The URL can be used to link to this page

2p. Approve Grant Application, Multi-City/School District Cooperative AgreementUl C I TY OF ---IF. CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 I I MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Don Ashworth, City Manager DATE: January 5, 1994 SUBJ: Approve Grant Application, Multi-City /School District Cooperative Agreement ,Xrant to cooperatively work with our sister cities qty "¢trouncil last looked at this are the City of tonka,School District. Various grants are being )st is``the recreational element. If our efforts are "one stop shopping" for all recreational services sen, Minnetonka School District, or the Chaska School District. All of the data bases from each of those agencies would be interconnected and a person stopping at Chanhassen City Hall to sign up for fall basketball or volleyball, could also choose whether they wish to sign up for beginning bridge to be held Wednesday evening in Tonka Bay, Thursday evening at the Minnetonka Junior High, or Monday evening at the Chaska Community Center. We are at Step 2 of the application process for and school districts. New players since the Chaska, Chaska School District, and the Mint applied for, but the one that interests me the,41 successful, citizens should be able to carry,ou whether they be provided by Chaska, Chaha Authorizing the r Minnesota Board er`:to sign the Part 2 application for vo operative planning grant to the is recommended. r� SPECIAL MEETING NOTICE STEERING COMMITTEE LAKE MINNETONKA AREA CITIES ADMINISTRATORS AND MANAGERS WEDNESDAY JANUARY 5, 1994 9:00 AM Shorewood City Hall 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood AGENDA I. RECREATION /COMMUNITY EDUCATION SERVICES -- Part Two Application for a Cooperative Planning Grant Minnesota Board on Government Innovation and Cooperation (CP- 93 -07) We have asked the Community Education Directors for the seven school districts that are part of the 14 -city area to attend the meeting. A copy of the grant application is enclosed. It is important that the administrator /manager of 10 cities that agreed to apply attend the meeting so they can sign the application submittal form (Chanhassen, Deephaven, Minnetonka, Minnetonka Beach, Minnetrista, Mound, Shorewood, Spring Park, Victoria, and Woodland) II PUBLIC SAFETY -- Part Two Application for a Cooperative Planning Grant Minnesota Board on Government Innovation and Cooperation (CP- 93 -17) A copy of the grant application is enclosed. It is important that the administrator /manager of 10 cities that agreed to apply attend the meeting so they can sign the application submittal form (Chanhassen, Deephaven, Minnetonka, Minnetonka Beach, Minnetrista, Mound, Shorewood, Spring Park, Victoria, and Woodland) Note: John H. Kari has been assigned by the Metropolitan Council to provide staff and technical assistance. John is a senior planner and can be reached at 291 -6548 [FAX 291 -6464) RECEIVED �Y CITY OF CHANHAbStiv LAKE MINNETONKA AREA MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATORS AND MANAGERS CHANHASSEN: Don Ashworth, City Manager 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: 937 -1900 Fax: 937 -5739 DEEPHAVEN, GREENWOOD, WOODLAND: Sandra Langley, Administrator 'f 20225 Cottagewood Road Deephaven, MN 55391 Phone: 4744755 Fax: 474 -1274 EXCELSIOR: Carl Zieman, City Manager/Public Works Director 339 Third Street Excelsior, MN 55331 Phone: 474 -5233 Fax: 474 -5364 MINNETONKA: David Childs, City Manager 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone: 939 -8200 Fax: 939 -8244 MINNETONKA BEACH: Barbara Bedell, Clerk P. O. Box 146 Minnetonka Beach, MN 55361 Phone: 471 -8878 Fax: 471 -8878 MINNETRISTA: Charlotte Erickson, City Administrator 7701 County Road 110 West Minnetrista, MN 55364 Phone: 446 -1660 Fax: 446 -1311 MOUND: Edward Shukle, Jr., City Manager 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Phone: 472 -0609 Fax: 472 -0620 ORONO: Ron Moorse, City Administrator Box 66 Crystal Bay Orono, MN 55323 Phone: 473 -7357 Fax: 473 -0510 SHOREWOOD: Jim Hurm, City Administrator 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Phone: 474 -3236 Fax: 474 -0128 SPRING PAR K: Patricia Osmonson, Administrator 4349 Warren, Box 452 Spring Park, MN 55384 Phone: 471 -9051 Fax: 471 -9055 TONKA BAY: David Callister, Administrator 490 Manitou Road Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Phone: 474 -7994 Fax: 474 -6538 VICTORIA: Miriam Porter, Administrator P.O. Box 36 Victoria, MN 55386 Phone: 443 -2363 Fax: 443 -2110 WAYZATA: Allen Orsen, City Manager 600 Rice Street Wayzata, MN 55391 Phone: 473 -0234 Fax: 473 -4178 Community Education Directors Greg Shank Community Education Chaska School District 110600 Village Road Chaska, MN 55318 Jim Jones Community Education Minnetonka School District 261 School Ave. Excelsior, MN 55331 Ted Sauer Community Education Hopkins School District 1001 State Hwy 7 Hopkins, MN 55343 Jim Brandl Community Education Wayzata School District PO Box 660 Wayzata, MN 55391 Melanie DeLuca Community Education Orono School District 705 Old Crystal Bay Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Michael Looby Community Education Westonka Community Services 5600 Lynwood Blvd Mound, MN 55364 Jim Litfin Community Education Waconia School District 24 South Walnut Waconia, MN 55387 1 RECREATION /COMMUNITY EDUCATION , COOPERATIVE PLANNING GRANT 1 I � I � 11 1 1. BOARD OF GOVERNMENT INNOVATION AND COOPERATION APPLICATION FOR A COOPERATIVE PLANNING GRANT CP -93 -07 PART TWO Name of participating local government units. The cities of Chanhassen, Deephaven, Minnetonka, Minnetonka Beach, Minnetrista, Mound, Shorewood, Spring Park, Victoria, and Woodland. These ten cities are participating in this Cooperative Planning Grant application. In addition, they are members of a larger, 14 -city cooperative effort, formed 1993 to explore opportunities for improving cooperation among themselves relative to the provision of public services. The larger ' 14 -city group also includes Excelsior, Orono, Tonka Bay and Wayzata. This Part Two application for a Cooperative Planning Grant is one of several initiatives undertaken by members of the. cooperative effort. Member cities may select the type and degree of involvement in any project ' or initiatives based on their interests and resources. The Metropolitan Council is technical assistance and support for the cooperative effort for three years. ' The "Lake Area Recreational Study" includes all or parts of: • the cities of Chanhassen, Deephaven, Excelsior, Minnetonka, Minnetonka Beach, Minnetrista, Mound, Orono, Shorewood, Spring Park, Tonka Bay, Victoria, Wayzata and Woodland; ' • the school districts of Chaska (112), Hopkins (270), Minnetonka (276), Orono (278), Waconia (110), Wayzata (284) and Westonka (277). 2. Name, address and telephone number of an individual who is able to respond to questions regarding the grant application: Name: John H. Kari Position: Senior Planner Address: Metropolitan Council Telephone: 291 -6548 230 East Fifth Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 3. Provide a detailed budget for the development of the proposed intergovernmental cooperation plan. Identify all sources of revenue, including all in -kind contributions that will be made to the project. Describe in detail the expenditures (including in -kind expenditures) that will be made to ' develop the plan, including salaries and benefits of employees, consultant fees and expenses, office expenses (including office supplies and equipment, rent, postage, telephone, and printing), public meeting expenses, and travel. Clearly identify the expenditures that will be in -kind expenditures. r COOPERATIVE PLANNING GRANT CP -93 -07 BUDGET Activity Budget In -Kiad* Grant Request Step 1. • Study Team Formation MCS $ 768 MCT 30 MCSS 50 LAST 2000 LAMS 40 subtotal $2,888 • Request for Proposal A Work Plan MCS $3,456 MCT 90 MCSS IS0 LAST 6,000 LAMS 120 subtotal $9,816 • Evaluation MCS $ 98 LAST 500 subtotal $S98 Total $13,302 Step 2. • Inventory of Rec. /Com. Ed. Programs MCS $ 2,304 Consultant $10,000 MCT 90 MCSS 75 LAST "1,000 LASR 1,330 LAMS 20 subtotal $4,819 • Analysis of Information MCS $2,304• Consultant $7,000 MCT 90 MCSS 7S LAST 3,000 LASR .630 LAMS 60 subtotal $6,159 • Evaluation MCS $ 98 Consultant $200 LAST S20 subtotal $S98 Total $11,576 Total $17,200 Step 3. • Assessment /Design Req. Info Systems MCS $2,304 Consultant $8,000 MCT 90 MCSS 25 LAST 500 LASR 1,050 LAMS 10 subtotal $3,979 • Evaluation MCS $ 98 Consultant $200 LAST SOO subtotal $598 Total $4,577 Total $8,200 2 1 i 1 1 I I I 7 � I � I � I Step 4. • Preliminary Strategy Options MCS $5,376 Consultant $10,000 MCT 210 MCSS 175 LAST 7,000 LAMS 140 subtotal $12,901 • Evaluation MCS $- 98 Consultant $200 LAST 500 subtotal $598 Total $13,499 Total $10,200 Step 5. • Findings /Conclusions /Recommendations MCS $4,608 Consultant $5,600 MCT 90 MCSS 100 LAST 4,000 LAMS 80 subtotal $8,878 • Print Report Printing $1,200 Total $8,878 Total $6,800 Grand Total In -kind $51,832 Grant $42,400 * In -Kind Abbreviations: Metropolitan Council is providing technical assistance to the applicants for a three year period 1993 -1995. MCS = Metropolitan Council Staff; senior planner ($48 per hour -- salary, benefits, indirects). MCT = Metropolitan Council Travel; local travel ($0.28 per mile; estimate average round trip to Lakes Area communities of 54 miles; average trip cost estimate -- $15.00). MCSS = Metropolitan Council Study Support; mailing and photocopying (estimate 25 packets per mailing; estimate cost $25' per mailing). Lake Area Communities will provide Study Team members, meeting rooms, staff to assist consultant collect /compile information and review analysis. LAST = Lake Area Study Team; assume 10 member study team (estimate $50 per hour -- salary, benefits, indirects, local travel). LAMS = Lake Area Meeting Space; conference rooms (estimate $10 per hour) . LASR = Lake Area Staff Review; staff support to consultant in collecting data and reviewing analysis (estimate $35 per hour -- salary, benefits, indirects). 3 4. Provide a detailed f the o description P roposed planning process, including a detailed timeline for . P completion of the plan. The timetable should identify all significant milestones that are anticipated in the development of the plan. ' 4a. Identify all employees, consultants and organizations that will participate in the planning process. • What will be their individual responsibilities. • Estimate the amount of time that will be spent on the development of the plan by each individual. LAKE AREA RECREATION /COMMUNITY EDUCATION ACI'MTIE.S STUDY ' Lake Area Recreation/Community Education Services Study planning process to analyze the potential and , feasibility for (1) a one - stop -shop source of information and registration materials and (2) expanded citizen access to recreational/community educational activities in the Lake Area through intergovernmental cooperation: , Step 1. Formation of Study Team and Consultant Services Selection. • Study Team "Study o Ten -city group forms a Team" to guide the planning study process; including representation from city and school administration, city park and recreation, community education, and athletic associations. , • Consultant and Work Plan o "Request for Proposal" developed, sent out and reviewed. The proposal will be for two distinct ' elements of the study: 1)Information Gathering/Assessment/Strategy [equal emphasis on data collection, analysis and option development skills/experience and coalition building in intergovernmental settings]; and 2) Information Technology [emphasis on software/technology ' design and specification to meet program objectives]. Consultants will be able to bid on one or both elements. o Consultant Services selected. ' o More detailed work plan developed for ongoing planning process and involvement by interested parties [interested parties identified]. Activities for involvement may include regular meetings, forums, communications, working papers. Evaluation will occur as the project proceeds through ' each step: 1) to keep the work directed; 2) to establish and maintain accountability [important in an multi -party planning activity]; and 3) to discern the lessons of the planning process and the various work products. • Evaluation , 0 Evaluate progress to date including what is working well and what needs attention. Step 2. Information Gathering and Assessment ' Inventory of city, community education, school district and athletic association programs: o Survey instrument and process developed to determine what programs are currently being offered ' in the Recreation /Community Education Study Area (interview, written survey, etc.). o Information gathered on programs that have a potential for sharing (broader interest, similar programs, specialized, capital or labor intensive, economics of scale requires larger pool of ' potential users) including such things as: program offering, geographic coverage, registration requirements, cost, personnel, facilities; specialized equipment, existing coordination and joint efforts (formal and informal), target groups /priorities, future plans, information/communication ' programs and activities. Priorities will be established for what programs /activities are to be examined. Working paper developed for review and comment by interested parties. o Identification of issues and potential barriers to intergovernmental cooperation for one - stop -shop ' information and registration system and broader citizen access to recreational and community education opportunities in the Lake Area. 11 • Analysis of Information o Community forum held to discuss and begin process for analyzing the information for potential - needs and areas for cooperative information and registration activities. o Analysis draft working paper prepared and sent out for review and comment. o Revision of information and assessment working paper. • Evaluation o Evaluate progress to date including what is working well and what needs attention. Step 3. Information Technology Assessment and Design Requirements • Assessment and Design Requirements o Inventory of existing technology (networks, software, hardware) used for information and registration for programs and activities in Lake Area Recreation/Community Education Study Area. o Assessment of issues and opportunities for joint information and registration activities. o For each strategy options identify information technology alternatives; prototype system design. o Preparation of working paper. o Review of working paper by interested parties and revision. • Evaluation o Evaluate progress to date including what is working well and what needs attention. 5 Step 4. Strategy Options Development • Preliminary Set of Strategy Options I o Options selected for refinement and study [may include maintain existing cooperative /joint activities, expand. informal activities, or establish joint powers agreements]. o Options detailed in a draft working paper and discussed with interested parties. ' o Community forum held to review and comment on options. o Revision of options working paper. • Evaluation o Evaluate progress to date including what is working well and what needs attention. Step 5. Final Planning Report ' • Findings, Conclusions and Strategy Recommendations o Develop draft report including: 1) findings and conclusions regarding the various informational/data collection tasks; 2; findings and assessment of the barriers to and strategies options for intergovernmental cooperation and broader citizen access to recreational and , community education opportunities; 3) findings and conclusions regarding the strategy options; 4) findings and conclusions regarding the computer software/technology design and specifications to meet program objectives; 5) strategy recommendations for consideration by the 10 -cities and interested parties; 6) cost estimates and timeline for implementation of strategy; and 7) an ' evaluation of planning process and recommendations for other intergovernmental planning processes. , o Review by interested parties, final adoption and printing. LAKE AREA RECREATION /COMMUNITY EDUCATION ACrlvrrlEs STUDY PARTICIPANTS ' Or Sponsoring Organizations g Members: Chanhassen, Deephaven, Excelsior, Minnetonka, Minnetonka Beach, Minnetrista, Mound, ' Orono, Shorewood, Spring Park, Tonka Bay, Victoria, Wayzata and Woodland; Roles: 1. Oversight, formation and participation in Study Team (estimate 10 study team ' members contributing each one to two weeks of time); 2. Review of "Request for Proposal "; , 3. Approval of consultant selection upon recommendation of the Study Team; 4. Providing meeting rooms; 6 I S. Providing information and reviews of assessments /reports (estimate 2 -3 weeks of staff time total for all cities); 6. Grant fiscal management (City of Mound will be fiscal agent for the grant); and 7. Communication and public information regarding each phase of the study; Participating Organizations (to be Officially Invited Upon Receiving the Grant): Members: School districts of Chaska (112), Hopkins (270), Minnetonka (276), Orono (278), Waconia (110), Wayzata (284) and Westonka (277); other Lake Area municipalities including Chaska, Excelsior, Greenwood, Hopkins, Tonka Bay, and Wayzata; and private athletic associations. Roles: 1. Designation of key contact to follow the study and keep organization informed; 2. Participation in Study Team; and 3. Providing information and reviews of assessments /reports. Consultant(s) Roles: 1. Information gathering and assessment (Step 2); 2. Information technology assessment and design requirements (Step 3); 3. Strategy options development (Step 4); and 4. Final planning report (Step 5). Metropolitan Council Roles: 1. Staff technical assistance -- John H. Kari, senior planner, for 26 percent of his time; and 2. Support services -- mail, photocopying, communications. 7 LAKE AREA RECREATION /COMMUNITY EDUCATION ACTIVITIES STUDY TIMELINE OF ACTIVITIES �. 5. What are the significant impediments to intergovernmental cooperation that must be addressed by the plan. Sa. What strategies will be tried to overcome those impediments? ' Significant impediments to intergovernmental cooperation to provide a one -stop shop source information and registration of recreational /community educational activities: • The large number of cities, school districts and private /non - profit athletic associations in the Recreational Study Area present issues for coordination, communication and consensus building. • Concerns of "turf' and loss of flexibility when one participates in joint or cooperative efforts. • Seasonal aspects of the programs and activities. • Internal operational procedures; concern for autonomy; concerns about sharing of information on users; concerns about Data Practices Act rules and regulations; concerns about affording outsiders ' access to computer files; concerns about maintenance of computer files. • Cost implications of cooperative recreational information and registration activity; if a party participates will the cost and degree of participation be fairly allocated? ' Residency requirements for access to various recreational and community educational activities. • Scheduling and management control over facilities. • Diversity of program offering and registration requirements. Strategies for intergovernmental cooperation: • Open communication and involvement of all interests including an operating principle that participation in the study does not require participants to accept any of the recommendations of the study. 1 • Management of the study process by the participants; including establishment of a Study Team with representatives from city and school administration, city park and recreation, community education, athletic association. • Review of information and assessments by participants and outside interests. • Clear identification of the self - interests and concerns of all potentially affected parties including study process, roles and responsibilities, program, facilities, and technology. • Development of options collaboratively to cover a range from no change from existing situation to more informal cooperation to formal cooperative agreements (maybe all or combination of groups). L IJI E 1 L`s 10 ' 11 6. Describe in greater detail the service(s) or program(s) that are to be the subject of the intergovernmental cooperation effort. by 6a. Estimate how much is currently being spent on the delivery of the service(s) or programs) all participating local units ofgovernment. Will this entire amount be dedicated to the implementation of the plan? 6b. Is it likely the cost of the service(s) or program(s) will be reduced through the implementation of the proposed plan? If so, approximately how much will be saved? ' 6c. Is it Likely that the quality of the service(s) or programs) will be improved by the implementation of the plan? If so, please explain. ' The proposed program will help participants redesign how information is provided, registration is handled and how recreational and community education programs are accessed by citizens from preschool children through senior citizens in the Lake Area. The planning study will look at ways to increase awareness and ' access to a variety of recreational and community educational activities. To do so the sponsoring cities will enlist the cooperation and support of the seven school district community education programs, the private athletic associations such as youth hockey and little league, and people from the communities. ' The vision for this planning effort is to bring together all the parties to create a way for the citizens of all ages in the Lake Area to have access to, knowledge of and easy registration for all the recreational , activities and community education programs provided. This may be done informally or may involve a formal joint powers agreement. Some type of interconnected or perhaps an integrated computer /information system /network and staffing component to keep all the information current may be recommended. The objective would be to have a design package specified that participants collectively or individually could use to go out for vendor bids. Interconnection and networking among the various parties would be part of the design. The concept is to have information and registration materials available at more public sites throughout the Lake Area potentially at city halls, community centers, schools and retail centers. However, a key question to be answered by the study will be what are the optimum contact points for users or clients of the various programs and activities? ' Presently efforts envisioned by this proposal do not exist. There are informal efforts and sharing of information is done upon request. Each group advertises it activities and offerings. This would likely continue, however, with a shared, multi - access system envisioned some cost reductions should be experienced. In addition, with a broader base for participants programs should be more fully utilized making them more cost effective to provide. Expanded program offerings could also result. Facilities and equipment should also be more fully and effectively utilized. 1 L`s 10 ' 11 7. Describe in detail the work product that will be produced through the development of this plan. ' 7a. Explain how this work product will be useful to local governments interested in replicating the plan. Work products: • Recreational Activity and Community Educational Opportunities Inventory This will be developed in the first part of the study. It will be useful to citizens, cities, school districts and athletic associations as a resource. • Barriers to Access Inventory. d �J fl J This will be developed also in the first part of the study. This will be useful to cities, school districts and athletic associations as they consider changes and improvements to-the services they provide. In addition, other local governments should find the inventory useful when exploring their own intergovernmental cooperative efforts. • Information Technology Assessment and Design Requirements This will be developed in the middle part of the study. This will be useful to cities, school districts and athletic associations as they consider changes and improvements to the computer /software and information services they use. In addition, other local governments should find the assessment and design requirements useful when exploring their own system upgrades and changes. • Strategy Options and Recommendation This will be developed the final product of the study. This will be useful to cities, school districts and athletic associations as they consider how they want to proceed to implement the findings, conclusions of the study. In addition, other local governments should find the strategy options and recommendations useful when exploring their own system upgrades and changes. 11 i To the best of my (our) knowledge, all information contained in this application is accurate and complete. City of Chanhassen (Signature) (Title) (Date) City of Deephaven (Signature) (Title) (Date) (Signature) (Title) City of Minnetonka (Date) 1 it City of Minnetonka Beach (Signature) (Title) (Date (Signature) (Title) (Signature) (Title) (Date) 1 City of Shorewood (Signature) (Title) (Date ) City of Spring Park (Signature) (Title) (Date) (Signature) (Title) (Signature) (Title) City of Minnetrista (Date) Cityofflound City of Victoria (Date) Cityof Woodland (Date) 1 12 LI 1 1 1 i PUBLIC SAFETY COOPERATIVE PLANNING GRANT 1� 1 1 BOARD OF GOVERNMENT INNOVATION AND COOPERATION APPLICATION FOR A COOPERATIVE PLANNING GRANT CP -93 -17 PART TWO 1. 9 3. Name of participating local government units. The cities of Chanhassen, Deephaven, Minnetonka, Minnetonka Beach, Minnetrista, Mound, Shorewood, Spring Park, Victoria, and Woodland. These cities are members of a 14 -city cooperative effort that includes Chanhassen, Deephaven, Excelsior, Minnetonka, Minnetonka Beach, Minnetrista, Mound, Orono, Shorewood, Spring Park, Tonka Bay, Victoria, Wayzata and Woodland. This Part Two application for a Cooperative Planning Grant is one of several initiatives undertaken by members of the cooperative effort. Member cities may select which project initiatives in which they want to participate. The Metropolitan.Council is technical assistance and support for the cooperative effort for three years. Name, address and telephone number of an individual who is able to respond to questions regarding the grant application: Name: John H. Kari Address: Metropolitan Council 230 East Fifth Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 Position: Senior Planner Telephone: 291 -6548 1 P11 Provide a detailed budget for the development of the proposed intergovernmental cooperation plan. I • Identify all sources of revenue, including all in -kind contributions that will be made to the project. I • Describe in detail the expenditures (including in -kind expenditures) that will be made to develop the plan, including salaries and benefits of employees, consultant fees and expenses, o ff i ce expenses (including office supplies and equipment, rent, postage, telephone, and printing), public meeting expenses, and travel. Clearly identify the expenditures that will be in -kind expenditures. 1 1 COOPERATIVE PLANNING GRANT CP 93 -17 BUDGET 1 L.r 1 1 1 ACtivit Budget In -Rind* Grant Request Step 1. • Study Team Formation MCS $ 768 MCT 30 MCSS 50 PSPG 2000 PSMS 40 subtotal $2,888 • Consultant Selection is Work Plan MCS $3,456 MCT 90 MCSS 150 PSPG 6,000 PSMS subtotal $9,616 • Evaluation MCS $ 98 LAST 500 subtotal $598 Total $13,302 Step 2. • Inventory of Public Safety Operations MCS $ 2,304 Consultant $12,000 MCT 90 MCSS 25 PSPG 1,000 PSSR 1,050 PSMS 20 subtotal $4,489 • Analysis of Information MCS $2,304 Consultant $6,000 MCT 90 MCSS 125 PSPG 3,000 PSSR 525 PSMS 2-0 subtotal $6,134 • Evaluation MCS $ 98 Consultant '$200 LAST 500 subtotal $598 Total $11,221 Total $18,200 Step 3. 0 Activity Cluster Planning 8 Strategy MCS $4,608 Consultant $12,000 Option Development MCT 315 MCSS 125 PSPG 1,000 PSACP 10,000 PSMS 420 subtotal $16,468 0 Evaluation MCS $ 98 Consultant $200 LAST 500 subtotal $598 Total $17,066 1 Total $12,200 2 Step 4. ' for a three year period 1993 -1995. MCS = Metropolitan Council Staff; senior planner ($48 per hour -- • Findings /Conclusions /Recommendations MCS $4,608 Consultant $5,600 estimate average round trip to Lakes Area Public Safety MCT 90 $15.00). MCSS 225 (estimate for Planning Group: 25 packets per mailing; estimate cost $25 per mailing) (estimate for community forums: PSPG 6,000 per packet for Activity Cluster mailing; estimate cost of PSMS 150 Lake Area Public Safety Communities will provide Planning Group members, meeting rooms, staff to assist consultant collect /compile information and subtotal $11,073 PSPG = Public Safety Planning Group; assume 10 Planning Group members • Print Report (estimate $50 per hour -- salary, benefits, indirects, local Printing $1,200 PSMS = Pubic Safety Meeting Space; conference rooms (estimate $10 per Total $11,073 Total $6,800 Grand Total In -kind $52,662 Grant $37,200 * In -kind Abbreviations: t t 1 �J Metropolitan Council is providing technical assistance to the applicants ' for a three year period 1993 -1995. MCS = Metropolitan Council Staff; senior planner ($48 per hour -- salary, benefits, indirects). MCT.= Metropolitan Council Travel; local travel ($0.28 per mile; estimate average round trip to Lakes Area Public Safety communities of 54 miles; average trip cost estimate $15.00). MCSS = Metropolitan Council Study Support; mailing and photocopying (estimate for Planning Group: 25 packets per mailing; estimate cost $25 per mailing) (estimate for community forums: ' 200 packets; estimate cost $100 per mailing) (estimate $1.00 per packet for Activity Cluster mailing; estimate cost of $5.00 per meeting). Lake Area Public Safety Communities will provide Planning Group members, meeting rooms, staff to assist consultant collect /compile information and review analysis. PSPG = Public Safety Planning Group; assume 10 Planning Group members (estimate $50 per hour -- salary, benefits, indirects, local travel) . PSMS = Pubic Safety Meeting Space; conference rooms (estimate $10 per hour) and community rooms (estimate $25 per hour). PSSR = Public Safety Staff Review; staff support to consultant in collecting data and reviewing analysis (estimate $35 per hour -- salary, benefits, indirects). PSACP = Public Safety Cluster Planning; assume 5 members per cluster planning team (estimate $50 per hour -- salary, benefits, indirects and local travel). 3 � 4. Provide a detailed description of the proposed planning process, including a detailed timeline for completion of the plan. The timetable should identify all significant milestones that are anticipated in the development of the plan. 4a. Identify all employees, consultants and organizations that will participate in the planning process. • R'hat will be their individual responsibilities. • Estimate the amount of time that will be spent on the development of the plan by each individual. LAKE AREA PUBLIC SAFETY PLANNING STUDY Step 1. Formation of Lakes Area Public Safety Planning Group and Selection of Consultant Services • Study Team o Ten -city group forms a "Lakes Area Public Safety Planning Group" ["Planning Group "] to guide the planning study process; including representation from elected officials, city administration and police and fire departments. ' Consultant and Work Plan 77 Lj o 'Request for Proposal' developed, sent out and reviewed. Key qualifications include public safety (police /fire) experience and/or planning/management experience in municipal services. The consultant will need to demonstrate previous experience with the three main elements of the study: 1) inventory and analysis of public safety operations; 2) assessment of barriers and opportunities for intergovernmental cooperation; and 3) development of implementation strategies. o Consultant Services selected. o More detailed work plan developed between Consultant and Planning Group for ongoing planning process and involvement/communication plans for all interested parties [cities, police and fire departments, county sheriff offices; citizens; and elected officials]. Activities for involvement may include regular meetings of the Planning Group, community forums or town meetings, cable television programs, project updates /newsletters, working papers. • Evaluation o Evaluate progress to date including what is working well and what needs attention. Evaluation will occur as the project proceeds through each step: 1) to keep the work directed; 2) to establish and maintain accountability [important in an multi -party planning activity]; and 3) to discern the lessons of the planning process and the various work products. V* 4 Analysis of Information I o Meetings with affected groups and a community forum involving citizens, elected officials, public safety professionals, and city officials. These will be held to discuss and to begin the analysis ' phase of the project and to identify "activity clusters "of promising ideas for further study. The "activity clusters" would cover activities where some or all cities want to work together and potentially establish an intergovernmental cooperation agreement. ' 1 'n Step 2. Information Gathering and Assessment • Inventory of public safety operations o Inventory and identification of potential areas for intergovernmental sharing (either among all parties or among one or more subsets): Survey instrument and process developed to determine what programs are currently being offered, their cost and how they are financed; Information gathered on programs or potential activities as directed by the Planning Group including: a. Recruiting -- including sworn and non -sworn officers (relate to Minnesota Police Recruiting Service), promotional opportunities, clerical positions and initial screening (standard screening test) and background sharing of applicants; b. Training — discretionary and specialized training needs specific to the area cities, firearms maintenance, training to augment what is already available; c. Specialized Units — canine; emergency response; hazardous waste (HAZMAT); drug ' task forces; investigations; park/recreation patrols and trail patrols; firearms training and equipment; d. Public Safety Prevention — crime and fire prevention programs; e. Purchasing — equipment and supplies; public purchase network (include federal, state and county contracts and joint purchase/bidding cooperative); f. Detention -- temporary and transportation to county sheriff (downtown Minneapolis ' for Hennepin County cities); g. Equipment — command post, firearm training, etc.; h. Information Systems -- software; intercommunity faxing; automatic intercommunity alerting system; i. Mutual Aid Agreements — temporary sharing of services and personnel; establishing policies and fee schedule for shared services including reserve recruitment and training, ' temporary supervision needs, canine unit, dispatching back -up, investigations; j. Emergency Planning; k. Personnel exchange programs for training and effectiveness of mutual aid agreements; , 1. Policy -- common rules /procedures for how to deal with specific issues and situations. o Identification of opportunities, issues and potential barriers to public safety intergovernmental cooperation. Analysis of Information I o Meetings with affected groups and a community forum involving citizens, elected officials, public safety professionals, and city officials. These will be held to discuss and to begin the analysis ' phase of the project and to identify "activity clusters "of promising ideas for further study. The "activity clusters" would cover activities where some or all cities want to work together and potentially establish an intergovernmental cooperation agreement. ' 1 1 • Evaluation o Evaluate progress to date including what is working well and what needs attention. Step 3. Activity Clusters and Development of Strategy Options • Activity Clusters and Options o Create 1 -5 "activity clusters" planning groups (may need to add additional resources from the cities or agencies affected). o Detailed examination of the activities and cost/benefit comparisons with existing practices and procedures; identification of potential strategies for cooperation -- informal, memoranda of understanding, joint powers, etc.; identification of potential cost sharing mechanisms and strategy options. o Meetings with affected groups and/or community forum involving citizens, elected officials, public safety professionals, and city officials. These will be conducted to discuss and to begin the analysis of the information and to identify "activity clusters" for further study. • Evaluation o Evaluate progress to date including what is working well and what needs attention. Step 4. Implementation Strategies • Findings, Conclusions and Strategy Recommendations o Develop draft report including: 1) findings and conclusions from the various "activity cluster" planning groups; 2) strategy options and recommendations; 3) an evaluation of planning process and recommendations for other public safety or general intergovernmental planning processes. o Community meeting and presentation; review by interested parties; final adoption of report by Lakes Area Public Safety Planning Group; and print report. LAKE AREA PUBLIC SAFETY PLANNING STUDY PARTICIPANTS Syonsoring Organizations Members: Chanhassen, Deephaven, Excelsior, Minnetonka, Minnetonka Beach, Minnetrista, Mound, Orono, Shorewood, Spring Park, Tonka Bay, Victoria, Wayzata and Woodland; Roles: 1. Oversight, formation and participation in Study Team (estimate 10 study team members contributing each one to two weeks of time); 2. Review of "Request for Proposal "; 3. Approval of consultant selection upon recommendation of the Study Team; 4. Providing meeting rooms; 5. Providing information and reviews of assessments /reports (estimate 2 -3 weeks of staff time total for all cities); 6. Grant fiscal management (City of Mound will be fiscal agent for the grant); and 7. Communication and public information regarding each phase of the study; Participating Organizations (to be Officially Invited Upon Receiving the Grant): Members: Other Lake Area municipalities including Excelsior, Greenwood, Tonka Bay, and Wayzata. Roles: 1. Designation of key contact to follow the study and keep organization informed; 2. Participation in Planning Group; and 3. Providing information and reviews of assessments /reports. Consultant(s) Roles: 1. Information gathering and assessment (Step 2); 2. Activity clusters and development of strategy options (Step 3); and 3. Implementation strategies (Step 4). Metropolitan Council Roles: 1. Staff technical assistance -- John H. Kari, senior planner, for 26 percent of his time; and 2. Support services -- mail, photocopying, communications. 7 M M M M M M M M M M M r M M M r M Mr LAKE AREA PUBLIC SAFETY PLANNING STUDY TIMELINE OF ACTIVITIES JAN 94 FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN 95 FEB MAR Step 1. Public Safety lanning Group & Consultant Selection 1�1 1�1� ■1�1 I�I� Step 2. Information Gathering & Assessment . l.r ■1�1 Ir Step 3. Activity Clusters & Development of Strategy Options ■1�1 1�1■ Step 4. Implementation Strategies r' 5. 5a. impediments to intergovernmental hat are the significant cooperation that must be addressed g p by the plan. to ies will be tried to overcome those impediments? hat strategies g p Significant impediments to intergovernmental cooperation shared public safety activities in the Lake Area include: • The large number of governmental jurisdictions -- 10 cities, two counties — present issues for coordination, communication and consensus building. • Concerns of "turf' of existing police and fire service arrangements and fear of loss of flexibility and municipal identity when one participates in joint or cooperative efforts. • Internal city and public safety department procedures and practices and the general concerns of change. • Cost implications of cooperative and intergovernmental activities. • Scheduling and management control over shared equipment, services, and facilities. • Differences in existing service levels and resident priorities for service. Strategies for intergovernmental cooperation: • Open communication and involvement of all interests including an operating principle that participation in the study does not require participants to accept any of the recommendations of the study. • Management of the study process by the participants; including establishment of a Lakes Area Public Safety PIanning Group with representatives from city administration, public safety departments, and elected officials. • Review of information and assessments by participants and outside interests. • Clear identification of the self - interests and concerns of all potentially affected parties including study process, roles and responsibilities, program, facilities, and technology. E 6. Describe in greater detail the service(s) or program(s) that are to be th subject of the intergovernmental cooperation effort. 6a. Estimate how much is currently being spent on the delivery of the service(s) or program(s) by all participating local units of government. Will this entire amount be dedicated to the implementation of the plan? 6b. Is it likely the cost of the service(s) or program(s) will be reduced through the implementation of the proposed plan? If so, approximately how much will be saved? 6c. Is it Likely that the quality of the service(s) or programs) will be improved by the implementation of the plan? If so, please explain. The purpose of the planning grant is to examine ways that the cities in the Lakes Area can maintain their historic and strong community identities and increase the cost and service delivery effectiveness of their public safety services. All units of local government are facing resource limitations and increased demands. r The citizens of the Lakes Area value very highly "small town government" with its characteristic "feel" of responsive and accessible public services. The Lakes Area has several small cities with strong identities -- Deephaven (3,681 people), Minnetonka Beach (612 people), Minnetrista (3,555 people), Shorewood (6,322 people), Spring Park (1,734 people), Victoria (2,669 people), and Woodland (489 people). -The Lakes Area also has some larger cities — Chanhassen ( 12,863 people), Minnetonka (49,266 people), Mound (9,652 people). Police and fire protection services are currently delivered in a wide variety of ways in the Lakes Area. Smaller cities contract with adjacent cities for these services. Woodland contracts with Deephaven for police services and Wayzata for fire protection. Minnetonka Beach contracts with Orono for police services and Mound for fire protection. Shorewood is part of a four -city joint powers authority, the South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety Department, for police services and contracts with Excelsior for fare protection. Larger cities like Minnetonka have their own police and fire departments. Chanhassen and Victoria, like other cities in Carver County receive police services from the county. Cities in Hennepin County have additional police services available from the county sheriff's office and the water patrol. Cities spend a large amount of their annual budgets for police and fire protection services. City managers and administrators report that between 40 and 65 percent of their budgets are devoted to these services. This emphasizes the overall importance of spending better and more efficiently the use of the dollars appropriated for this purpose. The purpose of the planning grant will be three -fold. During the first phase an inventory and assessment of all the police and fire services, equipment, facilities and operations. A key part will be to identify activities with potential for cooperation and joint ventures and grouping them for further examination (a geographic grouping of cities for certain activities may also be done). The second phase will involve bringing together the pertinent parties and interests from the cities to discuss the assessment results and developing a mission statement for the mutual benefit to all of shared components of police and fire protection in the 14 -city area. The third phase will analyze different components of fire and police services and develop proposals for shared services for consideration by all or various subsets of the cities. 10 0 7. Describe in detail the work product that will be produced through the development of this plan. 7a. Explain how this work product will be useful to local governments interested in replicating the plan. Work products: • Public Safety Services Inventory and Assessment This will be developed in the first part of the study. This inventory and assessment of current services, practices and procedures will be useful to citizens and cities within the Lakes Area (survey will also include all cities within the study area). • Public Safety Intergovernmental Activity Options This will be developed in the second part of the study. This will be useful to cities and public safety departments they consider changes and improvements to the services they provide. In addition, other local governments should find the analysis of the options for intergovernmental cooperation helpful as they move to other joint/mutual assistance activities. • Strategy Options and Recommendation This will be developed the final product of the study. This will be used by the Lake Area cities as they consider how they want to proceed to implement the findings, conclusions of the study. In addition, other local governments should find the strategy options and recommendations useful when exploring their own public safety service delivery improvements and innovations. 11 1 1 L' I I I I I I I I I I I To the best of my (our) knowledge, all information contained in this application is accurate and complete. City of Spring Park (Signature) (Title) (Date) City of Victoria (Signature) (Title) (Signature) (Title) Cityof Woodland (Date) (Date) 12 City of Chanhassen (Signature) (Title) (Date) City of Deephaven (Signature) (Title) (Date) City of Minnetonka (Signature) (Title) (Date) City of Minnetonka Beach (Signature) (Title) (Date) City of Minnetrista (Signature) (Title) (Date) CityofMound (Signature) (Title) (Date) CityofShorewood (Signature) (Title) (Date) City of Spring Park (Signature) (Title) (Date) City of Victoria (Signature) (Title) (Signature) (Title) Cityof Woodland (Date) (Date) 12 MINNESOTA, BOARD OF GOVERNMENT INNOVATION AND COOPERATION Grant Docket Service Sharing Grants Grant No. Date Received No. of Appli- Applicant Agencies Proposed Service Funding Requested Total Project cants Cost SS -93 -01 10/8/93 2 City of Oakdale Place a school liaison police officer at the high school $36,786 $61,086 ISD 0622 SS-93-02 10129/93 3 ISD #533 Operate a joint day treatment program for young children $42,000 $S3,500 Olmsted County with severe emotional disturbance ISD # 535 SS-93-03 11/04/93 4 Fridley Mounds View Provide a comprehensive senior citizen program operated $120,000 $2,394,049 New Brighton out of a regional senior citizen center facility Spring lake Park SS -93-04 11/04/93 2 Brown County Shared dispatching of law enforcement, fire departments, $87,178 $136,622 New Ulm ambulance services, and social services SS -93-OS 11/5/93 6 Renville Redwood Children's Mental Health Collaborative. Develop a multi- $50,000 $112,000 Meeker Kandiyohi county, multi- agency approach to delivering children's Chippewa mental health services Yellow Medicine SS -93-06 1115193 14 Chanhassen + 13 Shared human resources and personnel service $50,000 $??? other cities SS 93.07 11/5/93 3 Washington, Ramsey, Combine resources and personnel, and develop common $50,000 $??? Dakota Counties policies and procedures to build the infrastructure for Homes Plus (adult foster care for seniors) SS-93-08 1115/93 3 Cottonwood, Jackson, Share a staff person who would monitor and enforce fine $50,000 $??? Watonwan County collections, restitution payments to victims, anil'collect District courts reimbursement for public defender services c November 8, 1993 Service Sharing Grants Page 1 i� � i� � iii � i� i• � i r�1 iil� i� � i� � � Grant Date No. of Funding Total No. Received Appli- Applicant Agencies Proposed Service Requested Project cants Cost SS -93-09 11/5/93 3 Rice County Combine resources of many agencies to work with truant $33,870 $67,740 Northfield Schools children and their families Faribault Schools SS -93 -10 11/5/93 3 Stearns Carver Develop a computer program that would combine the $10,000 $10,000 Cottonwood features of the BRC tax (parcel property) files currently used by the 44- member Minnesota Counties Computer Cooperative with that of the 911 addressing and emergency responder system SS -93- $ $ SS -93- $ $ SS -93- $ $ SS -93- $ $ SS -93- $ $ SS -93- $ $ SS -93- $ $ Total 43 $529,834 $2,834,997 November 8, 1993 Service Sharing Grants Page 2 MINNESOTA BOARD OF GOVERNMENT INNOVATION AND COOPERATION Grant Docket Service Budget Management Model Grants Grant Date No. Funding Total No. Received of Applicant Agency(ies) Proposed Service Requested Estimated Appli Cost cants SBMM- 10114193 1 Rice Co. Social Services Train 10 families to be case managers for their ova family member; $4,700 ?? 93 -01 train "personal futures specialists' to train the families; provide respite care for families to participate in training and provide case management services. SBMM- 1113193 1 City of New Brighton Build and develop a model for a youth advocate to work with teens $50,000 $50,000 93.02 at the Family Service Center under development with ISD 0621 and Northwest Youth and Family Services. SBMM- 1113/93 1 Anoka County /101h Judicial Computer project to implement unattended touch- screen video $49,495 $49,49S 93 -03 District Courts monitors, which will provide information on court - related activities (e.g. courtroom assignment and location) SBMM- 1114/93 8 Itasca, Cook, Lake, St. Conduct a planning process for regional solid waste managment $50,000 $50,000 93-04 Louis, Carlton, Koochiching, Aitkin, Western Lake Superior Sanitary District SBMM 1 115/93 1 City of Saint Paul. Office of To develop & implement model for protean redesign (process re- $30,000 $125,000 93 -05 License. Inspections & engineering) Environment Protection SBMM- 1115/93 1 The High Speed Bus To assist with redesign dr. delivery of existing transit services $50,000 $50,000 93-06 Coalition SBMM- 11/5/93 2 Branch/North Branch Consolidation study ptwmaut to MN Statute 1 414.041. $S0,000 $130,000 93-07 L 5 Consolidation Study Comnn November 8, 1993 Service Budget Management Model Grants - Page 1 its i� �- � 1� ■s i■s ■s r■s � �s r � ins 1� � � � � M M M M == M M M i1■11 M= M M dw Ow to Grant Date No. Funding Total No. Received of Applicant Agency(ies) Proposed Service Requested Estimated Appli Cost cants SBMM- 11/4/93 4 Clearwater County, Prior Collaborative conference to begin imple- mentation of strategies to $50,000 $124,000 93 -08 Lake Public Schools, initiate, improve & expand collaborative & cooperative efforts Association of MN Counties, between counties & schools MN School Board Association SBMM- 11/5/93 1 Moose Lake Water & Light Establish a cogeneration facility adjacent to existing boiler plant $50,000 $150,000 93-09 Commission SBMM- 11/8/93 1 Steams County Government Entirely Revamped & fully integrated County Wide Financial $25 ► 000 $50,000 93 -10 Center System SBMM- 11/8/93 3 City of Rushford, City of To improve quality of emergency communication system $30,000 $30,000 93 -11 Chatfield, Fillmore County SBMM- 11/8/93 2 City of Prior Lake, Prior Cooperative effort to address the youth athletic program in Prior $6,000 36,000 93 -12 Lake Athletics For Youth " Lake SBMM- 11/8/93 2 City of Saint Louis Park, 'Children First' project is designed to create a replicable model that $50,000 "$1,000,000 93 -13 Independent School District communities can use to mobilize their social resources to promote 283 the healthy development of children & adolescents. SBMM - 93- Total ` . ,::.... 28 November 8, 1993 Service Budget Management Model Grants Page 2 MINNESOTA BOARD OF GOVERNMENT INNOVATION AND COOPERATION Grant Docket Cooperation Planning Grants Grant No. Date Received No. of Applicant Agencies Proposed Service Funding Requested Total • . Estimated Appli- Cost cants CP -93 -01 10/7193 3 City of Oakdale Create an economic development partnership to $6,600 $13,200 City of North St. Paul increase the economic development efforts of all three City of Maplewood cities; consultant analysis of the cities' activities; develop a cooperative plan for economic development . activities CP 93-02 11/3/93 6 Fridley Arden Hills Plan and set up a joint powers agency to provide 525,000 $25.000 Mounds View New shared building inspection services Brighton Shoreview St. Anthony CP -93 -03 11/4/93 4+ Clayton Tnshp Cooperative economic development activities for- $45.000 $60.000 Lansing Tnshp Mower County residents Mower Austin (others) CP -93.04 11/4193 4 Frankfort Tnshp Plan for a regional comprehensive waste water $45.000 $50,000- Rockford Tnshp treatmmrt system $60,000 Hanover Rockford CP93 -OS 11/4/93 16 Itasca County Develop a land use plan for the western Mesabi $50,000 $163,200 Bovey, Calumet, Range in Itasca county. The Isnd an plan will be Coleraine. Grand used to develop a uniform zoning ordinance for the Rapids, Keewatin, entire region and 10 others November 8, 1993 • I Cooperation Planning Cfants Page 1 1. M w iim M M MM M- r MM M Ow No Grant Date No. Funding Total ' No. Received of Applicant Agencies Proposed Service Requested Estimated Appli- Cost cants CP -93-06 11/4/93 4 Hennepin Create a cross - system financing staff position to take $50,000 $500,000 Minneapolis the lead role in developing an Interagency Budget and ISD #1 Spending plan for family and children's services. ISD #281 CP -93 -07 11/5/93 14 Chanhassen + 13 Jointly explore and investigate cooperative efforts to $50,000 sm others provide maximium recreational opportunities for citizens CP 93 -08 11/5/93 3 Hennepin Reduce truancy by designing an carrying out a multi- $36,000 $36,000 Minneapolis faceted media campaign ISD #1 CP -93-09 1115/93 4 Washington County Assess transit needs and services in Washington $50,000 $50,000 ISD #832 County ISD #834 Cottage Grove CP -93 -10 11/5/93 4 Washington County Design an "Employee Development System' to $47,500 $47,500 Dakota County address employee and management needs to Rice County emphasize people skills in evaluating job performance Cottage Grove CP -93 -11 11/5/93 3 St. Paul Create a Family /Child support network for more $50,000 $150,000 St. Paul Public timely intervention of social workers, counselors, and Schools others for "at risk' families Ramsey County CP -93 -12 11 /5/93 3 St. Paul Enhance the quality and quantity of the leisure $50,000 $150,000 Ramsey County programs provided for St. Paul residents St. Paul Public Schools CP -93 -13 11/5/93 2 Newport Combine police departments into a single police $17,500 $22,500 St. Paul Park department November 8, 1993 Cooperation Planning Grants Page 2 Grant Date No. Fund Tom No. Received of Applicant Agencies Proposed Service Requested Estimated Appli- Cost rants CP -93 -14 11/5193 5 Brooklyn Center Develop strategies and systems to implement $50,000 $71,000 Brooklyn Park cooperative housing programs among five Crystal jurisdictions New Hope Robbinsdale CP -93 -15 11/5193 6 Pennington, Polk, Red Organize a joint powers agreement to deal with $10,000 $10,000 Lake, Beltami, beaver damage Clearwater, Marshall + all townships CP -93 -16 1115/93 2 Norwood Explore potential for cooperation in administration, $50,000 $50,000 ' Young America fire, police, public works, parka, community development, service sharing CP93 -17 1115/93 14 Chanhassen + 13 Explore potential for cooperation in public safety (fire $5000 $??? d others and police) CP -93-18 11/5/93 2 Roseville Police Explore a store -front community policing office in $50,000 $??? Ramsey County Rosedale Center Sheriff CP -93- $ $ CP -93- $ $ CP93- $ $ CP 93- $ $ .CP 93- $ $ CP 93- $ $ CP -93- $ $ e November 8, 1993 Cooperation Planning Grants Page 3 Ml r = M= Ml M IM W M W M M= =1 M AW on Grant Date No. Funding Total No. Received of Applicant Agencies Proposed Service Requested Estimated Appli- Cost cants CP-93- $ $ CP-93- ........................». ............. . ............ $ Total 99 $732,600 r e qu ested Page 4 CARVER COUNTY CITY OF CHANHASSEN i CITY OF CHASKA CITY OF VICTORIA POSTED SPEED LIMITS 1.AAAA 55MPH ■■■■■ 50 MPH 00900 45 MPH AAAAA 40 MPH ❑ 0000 35 MPH 00000 30 MPH JANUARY, 1994 MAP A m I f CARVER COUNTY CITY OF CHANHASSEN CITY OF CHASKA CITY OF VIC P ROPOSED SPEED LIMIT �. 1. I► I► 55 MPH ■■■■■ 50 MPH 000 45 MPH AAAAA 40 MPH ❑ 13 13 0 0 35 MPH 00000 30 MPH JANUARY, 1994