CorrespondenceChanhassen Fire Department Fire/Rescue Call Sheet dated June 18 - June 24, 2001.
Chanhassen Fire Department Fire/Rescue Call Sheet dated June 25 - July 1, 2001.
Fax to Kate Aanenson dated June 26, 2001.
Letter to Jill Sinclair dated June 27, 2001.
Letter from the Department of Employee Relations dated June 26, 2001.
Legislative Change Q & A sheet from Ehlers & Associates received July 5, 2001.
mon
Mon
Mon
Mon
Mon
Mon
Weds
Weds
Weds
Thurs
Thurs
Thurs
Fri
Sat
Sat
Sat
Sun
Sun
Jun 18
Jun 18
Jun 18
Jun 18
Jun 18
Jun 18
Jun 20
Jun 20
Jun 20
Jun 21
Jun 21
Jun 21
Jun 22
Jun 23
Jun 23
Jun 23
Jun 24
Jun 24
3:16 AM
7:34 AM
11:11 AM
12:52 PM
1:07 PM
2:45 PM
6:27 AM
1:35 PM
6:18 PM
3:13 PM
5:28 PM
9:27 PM
3:15 AM
12:43 PM
1:55 PM
6:10 PM
2:41 PM
6:56 PM
CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT
FIRE/RESCUE
WEEK OF JUNE 18, - JUNE 24, 2001
Chanhassen Road
Chanhassen Fire Station
Dakota Lane
Highway 5 & Powers Blvd
Santa Vera Drive
Highway 7
Pontiac Lane
Century Boulevard
Elm Tree Avenue
Laredo Drive
Lake Ann
West 78th Street
West 62nd Street
West 78th Street
Market Boulevard
Highway 101 & Pioneer Tr
Erie Avenue
Powers Place
'Medical- back injury
Stand by - weather watch
Power line down
Medical - trouble breathing
Fire alarm - false alarm, no fire
Medical - trouble breathing
Medical - assist ambulance
Medical - trouble breathing
Possible electrical fire
Fire alarm - false alarm, no fire
Medical - person not breathing
Medical - chest pain
Medical- injured shoulder, cancelled
Car accident- cancelled, no injuries
Medical - chest pains
Car accident with injuries
Dog bite - cancelled enroute
Garage fire
CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT
FIRE/RESCUE
WEEK OF JUNE 25, - JULY 1,2001
Tues
Tues
Tues
Tues
Weds
Thurs
Thurs
Thurs
Thurs
Fri
Fri
Sat
Sat
Sat
Sun
Sun
Sun
Jun 26 9:52 AM
Jun 26 10:40 AM
Jun 26 4:29 PM
Jun 26 10:56 PM
Jun 27 11:45 AM
Jun 28 3:37 PM
Jun 28 5:09 PM
Jun 28 9:02 PM
Jun 28 9:38 PM
Jun 29 9:56 AM
Jun 29 10:03 PM
Jun 30 3:13 AM
Jun 30 6:18 PM
Jun 30 10:41 PM
Jul 1 11:38 AM
Jul 1 4:44 PM
Jul 1 8:26 PM
Hazeltine Blvd
Fox Path
Arboretum Drive
Frontier Trail
Arboretum Boulevard
Highway 101 & Pioneer Trail
Pioneer Trail
West 78th Street
Highway 5 & Galpin Blvd
Basswood Circle
Lakeridge Road
Lake Riley Boulevard
Nez Peree Drive
Highway 101 & Pioneer Trail
Minnewashta Parkway
Deerbrook Drive
Redwing Lane
Smoke in the area, controlled burn
Carbon monoxide alarm
Medical - person down, cancelled
Medical - chest pains
Medical - possible heat stroke
Car accident with injuries
Car accident- cancelled, no injuries
Car vs bike accident, minor injuries
Motorcycle accident with injuries
Ruptured gas line
Medical - difficulty breathing
Medical - unknown problem
Medical - cut mouth
Smoke in the area, controlled bum
Medical - person passed out
Medical - head injury from a fall
Medical - trouble'breathing
Aanenson, Kate
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Dan Malone [dan.malone@digi.com]
Tuesday, June 26, 2001 10:57 AM
'chpln5 @ ci.chanhassen.m ri.us'
'maloneclan40'; 'aanenson @ci.chanhassen.mn.us'; 'chacmgr@ci.chanhassen.mn.us'
We Like Our Tree
Jill,
Thanks to your work in the 2001 Chanhassen Boulevard Tree
Planting Program we have a beautiful Sugar Maple in our
yard. I appreciate your answers to our questions on the
phone regarding placement options. I am also grateful to
the City of Chanhassen for this kind of program that I
believe enhances the beauty and value of the community.
There are certainly many individuals whose work also
contributed to the end result, so I would ask you to pass
along our appreciation for their efforts as well.
Best Regards,
Dan and Ann Malone
7061 Derby Drive
June 27, 2001
Dear Jill,
Just a note to thank you for all the help you have given
the Heights the past couple of years with our entrance
beautification project.
Your efforts on our behalf have helped make the project
successful.
It is hoped that the plantings will flourish during th'e
next few years and will make the park and community entrance
more attractive.
It has been a pleasure working with you. You are a great
representative for the City of Chanhassen.
Sincerely,
Hud Hollenback
cc: Kate Aanenson, Community Developement Director
RECEIVED
JUN 2 8 2001
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
~i:~::?~:~7"-~-%:-~:-,, Department 0 Em loyee Relatiom
or [mmovee' ?'' 658 Cedar Street
'D'nl~+~'~~ , St. Paul, MN 55155-1603
'-i .......
_2. _*"-: ..... ,
June 26, 2001
Todd Gerhardt
Assistant City Manager
Chanhassen
690 City Center Drive
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Dear Mr. Gerhardt:
Congratulations! I am very pleased to send you the enclosed notification of compliance with
the Local Government Pay Equity Act. Since the law was passed in 1984, jurisdictions have
.worked diligently to meet compliance requirements and your work is to be commended.
As you know, Minnesota Rules Chapter 3920 specifies the procedure and criteria for
measuring compliance and information about your situation is enclosed. In an effort to
conserve resources, we are no longer enclosing the "Guide to Understanding Pay Equity
Compliance and Computer Reports." Instead, we are directing you to our web site
.www.doer.state.mn.us/Ir-peqty/resource.htm for this publication or we will send you a copy in
the mail upon request. If you have any questions about the materials or about pay equity in
general, please contact me at (651) 296-2653.
One of the things the rule requires is that we notify each jurisdiction when the next pay equity
report is due. In your case, this date is January 31, 2004, and we will be sending you forms
and instructions at a later time. Also, this notice and results of the compliance review are
public information and must be supplied upon request to any interested party.
Again, congratulations on your achievement!
Sincerely,
Faith Zwemke
Pay Equity Coordinator
Attachments
An equal opportunity employer that supports workforce diversity
.~aUO!SS!LULUO3
':3 Ua~ln[~
aleCI
t00~ '9~ aun[
'pm, e!3a~dde
s! s~,uaLuaJ!nba~ ,q!nba/(ed lUaLUU.laAO~ le3Ol aq~, q~,!A~ §u!AIdLuo3 u! uo!leJadoo3 JnoA
· l~oda~ ,q!nba
A~d L00~: ~noA jo suo!l~la~i aaAoldm] :lo ~,uaLul~dac] ~losauu!lN aLI1 Aq A, Xa!Aa.I
ue jo llnsa~ e s! a3!lou S!Lt_L '0~6E ~a~,d~LI2) Salm ~losauu!lA/pu~ 666' LZt7- L66' I. Zt7
'S'IA/I:)V/q!nbE! ,~d luamm@AOD [e3o-I alp, JO sluaLua~!nba~ aLI1 §U!laaLU ,~[Injssa33ns
Results of Tests for Pay Equity Compliance
1. Completeness and Accuracy Test
~'~'assed. Required information was submitted accurately and
on time.
2. Statistical Analysis Test
Passed. Jurisdiction had more than three male classes and
an underpayment ratio of 80% or more.
t,// Passed. Jurisdiction had at least six male classes, at least
one class with a salary range, an underpayment ratio below
80% but a t-test that was not statistically significant.
3. Salary Range Test
P/ Passed. Too few classes had an established number of
years to move through a salary range.
Passed. Salary range test showed a score of 80% or more.
4. Exceptionj~l Service Pay Test
Passed. Too few classes received exceptional service pay.
Passed. Exceptional service pay test showed a score of
80% or more.
The enclosed material describes compliance requirements in more detail. If
you have questions, contact Pay Equity Coordinator, Faith Zwemke, at
(6S 1) 296-2653.
Compliance Report
Jurisdiction: City of Chanhassen Date: 6/5/01
COntact: Todd Gerhardt Phone: (952)937-1900
Insurance Added? N Job Evaluation System Used: Control Data
The statistical analysis, salary range and exceptional service pay test results are shown below. Part I is general
information from your Pay Equity Report data. Parts II, III, and IV give you the test results. For more detail on each
test, refer to the guidebook.
I. GENERAL JOB CLASS INFORMATION
# Job Classes
# Employees
Avg. Max Monthly
Pay per Employee
Male Female Balanced AIIJob
Classes Classes Classes Classes
31 12 1 44
48 22 2 72
5,016.83 4,582.91 4,904.39
II.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS TEST
A. UNDERPAYMENT RATIO = 33.2
a. # at or above Predicted Pay
b. # Below Predicted Pay
c. TOTAL
Male Female
Classes Classes
25 5
6 7
31 12
d. % Below Predicted Pay 19.35 58.33
(b divided by c = d)
* (Result is % of male classes below predicted pay divided by % of female claSses below predicted pay)
B.
T-TEST RESULTS
Degrees of Freedom (DF) = 68
a. Avg. diff. in pay from predicted pay for male jobs =
b. Avg. diff. in pay from predicted pay for female jobs =
Value of T = 1.528
$25
-$69
(Result is A divided by B)
!11. SALARY RANGE TEST =
.00 %
A. Avg. # of years to max salary for male jobs = .00
B. Avg. # of years to max salary for female jobs = .00
IV. EXCEPTIONAL SERVICE PAY TEST .00 %
A. % of male classes receiving ESP .00'
B. % of female classes receiving ESP .00
* (if 20% or less, test result will be 0.00)
Predicted Pay Report-
Case: 2001 DATA
City of Chanhassen
Job Male Female
Nbr Job Title Empl Empl
I Comm Service Officer I 0
2 Sr Citizen Coord 0 1
3 Receptionist/Secretary 0 3
zt Bldg Maint Worker 1 0
5 Environmental Res Coord 0 1
6 Utility Operator 5 0
7 Equipment Operator 9 0
8 Planner I 0 1
9 Secretary 0 7
10 GIS Spec 0 1
11 . Engineer 1 0
12 Eng Tech II I 0
13 Rec Supv I I 0
14 Account Clerk 0 3
15 Crime Prevention Spec 0 1
16 Fire Inspector/Training Coord 1 0
17 Heavy Equipment Oper 2 0
18 Mechanic 2 0
19 Bldg Inspector I 2 0
20 Heavy Equip Oper Foreman 1 0
21 Park Foreman 1 0
22 Fire Marshal 1 0
23 Bldg Inspector II 2 0
24 Mechanical Inspector II 2 0
25 Water Resource Coord 0 1
26 Asst Utility Supt 1 0
27 Park Supt I 0
28 Equipment Supt 1 0
29 Bldg Official 1 0
30 MIS Coord 1 0
31 Sr Planner 1 1
32 Office Mgr 0 1
33 Street Supt 1 0
34 Utility Supt I 0
Total Work
Empl Sex Points
1 M 45
1 F 45
3 F 46
1 M 49
1 F 52
5 M 53
9 M 53
1 F 53
7 F 54
1 F 54
1 M 56
1 M_ 56
1 M 56
3 F 56
1 F 56
1 M 56
2 M 57
2 M 57
2 M 57
1 M 57
1 M 60
1 M 60
2 M 60
2 M 6O
1 F 65
1 M 65
I M 78
1 M 78
1 M 78
1 M 78
2 B 78
1 F 8O
1 M 82
1 M 82
Max Mo.
Salary
$3,830.00
$3,83O.0O
$3,83O.OO
$4,163.00
$4,163.00
$4,163.00
$4,163.00
$4,163.00
$4,163.00
$4,163.00
$4,769.00
$4,769.00
$4,769.00
$4,769.00
$4,769.00
$4,769.00
$5,182.O0
$5,182.00
$5,182.00
$5,182.00
$5,182.00
$5,182.00
$5,182.00
$5,182.00
$5,182.OO
$5,182.00
$5,742.00
$5,742.00
$5,742.00
$5,742.00
$5,742.00
$5,742.00
$5,742.00
$5,742.00
Predicted
Pay
$3,344.26
$3,344.26
$3,47O .53
$3,85O.94
$4,231.34
$4,358.14
$4,358.14
$4,358.14
$4,450.33
$4,450.33
$4,731.85
$4,731.85
$4,731.85
$4,731.85
$4,731.85
$4,731.85
$4,800.34
$4,8OO.34
$4,800.34
$4,8OO.34
$5,152.6I
$5,152.61
$5,152.61
$5,152.61
$5,182.00
$5,182.00
$5,642.67
$5,642.67
$5,642.67
$5,642.67
$5,642.67
$5,841.33
$6,040.00
$6,O4O .00
6/5/01 1:09:20 PM
Page: 1
Pay
Difference
$485.74
$485.74
$359.47
$312.06
-$68.34
-$195.14
-$195.14
-$195.14
-$287.33
-$287.33
$37.15
$37.15
$37.15
$37.15
$37.15
$37.15
$381.66
$381.66
$381.66
$381.66
$29.39
$29.39
$29.39
$29.39
$.oo
$.00
$99.33
$99.33
$99.33
$99.33
$99.33
-$99.33
-$298.0O
-$298,O0
Predicted Pay Report-
Case: 2001 DATA
Job
Nbr Job Title
35 Finance Director
36 Park & Rec Director
37 Comm Develop Dir
38 Public Works Dir/City Eng
39 Asst City Mgr
40 City Mgr
41 Eng Tech IV
42 Project Engineer
43 Recreation Supt
44 Rec Center Mgr
City of Chanhassen
Male Female
Empl Empl
I 0
I 0
0 1
0 1
I 0
I 0
I 0
1 0
I 0
I 0
Total Work Max Mo.
Empl Sex Points Salary
1 M 9O
I M 90
I F 98
I F 98
I M 98
I M 128
I M 60
I M 65
I M 60
I M 48
$6,931.00
$6,937.00
$6,937.OO
$6,937.OO
$6,937.00
$8,276.00
$5,182.00
$5,182.00
$5,182.00
$3,830.00
Predicted
Pay
$6,611.71
$6,611.71
$7,218.63
$7,218.63
$7,218.63
$8,487.08
$5,152.61
$5,182.00
$5,152.61
$3,724.14
6/5/01 1:09:26 PM
Page: 2
Pay
Difference
$319.29
$325.29
-$281.63
-$281.63
-$281.63
-$211.08
$29.39
$.oo
$29.39
$105.86
sqor, peouele8 · sqop eleWe_-I []
sqop elelA! · /~cl Pelo!PeJcl- I
s u!od
Sg I. Og t S [ [ 0 I. [ SO [ O0 I. S6 06 g8 08
! , r , ! , i , I : · , I , , , ! : , ~ I t , : ] : , r I ~ , : I : : . I .
® []
gL OL
:000'9
~-OOZ'9
~001~'9
~-009'9
~-008'9
.:
.-O00'Z
.-OOZ'Z
:-O0~'Z
--O09'Z
5009'Z
:000'9
-OOt,'~
Aed
uessequeqo o/[1lO
Aed aOl~deS
leUOlldeox3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
OOlA.laS
~.o sJA
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
/~eleS
xe~ot
O0'~I~L'S$
O0'~:t,L'~$
O0'~:t,/..'S$
O0'gt,/..'~$
00'~8 I.'CJ$
O0'~:SVS$
O0'~SL'S$
00'~8 L'G$
oo'ce~'s$
O0'~8L'G$
O0'CSL'g$
00'~8~'S$
O0'~8L'S$
oo'zeCs$
00'69/.'I~$
00'69/.'!~$
00'69/'1~$
O0'69Z'P$
00'69/.'I~$
00'69/-'P$
O0'C9L'I~$
oo'c9r't,$
00'C9 I.'t,$
00'£9 I.'t~$
O0'C9L't,$
O0'£9L't~$
00'~9 i.'t~$
00'0C8'~$
aa'ate'cs
O0'OCO'C$
/~eles
· off xefl
~0 :sntets
O0'CCS'C$ 8Z fl 0 r
O0'CCg'C$ 8Z ~ 0 r '
O0'CCg'C$ 8Z ~ 0 t
00'68L'C$ g9 ~ 0 L
00'68 L'CS g9 d L 0
00'68 L'C$ 09 ~ 0 ~
00'68~'C$ 09 n 0 ~
O0'6Sr'C$ 09 fl 0 ~
00'68t'C$ 09 n 0 ~
00'68L'C$ ZS fl 0 r
00'68~'C$ ZS ~ 0 ~
00'68~'C$ £S fl 0 ~
00'68L'C$ ZS ~ 0 ~
00'SC6'~$ 9S n 0 L
00'SC6'~$ 9S ~ t 0
00'SC6'~$ 9S d C 0
00'SC6'~$ 9S ~ 0 ~
00'SC6'~$ 9S n 0 r
00'SC6'~$ 9S n 0 ~
00'~9S'~$ ~S d ~ 0
00'~9S'~$ ~S d Z 0
00'~9S'~$ CS d L 0
00'~9g'~$ CS fl 0 6
00'~9S'~$ CS ~ 0 S
00'~9S'~$ ~S ~ t o
00'~9g'~$ 6P ~ 0 L
oo'zsc'~$ 9~ d ~ o
oo'zsc'~$ SP d ~ 0
O0'ZgC'~$ S~ fl 0 t
/ueles slUlOd adA£ saletuad salefl
· o~ Ulfl sqo~ sselo ~qN JqN
VIVQ I. OOC :aseo
aP, I.L JqN
sselo qor
/[ed aoFues
leUOlldaox3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
/..9~ :C]ID'I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
~4ele$
xe~ ot
00'0£8'S$
00';:8 I.'95
O0'gSr'~;$
00'9/..Z'85
00'/_g6'95
00'/...g6'95
00'ZS6'9$
00'ZS6'95
00' LS6'95'
O0'~l~Z'S$
O0'~I~L'S$
O0'~L'S$
O0'~PZ'S$
/ueles
· o~1 xel/~
LO :snlels
00'l.9S'~$
O0'68L'g$
00'6~i.'85
00'69
00'S60'S$
O0'69g'ff$
00'69;~'~$
O0'69g't~$
O0'69g't~$
00'SS9'S$
O0'gSS'S$
O0'gg~'S$
~eleS
· o1~i U!lN
09
g9
09
86
86
86
06
06
Z8
~8
08
8L
s~u!od
sqor
ad~£
SSelO
VJ.VCl [00~: :aseo
uassequeqo lS!'1 UOlleo!JUeA ~Jlu~! eleo sselO qop
JUl_
~, ZOO1
The 2001 Minnesota Legislature has finally adjourned for the
~:-~-v ~':-~ ,,,t~r:~¢~-,.~q~c:n~ year. Unprecedented tax "reform" was the cornerstone of the
Change extended session. What does it mean to cities? How will the
~l~g new law impact budgets, tax rates and new and existing tax
islative
increment districts? The fact is nobody knows for sure right
now. Ehlers & Associates is committed to assisting our
clients in responding to these and other questions as soon as
key information is available to preparing projections. Ehlers
will publish updates as information becomes available. For now, here are some facts regarding
some key issues relating to this historical legislation:
QI
Media reports have indicated that there will be a significant reduction in property
taxes. How much of a reduction will our residents and businesses realize in
property, taxes?
Ao
Several key pieces of information will need to be calculated at the state and county level
before estimates can be made including:
· Calculation of the revised net tax capacity with tax jurisdictions and statewide.
· Calculation of statewide and local tax rates.
· The statewide education property tax rate are to be calculated by the state. (This
replaces the local education property tax but not local debt or referendum levies.)
· Cities and counties will develop levy 2002 requests factoring loss of LGA and HACA
credits.
· Factoring fiscal disparities calculations into local levies.
Once this information is available it will be possible to make some estimates regarding
property tax rates and impacts.
Q. When will this information be available?
A.
The speculation is most information should be available by late July to early August.
Local tax levy information will not be ready until late December.
QI
Is it safe to assume most property owners ~vill experience a reduction in the taxes
they will pay in 2002?
Qo
No. Several key factors will influence the local impact of the property taxes and may
vary among cities. These factors include:
· The current mix of owner occupied and rental housing, commercial/industrial/public
utility, seasonal recreational commercial, seasonal recreational residential and
agricultural property.
· The revised fiscal disparities rate.
· The state education tax rate.
· Reductions in state LGA and HACA.
· The cities/counties levy amount.
EHLERS
& ASSOCIATES INC
LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE
3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, MN 55113-1105
651.697.8500 fax 651.697.8555 www.ehlers-inc.com
Offices in Roseville, MN, Brookfield, Wi and Naperville, iL
mo
4
2~
Yes, we believe that some taxpayers may not realize reductions and actually see
increases in their tax bill as a result of the new law. It is not too early to begin to plan for
dealing with this issue. Our suggestions include the following:
Prepare a communications plan forecasting the potential impact of the tax bill on your
residents and businesses. Public discussion of these issues will lay the ground work for
future actions. State mandated "Truth In Taxation" public hearings will not be required
and parcel specific tax impact estimates will not be available this year. Side by side
comparisons of sample tax bills with and without the legislative changes may by a useful.
Develop a long term financial plan. In addition to providing a wide variety of services
cities must constantly reinvest in their infrastructure including roads, public facilities,
parks, utility systems and economic base. A plan which forecasts and schedules these
expenditures is a critical element to assuring that resources are available to meet future
needs.
o
4~
Qe
mo
Q,
mo
Develop options to current level of services. Knowing the trade-offs between taxes and
services improves the quality of the decision making.
Communicate with your legislators. Make sure you provide an opportunity for your
legislator to describe the intent of the new tax bill. In turn, once the tax impact is known,
discuss their ramifications for your community.
When Will we know what our projected 2002 state aids will be?
The Commissioner of Revenue is required to certify state aid payable amounts by
September 1 st. In the meantime, the League of Minnesota Cities has provided an estimate
of next year's state aids as calculated by Legislative staff. It can be found at
www.lmnc.org.
Are levy limits back in place?
Yes. The Commissioner of Revenue is required to make all the levy limit calculations
and notify the local government by September 1st. Local governments will be required to
report certain levy information to the Commissioner of Revenue by July 20th. Some
special levies that have been added include levies for increases in employer contributions
to PERA that are effective after June 30, 2001. Some special levies that have been
eliminated include levies for unreimbursed costs due to the 1997 floods and abatements
due to the 1997 floods and the 1998 tornadoes.
*Please visit our website at www. ehlers-inc.com for further
updates as they become available.