The URL can be used to link to this page

2. Continuation of Public Hearing-TH 5 South Frontage Road from Galpin to Audubon & Galpin from Timberwood to TH 5 Project 93-26a 1 I MEMORANDUM C 1 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager FROM: Charles Folch, City Engineer DATE: February 22, 1994 Action by City AdminWWW findo ModN Rejecte Dates... -.. - • Date submitted to commissiod We Su`mltted to Council —�k_ SUBJ: Continuation of Public Hearing Concerning the Feasibility Study for the Proposed Trunk Highway 5 South Frontage Road (from Galpin Boulevard to Audubon Road) and Galpin Boulevard/C 19 (from Timberwood Drive to Trunk Highway 5) Roadway, Storm Drainage and Trunk Utility Improvement Project Project No. 93 -26 Unfortunately, due to health reasons I was unable to attend the February 14 1994 City Council meeting when the initial public hearing for this proposed improvement project was held. It is my understanding that one of the primary reasons for the continuance of the public hearing was to afford affected property owners and their representatives more time to review the revised cost estimates and preliminary assessment, "rolls for this improvement project. Staff has also had the opportunity to respond to and discuss any questions or issues that have been raised during the continuance period. Attached to this staff report is an amendment to the feasibility study document dated January, 1994. This amendment contains ari npdated,vost estimate and preliminary assessment roll for the proposed improvement project , e : updated ; east, estimate-includes expansion of the Stage I road construction limits from the east fork of Bluff Creek to the west property line of the McGlynn and Shamrock properties. Costs for the installation of the trunk. sanitary sewer to serve the properties affected by this project have also,been added. ,;It vas initially thought that another trunk utility improvement project would be expanded to perform this work; however, given further information received, it now appears V prudent to include this trunk utility work as a pant of this overall improvement project In conclusion, it is believed that the proposed elements associated with this improvement project are necessary for the development of the more than 200 acres of petitioning property. It is therefore recommended that the City Council approve the feasibility study for the Trunk Highway 5 South Frontage Road (from Galpin Boulevard to Audubon Road) and Galpin Boulevard/CSAH Don Ashworth February 22, 1994 Page 2 19 (from Timberwood Drive to Trunk Highway 5) Roadway, Storm Drainage and Trunk Utility Improvement Project No. 93 -26 dated Janaury, 1994 and its amendment dated February 23, 1994 and that Barton - Aschmann be authorized to proceed with preparation of the project plan and specification documents. ems Attachment: 1. Memorandum from Barton - Aschman dated February 23, 1994. 2. Letter to John Dietrich from Charles Folch regarding the funding status (MSA). 3. Staff report dated January 5, 1994 submitted to Council on Febraury 14, 1994. c: Dave Hempel, Assistant City Engineer James Unruh, Barton - Aschman Steve Shwanke, RLK John Dietrich, RLK John Dobbs, Heritage Development gAeng \charles \cc\frontage February 16, 1994 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 VIA FACSIMILE 933 -115 Mr. John Dietrich RLK Associates, Ltd. 922 Mainstreet Hopkins, MN 55343 Re: Trunk Highway 5 South Frontage Road Improvement Project No. 93 -26 Assessment/Funding Status Dear John: Unfortunately I was not able to be at the public hearing for the Trunk Highway 5 South Frontage Road (from Galpin Boulevard to McGlynn Drive) project which was held at the City Council's regular meeting on Monday, February 14, 1994. However, I have been informed that you had raised some questions concerning proposed assessments and, in particular, State -Aid funding for this improvement project. This frontage road alignment has been previously designated as a non- existing Municipal State -Aid (MSA) roadway which is probably the reason that the question of implementing State -Aid funding to build this roadway has been raised over the past few months by both associates from your firm and your client developers of properties adjacent to this project. I have verbally responded to this question; however, there still appears to be some confusion. Therefore, to avoid any misconceptions regarding this issue, I believe it is imperative that I reiterate the State -Aid funding status position for this roadway project in writing. The annual apportionment of funds know as Municipal State -Aid (MSA) funds to qualifying municipalities for construction and reconstruction of designated roads is regulated by state law. The primary purpose for this funding source is to assist municipalities with the construction or maintenance of these routes to required standards. The program is not intended to fully fund the construction of an MSA system. In fact, the annual apportionment by itself is not sizeable enough to be able to fund the reconstruction or construction of a new State -Aid route. As such, a number of years of State -Aid allotments must be banked or pledged in order to sufficiently fund a State -Aid improvement project. In fact, this is an important factor in the development of short- range and long -range roadway capital improvement projects within a city. Based on the currently adopted capital improvement program, State -Aid dollars for the next six years (are banked) for two other proposed State -Aid improvement projects within the City, one of which is proposed to begin construction this summer. In terms of the Trunk Highway 5 South Frontage Road improvement project from Galpin Boulevard to McGlynn Drive, the initial scope of the project was to extend this frontage road 4 [I J Mr. John Dietrich February 16, 1994 Page 2 from Galpin Boulevard east to the east property line of the school site. Since MSA dollars are not available in the near term due to previous priority commitments, the proposed funding for this improvement project was to be through a combination of assessments, tax increment financing and City funds. Subsequent to the initial scope of the project the City received petitions from the properties lying east and southeast of the school site, i.e. Highway 5 Partnership and Heritage Development (which you represent), for extending the frontage road further east to serve both of these developments. The City acknowledged these petitions and has included this work scope in the proposed Stage I phase project as detailed in the feasibility study. The feasibility study presented to the City Council at the public hearing included the additional work items and costs for providing a frontage road to serve these developing properties between the school site and the McGlynn property. The proposed funding for the project which implements special assessments to benefitting properties is consistent with the initial methodologies when the project only involved the school district and the City of Chanhassen. No State -Aid funding has ever been considered by this office to be used for the initial project or the expanded scope project which is currently being considered. I trust that this issue will be more clearly understood now; however, if you should have additional questions on this matter, feel free to contact me. r Sincerely, CITY OF CHANHASSEN Charles D. Folch, P.E. Director of Public Works /City Engineer CDF:ktm ' c: Dave Hempel, Assistant City Engineer Don Ashworth, City Manager James Unruh, Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. John Dobbs, Heritage Development Steve Schwanke, RLK Associates, Ltd. Dennis Dirlam, Hi -Way 5 Partnership ' g:lengkhwlesUetters\dietrich.e CITY OF 6 CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 Action by City Adminishaia TO: FROM DATE: SUBJ: Don Ashworth, City Manager Charles Folch, Director of Public Works/City Engineer C En;orse,J Z -1>9) Rawl — De:e�l�.i: "�� ate Su.smatted to Commission + 0* Submitt ed to Council January 5, 1994 / — 10 y I Receive Feasibility Study for Trunk Highway 5 South Frontage Road (Galpin Boulevard to McGlynn Drive) and Galpin Boulevard (Trunk Highway 5 to Timberwood Drive) and Area Trunk Utilities - Project No. 93 -26 1 Attached is a feasibility study as prepared by Barton - Aschman & Associates for the proposed construction of roadway and trunk utility improvements in Section 18 in Chanhassen. The elements of the proposed project consist of the construction of a south frontage (collector) road from Galpin Boulevard (County Road 19) east to McGlynn Drive, the reconstruction and widening of Galpin Boulevard (County Road 19) from Trunk Highway 5 south to Timberwood Drive, and the extension of trunk sanitary sewer and watermain from their current terminus associated with the Upper Bluff Creek Trunk Utility Improvement Project No. 91 -17B. These trunk improvements were petitioned by and will benefit nearly 200 acres of land imminent for development consisting of the proposed elementary school site, the Trunk Highway 5 Partnership property and the Heritage Development property. The proposed improvements to Galpin Boulevard are consistent with Carver County's future function and design criteria for this roadway. The feasibility study describes in further detail the design elements for the proposed project, environmental impacts, permits required, costs and proposed funding. The typical procedure on public improvement projects such as this is for the City Council to receive the feasibility study document and have approximately one month's time to review the document and become familiar with the proposed improvement project prior to holding a formal public hearing. It is therefore recommended that the City Council formally receive the feasibility study for the Trunk Highway 5 south frontage road (from Galpin Boulevard to McGlynn Drive) and Galpin Boulevard (CSAH 19) from Trunk Highway 5 to Timberwood Drive and area trunk utilities, Project No. 93 -32 and call for a public hearing at their regular meeting on Monday, February 14, 1994. Attachments: 1. Feasibility Report. 2. Staff report dated September 8, 1993. 3. Staff report dated December S, 1993. c: Dave Hempel, Assistant City Engineer Dave Warzala, Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. Steve Schwanke, RLK 1 MEMORANDUM MEMORANDUM C8AN8ASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager FROM: Charles Folch, Director of Public Works/City Engineer L`^ DATE: September 8, 1993 SUBJ: Authorize Preparation of Feasibility Study for Trunk Highway 5 South Frontage Road from Galpin Boulevard (County Road 19) cast to Audubon Road Project No. 93 -26 For sometime now, City staff has been involved in discussions with representatives of the Chaska school district concerning the proposed elementary school site located in the southeast quadrant of Trunk Highway 5 and Galpin Boulevard. For more than a year, staff has also been receiving inquiries about development of property located immediately east of the proposed school site and east of the Timberwood subdivision. It appears that potential development of these properties is now moving ahead as the City has been receiving concept plans for property in this area along with petitions from property owners for public improvements. The petitions received from the Trunk Highway 5 Partnership and the Heritage Development Company encompass approximately 137 acres of office industrial zoned property and approximately 24 acres of residential zoned property. The public improvements necessary for development of this area and the proposed school site consist of an east/west collector road from Galpin Boulevard (County Road 19) east to Audubon Road, storm sewer, trunk watermain and trunk sanitary sewer. The consultant engineering firm of Barton- Aschmann & Associates has been working with the City's Highway 5 Corridor Task Force to development the overall plan for the Highway 5 corridor including the adjacent north and south access boulevard alignments. Needless to say, their background knowledge and history surrounding this proposed roadway improvement is fairly extensive making them appropriately suited to design this project. I have asked Barton- Aschmann to prepare a proposal to conduct the engineering feasibility study for the installation of the south access boulevard collector street, storm drainage facilities and trunk sanitary sewer and watermain utilities. Barton- Aschmann has provided an outline and corresponding detailed description of the work tasks needed to be performed as a part of the r E Don Ashworth September 8, 1993 Page 2 feasibility study along with a preliminary time schedule. It should also be noted that it is not yet known at this time whether an environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) will need to be completed as a part of this feasibility process. Significant impact issues involving wetland impacts and the crossing of the east and west forks of Bluff Creek may require that an EAW be completed to address these environmental issues prior to receiving permit approval from agencies such as the DNR, Corps of Engineers and PCA. Based on the extent of the project as defined at this time and the known available data, Barton - Aschmann has estimated that the feasibility study will cost approximately $18,812. If an EAW should be necessary to be completed, the cost to perform this work task has been estimated at $19,612. At this time, it is staff's recommendation that the City Council authorize the preparation of the feasibility study. If it is found that the EAW necessary, staff will notify the Council of such for authorization to proceed as outlined in this proposal with the cost estimate as shown. It is therefore recommended that City Council authorize the preparation of the feasibility study for the South Boulevard Access Road between Galpin Boulevard (County Road 19) and Audubon Road along with the trunk utility improvements, Project No. 93 -26 and that Barton- Aschmann be assigned as the project engineer for this project. ems Attachments: 1. Location map. 2. Proposal. 3. Petition from Heritage Development Company. 4. Petition from Hi -Way 5 Partnership. c: Dave Hempel, Assistant City Engineer Dave Warzala, Barton- Aschmann Barry Warner, Barton- Aschmann Steven Schwanke, RLK Associates, Ltd. 1 •I• •I«1±ll II$ b►) :.I PR[7PFFi - 1 , G all I! I IK BARTON- ASCNMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. 111 Trvc AJenie South Su to 350 • kl�nneaoo!:s, to nnesota 55401 USA • (612) 332 -0421 • Fax (612) 332- 6180 September 8, 1993 Mr. Charles Folch, P.E. City Engineer City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: South Access Boulevard Engineering Feasibility Study I Dear Mr. Folch: I We are pleased to submit this proposal for professional engineering services in connection with the development of a proposed elementary school in the southeast quadrant of TH 5 and Galpin Boulevard in Chanhassen, Minnesota. To adequately access the school site, the city proposes to construct a portion of the south access roadway paralleling TH 5 on the south from Audubon Road to Galpin Boulevard. The project also includes extension of utilities to properly serve the site. Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. has developed a Scope of Services based on our recent meeting with you to discuss the project and our experience in the area. The work program will study the feasibility and cost for a 36 -foot urban section roadway in M an 80 -foot right -of -way with pedestrian amenities including water main and sanitary sewer extensions in accordance with city comprehensive plans. The Scope of Services is as follows: rr 1.0 Data Collection/Inventory The consultant will develop a list of items such as plat maps, reports, development proposals, surveys, aerial photos, etc. The city will provide the consultant with the requested items and any additional information necessary to complete the project. 2.0 Basemapping It is anticipated that 1" = 100' aerial photography with contours will be utilized to develop the project basemapping. The City of Chanhassen obtained the aerial photography in 1989. A field check will be conducted to verify that the aerials are up -to -date. The Sasemapping will be utilized for the project design. 3.0 Conceptual RoadwayTtility Designs I The south access boulevard will be designed as a two -lane urban roadway. Variables such as pavement thickness, design speed, roadway width, etc. will be estimated during this phase of ' the project. It is anticipated that one roadway alignment alternative will be considered from :PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP �J BARTON- A51- A550CIATES, INC. September 8, 1993 Page 2 Galpin Boulevard to the east edge of the proposed school site. From the east edge of the school site to Audubon Road, it is anticipated that two alignment alternatives will be considered. I t Several trunk utility lines may follow the roadway corridor. Chanhassen's comprehensive utilities plans will be analyzed as well as potential site developments to determine the size, location, and construction timing of the utilities. It is assumed that capacity analysis for sanitary sewer and water main utilities will be done by others. 4.0 Construction Cost Estimates Based on the conceptual roadway and utility designs, construction costs will be estimated. Costs will be adjusted in accordance with acceptable indexing methods for the anticipated year of construction. Administrative, legal, and engineering costs will also be included in the estimates. Costs for right -of -way and easements will not be computed since those areas will be dedicated for roadwa } and utilities through the platting process. 5.0 Feasibility Study All roadway and utility designs, cost estimates, probable construction timing, land use and development issues, etc. will be addressed and summarized in the Feasibility Study for the Project. Potential assessment costs will also be presented. The study will make a final recommendation regarding the overall need and feasibility of the project. 6.0 Environmental Assessment Worksheet M .Options 1 This section presents the Scope of Services to complete the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) and related permits for proposed south access boulevard between Galpin Boulevard and Audubon Road. The consultant anticipates that the more significant impact issues will involve wetland impacts and crossings of the east and west forks of Bluff Creek. The EAW requires information on type, size, location, and impacts (magnitude and significance) to both of these natural features. Our focus will be those environmental issues, such as wetlands and floodplain encroachment, that have a direct bearing on the Record of Decision (ROD). EAW Proce The EAW process will begin with data collection to prepare the EAW and end with the Record of Decision containing specific findings of fact that support the decision on the need for an EIS to be prepared. Responsibility for steps in the process are highlighted in Table 1. BARTON- ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. September 8, 1993 Page 3 6.1 Data Collection Data to be collected includes specific information on the proposed alignment for the south access boulevard. Field reconnaissance of the project will be done and contacts made to the appropriate regulatory and planning agencies including USCOE, USFWS, MnDNR, MPCA, MHS /SHPO, and Riley and Bluff Creek Watershed District. The EAW requires analysis to address 32 specific items comprising the review document. The consultant will collect the bulk of the data, addressing items dealing with project design, land use and zoning, natural resources, mapping, and traffic and noise and air quality analysis. The remainder of the data for the EAW will be provided by the city and includes project maintenance plans, traffic projection figures (volume, peak hours, distribution); and past and future related developments (including the relationship of this project to the existing network in the area and anticipated future roadways). After all data is available, the EAW will be prepared in accordance with the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) rules for this type of document. TABLE I- -EAW TIMETABLE EAW Step Time Frame Responsible Party Consultant, Data Collection 2 weeks City of Chanhassen EAW Preparation End 60 days after data collection Consultant EAW Review End 15 days after submission of draft City of Chanhassen document to city EAW Revision 15 days after end of review Consultant EAW Approval 1 -5 working days City of Chanhassen EAW Public Distribution 1 -5 working days/begin 30 -day comment period City of Chanhassen EAW Public Information To be held during 30 -day comment Consultant, Meeting period City of Chanhassen EAW Comments Collected End with 30 -day public review Consultant, City of Chanhassen EAW Approval by City 3 to 30 days after close of comment City of Chanhassen period EAW Record of Decision 3 to 30 days from comment period's Consultant • 30 days additional could be required it additional information is aeemeo necessary JUI ,1r. Record of Decision. t Fi L Li u n J J 1 BARTON - ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. September 8, 1993 Page 4 6.2 EA R' Preparation and Reproduction The City of Chanhassen may recommend a revision of the EAW prior to approval and public distribution. The consultant will make all necessary revisions and then supply the final EAW and thirty (30) copies to the city for public distribution. 6.3 Response to Comments and Meeting Attendance The consultant will prepare responses to comments received from the public and agencies during the 30 -day comment period. The consultant will participate in up to five (5) meetings including the Public Information meeting throughout the EAW process. The consultant will also be responsible for the preparation of necessary graphics, mapping, and written materials for these meetings. 6.4 Deliverables The consultant, in consultation and coordination with the City of Chanhassen, will provide the following deliverables: EAW for public distribution Responses to comments received during the 30 -day comment period Additional data for EAW as needed for ROD TIME OF PERFORMANCE The tasks described in Items 1 through 5 of the Scope of Services can be completed within eight (8) weeks following receipt of a notice to proceed from the city. If it is determined that an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (Item 6) is required to construct the project, the timeline for EAW preparation will be in accordance with Table 1 herein. COST FOR SERVICES Costs for services rendered under this agreement will be based on the hourly billing rates in effect for staff time expended on the assignment plus reimbursement at cost for direct expenses. A detailed cost breakdown by work task and staff classification is provided in 1 Attachment A. Items I through 5 are computed as base services with Item 6 provided as an optional task, should it be required. METHOD OF PAYMENT Billings for services rendered will be submitted on a monthly basis and are due and payable ' upon receipt. Balances on invoices which remain unpaid after 30 days will accrue interest at the rate of 1.5 percent per month. BARTON- ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. September 8, 1993 Page 5 Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. looks forward to working with you and continuing our involvement in the TH 5 corridor. Sincerely, BARTON - ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. ACCEPTED AND APPROVED BY: David B. W,afzala, P.E. Principal Associate and Its Contracting Officer (Signature) (Typed Name) Authorized to Execute Agreement for: ate DBW:k-ro Page 1 of 2 t t n T C Total 16 10 -- 28 32 -- 96 16 -- 44 12 20 120 80 X50 20 $34 304 ,000 $680 $18,512 $300 $18,812 t t I ATTACMIENT A (cont'd) CITY OF CHANHASSEN —SOUTH ACCESS BOULEVARD OPTIONAL TASK Page 2 of 2 PROJECTED HOURS BY STAFF CLASSIFICATION Classification Task PA L SA A T C Total 6.0 Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) 6.1 Data Collection — 10 16 — — 26 6.2 EAW Preparation 16 40 80 40 30 206 6.3 Response to 16 32 16 16 10 90 Comments Total Hours 32 82 112 56 40 322 Hourly Rate $90 $68 $58 $50 $34 Labor Cost $2,880 $5,576 $6,496 $2,800 $1,360 $19,112 (including O &P) Direct Expenses Reproduction Telephone/Fax Mileage @ 0.28 /mile $500 TOTAL COST $19,612 COST SiTAMARY Study and Report Phase Environmental Assessment Worksheet TOTAL $18,812 $19.612 $38,424 SEP -08-1993 11:09 FROM RLK u LTD. i RLK ASSOCIATES,.LTD.... TO Post -R" brand fax transmittal memo 767't I Ppes ► (A 5-2 — S-73M 3 ) 3 9375739 P.01 922 Mainstreet Hopkins. Mn. >, 55343 (612) 933.0972 laz: (612 933.115 1 S " September 8, 1993 Charles D. Folch P.E. Director of Public Works\City Engineer City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Petition to provide public improvements to serve the Chanhassen Corporate Center site and adjacent property Dear Mr. Folch: ' On behalf of Heritage Development Company and the Trunk Highway 5 Partners, R.LK Associates has been authorized to petition the City of Chanhassen for public improvements to serve the 137 -acre ' Chanhassen Corporate Center (per the attached legal description) and the 24 -acre Heritage Development site (per the attached legal description) . Please place this request on the next available City Council meeting. The respective entities have requested to be notified when the feasibility study becomes available and the estimated costs associated with the proposed public improvements. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, RLK S CI ' even e Sc wanke Civil Eng ineering • Tra nsoortation • cc. Paul Krause, City of Chanhassen Planning Director Dennis Dirlam, Trunk Highway 5 Partnership Kevin VonRiedel, Heritage Development Pat Gannon, Chanland Partnership Landscape Architecture ' Construction Management SEP- 08 -1G93 11.10 FROM RLK ASSOCIATES +.LTD.... RLK ASSOCIATES LTD. TO 9375739 F.02 11 922 Mainstreet Hopkins, Mn. 55343 (612) 933.0972 tax: (612) 933 -1153 HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT 24 -ACRE SITE A Legal Description west of the centerline of the creek, SE one - quarter of section 15, township 116, range 23. ' civil Entn ineering ' Transportation • Infrastructure Aedeyeli ' L endscape Architecture ' Construction Management SEP -08 -1993 11:10 FROM RLK ASSOCIATES +.LTD.... TO 9375739 P.03 922 Mainstr RLIK eet Hopkins. Mn. 55343 (612)933.0972 ASSOCIATES LTD. tax: (612) 933 -1153 1 ' 1 r CHANHASSEN CORPORATE CENTER A Legal Description 1 Tract 1: The West Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 15. r Township 116 North. Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. 1 ct 2. That part of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 15. Township 116 North. Range 23 West of the 5th r Principal Meridian. lying southeasterly of the centerline of County State Aid Highway No. 117 as traveled and southerly of the ' centerline of State Trunk Highway No. 5 as described in Book L of Miscellaneous - Page 472. 1 1 . i r r r . r . Civil Engineering . Transportation • Infrastrur„ ure RedeveioPment • Landscape Architecture • Construction Management HI —WAY 5 PARTHERSHIP A Minnesota Limited Partnership GERERAL PARTNERS; , 15141 CREEdSIDE COURT DEBRIS P. DIRLAM (612) 937-1602 BDEN PRAIRIE, MR 55344 JON N. BLARCBAR (612) 881-0542 June 30, 1993 City of Chanhassen Planning Commission Chanhassen, MN Attn: Paul Krause ' Re: W1 /2 of the NE1 /4, Section 15, Township 116, Range 23, Containing 8 acres of land, more or less. , Dear Mr. Krause: We are the general partners of the Hi -Way 5 Limited Partnership which owns the Mary Welter farm. As you are aware, we recently completed the sale of the West 40 acres to the City of Chanhassen for the proposed school site. We are also negotiating , a sale of the southern most 40 acres located directly east of the Timberwood development. It is contemplated that the purchasers will be submitting a PUD to the City for approval. We are requesting that the City consider our petition to extend utilities to service the above captioned property. It will be necessary to extend water and sewer to the two 40 acre parcels ' referenced above. We are also requesting that the City approve the proposed ' east /west collector raod which will connect new Carver County Road 19 to Audubon Road. It is my understanding that this road will extend along the northern boundry of Timberwood easterly through ' McGlynn properties to the east. Obviously, this road will service both of the parcels which I have mentioned. If you have any questions, please contact either of us and we ' will be most happy to discuss this with you. You may also contact Mr. Robert Morehouse of Morehouse Realty, who is working with the purchasers. Thank you for your attention to this matter. HI -WAY 5 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP *Blan char, am, General Partner General Partner cc: Robert Morehouse i CITY OF 0 2 A 0 0 E X g --- 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 Ate by W AdminlstMot TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager GMo rsorL Modifie Ilejecte D� /a -& - r _ Dete Submitted to CommiasIN FROM: Charles Folch, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Date Submitted to Cmund DATE: December 8, 1993 /I -13 -q3 SUBJ: Select Preferred Alignment Alternative for Galpin Boulevard South of Trunk Highway 5; Amend Feasibility Scope - Project No. 93 -26 Earlier this fall the City commissioned the consulting firm of Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. to conduct a feasibility study for the Trunk Highway 5 south frontage road between Galpin Boulevard and Audubon Road and area trunk utility improvements, Project No. 93 -26. An important road element of this project is the improvement of Galpin Boulevard from Trunk Highway 5 south to Timberwood Drive. During the process of conducting the feasibility study, Barton- Aschman has identified 2 alignment alternatives for this segment of Galpin Boulevard. Alternative No. 1 basically proposes to load the road widening area on the east side of Galpin Boulevard. Conversely, Alternative No. 2 proposes the widening to be loaded on the west side. A cost estimate /impact summary matrix has been prepared for each of the two alternatives. Alternative No. 1 (widening along the east side) is further differentiated into three options to deal with the roadway side slope, i.e. retaining wall, 2:1 back slope and 3:1 back slope. From a purely economic standpoint, Alternative No. I implementing a 3:1 roadway back slope is the recommended choice; however, the engineer and staff wanted to present these alternatives and corresponding information to the Council for further discussion and confirmation. Selecting the preferred alignment alternative is important at this point in time in order to allow preliminary surveying work and the geotechnical investigation to be accomplished in a timely manner and corresponding information included in the study report. Unless pertinent questions or concerns are raised by Council which may require further investigation, it is staffs recommendation to select Alternative No. 1 as the preferred roadway alignment for Galpin Boulevard from Trunk Highway 5 south to Timberwood Drive as a part of the overall south frontage road Project No. 93 -26. ktm Attachment: Memo from Barton- Aschman dated December 8, 1993. 1 Dave Hempel, Assistant City Engineer James Unruh, Barton- Aschman Roger Gustafson, Carver County Engineer Thomas & Marian Schmitz, 8190 Galpin Boulevard Dale F. & Marcia Wanninger, 8170 Galpin Boulevard Mitchell & Mary Krause, 2380 Timberwood Drive James L. & Linda J. Leirdahl, 2350 Timberwood Drive Lawrence & F. Raser, 8210 Galpin Boulevard .e MEMORANDUM BARTON- ASCMMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. 111 Tn .Avenue Sou:h. Su , ;e 350 • Mmneapous. Mmnesva 55401 USA • (612) 332 -0421 • Fax. (612) 332- 6180 MEMORANDUM TO: Charles Folch, City of Chanhassen COPIES TO: Roger Gustafson, Carver County ' Harold Eriksen, HGA FROM: James Unruh , DATE: December 8, 1993 ' SUBJECT: Galpin Boulevard (CSAH 19) Reconstruction Alternatives - 1 __J As discussed at our November 16, 1993, meeting, Barton- Aschman has developed and analyzed various alternatives for the reconstruction of Galpin Boulevard (CSAH 19) ' between Timberwood Drive and Trunk Highway 5. This memorandum and its attachments briefly describe the alternatives and their comparative costs and impacts. It is anticipated that the Chanhassen City Council will select an alternative at its ' December 13, 1993, meeting. The information presented in this memorandum will also be included in the forthcoming , TH 5 South Frontage Road Feasibility Study. Overview , Independent School District 112 is proposing to construct a new elementary school on the property east of Galpin Boulevard and south of TH 5 (see Figure 1). A new frontage road ' is proposed along the south side of the school site. Trunk Highway 5 is scheduled for upgrading to a four -lane divided roadway in the late 1990s. Galpin Boulevard will be reconstructed to two lanes in each direction with left -turn lanes , along the west side of the school site. From south of the school site to Lyman Boulevard, Galpin Boulevard will be widened to 52 feet; it is likely that pavement striping would limit traffic to one through lane in each direction. ' Occupation of the elementary school is scheduled for the fall of 1995. The proposed ' roadway and utility improvements including the south frontage road along the south side of the school site, reconstructed Galpin Boulevard between Timberwood Drive and TH 5, and all utilities must in -place at that time. Alternatives for the reconstruction of Galpin Boulevard between Timberwood Drive and ' TH 5 have been developed and are illustrated on Figures 1 through 4. Table 1 summarizes the comparative cost estimates and the impacts of the alternatives. Figure 5 , shows the existing and proposed profiles of Galpin Boulevard, which are the same for both alternatives. PARSONS ' TRANSPORTATION GROUP A^ E OC J BARTON - ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Alternatives Under Alternative 1 (Figures 1 and 2), Galpin Boulevard would be widened to the east along the school site and to the west along Timberwood Estates. This alternative minimizes impacts to the three existing residences along the west side of Galpin Boulevard and to the mini golf/driving range business northwest of the TH 5 /Galpin Boulevard intersection. Lowering of the Galpin Boulevard profile (as shown on Figure 5) will require that the front yards of the residences be re- landscaped. The driveways will also need to be reconstructed. Some impacts occur in the northwest corner of the Timberwood Estates. Section B -B on Figure 2 shows three grading options for the area. Table 1 summarizes the comparative costs and impacts of the grading options. Under Alternative 2 (Figures 3 and 4), Galpin Boulevard would be widened to the west along the school site and along Timberwood Estates. However, the alignment would be adjusted at TH 5 to minimize impacts to the mini golf/driving range business north of TH 5. The three existing residences would be purchased or condemned as roadway right -of -way under this alternative. The middle property is currently for sale. The listed price was $118,900 as of November 18, 1993. An assumed cost of $120,000 for each property was ' utilized in the comparative cost estimate. I l It is recommended that Alternative 1 be selected because of its substantially lower right - of-way costs. The 3:1 backslope grading option of Alternative 1 is also recommended. Retaining wall costs are eliminated and a stable groundslope is provided. The two fir trees that would be impacted seem to be in marginal condition. Some scrub growth would have to be cleared. However, the 36 -inch mature oak tree would be preserved. dmv 2 TABLE 1 GALPIN BOULEVARD RECONSTRUCTION ALTERNATIVES COMPARATIVE COST ESTIMATE/IMPACTS SUMMARY Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Widen Galpin Boulevard to east along school site Widen Galpin Boulevard to west Widen Galpin Boulevard to west along Timberwood Roadway Construction Same for Both Alternatives East Backslope Options Retaining Wall 2:1 Backslope 3:1 Backslope Right -of -Way 0.3 ac = $7,500 0.2 ac = $5,000 0.2 ac = $5,000 (@ $25,000 per acre) East Side Temporary Easement (@ $20,000 per acre) West Side Easements & Restoration at Residences Retaining Wall Construction TOTALS Tree Removals 0.3 ac = $6,000 $20,000 200 ft. @ 8 ft. ht. @ $40 /s.f. = $64,000 $97,500 None 0.3 ac = $6,000 10.4 ac = $8,000 3:1 Backslope 3 Residential Properties @ $120,000 each = $360,000 0:2 ac = $4,000 $20,000 I $20,000 I None None I None $31,000 $33,000 One 24" Fir j Two 24" Firs None $364,000 None A Wia 01DOSE WAL. ar E TATS' P W-4. DZVMAPMEN AMID, AL .71 FOOW ROADWAY jk 4 6 *M 14' Nt 4% I -. t :. k DR. LEGEND PROPOSED GALPIN BLVD. TEMPORARY EASEMENT PERMANENT R/W TAKING EXISTING R/W F E A S I B I L I T Y ITY STUDY CITY OF CHANHASSEN FIGURE I WAFITON-ASC34PAAN ASSOCIATES@ WC- Galpin Boulevard Layout (60-1 PMACOW TVk^J UMCMW Alternative I DICATED VIA SCHOOL DDEVELOPMENT � MATCH SCHOOL SITE GRADING . 1 hums DEVELOPMENT I AS EXISTING REO GALPIN BLVD 23' PROPOSED R/W, I W/O RETAINING WALL I I 8B aALP IN NO GALPIN PROPOSED R/W 16' W/ RETAINING WALL I BLVD I BLVD I 24' I 8' 14' 12' 12' 14' 10' 8' FIR — — 2' — — BLVD SDWK I LANE LANE LANE LANE — — B824 C-0 824 C -31 !3y ( _.2% 2% �2% SECTION B -B FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CHANHASSEN FIR.� RETAINING SCALE- 1•- 2W WALL WIDEN GALPIN BLVD TO THE EAST ALONG SCHOOL SITE WIDEN GALPIN BLVD TO THE WEST ALONG TIMBERWOOD TH 5 South Frontage Road eva (from Galpin Boulrd to McGlim Road) FIGURE 2 MERTON- ASCHMAN ASSOCI l►Tas, INC. Galpin Bou rd (CSAH 19) Galpin Blvd. Typical Sections ® PAINKON TAAN/POiiTATIDNI OPOUP (fmmTlmb mvW DfIntoTH6) Alternative ESTATE WtPOR DE ENT ' FUTURE ROADWA .r Ile 4V ftQ so ROPERTIEW r • ' ' �! ..Q> ter. • .7�_ :1 • 20. O 1 y Jk, ST V. LEGEND: y • ' `'( : 1'• ':ir � � � 1 r ........ PR GA r : PROPOSED LP IN ' BLVD. .♦ i \. . i' y�. TEMPORARY `• ' ' • EASEMENT R x• - ]� V J PERMANENT t R/W TAKING f ,E - - -- — EaSTING R/W ~`'• hh � 5 FEASIBILITY STUDY ' CITY OF CHANHASSEN tw FIGURE 3 : AATO N- ASCHMAAI ASSOCIATIRS, ■= Galpin Boulevard Layout ' P� **�*A*om �. Alternative 2 H SCHOOL 3RADING H SECTION D -D FEASIBILITY STUDY ' CITY OF CHANHASSEN TH S South Frontage Road (fmm Gelon Boulwnd to McG nA RomQ °.VELOPMENT J4� 24• F't SCALE 1'- 2V WIDEN OALPIN BLVD TO THE WEST : FIGURE 4 MARTOIN- ASCMNAN ASSOCIATtrft MMC' Galpin Boulevard (CSAH 19) Galpin Blvd. Typical Sections ® P ATIONI GROUP (frmnThi6w odDrfwtoTHS) Alternative 2 dw .................... ................... ................... ................... ................... ................... ................... ................... ! ................... ................... ................... ................... .................. ................... ................... ........................................ .......... ......... .................. ................... ......... ................... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... ......... ...... I .......... ........ ...... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ........ .......... ...... ............ ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .......... ......... ........ .......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ............ ......... : ............. ......3.............:....:..... .............. ................... ................... ................... ................... ................... .. ................... ............... ................... ................... ....................................... ................... ................... ................. .......... ................... ............... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ........ ......... .............................. ... ... . ......... ...... ................... ........ ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ........ ................... .......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... PV1- 6 ......... ......... ....... 1t.t80:EL.'.969.66:::: ............ ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ........ .... : ................... ......... ......... ......... ......... ........ ... ..... ......... ........... I*X 9 - - . ....... ................... ......... .......... ......... ........ : ......... ....... ....................................... ........ :L • -3W ........ ............... PVI:)Of25:EL970.'61:::::;:::::.'* ....... ........ .................... : ................... ................... ................... ............. ................... ................... ................... ............... .................... ................... ......... ...... ................... ................... ................... ................... ........... : ................... ............... ..................................... .............................. ......... ......... : ......... ......... ........... .... : ........ ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... Vr" wu:w iw.kb;: ................... ......... ......... P�OPFJM like eir ........................................................ ......... ......... ......... ................. ......... r, SOUT14: nMWPA30 FMD::::: ......... ......... ....... ................... ....... ......... ......... ......... ......... ................. ....... . . . ....... ......... !::PVr 19#TMWM. 9M25::: ............. .......... ......... ................... ....... ......... ....... .................... ......... ........ ......... ......... ILE WOW .... .. .. M4 a ......... : ......... ......... ......... ......... ....... I.: : : ..... . MCI ....................................... ................... ................... ................... ................... ........... -CRNMY: ......... ....... ...... .................. -1 ........... . .......... ......... .......... ......... ......... ....... . ....... .......... ..... ............. ............... .......... ......... ........... ......... • ........ . ................ .... ........... ........ ..... ......................... . . . ...... ........................................ ........ ....... A; ......___3_ ....... .......... ......... ........... 1: M77n: nr:7n • It m 9w i - -SPEED- i ...... .......... f ..................... . ................ . ............... .............. .................... : ...... ........... ............. ................... ......... MX0.34 , ......... ........ .......... .......... .......... ......... ....... ...... ......... ...... ..... �4* ....... �-- . ..... ... ........ 151 �OA ........ ...... ........ . ....... ...... ........ .................... ......... ........ ........ EXISTM ..... ......... ......... ......... ...... .. ............ ......... ......... ........ ... . ................... . . ...... ......... ................... ......... ......... ... .......... ......................... ......... : ......... ....................................... .......... ................. ......... .... ................. : ......... ....... ........... ......... ......... ......... i .......... .......... ......... ................... sIMeERw000 . .... ............. ... .... . .......... ................... ........... .... ..... .................... : ................... ....... . ........ :.: ............................... .. . .. ..... . :. ............... yl— ..: ... .... : ........ ........... ................... ......... ... ..... .......... ..... 040 . ... ......... ........... ......... . ..... ......... .............. ............... ........ . . ......... ...... ............... ........... .... ............................ ........ .......... ..... . . .......... ................. ... ..................... .... I ..... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ...... .. ........ ......... ......... ................... ......... ............ ......... ....... ...... ......... .... .. . ..... . ......... ......... .......... .... ......... ......... . .... .......... MtR.MAW .......... .................... ......... ........ ................... ......... . . ......... ......... ........ . ... ..: ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ...... ........... ......... ......... ......... ......... ..... . .... .. ......... . ............ : ................... .......... ... : ... .......... ................... ................... ....................................... ................... ................... ................... ................... .......... ...................... ....... .......... ......... ......... ; ......... ......... ......... ......... !-. ..:*:*:] ....................... ................... ... . ............................................... ......... ... ... ......... ....... ... .... ................................ ::::::: i:: * * .,. : .................. ,: ......... .. .... .... ...... ....... .. ... ....... ......... ................ : ......... ..... .. ....... ...... ....... ..... ....... ....... ...... .... ... ...... ......... ............ .. ............................. : *:::::: .. ......... ............ ............... ......... ........ : .......... ......... ........ . ..... . ........ ................... ............... ............... ................... ................... ... ..... .. ...... ........ . ... . ................... ................... .... ......... . .......... .... ......... .......... .......... ......... .............. ............... ......... ......... ....... ..... ....... :J ............................. ......... ......... ... ................... ......................... ......... 1— .............. ......... ......... ; :: i ... * ... : .................. ................... ......... i ......... ..... .. ......... ............ ....... ......... .......... ................... .............. ................... ......... ......... ................... ......... .................... ............... ........... ..... ........ ........ ..... . .... ........ ........ ....... ..... 1$4 i::::::: ......... .................... .................................. ..... . . ........... .......... . ...... ................ . .................... .......... ........ ....... ............. ................... ............... ........... ......... ......... ...... ......... .... . ... ............. ......... ......... ................................... ................... ............ ......... ......... ............. ................... ......... ......... : ......... ......... ...... .......... ................. ......... ......... ......... ....... ......... .... ..... ......... ......... : ....... ......... .... ........................... ....... ......... ........... ......... ......... ........ ................. : .......... ......... ......... ......... : .... ............... ............... ......... ......... ......... ....... .............................. ................... ......... ......... ....... ......... ......... ......... ................... ........... ................... ................... ---------- ----- --- * FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY OF CHANHASSEN TH 5 South Frontage Road (from Ga1p1n9oW*vwdtoMcG1jm Res* FIGURE 5 MWU%TOM-ASCMMAM ASSOCIATES Mc. -14rmw Galpin Boulevard (CSAH 19) 95 PASEEN40 TRAMIMPOWATMN 01VXW (fnxn71 WmvodDdntoTH5) Galpin Boulevard Profile BARTON- A51CHMAN A990CIATE5, INC. ' 111 Third Avenue South, Suite 350 • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 USA • (612) 332 -0421 • Fax: (612) 332- 6180 CITY OF CHAIN SE MEMORANDUM TO: Charles Folch, Chanhassen FEB 2 4 1994 ' FROM: James Unruh Elffid'INEERaw DEPT. DATE: February 14, 1994; Revised February 23, 1994 ' SUBJECT: Updated Cost Estimate and Preliminary Assessment Roll for TH 5 South Frontage Road Construction (Project No. 93 -26) This memorandum provides the information that was noted as pending in the "TH 5 ' South Frontage Road and Galpin Boulevard Feasibility Study" dated January 4, 1994. TH 5 South Frontage Road Cost Estimate and Assessments The cost estimate for the TH 5 South Frontage Road (Table 1A) has been modified from the estimate included in the feasibility study. The construction cost for the proposed ' storm water treatment pond in the southeast corner of the school site has been added. Trunk and lateral utility costs are listed in Tables 1B, 1C, and 1D. Table 1E summarizes the project costs. ' The feasibility study noted that frontage road grading and street construction costs would be assessed to abutting land owners on a front -foot basis. The cost participation for the frontage road is shown in Table 1 and is based on the following City policy: • Abutting property owners are assessed for a standard 31 -foot wide, 9 -ton design load roadway. Since the TH 5 South Frontage Road will be 36 feet wide for ' capacity purposes, the City will pay for the additional 5 -foot width. This computes to an 86.1 percent share of the roadway cost assessed to the abutting property ' owners. 0 Abutting property owners are assessed for 100 percent of curb and gutter costs. ' Abutting property owners are assessed for 50 percent of drainage, landscaping, lighting, and sidewalk costs. ' The resulting specific roadway assessment costs for individual property owners are listed in Table 2. The property locations are shown on Figure 1. Figure 2 from the feasibility study shows the frontage road and utility layout and is included with this memorandum. t The mass grading costs for the school site will be shared by the City and Independent School District No. 112; the associated assessments are included in Table 2. ' PARSONS KTRANSPORTATION GROUP An Equal Opportunity Employer BARTON- ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Trunk Water Main Assessments The cost estimates for the trunk and lateral sanitary sewer and trunk water main are listed in Tables 1B, 1C, and 1D. The associated assessments listed in Table 2 are based on the 1994 assessment rates, which are as follows: Note: REU = residential equivalent units Net Area = total parcel area less major right -of -way and wetlands The City of Chanhassen and Independent School District #112 assessments include the ' cost for a 12 -inch sanitary sewer lateral necessary to serve the proposed school/community center. The cost -split is based on the area of the building utilized for school versus community center purposes. The Hi -Way 5 Partnership assessment also includes the cost for a 12 -inch sanitary sewer lateral. ' ,Summary The assessments listed in Table 2 are preliminary and are subject to change based on ' actual construction costs, development plans, right -of -way takings, etc. The schedule for construction of the roadway was noted in the feasibility study. It is likely that the trunk utilities will be installed concurrently with the roadway construction. 1 1 dmv 2 Trunk Sanitary Sewer Trunk Water Main Land Use Minimum REU /Acre REU Rate Net Area REU Rate Net Area Charge Charge Single - Family 2 $1,050/REU $2,100 /acre $1,375/REU $2,750 /acre Multifamily 3 $1,050/REU $3,150 /acre $1,375/REU $4,125 /acre (low density) Multifamily 6 $1,050/REU $6,300 /acre $1,375/REU $8,250 /acre (high density) Commercial/Industrial 4 $1,050/REU $4,200 /acre $1,375/REU $5,500 /acre Public 2 $1,050/REU $2,100 /acre $1,375/REU $2,750 /acre Note: REU = residential equivalent units Net Area = total parcel area less major right -of -way and wetlands The City of Chanhassen and Independent School District #112 assessments include the ' cost for a 12 -inch sanitary sewer lateral necessary to serve the proposed school/community center. The cost -split is based on the area of the building utilized for school versus community center purposes. The Hi -Way 5 Partnership assessment also includes the cost for a 12 -inch sanitary sewer lateral. ' ,Summary The assessments listed in Table 2 are preliminary and are subject to change based on ' actual construction costs, development plans, right -of -way takings, etc. The schedule for construction of the roadway was noted in the feasibility study. It is likely that the trunk utilities will be installed concurrently with the roadway construction. 1 1 dmv 2 TABLE 1A - TH5 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD COST ESTIMATE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, AND RIGHT -OF -WAY COST PARTICIPATION 2/14194 PROPERTY OWNER COST CITY COST ITEM UNIT OUAN. COST $AJNIT TOTALS 100% 31/36 (86.1 %) 50% 5136 (13.9%) 50% COMMON EXCAVATION SUBGRADE EXCAVATION GRANULAR BORROW L AGGREGATE BASE CL 5 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE, TYPE 41 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE, TYPE 31 8618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER C.Y. C.Y. C.Y. TON TON TON L.F. 55,700 16,000 16,000 10,950 1,650 3,700 8,100 3.00 3.50 4.50 6.50 23.00 21.00 7.00 167,100.00 56,000.00 72,000.00 71,175.00 37,950.00 77,700.00 56,700.00 56,700,00 143,873.00 48,216.00 61,992.00 61,282.00 32,675.00 66,900.00 23,227.00 7,784.00 10,008.00 9,893.00 5,275.00 10,800.00 CATCH BASIN EACH 26 1,200.00 31,200.00 15,600.00 15,600.00 12' RCP L.F. 216 20.00 4,320.00 2,160.00 2,160.00 15' RCP L.F. 900 22.00 19,800.00 9,900.00 9,900.00 18' RCP L.F. 390 28.00 10,920.00 5,460.00 5,460.00 4' RCP L.F. 2, 100 33.00 69,300.00 34,650.00 34,650.00 36' RCP L.F. 700 46.00 32,200.00 16,100.00 16,100.00 48 ' RC CULVERT L.F. 100 80.00 8,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 ' RC APRON EACH 2 900.00 1,800.00 900.00 900.00 RIPRAP C.Y. 18 50.00 900.00 450.00 450.00 STORMWATER TREATMENT POND L.S. 1 100,000.00 100,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 CONCRETE WALK S.F. 32,400 2.00 64,800.00 32,400.00 32,400.00 CONCRETE RETAINING WALL L.F. 600 250.00 150,000.00 129,150.00 20,850.00 ELECTRICAL LIGHTING DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM L.S. 1 35,000.00 35,000.00 17,500.00 17,500.00 FATHERING STEEL LIGHT POLES WITH 250 HPS, 30' MOUNTING HEIGHT 1/2' CAL. BOULEVARD TREES, 60' SPACING SOD EACH EACH S.Y. 25 140 9,000 3,800.00 400.00 1.50 95,000.00 56,000.00 13,500.00 47,500.00 28,000.00 6,750.00 47,500.00 28,000.00 6,750.00 ARCH STRUCTURE L.S. 1 300,000.00 300,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 SEED / MULCH L.S. 1 3,000.00 3,000.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 MOBILIZATION L.S. 1 74,331.00 74,331.00 63,999.00 10,332.00 RIGHT -OF -WAY L.S. 1 25000.00 25000.00 25000.00 IF SUBTOTAL 1,633,696.00 1,112,657.00 521,039.00 15% CONTINGENCY 245,055.00 166,899.00 78,156.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST DD 30% FOR ENGINEERING, LEGAL, ADMINISTRATION AL PROJECT COST 1,878,751.00 563,625.00 2,442,376.00 1,279,556.00 383,867.00 1,663,423.00 599,195.00 179,758.00 778,953.00 LINEAL r FEET OF ROADWAY FRONTAG 8400 PROPERTY OWNER COST / LINEAL FOOT OF FRONTAGE 1,663423/8400: $198.0261FT TABLE 1B - TH 5 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD COST ESTIMATE TABLE 1C - TH 5 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD COST ESTIMATE TRUNK SANITARY SEWER LINE LATERAL SANITARY SEWER LINE 2/23/94 2/23/94 ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST SCHOOL SITE 18" RCP SANITARY SEWER 0' -10' DEPTH L.F. 480 $22.00 $10.560.00 12" RCP SANITARY SEWER L.F. 920 $28.00 $25,760.00 18' RCP SANITARY SEWER 10' -15' DEPTH L.F. 1340 $28.00 $37520.00 OUTSIDE DROP L.F. 12 $250.00 $3,000.W 18' RCP SANITARY SEWER 15' -20' DEPTH L.F. 2320 $34.00 $78 880.00 STANDARD 4' DIA. MANHOLE L.F. 24 $180.00 $4.320.00 18' RCP SANITARY SEWER 20' -25' DEPTH L.F. 1425 $48.00 $68,400.00 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 3 $350.00 $1050.00 18" RCP SANITARY SEWER 25' -30' DEPTH L.F. 290 $54.00 $15,660.00 SUBTOTAL $34,130.00 18' RCP SANITARY SEWER CL. V JACKED L.F. 110 $250.00 $27,500.00 15 %CONTINGENCY $7,650.00 36 * STEEL CASING PIPE L.F. 200 $70.00 $14,000.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $41,780.00 STANDARD 4' DIA. MANHOLE L.F. 340 $180.00 $61,200.00 ADD 30% FOR ENGINEERING, LEGAL, ADMIN. $17,595.00 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 20 $350.00 $7,000.00 TOTAL COST $59,375.00 SILT FENCE FOR EROSION CONTROL L.F. 1000 $2.00 $2,000.00 HI -WAY 5 PARTNERSHIP DEWATERING L.S. 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING L.S. 1 $1000000 $10,000.00 12" RCP SANITARY SEWER L.F. 1300 $28.00 $36400.00 RESTORATION DWYS. , TREES ETC. L.S. 1 $10,000.00 $10 000.00 OUTSIDE DROP L.F. 14 $250.00 $3,5W.00 SEEDING W/ MULCH AND FERTILIZER ACRES 6 $120000 $7 STANDARD 4' DIA. MANHOLE L.F. 50 $180.00 $9.000.00 SOD I S.Y. 1 3500 $2.00 $7 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 6 $350.00 $2100.00 SUBTOTAL $381,920.00 SUBTOTAL 551,000.00 15% CONTINGENCY $58,488.00 15% CONTINGENCY $7,650.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $440,408.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $58,65 ADD 30% FOR ENGINEERING, LEGAL, ADMIN. $134,522.00 ADD 30% FOR ENGINEERING, LEGAL, ADMIN. $17,595.00 OTAL COST $574,930.00 - TOTAL COST $76,245.00 = = m = m = = = = = m = = = mm = = TABLE 2 - TH 5 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL TH 5 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD AND TRUNK UTILITIES ?114/94 SANITARY NET REUS SEWER WATERMAIN ROADWAY ROADWAY TOTAL ASSESS. LAND PER NO.OF ASSESS. ASSESS. FRONTAGE ASSESSMENT TOTAL MAP REF. PROP. (DENT. NO. OWNER ACRES ACRES USE ACRE REU'S $1050/REU 1375/REU FT. 198.0261FT. ASSESSMENT 1 25.0151210 CHAN LAND PARTNERS 40.76 27.46 COM /IND 4 110 $115,500.00 $151,250.00 $266,750.00 200 HWY, 13 W. BURNSVIL MN 55337 2 25.0151211 HERTITAGE DEVELOPMENT INC. 24.1 19.97 SINGLE FAMILY 2 40 $42,000.00 $55,000.00 $97,000.00 450 E. CO. RD. D LITTLE CAN ADA, MN 55117 3 25.0150300 HI -WAY 5 PARTNERSHIP 94.32 76.5 15.2 ACRES SIN. FAM 2 326 $342,300.00 $448,250.00 4000 $792,104.00 $1,658,899.00 & PART 25.0151100 15241 CREEKSIDE COURT 29.4 ACRES MULTI FAM. 3 $76245.00 (L) EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 (LOW DENSITY) 51.8 ACRES COMAND 4 4 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 16.58 12.99 PUBLIC 2 26 $27,300.00 (T) $35,750.00 1500 $297,039.00 $598,433.00 690 COULTER DRIVE $9500.00 (L) ( P.O. BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 5 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL 24.28 18.23 PUBLIC 2 36 $37,800.00 (f) $49,500.00 1900 $376,249.00 $834,580.00 DISTRICT #112 1 $49875.00 L 3 6 25.0151700 BETTYO'SHAUGHNESSY 83.53 61.51 SINGLE FAMILY 2 123 (1) (1) 1000 HESSE FARM ROAD CHASKA, MN 55318 7 25.0151400 DALE F. & MARCIAWANNINGER 0.69 0.69 SINGLE FAMILY 2 1 (1) (1) 8170 GALPIN BLVD. CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 8 25.0151300 THOMAS & MARIAN SCHMITZ 0.50 0.50 SINGLE FAMILY 2 1 (1) (1) 8190 GALPIN BLVD. CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9 25.0150600 LAWRENCE d F. RASER 0.75 0.75 SINGLE FAMILY 2 1 (1) (1) 8210 GALPIN BLVD. CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 10 25.4520010 McGLYNN BAKERIES INC. 43.10 37.51 500 $99,013.00 $99,013.00 C/O GRAND MET TAX DEPT. 200 S. 6th ST. MS: 1843 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 11 25.4520020 3 SHAMROCK PROPERTY PARTNERS 32.70 32.70 1000 $99,013.00 $99,013.00 25.4520030 ONE McGLYNN DRIVE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (1) ASSESSMENTS PENDING COMPLETION OF UPPER BLUFF CREEK - PHASE 2 PROJECT (No. 91 -17B) (2) INCLUDES $228,884.00 MASS GRADING COST FOR SCHOOL SITE. (3) INCLUDES $321,156.00 MASS GRADING COST FOR SCHOOL SITE. (n TRUNK SANITARY LINE ,t 1. �+ . - - .. _ -�" i,. � '' ' •�,�- i•. : R=^ �� t:• .. ,� s ir /. aIlk, _ IL • �c t'i't, +' i � .� .Iiii9�,� � � a•�' r' fr, e x . 1 ' t +t .6 ` ' j � � � 'h � ^�` )' - . i �. �. � [x I •r - _ t mac. ' '`,. iA �,(..`�, ; y � _ Y i� `^. e- .��..� t��; /Oi'��e /ti't ..Y•'M� �� *+ . ,, • :7 ..' Eµ'i �. I � �� t i r � � �6 ::. �`� � � ./�� ..r . �.as . ' ., ,` �'fwD 1 A„ . ` ..� .i . . ♦ �� x. tic ''/ ► y ti 4 •. � � � 'Yi r ,Z, � ' � 'r' T � < z' F � `+� gip^ � N � „�- , Y.* ' , t . �.( , S � � �} `[. is i yt� _ * • � .�� / - "M � 2f" • ^ �` l am ^ ' • 4 � s � Y -r ' ~ i�. �e E S .•"� ' ` r +� �M � �1� •r � I � � ... � s,: �� , lit J �� t ;R a.. + ,JIB "�.,.` � -' d,. - � • x `,.,� � _ ` •. ? ,..�'! . � . "�°" • tc}�'� i- y �' ' ° � •� is .: y�.i' S , ,`<. 1 t�O/} T`i R`t YC 'r mem < 1+1 w t < i G ........v.v .n t: V. n.: ..::..:.:: .... . fA>w: / ............::::: ::::.:....:.::nom::.:: :......... . ..., ... ,. .:5 ...... ..... .. . . ...... .:. : <•: .:: :.. <..:3+i :...... :L �a +/�� .., ... ......:.:.:,.,.:<...;+. : %.`.'+�wv°vv"::•::::::::ai;.:. r. .}.5::'.,•.'•.:ki?2L: <i:;l�.wf. {.RAY. // i5 1 Wil 15 WA • • FU FU 1. TORE T.H. 5 UPGPADE j ,. / K k PROP REAL ES�iATE �:� r PROPOSED CHANHASSEN : .�, �:•:•:• : ..:.:.:.:.:.•:••r:�•� }:• ••••• ..•L CORPORATION I ;, >f1= CORPORATE CENTER b t DEVELOPMENT P M V ELO NT EL PM N 0 T E E _ ......• �::::�:::::::�:= BLUFF C Z y •:t M .r BLUFF �.A T Q S 0 RK R K C E E S EE FIGS. 5 & 7 c� r•:.:•::• . • . :: ..:1:. »::•::::•:•::::::: — WEST CONNECT TO :::::. :�. FORK 2wr, ,. i ;� R 6�.(0. �.: ::::::.: :<:: ,::::.` GALPIN ::. FUTURE I McGLYNN RD. . N - a 9L_ 4 GRADE :: :: ROADWAYS f 12 WM s S — .< .; . s= - - - - -_ McGLYNN / 2 ` D. RD. ... ;SAN : - = / 12 \` A ONTAGE R I # S GE TAG 2 ! ate ` q RE T4111 ft Cy . ;,. M MCGLYIN , — ' WALL t ": BAKERY ' . i r TlMBERWO.DD %; '� t = I -% TES j i " `� �► v "� _ ` L M r + t ao ! J u I %ors m Y _ f LEGEND EXISTING WETLAND PROPOSED SCHOOL SITE PROPERTY LINE -- i EXISTING WATERMAIN PROPOSED WATERMAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER — > — PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER - - PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN TRAIL PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN j TRAIL UNDERPASS PROPOSED RETAINING WALL F E A S I B I L I T Y S T U D Y r CITY OF CHANHASSEN ' BARTON- ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. PARSONS TRANSPORTATION GROUP TH 5 South R oad) (from Galpin h Fronttag Galpin Boulevard (CSAH 19) (from Timberwood Drive to TH5) FIGURE 2 Frontage Road Layout