Loading...
11. Powers Blvd Trail: Change Order.CITY OF - CHANHASSEN r t I 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 MEMORANDUM TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager FROM: Todd Hoffman, Park & Recreation Director DATE: August 24, 1995 SUBJ: Approval of Change Order for Trail (Sidewalk) Along Powers Boulevard This item was tabled from the July 10, 1995 agene requested additional information regarding the fun( FUNDING SOURCE Tax Increment Financing Project No. 92 -3, West 7 designated funding source. This project is capable NEED In reviewing the minutes, the council source for this proposed trail link. treet/Downtown Improvement is the )sorbinu these costs. The section of trail, as eluded to in my original memorandum, is a critical link in the city's expanding network of non - vehicular transportation /recreation routes. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the city council approve a change order to City Project No. 92 -3 to construct the described concrete walk at the an estimated cost of $124,000. ATTACHMENTS 1. Memorandum to Don Ashworth dated July 6, 1995. 2. City Council minutes dated July 10, 1995. c: Charles Folch, City Engineer David Juliff, Strgar Roscoe Fausch, Inc. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager - , 7 11" FROM: Todd Hoffman, Park & Recreation Director DATE: July 6, 1995 SUBJ: Approve Change Order for Trail (Sidewalk) Along Powers Boulevard Attached to this memorandum please find a feasibility report for a trail (sidewalk) along Powers Boulevard. This is a critical link between a major population center of the city and the western entrance to our downtown. The sidewalk is proposed to originate at Santa Vera Lane and travel north one -third mile to Saddlebrook. Curve. Construction would be limited to the east side of Powers Boulevard. Strgar - Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. (SRF), the consulting engineer for the "parent project" (92 -3 widening /reconstruction of Powers Boulevard), prepared this report at the request of the city. As indicated in the report, this trail work was to be completed last summer. The delay in scheduling was required to allow further monitoring of the road embankment. With their evaluation complete, SRF has forwarded three alternatives for this construction. These "options" are detailed in the report. Highlights of each include: Option A: 8 ft. asphalt surface at grade with Powers Boulevard. Trail set behind existing guard rail. Requires modular block wall or sheet piling. Estimated Cost: With modular block wall $196,000 With Sheet Piling $552,000 Option B: 8 ft. asphalt surface set below the grade of Powers Boulevard. Requires modular block wall or sheet piling. Estimated Cost: With modular block wall $210,000 With Sheet Piling $552,000 Option C: 6 ft. concrete walk at grade with Powers Boulevard. Walk set behind existing ' guard rail. Requires less modular block wall. Estimated Cost: With modular block wall $124,000 ' MEMORANDUM n 0 L 0 Mr. Don Ashworth July 6, 1995 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the city council approve a change order to City Project No. 92 -3 to construct the described concrete walk at a cost not to exceed $124,000. ATTACHMENT c: Charles Folch, City Engineer SRF STRGAR- ROSCOE- FAUSCH, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS TRANSPORTATION ■ CIVIL ■ STRUCTURAL ■ ENVIRONMENTAL ■ PARKING SRF No. 0921634 July 5, 1995 Mr. T^dd Hoffman Park & Recreation Director CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: WEST 78TH STREET DETACHMENT /POWERS BOULEVARD CITY PROJECT NO. 92 -3 TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY AND REPORT (POWERS BOULEVARD) Dear Mr. Hoffman: As requested, we have prepared the following feasibility study for trail improvements along Powers Boulevard (CSAH 17) between Santa Vera Drive and Saddlebrook Cv. (See Figure 1.) INTRODUCTION In April of 1993, construction of City Project 92 -3 began, which included widening /reconstruction of Powers Boulevard (CSAH 17). During the course of construction, the City of Chanhassen expressed an interest in constructing an eight -foot wide bituminous trail on the east side of Powers Boulevard between Santa Vera Drive and Saddlebrook Cv. A number of options were evaluated, and the decision was made to construct a bituminous trail adjacent to the proposed guardrail. A modular block retaining wall on the east side of the trail was proposed to prevent additional wetland impacts. Braun- Intertec designed the retaining wall for this portion of the project. Shortly before construction would have begun on the trail /retaining wall, a crack in the embankment was discovered which ran parallel to Powers Boulevard (in approximately the same location as the proposed retaining wall). The decision was made to monitor the slope and to determine the extent of the failure before construction of a retaining wall was undertaken. Based on the information presented by Braun- Intertec on the slope failure, three alternatives are evaluated in this report for the construction of this trail. Suite 150, One Carlson Parkway North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55447 -4443 (612) 475 -0010 FAX (612) 475 -2429 v1Ee1 e : ai e• a Y OOVF �Q ` St■AI tOM ft t r •N G�' , 3n. t= ? \a ', a` rOt• P LAf ,y d, `: roc •p pA/ t• t .UCY LA. R0. 4 ' a) !rh `�'. A a rOCIA(L fp■ ui. oSROAOM ORE tH 4 13. NAVAJO OR. te a• L4tE LIXT RD. f I� R A N ► C1. ,N .. i 2 HYIROGATE •7 14. BROcEw AMOS DR. 'Af` �• •. „ OW . rox i ° °� S 15. RED RIN4 C1. S■ENEN D(1A11 ■E.SIERN OR. ' L f << tc,OIAAARRA( C1. Q fIR. NIARAnu LE T.PASAN) CIA. o s CT t1. NEI PERCE Cf. `� a e. RI UC RIRROM C1. .- s s CARVER BEACN R0, �) �. U, PIMA DAT u n J CAEE OA, •A, r 1(r.AA �'• ti B. 1 411/1ERS Cf. I t�• ♦r J hp0. W a TAN ND CHOC l i hiy Z r o y d" rC �hTy PO E R O S CIA /�JS = y LONE OR. JAI. CIA. J �SE1+ lA. c ■ Rp EAGLE p1. L A• r0} Lvwr s " J , u 1 C ON CIA. .` j i a \�• f wool) 11 MUCOR. LL OA. La4t �'lbr ■ s A0 1OfU5 a NI HOO - i v1EM OR. RIOCE CIA. La1et 1-ucy _ ` ♦ e•� s % ' p �1�` o i wPIE LEA FIAII RIDGE CT. J z A " __� j >• c _ PON(IAC %L C a p O p QA. ° OR. J C Or TR. 4 a u FICA LA. Cl• u VI i4 11 s d p BICNOQ' y' ERON1fFq'� AILLOVEE BJITE CT. f.SN 1Q•' G0 �♦•-' i z 'p lAloct L aht Ann • 24.SAOUL PA 2S. CHIPPEWA rA, Q PROJECT LOCATION N 1 PARR 1116M A1 r■ 101.1 CT. IS 1. 1 t Phi Co. q 2A. .CON 't10►R � .1 � � i, o --LAD � rA 0 T R- r PMEAy W N NI dl Cl• °u OA. u LNO OA. _� OEE REIE 0 Cl 1011�� LA ISTIE <A `r , Y 4p � E�° CIWRAON $ ` e CHIPPEWA $ X. } x ° P C T. +G N B 2 SAR► ° f 4 �✓ ♦P V. ? DE%. S.M :4Y� rVILIC l 4 t a W. 76t" ° s1. � - cb ■ o ts, Ilm ST, CHAN vl £ COOL TER DR, v, CHAN VI E• ST. « f ■• o 0 left, I. 18th ST, ° I 0 1101 I E. PICHA OR. R /`' Sl f114M on- 1r1 r 1 5 ♦' i tSlt Ratt 'EN 11118 eo m i y JS s •9S= �+ `� s SI Ia. z !{.• YJ 4 'OACpr G ., u R id Lake Sloan f cjT' �`G 101 G Im1S dt r r 111614 R?NI :J 2. eAReAaA T. � .,►� � ci L 101 Laht 1� C�; z f�� < Z x RAC M ll" S STRGAR- ROSCOE- FAUSCH, INC. CITY OF CHANHASSEN FIGURE 1 lRI' CONSULnNG ENGiNMS A, PLANN£R.S 14m/pvntAm I Cl.fl a Stflcfsat o Favhorm+mtal t Pu1dA8 POWERS BOULEVARD TRAIL PROJECT LOCATION MAP Suite 150, One Carlson Parkway North Minneapolis, MN 55447 (612) 475 -0010 CITY PROJ. NO. 92 -3 SRF NO. 0921634 PI Mr. Todd Hoffman PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Trail Improvements -3- The three trail alternatives which were evaluated are shown in Figure 2. Options "A" and "B" consist of bituminous walks and retaining walls along the east side of Powers Boulevard. (See Figure 3 for differences between Option "A" and Option "B. ") Option "C" involves the construction of a six -foot wide concrete walk along the east side of Powers Boulevard. Each of the alternatives is described in more detail and evaluated below. In addition to the trail improvements, some additional slope correction, as recommended by Braun - Intertec, will be necessary to repair the existing crack no matter which option is selected. 1. Option "A" This option involves the construction of an eight -foot wide bituminous trail along the east slope of Powers Boulevard, and requires either a modular block retaining wall or sheet piling from Santa Vera Drive to approximately 620 feet north of Santa Vera Drive. This option is very similar to the original plan for constructing the trail and retaining wall. however, the proposed wall would need to be approximately five feet deeper than originally planned to minimize the possibility of the wall collapsing in the event the slope continues to fail. Although the cost of sheet piling is very high, the recommendation from Braun- Intertec is to use the sheet piling rather than the modular block wall, as there is still some risk that the modular block wall could collapse. It is their opinion that if the slope continues to fail, the sheet piling would prevent any possible damage to the trail. In this case, the modular block retaining wall (or sheet piling) would be below the proposed trail. In addition, a metal pipe rail would be required along the top of the wall (or sheet piling) to prevent pedestrians and bicyclists from leaving the trail. Also, reconstruction of a portion of Powers Boulevard as well as the removal and replacement of some of the new guardrail would be necessary for the installation of a modular block wall under this option. 2. Option "B' Similar to Option "A ", this option also involves the construction of an eight -foot wide bituminous trail along the east slope of Powers Boulevard and requires a modular block retaining wall or sheet piling from Santa Vera Drive to approximately 620 feet north of Santa Vera Drive. However, in this instance, the modular block retaining wall (or sheet piling) would be above July 5, 1995 , loo 0 Xw .Cale f"t XC-- XC- _"__xC XC XC —,X�C-- E!_ n - -- - -- -- - -- - o P P P � ) o SLOPE FAILURE EXISTING � SEDIMENTATION POND W 4' Q Qr' W Q H Q N G r PROPOSED TRAIL OPTIONS A. 6. d C / OPTION A - WALL /SHEET PILING BELOW THE TRAIL (FROM STA 31.50 TO STA. 37 -70) OPTION 8 WALL /SHEET PILING ABOVE THE TRAIL (FROM STA 31.50 TO STA 37.70) OPTION C - W CONCRETE WALK (WALL FROM STA 35.00 TO STA. 37.70) _ POWERS BLVD. < 0 �O WETLAND SRF STRGAR- ROSCOE- FAUSCH, INC. CITY OF CHANHASSEN FIGURE 2 CONSULTING ENGINEERS k PLANNERS M pmudm ■ CPA ■ %anal ■ Fnvl -tal■ Pukbg Suite 150, One Carlson Parkway North POWERS BOULEVARD TRAIL TRAIL ALIGNMENT OPTIONS Minneapolis, MN 55447 (612) 475 -0010 CITY PROJECT NO. 92-3 SRF NO. 0921634 8.0' BITUN TRAIL N.B. CO. RD. 17 I METAL PIPE RAIL EXISTING GR. STA. 31 +50 TO STA. 35 +00 (SHORT WALL REQUIRED) MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING EXISTING WALL OR SHEET PILING GUARDRAIL OPTION 'A' op EXISTING ° pF � EXISTING GROUND STA. 35 +00 TO STA.37 +70 N.B. CO. RD. 17 8,0' 2.0' 3.0' SHOULDER 8.0' BITUMINOUS TRAIL METAL PIPE RAIL EXISTING GUARDRAIL MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING 2 � WALL OR SHEET PILING Si OPTION 'B I I L EXISTING GROUND u STA.35 +00 TO 6.0' CONCRETE i STA. 37 +70 N.B. CO. RD. 17 I METAL PIPE RAIL EXISTING GROUND STA. 31 +50 TO STA. 35 +00 (NO WALL REQUIRED) MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL EXISTING GUARDRAIL ��� OPTION 'C' � EXISTING GROUND STA. 35 +00 TO STA.37 +70 S " STRGAR- ROSCOE- FAUSCH, INC. CITY OF CHANHASSEN FIGURE 3 lRI' CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS han' t.. t C14 t %.hvil 3 Pavevam W ■ Puk g Suite 150 One Carlson Parkway North POWERS BOULEVARD TRAIL PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTIONS Minneapolis, MN 55447 (612) 475 -0010 CITY PROJ NO 92 -3 SRF NO. 0921634 7 I Mr. Todd Hoffman 7 L K-M July 5, 1995 the proposed trail. Unlike Option "A," no protection for the trail is provided by the retaining wall if the slope continues to fail. Again, a metal pipe rail would be required along the east edge of the trail to prevent pedestrians and bicyclists from leaving the trail. In addition, reconstruction of a portion of Powers Boulevard would be necessary, as well as the removal and replacement of all of the new guardrail for the installation of a modular block wall under this option. Even with the additional cost for reconstruction of Powers Boulevard, the cost of constructing a modular block retaining wall is still considerably less expensive than the installation of sheet piling and, in this instance, no additional stability for the trail would be provided by the sheet piling. 3. Option "C" This option involves the construction of a six -foot wide concrete sidewalk along the east slope of Powers Boulevard. A modular block retaining wall would also be necessary for this option, but the length of the retaining wall is considerably less than with Options A or B. The retaining wall would be approximately 270 feet long for this option (compared to 620 feet long for Options A or B). In addition, the retaining wall for this option would not be in danger of collapse as it would be beyond the area of the slope failure. Like Options A and B, a metal pipe rail would be necessary from Santa Vera Drive to approximately 620 feet north of Santa Vera Drive to prevent pedestrians and bicyclists from leaving the sidewalk. I B. Easements and Right -of -Way ' No additional right -of -way is necessary for any of the options. However, the temporary easements obtained for the original construction of Powers Boulevard have expired. Hence, it will be necessary to obtain easements to construct any of ' the options. t ESTIMATED COSTS The estimated costs of the three options evaluated are summarized below. ' Construction costs are indicated, and an allowance is included for design, inspection, legal, administrative and fiscal expenses. Detailed estimates of construction costs for the three options are included in the Appendix. The costs ' presented on the following page do not include any amounts for easement acquisition, nor do they include costs for any corrective work on the failed slope. i Mr. Todd Hoffman -7- Construction Total Legal, Administration, Fiscal (35 percent) Estimated Costs July 5, 1995 Option "A° Option °B" Option °C° ' Modular Sheet Modular Sheet Concrete Walk Block Wall Piling Block Wall Piling ' $145,225 $408,935 $155,740 $408,935 $ 91,695 50,825 $143,130 54,510 $143,130 Total Estimated Costs $196,050 $552,065 $210,250 $552,065 SUMMARY 32,095 $123,790 Based on the preceding discussions and cost comparisons, we recommend that Option "C" (six -foot concrete sidewalk) be constructed as the preferred alternate. Although the walk would only be six feet wide (instead of eight feet wide for a bituminous trail), the cost savings over other alternatives is considerable and still provides a benefit to all trail users. In addition, the trail north of Saddlebrook Cv., with which the proposed sidewalk would connect, is also only six feet wide. However, if the City desires to construct an eight -foot wide bituminous trail, we would recommend Option °A" with the modular block retaining wall. The alternatives proposed herein are feasible from an engineering standpoint. We would be pleased to meet with the City Council, Park Board, staff and other interested parties to review any aspect of this report. Respectfully Submitted, STRGAR- ROSCOE- FAUSCH, INC. David J. Juli , itt Senior Engineer DJJ /JRD /smf Enclosures de ames R. Dvorak, P.E. nior Associate CITY OF CHANHASSEN CITY PROJECT NO. 92 -3 ESTIMATED COSTS FOR TRAIL ALONG POWERS BLVD. 1635TRL.XLS PREPARED BY: STRGAR - ROSCOE- FAUSCH, INC. SRF NO. 0921635 JUNE 1995 Page 1 OPTION "A" MODULAR BLOCK SHEET PILING ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED QUANTITY TOTAL COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY TOTAL COST 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 2104.521 SALVAGE GUARDRAIL LIN. FT. $10.00 250 $2,500.00 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION CU. YD. $10.00 600 $6,000.00 560 $5,600.00 2211.503 AGGREGATE BASE C CLASS 5 CU. YD. $12.00 215 $2,580.00 2151 $2,580.00 2340.508 TYPE 41 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON $30.00 5 $150.00 2340.510 TYPE 41 BINDER COURSE MIXTURE TON $30.00 6 $180.00 2340.514 TYPE 31 BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON $30.00 11 $330.00 2402.583 METAL PIPE RAILING LIN. FT. $65.00 620 $40,300.00 620 $40,300.00 0403.603 TIMBER BOARDWALK SO. FT. $20.00 0411.603 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SQ. FT. $15.00 4275 $64,125.00 0411.603 PRECAST ARCHITECTURAL PANEL SQ. FT. $20.00 2360 $47,200.00 0452.603 STEEL SHEET PILING SQ. FT. $20.00 14335 $286,700.00 2521.511 3" BITUMINOUS WALK SO. FT. $1.10 17325 $19,057.50 17325 $19,057.50 2521.501 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK SQ. FT. $1.70 2554.511 INSTALL TRAFFIC BARRIER DESIGN B8307 I LIN. FT. $10.00 2501 $2,500.00 0563.601 ITRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM $2 1 $2 1 $2,500.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $145 $408 35% ENGINEERING INSPECTION ADMINISTRATION CAPITALIZED INTEREST $50 $143 TOTAL PROJECT COST $196 $552 Page 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CITY PROJECT NO. 92 -3 ESTIMATED COSTS FOR TRAIL ALONG POWERS BLVD. 1635TRL.XLS PREPARED BY: STRGAR - ROSCOE- FAUSCH, INC. SRF NO. 0921635 JUNE 1995 Page 2 OPTION "B" MODULAR BLOCK SHEET PILING ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED QUANTITY TOTAL COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY TOTAL COST 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 2104.521 SALVAGE GUARDRAIL LIN. FT. $10.00 650 $6,500.00 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION CU. YD. $10.00 560 $5,600.00 560 $5,600.00 2211.503 AGGREGATE BASE C CLASS 5 CU. YD. $12.00 215 $2,580.00 215 $2,580.00 2340.508 TYPE 41 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON $30.00 72 $2,160.00 2340.510 TYPE 41 BINDER COURSE MIXTURE TON $30.00 96 $2,880.00 2340.514 TYPE 31 BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON $30.00 168 $5,040.00 2402.583 METAL PIPE RAILING LIN. FT. $65.00 620 $40,300.00 620 $40,300.00 0403.603 TIMBER BOARDWALK SQ. FT. $20.00 0411.603 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SQ. FT. $15.00 4275 $64,125.00 0411.603 PRECAST ARCHITECTURAL PANEL SO. FT. $20.00 2360 $47,200.00 0452.603 STEEL SHEET PILING SO. FT. $20.00 14335 $286,700.00 2521.511 3" BITUMINOUS WALK SQ. FT. $1.10 17325 $19,057.50 17325 $19,057.50 2521.501 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK SO. FT. $1.70 2554.511 JINSTALL TRAFFIC BARRIER DESIGN B8307 LIN. FT. $10.00 0563.601 ITRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM $2 1 $2 1 $2 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $155 $408 35% ENGINEERING INSPECTION ADMINISTRATION CAPITALIZED INTEREST $54 $143128.13 TOTAL PROJECT COST $210 $552,065 Page 2 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CITY PROJECT NO. 92 -3 ESTIMATED COSTS FOR TRAIL ALONG POWERS BLVD. 1635TRL.XLS PREPARED BY: STRGAR - ROSCOE- FAUSCH, INC. SRF NO. 0921635 JUNE 1995 Page 3 OPTION "C' CONCRETE WALK ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED QUANTITY TOTAL COST 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 2104.521 SALVAGE GUARDRAIL LIN. FT. $10.00 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION CU. YD. $10.00 350 $3,500.00 2211.503 JAGGREGATE BASE C CLASS 5 CU. YD. $12.00 90 $1,080.00 2340.508 TYPE 41 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON $30.00 2340.510 TYPE 41 BINDER COURSE MIXTURE TON $30.00 2340.514 TYPE 31 BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON $30.00 2402.583 METAL PIPE RAILING LIN. FT. $65.00 620 $40,300.00 0403.603 TIMBER BOARDWALK SQ. FT. $20.00 0411.603 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SQ. FT. $15.00 1550 $23,250.00 0411.603 1 PRECAST ARCHITECTURAL PANEL SQ. FT. $20.00 0452.603 STEEL SHEET PILING SQ. FT. $20.00 2521.511 3" BITUMINOUS WALK SQ. FT. $1.10 2521.501 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK SQ. FT. $1.70 9450 $16,065.00 2554.511 INSTALL TRAFFIC BARRIER DESIGN B8307 LIN. FT. $10.00 0563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM $2 1 $2 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $91,695.00 35% ENGINEERING INSPECTION ADMINISTRATION CAPITALIZED INTEREST $32,093.25 TOTAL PROJECT COST $123 Page 3 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JULY 10, 1995 Mayor Chmiel called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Chmiel, Councilman Senn, Councilman Mason, Councilwoman Dockendorf, and Councilman Berquist STAFF PRESENT: Don Ashworth, Tom Scott, Charles Folch, Kate Aanenson, Bob Generous and Scott Harr APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Councilman Senn moved, Councilman Mason seconded to approve the agenda as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: PROCLAMATION DECLARING JULY AS RECREATION & PARKS MONTH. Mayor Chmiel read the following proclamation to be adopted by the City Council Whereas, physical recreation and meaningful leisure experiences contribute to physical and mental well -being as well as the overall quality of life; and Whereas, community recreation and leisure opportunities create socially <: beneficial connections between and among individuals, groups, and communities; and Whereas, parks and recreation services provide preventive health benefits, support more productive work forces, enhance the desirability of locations for business and families, and stimulate tourism revenues to increase a total community economic development model; and Whereas, the provision and preservation of parks and open spaces are both an investment and insurance plan for our collective quality of life. Now Therefore, be it resolved that July has been designated as Recreation and Parks Month by the National Recreation and Park Association and Be It Further Resolved, that all citizens of this great city join in this nationwide celebration bringing recognition to all the benefits derived from quality public and private recreation and park resources at the local level. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 10th day of July, 1995. Resolution 495 -: Councilman Mason moved, Councilman Benluist seconded to adopt the Resolution proclaiming Jule as Recreation and Packs Month. All voted in favor and the motion carried. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilwoman Dockendorf moved, Councilman Mason seconded to approve the following Consent Agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: d. Approval of Accounts. f. City Code Amendment Regarding Horses and Stables, First Reading. All voted in favor and the motion carried. C. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER FOR TRAIL ALONG POWERS BOULEVARD. , 1,. Councilman Senn asked if Option C, $124,000.00 was the recommendation by staff. The City Engineer stated that it was. Councilman Senn wanted to know how the trail was going to be funded. Through park trail funds ' or TIF dollars. Councilman Senn then asked that this item be tabled for further clarification of the funding i ' City Council Meeting - July 10, 1995 sources. Mayor Chmiel stated that Jan Lash, from the Park and Recreation Commission, had called him to ' notify him that she could not attend the meeting but wished to convey the Park and Recreation Commission's full support of this item. ' (Taping of the meeting began at this point in the discussion.) Mayor Chmiel: ...of the fact that the balance of the commission approved this and fully stands behind it so I just wanted to interject that into the discussion. Is there any time frame problems with any of this? ' Charles Folch: I don't think so. ' Mayor Chmiel: Okay. There's a motion on the floor, with a second to table. Councilman Senn moved, Councilman BeMuist seconded to table approval of Change Omer for the Trail along Powers Boulevard for further clarification regarding funding sources. All voted in favor and the motion carved. ' E. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: ' Councilwoman Dockendorf: In the Minutes from last meeting there are several gaps that I think for the record we should have on there. Starting on page 28, and I think a lot of the comments were from Mr. Michael Byrne, who the speaker system didn't pick up because it was coming from the audience. And just from my ' recollection, and I hope the Council would help me to make sure we get this right. On the bottom of page 28, last sentence from the bottom. I think Mr. Byrne is saying that he would like to ask Council to table the issue. And at the top of page 29, quoting him as much as I can, I think he wanted to ask us to expedite it. I don't think that really changes what we decided but I just wanted to put it for the record that that's my recollection of what he was requesting. Having said that, I think we did decide that the Council wanted it to go back to the Planning Commission and that was resolved by withdrawing the application as opposed to us denying it. So for the record I'd like those changes made. ' Mayor Chmiel: I would say that's basically what was discussed at that particular time. Any other input? Councilwoman Dockendorf: Not from me. Mayor Chmiel: Thank you. ' Councilwoman Dockendorf: So with those changes I'd move approval. Councilman Mason: Second. ' Councilwoman Dockendorf moved, Councilman Mason seconded to approve the Minutes of the City Council meeting dated June 26, 1995 as amended by Councilwoman Dockendorf. Also to approve the Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated June 21, 1995 as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: t Michael Byrne: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council. My name is Michael Byrne... Kimberly Road... Recalling the conversation ... my conversations with the City Attorney where upon reviewing the tape of the Council