not a lot of pedestrian movement from Minnewashta Parkway to the Landscape Arboretum. However, the Arboretum wants to encourage more "walk -up" traffic and is planning to make internal capital improvements for this to happen. The City has partnered with the Arboretum to encourage the general public to utilize this facility. Chanhassen residents will be able to cross TH 5 at Minnewashta Parkway with a safe grade separated connection and gain access to the Arboretum at no cost. The pedestrian underpass will allow the Landscape Arboretum to become an extension of the City's park system for all to enjoy. FUNDING Currently, the project has the following funding: • $4.7 million in MnDOT roadway preservation funds. • $1.25 million in Bridge Improvement or Replacement (BIR) Program funds to reconstruct the bridge over the recreational trail west of Rose Street awarded to MnDOT. • $900,000 in Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds awarded to the City of Chanhassen for turn lane improvements, shoulder widening and access modifications near TH 5 and Minnewashta Parkway (this funding requires a 10% match from the City of Chanhassen). • $1 million in Transportation Enhancement (TE) Program funds awarded to the City of Chanhassen for a pedestrian underpass beneath TH 5 east of Minnewashta Parkway (this funding requires a 20% match from the City of Chanhassen). • $362,900 in Municipal Agreement Program funds awarded to the City of Victoria for turn lane and shoulder improvements at TH 5 and the west junction of CSAH 11 /Victoria Drive (this funding requires the balance to be matched by the City of Victoria). The most current preliminary cost estimate is below the funding levels. There are some final design details to be worked out as the project continues through final design. In addition, once MnDOT fully understand the utility impacts there may be a cost share from the City for relocations. Based on MnDOT's latest cost estimate, the City of Chanhassen participation is roughly $180,000 for the federal funding grant match requirements which is broken down as follows: gAeng \public \pw067b2 th 5 corridor study - 41 to 212 \022811 th 5 munc consent call ph.doc Todd Gerhardt TH 5 Improvement Project February 28, 2011 Page 4 $70,000 (based on current estimate) for matching dollars for safety improvements (HSIP funding) on TH 5 at Minnewashta Parkway area. The grant application was fora $100,000 match. • $110,000 (based on current estimate) for pedestrian underpass at Minnewashta Parkway. The grant application was for $245,000 in matching funds. The City's cost participation will be refined as final design cost estimates are further detailed. The actual amount may be a lump sum or may depend on the awarded bid if that is how the agreement is structured. The City of Chanhassen did take the lead in applying for federal grants, however other agencies will benefit from these improvements. Staff has discussed with other agencies the need to help pay for the matching funds and indirect costs for the federal grant improvements. It is staff s belief Carver County, the City of Victoria and the Landscape Arboretum should help pay for the trail underpass at Minnewashta Parkway. It is proposed each of these agencies contribute 25% of the total federal matching funds along with right -of-way and indirect costs for the pedestrian underpass. Likewise, the City of Victoria should also help pay for the matching funds for the safety improvements on TH 5 since some of these improvements are in City of Victoria city limits. Staff is planning to meet with these agencies in the near future so an equitable cost sharing agreement can be worked out. MUNCIPAL CONSENT APPROVAL PROCESS Municipal Consent is a process that MnDOT must follow when a state construction project is proposed through a local municipality with local cost participation. The process is outlined in Minnesota Statute 161.162 to 161.167. The process begins when MnDOT submits plans and requests scheduling a public hearing to the local municipality. The City received MnDOT's layout for TH 5 on February 14, 2011. According to state law, the City must now call a public hearing within 15 days of the submittal date. The actual public hearing, however, does not have to be held until 60 days after the submittal date. SCHEDULE The preliminary schedule is as follows: • Hold Municipal Consent Public Hearing • City Council considers passing resolution approving /disapproving of improvements • Bid opening • Start Construction • Substantial Completion Attachment: Letter from MnDOT dated 2/14/11 Resolution CIP Page April 11, 2011 June 27, 2011 January 27, 2012 April, 2012 End of October, 2012 gAeng \public \pw067b2 th 5 corridor study - 41 to 212 \022811 th 5 munc consent call ph.doc Minnesota Oeparttoet4 of TtOnsportatio, 1500 West Count Road 139. osevilld, M.N. 55113 OP TO Date. Februar 14, 20-11 PaulOeh a Chanhassen. Cit En 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box, 147 Chanhassen,, Mn 553,17 RE to Re for Municipal Consent state Project 10.02-89 Hi between Hi 41 and West Junction 6f, Count Hi 11 Nictoria Drive In the Cities of Chanhassen I nc * Victoria, Carver Count Pearl r. O.ehm.e.*. 19, "Wayf". of., V ictoria and, h 21.2 in Eden Prairie is an 19 way As y ou are aware., HJ h S betw.00. I e, 0 .H "tes and busine'es road wa -servni xm- m n n mpttntzecondAi *Ilo. Ito ll S n orth of Hi 212. In ss 0 j unction 21:2 Mn/O ''o la m to, 1 4.1 Hi roe B arr the: mast -OT mprova:a, -mile, sp twee s SAH in . 'c '-aen . of: Count State. A,id -.Hi (C )N' de: Dd M, for and Hi 41 n� C hanh The p TO -o sed p '-will.�*: - Se*. ...Oer of 2010, I istribut �d full size: plQts. of our--,M-n-/D staff ;approved, lo Please: let P , Y : -o. the the pr e W .b....siate si :view need. a u m_ I' M-80. "0 1.1.1 --nothorto, on ex I tml n; I tro /p V NAV I i AOL.. d The pro . a. lettin -10' ostimoted,:."to, be tspr fia 271# n in in ho in and =Om- pi-ste I the fall of at �Aear,, Two:so Ot., of H hwa ar 5' a. anus aced to be closed: be tween y ,,,'i t :�b #d Wm 0 a eh; a %n dal. and. L :bo Oa h i l l I' 1b th'"O � r ace y m Mp g e over a An E Opportuni Employer P 260 SP -10 1 62 , -89 Munld* Consen ., t R,6qmt is t tid of .recreation trail west of Rose Street and another four recons ruc. n pavement W t: of 78h Street. Other shorter 'Impacts .ma occur thtou the cons-truoAon for vari. ous pipe r . acements under Hi 5 and a,pedettrian: underpass east of Mihhewashta Par kwa (Please t6f6r to the enclosed: dt-- rvidW h* fo iii usUation -6-f� locations.) , pro ove . g .rap %tic r Currentl the project has the follow' in fundin Enclosedis our most current preliminar cost estl te. V h ::is curre- 1 1 k ' a ntl be.ow our fundin evets Therware some :14 n.00tails. to beroftood as�':we. 000#nue_ throu final design that m add cost ay !,"r! I to fully d "to n.., once we 'in the e . but the Cit will be 'nvoNed th cl - sas a x1at a jo n UtU .."o : relocations. e a: t' ssere ftm thei f or stand.t e 11 Y -Jm Pact$ thor ma b w s Based On: Whatwe*Aow at this: ft'6, our *0d cost participation 1br Cit Of C. hhassen r r hi N-tww -, ee n$180,00 and :$346,000 WhIth can be b down asfol,low Y e . : POO. (0ased: on W(q e $10 tkna 0,004(basedon.. app n.es te in mathjn an for the HST P fundin * $41 000 ( Oas on.. oo:.$M.,0W . on a. pocatim in , estimaw currwt'� est'imaw P matchin funs for the TE,10nding 0: Other u-0 s cast Hanes �reiinec as we g era oar Erna est. n �participation wi e h'It %y 011b f g " 611�6t 6st'! mates. t T116 �� cost t I I � f -A s e mu m y be a t o e in fiz thi f L Th a0UA-1 aont a o�m6r and, further;det in out zret! e a structure-do. s h..-dw. th. t ump su m r o ma y . , epen on a awarded bid: � if to 1:1 d t` d tie g .,reemen. is An. OppoduhlR E mp l oyer 3;of:3 SPIOZ89 Municipal consent Request M nicipat'approva I is re for most Mh./DOT CtS ftt re' 1. 1 "fibn Of permat U pro q u re acqui n si capacit withih, a municipalit This* p ' ri alters a qq pss * or.chan g es,rna l nijne r0i ect oermanent d r uires munici a ne eded f r ina �a na ease- memht�vnee e dra* flets. eqpal e, e.-O pprovalf or th Within the Cit of "Chanhassen permanent drainaae easem. e to are needed at the followin locaribris. hta Parkwa t he south side of Hi hwi a y 6 f m p 208 ast of Minnewas on 9 West of Hi 41 on thei south side of Hi W a 5 from. parcel. 309 • h i Hi M parc West of Hi 4 y 1 on the nort , side of .5 fr kel Please note than are other temporar ac sit ionsj. needed for the construction o f the pro that, will be released back to the proverty owner afterwards.. ( Please.: see enclosed ri g raphicsi.,) p ove saet a ni mo un Plea s e* let me know how o' fls�-pt dit to i f weappre.c..*ta,te.. rtfnth I c a ssist y ou *in this rocess. eso le lution R Sarrip P,- hiln�ar Pt*d CO$t E$t� Pro ect OverviO GO W cc M , r kw -., MUNMOT South At" ana . I� L RO*M, Carver County En g ineer AO Edual ODOOttUn Error It the Cit di sappro v es, Mn/DOrs options aros. 1 n/ T WWI C th It that Itis. a pp e al i ng . . M es .. e, I M Ap Board of three Pers s is establlslvd� rots a m U nd.offned .. me to 0 Th appoints'. a ber establish appeal board the � c e t b ot e n wen & Third member selecteo. Py mutual y If Ile y �cannot a Mn/DOT r eqqoot � the. Chief Justice10 sell0kd appoints1h w I i I I nI , 4 da of Ia /DOT's re 14 da he:Chlef Justic rd M��r th. ESTIMATE FOR: SP 1002.89 TH 5 Mill and Overla Brid Replacement, Turn Lanes and Soil Correction MSD PROJ. 10: 725 GRADING, SURFACING, DRAINAGE, TURN LANES, PEDESTRIAN UNDERPASS, AND BRIDGE #6654. SP 1002.89 TH 5, LETTING DATE I YEAR: 1/27112 LOCATED ON TH 5 FROM 661+00 TO 858+50, PROJECT SCOPE HIGHWAY MAINUN-E IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION: - 4'f4&OCAF SHOULDERS W" SETTLEM04TAPEA8 CROSS S!-OPECO�Rmm THREE CPEN CUT CULVERT REPLACE0,VfTS DRA-RAGE & EROS 0114 REPkR SIDE STREET IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION: R G HT TI)RN LA)vE 01`4 FM BAVARIA ROAD ( CO. RD, 13 TO Fa TH 5+ I-PRCP-EF.EUTS OU LMN'NEWASWA PAM'1AY IINCLUD ING 6 AE, PEO TLW%*.L UNDER TH 5. ACC ESS CLOSURE TO LONE CEDAR LME MD ONE MVEWAY WITH ASSOCIATED FRONTAGE ROAD CONSTRUCTIQU :NTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIPTION ( SIGNALS, GE011VIETRIC. INTERCHANGES F-ASTBOXiO BYPASS L/-.'o'E AT III. 'i1;EWAStfTA PAIWiAY CaNVERT EASTBOUND BYPASS Lk.E AT MUENVASHTA PARMAY TO LEFT TUM4 LAME CONS I RUC , 11. E T TURN LA:-ES ON E B AND WS TH 5 AT KOCHA LANEMARK DRIVE. VALIDATED ESTIMATE DATE ES TiMA TE ESTIMATE DATE1 08/11/10 ESTIMATE COMPLETED BY: LOCATION ( FROWTO) AREA (s 444) Peter Davich (last modified b NP 11/19110 Ii d LWD FACTOR %'We h R. 5k &-d IM le, on 9:R S 1,297,173 4.1 51 29 694,344 TC $ 1 CA(V*f CQUr+ S 322,337 1g , Vk (Of [A Coop "-aMng WaI for PI;I r.nee-ashla B )•e Tra.1 Chanhassen TES 5428 2f+E JOLhof Wq DOT I $ 40 Total $ 7.W 3,41 ---- Safet capl6r 5 94 1. 7 6 pa'.fimorh Pros. S ?A S,V.3 WRE TH 5 SHOULD RECONST SETTLE CORRECT PAVE PRES Si 40 069 g e 5 z0'(ej0'CA0.td 4 ema*4 ho"n Ed V, rICW4- s g ral; V &-d p&.wnarl. IW vor4wyV.,.* TH 5 St-10kkDER CONST;I40ENING M-r%'00T Total S 4, ROADWAY LOCATION ( FROWTO) AREA (s 444) DEPTH OWN LWD FACTOR LWD COST WATIPUER CoU ST. COST TH 5 ki LL & 0`1ERLAY Vif A$LOPE CORRECT PAVE M S, INCLUDES 01' XSLOPE CCRRECTM 792,745 4.1 51 29 -- 3 3, (CO $160,165 TH 5 MAN',LINE RECON ST: 6R,DG E 6654 FEDERAL BR,OGE I'1.!PRCt-VEfV-NT & REPLACEM4T PROGRAM 7,911 80 0 V) S67'm "-aMng WaI for PI;I r.nee-ashla B )•e Tra.1 Chanhassen TES TH 5 SHOULDER RECOINST OR•DGE E655 FEOERAL eR OGE IMPRWEr."ENT E. REPLACEf.•ENT PROGRA-M 2.295 40 0 14 $57.000 Ils% TH 5 h1W.1110NE FtECV.;ST- SETTLE CORRECT PAVE PRES 21.750 so 2 74 S i 40,000 $63,000 TH 5 SHOULD RECONST SETTLE CORRECT PAVE PRES 1 1,021 40 069 $140,CO3 5 z0'(ej0'CA0.td 4 ema*4 ho"n Ed V, rICW4- s g ral; V &-d p&.wnarl. IW vor4wyV.,.* TH 5 St-10kkDER CONST;I40ENING 2352, SAFET-Y CAPAC(rY 1 34,6% 40 875 $57.003 15r TH 5 TUFL*,LAJ%E CONST. KOCHAPARK SAFETY CAPAWY 29.946 80 378 $-37 $251,W CSAH I-% RAVARI-A TURNLME CONST CARVER COWITY 27.184 80 343 c -8 7, 0', 1) 2xrl ( CSM 1 1 SAVWA U40LILDER CONST CARVER COUNTY 3,112 40 0.19 $57,W) WAY TH 5 KIMNEWASHTA BYPASS L&NE CON ST NE ED Ml, FEDERAL H$ P t$ 23.699 80 299 "7.40W 0% TH 5 WiN.EVIA-SHTA BYPASS S40MO CC ;S NEED M1, FEDERAL HSP,,SI,Q00, 27,320 40 1 72 $57,OCO $ W AN!I'FWASHTAP'XWY RECOINST EEO 2151, FEOERAL HSP 20,637 55 ILONE C.EOAA 00,'ZT IF ECERAL H5 55 1 30 $67,000 7,1 PROJECT BRIDGE COST CALCULATIONS L00XT SRI E N = LIE NWH (FEET ) I WMTHEFEET) I SQUARE FEET I VSOFT I C OST ITH 5 just Wast of Do.%rIto,,vn VrOooa Federal Br Impraement & Repfacenrwnt pto $ V154 1 00 1 00 1 0 1 113 1 s 1.21 1 e4 SPiDGE. COST TOTAL$ 5 1.21 1, " CO"TRUCT)ON SUM EM ROADWAY COST ( PAVEMENT) - PROJECT RUSK OETAKS F?.I$,K BA4E0 OT1 UN JV40vW4 QVA:4Trri & C ati D MO:4 3 % OF RISK 10% CONST. ST 63.745,130 CO $-1,119,6.13 MOGE COST. Federal Sr Improvement & ReplacerrAnt Pro $ Est■r#'4 prv.ilaed b L%DOT 0"1c*, ircWes deTVIx�n, 5% 60, for W r&-An QuIrVes and CC-M!0- so"* S11.21 1, 1184 $1,271,743 8 ke Tra I Pedewfan Undetpass Chanhassen TE S Casts b-3w-J cA 10.X12 Bo 145' LwWw. S 757ilft $12.700 vid sector.-4, IdQQ9 Wx " 10% r-4-k- L-41814-1 CO51, 10% $160,165 5116,182 8 ka Tral 2 M nr.e-%aWa Chanhassen 7E$ C*53 biwej co I 1W tra4, SX&0,0WrA*. " ION r.0- (Ft" Ed K, Lke! cwse-reat%i 10% S0.067 S45,83-A "-aMng WaI for PI;I r.nee-ashla B )•e Tra.1 Chanhassen TES Costs based on 3W lc!al Wr - 15 he; rc-tM to 3500 SF, " $84SF (MSF firrn Ed K, 11054 $280.000 S-YA'000 RSS Wa-1 Wor Wtorta B,1,e Tra I Chanhassen Federal HSIP Costs awxre 7adA Ae 115S st, Fourids'<,rts eemVe us�r 51P.SF Ils% 5513.7313 $$ `I. Lori! Ctd-ar Grst ChaTsber Chanhassen Federal HSIP S 0' S • W.000 $63,000 M scelae*ous RE York WRE Funds :I RE wyk root mved im M0 multl Is stir a!s %trfed v" b2xV20 10 WRE 6-a ec--i e em 3!'o 10% $99, €C- S i CA, Wo con"erl r:e Cu%*1 ReOacorr.ents ( S cui vens WRE Funds 5 z0'(ej0'CA0.td 4 ema*4 ho"n Ed V, rICW4- s g ral; V &-d p&.wnarl. IW vor4wyV.,.* 10% PROJECT ENGINEERING $176,000 ' Cc . .!.*rl RepJar-o7em at STA 602+50 VARE Funds f4ot a wilertre Wert, v6t!I� ktwo%m RW 40% $1S.0 $15,50) Sot Cui.*fl F0 WRE Funds Co rvm e s!jr W-3 ba sed cn r ect-i-,f Vd prices, 2 571 r4k fo r trcno xr, Ie s &-d tr,49A pf orce Ss 25% 520,000 $25,000 S" S!.) tjreVur-tm PYRE Funds Up to 4 sk-pes m any w * cwieOK". cuTe,1 e V3 nala is a omser. a ei4,rr a!* for It,* wrecton of ors 23% $15,000 $18,750 ADA Im"mments tn Victo6a. CSAH 13. aewd TH 41 Pavement Pres P-v-tk i s we rro$ft-1 c*s',* w3 Out aw ADA Varojarwds wrtf" to f4xk,-s'4 50% r.-20.04(3 $ 30, CO) CSAH 13 SIG SYSTEM REVISION 50% Stat*, SO -6 Count EslrW4 ptorOdeJ b WDOT Moto Tia"fic 0111, a j69.342 569'31? CSAH 13 VIGUAL LOOP REPLACEMENT 60% Stale, 50% Count EVkn see pro-'d*d b f.1n DOT I.Wm Traft 0 'i $33,294 533,2e4 Cit of vittona Co-op Pro"KI 0% NEED MORE LISES? ADD AMIK"M ROWS HERE ( W4W W TH95 LINE, RK511AT CLICK, SELECT r E81) PVJWT< 6 150 FT $334 LWO PORTION COST OTHER COSTS 63 9 41,5% ROAMAY ONLY Flof IX, S I LIE 51.012,197 S I LA.I;E 0LE $506,099 TOTAL PROJECT FRQJ S J f4LE $1,876.899 S / LA.ItE M LE ss-n.4F'o I ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $6,404,002 SU13-TOTAL (CONSTRUCTION III R1-qk% >>A $6,944,527 OVERALL PROJECT RISK[ 8.44% RAILROAD AGREEMENTS AND UTILITIES DATE 8;1112010 CURRENT PROJECT COST TOTAL ( CONSTRUCTION + RISK + OTHER EXTERNAL COSTS >>> $7,444,527 DATE FISCAL YEAR PERCENT INFLATI04 f/I I i+D �SCOPING DATABASE INFLATION ADJUSTED COST 2012 1 .0200 $7,083,417 $11 REVISE SCOPINU DATABASE iNFLATION ADJUSTED COST r 2012 �2O $7,593,417 TEMPLATE CURREUT AS OF. MOWOO LWD DATABASE REFERENCE JOB NUVSER If AVA&ABLE. OXXXXX Hie Narne and Fain S.'Area 5 SP 1002-fTA ID02-69 TH 5 MSO LWD 8-11-10 PAD)-J lW2-69 TH 5 'I A om RiGNT•O COST (Need 1858) 100Y. S500.cepol [RAILROAD AGREEMENT COST 0% so' TOTAL PROJECT )ALE11 37 TOTAL PROJECT LME ISLES 7.4 [MAJOR UTILITY RELOCATION COST 0% S 0' TOTAL PROJECT AVX. LME PALES E XTERNAL PROJECT COST 1 6% —T— Sol PROJECT ENGINEERING COSTS ESTIMATED PROJECT LANOSCAPE COST 7 1 0% So l, to] Pre - Lettin 121,"o of Construct! c $833,34-3 (LANDSCAPING NOT ilk'CLWED 1*4 TOTAL COST BUT IS A REMNDFR FOR FUTURE PROGRAO&I..14 NEEDS) Construction 8% of Construc-Iii7orric $555,562 En Tolal 20% of Constructio. $1,368,905 TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION, R-O•W, >>> $7,194,527 RAILROAD AGREEMENTS AND UTILITIES DATE 8;1112010 CURRENT PROJECT COST TOTAL ( CONSTRUCTION + RISK + OTHER EXTERNAL COSTS >>> $7,444,527 DATE FISCAL YEAR PERCENT INFLATI04 f/I I i+D �SCOPING DATABASE INFLATION ADJUSTED COST 2012 1 .0200 $7,083,417 $11 REVISE SCOPINU DATABASE iNFLATION ADJUSTED COST r 2012 �2O $7,593,417 TEMPLATE CURREUT AS OF. MOWOO LWD DATABASE REFERENCE JOB NUVSER If AVA&ABLE. OXXXXX Hie Narne and Fain S.'Area 5 SP 1002-fTA ID02-69 TH 5 MSO LWD 8-11-10 PAD)-J lW2-69 TH 5 'I A om MN/DOT Highway 5 Project in Victoria and Chanhassen Mill and overlay, turn lane improvements and drainage project Vol �e�,. ° ae�.", w'.: .,�,:. ��"&3xy a fia ' � �« %g # i -' .. « r:. ♦ �:i< � .. .. ..m.w....M.: �U . ,. • >,p! a .rw.,,s • #,'.ad�f°'r ^:. '.+ r >� .,t. V4....wer.y ♦ , "t� r^ ,. P`y�F 4 AAA Ile �� /��' � � d t �� ':,.Yy �� 1111�� ,.. . .. - _ ,X`. �k �.•�'' t .�:. � _ "�, ... � r. «` � ., .~ .F'� rw /' a' I('° S . � n+ � - b '•. ek: I '� ..4.�R s. « {.., ,7 y� � y� � � �. . � � ..•�.. .. /�. (ea� !fir � ��'6 r �' , t � �f .� .. � -,-�p� ; ll.'�� ' �, .Mr^ �'�'a.� 'P+i ' �' �r� I' � '^� .e w. s _ ��qr �+ i �: �F' f +t. •� 4 d wnia January 2011 1 l e Marr►n�n F RalR:iHy m - . C ArMr J �J a 0.125 0.25 0,5 KICS I 1 I I t 1 1 i CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: February 28, 2011 RESOLUTION NO: MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: 2011- A RESOLUTION CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE TH 5 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT -- PW067132 WHEREAS, pursuant to a letter dated February 14, 2011, MnDOT is requesting Municipal Consent on State Project 1002 -89 /City Project PW067132, TH 5 Improvement Proj ect between Highway 41 and the west junction of County Highway I INictoria Drive, and WHEREAS, the letter provides information regarding the proposed project and the municipal consent process. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council: 1. The Council will consider the improvement of such project. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 11 day of April, 2011 for the TH 5 Improvement Project, PW067B2 in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 7:00 PM and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 28 day of February, 2011. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor YES NO ABSENT Capital, Improvement Program 2011 thru 2415 Department Street Improvements City of C MN Contact Paul Oehme Type Improvement Useful Life Category Streets/Highways Account #1 Account #3 Priority n/a Account #2 Account #4 Description Total Project Cost: $9,029,000 MNDOT is planning to resurface Md make improvements to TH5 west of TH41 in 2011. These improvements include resurfacing, shoulder improvements, turn lane improvements and intersection improvements at Minnewashta Parkway. The City will be responsible for a small portion of the project as it relates to local access and trail and underpass improvements. The City applied for federal funding for trail and underpass improvements along with safety improvements at Minnewashta Parkway. The trail underpass local share is estimated at $275,000. It is anticipated the Landscape Arboretum, City of Victoria and Carver County Parks will help pay for the local share. Justification To improve safety and mobility along the corridor. Expenditures 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Construction 91029,000 91029,000 Total 9,029,000 99029,000 Funding Sources 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Other Agency Contribution 8 829 000 8,829,000 Park Dedication Fund 801,000 80,000 Street Pavement Management 120,000 120,000 Total 99029 9000 91029,000 Budget Impact/Other 110