1968 10 14PUBLIC HEARING OCTOBER 14, 1968
- ASSESSMENT HEARING ON 1968 -6 KERBER DRIVE
The assessment roll was shown and explained both to the Council and to
interested persons involved in this project. Persons present were
Mrs. Raymond,Roufs, Frank Bjornson, John Havlik, and Michael Walsh.
Mrs. Roufs wanted to know when their 15" culvert would be replaced.
She was info rmed *that _ this would be taken care of before this.project
was completed also all boulevards will be seeded.
The Administrator presented Mr. Brose's request to inform the Council
of the amount of land on Kerber Drive that has been zoned commercial
and residential because of the price differential between the assessment
for different zoning. districts.
No objections were filed in regards to the assessment roll as presented.
Meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING SUNRISE HILLS 3rd ADDITION
Mr. Robert Scholer gave a report as to the reason for the replatting.
A letter and .petition signed by adjacent property owners was filed
with the Planning Commission when plan was presented to the Planning
Commission in' regards to this replat. The letter read as follows:
"With reference to my formal request dated August 26, 1968, for
replatting the above subject property, I would ask the planning
commission to waive public hearings and approve the request for'the
following reasons:
1. At the time of final plat approval for Sunrise Hills 2nd Addition,
the subject property was and remains subject to the Village of Chanhassen
ordinances and not Chanhassen Township ordinances.
2. The request does not involve.the general public except for
homeowners and owners of lots in the immediate area of the subdivision.
These owners have been made aware of and approve the requested change
as evidenced.'by attached letter.
3. Sewer and water are in to serve the subject property.
4. The drainage;pattern'i's not changed.
5. The black top street is in paid for by'the applicant, thus
providing for minimum maintenance from public funds.
6. The. Village picks up one additional customer for utility services
on existing collection and distribution systems.
7. Lot sizes as proposed in the replat are 70% larger than the
11,700 square foot minimum now under consideration by the Village.
8. The lots as proposed will be more easily'maintained by future
homeowners.
9. The Village has approved the proposal.
Your prompt attention to my request will be appreciated.
/S/ Robert A. Scholer."
The petition dated September 7, 1968 was also presented.
"We, the undersigned residents and /or owners of lots in Sunrise Hills
attest that we have been shown and approve the plan to replat Lots 4,
5, 6, and 7, Sunrise Hills Second Addition into lots to be known
as Sunrise Hills Third Addition. In as much as this replatting does
not change existing drainage patterns., and in view of the fact that
sewer, water, and blacktop streets are in at this time we do not feel
that the character of the neighborhood will be adversely affected by
this replat. We, the undersigned recommend that the Village Council
approve the above referred to replat application.
The following signatures appeared -on the petition. J. Ward Passe,
Ann Marie Passe, "Dave Halverson, Ken Erickson, Theresa Erickson,
Felix White, D. R. Bakke, R. W. Pearson, Harold Kerber, Leona Kerber,
Ralph Thrane, Arnie Holm, Francis Scott, Irene Scott, and Mary Spencer."
Residents present at the hearing: Mary Spencer., Lorene Courtney,
Dolores.Bucol, Steve Bucol, Jim Morrison ", Ann.and W and
Russell Larson. 'Mr. Bucol presented a letter from persons objecting
to the replatting which read as follows's''"We, the'undersigned owners
of property in Sunrise Hills First and Second Additions, strongly
oppose the.. replatting.of Lgts, 5, 6, and 7., Block 2 Sunrise Hills
Second` Addition into five "lots as proposed by Robert Scholer. The
following signatures appeared.on the petition: Stephen Bucol, Elmer
Kunerth, Russell Larson, Doris Larson, T. R. Barrett,: Jean Barrett,
James Morrison, Helen Morrison, Don Huseth, Robert "Burke, Robert.
Smith, R. "A. Patterson, Leo Bovy, Bucol, Julie Kunerth,
Jean Baird, Frank Perrin, Audrey Perrin, Tod Kelly, Betty Kelly,.
Jerry Van Gundy, Mr. and Mrs. Alan Kanter, A. E. Johnson. After
due consideration I rescind my signature on the petition of R. Scholer
dated September 7th, Mary Spencer."
A report was on hand from the Village Engineer in regards to the
proposed replat as follows: Upon your request, I have reviewed the
proposed rearrangement of certain lots in Block 2 in Sunrise Hills
Second Addition. I do_not�see - any problems,in ' rearranging these
lots so an additional lot' will'be.available'. It will riot ""affect the
drainage and'the "needed frontage The'sewer hookups are in the back,
so only'an"additional water service will have to be installed in the
street at the time of house construction. An additional assessment
should be paid at the time .of, keplatting. "
Also a letter presented from Ra1ph.Thrane which read'as follows:
"My name appears on a form which I believe.indicates,approval of
breaking up existing lot size adjacent to abutting my property. The
conditions under which this was presented. did not allow for'Adequate'
information or study concerning this proposal; consequently,I would
like to withdraw approval until several conditions are made clear:
1. How, does the.. proposal affect. our_. sewer and assessments?
I believe the Council should clarify this position. In my.opinion
the entire cost would have to be re- apportioned and any additional
lots should bear the ful.l:.cost of se"wer, and water" assessments
2. What is the engineering plan for any gracing or building. on`
existing or changed plat layout. Because of the unusual topography
of the area in question, changes in platting and even.'the existing
platting of this property could naturally affect my property and
could also deposit silt on the beach lot and in the lake. I would
like a statement in this regard.
3. A much closer examination of the proposal reveals that.the
manner of building and contouring could be more important than actual
square footage due to unique characteristics of the land area and fill
required.
I would ask that the above be given consideration prior to approval
of the revised,p'lat plan., /S/ Ralph Thrane."
Mr. Larson stated that as a resident of Sunrise Hills First Addition
he objected.on a number of points.
On a motion made by Councilman Pearson and seconded by Councilman Hill
the Council will defer any action at this time and adjourn the public
hearing until November 18 at 7:30 p.m. The following voted in favor
Village Council Minutes, October 14, 1968
-3-
thereof: Mayor Coulter, Councilmen Hill, Bennyhoff, Klingelhutz,
and Pearson. No negative votes. Motion carried.
CHANHASSEN VILLAGE COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 14, 1968
The Chanhassen Village Council met on October 14, 1968, at 8:00 p.m.
The following members.were present: Mayor Coulter, Councilmen Hill,
Bennyhoff,-.Klingelhutz, and Pearson.
MINUTES: On a motion made by Councilman Pearson and seconded by
Councilman Hill to approve the minutes of the October 7th meeting.
The following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Coulter, Councilmen Hill,
Pearson, Bennyhoff, and Klingelhutz. No negative votes. Motion
carried.
The Park and.Recreation Commission minutes of September 23 were read
and noted.
SIGN ORDINANCE : . The proposed sign ordinance was discussed point.by
point by the-Council and Planning Commission. Mr. Robert Jr. and
William Naegele were present and requested that they be.granted time
in which they could explain a number of points in regards to the .
sign ordinance. _On a motion made by Councilman.Pearson and seconded
by Councilman Bennyhoff that the Council defer any action at this
time. The following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Coulter, Councilmen
Hill, Bennyhoff, Pearson, and Klingelhutz. No negative votes. Motion
carried.
The Naegele Company will supply the Council.and Planning Commission in
written form the revisions that they had discussed. A second hearing
will be set after Planning Commission has had time to discuss points
brought out at this meeting and revisions by the Naegeles.
WELL SITE: The Administrator presented a map and information sheet
showing:estimated.costs for nine:different well sites also estimated
costs for connection to main line. On a motion made by Councilman
Hill and seconded by Councilman Pearson to approve site number 1.
The Administrator to. initiate -steps to purchase this property. The
following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Coulter, Councilmen Hill,
Bennyhoff, Pearson, and Klingelhutz. No negative votes. Motion
carried.
LAND PURCHASE-: :On a motion :.made by Councilman Pearson and seconded
by Councilman Hill to purchase site number seven. The administrator
to initiate steps to purchase this property. The following voted in
favor thereof: Mayor Coulter, Councilmen Hill, Bennyhoff, Klingelhutz,
and Pearson. No negative votes. Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING ON SEWER TRUNK LINE (1968 -3): Councilman Hill moved
the adoption of the following resolution. BE IT RESOLVED by the
.Village Council of the Village of Chanhassen, Minnesota, as follows:
1. It is hereby found and determined that T. Flatebo Engineering,
Inc., the consulting engineering firm for the Village, has reported
to this Council that a local improvement as hereinafter described
is feasible and may best be made as proposed, and not in conjunction
with any other improvement, and that the estimated cost of said
improvement to the Village is $78,440.00.
2. Said improvement consists of the following:
A proposed sanitary sewer trunk to serve areas in Sections,13
and 14, Township 116 North, Range 23 West lying southerly of County
Road No. 16. The trunk sewer would extend from the existing lift
station on'the north side. of Rice Marsh;Lake, thence southwesterly
approximately 1,000 feet, thence northwesterly approximately 900
feet to. TH. 101, thence northerly .approximately 300 feet to THS., . _ . .. .
thence approximately 350 feet southwesterly along the -south right -of-
way line of TH5, thence northerly approximately 100 feet.across TH 5:
and there terminating.
3. This Council shall meet at the Village Hall on Monday., the 2nd
day of December, 1968, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., for the purpose of
holding -a public hearing on the proposed construction of said
improvement.
4. The Clerk-is authorized and directed to cause notice of the
time, place and purpose of said hearing to be published for two
successive weeks in.the Minnetonka Sun,'being the.official.newspaper
of the Village, the first of such publications to be not less than
10 days and the second not less than 3 days prior to the date of
said hearing, and to be.mailed to.the owners of the.property in the.
area proposed to be assessed not less than 10 days prior to the date
of said hearing.. Resolution seconded by Councilman.Pearson.. The
following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Coulter, Councilmen Hill
Klingelhutz, Bennyhoff, and Pearson. No negative.votes — Motion.
carried.
TAX DELINQUENT PROPERTY: On a motion made by Councilman.Pearson and
seconded by Councilman Hill to approve the classification and sale-of
property submitted by the County Auditor. The following voted in
favor thereof: Mayor Coulter, Councilmen Pearson, Klingelhutz, Hill,
and Bennyhoff. No negative votes. Motion carried.
FLUORIDATION: Councilman Bennyhoff gave a short report on the points
in favor of fluoridation.
On a motion made by Councilman Bennyhoff and seconded by,Councilman
Pearson the meeting adjourned.
1
1