Loading...
1 VAR 7616 Frontier TrailCITY OF PC DATE: 8/18/99 CCDATE: CASE #: 99-13 VAR By: Kirchoff.'v STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: LOCATION: APPLICANT: Request for an 8 foot variance from the 30 foot front yard setback for the construction of an addition. 7616 Frontier Trail Jim & Diane Buranen 7616 Frontier Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 974-8457 PRESENT ZONING: ACREAGE: DENSITY: RSF, Single Family Residential 23,625 sq. ft. N/A LtJ ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USES: WATER AND SEWER: PHYSICAL CHARACTER: 2000 LAND USE PLAN: N: S: E: W: RSF, Single Family Residential RSF, Single Family Residential RSF, Single Family Residential RSF, Single Family Residential Available to the site A single family home with a detached one-st.all garage exits on the site. Low Density Residential &t Buranen Variance August 11, 1999 Page 2 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Section 20-615 of the zoning ordinance requires a 30 foot front yard setback for properties zoned RSF (Attachment 2). Section 20-72(a) states that there shall be no expansion, intensification, replacement, structural change, or relocation of any nonconforming use or nonconforming structure except to lessen or eliminate the nonconformity (Attachment 3). Section 20-72 (e) states that removal or destruction of a non-conforming structure to the extent of more than 50 percent of its estimated value, excluding land value and as determined by the city, shall terminate the right to continue the nonconforming structure (Attachment 3). BACKGROUND The property is an unplatted parcel, meaning it has a metes and bounds legal description, not a lot and block. According to records supplied by Carver County, this home was constructed in 1970 prior to the 1972 zoning ordinance. The existing 20 foot by 22 foot detached garage, built in 1981 according to city records, does not meet the 30 foot front yard setback currently required by ordinance. In 1984, an addition was constructed on the front of the 26 foot by 56 foot home. This addition meets the required 30 foot setback. The subject property is 23,622 sq. ft. It is 112.5 feet in width (90 feet required) and 210 feet in depth (125 feet required). The table displays the setbacks maintained by the existing home. TABLE 1 Setbacks For 7616 Frontier Trail Setback Distance Required Distance Maintained Front/West 77th Street 30 feet Garage: 22 feet Home: 54 feet Side 10 feet North: 109 feet West: 35.7 feet Front/Frontier Trail 30 feet 48.6 feet On June 2, 1999 a building permit was issued for the construction of a 24 foot by 31 foot garage. The garage was proposed to be attached to the existing home. The proposed garage was to meet the 30 foot front yard setback. The garage was never built. The applicant would now like to construct a 961 sq. ft. (31 feet by 31 feet), 3-stall garage addition onto an existing single family dwelling. The existing 440 sq. ft. detached garage will be demolished. The addition is proposed to maintain the 22 foot nonconforming front yard setback and a 10 foot side yard setback. Buranen Variance August 11, 1999 Page 3 ANALYSIS The applicant is requesting an 8 foot variance from the 30 foot front yard setback for the construction of a 3-stall garage addition. The existing garage was constructed at a 22 foot front yard setback in 1981. The applicant seeks to maintain that nonconforming setback. Site Characteristics The topography of the site does not limit the buildable area to the extent a variance is needed to construct a garage. The location of the existing home limits the location of a garage addition, however, a permit was issued for a 2-stall garage in June 1999 that complied with ordinance requirements. The location of the existing home does not require a variance for the construction of a garage. (see Buildable Area in Attachment 5.) Permitted Use This site is zoned RSF, Single Family Residential. A single family home can be legally constructed on the site. The zoning ordinance (Section 20-1124 (2) f) requires two parking spaces, both of which shall be completely enclosed for single family dwellings. The applicant is entitled to construct a 2-stall garage on the site, not a 3-stall as requested. Currently, a single family dwelling with one covered parking space is present on the site. A building permit was recently issued for a 2-stall garage. Reasonable Use The buildable area (12,702 sq. ft. or 73 feet by 174 feet) is not constrained by the literal enforcement of the zoning ordinance. The required setbacks do not limit the buildable area to make it impossible to construct a garage without a variance. The property owner has the opportunity to make a reasonable use of the site without any variances. A reasonable use is defined as the use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet. A "use" can be defined as "the purpose or activity for which land or buildings are designed, arranged or intended or for which land or buildings are occupied or maintained." In this case, because it is in a RSF zoning district, a reasonable use is a single family home with a two-stall garage. A building permit has been issued for the construction of a 2-stall garage, so the owner has a reasonable use of the property. A variance is granted when a hardship is present. That is, the property owner cannot make a reasonable use of the site without relief from the ordinance. In this instance, the owner can construct a garage within the buildable area (as noted by building permit #9900406) Buranen Variance August 11, 1999 Page 4 Nonconforming Setback The existing garage maintains a nonconforming 22 foot front yard setback. The zoning ordinance permits a nonconforming structure to be maintained or repaired but only to 50 percent of its value. It also states that a nonconformity shall not be increased. Specifically, the ordinance states ifa setback of a dwelling is nonconforming, no additions may be added to the nonconforming side of the building unless the addition meets setback requirements. The proposed garage addition does not meet the required 30 foot front yard setback and will expand the garage area at the nonconforming setback. The 2-stall garage proposed on the building permit plans meets the setback requirements. Staff believes that a variance should not be granted because it will increase the nonconformity of the setback. It is not reasonable to assume that since the existing garage maintains a 22 foot setback, that a variance will or should be granted. This addition should lessen the nonconformity of the setback, not increase it. Neighborhood Setbacks Staff performed a visual survey of the surrounding properties and found a significant number of homes that do not meet the required setbacks. This is not unusual as this area was settled in the late 1800s. However, this is not justification for this variance. It has been demonstrated that a garage can be constructed on this site without a variance. Yard Encroachments In cases where a variance is granted, the zoning ordinance does not permit any encroachments into the setback such as eaves or bay windows. If a variance is granted, the setback shall be measured from the edge of the eave of the garage. Staff recommends denial of the 8-foot variance request because the applicant has not demonstrated a hardship. FINDINGS The Planning Commission shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts: That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of/ts size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing downward from them meet this criteria. Buranen Variance August 11, 1999 Page 5 Finding: The literal enforcement of the ordinance does not create a hardship, however, the location of the home dictates where an addition can be placed. A building permit has been issued to allow the applicant to construct a 2-stall garage on the site. Approving the variance will increase the nonconformity of the setback and depart downward from pre- existing standards. The inability to construct a 3-stall garage in this location does not constitute a hardship. bo The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. Finding: The conditions upon which this variance is based are applicable to all properties in the RSF zoning district. Co The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. Finding: The 3-stall garage will increase the value of the property, however, staff does not believe that is the sole reason for the request. do The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship. Finding: The home was constructed prior to the ordinance, so the hardship is not entirely self-created. However, the fact that the applicant wishes to construct a 3-stall garage when a permit was issued for a 2-stall, is a self-created hardship. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. Finding: The variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. However, the granting of the variance will allow the expansion of a nonconformity, which could contribute to a downward deviation of standards in the neighborhood. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Finding: The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets. However, permitting the 8 foot variance would increase the nonconformity of the setback. Buranen Variance August 11, 1999 Page 6 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: "The Planning Commission denies the request #99-13 for an 8 foot variance from the 30 foot front yard setback for the construction of a 3 stall garage based upon the staff report and the following: 1. The applicant has not demonstrated a hardship to warrant a variance. 2. A 2-stall garage can be constructed on the site without a variance. 3. Sufficient buildable area exists on the site at the required setbacks to permit the construction of a garage." ATTACHMENTS 1. Application and Letter 2. Section 20-615, RSF District Requirements 3. Section 20-72, Nonconforming Uses and Structures 4. Lot Survey 5. Site Buildable Area 6. Public hearing notice and property owners g:\plan\ck\boa\buranen 99-11 vat.doc Jim & Diane Buranen 7616 Frontier Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Date: July 19, 1999 City of Chanhassen Planning Committee 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Planning Committee, We are asking approval for an eight foot variance on our residence at 7616 Frontier Trail for an attached garage. We purchased our home last year which has a two car unattached garage. We were newly married and wanted to live in the Chanhassen area near our families. We thought we could handle an unattached garage for awhile and noticed that there was plenty of space between the garage and house to later connect them together. After living a year of slipping and running to the garage through snow, rain and hail we now know we definitely love attached garages and need one. In addition, we like our three new vehicles to be housed in a garage away from Minnesota's weather elements especially the hail, One of our vehicles got caught in the hail storm a year ago and we had several thousand dollars of damage. We work hard to afford nice vehicles and want them to keep looking nice. Our dilemma is that our current garage side is 38 feet from the road which would fulfill the requirement of the 30 feet set back. However, later we discovered that the 38 feet included 16 feet of the city's setback property which brought our property setback to only 22 feet. Therefore, our current existing garage has a variance of 8 feet. We simply desire this same 8 feet variance for our new attached garage. The existing garage is further from the road then some of our neighbor's houses and does not cause a problem with it's location. So by granting this variance you would not be causing any hardship for anyone but merely eliminating ours. Any concerns, we would be happy to address. We appreciate your time and hope you approve our request. Sincerely, Jim and Diane Buranen CiTY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (612) 937-1900 RECEWE JUL 1_ 9 1999 C, tTY OF cHANH^SSEN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit Conditional Use Permit interim Use Permit . Non-conforming Use Permit Vacation of ROW/Easements Variance c'J,:) 7~' Wetland Alteration Permit Planned Unit Development* Rezoning Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits Sign Plan Review .Site Pian Review* Subdivision* Notification Sign X Escro)~'~-~pg Fees/Attorney Cost'* (~50 CU P~SP R/VAC/VAR/WAP/Metes d~nds, $400 Minor SUB) TOTAL FEE $ A list of all property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the application. --i~din..q inaterial sampic3 must bc 3ubmittcd with site-plan rcvicws. ~['wcnty~ix full size folded-copies-ortho plansmust--be~submiffed,~ncluding~--1-q'-reduced'copyTM ~r~n.t~p~renc¥ fnr ~.ach plan sheet, "~ Escrow will be req, dred fnr nther application3 through thc development contract NOTE - When mu]tiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. § 20-595 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE b. For accessory structures, three (3) stories/forty (40) feet. (7) The minimum driveway separation is as follows: a. If the drivew~y is on a collector street, four hundred (400) feet. b. If the drivew~y is on an arterial street, one thousand two hundred fifty (1,250) feet. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 4(5-4-5), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 127, § 2, 3-26-90; Ord. No. 170, § 2, 6-8-92; Ord. No. 194, § 2, 10-11-93) Sec. 20-596. Interim uses. The following are interim uses in the "RR" District: (1) Commercial kennels and stables. (Ord. No. 120, § 3, 2-12-90) Editor's note Inasmuch as there exists a § 20-595, the provisions added by § 3 of Ord. No. 120 as § 20-595 have been redesignated as § 20-596. Secs. 20-597--20-610. Reserved. ARTICLE XII. '~{SF" SINGLE.FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 20-611. Intent. The intent of the "RSF" District is to provide for single-family residential subdivisions. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5-1), 12-15-86) Sec. 20-612. Permitted uses. The (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (Ord. following uses are permitted in an "RSF" District: Single-family dwellings. Public and private open space. State-licensed day care center for twelve (12) er fewer children. State-licensed group home serving six (6) or fewer persons. Utility services. Temporary real estate office and model home. Antennas as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5..2), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 259, § 11, 11-12-96) Sec. 20-613. Permitted accessory uses. The following are permitted accessory uses in an "RSF" District: (1) Garage. Supp. No. 9 1210 ZONING § 20-615 (2) Storage building. (3) Swimming pool. (4) Tennis court. (5) Signs. (6) Home occupations. (7) One (1) dock. (8) Private kennel. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5-3), 12-15-86) Sec. 20-614. Conditional uses. The following are conditional uses in an "RSF" District: (1) Churches. (2) Reserved. (3) Recreational beach lots. (4) Towers as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5.4), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 120, § 4(4), 2-12-90; Ord. No. 259, § 12, 11-12-96) State law reference--Conditional uses, M.S. § 462.3595. Sec. 20-615. Lot requirements and setbacks. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an "RSF" District subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this chapter and chapter 18: (1) The minimum lot area is fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet. For neck or flag lots, the lot area requirements shall be met after the area contained within the "neck" has been excluded from consideration. (2) The minimum lot frontage is ninety (90) feet, except that lots fronting on a cul-de-sac "bubble" or along the outside curve of curvilinear street sections shall be ninety (90) feet in width at the building setback line. The location of this lot is conceptually Supp. No. 9 1211 § 20-615 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE illustrated below. Lotl Whore Frontlgo lo (3) The minimum lot depth is one hundred twenty-five (125) feet. The location of these lots is conceptually illustrated below. Lot width on neck or flag lots and lots accessed by private driveways shall be one hundred (100) feet as measured at the front building setback line. Neck I Flag Lots lO0/kot Fro7 Lot Line k,.., / . I / II I , t /it Width .~ ! ~ I I I , t I I I L_L .... I__j (4) The maximum lot coverage for all structures and paved surfaces is twenty-five (25) percent. (5) The setbacks are as follows: b. For front yards, thirty (30) feet. . For rear yards, thirty (30) feet. Supp. No. 9 1212 ZONING § 20-632 (6) (7) For side yards, ten (10) feet. setbacks for lots served by private driveways and/or neck lots are as follows: For front yard, thirty (30) feet. The front yard shall be the lot line nearest the public right-of-way that provides access to the parcel. The rear yard lot line is to be located opposite from the front lot line with the remaining exposures treated as side lot lines. On neck lots the front yard setback shall be measured at the point nearest the front lot line' where the lot achieves a one-hundred-foot minimum width. b. For rear yards, thirty (30) feet. c. For side yards, ten (10) feet. The maximum height is as follows: a. For the principal structure, three (3) stories/forty (40) feet. b. For accessory structures, twenty (20) feet. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5-5), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 90, § 1, 3-14-88; Ord. No. 127, § 3, 3-26-90; Ord. No. 145, § 2, 4-8-91; Ord. No. 240, § 18, 7-24-95) Editor's note~Section 2 of Ord. No. 145 purported to amend § 20-615(6)b. pertaining to accessory structures; such provision were contained in § 20-615(7)b., subsequent to amend- ment of the section by Ord. No. 127. Hence, the provisions of Ord. No. 145, § 2, were included as amending § 20-615(7)b. Sec. 20-616. Interim uses. The following are interim uses in the "RSF" District: (1) Private stables subject to provisions of chapter 5, article IV. (2) Commercial stables with a minimum lot size of five (5) acres. (Ord. No. 120, § 3, 2-12-90) Secs. 20-617m20-630. Reserved. ARTICLE XIII. 'rR-4" MIXED LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 20-631. Intent. The intent of the "R-4" District is to provide for single-family and attached residential development at a maximum net density of four (4) dwelling units per acre. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 6(5-6-1), 12-15-86) Sec. 20-632. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in an "R-4" District: (1} Single-family dwellings. (2) Two-family dwellings. Supp. No. 9 1213 § 20-60 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE Sec. 20-60. Denial. Variances may be deemed by the board of adjustments and appeals and the council, and such denial shall constitute a finding and determination that the conditions required for approval do not exist. (Ord. No. 80, Art. III, § 1(3.1-4(6)), 12-15-86) Secs. 20-61--20-70. Reserved. DIAqSION 4. NONCONFORMING USES* Sec. 20-71. Purpose. The purpose of this division is: (1) To recognize the existence of uses, lots, and structures which were lawful when established, but which no longer meet all ordinance requirements; (2) To prevent the enlargement, expansion, intensification, or extension of any noncon- fo _truing use, building, or structure; (3) To encourage the elimination of nonconforming uses, lots, and structures or reduce their impact on adjacent properties. (Ord. No. 165, § 2, 2-10-92) Sec. 20.72. Nonconforming uses and structures. ~There shall be no expansion, intensification, replacement, structural change, or relo- cation of any nonconforr-lng use or nonconforming structure except to lessen or eliminate the nonconformity. (b) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, any detached single-family dwelling that is on a nonconforming lot or that is a nonconforming use or structure may be altered, or expanded provided, however, that the nonconformity may not be increased. If a setback of a dwelling is nonconforming, no additions may be added to the nonconforming side of the building unless the addition meets setback requirements. (c) No nonconforming use shall be resumed if normal operation of the use has been discontinued for a period of twelve (12) or more months. Time shall be calculated as beginning on the day following the last day in which the use was in normal operation and shall run continuously thereafter. Following the expiration of twelve (12) months, only land uses which are permitted by this ordinance shall be allowed to be established. *Editor's note-Section 2 of Ord. No. 165, adopted Feb. 10, 1992, amended Div. 4 in its entirety to read as set out in §§ 20-71-20.73. Prior to amendment, Div. 4 contained §§ 20-71-20-78, which pertained to similar subject matter and derived from Ord. No. 80, Art. III, § 5, adopted Dec. 15, 1986; and Ord. No. 163, § 1, adopted Feb. 24, 1992. ~upp. No. 4 1164 ZONING § 20-73 (d) Full use of a nonconforming land use shall not be resumed if the amount of land or floor area dedicated to the use is lessened or if the intensity of the use is in any manner diminished for a period of twelve (12) or more months. Time shall be calculated as beginning on the day following the last day in which the nonconforming land use was in full operation and shall run continuously thereafter.. Following the expiration of twelve (12) months, the nonconforming land use may be used only in the manner or to the extent used during the preceding twelve (12) months. For the purposes of this section, intensity of use shall be mea- sured by hours of operation, traffic, noise, exterior storage, signs, odors, number of employees, and other factors deemed relevant by the city. O Maintenanee and repair nonconforming structures is permitted, or destruc. of Removal tion of a nonconforming structure to the extent of more than fifty (50) percent of its estimated value, excluding land value and as determined by the city, shall terminate the right to con- tinue the nonconforming structure. (f) Notwithstanding the prohibitions contained in the forgoing paragraphs of this section, if approved by the city council a nonconforming land use may be changed to another noncon- forming land use of less intensity if it is in the public interest. In all instances the applicant has the burden of proof regarding the relative intensities of uses. (g) If a nonconforming land use is superseded or replaced by a permitted use, the non- conforming status of the premises and any rights which arise under the provisions of this section shall terminate. (Ord. No. 165, § 2, 2.10-92) Sec. 20.73. Nonconforming lots of record. (a) No variance shall be required to reconstruct a detached single-family dwelling located on a nonconforming lot of record or which is a nonconforming use if it is destroyed by natural disaster so long as the replacement dwelling has a footprint which is no larger than that of the destroyed structure and is substantially the same size in building height, and floor area as the destroyed structure. Reconstruction shall commence within two (2) years of the date of the destruction of the original building and reasonable progress shall be made in completing the project. A building permit shall be obtained prior to construction of the new dwelling and the new structure shall be constructed in compliance with all other city codes and regulations. (b) No variance shall be required to construct a detached single-family dwelling on a nonconforming lot provided that it fronts on a public street or approved private street and provided that the width and area measurements are at lest seventy-five (75) percent of the minimum requirements of this chapter. (c) Except as otherwise specifi~y provided for detached single-family dwellings, 'there shall be no expansion, intensification, replacement, or structural changes of a structure on a nonconforming lot. (d) If two (2) or more contiguous lots are in single ownership and if all or part of the lots do not meet the width and area requirements of this chapter for lots in the district, the Supp. No. 4 1165 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JIM & DIANE BURANEN, JR. 7616 FRONTIER TRAIL CHANHAS~EN, MN. 55317 RECEWr; ,JUL ~ 0 1999 0 DENOTES SET REBAR MARKED R.L.S. NO. 19162 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A DENOTES SET P-K NAIL · DENOTES FOUND IRON PIPE That port of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quorter(SWl/4 of SE 1/4) of Section 12, Township 116, Range 2.3, Carver County, Minnesota, described os follows; Commencing at the point of intersection of the North Line of St. Alloys Street(West 77th Street) and the West Line of St. Francis Street (Frontier Trail) in the Village of Chonhossen occ'ording to the plot thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deed for said County;, thence West along the North Line of St. Alloys Street (77th) 112.50 feet ; thence North parallel with the said West Line of St. Francis Street(Frontier) 22,3.0 feet; thence Southeasterly to a point on the West Line of said St. Frances Street(Frontier) o distance of 210.O feet northerly, measured along said line, from said point of commencing; thence Southerly 210.0 feet along the said West line to the point of commencing. JOB NO.: 9040.211 I sc~t,~: r' = 4o'[ From BOOK: 50 PAGE: ','ha' 2 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report, was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I om o Duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the StoLe of Minnesota. Darton 13. ^hrens, R.LS. No. 19162 ENVIROSCIENCE ENGINEERS eSCIENTISTS · LAND SURVEYORS 49 J DRAWN BY: B.G.A. J 9040-BURANEN.DWG CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JIM & DIANE BURANEN, JR. 7616 FRONTIER TRAIL CHANHASSEN, MN. 55317 Buildable Area 0 DENOTES SET REBAR MARKED R.L.S. NO. Ig162 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A DENOTES SET P-K NAIL · DENOTES FOUND IRON PIPE That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quorter(SWl/4 of SE 1/4) of Section 12, Township 116, Range 25, Carver County, Minnesota, described os follows; Commencing at the point of intersection of the North Line of St. Alloys Street(West 77th Street) and the West Line of St. Francis Street (Frontier Trail) in the Village of Chonhossen according to the plot thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deed for said County;, thence West along the North Line of St. Alloys Street (77th) 112.,50 feet ; thence North parallel with the said West Line of St. Francis Street(Frontier) 22,3.0 feet; thence Southeasterly to o point on the West Line of said St. Frances Street(Frontier) o distance of 210.0 feet northerly, measured along said line, from said point of commencing; thence Southerly 2t0.O feet along the said West line to the point of commencing. I JOB NO.: 9040.211 [ SCALE: 1' = 4~0"[ FIELD BOOK: 50 PAGE: ,,~(-)~ CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report, was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I om o Duly Registered Land Surveyor under the lows of the State of Minnesota. Barton O. Ahrens, R.LS. No. lg162 Doled: ~ Z,,~-/~'~ ,Jun 0 1 1~99 ENVIROSCIENCE ENGINEERS · SCIENHSTS · LAND SURVEYORS ENGINEERING DEpI; 49 I DRAm BY: B.G.A. I 9O40-BURA.N~H'.DqG NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 18, 1999 AT 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 690 CITY CENTER DRIVE PROPOSAL: Request for a Front Yard Setback Variance APPLICANT: LOCATION: Jim and Diane Buranen 7616 Frontier Trail NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a proposal in your area. The applicants, Jim and Diane Buranen, request for an 8' variance from the 30 foot front yard setback for the construction of an addition on property zoned RSF and located at 7616 Frontier Trail. What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the developer's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting,'the'Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The Developer will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses project. Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Cindy at 937-1900 ext. 117. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on August 5, 1999. W 78th St ~Z Z ~Z w~w ~w~ ~w~ ~w~ '0 Z w Z ~~ w ~ 0 ~ ~ WZ Z w~ Z>W ~ Z Ow~ z~< 0~ ~w~ ~W<~ F-Z~ Z IJJ 0 IJJ ,~- cEx O0 Zm -i- Z -i- WZ Z 0 Z .W>w ~w <- W~ Z~ Z ~OZ ~0 Z 0 Z ~Z ~ ~w~ - wz w-w ~w Z W~Z ~Z ~ w~. w~ w~ ~ ~wz >wz ~ w ~w ~w ~ Z~ z ~z ~ ~ Z ,-.r ~ z m-r-~ ,~m Z o>~ zz <~z o~z ZZ w Z 5~ ~o z~~ oLU~ ,~ z~z I.IJ w,,~ zOz mZ -i-Orr >- 7Z UlZZ m OZZ ~.D U.i CD ZZ'