Administrative Sectiontl
i
i
i
Administrative Section
1
1
Letter from Janice M. Haugen, MWCC dated June 30, 1994
Letter to David Headla, City of Chanhassen dated July, 5, 1994
1
Letter from Dottie p D ie Rietow, Metropolitan Council dated June 30, 1994
1 Letter from Conrad Fiskness, Riley- Purgatory-Bluff .Creek Watershed District
dated June 20, 1994
Letter from Helen Merchant, Chanhassen Elementary School
1 Letter from Roger Gustafson, County of Carver dated June 23, 1994
1
1
1
1
I June 30, 1994
ee _
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
_Mears Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, M inneso ta 55101 -1633
612 222 -8423
The Honorable Don Chmiel
and City Council Members
City of Chanhassen
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 -0147
Dear or Chmiel and City Council Members:
/
As you probably know by now, the legislature passed the
Metropolitan Governance Bill which eliminated the Chair and Boards
of the RTB, MTC, and MWCC at various times during the next 12
months.
I'm sorry I didn't get to visit with all of you in the district.
I started going to the Council meetings in the more distant areas
of the district and was working my way in toward the Twin Cities.
My goal had been all cities by the middle of 1995. Well, the
legislature canceled that goal.
July 1, 1994 was the date set for the MWCC, so as of that date I
will no longer represent you. Depending on which Metropolitan
District you are in, your questions and concerns should be directed
to either Mary Smith or Julius Smith. Both are dedicated
Metropolitan Council members and will try to assist you.
Sincerely,
' Janice M. Hau en, Commissioner
Precinct B
I JMH:cc
Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer
July 5, 1994
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
D
1
Mr. David Headla
6870 Minnewashta Parkway
Excelsior, MN 55331
Dear Dave:
It's hard to believe that almost twenty years have passed since you agreed to inspect private
stables for the city. During this time frame, you have volunteered many hours of your time
to ensure that horses were well-cared for, fences were adequate, food and shelter was
provided, etc. Sometimes you had to deal with angry residents, which is difficult in a
volunteer position, but you were usually able to come to some sort of agreement with the
horse owner.
On behalf of the Mayor and City Council, I would like to thank you for all the valuable
input, time and energy you provided as our Stable Inspector. I know you are ready to move
on to other things; as I understand that you will be biking around Ireland for two weeks this
summer. I hope you enjoy your trip and I wish you the best. Thanks again for your service
to the community.
On July 25, 1994 at 7:30 p.m., the City Council would like to present you with a placque in
recognition of your community service. Please call Karen Engelhardt at 937 -1900 ext. 104 to
confirm if you will be available that evening.
Sincerely,
Don Ashworth
City Manager
DA:k
91
Metropolitan Council
Advocating regional economic, societal and environmental issues and solutions
� I
� I
� I
June 30, 1994
Paul Krauss
City of Chanhassen
690 Coulter Drive
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
' RE: City of Chanhassen
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review
Water Supply and Distribution Plan
' Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 15865 -2
Dear Mr. Krauss.
' At its meeting on June 23, 1994, the Metropolitan Council considered the city of Chanhassen's
comprehensive plan amendment. This consideration was based on a report of the Environment
Committee Consent List. A copy of this report is attached.
' The Metropolitan Council transmits the attached comments to the Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources (DNR) and to the city of Chanhassen.
'
S
1
Dottie Rietow
Chair
DR:ly
Attachment
cc: Phil Gravel, BRA Client Representative, City of Chanhassen
Donald Bluhm, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
Victoria Boers, Metropolitan Council Staff
Mears Park Centre
® Recycled Paper
230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1634 612 291 -6359 Fax 291 -6550 TDD 291 -0904
An Equal Opportunity Employer
t
Metropolitan Council Meeting of June 23, 1994
Business Item: A -2n.
1
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth St., St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 ,
612/291 -6359
REPORT OF THE
ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE 1
DATE: June 9, 1994 '
TO: Metropolitan Council
SUBJECT: Consent List Item
City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan Amendment '
Water Supply and Distribution Plan
Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 15865 -2
Metropolitan Council District No. 4 '
BACKGROUND I
This plan amendment is an update of the city of Chanhassen's water distribution plan. The water
supply and distribution plan serves as a guide for expansion of the city's trunk water system.
Chapter 186 of the 1993 session (MN Stat. 473.859, subd. 3, sec.4) mandates communities with ,
municipal water supplies to amend the public facilities section of their comprehensive plans to
incorporate a water supply plan. This is the fast municipal water supply plan prepared under the new
legislation. ,
Chanhassen's plan documents existing and proposed water systems. It also anticipates problems and
designs a system to meet necessary water distribution requirements. The plan reflects some of the
spirit of the planning initiative by developing a system interconnection with the city of Chaska. The
Council advocates such an approach as a way to coordinate emergency back -up measures among the
112 individual municipal suppliers. The plan is well prepared and can serve as a model for other '
communities once the conservation assumptions are rolled into the city's future supply projections.
ISSUES AND CONCERNS - Marcel Jouseau provided background and explanation regarding new '
water planning legislation and on the report. There were no questions from committee members.
RECOMMENDATION I
That the Metropolitan Council transmit these comments to the DNR and to the city of Chanhassen.
Respectfully submitted, t
Carol Kummer, Chair
u
J
Environment Committee Meeting of June 8, 1994 Business Item: A -1
METROPOLTTAN COUNCIL
Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
612 291 -6359 TDD 612 291 -0904
DATE: June 2, 1994
' TO: Metropolitan Council Environmental Committee
FROM: Tori Flood, Office of Local Assistance (291 -6621)
' Gary Oberts, Water Unit (291 -6484)
SUBJECT: Consent List Item
t City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Water Supply and Distribution Plan
Metropolitan Council Referral He No. 15865 -2
' Metropolitan Council District No. 4
INTRODUCTION
This plan amendment is an update of the city of Chanhassen's water distribution plan. The water
supply and distribution plan serves as a guide for the expansion of the city's trunk water system.
' AUTHORITY TO REVIEW
' The 1993 legislative session amended Minn. Stat. 473 (the Land Use Planning Act) to include a
section on water supply planning. Chapter 186 of the 1993 session (M.S. 473.859, subd. 3, sec.4)
mandates communities with municipal water supplies to amend the public facilities section of their
' comprehensive plans to incorporate a water supply plan. This is the first municipal water supply
plan prepared under the new legislation.
1
The Council and the MN Department of Natural Resources (DNR) worked jointly to develop the
Metropolitan Area Community Water Supply Plan Content Guidelines, which outline requirements
for water supply plan content and assist communities in the preparation of their water supply
plans. The Council reviews community water supply plans according to M.S. 473.175. Plans are
reviewed for consistency with Council policy, and plan modification is required if there is a
metropolitan system impact. Adjacent units of government may review a water supply plan prior
to submittal to the Council. Counties that have adopted groundwater plans have the opportunity
to review the plans of communities within that county that use groundwater as a water source.
The 1993 water supply legislation also gives the DNR approval authority over each community's
water conservation and emergency contingency plan, two of the required elements of the plan.
The Council has agreed to submit its comments to the DNR and to the city simultaneously so that
the DNR can consider the Council's comments in its review. This process provides a coordinated
review of water supply plans by both agencies.
t
BACKGROUND
Technical comments were prepared by Council staff according to the content guidelines and are '
attached. The plan is comprehensive in outlining a city -wide service strategy. Fasting and
proposed water systems are detailed and well documented. The city's plan anticipates problems
and designs a system to meet necessary water distribution requirements. Its plan reflects some of '
the spirit of the planning initiative by developing a system interconnection with the city of Chaska.
The Council advocates such an approach as a way to coordinate emergency back -up measures
among the 112 individual municipal suppliers. The city has also tapped two separate aquifer units '
as a safety precaution in the event of contamination of one of the aquifers.
The portion of the plan that merits improvement is the incorporation of the conservation goals '
into the future use projections. The city has prepared an outlook for future needs based on a
demand level that does not appear to incorporate any of the water saving plans discussed in the
conservation plan element. That is, water demand projections are not lowered to account for
conservation savings, and in fact actually assume increased per capita demand. This discrepancy is '
pointed out in the review comments and should be addressed by the city.
In short, the plan is well prepared and can serve as a model for other communities once the
conservation assumptions are rolled into the city's future supply projections.
RECOMMENDATION '
That the Metropolitan Council transmit these comments to the DNR and to the city of
Chanhassen. '
kl 7ibnarylrneyribinaneldiarn�er.A! ,
0
11
I
Metropolitan Council Comments on Chanhassen
Municipal Water Supply Plan
DrIRODUCTION
The City of Chanhassen's "Water Supply and Distribution Plan" (February 1993) and an amendment
were submitted on March 31, 1994. This plan was the first submittal under the 1993 legislation
(Chapter 186) requiring Metropolitan Area communities to amend their local comprehensive plans
to include a water supply element if the community has a municipal water supply system.
' The plan submittal was reviewed according to the' Metropolitan Area Community Water Supply Plan
Content Guidelines" adopted jointly by the Council and the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources (DNR) in January 1994. The Council also reviewed the submittal as a local
' comprehensive plan amendment, and applied the authorities contained in Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 473 in so doing.
Comments on the required conservation plan will be submitted to the DNR for its consideration in
the review of this plan according to Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.291, subd3. Since the
Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) has not completed its promulgation of wellhead protection
rules according to Minnesota Statutes, Section 103L 101, the Chanhassen plan contains only a
' statement of intent to develop this program when required by MDH. The Council's comments,
therefore, will not address a wellhead protection plan other than in reference to the city's statement
of intent.
GENERAL COMMENTS
J
The Chanhassen plan address water supply needs for the city through ultimate development
(population 43,500), which is not expected until well after 2020. Projected water demands in the plan
extend to the year 2010 and a served population of 25,000. Approximately 1,000 residents of
Chanhassen will not be served by the municipal water system. The projections are based on the city's
adopted comprehensive plan, which has been reviewed by the Metropolitan Council. The plan is
consistent with metropolitan system plans and with adopted Council policy chapters.
The plan is well done and presents the required content elements in a clear manner. There could,
however, be some improvement in the plan by incorporating conservation principles into projections
for future per capita demand. Specific comments on this will follow in a later section.
LOCAL AND COUN'T'Y REVIEW COQ
No comments were received from communities adjacent to the city of Chanhassen regarding the
water supply plan. Notification of availability of the plan was sent to Carver County in accord with
Minnesota Statutes, §473.859, subd. 6. No comments were received from the county within the 45
day review period
Ii
n
-2-
COMrAENTS BASED ON CONTENT GUIDELINES '
Part I - Water Supply System Description and Evaluation
Essentially all of the requirements in the guidelines are addressed to some level. The plan contains '
numbers on historic and current use, per capita use, and monthly pumpage from 1986 to 1992. The
inclusion of less than 10 years of historic data is explained in terms of relevancy and reliability of data. '
Comments will be made later relative to the city's assumption that overall per capita use will rise as
the city develops its commerciaUmdustrial base. '
Since the city does not treat its water beyond chlorination and fluoridation at the wellhead, there is
no discussion on existing treatment. The plan does, however, explain the city's outlook on how a ,
treatment system could evolve in the future if a need is determined
An explanation of the current and anticipated storage requirements of the city is presented Some
confusion on the size of the Powers Blvd. ground reservoir (1.5 mg in Table 11 versus 3.5 mg stated '
on page 50) was cleared -up by the city; a "useable" storage of 1.5 mg exists, with an additional 2.0 mg
of "emergency" storage available. The storage plans parallel anticipated service to currently unserved
areas, with provision of storage slightly preceding other urban services into undeveloped portions of '
the city. This approach is reasonable as long as services are provided according to the approved local
comprehensive plan.
The plan addresses the sources of water used by the city and goes into some detail on wellfield plans
for the future. The approach used by the city that splits demand between two aquifer units is a very
good idea. Using the Galpin wellfield and the Jordan Aquifer in combination with the Lotus wellfield ,
and the Drift Aquifer minimizes the possibility that contamination will simultaneously render the
groundwater sources unusable. Splitting future plans in the same manner should assure continued
reliability, particularly after adoption of a wellhead protection program focusing on the somewhat '
vulnerable Drift Aquifer.
One of the problems noted by the Council and the DNR in studies of Metropolitan Area water use '
is the proliferation of new wells to meet peak summer demand for non - essential uses. Comments on
the installation of 11 new wells to meet a peak ultimate demand versus the implementation of
demand controls to obviate the need for so many wells are made in the conservation section. Again,
however, better implementation is needed in the plan. '
Part II - Emergency Planning for Public Water &RRhers '
The Chanhassen plan contains a separate "Water System Emergency Preparedness Plan" that
addresses the items in Part H in the guidelines. The plan contains a list of contacts as suggested; '
please note that the DNR appropriation permit number has not been placed on the list. The
inclusion of a phone operator emergency reporting information checklist is a good idea and one that
will be recommended to all other cities. '
' If the preparedness plan is to act as a stand -alone document, available to emergency responders
independent of the overall water plan, data on the specific groundwater sources should be contained
in the emergency plan. That is, referring to vital information in another document that might not
' be readily available could cause unnecessary delays in action. Perhaps binding the appropriate maps
and well specifications along with the emergency plan would allow several fully contained documents
to be located at appropriate locations in the city.
' A Metropolitan Council survey filled out by the city in the late 1980's showed that an eight -inch
interconnection exists with the city of Shorewood. This connection was verified with the Water
' Superintendent, but is not mentioned in the plan component addressing Basting interconnections.
One of the key objectives in having local plans developed is to have every city aware of their
vulnerabilities and their emergency response capabilities. Knowing that the possibility exists to get
emergency water from Shorewood would seem to be an important part of Chanhassen's plan. If some
' difficulty exists that caused the city to ignore the interconnection, this would certainly be an
appropriate time to raise it. If the interconnection is not reliable or poses the threat of
contamination, it should be terminated or upgraded so that a false sense of security does not persist.
' The possibility of interconnection in the future with Chaska to gain another source during an
emergency is noted.
' The demand reduction measures during an emergency reflect the state priorities in Section 103G.261,
as required. These allocation procedures would be the third step after voluntary reductions and
sprinkling restrictions. The triggers for implementing emergency plan components and the
' enforcement procedures are reasonable.
Reference is made elsewhere in the water supply plan to the city's interest in more closely monitoring
' water level fluctuation associated with its wellfields. This approach is beneficial also in early
notification that water levels are dropping and an emergency might arise. We encourage the city to
pursue this as an additional precaution, perhaps as part of its wellhead protection monitoring plan.
' Not mentioned in the guidelines, but a good idea to institutionalize in any event, is a training program
under which emergency scenarios are developed and response procedures are evaluated. Since an
exact "flow scheme" is not contained in the emergency plan, some training on what specifically is
' required from each responding individual would help the city identify personnel and equipment
shortcomings before a critical event.
' As a final note, the rules being considered for promulgation by the MDH for wellhead protection
contain additional contingency plan elements. The city's emergency plan should be considered a
flexible document, subject to change after the development of a wellhead protection plan. The stand-
' alone format chosen by the city for the emergency plan should accommodate such an approach.
Part III - Water Conservation Plans for Public Water Suppliers
The theme that the water supply plan seems to state to this point is that the city expects rather
' dramatic growth and that it will make sure an adequate amount of water is available to meet peak
demands as defined by current and anticipated increases in use. Nothing has been stated, other than
t
-4-
in emergency conditions, that attempts will be made to hold down per capita water use. Rather, the
'
plan states in effect that per capita water use will rise from the current level to 165 gallons per capita
per day (ged). The conservation plan contains a general outline for some conservation efforts, but
does not seem to undo the notion that per capita water use is certain to rise. That is, no mention
,
is made of the fact that water use can be limited through the implementation of a good conservation
or "vise use" program. Specific comments follow.
'
The role of conservation section at the beginning of the conservation plan conveys the right idea for
moving the city forward in water conservation, but the text does not propose a strong program or any
translation of the conservation program into expected reduction goals. The per capita use figure of
'
113 gcd noted in the second paragraph of the conservation discussion is inconsistent with the numbers
in Table 6. The difference between 113 gcd and the 134 god in Table 6 is important because it forms
the basis for projecting facility needs. Starting with a lower per capita use and attempting to keep
use at that level will mean that perhaps fewer than 11 new wells will be needed We would like to
'
have seen an analysis of how the city could reduce the installation of all of these new wells through
implementation of its conservation program. Starting at 113 gcd and maintaining that use means that
an ultimate demand of about 4.9 MGD will be reached rather than 7.1 MGD. Similarly, assuming
,
the same average daily to maximum daily ratio as in Table 6, a maximum demand at ultimate
development would be 132 MGD, leading to a need for about four fewer new wells. Assuming a
starting per capita use of 134 gcd and keeping it uniform through ultimate development yields an
'
average demand of about 5.8 MGD, with an ultimate maximum demand of about 15.7 MGD, which
means at least two less wells. These calculations are undoubtedly simplistic, but they show how
maintaining per capita use can translate into fewer wells, which means increased savings to the
'
community and fewer intrusions into the groundwater resource.
The program outlined in the plan is a step in the right direction. The pricing system and other '
methods covered in the program are reflective of a wise use approach and should yield some good
savings in the resource, as well as financial savings for the city. The only component in the guidelines
not included in the program is the schedule for adoption, which can be determined after the review ,
process.
Part IV - Items for Metropolitan Area Public Sunnlies '
All required elements for amending the city's local comprehensive plan have been included in the ,
Part IV section of the water supply plan. Please submit a copy of the City Council resolution
adopting the policy statement when it is passed; the resolution will be placed in the plan.
The possibility of interconnection with Eden Prairie in the northeast section of Chanhassen was not ,
mentioned Since the Lotus wellfield and a 24 -inch distribution line exist adjacent to Eden Prairie,
it seems that at least the possibility of an interconnection exists.
wellhead protection techniques in advance of final MDH rule
The adoption of e llh promulgation is a p q P
forward - looking measure, since the schedule for rule adoption and the phasing -in of municipal wells
is not yet complete. Please submit a copy of the anticipated wellhead plan when it is drafted. '
1
th
A nnivers
ly
1969-1994
X-4M 1�1-
Riley'- Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District
Engineering Advisor: Barr Engineering Co.
8300 Norman Center Drive
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55437
832 -2600
Legal Advisor: Popham, Haik, Schnobrich & Kaufman
3300 Piper Jaffray Tower
222 South Ninth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
333 -4800
June 20, 1994
MN Board of Water & Soil Resources
Attn: Board Members
155 South Wabasha Street, Suite 104
St. Paul, MN 55107
Re: Riley- Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District
Second Generation Water Management Plan
Dear Members:
It is with pleasure that the Managers of the Riley- Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed
District submit its Second Generation Water Management Plan prepared in accordance with the
Board's new requirements for plan content. The early completion of the Plan was due to the
Managers' involvement at the start with municipal elected and staff officials. The municipal
officials identified issues that needed to be addressed in the Plan. Identification and early
circulation of written summaries of the issues shortened Plan completion by months. From the
inception of the meetings, the BWSR staff was aware of these issues and the need to resolve
competing views.
C
The Plan is a model second generation plan which can be a guide for urban Districts.
In the course of the Plan preparation, the Managers reviewed letters from the staffs of the
Board of Water and Soil Resources and the Metropolitan Council. These letters were prepared
without contacting any of the Managers and without any knowledge of the Managers' assignment
to District staff to prepare minutes of meetings and reduce to writing issues identified by the
cities. This direction was to ensure that the Plan was state of the art, addressed all policies, state,
metropolitan and city, and prepared in compliance with state laws and regulations. The District
staff works for and is directed by the Managers. If staff of state agencies have concerns, they
should contact the Managers. Identification of issues of concern is a required element of the law
1
and regulations preparation process. The Eden Prairie meeting, which apparently proiR ttQ ED
1994
CITY OF C l ,-- H�AtjjiV
Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources
June 20, 1994
Page 2
unfortunate letters, was not sponsored by the Watershed District. The City convened the meeting '
which was chaired by the Mayor to discuss with state and Metropolitan officials the issues of
concern identified by city attorneys, planners and engineers. '
From the District's inception, the Managers have worked with the cities and state agencies
to implement state laws and policies. Our on -going regulatory, planning and project programs, '
as evidenced by the first 25 years demonstrates leadership in compliance with state laws and
policies. The Managers review and regulate all projects, public and private. When new state
agency requirements, such as MPCA non -point source or water quality standards are adopted, or '
when the Metropolitan Council's 1982 water management plan is revised, District regulations will
be amended as required to implement the new requirements.
In recent years, the Managers have been working to protect the Bluff Creek lands with '
a program similar to the successful plan which is in place for Purgatory Creek. The District's
application for a grant from the Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources to expedite '
projects to protect and preserve Bluff Creek Watershed was denied. A second grant application
by Chanhassen, supported by the District, was also denied. The Managers have acquired property
to preserve critical Bluff Creek open space lands. Approval of its Plan will enable the Managers '
and city officials to promptly undertake a project to protect the scenic and natural resources of
Bluff Creek.
The most current state and metropolitan policies as received from these agencies are set '
forth in the Plan. The matrix, maps, tables, checklist and graphs bring the requirements of the
Metropolitan Council, MPCA, MDNR together in one place. These formats and checklists, in '
the Managers' judgment, are a model for other Watersheds and state agencies.
To correct any confusion as to who directs the policies and programs of the District, the '
Managers intend to meet with the officials of the Metropolitan Council, MPCA and other state
agencies whose staff have written to District employees to comment on the procedures and '
position papers developed by the Managers in the Plan preparation process. The assumption that
the Managers were not involved with or were failing to direct their staff is not correct,. As the
Board is aware, a revised Plan had been previously submitted but approval was delayed since the '
State Board rules on plan content were not then adopted.
�y yon
Conrad Fiskness, President '
Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District
Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources
June 20, 1994
Page 3
cc: Chanhassen Mayor and City Council
Deephaven Mayor and City Council
Shorewood Mayor and City Council
Bloomington Mayor and Council
Minnetonka Mayor and Council
Eden Prairie Mayor and Council
Metropolitan Council Members
Hennepin County Commissioners
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Minnesota Board of Health
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Mary Smith, Met Council Dist. #3
Julius Smith, Met Council Dist. #4
Sondra Simonson, Met Council Dist. #5
Diane Popovich- Lynch, Eden Prairie Parks
Aileen Kulak, Nine Mile Creek WD
Cyril Ess, Lower Minnesota River WD
SPECIAL THANKS...
Nkleao
FROM
CHANHASSEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
11
t
1
C
SA -2N
- --
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
(612) 361.1010
FAX (612) 361 -1025
ee P ' H - -�-�-
CARVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE
600 EAST 4TH STREET, BOX 6
CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318
COUNTY OF CARVER
To: Don Ashworth, Chanhassen City Administrator
Dave Pokorney, Chaska City Administrator
Miriam Porter, Victoria City Administrator
From: Roger Gustafson, County Engineer
Date: June 23, 1994
Subject: TH 5 Improvements
The 1995 -97 TIP now includes 1997 traffic signal installation projects at the CSAH 19 (Galpin
Boulevard) and CSAH 13 (Bavaria Road /Rolling Acres Road) intersections with TH 5.
Expediting these projects to letting dates prior to MnDOT fiscal year 1997 (July, 1996 through
June, 1997) will now be pursued.
If you have questions, please contact me.
cc: Dick Stolz, County Administrator
RECEIVED
j 19# 94
CITY OF Cpl; . ^ H. 4
Affirmative Action /Equal Opportunity Employer
Printed on Recycled Paper
Contains Minimum 10% Post Consumer Waste