Loading...
4. Lake Dr Business Center Parking Lot Expansion7700 Market Boulevard PC Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227,1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952227.1110 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJ: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Bob Generous, Senior Planner September 12, 2011'' Lake Drive Business Center Parking Lot Expansion Planning Case #2011 -08 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the Site Plan for a parking lot expansion located at 950 Lake Drive; plans prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc., dated July 19, 2011, subject to the conditions of the staff report; and adoption of the Findings of Fact." City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council present. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant is proposing a 155 -space expansion of the site parking. However, due to revisions to the plan resulting from the conditions of approval, such as providing additional landscape islands and moving the retaining wall out of the eastern drainage and utility easement, the final number of additional parking spaces is not determined. The parking lot installation is anticipated to be completed in three stages and will be responsive to economic conditions. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 16, 2011 to review the proposed plan. The Planning Commission voted six for and none against a motion recommending that City Council approve the site plan subject to the conditions of the staff report. There were no issues or concerns regarding the proposed parking lot expansion. The Planning Commission minutes are item 1 a of the September 12, 2011 City Council packet. RECOMMENDATION Public Works Staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of the site plan for the parking 1591 Park Road lot expansion subject to the conditions specified on pages 8 — 10 of the Planning Phone: 952.227.1300 Commission staff report dated August 16, 2011 approving the Lake Drive Business Fax: 952.227.1310 Center parking lot expansion. Senior Center ATTACHMENTS Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952227.1110 1. Email to Bob Generous from Glenn Pauls' Office dated August 15, 2011. Web Site 2. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated August 16, 2011. =v.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 3. Site Plan Agreement. gAplan\201 1 planning cases \1 1 -08 lake drive business center parking site plan \executive summary. doc Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Generous, Bob From: Glenn Pauls Office [rlipauls @earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 8:17 PM To: Generous, Bob Subject: CSM Corp Parking addition Attachments: Chan Lot PID Map.pdf Hi Robert I work with the Pauls Family Trust which is the owner of the adjacent undeveloped property on the west side of Powers Dr. (PID: 251900370). We are concerned about the addition of 150 parking spaces being added to this lot. Our primary concern is with the spaces located at the intersection of Powers and Lake Drive. These will fall directly in the view corridor from our lot to Lake Susan Park. We have no problems with any of the other lot expansions. Since our intersection is already built we will have to build a road north east from that intersection parallel to Powers Dr to access our lot (as seen on PID map attached). When leaving our lot you will look right at those new parking spaces as you drive down to the intersection from our build -able area. Please include this in the meeting minutes. If you have any questions please call Scott or Glenn at 970 - 728 -3540 970 - 318 -6614 Thanks CARVER COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION t ...J co La - o. v C P r Parcel Information - PID: 251900370 Property Address: Taxpayer Information: Not On File PAULS FAMILY TRUST .7676 HIGHWAY 145 TELLURIDE, CO 81435 -4100 I Parcel Properties GIS Acres: 16.94 City /Township: CHANHASSEN School District: 0112 Legend Parcel Location Street View Actin PLSS: TWP 116, RNG 023, SEC 14 Lot: Not On File Plat Name: CHANHASSEN LAKES BUS. PARK Block: Not On File j 4~ L P Est. Market Value Land: $1362100 r tt [ i 1 Sale Date: Not On File Est. Market Value Building: SO Sale Price: Not On File Est. Market Value Total: 513621 Qualified/Unqualified: Not On File s '. r � F E Cfi � � E v " LA t . , w.7 _ i } gib ,ty/ •� 'E .E- w r 3o N ' .^ 33 4 s i j u 1 r Y 4 17 'Su V'L7 1.� U fKE t ...J co La - o. v C P r Parcel Information - PID: 251900370 Property Address: Taxpayer Information: Not On File PAULS FAMILY TRUST .7676 HIGHWAY 145 TELLURIDE, CO 81435 -4100 I Parcel Properties GIS Acres: 16.94 City /Township: CHANHASSEN School District: 0112 Legend Parcel Location Street View Actin PLSS: TWP 116, RNG 023, SEC 14 Lot: Not On File Plat Name: CHANHASSEN LAKES BUS. PARK Block: Not On File Payable Year 2011 Last Sale Information Est. Market Value Land: $1362100 Sale Date: Not On File Est. Market Value Building: SO Sale Price: Not On File Est. Market Value Total: 513621 Qualified/Unqualified: Not On File AM Map created on 3/30/2011 PC DATE: August 16, 2011 1 CC DATE: September 12, 2011 1 REVIEW DEADLINE: September 13, 2011 CASE #: 2011 -08 BY: RG, TJ, ML, JM, JS, JS PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve the Site Plan for a parking lot expansion located at 950 Lake Drive, plans prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc., dated July 19, 2011, subject to the conditions of the staff report; and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Recommendation." CITY OF CHANHASSEN SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Plan Review for a 155 -stall parking lot expansion for the Lake Drive Business Center building. LOCATION: 950 Lake Drive Lot 1, Block 1, Empak Addition (PID 25- 2710010) APPLICANT: CSM Corporation Attn: John Ferrier 500 Washington Avenue South, Suite 3000 Minneapolis, MN 55415 (612) 395 -7000 j ferrier(:c�csmcorp.net PRESENT ZONING: Industrial Office Park (IOP) 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Office Industrial ACREAGE: 12.6 acres DENSITY: 0.35 F.A.R. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION - MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets those standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi - judicial decision. PROPOSAL /SUMMARY The applicant is proposing a 155 -space expansion of the site parking. The applicant believes that this parking expansion makes the building more marketable to office and warehouse tenants. They have been in contact with potential tenants who have expressed a concern about the lack of parking near the office portion of the building, which is located on the west end of the building. Additionally, the parking expansion permits greater flexibility for additional office space within the building. The parking will be installed in phases with the parking immediately southwest of the Planning Commission Lake Drive Business Center Site Plan — Planning Case 2011 -08 August 16, 2011 Page 2 of 10 building being installed first. The parking in the southeast portion of the building will be installed second, and the parking on the east end and the truck loading/maneuvering area will be installed third. However, should a large user be found all the parking could be installed in one phase. Some of this parking (located east of the building) was previously shown as part of a building expansion approved in 2000, but was held in proof of parking status. However, the proposed parking lot expansion and the resulting grading operation exceeded the amount that could be approved by staff administratively (1,000 cubic yards). The City may approve site grading through the site plan review process, the interim use process or as part of a subdivision. Since the proposal includes both landscaping, sign relocation and site lighting review in addition to the grading and parking lot expansion, the site plan review process is appropriate. With this site plan, they will have all their approvals in place for construction of the parking lot expansion. The property to the east is Roberts Automatic Products, another industrial user. Lake Susan Park is located south across Lake Drive. To the west across Powers Boulevard is a vacant office /industrial site. To the north are the railroad tracks at the top of a steep slope (elevation 946), 35 feet above the finished floor elevation of the building (elevation 911). To the southwest, the proposed parking expansion will be approximately seven feet above the corner of Powers Boulevard and Lake Drive. The site is served by City sewer and water service. Access is via Lake Drive with two driveways. Truck access is limited to the easterly driveway. The building is currently estimated to have the following breakdown of space usage: Office — 16,500 square feet, manufacturing area — 78,760 square feet and warehouse — 96,925 square feet. When the site plan was originally approved in 1989, the parking requirements for an office use were 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet of building area. At the time of the building expansion in 2000, City of Chanhassen's standards were 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Based on the parking requirements, the site needed the following parking: Office — 74 spaces, largest shift — 65 spaces, warehouse — 54 spaces. The total spaces needed were 193 spaces. There were ample locations to incorporate additional parking on site. At that time, staff visited the site on two different occasions and noticed that approximately one -half of the parking was occupied. The City permitted 30 percent of the parking (58 stalls) in proof of parking pursuant to section 20- 1124 (1) of the City Code. These spaces are located along the east side of the building. If parking had become a problem, the City could have required the installation of the additional parking spaces. Staff is recommending approval of the site plan subject to the conditions of this staff report. APPLICABLE REGUATIONS Section 20 -106 — 20 -116, Site Plan Review Section 20 -811— 20 -816, IOP District Regulations Section 20 -1116 — 20 -1124, Parking and Loading Section 20 -1176 — 20 -1183, Landscaping and Tree Removal Planning Commission Lake Drive Business Center Site Plan — Planning Case 2011 -08 August 16, 2011 Page 3 of 10 BACKGROUND On November 14, 2000, the Chanhassen Planning Commission as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments approved a six (6) foot variance from the 50 -foot height limitation for the construction of storage silos. On August 28, 2000, the Chanhassen City Council approved Site Plan #2000 -10 for a 96,925 square -foot expansion to a 95,260 square -foot building. On April 24, 1989, the Chanhassen City Council approved the plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Empak Addition, replatting Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park 2 nd Addition. On April 10, 1989, the Chanhassen City Council approved site plan 989 - for a 77,690 square - foot office and production facility. GENERAL SITE PLAN The applicant is proposing a three - phase, 155 -space expansion of the site parking. The parking expansion southwest of the building is proposed to be installed first; the parking in the southeast portion of the building installed second; and the parking on the east end and the truck loading/maneuvering area installed third. Parking lot landscaping, parking area lighting and extensive retaining walls are included as part of the plan. The sign in the southwest corner of the building will be relocated further north on Powers Boulevard. 2 - ,� T LOT L FLOCK 1 eg `^ ACCESS Access to the site is provided from Lake Drive via two existing driveways. No additional street access is being proposed. GRADING AND DRAINAGE This 12.6 -acre site is located in Empak Addition which is on the northeast corner of Powers Boulevard and Lake Drive. A 188,900 square foot building with parking is currently on the site. Beyond the parking and building areas is grass. This development is located in the Bluff Creek Watershed District. Grading will take place on the site to prepare the parking areas. The grass area maximum slope must not exceed 3:1. Runoff from this site will be treated using an underground treatment system. The drainage and storm sewer system within the site is privately owned and must be maintained by the owner. Existing runoff rates must be maintained for the 2 -, 10- and 100 -year rain events. The drainage Planning Commission Lake Drive Business Center Site Plan — Planning Case 2011 -08 August 16, 2011 Page 4 of 10 calculations do not match the plans. The applicant must submit revised plans and calculations meeting City requirements. An easement is required from the appropriate property owner for any off -site grading. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. Erosion and Sediment Control The applicant has prepared an erosion control plan for all phases of this project. The first phase of this project will result in 3:1 slopes with a positive grade towards Lake Drive. This disturbed area will need to be covered with erosion control blanket or sod within 14 days of cessation of work. This should be indicated in the plan. Other than the need for blanket or sod on all 3:1 slopes, the plan appears adequate for existing conditions. However, a note must be added to the plan that additional best management practices may be necessary as site and climatic O ;i ri t LOT 1 d - KCCK ' r conditions change throughout construction. To assure that erosion and sediment control best management practices are installed and maintained, an escrow or letter of credit in the amount of $2,450 will be required with the first phase. This number was calculated based upon 450 feet of silt fence, three (3) inlet protection devices, and 370 yards of blanket and seed. Storm Water Management The applicant is proposing to construct 155 new parking stalls in three areas. These parking areas are to be phased in with only the most southwesterly parking area being constructed with the first phase. The applicant is proposing to utilize perforated storm sewer and embedded within a rock trench to achieve rate control and some pre- treatment of the runoff. Water from this site is directed to Lake Susan pond (LS- P3.34). Approximately 150 acres of commercial and industrial land use is also directed to the Lake Susan Pond. This water is routed through three primary storm sewer conveyance routes. Powers Boulevard from MN T.H. 5 to Lake Drive is routed through a 30 -inch RCP along Powers Boulevard. Chanhassen Retail Addition is routed through a 36 -inch RCP immediately east of the subject property. The third area drains through a 30 -inch RCP along Lake Drive and accepts drainage from Lake Drive as well as the intersection of T.H. 5 and MN T.H. 101. Because of the size of the drainage area being conveyed through these pipes, the applicant must either model the entire watershed to Planning Commission Lake Drive Business Center Site Plan — Planning Case 2011 -08 August 16, 2011 Page 5 of 10 show that there is adequate capacity in the pipes or maintain, or preferably decrease discharge rates to the system. While this system is generally acceptable, it is undetermined at this time how it will be maintained. The City has required, and the consulting engineer has agreed to provide, a long- term operations and maintenance plan for this system. This system will remain private and the land owner will be responsible for the maintenance of the system. With proper lead time, staff has indicated to the applicant's engineer that the City would have an interest in working with the applicant to procure grant funds and partner or accept cash in lieu of installation of the pretreatment features being proposed. Because of the existing infrastructure and size of the contributing watershed, rate control must be achieved on site. However, the City would still have an interest in partnering with the applicant and other agencies to implement some alternative storm water BMPs. WETLANDS AND SHORELAND No wetlands appear to exist on or immediately adjacent to the proposed project area. Although the subject property is tributary to both Lake Susan and Riley Creek, it lies outside of the shoreland overlay district for both of these water bodies. RETAINING WALLS The proposed retaining walls are as follows: Location Length (approx.) Maximum Height rox. (app ) Southeast corner parking area 1 (Wall 1) 70 feet 2.5 feet North side of parking area 2 — 5' from the building (Wall 2) 430 feet 6.8 feet East side of parking area 3 (Wall 3) 360 feet 8.8 feet North side of parking area 4 (Wall 4) 330 feet 17.5 feet Building permits are required for all retaining walls four feet tall or higher and must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. The exits in front of Wall 2 may be inadequate for some uses of the building under the proposed parking scenario. Exterior exit discharge must accommodate exits served. The parking stalls in this area should be constructed at the time when a final end user is determined so that the exits will not limit the occupancy. The wall and support structure (not including soil) in Parking Area 3 must be moved outside of the City utility easement. A 36 -inch diameter storm sewer is within this easement. Moving the wall in this area will cause a reduction in the number of parking stalls. Planning Commission Lake Drive Business Center Site Plan — Planning Case 2011 -08 August 16, 2011 Page 6 of 10 UTILITIES Details must be provided for all proposed storm, sanitary, and watermain crossings. Actual elevations of existing utilities shall be verified for accuracy. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to provide the City with the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee the installation of the storm sewer, erosion control, and seeding. This amount will be determined prior to start of construction due to the possible phasing of the project and not knowing the amount to be installed and disturbed. The applicant must also notify the City after installation of the erosion control and 48 hours prior to the commencement of grading. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will be required. LIGHTING /SIGNAGE The applicant is proposing parking lot lighting as part of the parking area expansion. The photometric plan describes the use of 25 -foot poles, which would comply with city requirements that restrict pole height to 30 feet. City code requires that all fixtures must be shielded, high - pressure sodium or light- emitting diode (LED) with a total cutoff angle equal to or less than 90 degrees. The applicant is proposing relocating the monument sign on the site. This relocation will require a separate building permit and sign permit. Such sign shall not exceed 64 square feet in display area nor be greater than eight feet in height. The proposed monument sign is shown 35.7 feet from the westerly property line. LANDSCAPING /TREE PRESERVATION Minimum requirements for landscaping include 472 square feet of landscaped area around the parking lot, two trees for the parking lot, and bufferyard plantings along Lake Drive, as well as neighboring property lines. The applicant's proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table. Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape area 12,655 square feet >12,655 square feet Trees/ parking lot 50 overstory trees 14+ existing (not shown on plans) Landscape islands or peninsulas required 16 7 Bufferyard B — S. property line Adequate screening in accord I with existing buffer plantings Screening needs revision Planning Commission Lake Drive Business Center Site Plan — Planning Case 2011 -08 August 16, 2011 Page 7 of 10 Applicant does not meet minimum requirements for parking lot landscape islands /peninsulas or required trees. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan showing the minimum number of landscape islands /peninsulas and trees. Additionally, screening for parking along Lake Drive is not adequate. The applicant can match the existing screening or revise the selected shrubs to a species with greater height. The landscape island on the north end of the parking proposed adjacent to the east side of the building shall be extended further out to provide full protection of the parking space immediately adjacent to the island. MISCELLANEOUS Extend Isl.uol Building The propose number of accessible parking spaces (7) with adjacent access aisles and their locations are in accordance with Minnesota State Building Code (Chap. 1341, Accessibility). The plans and drainage calculations must be signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. OTHER AGENCY APPROVALS The applicant will be responsible for applying for and procuring any additional permits that may be required for this project. It appears that all phases of this project exceed one acre of disturbance. If this is the case a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System construction stormwater permit will be required. COMPLIANCE REVIEW Required Parking Setback: North — 0', East — 0', South — 25', West — 30' Proposed Parking Setback: North — 60', East — 20', South — 25', West 35' Parking Standards: Manufacturing or processing plant — One off - street parking space for each employee on the major shift and one off - street parking space for each motor vehicle when customarily kept on the premises. Office buildings (administrative, business or professional) — Buildings under 49,999 square feet, five stalls per 1,000 square feet gross floor area; buildings from 50,000 to 99,999 square feet, four stalls per 1,000 square feet gross floor area; and buildings over 100,000 square feet, three stalls per 1,000 square feet gross floor area. Building area square footages shall exclude common areas such as reception areas, cafeterias, hallways, etc. in calculating the parking requirements for an office building. Storage, wholesale, or warehouse establishments — One space for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area up to 10,000 square feet and one additional space for each additional 2,000 square feet, Planning Commission Lake Drive Business Center Site Plan — Planning Case 2011 -08 August 16, 2011 Page 8of10 plus one space for each company vehicle operating from the premises. If it can be demonstrated by the applicant that the number of employees in the warehouse or storage area will require less than the required number of spaces, and if the applicant shall submit a letter to the city assuring that if there is to be any increase in employees, the applicant agrees to provide additional parking area, then the city may approve a lesser number of parking spaces. Hard Surface Coverage: permitted - 70% proposed - 63% RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the site plan subject to the conditions of the staff report and adoption of the attached findings of fact and recommendation. The recommended conditions of approval are as follows: Planning Department Conditions 1. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement and provide the security required by it. 2. This relocated sign shall require a separate building permit and sign permit. 3. The landscape island on the north end of the parking adjacent to the east side of the building shall be extended further out to provide full protection of the parking stall. Environmental Resource Specialist Conditions 1. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan showing the minimum number of landscape islands /peninsulas (16) and trees (50). 2. The applicant shall provide adequate screening for the new parking areas along Lake Drive. Shrubs shall reach a mature height of at least two feet. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the city for approval. Water Resources Coordinator Conditions Rates of surface water runoff must not be increased from existing conditions. Where practicable to do so, rates should be decreased. 2. The applicant and city shall work together on future phases to look for potential cooperative surface water management opportunities. 3. These approvals for future phases are contingent upon City code and other jurisdictional agency rules remaining the same. In the event that any of these changes, the applicant will need to resubmit to assure that the plans meet any new rules germane to this project. 4. Include a note on the Grading and Erosion Control plan indicating that the proposed best management practices is the minimum controls anticipated, but that as unanticipated site and Planning Commission Lake Drive Business Center Site Plan — Planning Case 2011 -08 August 16, 2011 Page 9 of 10 climatic conditions present themselves, it will be to modify the best management practices to meet these new conditions. 5. All 3:1 slopes shall be covered with erosion control blanket or sod. This needs to be indicated within the plan set on sheet C -2: Grading and Erosion Control. 6. An escrow or letter of credit in the amount of $2,450.00 shall be provided to the City before commencement of the first phase. This escrow is only for the first phase. Subsequent phases will require additional assurance funds. 7. Applicant must apply for and receive approvals from other jurisdictional agencies as necessary. 8. The applicant must show that the total disturbed area for all phases is less than one acre or they must apply for and receive an NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit from the MPCA. If this is the case, a full Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan must be prepared and submitted to the City for review and comment. 9. All exposed soils must be stabilized within 14 days of cessation of earth work activities. 10. Lake Drive must be swept clean of soils and debris tracked onto it from the site as needed but no less than once per week until final stabilization is achieved. 11. The applicant or their designee must maintain the best management practices in good working order until final stabilization is achieved. Engineering Department Conditions 1. Grass area maximum slope must not exceed 3:1. 2. The applicant must submit revised plans (redlines) which meet the requirements of the City. 3. Drainage plans must be revised so that the plans match the drainage calculations. The applicant must also follow City standards for water quality volume. Also, the proposed drainage rates must be maintained for the 2 -, 10 -, and 100 -year rain events. 4. The storm sewer provided for treatment will be privately owned and maintained. 5. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. 6. Building permits are required for all retaining walls four feet tall or higher and must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. A fence must be placed at the top of the wall for safety. Planning Commission Lake Drive Business Center Site Plan — Planning Case 2011 -08 August 16, 2011 Page 10 of 10 7. The exits in front of Wall 2 may be inadequate for some uses of the building under the proposed parking scenario. Exterior exit discharge must accommodate exits served. The parking stalls in this area should be constructed at the time when a final end user is determined so that the exits will not limit the occupancy. 8. The wall and wall supports (not including soil) in drainage area three on the east side of the site must be removed from the drainage and utility easement. 9. Details must be provided for all proposed storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and watermain crossings. Actual elevations of existing utilities shall be verified for accuracy. A minimum vertical separation of 18" is required at all storm, sanitary, and watermain crossings. 10. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to provide the City with the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee the installation of the storm sewer, erosion control, and seeding. This amount will be determined prior to start of construction due to the possible phasing of the project and not knowing the amount to be installed and disturbed. 11. The applicant must also notify the City after installation of the erosion control and 48 hours prior to the commencement of grading. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will be required. 12. The plans and drainage calculations must be signed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation 2. Reduced Copy Cover Sheet. 3. Reduced Copy Alta Survey Sheet 1. 4. Reduced Copy Alta Survey Sheet 2. S. Reduced Copy Site Plan. 6. Reduced Copy Grading and Erosion Control Plan. 7. Reduced Copy Stormwater Management Plan. 8. Reduced Copy Details. 9. Reduced Copy Landscaping Plan. 10. Reduced Copy Photometric Plan 11. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List. gAplan\2011 planning cases \11 -08 lake drive business center parking site plan \staff report lake drive business center pkg exp.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of CSM Corporation for Site Plan Review for a 155 -stall parking lot expansion in the Industrial Office Park District (IOP). On August 16, 2011, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of CSM Corporation for Site Plan Review for a 155 -stall parking lot expansion for property located at 950 Lake Drive. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the site plan which was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Industrial Office Park District (IOP) 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Office Industrial use. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 1, Block 1, Empak Addition. 4. Site Plan Findings: a. The proposed development is consistent with the elements and objectives of the City's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; Finding: The development of the site is consistent with the City's development guides and comprehensive plan. The proposed parking expansion provides greater marketability and flexibility in the use of the site for office and industrial users. b. The proposed development is consistent with the site plan review requirements; Finding: The site is consistent with the site plan review requirements and complies with all zoning code requirements. c. The proposed development preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas; Finding: The propose parking areas are in locations that have previously been altered with the development of the site. The proposed development is in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed areas. The proposed development will incorporate surface water treatment of runoff and additional site landscaping. Retaining walls are being incorporated to reduce site grading. d. The proposed development creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; Finding: The development will be harmonious with the existing site building and features. e. The proposed development creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1) An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; Finding: The proposed expansion is in logical and practical locations on the site. 2) The amount and location of open space and landscaping; Finding: The proposed parking lot expansion is located around the site. The proposed site coverage is less than permitted by code. Additional landscaping is being provided around the parking areas. 3) Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and Finding: The proposed parking lot expansion will provide additional flexibility with the use of the existing building and is compatible with adjacent development. 4) Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. Finding: Access to the site shall remain as exists. Parking areas and circulation comply with code requirements and are being distributed around three sides of the building. 5) Protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: Surface water is being directed to an improved storm water system. The parking areas are being served by adequate drainage improvements. Landscaping is provided around the parking lot to buffer from public view. 2 5. The planning report, Planning Case #2011 -08 dated August 16, 2011, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Planning Case #2011 -08 for Site Plan approval for a 155 -space parking lot expansion, plans prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc., dated July 19, 2011, on property located at 950 Lake Drive subject to the recommended conditions of approval. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 16 day of August, 2011. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: Its Chairman 3 LAKE DRIVE BUSINESS CENTER CITY OF CHANHASSEN CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA RECEIVED JUL 1 9 2011 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT I LOCATION MAP ° d � " IIE im. SHEET INDEX NO. C -0 COVER SHEET 1 -9 BOUNDARY /EASEMENTS /SETBACK/ AS -BUILT INFO 2 -9 TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 3 -9 C -1 SITE PLAN 4 -9 C -2 GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 5 -9 C -3 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 6 -9 C -4 DETAILS 7 -9 L -1 LANDSCAPE PLAN 8 -9 P -1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 9 -9 DEVELOPER /PROJECT ARCHITECT JOHN FERRIER CSM EQUITIES, LLC 500 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 3000 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 PH 612- 395 -7000 FX 612- 395 -7002 ENGINEER CLARK WICKLUND ALLIANT ENGINEERING 233 PARK AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 300 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 PH 612 - 767 -9302 FX 612- 758 -3099 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MARK KRONBECK ALLIANT ENGINEERING 233 PARK AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 300 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 PH 612- 767 -9338 FX 612 -758 -3099 pOF PE � N , E yg VI �L� \� N4�� NS a ALLIANT GINEEIUNG. INC. �(- COUTN, 61 aao one iePoimeroso m z �F 3� my OUArtT AS NCE /o0N QL DALE ISSUE u„ PROJECT 1.. DATA C -0 m 1 of 9 .CANNED 0 50 00 200 SCAL� BENCHM RK :.I ::. BASIS OF BEARINGS f Fmd ut !m a . r nbmw °r u. x'Y ° .° I ivi ° x G•°O!• cu.w �� . ram o y. w��'cxwmY�e�N. Ry, o•. xc] o . smw scrw u 5. noon ux o dpa m. �m _ e - w� sly c oy � mend • D - Mnpt M4 xmF �. fW SYxE � • cvsi 4dVYpi �- OF, mlq vox 7 - rcuxP F.x xut G W 100 Scou IN mff EMPAK AaDO /T /ON Chanhassen, MN . PROPERTY DESCRIPTION u -ioz u e i ii pi o n i ' n e� a ]w.m eaw 1 H • nm °t nb� x veafo NOTES .— ...... ♦ v�ap•ny I. am.e Im Oneu.uta amu vw 01.uN) we. wwlmel. ]mxe nwleumw umrm wu°a� n pw I °bun • mue°e Want- e� -.°H wwt °• peaa.e n ..sum. m -riot • eaa.n o u. ww•nr o az dw dw.nez•.0 xu exu]. n au e p ' a• �°w q � u•IV���'u�tuwww ya u w.t a � � "a �;u .I�, �'�:" a; :^a'°o:"m "a d�" «M ao� b ww een e.a ie:l_ 000iti ° e' ' r mw n n °I „a, entnt ewn. at.n m. e,n - m w - weMl t° e..Nea• na uulh • °•.nni. Dr pIN °i weuf ugnd .• wen nr•m. x mn waF.�laq . I� •^ -nt p mw et vmxete G• eanpmY e• emles.a N oat men .. OPrwrlr t°..nm n w•n.�l yr o.eumnt xw Txul, w won n..m. c•esebm °( nMwmnt 31naW. me Frwmum ce.nm4 pr owvmnt 1 •pnt 1° iemw wneN nw1Nn. anpwt0 uDn u° Ime ey we c.tivnum N°. a.n eWgiM ° wnt Mo-, by ],Mgmnl / ♦q..°nt Dr p.wmnt Nw 3asp]. •�..: � :N�:.a, �: ~� la; � mo,ar. na nN..n n,. cxr N dmn °wn ne m..m Nw.'ninrw~bFN x°�camn shat a uuwinri cmueny a� a•n rwn. °°- b, erpwVm, eulv� na wnpJm es [aiinnt pv oaw i�1 Xa It— 11 w._ V rb I N.z-�a�. � •o.nae °� ry�;� �.xw Inn 1e - Wyly wbPd to —U.. d — zow-ia yr o°annt Nw D1771e °. we•n n..m. SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION.?: ° G91 an..n IIM�tN ov q.t' me ub�e �~ m ntl• Inwrcnn d, �4 N�n mD wo .ilp \M Ni uuYmVm tlDn ..t M�I H� bri m N ° 1. b frlPUt ernh wN le) ul N w,mr I. ° bvw eamN ma eewnt. ne•ns one .vmnteun N w. I i aMw ±..a . aiw......... n V . — o7 m u ° °u a .oi %r nlenno •ai. nr•m ei vu mvea ne /r v °1O imatw ` m aevm. a u• ..ne n nnne.e tD a. wapa Ien nena.e a°wmnt nom 1r o e nnY'n ew,.er In.. N'ei�Hn, qw .u•. mewt e. wan n..ml (.) w. �. a .ra�ln N ewwn. emw.l. ne ewwmw w mN w. D� �. ne Iw°l.a N m m pax �na� aor a�et�> M1c�a Iw. uevaxv •p wl IsnlVUm. e� a nme nezre a•d (iw nn Rom v'0 u�st t a 1tl riwV W N1✓ri• �. q u0 get a ue en.°n"lep m'.p p 4 °w+� a rIU�ulnu�num S uln m a ): ° Finny •aaxlw.e me .ew�N br Y Ue wc�a Ttl v. re. pt+by ° plN by uin ne nea tm n urn/ • i Nw,aen oaon n•wroa ^e xau uri /� °) tly Y( a )' a n(u.)•.ew.�T �e bauaw a a. ` i v "a "]i u] -op]z '- ,PARKING COUNT v a =n PI 51 E on 9 I Jib i 6 M fil 8 9 p S \ O F Z � w D N ED ¢ I W N K N ¢ Y O U Z 6 O m m � � � d 6 m � I� s J: Jdv) � N u -N m w c — cl U 3 >- O z — ^ S IY hoc o_m ¢ o ¢ LJV W Ek4l AL TA/ACSM Land Title Survey �o� CSM EQ U/T/ES L L C ok 02005 FU(- K-1.t% LID. fG�i3 a 7 ALTA/ACSM Land 8�$ o CSM EQU/T/ES LL C 3 E Title Survey ok EMPAK ADD /T /ON With Contour Over /ay _ Chanhassen, MN g IL ROAD ��)9��0'� 4424 f l e E PACIFIC RA 5 6 01 S7 PAUL ANO �: U� N�160 0 r - - L MIL WAUKEE .At 1 o o °? u,T 11 � " m �s J l n � A oa65 D 5D 1w �;��, A Aa +3 / e LOT 1 acM m .alal I I II Il 1 l / tM Ds y .�ill;i BLOCK 1'�S� I I LEGEND '- •_ i a, ` � a:'21"C— xµ—x w 1 MOLCL& -J N mt I I / / wnafw �� 3 �. wu 02 �.. wm sPn • N v III w. _ 6$ y W UIT 'W- ,uoa�u+ C. raxa vx xul. N 1 1 1. 1h GF _��:mmwo s •y ':roN �' \ \ \ \ n 5 f `e \ ati tMt .mfm— w_�.O,sxxc Aga i U 3 Ift xa.zslelmw LD st �il z LOCATION MAV Q o C .�BENORMPRK OF BASIS OF BEIR(NGS h" 1 C )i9 .PARKING GOUNTL�_.�.'.:1L� Q `i U x µ « .mlae rwc °-pj5 ' r wn. . of u. cax tx ..om I. a.rm.a w s.mosia,e r let p�aunr.° Ni.�oP"nox �z2 SITE 3 6:w .i (:� cuxven c00xtt. ulxxcsoru. r, ,`y� ph °H P AUL AN[) PACIFIC RAILROAD `\ S P00 N7 1 E 60.p CACC MILWAUKEE U. `. 500. MopU CONCRETE BLOCK RETAINING WALL sV1H ' BUCK vOLY- COATED FENCE i J — ABOVE WALL FACE OF ALL T9 BE 2' FROM BACK {d I 'I / 1 . 0. ctP ga• r � � 1 �>\. I E, U 5 d B 1B �x' ' — �� ©. O , 1 1 �1 [ 9 ° RG66��44i' S$W./ � "./ -'i + - -- = 78442 11 > ` 0 EN DES STANDARDS. C04PLV WOH TH C ALL CURB AND GUTT TO BE C 8012 CURB UNLESS NOTED ALL E G ATST C L"RES AND 1OPOGROHC —RES S SUCCH E S E -NG� 1U THE R GRADES AT THE PROPOSED GR LEWAYS, PR 10 THE START GRAD H. E --- , ACTOR SHALL AT£Lr NOTrtT' SHA ENONEER OF A Y OSCHEPANCRS OF VAR An0,u5 THE PIANs BTA� ro E eE T LGHT o� DUTY I No S RNOVEN M V MENT ND P KHG WE DATA; REMOVED CURB TO HE 1 Y M E KR EA / //� PERCENT OF — COVERED BY uPGRV11S SURFACE: 83% RETANNG WALL IWTH A' BLACK PCL - COATEp FENCE ABOVE ✓"� NVALIL. FACE OP WALL TO BE 2 FRO BACK OF CURB ODO EN— CURB TO BE REMOVED �Pr O "� s / GONG vARNWO 11 11", ^Z \ OV.EO - DOE SPACES 1i iA I I r lil o / � .. ��• O ✓ + LOT 1 I W i MODULAR BLOCK BLOCK 1 I I+ B Vi CONCRETE DNN OG w F e NAL FCE ABOVE WALL FA CE OF WALL TO BE LOCATED AT BACK OF CURB , I/c) CONCRETE SDEWALK VAN ACCESS HA DICAP SUN, {d I 'I / 1 . 0. ctP ga• r � � 1 �>\. I E, U 5 d B 1B �x' ' — �� ©. O , 1 1 �1 [ 9 ° RG66��44i' S$W./ � "./ SITE PLAN NOTES ..¢L OMENS ONB ARE To FACE OF Bu LONG AND/GR FINE OF -E. 2 . TO PROPOSED BULO NO S FOR CONCRETE STOOPS 3. CONTINUOUS CONCRETE CURB k GUTTER .111 CHANGES ttP[ SHSLL HAVE A FIVE FOOT "SMON. a SEP IO CURB AN R ENT TO CONCRETE BE 9 STRPNG T. BY SHUL / 4 NCH DH tAPwH,iE. S WALK BE J 0 EN DES STANDARDS. C04PLV WOH TH C ALL CURB AND GUTT TO BE C 8012 CURB UNLESS NOTED ALL E G ATST C L"RES AND 1OPOGROHC —RES S SUCCH E S E -NG� 1U THE R GRADES AT THE PROPOSED GR LEWAYS, PR 10 THE START GRAD H. E --- , ACTOR SHALL AT£Lr NOTrtT' SHA ENONEER OF A Y OSCHEPANCRS OF VAR An0,u5 THE PIANs BTA� ro E eE T LGHT o� DUTY I No S RNOVEN M V MENT ND P KHG WE DATA; STNO C G K /PROPOSEO ton N OP9 HOUSTRUI ARK) LOT I 500 50. FF IC 0 PARK) 1 GROSS BUILD AREA I.— Ba I ERCENT OF SIE COVERED UT BU SCR TOTAL PERU US AREA 20a 889 SO. FT: — AC (37K) MODULAR CONCRETE BLOCK PERCENT OF — COVERED BY uPGRV11S SURFACE: 83% RETANNG WALL IWTH A' BLACK PCL - COATEp FENCE ABOVE PERCENT OF SIZE COYERUE, BY PARKNG AREA 21[ NVALIL. FACE OP WALL TO BE 2 FRO BACK OF CURB ODO EN— CURB TO BE REMOVED PARKING DATA: / GONG vARNWO 11 11", PRGPOS. —.I.G - 1 . GRADES ^Z \ OV.EO - DOE SPACES \`a\/ HANDCAR PARK REOUREO - wWGI— PARKIN. PROVO. - T SPAC S iA RETAN NC WALL {d I 'I / 1 . 0. ctP ga• r � � 1 �>\. I E, U 5 d B 1B �x' ' — �� ©. O , 1 1 �1 [ 9 ° RG66��44i' S$W./ � "./ ph2 y .. "� ENSTNG CURB TO BE MONUMENT SGN a �I ,STD BE S �' !�_ {- �.TMTI •� h�. xsIBIGJan ONNER. ./:� _ /' ODO ,,.« / VAN ACCESSIBLE ......,...f.... HANDICAP SIGNS .... R= 299.86 .......... .. A--417 9 ...m � ChBrg N8940'08'W MODULAR CONCRETE BLOCK RETAN NC WALL LEGEND B GUTTER BO' ORCO 0 GUTTER (OUTFACE) -- - -- D —UGT.H uI -- — BOOTTH, SERACKS LUMIHNR FASEU s ENr H E, 25' HT., 400 WATT, METAL —.E O DIO SCRON OF TRAFBC OS. BRUMNOUs PAVIC'm m. TRUCK MANMNERING AREA / BNUMIHOUS PAVEMENT N patd 25 5O loo SCALE IN FEET 5 S� ffi c k0 U ALLIANT 0. ENOINEERINC, INC. :JJPAAN AV S M11N S RA I N . 1 . �oe0 ir Lu W U N N Ill T.. (n D m La C ED uj g 3 m� DuALEW MSURANCE/CONTROL OATS ISSUE PUUNK.. FOUR l 'G'EGGO TEAM DATA C -1 —11 4 of 9 GRADING NOTES ! SON. �" C. I — _7 1 =1117 OF D 71 = I:R 1* ALLIANT M ENGINEERING. WC. F-11— - X559 sop 01x1 iaesD.uR —I —E FE 1-7-MAPI& L LA-HEMO-W . �C "N A CI-11 1 11 11= L_. EROSION CONTROL SCHEDULE tl 1.1 ­U Dx a pR [ Po -11- N—L PA 11R 4, Fuu r I_, I , _ _�, _ " I_ _F.. z A— lUl 1 IA EL A� AFE 11T 1111 l=N "" "' _j —E 107CI OF;%2 IS IA� 01 F­ w z A o � E Oo ME= Lu z 0 L) to w c0 Z 0 En GRADING LEGEND: .—I CONTOUR ELI § z .1�2. — LNE • B73O TOP OF —L uj A POSE GTCN EASMS —ONIO IT— SEWER --I D.CE Dt OF DFAIIAGE pl.—Ml %1111 ifE ILEVA— 110-1 III F.CC U� QUALITY ASS­CE/CONFFOL .1 o• 0— ISSUE P-- A,um—AL N o NN- , 4 PROJEM TUM DATA ps I.- K: No po o 25 5C No C-2 1!!%wm2!!Tn SCALE IN -, IHO. 5 Of 9 1 LrnLRY NOTES: ME SEN'RE, MM M . Ma a .1 o oR E— Or 1» ... R RIB AB R E Or NEBRx or eR M cR.%caBlm ,Rk %wJ Pf a91E �caROMICE Mwl ,xE RxwREMExn 9r ,»f r o Arz ONE cu4 (aoo)xsx I lse..a NO r I.P RP scan or ,. s ,�, R .R. No", IN. n .r ul l .n /ft x .x e ON II r. c E ap13 s. PM Rio x ®A co! + or ix E nNU wNwx uLO,wwxs oR s9E„r .u. EX E iY _M RS R O axro �° R. an RI°xoos°:x° xrN m Eci S 80) 05 5 REENEIIE E To E (S) +•w - _ CN =BI a •�-. i 1 \ 09).5 (SUMP) v u x o— eU.xs ,wo mi, OOCUUENI4 -Emw m Z or c„o» OR r,BRIUBpx Nom. B_ UMP�,xE OPNTRwrPR EMB No TN RB9E.R� BN o A O BB tYv48 CMP TEE uu SEWEF cxo55xo wngEVF�� iMILRO �owiax s ➢F. s 55 M W 4 r ' 3: ( M—O N 11.0. Bn -9 B N o E BR _ .. RF. CMP O O�RxcY SuN1 BE 6JU1 u t B e I - , 155 48 µE IB..uL uiOH vnv Y �„2 -� - 5� 1 A94 � 11 1 A 1 y m sxw. BE O (SEE 4 ��� I ���/ E ) _ LEGEND: » Yp {I � f K 99s o SiaJc9 I E 8980 (S SO f ■ 0 =4 BAS NS 11 / J .. \, ''� B 01A %60 R n0 u 5 5 qfR Q 2 X (! 1 2 0 OB J04 �{ \ E %EVE FY — 'I ( 1)t Ipf I T 1 .� } -�jj/ " •J > /' RE 90)9 /• PROP E 0 3 YN iNry 0¢wfR 48 DIA ' F Y 1 V //; ` Y �/ / �• PVC IE 903.8 (E) 1 ' R @• I xE 402 IE 099 B (EUMP) 1%511 P 4 S NUMB O (� CS 302 /' .. 6)p 1 —0 E 9011 (S) )2 GIA 4e) I �; I"I 0 TOP WER 902.75 Rf 909.0 N $> \ 4 •• ^` /EX rnx ow 4R x UON 1 IL' / 65 0 IEICE 801.1 E 901 fi (N) �r r N' \ 380E - w CHUFM RREA I _I T 0 901.5 (E 906 ) 15 b 090 URrACE AREe I� 86WEfl /' E \ _COMPOERE OR EICE 902 // ir CN )0 CURE ER '.)it' PROPOSED pRMN,oE .NU . RM.npx I . 3 P 399E >< -rora su9wicxuENr I— ON EURRACE MR. d I ^^ 4 I x -�,• � ' ' Bc COMPOWE CURVE NUMBER 1 , p >e CJ •-- •• - -•• EUOGTCxMExr OEOxEATION MMrtE 2z. 5 h) � I ; I •J 4I { I BExo sB B i f y ox v A o 1 I f U �)N);' i �j; / �j l / z � �$'ni wfn .. e• o.c 1 �•I�p 2 ��� � � � , I � �dlll /�''� � �/ � /� /' � e� ®Jai ,� '�'' ' / p'%v, / " °. TO tea- OC II� e 11 5 xP ill /`� 5s / � .. � �' - 11 i \1, ux za3 G � .. 711" } r , � � eE o � I / Q jY .(� I.n,r• " l {// �!/ t Izze o Be18 ac .. :�- w -, �' t' 5 is - N zo 5 P ffiUCT ,e.,.... ocs tor !)l:' 2 f tt �.`, • k , cN. \aQ1i� (11 z 9Cms'zy / . / )2 D!' E 96z - 4 TO EX' . fy RCS _ �:, 1 RE 90 GRILL 'j�." IE 0 `! r � I I:0 9 �. F • - E � - REMOVE'CABII,NG . E�O; RE'BOy J6 -12 RCP �� . l E B (W) 3 Ac , 150 �. � % / � 4 692 (BUM�E IC $:0 (W) • C1-5�01.OR PROP E 8952 PB O (N) TOR 898 Y� ' P 1 P 6p 5 Q [T, 85 -40 P I 4B PERF C x. / B OR 9�I r R N. IN R - X0.0[ 1N1H OC 1458 T P WER ¢BB T� ° f r 0091 r 9 B.ORIFlCE 8986 0 NG (SEE DETA I) �BEOD1Np ( L) S \ ✓i � YY I 6 FF E 60R SSOf.SX L t l PY „. ,y OC9 L ip \EXEBMH l 7 3• •_ ' i SfOM1NA,TLR fANAGEME:Vt' UMMARYTAOU,LATION - - - TYPICAL D I •� CO R OP / RE 90480 IS 898 '(E) E'0960 'IE 998,0 // _.... .. _....� IE 693 .0 (SIf P) 1 S -L E.'N, ) rc...cnm mps oss swtx RrveULSnvunm.•I .. `.... _ � � 'G p ON 5KR SCALE M fF:EI' N OT FO ALLIANT PAR ENGINEERING, INC NCE Ne lol LIESOiono e s Jro n .NE (oI bS J099 z cc IL r z z W w U N W N w z z z Y) m m uj = Q cc w� 3 Y S z O ' au ° p uu'1 "oe o N olio ukenve Nom OLNUMW ASSUMNCE /CONTROI. DATE IS p4 C -3 O.Mr 6 of 9 uQ+i� ,tJa rnif''C'�'E+ �� O uau © waraw ® �r�un m�wmY O tr °a PERF RATE CMP � O rmnv ..oie,r.mw man cb�y� �O TYPICAL CMP ROCK r N SEDDINQ DETAIL PE� 5 a o z5 BE 100 S -L E.'N, ) rc...cnm mps oss swtx RrveULSnvunm.•I .. `.... _ � � 'G p ON 5KR SCALE M fF:EI' N OT FO ALLIANT PAR ENGINEERING, INC NCE Ne lol LIESOiono e s Jro n .NE (oI bS J099 z cc IL r z z W w U N W N w z z z Y) m m uj = Q cc w� 3 Y S z O ' au ° p uu'1 "oe o N olio ukenve Nom OLNUMW ASSUMNCE /CONTROI. DATE IS p4 C -3 O.Mr 6 of 9 n GRUBBED STONE CONSTRUCTION EXIT Ho onFt9 & --- CONCRETE SIDEWALK oosa FENCE , I - 1 I l IT 6 CONCRETE PAVEMENT °,� Ilpll II If IWFIIk I II II CI =IICII II II 11 =1 H812 CURB AND GUTTER PM CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER r,v govigug.sAy r�LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT n HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ALLIANT 6NOINfiEAINC, INC. W"S =IOMH. ' fTZ M W xssxoso 1. fn (n uj Z U, m ca w Zi cc 5 QUA ASSURANCE/CONML DATE ISSUE °.i —1- LEAH OAlA ,0\51 O\Ao N C-4 7 of 9 LJ ACCESSIBLE ROUND BOLLARD , W1% I I I PACIF /' ILWAUKEE T PAUL 51- - � O C HICAGI W J-- - x �N To � ;sA,.� '" `�, I� ' e ;, I ,a � F I I � ,� rA%Q IM 1=1 III, 12 I . . .. RD. NA Go- I-- Px 11101111 7d ER W SEED PLANTING NOTES: �5/ LOT I 5 BLOCK I Fil y 'UCRPR WLL R PLANTING NOTES = 71 - Z. _D 4, �TAIL 01!ELP�IITING OETAIL LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE �N To —G—G— -1— rA%Q IM 1=1 III, 12 I . . .. RD. NA Go- I-- Px 11101111 7d ER W SEED PLANTING NOTES: 2�GY SEEDING WE TO BE 94 ­U ZRE M RUFE .pl I LOS/ (P URE � U SIDED). RECOMMENDED SEEDING WE HAS BEEN MULTIPLIED BY 1,25 TO ENSURE MORE COMPLETE SEEDING -CRACE. MULCH SEEDED MW WITH Mx /DOT TYPE 3 (MCR CERTIFIED WEED FREE) MULCH AT A WE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE WITHIN 48 HOURS OF BEDDING. MULCH — MEN 86 OBC ANCHORED TO RBUP IT FROM RI-NO SHE TO BE PREPARED BY -N LOOSENING TOPSOIL TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 INCH.. SEEDING — BE APPUI FROM APNII- 15 - JULY 20 OR 'EPTOMSEN 20 - FREEZE UP ME GGE TO BE HARROWED OR RAKED FOLLOWING DECIDING, AND MEN PACKED USING A CULT - PACKER OR EQU-ENT. -Dm — BY W-ONG, REMu'ON.G AND ING AS NECHS- TO ESTABUSH A UNIFORM Ly D ENSE STAND OF ME SPECIFIED GRASSES UNTIL AGGEPTED. AREAS RMUNG TO ESTARUSH A STAND SH ALL E RESEEDED TIRED h R EFE AR RCMCHED WHENOVER 70% VEo IS IETA- NOT �H D RESEE DI-L CONFGFRI IN I � RESPECTS TO ME CONTRACTOR ""' "P"' ANY M` ME S W ` GR ` K Ar =­ RE RESULTING FROM EROSION AND/OR EQUIZ T 0 ENT ME CONTRACTOR SHALL — DAMAGE. INCLUDING REGRADING. RESEEDING, ETC. AB NEGESSNRY, BEFORE SIGNII IMGMME OCCURS. = 71 - Z. _D 4, �TAIL 01!ELP�IITING OETAIL LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE �N 'WI rA%Q IM 1=1 III, 12 I =n sIDEtlNtlS wnkvYalweAl F -1 PGGI ID m I GOR, I 7d ER VE� FZI = 71 - Z. _D 4, �TAIL 01!ELP�IITING OETAIL LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE 'WI rA%Q IM 1=1 III, 12 I =n sIDEtlNtlS wnkvYalweAl F -1 PGGI ID m I GOR, I 7d ER .- 0 25 So ,, FO sc- IN FEET ALLIANT F—HERS.. INC. -PA -C— S . -- LUN" 0"' IN.N. DID Lu Z QUAUTY -VRUUUCE/CONTROL DATE ..US D IT 79,- -1 ".11DOT TEAM DATA L-1 —IT 8 of 9 5 2500 N76-44'24"C Sr PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD �, 160.00 GO MILWAUKEE CHICA N76 7 s �. yiiv 0 s LOT 1 p> d� 'i BLOCK 1 0 p0 v r° ro 3 t N bQ 's 1 w M �... ... R-299.86 dsA17708" / / oo..m / � ChBrg =N89%SOOB "W Sales Associ ..+ " ates ' / ON� UGS \GN —` \00 Y f� o 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET �!! e I�g � ALLIANT fan sDN'6ERINC, FSOo NRio vie xoso e xm,[, +as aoxn W 2 W U N W Z g U) a m U > r� uj g s a_ m a GUAUtt ASWU CE /CONTROL ­E SsUE OA, PROJECT iEAN DATA P -1 ar 9 of 9 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on August 4, 2011, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Lake Drive Business Center - PIanning Case No. 2011 -08 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A ", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. 1, Kare,WJ. Engell ar t, Depot Clerk f Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of -- , 2011. 1) rV1 otary ublic KIM T. MEUWISSEN e Notary Public- Minnesota ,`'� :.� �'� My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2015 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Site Plan Review for a 155 -stall parking lot Proposal: expansion on property zoned Industrial Office Park (IOP) — Lake Drive Business Center Applicant: CSM Corporation Property 950 Lake Drive Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /sere /plan /11- 08,html If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Robert Questions & Generous by email at bgenerous(cD_ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by Comments: phone at 952 - 227 -1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council, The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial /industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Site Plan Review for a 155 -stall parking lot Proposal: expansion on property zoned Industrial Office Park (IOP) — Lake Drive Business Center Applicant: CSM Corporation Property 950 Lake Drive Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /sery /plan /11- 08.him) If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Robert Questions & Generous by email at bgenerousaci.chanhassen.mn.us or by Comments: phone at 952 - 227 -1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Co mmission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial /industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. CARVER COUNTY JOHN FERRIER ISTAR MINNESOTA LLC CSM PROPERTIES INC 600 4TH ST E 500 WASHINGTON AVE S #3000 PO BOX 4900 CHASKA MN 55318 -2102 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55415 -1151 SCOTTSDALE AZ 85261 -4900 PAULS FAMILY TRUST ROBERTS AUTOMATIC PRODUCTS ROSEMOUNT INC 7676 HIGHWAY 145 INC 12001 TECHNOLOGY DR TELLURIDE CO 81435 -4100 880 LAKE DR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 -3695 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9325 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT 9 2011 -08 SPECIAL PROVISIONS AGREEMENT dated September 12, 2011, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the "City "), and CSM Corporation, (the "Developer "). 1. Request for Site Plan Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a site plan for a parking lot expansion located at 950 Lake Drive (referred to in this Permit as the "project "). The land is legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Empak Addition. 2. Conditions of Site Plan Approval. The City hereby approves the site plan on condition that the Developer enter into this Permit and furnish the security required by it. 3. Development Plans. The project shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Permit, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A: Site Plan prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc., dated 7/9/11. Plan B: Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc., dated 7/9/11. Plan C: Landscaping Plan prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc., dated 7/9/11. Plan D: Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc., dated 7/9/11. 4. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required screening and landscaping by October 1, 2012. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Permit, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, cash escrow, or equivalent ( "security ") for $10,000.00 (boulevard restoration, erosion control, landscaping and stormwater). If the Developer requests a Certificate of Occupancy prior to the installation of site landscaping, then the developer shall provide to the city a letter of credit or cash escrow in an amount sufficient to insure the installation of said landscaping. PROCEDURES FOR LETTER OF CREDIT REDUCTION a. Requests for reductions of Letters of Credit must be submitted to the City in writing by the Developer or his Engineer. b. Partial lien waivers totaling the amount of the requested reduction shall accompany each such request. c. Any reduction shall be subject to City approval. 6. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: CSM Corporation Attn: John Ferrier 500 Washington Avenue South, Suite 3000 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227 -1100. 7. Other Special Conditions. City Council approves a site plan for a parking lot expansion subject to the following conditions: a. PlanninIZ Department Conditions 1) The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement and provide the security required by it. 2) This relocated sign shall require a separate building permit and sign permit. 3) The landscape island on the north end of the parking adjacent to the east side of the building shall be extended further out to provide full protection of the parking stall. b. Environmental Resource Specialist Conditions 1) The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan showing the minimum number of landscape islands /peninsulas (16) and trees (50). 2) The applicant shall provide adequate screening for the new parking areas along Lake Drive. Shrubs shall reach a mature height of at least two feet. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the city for approval. 2 c. Water Resources Coordinator Conditions 1) Rates of surface water runoff must not be increased from existing conditions. Where practicable to do so, rates should be decreased. 2) The applicant and city shall work together on future phases to look for potential cooperative surface water management opportunities. 3) These approvals for future phases are contingent upon City code and other jurisdictional agency rules remaining the same. In the event that any of these changes, the applicant will need to resubmit to assure that the plans meet any new rules germane to this project. 4) Include a note on the Grading and Erosion Control plan indicating that the proposed best management practices is the minimum controls anticipated, but that as unanticipated site and climatic conditions present themselves, it will be to modify the best management practices to meet these new conditions. 5) All 3:1 slopes shall be covered with erosion control blanket or sod. This needs to be indicated within the plan set on sheet C -2: Grading and Erosion Control. 6) An escrow or letter of credit in the amount of $2,450.00 shall be provided to the City before commencement of the first phase. This escrow is only for the first phase. Subsequent phases will require additional assurance funds. 7) Applicant must apply for and receive approvals from other jurisdictional agencies as necessary. 8) The applicant must show that the total disturbed area for all phases is less than one acre or they must apply for and receive an NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit from the MPCA. If this is the case, a full Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan must be prepared and submitted to the City for review and comment. 9) All exposed soils must be stabilized within 14 days of cessation of earth work activities. 10) Lake Drive must be swept clean of soils and debris tracked onto it from the site as needed but no less than once per week until final stabilization is achieved. 11) The applicant or their designee must maintain the best management practices in good working order until final stabilization is achieved. d. EnaineerinI4 Department Conditions 1) Grass area maximum slope must not exceed 3:1. 2) The applicant must submit revised plans (redlines) which meet the requirements of the City. 3 3) Drainage plans must be revised so that the plans match the drainage calculations. The applicant must also follow City standards for water quality volume. Also, the proposed drainage rates must be maintained for the 2 -, 10 -, and 100 -year rain events. 4) The storm sewer provided for treatment will be privately owned and maintained. 5) If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. 6) Building permits are required for all retaining walls four feet tall or higher and must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. A fence must be placed at the top of the wall for safety. 7) The exits in front of Wall 2 may be inadequate for some uses of the building under the proposed parking scenario. Exterior exit discharge must accommodate exits served. The parking stalls in this area should be constructed at the time when a final end user is determined so that the exits will not limit the occupancy. 8) The wall and wall supports (not including soil) in drainage area three on the east side of the site must be removed from the drainage and utility easement. 9) Details must be provided for all proposed storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and watermain crossings. Actual elevations of existing utilities shall be verified for accuracy. A minimum vertical separation of 18" is required at all storm, sanitary, and watermain crossings. 10) All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to provide the City with the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee the installation of the storm sewer, erosion control, and seeding. This amount will be determined prior to start of construction due to the possible phasing of the project and not knowing the amount to be installed and disturbed. 11) The applicant must also notify the City after installation of the erosion control and 48 hours prior to the commencement of grading. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will be required. 12) The plans and drainage calculations must be signed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. 8. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Permit are attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein. rd CITY OF CHANHASSEN :' Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor AND: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) DEVELOPER: CSM CORPORATION Its The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2011, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2011 by , the Corporation. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227 -1100 day of 5 of CSM CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Right to Proceed. Within the site plan area, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, and 3) the City has issued a building permit in reliance on the foregoing conditions having been satisfied. 2. Maintenance of site. The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. Plants and ground cover required as a condition of site plan approval which die shall be promptly replaced. 3. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site plan development. 4. Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless there is full compliance with the erosion control requirements. Erosion control shall be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control, the City will authorize removal of the erosion control measures. 5. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6. Warranty. All trees, grass, and sod required in the approved Landscaping Plan, Plan C, shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free at the time of planting. All trees shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer or his contractor(s) shall post a letter of credit or cash escrow to the City to secure the warranties at the time of final acceptance. C 7. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Permit, including engineering and attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all development work and construction. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. 8. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 9. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers Placement of on -site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Permit. D. Breach of Contract Breach of the terms of this Permit by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. E. Severability If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Permit is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Occupancy Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities tested and approved by the city. G. Waivers /Amendments The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Recording This Permit shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. I. Remedies Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every 7 right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. J. Construction Hours The normal construction hours under this contract shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Operation of all internal combustion engines used for construction or dewatering purposes beyond the normal working hours will require City Council approval. K. Soil Treatment Systems If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the site plan process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. L. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations In the development of the site plan the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District; 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. M. Proof of Title Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers too enter into this Development Contract. N. Soil Conditions The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. O. Soil Correction The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. CONSENT Owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Permit, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this day of , 2011 IC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2011, by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 0 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO SITE PLAN AGREEMENT which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Agreement, agrees that the Site Plan Agreement shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this day of , 2011. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ) ( ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20_, by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227 -1100 10