2o. Establish 1994 Park and Trail Dedication Fees1
1
J
1
�J
CITY OF aO
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager
FROM: Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Director
DATE: January 5, 1994
SUBJ: Establish 1994 Park and Trail Dedication Fees
City Code Section 18 -79 specifies that park and trail fees shall be established annually by the city
council by resolution. Park and trail fees are based upon the premise that the development which
is creating a need for parks, open space, and trail systems is responsible for the initial provision
of these services. The city standard for the provision of park/open space is one acre of land for
every 75 persons. Therefore, 25 single family homes, with an average of three persons per home,
creates a need for one acre of park/open space.
Upon receiving an application for development of 25 sites, the city has the option of
requiring dedication of one acre of suitable park/open space, or requiring an equivalent cash
contribution, or requiring any combination of both. If a cash contribution is determined to be
in the best interests of the city, it has been the city's policy to collect this fee at the time of
building permit application in lieu of a lump sum collection at the time of plat approval. In order
to receive cash, equivalent to the value of the land, a median "land value" must be established
allowing the per household park fee to be determined. In 1993, $20,000 per acre for residential
property was used. I am recommending that a figure of $22,500 ($25,000 may be even more
realistic) be used for 1994. This recommendation is, based upon recent or, pending land
transaction costs" in Chanhassen. Therefore, to receive an equivalent cash contribution in our
example, the development must generate $22,500 in park fees or $900 per home. For comparison
purposes, our current park fee of $600 would only allow us to offer $15,000 per acre. We are
all aware that $15,000 will not purchase an acre of residential property in Chanhassen. Trail fees
are assessed at 1 /a the park rate which would `to $300 per home at the proposed 1994 rates.
This is one case study of the premise on which the city's park and trail dedication fees are
founded. Obviously there are many more examples of this same principle which using a myriad
of different costs and numbers can be quantified. However, the results are similar and they all
point to the fact that the city's current park fees are not producing revenues equivalent to the
value of the land foregone in accepting fees. Fees for multi- family /apartment units are
established following the same criteria. Fees for industrial property are based on 10% of raw
MEMORANDUM
I Mr. Don Ashworth
January 5, 1994
Page 2
land values. The current industrial park fee of $3,000 per acre was based on land values for
' industrial property of $30,000 per acre. The current median price for industrial land is closer to
$45,000 per acre. Commercial rates have traditionally been established at a rate equal to the
industrial fee, although commercial property sells for much more per acre.
These findings bring me to the recommendation of establishing the 1994 park and trail fees at:
' Residential Single Family/Duplex Units $ 900 /unit
Multi- Family /Apartment Units $ 4561cnit WO, oa /- (,�
Commercial /Industrial Property $4,500 /acre
Trail Dedication Fees One -third the cost of park dedication fees
These increases should shock you; however, it is just as much of a shock that the current park
' fees do not even allow the city to buy the parks which it needs, much less install playground
equipment, ballfields, furnish picnic tables, etc. for its residents. Likewise, the current trail'fee
does not allow the city to even get out of the gates in the effort to provide a comprehensive trail
' system for its residents. At costs ranging from $100,000 to $300,000 per mile, 500 to 1,500
houses need to be built to pay for one mile of trail at current trail fee rates (251 residential
' building permits were issued in 1993).
In establishing the new fees for 1994, staff recognizes the extent of the increase over 1993. The
' rapid acceleration of the cost of land is the driving force behind this recommendation. We either
have to get our fair share or the city's residents will suffer the consequences. I have delivered
numerous red flags to the City Council on behalf of the Park and Recreation Commission in
' regard to the lack of finances available for park and trail development and acquisition. This
recommendation is part of the remedy. In consultation with the City Manager's office, a decision
was made to recommend requiring one -third of total park and trail fees for a development be paid
' at the time of final plat, collecting the remainder with the building permit. I recommend that this
system be authorized by the city council. (This change will require an ordinance amendment.)
Some cities (i.e. Burnsville, Lakeville, Plymouth) collect all fees at the time of final plat. A
' move to splitting the point of collection would allow the city to use the up front money to get
underway with park and trail development in lieu of always operating under deficit accounting.
I have attached four support items for your reference:
1. A memo dated September 15, 1993 (Items 1 and 4 pertain);
2. A recent survey of park and trail fees (courtesy of the City of Ramsey);
3. A draft resolution; and
4. Copy of 1993 resolution
f 18-78
CHANHASSEN CM CODE
(12) All utility lines for telephone and electrical service shall be placed underground or
where this is not feasible shall be placed in rear lot line easements when carried on
overhead poles.
(c) Prior to the city signing the final plat and prior to the construction of any improve-
ments, the developer shall provide the city with a letter of credit or cash escrow to insure that
all improvements required by this chapter will be installed and paid for at no city expense.
For improvements to be installed Vy the developer, the developer is obligated to install and
complete all such improvements at his own expense and under the supervision and inspection
of the city. For improvements which the city agrees to install, the developer shall pay the cost
of such improvements through payment of special assessments. As security to the city for
installation of the improvements or the payment of the special assessments, the developer
shall be required to file a cash escrow or letter of credit in an amount and form acceptable to
the city to cover the cost of all public improvements and special assessments.
(Ord. No. 33 -D,19, 2- 25-85; Ord. No. 33-E, # 1,12- 15-86)
Sec. 18.79. Park land dedication requirements.
(a) As a prerequisite to subdivision approval, subdividers shall dedicate land for parks,
playgrounds, public open spaces and trails and/or shall make a cash contribution to the city's
park fund and trail fund as provided by this section.
(b) Land to be dedicated shall be reasonably suitable for its intended use and shall be at a
location convenient to the people to be served. Factors used in evaluating the adequacy of
proposed park and recreation areas shall include size, shape, topography, geology, hydrology,
tree cover, access and location.
(c) The park and recreation committee shall recommend to the city council the land
dedication and cash contribution requirements for proposed subdivisions.
(d) Changes in density of plats shall be reviewed by the park and recreation committee
for reconsideration of park dedication and cash contribution requirements.
(e) When a proposed park, playground, recreational area, school site or other public
ground has been indicated in the city's official map or comprehensive plan and is located in
whole or in part within a proposed plat, it shall be designated as such on the plat and shall be
dedicated to the appropriate governmental unit. If the subdivider elects not to dedicate an
area in excess of the land required hereunder for such proposed public site, the city may
consider acquiring the site through purchase or condemnation.
(fl Land area conveyed or dedicated to the city shall not be used in calculating density
requirements of the city zoning ordinance and shall be in addition to and not in lieu of open
space requirements for planned unit developments.
(g) Where private open space for park and recreation purposes is provided in a proposed
subdivision, such areas may be used for credit, at the discretion of the city council, against the
requirement of dedication for park and recreation purposes, provided the city council finds it
is in the public interest to do so.
ve
Supp. No. 5 1016
SUBDIVISIONS 118-79
' (h) The city, upon consideration of the particular type of development, may require larger
or lesser parcels of land to be dedicated if the city determines that present or future residents
would require greater or lesser land for park and playground purposes.
(i) In residential plats one (1) acre of land shall be conveyed to the city as an outlet by
warranty deed for every seventy-five (75) people the platted land could house based upon the
following population calculations: .
Single - family detached dwelling lots ...... ............................8.0 persons
Two - family dwelling lots ................ ............................6.0 persons
' Apartment, townhouses, condominiums and other dwelling units, per bedroom 1.0 person
6) In plats other than residential plats, either a cash donation equal to ten (10) percent of
' the fair market value of the undeveloped property or ten (10) percent of the gross area of land
being platted or a combination thereof, shall be conveyed to the city.
' (k) In lieu of a park land donation, the city may require an equivalent cash donation based
upon average undeveloped land value in the city. The cash dedication requirement shall be
established annually by the city council.
'
(1) In lieu of a trail donation, trail construction, or trail easement dedication, the city may
require a cash donation for the trail system. The cash dedication requirement shall be estab-
lished annually by the city council.
(m) The city may elect to receive a combination of cash, land, and development of the
land for park use. The fair market value of the land the city wants. and the value of the
development of the land shall be calculated. That amount shall be subtracted from the cash
contribution required by subsection (k) above. The remainder shall be the cash contribution
requirement.
'
(n) "Fair market value" shall be determined as of the time of filing the final plat in
accordance with the following:
(1) The city and the developer may agree as to the fair market value, or
(2) The fair market value may be based upon a current appraisal submitted to the city by
'
the subdivider at the subdivider's expense.
(3) If the city disputes such appraisal the city may, at the subdivider's expense, obtain
an appraisal of the property by a qualified real estate appraiser, which appraisal
shall be conclusive evidence of the fair market value of the land.
(o) Planned developments with mixed land uses shall make cash and/or land contribu-
tions in accordance with this section based upon the percentage of land devoted to the various
uses.
(p) Park and trail cash contributions are to be calculated at the time building permits are
issued and shall be paid when the permit is issued by the person requesting the permit.
Supp. No. 5 1017
118-79 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE
(q) The cash contributions for parks and trails shall be deposited in either the city's park
and recreation development fund or multipurpose pedestrian trail fund and shall be used only
for park acquisition or development and trail acquisition or development.
(r) If a subdivider is unwilling or unable to make a commitment to the city as to the type
of building that will be constructed on lots in the proposed plat, then the land and cash
contribution requirement will be a reasonable amount as determined by the city council.
(s) Wetlands, ponding areas and drainage ways accepted by the city shall not be consid-
ered in the park land and/or cash contribution to the city.
(t) Subdividers of land abutting streets that have been designated in the city's compre-
hensive trail plan for the installation of a trail shall be required to dedicate. the land for the
trail to the city and construct the trail. An appropriate trail fee credit shall be granted.
(Ord. No. 85, § 2, 3 -1488; Ord. No. 182, §§ 1, 2, 3-8-93)
Editor's note — Section 2 of Ord. No. 85, adopted Mar. 14, 1988, amended the Code by
adding a new 118-78 thereto. Inasmuch as there already existed a 118-78, the editor has
designated the new provisions as § 18-79.
Cross references —Parks and recreation, Ch. 14; neighborhood park acquisition and
improvement, f 1431 et seq.; official maps, 115-20 et seq.
x s [The next page is 10631
Supp. No. 5 1018
I MEMORANDUM
1
n
,rte -i7z
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
TO: Mayor and City Council
Park and Recreation Commission
FROM: Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Director r}� I -L,,
DATE: September 15, 1993
SUBJ: Joint Meeting, Monday, September 20, 1993, 5:30 p.m., City Council Chambers
I am pleased to coordinate this opportunity for the City Council and Park and Recreation
Commission to meet, discuss park and recreation issues and socialize. I have prepared brief
introductory comments and attachments for the agenda items identified for this meeting. Last
year's meeting was held at this same time of the year and included discussions on the following
issues:
1. Park and Recreation Needs Assessment and Opinion Survey.
2. The future of parks and recreation in Chanhassen.
3. What are the priorities?
4. Trails: When? Where? How? $?
5. Funding of the annual capital improvement program.
6. Golf course.
7. Central Park: Its affects on City Center Park.
8. 1993 Park Acquisition and Development Capital Improvement Program Budget
Recommendation.
9. Preservation of Open Space. Y `
10. Highway 5 Corridor.
This year's agenda includes: s ^
1. The provision of general funds to finance the refurbishment and/or replacement of capital
equipment in existing parks.
The Park Acquisition and Development Fund (410) is currently relied on to finance the
majority of capital expenditures for all parks- -new and old -- within the city. This
I l
Mayor and City Council
Park and Recreation Commission
September 15, 1993 '
Page 2
financing mechanism has a flaw in it, however, and cannot keep pace with demands being '
placed upon it. New homeowners (and businesses) are the only ones paying into the pot.
If all the money collected was used exclusively to develop new parks for new
neighborhoods, we would still have to practice deficit spending to satisfy park needs, or
suffer the consequences of not meeting the recreational needs of our community. '
The city maintains a standard of providing one acre of parkland for every 75 persons. I
A very simple, but applicable, story problem demonstrates our dilemma:
Ten acres is a standard size for a neighborhood park. This ten acres can service '
750 residents. 750 residents typically live in 250 homes. These homes contribute
$150,000 in park fees to Fund 410 at the current park fee rate of $600 per single
family dwelling unit. Now let's go shopping for a ten acre park. ,
$150,000
-$ 8,000 acquisition/design/legal/other consultant fees ,
- $50,000 grading/entrance road/parking lot
- $40,000 play structure conforming to U.S. Consumer Products Safety
Commission guidelines/ADA standards '
- $10,000 basketball court/volleyball court/soccer nets/backstop/picnic
tables/benches /etc.
-$ 5,000 landscaping budget '
- land acquisition cost (10 acres at $20,000 /acre)
- $163,000
If the same 250 home development donated the ten acres in lieu of paying P ark fees, land
acquisition co '
sts are eliminated, but we are still left to pay for $113,000 in improvements with
no income from the development. [Note: this example also demonstrates the discrepancy
between land '
values and park fee totals to be discussed as a part of Item No. 4.] If this is not
bad enough, we also rely on the fund to buy replacement or refurbishment equipment for existing
parks. The Council will recall the issue raised about the grading of Power Hill Park at last
Monday's co ,
uncil meeting. We simply do not have the ability to contract this work out. The
residents' concerns also included the lack of a play structure in the park. Please be aware that
the Park and
Recreation Commission did not recommend its purchase in 1994. This
recommendati
on is not based on a lack of need, but on a scarcity of resources.
To further magnify this phenomenon, the 1993 capital improvement budget is ,
shown below with expenditures being split between new and old parks.
Total 1993 CHI
Budget - $150,000.00
Budget - $150,000.00
Mayor and City Council
Park and Recreation Commission
September 15, 1993
Page 3
New Park Expenditures
Wood ID Sign - Bandimere Community Park $ 400.00
General Improvements, Final Grading, Seeding,
Entrance Road and Parking Lot - Power Hill Park 15,000.00
Trees and play area expansion - Sunset Ridge Park 15.000.00
Total $30,400.00
Old Park Expenditures
Swing - Bandimere Heights Park 1,500.00
Grills, picnic tables, swimming buoys -
Carver Beach Park 3,200.00
Bleacher -Carver Beach Playground 1,400.00
Half -court basketball and tree - Chanhassen
Hills Park 3,500.00
Wood ID sign, miscellaneous repairs - .Chanhassen
Pond Park 2,250.00
Trees and swingset - Curry Farms Park
Grill - Greenwood Shores Park
Wood ID Sign - Herman Field Park
Equipment for concession stand contingency,
trees - Lake Ann Park
Ballfield lights - Lake Susan Park
Note: This expenditure has been postponed
in anticipation of a request being made of the
HRA to finance this improvement in order to
protect the park fund balance.
off of
of of
of of
19,450.00
65,000.00
Fl
L-1
To address this maturing of our park sy stem, I recommend the City Council '
implement a budget which pays for replacements and refurbishments in city parks.
A capital replacement budget similar to the vehicle replacement fund should be '
implemented. A 5110 year replacement/refurbishment schedule would then be
established and reviewed on an annual basis. Please note that I have attached a '
copy of City Manager Ashworth's memo to the Mayor and City Council in regard
to setting the tax levy. The City Manager describes the Park and Recreation
Commission's dilemma much more succinctly than I and predicted without a ,
discussion between us exactly what the commission is proposing.
2. The proposed Lake Minnewashta (Minnewashta Parkway) Neighborhood Park: '
Heritage Development Company has left the table in regard to their effort to move
forward with the development in this area. It is staff's belief that they will most likely
attempt to extend their purchase options and reinitiate an application for the 1994"
construction season.
Would anyone care to discuss how we are going to pay for this park?
3. Highway 5 Corridor, Non - Vehicular Components, i.e. Trails, Underpasses, Open Space: I I
Commissioner Andrews is prepared to discuss this issue from the Task Force's '
perspective. I have attached the Parks, Open Space, and Trails section of the Highway
5 Corridor Land Use Design Study for your review.
Mayor and City Council
Park and Recreation Commission
September 15, 1993
Page 4
Bleacher - Meadow Green Park
1,400.00
'
Trees - North Lotus Lake Park
1,000.00
'
Scout Projects
1,000.00
Contingency
9,500.00
,
New Required Reserve - City Center Park
8.000.00
'
Total
$119,600.00
To address this maturing of our park sy stem, I recommend the City Council '
implement a budget which pays for replacements and refurbishments in city parks.
A capital replacement budget similar to the vehicle replacement fund should be '
implemented. A 5110 year replacement/refurbishment schedule would then be
established and reviewed on an annual basis. Please note that I have attached a '
copy of City Manager Ashworth's memo to the Mayor and City Council in regard
to setting the tax levy. The City Manager describes the Park and Recreation
Commission's dilemma much more succinctly than I and predicted without a ,
discussion between us exactly what the commission is proposing.
2. The proposed Lake Minnewashta (Minnewashta Parkway) Neighborhood Park: '
Heritage Development Company has left the table in regard to their effort to move
forward with the development in this area. It is staff's belief that they will most likely
attempt to extend their purchase options and reinitiate an application for the 1994"
construction season.
Would anyone care to discuss how we are going to pay for this park?
3. Highway 5 Corridor, Non - Vehicular Components, i.e. Trails, Underpasses, Open Space: I I
Commissioner Andrews is prepared to discuss this issue from the Task Force's '
perspective. I have attached the Parks, Open Space, and Trails section of the Highway
5 Corridor Land Use Design Study for your review.
1
�I
1
1
J
Mayor and City Council
Park and Recreation Commission
September 15, 1993
Page 5
4. Park and Trail Fee Increase, Including a Discussion of the Inequities Between the Value
of Fees vs. the Value of Land Dedication Which Could be Assessed Against Any Given
Plat:
Park and Trail fees were increased in February 1993 (see attached resolution), and I will
be recommending another increase effective January 1, 1994. How much of an increase
needs to be implemented to meet the city's goals? Please refer back to the story problem
of Item No. 1. A developer builds 250 homes bringing 750 new residents to the
community. These residents require 10 acres of parkland to fulfill their recreational
needs. This ten acres of property at current land values will cost $150,000 to $300,000
(if we buy outside the MUSA Line, taking a proactive stance, costs will be at the lower
end. If we wait for development, as we have been doing in most cases, the costs will be
at the higher end.) The 250 homes currently net the city $150,000 in fees, which could
buy ten acres at bottom dollar outside the MUSA Line. However, the development
expects a park in their neighborhood, not somewhere else in the city. The problem can't
be solved by simply doubling the fees, or can it? The subdivision ordinance states in
Section 18 -79, Parkland Dedication Requirements, Item k, "In lieu of a parkland donation,
the city may require an equivalent cash donation based upon average undeveloped land
value in the city. The cash dedication requirement shall be established annually by the
City Council." What is the average undeveloped land value in the city?
Price Per Acre Current Park Fee Is
$15,000 an acre right on
$17,500 an acre $100 low per house
$20,000 an acre $200 low per house
$22,500 an acre $350 low per house
$25,000 an acre $400 low per house
$27,500 an acre $500 low per house
Note on Trail Fees. The current fee of $200 per home will pay for the construction of
3 to 10 feet of 8 foot bituminous trail depending on site constraints. If 200 homes are
constructed a year, plus a commercial site, with a trail charge of $10,000, the trail fund
nets $50,000. This will buy 750 to 2500 feet of trail based upon a cost range of $66.00
per foot at the high end to $20 per foot at the low end. As can be deduced, the city's
trail system is not going to get far on these dollars. This observation is confirmed when
.
r
Mayor and City Council
Park and Recreation Commission
September 15, 1993
Page 6
looking at anyone of the major trail segments recently completed in the city and its I
funding source.
Location Funding Source
'
Minnewashta Parkway State aid - assessments.
'
Highway 5 State of Minnesota
Hidden Valley Trail Tax Increment Financing
5. New Chanhassen Elementary:
'
The first new Elementary School Site City Task Force meeting was held on Tuesday,
September 14. Commissioner Schroers, Berg, and Manders can update the
Commission in this regard.
6. Setting Higher Expectations of Developers in Regard to Park and Trail Issues: '
We all know what can happen when developers are pressed on park and trail issues. I
firmly believe that united we can stand, but divided we will fall in our attempts to '
demand compliance with the Comprehensive Plan from developers.
7. Exploration of Park and Trail Project Funding Sources: '
Please refer to items #1 and #4.
8. The Urgency of Making Plans Due to the Rapid Pace of Development: '
The Park and Recreation Commission initiated an update of the Recreation Section of the '
city's Comprehensive Plan last fall. Ironically, this effort was put on hold to enable the
commission and staff to react to the large number of land development proposals being
submitted to the city. The Commission will pick up this effort again this fall. One of
the major new initiatives as a part of this update will be the creation of a comprehensive
park plan. The Council should be aware that citizen interest and concern in this regard
will be high due to the ramification of future park sites being mapped on private property '
throughout the city.
iA
Mayor and City Council
Park and Recreation Commission
September 15, 1993
Page 7
9. The Community Center Issue:
The new school site does not displace the need for a community center within the city.
Where do we go from here?
10. Input on Public versus Private Parks:
Lundgren Bros. will be constructing one private park within the community and is
proposing a second private or association park. Is this the trend of the future, and if so,
what impact will this have on the city's park system?
See you on Monday. Supper will be available.
11,
12/09/93 10:59 $ 612 427 1410 CITY OF RRMSEY P.02
PARK DEDICATION SURVEY - CASH CONTRIBUTIONS
RESIDENTIAL COi�i MERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL
Ramsey ' '
$450.00
less than 1 unit
unit
$1,152.00 per acre
per 3.3 acres
Townhomes
$650.00
all other dwellings
Eagan Single Family
$700.00
per unit
Duplex
$621.00
per unit
Ouad
$553.00
per unit
Multi
$559.00
per unit
Eden Prairie ' 'Single Family
Plymouth Single Family
Lakeville Single Family
$900.00 per unit
$885.00 per unit
$650.00 per unit plus
$150.00 trails fee per unit
5% of gross land area as
determined by Council
$0.055 per square foot
of net land
$3,250.00 per acre
$3,600.00 per acre
5.00% of assessed
valuation
Maple Grove Single Family $638.00 per unit Industrial $2,058.00 per acre
Commercial $3,064.00 per acre
Champlin ' *Single Family $1,850.00 per acre $6,750.00 per acre
Multi Family $4,500.00 per acre
Ham Lake 10% of market value of land or $400 per lot - based on recommendation from Park Commiss
Coon Rapids
Single Family
$384.00 per
unit
$1,152.00 per acre
Townhomes
$286.00 per
unit
(includes offices)
Apartments
$238.00 per
unit
Blaine
Single Family
$620.00 per
unit
Industrial $1,630.00 per acre
Duplex
$530.00 per
unit
Commercial $1,860.00 per acre
Townhouse /Quad
$460.00 per
unit
Multi Family
$390.00 per
unit
Mobile Home
$475.00 per
unit
Andover
Cash contribution
based on Commission recommendation
- calculated on the 'market value"
of the undeveloped
land that would otherwise
have been conveyed or dedicated.
Brooklyn Park
10% of assessed value per parcel
4% of assessed value per parcel
(FMV range: $20,000 - $30,000 /acre)
(FMV range: $65,000 - $400,000 /acre)
NOTE: Plats with
4 or less lots
$500.00 per
lot
Inver Grove
Heights A & E Districts
R -1 & R -2
R -3
$650.00 per unit P & A
$850.00 per unit B -1
$650.00 per unit B -2,3 & 4
1 -1 & 1 -2
$175.00 per 1,000 sq
$175.00 ft gross floor
$125.00 area
$75.00.
12/7/93
12/09/93 11:01 $ 612 427 1410 CITY OF
RAMSEY
P.03
PARK DEDICATION SURVEY - CASH CONTRIBUTIONS
SSJIY
RESID� ENTIAL
QOMMERCIALJINDUSTRIAL
Apple Valley
10% of assessed land value
5% of land or cash in lieu of land
1
(currently using $20,000 /acre)
(currently using $20,000 /acre)
Lino Lakes
' 'Formula using raw land value, housing density
$200.00
per 1,000 sq
to arrive at amount equal to what a parcel
ft gross floor
could be purchased for.
area
Chanhassen
' Single /Duplex $600.00 per unit park
$3,000.00
per acre park
33% or $200 per unit trail
$1,000.00
per acre trail
Multi /Apts $525,00 per unit park
$175.00 per unit trail
Minnetonka
Single Family $400.00 per unit
Office /Intl $0.20
per square foot
'
Town /Duplex $300.00 per unit
Commercial $0.10
of buildin area
Apartments $250.00 per unit
Oakdale
Single Family $525.00 per unit
$1,575.00
per acre
Multi Family $425.00 per unit
'
(cash dedication in lieu of 10%
land dedication)
Burnsville
Single Family $512.40 per unit
Commercial $3,500.00
per acre
Duplex $581.00 per unit
Industrial $2,000.00
per acre
Multi Family -
3-4 units $596.00 per unit
Apt Complexes $752.00 per unit
Chaska
Greater of $1,000 per acre or
$1,750.00
per acre
Single /Duplex $475.00 per unit
Townhomes /Quad: $300.00 per unit
Apts /Condos $250.00 per unit
Woodbury
Single Family $725.00 per lot
$1,600.00
per acre
Multi Family $500.00 per unit
Moblie Home $350.00 per lot
'
(land contribution is 10% of value of gross acres)
'
Elk River
' 'Single Family $450.00 per unit
w/o S &W $1,000,00
per acre
with S &W $1,500.00
per acre
Rosemount
Single Family $520.00 per unit
$1,100.00
per acre
(based on 5%
of land value at
$22,000 per
acre)
'
Prior Lake
Single Family $800.00 per unit
$1.00
per square foot
(plus $300 on each bldg permit
'
now construction)
NOTE
Rates. will be proposed to change during 1994 at some point - recommendations not yet mad
' *These
are the recommended rates for 1994 - not
necessarily adopted at this time.
12/7/93
12/09/93 10:58 a 612 427 1410 CITY OF RRMSEY
CITY OF RRMSEY
15153 Nowthen Boulevard N.W.
Ramsey, MN 55303
Telephone Number: (612) 427 -1410
FAX Number: (612) 427 -5543
If you encounter any problems with this transmission please
contact Jackie at our City Offices (612) 427 -1410. Thank you.
Please Deliver This Transmission To The Following Person(s):
P.01
Fax Number: G � - 1- 7 a
Company- Coc�u �o`SS
F
Date: 1� - (� `S .—
Number of Pages (including this cover sheet): -�
Comments:
The information contained in this facsimile message is legally privileged and confidential
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of
Us message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this telecopy is strictly prohibited. If you have received this telecopy in
error, please immediately notify us by telephone and return the original message to us at the
address above via the United States Postal Service. Thank you.
FAX CONFID NTIALTTY NOTE
F
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
DATE: RESOLUTION NO:
MOTION BY: SECONDED BY:
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 1994 PARK AND TRAIL DEDICATION FEES
WHEREAS, the City determines park dedication fees and trail dedication fees based on
land values, density, and a park acreage standard of 1 acre per 75 people.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council that park and
trail dedication fees collected with building permit fees be established as follows:
Residential Single Family/Duplex Units $ 900 unit
Multi - Family /Apartment Units $ 750.W /unit
Commercial/Industrial Property
$4,500.00 /acre
Trail Dedication Fees One -third of the cost of
park dedication fees
Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this day of January, 1994.
ATTEST:
Don Ashworth, City Clerk/Manager Donald J. Chmiel, Mayor
YES NO ABSENT
to
I i
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
DATE: February 22, 1993 RESOLUTION NO: 93 -13
MOTION BY: Wing SECONDED BY: Dockendorf
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 1993 PARK AND TRAIL. DEDICATION FEES
WHEREAS, the City determines park dedication fees and trail dedication fees based on
land values, density, and a park acreage standard of 1 acre per 75 people.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council that park and
trail dedication fees collected with building permit fees be established as follows:
Residential Single Family/Duplex Units $600.00 /unit
Multi- Family /Aparanent Units $525.00/unit
Commercial/Industrial Property 53,000.00 /acre
Trail Dedication Fees One -third of the cost of
park dedication fees
Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 22nd day of February, 1993.
ATTEST:
1 �
Don Ashworth, Ci y Clerk/Manager Donald J. Chmi3jeMaiyor
YES
Chmiel
Mason
Senn
Dockendorf
Wing
NO
None
ABSENT
None