9. Press Expansion and Kinder Care FacilityCITY OF
CHANHASSEN
q I
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager
FROM: Sharmin Al -Jaff, Planner II
DATE: June 8, 1994
SUBJ: Preliminary plat to replat Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlot B, Park One 2nd Addition
into Lots 1, 2, and 3, Park One Third Addition; a Site Plan for a 54,720 square
foot warehouse expansion for the Press and a 10,315 square foot Kinder Care
facility; and a Conditional Use Permit for a Licensed Day Care Center in an IOP,
Industrial Office Park; located at the northwest quadrant of Dell Road and State
Highway 5, Marcus Corporation
The Planning Commission reviewed this application for the fourth time on June 1, 1994. The
applicant revised the plan to try to improve circulation. The Planning Commission recommended
denial of the Conditional Use permit to allow a day care facility in the IOP district as well as the
site plan review. (The Press building expansion was recommended for approval at the May 4
Planning Commission meeting.) The denial of the Kinder Care facility was based on the
following:
* The Planning Commission wanted the building to face Hwy 5 rather than the parking lot.
This could be accommodated if the applicant flip - flopped the building. There is a high
voltage electric line that runs along the south edge of the site. Kinder Care has internal
regulations prohibiting the location of buildings and playground areas immediately next
to high voltage electric transmission lines. The applicant alleges that because of the
Electro Magnetic Fields (EMF) emitted from the electric lines, there could be some harm
done to the children. Staff does not have the expertise to comment on this issue. We
have contacted numerous agencies and ordered materials addressing this issue which you
will find attached to this report. We gather that the results of the studies are inconclusive.
The Planning Commission believed that parking circulation on the Kinder Care site
allowed Press employees to cut through the day care parking to get to Hwy 5. The
Planning Commission discussed the possibility of closing off the access onto Dell Road
to prohibit Press employees from using the Kinder Care parking lot as a short cut. A
second reason for eliminating the curb cut off of Dell Road was the potential for U -turns
for cars heading north on Dell Road. The U -turn would take place at the intersection of
w
1
I
7'
MEMORANDUM
Mr. Don Ashworth
June 8, 1994
Page 2
Dell Road and West 77th Street to enter the Kinder Care Site. Engineering staff
suggested to the Planning Commission the possibility of having an east/west access
bisecting proposed Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Park One 3rd Addition. This solution would
allow the desired access onto Dell Road and prevent short cuts through the Kinder Care
Site. The applicant suggested a detached driveway off of West 77th Street to the Kinder
Care site to discourage thru traffic.
The architectural style of Kinder Care's building was also discussed. It was concluded
that the design is incompatible with the buildings located in the industrial park. Also, the
size of the roof in proportion to the building is incompatible. The Planning Commission
wanted to see the roof line redesigned.
The Planning Commission questioned the possibility of a fire truck negotiating turning
movements as proposed by the applicant and being able to get to the building. Staff
reviewed the plan with the Fire Marshal and concluded that the curb cut on Dell Road
would have to be moved further north, maintaining a 200 ft. setback from the intersection
of Dell Road and Hwy 5. The Kinder Care building must be shifted approximately 40
feet to the north to allow an access radius that can be negotiated by a fire truck or a
school bus. If the plans remain as proposed by the applicant, vehicles will be able to
maneuver their way in with some difficulty, but will not be able to exit the site without
backing up several times.
*` Commissioner Farmakes stated that based upon the discussion that took place at the
meeting, the proposed use (day care center) is not an appropriate use at this particular
area. Environmentally, there are unknown potential hazards.
PRESS SITE PLAN REVIEW (PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 4, 1994)
The Press request was approved as follows:
Mancino moved, Conrad seconded that the Planning Commission recommend approval of
Site Plan Review #94 -1 for a 54,760 square foot expansion of the Press building as approved
by the Planning Commission on May 4, 1994, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the applicant must revise plans to include trash screening of the Press site and show
the type of materials used to screen the trash enclosures on the Press site. Plans must be
submitted for staff review prior to the City Council meeting.
2. Deleted.
3. The applicant shall provide a meandering berm with landscaping along the south portion
of the site, between the parking lot and Highway 5. The height of the berm shall be
1
n
J
�
0
7
Mr. Don Ashworth
June 8, 1994
Page 3
between 3 and 4 feet. The applicant shall also provide staff with a detailed cost estimate
of landscaping to be used in calculating the required financial guarantees. These
guarantees must be posted prior to building permit issuance. There shall be added
landscaping to the perimeter of the Press expansion of coniferous trees as suggested by
Nancy Mancino.
4. The applicant shall enter into a site plan development contract with the city and provide
the necessary financial securities as required for landscaping.
5. Meet all conditions outlined in the Fire Marshal's memo dated March 10, 1994.
6. The Press addition shall contain some architectural detailing (with relief) to break up the
long wall masses.
7. Concurrent with the building permit, a detailed lighting plan meeting city standards shall
be submitted.
8. The grading/utility plan shall be revised to incorporate storm sewers in the parking lot's
drive aisles for the Press. Detailed drainage calculations for a 10 year storm event shall
be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval.
9. The applicant shall apply and comply with the necessary permits from the appropriate
agencies (MPCA, Watershed District, and City Building Department).
10. Silt fence shall be placed along the northern property line where the parking lot for the
Press is being relocated.
11. Deleted.
12. Deleted.
13. The main thoroughfare (drive aisle) located on the Press site north of the main parking
lot area should be a minimum width of 26 feet with turning radiuses at 77th Street West
of 30 feet and two way traffic. In addition, the main thoroughfare (drive aisle) shall be
posted with no parking signs.
14. The driveway access point shall be constructed in accordance to the City's typical
' industrial driveway apron detail.
' 15. The applicant shall provide the City with a security deposit (letter of credit or cash
escrow) in the amount of $5,000.00 to guarantee boulevard restoration. All boulevards
disturbed as a result of the site improvements shall be restored with sod.
Mr. Don Ashworth '
June 8, 1994
Page 4
16. Conditions of the Building Official's memo dated March 25, 1994. ,
17. The parking configuration of the Press shall be incorporated into the final design ,
approval given to Kinder Care taking into account such things as sidewalks for
pedestrian traffic and traffic circulation between the Press and Kinder Care.
18. No rooftop equipment shall be visible from Highway 5, Dell Road or 77th Street. '
19. The impervious surface of the Press shall be a conforming permit at 70 %. '
20. Conditions of the Building Official's memo dated March 25, 1994:
1) Submit a 1/8" = 1" -0" scale plan of the entire existing building indicating
dimensions and use of all spaces on all floors.
2) Revise site plans to show site approach details and handicap parking stalls in ,
compliance with MSBC Chapter 1340.
All voted in favor, except Diane Harberts who was not present to vote, and the motion
carried.
PRELIMINARY PLAT (May 4, 1994) '
Mancino moved, Farmakes seconded that the Planning Commission recommend approval
of Preliminary Plat for Subdivision #94 -2 for Park One 3rd Addition into Lot 1, Block 1
and Outlot A (Lots 2 and 3, Block 1), with the following conditions:
1. Park and trail dedication fees to be collected per city ordinance. ,
2. Provide the following easements: f
a. A standard 5 foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated along the '
common lot line between Lot 1 and Outlot A, Block 1.
b. Delete. I
C. A 15 foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated on the final plat
along the west property line of Outlot A to facilitate the extension of the sewer I
service.
3. Enter into a site plan development agreement acceptable to the city. I
�,I
Mr. Don Ashworth
June S, 1994
' Page 5
4. A driveway or cross access easement for use of the access off 77th Street West. The
easement shall be dedicated in favor of Lots 1, Block 1 and Outlot A. The easement
agreement shall be drafted and filed concurrently with a private maintenance agreement
acceptable to the City.
5. The developer shall obtain and comply with all necessary permits from the Watershed
District, Health Department, etc.
6. Erosion control measures (silt fence - Type I) shall be shown on the grading plan. Silt
fence shall be placed along the north property line where the parking lot for the Press is
' being relocated.
All voted in favor, except Diane Harberts who was not present to vote, and the motion
' carried.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
If the City Council chooses to approve this entire application, including:
' 1. Preliminary Plat
2. Site Plan Review for the Press
3. Site Plan Review for Kinder Care
4. Conditional Use Permit for Kinder Care
staff recommends the following motion with conditions:
' I. SITE PLAN REVIEW (BOTH THE PRESS AND KINDER CARE)
1 "The City Council approves Site Plan Review #94 -1 as shown on the site plan received April 13,
1994, revised on June 1, 1994 subject to the following conditions:
1. That the applicant must revise plans to include trash screening of the Press site and show
the type of materials used to screen the trash enclosures on the Press site. Plans must be
' submitted for staff review prior to City Council meeting.
2. The applicant must obtain a sign permit prior to erecting any signage on site. The
' monument sign on the Kinder Care site shall utilize brick as a base for the sign rather
than metal poles.
' 3. The applicant shall provide a meandering berm with landscaping along the south portion
of the site, between the parking lot and Highway 5. The height of the berm shall be
between 3 and 4 feet. The applicant shall also provide staff with a detailed cost estimate
Mr. Don Ashworth
June 8, 1994
Page 6
of landscaping to be used in calculating the required financial guarantees. These
guarantees must be posted prior to building permit issuance. There shall be added
landscaping to the perimeter of the Press expansion of coniferous trees as suggested by
Nancy Mancino.
4. The applicant shall enter into a site plan development contract with the city and provide
the necessary financial securities as required for landscaping.
5. Meet all conditions outlined in the Fire Marshal's memo dated March 10, 1994.
6. The Press addition shall contain some architectural detailing (with relief) to break up the
long wall masses.
7. Concurrent with the building permit, a detailed lighting plan meeting city standards shall
be submitted.
�I
8. The grading/utility plan shall be revised to incorporate storm sewers in the parking lot's
drive aisles for the Press. Detailed drainage calculations for a 10 year storm event shall I
be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval.
9. The applicant shall apply and comply with the necessary permits from the appropriate I
agencies (MPCA, Watershed District, and City Building Department).
10. Silt fence shall be placed along the northern property line where the parking lot for the I
Press is being relocated.
11. A rock construction entrance shall also be placed at the driveway entrance to the Kinder '
Care site off of Dell Road.
12. The applicant shall utilize the existing water service from Dell Road. Open cutting of '
Dell Road will be prohibited.
13. The main thoroughfare (drive aisle) located on the Press site north of the main parking '
lot area should be a minimum width of 26 feet with turning radiuses at 77th Street West
of 30 feet and two way traffic. In addition, the main thoroughfare (drive aisle) shall be '
posted with no parking signs.
14. The driveway access point shall be constructed in accordance to the City's typical
industrial driveway apron detail.
F
Lam'
Mr. Don Ashworth
June 8, 1994
Page 7
15. The applicant shall provide the City with a security deposit (letter of credit or cash
escrow) in the amount of $5,000.00 to guarantee boulevard restoration. All boulevards
disturbed as a result of the site improvements shall be restored with sod.
16. Conditions of the Building Official's memo dated March 25, 1994.
17. An island or a speed bump shall be placed between the Press and Kinder Care site to
slow down and discourage traffic from cutting through the Kinder Care site.
18. No roof top equipment shall be visible from Highway 5, Dell Road or 77th Street West.
19. Brick shall be used on the Kinder Care facade to resemble the building shown in the
submitted photographs.
20. The traffic circulation and parking lot layout shall be revised as shown on the revised
plan prepared by Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. Access to Dell Road shall be revised to
a right -out only to eliminate short cuts. The maximum number of parking stalls will
be limited to 33.
I 21. The applicant shall be responsible for all fees associated with the traffic study prepared
by SERF.
22. There shall be a landscaping easement of 30 feet running parallel to Highway 5 and
then north parallel to Dell Road a distance of 75 feet. A significant number of trees
shall be placed on the southeast corner for an entryway. Plantings around the
' building as well as interior parking shall be provided.
23. Staff shall review an east /west connection.
' 24. Proportion of the roof size to the building wall height is incompatible. Architectural
plans must be revised to reflect compatibility. The applicant shall bring in
' architectural drawings of the Kinder Care building making it compatible with
buildings in the surrounding area.
25. The applicant shall move the Kinder Care building 40 feet to the north to realign the
driveway access onto Dell Road to accommodate emergency vehicle and school bus
turning movements."
U. PRELIMINARY PLAT (FOR BOTH THE PRESS AND KINDER CARE)
"The City Council approves the preliminary plat for Subdivision #94 -2 for Park One 3rd Addition
as shown on the plat received April 13, 1994, with the following conditions:
Mr. Don Ashworth
June 8, 1994
Page 8
1. Park and trail dedication fees to be collected per city ordinance.
2. Provide the following easements: '
a. A standard 5 -foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated along the
common lot line between Lots 1, and 2 and 3, Block 1. '
b. Dedication of public right -of -way.
C. A 15 -foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated on the final plat ,
along the west property line of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 to facilitate the extension
of the sewer service. '
3. Enter into a site plan development agreement acceptable to the city.
4. A driveway or cross - access easement for use of the access of off 77th Street West. The '
easement shall be dedicated in favor of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1. The easement
agreement shall be drafted and filed concurrently with a private maintenance agreement '
acceptable to the City.
5. The developer shall obtain and comply with all necessary permits from the watershed ,
district, health department, etc.
6. Erosion control measures (silt fence - Type I) shall be shown on the grading plan. Silt '
fence shall be placed along the north property line where the parking lot for The Press
is being relocated."
III. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (KINDER CARE) '
"The Planning Commission recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit #94 -1 subject to the '
following conditions:
1. Compliance with conditions of site plan and plat approval. '
2. Obtain all applicable state, county, and city licenses." '
Attachments
1. Traffic study prepared by SERF, dated May 24, 1994. '
2. Staff report and Planning Commission minutes dated April 13, 1994.
3. Photocopies of photographs showing an existing Kinder Care facility.
4. Site Plan.
I
I Planning Commission Meeting - June 1, 1994
I Mancino: At the school.
Scott: Well there's a, I'm trying to remember who had it.
Mancino: Oh, Heritage.
' Scott: Yeah. So there's an opportunity if you would like to make a proposal on that
particular piece. See there's, we've retained some of that, we've seen a request to rezone
' property adjacent to the north side of Timberwood and I believe there are some 15,000 square
foot lots. At least the development that we saw had 15,000 square foot lots lined up, you
know where the power line goes through there?
' Mancino: Yes.
' Scott: Abutting the east side. So that is a similar, it's guided similar to this particular
property but it is not as far along.
' Mancino: And this one has some other site characteristics being...100 %. 99.6% wooded so...
to preserve some of our woodland areas. And I think that this is important so that we do
' have bigger lots...
Scott: And severe topography.
' Mancino: Severe topography which will be a little different. I just, I don't know. Don't
think that this is the best use of that land.
' Scott: Okay. This is for the 13th? Okay. Thank you for coming sir. And the applicant,
thank you.
' SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR A 10,315 SQUARE FOOT KINDERCARE FACILITY AND
A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A LICENSED DAY CARE CENTER IN AN
' IOP, INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT
OF DELL ROAD AND STATE HIGHWAY 5, MARCUS CORPORATION.
Sharmin Al -Jaff presented the staff report on this item.
Scott: Any questions or comments from commissioners?
' Mancino: Sharmin, I just have a question about the site plan review on page, starting on
page 1. The April 13th meeting. That those need to be revised. That those are not the...13th
28
1
+ 1
i
S ' T'RGAR ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC.
SRF ��✓" . f
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS
TRANSPORTATION i QVIL a STRUCTURAL ■ ENV OINMENTAL ■ PARUNC,
SRF No. 0942058
MEMORANDUM
TO: David C_ Hemple
Assistant City Engineer
City of Chanhassen
FROM: Dennis R. Eyler, P.E.
Principal
Jeffrey R. Bednar
Senior Traffic Engineering Specialist
DATE: May 24, 1994
SUBJECT: KINDERCARE SITE ACCESS REVIEW
T.H. 5 & DELL ROAD
L.U.R_ FILE NO. 94 -7
As you requested, we have completed a cursory review of the subject site
access and circulation issues. Based on this review, we offer the following
comments and recommendations for your consideration:
1. The tight turning radiuses and turning restrictions associated with the site
are a concern, especially for emergency vehicles such as ambulances
and firetrescue vehicles.
2. Any type of access shared with the adjacent 'Press" property will result in
a potential for short-cut use of the Kindercare parking facility. Attached is
a conceptual sketch of an alternative site parking layout which may
discourage this short-cut traffic.
3. Due to the median restricted Dell Road access it can be expected that
many site generated trips will include a U -turn either at 77th Street or
Highway 5. This could represent a potential traffic accident occurrence
factor. Most drivers will at least initially attempt these U -tums instead of
using the alternative "Press" private property access option.
Suite 150, One Carlson Parkwav North, Minneavolis, Minnesota 55447443
1
_ .
David C. Hempie
-2-
May 24, 1994
4. A right -turn exit only from the site to southbound Dell Road would resolve
this U -turn issue at 77th Street. But there may continue to be a significant
U -turn volume at the Highway 5 intersection which would also involve a
short weaving maneuver.
5. Based on the 1991 LT.E, "Trip Generation" report this daycare center site
could generate an average of 84 inbound and 72 outbound during the
a.m. peak hour period and 74 inbound and 86 outbound trips during the
afternoon peak hour period. The average daily trips generated are
estimated at close to 800 trip ends.
6. Many to most of these site generated trips are not new trips on the
adjacent roadways. Rather they can be characterized as pass -by trips
which would already be using these roadways.
7. On -site pedestrian safety has also been addressed by the attached
alternative site parking layout. The one -way operation reduces the
pedestrian crossing conflicts and the narrower aisles reduce the distance
required to cross.
Should you have any questions or comments concerning this review please
contact us.
JRB:bba
Attachment
Q7 0.
4 1 FR
T1
B" KINDER CARE
10,315 SF
1 4-
o
I 1A
OWJ
n-' Noo
��l U -----------------
)14
STATE HIGHWAY 5
CITY
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Sharmin Al -Jaff, Planner II
DATE: April 13, 1994
SUBJ: Site Plan Review and Subdivision application for the purpose of constructing a
Warehouse addition to The Press Building and a Conditional Use Permit to allow
a Day Care Center (Kindercare), Located North of Hwy. 5, West of Dell Road,
East of 187th Avenue West, and South of 77th Street West. Marcus
Corporation
On April 6, 1994, the Planning Commission reviewed the following application:
1) Site Plan Review for a 54,760 square foot expansion of The Press Building, and
construction of a Kinder Care Day Care Center, 10,315 Square Feet
2) Preliminary Plat to Replat Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlot B, Park One 2nd Addition
into Lots 1, 2, and 3, Park One Third Addition.
3) Conditional Use Permit to Allow a Day Care Center in an IOP District
The Planning Commission had some concerns regarding the application and voted to table action
until these concerns have been addressed by the applicant. The applicant has submitted revised
plans reflecting changes requested by the Planning Commission. The following section will
address all the issues that were raised at the April 6, 1994 Planning Commission meeting:
ISSUE: The Press plans reflected 314 parking spaces. Under the Zoning Ordinance
requirements, only 245 spaces are needed. The Planning Commission directed the
applicant to reduce the number of parking stalls.
FINDING: The applicant wanted to provide the additional parking to accommodate the new
employees that will be employed in the new addition. There will be a total of
327 employees, working in three shifts. The first shift will have 200 employees,
the second will have 98 employees, and the third shift 30 employees. Between
the first and second shift, there is an overlap of 298 employees present at the
building, while the change of shift is taking place. This could potentially require
MEMORANDUM
I
'•
Planning Commission
April 13, 1994
Page 2
'
298 parking spaces. The original plans reflected 314 parking spaces. The
applicant eliminated 16 parking spaces to achieve the 298 spaces.
'
ISSUE:
The Zoning Ordinance permits up to 70% hard surface coverage. The applicant
stated at the April 6, 1994, Planning Commission meeting that the hard surface
'
coverage for the Press will be 77 %. This number includes the proposed addition
and new parking. The Planning Commission wanted to see this number reduced
to meet ordinance requirements.
'
FINDING:
The existing hard surface coverage for the Press property is 79 %. The applicant
is improving the situation by reducing the coverage to 76.8 %. The zoning
'
ordinance states that a nonconforming use or structure may be expanded provided
that the nonconformity may not be increased. The applicant is not increasing the
nonconformity and is in compliance with the ordinance.
'
ISSUE:
The Press addition elevations lacked in architectural detailing. The Planning
Commission directed the applicant to incorporate some elements from the existing
'
Press building, such as windows and landscaping.
FINDING:
The applicant has revised the landscaping plan to show a variety of trees and a 4
'
foot high berm to break the massing of the wall. Staff is recommending some
architectural detailing be added to break the long spans of the walls.
,
ISSUE:
The link between The Press and Kindercare will encourage The Press employees
to use the Kindercare parking lot as a short cut to get to Dell Road.
'
FINDING:
The applicant suggested that this issue can be addressed by The Press management
by asking all employees not to use the Kindercare parking lot as a short cut. Staff
,
is recommending the applicant use speed bumps or landscaping islands that would
require cars to slow down and maneuver around those islands prior to entering the
Kindercare parking area. The applicant has stated that if the short cut through the
'
Kindercare becomes a problem, they would be willing to provide speed bumps or
a landscaped island.
ISSUE:
The Planning Commission requested the definition of EIFS (Exterior Insulation
Finished System) or stucco over insulation. Also requested was samples of the
materials proposed to be used on the buildings.
'
FINDING:
The applicant has supplied staff with photographs showing some existing
Kindercare buildings. These photos reflect two types of brick on the facade of the
,
building. It also reflect a high quality material. The applicant stated that the
proposed Kindercare building will be similar to that shown in the photograph.
t
.'
Planning Commission
April 13, 1994
Page 3
'
The photographs also show a black chain link fence. Staff is recommending a
similar material be used on this site.
'
ISSUE:
The Planning Commission requested sign plans be submitted for review.
FINDING:
The applicant has submitted a sign plan. One free standing sign is proposed on
the southeast corner of the site. This sign is proposed to be 5 feet in height, and
have an area of 27 square feet. The sign is elevated on two poles. Staff is
'
recommending the two metal poles be replaced with brick to match the proposed
building. The applicant is also showing one wall mounted sign. The area of the
sign is 12 square feet which is below the maximum requirements of the sign
ordinance.
'
ISSUE:
Setback issues were raised by staff and compliance with the requirements of the
highway 5 corridor study.
'
FINDING:
At the time of writing the staff report dated April 6, 1994, staff assumed that the
entire Highway 5 corridor would have to meet the new setbacks required by the
study. This setback is 70 feet minimum and 150 feet maximum for any structure
to be located adjacent to highway 5. Staff later discovered that only the
'
underlying district standards apply to this site. Therefore, the Kindercare building
does not have to be moved any closer to the south.
'
ISSUE:
The Planning Commission requested pedestrian access between The Press and
Kindercare.
t FINDING:
The applicant has provided a sidewalk to link the two sites.
'
ISSUE:
The plans showed wood being used as the material to screen the trash enclosure
for the Kindercare building.
'
FINDING:
The applicant has revised the plan and changed trash enclosure from wood to
brick to match materials on the proposed building.
' Staff is still recommending approval of the site plan, subdivision, and conditional use permit with
appropriate conditions.
' STAFF RECOMMENDATION
' Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion:
I.
Planning Commission '
April 13, 1994
Page 4 '
I. SITE PLAN REVIEW
"The Planning Commission recommends approval of Site Plan Review #94 -1 as shown on the t
site plan received April 13, 1994, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant must revise plans to include trash screening for The Press site and show
the type of materials used to screen the trash enclosure on The Press site. Plans must be
submitted for staff review prior to City Council meeting. '
2. The applicant must obtain a sign permit prior to erecting any signage on site. The
monument sign on the Kindercare site shall utilize brick as a base for the sign rather than '
metal poles.
3. The applicant shall provide a meandering berm with landscaping along the south portion '
of the site, between the parking area and Hwy. 5. The height of the berm shall be
between 3 to 4 feet. The applicant shall also provide staff with a detailed cost estimate
of landscaping to be used in calculating the required financial guarantees. These '
guarantees must be posted prior to building permit issuance.
4. The applicant shall enter into a site plan development contract with the city and provide '
the necessary financial securities as required for landscaping.
5. Meet all conditions outlined in the Fire Marshal memo dated March 10, 1994. '
6. The Press addition shall contain some architectural detailing to break the long wall
masses. '
7. Concurrent with the building permit, a detailed lighting plan meeting city standards shall ,
be submitted.
8. The grading/utility plan shall be revised to incorporate storm sewers in the parking lot's '
drive aisles for The Press. Detailed drainage calculations for a 10 -year storm event
should be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval.
9. The applicant shall apply and comply with the necessary permits from the appropriate '
agencies (MPCA, watershed district, and City Building Department).
10. Silt fence shall also be placed along the north property line where the parking lot for The '
Press is being relocated.
11. A rock construction entrance shall also be placed at the driveway entrance to the ,
Kindercare site off of Dell Road.
' Planning Commission
April 13, 1994
Page 5
' 12. The applicant shall utilize the existing water service from Dell Road. Open cutting of
Dell Road will be prohibited.
13. The main thoroughfare (drive aisle) located on The Press site north of the main parking
lot area should be a minimum width of 26 feet with turning radiuses at 77th Street West
' of 30 feet. In addition, the main thoroughfare (drive aisle) shall be posted with no
parking signs.
I 14. Both driveway access points shall be constructed in accordance to the City's typical
industrial driveway apron detail.
'
15.
The applicant shall be responsible for all boulevard restoration including the sidewalk
along Dell Road. The applicant shall provide the City with a security deposit (letter of
credit or cash escrow) in the amount of $5,000 to guarantee boulevard restoration. All
'
boulevards disturbed as a result of the site improvements shall be restored with sod.
16.
Conditions of the Building Off'icial's memo dated March 25, 1994.
'
17.
An island or a speed bump shall be placed between the Press and Kinder Care site to
slow down and discourage traffic from cutting through the Kinder Care site.
'
18.
No roof top equipment shall be visible from Highway 5, Dell Road, or 77th Street West.
'
19.
Brick shall be used on the Kinder Care facade to resemble the building shown in the
submitted photographs.
'
II.
PRELIMINARY PLAT
'
"The Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat for Subdivision #94 -2
for Park One 3rd Addition as shown on plat received April 13, 1994, with the following
conditions:
'
1.
Park and trail dedication fees to be collected per city ordinance.
'
2.
Provide the following easements:
a. A standard 5 -foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated along the
'
common lot line between Lots 1, and 2 and 3, Block 1.
b. Dedication of public right -of -way.
I
Planning Commission
April 13, 1994
Page 6
C. A 15 -foot wide drainage and utility asement shall be dedicated on the final plat '
ty
along the west property line of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 to facilitate the extension
of the sewer service. '
3. Enter into a site plan development agreement acceptable to the city. '
4. A driveway or cross- access easement for use of the access of off 77th Street West. The
easement shall be dedicated in favor of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1. The easement '
agreement shall be drafted and filed concurrently with a private maintenance agreement
acceptable to the City.
5. The developer shall obtain and comply with all necessary permits from the watershed '
district, health department, etc.
6. Erosion control measures (silt fence - Type 1) shall be shown on the grading plan. Silt '
fence shall be placed along the north property line where the parking lot for The Press
is being relocated." '
III. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
"The Planning Commission recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit #94 -1 subject to the '
following conditions:
1. Compliance with conditions of site plan and plat approval. ,
2. Obtain all applicable state, county, and city licenses." I
Attachments
1. Staff report dated April 6, 1994. '
2. Planning Commission minutes dated April 6, 1994.
3. Photocopies of photographs showing an existing Kinder Care facility. '
4. Revised plans received April 13, 1994.
.
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Sharmin Al -Jaff, Planner 11
DATE: April 26, 1994
SUBJ: Preliminary plat to replat Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlot B, Park One 2nd Addition
into Lots 1, 2, and 3, Park One Third Addition, a Site Plan for a 54,720 square
foot warehouse expansion for the Press and a 10,315 square foot Kinder Care
facility and a Conditional Use Permit for a Licensed Day Care Center in an IOP,
Industrial Office Park, located at the northwest quadrant of Dell Road and State
Highway 5, Marcus Corporation
On April 20, 1994, the Planning Commission reviewed the following application for the second
time:
1) Site Plan Review for a 54,760 square foot expansion of The Press Building, and
construction of a Kinder Care Day Care Center, 10,315 Square Feet
2) Preliminary Plat to Replat Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlot B, Park One 2nd Addition
into Lots 1, 2, and 3, Park One Third Addition.
3) Conditional Use Permit to Allow a Day Care Center in an IOP District
The first time this application appeared before the Planning Commission was on April 6, 1994.
The Planning Commission had some concerns regarding the application and voted to table action
until these concerns have been addressed by the applicant. The applicant submitted revised plans
reflecting changes requested by the Planning Commission. The following section addresses all
the issues that were raised at the April 6, 1994 Planning Commission meeting:
ISSUE: The Press plans reflected 314 parking spaces. Under the Zoning Ordinance
requirements, only 245 spaces are needed. The Planning Commission directed the
applicant to reduce the number of parking stalls.
FINDING: The applicant wanted to provide the additional parking to accommodate the new
employees that will be employed in the new addition. There will be a total of
327 employees working in three shifts. The first shift will have 200 employees,
the second will have 98 employees, and the third shift 30 employees. Between
MEMORANDUM
I.
Planning Commission '
April 26, 1994
Page 2 '
the first and second shift, there is an overlap of 298 employees present at the
building while the change of shift is taking place. This could potentially require '
298 parking spaces. The original plans reflected 314 parking spaces. The
applicant eliminated 16 parking spaces to achieve the 298 spaces.
ISSUE:
The Zoning Ordinance permits up to 70% hard surface coverage. The applicant
'
stated at the April 6, 1994, Planning Commission meeting that the hard surface
coverage for the Press will be 77 %. This number includes the proposed addition
and new parking. The Planning Commission wanted to see this number reduced
,
to meet ordinance requirements.
FINDING:
The existing hard surface coverage for the Press property is 79 %. The applicant
'
is improving the situation by reducing the coverage to 76.8 %. The zoning
ordinance states that a nonconforming use or structure may be expanded provided
that the nonconformity may not be increased. The applicant is not increasing the
'
nonconformity and is in compliance with the ordinance.
Planning
'
ISSUE:
The Press addition elevations lacked in architectural detailing. The
Commission directed the applicant to incorporate some elements from the existing
Press building, such as windows and landscaping.
'
FINDING:
The applicant has revised the landscaping plan to show a variety of trees and a 4
foot high berm to break the massing of the wall. Staff is recommending some
,
architectural detailing be added to break the long spans of the walls.
ISSUE:
The link between The Press and Kinder Care will encourage The Press employees
'
to use the Kinder Care parking lot as a short cut to get to Dell Road.
FINDING:
The applicant suggested that this issue can be addressed by The Press management
'
by asking all employees not to use the Kinder Care parking lot as a short cut.
Staff is recommending the applicant use speed bumps or landscaping islands that
would require cars to slow down and maneuver around those islands prior to
'
entering the Kinder Care parking area. The applicant has stated that if the short
cut through the Kinder Care becomes a problem, they would be willing to
provide speed bumps or a landscaped island.
'
ISSUE:
The Planning Commission requested the definition of EIFS (Exterior Insulation
Finished System) or stucco over insulation. Also requested was samples of the
,
materials proposed to be used on the buildings.
'
FINDING:
The applicant has supplied staff with photographs showing some existing Kinder
Care buildings. These photos reflect two types of brick on the facade of the
Planning Commission
April 26, 1994
Page 3
' building. It also reflects a high quality material. The applicant stated that the
proposed Kinder Care building will be similar to that shown in the photograph.
The photographs also show a black chain link fence. Staff is recommending a
similar material be used on this site.
ISSUE: The Planning Commission requested sign plans be submitted for review.
FINDING: The applicant has submitted a sign plar One free standing sign is proposed on
the southeast corner of the site. This n is proposed to be 5 feet in height, and
have an area of 27 square feet. The sign is elevated on two poles. Staff is
recommending the two metal poles be replaced with brick to match the proposed
' building. The applicant is also showing one wall mounted sign. The area of the
sign is 12 square feet which is below the maximum requirements of the sign
ordinance.
I ISSUE:
r�
r
L
Setback issues were raised by staff and compliance with the requirements of the
Highway 5 corridor study.
FINDING: At the time of writing the staff report dated April 6, 1994, staff assumed that the
entire Highway 5 corridor would have to meet the new setbacks required by the
study. This setback is 70 feet minimum and 150 feet maximum for any structure
to be located adjacent to Highway 5. Staff later discovered that only the
underlying district standards apply to this site. Therefore, the Kinder Care
building does not have to be moved any closer to the south.
ISSUE: The Planning Commission requested pedestrian access between The Press and
Kinder Care .
FINDING: The applicant has provided a sidewalk to link the two sites.
ISSUE: The plans showed wood being used as the material to screen the trash enclosure
for the Kinder Care building.
FINDING: The applicant has revised the plan and changed the trash enclosure from wood to
brick to match materials on the proposed building.
At the April 20, 1994 meeting, additional issues were raised which included the following:
• Landscaping along the southeast corner of the Kinder Care site: This corner is an entry
way into Chanhassen. The Highway 5 Corridor study recommended the city consider
some type of gateway treatment at Dell Road and Highway 5. A formal gateway
Planning Commission ,
April 26, 1994
Page 4 ,
treatment has not been developed for this area. The preliminary thought is for the
possibility of clustering trees. '
• The side walk that links the Press with the Kinder Care site is not wheelchair accessible.
The Planning Commission recommended that this sidewalk be adjusted to provide this
accessibility.
Architectural detailing has not been shown on the Press addition. Such should be shown I
on the plans. The detailing should complement the existing Press architecture.
• The Planning Commission questioned the number of parking spaces at the Kinder Care
site. The building can accommodate 200 children. The ordinance requires 1 space per
'
6 children, which will result in 33 spaces required. The applicant is providing 45 spaces,
which exceeds the ordinance requirements by 12 spaces. The Planning Commission
'
wanted the number of spaces reduced to increase the green space area on the Kinder Care
site, specifically along Highway 5. The site has 59% hard surface coverage which is
below the 70% required by ordinance.
'
• The Planning Commission wanted to see the parking lot for the Kinder Care site shifted
to the north to move it further from Hwy 5. There are high voltage electric lines along
'
the south edge of the site. The applicant stated that there are federal regulations
prohibiting day care buildings and playground areas from being located close to power
lines.
,
• The Planning Commission recommended the hard surface coverage of the Press site be
adjusted to meet the required 70% by adding proposed Lot 3 to the area of the Press site.
'
Based on the forgoing, the Planning Commission recommended tabling the Conditional Use
Permit and Site Plan approval for the Kinder Care facility and recommended approval of
'
the Press expansion with the following conditions:
I. SITE PLAN REVIEW
Mancino moved, Harberts seconded that the Planning Commission recommend to approve
,
the Site Plan Review for a 54,760 square foot expansion of the Press building as shown on
the site plan received April 13, 1994, subject to the following conditions.
,
1. That the applicant must revise plans to include trash screening of The Press site and show
the type of materials used to screen the trash enclosures on The Press site. Plans must
'
be submitted for staff review prior to City Council meeting.
13. The main thoroughfare (drive aisle) located on the Press site north of the main parking
lot area should be a minimum width of 26 feet with turning radiuses at 77th Street West
of 30 feet and two way traffic. In addition, the main thoroughfare (drive aisle) shall be
posted with no parking signs.
Planning Commission
'
April 26, 1994
Page 5
'
2.
Deleted.
'
3.
The applicant shall provide a meandering berm with landscaping along the south portion
of the site, between the parking lot and Highway 5. The height of the berm shall be
between 3 and 4 feet. The applicant shall also provide staff with a detailed cost estimate
'
of landscaping to be used in calculating the required financial guarantees. These
guarantees must be posted prior to building permit issuance. There shall be added
landscaping to the perimeter of the Press expansion of coniferous trees as suggested by
'
Nancy Mancino.
4.
The applicant shall enter into a site plan development contract with the city and provide
'
the necessary financial securities as required for landscaping.
5.
Meet all conditions outlined in the Fire Marshal memo dated March 10, 1994.
'
6.
The Press addition shall contain some architectural detailing (with relief) to break up the
long wall masses
'
7.
Concurrent with the building permit, a detailed lighting plan meeting city standards shall
be submitted.
'
8.
The grading/utility plan shall be revised to incorporate storm sewers in the parking lot's
drive aisles for the Press. Detailed drainage calculations for a 10 year storm event shall
be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval.
'
9.
The applicant shall apply and comply with the necessary permits from the appropriate
agencies (MPCA, Watershed District, and City Building Department).
'
10.
Silt fence shall be placed along the northern property line where the parking lot for the
Press is being relocated.
'
11.
Deleted.
'
12.
Deleted.
13. The main thoroughfare (drive aisle) located on the Press site north of the main parking
lot area should be a minimum width of 26 feet with turning radiuses at 77th Street West
of 30 feet and two way traffic. In addition, the main thoroughfare (drive aisle) shall be
posted with no parking signs.
Planning Commission
April 26, 1994
Page 6
I-
I
14. The driveway access point shall be constructed in accordance to the City's typical
industrial driveway apron detail. I
15. The applicant shall provide the City with a security deposit (letter of credit or cash
escrow) in the amount of $5,000.00 to guarantee boulevard restoration. All boulevards I
disturbed as a result of the site improvements shall be restored with sod.
16. Conditions of the Building Official's memo dated March 25, 1994.
17. The parking configuration of the Press shall be incorporated into the final design
approval given to Kinder Care taking into account such things as sidewalks for ,
pedestrian traffic and traffic circulation between the Press and Kinder Care .
18. No rooftop equipment shall be visible from Highway 5, Dell Road or 77th Street.
19. The impervious surface of the Press shall be a conforming permit at 70 %.
The Planning Commission also recommended approval of the subdivision request with the
condition that the applicant replats the parcels shown as proposed Lots 2 and 3 into Outlot A in
addition to staff's recommendation. The Planning Commission acted as follow:
Mancino moved, Ledvina seconded that the Planning Commission recommend approval of
preliminary plat for Subdivision #94.2 for Park One 3rd Addition into Lot 1, Block 1 and
Outlot A (Lots 2 and 3, Block 1), with the following conditions:
1. Park and trail dedication fees to be collected per city ordinance.
2. Provide the following easements:
a. A standard 5 foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated along the
common lot line between Lot 1 and Outlot A, Block 1.
b. Delete.
C. A 15 foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated on the final plat
along the west property line of Outlot A to facilitate the extension of the sewer
service.
3. Enter into a site plan development agreement acceptable to the city.
J
J
I I
Planning Commission
April 26, 1994
Page 7
' 4. A driveway or cross access easement for use of the access off 77th Street West. The
easement shall be dedicated in favor of Lots 1, Block 1 and Outlot A. The easement
agreemen shall be drafted and filed concurrently with a private maintenance agreement
acceptable to the City.
5. The developer shall obtain and comply with all necessary permits from the Watershed
District, Health Department, etc.
6. Erosion control measures (silt fence - Type I) shall be shown on the grading plan. Silt
fence shall be placed along the north property line where the parking lot for the Press is
' being relocated.
The applicant requested that the City Council consider the Kinder Care application even though
it was tabled by the Planning Commission. On April 25, 1994, the City Council had a discussion
on this item. They agreed unanimously that this application should go back to the Planning
Commission for a recommendation. They also requested the Press and Kinder Care applications
' be treated as one. The Planning Commission has 60 days to render a recommendation to the City
Council by June 1, 1994.
' Planning Commissioner Mancino requested a copy of the federal regulations prohibiting day care
facilities to be located within a specific distance of high power electric lines. Staff contacted
loan officers as well as the City Attorney in search of the regulations, however, we have been
unsuccessful in locating these regulations.
The plans have not changed since they last appeared before the Planning Commission. The
applicant is still requesting approval of the Kinder Care site plan, conditional use permit and
subdivision request as submitted.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the following motion:
"The Planning Commission recommends approval of Site Plan Review #94 -1 as shown on the
site plan received April 13, 1994, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant must revise plans to include trash screening for The Press site and show
the type of materials used to screen the trash enclosure on The Press site. Plans must be
submitted for staff review prior to City Council meeting.
2. The applicant must obtain a sign permit prior to erecting any signage on site. The
monument sign on the Kinder Care site shall utilize brick as a base for the sign rather
than metal poles.
u
11. A rock construction entrance shall also be placed at the driveway entrance to the Kinder I
Care site off of Dell Road.
12. The applicant shall utilize the existing water service from Dell Road. Open cutting of I
Dell Road will be prohibited.
13. The main thoroughfare (drive aisle) located on The Press site north of the main parking '
lot area should be a minimum width of 26 feet with turning radiuses at 77th Street West
of 30 feet. In addition, the main thoroughfare (drive aisle) shall be posted with no
parking signs. '
14. Both driveway access points shall be constructed in accordance to the City's typical
industrial driveway apron detail. ,
Planning
Commission
April 26, 1994
Page 8
,
3.
The applicant shall provide a meandering berm with landscaping along the south portion
of the site, between the parking area and Hwy. 5. The height of the berm shall be
between 3 to 4 feet. The applicant shall also provide staff with a detailed cost estimate
of landscaping to be used in calculating the required financial guarantees. These
guarantees must be posted prior to building permit issuance.
'
4.
The applicant shall enter into a site plan development contract with the city and provide
the necessary financial securities as required for landscaping.
5.
Meet all conditions outlined in the Fire Marshal's memo dated March 10, 1994.
6.
The Press addition shall contain some architectural detailing with relief to break the long
wall masses.
7.
Concurrent with the building permit, a detailed lighting plan meeting city standards shall
be submitted.
'
8.
The grading/utility plan shall be revised to incorporate storm sewers in the parking lot's
drive aisles for The Press. Detailed drainage calculations for a 10 -year storm event
should be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval.
,
9.
The applicant shall apply and comply with the necessary permits from the appropriate
agencies (MPCA, watershed district, and City Building Department).
'
10.
Silt fence shall also be placed along the north property line where the parking lot for The
Press is being relocated.
'
11. A rock construction entrance shall also be placed at the driveway entrance to the Kinder I
Care site off of Dell Road.
12. The applicant shall utilize the existing water service from Dell Road. Open cutting of I
Dell Road will be prohibited.
13. The main thoroughfare (drive aisle) located on The Press site north of the main parking '
lot area should be a minimum width of 26 feet with turning radiuses at 77th Street West
of 30 feet. In addition, the main thoroughfare (drive aisle) shall be posted with no
parking signs. '
14. Both driveway access points shall be constructed in accordance to the City's typical
industrial driveway apron detail. ,
1
u
Planning Commission
April 26, 1994
Page 9
15. The applicant shall be responsible for all boulevard restoration including the sidewalk
along Dell Road. The applicant shall provide the City with a security deposit (letter of
credit or cash escrow) in the amount of $5,000 to guarantee boulevard restoration. All
boulevards disturbed as a result of the site improvements shall be restored with sod.
16. Conditions of the Building Official's memo dated March 25, 1994.
17. An island or a speed bump shall be placed between the Press and Kinder Care site to
slow down and discourage traffic from cutting through the Kinder Care site.
18. No roof top equipment shall be visible from Highway 5, Dell Road, or 77th Street West.
19. Brick shall be used on the Kinder Care facade to resemble the building shown in the
submitted photographs.
20. The parking configuration of the Press shall be incorporated into the final design
approval given to Kinder Care taking into account such things as sidewalks for
pedestrian traffic and traffic circulation between the Press and Kinder Care .
21. No rooftop equipment shall be visible from Highway 5, Dell Road or 77th Street.
22. The impervious surface of the Press shall be a conforming permit at 70 %.
1 U. PRELIMINARY PLAT
"The Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat for Subdivision #94-2
for Park One 3rd Addition as shown on the plat received April 13, 1994, with the following
conditions:
1. Park and trail dedication fees to be collected per city ordinance.
2. Provide the following easements:
a. A standard 5 -foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated along the
common lot line between Lots 1, and 2 and 3, Block 1.
b. A 15 -foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated on the final plat
along the west property line of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 to facilitate the extension
of the sewer service.
3. Enter into a site plan development agreement acceptable to the city.
r
Planning Commission
April 26, 1994
Page 10
4. A driveway or cross- access easement for use of the access off of 77th Street West. The
easement shall be dedicated in favor of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1. The easement
agreement shall be drafted and filed concurrently with a private maintenance agreement
acceptable to the City.
t
5. The developer shall obtain and comply with all necessary permits from the watershed r
district, health department, etc.
6. Erosion control measures (silt fence - Type I) shall be shown on the grading plan. Silt
fence shall be placed along the north property line where the parking lot for The Press
is being relocated."
III. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
"The Planning Commission recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit #94 -1 subject to the
following conditions:
1. Compliance with conditions of site plan and plat approval.
2. Obtain all applicable state, county, and city licenses."
Attachments
1. Letter from the applicant dated April 21, 1994.
2. Letter from City Attorney dated April 21, 1994.
3. Planning Commission minutes dated April 20, 1994.
4. Staff report dated April 6, 1994.
5. Planning Commission minutes dated April 6, 1994.
6. Photocopies of photographs showing an existing Kinder Care facility.
7. Revised plans received April 13, 1994.
7
J
A [RLK�
SSOCIATES LTD.
April 21, 1994
C�J • .
Manager's Comments As can be seen below,
the applicant is requesting City Council review
even though the Planning Commission tabled
the Kindercare part of the project. Given
this unusual procedural request, i have
asked the City Attorney for an opinion (see
attached).
DWA (4- 21 -94)
RE: The Press/Kindercare Project
► 922 Mainstreet
Hopkins, Mn.
55343
(612) 933 -0972
fax: (612) 933 -1153
Dear Ms. Aanenson,
The applicant is hereby requesting that the City Council consider in conjunction with the Press
expansion (passed onto it with a positive recommendation from the planning commission) an
appeal of the kindercare element of the project (which has been tabled twice by the planning
commission). The projects are inseparable through their interrelationships both physically and
economically. Additionally, if the kindercare cannot proceed at this time, it delays the kindercare
project over a year which could also jeopardize the Press expansion. The applicant and the
planning commission have reached an impasse in that the remaining issues of the planning
commission, relating to kindercare, are not solvable.
Given the dramatic need for additional davcare at this time in Chanhassen, we implore the Council
to consider our appeal so as to fulfill part of that need this year.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your assistance.
Yours truly.
RLK Associates, Ltd.
L
John Dietrich
cc: John Pinmore. Kindercarc
.Civil Engineering .Transportation .Infrastructure Redevelopment
. Landscape Architecture . Construction Management
'
Kathryn R. Aanenson
Director of Planning
City of Chanhassen
'
690 Coulter Drive
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, A,!? 55317
Manager's Comments As can be seen below,
the applicant is requesting City Council review
even though the Planning Commission tabled
the Kindercare part of the project. Given
this unusual procedural request, i have
asked the City Attorney for an opinion (see
attached).
DWA (4- 21 -94)
RE: The Press/Kindercare Project
► 922 Mainstreet
Hopkins, Mn.
55343
(612) 933 -0972
fax: (612) 933 -1153
Dear Ms. Aanenson,
The applicant is hereby requesting that the City Council consider in conjunction with the Press
expansion (passed onto it with a positive recommendation from the planning commission) an
appeal of the kindercare element of the project (which has been tabled twice by the planning
commission). The projects are inseparable through their interrelationships both physically and
economically. Additionally, if the kindercare cannot proceed at this time, it delays the kindercare
project over a year which could also jeopardize the Press expansion. The applicant and the
planning commission have reached an impasse in that the remaining issues of the planning
commission, relating to kindercare, are not solvable.
Given the dramatic need for additional davcare at this time in Chanhassen, we implore the Council
to consider our appeal so as to fulfill part of that need this year.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your assistance.
Yours truly.
RLK Associates, Ltd.
L
John Dietrich
cc: John Pinmore. Kindercarc
.Civil Engineering .Transportation .Infrastructure Redevelopment
. Landscape Architecture . Construction Management
CRMPEELL, F:NUTSON, SCOTT & FUCHS, P.A Apr 21,94 16:10 No-012 P.01
CAMPBELL, KNUI' SCOT-I' & RIC:HS, P.A. ■
Attorneys al Law
fh,m,n J C:ur hh+ It (612) q i1•St!i1;
h.,ycy 1;. t 1111fMll� Fax (612) 5551.)
(;ary
}_Ili++it l). Kti,•Iu'Ir
L'li-okr 1, A. Ltm: r '
/1n,lm,r M, l k,cn'll I'+x•lrlr•r
April 21, 1994
T t
BY FAX TRAh SMESSION
Mr. Don Ashworth
Chanhassen City Hall
690 Coulter Drive, Box 147 ,
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
RE: The Press/Kindercare Project 1
Dear Don:
You asked me if the City Council could take action on conditional use permits for The '
Press /Kindercare Project. The Planning Commission tabled action on the Kindercare part of the
project and recommended approval of The Press part of the project.
Section 20-231 of the City Code provides that the procedure for adopting amendments
to the zoning ordinance apply to the issuance of conditional use permits. Section 20-44 of the
City Code provides:
Following conclusion of the public hearing held by the Planning Commission, the
Commission shall report its findings and recommendations on the proposed amendment
to this chapter, including the zoning map to the Council. If no report of recommendation
is transmitted by the Planning Commission within sixty (60) days following referral of the t
amendment to the Commission, the Council may take action on the amendment wlthour
awaiting such recommendation.
The City Council therefore cannot take a conditional use permit application away from
the Planning Commission before the Planning Commission acts on it, unless the Planning ,
Commission has held the application for at least sixty (60) days.
At first blush therefore the City Council would be ignoring the City Code provision if ,
it acts on Kindercare. The troubling aspect is that the Planning Commission divided a project
in two. No such piecemeal approach is authorized by the City Code. An argument Could be
made that since there is no authority to piecemeal a project since part of it has been sent on to ,
the City Council the Council Can act on all of it. My conclusion, however, is that the Planning
5tti1�` 3l • 1 ,7t;,�ncl,ale ��fii�c` (.:enter • 13$0 C�cirix)tate Center Curve • Eagan, hIN 55121 t
Mr. bon Ashworth
April 21, 1994
Page 2
Commission has rightly or wrongly not taken action on Kindercam and the Council would
violate City Code Section 20-44 if it acts at this time.
:Y- I yours,
M KNUTSON, SCOTT
4 S, P.A.
ger N. Knutson
f is
Aw
OMA
40W
A
Xw
h 4}S 3 (' - �, + y � $�5� - ���,yp�� � Fi �d ��;;•� � '��i +k ,x� �Y,, ���; ��.: �,
)e � -..r �k.. � ;d�v 7 � _f` �� `° .v + ., � t '�,�ry ��.m � ,'.�_ 'd S �a .7 •. z ��. �V'�"� ti ^'�.`
J y .K •.+'r �. .cyl . � q +,,,,'{F�3 A.. p•, �;.� r Y.�� .�I", � �y, 1.• 1 ,7'r� ...
, �sG y� f�✓,�l r;� i +� � + v� �'�y�` §��ti T y d., X �+t Si ,� I __ ,yy X L�. e a �'� y
I 4fr,
m m m w m
"ITY OF
y�� CHANBASSEN
�
Z
U
�a
IQ
1
1
1
1
�
p
' W
H
STAFF REPORT
T DATE: 4 -6 -94
CA— DATE: 4 -25 -94
"ASE: 94 -1 Site Plan
94 -1 CUP, 94 -2 SUB
BY: Al -Jaff
PROPOSAL:1) Site Plan Review for a 54,760 square foot expansion of The Press
Building, and construction of a Kindercare Day Care Center, 10,315
Square Feet
2) Preliminary Plat to Replat Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlot B, Park One 2nd
Addition into Lots 1, 2, and 3, Park One Third Addition.
3) Conditional Use Permit to Allow a Day Care Center in an IOP District
LOCATION: North of Hwy. 5, West of Dell Road, East of 187th Avenue West, and
South of 77th Street West.
APPLICANT : Marcus Corporation The Press, Inc.
10001 Wayzata Blvd., Ste. 100 18780 West 78th Street
Minnetonka, MN 55305 Chanhassen, MN 55317
PRESENT ZONING: Industrial Office Park
ACREAGE: 13.64 acres
ADJACENT ZONING
AND LAND USE: N - 77th Street West/IOP
S - Highway 5/IOP
E - Dell Road/Eden Prairie
W - 187th Avenue West/IOP
SEWER AND WATER: Services are available to the site.
ACON N M Administrator
EW . - -- ✓ 7jllJl
Rej;�r' i
Date S}amted to Commission
4-b - 9I/
Date Submitted to Counoil
SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The site contains the Press Building along the westerly
portion. The easterly half is undeveloped and vegetated
primarily with brush. The property is bordered by Hwy. 5
on the south and Dell Road on the east.
Cn
2000 LAND USE:
Office/Industrial
The Press/Kinder Care '
April 6, 1994
Page 2 '
PROPOSAL /SUMMARY
The applicant is proposing to construct a day care facility and expand the warehouse and press '
room of the Press building. The site is bordered by 77th Street West along the north, Hwy. 5
to the south, 187th Avenue West to the west, and Dell Road to the east. The lot area of the '
Press site is 518,000 square feet and the Kindercare Day Care Facility site is 76,372 square feet.
Both sites are located in an Industrial Office Park District. The site is visible directly from
Highway 5 and has full access from 77th Street West and 187th Avenue West. Access to and ,
from the Kindercare site via Dell Road is restricted to right- in/right -out only.
In an accompanying subdivision request, the site is being replatted into three lots, one of which '
will expand the existing Press site to accommodate the proposed expansion, the second lot will
contain the Kindercare building, and the third lot will be reserved for future development. Staff
is not aware of any pending developments for the third lot. The subdivision request is a '
relatively straightforward action. Conditions proposed for review would result in dedication of
all required easements.
The site plan is reasonably well developed. The Press expansion will utilize scored concrete '
panels, an identical material to that used on the existing building. Staff has requested that the
applicant provide elevations showing the facade after incorporating the proposed expansion. The ,
Kindercare building is proposed to utilize face brick wainscoting on all four sides accented by
columns, ceramic tile, a canopy, and has a pitched roof
resulting from the expansion of the Press building ,
One of the advantages g p g will be the relocation
of the loading dock area. Currently, the loading docks are visible from Highway 5. The '
expansion will relocate the docks to the rear of the building, and will face 77th Street West.
Parking for vehicles is located on the east and west side of the Press building, and south of the ,
Kindercare building. Vehicles will be screened by berms and landscaping materials from
Highway 5.
The site landscaping is generally of high quality due to the attention that was paid to this issue '
by the applicant. A variety of trees and bushes will be used. We are recommending that a
meandering berm of 3 to 4 feet in height be located along the southerly edge of the site, between '
the parking lot and Highway 5.
Staff regards the project as a reasonable use of the land. The overall design is sensitive to the I
Highway 5 corridor's image.
Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan, without variances,
conditional use permit and subdivision requests for this proposal.
The Press/Kinder Care
April 6, 1994
Page 3
' BACKGROUND
' On June 19, 1978, the City Council approved a Planned Industrial Development Plan #78 -5 PUD,
which included a subdivision that resulted in dividing 701,656 square feet into Lot 1, Block 1,
Park One (444,734 square feet), and Outlot B (256,922 square feet). Lot 1 became the site for
' the Press Building which was approved as a permitted use in the Planned Industrial Development
Plan concurrently with the subdivision. Outlot B was reserved for future development and is
being proposed for subdivision into two lots with this application.
GENERAL SITE PLAN /ARCHITECTURE
' The existing Press building is situated parallel to and north of Hwy. 5. The site is bordered by
77th Street West along the north, Hwy. 5 to the south, 187th Avenue West to the west, and Dell
Road to the east. Access to the Press building is gained off of 77th Street West and 187th
' Avenue West. The proposed expansion of 54,760 square feet will be located to the east of the
existing building. Kindercare is proposed to be located to the east of the Press building and will
have an area of 10,315 square feet. Parking will be located to the south and between the two
buildings. Direct views of the existing loading docks and parking area are currently visible from
Hwy. 5. The proposed addition will relocate the loading docks to the north of the building and
- -'� _ provide complete screening from Hwy. 5.- Staff is recommending that a meandering berm with
landscaping, 3 to 4 feet in height, be installed between the parking lot and Hwy. 5 to provide
additional screening.
The Press building, including the proposed addition, is located 30 feet from the north, 100 feet
from the east, 120 from the south, and 65 feet from the west property line. The Kindercare
building is located 70 feet from the north, 40 feet from the east, 190 feet from the south, and 50
feet from the west property line.
Materials used on the Press addition will be identical to the existing building's scored concrete
panels. The applicant has been informed that elevations of the building, with the addition
incorporated into them, must be submitted for review and evaluation. The Kindercare building
will consist of face brick wainscoting on all four sides. The entry will have a canopy with
columns and ceramic file detailing. The building's architecture is tastefully designed and meets
the standards of the site plan ordinance requirements.
The site plan for the Kindercare site shows the trash enclosure located southwest of the day care
building. The location of the trash enclosure for the Press site has not been shown. Plans must
' be revised to show the location and submitted for review and approval. The trash enclosure shall
utilize materials similar to materials used on the main building. Any roof top equipment should
be screened from Highway 5.
The Press/Kinder Care
April 6, 1994
Page 4
The Planning ommission has reviewed the Highway Corridor Overlay design standards. ,
g g Y Y
Although they have not officially been adopted, staff has reviewed these standards to see how
this project meets the intent of the proposed ordinance. The purpose of the overlay district is to '
promote high - quality architectural and site design through improvement development standards
with the corridor. The design standards should create a unified, harmonious and high quality
visual environment. The plan and design of the proposed development meets the intent of the '
overlay district with the following features:
The Press addition will utilize material identical to those used on the existing building.
The same is true for the color and height of the addition. The Kindercare building will
also be one story and the architectural style is unique to the industrial park but will fit in. '
The addition to the Press will be compatible with the existing building. The Kindercare
building will provide a variation in style through the use of columns and the pitched roof
element. Because the request is only for an addition to The Press, there is no room to '
provide a pitched element. Also, a pitched roof would be out of character for the existing
style of the building. The Kindercare building is providing a pitched roof as well as a
pitched canopy. The Kindercare building must be moved 40 feet to the south to meet the
maximum setback of 150 feet. Both buildings are utilizing exterior materials that are
durable and of high quality. The colors of the Press building addition will be identical
to the existing building.- The applicant must show the colors proposed to be used on the ,
Kindercare building.
The new Press addition will move loading docks to the rear of the building, screening it
from views from Hwy. 5. The trash enclosure has not been shown on the Press site and
such shall be shown on the final plans.
The site is level and minimum grading will take place with the exception of areas along '
Hwy. 5 where staff is requiring a berm. The site is devoid of vegetation with the
exception of underbrush. The landscaping plan provides a variety of plant materials that ,
are massed where possible particularly along Hwy. 5. The berm and landscaping
materials will be a continuation of the existing berm on the Press site. The plant
materials are repetitious in some locations and variable in others. Proposed plant 1
materials are indigenous to Minnesota. A curb is required along the parameters of the
green space area. The applicant is providing a wide green space area between Hwy. 5
right -of -way and the Kindercare site. All planting areas are adequate in size to allow t
trees to grow.
The light poles are incorporated within the planters /islands. Staff is requiring a sign plan '
which should include lighting method.
i
The Press/Kinder Care
April 6, 1994
Page 5
PARKING/INTERIOR CIRCULATION
The City's parking ordinance for day care centers requires a design capacity of one stall for each
six children. The applicant is providing 45 parking spaces. The total number of children
enrolled at the day care may not exceed 270.
The parking ordinance for warehouses requires one space for each 1,000 square feet of gross
floor area up to 10,000 square feet and 1 additional space for each additional 2,000 square feet.
The total spaces required for the addition is 32 spaces. The ordinance also requires processing
facilities to provide 1 parking space for each employee on the major shift. The Press employs
a total of 245 employees. These employees work in 3 shifts. Assuming all employees were
present at the same time, a total of 245 spaces would be required. The total spaces required
including the addition is 277 spaces. The applicant is providing 314 spaces which far exceed the
ordinance requirements.
The submitted site plans does not indicate any handicapped parking spaces. The Minnesota State
Building Code (MSBC) requires that such spaces be provide at the rate of one handicapped space
per every 50 spaces in the lot(s). This calculated out to 7 spaces for the Press and 1 space for
the Kindercare. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) has specific requirements for van
spaces which currently are not part of the MSBC. These requirements are not enforced by the
Inspections Division, but should be incorporated into the site plan. Site approaches are regulated
by the MSBC, and are not detailed or, the site plan. Curb cuts, width, texture and slope are
details that must be included on the site plans.
Landscaping is propose d
' parking area. This will
meandering landscaped
along the south side, adjacent to Highway 5 as well as throughout the
provide screening of cars parked in the lot. Staff is recommending a
berm, 3 to 4 feet in height, be installed between the parking lots and
Hwy. 5 to provide additional screening.
ACCESS/PARKING LOT CIRCULATION
Dell Road is a four -lane divided collector street. Access to and from the Kindercare site via Dell
Road is restricted to a right- in/right -out only due to the existing center median. The parking lot
configuration appears to circulate well with the secondary access from The Press. However, the
disadvantage is the new parking lot and access on to Dell Road will make it very convenient for
traffic from The Press to short circuit through the Kindercare site to get to Dell Road and on to
Trunk Highway 5.
The proposed warehouse expansion at The Press will involve relocating the existing drive aisles
and parking lots. The proposed drive aisle will be constructed to 24 -feet wide. The site
currently has a number of semi - trailers parked adjacent to the drive aisles. With the anticipated
truck traffic movement, staff believes the main thoroughfare (drive aisle) should be a minimum
The Press/Kinder Care
April 6, 1994
Page 6 ,
of 26 -feet wide with turning radiuses on to 77th Street West of 30 feet. In addition, the drive
aisles lying north of the main parking lot should be posted for no parking on both sides. Both '
driveway access points (77th Street West and Dell Road) should be constructed in accordance
to the City's typical industrial driveway apron detail (see Attachment No. 1).
The 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk exists along the west side of Dell Road adjacent the site. The '
applicant shall be responsible for replacing any sidewalk damage during construction of the site
improvements. The applicant should post security escrow (letter of credit or cash escrow) in the ,
amount of $5,000 to guarantee boulevard restoration.
LANDSCAPING I
The landscaping plan is very well conceived. The applicant is providing a variety of plantings
throughout the parking lot and especially along the perimeters of the sites. The plant materials '
include ornamental conifer, deciduous trees, and shrubs. The Kindercare site will be the first site
an individual will encounter as they enter Chanhassen. Plantings, as well as the design and
material used on the Kindercare building, have been done tastefully. Staff is recommending one ,
modification to the landscaping plan. The incorporation of a meandering berm with landscaping
between Hwy. 5 and the parking lot area for both sites. The parking area for the Kindercare site
is setback 75 feet from the property line, which is in compliance with the Hwy. 5 corridor study '
requirements.
LIGHTING
Lighting locations have been illustrated on the plans. Only shielded fixtures are allowed and the
applicant shall demonstrate that there is no more than 'f6 foot candles of light at the property line
as required by ordinance. Detailed lighting plan should be submitted when building permits are
requested. '
SIGNAGE
The applicant has not submitted a signage plan. One ground low profile business sign is '
permitted per street frontage with a maximum of 2 such signs per lot. The area of the sign may
not exceed 80 square feet and a height of 8 feet. Also, one wall mounted sign shall be permitted '
per street frontage. The total display area shall not exceed 15% of the total area of the building
wall upon which the signs are mounted. No sign may exceed 80 square feet. The applicant must
obtain a sign permit prior to erecting the sign on site. One stop sign must be posted on the '
driveway at the exit point of both sites. A sign plan acceptable to staff should be provided prior
to requesting a building permit.
I
1
The Press/Kinder Care
April 6, 1994
' Page 7
GRADING AND DRAINAGE
In addition to the site drainage for the Kindercare site, it appears a large portion of the east
parking lot for The Press is also proposed to be redone to accommodate future expansions. The
overall grading plan appears acceptable, however, additional storm sewers will be necessary to
convey stormwater runoff from the parking lot relocation on The Press site. The grading/utility
plan should be revised incorporating the existing or proposed storm sewer system. Detailed
' drainage calculations for both sites (Kindercare/Press) should be submitted to the City Engineer
for review and approval. The drainage calculations shall be a 10 -year storm event.
' Based on the grading plan, it appears site grading will exceed five acres in size thus requiring
permits from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) and watershed district. The site will be served with storm sewers
that were installed in 77th Street West and Dell Road. These storm drainage systems convey
storm runoff to a regional stormwater pond located north of the site. Therefore, no additional
on -site ponding will be required as a result of this development. The development will be
' responsible for the applicable Surface Water Management Utility fee in accordance with city
ordinance.
I PUBLIC UTILITIES
The Kindercare site is proposed to be served from a watermain located in Dell Road. The plans
' propose open cutting in Dell Road to tap the watermain. According to the City's records, an fl-
inch waterline has been stubbed into the site just north of the proposed connection. Staff
' recommends that the existing water service be utilized and the open cutting of Dell Road
prohibited.
' Sanitary sewer service is extended to the site from 77th Street West. The plans propose to
extend a 6 -inch service to the Kindercare site along the west property lines of Lots 2 and 3,
Block 1. The appropriate drainage and utility easement should be dedicated on the final plat
along the service line. Since both the sanitary and water services lines will be private (not
maintained by the City), the applicable permits and inspections should be coordinated by the
applicant through the City Building Department.
' MISCELLANEOUS
The plans propose installation of irrigation systems. The applicant should be aware the
appropriate permits and inspections will be necessary for the installation of the irrigation system
through the City's Building Department.
' All boulevard areas disturbed as a result of site improvements should be restored with sod.
The Press/Kinder Care
April 6, 1994
Page 8
EROSION CONTROL
The plans are proposing silt fence along the east side of the Kindercare lot to protect Dell Road.
Staff also believes it would be appropriate to install silt fence along the north property line of
The Press to protect 77th Street West.
A rock construction entrance is proposed at the north driveway access to The Press. Staff
believes the construction activity on the Kindercare site will also necessitate a rock construction
entrance at the proposed entrance off of Dell Road. Staff recommends that a rock construction
entrance be provided at the Dell Road driveway access as well.
COMPLIANCE TABLE - IOP DISTRICT
Ordinance The Press Kindercare
Building Height 2 stories 1 story 1 story
Building Setback N -30' E -30' N -30' E -NA N -NA E - -50'
S -30' W -30' S -120' W -75' S -190' W -NA'
Parking stalls 245/ 45 stalls 314 stalls 45 stalls*
Parking Setback N -25' E -25' N -25' E -NA' N -NA' E -30'
S -25' W -25' S -35' W -30' S -75' W -NA'
Hard surface 70% Not Provided Not Provided
Coverage
Lot Area 1 acre 11.89 acres 1.75 acres
* The City's parking ordinance for day care centers requires a design capacity of one stall
for each six children. The applicant is providing 45 parking spaces. The total number
of children enrolled at the day care may not exceed 270.
PARK AND TRAIL DEDICATION FEES
The City is requiring that park and trails fees be submitted in lieu of park land. Fees are to be
paid in accordance to city ordinance.
The Press/Kinder Care
April 6, 1994
Page 9
' SUBDIVISION
The subdivision proposal is a relatively simple request that will serve to enlarge The Press site
to accommodate the addition and divide an outlot into 2 lots. The total site area is approximately
15 acres. The existing easterly line of Lot 1 (The Press site) is being shifted 115 feet to the east
' to accommodate the proposed expansion and maintain the required setback. Lot 1 will have an
area of 518,000 square feet. Lot 2 is not being developed at the present time. It is proposed to
have an area of 62,000 square feet. Lot 3 is proposed to contain the Kindercare building and will
' have an area of 76,372 square feet. The subdivision request is a relatively straightforward action.
Conditions proposed for review would result in dedication of all required easements. The
following easements are either illustrated on the plat or should be acquired:
' 1. Standard drainage and utility easements around the perimeters of all lots.
2. Dedication of public right -of -way.
3. A 15 -foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated on the final plat along
' the west property line of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 to facilitate the extension of the sewer
service.
' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
' Day care centers are permitted in the IOP District as a conditional use. The following constitutes
our review of this proposal against conditional use permit standards.
GENERAL ISSUANCE STANDARDS
1. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort,
convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or city.
FINDING - The site is zoned IOP. The proposed use will not create any significant
' or unexpected impacts from this use. It will provide a convenient location
for employees of the office industrial park to drop off their children.
2. Will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and this
chapter.
FINDING - The proposed use would be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan.
The use is also in compliance with the Hwy. 5 Corridor Plan although it
has not yet been incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan. Both sites
meet the requirements of the design standards as discussed in the site
plan/architecture section.
r
The Press/Kinder Care
April 6, 1994
Page 10 '
3. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in ,
appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will
not change the essential character of that area.
FINDING - The site is located adjacent to a major highway and a collector road. It is
in the industrial district and as such, a day care center is fully consistent
with this site. Architectural standards required by the Highway 5 corridor ,
study and are being adhered to.
4. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. ,
FINDING - There will be no measurable impacts to the existing or planned
neighboring uses. This use will have traffic patterns that should combine '
trips with existing businesses.
5. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, '
police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer
systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services
provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the ,
proposed use.
FINDING - Full city services are available to this site. Roads serving the site are fully
capable of handling the access needs of this proposal.
6. Will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not '
be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community.
FINDING - There are no projected needs for public facilities and services that staff is '
aware of. However, we do believe that there is always a need for a day
care center within any Office Industrial Park. The day care use is a good ,
auxiliary use for the industrial park.
7. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of '
operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare
because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents,
or trash. '
FINDING - This site will not create adverse impacts to persons, property or the general
welfare of the area. Hours of operation, orientation of the building, and '
lighting standards will comply with city ordinances.
I
The Press/Kinder Care
April 6, 1994
Page 11
S. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic
congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares.
FINDING - The site is visible from a major highway and is accessible from that
highway by a signalized intersection and a collector street designed to
' commercial standards. There will be no direct traffic impacts to any area
residential neighborhood.
' 9. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or
historic features of major significance.
t
FINDING - The development of this site will not result in the loss of any features.
10. Will be aesthetically compatible with the area.
FINDING - The site plan is well designed to provide adequate landscaping and
buffering from adjoining properties. The building is to be built of brick
accented by columns, ceramic tile, and a canopy. Consistent with
Highway 5 overlay district.
11. Will not depreciate surrounding property values.
FINDING - The site is being used for a day care type of operation which is consistent
with its designation. It will not depreciate surrounding property values.
On the contrary, it will add a convenient location for employees working
in the surrounding area to drop off their children.
12. Will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in this article.
FINDING - The following is our review of conditions of approval and appropriate
findings:
a. The site shall have loading and drop off points designed to avoid interfering
with traffic and pedestrian movements
FINDING - The building is surrounded by a sidewalk to allow pedestrian movement.
b. Outdoor play areas shall be located and designed in a manner which
mitigates visual and noise impacts on adjoining residential areas.
FINDING - There are no adjoining residential areas.
The Press/Kinder Care i
April 6, 1994
Page 12
C. Each center shall obtain all applicable state, county, and city licenses.
FINDING - Staff will insure compliance with this condition prior to issuing a '
Certificate of Occupancy.
Based upon the foregoing findings, staff is recommending that the conditional use permit be '
approved with appropriate conditions.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION '
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: '
I. SITE PLAN REVIEW
"The Planning Commission recommends approval of Site Plan Review #94 -1 as shown on the
site plan received March 8, 1994, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant must revise plans to include trash screening for The Press site and show ,
the type of materials used to screen the trash enclosure on both the Press and Kindercare
sites. Plans must be submitted for staff review prior to City Council meeting. '
2. The applicant must obtain a sign permit prior to erecting any signage on site. Provide
a detailed sign plan for review and approval. '
3. The applicant shall provide a meandering berm with landscaping along the south portion
of the site, between the parking area and Hwy. 5. The height of the berm shall be '
between 3 to 4 feet. The applicant shall also provide staff with a detailed cost estimate
of landscaping to be used in calculating the required financial guarantees. These '
guarantees must be posted prior to building permit issuance.
4. The applicant shall enter into a site plan development contract with the city and provide '
the necessary financial securities as required for landscaping.
5. Meet all conditions outlined in the Fire Marshal memo dated March 10, 1994. '
6. The applicant shall provide elevations of The Press building for review and approval.
7. Concurrent with the building permit, a detailed lighting plan meeting city standards shall '
be submitted.
n
Ij
I II, SUBDIVISION
"The Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat for Subdivision #94-2
for Park One 3rd Addition as shown on plat received March 8, 1994, with the following
conditions:
' 1. Park and trail dedication fees to be collected per city ordinance.
' 2. Provide the following easements:
The Press/Kinder Care
April
6, 1994
Page
13
8.
The grading/utility plan shall be revised to incorporate storm sewers in the parking lot's
drive aisles for The Press. Detailed drainage calculations for a 10 -year storm event
'
should be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval.
9.
The applicant shall apply and comply with the necessary permits from the appropriate
'
agencies (MPCA, watershed district, and City Building Department).
10.
Silt fence shall also be placed along the north property line where the parking lot for The
Press is being relocated.
'
11.
A rock construction entrance shall also be placed at the driveway entrance to the
Kindercare site off of Dell Road.
12.
The applicant shall utilize the existing water service from Dell Road. Open cutting of
Dell Road will be prohibited.
'
13.
The main thoroughfare (drive aisle) located on The Press site north of the main parking
lot area should be a minimum width of 26 feet with turning radiuses at 77th Street West
of 30 feet. In addition, the main thoroughfare (drive aisle) shall be posted with no
'
parking signs.
14.
Both driveway access points shall be constructed in accordance to the City's typical
industrial driveway apron detail.
15.
The applicant shall be responsible for all boulevard restoration including the sidewalk
'
along Dell Road. The applicant shall provide the City with a security deposit (letter of
credit or cash escrow) in the amount of $5,000 to guarantee boulevard restoration. All
boulevards disturbed as a result of the site improvements shall be restored with sod.
16.
Conditions of the Building Official's memo dated March 25, 1994."
I II, SUBDIVISION
"The Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat for Subdivision #94-2
for Park One 3rd Addition as shown on plat received March 8, 1994, with the following
conditions:
' 1. Park and trail dedication fees to be collected per city ordinance.
' 2. Provide the following easements:
The Press/Kinder Care
April 6, 1994
Page 14 ,
a. A standard 5 -foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated along the
common lot line between Lots 1, and 2 and 3, Block 1. '
b. Dedication of public right -of -way.
C. A 15 -foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated on the final plat ,
along the west property line of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 to facilitate the extension
of the sewer service.
3. Enter into a site plan development agreement acceptable to the city.
4. A driveway or cross- access easement for use of the access of off 77th Street West. The '
easement shall be dedicated in favor of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1. The easement
agreement shall be drafted and filed concurrently with a private maintenance agreement
acceptable to the City.
5. The developer shall obtain and comply with all necessary permits from the watershed I
district, health department, etc.
6. Erosion control measures (silt fence - Type 1) shall be shown on the grading plan. Silt
fence shall be placed along the north property line where the parking lot for The Press
is being relocated."
III. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
"The Planning Commission recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit #94 -1 subject to the
following conditions:
1. Compliance with conditions of site plan and plat approval.
2. Obtain all applicable state, county, and city licenses."
ATTACHMENTS
1. Memo from Dave Hempel, Assistant City Engineer, dated March 25, 1994.
2. Memo from Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal, dated March 10, 1994.
3. Memo from Steve Kirchman dated March 25, 1994.
4. Project Narrative Document dated March 7, 1994.
5. Plans received March 8, 1994.
I MEMORANDUM
u
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
TO: Sharmin Al -Jaff, Planner II
�f
FROM: Dave Hempel, Assistant City Engineer
DATE: March 25, 1994
SUBJ: Review of Preliminary and Final Plat - Park One 3rd Addition and Site Plan
Review for Kindercare
Land Use Review File No. 94 -7
Upon review of the site plans dated March 7, 1994, prepared by RLK Associates, Ltd. and the
preliminary plat prepared by Eagan, Field and Nowak, Inc., I offer the following comments and
recommendations:
GRADING AND DRAINAGE
In addition to the site drainage for the Kindercare site, it appears a large portion of the east
parking lot for The Press is also proposed to be redone to accommodate future expansions. The
overall grading plan appears acceptable; however, additional storm sewers will be necessary to
convey storm water runoff from the parking lot relocation on The Press site. The grading/utility
plan should be revised incorporating the existing or proposed storm sewer system. Detailed
drainage calculations for both sites (Kindercare/Press) should be submitted to the City Engineer
for review and approval. The drainage calculations shall be for a 10 -year storm event.
Based on the grading plan, it appears site grading will exceed five acres in size thus requiring
permits from the MPCA (NPDES) and watershed district. The site will be served from storm
sewers that were installed in 77th Street West and Dell Road. These storm drainage systems
convey storm runoff to a regional storm water pond located north of the site. Therefore, no on-
site ponding will be required as a result of this development. The development will be
responsible for the applicable Surface Water Management Utility fee in accordance with city
ordinance.
r
Sharmin AI -Jaff
March 25, 1994
Page 2 ,
EROSION CONTROL I
The plans are proposing silt fence along the east side of the Kindercare lot to protect Dell Road.
Staff also believes it would be appropriate to install silt fence along the north property line of I
The Press adjacent the grading work to protect 77th Street West.
A rock construction entrance is proposed at the north driveway access to The Press. Staff '
believes the construction activity on the Kindercare site will also necessitate a rock construction
entrance at the proposed entrance off of Dell Road. Staff recommends that a rock construction
entrance be provided at the Dell Road driveway access as well. '
UTILITIES
The Kindercare site is proposed to be served from a watermain located in Dell Road. The plans
propose open cutting in Dell Road to tap the watermain. According to the City's records, an 8-
inch water line has been stubbed into the site just north of the proposed connection. Staff
recommends that the existing water service be utilized and open cutting of Dell Road prohibited.
Sanitary sewer service is proposed to be extended to the site from 77th Street West. The plans ,
propose to extend a 6 -inch service to the Kindercare site along the west property lines of Lots
2 and 3, Block 1. The appropriate drainage and utility easement should be dedicated on the final '
plat along the service line. Since both the sanitary and water services lines will be private (not
maintained by the City), the applicable permits and inspections should be coordinated by the
applicant through the City Building Department. ,
ACCESSIPARKIITG LOT CIRCULATION
Dell Road is a four -lane divided collector street. Access to and from the Kindercare site via Dell ,
Road is restricted to a right -in right -out only due to the existing center median. The parking lot
configuration appears to circulate well with the secondary access from The Press. However, the '
disadvantage is the new parking lot and access onto Dell Road will make it very convenient for
traffic from The Press to short circuit through the Kindercare site to get to Dell Road and onto
Trunk Highway 5. 1
The proposed warehouse expansion at The Press will involve relocating the existing drive aisles
and parking lots. The proposed drive aisle will be constructed to 24 -feet wide. The site currently '
has a number of semi - trailers parked adjacent to the drive aisles. With the anticipated truck
traffic movement, staff believes the main thoroughfare (drive aisle) should be a minimum of 26-
feet wide with turning radiuses onto 77th Street West of 30 feet. In addition, the drive aisles
lying north of the main parking lot should be posted for no parking on both sides. Both driveway
r
Sharmin Al -Jaff
March 25, 1994
Page 3
access points (77th Street West and Dell Road) should be constructed in accordance to the City's
typical industrial driveway apron detail (see Attachment No. 1).
A 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk exists along the west side of Dell Road adjacent the site. The
applicant shall be responsible for replacing any sidewalk damaged during construction of the site
improvements. The applicant should post a security escrow (letter of credit or cash escrow) in
' the amount of $5,000 to guarantee boulevard restoration.
MISCELLANEOUS
' The plans propose installation of irrigation systems. The applicant should be aware the
appropriate permits and inspections will be necessary for the installation of the irrigation system
' through the City's Building Department.
All boulevard areas disturbed as a result of site improvements should be restored with sod.
RECOMMENDED CONDMONS OF APPROVAL
'
1.
The grading /utility plan shall be revised to incorporate storm sewers in the parking lots
and drive aisles for The Press. Detailed drainage calculations for both sites (The Press
and Kindercare) for a 10 -year storm event should be submitted to the City Engineer for
review and approval.
2.
The applicant shall apply and comply with the necessary permits from the appropriate
'
agencies (MPCA, watershed district, and City Building Department).
3.
Silt fence shall also be placed along the north property line of The Press adjacent the
'
grading activities to protect 77th Street West.
'
4.
A rock construction entrance shall also be placed at the driveway entrance to the
Kindercare site off of Dell Road.
5.
The applicant shall utilize the existing water service from Dell Road. Open cutting of
Dell Road will be prohibited.
'
6.
A 15 -foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated on the final plat along
the west property line of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 to facilitate the extension of the sanitary
sewer service to the Kindercare site.
'
7.
The main thoroughfare (drive aisle) located on The Press site north of the main parking
lot area should be a minimum width of 26 feet with turning radiuses at 77th Street West
Sharmin Al -Jaff
March 25, 1994
Page 4
of 30 feet. In addition, the main thoroughfare (drive aisle) shall be posted with no
parking signs.
8. Both driveway access points shall be constructed in accordance to the City's typical
industrial driveway apron detail.
9. The applicant shall be responsible for all boulevard restoration including the sidewalk
along Dell Road. The applicant shall provide the City with a security deposit (letter of
credit or cash escrow) in the amount of $5,000 to guarantee boulevard restoration. All
boulevards disturbed as a result of the site improvements shall be restored with sod.
Jms
Attachments: 1. Driveway apron detail.
c: Charles Folch, City Engineer
gAeng \dave \pc \parkonelfpr
0
m
N
CO
RIGHT OF WAY
CONTRACTION JOINTS
MAXIMUM SPACING
IN VALLEY GUTTER
m 8' -�
n
cn 0
r*i -n .
VARIES - SEE PLAN..
8618 CIG
BITUMINOUS
5'
86J 8 CURB
t GUTTER
TRIANGULAR VALLEY GUTTER
5' -0
EXPANSION
JOINTS
CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTEF
L * MIN 2%
7' #L 1 ` ' �, 7i ,. ' , , ' �v ; v� ,•� D ` . 7112.
Q . . • 1 p
r
r
r'
m
NOTES
o
Z
1) REINFORCE VALLEY GUTTER AND TRIANG
.�
a
SECTIONS WITH 6'x6'x *6 WELDED WIRE MESH
(A
2) CONTRACTION JOINT SHALL BE 1 13 THE DEPTH
?
N
OF THE SLAB,
~
r
3) 5lTUMM#OUS FAYM SECTION TO THE RIGHT
OF WAY IS THE SAME AS THE STREET
PAVING SECTION.
r
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
TO: Sharmin Al -Jaff, Planner H
FROM: Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal
DATE: March 10, 1994
SUBJ: The Press Expansion and New Kindercare Facility
Planning Case 94 -2 SUB, 94 -1 CUP, 94 -1 SPR
I have reviewed the plans and have the following requirements:
1. Submit utility plans showing existing and proposed fire hydrant locations. A
determination will then be made if additional hydrants will be needed.
2. In the new north parking lot, labeled "One Way ", maintain a 20 foot wide
driving lane between parking stalls. This will satisfy the 20 foot wide fire
apparatus access road width.
3. Provide turning radius of fire apparatus access roads to Chanhassen Fire
Marshal and Chanhassen City Engineer for approval.
4. A ten foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants.
MEMORANDUM
r
i
I MEMORANDUM
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
TO: Sharmin Al -Jaff, Planner I
FROM: Steve A. Kirchman. Building Officials (�
DATE: March 25, 1994
SUBJ: 94 -2 SUB, 94 -1 CUP & 94 -1 SPR (Press expansion & Kindercare)
I have been asked for comments on the above referenced Planning Department application.
Background:
The existing facility was built in phases beginning in 1978 and continuing until 1992.
Analysis:
Because the building was built over a period of time and many portions were constructed before
the Inspections Division performed plan reviews, the City does not have accurate records of the
existing structure. In order to perform an accurate plan review of the proposed addition the
occupancy classification(s), occupant load and construction type of both the existing building
and the proposed addition must be determined. These determinations will allow occupant loads
to be assigned , exiting requirements to be evaluated and construction requirements determined.
Accurately dimensioned plans indicating the use of all spaces are needed to insure accuracy.
The submitted site plans does not indicate any handicapped parking spaces. The Minnesota State
Building Code (MSBC) requires that such spaces be provide at the rate of one handicapped space
per every 50 spaces in the lot(s). This `calculated out to 7 spaces for the Press and 1 space for
the Kindercare. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) has specific requirements for van
spaces which are not now part of the MSBC "These requirements are not enforced by the
Inspections Division, but should be incorporated into the site plan. Site approaches are regulated
by the MSBC, and are not detailed on the site plan. Curb cuts, width, texture and slope are
details that must be included on the site plans.
Sharmin Al -Jaff
March 25, 1994
Page 2
UBC Appendix Chapter 38 as amended by the MSBC was adopted by the City in 1987.
Consequently, the proposed addition to The Press as well as the Kindercare will be required to I
be fire sprinMered.
Recommendations: I
1. Submit a 1/8" = 1 " -0" scale plan of the entire existing building indicating dimensions and
use of all spaces on all floors.
2. Revise site plans to show site approach details and handicap parking stalls in compliance
with MSBC Chapter 1340.
g:\safetyNsak\memos�p] an1press.s j 1
NARRATIVE DOCUMENT
Kindercare
The Press
SITE PLAN APPROVAL SUBXHSSION
March 7, 1994
1
Prepared For:
i
CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA
Developer:
1
MARCUS CORPORATION _
1
'
Prepared By:
'
RLK Associates, Ltd.
922 Mainstreet
1
Hopkins, MN 55343
(612) 933 -0972
March 7, 1994 1
Site Plan Approval Submission
The Press - Warehouse Expansion
Kindercare Inc. - Daycare Facility
Dell Road and State Highway 5
Chanhassen, Minnesota I
By: '
Marcus Corporation
10001 Wayzata Blvd. '
Minnetonka, MN 55343
REQUESTS '
City review for site plan approval and replatting of a 15± acre parcel at the northwest quadrant
of Dell Road and State Highway 5, which will provide the following:
• Warehouse expansion of 54,720 sq. ft. for the Press.
- Rearrangement of East parking lot and entrance out of W. 77th Street.
- The addition of 16 parking stalls.
• Kindercare day care facility on a 1.75± acre parcel.
• 1.5 acre outlot for future development. '
• Site plan, preliminary and final plat approval.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1
The Press Inc., an office /warehouse facility has occupied the existing 15 acre parcel for the last
13 years. In order to accommodate an expansion of 54,720 sq. ft. the existing parking lot and
plat have to be amended. A replatting of the property into three developable parcels will occur
with this application. A coauthorized site plan has been developed by the Press and _,
Kindercare, a nationally known company providing quality day care and children support
'
services. The proposed development will provide a new access from West 77th Street to be
utilized by the Press, Kindercare and a future outlot north of Kindercare. The rearranged
parking for the Press will enable landscape islands and a landscaped entry boulevard to be
'
installed. The proposed expansion of the Press will enclose the loading dock area, and will
architecturally match the existing exterior of scored concrete parcels.
'
Kindercare ro oses to develop the corner lot at Dell Road and State Highway 5 according to
P P
the attached site plan which identifies a 10,315 sq. ft. building, a 45 stall parking lot, children's
play area and impressive landscaping. In addition a right in /right out access is proposed on
,
Dell Road. This access will allow vehicles to access State Highway 5 at an improved
signalized intersection.
C�
Sheet 6 Kindercare Building Elevations
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The site is currently occupied by the Press, a 186,000 sq. ft. office, warehouse, manufacturing
' facility, and a series of parking lots which provide space for 298 vehicles. The intersection of
Dell Road and State Highway 5 has recently been improved to provide a signalized intersection
complete with turn lanes and a center median on Dell Road. An 8' wide bituminous
bicycle /pedestrian trail running parallel within the north right -of -way of State Highway 5 will
be maintained in its current alignment. The existing landscaping on the south side of this
parcel will be preserved and added to in order to be consistent with the City landscape code and
' Highway 5 Corridor Study Objectives. The sidewalk on the west side of Dell Road will also be
maintained and repaired if any utility construction disrupts it.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That part of Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlot B, Second Addition lying west of Dell Road and North
of State Highway 5.
SITE DESCRIPTION
The proposed development is consistent with the comprehensive plan which calls for quality
office /industrial development within this area of Chanhassen. Expansion of existing facilities is
to be encouraged wherever possible and a pooling of resources is being utilized in order to
coordinate the access, utility /drainage facilities and landscaping for the warehouse expansion
and Kindercare development. A day care facility centrally located among the existing
office /warehouse buildings will be a welcome land use for the number of employees currently
employed within a 1/2 mile radius of this site which is in the eastern portion of Chanhassen.
The proposed site plan will greatly enhance the northwest corner of Dell Road and State
Highway 5, acting as an eastern entry to the City of Chanhassen.
March 7, 1994 Page 2
1
THE PRESS - WAREHOUSE EXPANSION
Descriptive Narrative
'
Attached with this narrative are six lan sheets which identify the project location, proposed
P fy P J P P
'
site plan, grading /utility systems, platting, landscape plan and building elevation. The attached
plan sheets are:
Sheet 1 Title Sheet /Site Plan
'
Sheet 2 Existing Conditions
Sheet 3 Grading /Utility Plan
Sheet 4 Landscape Plan
Sheet 5 Preliminary /Final Plat
Sheet 6 Kindercare Building Elevations
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The site is currently occupied by the Press, a 186,000 sq. ft. office, warehouse, manufacturing
' facility, and a series of parking lots which provide space for 298 vehicles. The intersection of
Dell Road and State Highway 5 has recently been improved to provide a signalized intersection
complete with turn lanes and a center median on Dell Road. An 8' wide bituminous
bicycle /pedestrian trail running parallel within the north right -of -way of State Highway 5 will
be maintained in its current alignment. The existing landscaping on the south side of this
parcel will be preserved and added to in order to be consistent with the City landscape code and
' Highway 5 Corridor Study Objectives. The sidewalk on the west side of Dell Road will also be
maintained and repaired if any utility construction disrupts it.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That part of Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlot B, Second Addition lying west of Dell Road and North
of State Highway 5.
SITE DESCRIPTION
The proposed development is consistent with the comprehensive plan which calls for quality
office /industrial development within this area of Chanhassen. Expansion of existing facilities is
to be encouraged wherever possible and a pooling of resources is being utilized in order to
coordinate the access, utility /drainage facilities and landscaping for the warehouse expansion
and Kindercare development. A day care facility centrally located among the existing
office /warehouse buildings will be a welcome land use for the number of employees currently
employed within a 1/2 mile radius of this site which is in the eastern portion of Chanhassen.
The proposed site plan will greatly enhance the northwest corner of Dell Road and State
Highway 5, acting as an eastern entry to the City of Chanhassen.
March 7, 1994 Page 3
THE PRESS - WAREHOUSE EXPANSION
Descriptive Narrative
DESCRIPTION OF THE PLAN SHEETS
Site Plan t
As illustrated, the Press property will be rearranged to allow for the Kindercare parcel and one '
additional parcel to be developed at a future date. The joint entry from West 77th Street will
provide a separation for passenger cars and truck traffic. The landscape entry islands will
direct traffic in a logical and aesthetic manner while increasing the number of parking stalls to
be consistent with the Zoning Code for the proposed 54,720 sq. ft. warehouse addition. Based '
on the current division between office and warehouse functions, it is estimated the current
parking lot exceeds City parking code requirements by approximately 40 stalls. The proposed
landscape parking islands will enhance the image of the existing parking lot and provide '
locations for overstory trees and light fixtures which will be relocated from the current parking
lot.
Drainage and Utility Plan '
The parking lot for the Press will be expanded and surface drained from the south to West
'
77th. The proposed drainage pattern is consistent with how the site drains today. Once the
surface water is collected in the West 77th storm sewer system, it is directed to the existing
stormwater pond one block away on the north side of the Ver- Sa -Til building. The proposed
,
drainage system is consistent with the City's stormwater management plan.
The Kindercare parking lot will be surface drained to a storm sewer at the northeast corner of
the lot and directed to the storm sewer system within Dell Road. The Dell Road storm sewer
,
system also drains directly to the stormwater pond north of Ver- Sa -Til.
Water service for Kindercare will be taken from an existing watermain located within Dell
,
Road. At this time it is proposed that a new service be added which will necessitate an open
cut with Dell Road. If an available water service is known, the plan will be changed to _utilize
the existing stop box. Sanitary sewer service will be directed to the North and tie into an
existing 6" wye within W. 77th Street. It is anticipated the future development of the lot north
of Kindercare will also utilize this sanitary sewer line.
Landscape Plan
The landscape plan provides for a very generous planting plan on the perimeter of the site
'
adjacent to State Highway 5 and Dell Road. The parking island landscape plan was developed
to coordinate the site lighting and overstory trees within the parking islands. The plant material
selected provides for a variety of ornamental conifer and deciduous trees and shrubs to create
'
colorful and enhanced landscape plan on a year round basis. The planting adjacent to Highway
5 has received special treatment in order to be compatible with the Highway 5 Corridor plan
and function as a entry statement to the City of Chanhassen.
March 7, 1994
THE PRESS - WAREHOUSE EXPANSION
Descriptive Narrative
Lighting Plan
Page 4
All proposed site lighting will either be relocated existing fixtures from the Press parking lot or
similar poles and fixtures with a downcast shoe box fixture to conceal all visible light sources.
The maximum height of all poles will be 25 feet.
BUILDING ELEVATION
Kindercare corporate headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia provided the architectural drawing
elevations to be submitted in this package. The facade will consist of face brick wainscoting on
all four sides and EIFS panel systems above the wainscoting. The entry will have a canopy
with columns and ceramic tile detailing.
The proposed Press expansion will match the existing architectural style of scored concrete
panels. The expansion will be warehouse space only and will not require windows or office
treatments.
�r `ter
�
rr r■ r �
� � �• r � r
rr •r �r r� r� �r
RUN DATE 03/0494. HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATICN SYSTEM
REPORT N0. PI435401
PROPERTY.OPNER8 LIST
PAGE 10
BATCH 004
14 07 -116 -22 34 0038
14 07- 116 -22 34.0009
14 07- 116 -22 34 0012
�.
PROP ADDR
18780 78TH Sr X.
00014 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
07660 . QUATTRO OR
OK4ER NAME
THE PRESS 'INC
THE PRESS INC
MAYTEK INC
TAXPAYER
THE PRESS INC.
THE PRESS INC
WAYTEK INC
NAME/ADOR
18780 W 78TH ST
18780 78TH ST H
7660 QUATTRO DR PO 8OX 690
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
CHANHASSEH MN ,55317
14 07-116-223+40017
14 07- 116 -22 340018
14 18- 116 -22 21 0002
PROP ADDR
18400 77TH ST H
67700 QUATTRO DR
19011 LAKE DR E
0;'tMR NAME
D J BOGEMA .
FRANC. JR $ MARILYN A BEDDOR
DATASERV INC
TAXPAYER
0 J BOGEMA
FRANC JR 8 MARILYN A BEODOR,
DATASERV INC
r
NAME /ADDR
18400 77TH ST K
649 STH AVE S
ATTN LEGAL DEPARTMENT
\
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
NAPLES FL 33949 -
19011 LAKE DR'E
CHANHASSEN MdV 5531y
61 07- 116 -22 43 0004
61 •07- 116 —U 43 0006
61 0Y- 116 -22 43.0007
PROP ADDR
18210 787H ST K
07619.• KIMERLY LA
07611 KXME RL L
1 K EY LA`
CWER NAME
FRANC BEDDOR JR
F R SILVERS i L-A S SILVERS
L S O':
f
TAXPAYER.
ROMUND.COWANY INC
FREDRIC.R'$ LORI A S SILVERS
LEE•5 i
& DEBORAH t SELKA
l
NAtt CAl?DR;..
5202. RIVEk:.RII.
7619 KIMBERLY .LA
761l LA.
EDEN .PRAIRIE MH 55344. ,
. KIMBERLY
EDEN PRAIRIE h41 • . 55346
b1. :07- 114-22 43 0008
61X16- 11622 12 9025
PROF ADDR
07603.' K- THURLY LA-
00061 ADDRESS UNASSIGWD
04HER NAME
R M. FOOTE d J L FOITJE
TAHITEl1 PROPERTIES
TAXPAYER •,
NANE/ADCi ':
RANOALL E d JULIA L' TE
. F00
' t '
TANDEkF, PROPERTIES
TOTAL BATCH 004 001X..
7603 KIMERLY 'LA -•. . . .
2765 CASCO POINT RA
'
EDEM :44 AIRIE MN : , •55346.
.:. HAYZATA MH • 55391
l
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE
AN ACCURATE AHD TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PR T THE BEST
OF MY KNOMEDGE AND BELIEF.
~
DATE B
Z
m m m = m r m = m = m m w w Ir -"
J .Sf
A
Y U��„;tN Y�� .7�I�
;i;;, ar :.r.a a7'" r
( "� "4:: PS4y Y. 1'g'r • � x{ r'i. nI
lti { �N • Y,.Br`f,� I rir�� ,Z' ..h c.. ?rk. t ty.. :.'`! ;' F... r 1F }, std -� ,..,,�rr',f r'' },n$ r�.', h; �S 3 r ♦. 7 �; { ,}j
f, /Jy �R.'�a� ° 'T.;Yj :'Ma 4 z::. v �.�•li', ,r�.,t '�Y' ,'.4r, ,r y z. �..� 3 ,. .�'.r , � ,.sr .r � , p.. ', '�� ��� ' t ,:,.�. �J ,. ti a�l��; �:t �.� ;� ,�..
i r�;.�
' x ° %��l? .•, .fle � I ij1�'. ' t t A�t -. ' � +� �• x_''� � � r ir t ,� w ',+ } x ux i;r� r � r Y + -�:
'
F CJS r >v
z v
1
" rb }W
t •� � �P F� ���plPq v• h
« w'I �
I m m= m m m= m r m r m == r= m M W
,. "� �: '..� ��`..,i�� �..:.i . �ww;!� .,X' p-} +� J ': r "�:. -
V
a � � t , � �� � � Y NILSFM'0'�: ! �Y L eh�� �. - � rav� :y,.l: K
;-, -, * ..qr
a
Yt�� * � � `� fir
Al.
�' �• �1�Y��� / / •��•;� 1 ,� \ ^ i Yom} 1 +f 1 ._ "�
VA.
lot,
IV.
4 1
E P
m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m = m
[i
F1
Ll
I I
n
L e i
Planning Com Mission Meeting - April 6, 1994
passenger bus. We're up to an articulated bus at 65 passengers in terms of reverse commute.
It's only going to get larger. I guess I'm looking for that type of opportunity where we can
help the employers have that type of advantage because it does help them with regard to
employees. I would just go on record with my comments to the City Council and to the
applicant that perhaps, and I will extend the services of Southwest Metro Transit, to sit down
and perhaps help you identify where those type of advantages may be able to come into this
site element. I think this is an excellent idea. I hope we see more of this but I just think
we're missing some of the fine tuning in terms of the elements and I would certainly
encourage that perhaps staff, from the city, staff from Southwest Metro Transit, can sit down.
If it requires a little bit of redesigning, why not take that opportunity now because based on
my experience, based on where the public policy is going on a regional level from the metro
area, it's only going to pay off as a positive investment now later on in the future.
Scott: Do you want to see this reworked?
Mancino: That's what I was going to ask. Wouldn't you want to see it reworked and see it
again?
Harberts: Well from my professional experience I would say yes. But I would want the, I
would really encourage that the applicant want to take that initiative to do it. I don't want
government, public policy to be a hinderance but I want it to be viewed as a very positive
and like I said, from what my experience is, as well as with where the region is going in
terms of public policy and transit, I think if you take that little extra time to maybe take
another look at how transit and how this type of pedestrian element can be blended to make it
more advantageous, it's going to pay off long term for the business.
Mancino: So we have some issues that we want to see.
Scott: Yeah, reading from my notes here we see traffic circulation. We see impervious
surface. We see two major things relating to the Highway 5 and related ordinances which
appearance of the warehouse addition. We have setback concerns on the Kindercare facility.
Are those major to the point where we want to see it reworked again? Yes? Okay. Can I
have a motion please?
Mancino: Okay. I will move that the Planning Commission not approve the site plan review
#94 -1 as shown on site plan received.
Conrad: Do you want to table it?
Mancino: Oh, okay. I move that we table it and see it again. With all the recommendations
14
1I
I
Pa N.'u m b er : 1
it i f i
C e UJr Dot,eier
of wisconsin, Hiiwaukce 5�1226.
e ion of health effects from exposure to electromagnetic
1 7-36, 199 F&L
I
e f - tsl
C L
JL dl
&t C) It 1 U E- e', (- y
t C"
e X F. t o 1 . o w n t. e f: I T e
t
S C-d a t t o t -:1 on Ili
n- C7
s ec J T t h if- p u i c me a
t e
c it a 1 1 a nu. F1
u E, c a I effects that may be ) in
h- -tf: ( C-F (:on people. Fit - t- e. v
t m C- nisms this relationship are tar from clea-i
�- j a - o f I )-
u,:1 es s�jogest t hat EMiFs might be cancer promoters but. a r E
C C c rI l fl t j a t o s . A. t the i & of h u rn 8 n
ep l
4.-en approximately 50 studies have examined the
-r) of EMF exposures with adult and chi ldhoc---
cancers. Although the possibility of a correlation is weak, it
n t be discounted, and further research is needed. In the
r: ea,tim a practice of "prudent avoidance" of prolonged
F, o U tc. ErIlFs is warranted. [References: 891
T a u e Id e nt ifi er
E U C)
E vision Ar m s t r c n L a L
(7.; j e T C,
i at
h effects O ff' elec L r I r magnetic Tleids
i c s - i t he t e ui e e: v j, E: w
-�p- t i o i i L I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c r owa ve Power V`11 El ectr omagnetic E ni y
;j-, s ect actin s
I
rl
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
P ac,
i--. u u I t
-tromag.rietic FieldExae [Adverse f ects]
Exposure
C up t C 181 EXPOSU)
1 i Cr 0 C C -I C, & D T_ X F C) E'. U j S G ci o) rT, a 11
r rortc d t be a s s o c a i t h h e I t h pr
6- -7. 1_' r e 7`1_ C- d U C t i EC +
M
effects c:orj+li,nLe to be blished in fl'i't
Invalid st tements r e i
i - tects are c h a I i e e JL n th. 1 S p - e r r e p rD i
e Ur e E:F'iaY r D I` T -
:s I.() V_deC) CIEFiaY J.
o rn t e I e v i::n o n
3 f C e T microwaves ti
L L S c e - f - i CG b 1 e i e C t r C heat
P U t , Z
F C WE�'[ i tr a f j c
e X F.C. a 1 0 e 8, r e a Tl,� L C Z -tecer:
u
n c L
er U Pa i e i o 1 1 e a I � h E f er t. s c t L re ^ - 7
c.J Djnl- t ic I ie I cl-s Li eL ter coFj
6 , 199:; Apr 2
. Headings
E ! t_; u _1 t
L r E-) i n Neopi asms./ep E p i d e m 1 o c. 9 y
rein kieo F i a s i P. s / e t. E tio l o gy ]
Effects]
u rna-- n
E p i %de , n i o I o y
i ri i a & t FEt i o I o
l awns /et [ E t i o l o g y ]
i,; e o:) e n
U n 1. -1 ij n t, 1 f I e r
t I
. F r r i t 1 C �,i. L.? l i v e 'f i t j� .
vt c'emi c:la_; i, ca l studieS on thE. reJ tic null] c
YO p su;
cle��flla• - Ie�1C e:� o�. rc- to
Z.
- -on ! <:os h L Eisei Zas,shi - Japanese Journal of PI! }Dlic Health.
'J irD - r1 i - 2 93 Oct .
NieS! 1 Subject Headings
�'_:1. -uti cnla rlet i ields: /a� [-ndveYse Effects]
strac.t
:i� `Illci n
*' oplasrns /ep [Epidemiology]
;= =r 'et !_Etiology]
_ = r Eri�
s. r, F actors
c�1C��;iI_I- c�_iiCal �t : 1 -1 !'icz`✓ h�eeTl pUhliE'hed that
i del t eY. ^�i tll e_to 4 I o ill eti
_ _. _ ric l" = �Gl•JeT" Uric COUld increase the risk �r
as leukemia a
�cc Sh0) "tCcorr, _ - c>t : he Lud1eS al - e Sl c
not to allott,� concll_�icr= _
iE r.a a 1 O ce r<C tv1" cu iL
e t 1 Gl CaS� Of cccl_!�ational exposure the f indi?i js do n;7t
cT) l electrorllar;netic Held ex( cisu)i 6 iS 'a Yi i�
�t� =� �l•J? L' -1 irlfoT "f l ist iGrl s to, "Se to
_ .. = _ r: � _ ... • . _.. � t 1 rl � w 1 � i� c L l_ r ti" c � Y V r l� � � I , ...? i .. a L e t � .
_ icl iii Lrle aYea ShCUi� e puY "SUe�a L Refel - ences
�;c�.ltny children ( letter )] . [Danish]
U� tt for Langer. 155(41 1��;3 Oct 11
e a d i n g s
�,', r;orrna i ides /et [Etiology]
r!�:r:ormalities.�'pc [prevention & Control]
ti.cn/ et [Etiology]
*c. _eCtl Orin netic F ieluS/ ae LAdveYSe E i i ects
r ern.; !.e
i; u rn a n
Occupational /ae [Adverse Effects]
:_Mors
1�
1 -7
r�
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 • _ i L : e IUe rlt i tier
�J
P u I a I a E lHo ng i sto tl Y
V
V a I Ju s -7 E . -7 a -,- v i n e_ T
T E t i U
o Pu I-b 1 ic Hea U n 1v er s i t y o H.;=_ I s i n k i , F - *L T I a n d
y
1 E i r" C T CaTICer in Finnisin children i close to power line
U &
r - 7
1 O 9
-7 r
; J
T ate the risk of cancer in chlic•i
dead power iirtes with magnetic fields of
F G I C o h' )- t E-:,t .E T T I 1 \!�
m i C N. I L , - - Uv -
. � I .
11 n SUDJECTS68 300 boys and 6c, CDC g: )- I s a
V.!
c Year i i T du r i ng 197069 within 500 m of overhead p c e r
s
n e s o f 11 C) 4 0 'D kV i 1 magnetic f ieids calcu.11ated to be ) or
m ic ro: .,-� i ;
L L
_;eCTS were identified by record linkages of
_Lo n w d e registers . MAIN OUTCOME 1 of
S i r, +C µ i rL� UP for CaTiCer and standardised in
T ail cancers and pai for nervous system tumours
m a and lymphoma. RESULTS--In the whole cohort 140 cases
- ncer obser 145 expected; standardised irl.ilenc.:�
1 i de nc & i nterva l 0.01 to I .1 No
C-1 iy significant increases in all cancers and in
lymphoma were found in children at aTly eX
st -Listir sigmit 'cant excess of nervous s'
L C) y s U t T _E 1 Fl. C i) C-X C! C. ,
n - oT
r- >: F su I
C'' 0 .2 - ;.i c) or jr) -ilative
C C.T Res_`Ldentia magnetic
I
I
an�;Ylissi o? "! po«Jer lines do not constitute n;� ,jor
C r 1Ch p roblerr! Ye0 rd T � j C Ca i1e r(I =1 1
r:Ur!li�Cl do TIOt __11.0:'! tuYthEr Conclusions about th(.}' disk t:)
or! er rr, n tic fie IdE
rlielaC- rl A Schuigen G.
4- .1.
r & r 0C1Ety, (.J iv E.i0n tC >'i CaIICeY EpidOrrl
:. ..._c rit31- ri: `;i; voltace facilities an risk, of cancE'f r!
t`- - C C r F T
1 Oct
i ILl" , 1 tl.......1..e:-
LL,F id 0 - C"'Y 1
t
rri:enta i xposure
1 ni:.'ct ,LEtiolo
_ro, - s
--- in'✓estiqatE whethel YP.si ti �c° r,c w cnG at'�c.
h — ih voltage installations increases a ch11.0'_
`I s' s gitih
Cif �a�ICc-r acid w hether r CG1`YelatE with the stren
_ a F 1 1e 1G D`SIGN ---A population based casc-'co nt
L i „.- DEnr`ial" SUi JEC I - ___17Cti7 Ci111d1`En under the a; e
turi!our of the central nervous system, O1
m._:._. phoriia d:ac_<rlosed in l -)68 8E and 4766 children tali =-n
cents__ l popl_Jlat ion register MAIN UIJTCC !,
T before and after �i .rth to crii�Liii Of i o' i(iO'i
_ - 4VC kV ti alnsmission Connections and substations
ci _. =�& - Ja ted historical electromac;netic fields calculated c >ri
n� ,asis of current load on line, phase ordering of line.,
from the dwelling. RESULTS- °A significant assoc _at__�,
cc J.1 major ty OT chi IdhoOG c an� cl" ` iui')1 .
__!'; E' Lo u _ _;rEL 1C f -ci , f YO!I hl Si' voitc ,e in= L&
tiO �i.F At ) O micr
_ �Clation was -een toCids latio 1.S r F'C'aC_._�_
I
I
T U t
L
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t ai , 1 ! . r , - !
E rl L
E iC Resea We
C
t r
-'D FTI a �D n e t a C 's
1 0 e e c r I
_t cl.: F'. ti 14( 3 j :�7204 lc)93
Head'in,s
In '11edl
t ' r a T - I e t j F7 I d e .-- 17f t
f ii! i
F i Death/et [Etioiogy
[Eti0iogy]
d C E:'�
i r e L)
a F U S E- C' M z ' F e t i C T i C P I'i F
I
Pa
C - On
-'
the ba_ , L t e
a dc 2
--fta on electricity
t 1 1 desc I _iwe d ata
'
n} or. a Tj
i ric i oe nc e of chi i dhood c a ric e )- J L n
D e r) m r k a n c e
`_�
e t was
n u d e d that t h e p) - opo) - tiorl C)
' I I- I I �_ -
T C d
71 C S E, i E iy
C C 'u s e C2 b y 5 0 [-; e i e c t r oma g' ne t i c
f ields must be
I
T U t
L
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t ai , 1 ! . r , - !
E rl L
E iC Resea We
C
t r
-'D FTI a �D n e t a C 's
1 0 e e c r I
_t cl.: F'. ti 14( 3 j :�7204 lc)93
Head'in,s
In '11edl
t ' r a T - I e t j F7 I d e .-- 17f t
f ii! i
F i Death/et [Etioiogy
[Eti0iogy]
d C E:'�
i r e L)
a F U S E- C' M z ' F e t i C T i C P I'i F
I
I
T E C .
Ff 1" C. a F
f ..- I yC
e T C 1 C "' (7 4- D n- was invc—
ass d' on a total of 707 exposed c T I d '1 L. e X "D S e C-
cj a y
d res began Or
-MF z)s!_j IX
a m an e:Y'p C)'[
FrI e7- n
rimen'
al k-, 01 7 (exre
ntii day 19 post conception p.c. E r
when they w Ye
C
t"� I time
F n r
nulm'De ot plac ital reso)
I T_! r,' Of dead- f -uses; number of ma1form_atA.(:
tetLjEes- - :c - th and! Lbody
a 1 T mass of
t e u e Co rit c. I da r s _,- we re s an)--exposed concurrently with
po T d nc ,'. L
PMF--e , ose' dams, With the exep�ic)n of
"T e X R'D
rfj 1 c had Si-nit iC81 Fr: O'f a C- e T
t t)
7 9,
1 'D T
1 tt
7 1
Tc U S E nvt s
T any c. f the e xp c s c! c F , -
1
E_ E A F'. c a ur e t P �''i F . T ft
I i
F7 ,
1 C
I T
t L.
I Puk'k��_Ia E.
k e M il
F
- "t C) 0 d C 1!C
L
� Z_
7
I 1. 7
a C S
ieidisl/ae [• :idverEe Ett'ectsi
L
L y ide T; i C' i c'
E t io 1, C) ' y �i
i E t I c. . o 0
"D Fri
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
17
L
I
I
I
F
17
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
C-t I T C T Fi Er Ti
FI e a r
c a n c c- in c r, e n r e s i e
P OW & I 1 nee
C J ui rI& i C f, C y 13 71 J 4 C , 7- I 1 '3 0 c t
-I ject Headings
C S C C 'L C) J- 1 -1 d e:
i ea c hoo I
Cl',- 7 1 'd g,
- t t 7
F-c T LT E
a i L x O SuI e 3 1
L
t
L oE-
'L
T 1 � j th t ' Fj e gene =ra e Dy
S;- E;
G arlCer 1 r1c 10 T I C 1 C" e T!
C 1 1 S� ed c ulnde) _
E
I C) C er� L'i - 'L t h TI 3" 'JU
-L F! e"
I i w d i d u r i n t h e p r i o
7
:e t C) i i C. e, 01 trom thei en _nto L 1
A tota of 142 cancer cases were identified
to the Swedish Cancer Re s t r y . T
k-m a and 33 central nervous sy stem t u M.or case = .
C C C T t r 0 S j - e e z, e a t r a T -, e
m t i th stu
b
spot measurements a. n
:�:e mag.--et c field-- g.-eneratE-C' L.y t 'n
L
F C!
6 K 1 j Cl' :� I S e line rt- c o n t ur a t io n , a n o a T
c j nt I nformation about historical loads on the power lines
calculate the magnetic t i e' d- f or t[-,e year closest
!"'hen -t-i,aL cai calculat-ions wej-e use c
ch with
c , + e E.
m. cr o T t e s t i m a t & d re i a v-
Ll rask
the ti,jo ar, w;is a
C r C T -i
e �Ja ri I U C. v e
- ,e n t.h e u e u t o T
J2 w;
I
I
I 1- n t i t i e r
I D
e r e 1 t
i e ri L-� a 3
%
c 1 1
T E. re'r 5 1 s
wrien
t f
ad F:� r
a S 1 n Leuk Res 1?')3 r) ; 1 4
77
- t c t o r s a ma 'e
For
c e n t r a I rt e V !...
'
F i +
C) m
a a Tj -j
cance
c r t
for an w" c a
I 1- n t i t i e r
. ti c + 1 d , S e CJ i t C) i
L-
a S 1 n Leuk Res 1?')3 r) ; 1 4
a i
F i +
t= 3 E- T C e T) e & i e I e C - L 'r a c 1 t Y
t 1 & P I E a C
c t t cl
C, In "D t S t u C, e s-
1 L g., - !- 1 -� r, i- y a e - verse Effects]
L e c t o n a g, n e t ic Fields/ae [Adverse Ef f ects"
T!.Il! e T a- , L posulre/ae Ef 4 1 eCT-S
a r - . ! s/ r p . o M or t a l:ity]
'
/c— LEPidemiclogyl
- a)
ire F) - acteristica.
I J= F:1. ed S t L-1 d e S
_LF e i e c t r c r
a �j I c - It - JL .._
,
I
I
I C.
to human health in p a rt - Lcj I r f -
1 0 C. I J [I': I a 71
n h h a z a r d t t- h F u
Trou- 1 - 'e n f i e
C-1 peo .1 n T" li V e
C E2 t 1 1 �D
ic ht i n h t L r:) 1 0 k c 1 t: Wv'
a r 1t: n e a I - L.� L -L I, C
a t -Lon n a I e
no thc- Dutch popu'at - ion reg`st) it
I I L-
tc ifY retrospectively 3549 inha' itants of t he
there for at least S years between 1956 anca
l ive d i t h'i
-tE.
I L s i o n e - u -ip m e n t an w er e ex p o sed to ri ri
& ci of I --I 1 .0 mi -I i iGauss . The overall standa) E-1
ty a. t ic- and cancer mortality ratios were either not yr
'
} e �' s.t�dy does T C t
_
8 i (D n s of e Y, r o su r e t E L F e F, e t
ri c ef a i di breast C a TI eT
7:
L
Z:7
j
T r,+
Ci C
L I ieids/ae cj v ez- S e, L t e c t j
—ital Exposure/ae [Ad ;er
L "J -,. se E f f e c t s !
Fr:
J e n C e
t
Po ie). Plants
5- r CtcY I C: E
Ffi C- r lca Da t.
'
_ _ _ _ _ _ r t -=-r e TI t r - S!" t a C S w,
I
I
j7-
l w _ kel ilia in C i dr e n 1 1
t o h 0!n electri vo 1 t ac e M itt
S' J E - i e t F f E 0 � T . 1 C f i e i S of ic t T e C, u; e 'Fic Y L!"i F
'E c t i ti - I n c h I r:
e) 1 ✓ 1 I n 8 T aY era c I ose t0 E M, F
I e c I c t r & l i p f o i m e r s. h e l e c t r i c v o I t a Fes'
I = -i C ',- t Y E, rf: 1 S S .1 C - 1, 1 i T a n C-' electric substat i oin E
r i s k Tactor in the de-,./elopment of leukemia in chl lah li
METHODS E, o
y T x cc' C t y . - A L A F.) o.,j e c t v
M T E F� 7
k ud . T h e c a s s er g- O L. r C.F.
t I-- t h .
ird le ,, e I . The diagrios.Ls of lelu km
eia in i
arieties was cont irmed througil biopsy of bone mat c
E erted In the Same= hospital ti l r
t e F) t n E- c), a s i
+ e n t pr c) b m s , ex
F. e Cc. C c . = S d 7 t s w s T e
aT ci z e C��
e W Ee) C-
L ,l El-
t
t
a c u a e d
-
t, a s a c t
f
ct t e r e 'E,
C C 1 T; J
t
C-C j,- 1 L lw a a r1l
7
s
e
J
r E 7- c
T
e
t t
Fl
Li 1 S k C 0 1 1 U C 0 F:
L;- r e s, . C 0 N'C L U S 0 NS . The EMF exposu e was GD;
e. C&) r t is: I O ft - L- other StL not very pecise, that is why it ia
L-
r
di es t C) c 0 T f r m the ex i stence
"
association and Correct possitie biases t "Jhacil
P
I
I
I
I
F,
I
L F
I
I
� l i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I April I2, 1994
' Alayor Donald Chmiel
Cihy of Chanhassen
' 690 Coulter Drive
P.O. Bo1 1.17
Chanhassen, INI . 55317
I Dear A -lavor Chlniel:
DR. JAMES AMUNDSON
CHIROPRACTOR
' I was at the April 9,1994 City Council meeting where there was some discussion on
developing additional warehouse space at the Press. Along with this proposal a hinder
Care was to be built neat to the expansion. There was discussion as to what effects the
1 proxunitN' of power lines may have on children attending the day care. I ran a literature
search regarding the subject and I have attached the current research. I have taken the
liberty to highlight areas that seemed appropriate. From what I read there does not seem to
be a threat to individuals that are located close to the electromagnetic source. To be honest
with you, I thought I would find information to the contrary.
' I hope this information is helpful and should you need any additional search to be done
please to not hesitate to phone me. We have just recently sold our house in St. Louis Park
and are closing on —May 31, 1994 on a home in Chanhassen. I look forward to becoming a
member of the community. Again, do not hesitate to call should additional information be
needed.
Sincerely:
Dr. James Amundson
4� � .
ANDERSON LAKES CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC
8781 Columbine Eden Prairie, MN 55344 • (612) 944 -2133
I I I � r■etert ttwfnr■ wfr
1 U y r
r------------------------------------------ - - - - -- !
1
nth STREET WEST —
4tQA'41 I R 73.00'
7
1 rJ I z
1
1 PROPOSED WAREHOUSE
EXPANSION i 1 11111111 11111 DATA
I
40.000 SF �`. I I 1 I I WE
I wan•I t � I M[3f \ wfIOMCMt
1 I [f•nlV ^. RrILD'ND APCA 1 t0.1 SO SI N/A
r sr EXISTING c8' LDINC e l I `L•" I 1 Ir Pfof0lro sun roro A4[A 54. 10.31s if
�• 1 rNF F FC JJ
I I t Bi., trip ' - T � I �ry ARPN:. 64fMC 4R A 2v4 cIy S N/A
I 1 ! 1 ! 'T t PanPOStC o.arwf:.cU t 11415 4 s S41:<
1
rU -X.- toff 411 rIC: 1 1f rw lD
I 1 n i wyofMCNgM PIR. •Ira o�rrc:: rraac•a•ou
I , c , Q. G I _ -- _ -- _ - - Lr - " - : - - 1 I TOIA, : ^i G7C IV) 509.0.^ qr 76.71: :r
_—
i
of ACP
,. I I , 7oul lrl vt: tACrn I, IS 17y ACPCa
V
� I
I iNf,ER CARS o
-•- k —{— _ - -_- . r 1 ( KaCtA lua[AV10lIS 70 f O
St ff
I • = a � 1).315 SF I tI
t, J / _. - .� -� I _• -fir --r te 1 I i [t15114D fpCwgOt fnlr tY 'wl rF[" P40rYP.1v '> „.52
1 -
I „I _ _ - • f ♦ I I ! A■1 rA■■INe LOT MAIL - 11111111 ATIt[T omtT
IwlsoewrANefert -. .
fora O.,alnf,.. -
, crux _. ''1 " - < -1 1-•e elrctt I " nun
1 •, O r I I MET errtn a nral.c rmomPC
� . ^ q 6 _ 1 CT ! ■ .n
1 Pl I U'.
.t, 1 00o ■nett � u�tls A .[ e, •v
I -- Iww qw• M w r _/ -- -- _ I� r � � I MttT A ret11N1. Aal U/
' � TM.:U. •_ N t r I I 1 I ,/ EM[A t ql »I I 4 M0. l1 MIAIMI
1 1 "'- - - - "' _' I S 1. •� c I enC7T a rHOPMV MM tMATm.]/
c !LD —
1
- - - - - - - - - - -
STATE HIGHWAY S
N FOR CO NSTR U CTION
.•r,Av: ./�.:;. ��. «.... ^''" ' 1.'• ° KINDERCARE/ •!ifn.
"►- MARCUS CORPORATION SITE PLAN
jMxj
THE PRESS
1
i 1
_ F I
�- 77th' STREET N "EST ^�
It
I I n.2 a -fill
I
EXISTING PARKING
LOT LIGHT (TYP)
of n4 , w .__.... ___ � JJ •n /.•
I L I MARCUS CORPORATION DERCARE/ EXISTING
HE PRESS CONDITIONS 2�s
w.
a
'
C %IS.i1NC BUI'_D'Nf.•
�.
� '•�1,9'i'
�,,
y
�
4,
fi
-
n
R
ct
PARKIN(. LOT
S
r
I
,255 STALLS
it
I
4
t
1
I
i .�: a
ti 1
.;
et •.
Ne
o
LC
3
1
4
p.
Vp. to
STATF,
HIGHWAY 5
— - — - — -
— - — - — - — - — - — - - --
---
-
---------
------
--�
—
of n4 , w .__.... ___ � JJ •n /.•
I L I MARCUS CORPORATION DERCARE/ EXISTING
HE PRESS CONDITIONS 2�s
w.
.. . ......................................
EM"N' v slue
77th .STREET IVP,'ST
– 7 - 7 —
ROCK CONSTRUCTION
E
1w S3
PR,"POSA 110RE-ICUSE I
I
EXPANSION
n o,on0 Sr
CORT00t. At CATCH
RAW OPINIHMI
SILT FENCE
DIVERSIONARY DIKE
TmE PRE3.
i s"I
I aI
iT-d
00
V!
I
.!,@
C
I'k-POSEE
1INC10 1,1111E
id.315 Sr
C�
.. .. . .... ............ .
J
STATE HIGHWAY
--------------------------------------------
77
SILT FENCE
DIVERSIONARY DIKE
N
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
KINDERCARE/
I ms
MARCUS CORPORATION GRADING/,
THE PRESS VTLity POW
4d AN
. 1YI29
FRCYPOSEf)
EXISTING
N
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
KINDERCARE/
I ms
MARCUS CORPORATION GRADING/,
THE PRESS VTLity POW
4d AN
. 1YI29
� r r r� ■. � r� � rr r� � r � r� � r■ rr r �
1
IN nAM11111 11 O tAN111111 0MMMor
!'I'+�.'�lrcaw•wv�a+r�la..
tays�- vtrl�wlra�r�••-
•
, � . �� -_ ��,,
� n.-L.- a ..�� s rr�� r �� -
-• rr lh STREET WEST
• te r -
RTSrfJ�^. Ii��r
1'�Ltt!><�'^r�nrraw�nr
tar w a�slt�al�- •
•iN l
_�lD7^Y:L__
�r:i i__ -- "
- -
-- - 1} +gip .■
Rtix'r :..'1 "'-^
- •.�
--aY
'
��y,1J
T
I
..1$ • N M
I
I
-`�
.. ...�
1. 111.17•
1
�. 117•
TL' -
• /7FTIa1rJJrSYlat,itA+VtJ1�
J I (
' 1I7aN'�+LAi'�'- *a s�vr•
' 1Nrj{IQYi$ nrs�ntwsw
I
' 1
,
� � �
t I
••I
I
1
I t l
I �
•_.�r
M-All
t I
,. as.11./.
,• I
_ _
�•
• / iii
• r11111
• •.a_ r_..rr
.I
fro -�
1 •1
t �
-/
;
1
I
I
1
y
�•rr
�
z
cp
I
1 • ,,,I' a
:�
.� _ +—
fm
or
I+ _ _ � _ . r.:�L��� A 1 .o �l�l� . � . f j j p '• �' - � �
.�L:Y>;
���.
- - �- - .� _ _ X5.1'—
•�ir"I,�i�.._-
Q O "' 1 Ail -
/ �
.•�
- -•�.. �... -- - ---
_-- -_-- -_ •.y... , - T=*-- - -art+
s�.:.I�
xx
J 1
1
M MAN?
r OntaAL W
IN nAM11111 11 O tAN111111 0MMMor
!'I'+�.'�lrcaw•wv�a+r�la..
tays�- vtrl�wlra�r�••-
•
, � . �� -_ ��,,
� n.-L.- a ..�� s rr�� r �� -
• te r -
RTSrfJ�^. Ii��r
1'�Ltt!><�'^r�nrraw�nr
tar w a�slt�al�- •
•iN l
2. •�
i��w5'
M
,
•-
Rtix'r :..'1 "'-^
- •.�
--aY
• fit... +.. rr -_�....
��y,1J
T
hH•T1M� Ilgtl
-`�
==
r�
tam,
rlol. u
TL' -
• /7FTIa1rJJrSYlat,itA+VtJ1�
. �.+a�•tifA�
' 1I7aN'�+LAi'�'- *a s�vr•
' 1Nrj{IQYi$ nrs�ntwsw
• YwllnvaalNw +�A+1wI
,
� � r •Y�
i1ir���
.• r' .
.. �r•rr��r11
!
��r.
•_.�r
M-All
,. as.11./.
�..
_ _
�•
• / iii
• r11111
• •.a_ r_..rr
r OntaAL W
IN nAM11111 11 O tAN111111 0MMMor
!'I'+�.'�lrcaw•wv�a+r�la..
tays�- vtrl�wlra�r�••-
•
, � . �� -_ ��,,
� n.-L.- a ..�� s rr�� r �� -
• te r -
RTSrfJ�^. Ii��r
1'�Ltt!><�'^r�nrraw�nr
tar w a�slt�al�- •
/ • I • � � +
,
• ILW , TLfJr'JrYlb•Lt71Pf '•
Rtix'r :..'1 "'-^
' �ik�jt�L��.��r
' ft' *. a•.tl.Jf�IL�X��.
• fit... +.. rr -_�....
hH•T1M� Ilgtl
• IMIOAIIOM wms
tri "ItL1owurd
• /7FTIa1rJJrSYlat,itA+VtJ1�
. �.+a�•tifA�
' 1I7aN'�+LAi'�'- *a s�vr•
' 1Nrj{IQYi$ nrs�ntwsw
• YwllnvaalNw +�A+1wI
,
• b
fro -�
Y��
NOT FOR OONe1wYCTNIN
MARCUB CORPORATION
X>;�.- w'•._. KINDERCARE/ LANDSCAPE/
•, x ,.; l • n1 a1 -n v - THE PRESS LIGHTING PLAN Q
PROPOSED: PARK ONE THIRD ADDITION
I �
771h
_ LEGEND ' - -
YtNNOII 1 1
.1CN e�LN e95109 1,
N'IUMrMT A -
75.00'
rlo5' -,- .
.A 15. or 00' / 1 1 l - „ ),er t I 01101110 RcALR
n•n wlft 1 I •v / I
le \ l I I
CL
L \ I- `i I I li I ?O�CSEO
/ SO LD NG
1 ; �rrrrr r.11 - rrr[111 : --»�'-
f cl
�'LLIILWJJJJJJ j »
i
000 ++
,0,-.C3
s' s'rAI'r 111MMAY 5
i_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - -- - -.
EO A URVLEYOR30WAK INC.
7415 .5c.idlo 9oule.a M;nneonors Mfnnr•ro'n 554,6
m ssm•,s
t}t M-- i,wtl yM rr►�T +M��.Y wA ' A f / »M
�� fff-1 -�wti•r.r
•SS�c:U,ts t10. It'll ru -art
lu -. U rf1 -„If 1,11
-P I, .
NORTH ELEVATION
,
SOUTH ELEVATION
. 4r,n✓ . a.
EAST ELEVATION
_... ...
THE
RU( - • MARCUS CORPORATION PRESS EXISTING
CONDITIONS
C"ANKAB"". M"OWsotA
s
WEST ELEVATION,
R 7 ,7 , V 7, , l l �- �
, � .41 j L I .. I � T- 6 t .�
It 9L
n
Aww" .
NORTH ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION
't T 11
k
IZ
SOUTH ELEVATION
Chanhassen
KinderCam
0 37'
THE
MARCUS COFNK)RATION PRESS euvwnonsi
s/. o
CHATASWIt W"WOOTA
"7 LOT ftAYOMM AA UND
� f
m ff
PROPOSED
KINDER CARE
10,315 SF f
t
I I t�u
!IIIIIIIIIIIIIO
jr ....2 2j
•
T-
d
•Q
�•o
�t •
fa
t •
II
f W
t 4
•
•
•
•
•
;N
1
W
pco
�
0
V)
•
-- 50.00♦
•
I�
STATE HIGHWAY r
MAY—O4 -1994 17:88 FROM P " ASSOCIATES..LTD....
CD s
. o z\
,o
S 00 °08'51" E
9375739 P.82 I I
t
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
' PRELIMINARY PLAT TO REPLAT LOT 1, BLOCK 1, AND OUTLOT B, PARK ONE
2ND ADDITION INTO LOTS 1, 2 AND 3, PARK ONE THIRD ADDITION, A SITE
PLAN REVIEW FOR A 54,720 SQUARE FOOT WAREHOUSE EXPANSION FOR
' THE PRESS AND A 10,315 SQUARE FOOT KINDERCARE FACILITY AND A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A LICENSED DAYCARE CENTER IN AN IOP,
INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF
DELL ROAD AND STATE HIGHWAY 5.
Scott: If you could identify new information. Changes that have been made. You know
' we've seen this a couple of times already so if you can go that way.
Al -Jaff: Sure. I'll try to make it as short as possible. You looked at this application 2
weeks ago. You separated the site plan by moving the Press forward and tabling Kindercare.
When this went to the City Council, they recommended that this come back before the
t Planning Commission and be reviewed as one application. So that's why both the Press and
Kindercare are before you again today. There has been some changes since Friday, which is
one day after the reports went out. We received a letter from Department of Transportation
' stating that the original access point ..into the daycare facility is located within the
Department of Transportation's access control. They basically said move it back north of this
line right here. The applicant submitted this application, or this change by moving the access
' north of the line that Department of Transportation recommended. We received this
application at, it says here 1801 so that would be approximately 6:00 and I don't know if
Dave has had time to review this. If you have any comments on this particular issue.
' Hempel: Not thoroughly.
' Farmakes: So they would be making, U- turning back out to that. As they go north they have
to U turn and go south, that's one way correct that you're showing.
' Al -Jaff: Correct. Right -in, right -out. It's still the same as before with the exception that it
has been moved further north. It's approximately 220 feet from the corner of the property
line. Versus it used to be 150 feet from the corner.
' Harberts: So I'm guessing when engineering looks at it, the public safety will look at it too
with regards to access with large vehicles.
' Hempel: Turning radius, yes.
t Al -Jaff: Another thing that has changed. We overlapped this transparency over the old
landscaping plan. We lost 2 trees with this change. Another thing that was requested...
' 34
d
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
Commissioner Mancino was any ordinances, federal regulations regarding the electromagnetic
field. We contacted the EPA, the EQB and NSP. We have received some studies. We gave
you copies of them. Those studies are inconclusive. Some of them are pro. Others are
against magnetic fields. We feel we don't have the expertise here to make a judgment on
that. NSP sent their regulations. Those are definitions as well as setbacks that they require.
It doesn't say that magnetic fields are harmful or, again. It's an inconclusive decision from
all agencies that we have contacted and again the materials were received between yesterday
and today. That's why we couldn't include it with the staff report when we mailed the
copies. One change that we are requesting, the building official going through the report and
condition 16 of the site plan approval. Basically states the applicant meet conditions of
Building Official's memo dated March 25, 1994. And the building official requested that
these conditions be spelled out. There are only two conditions and they should read, submit a
1/8 " =1" scale plan of the entire existing building indicating dimensions and use of all spaces
on all floors. And the second condition would be, revise site plans to show site approach
details and handicap parking stalls in compliance with Minnesota State Building Code,
Chapter 1340. And with that, staff is recommending approval of the applications of site plan
for both the Kindercare facility and the addition of the Press, a conditional use permit for the
Kindercare and the subdivision as outlined in the staff report with the conditions. Thank you.
Scott: Okay. Questions or comments for staff please.
Mancino: My only comment is, I would like to get staff's, have staff have some time to look
at the new entryway because I think one of our concerns has been the egress and ingress of
the Kindercare lot. And since we just got this new information I would like to have staff
have some time to look it over and make a recommendation. To put it through the process
that we usually do. I would also like some time to read through. I know that Kindercare is
concerned about the EMF's and the magnetic fields and I don't think any of us are scientist
or anything but it would be good information to look through and to get a little knowledge
about. To be able to talk intelligently.
Scott: Sharmin, was there any, you said they were inconclusive. Was there any sort of an
indication as to which side of the fence the studies would go on? Meaning does NSP say it's
not a big deal? Do the governmental agencies say not a big deal? But are there independent
sources that say maybe there is a big deal? I mean is this just.
Al -Jaff: There are studies that support both sides and there are studies that.
Scott: Are they related in any way to the being in the power line business?
Mancino: A little special interest.
l
1
L
35 '
L
I Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
' Scott: Yeah I, you know. We have a pretty good pile of documentation that we need to go
through and I'm just trying to, if it's very parochial, as things tend to be.
' Al -Jaff: I think the study that was sent by the EQB, but even then they're saying in their
document that it does not represent or reflect the Board's opinion because the studies that
were submitted, done for the EQB formally with their policies, none of the documents that we
have would commit themselves to an opinion. They all give you statistics but that's about it.
' Farmakes: I read both of the studies and it seems that the only thing that they can give you a
conclusive answer on is that there seems to be less of a problem the farther you move away
from it. That seems to be about it. There seems, I wonder how much these documents cost
' because they really don't draw any conclusion and they have to be several taxpayer's dollars
long so. I was frustrated reading them.
' Scott: Any other questions or comments for staff? We'd like to hear from the applicant. If
there's some new information or, please let us hear it.
1 John Dietrich: Thank you. John Dietrich, RLK Associates. Again representing the applicant
for the Press and Kindercare. We are the site plan designers... engineering and landscape
architects of the site. And with me tonight is also John Finnemore of Kindercare and he will
be able to address the issues of the placement of the building and provide some additional
information on the EMF's frequencies and where some of those issues come from. As
Sharmin had indicated, the site plan that is before you is comparable to what has been shown
i on previous applications. The one change of the site plan has been the location of the
driveway and based on obtaining information from MnDot and looking at the site plan
closely, I'd like to put up an overhead that identifies a modification of the access. Based on
the need to move the driveway back, which also then assists in the cut through traffic issue
that was a concern to the Planning Commission, we have looked at the specifics of the
' location of the access and of the building itself. It is our recommendation that the building
site plan shift approximately 15 feet to the west and essentially come about 10 feet off of the
existing curb which would still place the building 20 feet off of the property line and well
' within any setback requirements. It would be proposed it would be a heavy landscaped edge
along the western side of the building. That would allow more space on the eastern side of
the building and allow the access to Dell Road to have a wider throat and a proper turn radius
' into the parking lot, onto Dell Road. It would be necessary to have this for control of the
speed and access to the lot from the Press and also to move the driveway back to
accommodate the access control from MnDot. In addition to the driveway location, we have
had discussions with staff in regard to the landscape area south of the parking lot. We will
be going to enter into an easement for landscaping purposes to accommodate the street
monuments. Landscaping or elements that the Planning Commission and Council decide...
36
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
Mancino: My question is, have you thought about signage for Kindercare if we use that
portion for a monument for the city. I mean where would the signage go for Kindercare if it
can't go right there on that main corner?
John Dietrich: We feel the signage elements would be a flexible element along the...
Scott: Are there any other questions or comments for the applicant? Or I mean if you have
more people from the development team, sure.
John Dietrich: I'd like John Finnemore to discuss the building location and the EMF's.
John Finnemore: You can read the articles that were given to you and you definitely won't
find anything conclusive. There really isn't any conclusive studies as far as EMF go. This is
pretty much what I've read about electromagnetic fields and the majority of the research has
been done by the power company because they have the biggest stake in the matter. Sweden
and France have passed laws on electromagnet fields and they're enforcing with their power
companies, which happen to public. They're not private. They're publicly owned. They're
relocating lines. They're doing things to reduce electromagnet fields. Whether our country
ever adopts any type of standards or not is definitely, the jury's out on that. The EPA has
done a lot of studies themselves but like any other governmental EPA study, you can read it
and then say, why did we spend money on this study? It doesn't say anything. Another
thing too. I've purchased what they call a guastmeter. These little old looking Texas
Instrument calculator costs $550.00 to measure electromagnetic fields and what is mentioned
a lot of these documents is, you measure electromagnet fields and you give it a measure
called milogaust. And they've used 2.0 as the level where they perceive problems possibly
arising. And there had been talk, in fact I guess they were close to introducing a bill that was
saying that schools and other sort of uses need to be at a level of 2.0 or lower but that is, all
went away. Nothing has went to apply that law or bill. So we as a company, just knowing
that that may happen or could happen or that's been determined to be a level, is the level
we've adopted as what we try to keep playgrounds and children away from. So that's what
we've done here is you know, I went out and paced off at a point where I got a reading of
2.0 lower on my meter and that's where we said it would be back from. The problem with
taking measurements like that is they vary. You can go out there 7 days a week and get 7
readings at different, not drastically but you're, the key time to take a reading is in the hottest
months of the year because that's when the major amount of electricity is going through the
lines. But even at that, those are transmission lines. I meant here's times when they literally
shut them off. You just don't know. I mean they're on a big grid system. The different
power companies are connected. It's a tough thing to get a good reading on so we've just
adopted the 2.0 and that's what we're going with. Really the biggest thing I've got out of all
these studies was Carnegie Millen University did a study and a situation like this you can
37
L
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
' really do two things. Something like an electromagnetic field. You can just ignore it and say
it's not a problem. Or you can just completely over react and you know move all the houses
and everything you know 300 feet away from a power line. Or you can adopt a practice
' which, the term is prudence avoidance. Basically it just means that. You do things that are
prudent and economic and that you can do, you can do now which in our case, that is setting
our building back. Now we do have centers that are much closer to power lines. We built
' them years ago before we ever heard of the tern electromagnetic field. Now, if we took the
step of the drastic step of just you know closing the center down, that would be taking a
drastic step. But the center's already there. We built it. We built it before we knew there
' was a problem. Now in the case I've got a center in Illinois where there's a power line very
close to the playground. The city owns their own power company. They're so concerned
about the issue, they happen to own the property next to us. They have a well site there.
They're going to trade us 6,000 square feet of their property for widening of the easements so
that we can move our playground farther away from the power lines and put it onto their
property. That's how concerned they are about it. It's called prudence avoidance. That's
' what you try to do. We try to avoid, where it's economical and it makes sense, you try to
avoid it and that's really what we're trying to do here. And I mean you can read, I've got an
article here. I'll be glad to make copies and send it in. It's a real lengthy article from the
New Yorker that basically this very article. But you can read just as many articles and put it
in studies, scientific studies put out by the power companies that will tell you, I wouldn't
' worry about it. It's very inconclusive. But we feel that we need, as a company, to set a
precedence for our own well being and set back from it. A lot of people are now becoming
concerned with this. When you do an environmental study of the site now, part of the study
is where they test for asbestos and all the chemicals, they give you electromagnetic field
readings because people are concerned about it. Everybody's starting to buy these little
meters. I mean who ever's making these is making a killing because if this is worth $550.00
' you know, I mean I'd like to be selling them but you just can't buy them any cheaper than
this at this point. So it's, you know it's, we don't know if it's a real problem but we need to
address it. You can't just ignore it because it could become a problem and someday
' legislation could be passed. Other countries have passed it and have significant concerns
about it.
' Mancino: John, on your buildings that are already existing, where they are close to the power
lines and it's just something back in the early 80's or something that you built it and this
information hadn't come up. Are those still running at full capacity?
John Finnemore: The one that I'm the most aware of is this one in the Illinois area and
parents were raising concerns about it as they read the articles in the paper and asked,
' actually the city even came to us before we went to them with the proposed solution. I'm not
really aware of any other ones that I can. In fact I know of a site in St. Louis where we
38
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
were, actually we owned land and we decided not to build on it because of the proximity of
the power lines and now we're trying to sell that property. I don't know of any other specific
ones but I know we have. And those are the two I'm aware of and we're not building on the
one because it's so close. We're selling the land. We had permits. We were ready to build.
We've got major investment into the property and we're now selling it because we don't feel
that we should be putting a childcare center there.
Mancino: Sharmin, do we have, I mean we have power lines going through the city right
now. I mean in residential areas. South of Highway 5 that parallel the railroad, etc. Do we
have those either residences or commercial establishments concerned about it right now? Is
there a concern in the city? Have people come to staff or to the City Hall asking about that?
Al -Jaff: We're not aware of any such case.
Aanenson: ...based on the other application we had last Planning Commission meeting, we
also checked on residential issues because they were saying they were having a hard time
with financing. As a note—some FHA requirements an additional 10 feet. We did call HUD
and we did call just some mortgage brokers to find out if they have concern lending and what
we found out is, most standard... depending on who's underwriting it. Maybe insurance
companies that said it's too close to the power line, they will not underwrite it. So there is
some, for residential and maybe some issues that they do look at. Some mortgage lenders
will look at that ... power lines.
Mancino: Is that multi- family or is that single family?
Aanenson: Both.
Mancino: Both? Okay. So it's probably on the secondary market because they're going to
sell their mortgages to a secondary.
Aanenson: Right. Yeah, and that's the issue. Depending on who's doing the financing, that
may be an issue to them.
Scott: Any other questions or comments for the applicant or if the applicant has any other
information?
John Dietrich: I'd just like to make mention that we do have some materials for the
Kindercare site that are comparable to the plan that you have previously been provided and
I'd like to just quickly identify some on the site plan. That we are proposing. That it would
be able to incorporate all the site conditions that you have previously mentioned. In addition
39 1
1
L
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
to adding more evergreen trees as was suggested and a sidewalk going into that parking stall
so that we would be in conformance with ADA requirements. This plan does not show the
realigned access onto Dell Road and we would incorporate that into the plan. And in addition,
we have provided a site elevation perspective that would be approximately drawn from, if you
were in your car heading west at about the location of the property line between the
Kindercare and the Press facility. This is an actual perspective of what you would see as you
were looking towards the Press with the existing berm that is out there and the existing
walking/running trail that is on the north side of the road. The existing conifer trees that are
on the berm and then the additional trees that we had lighten in for the proposed trees that
will be going through the parking lot and finally the little bit darker elevations on the Press
that would be going through the site. So the perspective of the building would be dying into
the berm. And we anticipate this berm even coming up higher and being incorporated into
the enhancement element of County Road 5 and Dell Road. Or State Highway 5.
Mancino: John, can you talk a little bit about your point of view of the Press is very much
of a, what do I want to say, you know an industrial, commercial type building. The
Kindercare is a little homier. Has a different look. Can you talk a little bit about the
compatibility between the Kindercare architectural style fitting in the IOP area? I mean
we've got industrial commercial in that whole area. Whether you look at Ver -sa -til and the
other things that are going on in there. And then all of a sudden Kindercare has kind of a
different look going on. How does that fit in, from your perspective?
John Dietrich: From my perspective I feel Kindercare has an opportunity to really enhance
the corner. It pulls the scale of the large industrial buildings down to more of a human scale
at the corner of Dell Road and State Highway 5, which I think will be a complimentary
element to an entry feeling. A green element coming into Chanhassen. There's residential
properties both on the south side of Dell Road as we move into Eden Prairie and beyond the
DataSery property. And I feel this is a transition from industrial and still would be a strong
and good compatible land use.
Scott: Any other comments or any other information from the applicant? Good, thank you.
This is a public hearing and if anyone from the public would like to speak, please come up
and identify yourself. Is there anyone who would like to speak? Well seeing none, can I
have a motion to close the public hearing please? Actually we didn't open it in the first
place. Let's open the public hearing and then we'll close it. Can I have a motion to open the
public hearing?
Mancino moved, Harberts seconded to open the public hearing. All voted in favor and
the motion carried. The public hearing was opened.
40
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
Scott: Let the record show that no one wishes to speak at the public hearing so can I have a
motion to close the public hearing?
Harberts moved, Conrad seconded to close the public hearing. All voted in favor and
the motion carried. The public bearing was closed.
Scott: Diane.
Harberts: I'll pass.
Scott: You'll pass? Okay, Ladd.
Conrad: I wasn't around for much of the discussions so I just have to backtrack just a little
bit. Bear with me. A key issue for me is impervious surface on this property and I don't
understand the staff's report given, I just don't understand why we can't pull it into
compliance so could you tell me why we can't.
Al -Jaff: City ordinance states that as long as they are improving or, improving an existing
non - conforming.
Conrad: Okay, yeah I saw that They're adding 14,000 and 40,000. Now I guess what I
don't understand is.
Aanenson: You're not changing the impervious surface. You're expanding the building.
We're looking at strict interpretation of impervious and the building...
Conrad: Right, so what is, where they are expanding the building was parking before?
Aanenson: Correct.
Conrad: Okay. And the lots, the other lots do not count because this was a lot of record?
Aanenson: Correct.
Conrad: And for some reason we allowed a 79% impervious surface.
Aanenson: It was zoned PUD then and that's probably one of the things that ..impervious
surface. It was at one time PUD.
Mancino: Ladd, you were here.
41
I
r
L
C
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
Conrad: Yeah, I'm the only one that I can blame. That's real irritating.
Al -Jaff: There wasn't a staff report explaining this impervious surface. We went through all
' the history.
Conrad: I think 70% has pretty much been our standard as long as my memory serves.
' Okay. The roadway, basically the right - in/right -out off of Dell. Dave, let me talk to you
about this, and I'm not even going to talk about that one. Is it basically your feeling that this
Kindercare should be served via that road, that internal road? And the Press simply because
' we're not trying to encourage U turns. I'm trying to figure out, that just is a lousy way of
servicing Kindercare here. Bringing them down an internal road like that. But is that
basically the rationale that we won't force the U turns on Dell coming in from Highway 5
' and circling around back?
Hempel: Certainly that's the thought but we all know that U turns are going to happen. It's
the shortest route, even with the proper traffic signage. Unless enforcement is there everyday,
you're going to have U turns.
Conrad: Is it staff recommendation to have that internal road like that or was it pretty much
the applicant's recommendation?
' Hempel: Well, it probably was a little of both. This is a difficult site to serve. I guess if
you look at other industrial parks and so forth, you don't have the major collector ... two
' boundaries actually. Trunk Highway 5 and Dell. So it kind of ser, the interior service
road system similar to the shopping center.
Conrad: Okay. Couldn't make a curb cut or couldn't make any kind of a cut halfway
through that Dell. So we could service the north and the south part of this parcel?
Hempel: I had conversation with the City Engineer...
Conrad: Can't do?
Hempel: Weren't real comfortable with it.
Conrad: Basically, huh. So what's going to be the access to that north lot? What's going to
happen up there sometime Dave? Is it just going to be another, is there going to be a, is your
forecast a curb cut coming out of that or right out?
Hempel: That would be one of the access points as well as another interior access point for
42
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
the service drive.
Conrad: Okay. On a grade of 1 to 10, what would you rate this traffic system Dave? Less
than 5? Never mind. Never mind. That's just a facetious comment on my part. Got a lot of
issues. I guess I'm not, I don't have a problem with the Press and some of the things. I think
everything looks okay there. I like the elevations. I think the Press looks fine. I'm really
bothered by the impervious surface. It really bothers me that we have some land and it's
probably my fault from many, many years ago. Don't have a clue why we did that but that's
just such a basic standard. It just sort of hurts that this is happening here. I think the Press
is doing a good job of expansion. They're a hell of a good company. They're terrific to
have in town. But this is just, and I'm going to stop talking because I don't see the solution
right now. I really did want to flip flop. I really wanted to move this playground and stuff
to the south and I have a hard time doing that right now. I guess I will keep it the way it's
located with the playgrounds and what have you away from the power lines, although I would
have loved to have moved it forward. It was sort of a neater way to say welcome to
Chanhassen. Even though I personally don't believe this is the entrance to Chanhassen. The
entrance and the monument to Chanhassen will be the bridge when it goes up. That will be,
in my mind, to say the statement saying, you are here. Whether they allow our maple leaf on
there or our name. You know I'm not totally convinced that this is really that key an access
point. I think people will feel they're in Chanhassen when they get to the walk bridge. So
that doesn't bother me. I like the transition of Kindercare there to the industrial. I think
that's, as the applicant spokesperson said, I think that's okay. I'm going to let the rest of you
talk about some of the issues because I know you care about that but I think the traffic is
just, I don't have a solution to my two problems. I don't have a solution to the impervious
surface that I think we can enforce or do and I just don't like the traffic circulation but I tell
you, I don't see without a curb cut or a median cut, I can't find a solution so I'm stuck folks.
Those are my comments.
Scott: Jeff.
Farmakes: My comments are still pretty much the same as they were this last meeting. I
don't have a problem with the proposed expansion. I understand the issue of impervious
surface and the criteria that was used so I'm going to argue with that. I'm going to vote to
deny this for the following reasons. The foremost reason and that is that I don't think this
conditional use should be enacted upon until the Highway 5 issue is completed, because it is
a development along the highway. It is the eastern gate. I think that the type of development
that we're seeing in the conditional use of the Kindercare is a typical use that we see where
the parking lot is shoved up next to the highway as close as you can get it. The discussion
we had at the last meeting I think when we were discussing buffers. I think pointing out the
road median and I don't think an 8 inch curb would be considered a sufficient buffer.
43
I
I
1
I
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
Anyway, the people that spent, community and business leaders that spent considerable
amount of time and input on the Highway 5 issue, and I think 3 of the people here on this
commission. This simply does not conform to what we worked on. And it's in a pivotal area
of the city and whether it's the entrance per se, it's still very much a part of what was
discussed in buffering TH 5 from, parking lots from exposed industrial areas. The fact of the
matter is that obviously anybody who owns property wants to maximize it's full capacity.
Property costs a lot of money in Chanhassen and it's understandable that the applicant wants
to maximize out the potential of the property. However there are other issues involved as
well in that park ... I think are community interests. But however if the city is serious about
this, these particular types of pieces of property at intersections of main roads and so on, the
city's going to have to look at the potential of acquiring 100 feet here or 100 feet there. To
get any type of true massing going on where you're bringing some relief, it's more than just
building one ditch and a row of trees. If you look at some of the stuff that Morrish did, part
of that has different types of massings and significant portions of landscaping, and I don't
think that this qualifies for that. The next issue is a safety issue. The traffic. This latest
development. Even is more bizarre. Basically make a U turn out to the lane going in the
opposite direction. You go north to go south. I'm not sure what the shuttle bus type of use
for something like this is but I would assume that they would have to block both lanes
making the turn. This makes no sense to me. The issue of safety, these power line reports
are really ridiculous. They don't say a thing and they come to no conclusion. It's sort of
like looking at a cigarette report back in the 70's. I do not have a problem if this particular
type of development went to the north site. I.think that would alleviate considerable amount
of traffic. It would be a considerable distance away from the power lines. But I don't see a
proposal here on that or a conceptual issue on that so I'm going to vote to deny this.
Mancino: I really have no new comments. I agree with Jeff in the Highway 5 in it's not in
keeping with the corridor plan and I also agree with Ladd and traffic flow and that gets into a
public safety issue for me. Having cars going through a parking lot where kids are getting
out and going to cars, etc. I would also like, I don't know if I'd deny it or table it I would
like to get Dave's written comments in a staff report on the new access point which you have
not had time to do. And I'd like to read your words of wisdom and whether buses, etc,
trucks, etc, can get in there. Other than that the only other comment is that we also talked
about a reduction of parking spaces for Kindercare. That there should be 33 and I don't see
anything. That hasn't been changed either. So I would, my suggestion would be to table it
until staff has had some time to look at the traffic issues. Circulation issues.
Scott: Okay. Matt.
Ledvina: Well I would also agree with Jeffs comments and Nancy's comments regarding the
site plan and Highway 5 standards. Traffic. Certainly concerns that haven't been addressed
44
fl
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
or at least evaluated properly at this point. I would like to get some input from the applicant
as to what type of action they would like to see, if I were to vote for it, specifically I would
vote for denial. But I could also vote for a table if the applicant felt that they would like to
do that and come back. Okay. That's the extent of my comments.
Scott: Okay. I really don't have any new comments. I was going to ask for your
impression. I'd like to see that. That seems to be a real pivotal issue and my guess is Dave,
is that if it's not possible based upon the setbacks and the MnDot requirement of easement,
that could potentially have a significant impact on the developability of that particular parcel.
A question that I have just a simple question for the applicant. Is the ownership of that lot
behind the one that you're proposing, is that owned by the same group of people as the
corner lot?
John Dietrich: Yes. The lot is currently, the entire property is currently owned by the Press
and they have indicated that they would sell the southeast parcel to Kindercare and it is their
intent to hold onto that northern parcel to maintain for future rights of development.
Scott: Future expansion from their standpoint. So that basically would preclude the
movement of the Kindercare project to that northerly lot? Okay. I don't have any further
comments.
Mancino: I have a question. Did we get a perspective from, excuse me John. This
perspective, it doesn't show Kindercare at all.
John Dietrich: No it does not. In fact it was again taken approximately on Highway 5
looking at the property line.
Mancino: Looking that way?
John Dietrich: Yes.
Mancino: So we haven't seen a perspective from in front of Kindercare where that parking
lot and what has to.
John Dietrich: No we do not. I would be willing to say from the roadway, the berm
continues to come up. We have approximately 70 feet of landscape area in the front from the
south property line that is going to be completely screened unless you were off on the east
side of.
45
f
LJ
1
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
Mancino: And it's screened all year round or there's deciduous trees?
John Dietrich: The requirement is 3 to 4 foot berms and with the elevation of the road would
be down approximately 4 feet below general elevation. I see the berms being anywhere from
6 to 7 feet above the roadway elevation.
' Mancino: You know Kate, I think that that's a good thing to ask for every single
development on Highway 5, especially when we're so close to the road. To make sure that
' we get a perspective from right in front. What that will look like and again, with the
landscaping, the massing of trees planted that year. Not in 10 years. What it will look like.
But what it will look like in a present day sense and to ask for that for every one of them on
1 TH 5. And the other part of that is, I think it's important for the opacity, not seeing the
parking lot but also making sure that we landscape the berm on this side of Highway 5 so we
dust don't see this grass berm on one side. A question I have procedurally for us as a
' Planning Commission and that is, all of us have talked about having some problems with the
traffic circulation, etc.
Scott: Can I ask a question that's really going to throw a curve ball on this one?
Mancino: Okay.
' Scott: John, could you put that overhead that shows the expansion of the Press. The one that
you just had. It's just that view from above that you put up for the site plan. Yeah, it was
that that. That one right there. Could you put that up. Something just struck me. What
happens to this. Let's say that the Press decides that they want to expand and they end up
going, let's say they put another 50,000 square foot expansion. How are they going to get to
' that parking lot? I mean I'm just trying, I'm trying to look out from a land use standpoint
and trying to figure out what's going to happen. Let's say they build that thing all the way
across. How are they going to get to the parking? Are they going to be, probably have to
sneak in through that and cut, because you've got your playground there.
John Dietrich: You're talking in this area here?
' Scott: Yeah. Or you're thinking it would be just like a stand alone facility?
ty
' John Dietrich: It could be a storage facility. If that's where the expansion is going on
because of all the technical equipment that is in there. Perhaps it could be another free
standing operation for the Press that they wish to buy. Or it could be potentially...
Scott: It could be another company or something? Okay.
' 46
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
John Dietrich: But we anticipate it will be of an industrial manufacturing type facility or
support for that type of facility.
Scott: Okay, good. I was, something just popped into my mind. Any other?
Mancino: Well my comment's just procedurally. When a developer comes in at the last
minute with some revisions, how do we feel as a commission when it hasn't gone through
staff and staff hasn't made a recommendation to us. And if we table it, it goes ahead to City
Council without staff's input.
Scott: We could deny it. It would go to City Council without staff input.
Mancino: And if you table it, it comes back.
Scott: It comes back to us.
Mancino: After staff has reviewed it.
Farmakes: I think to a certain extent that would depend somewhat if you thought it was safe
to do with the operation.
Scott: Yeah, and we were kind of iffy on the public safety.
Ledvina: This is the third time we've seen it.
Scott: Yeah but it's like new, significant things keep popping up.
Ledvina: Yeah, but other things haven't been changed that we've discussed.
Mancino: But we can't, I mean I take it that the responsibility is to give City Council, to go
over everything and to weigh everything and I can't really weigh this new entrance because I
haven't. I don't know if a truck can turn in there. I don't know if a bus can use it. I don't
have any of those things which David would tell us. So that hasn't been thought through is
what I'm saying. And it hasn't been thought through before it goes to City Council.
Scott: And if they can, if we had two lanes coming in, we've got turning radius and.
Ledvina: I see that as an important issue but I don't see that as the overriding issue that
would tell us that, if it was okay would you approve the thing tonight?
47
L�
L�
L_J
[1,
i
I
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
Farmakes: I understand what you're saying but, as far as my vote goes, it was unsafe to
begin with. Not a logical ... of traffic. This new addition just makes it worst so I see what
you're saying. Getting an evaluation of that but it won't affect my vote so.
Mancino: Okay.
Scott: Are we ready for a motion?
Farmakes: That's just me.
Mancino: Any other comments on what I brought up? Ladd?
Conrad: I don't want to see it anymore. I think City Council will have their perspective. I
think we've gotten the issues out. Yeah, it could come back. I don't see you changing your
vote. But the issue is there and we have at least one Council member here. We used to have
two. The issues are there Nancy. I think the applicant's going to want to approve it. In
terms of traffic and I think they're motivated to show the Council whether it can or can't
work and I don't know that it needs to come back.
Mancino: But I also, we can add that to a recommendation. A condition that it be reviewed
by staff before it goes to City Council and you add your thoughts to that new entrance.
Conrad: Absolutely. That's a good thought.
John Dietrich: Mr. Chairman?
I Scott: Yes.
John Dietrich: I would just like to, the changes to the access, we were notified of that
condition of the controlled access on Monday by city staff so we tried to turn that around as
quickly as we could in order to show a modification and a modification of that basically, that
has access in was presented to staff when we first started the process and it was determined
to go with the straight access so.
Mancino: I didn't mean to say any negligence on your part.
John Dietrich: But we're trying to, as the conditions change, we try to...
Scott: Okay. Any other discussion? Can I have a motion please? Don't everybody talk at
once.
48
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
Conrad: Point of clarification Mr. Chairman. The motion that was passed to the City
Council in favor of the site plan review, huh. Has anybody seen any changes to that motion?
Mancino: Where are you looking?
Ledvina: From the last time?
Conrad: From the last time, yeah.
Farmakes: It was my understanding on this piece, but you can ask the staff. It was all or
nothing on this piece. Is that correct?
Scott: That's the way it's being presented. I know that the outcome of the City Council
meeting was that due to a technicality with regard to conditional use permits, the City
Council cannot act on a conditional use permit until two things happen. One, a
recommendation of denial or approval is made to the City Council. Number two, is a 60 day
time frame to where if we don't make a recommendation, they can act on it. So the reason
why it came back didn't have really anything to do with what we had recommended vis a vis
passing the Press expansion ahead and tabling the Kindercare. It was the fact that they were
not able to act on the conditional use permit without a recommendation from us so that
without the conditional use permit, the Kindercare facility can't be constructed.
Farmakes: Okay, so we don't have to revote on those other issues. We didn't violate
anything at the time that that was done.
Scott: No. The opinion from the City Attorney was that there were no ordinances that
specifically said we could split a project. There were no ordinances that said that we
couldn't. So that particular point became moot and he focused on the very accessible
conditional use permit time frame and that was what he gravitated to. So basically it was not
remanded to us. They couldn't act upon it anyway because of ordinance.
Farmakes: So if we vote to deny it simply, or approve, we're just dealing with the
conditional use permit...
Scott: Well what we had, we're all clear on what we had passed on. It was tabling
conditional use. Changing the.
Farmakes: We voted on everything but that.
M
u
1
LJ
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
Mancino: Well no because on this site plan review.
Scott: No, there were 3 motions.
Farmakes: No, I understand it was part of the conditional use and part of the site plan. It's
hard to separate the one from the other in regards to, essentially that's one lot right?
Scott: Yeah. At least the way we proposed it. Outlot A I believe.
Farmakes: I can't see how you can approve the site plan without approving the conditional
use.
Scott: Yeah because it's worthless if the conditional use permit isn't approved or passed on,
yeah.
Ledvina: I think it's just the other way around. I think you, if you don't pass the site plan,
you can't have a conditional use permit. Because you can build the building. It's just, can
you put people in it or whatever.
Ledvina: Right. Right.
Scott: Can it be a daycare center in an IOP?
Farmakes: I wasn't, when I made the comment a moment ago I wasn't dealing with the order
that it was coming in. The content overall.
Mancino: But I still don't have any problem with the Press and the Kindercare I still have a
problem with traffic, etc. So one I would say okay and the other one I would deny for a site
plan review.
Farmakes: As I understand it, we voted did we not?
Scott: Well yeah.
Mancino: But we voted yes on the Press but not on Kindercare.
Scott: Correct. We tabled everything else, right.
Ledvina: Right, because it's one site plan.
50
' 1,
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
Scott: Well no. No.
Mancino: Now they're two site plans.
Conrad: I think we can.
Aanenson: There are two site plans. You recommended approval of the site plan request and
the subdivision. You didn't make any action on the site plan and conditional use for the
Kindercare. So that's what's still before you. Your other motion can still stand but what you
have to address is the site plan for the Kindercare site and the conditional use.
Mancino: So I suggest that we keep, except that Sharmin has our original site plan for the
Press we passed two weeks ago. I recommend that we keep it with the addition of the
building code?
Al -Jaff: The building official's conditions be spelled out as, I'm sure Nann got the verbiage
but I can go through the conditions again for you.
Conrad: That was point number 16?
Al -Jaff: Yes.
Conrad: Okay. They can figure that out.
Mancino: So we use what we've had before and just add that to it. Okay?
Conrad: Well, are you making a motion? Did you make a motion?
Mancino: Yes. I move that we go ahead and approve the site plan that we, Site Plan Review
#94 -1 that we approved on April 13th, 1994, which is subject to the following conditions and
it is on page 4 of our staff report. Number 1 ffim 19 with the addition of number 20 being
conditions of the Building Official's memo dated March 25, 1994.
Conrad: Number 20? You changed number 16, right?
Mancino: No. I'm on page 4. This is the original site plan review.
Conrad: I think the motion that the staff has in front of us is on page 8.
51
J
L�
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
Mancino: But I don't agree with that one because that approves both the Kindercare and the
press in one site plan and I'm not recommending that we approve Kindercare site plan. Does
that make sense?
Farmakes: How do you define that? They're both #94 -1.
Conrad: How can Kindercare be considered in the site plan for the Press?
Aanenson: She just separated them.
Mancino: I've just separated them. I approve that we recommend approval of the Press site
plan that we recommended on April 13th, 1994 on page 4 of the staff report which is
numbers 1 thru 19 with the addition of number 20 which reads, conditions of the Building
Official's memo dated March 25, 1994. And that approval is for only the Press site review.
Okay?
Scott: Is there a second?
Conrad: I second that.
' Scott: Is there any discussion?
Mancino moved, Conrad seconded that the Planning Commission recommend approval
' of Site Plan Review #94 -1 for a 54,760 square foot expansion of the Press building as
approved by the Planning Commission on April 13, 1994, subject to the following
conditions:
1. That the applicant must revise plans to include trash screening of the Press site and
show the type of materials used to screen the trash enclosures on the Press site. Plans
must be submitted for staff review prior to City Council meeting.
2. Deleted.
' 3. The applicant shall provide a meandering berm with landscaping along the south
PP P g P g g
' portion of the site, between the parking lot and Highway 5. The height of the berm
shall be between 3 and 4 feet. The applicant shall also provide staff with a detailed
cost estimate of landscaping to be used in calculating the required financial guarantees.
' These guarantees must be posted prior to building permit issuance. There shall be
added landscaping to the perimeter of the Press expansion of coniferous trees as
suggested by Nancy Mancino.
'
52
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
4.
5.
6.
7.
The applicant shall enter into a site plan development contract with the city and
provide the necessary financial securities as required for landscaping.
Meet all conditions outlined in the Fire Marshal memo dated March 10, 1994.
The Press addition shall contain some architectural detailing (with relief) to break up
the long wall masses
Concurrent with the building permit, a detailed lighting plan meeting city standards
shall be submitted.
8. The grading/utility plan shall be revised to incorporate storm sewers in the parking
lot's drive aisles for the Press. Detailed drainage calculations for a 10 year storm
event shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval.
9. The applicant shall apply and comply with the necessary permits from the appropriate
agencies (MPCA, Watershed District, and City Building Department).
10. Silt fence shall be placed along the northern property line where the parking lot for the
Press is being relocated.
11. Deleted.
12. Deleted.
13. The main thoroughfare (drive aisle) located on the Press site north of the main parking
lot area should be a minimum width of 26 feet with turning radiuses at 77th Street
West of 30 feet and two way traffic. In addition, the main thoroughfare (drive aisle)
shall be posted with no parking signs.
L�
II
n
14. The driveway access point shall be constructed in accordance to the City's typical
industrial driveway apron detail. I
15. The applicant shall provide the City with a security deposit (letter of credit or cash
escrow) in the amount of $5,000.00 to guarantee boulevard restoration. All boulevards '
disturbed as a result of the site improvements shall be restored with sod.
16. Conditions of the Building Official's memo dated March 25, 1994.
53
1�
r
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
17. The parking configuration of the Press shall be incorporated into the final design
approval given to Kindercare taking into account such things as sidewalks for
pedestrian traffic and traffic circulation between the Press and Kindercare.
18. No rooftop equipment shall be visible from Highway 5, Dell Road or 77th Street.
19. The impervious surface of the Press shall be a conforming permit at 70 %.
20. Conditions of the Building Official's memo dated March 25, 1994:
1) Submit a 1/8" = 1" -0" scale plan of the entire existing building indicating
dimensions and use of all spaces on all floors.
2) Revise site plans to show site approach details and handicap parking stalls in
compliance with MSBC Chapter 1340.
All voted in favor, except Diane Harberts who was not present to vote, and the motion
carried.
Farmakes: Should that be given a number of reference?
Aanenson: Yeah... site plan review.
Scott: #94 -1 -A, I don't know but I think the verbiage is clear as to what's going on.
Mancino: Now the site plan for.
Scott: Okay. Can I have another motion please? If, do we want to have that as the extent of
our motion? Okay.
Conrad: Keep going. Motion.
Scott: Oh, I was just going to say, let's give some more time and.
Conrad: This is confusing Joe.
Scott: Well see I don't have to make the motion. That's why I can say it. But sure, we'll
take as much time as you need to.
Mancino: The next thing that we need to do is recommend, or I recommend denial of the
54
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
Kindercare site plan.
Aanenson: I think what's left is on the subdivision. When you subdivide it, depending on
whatever you do with the Kindercare—the subdivision along the line move to further to the
east for the Press expansion. You left the remaining of that property all in an outlot. So if,
whatever you do with the Kindercare, you need to ... split that lot.
Mancino: So we should do that first?
Aanenson: Well I...
Scott: That was one of the motions that we had last time was to.
Aanenson: Yeah, but you left it all as one outlot. You didn't want Kindercare to go in so
whatever you do.
Scott: And your motion is?
Conrad: Well you're just, Nancy you just want to deny the subdivision. You don't need to
say anything about Kindercare. You want to deny the subdivision because of traffic and all
these things. I'm not making the motion.
Scott: Or based upon Dave's information, do you want to see that before we pass it on?
Mancino: No, that would be fine if he puts a report in before it gets to City Council. I want
to deny the subdivision?
Conrad: I think you do.
Mancino: I think I want to deny the Kindercare site review. Can I have some help from
staff?
Al -Jaff: Basically right now, if you deny the Kindercare, the subdivision would be done
administratively because we're only moving a property line. We're not going to give them
any additional.
Aanenson: Yeah but it doesn't, it keeps that as one lot though. So it would have to be split
again so it prevents that other lot from being split which would allow the Kindercare ... So if
you left your motion as it stands, everything... to the Press expansion is still on an outlot.
55
n
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
Mancino: Which is what we had before.
Scott: Which is Lot 1, Outlot A I think is what you said.
' Aanenson: Correct. Yeah.
' Mancino: And we've already approved the preliminary plat for Subdivision #94 -2 for Park
One 3rd Addition into Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot A (Lots 2 and 3, Block 1), with the
following conditions. And this is on page 6 of the staff report which is 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
Any second to that motion?
' Farmakes: I'll second that.
Scott: It's been moved and seconded. That we, it's been moved with a second, this really is
' discussion. No discussion?
Ledvina: Hold on. Is this a repeat of essentially the previous motion?
' Scott: A repeat but getting.
' Ledvina: But getting the outlot in there. Identifying the outlot.
Aanenson: You did that before.
Ledvina: Okay. Alright.
' Scott: Would you restate that motion so I understand what you're saying.
Mancino: I'm repeating the motion that we made 2 weeks ago on April 13th on page 6 of
the staff report which is I'm recommending approval of preliminary plat for Subdivision #94-
2 for Park One 3rd Addition into Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot A (Lots 2 and 3, Block 1), with
the following conditions. Number 1 in it's entirety. Number 2 in it's entirety. Number 3 in
' it's entirety. Number 4 in it's entirety. Number 5 in it's entirety. And number 6 in it's
entirety.
r Mancino moved, Farmakes seconded that the Planning Commission recommend
approval of Preliminary Plat for Subdivision #94 -2 for Park One 3rd Addition into Lot
' 1, Block 1 and Outlot A (Lots 2 and 3, Block 1), with the following conditions:
1. Park and trail dedication fees to be collected per city ordinance.
56
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994 1
2. Provide the following easements:
a. A standard 5 foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated along the
common lot line between Lot 1 and Outlot A, Block 1.
b. Delete. I
c. A 15 foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated on the final plat
along the west property line of Outlot A to facilitate the extension of the sewer
service.
3. Enter into a site plan development agreement acceptable to the city. ,
4. A driveway or cross access easement for use of the access off 77th Street West. The
easement shall be dedicated in favor of Lots 1, Block 1 and Outlot A. The easement '
agreement shall be drafted and filed concurrently with a private maintenance
agreement acceptable to the City.
5. The developer shall obtain and comply with all necessary permits from the Watershed '
District, Health Department, etc.
6. Erosion control measures (silt fence - Type I) shall be shown on the grading plan. Silt
fence shall be placed along the north property line where the parking lot for the Press
is being relocated.
All voted in favor, except Diane Harberts who was not present to vote, and the motion
carried. ,
Scott: Can I have another motion? ,
Mancino: What other motion do we have to pass? Conditional use?
Ledvina: No, we don't want that. This relates to the site plan for Kindercare, right? ,
Scott: Well now there's an outlot so it hasn't been, it hasn't been subdivided for that '
particular parcel so, does that preclude us from then doing anything with regard to the
Kindercare site plan and the conditional use permit now because there's no lot for it?
Aanenson: There's no lot, yeah. '
57
r�
V
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
Ledvina: So is that it?
Scott: Now, if someone wants to make any additional motions.
Farmakes: Well, what message are you sending?
Mancino: Yeah, that's the important part. What message, what are we sending to the City
Council to make sure that they understand why we are denying this? That's what's important
to me.
Farmakes: It's barely an issue of lot lines...
Scott: Or direction to the applicant. I mean there's a situation where, I think what we need
to do is to say well, obviously we've got some issues with public safety, etc, etc. Maybe we
need to do some if then. I don't know, I'm throwing that out. But right now it's, the
conditional use doesn't go on. The Kindercare site plan does not go on. Basically we're
sending them the Press again. Is that what you want to do?
Conrad: That's okay.
Scott: Okay. If that's what we want to do, then we don't need any other motions.
Conrad: I guess I'm real confused. Now Nancy, your last motion recommended approval of
the plat for the subdivision.
Scott: The Press expansion.
Mancino: So I want to make sure that the Press is subdivided into that lot.
Scott: So basically it just sends forward the Press expansion and the necessary lot line
movement to handle it. And that's because the original plat included the existing Press
facility. It did not include where the expansion is going, correct? So we had to replat to
make room for the expansion and then send the site plan along for the expansion so.
' Conrad: The original plat did not have on it.
Ledvina: This is what we did. This is what they wanted and we took this line out.
Essentially. They wanted Lots 1 and 2 here and we just made it Outlot A, or whatever, so
we took that out. So we said that would have to be the entire piece then.
1 58
Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994 1
Scott: So basically the signal or the message that we're sending is that the same thing all !
over again. Press expansion is fine. There's still some additional issues. Now just the next
question then. If Dave comes back next time and says hey. This works just fine. Are there ,
some other things because I think what we want to do is give the applicant some very
specific direction and say hey, if you do this, then because I don't want to just have this kind
of fluffy thing going on. ,
Mancino: Jeff, articulate this.
Scott: If it's a parking lot in back. '
Farmakes: I think we're just repeating ourselves... several times. In listening to the applicant, '
both here and at City Council, it seems to me that they're.
Scott: They don't want to change. '
Farmakes: That they have a pretty concise idea of what was necessary to move that forward '
and ... They chose not to deal with that so Ladd's right. Deny it and send it forward.
Mancino: And the issues are Highway 5 which Jeff eloquently said and.
Scott: Okay, so we're. '
Mancino: And traffic circulation and no staff report on the new entrance.
Scott: So are we all satisfied that the motions that we passed indicate the direction we want?
Yes?
Ledvina: Yes. i
Farmakes: I'm comfortable. '
Scott: You're fine. Ladd?
Conrad: Sure. t
Aanenson: Can I have a clarification on that then. Because you didn't act on it, we have to
pass the 60 days. The Kindercare is still...
59
I Planning Commission Meeting - May 4, 1994
1 Scott: Yeah.
L�
Aanenson: So the Press is going forward but the Kindercare stays here?
Farmakes: I would be comfortable denying it and sending it on.
Aanenson: Well you have to have a motion...
Scott: And that 60 day time period will be, since it's the commission we're talking June 4th?
Because we got it on April 4th. June 4th?
Aanenson: Yeah.
Scott: Okay. So one way or the other the conditional use permit's going to be able to be
acted on by the City Council.
Aanenson: Right, but if you want to put it on your next agenda, that's fine. Otherwise it will
just sit in holding until you...
Scott: Yeah, I mean I'd like to hear what you have to say. Because that's real important.
Public safety is an important issue.
Mancino: So we have to make a motion?
Scott: No we don't.
Aanenson: ...unless you want to put it back on.
Scott: Okay. Item 5 was deleted.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Mancino moved, Farmakes seconded to approve the Planning
Commission Minutes dated April 20, 1994 as presented. All voted in favor and the motion
carried.
' CITY COUNCIL UPDATE.
Aanenson: ...was given final plat approval. ...Heritage plat that you recommended denial and
' the City Council did also. What we found out with this plat is the extension of that street
will... run north/south along the eastern border of Timberwood. As we find out what that
plat... so we had to work to get that resolved and ... The Council did approve a design charette
60
r-,
S1 `RGAR ROSCOE-FAUSCH, I`7 �.-
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS
TRANSPORTi1MN ■ C VII- a 6MUC MAL ■ ENVIRONMENTAL / PARKNO
SRF No. 0942056 1
MEMORANDUM
TO: David C_ Hemple
Assistant City Engineer
City of Chanhassen
FROM: Dennis R. Eyler, P.E.
Principal
Jeffrey R. Bednar
Senior Traffic Engineering Specialist
DATE: May 24, 1994
SUBJECT: KINDERCARE SITE ACCESS REVIEW
T.H. 5 & DELL ROAD
L.U.R. FILE NO. 94 -7
As you requested, we have completed a cursory review of the subject site
access and circulation issues. Based on this review, we offer the following
comments and recommendations for your consideration:
1. The tight turning radiuses and turning restrictions associated with the site
are a concem, especially for emergency vehicles such as ambulances
and firelrescue vehicles.
2. Any type of access shared with the adjacent "Press" property will result in
a potential for short -cut use of the Kindercare parking facility. Attached is
a conceptual sketch of an alternative site parking layout which may
discourage this short -cut traffic.
3. Due to the median restricted Dell Road access it can be expected that
many site generated trips will include a U -tum either at 77th Street or
Highway 5. This could represent a potential traffic accident occurrence
factor. Most drivers will at least initially attempt these U -turns instead of
using the alternative "Press" private property access option.
Suite 150, One Carlson Parkwav North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55447-4443
e
1
Planning Commission Meeting - June 1, 1994
Mancino: At the school.
Scott: Well there's a, I'm trying to remember who had it.
Mancino: Oh, Heritage.
Scott: Yeah. So there's an opportunity if you would like to make a proposal on that
particular piece. See there's, we've retained some of that, we've seen a request to rezone
property adjacent to the north side of Timberwood and I believe there are some 15,000 square
foot lots. At least the development that we saw had 15,000 square foot lots lined up, you
know where the power line goes through there?
Mancino: Yes.
Scott: Abutting the east side. So that is a similar, it's guided similar to this particular
property but it is not as far along.
Mancino: And this one has some other site characteristics being ... 100 %. 99.6% wooded so...
to preserve some of our woodland areas. And I think that this is important so that we do
have bigger lots...
Scott: And severe topography.
Mancino: Severe topography which will be a little different. I just, I don't know. Don't
think that this is the best use of that land.
Scott: Okay. This is for the 13th? Okay. Thank you for coming sir. And the applicant,
thank you.
SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR A 10,315 SQUARE FOOT KINDERCARE FACILITY AND
A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A LICENSED DAY CARE CENTER IN AN
IOP, INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT
OF DELL ROAD AND STATE HIGHWAY 5 MARCUS CORPORATION.
Sharmin Al -Jaff presented the staff report on this item
Scott: Any questions or comments from commissioners?
Mancino: Sharmin, I just have a question about the site plan review on page, starting on
page 1. The April 13th meeting. That those need to be revised. That those are not the...13th
28
Planning Commission Meeting - June 1, 1994 ,
meeting. The staff recommendation that we adopted the following motions on April 13th.
That those are different than the ones that start on page 34. So I wanted to make sure that
you've got the right ones in here. On page 34 it says, Mancino moved, Harberts seconded
that the Planning Commission recommend to approve the site plan review for a 54,760 square
foot expansion of the Press building shown on the site plan received April 13, 1993 subject to
the following conditions. And if you look for instance on number 6 on page 2 of our current '
report dated May 26, 1994 it says, the Press addition shall contain architectural detailing to
break the long wall masses. If you look on page 35, number 6. You had put in bold, what
we wanted to add so that all of these 1 thru 21 should really reflect or be the same ones as '
what's on page 34, 35, and 36. Is that correct? Because I know that we wanted to keep the
impervious surface of the Press at 70% and you had that in 19 on page 36. Is everybody
kind of following me? '
Commission: Yes.
Mancino: Okay. So we need to change that. Thank you. And I don't know about 20 and
21. Yeah, 20 and 21 stay also. That are on page 3 of the most recent staff report. Thank
you. 1
Scott: Any other questions or comments for staff? Dave, I've got a question for you on the '
SRF memo. Item number 1. The tight turning radiuses and turning restrictions associated
with the site are a concern, especially for emergency vehicles such as ambulances and fire
rescue vehicles. Would this be the kind of thing that would be sent to the fire department,
staff or, because I saw this and then I was looking through my staff report expecting to see a '
memo from Jim. Is this the kind of, I mean they've reviewed the site plan that we saw the
first part of April and my expectation was to see a comment from them on that. To your '
knowledge have they had a chance to review this?
Hempel: No they have not. I
Scott: Huh, okay. Not yet. First of all are there any other comments for staff? None.
Would the applicant like to make a presentation? I
Mark Senn: Good evening. Forgive my voice. It's almost gone. We don't have any
problems with the consultant's suggestion in terms of the Kindercare parking lot. The other '
thing we did in response to some of your concerns was redesign the parking lot here creating
a detached driveway basically going through here towards the south. Basically there's a fairly
substantial barrier to use this thru traffic. We just have done the absolute, I didn't get a '
chance to mention it earlier today to staff ...but I think it answers a lot of the questions about
the pass thru traffic...
29
J
Planning Commission Meeting - June 1, 1994
Scott: Good. Just a show of hands. Are there any people here for the public hearing on the
Kindercare/Press expansion? Seeing none, we'll forego the public hearing. Ladd.
Conrad: I'm glad to see Mark go back. I don't want what you have. Well Dave, tell me
' about the traffic engineer's report in your mind. Have we improved? They've made some
statements. Have we taken it to the level that you're comfortable with?
' Hempel: I believe we have Commissioner Conrad based on the parking lot movements. The
one restriction that still is, makes me uncomfortable is the sharp turn into the site. But given
' the fact that they've then restricted the access to the site, we're really limited. I envisioned
seeing a lot of U turns happening at the intersection of 77th Street and Dell Road, or 24th
Street. Whatever you want to call it. Essentially traffic signage will be installed there to
prohibit those type of turning movements. And as people get more accustomed to access the
Kindercare through the Press site, it may alleviate that problem.
Conrad: So you haven't seen what Mark has done in terms of the internal roadway. In my
mind that is solving a major part of the traffic issue that had me concerned before. You have
not seen this?
Hempel: That's correct. I have not seen that in detail.
Conrad: Okay. On the surface it sure looks like it's taking care of the traffic needs which
would basically. The no U turn would basically force most traffic down that internal
' roadway, correct?
Hempel: That's correct.
Mancino: Ladd, can I further ask a question of Dave? Looking at this... As I was thinking
about it, one of my suggestions and can you put that up on an easel for us all to look at
' while I'm talking and Mark, you want to be too. To maybe simplify the circulation problem
and I know that we were all concerned with the U turns. When you're leaving on Dell Road
and the U turns we create on the 77th, we were concerned about the people from the Press
' parking lot cutting through to get to Dell Road and they still can go around the barrier,
although that's much better. The barrier that's up there. But it still doesn't close off the cut
thru. My question is, and it's something that's, I know that Jeff brought out in the last
meeting was, flip flopping the playground and the parking lot. First of all the parking lot,
according to the consultants, would be 33 spaces versus 45 and that's I per 6 child which is
what our ordinances require. But if you have the parking lot, flip flop it. We have it on the
north side of the building, you egress and ingress through the 77th driveway through the Press
1 30
Planning Commission Meeting - June 1, 1994 ,
and o into the parking lot and that's our egress and ingress. There's nothing on the Dell ,
g P g Y Sr' Sr g
Road so that people can't cut through. The Press employees can't cut through to get to Dell ,
Road. You have one driveway that accesses both the Press and Kindercare, which is done for
Abra and Goodyear and the emission controls where you have the one driveway and you go
to each individual place, and doesn't that cut a lot of the circulation problems? Easy. '
Scott: Yeah, you don't have the U turns.
Mancino: You don't have U turns. You have people coming off of Highway 5. If they're '
coming west, obviously a right turn onto Dell Road. East on 77th and come through that
way. And you don't have any cut throughs and you don't have your turning radiuses so '
small. I mean you have to kind of redesign that entry point but that seems to me to be very,
very simple and we could use it in other applications.
Farmakes: How has the pad changed? That he's proposed. '
Conrad: I thought you didn't want to put the kids close to the electrical wires. '
Mancino: The building's in the same place.
Conrad: But the kids are closer you know. I think.
Farmakes: You need more room to the north. I
Mancino: You need less room because first of all the parking lot wouldn't be as big. The
parking lot gets smaller. It has 33 spaces, not 45. And you can actually take the building a '
little bit more to your east and if you wanted to put some staff parking on the west side of
the building there. The buildings are in the same place. The kids are going to be in the
building 3/4 of the time you know in the day and that's the same distance from the electrical '
wires versus they may be outside a couple hours a day. And in the winter they're never.
Conrad: Well did I read things wrong the last meeting we had. I really thought that, I think '
that's a real logical thing to move the parking lot to the other side in terms of traffic.
Mark Senn: As far as traffic goes, I can't disagree with you but they can't build the facility
then and the reason is the lot, the playground cannot be on that side of the building. Yes,
there's the regulations as it relates to the readings coming off of the lines. Okay. The '
building right now meets that setback because the parking lot is in front of it. The
playground area is considered the exact same way that the building is as it relates to what's
emitted off of those power lines. They're actually more exposed because now you've '
31 '
I Planning Commission Meeting - June 1, 1994
' eliminated the shell buildin g and putting the kids out in effect an open area and stuff. The
other thing is that you also have a highway out there with 55 mph speed limit and stuff and if
' a runaway car would occur, you have absolutely no barrier at that point between a playground
area in effect and where the kids would be outside. And in a situation, I mean you'd have a
' limitation of a berm and that's about it.
Farmakes: There's two berms there though. The signal light berm and then there's the hill
plus the trees you're planting. I see what you're saying. As 200 feet for a setback. That
' was their recommendation though.
' Mancino: It's not a state recommendation.
Farmakes: Well there is no recommendation based on what we've read there in... There's
' fielder's choice. They can't say there is and they can't say there isn't.
Mark Senn: There is no current U.S. law. There is a current U.S. standard which follows the
European standard of 150 feet back. Okay. And the standard has no basis in law one way or
the other. Right now there is pending legislation to make that but that hasn't been passed and
it's an issue that's going through substantial debate because of the power constraints and who
' knows if it's ever going to be passed. Those laws have been passed in Europe and again
that's a standard that's trying ... in Europe.
' Mancino: How did you draw any conclusions from your reading?
Conrad: Well, I guess I would err on, well. I think there's something to it and I would feel
' badly by, you've got a safety problem in terms of traffic and if some kid gets hurt, we're
going to feel badly. Yet on the other hand, if you put 50 to 100 kids closer to some
electrical, you don't know what that damage is. It's not necessarily seen real quickly. I
couldn't do that. I couldn't expose them simply knowing that there probably is some impact.
Even though it's not proven. Even though maybe there aren't the definite standards. I think
if there's a debate, I guess you can't do it so the risk is we still have a mediocre traffic
i situation at best. But I think it's been improved. Your solution was just perfect, and I think
the parking lot in the rear is exactly where it should be Nancy. But we can't put the kids out
close to the wires.
Mancino: What do we do about single family developments then. They are going to go very
close to, you know and I see it in Eden Prairie. Down Highway 5. There are single family
' houses that are right underneath them. I mean they're not, maybe they're 20 feet away.
What do we do at that point? Do we say as a city that you can't build closer than a certain
footage from you know the power lines? And is that a taking? I mean you know. I'm
32
fJ
Planning Commission Meeting - June 1, 1994
taking what you're saying and.
Mark Senn: If I could offer, you don't have to say that. Okay. Right now there isn't a
mortgage company I'm aware of that would lend on a house that way. Now that doesn't go
back to say that when houses you're referencing in Eden Prairie were built some 20 -30 years
ago, that wasn't the case.
Mancino: No, new ones. Just the new ones that are on Highway 5 on the north side between
that shopping center and Dell Road. I mean there are new houses right there.
Mark Senn: Between the shopping center and Dell Road?
Mancino: Yeah. What.
Conrad: County 4 going west.
Mark Senn: The housing all along Highway 5 on the north side there is not new housing.
It's far from it.
Mancino: But it's not 23 years old. I mean it's in the last.
Mark Senn: Well it may be 15 years, yeah. Maybe 15 at best.
Mancino: That was just last year.
Scott: I know Diane's house is probably 5 years old and she's got a power line running
down her east property line.
Conrad: We wanted these power lines buried as I recall.
Mancino: Does that help?
Scott: No. What about taking your idea where the traffic goes down into the Press and
there's no ingress and egress onto Dell Road but the ingress and egress is from the west side
of the parking lot?
Mancino: Sure. Take the same idea and just cut the egress and ingress off of Dell Road.
Keep the parking lot where it is and then you just, you know. I mean that would work too.
33
t
Planning Commission Meeting - June 1, 1994
' Scott: Because it seems like, in listening to Dave, I mean it seems that that's going to be
kind of a traffic pattern that you're not going to want to have more. They're talking about
800 trips a day or something like that?
Hempel: That's correct. And then all of those would be doing the U turns. Some of those.
' Some would be normal southbound traffic on Dell Road. Another consideration too, if you
eliminate that U turn would be to restrict this access onto Dell Road as a right out only...
' Mancino: Yeah, no entry.
Hempel: That would force your traffic to enter the site from the Press driveway.
Mancino: But that still doesn't eliminate any sort of a cut through. I mean what the
' developer has done has helped negate that. I understand that. I just wanted to respond to
your circulation and parking lot.
Conrad: The cut thru is a big deal. And informing the Press employees not to do it is not,
that's not forever. That's 2 weeks. A month and then it's gone. It's just got to, you know
I'm looking for an absolute way. I think you've got to have a right in, right out. I'd rather
' not be moving people up and down that long road. There's going to be some development up
there and I don't know. I guess I'd rather not do that if I don't have to so getting people out
is probably the right thing to do but I really haven't found the solution to keep the cut
' through down. I can't come up with that.
Scott: What do you think Dave?
' Hempel: I just thought of something and I'll throw it out on the table at this time. The
access issue onto Dell Road, it would be nice to have an access onto Dell Road, especially if
' you have another development occur north of this site. What happens if that access street
divides these two parcels? Or if we cut off the access to the Kindercare off of Dell Road but
later on when the parcels to the north develop, we have a thru street there. That would serve
' as a.
Mancino: Show me where that would be.
' YHempel: Midway point in this fashion in here.
P
Mancino: Okay. So it services both the north and the south lot.
' Hempel: Right. Or either short cut if you will out of the site through here. It divides the
34
Planning Commission Meeting - June 1, 1994 '
two points off the parking lot. What would happen though if this drive aisle would ideally '
have to be shifted back to provide this, have a 4 way intersection if you will. You'd have to
provide enough buffering though between the playground area and their access. That would '
give you access either to the site through there or through at this site here. It still wouldn't
eliminate your U turn potential though at 77th Street if somebody wanted to come in through
that and turn.
Mancino: But that would eliminate any cut through that we're concerned about through the '
parking lot?
Hempel: That's correct.
Scott: To the Kindercare center. '
Mancino: Any other comments on that? That's pretty good.
Conrad: Something to think about. Then you've got some traffic conflicts. Internal '
conflicts. Dave, would that cut out the road, no you'd still have the road going to the north.
So you've got cross traffic. Mr. Chairman, I don't have any other comments other than the '
traffic issue.
Scott: Okay. Any other comments? Matt. I
Ledvina: Well, I'm not going to add anything more to the traffic discussion other than the
memo from SRF. That first comment. I don't know, it seems to leave everything up in the '
air, and what weight do we place on that? It says the tight turning radiuses and the turning
restrictions associated with the site are a concern, especially for emergency vehicles such as
ambulances and fire rescue vehicles. Is this to the point where we, is this such a concern that
you know it's unacceptable? Do you have thoughts on that Dave? I don't know. I mean if
we have to have that access, are we cutting ourselves short by approving this site plan?
Hempel: I don't want to speak for public safety but I would like to point out there is two '
access points to this site for emergency vehicles. The quickest response route, I couldn't give
you that answer at this time. I would suspect the turning radius onto Dell Road would ,
accommodate a paramedic type unit vehicle or ambulance and definitely would not
accommodate a full fledged fire truck.
Ledvina: In the event that we had a fire emergency, a couple extra thousand feet or whatever '
to go through the Press access, right? '
35
�I
Planning Commission Meeting - June 1, 1994
Hempel: Actually it may be a shorter route if they use West 78th Street as a frontage road to
get to the Press access. It might actually be quicker than going out onto Highway 5, down
Dell Road and trying to make a turn there.
Ledvina: That's right.
Hempel: The other issue, if a fire truck pulls up, they may just stay on Dell Road to address
any kind of a fire.
Ledvina: Okay. So the magnitude of that comment is somewhat unknown but it's, it may
not necessarily be.
Conrad: I don't think it's stops it.
Ledvina: A deal killer, okay. Alright. I guess I would like to see if we do take the
recommendation by SRF. I notice that they have a parking plan that utilizes 33 parking stalls
and I don't know what the proposal with the new plan is. It's probably still at 45 but I think
one of the things that we've talked about is softening the, you know the parking lot impact on
that side of the building and I think that would help if we start reducing those spots to what's
a more reasonable number and what's, you know what can be laid out to accommodate the
site based on ordinance and what's been discussed in the past. So I would like to see that. I
don't know about the cut through issue. I think if you have a speed bump there, I think
that's going to slow the traffic down and you're going to reduce your conflicts between
pedestrians and vehicles. They're going to be there but at least at slower speeds you're going
to increase the safety factor so.
Conrad: Matt, I think the new design that got brought in is going to help that But pay
attention to the fact that as you're coming from the north down to the south, you miss the
first entry point and then you've got to loop around so we got double traffic in there. So you
come in to the south. You loop around to drop your kid off to the north and then you loop
around again so we're.
Ledvina: Well, I don't know.
' Farmakes: You interpret SRF as a glowing recommendation? Is that what I heard?
Ledvina: I don't know. I think that, I know that there's a lot of looping going on here.
'
There's kind of one way type of traffic in here but I don't know. I think that it can work.
That's the extent of my comments at this time.
36
Planning Commission Meeting - June 1, 1994
Scott: Okay, thanks. Jeff.
Farmakes: I'm going to back up just a little bit and rather than... traffic. I'm going to discuss
the use of what we have here. It's becoming apparent to me that this is not an appropriate
use at this particular area. I think environmentally there are potential hazards. We're not
sure what they are. It's constricting where the building goes or where the outlot development
goes in that building... There is virtually nothing that can be done for the Highway 5 issues
that we talked about. That's another issue that we're not discussing here right now tonight.
But it is a pertinent issue for this area. I think that this is typical of the type of the
development that you're going to see on the remainder of Highway 5. More often than not
we'll see parking lots extended as far and as close to Highway 5 as you can get them. The
barrier I think is minimal between TH 5 and the highway, although I'm not sure it's an
endangerment but even, it's a buffer of some sort. Essentially you've got enough room for a
row of trees and that's nothing different than what Eden Prairie's done. A lot of things in the
traffic pattern are telling us that this is a make work situation. It's not an optimal situation.
Potential options as I see it would be to run the road higher on the border line. I'm not sure
how much that would reduce the additional lot sizes.
Mancino: What does that mean?
Farmakes: The recommendation that the city engineer just made. To replace the Kindercare
on the north lot. Again, the marketability of the south lot comes into question I think because
of it's access. I don't think that on this scale that this is an appropriate use for a daycare
center. The issues have been brought up that financially it has to go there. It has to be seen
from the highway. There are several daycares, both commercial and not commercial. I'll use
the example of the Sunshine or Sunrise and non - commercial would be the Lutheran Church
up here that we just looked at. They've got about 100 kids there. It's an old daycare. It's
been there for years.
Scott: Or the New Horizon that's on Lake Drive and faces south.
Farmakes: They are not dependent on signage from a major highway, although I'm sure it
would be beneficial or desirable. Again, I have to ask myself what's an appropriate use there.
It almost seems like we're sticking a use there that would be inappropriate. I would expect in
looking at that, that would be an industrial use. And remain so. The problem if the daycare
were shifted to the north, I think it would lessen the environmental concerns, but also lessen
the traffic problem. Again, that does not address the problem of the developer and
marketability of the south lot. But I think that those are criteria that back up farther than just
discussing the traffic issue. I don't think this is a glowing recommendation on the part of the
engineer. At least that's my interpretation of it. It says yeah, you can do it but it's probably
37
I
Planning Commission Meeting - June 1, 1994
' not a ood idea. I have concern about the U turn issues and I think an of those would be
g Y
enough to deny this usage and I see several still yet remaining as compelling issues to me to
discuss it. That's where I'm at.
Mancino: Another thing I think you would add. I think we're trying to work something in
there that just doesn't, isn't working. Circulation wise. Highway 5 wise. Even
architecturally wise in this IOP area. I think that the Kindercare architectural style does not
' fit in here. So I have still some big concerns with trying to put it here on this lot.
Scott: Well we have 3, we need 3 motions. One for the site plan review. One for the
' preliminary plat and one for the conditional use permit. So, would any of you like to take a
stab at any one of those?
' Mancino: Didn't hear your comments.
Scott: I would have just been, I don't have any new issues so. So I'd like to call the
' question or have a motion please. Jeff, do you want to take the conditional use permit.
Mancino: Kate, a question for you and Sharmin. Conditional use permit. This is a
conditional use permitted in this area, correct?
Al -Jaff: For use of a daycare center.
' Mancino: Daycare center in an IOP.
' Al -Jaff: ...permitted under conditional use permits in an IOP.
Mancino: Okay. So that's a done deal, Kate is it?
' Aanenson: No, g ou have to o through the criteria to see whether or not it meets the criteria
Y g
of a conditional use. That's what Sharmin has outlined in the report. And we have to have
findings to support your recommendation. That's what Sharmin put in her report...
' Conrad: Before somebody makes a motion. Nancy, Jeff. If the parking lot were flip
flopped, then what? Mark says it's a dead deal but if it was flip flopped, have we solved.
' Farmakes: The only way that that would work if you flip flopped it is you have to back up
the building a little bit farther to the north so that the playground area was beyond the
recommendation. I'm still uncomfortable with the recommendation. 150 feet. That's what
the Europeans are doing. I've never seen so many, well I guess I don't look at government
' 38
Planning Commission Meeting - June 1, 1994
reports that often from the EPA but it kind of reminds me of the water quality thing from
where we had this various government agencies giving you reports that really were 300 pages
to say very little. I got nothing out of those reports.
Conrad: So how do you read that? Then if you got nothing out of them, then are you
concerned?
Farmakes: If there is a problem, I hate to put kids within 50 feet of them..
Mancino: Yeah, exactly. I'm still concerned. I feel like it's a catch 22 either way. I mean
yes, I would like to flip flop this as I first brought up and I thought that that probably solved
the circulation problems but I'm not going to put children at risk.
Farmakes: If the city looks at acquiring some additional property along TH 5 for some tree
massing or something. Total feet or enough property to get us something other than a row of
trees, will there be a viable lot to the north if you move everything up 50 feet? A second lot.
It seems to me that you have to ask the question first as to whether or not that particular use
there, even as a conditional use, is viable for that area and theta does it fit into the site. I'm
still very worried about this issue of are we taking considerations for the outlot, the totlot
issue. We're going to move it 150 feet here but again, the criteria that we're using is being
supplied by the applicant. And I was surprised that the government really has to press this
issue at all.
Mancino: Well if you move this to the north and you put a building in for people to work
in, I mean you move this to the north and then you have this southern lot. What goes in
there? Do you want those people susceptible to the same problem? Whether it's children or
whether it's adults. Inside a building.
Conrad: You're really talking about quantities. The power line is there. The power line is
running along Highway 5. It was approved to go there. There are, to my knowledge there
aren't really grade restrictions. There aren't restrictions so we're making them up or we're
just...
(There was a tape change at this point and the remainder of the discussion pertaining to this
item did not get recorded. The following is a summary of the action taken.)
Matt Ledvina made a motion that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Site Plan
Review #94 -1 as shown on the site plan received April 13, 1994 and as updated on June 1,
1994 by the applicant pertaining to the access from the north, subject to the following
conditions:
39
C
r
I Planning Commission Meeting - June 1, 1994
' 1. That the applicant must revise plans to include trash screening of the Press site and
show the type of materials used to screen the trash enclosures on the Press site. Plans
' must be submitted for staff review prior to City Council meeting.
2. The applicant must obtain a sign permit prior to erecting any signage on site. The
monument sign on the Kindercare site shall utilize brick as a base for the sign rather
than metal poles.
3. The applicant shall provide a meandering berm with landscaping along the south
portion of the site, between the parking lot and Highway 5. The height of the berm
shall be between 3 and 4 feet. The applicant shall also provide staff with a detailed
' cost estimate of landscaping to be used in calculating the required financial guarantees.
These guarantees must be posted prior to building permit issuance. There shall be
added landscaping to the perimeter of the Press expansion of coniferous trees as
suggested by Nancy Mancino.
' 4. The applicant shall enter into a site plan development contract with the city and provide
the necessary financial securities as required for landscaping.
' 5. Meet all conditions outlined in the Fire Marshal memo dated March 10, 1994.
6. The Press addition shall contain some architectural detailing (with relief) to break up
the long wall masses
7. Concurrent with the building permit, a detailed lighting plan meeting city standards
' shall be submitted.
8. The grading/utility plan shall be revised to incorporate storm sewers in the parking lot's
' drive aisles for the Press. Detailed drainage calculations for a 10 year storm event
shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval.
I 9. The applicant shall apply and comply with the necessary permits from the appropriate
agencies (MPCA, Watershed District, and City Building Department).
' 10. Silt fence shall be placed along the northern property line where the parking lot for the
Press is being relocated.
' 11. A rock construction entrance shall also be placed at the driveway entrance to the
Kindercare site off of Dell Road.
Ell
Planning Commission Meeting - June 1, 1994
12. The applicant shall utilize the existing water service from Dell Road. Open cutting of '
Dell Road will be prohibited.
13. The main thoroughfare (drive aisle) located on the Press site north of the main parking '
lot area should be a minimum width of 26 feet with turning radiuses at 77th Street
West of 30 feet and two way traffic. In addition, the main thoroughfare (drive aisle) '
shall be posted with no parking signs.
14. The driveway access point shall be constructed in accordance to the City's typical
industrial driveway apron detail.
15.
The applicant shall provide the City with a security deposit (letter of credit or cash
escrow) in the amount of $5,000.00 to guarantee boulevard restoration. All boulevards
'
disturbed as a result of the site improvements shall be restored with sod.
16.
Conditions of the Building Official's memo dated March 25, 1994.
'
17.
An island or a speed bump shall be placed between the Press and Kindercare site to
'
slow down and discourage traffic from cutting through the Kindercare site.
18.
No roof top equipment shall be visible from Highway 5, Dell Road or 77th Street
'
West.
19.
Brick shall be used on the Kindercare facade to resemble the building shown in the
submitted photographs.
20.
The traffic circulation and parking lot layout shall be revised as shown on the revised
plan prepared by Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. Access to Dell Road shall be revised to
a right -out only to eliminate short cuts. The maximum number of parking stalls
will be limited to 33.
,
21.
The applicant shall be responsible for all fees associated with the traffic study prepared
by SRF.
22.
There shall be a landscaping easement of 30 feet running parallel to Highway 5
and then north parallel to Dell Road a distance of 75 feet. A significant number
'
of trees shall be placed on the southeast corner for an entryway. Plantings around
the building as well as interior parking shall be provided.
23.
Staff shall review an east/west connection.
41
1
Planning Commission Meeting - June 1, 1994
24. Proportion of the roof size to the building wall height is incompatible.
Architectural plans must be revised to reflect compatibility. The applicant shall
bring in architectural drawings of the Kindercare building making it compatible
with buildings in the surrounding area.
Ledvina and Conrad voted in favor of this motion and Mancino, Scott and Farmakes voted in
opposition. The motion failed with a vote of 2 to 3.
Farmakes moved and Mancino seconded to deny Site Plan Review #94 -1 for the Kindercare
Daycare facility based on traffic circulation and inconclusive information relating to the
harmful effects of Electro Magnetic Field from power lines. Scott, Mancino and Farmakes
voted in favor of denial and Conrad and Ledvina voted in opposition. The motion carried
with a vote of 3 to 2.
The Conditional Use Permit #94 -1 was also denied by the Planning Commission.
PUBLIC HEARING:
REQUEST FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY ZONED RSF
TO PUD (46.56 ACRES), PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR 74 LOTS OF MIXED HIGH
DENSITY (186 QNVELLING UNITS), 15 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND AN OUTLOT
WHICH WILL CONTAIN FUTURE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL USE(S),
SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR MIXED HIGH DENSITY DWELLING UNITS AND
VACATION OF A PORTION OF 86TH STREET. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED
EAST OF HWY. 101 AT 86TH STREET, MISSION HILLS, TANDEM PROPERTIES.
Sham Al -Jaff presented the staff report on this item.
(Taping of the meeting began again at this point in the discussion.)
Don Jensen: ...window shapes create budding problems for signing and other ways to make
ceiling of those designs. They're a little bit more difficult and they add cost to the building.
So if we can keep within those particular parameters that we've looked at and that we've
proposed, we would appreciate the Planning Commission working with us on that particular
42