Loading...
B. CSAH 18 Alternative Analysis - TH 41 to CSAH 13Engineering Currently, this section of CSAH 18 is a gravel,two -lane roadway. The daily traffic was 260 Phone: 952.227.1160 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Fax: 952.227.1110 Q FROM: Paul Oehme, Director of Public Works /City Engineer CHANHASSEN existing traffic conflicts or accident problems were identified in the report. Phone: 952.227.1140 R DATE: September 13 2008 7700 Market Boulevard The County believes this corridor is important from a transportation perspective because it PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJ: CSAH 18 Alternative Analysis - TH 41 to CSAH 13 (Bavaria Road) Park &Recreation Phone: 952227.1120 PWO08A Administration County. The construction of this section of CSAH could take place as early as 2013. Phone: 952.227.1100 BACKGROUND Fax: 952.227, 1110 roadway. This recommendation reduced the amount of impacts to the adjacent property Phone: 952.227.1400 Carver County is considering making improvements to CSAH 18 from TH 41 to CSAH 13, Building Inspections south of the Landscape Arboretum, in the future. Carver County has completed an alternative Phone: 952.227.1180 analysis to review environmental issues, identify project needs, review corridor alternatives, Fax: 952.227. 1190 complete traffic analysis, identify preliminary costs and make an alternative recommendation. Engineering Currently, this section of CSAH 18 is a gravel,two -lane roadway. The daily traffic was 260 Phone: 952.227.1160 vehicles per day in 2009 after TH 212 was opened. The 20 -year traffic projection is expected Fax: 952.227.1170 to increase to 2,400 vehicles per day. If the roadway is improved, it is expected to increase to Fax: 952.227.1110 8,000 vehicles per day. These increases are based on expected growth in the area. No Finance existing traffic conflicts or accident problems were identified in the report. Phone: 952.227.1140 mitigation or right -of -way costs that are negotiated items with local communities for these Fax: 952.227.1110 The County believes this corridor is important from a transportation perspective because it Phone: 952.227.1300 could reduce traffic volumes on TH 5 that is already over capacity, improve the school bus Park &Recreation Phone: 952227.1120 route to the Chanhassen High School- and provide an important east -west corridor through the Fax: 952.227.1110 County. The construction of this section of CSAH could take place as early as 2013. Recreation Center The alternative analysis recommended a 40 mph, two -lane roadway to replace the gravel 2310 Coulter Boulevard roadway. This recommendation reduced the amount of impacts to the adjacent property Phone: 952.227.1400 owners by needing 100 feet of right -of -way while providing for the design capacity needed in Fax: 952.227.1404 the future. Planning & DISCUSSION Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Since a portion of the improvements are within the city limits of Chanhassen and based on Fax: 952.227.1110 the 2007 Carver County cost participation policy, Chanhassen would be responsible for $97,800 of the recommended alternative. This cost does not include engineering, wetland Public Works mitigation or right -of -way costs that are negotiated items with local communities for these 1591 Park Road types of projects. Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Staff has reviewed the alternative analysis report and sent comments back to the County. Staff is planning to review the highlights of the analysis reports with the Council at the work Senior Center session. If the Council decides this project is necessary and needed at this time, funding Phone: 952.227.1125 should be programmed in the 2012 Capital Improvement Plan. Fax: 952.227,1110 Web Site Attachments www.d.chanhassen.mn.us Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 0 CITY OF CHANgASSEN March 7, 2011 7700 Market Boulevard Mr. Lyndon Robjent PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Carver County Public Works 11360 Highway 212 Suite 1 Cologne, MN 55322 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 RE: CSAH 18 Alternative Analysis (TH 41 to CR 13) — PWO08A Fax: 952.227.1110 Building.lnspections Doar Lyndon: Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Chanhassen has reviewed the Alternative Analysis for CSAH 18 and offers the following comments: Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 1. As you are aware, the City of Chanhassen does not have any Fax: 952.227.1170 residential or commercial property that abut or that have access to this Finance section of CSAH 18. The amount of traffic that currently and is Phone: 952.227,1140 forecasted to use CSAH 18 is relatively low and appears to not have Fax: 952.227.1110 much transportation value for our community. Park & Recreation 2. The alternative analysis did not highlight any existing congestion or Phone: 952.227.1120 significant safety problem that will be corrected on CSAH 18 with this Fax: 952.227.1110 project. The City does acknowledge this corridor may allow for City Recreation Center of Victoria residents a secondary route to the Chanhassen High School 2310 Coulter Boulevard rather that traveling on TH 5. The Cities of Victoria, Waconia and Phone: 952.227.1400 Chanhassen have prioritized TH 5 west of 41 to TH 212 as a top Fax: 952227,1404 transportation priority for our communities. Planning & 3. The proposed roadway design and the amount of traffic it will handle Natural Resources appear to be more of a City collector roadway design than a County Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952,227.1110 State Aid Highway design. The project seems to help other communities with future development plans then address a serious Public Works County transportation need. The letter you received from the City of 1591 Park Road Chaska dated February 22, 2011 stated the project should be delayed Phone: 952.227.1300 because of lack of development south of this corridor. Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center 4. This section of CSAH 18 is less than 2 miles long. The project is Phone: 952.227.1125 estimated to cost over $11,345,000 to construct when right -of -way, Fax: 952.227.1110 wetland mitigation and engineering costs are included. These costs seem to be excessive since the project does not appear to correct a Web Site congestion or serious safety problem. mad.chanhassen,mn.us Phnnhncenn 6 �mmnnifu_fnr I ifn - Prnvidinn fnr Tnd and Planninn fnr TnnlMMAI *EXERPTS FROM REPORT &I O ki I E N G I N E E R S P LAN N E RS DESIGNER S Consulting Group, Inc. SRF No. 0096981 0040 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Lyndon Robjent, PE, County Engineer Carver County FROM: Nathen Will, PE, Senior Associate RECEOVED �SEN Patrick Corkle, PE, PTOE, Principal FEB 0 8 2011 DATE: January 12, 2011 ENGINEERI DEPT SUBJECT: CSAH 18 FROM TH 41 TO CSAH 13 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS PURPOSE OF�STUDY The purpose of this Alternative Analysis is to select a preferred alignment for 'CSAH J 18 (82nd Street /Lyman Boulevard) between CSAH 13 (Bavaria Road) and TH 41. The existing "connection" is a gravel roadway with signif icant number,of low speed curves, poor intersections and no pedestrian or bike facilities. This project would provide a two -lane paved roadway providing an extension of CSAH 18 to accommodate vehicle, pedestrian, bicycle and school bus movements while maintaining natural ,features. PFOJ,ECT NEED,., The project need is based on the following factors: 1) CSAH 18 is an important east -west corridor through Carver County, The County is staging the upgrade., of CSAH:. j8, .from' CSAH 13 (Bavaria Road) over to CSAH 17 (Powers Boulevard:, Po. We : rs, Boulevard provides easy access from CSAH 18 to a TH 212 . _. interchange. 2) Traffic volumes are expected to increase over the next 20 years. The 2007/2008 daily traffic Volume ` is approximately 690 vehicles per day. This volume is expected to increase to 2,400 vehicles per day in 20 years without any improvements. An improved.roadway would result. ini - 000-vehicles perday :int20 yea -rs, - : :..... .. .::... . zS 7 3) Provide connectivity trails and school bus roirtes tlirou 'h the Cities 'of Chanha sseri; 'Cfiaska, An ctoria:' CurrentlX, _ ' these. - trarisp,ortatiop modes do not have a t`tF S' e l continuous route. ` www.srfcohsulii'ng.com One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150 1 Minneapolis, MN 55447 -4443 763.475.0010 Fax: 763.475.2429 Equal Opportunity Employer Mr. Lyndon. Robjent, PE, County Engineer January 12,2011 Carver County Page 2 of 10 PREVIOUS WORK A previous planning study was completed to discuss design principles for CSAH 18 in ilia project area including vehicles, pedestrians, bikes and horses. The following is a brief summary of the Chaska Conservancy Ow - retie from Mareh'2007: Roadway Design * Design a Scenic Parkway to slow and calm traffic. Connect 82nd Street to CSA14 18 (Lyman Boulevard). Include a center median to enhance the natural, look and provide better drainage. Rural section %rith. vegetative swales adjacent roadkvay. Roadway alignment and section should not impact significant treed areas. • Roundabouts to control CSAH 18 at CSAH 13 (Bavaria Road) and McKnight Road intersections. Pedestrian and bike trail should be provided on the south side to connect kvith Chaska Conservancy and Arboretum systems, • Allow limited direct access to the proposed roadway from existing propellies. • Prevent traffic from short cutting north on the existing 82nd Street to TH 41. Pedestrian, Bike and Horse and Cross-Country Trail Design • Separate each mode, as required # Maximize the recreational and education experience for trail users CSAH 18 currently exists cast of TH 41 and' vest of CSAH 13 (Bavaria Road). CSAH 18 does not exist between TH 41 and CSA111 13, which is slightly less than. two miles in. length. An. existing gravel roadway proNddes a curvy connection between - these two road% although the eastern connection is offset one-half mile north of the existing CSAH 18 intersection with TFI 41 (see Appendix A. for the Project Location Map). Mr- Lyndon Robjent, PE, County Erigiineer Carver (' ounly January 12.20'11 Page 3 of 10 The existing roadway is unpaved It has sharp curves and uncontrolled intersection, which makes drivers feel uncornfortable, The roadway does - not provide any pedestrian or bike facilities. It does not provide a suitable route for school buses, which currently must use TI-I 5. Much of the proposed roadway is aqjacent the University of Minnesota Landscape Arboretum. The remaining land use is mainly rural residential. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS A traffic analysis wus completed for this project. It is shown in Appendix B and dated July 13, 2010. The - following is a brief summary of the findings: CSAH 18 Traffic Volumes (Project Area) # Year 2007/2008 traffic volumes (before New TI.-I 212): 690 vehicles per day • Year 2009/2010 traffic volumes (after New TH 212): 395 vehicles per day • 20-Year traffic forecasts with an unimproved roadway: 2,400 vehicles per day * 20 -Year traffic forecasts with an improved roadway: 8,000 vehicles per day Actual Impact of TH 212 Opening on TH 5 and CSAH 18: The opening of TH 212 has resulted in lower traffic volumes on'rH S. The actual. counted volume reduced Erom 19,100 to 12,200 vehicles per day {wrest. of C.SAI-I *13) and 42,500 to 29,200 vehicles per day (east of Powers Boulevard). Is The opening of TH 212 has resulted in lower traffic volumes on CSAI-'l 18, The actual counted volume reduced from 4,000 to 4,000 vehicles per day (west of CSAII 13) to 15,300 to 11,500 vehicles per day (east of CSAH 17). Forecasted TH 5 Traffic Volumies impacted by CSAI-118 improve ment Construction of CSAH 18 (betx'veen CSAH 13 to TH 41) is forecast to reduce TH 5 traffic volumes by 1,400 to 2,800 vehicles per day. The reduction is, at most,. 10 percent of the daily vehicles. It is anticipated that TH 5 - would be at capacity again shortly after. CSAH 18 opens. with traffic from other routes "backfilling" the void. I I Mr. I.,yndon Robjent, PE-, County Engineer January 12, 2011 I �­ 4 of 1 0 Carver Count Forecasted CSAH 18 Traffic Volumes with T11 5 as our Lanes • 16whenTH '_5 expands to a four-lane road 20-year traffic forecast volumes are expected to decrease from 8,000 vehicles per day to 5,700 vehicles per day. With the 20-year projected traffic volumes of 8,000 vehicles per day, a two-lane roadway would provide acceptable traffic operations and capacity. If T1`1 5 is expanded from a two-lane to a four-lane roadway, a two-June facility would still be required for the CSAH 18 connection. .Based on the forecast traffic volumes, a single-lane roundabout would likely provide acceptable levels o I' service and capacity at the it of CSAH 18 and McKnight Road. Originally. three alternatives were developed. The main differences between them were urban versus rural sections, design speed (40 MPH vs, 45 MPH),, horizontal alignment and typical sections. The design objectives included providing system. connectivity for vehicles, pedestrians, bikes and school buses, minimizing environmental impacts, minimizing property impacts and developing a unique scenic parkway. Three alteinatives - were developed based on the above desire criteria, Project Management Team (1 and Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) input and elements discussed at the Chaska Conservancy Charrette. From group discussions on the original. three alternatives, a fourth alternative was developed. These Alternatives Alignment Sketches are showm in Appendix C and the Typical Sections are shown in AppenclN.D. Alternative I (Red) Alternative I was developed as a basic urban roadway minimiZing right-of-way requirements and costs. This alternative provided a standard urban undivided two-lane roadNvay with shoulders and a 40 MPH design speed. A 10-foot trail is provided on one-side of the roadway. This type of roadway yields the least amount of'required right-of-way, 90 feet... Alternative 2 (Orange) Alternative 2 was developed to provide a combination urban and rural section. This alternative provided a hybrid urbarL/rural divided two-lane roadway Aith landscaped median. and a 40.M1 design speed. A 10-foot trail is provided on one-side of the roadway. This type of roadway requires a 120-foot right-of-way. Mr. Lyndon Ro ient, PE County Engineer January 12, 2011 Carver County I Page 5 of 10 Alternative 3 (Blue) .Alternative 3 developed a more typical County design. with. a fitill rural section and higher design speed. This alternative provided a rural divided t roadAay with a 45 NIP H design speed, A I 0-foot trail is proposed on one-side of the roadway. This type of roadway requires the most right-of-way, 140 feet, Alternative 4 (Green) This alternative was developed to reduce impacts on residential or Section 6(f) properties while .maintaining a nattval. rnedian area. 17his alteniative provided mi. urban divided two-lane roadway with a 40 MPH design speed. A I 0-foot trai is provided on one-side of the roadway, This type Y.1 of roadway requires a 1 00 -fort right-of-way. The alternatives were cvaluated during PMT and PAC mectings. The results. were. documented through the use of an Alternatives Evaluation Matrix (Shown in. Appendix E). Th.e Matrix. includes estimated project costs, design features shown in the alternative alignments and typical sections, environmental impacts (broad overview), property impacts and constructability. Project Mleetings '1 alternative analysis included four PMT (P ject Management Team) and one PAC (Policy ro) Advisory Committee) meetings. The following is a summary of the meetings: PNIT #1 - January 5, 201 A Project Management Team (PMT) meeting was held on January 5, 2010 at the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, The following agencies were in attendance: Carver County,, Cities ofChanbassen, Chaska and Victoria, Minnesota Landscape Arboretum. and SRF Consulting Group, Inc. The following was discussed at the meeting: Project description. and schedule, review layout and typical sections of the three alternatives, overview of environmental and right-of-way issues., and development of a Policy Advisory Committee (PAC). See the Meeting Minutes dated January 17, 2010 for more details. N-1r. Lyndon.Robjent, E. County Engineer J . anuary l.?, 201 Carver County Page 9 of 10 No-Build This alternative does not meet future transportation needs. It does not improve adequate vehicle, pedestrian or bike connectivity. The existing gravel :road has triany undesirable curves and poor intersection design,, - which makes it a poor in safely accommodating the expected level of traffic. Currently, school bus traffic must use TH 5 to access schools. If CSAI-1 18 were completed, this would become the new bus route, Alternative I (Red) This alternative meets rnost needs with minimal impacts, It requires the smallest right-of-way. least permanent right-of-way acquisition and is marginally more expensive than Alternative I-lowever,. it does not provide a median and would have 40 feet of continuous width pavement. This alternative does not lit well into the natural surroundings of the area. Altetitative 2 (Orange) This alternative meets most needs of the project. flo-wever, tilis alternative requires the most per. artent right-of-way, residential building acquisitions and wetland impacts. .Alternative 3 (Blue) This alternative meets most of the needs of the project, except it impacts the University of Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, Section. 6(f) property. This could be considered a fatal flaw, since other feasible alternatives exist It is also the most expensive, Alternative 4 (Green) This alternative meets most of the needs for the prq Ject. It incorporates many of the positive attributes of the other alternatives, while removing the negative attributes. TWs alternative is expected to be marginally more expensive than Allerriative 1, but does not require any acquisition of residential buildings or impact the Section. 6(f) lands. The preferred alternative is Alternative 4 (Green.). This alternative provides an urban tWo4ane divided roadway with a separated 10-foot trail and design speed of 40 MPH. This alternative is marginally less expensive than Alternative 1, and does not impact any residential buildings or Section 6(f) property. The inverted center median would provide for a more natural look which is desired for the area. W Lyndon Robjent, PE.. County Engineer January 12,2011 Carver County Page 1.0} of 10 Alternative 4 was created by addressing positive and neg ,ative elements of the three other alternatives during discussions with the PMT, PAC and MrL/D0T State Aid Office. The alignment developed does not require any residential buildings to be taken, as shown in the three other alternatives, and it also avoids the Section 6(f.) property. This was one of the main goals when developing Alternative 4. However, in doing so, the alignment does impact other features., such as wetlands and private property. Another key element was the typical section, , provides a 20-foot natural median area. 1"he project t earn feels this fits in well with the natural surroundings of the prqject. The median. provides a linear location for providing storm water treatment and infiltration. The trail is located on south side of the roadway because it would provide coimections to future development. TIMELINE OF NEXT STEPS A potential timeline was completed for the project process for CSAH 18 between TH 41 and CS W-1 13. Construction. of this project is planned for 20113, I the preferred alternative for this segment of CSAH 18 is accepted and funding available, the following would be the next steps 1br implementation: # Alternatives Analysis Report (Finalized) — January 2011 • Local Agency Discussions — January 201 to April 201 Q months) • Preliminary Design - - .May 201 to October 2011 (6 months) • Final Design.— January 2012 to June 2012 (5 months) • Right-of-Way Acquisition — May 2012 to June 2013 (12 months) • Letting/Contract Signed — June .20113 to July 201.3 (2 months) • Construction — July 2013 to September 2014 (15 months) The schedule could possibly be accelerated if funding were available, r of f all agencies are in favor. - c tion could be substantiall the project, right-o - ay acquisition process is agreeable and consti u completed in one MI construction. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact us. NAW/1 "/bIs Attacbments h.,prqjaax�698,11 1.25 1' -6" 1 1' -6" Clear Clear 15' 1 2' 5' Median I Clear Clear 13' -6" 6' 16' 8' 12' 2' 7' -6" 7' -6" 2' 12' 4' 10' 10' 9' -6" Ditch Shld Thru Thru Shld Blvd Trail 65' 55' 120' Proposed Right of Way ® Typical Cross Section Alternatives CSAH 18 Alignment Study Figure 1 Carver County 6981 7/20/2010 Alternative 3 Rural Design 40 or 45 mph Design Speed L- - - Alternative 4 Hybrid Design 4 mph Design Speed 30' Recovery Area PROP. R/W 30' Recovery Area 1 4 V-6" V-6" 'Clear Clear 15' Median v!3 91 6 16' 8' 12' 2' T-6 7' -6" 2' 12' 8. 12' 6' 6' 2' 10' 5' 9 Ditch I Shld Thru Thru Shld ( Ditch ' Cfear Trail bear 60'-6" 79'-6" 140' Proposed Right of Way PROP. PROP. R/W .020 .020 1 4 AA - — Clear 4 2' 1--6- 1 -/ / I 1' -6-- Clear Clear 3' 2' 6' 4' 6' 12' 2' 20' 2' 12' 6' 10 10, 5. Blvd Shld Thru Shld Median Shld Thru Shld Blvd Trail Clear 100 Proposed Right of Way Typical Cross Section Alternatives Figure 2 CSAH 18 Alignment Study Carver County 6981 7/20/2010 SRF Comm. No. 6981 Carver County CSAH 18 Alternative Evaluation Matrix January 11, 2011 Goals /Criteria No -Build Alternative 1(Red) Alternative 2 (Yellow) Alternative 3 (Blue) Alternative 4 (Green) Estimated Project Construction Costs - Total (w/ Bridge) $OM $12.1M $15.OM $16.4M $11.4M - Total (w /Culvert) $OM $10.8M $13.5M $14.9M $10.1M Design Features - System Continuity (provides continuous east -west corridor for pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles) No continuity Provides continuity Provides continuity Provides continuity Provides continuity - Sensitivity and Fit into an Area with Natural Features Existing rural gravel roadway Standard continuous 40 feet of paved surface with no median 40 feet of paved surface with 15 -foot landscaped median 44 feet of paved surface with 15 -foot landscaped median 36 feet of paved surface with 20 -foot grass median - Roadway Design Speed 35 MPH or less 40 MPH 40 MPH 45 MPH 40 MPH - Section Type Rural - Gravel Rural Urban /Rural Rural Urban - Paved Roadway No Yes Yes Yes Yes - Pedestrian Accommodations None 10 -foot trail on one side 10 -foot trail on one side 10 -foot trail on one side 10 -foot trail on one side - Bike Accommodations None 10 -foot trail on one side 10 -foot trail on one side 10 -foot trail on one side 10 -foot trail on one side - Horse Accommodations (Designated Route) None None None None None - School Routing /Busing Must use TH 5 Provides better connection Provides better connection Provides better connection Provides better connection - Drainage Issues Existing drainage issues Accommodates drainage Accommodates drainage Accommodates drainage Accommodates drainage - Projected Traffic (2030) 2,400 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 Environmental Impacts (Broad Overview) - Required Environmental Documentation N/A No environmental document (unless federal funds are used) No environmental document (unless federal funds are used) Environmental process required w/ LAWCON conversion No environmental document (unless federal funds are used) - Park Recreational and Section 4(f) /6(f) Lands No impacts No impacts No impacts 2.5 acres of 6(f) impacts No impacts - Wetlands No impacts 0.15 acres of wetland impacts 1 acre of wetland impacts 0.4 acres of wetland impacts 1 acre of wetland impacts - Historic and Archaeological Properties No impacts No impacts No impacts No impacts No impacts - Threaten and Endangered Species No impacts No known impacts (two species are near project limits) No known impacts (two species are near project limits) No known impacts (two species are near project limits) No known impacts (two species are near project limits) - Contamination No impacts No known impacts (three sites are near project limits) No known impacts (three sites are near project limits) No known impacts (three sites are near project limits) No known impacts (three sites are near project limits) - Steep Slopes and Soils No impacts Steep slopes present— potential high erosion area (east end) Steep slopes present — potential high erosion area (east end) Steep slopes present — potential high erosion area (east end) Steep slopes present — potential high erosion area (east end) Property Impacts - Proposed Right -of Way Width 66 feet, but varies 90 feet 120 feet 140 feet 100 feet - Permanent Right -of -Way Acquisition (Total) No impacts 4 acres 10.5 acres 8.4 acres 9 acres - Right -of -Way Impacts — Minnesota Landscape Arboretum No impacts 1 acre 1.5 acres 3 acres 2.5 acres - Temporary Easements No impacts 3 acres 6 acres 5 acres 4 Acres - Residential Buildings No impacts 1— potential 2 — potential 1— potential None Constructability - Estimated Construction Completion (if available funding and support) N/A 2 to 3 years 2 to 3 years 3 to 4 years 2 to 3 years - Ability to Obtain Permits N/A Likely to obtain permit Likely to obtain permit Some difficulty to obtain Likely to obtain permit Overall Alternative Summary Does not meet future transportation needs. Gravel roadway with no system continuity for pedestrians, bicycles, vehicles and buses Meets most needs with minimal impacts, but does not fit well with natural surroundings Meets most needs with highest impact on wetlands and residential structures. Requires most right -of- way acquisition Meets most needs, but impacts 6(f) property which could be a fatal flaw, design speed higher than preferred by local interests, superelevation of roadway undesirable Meets most needs. It avoids residential impacts and 6(f) property while fitting well into natural surroundings, preferred by the PMT. H:\Projects\6981\TS\110111—AltMatrix—HIMU.docx SRF Comm No 6981 CARVER COUNTY CSAH 18 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS Jul 21, 2010 CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE OF COST Revised January 4, 2011 ITEM DESCRIPTION NOTES UNIT UNIT PRICE Alternative 1 (7) 2 -1-ane Urban Alternative 2 (7) Alternative 3 (7) 2 -Lane Divided Urban /Rural 2 -Lane Divided Rural ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT $0 $0 Alternative 4 (6) 2 -Lane Divided Hybrid ESTIMATED ESTIMATED QUANTITY AMOUNT ESTIMATED ESTIMATED QUANTITY AMOUNT ROADWAY COSTS 2 -1-ane Urban Mile $3,300,000 2.1 $6,930,000 2 -Lane Divided Urban /Rural Mile $3,500,000 $0 2.1 $7,350,000 2 -1-ane Divided Rural (Includes connection to McKnight Road) Mile $3,600,000 $0 $0 2.2 $7,920,000 Roundabout (estimated length 500 feet) Each $350,000 1 $350,000 1 $350,000 p $0 (6)(8) $6,742,340 SUBTOTAL ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION COSTS: $7,280,000 $7,700,000 $7,920,000 RIGHT OF WAY COSTS Permanent R/W Acquisition (Residential) Acre $217,800 4 $871,200 10.5 $2,286,900 8.4 $1,829,520 ( 9 2.5 $1,960,200 $0 $0 Permanent R/W Acquisition (Total Take - Residential) ( 1) Each $250,000 0 $0 0 $0 1 $250,000 Permanent R/W Acquisition (Minnesota Landscape Arboretum) (3) Acre $196,200 1 $196,200 1.5 6 $294,300 3 $653,400 5 $588,600 Temporary Easement Acre $108,900 3 $326,700 $544,500 4 $435,600 6(f) LAWCON (Minnesota Landscape Arboretum) ( 2) Acre $392,040 0 $0 0 $0 2.5 $980,100 0 $0 SUBTOTAL RIGHT OF WAY COSTS: $1,394,100 $3,234,600 $4,192,720 (6) $2,395,800 WETLAND MITIGATION COSTS Wetland Impacts ( 5) Acre 1 $50,000 0.15 $7,500 1 $50,000 0.4 $20,000 1 $50,000 r SUBTOTAL WETLAND MITIGATION COSTS: $7,500 $50,000 $20,000 (6) $50,000 ESTIMATED TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS without Contingency: $8,681,600 $10,984,600 $12,132,720 $9,188,140 Contingency or "risk" 20% $1,736,320 20 $2,196,920 20% $2,426,544 ° 10% $918,814 ESTIMATED TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS PLUS CONTINGENCY: (4) $10,417,920 $13,181,520 $14,559,264 $10,106,954 OTHER PROJECT COSTS: � $0 C Bridge (estimated length 150 feet x 56 feet width, no median) Sq Ft $200 8400 $ 1,680,000 $p $ 1,680,000 Bridge (estimated length 150 feet x 62 feet wid with 6' me dian) Sq Ft $200 $0 9300 $1,860,000 9300 $1,860,000 a $0 10'x12' Box Culvert (trail underpass) and large drainage culvert (estimate length 280 feet each) Lin Ft $1,210 280 $338,800 280 i $338,800 280 $338,800 (8) $338,800 ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COST WITH BRIDGE: $12,097,920 $15,041,520 $15,000,000 $16,419,264 '. $16,400,000 $11,448,154 ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COST WITH BRIDGE ROUNDED TO NEAREST $0.1 MILLION: $12,100,000 $11,400,000 ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COST WITH CULVERTS: $10,756,720 $13,520,320 $13,500,000 $14,898,064 $14,900,000 (8) $10,106,954 ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COST WITH CULVERTS ROUNDED TO NEAREST $0.1 MILLION: $10,800,000 (8) $10,100,000 Notes: (1) Unit cost estimated at 125% of 2010 assessed value which includes relocation costs. (2) Unit cost assumes permanent R/W acquisition of 6(f) property and equal or better replacement property. (3) Arboretum favors Alternate No. 4, therefore acquisition cost shown as zero for Alternate No. 4. (4) Total project costs do not include engineering or construction administration costs. (5) Estimated wetland replacement costs range from $2,500 to $203,000 per acre for urban areas. (Resource: Mn BWSR website) (6) See detailed preferred alternative cost estimate. (7) Updated 7/21/10 Estimate, Includes intersection improvements to CSAH 13. (8) Detailed preferred alternative cost estimate includes costs for 10x12 box culvert (trail underpass) and drainage culvert instead of bridge. Estimated cost for both = $338,800 H: \Projects\ 6981 \HI -MU \EXCEL \Estimate \6981_Cost Summary_Rev 110104.xlsx Printed: 1/4/20111:57 PM SRF Comm No 6981 Construction Cost Estimate CSAH 18 Extension between CSAH 13 and TH 41 Prepared By: SRF Consulting Group, Inc., January 4, 2011 January 4, 2011 CITY OF VICTORIA E Nci EFR5 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY PLANNERS D ESSGNE &S Consulting Group, Inc. EST. Construction Cost Estimate CSAH 18 Extension between CSAH 13 and TH 41 Prepared By: SRF Consulting Group, Inc., January 4, 2011 January 4, 2011 Estimated Right of Way Acquisition Cost = $2,395,800 (5)(6) Estimated Wetland Mitigation Cost = $50,000 Estimated Engineering Cost (20% of construction) = $1,483,000 NOTES: (1) Includes aggregate base class 5. (2) Paved median areas only. Does not include pedestrian sidewalks. (3) If bridge is needed, underpass will be deleted and the cost of the project will increase. (4) Does not include Right of Way or Design and Construction Engineering costs (5) Assumes Arboretum R/W acquired without cost to the project (6) Right of Way Acquisition cost participation subject to negotiation by the County Engineer (per Carver County cost participation policies, February 13, 2007) H:\Projects\ 6981 \HI -MU\ EXCEL\ Estimate\ 6981_ ConceptCostEst _ParticipationBreakdown_Rev 110104.xlsx CITY OF VICTORIA CITY OF CHASKA CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY TOTAL UNIT EST. EST. EST. EST. EST. EST. EST. EST. EST. EST. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT PAVING AND GRADING COSTS 1 Excavation - common & sub grade cu. vd. $7.00 82,200 $575,400 82,200 $575,400 2 Muck Excavation cu. yd. $3.00 32,000 $96,000 32,000 $96,000 3 Granular Backfill cu. yd. $8.00 32,000 $256,000 32,000 $256,000 4 Granular Sub CV cu. yd. $14.00 36,500 $511,000 36,500 $511,000 5 Mainline Pavement 1 sq. yd. $30.00 54,790 $1,643,700 54,790 $1,643,700 6 Bituminous Trail 1 sa. vd. 18.00 230 $4,140 10,450 $188,100 10,680 $192,240 7 1 Concrete Walk 2 sa. vd. $27.00 1,400 $37,800 600 16 200 390 $10,5 30 2,390 $64,530 8 lConcrete Curb and Gutter fin. ft. $11.00 4,520 $49,720 11,240 $123,640 5,570 $61,270 9 140 $100,540 30,470 $335,170 9 Retaining Wall s . ft. 35 4,800 $168,000 4,800 $168,000 10 1 Roundabout lump sum $350,000 1 $350, 000 1 $350,000 SUBTOTAL PAVING AND GRADING COSTS: $91,660 $327,940 $71,800 $3,700,640 $4,192,040 MISC. UNIT or PERCENTAGE OF PAVING AND GRADING COSTS 1 Removals - Pavement sq. vd. $3.00 7,100 $21,300 7 100 $21,300 2 Draina e - urban 17% _ $713,000 $713,000 8 Drainage - rural mile $100,000 3 Turf Establishment & Erosion Control 3% $126,0 00 $126,000 4 Landscaping 3% $126.000 $126,000 SUBTOTAL MISC. PERCENTAGE COSTS: $986,300 $986,300 SIGNING COSTS 1 IMainline Striping mile $3.500 1 2.2 $770011 2.2 $7,700 2 lMainline Signing C &D mile $6,500 1 2.21 $14,300 2.2 $14,300 SUBTOTAL SIGNING & STRIPING COSTS: $22,000 $22,000 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS: $91,660 11 $327,940 $71,800 $4,708,940 $5,200,340 MISCELLANEOUS COSTS 1 Mobilization 5% $5,000 $16,000 $4,000 $235,00 $260,000 2 Non Quantified Minor Items 15% $14,000 $49,000 $11,000 $706,000 $780,000 3 Tempo ry Pavement & Drainage 2% $2,000 $7,000 $1,000 $94,000 $104,000 4 Traffic Control 2% $2,000 $7,000 $1,000 $94,000 $104,000 5 1 0x1 2 Box Culvert trail underpass) 3 lin. ft. $1,050 280 $294,000 280 $294,000 SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS COSTS: $23,000 $373,000 $17,0 $1,129,000 $1,542,000 ESTIMATED TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS without Contingency: $114,660 $700,940 $88,800 $5,837 $6,742,340 1 1 Contingency or "risk" I 1 10% $11,000 $70,000 $9,000 $584,000 1 $674,000 ESTIMATED TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS PLUS CONTINGENCY (4): $125,660 $770,940 $97,800 $6,421,940 $7,416,340 Estimated Right of Way Acquisition Cost = $2,395,800 (5)(6) Estimated Wetland Mitigation Cost = $50,000 Estimated Engineering Cost (20% of construction) = $1,483,000 NOTES: (1) Includes aggregate base class 5. (2) Paved median areas only. Does not include pedestrian sidewalks. (3) If bridge is needed, underpass will be deleted and the cost of the project will increase. (4) Does not include Right of Way or Design and Construction Engineering costs (5) Assumes Arboretum R/W acquired without cost to the project (6) Right of Way Acquisition cost participation subject to negotiation by the County Engineer (per Carver County cost participation policies, February 13, 2007) H:\Projects\ 6981 \HI -MU\ EXCEL\ Estimate\ 6981_ ConceptCostEst _ParticipationBreakdown_Rev 110104.xlsx