9 Assumption Seminary PropertyClTYOF
690 City Center Drive
PO Box 147
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
Phone
952.937.1900
General Fax
952.937.5739
Engineering Department Fax
952.937.9152
&dlding Department Fax
952.934.2524
Web Site
www. ci. chanhassen, mn. us
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Jansen
City Council
FROM:
Loft Haak, Water Resources Coordinator
DATE: April 17, 2001
Assumption Seminary Property
BACKGROUND
The Assumption Seminary property consists of approximately 160 acres on the
north side of Highway 212 and west of Bluff Creek Drive. (The land containing
Assumption Creek and Seminary Fen is actually larger and owned by a dozen or
more property owners; however, the property shown in the map below contains
most of the creek and fen that is still in private OWTtership.) Because the
Assumption Seminary site contains some of the highest quality natural resources
in the City of Chanhassen, it is prudent to provide the Cotmcil with a description
of the site and a snapshot of the City's past perspectives on its management.
-.
Assumption Seminary Property
.
The purpose of this memo is to provide background on:
1. The Assumption Creek, Seminary Fen and the Assumption Seminary
property; and
2. The City documents that address a management strategy for this property.
Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2001
Page 2
ASSUMPTION CREEK AND SEMINARY FEN
The Assumption Creek/Seminary Fen complex is a very unique resource within the City of
Chanhassen, the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD) and the Twin Cities
Metropolitan Area. The subwatershed contains a DNR-designated trout stream (Assumption
Creek) and a calcareous seepage fen (Seminary Fen).
Assumption Creek
Assumption Creek begins on the Assumption Seminary site and empties into the Minnesota
River after flowing through the Raguet Wildlife Management Area, west of Highway 101 and
south of Highway 212 in Chanhassen. The creek is Carver County's only remaining native trout
stream. It is one of only 15 streams in the metro area that still supports trout populations.
Seminary Fen
The Seminary Fen is a calcareous seepage fen that is approximately 90 acres in size. A majority
of the 90 acres is located on the Assumption Seminary property.
Fens are types of bogs that form in low-lying areas that are wholly or partly covered with water
and dominated by plants like grasses, sedges and reeds. The soils of fens are organic (peaty) and
not acidic like the soils of bogs. The water that fens receive is typically groundwater that
contains dissolved minerals and is moderately acidic.
Calcareous seepage fens are the least common type of fen because the conditions that must exist
to create a calcareous fen are unique. Calcareous seepage fens.are formed when water from atop
a river bluff area percolates through soils rich in calcium and magnesium, collects those minerals
and seeps out of more shallowly sloped portions of the bluff. Because calcareous seepage fens
are few and far between, the plants that live in the fen are considered quite rare. According to a
September 30, 1999 Chanhassen Villager article, the unique environment that exists in Seminary
Fen supports eight rare plants: "five 'state threatened' plant species and three 'state special
concern' species."
The plant community of the Seminary Fen is exceptional not only because it contains several
rare plant species, but also because it is relatively untouched. Despite the site's use by Mudcura
Sanitarium and the Assumption Seminary (Attachment 1), the plant community has resisted
invasion by non-native plant species to a great extent. According to Hannah Dunevitz, Regional
Plant Ecologist with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), the Seminary Fen
is the highest quality calcareous seepage fen in the Minnesota River Valley in the metro area.
Attached is the Chanhassen Villager article from September 30, 1999 that discusses the unique
natural resources that exist on this property in more detail (Attachment 2).
STEWARDSHIP AND PROTECTION PLAN
In December 2000, a work group was formed to address the management of Assumption Creek
and Seminary Fen. The work group consists of representatives from DNR, Friends of the
Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2001
Page 3
Minnesota Valley, LMRWD, Carver County, Minnesota Land Trust, City of Chanhassen and
other organizations, as well as private citizens. City staff became involved through an invitation
from the District Administrator of the LMRWD, Kevin Bigalke. The LMRWD has sponsored
several grant applications to help fund the development of a Stewardship and Protection Plan for
the Assumption Creek and Seminary Fen.
The Stewardship and Protection Plan development process would assist the work group in
achieving three objectives:
1. Providing the residents of the area with information about the unique nature of
Assumption Creek, Seminary Fen and the surrounding area;
2. Providing the residents with information on ways their properties can be protected (e.g.,
conservation easements, restrictive covenants); and
3. Involving the residents of the Assumption Creek/Seminary Fen subwatershed in further
developing and implementing the Stewardship and Protection Plan.
The most important factor in ensuring the protection of this site is the integrity of the hydrologic
system, since the mineral-rich springs create the conditions necessary for the plants that grow in
the calcareous seepage fens. The site's hydrology can be protected through the education of and
involvement with property owners in the subwatershed. (The Stewardship and Protection Plan,
once complete, will describe the educational and involvement components of this initiative in
more detail.)
Protection of the bluffs above the wetlands is also, important. Deposition of sediment from the
bluffs above Minnesota River wetlands often creates an environment in which undesirable plants
like reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) thrive. In addition, runoff from golf courses,
lawns, parking lots and other developed areas could add herbicides and other pollutants to the
wetlands.
Management of the fen and adjacent wetlands would ideally include periodic prescribed burning.
Fire helps keep brush invasion to a minimum, control cool-season invasive exotic plants and
stimulate growth of native plants.
Finally, the working group would like to encourage long-term protective measures on all
privately held land in the subwatershed. This could include voluntary conservation easements
that would allow the owners to retain their lands but would restrict certain activities (like more
intensive land uses or development) or acquisition as a wildlife or open space area. On lands that
are currently undeveloped, very low densities and low impact development would best protect
the subwatershed's natural resources. Since the working group has no decision-making
authority, it is up to the local decision makers (like the City Council) to be aware of the resources
present on the Assumption Seminary property and manage the subwatershed with the future of
Assumption Creek and Seminary Fen in mind.
Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2001
Page 4
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
The City has repeatedly given protection of this area the highest priority of all wetlands in the
City (Surface Water Management Plan, Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan and
Comprehensive Plan--Attachments 3, 4 and 5). Other organizations have expressed similar
goals. Staff believes continued cooperation with the working group and other organizations will
accelerate progress toward the goals outlined in the City's Plans.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Mudcura Sanitarium Article
2. Chanhassen Villager Article, September 30, 1999
3. Excerpt from Surface Water Management Plan, 1994
4. Excerpt from Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan, 1996
5. Excerpt from City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan, 1998
GSENG~LORlhWETLANDSXAssumption SeminaryLAssumption Seminary Bkgd Memo.doc
-/
Mudcura Sanitarium
By Joseph Huber, Michael Huber and Patricia Huber
Aerial of Mudcura Sanitarium, Shakopee, MN from a postcard.
Mudcura, commonly known as Assumption Seminary,
sits on a rise just north of Highway 212 between Shakopee
and Chaska. It was one of three mud bath sanitariums that
operated in the Minnesota River Valley.
When we first decided to write articles on the mud
baths we wondered if there was something unique about
the geology of the river valley around Shakopee. The on-
ly mud baths that we are aware of in Minnesota are within
10 miles of each other. One between Shakopee and
Chaska 0VIudcura) and the other two between Shakopee
and Jordan (Mudbaden and Jordan Sulphur Springs).
(There was another proposed mud bath at Belle Plaine
around 1912 by Dr. Heinen o[ Minneapolis. We could find
nothing that would indicate that it was ever built?)
Geologists and related specialists we talked to did not have
any answers. There is some agreement that the water is
not deep water, but comes through materials left by the
glaciers. This material is capped above and below by layers
of rock or clay and ends as the land drops into the valley.
As the water runs through this rubble it leaches the
sulphur out of the shale or buried organic material as a
mineral.
Ole Rosendahl informally started what was to become
Mudbaden around the turn of the century; i.e., he gave
treatments in his farmhouse. He built additions to his farm-
house and in February 1908 went under new manage-
ment. Dr. Thenus M. Larsen, a graduate scientific masseur
(chiropractor) from Denmark, was a member of the new
management. By October 1908, Dr. Larsen was also listed
as the Vice President of Shakopee Mineral Springs Co.
(Mudcura) which had been started by Dr. H. P. Fischer of
Shakopee. In 1913 Dr. Larsen bought Rosendahl Sulphur
Springs (now Mudbaden). It is unclear whether Dr. Larsen
stayed on at Mudcura.
Dr. Henry P. Fischer was born in Formosa, Ontario,
the son of Michael and Katherine Fischer.2 A graduate of
Detroit Medical College, Dr. Fischer came to Shakopee in
1894, according to his granddaughter Betty Buss. He liv-
ed in a house on First Avenue in Shakopee and had a prac-
tice above Deutsch's Drug Store. He returned to Kitchener,
Ontario, where he had received his pre-reed education,
to marry Wilomenia (Minnie) Huck. The couple returned
to Shakopee and several years later they bought the house
at the corner of Holmes and Second Avenue where the
First National Bank of Shakopee now stands. The family
lived in part of the house and used another part for Dr.
Fischer's practice.
'.25
26
A patient came in one day to tell Dr. Fischer about
the springs on the bluff across the river. When he went
to look at the springs he was excited by what he found
- sulphur mud. He traveled around the U.S. looking at how
others had set up sulphur mud bath sanitariums. He then
returned to Shakopee to set about opening his own
sanitarium. By the time the sanitarium was ready to open,
Dr. Fischer's brother, Dr. Peter M. Fischer, had graduated
from Michigan Medical School and moved to Shakopee.
Dr. H.P. Fischer sold the house and his practice ,to his
brother and moved his family out to the sanitarium. Dr.
P.M. Fischer would eventually open the first hospital in
Shakopee in that house.2
The Henry Fischer family is pictured while still liv-
ing in Shakopee (see photo 1).
,:.~ ~: .. ~ .....~ x--..; -
Photo 2: Waterfall at Mudcura.
Photo 1: The Henry Fischer [amily; left to right, Henry, Marie, Georgina,
Jerome (Jim), Wilomenia (Minnie) and Antoinette.
In 1908, Dr. Fischer and his wife bought the Cameron
farm with the sulphur spring and mud. They then sold
it to the Shakopee Mineral Springs Co. in October of 1908.
Dr. Fischer was the president of the corporation, Dr. Larsen
the vice president and Fred W. Goodrich the secretary-
treasurer. The site was described as 120 acres (half of
which was mud) with three "palatable" sulphur springs,
one iron spring and one pure water spring. It also had
a well known trout stream, which the DNR now says is
the last natural trout stream in the metro area.
The only major changes to the grounds were that one
of the spring fed ponds was dammed to make a waterfall,
which provided the power to get the spring water into the
building (photo 2). They also built the "Mammoth cement
bottle" for the spring (photo 3). This was later built into
a gazebo for the patients (photo 4).
. .., ..,~..,,, --~ .~,~r_~. ~f .. .; '.. .,:..-;. .. :
im.L~~.&~:~~:~.,o'-'"-., '.;::,:.~i! :-' ~,..~:-: '.'
Photo 3: "Mammoth cement bottle" for the spring.
-,,,,7~.~-,..m~'''= -:-'::'-.~:: ,'"Z~. ~ ' ~;.Ir~¥:;~- - ~,~i~1
.... a ...:~..d.. I -' i ' " ~1
~T~~~'-',':;':' :T~ 7~-" --~'~' :-' *". - '-~ -'.~
Photo 4: Gazebo wi~h cement bottle enclosed.
The building was started the second week of
November 1908 with Arthur C. Clausen of Minneapolis
as the architect. The corporation started out with $50,000,
but by December 1908 they were advertising for another
$20.,000 in preferred stock.'~ At this point, with only the
foundation completed, they were ca!ling the facility the
Swastika Sulphur Springs Sanatorium.
The architect's rendering (photo 5) is the only guide
that we have as to what the original building looked like.
At this point we have not found any real photos of the
original structure. Shakopee Mineral Springs' original
structure was completed the middle of July 1909. The
main building was three stories high and about 80 feet
square. The bath area was at the left-rear of the main
building and was 40 feet wide and I10 feet long. The men's'
bath was on the west side and the women's bath on the
east. (The only details of the original building are the ar-
chitect's drawing and a description in a newspaper arti-
cle done just as the foundation was completed s). When
finished it was called Mudcura, even though they still had
a decorative Swastika in the main office. The building
had its own cigar and newsstand, smoking room and
barber shop. The bath department has mud, bath, cool-
ing and dressing rooms for both men and women. From
the newspaper article, it sounds like there are 27 bedrooms
(photo 6) and could handle 40 to 50 patients (depending
on the source).6 The room and board was $15.00 to $25.00
per week, depending on the location of the room. The
Fischer family also lived there, but we don't know how
many of the staff lived on site.4 A 1910 newspaper ad
shows Dr. P.M. Fischer (Henry's brother) also living at Mud-
cura, but by 1911 he was back in Shakopee. The family
residence (photo 7) was completed6 and-the family lived
there until they sold the property in 1951.
According to Susan Dreydoppel6 the building was
remodeled by 1912. This is the way most people remember
the building (photo 8). Shakopee papers covered parties
and cattle awards at the facility but did not mention the
expansion. Susan Dreydoppel also speculated that the
Fischers bought out Dr. Larsen and Mr. Goodrich by 1926.
But according to his obituary, Mr. Goodrich was treasurer-
secretary of Mudcura for several years.? Perhaps the
Fischers bought out Mr. Goodrich and Dr. Larsen when
the new building was completed and as Dr. Larsen return-
ed to Mudbaden.
By February 1914 the dormitory for workers was com-
pleted. In a small announcement it was called the "Helps
Hall and Nurses Home". It had 25 rooms with a separate
heating plant and bath rooms with hot and cold showers.8
The men lived on the first floor and the women on the
second floor. (pi~oto 9). Also in 1914 Dr. H.P. Fischer's
brother started expansion on the "How place" for the first
hospital in Shakopee.9 Both H.P. and P.M. (the brothers
always used their initials) used the "How place" as their
residence and their practice site.
Dr. B.E Pearson of Shakopee worked at Mudcura from
about ~.939 until it closed in 1951. He said most of the pa-
tients who came for the mud cure had some form of ar-
thritis or sciatica. Dr. Pearson did all the physicals
and every new patient had a physical. Advertising post-
cards from 1909 proclaimed that the baths were good for:
rheumatism, gout, neuralgia, asthma, skin, kidney and
nervous diseases. Treatment to dry out alcoholics was also
added at some point. Jim Fischer, Dr. Fischer's son, was
an alcoholic and a driving force in AA in Minnesota. He
was instrumental in having Mudcara used as an early
alcohol treatment center.
Treatment was started with a home drawn wagon. The
mud was loaded on the wagon north of the springs and
driven across the small bridge over the falls (photo 11).
It was off-loaded in a bin in the basement of the treat-
ment wing (photo 12). The mud was then taken upstairs,
put in a machine that pulverized and steam-heated it for
the patients. The patients would start their treatment at
about 6 a.m. Florence Greening, who worked at the
sanitarium, said some of the North Dakota farmers who
were patients would be ready and waiting by 5:30 a.m.
A canvas covering was put on a rattan bed and covered
with mud. The patient would lay on this and then be
covered to the neck with mod. The canvas would cover
them to keep the heat in (photo 13). Dished metal beds
were used in later years (photo 14). The patient would be
in the mud for at least one-half hour. There were also
"buckets" that would cover a patient's leg up to the knee
with mud for those who didn't want the full treatment.
The patients would then be hosed off and put in a hot
sulphur water bath (sulphur water was the only tyPe us-
· .ed at the facilit~y). After the bath the patient would be dried
~and wrapped in a blanket to cool off (photo 15). They
would receive a massage before returning to their rooms
to dress and go to the dining hall for breakfast.
When Mudcura was busy, it had a capacity of 100 with
the larger building, the treatments would go on into the
early afternoon. Other parts of the treatment included
drinking lots of sulphur water and electric treatments. We
have not found out what those entailed. During the day
the patients would relax, walk on the grounds (photo 17),
play lawn sports or cards and retire early for the next day's
treatment. Some patients would ride with the chauffeur,
in the afternoons, into Shakopee and relax around town.
During the winter patients ice-skated on the pond (photo
18).
The recommended stay was three weeks, but many
stayed less. Some even came in as out-patients once or
twice a week. Most patients came once a year and those
with worse symptoms often came two or three times a
year.
Dr. Fischer did not involve himself in the treatments
much. There was a physician who managed the
treatments, another physician who did the physicals and
27
Photo 5: Architect's rendering of Shakopee Mineral Springs Sanatorium.
o.
_...~,~,.~/<_:~_..,~.~...~<....,...:..~, ',~ ~ __ ~ . ~...,. Photo 8:1912 remodeled main h ildi ~_u..__n~.
Photo 9: Dormito~' with man on first floor and
women on second floor.
Photo 10: Cars outside Mudcu."a.
3O
a chiropractor who managed the massages. By 1921 Mud-
cura also had its own dentist. Dr. Sandin.~0
Mudcura's advertising went through several stages.
There were professional notices in the newspapers, essen-
tially business cards on the front page of the paped~ 42 ~3
These appeared in 1910, 1911, and 1912. There were also
print advertising postcards, which apparently were sold
at Mudcura and the patients would write friends and
relatives about their stay. Mudcura also had photographers
make photo postcards of patients and staff to send out
(photo 19). During 1914, a Dr. Watler Weimers wrote
a series of articles called 'Materia Mudcura". They were
mostly testimonials given by patients about their stay or
a note that they came to Mudcura. These one-sentence
statements always gave the person's name and hometown.
They were also used to give short announcements about
the staff. Some examples:
Mr. S. Slimmer, the St. Paul cattle buyer claims the
mudbaths are the stuff for his rheumatism.
Mr. L.C. Sutma/' of the firm of Lindeke, Warner and
Co., St. Paul says: "A mud bath now and then, is relish-
ed by the best of men'J
Mr. PS. Tiedeman and Perry' Peterson of Verona, N.D.
say that the), would rather be in the hot mud than to
be home in the North Dakota weather.
Miss Ruth Pickrell, the six-year.old patient h'om
Canada, who has been suffering with rheumatism, is
happy over her attempt at walking. She walks with
very little assistance.
These articles also give an indication of the range of
patients that used Mudcura. Besides coming from all
around Minnesota, they mention the following areas:
Alaska, Colorado, Iowa, North and South Dakota, Wiscon-
sin and Saskatchewan.~ Patients came by road or rail.
Train passengers arriving in Shakopee were chauffered
(photos 20, 21) to the Sanitarium along "lover's lane" (now
Highway 169)s through the river bottoms.
Advertising appeared in local papers listing what Mud-
cura had to offer?2 In 1924 there was a large Christmas
greeting in the Shakopee paper.TM It is not known if this
advertising was regional or just local. We have see one
brochure advertising Mudcura. There is no date but it is
from the later era as it shows the metal dish beds.
An indirect way of advertising was in form of Mud-
cura-sponsored social and community events. From 1910
to 1915 the Shakopee papers report on Mudcura's football
team, called the "Mudcuras" or the "Muds". It is not clear
whether these were adult teams or high school teams.
They played both high school teams and town teams from
Photo 17: Patients relaxing on the grounds.
'hoto 18: Patients ice skating on the pond.
31
Photo 19: Postcard of patients and staff.
~hoto 20: Dr. Fischer's automobile
for transporting train passengers.
qmto 21: Lovers' Lane, from a postcard.
now Highway 169.
'hoto 22: Dr. Fischer's prize-winning Holstein cattle.
Photo 23: Postcard ot staff oi Mudcura. - ' ................. _ ...... ~.~.
32
the Twin Cities and from as far south as New Prague. These
newspaper articles were few and it is not known if these
games happened on a regular basis?3 In 1911 the Mud-
curas had a baseball team in the Carver County. league.~5
Parties were another regular occurrence at Mudcura. The
Fischers sponsored many teas, socials and New Year's Eve
parties that were reported in the local papers.~6 In 1916,
Dr. Fischer gave a party at Ramsey Park near Redwood
Falls for graduates of Mudcura.~? As early as I926 Mud-
cura had a golf club with member from Shakopee and
Chaska. They had a contest between the two towns to see
who could get the most new members. Chaska won.
Newspaper accounts did not say where the golf was
played, but in a 1931 article it sounded like the course was
at Mudcura.~ a
Mudcura also had some in-house happenings. In
August 1929 Dr. Henry Wunder, the Mudcura house physi-
cian, and Cordelia Pond, a technician at Mudcura, who
was the daughter of E.J. Pond, were married in the
Presbyterian church her grandfather, Samuel Pond, found-
ed?9 In March of 1912 a $600 diamond stud was stolen
from Henry Dayfeil while he was taking the cure. He went
up to his room after his morning treatment and the dia-
mond was gone. Charles Kopp "the efficient sheriff in brain
and nerve of Scott Co)' was called in. Sheriff Kopp went
under cover as a patient, and working with Sheriff Gates
"the clever Sheriff of Carver County,' they determined that
a Mr. Charles Vickery of Chaska was the only patient to
leave Mudcura the day of the robbery. They traced him
to St. Paul and learned that he was coming back to Chaska
the following Monday. At Mr. Dayfeil's request, they call-
ed Capt. Clark of the St. Paul police department to "sweat
Mr. Vickery" about the diamond. They told him they
would not prosecute if he returned the diamond, which
he did. They then promptly turned him over to Kansas
authorities where he was wanted for more serious
charges.2o
In November t925 a patient from South Dakota disap-
peared from Mudcura and Sheriff Weckman from Shak-
opee made an extensive search. The man's body was
found several weeks later by some hunters on the north
side of the swamp. The man had apparently cut his own
throat with a pocket knife, which was still "clasped tight-
ly'' in his hand.2~
In June 1925, Mudcura was hit by a "real Kansas tor-
nado''. The storm went through Shakopee first and ended
up doing a lot of damage in Chaska. Mudcura suffered
about $20,000 worth of damage. One resident survived
as the garage collapsed around her car as she was sitting
in it. Another patient had just left his room as the smoke
stack crashed through the roof. Dr. Fischer and Larry
'Hunter, one of his assistants, both received broken arms
as they tried to close a second floor door. 22
Dr. Fischer's other interest was his prize-winning farm
animals. He won many state and local prizes for the farm
animals he raised. His Belgian horses were used to haul
the mud, and his poultry were used in the Mudcura kit.
chens. His prize-winning Holstein cattle provided the
sanitarium with milk and cream (photo 22). One of Dr.
Fischer's Holstein heifers, "Princess Aaggie Polkadot
deKol", set a world record for milk production. It was
797.7 pounds of milk in seven days. In a 365 day run, she
produced 31,600 pounds of milk and 1315 pounds of but-.
ter. Dr. Fischer was the president of the Scott County
Agricultural Society and vice president of the Scott County
Farm Bureau.~
In 1924, Dr. Fischer sold at auction 60 head of Hols-
teins, including "Princess Aaggie Polkadot deKol" for -
$24,790. The auction was held in the garage at Mudcura.
Buyers came from as far as St. Louis. Missouri. In July of
1930 the barn housing his herd was completely destroyed
by a fire started by "tramps", it was thought. Forty five
head were saved. At the time 14 cows were under pro-
duction tests, being milked 4 times a day.~'~
After 1933 Mudcura disappears from the Shakopee
newspapers, except for major events such as Dr. Fischer's
death and the selling of Mudcura. On January 17. 1940
Dr. Fischer was getting into his car on Lake Street in Min-
neapolis when he was struck by a passing motorist. He
received a broken arm and leg. His condition was made
more hfe-threatenmg by a chronic heart condition. He died
one week later on January 24, 1940 at the age of 69. At
the time of death, Dr. Fischer belonged to many medical.
religious and agricultural societies.
In 1951 the Fischer family decided to sell Mudcura.
It was announced in April that the property would be sold
to the Black Franciscans, Order of Friars Minor Conven-
tual, Our Lady of Consolation Provience, Louisville. Ken-
tucky. It would ultimately be called the Assumption
Seminary.~s The Seminary functioned until 1970. It ran
a seminary college associated with St. Catherine's and St.
Thomas' Colleges in St. Paul. They also continued the
dairy farm with a registered herd.6
The seminary sold the property to the Marian Coun-
cil Home Association as a possible retirement home for
the Knights of Columbus. The retirement home did not
happen. In 1976 the Marians sold the property to the
Chanhassen Springs Co. This was a group of attornevs who
bought it as an investment. There was concern during this
period that the building would be burned and cleared. The
dormitory was burned by the Chanhassen Fire Depart-
ment for practice in fire fighting. In the fall of 1990 the
Chanhassen Springs Co. sold the property to Leland
Gohlicke of Stillwater. Mr Gohlicke plans to restore the
buildings and turn them into a business retreat with bed
and breakfast facilities. They also plan to bring back a mud
bath spa.~
Note: Except for the initial announcement and advertise-
ment for a stock offering, the Chaska paper did not follow
happenings at Mudcura?
Photos and postcards from:
Florence Greening, blable Meriden a~d Joe Huher
1. Belle Plaine Herald, July 4, 1912; Shakopee Tribune, July 12, 1912.
'2. Shakopee Argus-Tribune, Jan, 25 and Feb. 1, 1940.
3. Betty Buss (Dr. Henry Fischer's granddaughter) personal comn'mnica-
tion, April 1992, Shakopee, MN.
4. Shakopee Tribune, Dec. 18, 1908.
5. The Minneapolis Jo. urnal, Nov. 15, 1908.
6. A talk by Susan M. Dreydoppel, Administrator, Carver County
Historical Society, at the Chaska Historical Society annual meeting,
Sept. 26. 1984.
7. Shakopee Argus. Tribune, Sept. 7. 1933.
8. Shakopee Tribune, Feb. 13, 1914.
9. Shakopee Tribune, Sept. 18, 1914.
10. Shakopee Tribune, Dec. 15, 1921.
11. Shakopee Tribune, Feb. 6, Feb. 13, Feb., 20, Feb. 27, March 6. and
April 24. 1914.
12. Shakopee Tribune, Dec. 14. 19'2'2.
13. Shakopee Tribune, Oct. 28, Nm,: 11, and Dec. 2, 1910 and Nov. 15, 1915.
14. Shakopee Tribune, Dec. 18, 1924
15. Shakopee Tribune, May 19, 1911.
16. Shakopee Tribune, Jan. 24, 1913: Jan. 5, 1917; June 16, 1921; Jan.
5, 1922.
17. Shakopee Tribune, , Sept. 8, 1916.
18. Shakopee Argus-Tribune, April 14, Ma.,,' 19, June 2, 1927; April 2, 1931.
19. Shakopee Argus-Tribune, Aug. 8, 1929.
20. Shakopee Tribune, March 8. 1912.
21. Sbakopee Tribune, Nov. 5, 1925.
22. Shakopee Tribune, June 4, 1925.
23. Shakopee Tribune, March 3, June 9. Dec. 15, 1921; Jan. 26, March
9, Junel3. Oct. 19, 1922, Aug. 25, 1927. Scott Count)., Argus. Sept.
13, 1918; Jan. 13, Sept. 5. Dec. 5, 1919.
24. Shakopee Argus. Tribune, July 10, 1930.
25. Shakopee Argus-Tribune, April 16, May 3, May 17. 1951.
26. Chaska Weekly Valley Herald, Nov. 19. Dec. 17, Dec. 24 and Dec.
31, 1908.
Fu rt~"e r references:
Dr. B.E Pearson (physician at Mudcura}. personal conversation, May
1992. Shakopee, MN.
Florence Greening (nurse at Mudcura), personal communication, May
1992, Shakopee, MN.
Shakopee Tribune, Oct. 16, 1924.
Shakopee Argus-Tribune, April 25. 1929.
Scott County Argus, July 23, 1909, and Shakopee Tribune., July 23,
1909.
Shakopee Tribune, Jan. 21. 1910 and March 17, 1911.
Keith l'haves, Jordan. MN
Joseph Huber
Joe Huber was raised in Shakopee and has an intimate
knowledge of the valley and its river. He is a Licensed
Pschoiogist. When not working at his profession, he has
many interests, including history and genealogy.
Michael and Particia Huber
Michael and Patricia Huber live in Shakopee where
they are employed by Shakopee Services Inc. The couple
share interests in local history and photography. The3;
along with Joseph Huber, Mike's brother, p;ublished a
photo history book of Shakopee's early days. Both Mike
and Pat grew up in Shakopee. They have two children.
Heather 10 and Mathew 8.
33
(Continued from Page 16)
of measuring the social and political support present? Does
support have to be generated to attain the necessary in-
volvement of the different players? What are the socially
acceptable and unacceptable land uses in the area? Are
there cultural and/or institutional perceptions that must
be overcome to implement change?
All of the above information can be used to develop
a specific definition of water quality as it relates to your
project. Note that it probably will not be an easy task.
A summary of this information is available from Greg
Johnson, MPCS-NSS. 52(.) I..afayette Road, St. Paul, MN
55155.
Thursday, September 30,1999
80 West 78th St., Str
~', '.',.:-..', ~ .... :~.-...:'~ .~?-:'.:<:,, .:.%, .. s ~ ... · ! Calcareous Fen Cross Section ~i.
'-~l~e~'Ot ~~:}:.'.:("2~:'-' -':" };:~: ' ~ ~ ~::' Water ~molat~ do~wa~. ">'
- "~aiz.'"' ' '" ' ' '
"~ and ~:ei~:,':,' :: t- ':<.-, ~ ~:., ;;T_-'t~:~ /upwaffi and over to ~o ~{~roous fen
-' .DNRtrout--ffir~SP.~J;j} . ~; "~:~:'~., { ...,~.:~?{' ~EOUS FEN
.. , . ..... ~..~ ..... ~,i.
.Iow H!ghway~{~..).::~":; -' ' :? ';'~ ~ ~
.... . .:.. ...... ~ - , _....'. - - :...,.-C2
. . -.. -- ~ ,: ..... ~','.' -;;~;:-,-~, ': ."~', 8 ':'":>:' ' '7' ' ' "-': ' ' '?': ;k · ~edtOC -. ;,.,_~..,',,.~ . -
. ,. ::-.. '.::,y - ' .- . ~,7'?~'~/t',-.-T~ .~.i?', · ~;:,.'....~:i..: < ., .:::., .. ~ ,'~ ' .. ~, - '
. · : ..: .- ': ....:.:' . _ nmnlex
, -~'a . - ,,:.~ - ~ · .... '. ' -. ~' ;,,.,:~ q'~'~:". ', "' ' . '~ t~'~ ~E ~' '
· .:.? .~ ~. :.. ::.. :~.~ ~ ,~.~.'~ . ~. ,. *,... ~.: ~ ,.....~ ....... ¢.,.~ ,., ~.~ :.: .. ~ : '.. .
~: . - .~ :., ..... . :, .. .. ,. . .*. ,. ,, ~-) ,,.~ .~ / , ,~ ).: . . .,,-~ :~. "~ . .
...... . ........... . ........ ~ ......... ..... .... ~~~ ~ ...
,...,:.., ........ .-. ......... ..~ .., ...... - ...... ~,~ ............. : ....-: .......
· . ))
hoSd~ i ~ of'~.~t ~, ' md~p0g~fi°qs~mbe~o~:D~' - ,
· U~, .,.~Y.,.: ....... i,;}t~,~i,,-~: ' A'~g6f~eP~~e*eg~sse~" '/-.4
.. _ ....: .:: ., ~,.- -.~.~~:~--.~ew ...... ....
· .......
' ' ~5 ~tof-~ .... :-. .... , ....... ; ..... .:,~: .......... :,. - ~~
.~ ~ . , .. .... ..:- ,. ....., :.;." . ..., "~:~ -,: .~, ...,~.-~ ~ .... .
~l~~a~*~'~'- . .. :~, . -..,:~:: ~':?":.7"*' :'~ · ~
~~., .~.. .,_. ~: .. ~. ,,~- ......... :~ ...... ~~.~. · ~
. -'. a- -
........ ': . ' . ~ ' 't:;. -~:~5~ ; ~'.: :~ :D':,~"-:t; ..... 4': ' '.
.~ ~cD~ . . , ' ·. -:~ :. ' .........t'.'o~'slo '~' ~ ~ ~ ~on c~ ~.~tM,~ :.
· · · fl" ~'O~.~ m~. 'tm'.u~j'. .- rt. -.' · : .......
~.~,~ ~Um~ ~ , :...'::,., .: ~ '-~ .-:m:., .' : . ,.'.' :.. - . ... ~ ~l~n~r~
~'- ~ '- ' ~ ' ;' ' ~' ': 'c~t Ot~m ' ~Water , , ~M~.~~I~) '
~ ~' ~e D~ w~ ~ ~ mk a~: <, ,xn ; ~.~,. ..... ,' i ~t .... ~s con-
· ~ ~ ~ ~tn~, . .;.. '.,; ,.'.. <.. ,:.. ~ ~.~. *~., '-'~ : - , ~ :.' · .
o~ ~ "' -'-"~a~'~' '~.O~D~t~,-"" H~,~e~ ~Sh~p~age~u~
:,. .. . .. ::..,- , ~O ~ . ~. ;,~. ,-,-..
...... .... :: ;' "~' :., "" ~ w'-'~-":.' .::':: '. "";' '> - ..... e f~ h - '
' n eaes: .:::it:: ,. '[5 ~'~ ~ ~¢:~, ~ . y. S~ ~ Wet M~OW .
~ ~ ~d ~m ~, l~t ~0~ .; "~g :.: .-'v~ '... : .' .... ..,,...-..: ....-:.:? :. :.."-:. :q. :'~
drology or soils are dis-
turbed, Dunevitz said, "the
Community can be com-
pletdy destroyed."
~[he fen depends upon
groundwater," said Jeanette
Leete, DNR hydrology su-
pervisor. "Just keeping the
area wet isn't enough, be-
cause for a fen to stay a fen,
it has to be so saturated all
the time with groundwater
and the groundwater has to
nm away.., not become stag- .
nant or ponding. So when it rains,
the rainwater is essentially rejected -
water offa duck's back.."
A fen's qualities lead to an image
problem. A "layperson'wouldn't cory
sider this a wetland because they don't
see water," said Kevin Bigalke, a metro
region trout stream watershed coordi-
nator with the DNR. Without the
open water, lined with cattails and
rushes, people ask "How can that be
a wetland? Bigalke said. "It's a tough
system to define."
Trout stream
The DNR is interested in preserv-
ing a large chunk of the fen water-
shed area. The entire wetland area is
600 acres, both north and south of
Highway 212. The area is owned by
about a dozen landownem
The land not only includes the fen,
but also &ssumption Creek, Carver
County's only trout stream and one
of only 15 trout strearm remaining
in' the seven-county metropolitan arem
Of those 15 trout streams, the DNR
has given six "high priorib/' status.
The reasons for the high priority are
the fen, increased devdopmem around
the watershed, fringes, and the stream
size. "It's one of the larger streams in
.the metro area," Bigalke said.
As'a priority stream the DNR keeps
a dose eye on its health. In August,
the DNR condu~:l a fish count in
the stream (the results'aren't in yet'). A
science class from Chaska High
School also monitOrs the number of
macroinvertebrates in the water - a
gauge of water quality.-
The DNR is "making
contact~ with respective
local .government units
and citizens who live in
the area, to find out what
they. know about the trout
stream and the~.tershed,"
Bigalke. said-
~' ' "x- ' .... Bigalke also foresee~ a
- "' <' -management strategy for
~ the watershed, so groups
can "protect the quality of'
resources-ttiat exist."
"All of it is in private (ownership)
right now and that provides a unique
opportunity for us-to get in tour~ with
and get to know property owners,'
Bigalke said. "We rely on them to man-
age resources, because we can't go onto
private property and tell them how to
take care of their land. We can pro-
vide them with information abotit re-
sources that are on the property and
the significance of them, and give them
information as fix as how they could
be better managing their land for the
.This approach helps neighbors
"gain a sense of ownership wi& the
.watershed, so it's like an extension of
their back yard, and they can take
pride in the way it's managed and pro-
tected," Bigalke said.
The DNR is initiating the educa-
tional program as a collaboration
with the Lower Minnesfm W'a~ershed
District and the Friends of the Min-
nesota Valley.
Ndghb6rly advice .
"In a lot of cases, I couldn't ~
ine'protec/ing a (water) ~'tem with-
out the pmple who live around it b~
ing the caretakers," Leete mid.
The Seminary Fen is "one of the
target areas for the next year or two,''
said NanCy Albrecht, registry coordi-
nator with the Friends of the Miune-
sota Valley, a non-profit conservation
organization.
' "What we hope to do ~s contact the
landowne~ adjacent m it and provide
them with information on what cal-
careous fens are and why they're im-
portant, and what they might be able
to do on their own land that will help
the fen .remain a healthier commtmi-
ty," Albrecht ~&
· Some of these measures include
controlling erosion, so surface water
quality rem~in.~ high, alad controlling
.exotic spedes. Wens are very rare and
they tend to have the diversity of plants
that you. don't see in other wetlands
'in this area. And this fen is in pretty
good shape and we want to keep it
this way," Albrecht said_ '
The 'Friends will start to. contaef
neighbors of the fen this fall, asking
them to join the Hk-itage Reghm/. The
registry'is a group oflandowfiers, who
%ohmteer to protect and preserve their
natural land for the benefit 0fwild-
life and the e~systems that support
it? Registration is voluntary and the
Jim and Maida Eggen belong tO the
Heritage Registry. They bought the
BluffCa'eek 13~ and Breakfast Which
sits dose to the fen about 14 months'
ago.
"It's very interesting" said Jim, of
the fen "In fact, the whole Minneso-
ta ValIW is replete with wildlife. It
amazes me relative to the other places
-Fve lived~"
Buying the fen
~bout nine months ago, the DNR
offered tO buy 160 acres ofCh~nhsu- -
sen laed,-'which contains most of the
fen area, from Emerald Ventures,
LLC., but the business didn't want to
sell. The DNR is limited by state law
tO offer appraised value.
piece, and it ranks high on the prior-
ity list in the metro area for acquisi-
tion,'' said Lee Markell, DNR land
protection Specialist for the scientific
and natural areas program. "If we
could negotiate.for the 160, we'd buy
iL".
·
'The DNK acquires sites with %tare- '
gride significance," Marker said. ~If
theyhave a fiir amount ofdimu'Mnce, -
we typically do not sede acquisition.
This remains pretty well undishaxbed
- the fen in particular."
· Sam Wetterlin, of Emerald'Proper-
ues, said he is thinking about 'devel-
oping the land .adjacent to Highway
212, the "non-wetland part.'' 'There is
"a substantial amount of high ground
north, of the creek also. We'd like'to
do some sort 6f devdopment there,"
Wetterlin mid. "
< "What we're Oxrrenfly looking at
is some sort of senior living campus
- a combination of assisted ca~e'and
unassisted living," Wetterlin said.
"Our idea is-to develop the high
ground and at the same time work
out something with the DNR to do-
nate thewetlands portion of the prop-
erty which would include the creelq"
W'etterlin said. '
He would g~ve the bulk of the proty
erty sohth of 212 to the DN1L "if we
work out some sort of mutually ac-
ceptable devdop, ment plan." Wetter-
lin said he would try tO develop the
land within the next five yeats.
The DNR would look at purchas-
ing surrounding properties, Marker
said, but ~the basic philosophy is-to
pick up the core area first."
"We certainly would like to stay
ahead of the curve as far as devdop-
ment, and not be in a position where
we're picking up scraps," Matke. II said.
~re'd like tO acquire a large chunk
with a significant bumper around the
fen, rather than a narrow strip along
the creek. We'd like a nice wide buff:-
lens are protected by strict state and
federal laws. 'Some areas of the semi-
nary area could be built on without
long as you don't change someth~g
that doesn't impact the hydrology or
change w~. ter quality,~ Leete said.
"These thin~ need to be t~lked
"When you disrapt calcareou~ fens
and encroach upon a wetland com-
plex, the _fen will retreat within,~ Leete
said "You c3.n't sacrifice fi'inging wet-
lands, without negatively imp.acting
FEN to p~ge 7
the. calcareous wetland
within. It functions as a
'whole ...... ·
~ _ _ '. .. :, , - ; · ~ ~-: ,
h=sen commum~ d~d-
· _ opm~t &rector, sa:d ~e.
· . · ~.' : .-. ; · . . .- .;
.~W s first choxce wo~Id
, t0 t~v~/t~e ~a'p~k
~wouId ~.equirc ~d acqui-'
~i~on..' ~. ' ' .~ '~~~'
' ~e.'ar& is, zoned' fOr
ag~ria~i~u~i %~. ~n-..t~.
2020.Compreh~ive.P~,
the ~ is slated' for o~ce
,. ,.--~,- .- ,. ... · . .
~son s'~d. If a bssin=S'went into'
· ~.. ~.~..me d~ WoUld .~ope for a
-~. . .. -
corporat~st~d. ~at would. ~ke
· =~e Of'the !and; ~ms6n s~d.
. M=~w~l~'~son s~d,
.~,.~e '~t'=ea We'll.be b~ng in"
· . . , .
f°r~wat~r'.'and s~er S.~c~
~e'~~ is""ve~ ~pOmt to the
~ . . .
~, s~d .P~p ~n;.Chanh=sen
~t~r r~ource coordimtor,.who m~-
ag=. ~e ci~'s surface %t~ pl~. "It's
going, to be und~ num~ous, res~c-
~ofis wh= ~ng.iS b~lt in
==; but ~t now, it'~ ... disco~e~-
ed. from' ~t ~o~ trends,"
'~-e'~"could pot=flaky ~ con-
~t~ bu[. ~. "cost is ~¢mendous,
md you.get .~nt9. ~paa~.is~u= ~h
'.- . : ,. ,: ·
~he water main,'~ said Bill.
Monk; dry of Chaska engi-
The city of Chaska owns
the.svestedy section of the
wetland area. It was deeded
bver-as, part of the platting
process, Mo'nk said: "We'Ve
tried "co pro.tect .the..ar~ as
mucfi as we can because we
know (the Water)goes into.
Ctianhassen and the fen."
·
Harold Hesse, who owns
a.. northern. Section of the
f.en,'Said he mould like.to see kis land
pre~evced, 'Td enjoy't6"See it preserved
and going back to ,nature,' Hesse said.
,. "This. is the big -.really big- op-
portunity,'! Dunevitz said. "If you
want· to pr..otect a fen,. this is the best
~ ..i
PlaCe to doit.''
.
SaVage ,fen'
,.
An&her nearby metrO'area calc~r-
eoias fen is in Savage. The ~avage Fen
Wetland complex is '425 acres, and
64 acres of the:wetlan.~ are calcareous
fen.'
The Sc° 'CSunty Highly Depart-
ment
debated with'environmental
,
groups over a. proposal to build an
extension or County Road 27 ac. foSS
the. £en. Th~'DNR ultimately denied
.... , · . . .
the countY s.gequest tO extend the high-.
way across the fen and wetland com,
ple. x.
A task force, including ~epresenta-
rives.from environmental groupS,' dry
· staff, . residents 'and' the 'Army Corps
of engineers, is now smdying '. three
altematlves to the original plan. The
state gave $200,000..to the group to
study alternative routes,
"Unlike the Savage situation, (we)
· don~t have any problems working'with
the DNR. We're.not trying.to.do'any-
thing to the fen that causes them any
'problems, so we don't expect'thesame
Pi:oblems 'they have in SaVage,"'Wgt-
terJin said.
The DNR also hopes to avoid Sa',/-
age's, developmentversus ,fen conflict.
"The people of Savage have been wo?k-
lng for a .long time to try to. make
tilings better,' or at least not make
thugs hurt, But a lot was already go/
lng qn before people became aware of
(the.fen)i. In that regards, in Chaska
and Chanhassen we've got a better
start," Leete said.
·
"I really admire the political heat
political leaders have taken in order
.-to protect the (Savage)' fen. And I
: WOuld .hope we can get ahead of the
curVe' in Chanhassen and Chaska so
it isn't such a hard political issue,"
Leete added.
F 2, G ree~wc]uj
F 3, r)evelopme~t
considering the highly developed nature of the vaatershed that
surrounds it.
The design of the trails and park system should continue to move forward
as the Park and Recreation Commission recommends and under the
viewpoints discussed above.
Development of the land and transportation routes should continue to
move forward with Watershed-Based Zoning and Cluster Development
and protection of the primary and secondary zones as discussed in section
V.E. The East Gorge area is erosive and it is important that the City require
setback regulations beyond the existing bluff ordinance to protect the
spring-fed creek. This may require an amendment to the existing bluff
ordinance.
Much of the area appears to already be divided into large lot residential
home sites. Future development would target further subdivision of
parcels. The City's effor-ts to manage this area should focus on cooperative
agreements to protect the area, especially the southern areas where
higher quality exists.
IV, G Regiom 5- 5emi~arbj Fe~
G, 1 Natural Resotarce5
· Approach
The Seminary Fen should receive the highest level of protection
to avoid declines in wetland quality. This wetland should remain
connected to the lower gorge area of Bluff Creek. Naturally
reproducing trout within the creek on this property should also
be protected.
The Seminary Fen is an extremely rare type of wetland found in
the state and should be protected from encroachment due to
draining, filling and exotic species (see Figure 14). To retain
groundwater discharge into this area, development should be
restricted on the bluff top areas so that recharge of groundwater
may ocdur. Buffer strips should be a minimum of 100 feet on all
sides of this wetland. Disturbances, such as vegetation removal,
should not be allowed. This wetland should remain connected to
the lower gorge area of Bluff Creek. Naturally reproducing trout
within the creek on this property should be protected as v/ell.
bluff Cree~ Watershed Nc~f~.trc]l Resource5 Management PIc]~
P~ge 60
I
1
The design of the trails and park system should continue to move forward
as the Park and Recreation Commission recommends and under the
viewpoints discussed above.
6,30eve!opme~qt
Development of the land and transportation routes should continue to
move forward with Watershed-Based Zoning and cluster development
and protection of the primary and secondary zones as discussed in section
V.E. The City should consider a variety of land uses in this area and should
choose the use that is most protective to the area. If possible, a means for
limited access for education purposes would be ideal. Maintenance of the
fen and trout stream is also important. Therefore, it is practical that lands
that are for sale be acquired and preserved as a. natural area. Lands that are
not for sale should be protected with conservation easements.
IV,H Educdtio~l
The goals for the educational component of the plan were established
after the following portion of the Steering C:on~mittee Vision:
"...'l-he creek serves as a field laboratory for ti,e schools, teachers
and commul'~it.y in order to develop a stewardship of the land .... "
The implications of the vision require the development of a watershed
awareness program for the entire comi~'nunity (school, citizens, etc.~, so that
the plan implementation process is part of an ongoing con~munity
education and involvement effort. There are some constraints, i.e., the
need for teacher training time, curricu!un~ develop~ent, field trips, and
support from the school principals.
The awareness program wilt focus on actively engaging children, fan'~l~es,
and the general public in lear'ning abot~t Bluff C~ eel<, its ecological and
cultural characteristics and role. It will also consider ways fo~' ti~e public
and special groups (nature societies, schools, corporate volunteers, garder;
clubs, etc.) to participate in corridor reseal'ch, restoration, -r~on tor'ing and
demonstration projects,
The program will emphasize the need for co~munity support beyo~'~d
private needs to .public support and involvement and the collabo~'ation w~th
other educational, community and business entities.
The City has initiated efforts to acquire a I00-acre parcel to develop an
interpr'etive nature center in the upper reaches of the watershed between
the hlinnesota Arboretum and the school site, south of Highway 5 and
Pdge 0 2
3~
Proposed improvements at Ponds LOM-P1.3, LOM-P1.4, LOM-P1.8, and LOM-PI.12
described in Section IV-J3. and Appendix C are high priority, highly efficient
improvements which contribute the most to enhance the water quality of the pristine
wetlands. :
Wetlands
Wetlands A34-8(1) and A34-12(1) should be protected from impacts of development
of adjacent uplands and from in-flowing water by use of upland buffer zones and
minimum setbacks as detailed in the Ordinance.
Wetlands A34-8(1) and A34-12(1) should be improved by allowing more water to pass
through the railroad grade in the northern portion of A34-12(1).
3. Wetlands such as A27-16(1) and A27-16(2) should be protected by implementing the
upland buffer zones and minimum setbacks as detailed in the Ordinance.
o
Purple loosestrife population center at wetland A34-8(1) should be treated in
accordance with State guidelines.
..
IV-K Drainage to Neighboring Communities
IV-K.1 Drainage to Christmas Lake
Watershed Description: The portion of Chanhassen draining to Christmas Lake is located at
the north central boundary of the City with a total area of about 234 acres. This area does not
receive any runoff from other watersheds inside or outside the City.
Topography within the area is fairly steep with a lot of small depressions, wetlands and ponds.
Land surface elevations range from about 1,040 feet to 930 at Christmas Lake shoreland. The
Christmas Lake area is fairly well developed (about 75%).
System Description IV-179
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1998
With the increase in Chanhassen's population in
recent years, the boat traffic on city lakes has also
increased.
As property taxes on lakeshore lots continually
increase, the demand for services to manage the,..,/=..
problems arising on city lakes will also increase. ,
Future lake management within Chanhassen will be
finding the balance of protecting and improving
water quality, preventing overuse and abuse of the
resources, while maintaining accessibility for all
Chanhassen residents.
WETLANDS
In 1992, the state of Minnesota passed the Wetland
Conservation Act (WCA), which put wetland
protection and preservation into law. The goal of
this act is to replace wetlands lost to previous
activities and to prevent the loss of existing
wetlands. Wetland identification and protection
have become integral parts of all development
throughout the entire state, including Chanhassen.
The City of Chanhassen, who has had wetland
protection ordinances in place since 1980, has
continued to take the lead on the issue of wetlands
and their protection. The city's 1994 Surface Water
Management Plan (SWMP) included identification
and reclassification of wetlands within the city. Low
areas were identified as possible wetland sites.
Wetland specialists made field identification of
these sites and detailed data sheets documenting
vegetation, landscape and existing conditions were
compiled. These data sheets serve only as a guide
for the city and are not to be used as the defining
wetland boundaries. Wetland boundaries are to be
determined by professional delineations conducted
by parties who propose to impact or develop land in
and around these areas. In addition, any proposed
development will be required to delineate their sites
for the existence of wetlands. From this study, a
wetlands map was generated and a new wetland
classification system was implemented, replacing
the state's classification system. The city went to
four levels of wetland identification; Pristine,
Natural, Ag/Urban and Utility. Pristine wetlands
were identified as wetlands that remain in their
natural state and have special and unusual
qualities worth protecting. Natural wetlands are
wetlands that still exist in their natural state and
typically show little sign of impact from surrounding
land use. Ag/urban wetlands have been impacted
by either agricultural or urbanization activities.
Utility wetlands are water bodies specifically created
to manage surface water created by development.
The Seminary Fen located north of Hwy. 212, in the
southwest corner of the city, is the only wetland
classified pristine. In 1995, the Seminary Fen was
identified by the Minnesota Biological Survey as the
most important site in all of Hennepin, Carver and
Scott Counties. There are approximately 90 acres
of calcareous seepage fen in this area with rare
and threatened plant species. Preserving and
protecting this resource should be at the top of the
city's wetland protection and preservation policies.
With the change in wetland laws, the regulation of
wetlands has also. changed. The State of
Minnesota appointed the Minnesota Board of Water
and Soil Resources (BWSR) to oversee the
regulation of the WCA. BWSR, in return, appointed
Local Governing Units (LGUs) to implement the
WCA for wetland activities. Chanhassen was
appointed as LGU for activities in its own city. This
change gave Chanhassen some responsibility and
control over wetland activities, but permits and
approval were still required from the Army Corps of
· Engineers, the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
and local watershed districts. In an attempt to
simplify regulation, Chanhassen was one of a
select few LGUs selected to participate in a
program which would make LGUs the sole
governing agency in cases where wetland impacts
are less than three acres. In addition, 1996
revisions to the WCA allowed LGUs to develop their
own comprehensive wetland plans. The City of
Chanhassen has submitted a draft plan to BWSR,
and because of previous work done in the SWMP,
the city is in the final stages of having their plan
approved. This plan allows the city to develop their
own rules specific to wetlands in Chanhassen.
City of Chanhassen
Chanhassen Improvement Program
EMPLOYEE SUGGESTION GUIDELINES
04/17/2001
PURPOSE
The City of Chanhassen employee suggestion system is intended to be a formalized
means of soliciting employee recommendations for improving the efficiency and
effectiveness of the City's service delivery system. In doing so, the system is intended
to benefit the City through economic savings and the delivery of higher quality services
or a greater number of services at the same cost. The errTployee will concurrently
benefit by assuming greater responsibility in assisting the organization in achieving its
objectives, while realizing greater job satisfaction, financial reward, and job
commitment. This system is intended to complement the City's other employee
recognition/participation programs and all employees are eligible to participate in this
program.
ADMINISTRATION
Administration of the Employee Suggestion system will be the responsibility of the City
Manager's office. A committee of three persons consisting of one representative from
the City Manager's office and two individuals elected by City employees will assist in the
administration of the program. At least one committee member must be-a non-
supervisory employee. Nominations will be Solicited from the employee for an election
to be held each year. Elected committee members will serve one year staggered terms
beginning January 1 and July 1. A department may not be represented on the
committee more than once every 12 months. The committee is responsible for:
1) evaluation and recommendation of the type, amount of savings and
appropriate recognition for each suggestion submitted.
2) refinement and clarification of the program's guidelines.
3) assuring compliance with program guidelines.
4) monitoring and improving methods for evaluating employee suggestions.
5) interpretation and clarification of suggestion system rules and eligibility
requirements.
6) encouragement and assistance in implementation of adopted suggestions.
7) development of methods for presenting awards and hearing appeals to the
program.
04/17/2001
8) assuring that the program's intended objective is reached.
9)
providing a report for City departments and the City Council regarding the
total number of suggestions received, number of suggestions implemented,
savings realized, and estimated program administration and award costs.
All revisions to the program shall be approved by the City Manager who shall be the
final arbitrator in ali matters with regard to this program.
SUGGESTIONS
A suggestion is a written proposal to improve our ability to serve the citizens of
Chanhassen through our service delivery systems. The suggestion must:
1) reduce costs, duplication of effort, time, accidents, or space utilization, or
2) increase productivity, employee safety, use of facilities, job interest, or
employee morale, or
3) improve standardization of procedures, reports, forms or equipment resulting
in greater effectiveness, or
4) improve city ability to enforce ordinances or accomplish mission.
5) the savings should not be temporal or create a situation for additional costs
All suggestions are welcomed and eligible fo~: consideration. Those areas which will not
normally be considered for monetary award include:
1) Suggestions relating to terms and conditions of employment or other matters
established by personnel policy or practice, or labor agreement;
2) Suggestions which reduce City costs by merely transferring them to other
Departments or time periods;
3)
Suggestions which fall within the normal scope of a supervisor's ongoing
responsibilities, as determined by the City Manager.
4)
Suggestions which fall within the principal effective control of a non-
supervisor's ongoing responsibilities, as determined by the department head
and city manager.
SUBMISSION OF SUGGESTIONS
04/17/2001
The employee will submit a completed suggestion form to the City Manager's office.
Forms and program guidelines will be available from the City Manager's office.
Suggestions must be submitted in accordance with these procedures to be eligible for
consideration.
EVALUATION OF SUGGESTIONS.
1)
The City Manager's office will be responsible for reviewing the suggestion
within ten working days of and responding to the employee who made the
suggestion about its status.
2)
If the suggestion meets the guidelines and the suggestion is specific enough
for evaluation, it will be distributed to the members of the suggestion
committee with a copy to the Finance Director and the supervisor(s) of the
department toward which the suggestion is directed. The supervisor will be
asked to evaluate the suggestion and forward the recommendation to the
suggestion, including his/her written comments regarding why the suggestion
should be accepted, rejected or deferred.
3)
If the suggestion is to be accepted, the supervisor will provide his/her
estimate of first year tangible and intangible benefits associated with the
suggestion.
4)
If the suggestion is to be rejected, the reason for rejection will be reviewed by
the supervisor with the committee. If rejected, the employee will receive
specific written reasoning for rejection of the suggestion from the Committee
through the supervisor. : ~
5)
If the suggestion is to be deferred, the reason for deferral will be reviewed by
the supervisor with the committee. If deferred, the employee will receive
specific written reasoning for deferral of the suggestion from the Committee
through the supervisor.
6)
The committee will be responsible for evaluating and recommending the type,
amount of savings and appropriate recognition for each suggestion to the City
Manager for approval. The City Manager will approve all proposed forms of
recognition. The committee will be responsible for communicating the
disposition of the suggestion and the award to the employee.
AWARDS
1)
Tangible Benefit suggestion: For suggestions for which tangible benefits can
reasonably be calculated, a one time award of up to a maximum of fifty
percent of the actual first year savings for a minimum of $250 and a
maximum of $2,500 will be awarded. The award of cash will be made based
upon the estimated first year cost savings. If the estimate is Iow, the
employee award will be adjusted accordingly once actual cost figures are
04/17/2001
available. The Finance Department will be responsible for calculating savings
associated with this program for award purposes.
2)
3)
Intangible Benefit Suggestions: These awards are for suggestions which
benefits cannot be reasonably calculated. Suggestions in this category will
be provided awards based upon an evaluation of the merits of each
suggestion. Awards could range from a certificate of appreciation, plaque or
cash award of $25 or more as set forth in the guidelines.
Issues Identification: Issue Identification awards are those which call
attention to a problem to which the employee does not have an immediate
solution; however, you wish to identify the issue(s) and bring them to the
Committee's attention. All valid suggestions/issues submitted will be
recognized with a certificate and eligibility for an annual drawing.
Suggestion #
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
EMPLOYEE SUGGESTION FORM
Date Received / /
Name (optional):
Date (mandatory):
Department (optional)-
Description of Suggestion (use additional sheet if needed):
Department Affected'
Steps/materials/tools necessary to implement suggestion:
Results/Savings (provide a calculation of savings expected if applicable)'
If your suggestion is implemented, do you want to be publicly recognized? Yes No
......... ~ ............. ~ , ....... · ............ ~ ............. ,~,~,~.=~.~ ~.~ ........... .'~*~ .......... ~ · '~,~ ..... '~i ......... ..... .~'~'~"~-'~ ........... ~'~' :'- ...... ~ ~'~'~ ............ ~'~ ?'~,. ' ............ .~"~':~: ~:~?~'~'-:~"'~--°="~J!~i~
You will be notified by the Committee regarding the outcome of your suggestion.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUGGESTION/
Fold and staple or tape before submitting.
TO'
SCOTT BOTCHER. CITY MANAGER