Loading...
1a-1. Mission Hills Final Plat ApprovalCITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager FROM: Sharmin Al -Jaff, Planner H Action by City Admini"toe Endorsed — Modificd Rejected_ P (b — Ao -9L/ Date Submittec to Ccmn, issaxt We Submitted to CaxM DATE: October 20, 1994 �o " a �F- 9L/ SUBJ: 1) Rezoning of Property from RSF, Residential Single Family to PUD, Planned Unit Development for low density (16 single family lots) and medium and high density (194 units) .residential units and neighborhood commercial uses, second OiO final reading. 2) Final Plat Approval for 210 total units/lots, located East of Highway 101, North and south cif West 86th Street, Tandem Properties. 3) Final Site Plan Approval, Missidn Hills and Mission Hills Second Addition, for 194 Unit Owner Occupied Multifamily Development BACKGROUND A w On July 11, 1994, the City Council approved the rezoning the property from RSF to PUD, preliminary plat for MissionBills (93 -4 PUD) and Site Plan X94 -5 for the construction of the following: Block 1 1 �$ multi fat y:, AnW Block 2 s 7 c uigle # family units Block 3 9 single fairiilY "uts Block 4 56 multi family units Outlot E Future neighborhood related This request is for final rezoning from RSF, Residential Single Family to PUD, Planned Unit Development, final plat approval, and site plan approval request to create a mixed use (mixed density residential and future neighborhood related commercial) development. The entire site is being final platted with the exception of the commercial portion. There has been some revisions made to the plans since the preliminary plan approval. These changes include the following: MEMORANDUM I Mission Hills October 20, 1994 Page 2 1. The Park and Recreation Commission met on June 28, 1994, and recommended the following conditions: ' a. The tot park facility shall include typical park amenities such as landscaped grassy areas, picnic tables, park benches, play apparatus and basketball courts, ' etc. b. Six foot wide concrete sidewalks be constructed on the south side of West 86th Street from Highway 101 east to the project's terminus and a 5 foot wide core sidewalk on Mission Hills Lane from West 86th Street north to the street's terminus. ' C. An 8' bituminous trail shall be cons n constructed encircling the wetland located south ' of West 86th Street, connecting the sidewalk system to the "park site." In consideration for the construction of said trail, the applicant shall receive a lump sum payment equal to the cost of construction. Said cost to be ' determined by the applicant for presentation to the city with documentation for verification. I d. Full park and trail fees shall be collected at the time of building permit applications at the rate then in force. I 2. The landscaping plan has been revised to reflect 3 trees on each single family lot within Blocks 2 and 3. The plans failed to show berming along Highway 101 Right -of -way. 3. The number of drainage ponds has been reduced to four from the original 7 ponds. 4. Revised elevation plans have been submitted. These changes include the addition of ' shutters, louvers, and variation in colors. 5. The site is being final platted in two additions. This does not impact the plat in any way. Staff is recommending approval with conditions. ' PUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The applicant has proposed development standards in their PUD plan. Staff has reviewed these proposals, made comments or findings, and then given the staff proposal for language to be incorporated into the final PUD plan document. r Mission Hills October 20, 1994 Page 3 a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD neighborhood commercial/mixed density ' housing zone. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to ' be placed underground. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. b. Permitted Uses I The permitted uses within the neighborhood commercial zone should be limited to ' appropriate commercial and service uses consistent with the neighborhood. The uses shall be limited to those as defined herein. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. The type ' of uses to be provided on this outlot shall be low intensity neighborhood oriented retail and service establishments to meet daily needs of residents. Such uses may include small to medium sized restaurant (no drive -thru windows), office, day care, , neighborhood scale commercial, convenience store, churches, or other similar type and scale uses. c. Setbacks ' In the PUD standards, the building setback for commercial is 50 feet from any public ' right -of -way. The Parking setback shall be 35 feet from any Public Right -of -Way and/ or interior property line. There shall be a buffer separating the residential portion from the commercial portion of the site. This buffer shall be in the form of a berm and ' landscaping. The following setbacks shall be observed: ' Residential Commercial Street Commercial Residential Parking Parking Building Setback Building Setback Setback Setback ' Hwy. 101 50' 50' 20' 35' , Hwy. 212 50' 50' 20' 35' West 86th Street 50' 30' 20' 35' ' 1 t Mission Hills October 20, 1994 Page 4 d. Development Standards Tabulation Box BLOCK USE Net Lot Density Area Outlot E Commercial 7.72 acres 1 138 Multi - Family units 18.00 acres 7.66 2 &3 16 Single - Family units 8.55 acres 2.24 4 56 Multi - Family units 8.92 acres 6.28 ROW Street and court 1.17 acres West 86th St Right -of -Way 2.23 acres Hwy 212 and 101 Right -of -Way 18.68 acres TOTAL AREA 61.67+ Lot Lot Home Area Width . Depth Ordinance 15,000 90' 125' BLOCK 2 Lot 1 23,374 117.48 198.83 Lot 2 20,196 100.30 201.96 Lot 3 20,824 100.31 208.23 Lot 4 21,386 100.17 212.5 Lot 5 20,898 100.45 207 Lot 6 21,566 116 189 Lot 7 22,006 125 176.5 BLOCK 3 Lot 1 16,349 108 150 Lot 2 15,126 95.6 155 Hard Surface Coverage 37% 43.2% Home Setback 30' front/30' rear 10' sides Mission Hills October 20, 1994 Page 5 Lot 3 15,554 90 172 Lot 4 16,185 90 180 Lot 5 15,232 127 134.5 Lot 6 24,778 55.62* 189.06 Lot 7 25,092 78.30* 189 Lot 8 15,752 76.6* 135.25 Lot 9 17,026 112 147.5 * denotes lots located on a cul -de -sac e. Building Materials and Design RESIDENTIAL Building's exterior material shall be a combination of a five inch aluminum siding and brick. The architectural style is generally classic with details such as arched transoms and soffit returns over the entries of the one story homes and horizontal transom windows over the two -story windows. On a similar project elsewhere, exterior finishes were soft gray and creamy white, featuring pearl gray siding, shell white soffit/facia, and gray velour brick. Finding The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. The two story buildings located on block 1, reflect some architectural variation which makes the units more appealing. The one story units located on Block 4 will also reflect architectural variation through the use of different elements such as transoms, half round windows, and shutters (Attachment #1). COMMERCIAL 1. All materials shall be of high quality and durable. Masonry material shall be used. Color shall be introduced through colored block or panels. 2. Brick may be used and must be approved to assure uniformity. 3. Block shall have a weathered face or be polished, fluted, or broken face. i f. Site Landscaping and Screening The planting plans prepared for the site are intended to create a strong sense of street tree plantings using overstory deciduous trees such as Summit Ash, Linden, and Sugar Maple. Highways 101 and 212 will be buffered with a combination of overstory evergreen trees and ornamental deciduous trees. The outdoor private living areas will be buffered with the use of evergreen trees. The wetland will be highlighted with the introduction of native wetland species. Mission Hills October 20, 1994 Page 6 4. Concrete may be poured in place, tilt -up or pre -cast, and shall be finished in stone, textured or coated. 5. Metal standing seam siding will not be approved except as support material to one of the above materials or curtain wall on office components. ' 6. All accessory structures shall be designed to be compatible with the primary ' structure. 7. All roof mounted ui ment shall be screened b itched roofs. Wood screen � P YP fences are prohibited. Screening shall consist of compatible materials. 8. All buildings on the e commercial site shall have a pitched roof line. ' 9. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building. ' RESIDENTIAL 1. Building exterior material shall be a combination of prepainted 5" aluminum ' siding and brick. 2. Arched transoms and soffit returns shall be used over the entries of the one ' story units and horizontal transom windows over the 2 story windows. Variation among the buildings is achieved through the shape of windows, adding louvers, shifting entry ways, and adding dormers. 3. Colors used shall be earth tones such as soft gray, creamy white, pearl gray, shell white, etc.). 4. Each unit shall have a minimum of 1 overstory tree within its front yard. ' S. All units shall have access onto an interior street and not 86th Street. f. Site Landscaping and Screening The planting plans prepared for the site are intended to create a strong sense of street tree plantings using overstory deciduous trees such as Summit Ash, Linden, and Sugar Maple. Highways 101 and 212 will be buffered with a combination of overstory evergreen trees and ornamental deciduous trees. The outdoor private living areas will be buffered with the use of evergreen trees. The wetland will be highlighted with the introduction of native wetland species. U Mission Hills October 20, 1994 Page 7 In addition, to adhere to the higher quality of development as spelled out in the PUD zone, all loading areas shall be screened. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. Berms of 2 to 3 feet high shall be added along the Highway 101 and 212 right -of -way. These berms shall be seeded and /or sodded and bushes and trees shall be planted on them. All disturbed areas within the single family lots shall be seeded and/or sodded. Two trees with a , minimum of a Zi inch caliper shall be planted within the front yard setback and one tree within the rear yard setback. These two trees shall consist of one overstory evergreen tree and one ornamental deciduous tree. , 1. All open spaces and non - parking lot surfaces (commercial site) shall be I landscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. 2. Outdoor storage is prohibited. , 3. Loading areas shall be screened from public right -of -ways. Wing wall may be required where deemed appropriate. ' 4. The Outlot shall be seeded and maintained in a weed free condition in all areas proposed for future development. , g. Signage COMMERCIAL ' Staff is proposing one monument sign be permitted for the outlot and one monument sign for the residential section of the PUD. 1. All businesses built within the outlot shall share one monument sign. Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. ' 2. Wall signs are permitted on no more that 2 street frontages. The total of each wall mounted sign display areas shall not exceed (24 square feet). 3. All signs require a separate permit. 4. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and shall tie the building materials to be consistent with the signs. Signs shall be an architectural feature, they shall not be solely mounted on a pole of a foundation. 1 u l Mission Hills October 20, 1994 Page 8 5. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. 6. No illuminated signs within the outlot may be viewed from the residential section of the PUD. ' 7. Only back -lit individual letter signs are permitted. 8. Individual letters may not exceed 3 feet in height. ' 9. Only he name and too of the business occupying the unit will be permitted Y g PY g P ' on the sign. ' RESIDENTIAL One monument identification sign shall be permitted for the residential development. The ' sign may not exceed 24 square feet in area and 5 feet in height. h. Lighting ' Finding All light fixtures shall be shielded high pressure sodium fixtures. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than ;6 candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting. The maximum height of a residential street light 1 shall not exceed 15 feet. Light fixtures within the outlot shall not exceed 25 feet. 2. Glare, whether direct or reflected, as differentiated from general illumination shall not be visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates. ' 3. Lights shall be on a photoelectric cell to turn them on and off automatically as activated by yearly conditions. 4. The outlot light poles shall be corten, shoe box light standards. GRADING & DRAINAGE The City previously anted an Interim Use Permit . 94- y p y gr (No 5) for site grading of this development. The site grading is approximately 80% completed at this time. The financial security and grading permit fees were received by the City. Staff has received a final grading I[] t Mission Hills October 20, 1994 Page 9 plan back from the applicant's engineer. The grading plans have been completed in compliance with staffs' recommendations. ' The grading plans do not propose any grading on the commercial portion of the site at this time, however, drainage from the existing runoff patterns have been considered and address at this time with this development. In the future when the development of the outlot occurs, , individual storm drainage plans will be required. The grading plan proposes large earth berms as shown between proposed the Trunk Highway ' 212 corridor and the development. Berming has also been provided along proposed Trunk Highway 101. The grading plan proposes four stormwater drainage basins designed to meet , the National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards. These NURP ponds are necessary to pretreat stormwater prior to discharging into the wetlands or downstream. Staff has now received all the final storm sewer runoff calculations and ponding data for this development. ' The site will be in conformance with the City's Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) from a water quality standpoint. Therefore no water quality fees are required. SWMP fees for water quantity have not been determined at the time of printing the report. Staff will , prepare a breakdown of the surface water quantity fees in accordance with the SWMP plan. The applicant shall be responsible for the appropriate surface water management quantity fees in accordance with the plan prior to the final plat being recorded at the County. ' There are numerous drainageways in the rear yard areas that have been protected with drainage and utility easements to maintain neighborhood drainage patterns. As mentioned, ' there are four stormwater ponds being created with this development. The city will take over maintenance responsibilities in these ponding areas to ensure periodic cleaning and maintenance to ensure the proper function of these ponding areas. The large wetland lying ' south of West 86th Street ( Outlot B, Mission Hills) should be conveyed to the city by warranty deed in conjunction with filing the plat to preserve the wetland and maintain the neighborhood drainage patterns. ' During the construction process of the new homes, the storm sewer lines and ponding areas , receive most of the erosion. Staff believes it should be the applicant's responsibility to maintain and clean the storm sewer lines and ponding areas until the site has been built out. This typically occurs approximately two years the final plat has been recorded. Staff has provided in the PUD/Development Contract a provision that requires the applicant be responsible for maintenance of the stormwater drainage system for two years after they are constructed. I L i I Mission Hills October 20, 1994 Page 10 I UTILITIES 1 iI u 1 The city has received the final construction documents back with the changes staff required. The plans and specifications have been developed in accordance with the city's standard specifications and detail plates. On October 10, 1994, the city authorized the Lake Riley Area Improvement Project (No. 93- 32) for extension of water service to this development. The city has received and awarded bids for this phase of the watermain project. In an effort to expedite the utility construction on the developer's property, the applicant has included the city's construction plans to incorporate the installation of the 12 -inch watermain along future West 86th Street. If the developer continues as planned to install the 12 -inch watermain proposed along West 86th Street., the City shall apply credits toward the applicant's overall assessments for said construction. This credit for the oversizing cost difference between the 8 -inch watermain and the 12 -inch watermain, shall be applied against the trunk watermain assessments to the development. As some of the City Council members may recall, this project was before you last year. However, one of the property owners of the Mission Hills plat, Mr. Al Klingelhutz, was not willing to dedicate the necessary utility easements at no cost to the city in order to extend water service to this area, thus resulting in the project not proceeding. By virtually the same scenario this year the water main is proposed to be extended from Chan Hills development to Mission Hills development through portions of Mr. Klingelhutz's property along TH 101. Staff believes that the city's water main project is a development driven project, whereby the Mission Hills development has petitioned and will receive direct benefit by this project and therefore feels that Mr. Klingelhutz, as a property owner of the Mission Hills plat, should dedicate the necessary utility easements on his property. Staff feels that the utility easements should be granted as a part of the overall plat approval process similar to other easements and street right -of -ways being dedicated with the final plat at no cost to the city. The proposed utility lines located outside of West 86th Street and Mission Hills Lane and Court shall be a private utility system and maintained by the homeowners association. Due to the magnitude of this project, the City has required that all utilities be installed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Fire hydrant location has been reviewed and approved by the City's fire marshal. The plans also include drain tile behind the curb to facilitate household sump pump discharge and also to improve roadway subgrade drainage. On the streets that are proposed to be private, staff is still recommending to the applicant that provisions be made to accommodate for sump pump discharge. f Mission Hills October 20, 1994 Page 11 Sanitary sewer service for this development will be extended from the existing sanitary sewer line located just outside the plat in the northwest corner of the site. The applicant will be responsible for obtaining and conveying the necessary permanent drainage and utility ' easement in order to connect to the sanitary sewer line and extend it to this development. The proposed sanitary sewer line which is actually a part of the city's trunk sewer system is proposed to follow along the east side of Trunk Highway 101 to proposed West 86th Street ' consistent with the city's feasibility study. The applicant will be installing this segment of trunk sanitary sewer line which was previously scheduled to be a part of the City's Lake Riley Hills Improvement Project. Therefore, the applicant should receive credit against their ' overall assessments for the cost of installing the trunk sanitary sewer line along TH 101 as long as these costs do not exceed fair market value. ' STREETS ' The applicant's engineer has supplied the City with detailed construction drawings for the streets within this development. The plans propose to realign West 86th Street which currently exists today as a 20 -24' wide gravel street. West 86th Street eventually turns into Tigua Lane which is upgraded to urban standards with blacktop and curb and gutter. The final plat will dedicate the necessary right -of -way for most of West 86th Street; however, the final plat does not provide necessary right -of -way through Outlot D, thus land locking this ' development from existing TH 101. Staff recommends the final plat be revised to dedicate West 86th Street through Outlot D to connect to TH 101 or the applicant dedicate to the city a permanent public roadway, drainage, utility and trail easement for this segment of West , 86th Street prior to the city signing the final plat. A portion of West 86th Street has been dedicated with 80' wide right -of -ways to accommodate turn lanes for the future commercial site to the southwest of the development and to provide adequate turning movements for the ' private streets. The remaining portion of West 86th Street is being dedicated at the city's normal right -of -way width (60'). ' xc tion of West 86th Street Mission Hills Lane and Court the remain. streets Wi ththee exception 8 will be private. Maintenance of these private streets will be the homeowners' responsibilities. Over the southerly one -half of the development (south of West 86th Street), this type of , development will require cross access easements to ensure access rights for all individuals as well as spell out maintenance responsibilities. Therefore, the applicant should prepare a cross access easement acceptable to the City for this area. ' Along TH 101, a 66' wide right -of -way currently exists (33' on the Mission Hills side). ' Eventually TH 101 will be upgraded to a major four lane urban section and additional right - of -way will be needed. The applicant has provided this corridor through platting of Outlot D for future acquisition. The applicant is dedicating an additional 17 feet of right -of -way along the easterly side of TH 101 to provide a total of 50' from the centerline of TH 101. Plans do provide for a 6' wide trail/sidewalk along the south side of West 86th Street from TH 101 to I i Mission Hills October 20, 1994 Page 12 the east plat boundary and a 5' wide concrete sidewalk along the east side of Mission Hills Lane. In addition, the plans are providing for an 8' wide bituminous trail around the wetland located south of West 86th Street which also connects to the proposed 6' wide sidewalk along West 86th Street. The appropriate 20' wide trail easement should be conveyed to preserve the access maintenance of this trail corridor around the wetlands. ' Staff has reviewed the street layout and has designated 8 street lights to be installed along Y g g West 86th Street and Mission Hills Lane and Court. Staff also recommends the applicant provide to the City for review and approval, an interior street lighting layout on the private streets as well. Pending MnDOT approval, turn lanes and bypass lanes along TH 101 are anticipated. Since MnDOT has not approved of the layout as of the preparation of this report, the street construction plans do not include construction of these interim acceleration and deceleration lanes along TH 101. Staff has added a condition to require the applicant to include the construction of these turn lanes and bypass lanes along TH 101 in accordance with MnDOT's standards or recommendations by July 1, 1995 or the city may withhold issuing additional building permits. A financial guarantee for the installation of these turn lanes is provided in the PUD agreement. The applicant has indicated that due to weather constraints, a phasing approach to this development will occur. Currently, the residents of Tigua Lane gain access through the site via the existing gravel road. So far access through this development during the site grading phase, construction has been bearable. It is very important that the applicant concentrate on completing West 86th Street completely from TH 101 to Tigua Lane prior to concentrating on the private streets. Staff believes that this should be a goal of this development in order to maintain safe access to the existing homes on Tigua Lane as well as for emergency vehicles. ' RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council adopt the following motion: "The City ouncil approves the rezoning second reading from RSF to PUD plat #93 -4 ; final tY PP g g ( ) P of Mission Hills, Block 1 with 19 multifamily lots to contain 138 units and 2 outlots, Block 2 ' for 7 single family lots, Block 3 for 9 single family lots; final plat of Mission Hills Second Addition (#94 -5 SUB) Block 4 for 56 multifamily lots to contain 56 units and one outlot; and Site Plan #94 -5 as shown on the plans received September 30, 1994, subject to the following conditions: 1. All utility and street improvements (public and private) shall be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant will be required to supply detailed construction plans for all utility and I f Mission Hills October 20, 1994 Page 13 , street improvements for the City to review and formally approve. Street grades throughout the subdivision should be between 0.75% and 7.0 %. West 86th Street shall be constructed with a 36' wide urban street section from existing TH 101 to Mission ' Hills Lane. The remaining street may be reduced to 31' wide. Private streets shall be constructed in accordance with the approved construction plans. ' 2. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining and complying with all necessary permits such as the DNR, MWCC, Health Department, Watershed Districts, PCA and ' MnDOT. 3. If the applicant installs the oversized (12 inch) watermain along West 86th Street and Mission Hills Way East, the City shall credit the applicant by means of reduction in their assessments for the oversizing costs. The oversizing costs shall be the difference between an 8 inch watermain and a 12 inch watermain. The applicant shall also receive credit against their assessments for the cost of installing the trunk sanitary sewer along TH 101 as long as these costs do not exceed fair market value. , 4. The applicant should provide a buffer area between the development and proposed Trunk Highway 212 as well as Trunk Highway 101. The buffer area should consist of both landscaping materials and berming. ' 5. The applicant shall include a drain tile system in all public streets where the adjacent dwellings have no other acceptable means of discharging such a pond, wetland or storm , sewer. 6. During construction of the site improvements, the applicant shall provide provisions for maintaining ingress and egress at all times for the homes on Tigua Lane as well as emergency vehicles. ' 7. Allowed uses in the commercial site shall be restricted to the uses described in the staff report. ' 8. The applicant shall provide density/hard and surface coverage calculations for each lot within PP P tY� g Blocks 1 and 4. These figures shall exclude the right -of -way and wetland areas. , 9. The landscaping plan shall be revised to add more trees along West 86th Street, along Highway 212 and Highway 101 right -of -ways and between the area separating commercial and residential lots. 10. Meet the following conditions of the Park and Recreation Commission: I I i Mission Hills October 20, 1994 Page 14 a. The tot park facility shall include typical park amenities such as landscaped grassy areas, picnic tables, park benches, play apparatus and basketball courts, ' etc. 11. The commercial portion of the PUD shall be consistent with the Highway 5 Corridor Study design standards. Setbacks shall comply with standards set forth in the PUD agreement. r 12. Chanhassen Fire Department's policy on Premise Identification must be followed. Additional monument signs for address location will be required. Contact the ' Chanhassen Fire Marshal for requirements and details. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy #29 -1992. Policy enclosed. 13. There will be no parking allowed on private streets or the south side of West 86th Street. Signage must be installed in compliance to Fire Prevention Policy #06 -1991. Pursuant to 1991 Chanhassen Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10.207(a). The City Council shall adopt a resolution accordingly. J 1 14. A ten foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e. street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, NSP, NW Bell, Cable TV, transform boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance Sec. 9 -1. 15. Street lights shall be provided along West 86th Street, Mission Hills Lane and Court, and all interior private streets. The city shall determine type and placement. b. Six foot wide concrete sidewalks be constructed on the south side of West 86th Street from Highway 101 east to the project's terminus and a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk on Mission Hills Lane from West 86th Street north to the street's terminus. C. An 8' wide bituminous trail shall be constructed encircling o tructed a cucluig the wetland located south of 86th Street, connecting the sidewalk system to the "park site." In consideration for the construction of said trail, the applicant shall receive a lump sum payment equal to the cost of construction. Said cost to be determined by the applicant for presentation to the city with documentation for verification. d. Full park and trail fees shall be collected at the time of building permit applications at the rate then in force. 11. The commercial portion of the PUD shall be consistent with the Highway 5 Corridor Study design standards. Setbacks shall comply with standards set forth in the PUD agreement. r 12. Chanhassen Fire Department's policy on Premise Identification must be followed. Additional monument signs for address location will be required. Contact the ' Chanhassen Fire Marshal for requirements and details. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy #29 -1992. Policy enclosed. 13. There will be no parking allowed on private streets or the south side of West 86th Street. Signage must be installed in compliance to Fire Prevention Policy #06 -1991. Pursuant to 1991 Chanhassen Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10.207(a). The City Council shall adopt a resolution accordingly. J 1 14. A ten foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e. street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, NSP, NW Bell, Cable TV, transform boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance Sec. 9 -1. 15. Street lights shall be provided along West 86th Street, Mission Hills Lane and Court, and all interior private streets. The city shall determine type and placement. f Mission Hills October 20, 1994 Page 15 16. The applicant shall verify that the landscaping plan meets the city tree preservation ordinance for canopy coverage. 17. The applicant shall provide diversity in the color schemes used in the buildings. 18. The applicant shall deposit with the city an escrow for the future upgrading if TH 101 north of West 86th Street. The escrow may be in the form of a letter of credit or cash deposit. The amount of the escrow will have to be determined after a feasibility study ' for the upgrading TH 101. 19. All areas disturbed as a result of construction activities shall be immediately restored , with seed and disc - mulched or wood -fiber blanket or sod within two weeks of completion of each activity in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook. 20. Wetland buffer areas shall be surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The City will install wetland buffer edge signs before construction begins and will charge the applicant $20 per sign. • 21. The applicant shall enter into a PUD development contract with the City and provide the necessary financial security to guarantee compliance with the terms of the development contract. 22. Water quantity fees will be based in accordance with the City's SWMP. These fees ' will be evaluated based on the applicant's contribution to the SWMP design requirements. ' 23. The applicant shall report to the City Engineer the location of any drain tiles found during construction and shall re- locate or abandon the drain tile as directed by the City Engineer. 24. All erosion control measures shall be installed prior to commencement of grading operations and be maintained until all disturbed areas have been fully restored. The applicant shall also be responsible for removal of all erosion control measures upon completion of site grading. The city engineer will determine the appropriate time and authorize the applicant to remove the erosion control measures. 25. Grading shall be prohibited within 10 feet of all wetlands. Erosion control fence shall , be installed outside the 10 -foot buffer as well. 26. The final plat shall be revised to dedicate an 80 foot wide right -of -way through Outlot D, Mission Hills for extension of West 86th Street to connect with TH 101 or the t i 5 Mission Hills October 20, 1994 Page 16 applicant shall dedicate to the city a permanent public roadway, drainage, utility and trail easement for this segment of West 86th Street prior to the city signing the final plat. 27. The bypass and turn lanes at the intersection of TH 101 and West 86th Street shall be constructed by July 1, 1995 or the city may withhold issuing additional permits. 28. A 20 -foot wide trail easement shall be conveyed by the applicant to the city over the proposed 8 foot wide bituminous trail which surrounds the wetland located south of West 86th Street. ' 29. The City will calculate the appropriate surface water management fees for water quantity. These fees shall be paid to the City prior to the final plat being recorded at the county. 30. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining and conveying the necessary permanent drainage and utility easements outside the plat to extend sanitary sewer service to the development. The final plat shall not be recorded without the appropriate easement first being conveyed to the city. 31. The applicant shall provide cross - access easements over the development lying south of West 86th Street to provide access to the utility ponds. On both the north and south sides of West 86th Street the homeowners association shall permit the City access to the storm water drainage system (ponds /wetland) to perform routine maintenance at all reasonable times. 32. The applicant agrees, in writing, that the plat shall be assessed for the extension of trunk and lateral sanitary sewer and watermains over the property in accordance with 1 the feasibility study for Project No. 93 -32. Said assessments shall be deemed adopted on the date this contract is signed by the City. The applicant/developer waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessment, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the property. The applicant/developer waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to M.S.A. §429.081. 33. Outlot B, Mission Hills shall be conveyed by warranty deed to the city at no cost. 34. The applicant shall provide to the city at no cost the necessary utility easements along Trunk Highway 101 through the Klingelhutz parcels to extend watermain to the Mission Hills development. t Mission Hills October 20, 1994 Page 17 PUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Approval of the final PUD development plan with the following standards: a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD neighborhood commercial/mixed density housing zone. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be placed underground. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses within the neighborhood commercial zone should be limited to appropriate commercial and service uses consistent with the neighborhood. The uses shall be limited to those as defined herein. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. The type of uses to be provided on this outlot shall be low intensity neighborhood oriented retail and service establishments to meet daily needs of residents. Such uses may include small to medium sized restaurant (no drive -thru windows), office, day care, neighborhood scale commercial, convenience store, churches, or other similar type and scale uses. C. Setbacks In the PUD standards, the building setback for commercial is 50 feet from any public right -of -way. The Parking setback shall be 35 feet from any Public Right -of -Way and/ or interior property line. There shall be a buffer separating the residential portion from the commercial portion of the site. This buffer shall be in the form of a berm and landscaping. The following setbacks shall be observed: Street Commercial Building Setback Hwy. 101 50' Hwy. 212 50' Residential Building Setback 50' 50' Residential Commercial Parking Parking Setback Setback 20' 35' 20' 35' 1 1 u I Mission Hills October 20, 1994 Page 18 West 86th Street 50' 30' d. Development Standards Tabulation Box BLOCK USE Net Lot Area Outlot E Commercial 7.72 acres 1 138 Multi - Family units 18.00 acres 2 &3 16 Single - Family units 8.55 acres 4 56 Multi- Family units 8.92 acres ROW Street and court 1.17 acres West 86th St Right -of -Way 2.23 acres Hwy. 212 and 101 Right -of -Way 18.68 acres TOTAL AREA 61.67+ Lot Lot Area Width Ordinance 15,000 90' BLOCK 2 Lot 1 23,374 117.48 Lot 2 20,196 100.30 Lot 3 20,824 100.31 Lot 4 21,386 100.17 Lot 5 20,898 100.45 Lot 6 21,566 116 Lot 7 22,006 125 BLOCK 3 20' 35' Density Hard Surface Coverage 7.66 37% 2.24 6.28 43.2% Home Home Depth Setback 125' 30' front/30' rear 10' sides 198.83 201.96 208.23 212.5 207 189 176.5 Mission Hills October 20, 1994 Page 19 Lot 1 16,349 108 150 Lot 2 15,126 95.6 '155 Lot 3 15,554 90 172 Lot 4 16,185 90 180 Lot 5 15,232 127 134.5 Lot 6 24,778 55.62* 189.06 Lot 7 25,092 78.30* 189 Lot 8 15,752 76.6* 135.25 Lot 9 17,026 112 147.5 * denotes lots located on a cul -de -sac e. Building Materials and Design RESIDENTIAL Building's exterior material shall be a combination of a five inch aluminum siding and brick. The architectural style is generally classic with details such as arched transoms and soffit returns over the entries of the one story homes and horizontal transom windows over the two -story windows. On a similar project elsewhere, exterior finishes were soft gray and creamy white, featuring pearl gray siding, shell white soffit/facia, and gray velour brick. Finding The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. The two story buildings located on block 1, reflect some architectural variation which makes the units more appealing. The one story units located on Block 4 have limited architectural variation. New elements should be added to give the units some variation. This could be in the form of changing the shape of windows, adding louvers, shifting entry ways, and adding dormers. COMMERCIAL Mission Hills October 20, 1994 Page 20 1 1. All materials shall be of high quality and durable. Masonry material shall be used. Color shall be introduced through colored block or panels. 2. Brick may be used and must be approved to assure uniformity. 3. Block shall have a weathered face or be polished, fluted, or broken face. 4. Concrete may be poured in place, tilt -up or pre -cast, and shall be finished in stone, textured or coated. 5. Metal standing seam siding will not be approved except as support material to one of the above materials or curtain wall on office components. 6. All accessory structures shall be designed to be compatible with the primary structure. 7. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened by pitched roofs. Wood screen fences are prohibited. Screening shall consist of compatible materials. 8. All buildings on the Outlot shall have a pitched roof line. 9. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building. RESIDENTIAL 1. Building exterior material shall be a combination of prepainted 5" aluminum siding and brick. 2. Arched transoms and soffit returns shall be used over the entries of the one story units and horizontal transom windows over the 2 story windows. Introduce some variation among the buildings through the shape of windows, adding louvers, shifting entry ways, and adding dormers. 3. Colors used shall be earth tones such as soft gray, creamy white, pearl gray, shell white, etc.). 4. Each unit shall have a minimum of 1 overstory tree within its front yard. 5. All units shall have access onto an interior street and not 86th Street. Site Landscaping and Screening f Mission Hills October 20, 1994 Page 21 The lantin plans prepared for the site are intended to create a strong sense of street P gP P P g tree plantings using overstory deciduous trees such as Summit Ash, Linden, and Sugar Maple. Highways 101 and 212 will be buffered with a combination of overstory evergreen trees and ornamental deciduous trees. The outdoor private living areas will be buffered with the use of evergreen trees. The wetland will be highlighted with the introduction of native wetland species. In addition, to adhere to the higher quality of development as spelled out in the PUD zone, all loading areas shall be screened. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. Berms of 2 to 3 feet high shall be added along the Highway 101 and 212 right -of -way. These berms shall be seeded and/or sodded and bushes and trees shall be planted on them. All disturbed areas within the single family lots shall be seeded and/or sodded. Two trees with a minimum of a 2 inch caliper shall be planted within the front yard setback. These two trees shall consist of one overstory evergreen tree and one ornamental deciduous tree. 1. All open spaces and non - parking lot surfaces ( outlot) shall be landscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. 2. Outdoor storage is prohibited. 3. Loading areas shall be screened from public right -of -ways. Wing wall may be , required where deemed appropriate. 4. The Outlot shall be seeded and maintained in a weed free condition in all areas proposed for future development. g. Signage COMMERCIAL Staff is proposing one monument sign be permitted for the outlot and one monument � P P g g sign for the residential section of the PUD. I 1. All businesses built within the oudot shall share one monument sign. Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. 2. Wall signs are permitted on no more that 2 street frontages. The total of each wall mounted sign display areas shall not exceed (24 square feet). Mission Hills October 20, 1994 Page 22 3. All signs require a separate permit. 4. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and shall tie the building materials to be consistent with the signs. Signs shall be an architectural feature, they shall not be solely mounted on a pole of a foundation. 5. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. 6. No illuminated signs within the outlot may be viewed from the residential section of the PUD. 7. Only back -lit individual letter signs are permitted. 8. Individual letters may not exceed 3 feet in height. 9. Only the name and logo of the business occupying the unit will be permitted on the sign. RESIDENTIAL One monument identification sign shall be permitted for the residential development. The sign may not exceed 24 square feet in area and 5 feet in height. h. Lighting Finding 1. All light fixtures shall be shielded high pressure sodium fixtures. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than l6 candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting. The maximum height of a residential street light shall not exceed 15 feet. Light fixtures within the outlot shall not exceed 25 feet. 2. Glare, whether direct or reflected, as differentiated from general illumination shall not be visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates. 3. Lights shall be on a photoelectric cell to turn them on and off automatically as activated by yearly conditions. 4. The outlot light poles shall be corten, shoe box light standards." 1 Mission Hills October 20, 1994 Page 23 ATTACHMENTS 1. Plans reflecting variation in design. 2. Sample of street light. 3. City Council minutes dated July 11, 1994. 4. Final plat for Mission Hills and Mission Hills 2nd Addition received October 18, 1994. 1 I � fl Ij 1 0 I RA 1 - P poll N� �, . .n ��= ����? :;7 41 PAAFA '.i W!; ■_. ` ra ■� �© _ ��Waa M 6 w �� � r :6 :45 '� �� Ii1111i 11111 Illitl� - k f R(YrTLIUND HOME TM A DIVISION OF THE ROTTLUND COMPANY, INC. �� �� � �COVER T ��� T SHEET Date: �L�'S Pages Sent (Including Cover): TO: Name: / +� / 7� " c�✓ F Company: c: Telephone: Fax Name: Company: Telephone: Fax: Name: Company: Telephone: Fax: Name: Company: Telephone: Fax: FROM: Name: BOB PORTER Company: THE ROTTLUND COMPANY Fax Phone: (612) 638 -0502 Telephone: (612) 638 -0500 I MESSAGE: A/vt/ ✓ 6✓ �' .... /�c� ., / �'�- J � /i / C� mac? 7 L ���z�"'l.Y�'JC.�3 Je'�' , � S:S� cF � /� /�L- S t 1 The information contained in this facsimile message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual of entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, and return the original message to us at the above address via the U.S. Postal Service. We will be happy to reimburse your for the postage. Please Reply Original Will Follow Please Reply Immediately Original Will NOT Follow No Reply Necessary FAX.doc EOVAL HOUS OIPOETUNITY 2681 LONG LAKE ROAD ROSEVILLE. MN 55113 (612) 63 - FAX (612) 638 -0501 m G T Vl By rn m�0 m rn � � C 99E of - g Barn= ;E �Om C�y Z � w © �v m a _N N w V °V I 1 ! vi VI C V LM ,�7 r VI N A/ N N N N co 1 V -9 ➢z 5 Con o � � all N N N N co 1 V -9 ➢z 5 Con o � � I I 11 I WHITTI U C.A. IVI Elevations Unit A Unit A Front Elevation 4 Unit Building Carden Horne, 11 I I I i 1 i� f t i1 ASSOCIATE ` I II:ATilt.ltl 11 '1 �II1nIT-A. 111 z 0 rA rA E Garden Homes g Unit Building Unit B Unit B ! Unit A Front Elevation Garden Homes A I I Unit A Unit A Side Elevation WHITTENJ Assoc[ATES,INC. Unit A i-7 Knc_h. Dery Dinmg Bedroom Bv� Patio U—it P.- ."�~\\_. . 'F %ef . 5 I Unit A Unit B Lmng Garage Unit B Main Level Plan 1W.I.I. Garden Homes Ti Z EU Carde Homes 8 Unit Building, A41 I I Li P, 1 1 1 i 1 71 Ll I I I Side Elevation Front Elevation o- 8 Unit Building WHITTEN ASSOCIA I I SANC I Villas --m 8 Unit Buildin= I L I i 1 [i i Asp NSP Street Lighting Service qq/ ' T An F t- E `R { r .. - _V� "� it oz h Maximum Spacing Recommendations Colonial Style *Use different wattage /Pole combinations or fixture types for better lighting Denotes best recommendation Price List Cost Traditional 100 Watt $700.00 Area OT use 720.00 Wattage /Pole Height Recreation Residential Commercial 18 FT. Fiberglass 273.00 15 FT. Aluminum 1,300.00 100W /18FT 190FT 175FT 140FT 100W /20FT 21 OFT 170FT 120FT 150W/18FT 230FT 21 OFT 200FT* 150W /20FT 21 OFT* 190FT* 185FT *Use different wattage /Pole combinations or fixture types for better lighting Denotes best recommendation Price List Cost Traditional 100 Watt $700.00 150 Watt 720.00 Pole 15 FT. Fiberglass 1,354.00 18 FT. Fiberglass 273.00 15 FT. Aluminum 1,300.00 20 FT. Aluminum 685.00 Base Pre -cast Concrete 550.00 Screw -In 6" 332.00 Northern States Power Company 6/93 2M 4M Printed on recycled paper 414 Nicollet Mall ILO 10% post- consumer waste Minneapolis, MN 55401 t City Council Meeting - July 11, 1994 1 Don Ashworth: Dave, is there any question as it deals with the 25th? Should we advise people to watch the paper as to the 25th or August 8th or can you make a commitment to the 25th? David Mitchell: I can make a commitment to the 25th. We're ... address those issues. I think in that time frame we can look at some possible alternatives for the east end and be prepared to do that I guess as I sit here and think of one of the options that has been presented is the density issue out there and the additional impact that Charles has given on the lift station as a possible ... I think we can address some of those impacts and proceed with the project at that point... Don Ashworth: Thank you. Councilman Mason: Will this private versus public thing enter into this at all? I mean what was mentioned. I mean for their credit towards what's going on. I believe it was Mr. Putnam brought that up. Is that an option to be looked at all here? I mean would that facilitate things at all or we don't care about that? Charles Folch: At this point, as long as there's still hope in doing at least that portion of the work this year, I think we should probably leave that issue, that alternative... r Councilman Mason: Okay. Okay. Mayor Chmiel: Alright. Any other discussion? Mayor Chmiel moved, Councilman Wing seconded to table the Lyman Boulevard and Lake Riley Trunk Utility Project No. 93 -32 and authorizing plans and specifications until the next City Council meeting on July 25, 1994. All voted in favor and the motion carried. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REQUEST, PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR 74 LOTS OF MIXED HIGH DENSITY (186 DWELLING UNITS), 15 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND AN OUTLOT WHICH CONTAIN FUTURE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL USE(S); SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR MIXED HIGH DENSITY UNITS LOCATED EAST OF HIGHWAY 101 AT WEST 86TH STREET; MISSION HILLS, TANDEM PROPERTIES. , Public Present: Name Address Dick Putnam Tandem Properties I Jim Ostenson Tandem Properties Don Jensen AI Klingelhutz Rottlund Homes 8600 Great Plains Blvd. Ed Hasek Westwood Engineering Dick Putnam: Mr. Mayor, my name is Dick Putnam, Tandem Properties. Jim Ostenson is here, who's my partner. Don Jensen, Director of Development for Rottlund Corporation is here to answer any questions... on the units themselves and Ed Hasek from Westwood Engineering who will present to you the changes that we made on the plans since the last meeting ... went back to the Park and Rec Commission to take a look at the site plan. 18 i City Council Meeting - July 11, 1994 We won't go through the project any more since you've been through it a couple times but I would like to ask Ed to ... and then any of us would be available to answer any questions on the units or... Mayor Chmiel: Thank you. Sharmin, I'll let you start this first. Sharmin Al -Jaffa Thank you. The...You tabled it mainly because of the park issue. The applicant had not appeared before the Park and Recreation Commission yet for preliminary PUD application. One of the issues was staff was requesting a 1.5 acre area for a park. The applicant was providing a .23 acre and this issue has been resolved. The Park and Rec Commission recommended the 1.5 acre and the applicant's revised the plans to show that park. This morning I was speaking to Mr. Mayer. He had some concerns regarding the location of the totlot in relationship to the wetlands. This wetland has standing water. It's within close proximity to the totlot is in close proximity to the wetland. Assuming that the children were supervised, would that be a concern and we looked at other situations that we have in this city. One of them was in Lake Susan. However, and it's along the beach there is a totlot next to, Lake Susan has a totlot. However there's a distance between it and the lake. Lake Ann has a totlot next to the beach but there's usually a lifeguard out there. We looked at fencing but rather not doing the fencing around the wetland. One possibility would be to put it around the todot itself. So these are options before you. The second issue that was raised was the grading and the ponding on this site. This remains an issue that hasn't been resolved and the engineering department and the applicant are working on this still. Elevations was the third issue and staff feels that we have reached an agreement with the applicant. He has revised the elevation plans and there are materials as well as renderings that he has brought with him that he could share with you so. Councilman Wing: This is the new one? These are not up to date? Councilwoman Dockendorf: These don't look compatible with what you've got up there. Sharmin Al -Jaffa Those are the old ones. Okay, what's here is the new one. Ed Hasek: This one's the new one too. Sharmin Al -Jaffa Correct. One other difference between the old and the new is the new plans show two additional units but they are still within the permitted density. They meet the comprehensive plan guidelines as well as the zoning ordinance. The previous plan showed a higher density than was permitted under the comprehensive plan within this quarter of the parcel. However, because they added this open space here, we no longer need to transfer density and they are within the guidelines. And also comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. So we are recommending approval with conditions outlined in the staff report and if you have any questions, I'll be more than glad to answer them. Mayor Chmiel: Okay. Thank you Sharmin. Gentlemen. Ed Hasek: Your Honor, members of the Council, my name is Ed Hasek. I'm with Westwood Professional Services. Again, our offices are located just down the highway here in Eden Prairie. I think to expedite things just a little bit this evening I'm going to be as brief as I possibly can. I think Sharmin has done a good job of outlining the changes between what I'm going to show you as the plan that we had presented for conceptual approval. Basically the plan that was put together and that's why I had this one flipped up before. We went through that concept with you I believe last time about the similarities and the project, the changes that have occurred on this particular project. That we have reduced density in the southeastern quarter of the project while 19 t City Council Meeting - July 11, 1994 F obtaining two additional units. We're actually under 8 units per acre in both the medium and the high density areas of this project as it stands right now. One thing that did occur, we have reduced the number of ponds by one at this point and as Sharmin had pointed out, we are working diligently with the engineering staff to work out the issues related to ponding for this property. They basically relate to what the ultimate plan is for water and how that's going to impact this particular development. What will or will not be temporary in... Again, 1.5+ acres of parkland is suggested for this plan. We're going to install the same facilities, the same todot, the same hard surface and ball court area. That will be located in the area that I just pointed to on the map. And the other thing that did occur on this is we had originally intended that the road that's just to the south of the pond, this one right here, be extended across on a temporary basis with some sort of sub - surface hard cover and for those times that emergency vehicles may want to use it. In working with the city staff and the fire marshal, we've included a hammerhead. The details of that have not been worked out yet at this time. We're still talking to him ... provided one that we know is in excess of what he's going to want and we're hoping that we can cut that back to further expand the open space in the park. At that I think I'll let it go. If you've got any questions of Don Jensen, related to the specific units, he can deal with that at this time. Don Jensen: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council. Don Jensen with the Rottlund Company. We brought all our boards with describing the various building components that are going into this. We would like to share with you our screens with private parks, which is ... this is not a public parks. It's being asked of the developers to create. Our insurance carriers, which then would insure for the homeowners association asked that we provide signage. We're not real excited about fencing off amenities that are in fact...desirable about Minnesota, Chanhassen and the western suburbs. Totlot is key in that it is for tots. The�question unsupervised lots is an interesting thing... supervision in Minnesota and ... that's always important regardless. Whether that's a pond or a lake. We've been asked to provide fencing and signage. That's for the insurance carriers so that they know that these areas do have at least an awareness posted. At what point the awareness goes, that's always subject to debate. We have worked with staff on changing the facade of our garden home product. That subdivision as planned in the north of 86th has not changed and we've also submitted our building materials, which I have next to Charlie here. And I'll just hold in front of the podium there, I think the camera picks those up as well. But we'd be looking at aluminum or vinyl siding. It depends on the manufacturers. Accent colors which are carried around the garden home also on shudders which are on the end of the buildings that we were looking at. We worked with staff on deviating on the standards. There's the transom windows. The detail as well as an arched window detail that we'd put on this end elevation. The previous plans had an idea for a fairly simply end treatment. The current plans that we re- submitted back to staff deal with the change on the 8 unit buildings in the center as well as beefing up the amount of window or perceived window volume on the end elevation. When you look at the building, in reality outside of the architectural elevations and we have some photographs that we shared with staff, virtually those whole end elevations are either doors or windows. There's not a whole lot of wall space on those units. In fact they have a whole lot of added insulation for instance so we feel pretty comfortable that we have a rather elegant looking building. Again, there's two sectors of the marketplace that we feel Chanhassen has created through the jobs market. It in Chaska and there's a lot of people that are really needing housing under $ 100,000.00 in categories both starting out in a job and people winding down on their jobs and that's what these two products are aimed squarely at with their building line and the garden home line. I'd be happy to have me go through in a little bit greater detail the building plans that are all in your packets. I would describe them at some length with some market research that we've been able to go through and we believe that the people that are going to be living here are going to be either working within about 5 miles to 7 miles of this area or they're already living within 5 to 7 miles of this area. Thank you very much. Mayor Chmiel: Thank you. Does anyone have any questions? 20 1 El 1 t 0 1 Ll r City Council Meeting - July 11, 1994 Mayor Chmiel: No, I'm looking at the audience who may be in and adjacent to that particular property. I don't see any so I'll bring it back to Council. Richard. Councilman Wing: Are you looking at us? Councilman Wing: Kate or Sharmin can you, my daughter just bought a house. She didn't qualify for much so I want to talk about affordable housing. At some point in the discussion of this project we talked affordable housing. And as I'm understanding, affordable housing that the city's looked at, we're looking at $60,000.00 to $70,000.00 is affordable housing. I mean anything over that you've got to have a $30,000.00, $40,000.00, $50,000.00 income. $100,000.00 mortgage doesn't come out of a $20,000.00 - $30,000.00 income. So what I'm getting at is, was this project supposedly going to enhance our affordable housing situation? Sharmin Al -Jaffa Initially when we started working on it we suggested that maybe we could create a housing district out there. That would be our only option basically to guarantee affordable prices on those units. Kate Aanenson: They've indicated that they want to make it some affordable housing ... make it clear that we have no way of guaranteeing what those prices are going to be. We can indicate a certain price range but there's no way that we can guarantee that that's what they're selling. Councilman Wing: But I need to define affordable housing, and is affordable housing under $80,000.00? Kate Aanenson: Yes. Councilman Wing: Are any of these units going to sell? Kate Aanenson: They had indicated that they had some at $69- $70,000.00. That's what we have in your report. What I'm saying is there's no guarantee. Councilman Wing: Is that true? Is that true that a percentage of these are affordable housing? Don Jensen: That's correct. I could show which ones are. Our standard villa, which is a one bathroom product which helps maintain the affordability, which is the center of the lower subdivision. It's next to 212. The buildings that are cut in half that look at the wetland areas, have a 2 bathroom standard. Because of the extra building materials, people are looking for that because that will tend to go in the 80's. These that are the back to back configuration will come on the market and our pricing—in the high 60's, low 70's. Obviously an influence to that is whether or not the utility infrastructure gets in this year or next year because none of that does get any cheaper. Kate Aanenson: We just want to make it clear that that's all preferenced on their good faith that that's what... Councilman Wing: Yeah, I'll get to that. Kate Aanenson: There's no guarantee that... Councilman Wing: Yeah, I want to ask about that. Out of your 100 and, I don't know how much are in these? Out of these, out of the all level housing units, how many of that number, because I can't see here. Do you know the number that would be in the $60,000.00 to $70,000.00 range? 21 City Council Meeting - July 11, 1994 1 Don Jensen: Certainly those would be all of the back to back dwelling units in through here that we'd be targeting and those are about 84 -88 units of the project as it is presently configured. Councilman Wing: And how about the ones that might go into the 80's? Approximately how many. Don Jensen: The center units in the garden home areas are targeted and slotted so we can try to reach that $80,000.00 category. As well as some of the interior units through here on this half buildings. Councilman Wing: So a good percentage. Don Jensen: Approximately 65% is trying to maintain underneath that $85,000.00 number and compared under ■ the villas under $80,000.00. Councilman Wing: Okay. I'm getting increasingly down on these densities and the number of homes coming in and the amount of traffic we're bringing in and the lack of infrastructure. It just seems like the cart's ahead of the horse. And so I'm having a harder and harder time with these developments because all we do is keep stamping them and all I look to see is that the silt fencing is in place and there's nothing more to be said. They meet our ordinances and I'm really concerned that we need an emergency review of our comprehensive plan. But I'll go after this a little differently now that if we're going to meet some affordable housing needs, which is with a good location and a good project, it alters my opinion on this. Can we, as a condition, lock in affordable housing of this project. Is there any way that we can assure that this goal is going to be met? If I was to approve this, is there any condition, any wording we can put in this to insure that that goal is met or that that in fact happens? Because once we approve it, like Kate said, there's nothing to say they can't go sell these for $125,000.00. If the market was there. �. Tom Scott: Mr. Mayor, I'm not aware of any conditions imposed on this plat that would require the developer to sell the units at a certain price. Mayor Chmiel: Unless the city were to come in with maybe having HRA or the County HRA subsidize a particular project. Tom Scott: If there was some sort of involvement of that nature, there certainly may be a different set of rules involved, yes. Don Jensen: Mr. Mayor, Councilman Wing. What we have found is that one of the ways that you maintain affordability, and quite often we're chased out of the room for bringing in housing under $80,000.00, is when you take a look at the square footage of the dwelling units that's going in and all of that is part of the—and you try to build value into each and every square foot. When you increase the square footage, no matter what condition you put on, the building's fixed cost of creating whether it's a single family home or apartment structure, you're right around that $45.00, $50.00, $55.00 a square foot range. When you can get market rate housing, a for profit builder trying to meet the needs of the market place and you look at that square footage, that's how you're going to allow to have the city affordability goals be maintained. And we believe we can do an awful good job trying to meet those needs of the city outlines and one of the ways we can do it is speed If we can move through a project and not have delays, we're able to maintain that pricing where we target it rather than having to have increases because of delays and because of what Kate mentioned... asphalt and other elements that we don't have any control over. 22 1 City Council Meeting - July 11, 1994 Councilman Wing: I don't want to belabor this and I don't want to bore my colleagues here but let me ask one more question of Kate. Give me an option or another way that we can approach this. Maybe we can't do it now but how can we obtain this goal? Would we have to rezone? Would we have to start out with city involvement right from scratch on a project like this? If we're going to go these high density projects, then I want to attain some goals. How can we make sure we attain those goals? Kate Aanenson: Well this property is under the ... zoning in the comprehensive plan. Okay, so it meets that criteria. Now they've gone beyond that and made a good faith effort and we're assuming that they're going to try to attain that as far as providing some affordable housing. That's one of the objectives of the PUD which was one of the reasons why we supported the project. Again, you can take it a little bit differently but we certainly feel that those are two objectives. As far as whether or not this ... city or some other agency would have had to get involved prior to this to make it happen. Councilman Wing: Okay. Mayor Chmiel: Okay, Colleen. Councilwoman Dockendorf. So this condition 14, I mean is that still a valid point? Are we still going to continue to explore options of putting a housing district over it? Sharmin Al -Jaffa I believe it's getting at a point where it's... Councilwoman Dockendorf. It's too late. That's what I just heard, okay. I think the developer's come a really long ways since what we fast saw and I'm very impressed with what the project looks like. I really am. I'm ready to go ahead with the preliminary plat. We do need to discuss however, as staff has pointed out, what goes in the commercial part of it, although it's not up tonight for any specific buildings. We should discuss what we want there. We've got some pretty nebulous definitions of what neighborhood community is, or maybe I just can't find it. I'm looking on page 7 and we're saying medium sized restaurant, office, daycare, neighborhood scale commercial, which I don't know what that is, convenient store, churches, etc. Do we need to pin down more specifically what we want here? Is that the direction you're looking for? Sharmin Al -Jaffa If there are certain uses that you believe should. Councilwoman Dockendorf: Well yeah. Kate Aanenson: Square footage is one... Councilwoman Dockendorf. Is the developer pretty much looking until TH 212 and TH 101 gets finished there before they determine what they want? Sharmin Al -Jaffa That's what they've told us. Councilwoman Dockendorf. Okay. And do we have to hold them, I mean when it comes in as a PUD we like i to look at the whole package so. 1 23 4 City Council Meeting - July 11, 1994 1 Kate Aanenson: Right. And we also wanted to look at some criteria if...understanding of this is the framework. This is what you're allowing. This is pretty significant to the understanding of...and also we want it to be a compatible design. Councilwoman Dockendorf. Do we have a definition of neighborhood commercial or is it pretty much what I just stated before? Sharmin Al -Jaffa This is pretty much the definition that we have. There is also in there a sentence that says, if there was some confusion about any of this, the Planning Director will make the determination of that use. Councilwoman Dockendorf. Okay. I'm fine with the definitions that are provided here. I think 20 and 26, the conditions in here are repetitive. Other than that I have no problem with the conditions. There's some work to be done but this has really gone a long way and this is only preliminary plat. From now on out it's just detail. Mayor Chmiel: Okay, Michael. Councilman Mason: I basically agree with what's been said. All along here Councilman Wing and I have disagreed on density issues and I suspect we will continue to. However, I do agree with him about infrastructure issues and I think as these kinds of developments start coming into Chanhassen with the hopes of allowing more affordable housing in this community, that infrastructure issue is something I really think we need to take a look at. I think that's a really good point. I do also agree with his comments about, and I'm not sure whether it's obtainable or attainable goals for affordable housing. I do commend Rottlund, and I think they've been in this city enough and I think hope to be in this city enough that I'm pretty comfortable with what they're trying to do here in terms of $60,000.00 to $80,000.00. That's a far cry from what is the average single family home now in Chan, $120,000.00? Mayor Chmiel: Yep. I Councilman Mason: So that's good. I'm really glad to see that. I agree with what Colleen has said about the work that's gone into this. Yeah, it looks good. I'm also, well believe me with children of my own, I do understand the Mayor's concern about safety. I also hear what Mr. Jensen is saying. And quite honestly I guess I do pretty strongly believe that while the city, safety obviously is a paramount issue, it's even more important for the family to practice that safety. Those safety issues than it is for the city. I guess I'm just throwing my two cents in on that but it looks good. Looks okay. Mayor Chmiel: Okay, thank you Mike. The only concern, we have an awful lot of ponding throughout the city and no fences in and adjacent to those. But only because of the close proximity to that one particular area, I became a little concerned with it. Looking at it from a safety aspect. And even looking at it from the standpoint if they were to just take fencing and just cover from one end down to the other and make a corner, which is close to that play lot, it would probably havd tendencies to alleviate some given problems. It's not a whole lot of fencing. It's just minor but because of that close proximity I guess that's where I really got my feeling from that. And watching my own grandkids, you can keep your eye on them. Turn your back for one second and they're gone. Just that quick. And I had a situation happen in a motel, and I won't give the name of the motel. No plugs. But one of my own children, who just moves fast and quick. I turned my head for no more than I'll bet you 5 seconds and he was on the diving board at 2 1/2 years old and in the water. And that's where my concerns come from. If an obstruction is there, it could just give that parent a little more time. But because, as I said and I'll reiterate it one more time. The close proximity, I have that concern. And I would like to even 24 1 i City Council Meeting - July 11, 1994 make that as an additional condition that they look at that and put fencing on that one specific area with that. But other than that, I think it does look good. I think density is there and they're still a little bit under density and maybe we need to improve our density aspects when we look at something but for what's there and what we have on the books, it's compatible. So with that, any other discussion? Councilman Wing: Do you want one more comment? Will you accept one more comment? Mayor Chmiel: You have it. Councilman Wing: I don't find any problem with the project. I think it meets some needs but for 4 years since we moved the MUSA line we've gotten into an identical routine that's starting to bother me because I've lived here 30 years and I moved here for some amenities and a lifestyle that's starting to get choked out. Everything coming before us is high density, maximum use. And all I'm seeing coming out of these are stop lights, traffic, and choking up a lifestyle. So everytime one of these high density projects comes in, and I'm glad this one isn't in my neighborhood, this is only one and there's another one tonight, and there was another one last week. We're just approving one right after another and the net result is I think we're really starting to affect a lifestyle and the future of this community and I'm not so sure it's in a positive way. But we're doing it without an awful lot of discussion. That's why I'm concerned about the comp plan and why I make these statements. Good project but what are we really doing visionary wise here. That's, I threw my two cents worth in here and I apologize humbly to. Councilwoman Dockendorf: Well, let me throw in one more comment. Tonight we're approving over 200 acres in the city. Just tonight. That's so scary. Mayor Chmiel: That's right. That's right. Which will be done by '97. Councilman Wing: Anyway with that I'll move approval. Wait a minute, what am I moving? Mayor Chmiel: Well there's 3 different motions that we'll have. Councilman Wing: Here, I'm going to let Mike do it because he's better at putting 3 together. Councilman Mason: It's that third grade teaching experience Councilman. Mayor Chmiel: If you look on page 2. It's under the comments. Councilman Mason: Alright. I'll move approval of Preliminary Plat for Subdivision #94 -5 and Site Plan #94 -5 as shown on plans dated April 15, 1994 and revised plans received July 5, 1994 as subject to the conditions as stated in the staff report. Mayor Chmiel: Okay. And in addition to that, does it also have the rezoning of the property? From RSF, residential single family to PUD. Councilman Mason: Yep, I'll move that also. Are we going to do them all three at once here? Mayor Chmiel: Yes. 25 t City Council Meeting - July 11, 1994 Councilman Mason: Okay. I'll move the preliminary site plan for the PUD. Mayor Chmiel: Is that what you're looking for Sharmin? Sharmin Al -Jaffa No. Actually the rezoning is done with the final plat. Mayor Chmiel: Okay. Alright, then we'll just sit with that and pull that back. I thought I'd best ask that question before we proceed. Councilman Wing: Item 14, can that be deleted? Mayor Chmiel: And item 14 being deleted. Councilman Wing: I'm asking. Should it be deleted? We're not going to put a housing district overlay on this. Mayor Chmiel: Yeah, okay. Councilwoman Dockendorf: Well as long as you're cleaning it up, I think 20 and 26 is repetitive. Kate Aanenson: Right. F L r Councilman Mason: Well one of them should stay in. That motion includes deleting item number 14 and item number 26. And all we want is preliminary plat tonight, right? Mayor Chmiel: That's all we're looking for. Strictly that as shown. Motion on the floor with a second. Councilman Mason moved, Councilman Wing seconded to approve the preliminary plat for Subdivision #94 -5 and Site Plan #94 -5 as shown on the plans dated April 15, 1994 and revised plans received July 5, 1994, subject to the following conditions: 1. All utility and street improvements (public and private) shall be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant will be required to supply detailed construction plans for all utility and street improvements for the City to review and formally approve. Street grades throughout the subdivision should be between 0.75% and 7.0 %. 86th Street shall be constructed with a 36' wide urban street section from existing TH 101 to "A" Street. The remaining street may be reduced to 31' wide. 2. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining and complying with all necessary permits such as the DNR, MWCC, Health Department, Watershed Districts, PCA and MnDOT. 3. If the applicant installs the oversized (12 inch) watermain, the City shall credit the applicant by means of reduction in their assessments for the oversizing costs. The oversizing costs shall be the difference between an 8 inch watermain and a 12 inch watermain. Placement of all fire hydrants shall be in accordance with the Fire Marshal's recommendations. 26 1 1 w City Council Meeting - July 11, 1994 4. The homeowners association declaration of covenants and restrictions shall be submitted to staff for review and approval as it pertains to site maintenance prior to final plat approval. 5. The applicant should provide a buffer area between the development and proposed Trunk Highway 212 as well as Trunk Highway 101. The buffer area should consist of both landscaping materials and berming. 6. The applicant shall include a drain tile system in all public streets where the adjacent dwellings have no other acceptable means of discharging such a pond, wetland or storm sewer. 7. An additional 17 feet of right -of -way lying easterly of the existing highway shall be dedicated with the final plat. The remaining property shall be platted as an outlot for future road right -of -way acquisition. 8. During construction of the site improvements, the applicant shall provide provisions for maintaining ingress and egress at all times for the homes on Tigua Lane as well as emergency vehicles. 9. Allowed uses in the commercial site (outlot) shall be restricted to the uses described in the staff report. 10. The applicant shall provide density/hard surface coverage calculations for each lot within Blocks 1 and 4. These figures shall exclude the right -of -way and wetland areas. 11. The landscaping plan shall be revised to add more trees along West 86th Street, along Highway 212 and Highway 101 right -of -ways and between the area separating commercial and residential lots. / 12. Meet the following conditions of the Park and Recreation Commission: A. The tot park facility shall include typical park amenities such as landscaped grassy areas, picnic ' tables, park benches, play apparatus and basketball courts, etc. B. Six foot wide concrete sidewalks be constructed on the south side of West 86th Street from Highway 101 east to the project's terminus and a 5 foot wide core sidewalk on "A" Street from West 86th Street north to the street's terminus. C. A bituminous trail shall be constructed encircling the wetland located south of 86th Street, connecting the sidewalk system to the "park site." In consideration for the construction of said trail, the applicant shall receive trail fee credit equal to the cost of construction. Said cost to be determined by the applicant for presentation to the city with documentation for verification. D. Full park fees shall be collected at the time of building permit applications at the rate then in force. 13. Plans outlining general layouts (with alternatives) building massings, square footage limitations, grading, building materials, architectural designs, pedestrian access, and development intent need to be developed for the commercial area. We realize that the developer, Tandem Properties, will not be owning or developing this area. Ownership is being retained by Al Klingelhutz. Still, both parcels are located within the PUD and we believe that the city would be remiss if we did not exercise our ability to ensure that the ultimate development of the parcel is compatible with the best interests of the community. We had suggested what we believe to be acceptable in this report and would appreciate the City Council's input. I 27 r r City Council Meeting - July 11, 1994 14. Preliminary and final plat approval shall be contingent upon the city authorizing and awarding the bid for the Lake Riley Area Trunk Utility Improvement Project No. 93 -32. 15. An additional trail easement along the south side of 86th Street may have to be dedicated to the city for the sidewalk construction. This will be determined during construction plan review and approval process. A 5' wide concrete sidewalk shall also be extended along the west side of "A" Street. 16. The commercial portion of the PUD shall be consistent with the Highway 5 Corridor Study design standards. 17. Submit street names for both public and private streets to the Chanhassen Fire Marshal for approval. 18. Chanhassen Fire Department's policy on Premise Identification must be followed. Additional monument signs for address location will be required. Contact the Chanhassen Fire Marshal for requirements and details. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy #29 -1992. Policy enclosed. 19. There will be no parking allowed on private streets or the south side of 86th Street. Signage must be installed in compliance to Fire Prevention Policy #06 -1991. Pursuant to 1991 Chanhassen Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10.207(a). 20. A ten foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e. street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, NSP, NW Bell, Cable TV, transform boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance Sec. 9 -1. 21. Submit turning radius to City Engineer and Fire Marshal for approval. Pursuant to 1991 Chanhassen Fire Code Sec. 10.204(c). 22. Dead Ends: Dead end fine apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus. When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, the provisions of this section may be modified by the Chief. Pursuant to 1991 Chanhassen Uniform Fire Code Sec. 10.204(d) and 10.203 exc. #1. ' 23. Street lights shall be provided along West 86th Street and A Street/Court. The city shall determine type and placement. 24. The applicant shall verify that the landscaping plan meets the city tree preservation ordinance for canopy coverage. 25. The applicant shall provide diversity in the color schemes used in the buildings. 26. The applicant shall deposit with the city an escrow for the future upgrading if TH 101 north of 86th Street. The escrow may be in the form of a letter of credit or cash deposit. The amount of the escrow will have to be determined after a feasibility study for the upgrading TH 101. 27. All areas disturbed as a result of construction activities shall be immediately restored with seed and disc - mulched or wood -fiber blanket or sod within two weeks of completion of each activity in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook. 28 1 71 I City Council Meeting - July 11, 1994 28. Wetland buffer areas shall be surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The City will install wetland buffer edge signs before construction begins and will charge the applicant $20 per sign. 29. The applicant will need to develop a sediment and erosion control plan in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook and the Surface Water Management Plan requirements for new developments. The plan shall be submitted to the City for review and formal approval 30. The applicant shall provide detailed storm sewer calculations for 10 -year and 100 -year storm events and provide ponding calculations for stormwater quality/quantity ponds in accordance with the City's Surface Water Management Plan for the City Engineer to review and approve. The applicant shall provide detailed predeveloped and post developed stormwater calculations for 100 -year storm events and normal water level and high water level calculations in existing basins and individual storm sewer calculations between each catch basin segment will also be required to determine if sufficient catch basins are being utilized. In addition, water quality ponding design calculations shall be based on Walker's Pondnet model. 31. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and provide the necessary financial security to guarantee compliance with the terms of the development contract. 32. The appropriate drainage and utility easements should be dedicated on the final plat for all utilities and ponding areas lying outside the right -of -way. The easement width shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide. Consideration should also be given for access for maintenance of the ponding areas. 33. The lowest exposed floor or opening elevation of all buildings should be a minimum of 3 feet above the 100 -year high water level of all wetlands and ponding basins. . 34. Water quantity fees will be based in accordance with the City's SWAP. Storm sewer trunk fees will be evaluated based on the applicant's contribution to the SWMP design requirements. 35. The applicant shall report to the City Engineer the location of any drain tiles found during construction and shall re- locate or abandon the drain tile as directed by the City Engineer. 36. All erosion control measures shall be installed prior to commencement of grading operations and be maintained until all disturbed areas have been fully restored The applicant shall also be responsible for removal of all erosion control measures upon completion of site grading. The city engineer will determine the appropriate time and authorize the applicant to remove the erosion control measures. 37. Grading shall be prohibited within 10 feet of all wetlands. Erosion control fence shall be installed outside the 10 -foot buffer as well. 38. The street turnaround located southeast of the wetland shall be redesigned as shown in attachment #2. All voted in favor and the motion carried. 1 1 1