1c. Receive Supplemental Feasibility Report for Powers Blvd.CITY OF Id-
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINIEtSoO�Ti�i553dm
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
Endorsed__
Rm de i - --
TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager Date SOm itted to commission
FROM: Charles Folch, Director of Public Works Q__
Date Sul tted to Council
DATE: December 7, 1995
SUBJ: Receive Supplemental Feasibility Report for Powers Boulevard (County
Road 17) from Trunk Highway 5 to Lyman Boulevard; Set Public Hearing Date
Project No. 93 -29
Attached is the supplemental feasibility report for pe bove
Alta PP - referenced project. This project is a
cooperative effort between the City and County, h6weVer, Carver County is administrating the
improvemen pr otect. The project engineer has provided a ne synopsis of the history of this
T
oposed improvement project and a description of the primary project elements as proposed.
Estimated project costs and project financing information`is also provided. Since the adjacent
industrial /commercial properties on the north'end of the project and some residential properties on
the south end of the project are proposed for special assessments, it is necessary that a public hearing
be held regarding this feasibility report. All of the property owners proposed for special assessments
will be sent written notification of the public hearing as well 4s notice placed in the Villager
newspaper. The project engineer will be present at the public hearing to provide a detailed
presentation of this feasibility report and respond to any questions as necessary. In the meantime, if
any of the Council members should have questions regarding the contents of this report, please feel
free to contact me.
MEMORANDUM
c: Dave Hempel, Assistant City Engineer
Roger Gustafson, Carver County
Bill Weckman, Carver County
Jon Horn, BRW
Greg Brown, BRW
'
gAeng \chazles \cc \powers.cc
MEMORANDUM
cc
I B R W INC
Planning
' Transportation
Engineering
Urban Design
Thresher Square
1
1
700 Third Street So.
Minneapolis,
MN 55415
612/370 -0700
Fax 612/370 -1378
Denver
Milwaukee
Minneapolis
Orlando
Phoenix
t,
November 30, 1995
Mr. Charles Folch, PE m
Director of Public Works ,
City of Chanhassen
Chanhassen, MN 55317
RE: CSAH 17 (Powers Boulevard) Improvements
City Project 93 -29
Dear Charles:
A public hearing was held on April 27, 1992, for the above - referenced project, which included the
reconstruction of CSAH 17 (Powers Boulevard) from Highway 5 to approximately 2,200 feet south.
At that time, the Council elected to reject the project due to concerns associated with the lack of any
County funding.
The City subsequently entered into a Cooperative Agreement with Carver County to upgrade a
number of County roadways within the City, including CSAH 17. As a result of this agreement,
CSAH 17 was scheduled for reconstruction during 1995. The project scope was extended to include
the reconstruction of CSAH 17 an additional 5,600 lineal feet to the south to Lyman Boulevard. A
feasibility study for the reconstruction project was presented to the City Council in December, 1994,
and a public hearing was held on January 9, 1995, however the project was postponed until 1996 by
the City due to funding concerns. It is our understanding that these funding concerns have been
resolved and that the City and County would like to proceed with the CSAH 17 improvements for
construction in 1996.
Portland
San Diego An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was completed and approved in September, 1994
Seattle for the project. The preparation of the EAW was mandatory as a result of the nature and length of
the project. The EAW did not identify any environmental issues that warranted the preparation of
an Environmental Impact Statement or would result in a delay in the project construction.
Two related projects have been completed to date. A surcharging embankment project was
completed during 1994 to allow the roadway to be widened over an area of poor soils. A wetland
mitigation project was completed this summer which provided for all of the wetland mitigation
requirements for the project.
The scope of the project has been expanded since the 1994 feasibility study was completed. At City
and /or County staff s request, the following items of work have been included:
• Concrete sidewalk along Park Road (City)
• Concrete maintenance strip behind median curbs (County)
• Sanitary sewer has been included south of Lake Susan Hills Drive (south) (City)
• Reconstruction near Trunk Highway 5 intersection including signal modifications
(County)
• Construction staging has been modified to enable the project to be constructed
under traffic. The 1994 feasibility study assumed that the roadway could be closed
to traffic during construction however two other major roadway projects will be
underway in the vicinity concurrently with this project making a closure of CSAH
17 unfeasible. (County, City)
Mr. Charles Folch
November 30, 1995
Page 2
The following amendments to the December 1994 feasibility study summarize the revised costs,
funding and assessment methodologies for the project, incorporating the scope changes listed above
and considering 1996 construction costs.
PROJECT COSTS
Costs to implement the County Road 17 Improvement Project fall into three primary categories.
They are:
A. Construction Costs
B. Land Acquisition/Easement Costs
C. Indirect Costs
We will attempt to define these costs as'estimated for this project in the following sections:
A. Construction Costs
•
Estimated
Improvements
Construction Cost
Sanitary Sewer Improvements
$
53,000.00
Watermain Improvements
$
148,340.00
Storm Drainage Improvements
$
569,710.00
Roadway Improvements
$
2,081,075.00
Pathway Improvements
$
182,625.00
Streetlighting Improvements
$
250,000.00
Landscaping Improvements
$
125.000.00
Total Construction Cost
$
3,409,750.00
B. Land Acquisition/Easement Costs
Additional land acquisition for roadway right -of -way is not anticipated for this project;
however, storm drainage easements and temporary construction easements will be required
in some areas for pond construction, storm sewer construction and embankment cuts and
fills.
Total Estimated Easement Cost
$ 5,000.00
C. Indirect Costs
The indirect costs for the project, consisting of engineering, planning, legal, fiscal,
appraisal, consultant fees, City and County staff expenses, publication and meeting costs
and other miscellaneous expenses for the total project are estimated to be 30 percent of the
construction costs.
Total Estimated Indirect Cost $ 1,022,925.00
' TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ 4,437,675.00
Mr. Charles Folch
November 30, 1995
Page 3
Assessments are proposed to be made to the commercial properties along the northern
' portion of the project area for watermain, storm drainage and roadway improvements. No
special assessments are proposed for pathway, landscaping, or streetlighting improvements.
This is consistent with the proposed assessment methodologies considered as a part of the
' 1992 feasibility study re- initiation for the project. No assessments are proposed for the
residential properties along the middle portion of the project area. Trunk area assessments
are proposed to be made to the residential properties along the southern portion of the project
area for watermain and sanitary sewer.
1
The construction cost for this project as outlined in the Cooperative Agreement between Chanhassen
'
and Carver County was estimated to be $3,120,000.00. The current estimated construction cost is
$3,409,750.00 as shown above. It should be noted that the current total estimated cost includes
watermain, sanitary sewer, construction staging, and additional pathway improvements which were
1
not included in the Cooperative Agreement cost estimate.
Detailed costs estimates for the proposed improvements are attached.
I PROJECT
FUNDING
'
The Project costs are proposed to be financed through a combination of special assessments and the
funding arrangements identified in the joint powers agreement between the City and Carver County.
The following table summarizes the estimated project costs for the various improvements and
1
provides a breakdown of the amounts to be financed through special assessments vs. the
arrangements of the joint powers agreement.
'
Assessable/Hookup City /County Total
Improvement Costs Costs Costs
Construction Costs
Sanitary Sewer $40,950.00 $12,050.00 $53,000.00
Watermain $67,025.00 $81,315.00 $148,340.00
Storm Drainage $88,125.00 $481,585.00 $569,710.00
Roadway Improvements $883,200.00 $1,197,875.00 $2,081,075.00
Pathway Improvements $0.00 $182,625.00 $182,625.00
Streetlighting Improvements $0.00 $250,000.00 $250,000.00
Landscaping Improvements $0.00 $125.000.00 $125.000.00
Subtotals $1,079,300.00 $2,230,450.00 $3,409,750.00
'
Land Acquisition /Easement Costs $0.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
Indirect Costs (30 %) $323.790.00 $699.135.00 $1.022.925.00
'
Totals $1,403,040.00 $3,034,585.00 $4,437,675.00
Assessments are proposed to be made to the commercial properties along the northern
' portion of the project area for watermain, storm drainage and roadway improvements. No
special assessments are proposed for pathway, landscaping, or streetlighting improvements.
This is consistent with the proposed assessment methodologies considered as a part of the
' 1992 feasibility study re- initiation for the project. No assessments are proposed for the
residential properties along the middle portion of the project area. Trunk area assessments
are proposed to be made to the residential properties along the southern portion of the project
area for watermain and sanitary sewer.
1
' Mr. Charles Folch
November 30, 1995
Page 4
ASSESSMENTS
The proposed methods of assessment, areas to be assessed and amounts to be assessed have
been determined though meetings with City staff. Assessment amounts are intended to be
consistent with existing City assessment policies where applicable, or consistent with
normally anticipated assessment rates experienced in similar projects. Methodology, rates,
areas to be assessed, credits, etc., can be revised from those illustrated in this report at the
discretion of the City Council.
Preliminary assessment rolls for this project are attached based upon the assessment
methodologies detailed below. Assessment Roll A details proposed assessments to the
commercial properties along the northern portion of the project area. Assessment Roll B
details proposed assessments to the residential properties along the southern portion of the
project.
ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
SanitM Sewer
Trunk area assessments are proposed for sanitary sewer to be constructed for residential
properties along the southern portion of the roadway at the rate of $1,050.00 per residential
equivalent unit (REU). One trunk unit assessment for each homesteaded property would be
assessed with this project. Additional trunk charges will be collected at the time property
subdivision occurs. At such time that service connection is made, these properties will be
required to pay lateral connection charges at the current year's rate. These charges are
reviewed and modified annually based upon construction cost indices.
Watermain
Those commercial properties for which watermain services are to be constructed and,
therefore, benefitting from this improvement will be assessed for the total cost of the
watermain service. Watermain services are being provided to two properties at the total cost
of $17,420.00. This cost includes two 8 inch services and one 12 inch service with wet -taps,
piping, gate valves and fittings. Assessments are, therefore, as follows:
Assessable Cost = $17,420.00 = $5,806.67 /Service
Total Services 3
Trunk area assessments are proposed for water main to be constructed for residential
properties along the southern portion of the roadway at the rate of $1,375.00 per residential
equivalent unit (REU). One trunk unit assessment for each homesteaded property would be
assessed with this project. Additional trunk charges will be collected at the time property
' Mr. Charles Folch
November 30, 1995
Page 5
subdivision occurs. At such time that service connection is made, these properties will be
required to pay lateral connection charges at the current year's rate. These charges are
reviewed and modified annually, based upon construction cost indices.
Storm Drainage
Consistent with current City policy, one -half ( /z) of the cost of the storm sewer is proposed
to be assessed. Storm drainage assessments are only proposed for the commercial properties
along the northern portion of the project area. Assessments are proposed against all areas
contributing to the new storm sewer system based upon the contributing drainage area,
where benefit from the improvement can be demonstrated. Based upon a total storm
drainage cost of $229,125.00, the storm drainage assessable cost is $114,562.50. The storm
drainage assessment rate is, therefore, as follows:
Assessable Cost = $114.562.50 = $5,069.14 /Acre
Drainage Area 22.6 Acres
Roadway Improvements
Commercial properties abutting County Road 17 along the northern portion of the project
area are proposed to be assessed for roadway improvements on a front footage basis, where
benefit from the improvement can be demonstrated. Based upon a total roadway assessable
cost of $1,148,160.00, the roadway assessment rate is as follows:
Assessable Cost = $1348360.00 = $245.18/FF
Total Front Footage (FF) 4,683 FF
In order for the project to further proceed, the City Council must accept these amendments
to the feasibility study and hold a public hearing for the project. It is our understanding that
the businesses along the north end of the project are to be assessed as proposed in 1994, but
the residential properties along the southern portion of the project will not be assessed.
If the City Council wishes to proceed with the project, the following is a tentative project
schedule:
Accept Feasibility Study
Public Hearing and Authorize Preparation
of Plans and Specification
Approve Plans and Specifications
(Carver County)
Concur with Plans and Specification Approval
(Chanhassen)
Bid Opening
Award Contract (Carver County)
Concur with Contract Award (Chanhassen)
Begin Construction
December 11, 1995
January 8, 1996
February 20, 1996
February 26, 1996
March 26, 1996
April 2, 1996
April 8, 1996
May 6, 1996
Mr. Charles Folch
November 30, 1995
Page 6
Since the roadway is designated as a State Aid route, we will be required to submit the plans
and specifications to MnDOT State Aid for their review and approval. We propose to submit
the plans and specifications for their review by January 22, 1996. Any delays in the State
Aid review process could result in some delays in the project schedule.
Please let me know if you have any questions or we can provide any additional information.
Sincerely,
BRW, INC.
Greg . Brown, PE
Project Engineer
GSB
Attachments
cc: Bill Weckman/Carver County
Jon Horn/BRW
File 2396A10
a N oo w Ln r 00
C A o0 �D [� N M a\ N
y O O tn M N N N tn .�
CA y Q 69
v7
d
Q
_ _ O cn C r N 't O; N C O 0 v
h E O vri eq 00 O N 00 >
H d N N .+
' 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 R M
69 N N N N N N N N
69 d C
.. O
00 O,
ccl
E d
[ a0 O M W O O O
a
n
E I M O
bq y d M N d
cl
C d O
C 8 8 S 8 U
O d c a"i
W) kn tn kn tn
b
° a S S M S S S S S g
M o 0 o c o oN a
oo v_ u E
c d to o
F � .G QO
a CA
w U � 3 o
3
d � � � o
O
kn h to to W N
cz
y c
1N V L
O n N O S 0w0 M_ O O O
N
w T cd
cd _U
C y
E o
C o0
O O N
c
Q � C
3 �
o v
s -
0 0 p 00 0 o O y C cn
M O S S S S C O
0. S g g � � o U
N N N N N N N N C U
' � N
H
V �
C �
(L
ti N+ O
CZ
M M •--' aE .� '�!' C .Y. i•• vi c
a o o O O a G�. ° a a ° o
CJ oa 3 b as 3 w ro m 3 cra 3 w d go b U a b o . 0
~¢ X c N mix o Cd o Cd E
cz
Um o
� ° :3 3
S o c o pC� p 5 b s b o b o o c
O.N as O ..7 CL ..]a .7 U en UClac`n axd E- z
' m
J
O
S
Z
W
2
U)
U)
' W
CD
Q
i
1
F-
H
Z
W
a
�
w y
0 O
S C
CL 3
S N N
a
> 0) o
W o.
J
D W .0 0 7 y
m0 a
CU
S
LU d N
0C
O
cc
a
' S E
U w
i
�ar�3
Q,J c0 U)
cn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
Lfi
0
LO
�
d
N
N
N
a _
N . 6
0
LO
-
C LU
r
:o
r
cli
6
r
.E
69
fR
Efl
Efl
E+9
EA
FA
J (C
�ar�3
Q,J c0 U)
cn
p
0
0
0
p
O
O
O
C
. C's
LO
LO
Lo
�
C5
LO
LO
0
LO
r p
C LU
r
:o
r
r
r
r
r
.E
69
fR
Efl
Efl
E+9
EA
FA
J (C
M
p
p
O
O
O
O
O
LO
N
N
N
N
N
N
C
C
m �
~
O
Ir y
Iir y
!T y
T y
I
YY
Co
C W C
76
y
O O
'm
o
O O
'..''.m
C O
O O
O O
Cp
O
!m N p
'
U)
N
y
d p
p.
rn
a
y
M
to y 0
c0 y
W
c0
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
Q
a
y
V
6c)
tO
V
64
�ar�3
Q,J c0 U)
cn
c
D
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
LO
LO
Lo
LO
C5
LO
LO
0
LO
r p
C LU
r
:o
r
r
r
r
r
.E
69
fR
Efl
Efl
E+9
EA
FA
M
M
CD
v
v
U)
v
LO
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
m �
O
Ir y
Iir y
!T y
T y
I
YY
Co
co
co
y
O O
'm
o
O O
'..''.m
C O
O O
O O
Cp
O
!m N p
O
''m N O
N
y
d p
p.
rn
a
y
M
to y 0
c0 y
t� y
c0
C
o =a
o- o
o =a
o =a
o =a
_
o -a
o
F-
W
`
L
CV
v
co
v
N c6
:CV
CO
. N
M
: N
''. M
Q
1
c
D
O
r
0
0
I
cc
CC
r p
O
N
N
�
LO
CO
O
M
M
M
M
M
C ?
C? C
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
Ir y
Iir y
!T y
T y
::r Y
YY
Co
co
co
y
O O
'm
o
O O
'..''.m
C O
O O
O O
Cp
O
!m N p
O
''m N O
N
y
d p
p.
rn
a
N .y
M
to y 0
c0 y
t� y
c0
o a
o =a
o- o
o =a
o =a
o =a
_
o -a
o
F-
a
CO
U
.
�C
y
O
0
E
c
C
N
c
O
a
CU
y
co
y
m
co
(+
7
U
(0
y
CU
CL
Y
O
O
t
Y
C
7
a
m
rn
cc
c �
U
O �
> 3
N (D
cC O
C �-
O O
a) O
W
W Q
cc
O
C 0 y
6 L6 d
O C' O
—61 ti-
T
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
COST ESTIMATE
SANITARY SEWER
Unit
No. Item
Unit Quanti Price
Amount
1. 8" PVC SDR 35
LF 1,450 $20.00
$29,000.00
2. Standard Manhole
EA 5 $1,500.00
$7,500.00
3. 4" DIP Forcemain
LF 1,100 $15.00
$16,500.00
Construction Cost
$53,000.00
30% Admin. Cost
$15,900.00
Total Project Cost
$68,900.00
' No. Item
'
1.
Connect to Existing Watermain
2.
18" DIP CL 52
Price
3.
12" DIP CL 52
' 4.
$500.00
8" DIP CL 52
LF
5.
6" DIP CL 52
$78,750.00
6.
8" Wet Tap
$24.00
7.
Hydrant w /Gate Valve
180
8.
DIP Fittings
LF
9.
Abandon Existing 18" DIP
$1,350.00
10.
12" Wet Tap
$2,500.00
11.
8" Gate Valve
5
12.
12" Gate Valve
'
13.
18" Butterfly Valve
1
LF
400
$6.50
$2,600.00
EA
1
$3,500.00
$3,500.00
EA
6
$650.00
$3,900.00
EA
1
COST ESTIMATE
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
Unit
Unit
Quanti
Price
Amount
EA
3
$500.00
$1,500.00
LF
2,250
$35.00
$78,750.00
LF
40
$24.00
$960.00
LF
180
$21.00
$3,780.00
LF
75
$18.00
$1,350.00
EA
2
$2,500.00
$5,000.00
EA
5
$1,800.00
$9,000.00
LB
10,000
$2.50
$25,000.00
LF
400
$6.50
$2,600.00
EA
1
$3,500.00
$3,500.00
EA
6
$650.00
$3,900.00
EA
1
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
EA
3
$4,000.00
$12,000.00
Construction Cost
$148,340.00
30% Admin.
Cost
$44,502.00
Total Project Cost
$192,842.00
COST ESTIMATE
STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
NORTHERN SYSTEM - ASSESSABLE COSTS
Unit
No.
Item
Unit
Quanti
Price
Amount
1.
Connect to Existing Storm Sewer
EA
4
$1,000.00
$4,000.00
2.
Remove Existing Pipe /Culvert
LF
1,000
$10.00
$10,000.00
3.
12" RCP
LF
1,425
$22.00
$31,350.00
4.
15" RCP
LF
250
$24.00
$6,000.00
5.
18" RCP
LF
296
$27.50
$8,140.00
6.
24" RCP
LF
60
$34.00
$2,040.00
7.
30" RCP
LF
942
$42.50
$40,035.00
8.
36" RCP
LF
194
$52.50
$10,185.00
9.
15" RC Apron w/Trashguard
EA
2
$750.00
$1,500.00
10.
24" RC Apron w /Trashguard
EA
2
$1,500.00
$3,000.00
11.
36" RC Apron w/Trashguard
EA
1
$3,000.00
$3,000.00
12.
58" RC -A Apron w /Trashguard
EA
2
$5,500.00
$11,000.00
13.
Construction CB(2'x3')
EA
10
$1,000.00
$10,000.00
14.
Construct MHCB (48 ")
EA
15
$1,250.00
$18,750.00
15.
Construct MHCB (60 ")
EA
3
$1,750.00
$5,250.00
16.
Construct MHCB (72 ")
EA
1
$3,500.00
$3,500.00
17.
4" Perforated PVC Pipe Drain
LF
400
$7.50
$3,000.00
18.
Riprap
Cy
50
$50.00
$2,500.00
19.
Construct Skimmer
EA
2
$1,500.00
$3,000.00
Construction Cost
$176,250.00
30% Admin.
Cost
$52,875.00
Total Project
Cost
$229,125.00
COST ESTIMATE
STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
SOUTHERN SYSTEM - NONASSESSABLE COSTS
Unit
Item
Unit
Ouanti
Price
Amount
Connect to Existing Storm Sewer
EA
4
$1,000.00
$4,000.00
Remove Existing Pipe /Culvert
LF
1,500
$10.00
$15,000.00
12" RCP
LF
1,350
$22.00
$29,700.00
15" RCP
LF
1,000
$24.00
$24,000.00
18" RCP
LF
244
$27.50
$6,710.00
21" RCP
LF
1,325
$30.00
$39,750.00
24" RCP
LF
700
$34.00
$23,800.00
30" RCP
LF
150
$42.50
$6,375.00
36" RCP
LF
450
$52.50
$23,625.00
42" RCP
LF
200
$100.00
$20,000.00
48" RCP
LF
200
$125.00
$25,000.00
15" RC Apron w /Trashguard
EA
2
$750.00
$1,500.00
18" RC Apron w /Trashguard
EA
3
$1,000.00
$3,000.00
24" RC Apron w /Trashguard
EA
7
$1,750.00
$12,250.00
30" RC Apron w/Trashguard
EA
1
$2,500.00
$2,500.00
48" RC Apron w/Trashguard
EA
1
$4,000.00
$4,000.00
Construct CB (2'x3')
EA
9
$1,000.00
$9,000.00
Construct MHCB (48 ")
EA
40
$1,250.00
$50,000.00
Construct MHCB (60 ")
EA
3
$1,750.00
$5,250.00
Construct MHCB (72 ")
EA
2
$2,500.00
$5,000.00
Construct MHCB (84 ")
EA
3
$3,500.00
$10,500.00
Outlet Control Structure
EA
3
$3,500.00
$10,500.00
4" Perforated PVC Pipe Drain
LF
1,000
$7.50
$7,500.00
Random Riprap
Cy
200
$50.00
$10,000.00
Erosion Control
LF
1,500.00
$3.00
$4,500.00
Pond Construction
LS
1
$40,000.00
$40,000.00
Construction Cost
$393,460.00
30% Admin.
Cost
$118,038.00
Total Project Cost
$511,498.00
COST ESTIMATE
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
NORTHERN PORTION - ASSESSABLE COSTS
I No. Item
Unit
Unit Ouanti Price Amount
' 1.
Pavement Removal
SY
24,000
$2.00
$48,000.00
2.
Miscellaneous Removals
LS
1
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
3.
Curb and Gutter Removal
LF
5,000
$2.50
$12,500.00
4.
Clear and Grub
TREE
6
$150.00
$900.00
5.
Mobilization
LS
1
$45,000.00
$45,000.00
6.
Common Excavation
CY
31,500
$2.00
$63,000.00
7.
Subgrade Excavation
CY
21,500
$2.00
$43,000.00
8.
Select Granular Borrow
CY
22,000
$5.00
$110,000.00
9.
Bituminous Wear Course
TON
2,700
$24.00
$64,800.00
10.
Bituminous Binder Course
TON
2,450
$22.00
$53,900.00
11.
Bituminous Base Course
TON
2,450
$20.00
$49,000.00
12.
Bituminous Tack Coat
GAL
2,200
$1.50
$3,300.00
Aggregate Base Class V
TON
6,800
$8.00
$54,400.00
' 13.
14.
B624 Curb and Gutter
LF
10,450
$8.00
$83,600.00
15.
3" Concrete Median
SF
2,500
$2.00
$5,000.00
16.
3" Concrete Maintenance Strip
SF
3,600
$2.25
$8,100.00
' 17.
7" Concrete Driveway
SF
1,200
$3.00
$3,600.00
18.
Seeding
AC
3.2
$750.00
$2,400.00
19.
Sodding
SY
10,200
$1.75
$17,850.00
' 20.
Traffic Control
LS
1
$55,000.00
$55,000.00
21.
Signing
SF
325
$30.00
$9,750.00
22.
Striping
LF
8,200
$.25
$2,050.00
Erosion Control
LF
6,000
$3.00
$18,000.00
' 23.
24.
Guardrail
LF
300
$15.00
$4,500.00
25.
Rigid Steel Conduit
LF
500
$12.00
$6,000.00
73" RCP -Arch
LF
100
$186.00
$1 8,600.00
' 26.
27.
73" RCP Apron Install
EA
2
$750.00
$1,500.00
28.
10'x9' Box Culvert
LF
56
$350.00
$19,600.00
29.
10'x9' Box End Section Install
EA
2
$1,750.00
$3,500.00
30.
58" RCP -Arch
LF
130
$120.00
$15,600.00
31.
58" RCP Apron Install
EA
4
$600.00
$2,400.00
32.
Signal Modifications
LS
1
$1,500.00
$15.000.00
'
Construction Cost
$844,850.00
30% Admin. Cost
$253,455.00
'
Total Project Cost
$1,098,305.00
COST ESTIMATE
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
SOUTHERN PORTION - NONASSESSABLE COSTS
Unit
Item
Unit
Ouanti
Price
Amount
Pavement Removal
SY
15,000
$2.00
$30,000.00
Miscellaneous Removals
LS
1
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
Clear and Grub
TREE
50
$150.00
$7,500.00
Mobilization
LS
1
$60,000.00
$60,000.00
Common Excavation
CY
13,400
$2.00
$26,800.00
Subgrade Excavation
CY
33,400
$2.00
$66,800.00
Select Granular Borrow
CY
48,350
$5.00
$241,750.00
Bituminous Wear Course
TON
4,150
$24.00
$99,600.00
Bituminous Binder Course
TON
4,150
$22.00
$91,300.00
Bituminous Base Course
TON
4,150
$20.00
$83,000.00
Bituminous Tack Coat
GAL
3,700
$1.50
$5,550.00
Aggregate Base Class V
TON
15,700
$8.00
$125,600.00
B624 Curb and Gutter
LF
19,350
$8.00
$154,800.00
4" Concrete Median
SF
4,000
$2.00
$8,000.00
4" Concrete Maintenance Strip
SF
5,400
$2.25
$12,150.00
7" Concrete Driveway
SF
320
$3.00
$960.00
Seeding
AC
13
$750.00
$9,750.00
Sodding
SY
17,500
$1.75.
$30,625.00
Traffic Control
LS
1
$85,000.00
$85,000.00
Signing
SF
550
$30.00
$16,500.00
Striping
LF
15,000
$.25
$3,750.00
Erosion Control
LF
9,000
$3.00
$27,000.00
Rigid Steel Conduit
LF
120
$12.00
$1,440.00
Construction Cost
$1,197,875.00
30% Admin.
Cost
$359,362.50
Total Project
Cost
$1,557,237.50
COST ESTIMATE
'
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
LAKE DRIVE - ASSESSABLE
COSTS
Unit
No.
Item
Unit
Quanti
Price
Amount
1.
Pavement Removal
Sy
1,200
$2.00
$2,400.00
' 2.
Mobilization
LS
1 $5,000.00
$5,000.00
3.
Common Excavation
Cy
1,400
$2.00
$2,800.00
4.
Bituminous Wear Course
TON
150
$24.00
$3,600.00
Bituminous Binder Course
TON
150
$22.00
$3,300.00
' 5.
6.
Bituminous Base Course
TON
200
$20.00
$4,000.00
7.
Bituminous Tack Coat
GAL
150
$1.50
$225.00
Aggregate Base Class V
TON
500
$8.00
$4,000.00
' 8.
9.
B624 Curb and Gutter
LF
900
$6.00
$5,400.00
10.
Seeding
AC
0.5
$750.00
$375.00
Sodding
Sy
1,000
$1.75
$1,750.00
' 11.
12.
Traffic Control
LS
1
$500.00
$500.00
13.
Signing
SF
50
$30.00
$1,500.00
Striping
LF
2,000
$.25
$500.00
' 14.
15.
Erosion Control
LF
1,000
$3.00
$3,000.00
'
Construction Cost
$38,350.00
30% Admin. Cost
$11,505.00
Total Project Cost
$49,855.00
COST ESTIMATE
PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS
Unit
Unit Quanti Price
SF
No.
Item
'
1.
Bituminous Walk (8' wide)
TON
2.
Concrete Walk (6' wide)
'
3.
Aggregate Base Class V
LS
4.
Sodding
SF
5.
Retaining Wall with Railing
'
6.
Modular Block Retaining Wall
30% Admin. Cost
Total Project Cost
COST ESTIMATE
PATHWAY IMPROVEMENTS
Unit
Unit Quanti Price
SF
135,000
$0.50
SF
25,000
$2.00
TON
4,500
$8.00
Sy
2,500
$1.75
LS
1 $7,500.00
SF
1,150
$15.00
Construction Cost
30% Admin. Cost
Total Project Cost
Amount
$67,500.00
$50,000.00
$36,000.00
$4,375.00
$7,500.00
$17,250.00
$182,625.00
$54.787.50
$237,412.50
COST ESTIMATE
STREET LIGHTING
Unit
No. Item Unit Quanti Price Amount
I . Lighting Standards EA 70 $2,800.00 $196,000.00
2. Service Panel EA 3 $3,000.00 $9,000.00
3. Wiring LF 50,000 $0.90 $45,000.00
Construction Cost $250,000.00
30% Admin. Cost $75,000.00
Total Project Cost $325,000.00
COST ESTIMATE
LANDSCAPING
Unit
No.
Item
Unit
Ouanti
Price
Amount
1.
Summit Ash
TREE
33
$300.00
$9,900.00
2.
Norway Maple
TREE
34
$300.00
$10,200.00
3.
Purple Ash
TREE
48
$300.00
$14,400.00
4.
Red Oak
TREE
35
$350.00
$12,250.00
5.
Hackberry
TREE
39
$300.00
$11,700.00
6.
Black Hills Spruce
TREE
20
$250.00
$5,000.00
7.
Balsam Fir
TREE
31
$250.00
$7,750.00
8.
Austrian Pine
TREE
6
$250.00
$1,500.00
9.
Amur Maple
TREE
35
$300.00
$10,500.00
10.
Japanese Tree Lilac
TREE
20
$350.00
$7,000.00
11.
Profusion Crab
TREE
34
$300.00
$10,200.00
12.
Snow Crab
TREE
38
$300.00
$11,400.00
13.
Red Splendor Crab
TREE
24
$300.00
$7,200.00
14.
Red Bud
TREE
20
$300.00
$6,000.00
Construction Cost
$125,000.00
30% Admin. Cost
$37.500.00
Total Project Cost
$162,500.00