The URL can be used to link to this page

i. Approval of Accounts06/20/95 s o e io 1� 1° 1° i i� Check Number 015935 015936 015937 015938 015939 015940 015941 015942 015943 01594+ 015945 015946 015947 015948 015949 015950 015951 015952 01.5953 015954 015955 015956 015957 015958 015959 015960 015961 015962 01.5963 015964 015965 015966 015967 015963 015969 015970 015971 015972 015973 015974 015975 015976 015977 015978 015979 015930 01.5981 015932 015983 015984 01.5985 Emp Nbr 1201 1202 1203 1206 1207 1209 1210 1212 1303 13014 1305 1306 1412 1702 2102 2 10 3 2504 2505 2506 2510 2511 2512 2513 2514 2515 2516 2517 251.8 2601 2603 2604 2605 3102 3103 310+ 31.05 3 10 6 3107 3108 3109 3202 3203 3205 3206 3207 3208 3209 3211 3701 3702 3703 City of Chanhassen PAYROLL C11 IF- CK RRGI STICR. JUNE 23, 1995 Employee Name ASHWORTH, DONALD ENGELHARDT, KAREN J DUMMER, NIKKI SCHULLER, NORMA L BURMEISTER, GINA OPHEIM, JANANN 0. GERHARDT, TODD R. RIECK, JANE CHAFFEE, THOMAS L. TIIIBODEAU, CHRISTINE EIDAM, ELIZABETH A. SNELL, PAMELA A. DAVITCH, AARON DRESSLER, DAVID M. DUNSMORE, CAROL M. BURGETT, ELIZABETH B. KIRCHMAN, STEVE A. BARKS, CARL E. LITTFIN, MARK G. IIARR, SCOTT DEBNER, RANDY L. MORN, JERRITT W. KOENIG, BETH A. TORELL, STEVEN B. MICHEL, LESLIE M WICKLUND, LLOYD E. REID, ROBERT W. HOESE, DOUGLAS LOSBY, SHEILA G. NOLDEN, KERRI ZYDOWSKY, ROBERT A. HAYES, GREGORY C. MEUWISSEN, KIN[ T. FOLCII, CHARLES D. BEMENT, WILLIAM R. STECKLING, JEAN M. REMER, DANIEL R. HEMPEL, DAVID C. MORIARITY, KELLY M DESOTELLE, DIANE M. SCHWARTZ, JEREMY M. OIEN, STEVEN WEGLER, MICHAEL PETERS, GARY THEIS, JAMES M. SAUTER, STEPHEN M. ROJINA, ROBERT S WtiLLIS, CORI BROSE, H_ "�ROLD GOETZE, DUANE E. SIEGLE, CHARLES J. Gross Pay 2,606.92 1,700.26 1,134.40 929.92 870.58 1,178.19 2,068.26 308.12 1,770.40 1,212.00 1,416.00 1,846.15 247.25 1,109.60 1,309.60 996.80 1,818.40 1,628.00 1,652.80 2,207.96 1,627.20 1,464.80 1,233.60 1,573.40 961.60 540.00 1,200.00 1,1.94.40 583.04 507.60 1,399.20 169.20 1,025.28 2,325.26 1,'+64.00 682.08 1,323.19 1,834.61 720.00 1,280.00 366.12 1,181.60 1,810.40 1,304.00 1,590.80 1,310.40 1,249.60 524.87 1,800.80 1,576.40 1,460.80 Page Check Amount -------------- 1,399.52 1,123.63 659.77 678.70 628.85 928.32 1,128.09 258.28 1,347.67 791.50 888.46 1,180.03 194.65 537.09 815.48 712.27 1,042.29 1,031.01 1,112.43 1,271.30 1,196.74 1,023.80 812.94 1,086.99 686.92 403.53 935.03 832.20 434.95 346.48 943.19 148.38 485.78 1,519.05 884.32 456.89 903.00 834.46 572.34 896.58 279.47 811.25 1,172.80 316.96 1,065.24 897.01 543.30 't12.93 970.14 1,124.57 1,023.44 Di De J. J. . J. J` J` .� n wr 06/20/95 City of Chanhassen Page PAYRC3LL CI4IGCIle- RI: S'TI;I2 JUNE 23, 1995 Check Emp Gross Check i Number Nbr Employee Name - - Pay - - -- -------- - - - - -- Amount -------- - - - - -- - - - - -- 015986 - - -- 3704 ------------------------ BARBER, THOMAS J. 224.00 198.25 015987 3801 GREGORY, DALE J. 1,771.20 905.33 015988 3802 SCHMIEG, DEAN F. 1,526.40 967.05 015989 3803 SCHMIEG, DARYL 432.00 326.48 015990 3804 SCHMIEG, DANA 320.00 246.56 015991 3805 EILER, CHARLES A. 1,322.40 926.76 015992 3806 SEGNER, JOHN F. 565.50 449.76 015993 3808 KOTSONAS, NICK C. 613.75 456.15 015994 3810 MIESELER, JASON E. 518.37 388.09 015995 3811 ABERNATHY, ANTHONY P. 301.00 233.01 015996 3813 MC KINLEY, KEITH L. 1,123.00 812.50 015997 3815 SEGNER, MYRON 364.00 326.18 015998 4202 HOFFMAN, TODD 1,917.61 1,253.31 015999 4501 RUEGEMER, GERALD G. 1,436.42 760.03 016000 4503 WEBER, ELIZABETH M. 644.00 477.73 016001 4505 LEMME BEITEL, DAWN E. 1,288.00 725.52 016002 4510 JOHNSON, KJERSTEN 25.00 23.09 016003 4512 DONLEY, ERIK 451.00 360.22 016004 4513 RASK, MARJORIE 245.37 226.60 016005 4514 BRUSIUS, ANNE E 166.37 136.95 016006 4515 BARKE, CALISSA 210.37 168.34 016007 4518 WARDLE, RYAN 199.37 160.49 016008 4520 WELTER, MOLLIE 114.12 99.67 016009 4521 KUSSARD, KATIE 178.75 145.78 016010 4522 PAULING, SARA R 148.50 137.14 016011 4523 WEBER, ANTHONY 137.50 126.98 016012 4524 KERN, DANIEL 1.04.50 96.50 016013 4525 GRANOWSKI, NICK 143.00 132.06 016014 4526 SHANNON, JULIE 284.37 241.33 016015 4602 ANDERSON, SARA M. 420.75 31.3.4+ 01.6016 4702 PANKRATZ, JENNIFER 371.00 303.14 016017 4703 MUELLER, NEAL 242.00 211.10 016018 5203 CHURCHILL, VICTORIA E. 1,320.00 911.84 016019 5204 AANENSON, KATHRYN R. 2,071.57 1,440.16 016020 5205 GENEROUS, ROBERT E. 1,471.46 1,026.12 016021 5206 AL -JAFF, SHARMIN M. 1,345.34 815.38 016022 5209 SINCLAIR, JILL A. 600.00 424.52 016023 5211 RASK, JOHN P. 1,052.00 729.51 016024 5302 SITTER, KATHRYN N. 324.50 266.95 016025 5306 TONN, BRYAN R. 114.00 99.53 016026 7201 BOUCHER, GERALD 1,827.20 1,193.27 016027 7202 KERBER, ARTHUR M. 1,516.00 896.41 016028 7203 ZIERMANN, CURTIS 1,513.60 910.24_ 016029 7206 CHIHOS, CHARLES G. 1,309.60 863.68 016030 7207 JOHNSON, JERRY M. 1,052.00 729.51 016031 7208 KRAMER, ERIC J. 1,052.00 74.8.76 016032 7209 SABINSKE, DEAN J. 1,195.20 812.67 Grand Totals -------- - - - - -- -------- - - - - -- 0 100,879.95 66,564.16 1 Page: 1 / te: 06/22/95 City of Chanhassen Detail Claims Roster �nd # voice # Description Amount l Checking Account 1010 J GWES - AAGARD WEST, INC. 5885 FIRE DEPT 96.44 695880 FIRE DEPT 34.15 5884 PARKS -------- - Total for Vendor: AAGWES 692.96 -------- - - - - -- 11 MEQU - ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 638 TRANSFER TANK 336.54 ABME Total for Vendo U 336.54 Q -------- - - - - -- CON - AMCON CM 1 CITY HALL EXPANSION 3,500.00 -------- - - - - -- ' Total for Vendor: AMCON - - - - -- 3,500_00 AMEBAR - AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION 1 902 MEMBERSHIP - SCOTT HARR 147.50 ' Total for Vendor: AMEBAR -- - - - - -- 147_50 AMEENG - AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING INC. 1301 LK RILEY TRUNK UTILITY 8,500.00 105 SOIL TESTING - LK LUCY RD 1,014.25 -------- - - - - -- Total for Vendor: AMEENG - - - - -- 9,514_25 ANDER8 - LOIS ANDERSON 740 REFUND - LK SUSAN PICNIC -- - - - - -- - 4500 Total for Vendor: ANDER8 45.00 -------- - - - - -- I T5 - AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES 1995 TELEPHONE BILL --------- - Total for Vendor: ATT5 10.74 -------- - - - - -- t SET1 - JO AUSETH 2 9677 REFUND- TENNIS TEAM 28.00 Page: 2 Date: 06/22/95 City of Chanhassen Detail Claims Roster Vend # Invoice ---- - - - ---------- # Description - -- ---------------------- - - - - -- -------- ---------------------- - - - - -- -------- Amount - - - - -- - - - - -- -------------- Total for Vendor: AUSETI 28.00 BANFIR -------- - BANNER FIREWORKS DISPLAY - - - - -- 29738 FIREWORKS - 4TH OF JULY 9,500.00 -------- Total for Vendor: BANFIR - - - - -- 9,500.00 BEABAL -------- - BEACON BALLFIELDS - - - - -- 314248 BASES 301.76 -------- Total for Vendor: BEABAL - - - - -- 301.76 BEMENT - -------- BILL BEMENT - - - - -- 061995 FLEX - DAYCARE 197.92 -------- Total for Vendor: BEMENT - - - - -- 197.92 BENNET - -------- WILLIAM BENNETT - - - - -- 060795 OFF -DUTY TRAFFIC CONTROL 150.00 -------- Total for Vendor: BENNET - - - - -- 150.00 BERCOF - -------- BERRY COFFEE COMPANY - - - - -- 50548 COFFEE 49.90 -------- Total for Vendor: BERCOF - - - - -- 49.90 BISCHO - -------- FLORENCE BISCHOFF - - - - -- 26784 REFUND- SENIOR TRIP 30.00 -------- Total for Vendor: BISCHO - - - - -- 30.00 BONROS - -------- BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK & ASSOC. - - - - -- 34070 STONE CREEK 5TH 1,387.16 34063 CHAN BUSINESS CTR 2ND 1,581.44 -------- Total for Vendor: BONROS - - - - -- 2,968.60 BORCHA - -------- ROBIN BORCHART - - - - -- 29681 SUMMER INSTRUCTOR 45.00 -------- Total for Vendor: BORCHA -------- - - - - -- 45.00 - - - - -- te: 06/22/95 City of Chanhassen Detail Claims Roster Page: 3 nd # BUSINESS ESSENTIALS INC voice # Description Amount �RSTA - BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY - - - - -- 372.81 - - - - -- 202633 SWITCH 2.36 8523 VAPOR LAMPS 37.03 1640 ELEC. SUPPLIES FOR MONUMENT 25.50 0764 SWITCH 48.38 Total for Vendor: BORSTA -------- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- 113_27 BOUCHE - GERALD BOUCHER - - - - -- 4 -001 LEGAL SERVICES 8,316.13 1 410 WATER CONF. - J. BOUCHER 413.49 061995 FLEX - HEALTH 346.00 ' Total for Vendor: BOUCHE -------- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- 759_49 BRW - BRW, INC. 1 76 CO RD 17 IMPROVEMENTS 3,774.37 6733 HWY 101 NORTH LEG 988.72 70 CO RD 17 1,033.15 69 SANITARY SEWER REHAB - - - -- 446_90 Total for Vendor: BRW 6,243.14 -------- - - - - -- 1 YROC - BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC �84 ROCK - - - - -- 1,030_45 Total for Vendor: BRYROC 1,030.45 -------- - - - - -- U ESS - BUSINESS ESSENTIALS INC 2813587 OFFICE SUPPLIES 372.81 -------- Total for Vendor: BUSESS -------- - - - - -- 372.81 - - - - -- COM - CADY COMMUNICATIONS INC 126057 CITY HALL PHONES 1,465.94 10127075 MAINT. AGREEMENT 73.65 127074 MAINT. AGREEMENT -------- - Total for Vendor: CADCOM 1,923.38 tMKNU - -------- CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT & FUCHS, P - - - - -- 4 -001 LEGAL SERVICES 8,316.13 Total for Vendor: CAMKNU -------- 8,316.13 - - - - -- Page: 4 Date: 06/22/95 City of Chanhassen Detail Claims Roster Vend # Invoice # Description -- Amount -------- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ---------------------- ---------- ---------------------- CEI - CEI - - - - - - - - -- -------- - - - - -- 416655 SCALE 9.53 Total for Vendor: CEI -------- - - - - -- 9.53 CENFEN - CENTURY FENCE COMPANY -------- - - - - -- 9935 FENCE - LK ANN PARK 6,629.00 Total for Vendor: CENFEN -------- - - - - -- 6,629.00 CHAFF2 - TOM CHAFFEE -------- - - - - -- 062195 TELEPHONE 23.68 Total for Vendor: CHAFF2 -------- - - - - -- 23.68 CHAPLA - CHAMPLAIN PLANNING PRESS -------- - - - - -- 061095 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 67.00 Total for Vendor: CHAPLA -------- - - - - -- 67.00 CHIHOS - CHARLIE CHIHOS -------- - - - - -- 27898 WATER SCHOOL 81.60 Total for Vendor: CHIHOS -------- - - - - -- 81.60 CHURCH - VICKI CHURCHILL -------- - - - - -- 061995 FLEX - DAYCARE 72.92 Total for Vendor: CHURCH -------- - - - - -- 72.92 CITBUS - CITY BUSINESS -------- - - - - -- 31055 DON CHMIEL 59.00 Total for Vendor: CITBUS 59.00 CLUUJO - CLUTCH & U -JOINT -------- - - - - -- 112356 U -JOINT 26.37 Total for Vendor: CLUUJO -------- - - - - -- 26.37 COLPUB - COLE PUBLICATIONS & INFORMATION -------- - - - - -- SVC 92046 COLE DIRECTORY 228.08 1 Page: 5 te: 06/22/95 City of Chanhassen Detail Claims Roster nd # voice # Description Amount Total for Vendor: COLPUB 228.08 -------- - - - - -- MASP - COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO 71 BLACKTOP 759.81 ' -------- Total for Vendor: COMASP -------- - - - - -- - COMTRA - COMM OF TRANSPORTATION CRYSTEEL DIST. '31512 FEES FOR SERVICES 231.51 - - - - -- 30008 -------- Total for Vendor: COMTRA 231.51 1PEQU -------- - - - - -- - COPY EQUIPMENT INC 6515 SCALES --- - - - - -- - 9_67 Total for Vendor: COPEQU 9.67 I YDIS - CRYSTEEL DIST. INC. -------- - - - - -- 30008 TANDEM TRUCK WING 70.29 009 TANDEM TRUCK WING - - - -- - 70_29 Total for Vendor: -- - CRYDIS 140.58 IMDIE - CUMMINS DIESEL -------- SALES INC - - - - -- 188251 SLACK ADJUSTER PULLER 94.44 Total for Vendor: CUMDIE -------- 94.44 - - - - -- LTOO - DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 48157 AIR HAMMER 45.30 ' Total for Vendor: -------- DELTOO -- - - - - - -- - - - -- - 45_30 DUMMER - NIKKI DUMMER 1 7502133 19.71 SEMINAR -------- - - - - -- ' Total for Vendor: DUMMER --------- - DUNSMO - CAROL DUNSMORE 1995 FLEX - HEALTH -- - - - - -- - 78_00 Total for Vendor: DUNSMO 78.00 -------- - - - - -- Date: 06/22/95 City of Chanhassen Detail Claims Roster Vend # Invoice ---- - - - # Description - -- ---------------------- Amount ---------- EASK01 ---------------------- - EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY - - - - -- -------- - - - - -- -------- - - - - -- - - - - -- 3M52819 COPIES 734.45 Total for Vendor: -------- EASK01 - - - - -- 734.45 EASKO2 -------- - EASTMAN KODAK CREDIT CO - - - - -- 8281819 COPY MACHINE 1,260.67 Total for Vendor: -------- EASKO2 -------- - - - - -- 1,260.67 - - - - -- ELECTR - ELECTROLUX CORPORATION 349678 VACUUM CLEANER 600.45 Total for Vendor: -------- ELECTR - - - - -- 600.45 ENCOMP - ENCOMPASS, INC -------- - - - - -- 11141 WEST VILLAGE APTS 782.19 Total for Vendor: -------- ENCOMP - - - - -- 782.19 ENGEL - JACKIE ENGEL -------- - - - - -- 29678 REFUND- TENNIS 20.50 Total for Vendor: -------- ENGEL - - - - -- 20.50 FASTEN - THE FASTENAL COMPANY -------- - - - - -- 23375 NUTS /WASHERS 31.54 Total for Vendor: -------- FASTEN - - - - -- 31.54 FEERIT - FEED RITE CONTROL -------- - - - - -- 26319 CONTAINER CHG 20.00 Total for Vendor: -------- FEERIT - - - - -- 20.00 FINNIC - NEIL FINNICUM -------- - - - - -- 29728 UMPIRE - SOFTBALL 224.00 Total for Vendor: -------- FINNIC - - - - -- 224.00 FIRENG - FIRE ENGINEERING -------- - - - - -- 28677 SUBSCRIPTION- M.LITTFIN 24.95 Page: 6 Page: 7 �te: 06/22/95 City of Chanhassen Detail Claims Roster t nd # oice # Description Amount Total for Vendor: FIRENG 24.95 -------- - - - - -- RTRU - FIRST TRUST 1986 GO BONDS 1986 77,505.00 -------- - - - - -- ' Total for Vendor: FIRTRU - - - -- 77,50500 FISHER - FISHER ENTERPRISES 872 BLACK DIRT -- - - - - -- - 3728 Total for Vendor: FISHER 37.28 -------- - - - - -- CONE - FOCUS ONE HOUR PHOTO �42 FILM PROCESSING -- - - - - -- 123_94 Total for Vendor: FOCONE 123.94 -------- - - - - -- I RWOR - FOREIGN WORLD AUTO PARTS, INC 1981 RADIO 100.00 ' Total for Vendor: FORWOR 100.00 -------- - - - - -- f ANKI - FRANKIE'S 95 PARK & REC 40.63 26879 PARK & REC 61.76 Total for Vendor: FRANKI 102.39 -------------- r QUE - FRANKLIN QUEST CO 13591464 CALENDAR PAGES 36.64 ' -------- Total for Vendor: FRAQUE -- - - - - - - -- - - -- - 36_64 GARHAR - GARDNER HARDWARE 1 247 CYLINDERS REKEYED 44.62 - - - - -- R NOFF -------- Total for Vendor: GARHAR -------- PRODUCTS 44.62 - - - - -- - GENERAL OFFICE 894640 OFFICE SUPPLIES 18.42 759180 OFFICE SUPPLIES 15.72 20894281 REFILLS 85.37 1 894280 OFFICE SUPPLIES 23.90 Date: 06/22/95 City of Chanhassen Detail Claims Roster Vend # Invoice # Description Amount -------- Total for Vendor: GENOFF - - - - -- 143.41 GERHAR -------- - TODD GERHARDT - - - - -- 061995 FLEX - HEALTH 169.00 051795 REIMBURSEMENT -MAY BIRTHDAYS/ 61.55 -------- Total for Vendor: GERHAR - - - - -- 230.55 GLEFLO - -------- GLENROSE FLORAL - - - - -- 178529 EMPLOYEE RECOG -MC KINLEY 23.00 178741 PLANT MAINTENANCE 225.00 178575 EMPLOYEE RECOG - CHURCHILL 31.58 -------- Total for Vendor: GLEFLO - - - - -- 279.58 GOPSTA - -------- GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL - - - - -- 5050154 CALLS & LOCATES 479.50 -------- Total for Vendor: GOPSTA - - - - -- 479.50 GROCHE - -------- GROSSMAN CHEVROLET CO - - - - -- 53862 CK10 CHEVY PICK -UP 17,574.00 -------- Total for Vendor: GROCHE -------- - - - - -- 17,574.00 HAMUNI - HAMLINE UNIVERSITY - - - - -- 0343 FALL TUITION - HOFFMAN 882.00 -------- Total for Vendor: HAMUNI - - - - -- 882.00 HANTHO - -------- HANSEN THORP - - - - -- 8108 CREEK SIDE 95 -8 102.00 8109 HIGHLAND AT ST.JOE 93 -31 187.00 8107 LAKE SUSAN HILLS WEST 9TH - 204.00 -------- Total for Vendor: HANTHO - - - - -- 493.00 -------- HARR - SCOTT HARR - - - - -- 061995 FLEX - HEALTH 309.08 -------- Total for Vendor: HARR - - - - -- 309.08 HEADLA - -------- DAVID & BARBARA HEADLA - - - - -- Page: 8 Page: 9 te: 06/22/95 City of Chanhassen Detail Claims Roster t nd # voice # Description Amount ---- - - - 694 - -- POSTS & BOUNDRY STAKES - -------- Total for Vendor: HEADLA 324.80 U TRE -------- - HENNEPIN COUNTY TREAS. - - - - -- 9510 ASSESSMENT CHARGES 597.45 ' Total for Vendor: HENTRE 597.45 -------- - - - - -- TOP - HI TOPS 737 STREET DANCE - 4TH OF JULY 1,450.00 ' -------- Total for Vendor: HITOP ------ - - - - -- - HOFFMA - TODD HOFFMAN 1 1995 FLEX- HEALTH -------- 73.49 - - - - -- Total for Vendor: HOFFMA 73.49 IFTAL -------- TALENT AGENCY - - - - -- - HOFFMAN 734 4TH OF JULY - -------- Total for Vendor: HOFTAL 350.00 I IKOE -------- - HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP - - - - -- CITY COMMONS 95 -27 2,760.60 1 695 695 PEDESTRAIN BRIDGE DESIGN 94- 152.13 0695 MISC. PARK PLANNING 95 -7 -------- 842.53 - - - - -- Total for Vendor: HOIKOE - - - - -- 3,755_26 IBSOM - IBSOM INC 3195 BATTERY -FIRE -- - - - - -- - 39_35 Total for Vendor: IBSOM 39.35 -------- INFRATECH - - - - -- FRAT - REFLECTIVE TRAFFIC SIGNS 367.63 1 243 259 SAFETY VESTS & WORK SHIRTS 83.87 257 MARKING FLAGS 400.37 -------- Total for Vendor: INFRAT -- - - - - -- - - - - -- 851_87 INLTRU - INLAND TRUCK PARTS CO Page: 10 Date: 06/22/95 City of Chanhassen Detail Claims Roster Vend # Invoice # Description Amount 56224 REPAIR SLIP SHAFT 94.23 -------- Total for Vendor: INLTRU - - - - -- 94.23 -------- IOS - I.O.S. - - - - -- 515031 COPIER MAINTENANCE 210.00 -------- Total for Vendor: IOS - - - - -- 210.00 ISD11B - -------- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 112 - - - - -- 471995 senior trip 187.00 -------- Total for Vendor: ISD11B - - - - -- 187.00 JOHNS- - -------- JERRY JOHNSON - - - - -- 061295 REIMBURSEMENT FOR LODGING 397.56 -------- Total for Vendor: JOHNS3 - - - - -- 397.56 JOHNS6 - -------- ALICIA JOHNSON - - - - -- 29679 REFUND - ADULT TENNIS 16.00 -------- Total for Vendor: JOHNS6 - - - - -- 16.00 JOHWIL - -------- JOHN WILEY & SONS INC - - - - -- 809 UPDATE -BOOK MATERIALS 66.83 -------- Total for Vendor: JOHWIL - - - - -- 66.83 KINKOS - -------- KINKO'S - - - - -- 10370 KINKO COPIES 5.11 10331 KINKO COPIES 1.17 10237 KINKO COPIES 25.56 -------- Total for Vendor: KINKOS -------- - - - - -- 31.84 - - - - -- KKE - KKE 704305 CH.ANHASSEN CITY HALL 95 -07 2,856.47 -------- - - - - -- Total for Vendor: KKE 2,856.47 -------- - - - - -- KOEHLE - TIMOTHY KOEHLER 060795 OFF DUTY WORK FOR CHAN 150.00 Page: 11 te: 06/22/95 City of Chanhassen Detail Claims Roster �nd # voice # Description Amount r Total for Vendor: KOEHLE 150.00 LAK COU - LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER 1 2 - 195 U.F.C. CONFERENCE /CLASS 125.00 62195 U.F.C. CONFERENCE /CLASS 125.00 ' Total for Vendor: LAKCOU 250.00 -------- - - - - -- kAR ELE - LARRY'S ELECTRIC INC k 944 LAKE ANN TIME CLOCKS 156.90 ' -------- Total for Vendor: LARELE -------- - - - - -- - LEAMNI - LEAGUE OF MINN CITIES 1 56 SUBSCRIPT TO "MINN CITIES" 18.00 - - - - -- -------- Total for Vendor: LEAMNI 18.00 -------- - - - - -- MME - DAWN LEMME 1995 FLEX - DAYCARE -- - - - - -- 395_84 Total for Vendor: LEMME 395.84 -------- - - - - -- ING - STEVE LONG 727 UMPIRE - SOFTBALL 68.00 Total for Vendor: LONG 68.00 -------- - - - - -- t NLAK - LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR 203210 HOSES & SEALS 188.22 2618 FITTINGS 21.53 Total for Vendor: LONLAK 209.75 -------- - - - - -- t MLUM - LYMAN LUMBER COMPANY 30205 WOOD 401.90 Total for Vendor: LYMLUM 401.90 -------- - - - - -- KHU - MARKHURD 178 AERIAL SURVEY OF CHAN 1,500.00 Page: 12 Date: 06/22/95 City of Chanhassen Detail Claims Roster Vend # Invoice ---- - - - - ---------- # Description -- ---------------------- ---------------------- - - - - -- -------- - - - - -- -------- Amount - - - - -- - - - - -- Total for Vendor: -------------- MARKHU -------- 1,500.00 - - - - -- MAUENT - MAUND ENTERTAINMENT 29735 CLOWN - 4TH OF JULY 120.00 Total for Vendor: -------- MAUENT - - - - -- 120.00 MCDONA - DAVE MCDONALD -------- - - - - -- 060795 OFF -DUTY WORK FOR CHAN 150.00 Total for Vendor: -------- MCDONA - - - - -- 150.00 MEUWII - KIM T. MEUWISSEN -------- - - - - -- 061995 FLEX - DAYCARE 197.92 Total for Vendor: -------- MEUWII - - - - -- 197.92 MIDEQU - MIDLAND EQUIPMENT CO. -------- - - - - -- 15277 AIR CYLINDER 146.97 Total for Vendor: -------- MIDEQU - - - - -- 146.97 MINBAR - -------- MN STATE BAR ASSOCIATION - - - - -- 061495 DUES 244.00 Total for Vendor: -------- MINBAR - - - - -- 244.00 MINFII - -------- MN STATE FIRE CHIEF ASSN - - - - -- 062195 MEMBERSFIP DUES -FIRE 115.00 Total for Vendor: -------- MINFII - - - - -- 115.00 MINGER - PAT AND KAREN MINGER -------- - - - - -- 263 INSTALLATION OF SEWER /MANHOL 8,647.13 Total for Vendor: -------- MINGER -------- - - - - -- 8,647.13 - - - -- MINHEA - MN. DEPT. OF HEALTH - 063095 WATER CONNECTION FEE 5,345.00 Total for Vendor: -------- MINHEA -------- - - - - -- 5,345.00 - - - - -- Page: 13 te: 06/22/95 City of Chanhassen Detail Claims Roster �nd # voice # Description Amount NNEG - MINNEGASCO 061595 GAS BILL 267.90 -------- - - - - -- ' Total for Vendor: MINNEG -- - - - - -- 26790 MINPUB - MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 1 0271 CONNECTION CHARGES 150.00 950272 OPERATIONS CHARGES 120.00 ' Total for Vendor: MINPUB 270.00 -------- - - - - -- NVA3 - MN VALLEY WHOLESALE INC. 467 BUSHES, WOODCHIPS -------- 132.11 - - - - -- ' Total for Vendor: MINVA3 -------- - MINVIC - MINN.- VICTORIA OIL CO. 015 NO -LEAD GAS 4,691.47 016 DIESEL -------- 1,582.88 - - - - -- Total for Vendor: MINVIC - - - - -- 6,274_35 MONSYS - MONROE SYSTEMS FOR 73257 COPIER RENTAL -------- - Total for Vendor: MONSYS 349.00 -------- MORRIS - - - - -- RRIS - DENISE 680 REFUND - ADULT TENNIS -- - - - - -- - 14_00 Total for Vendor: MORRIS 14.00 t RPH1 - -------- PAT MURPHY - - - - -- 060795 OFF -DUTY WORK FOR CHAN 150.00 ' Total for Vendor: MURPHI 150.00 TBAG - NATIONAL BAG COMPANY INC 1 00578 HEAVY MINIGRIP BAGS 147.66 -------- - - - - -- ' Total for Vendor: NATBAG -------- - NEBEVA - NEBCO EVANS DIST. MPLS Page: 14 Date: 06/22/95 City of Chanhassen Detail Claims Roster Vend # Invoice # Description Amount 399169 CONCESSION BLDG FOOD 531.99 406761 CONCESSION BLDG FOOD 117.62 762561 CONCESSION BLDG FOOD -15.00 402599 CONCESSION BLDG FOOD 56.02 404035 FREIGHT 3.00 -------- Total for Vendor: NEBEVA - - - - -- 693.63 NORMEM - -------- NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER - - - - -- 061495 TRAINING 89.00 -------- Total for Vendor: NORMEM - - - - -- 89.00 NORREP - -------- NORTHSTAR REPRO PRODUCTS - - - - -- 35472 BLUE LINE PAPER 101.70 -------- Total for Vendor: NORREP - - - - -- 101.70 NSP - NORTHERN -------- STATES POWER CO - - - - -- 062195 ELECTRIC BILL 20,662.96 070795 ELECTRIC BILL 177.58 -------- Total for Vendor: NSP - - - - -- 20,840.54 ORRSCH - -------- ORR SCHELEN MAYERON - - - - -- 510810012 MISC SERVICES 93.10 1,060.88 518301008 LK RILEY AREA TRUNK IMPROV-9 180.60 518310012 LK RILEY AREA TRUNK 92 -32B 2,379.94 510801012 CHAN ESTATES 1/3 IMPROV -93.1 3,081.84 -------- Total for Vendor: ORRSCH -------- - - - - -- 6,703.26 - - - - -- PARPRI - PARKSIDE PRINTING, INC. 67834 BUSINESS CARDS 98.51 -------- Total for Vendor: PARPRI - - - - -- 98.51 -------- PAUL - CYRIL PAUL - - - - -- 29736 BAND - 4TH OF JULY 875.00 -------- Total for Vendor: PAUL - - - - -- 875.00 PEARCE - -------- LANCE PEARCE - - - - -- 060795 OFF -DUTY WORK FOR CHAN 150.00 Page: 15 te: 06/22/95 City of Chanhassen Detail Claims Roster �nd # voice # Description Amount Total for Vendor: PEARCE 150.00 -------- - - - - -- PCOL - PEPSI COLA COMPANY 031812 RENTAL -SODA MACHINE 27.69 24700920 PEPSI 332.50 Total for Vendor: PEPCOL 360.19 -------- - - - - -- TSEE - PETERSON SEED COMPANY -- 39951 ALL PURPOSE LAWN MIX 119.81 PUSPED -------- Total for Vendor: PETSEE -- - - - - - -- - - - -- 119_81 PUMMET - PUMP AND METER SERVICE 1 995 REPAIR HOIST 40.00 - - - - -- 52.51 -------- Total for Vendor: PUMMET -------- 40.00 - - - - -- SPED - PUSH -PEDAL -PULL #25 r SEY - 516 HEX DUMBBELLS -- - - - - -- - 28_97 Total for Vendor: PUSPED 28.97 tISYM - RAINBOW SYMPHONY -------------- 5281 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 52.51 Total for Vendor: RAISYM -------------- 52.51 r SEY - RAMSEY COUNTY 5644 UTILITY BILL PROCESSING 479.70 Total for Vendor: -------- RAMSEY -- - - - - -- - - - - -- 479_70 RESENG - RESOURCE ENGINEERING 1 8 2,500.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - - - - -- ' Total for Vendor: -------- RESENG ------ - RIDDOO - RIDGE DOOR SALES & SVC 815 INSPECT FIRE GARAGE DOOR -- - - - - -- - 47_00 Total for Vendor: RIDDOO 47.00 -------- - - - - -- Date: 06/22/95 City of Chanhassen Detail Claims Roster Vend # Invoice # Description Amount RIDMED - RIDGEVIEW MEDICAL CENTER 051595 1ST RESPONSE CLASS -FIRE 1,120.00 -------- Total for Vendor: RIDMED - - - - -- 1,120.00 RIVVAL - -------- RIVER VALLEY AUTO PARTS - - - - -- 774031 BUSHING & FITTINGS 3.88 -------- Total for Vendor: RIVVAL - - - - -- 3.88 ROARES - -------- ROAD RESCUE, INC. - - - - -- 154402 DRIVING LIGHTS -FIRE 105.12 -------- Total for Vendor: ROARES - - - - -- 105.12 ROARUN - -------- ROAD RUNNER - - - - -- 2923 DELIVER TO CAMPBEL KNUTSON 23.15 -------- Total for Vendor: ROARUN - - - - -- 23.15 ROJINA - -------- ROBERT ROJINA - - - - -- 061995 FLEX - DAYCARE 208.33 -------- Total for Vendor: ROJINA - - - - -- 208.33 ROYPRI - -------- ROYAL PRINTING - - - - -- 95 -432 UMPIRE SCORE CARDS 111.35 95403 CITATION CARDS 94.73 -------- Total for Vendor: ROYPRI - - - - -- 206.08 RWROL - -------- R & W ROLLOFF SERVICE - - - - -- 10815 COMPOST SITE 1,060.00 -------- Total for Vendor: RWROL - - - - -- 1,060.00 SABINS - -------- DEAN SABINSKE - - - - -- 061995 FLEX - HEALTH 171.00 -------- Total for Vendor: SABINS - - - - -- 171.00 SAVSUP - -------- SAVOIE SUPPLY CO., INC. - - - - -- 029170 MISC. CLEANING SUPPLIES -FIRE 161.84 Page: 16 te: 06/22/95 City of Chanhassen Detail Claims Roster t nd # voice # Description Amount Total for Vendor: SAVSUP 161.84 -------- - - - - -- HMID - DOUG SCHMIDTKE 0795 OFF -DUTY WORK FOR CHAN 300.00 Page: 17 ' Total for Vendor: -------- SCHMID - - - - -- SCOTTI - SCOTT & ASSOCIATES INC -------- - 160 SUPPLIES FOR PUB. SAF. OPEN 1,608.75 Total for Vendor: -------- SCOTTI - - - - -- 1,608.75 -------- - - - - -- ARS - SEARS 44611 JEANS - Total for Vendor: --------- SEARS 99.96 I NSYS - SENTRY SYSTEMS INC -------- - - - - -- 90286 CENTRAL STATION MONITORING S 54.00 SENSYS 54.00 Total for Vendor: -------- - - - - -- I GSOU - SIGN SOURCE 1440 NAME PLATE 35.15 68 RELETTER - JULY 4 BANNER 55.00 14 SIGN - LAKE ST. JOE -- - - - - -- - 51_12 Total for Vendor: SIGSOU 141.27 -------- - - - - -- LITH2 - ROSEMARY SMITH 786 REFUND - SENIOR TRIP -- - - - - -- - 30_00 Total for Vendor: SMITH2 30.00 -------- - - - - -- t DERS - SODERSTROM'S 12227 PADDLE BOAT STEERING ASSEMB. 108.87 Total for Vendor: SODERS 108.87 UBUS - SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS USA 102 BULLETIN FOR BIDS 243.75 Page: 18 Date: 06/22/95 City of Chanhassen Detail Claims Roster Vend # Invoice ---- - - - ---------- # Description - -- ---------------------- - - - - -- -------- ---------------------- - - - - -- -------- Amount - - - - -- - - - - -- -------------- Total for Vendor: SOUBUS 243.75 SOURED -------- - SOUTHSIDE REDI -MIX INC - - - - -- 065999 CONCRETE 165.80 -------- Total for Vendor: SOURED - - - - -- 165.80 SOUSUB - -------- SW SUBURBAN PUBLISHING - - - - -- 052595 SENIOR CITIZEN COORD. 39.00 -------- Total for Vendor: SOUSUB - - - - -- 39.00 STECHL - -------- JEAN STECKLING - - - - -- 061995 FLEX - DAYCARE 131.25 -------- Total for Vendor: STECHL - - - - -- 131.25 STOFFE - -------- MARGE STOFFER - - - - -- 29739 REFUND - LK ANN PICNIC 30.00 -------- Total for Vendor: STOFFE - - - - -- 30.00 STREIC - -------- STREICHER'S - - - - -- 228661 BLUE COLOR FILTER FOR LIGHT 9.03 22104 CONVERSION KIT -NICAD BATTERY 62.41 240631 FLASH LIGHT /LAMP /SWITCHES 167.98 -------- Total for Vendor: STREIC - - - - -- 239.42 STRROS - -------- STRGAR- ROSCOE- FAUSCH INC - - - - -- 25 WEST 78TH STR -92.3 4,307.36 3 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE 1,842.62 -------- Total for Vendor: STRROS -------- - - - - -- 6,149.98 - - - - -- STUDER - TONY STUDER 28488 REPAIR BLOCKWORK - TRANSFORM 2,375.00 -------- Total for Vendor: STUDER -------- - - - - -- 2,375.00 SUBCHE - SUBURBAN CHEVROLET - - - - -- 225231 72 ARM KIT 77.90 225377 BRAKE PADS 138.75 Page: 19 te: 06/22/95 City of Chanhassen Detail Claims Roster � nd # voice # Description Amount 5569 CREDIT - 138.75 Total for Vendor: SUBCHE 77.90 -------- - - - - -- #EDBE - EINAR SWEDBERG 2 ■ 6787 REFUND- SENIOR TRIP 90.00 ' Total for Vendor: SWEDBE 90.00 -------- - - - - -- GET - TARGET 481 CATSUP & MUSTARD BOTTLES 3.39 346 TENNIS BALLS & SOCCER CONES 65.65 948 JUMBO BOX 34.79 090 SHOP VAC 38.33 81460 MISC TOOLS 74.49 384 FILM 11.42 Total for Vendor: TARGET 228.07 -------- - - - - -- 1 IBOD - CHRIS THIBODEAU 062195 FLEX - HEALTH 64.98 i Total for Vendor: THIBOD 64.98 -------- - - - - -- LGAS - TOLL GAS & WELDING 1542 MISC. EQUIP SUPP LIES 52.07 - - - - -- -------- Total for Vendor: TOLGAS -- - - - - -- - 52_07 TRAIMP - TRACTOR IMPLEMENT SUPPLY CO 1 97301 MISC SUPPLIES -------- 513.44 - - - - -- Total for Vendor: TRAIMP 513.44 tEGRA -------- GRAPHICS - - - - -- - TREADWAY 109 YOUTH CRIME PRE. MATERIAL - - - - -- 208_95 -- Total for Vendor: TREGRA 208.95 ',2.IART - -------- TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS - - - - -- 4441 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 207.80 Total for Vendor: TRIART -------- 207.80 - - - - -- Page: 20 Date: 06/22/95 City of Chanhassen Detail Claims Roster Vend # Invoice # Description Amount TWIGAR - TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 50932 REPAIR SPRING SHAFT & BEARIN 226.68 49518 REPAIR GARAGE DOOR -------- 2,154.00 Total for Vendor: TWIGAR - - - - -- 2,380.68 UNITEL - UNITED TELEPHONE -------- - - - - -- 061695 TELEPHONE BILL 26.94 Total for Vendor: -------- UNITEL - - - - -- 26.94 UNITHO - -------- UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS - - - - -- 030295 SEMINAR -T. HOFFMAN 140.00 Total for Vendor: -------- UNITHO - - - - -- 140.00 UNIUNL - UNIFORMS UNLIMITED -------- - - - - -- 493833 PAGER /GLOVER HOLDER 24.55 109366 BADGES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE 170.40 493834 MISC. EQUIPMENT 3.75 Total for Vendor: -------- UNIUNL - - - - -- 198.70 USWESI - -------- US WEST CELLULAR EQUIPMENT SALES - - - - -- 061095 TELEPHONE BILL 274.95 Total for Vendor: -------- USWESI - - - - -- 274.95 VICGAZ - VICTORIA GAZETTE -------- - - - - -- 265 AD - 4TH OF JULY 75.00 Total for Vendor: -------- VICGAZ - - - - -- 75.00 VIKELE - VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY -------- - - - - -- 1924540 FUSES 13.31 Total for Vendor: -------- VIKELE - - - - -- 13.31 VOLFIR - -------- VOLUNTEER FIREMEN'S BENEFIT ASSOC - - - - -- 28789 RENEWAL FEE 168.00 Total for Vendor: -------- VOLFIR -------- - - - - -- 168.00 - - - - -- I Page: 21 te: 06/22/95 City of Chanhassen Detail Claims Roster � nd # voice # Description Amount EIM - V W EIMICKE ASSOC INC 9661 ACTION TABS 143.86 -------- - - - - -- Total for Vendor: VWEIM -- - - - - -- 143_86 WACFAR - WACONIA FARM SUPPLY 1 077 ROUNDUP 106.08 9991 -------- Total for Vendor: WACFAR -------- LITES OF MN - - - - -- 106.08 - - - - -- LIT - WARNING 157.09 - - - - -- 82 SIGN KIT 43.72 83 WORK SHIRTS -------- 441.08 - - - - -- ' Total for Vendor: WARLIT -- - - - - -- 484_80 WASSQU - WASHINGTON SQUARE CAPITAL, INC. - - - -- - 94_10 95 HANDS BLDG - -- 5,620_95 t SCOM - - - Total for Vendor: WASSQU 5,620.95 JI TSUP -------- - - - - -- - WATERPRO SUPPLIES CORP 936.00 - - - - -- 9991 WIRE, GASKET, GREASE, VALVE 234.30 3607 DRAIN TILE -------- 157.09 - - - - -- Total for Vendor: WATSUP 391.39 I SART -------- ART & FRAME - - - - -- - WESTERMANN'S 8 PICTURE MOUNTED -- - - - - -- - 94_10 Total for Vendor: WESART 94.10 t SCOM - WESTCOTT COMMUNICATIONS 665172 HEAT TRAINING TAPES 936.00 Total for Vendor: WESCOM -------- 936.00 - - - - -- LLIA - DAVE WILLIAMS 195 OFF DUTY TRAFFIC CONTROL 300.00 -------- - - - - -- ' Total for Vendor: WILLIA -- - - - - -- 30000 WILPAP - WILCOX PAPER CO. Page: 22 Date: 06/22/95 City of Chanhassen Detail Claims Roster Vend # Invoice # Description Amount 567425 PAPER 50.59 Total for Vendor: WILPAP -------- - - - - -- 50.59 WMENG - WM ENGELHARDT ASSOC, INC -------- - - - - -- 3704 LK LUCY ROAD 5,315.00 3705 MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY 1,144.00 3703 BRENDEN PONDS 1,312.50 Total for Vendor: WMENG -------- - - - - -- 7,771.50 ZIEGLE - ZIEGLER, INC -------- - - - - -- 2250501 CATERPILLAR 28,716.66 -------- Total for Vendor: ZIEGLE - - - - -- 28,716.66 ZYDOWS - -------- BOB ZYDOWSKY - - - - -- 0695 SWAT TEAM SUPPLIES 108.85 -------- Total for Vendor: ZYDOWS -------- - - - - -- 108.85 - - - - -- Total for Checking Acoount: 1010 291,318.20 -------- - - - - -- ** Total ** $291,318.20 -------- - - - - -- -------------- � n i C 7 MEMORANDUM CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Don Ashworth, City Manager DATE: June 22, 1995 SUBJ: Excess Levy Reimbursement, School District 112, Tax Increment Funds Not included in the accounts payable is a check to School District 112 in the amount of $343,857. The excess levy reimbursement represents a means by which the City of Chanhassen can get dollars back to the school district which would have been received had it not been for the creation of Chanhassen's tax increment district. The plan amendment authorizing this reimbursement occurred in the fall of 1992. Processing of the actual amount to be paid to the school district could not reasonably occur until after actual dollars collected in 1994 were known. The importance of having this item as a part of this accounts payable recognizes that the school's fiscal year is July 1 to June 30 —such necessitating a myriad of meetings attempting to agree to the final number. I have additionally asked the school district to place the formula into a written form so as to ensure that we did not go through this process in future years. Although the physical check has not been shown in this accounts payable, I would ask that the city council consider that that payment is being made as a part of this accounts payable and if there are 4u tions as to the amount" calculated, those questions should occur at this time rather than after" the check has been issued. I should note that the original calculations were primarily based upon the amount of tax increase associated with additional debt issued by the school district. The final formula now includes a separate calculation as to the total amount of increment received by the city as a result of the school's levy and the amount being reimbursed to the school district cannot exceed the amount actually received by the city. [ Note: The plan amendment and the references to projects such as the community center in my memo of October 1992 (attached) occurred prior to the time of massive valuation Mayor and City Council June 22, 1995 Page 2 reductions in the industrial parks. Generally, we saw a 20 % -25% reduction in value which totally consumed the money anticipated to be received and dedicated towards the construction of the community center. In addition, the significant reduction in values has placed a hold on the County Road 17 project. I feel confident that the county road construction program can be resurrected, but major restructuring is required and staff has been working on this for nearly six months. I should also note that the calculation being made for reimbursement to the school district is solely for Tax Increment District No. 1. The dollars lost by the school district as a result of our creation of the McGlynn district have already been taken into account as a part of the special assessment and land write -downs that occurred as a part of the new elementary school project. Between the payment being made directly to the school district for dollars lost as a result of TIF No. 1 and the amounts indirectly distributed to them through the McGlynn District, we can honestly state that the school district has not lost any dollars as a result of our creating tax increment districts.] 4-3 (a dP BP r- 0 N a) 00 Ln a% O O A +3 U co co ^� (L) N N N O M O rn ..�� H b N O � GG Ix H 4-3 (a dP BP N a) 00 .rq �4 O O A +3 U oo ao (L) N 44 O A rn u za H a� a� a� x U U -W M z 4-J N 0) UI 'Ly • • .-.44 N M O C: Ln w v \ •-I 111 I- 44 ?+ C: ro % % •r{ 4-3 c 4J M M H 61%-643- UUa N M eM Ln N 0� rn of d+ x t0 a N >4 dP dP co 00 Ln 4-) U rn ct' I N H eM A I N (n +) +) z d) Z O O 01 N N fR 00 M O R1 01 r♦ [� O O U ^ �y >+ 00 N W N O Ln N Ln N i 4 0 W M O �- S 4 a X t0 ri •rl Z w M Ln d4 �� 66- W (0 t > }-I aHU (ZWEi .--I M Ln (d W 01 Ln 0) w W •rl N M 4-J -.W %0 O A +3 rd aP dP OM ri Ul U7 0 00 d' to •rl 6 - I O O M01 r X 00 . ^ z� ^ AA 4) M H Q1 Izr H k N N -1 a) H [11 Ln 00 (d W —0 A rn � (d Ul H O H a) 1 r Ul �+ 1 , 4 -P Y � nza v az r w � H H S-1 M L- 01 01 Ul 001 ri0cn N N to L0 0 4j ^Z p\-I (d N H CL4 O r vW o M Ln 01 ^ s� 4-) L- 00 L— L- Ln 4-) H A lf} 66-1 �- � aAN A +1 Ln N 01 U H E 01 Ln 41 cn 01Ln01 p z O ar O x m 00 0 +1 -1 z A (d I .a U1 b - E+ -i �r rn Ln . ,1 0 � � W 4 .-� .--I ri N d' to O A r4 RS Z O —0 p b M Ln N 4 X • d' Ln O N > % . % (d W U1 (a = z NMLn SI H 4-) (d 4-) MM O U r-I r•i ri E" ( •-1 4 a7 « « •rl U] 64 lb 1 lbo� 4.) U U a S4 :J M -W M d' Ln U 1-1 01 01 01 ct1 I 01 0) 01 rq x b a C7' k cd co M E-( D+ E( yH 1 ! £1 L 7 I n n 7. CITY OF WIWI CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 TO: Mayor and City Council Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Don Ashworth, City Manager DATE: October 29, 1992 SUBJ: Consider Tax Increment Plan Amendments BACKGROUND During the past five years, I have met with the School Board and Carver County Commissioners each year. They have asked but one question -- "When will your tax increment district cease to exist ?" For five years the answer has been the same, "By 1995/96, all existing debt /contracts will be fully funded through maturity." Both the school and county agree that the city will become a 'loser" when the district ceases, but each (primarily the county) sees benefits of ceasing the district (see attached, "Who Wins/Who Loses ? "). The plan amendments from one year ago included City Center Park, Cooperative Highway 5 Project (entry monuments /south Highway 101), and Market Square, which, in the aggregate, added one year to the life of the district. With the projected ending date being about the same (end of 1996), eye brows at the county and school district level did not go up. During the past year the commission has considered, and for practical purposes approved, a Conference Center plan ($6.0 M), West 78th Street Upgrade ($2.0 M), Realigned Highway 101/ Taco/Red -E -Mix ($2.0 M), and a new Library ($1.0 M). Although the commission may consider that these decisions have been made, they cannot become a reality until an official plan amendment is made —an action which cannot occur without submitting the total financial impact of such to the school and county for their comments. We have attempted to keep our County Commissioner aware of our actions, but it will be the final totals that will "raise the eye brows of the county board and school district." They do not have final veto powers, but be assured that the political winds in St. Paul will blow and we will have achieved a new record in "tax increment abuses" according to the Ann Rests and Ember Riehgots (State Legislators who oppose tax increment) of the world. PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER MEMORANDUM Mayor and City Council Housing and Redevelopment Authority October 29, 1992 Page 2 Current Dilemmas As stated earlier, staff has met with the county and school each year for the past five years. During the past year, those work efforts have been more intense recognizing that both the county and school district are facing some serious challenges if not dilemmas. Those dilemmas include: Carver County The county road systems are in deplorable condition. The proceeds of the county road referendum, which was sold several years ago, are currently depleted. Many of the county's resources are now being channelized to the criminal justice system. In essence, they have no additional monies to pledge to roads. Unfortunately, many of these roads exist within the Cities of Chaska and Chanhassen. The projected costs for county road improvements in Chanhassen is $11.5M, and $8.OM in Chaska (see attached sheets - "County Road Needs "). Roadways such as County Road 17, Audubon, County Road 117, and Lyman Boulevard are critical roadways to our community if we are to continue to grow and have adequate road systems. The possibility that the City of Chanhassen will not cease its tax increment district in 1996 is extremely excruciating to the county as they were looking forward to these dollars to help solve a part of their county road problems. Dick Stolz, County Administrator, will be present Monday evening to describe the county's road needs as well as estimated costs; and School District 112 Our school district is facing an extremely critical juncture. The school will need an additional 12 classrooms by 1993 and 25 additional classrooms by 1994. The problem continues years into the future. The current elementary class will transform itself into 600 -700 students by graduation. That is in comparison to the existing 250 to 300 in a typical class. The current high school can hold approximately 1,000 students. By the time that elementary class gets to high school, there will be over 3,000 students in that building. The school district recognizes that a need exists. They have estimated that to meet that need, over $40M will be spent in additional school buildings. The thought of Chanhassen continuing its tax increment district during 1996 -2000 is not as damaging to the school district as the county. Again, their estimated losses because of our district are $400,000 to $500,000 per year. Of greater concern is the fact that if a referendum is presented, that that assuredly will create a general tax increase of 10% to 15%. That increase would also be applied to parcels within the tax increment district which means that the city would see an additional $500,000 to $750,000 increase in tax increment receipts. Adding these two "losses" together produces a whopping $900,000 to $1.2M lost revenue to the school district. It is this aggregate which will assuredly be of major concern to our school district. Mayor and City Council Housing and Redevelopment Authority October 29, 1992 Page 3 Conclusion As stated earlier, current projects such as the conference center cannot become a reality until our redevelopment plan is amended to include these items and their associated costs. The plan will also have to be amended to reflect the loss in revenues by both the county and school district as a result of those plan amendments, i.e. the plan amendment will show that the city needs to continue receiving tax increment during the period of 1996 -2000. Also as stated earlier, we can be reasonably assured that these plan amendments will be distressful to both the County Board and School District in light of the financial dilemmas that they cuirently face. However, the process does not have to produce World War M. In fact, by simply sharing a portion of the monies that would be lost to Fiscal Disparity Contribution and Fiscal Disparity Distribution with both the county and school, we could assure that each of those two entities would be receiving more money than would have been received had the district in fact closed in 1996. For example, it is estimated that if we were to cease the district in 1996, we would lose approximately $2.6M due to Fiscal Disparities Contribution and Distribution (see "City of Chanhassen Property Values/Taxes and Trends "). The amount of money that the school and county would be gaining as a result of those actions would be approximately $400,000 and $600,000, respectively. By our including in the Redevelopment Plan a proposed expenditure of $500,000 and $700,000 /year, during the time frame of 1996 - 2000 to the school and county, respectfully, we would be assuring them of a greater amount of money than they would have received if the district would have closed. The plan amendment could also include two additional features -4) a statement that should the school district be successful in passing a referendum for school purposes, that the distribution back to the school would be increased to reflect the additional increment received by the city during the 1996 -2000 time frame, and 2) that the school district, county, and city jointly approach the legislature to allow collection of increment during 2000 -2003 as was originally set by the district plan. [Note: All "Redevelopment Districts" had their "collection years" artificially shortened by the legislature in 1989.] The revenues being generated during those three years is proposed to be divided between the county and school district. This action would add approximately $6M to both the school and the county and, therefore, produce a much higher package than could be achieved by solely considering the 1996- 2000 distributions, i.e. a total of $8M (school) and $9.2M (county). This point is important as, if the city agreed to the proposed plan amendments, the county would sell bonds to accelerate road construction and the school district would agree to use these dollars for tax relief as a part of the referendum literature. It should be noted that the City of Chaska has been a part of each of the meetings with the school district and county during the past five years and the more intense meetings of this past year. In fact, it was the City of Chaska which noted that the proposed referendum would generate significant new dollars to each of the tax increment districts which could then be used to decrease taxpayer costs (see attached "School District Referendum Options "). It is my understanding that the Chaska City Council has approved a modification to their tax increment plan to include each of the recommendations being made in this memorandum, i.e. a plan amendment to add county road construction costs for roads in Chaska and a plan amendment Mayor and City Council Housing and Redevelopment Authority October 29, 1992 Page 4 agreeing to pay the school district for 71F dollars lost because of the district and to return excess referendum dollars if the referendum passes. Both of the amendments regarding the school district would be conditioned on those dollars being used for property tax relief. The school district would also agree to restructure the proposed referendum so as to set a majority of debt to mature when the Chanhassen/Chaska districts retire (again, see "School District Referendum Options "). As noted earlier, Mayor Chmiel and I have been a part of each of the meetings with the school district/county/cities attempting to reach agreement as to how all of the entities can be financial "winners" during the next ten year period of time. We believe that the recommendations being brought to you make sense, and more importantly, are simply the right thing to do. We do recognize that the education process will be necessary to ensure that all of our citizens recognize that joint efforts that have been achieved by having the county, cities, and school district cooperatively working. If you agree, the action proposed to be taken by the Council/HRA is to authorize staff to prepare the specific plan amendments which would include the plan additions made this past year, i.e. conference center, library, and senior housing ( ?). In addition, staff should be instructed to include in that draft county road construction dollars (specific listing of roads to be completed/estimated time frames) as well as including estimated 'excess levy distribution" to School District 112. In addition, the school district plan amendment would include wordage agreeing to distributing additional tax dollars that may become available to the HRA as a result of a positive referendum by the school district. Both of the school district plan amendments would be conditioned upon the school district using those dollars to help reduce overall referendum costs. I should note that the proposed plan amendment as listed above would consume all revenues available to the HRA through the year 2000. This statement does not include potential new construction during that time frame; however, construction started after 1996 will basically return no increment given the delay in first tax receipts after initial construction. Approval of the recommendations presented in the above paragraph are recommended. Who Wins/Who Loses -- , An Analysis of Tax Increment as it Affects City, County and School Districts ' General Overview Minnesota tax laws are extremely complex and difficult to understand. Generally there is a group of interrelated policies that 1) permeate all of the tax laws, 2) share the wealth of the "haves" with the "have nots," and 3) to consider tax base/per capita income /disposal income in determining the basis of need. Most of these policy positions originated during the 1970s when there truly were "haves" and "have nots ", i.e. Maplewood (3M and Maplewood Mall equalled 80% of Maplewood's tax base), Burnsville (the Black Dog Utility Plant produces a similar 75% tax base for that city/county/school district), Rosemont (Koch Refinery), Edina, etc. In an effort to achieve equalization, the pendulum has now swung 180 ' to the point where the suburban communities are now subsidizing the core cities, if not the entire state. Laws such as Fiscal Disparities Contribution, Fiscal Disparities Distribution, Local Government Aid, Equalized Aid, Excess Levy Distributions, etc. create a, sea of mediocrity and ' beg the question, "Why strive for excellence ?" Communities such as Chaska, Eden Prairie, and Shakopee pay millions each and every year into these diffused programs while local referendums continue to be defeated for less money than is being taken out of the tax base, i.e. Eden Prairie ' shares more tax dollars with the rest of the metropolitan area in one year than it would have cost for the total (defeated) community park referendum two years ago. ' General Overview - Tax Increment Districts Similar to general tax laws, tax increment district laws are equally as complex. The laws that were in effect when your district was created are generally the rules that exist today. However, each year for the past 15 years has produced a more restrictive set of rules has emerged each year. And more importantly, the rules have changed as to the amount of money which must be shared with the rest of the metropolitan area. Accordingly, it is not fair to state that all tax increment districts hurt county financing or hurt ' school financing. Instead, you must look at each district individually and recognize the rules in effect for that district For example, Chanhassen's primary TID is a "pre- 1979" district. We do not lose the 40% of our tax base to Fiscal Disparities. By contrast, we receive Fiscal Disparities ' Distribution payments as we are seen as an industrially starved community. And finally, we are not required to make "excess levy distributions." Chaska's TIDs and Chanhassen's "McGlynn ' District" were created during the 1980s. Accordingly, they are subject to each of the "sharing laws" referred to above. As each of these districts receive full tax increment and each must pay into the "sharing pools," a shortfall exists which is then paid by the "community as a whole." [Note: The McGlynn district is basically tax base neutral as 33% of its tax base is shared and 36% distributed to Fiscal Disparities, i.e. a net loss of 3% in 1992 and projected 0% during 1993- 98.] The contention by the school district and county that "our tax base is being eroded" because ' of tax increment is a true statement in Chaska, but is not true in Chanhassen. Tax Increment District Effects on School _Distri 112 Finances The school district ' administration recognizes that the City of Chanhassen is a loser if our district ceases to exist, i.e. administrative costs directly charged to the district represent higher costs in a diluted pot, and local projects, such as the conference center, would never happen. However, the school district Housing and Redevelopment Authority October 29, 1992 Page 2 does not feel as though they are a part of the band wagon if we let the district "ride its course through the year 2000." All school districts are in a precarious position in that their primary funding source is not set locally, but in St. Paul. For 1992, our district could spend no more than $3,050 per weighted pupil unit (figure varies as to the percent of high school students versus middle versus grade). For our district, this cap is approximately $15M. Approximately 27% of the local tax base is to be used for education on a statewide basis, which in our case, produces approximately $8M. The state then pays the difference between the maximum revenues of $15M and the amount collected locally -48M. If the district did not exist, $10M would be derived locally which means that the state's share would go down. In either case, the school district cannot receive more than the $15M for general education purposes. Rchgot and Rest distort the truth when they say that TIDs hurt our school districts. They would be more honest if they would say that TIDs hurt the state budget. At issue is whether you honestly think that the $2M given to the state, by our ceasing our tax increment district, would in any way find its way back to our local school district. I think not. In summation, TIDs do not affect the bigger picture of school district financing. They do affect the minor, and for some people, the most important part of school district needs -- excess levy referendums and new school referendums. If the existing TID did not exist, there would be a broader tax base to absorb these local types of costs. It's difficult to put a number associated with the potential loss of revenue to the district because of our TID. The School Superintendent and Finance Director agree that it is minor. You could argue that the excess levy distribution is lost, which means a loss of approximately 13 %. You could argue a strict state formula loss which would yield 8%. In today's tax dollars this would yield a spread of $400,000 to a high of $650,000 per year as lost revenue to the school district if our district were to cease to exist during the time frame of 1996 - 2000. Affects of Tax Increment Districts on Carver County Without question, the county is the primary loser as a result of tax increment districts. If our tax increment district were not to exist, and after reducing the current increment for fiscal disparity contribution losses ($2M) and fiscal disparity distribution losses ($600,000), the overall tax base would be approximately $2.4M higher than it is today. With the county collecting 25% of the total tax bill, they could be considered losers of $600,000 per year. Before conceding that they should receive $600,000 per year during the years 1996 -2000, it must be noted that the E�&, not the county, took the risk in making this $2.4M happen. Every "inducement" which the city has made has paid significant returns. Paying $2.4M for the "old Instant Web Building," by the city, was seen as outrageous at the time. Today, the taxes paid by the four firms that were created by leveraging that payment has transformed itself into the construction of Instant Web, United Mailing, Victory Envelope, and the Press. These four firms pay more taxes = year than the city paid for their original relocation. The $2.5M incentive to Rosemount would have been unheard of prior to creation of the district, but today, Rosemount pays more than $1M per year in taxes. Housing and Redevelopment Authority October 29, 1992 ' Page 3 At issue is the fact that the ci •took the risk in each of these ventures. Our dividends have been ' enormous. The county now wishes to share in those dividends. The question is, "What if the city had invested in hotels as St. Paul did, would the county wish to share in the losses ?" If someone goofed up the projected income from Rosemount, would the county wish to share in the deficit? The answer is no as history will collaborate, i.e. the city invested in the "North Service Sewer Project" at a cost of $6.OM. The manager /financial consultant/engineers were later to be found over ambitious in their revenue projections. The Chanhassen taxpayers, once the -error was unveiled, ate $3M in shortfalls. The county never asked to take on any portion of that burden. The point of this longer paragraph is two -fold: 1) our existing tax increment district is revenue neutral to the county in that it does not erode the county's tax base, and 2) the county ' could contend that they would be losing $600,000 per year during the time frame of 1996 through 2000, but such would be premised on the fact that the city did make that revenue happen. Without the district, I sincerely believe that it would not have. I know that projects ' such as Instant Web transforming itself from a $87,000 per year taxpayer to a $1M per year taxpayer would not have happened without inducement from ourselves, the grocery store and retail center would not have occurred, and finally, the $5M to $10M in infrastructure ' improvements (storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water) would not have occurred without the tax increment district. ' Tax Increment District Affects on the City of Chanhassen The city becomes the biggest loser if the tax increment district ceases to exist. We move from a position of collecting ' approximately $5M per year, albeit that restrictive uses exist for spending those dollars, to a position of seeing that reduced to a real tax base increase of $2.4M. As the city receives approximately 20% of the total tax base, our net position would be approximately $480,000 or ' a loss of approximately $4.5M. We would then be working with 10 -cent dollars. I I 7 FJ r 0 Rs spas,. ds Ct _ Q • M • ! A w pp z z z • i z Q o il FI! ■ z z IL • • i r w O • • M z O o ^aasa 49 1 sr RR sa- -. • d d iili a z a k A S z z j s �Kt «R "° $ « gg�$ ° = «CMS �_ �8 $aaa�if ae lase � sgy$s «� • z � z ! a ¢ a a '1 .1 1 1 1 t v; 4 O S 1� J 1� 1v 1 gl 1� 1 1 1 1 1 . i a� � a £6 Ya U 2 i r i� `��6alil Q N o of* o Of a SSdd Q g +I e a e o of a M I A g O O♦ O, g V, P e C O O yp��{��f ad r b ¢¢ I In d N f - - I Q C GI Q e eQ O pQpq v v � rid rf f ot �LJ o of oI 7FI 7k o�+i Q 2S o !S Zf g wi \I 8 q o oil a� i�5 oI 2�S irS v � o of o e A j� q A 1 . i a� � a £6 Ya U 2 i r i� `��6alil Q N . i a� � a £6 Ya U 2 i r i� `��6alil p=d�000Q1�O7A1�0!a_r tO00��V1�00 (�j C 1'�0+ Y� p O Q A m p Q$ a N a pp�� ♦p rvim Ono 0vfIf1Y' wic40mbOmOO � E O CL Uf N � r r ° N�a I � ;, o OIL 1 cg 00000mmmosDml•t�l.��l.l�r•oo 00000 NNIf�QI�$ 000 ♦ �f $�0 N O x ' 1 auv Iff OS rl'�t1k0%gat Ct fD n0�1�p�p c c �O OI A l' ' Q Q�� I a � wrrrrrrwrrr� Y'f fp 0 1 w I ° 000000 �88�R�•,$�a�0w$ o0 Q NfOf� V I�nIV!;N01 � , , v c o L i a 8 R ° _ c �iv�:nroro�.�.$�w25o $ p� vU I w' O � a x I 0 0 a (g 000'0 ♦�f U) I 1 10"v O g� h InN rrrO O{ff 00 0 c� 80 R Ic N q -t N Ifs Cr 1 wNfl7 �f �t �t1�1IffNIA�f1h $ l7 � ip �O 1 Q ' ~ 'v Or ONN�N f p�p�prr fw gg 00 t� 25 ,v� in.o�:� o�o1lS `rk Ii 0 O tp pp !7 I rNNciciaa I �O,�NOI =Q 1 [JNNNllrrr�- C� ' C7�++ i !7 •� i ,t � •i = � a� y g O 00 i ♦ � N in 0 CL MIRO�a^Dmh�NIONj. :I^O _O �+ , 0 J I n ° I C7U I f � ZH $ 70g t V � ?g W C1Qi08w$N f►j� 1A ' 00C} wwwrrrrNNNN gg gg gggg gggg �2 ' sqgr o00000000000 ° °p00000°ppp g � oonr�t �t vteou it Is��pCi ' OIDf ff ff f f r N N N N N N N Nri O O -; F 'i 0i 0e 'i P - - ' - "' p - - - - 0.�i 0 0 O . - �� i d O:�N �'�'v Pi l�lJ x t7 �0 {7 ' G7 l ia r ° iKB�$v3iKa��d�c�oRirSirf °O (1f 11t � f IfI MfOPHtA lA00000A tS�StSif E b rr Q r Q r Q r Q r Q �� Q r Q r ' �� o�rRif '��,o8�aiSO252SlflS�2SiS rr��.�rr..• rr F cog h p� �v�Q p x gcriFI��i6 {$ �i & �So � oo ' a �� 1. 1 � p ' !fljr3vi lJ AffUflf d f Od00, 1 'PTQS lT 6uTJq pTnoM AlJedoJd 'pelvTnoTeo eU3 90TJd 843 ATTJesseOeu Sou sT enTeA sT41 S AZIoede0 xel 3eu 40UM WOJ; sTseq 043 ST enTeA 3a�JeW PelvWST4 'Z66t UT elgvAvd sexel J01 eieJ AlT09de0 x63 3ueJJno e4} o3 peppe eJ6M loer oJd eAoge 0U1 of enp eseeJouT elvi AlT0ede0 xel peleWTlSe 043 iT senTvA 49MJEW ' sn0TJEA le OTgeAed 6 UT eSe6JOuT Pe}eWTZSO 843 sMo48 eTnpe4os eAOge 841 698 't , 862 9 KZ 1 919 cSu'4 I S 991'6 ELV's 9E6 SR 9 000 1 OOE I eeL'b sot`s 0001002 8av L9e`b i tts o4s'ti I ass`s 080 000 ' I Zbe t8��e 1 8 8b 1 552 969'e I Lz 9`£ I i e et'e ssb `Z 000 E98 182t st8`t I £OL`Z ( Obe'Z Oe9`t 000 fSZ 1 601 900l I Sst 169 Z91 I L£9`t 08Z't 000 I ' f Da GM � 0ols WS L66 08L 000'SL i 6£9S OOSS 000 l6L I 'k9t6'£t i 4cL L L4 �CZ98'6t uo xel eN 1 9301 i :eSeeJOUj GM AlT xel. ' I wI PT Ten 3 I peowl I Xe1 4lTM I Xej TV e 3 3no43TM 3ov o d 3T0e e0 s.vnTOA I ' I eseeJouj sseeJOUj Zn04ZTM xel 3eNiM I xel 3eN 3eN POI Vl Mejo A} Je d oJd eloseuuTn �SLB'Ltl :e3sa AlToedeo xel 3eN AziedOJd PV9ZS050H TeT3vePTsed , ex9e40/uesse4ue40 stoat olgvAXd sexej u0 iosdwf ' • Pe;vJodJooui 031SJNIadS A 'L 8661 000`000 to 3oedaI £661 `spuoe 6 UTPTTng '0'J 1661 Jego300 peJedeJd T 00 40S eloSeuuTW 8 EXSe40 'Ltl OSI ' � 01 o e a a j o oa o o a a ZS ZS . N 0 C Fig I o il R o e a a s $ o of Q 75 e e e w Q ° oil e, ° c) 7F 4 a of Q O e, ° 1 r O� O OI Q 0 0 8 8 � ♦p I ° of 4 e � 1 ° tv _ ' o Q e of � e � o of � e �I o 8e , R � ° r ♦1 I R � j i i i� �� £8 YY Y € I � � v i 1 W r S � N 0 N Qf r 8' r c� cs 0 V O p�00W InOrdjrN(WOyOyt�11ON�SS 00 N �ZO 0y0 f. I�17 ti p00C 0)"c O co 0 v wiviw Nl?Cf N1D�f AIR�m g s 1D w if O fG t0 t0 t0 0 m cl itl OOOOOrNNN NAI 8 00 r f f N �� OO p j V Ot ��yy N pp C�j {p IA O N 8 C N�f 1Tf Vf��Y S SSITf l7 IV tL N rw��rr�r �w r 'Y�h � t•t• w - �W I(1NIDPf t.N rNQI {O y�v� 5� QQ ' a i inmt —w a d �I J tn in U l oC OC YL g n g r- 0 1H 5519MMIll 8 N ZS, a i t— �r CY t� CO 0 �m I a � v I Of W 1nIANNQ1f iO�OO w O W 1f1O O A tTtOPiO N 1pNAf.�Q1A N O I c � f,7OAO N ei' f`OfP �ti Ol r I f �O W f7e•7f')N1 f f f W VFO mfwow p r . w Q� � O'f WNY'flff f �p�p rtr�wpw� ��° �hO�f��h ^Ot��l7Om cm N �$ c w��Nt1TNTnINNci NNwrrr LL E CY W) � r►p� ip � 1 Q I �- lV N N Pi !7 l7 f f ltf lt) v U 1 ao O gg gg gg gg gg w r w r w r U� �m ER mop mm gg 8 N ZS, a i t— �r CY t� CO 0 �m R NpN�w �l'7 Ln 1 C p w 8 N ZS, a i t— �r CY t� CO 0 �m DI ' ----- ------------ ' 0000dod000000ddddd40000d W d-dd i4W'WWdoOd'ipAAa00'of00 ' , ,I �� °O ? ? ? ? ? ?TT ? W 0000ddoaaR � � NNNN " Ww- o NNNNNNN� dONff fff 1 4.0 f lf .0 f 1 0ff'016 dd �. R•g!'�07�10�0!l�qoO�fOON�g�nID1fS Z q S. � �NNNfI lJ !! ' m sf � y r a . .I sool"�d,�_Cn9 ff � .. E M o g c i F ' � �� ° �O� •� �f O�� VfO �Ql di �f �0�000 44 - _ - - - _ - - _ - - _ A u d '� 8� ��e��bf�ag��o2S6tliS,�2S�eoe d - fif►fif�flfiffrivi�d�oo�evnww co cn �Nf1 l7Y 1nO R�hQO�� b �ei ff fififiei ��niMfodo ddodd g gggaa gggggg by A A O�Nl1 P i� d - fif►fif�flfiffrivi�d�oo�evnww co cn �Nf1 l7Y 1nO R�hQO�� b �ei ff fififiei ��niMfodo ddodd g gggaa gggggg by A A O�Nl1 P i� v u pros IT BuT.iq pTnoM Aziedoid aqz eoTud eqz ATTJesseosu Zou st enTeA sT41 'paIeTnoTeo sT Alpedeo M Zeu 40T4M WoJA sTseq 9U3 sT enTeA IONJEw P8l9WT4s3 .. ' ' Z66 t uT eTgBAad sexez Jo j a RZT oedeo xsZ Zueujno oqZ o3 peppe s iom Zoe roud enoge e43 of enp eseeiouT *Zvi AZTosdeo xel pe3eWTlsa euz 1T SanTeA 38Xuew snoTueA 4e olgeAed sexeZ UT aseeuauT peIeaTZse 04Z sM04S eTnpegos enope e41 a ' 3 e wI pTV olenta I 3oe eI ATV jun5a I 4 00joid A ITORH O .. enTeA xel 4ITM I Ete M e I Ho 6l0 6 I SEGIL S 9 000 OOE ' I.seb £aZ's I Lts s ee 's I BELT S OOO'OOz , I e 0b Z1►£'b ! 8£5 LLV ( 6£6'E OWE 000'SLt xel ION I I , I I OTgeA9d Sexel uo 40edwi• 1 eze t9b'£ I Get 895'E I BEt'£ Ssp'Z 000'091 031SONIddS I On OSS'Z I O 099 I Ove 0£S't 000 81 099UU TR 'sxsey0 'Zlt USI 1 89t S08't ( b we I Lee 083 000`001 £Ol OOt't I L£t VELD 1 L66 08L 000'gl ' 99S 903 i Be$ LZLE i 6£9s 0095 000'09$ i b8 0 b %SLB' t :A4709 090 xel leN Teiol I %Bois e & : esmoq eZed AilosdeO xel 3 e wI pTV olenta I 3oe eI ATV jun5a I 4 00joid A ITORH O .. enTeA xel 4ITM I 1 3no4ITM Zno43TM xsl 39mi esseuoui ! easeuoui 1 xel 3eN 3eN POIEWT3s3 , :ese lC iedou a oseuu Vt TO Z d 3 TW %9LP'LZL :aieb AZT0ede0 xel ION Aziedo.id peeZseWOR TeTZUOPTseg s�seUO /uesss4uey0 , .L66t OTgeA9d Sexel uo 40edwi• (spunt dIl UZTI+) 000'000'~5$ 10 Zaedwl ' Pezejodjooul 031SONIddS A8 866t T E66t 'spuoe BuTpTTng TooyoS •0'0 Z86t '6 ue0300 POigdeJd 81 099UU TR 'sxsey0 'Zlt USI i Levy Impact ' New Issue Naximite Debt Iqualitation aid ' New Reduce Net Levy Issue Tai Incren ' Year 1992 Impact 11.831 Increase Impact 11.831 1993 13.931 1.171 6.761 1994 13.921 7.531 6.391 ' 1995 13.881 7.551 6.341 1996 13.881 7.781 6.191 1997 13.851 7.691 6.161 1998 13.811 5.641 8.181 ' 1999 13.861 4.171 9.691 1111 13.891 1.191 12.711 1011 14.131 1.251 13.781 ' 2112 14.141 14.141 2113 14.131 14.131 1114 14.111 14.111 ' 2115 13.971 13.971 2116 13.941 13.941 2117 13.911 13.911 ' 2118 1119 13.871 13.641 13.871 13.641 2111 13.611 13.611 1111 14.531 14.531 ' 1111 0.001 Ave 1013 1.111 1.1382195 0.1137311739 t ' Market Tas Impact Capacity ' $51,111.11 $511.11 156.87 $75,000.01 $781.11 888.71 ' $101,001.11 $115, 001.11 81,280.11 81, 831.01 0145.58 $208.13 $150, 000.01 82, 455.01 $I79.21 8175,101.11 83,180.01 $351.31 ' $201,011,01 $3,715.11 $411.38 $ 310,000 .10 $6,115.01 8705.71 i 1 i r C 7 I 1