Loading...
3. Highway 5 Corridor Study'I I I 0 r] MEMORANDUM CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager FROM: Kate Aanenson, AICP, Planning Director DATE: June 21, 1995 SUBJ: Highway 5 Corridor Study BACKGROUND The draft document for the Highway 5 Corridor Land Use Design Study was completed in August of 1993. This document is a comprehensive plan amendment that needs adoption by the City Council. This plan will guide development along the corridor. After adoption by the council, it will be forwarded to the Metropolitan Council for their approval. There are elements of this document that the council has already approved including the Overlay District Standards and the Northern Access Boulevard selection. The purpose of the Highway 5 the Comprehensive Plan was a proceed to define uses for two These study areas were locates likely expansions of the comm document provide land use re changes to existing parcels, loc Boulevard. Corridor Study goes back [opted after years of effort 1995 study areas as identi: outside of the expanded 1 g way. In the spring of 1991, a condition of approval was to i the Comprehensive Plan. ,, but they represented the next left these areas blank. This 1995 study area,as well as north of Highway 5 between State Highway 41 and Galpin Additional reasons for the Highway 5 Corridor Study was that at the time of the MUSA area expansion, there was ongoing pressure for development along Hwy. 5. Councilman Richard Wing was concerned about the development alcirg the corridor and requested the city work with the University of Minnesota Urban Design Center to prepare a plan. Out of this study, a document was put together by the Urban Design Center. From that document, staff requested a consultant prepare a plan to bridge this document and come up with specific design standards and land use recommendations along the Hwy. 5 corridor. The purpose and the intent of the Hwy. 5 Corridor Plan as stated in the design study is "the development within Highway 5 Corridor Study June 21, 1995 Page 2 the corridor will be the major factors influencing the visual and environmental quality of the entire community. At full development, the corridor will contain Chanhassen's central business district and other regionally significant retail nodes, employment concentrations, public institutions, recreation facilities and significant residential development. Due to the intensity of these land uses, the Hwy. 5 corridor represents the heart of Chanhassen as well as its dominating image to those passing through the community. Recognizing the importance of this corridor, the city undertook a number of studies designed to culminate in a Highway 5 Corridor Plan." Summary The plan is intended to provide orderly and attractive development of land within the corridor in a manner consistent with the established goals and policies. Development within the corridor is expected to be designed with greater sensitivity to the environment and a higher quality that might not have occurred in the absence of specific guidelines created through this planning effort. The goals and policies are broken down into a number of different areas including access boulevards, parks, open space and trails, development standards and the corridor design streetscape. The goal of the access boulevard is to guide development to be consistent with the city comprehensive plan and building community. The northern boulevard is designed to be the main street of Chanhassen as it will be continuous from State Highway 101 west through downtown Chanhassen to State Highway 41. Another goal is that the plan provide a mixture of land uses that support the concept of developing a diverse community according to the goals contained in the city's comprehensive plan. Land use decisions should seek to develop and support an image of Chanhassen as community with solid residential neighborhoods, a cohesive downtown, a diverse economy and a strong social fabric. The study is divided into the following chapters: 1. Executive Summary 2. Purpose of the Plan - this includes the goals and policies 3. A ccess Boulevards - This chapter outlines the design criteria for the north Hwy. 5 frontage road as well as proposed alignments. An alignment has been selected (the southerly alignment) as well as the specific design for the road cross section. 4. Land Use within the Corridor - The chapter gives specific land use recommendations including land uses for the 1995 study area. The map in the document, Figure 4.1, has been modified (see attachment) to reflect the changes. 5. Parks, Open Space and Trails - This chapter identifies proposed parks, open space and trails along the corridor. I Highway 5 Corridor Study June 21, 1995 Page 3 6. Landscape and Urban Design - This chapter identifies measures and design objectives intended to assist both public and private sector development with landscape and urban design treatments. ' 7. Parcel Development and Design Standards - This chapter has been modified and developed into an ordinance format and adopted by the City Council. 8. Parcel Site Analysis and Conceptual Development Plans - The parcel analysis and concept diagrams establish a recognition of site planning issues and options for development. 9. Implementation - This chapter provides an overview of the task force that should be undertaken as a means of implementing the Highway 5 Corridor Plan. Many of these action items have been implemented. • The Environmental Assessment was adopted and the road alignment was selected. • Park and Recreation Commission is updating their comprehensive plan. ' Hoisington Koegler prepared gateway /entryway designs. ' As the council is well aware, as a part of the EA document, it was previously thought that by 1996, MnDOT would be widening Hwy. 5 and they would participate in some of the acquisition for the northern frontage road. This widening of Hwy. 5 is now scheduled by ' MnDOT to the year post -2000. More than likely development along the north and south side of street will provide for the construction of the frontage road system. ' History of Hearings Following is an overview of the meeting dates on the Highway 5 Corridor Land Use Design ' Study: ' Task Force July 21, 1993 and September 15, 1993 Planning Commission held 2 informational ' meetings on the corridor study January 19, 1994 The commission held a public hearing and made recommendations on their findings on the study to the City Council. Highway 5 Corridor Study June 21, 1995 Page 4 February 14, 1994 February 7, 1994 March 28, 1994 June 27, 1994 July 11, 1994 January 23, 1995 City Council held a hearing on the Highway 5 Corridor Study. At that time, the council was reluctant to embrace the whole document based on the fact that they wanted to first decide where the frontage road could be because they felt the road drove the land use decision. The council adopted just the overlay district standards. City Council held a work session to review the Highway 5 Corridor Study and Environmental Assessment document as well as the design overlay ordinance. This session was an overview with the Planning Commission and Task Force recommendations for the corridor study. City Council held a hearing to take public comment on the Highway 5 Corridor Study, the EA document for the north access boulevard and the ordinance establishing development standards. At that meeting, the only action taken by the council was a resolution supporting the southern alignment for the north access boulevard. City Council held the first reading of the Highway 5 Overlay District and the first reading was approved. The Highway 5 Overlay District was approved. City Council selected the alignment for proposed Arboretum Boulevard or the northern access boulevard as part of the environmental assessment document. Since that date, no further action has occurred on the Highway 5 Corridor Land Use Design Study. ' Highway 5 Corridor Stud g Y Y ' June 21, 1995 Page 5 Discussion Staff is recommending the City Council approve the remainder of the document as it will become a comprehensive plan guide for the 1995 study area for land use. The other components of the guide include parks, open space and trails, landscaping urban design, parcel development and design standards, parcel site analysis and concept plans. The following issues were still of concern to the Planning Commission: • How large should the commercial zoning extend? • How large is the service area of the city? • What is the value of the city's life style? ' These are issues which effect the option for commercial zoning on the Ward property, located south of Hwy. 5 between Great Plains Blvd. and Market Blvd., and the VanDeVere property ' which is located on the northeast corner of Hwy. 5 and Galpin Boulevard. • The Opus site should be left IOP except for the most northwesterly portion ' west of Hwy. 41 which should be left for medium family residential. The PUD that will be developed for the site will guide the development of the individual parcels. • Eckankar property - the owners are requesting that in addition to the multi- family that institutional be listed as a permitted use. ' Swings Miniature /Golf property (15 - 20 acres) park should also be considered as an option. ' Heritage Development which owns the property west of Bluff Creek, south of the frontage road - multi - family should also be considered as an option as well ' as industrial. • The possible location of a 15 -20 acre park located east of the Fleet Farm property and a portion of the Dolejsi may also be another land use recommendation. ' Attached is a report that gives additional overview of the document's purpose and history as well as a colored land use map outlining the areas staff is recommending for land use changes. Again, in summary those are the proposals for the area (refer to attached map): ' west of Gal p in, north of Hwy. 5 - low density, office institutional, medium density, neighborhood commercial Highway 5 Corridor Study June 21, 1995 Page 6 • the Eckankar property with the added institutional use, the option for the property east of the school site which would include high density residential • the Ward property which the Planning Commission had recommended be consistent as shown on the zoning map which is industrial and allows up to 25% commercial under a PUD, office and medium density • the Gorra property north of Hwy. 5 on the westerly portion as low and medium density north of the high density and adjacent to Lake Ann • medium density east of Timberwood and north of Creekside • medium density on the southeast corner of DataSery RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council adopt the Highway 5 Corridor Land Use Study and the recommendations found in the document and amended attachment Figure 4.1. ATTACHMENTS 1. Highway 5 Corridor Study - PLEASE BRING YOUR COPY 2. Notice of public meeting 3. Memo dated February 2, 1994. 4. Ordinance No. 212- Hwy. 5 Overlay District 5. Land use map. NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING CITY OF CHANHASSEN HIGHWAY 5 CORRIDOR On Monday, June 26, 1995, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, the City Council will be holding a public meeting and take public comment on the adoption of Hwy. 5 Corridor Study. The document establishes development, design standards, and future land uses along the Highway 5 Corridor. Kathryn R. Aanenson, Planning Director (612) 937 -1900 ext. 118 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on June 15, 1995) Eckankar P. O. Box 27300 New Hope, MN 55427 Leander & P. Kerber 1620 Arboretum Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Michael Gorra ' 1680 Arboretum Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 David Luse 15195 Martin Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Chanhassen American Legion c/o George Beniek 412 West 76th Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chaska Gateway Partners 3610 Hwy. 101 S. Wayzata, MN 55391 Betty O'Shaughnessy (J -B 99 Partnership) 1000 Hesse Farm Road Chaska, MN 55318 Hi -Way 5 Partnership c/o Dennis Dirlam 15421 Creekside Court Eden Prairie, MN 55344 John Hennessy/D. Rengers 7305 Galpin Blvd. Excelsior, MN 55331 J P Links, Inc. 7750 Galpin Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 MN Horticulture Rm 1 Horticulture Building University of Minnesota St. Paul, MN 55108 Mr. Peter Olin MN Landscape Arboretum 3675 Arboretum Blvd. P. O. Box 39 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Henry & Edna Wrase 8175 Hazeltine Blvd. Chaska, MN 55318 Regents of Univ. Minnesota c/o University Attorney 100 Church Street Minneapolis, MN 55455 Chan Land Partners 200 Hwy. 13 W. Burnsville, MN 55337 Audubon 92 c/o Lars Akerberg P. O. Box 158 Chaska, MN 55318 Theodore & Marlene Bentz 7300 Galpin Blvd. Excelsior, MN 55331 Larry & E. VanDeVeire 4890 Co. Rd. 10 E. Chaska, MN 55318 Charles & S. Markert 7461 Hazeltine Blvd. Excelsior, MN 55331 E.Jerome Carlson/Beddor Enterprise 1000 Park Road ' Chanhassen, MN 55317 Paul & Carol Paulson 3160 82nd Street West Chaska, MN 55318 ' Dale & Marcia Wanninger 8170 Galpin Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Thomas & Marian Schmitz 8190 Galpin Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Raymond R. Notermann 1450 Arboretum Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Doug Bentz 7280 Galpin Blvd. Excelsior, MN 55331 Conway Lars 4952 Emerson Ave. So. Minneapolis, MN 55409 Jeffrey & L. Oberman 7450 Hazeltine Blvd. Excelsior, MN 55331 Thomas & S. Eischens Thomas & J. Kordonowy Jay C. Dolejsi 7460 Hazeltine Blvd. 3301 Tanadoona Drive 6961 Chaparral Lane Excelsior, MN 55331 Excelsior, MN 55331 Chanhassen, MN 55317 tus Lawn and Garden Center Lyman Lumber /ABC Redmond Products West 78th Street 18900 West 78th Street 18930 West 78th Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 The Press Versatil Data Sery West 78th Street 18400 West 77th Street 19011 Lake Drive East 13h 780 anhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 t aytek Inc. Dexter Magnetic Material Chanhassen Holding Company 660 Quattro 7600 Quattro Drive 14201 Excelsior Blvd. hanhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Minnetonka, MN 55343 F cDonalds Corporation (22 -146) Systems Control, Inc. Mortenson Development Co. AMF O'Hare 755 Mary Avenue N. 700 Meadow Lane No. Box 66207 Sunnyvale, CA 94086 Minneapolis, MN 55422 1 O. hicago, IL 60666 Family of Christ Lutheran Church Lake Drive Blue Circle Investment Co. Chanhassen NH Partnership � 75 . O. Box 388 6125 Blue Circle Drive 1100 International Centre Chanhassen, MN 55317 Minnetonka, MN 55343 900 Second Avenue So. I Minneapolis, MN 55402 R obert Dittrich Holiday Station Stores Thaddeus Korzenowski ( 827 Crestview Drive 4567 80th Street West 5315 3rd Avenue So. ew Ulm, MN 56073 Bloomington, MN 55437 Minneapolis, MN 55419 Chanhassen Inn Roberts Automatic Products Lutheran Church of Living Christ West 79th Street 880 Lake Drive Box 340 t 31 hanhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 jF4etro Lakes West Mini - Storage /o Mark Senn E. Jerome Carlson Suite 100 6950 QALPIN BLVD. 001 Wayzata Blvd. Excelsior, MN 55331 innetonka, MN 55343 k cGlynn Bakeries, Inc. /o Grand Met Tax Dept. F 00 South 6th Street Vlinneapolis, MN 55402 C. Burdick 26 Lake Street Excelsior, MN 55331 Shamrock Property Partners 1 McGlynn Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Target Stores, Inc. Attn: Mr. Dick Brooks 33 South 6th Street Box 1392 Minneapolis, MN 55440 Roman R. Roos 10341 Heidi Lane Chaska, MN 55318 M. J. Ward 8190 Great Plains Blvd. Box 213 Chanhassen, MN 55317 T. F. James Company P. O. Box 24137 Minneapolis, MN 55424 Mills Properties, Inc. Robert & L. Bergan Mid - American Baptist Social 512 Laurel Street 3241 Tanadoona Drive Services Corp. P. O. Box 505 Excelsior, MN 55331 2600 Arboretum Blvd. Brainerd, MN 56401 Excelsior, MN 55331 P6u1' Savaryn Michael Sorenson Lotus Realty 9950 No. Shore Road 7606 Erie Avenue 545 West 78th Street Waconia, MN 55387 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Valvoline Instant Oil Change Gary Brown Gary Kirt Suite 1200 1831 Koehnen Circle 3915 Hwy. 7 301 Main Street East Excelsior, MN 55331 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Lexington, KY 40507 Amoco American Oil Apple Valley Red -E -Mix Waterfront Assoc. Attn: Tax Department 6801 150th Street West 440 Union Place P. O. Box 3428 Apple Valley, MN 55124 Excelsior, MN 55331 Oakbrook, IL 60522 Donald McCarville Ralph Molnau/Ron Dubbe Neal and D. Wunderlich c/o State Bank of Chanhassen P. O. Box 151 7011 Galpin Blvd. 600 West 78th Street Waconia, MN 55387 Excelsior, MN 55331 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Lawrence & F. Raser Roger & G. Schmidt Current Resident 8210 Galpin Blvd. 8301 Galpin Blvd. 8241 Galpin Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Excelsior, MN 55331 Mr. Tom Green Timothy Dempsey Mills Property 8241 Galpin Blvd. 512 Laurel Chanhassen, MN 55317 Brainerd, MN 56401 C� � I MEMORANDUM i Fi J J 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 71900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager FROM: Paul Krauss, Planning Director Kate Aanenson, Senior Planner DATE: February 2, 1994 SUBJ: Public Hearing Highway 5 Corridor Study, Environmental Assessment for North Highway 5 Access Boulevard and Highway Corridor Overlay zone OVERVIEW On January 19, 1994, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for the purpose of making a recommendation to the City Council on the Highway 5 Corridor Land Use and Design Plan and the Environmental Assessment (EA) Document. The corridor study has two major components: one is the Land Use Study, and the other; are the proposed Development and Design Standards. The third issue the Planning Commission must consider is the of the alignment alternative for the north Highway 5 access boulevard. The Planning Commission has spent the better part of the last three months reviewing the components of these plans. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended adoption of the study, affirmation of the EAW and the northern frontage road as the preferred alternative. Staff is recommending that the City Council affirm the Planning Commission recommendations on the frontage "road alignment and the adoption of the corridor study including land use recommendations and overlay zone. Later in this report, we have attempted to frame the outstanding issues to facilitate the Council's review and recommendation. BACKGROUND In the spring of 1991, the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan was adopted after years of effort. As a condition of approval, at the request of the Planning Commission and City Council, work was to proceed to define uses for the two 1995 Study Areas which were identified on the Comprehensive Plan. These study areas were located outside the expanded MUSA but represented the next likely expansions of the community. The Comprehensive Plan left these areas blank, and this program was essentially going to be designed to fill in the blanks. Planning Commission February 2, 1994 Page 2 At the same time, it was evident that there would be growing pressure for development along Hwy. 5 and there was increasing concem among members of the City Council and other groups, lead by Councilman Richard Wing, to make sure that what happens on the corridor is of the highest possible quality. Councilman Wing had contacted the University's Urban Design Center for advice. At the same time, Planning staff organized a bus tour of the corridor. Growing out of this mix of issues, the HRA retained the University's Urban Design Center to do a conceptual corridor report to better define community interests and establish goals. This work was completed late last year and was presented to the task force and is now being presented to the Planning Commission. The City's Comprehensive Plan contains quite specific recommendations for the Hwy. 5 corridor. Among these are the following: The Hwy. 5 corridor, west of downtown Chanhassen in particular, should not become an industrial or commercial strip road as has been the case in Eden Prairie and on highways in other communities. Thus, the Land Use Plan was developed in such a way that residential land uses occupied much of the north side of the highway and break up the corridor on the south side in the vicinity of Timberwood. The Comprehensive Plan designated a middle school (now an elementary school) site at the intersection of Hwy. 5 and Galpin Boulevard. This was done not only because we think it is a good school site, but also because we think it has a tremendous amount of merit in providing permanent and substantial amounts of green space in this area. The plan envisioned some expansion to Lake Ann Park, as well as preservations of environmental and recreational corridors along both branches of Bluff Creek. The plan envisioned a system of collector streets (currently called parallel access boulevards) that will allow the movement of traffic without reliance on Hwy. 5. The plan established a 1995 Study Area at the northeast corner of the intersection of Hwy. 5 and Hwy. 41. In large part, from some perspectives, this may prove to be an optimal commercial site; however, it was determined that it is in the city's best interest to make sure that the downtown is fully developed before other commercial developments proceed. The city has also been involved in a number of initiatives that have a direct bearing on Hwy. 5 These include the following: Plannin g Commission ' February 2, 1994 Page 3 We have taken a proactive role in working with MnDOT to make sure that as ' Hwy. 5 is extended, there are unique and interesting design elements added to the project. The HRA has been extremely active in the vicinity of the primary entrances into the CBD and has retained, Hamel, Green and Associates, HGA, to ' prepare these design elements. d J r The city has retained Hoisington Koegler Group to complete a vision study for the Central Business District "Vision 2000." The study's mission is to create a city center that serves as the focal point for public services, abundant retail opportunities, entertainment, recreation and cultural facilities. The city received ISTEA (transportation enhancement) funding for a pedestrian/bicycle bridge crossing Hwy 5. The location of the bridge at the Apple Valley Red -E -Mix site and east of the American Legion property will link neighborhoods divided by Hwy. 5. The city is also working with Southwest Metro Transit to locate a park and ride on the American Legion property. A park and ride not only ties in to the mission of the Vision 2000 goals, but it also can be benefited by the future bridge. In the past two years, city ordinances have been extensively modified to require much higher levels of quality development than had been the case previously. During this time, we have adopted new landscaping standards, a new PUD district, some improved design guidelines, buffer yards, as well as a number of other changes. The city has embarked on a Surface Water Management Plan which is designed to enhance woodland protection, manage surface water as it flows through the community, and improve water quality. We have historically been ahead of the pack in this area with our trend setting wetlands program. This is likely to assist in preservation of water features in the corridor. The city is working with the DNR Forester to develop an urban reforestation plan and program for the city as well as a tree preservation ordinance. The city is working to secure a grant from the Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources LCMR, that assist in the protection, acquisition and recreational development of the Bluff Creek Corridor. The city has been proactive in the past in working in public private partnerships with developers as deemed appropriate. This mechanism not only assists the development but also gives the city an extra measure of control over the quality of development that is produced. Planning Commission February 2, 1994 Page 4 Arboretum Boulevard Background One aspect of the corridor study is the coordination with MnDOT on the design of the Highway 5 main line improvements as well as coordination between the city and MnDOT on the construction of the north access boulevard, referred to as "Arboretum Boulevard" in the Highway 5 Study. MnDOT is utilizing the new federal transportation bill in part to justify support for the city's efforts in constructing this roadway. This roadway will ultimately have a beneficial impact on Highway 5 since is it designed to intercept local trips from throughout the northern half of our community. It appears that the funding for Highway 5 and the frontage road may not be available until the year 2000. Development in the area of the frontage road and portions of the road may be built prior to any Federal or State funding availability. The city is funding the drafting of the Environmental Assessment document that is required to obtain state and federal funding for Arboretum Boulevard because the city still views this as an investment that may secure a larger amount of state and federal funds as a part of cost sharing for the roadway itself. The idea for what is now being called Arboretum Boulevard goes back to the city's 1990 Comprehensive Plan. It contains a description of access boulevards to be located on either side of Hwy. 5. The one located south of Hwy. 5 is somewhat discontinuous due to existing development patterns. The one located north of Hwy. 5, which is now being referred to as Arboretum Boulevard, has the potential of extending from Hwy. 41 over to Hwy. 101, east of the Chanhassen CBD. At the time the comprehensive plan was developed, it was believed that this road would be important to manage traffic issues. The idea of parallel frontage roads or access boulevards was given great emphasis by the plan developed for the City by Bill Morrish and his staff. Mr. Morrish viewed these roads, particularly the northern route with its continuity, as an extension of the main street of Chanhassen. In part, this stems from its connection to West 78th Street in the Chanhassen CBD, but also because of its continuity throughout the community which encourages the development of strip commercial along the highway. Their report described these routes as high amenity boulevards that could be used to orient development. The goal was to avoid having development oriented to the main line highway which is what has been normal practice in most communities. The typical pattern, consisting of a 300 foot wide corridor for a 4 -lane highway, an 80 foot wide corridor on either side of the highway for frontage roads, and potentially an additional 200 to 300 feet of black top beyond for parking lots, is what has yielded the bleak urban vision of University Avenue in Fridley. Rather, the report conceptualized focusing development on these routes directly. These routes also offer a means for residents to utilize a more user friendly facility to get from their homes to community parks, schools, centers of employment and shopping opportunities. ' Plannin g Commission ' February 2, 1994 Page 5 As these early plans were developed, staff began working in earnest with MnDOT to secure their ' cooperation and gain support for access roads ultimate construction. MnDOT agreed to help fund only the northern route. Their decision is based upon the fact that only the northern route offers full continuity across the community. Additionally, MnDOT had already proposed building short ' segments of a frontage road in this general vicinity to serve properties whose sole access would otherwise be directly to Hwy. 5. As time went on, staff worked with MnDOT to develop a joint ' approach towards coordinating the construction of this roadway along with Hwy. 5. MnDOT support was conditioned upon the City of Chanhassen's undertaking the completion of the Environmental Assessment document that is required to secure the use of federal funds. The City ' Council authorized this expenditure and gave firm guidelines to staff and the Highway 5 Task Force that it was imperative that the Hwy. 5 project itself not be delayed because of this effort. Additionally, MnDOT established the ground rule that their participation was linked to the ' coordination of the construction of Arboretum Boulevard with Hwy. 5. While reviewing the Corridor Study, the Planning Commission saw potential development ' proposals from the Gorra, Conway and the Vandeveire properties. The city staff has not reviewed these proposals except on a very rough overview. The Gorra property proposes a golf course with a club house, 10 -one acre lot subdivision and outlot, and an assisted elderly living facility. Mike Gorra, the developer and owner of the property, states that any frontage road would prohibit him from developing his property. Staff's general position is that we anticipate that direct access onto to Hwy. 5 as is proposed will be unacceptable to MnDOT. The other proposal for the Conway and Vandeveire property was presented by Brad Johnson. This site plan proposes a frontage road although the touch down point on Galpin Boulevard ' would split the J.P. Links (Swings) property in half. Staff would recommend against this location for the access boulevard. ' Highway 5 Task Force Actions The analysis of potential alignments has been reviewed by the task force on several occasions. ' Preliminary alignments were developed by Chanhassen staff and our consultants from Barton Aschman, Inc. The alignments were based upon several factors including consistency with the city's comprehensive plan and Morrish studies, an analysis of existing and proposed land uses, ' environmental constraints and opportunities including wetlands, topography, significant vegetation, and upon traffic engineering criteria. Two routes were developed which are basically in the northern and southern alignments. The southern route closely approximates a typical ' frontage road in location, while the northern route offers the opportunity for having development occur along both sides of the street. The Highway 5 Task Force determined that in terms of design characteristics, the roadway was to use a narrow 32' paved, two -lane roadway. The street ' is to be equipped with a grade separated 10' trail. Its alignment is curvilinear and generally follows the terrain of the land to minimize environmental impact and maximize the views that I Planning Commission February 2, 1994 Page 6 would occur along its route. It is anticipated that there would be an extensive landscaping along with the roadway construction. The Hwy. 5 Task Force attempted to refine these alternatives on two occasions. Although there are essentially two routes, the total number of alternatives is complicated by the fact that there are two cross -over points located on either side of Galpin Boulevard in the vicinity of Bluff Creek. Thus, there are actually a fairly significant number of alignments that could result. The Hwy. 5 Task Force held some rather lengthy and arduous discussions on attempting to eliminate some of the alternatives and thereby facilitated the completion of the Environmental Assessment document. What we ultimately found was that they were unable to restrict the number of alternatives at this time since the full analysis of the ultimate land uses and urban design issues of the corridor has not yet been completed. The Task Force held a public hearing and on June 23, 1993, and recommended adoption of access boulevard Alternative 1 with the cross over A/C at Galpin Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommended the northern access boulevard (Alternative 1) with no cross overs. Corridor Study The Highway 5 Corridor Land Use Design Study was prepared for the City by Barton Aschman Associates, in association by Camiros, working with an appointed Task Force. The intent of the study as stated in the document is to "guide design and development of the corridor that reflects the corridor's role as the heart of the City of Chanhassen." The planning effort has focused on ' land use, urban design, landscape and pedestrian elements. Adoption of this plan as a development guide and, more specifically land use recommendations, will result in zoning changes and guide plan amendments and a Highway Corridor Development and Design ' Ordinance. Much of the supporting data of this document was used to arrive at the recommendation for the ' land use and the development and design guideline elements. The portions of the study that address Landscape and Urban Design and Parks and Open Space are being implemented through different means within the city departments . This includes the Park and Recreation Department ' updating the Comprehensive Plan, the Vision 2000 study, Tree Board and the drafting of preservations ordinances, HGA gateway design, etc. On July 14, 1993, the Task Force recommended adoption of the Highway 5 Corridor Land Use ' Design Study with the land use recommendations and Development and Design Standards recommended in the document. ' Corridor Land Use Design Study and Development Standards The Planning Commission recommended the following changes to the Corridor Study Land I Uses: i r i Planning Commission i February 2, 1994 Page 7 The Ward property should be zoned Office/Institutional. Commercial would be i allowed under a PUD where it would not exceed 25 percent of the development. Commercial zoning was an alternative on the Vandeveire property and the recommended elimination of the easterly commercial area adjacent to the access road. i The Opus site plan should be left IOP except the far most northerly portion west of Highway 41 which should be left medium family residential. The PUD that will be developed for the site will guide the development of the individual parcels. i Eckankar property, in addition to the multi - family, institutional be listed as a permitted use. i J.P. Links, which is 15 -20 acres may considered as a park site. i Heritage Development, west of Bluff Creek south of the frontage road multi- family should be considered as an option with industrial. Possible location of a 15 -20 acre park of the easterly portion of the Fleet Farm property and a portion of the Dolejsi. E The following are recommendations for the Development and Design Standards: Application of these standards should be in two subdistricts. The central business ' district (HC -1) shall go from Dell Road on the east and Powers Boulevard on the west. n There should be flexibility from these standards for public transit use. Better definition of pitched roof elements, graphics will be added. Definition of accent color possibly amended to exclude corporate logo colors. Height of parking lot lighting possibly amended to state they are limited to one story (or no higher than the building) and shall be neutral in color. Additional recommendation of the plan includes adding additional information about the Bluff Creek Corridor in the Parks, Open Space and Trail chapter. Planning Commission February 2, 1994 Page 8 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following: 1. Affirm the preferred Alternative #1 alignment access road alignment and review of the Arboretum Boulevard Environmental Assessment document prepared by Barton - Aschman. 2. Approval of the Highway 5 Corridor Land Use Study and the land use recommendations as modified. 3. Approval of the ordinance establishing Highway Corridor Districts with modifications. ATTACHMENTS 1. Development and design standards ordinance. 2. Letter from Paul Paulson date February 1, 1994. 3. Letter from Opus Corporation dated January 18, 1994. 4. Letter from DataSery dated January 19, 1994. 2. January 19, 1994 Planning Commission minutes. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ' ORDINANCE NO. 212 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE ' CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, ESTABLISHING HIGHWAY CORRIDOR DISTRICTS I THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: ' SECTION 1. Section 20 -1 of the Chanhassen City Code is amended by adding the following definitions: ' Landscape means all forms of planting and vegetation, ground forms, rock groupings, water features and patterns, and all visible construction except buildings and site furnishings. n Site Furnishings means any structure, other than buildings, visible from any public way, and any street hardware located in streets and public ways and outside of buildings. Site furnishings include, but are not limited to signs, decorative paving treatments, fences, walls, railings, artwork, transformers, utility access boxes, lighting standards and arrays, and other visible site appurtenances. SECTION 2. Section 20 -201 of the Chanhassen City Code is amended by adding the following special districts: HC -1, Highway 5 Central Business Corridor District HC -2, Highway 5 Corridor District SECTION 3. Section 20 -106 of the Chanhassen City Code is amended by adding subparagraph (6) to read: (6) Within the HC districts, meet the additional purpose, intent and standards of the HC districts. SECTION 4. Section 20 -109 of the Chanhassen City Code is amended by adding subparagraph (6) to read: (6) Within the HC districts, the application shall also include: 1 A. Building elevations from all directions, indicating materials, colors and landscaping at installation. B. Building and site views from Highway 5, the appropriate access boulevard (north or south of Highway 5), and any other appropriate arterial or collector roadways. C. Site views showing the relationships of the proposed building or development to adjacent development, including buffered areas. D. Drawings of all significant or atypical site features, such as unusual landscaping, man-made water features other than retention ponds, outdoor sculpture, or other large -scale artwork, and other uncommon constructs. E. Sample building materials, upon the City's request. F. Sample paving materials, upon the City's request. SECTION 5. Section 20 -110 of the Chanhassen City Code is amended by adding subparagraph (7) to read: (7) Within the HC districts, consistency with the purpose, intent, and standards of the HC districts. SECTION 6. Section 20 -116 of the Chanhassen City Code is amended by adding subparagraph (e) to read: (e) Within the HC districts, the standards for the HC districts shall apply in addition to the standards specified in this division. SECTION 7. Section 20 -118 of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read: Sec. 20 -118. Retaining Walls. Retaining walls exceeding five (5) feet in height, include state walls which cumulatively exceed five (5) feet in height, must be constructed in accordance with plans prepared by a registered engineer or landscape architect and in conformance with all building materials specifications and limitations set forth in this division or, if applicable, in the HC districts. SECTION 8. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code is amended by adding Article XXIX to read: 2 I ARTICLE XXIX.HIGHWAY CORRIDOR DISTRICTS ' DIVISION 1, HC -1 DISTRICT ' Sec. 20 -1450. Purpose. The Highway 5 Corridor and the development within it will be major factors influencing the visual and environmental quality of the community as a whole. Due to the intensity of land uses, the Highway 5 Corridor represents the heart of Chanhassen as well as its dominating image of those passing through the community. Development in the corridor must be designed with greater sensitivity to the environment and of generally higher quality than might have occurred in the absence of specific standards. The purpose of the District is to: ' (a) Protect creek corridors, wetlands, and significant stands of mature trees through use of careful site design, protective easements, sensitive alignment and design of roadways ' and utilities, incorporation of natural features, landscaping and massing of trees that enhance existing natural features and views, and the practices delineated in the City's Best Management Practices Handbook. (b) Promote high - quality architectural and site design through improvement development standards within the corridor. These standards govern site planning, placement of building masses, use of materials, and the like enable the City to enhance what otherwise might result in low quality strip development. ' (c) Create a unified, harmonious, and high - quality visual environment throughout the corridor, thereby identifying it as a special place with a unique identity within both the City and the Twin Cities region as a whole. ' (d) Foster a distinctive and ositive community image, for the City as a whole and P Y g tY especially for the Highway 5 Corridor, which functions as the City's main entrance. ' Sec. 20 -1451. Intent. ' The City intends that all development within the district should strive toward the highest level of quality in both design and construction. The criteria by which new ' development in this district shall be judged are as follows: (a) Consistency with all provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, as amended from time ' to time; the Surface Water Protection Program; all provisions of the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance not specifically overridden by the provisions of this district; and all other applicable land use regulations. 3 (b) Preservation of the natural conditions found on each site to the greatest extent possible, through minimized removal of trees and other vegetation and soil, minimized site grading, and application of the practices found in the City's Best Management Practices Handbook. (c) Establishment throughout the district of harmonious physical and visual relationships among existing, new, and proposed buildings, open spaces, natural terrain, and plant materials and placement with the intent of creating a unique and unified appearance for the entire corridor. (d) Use of appropriate materials, lighting, textures, colors, and architectural and landscape forms to create a unified, high - quality design concept for each site that is compatible with adjacent and neighboring structures and functions, including but not limited to natural areas, City -owned property, and vacant land subject to future development in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. (e) Creation of unified site designs, each with a sense of internal order, that provide desirable environments for site users and visitors and the community as a whole and that consider all site elements including: the relationship of buildings to surrounding landforms; grading; architectural design; building, parking and loading dock orientation; building height; use of man -made materials, including paving; site furnishings (lighting, outdoor seating, signage, etc.); landscaping (retention of natural vegetation, plant selection and placement, retention and incorporation of water features, etc.); and other visible outdoor site elements. (f) Creation of a suitable balance between the amount and arrangement of open space, landscaping, and view protection and the design and function of man -made features on the other. Achieving this balance shall take into account screening, buffering, size and orientation of open spaces, personal and property security, localized wind and solar effects, and protection of important public ways. (g) Provision of safe and adequate access to and from sites giving ample consideration to the location and number of access points from public streets, the safety and convenience of merging and turning movements, and traffic management and mitigation. (h) Provision of on -site vehicular, bicycling, and pedestrian circulation by way of interior drives, parking areas, pathways, and walkways adequate to handle anticipated needs and to safety buffer pedestrians and cyclists from motor vehicles. Ample consideration shall be given to the width of interior drives, internal traffic movement and flow, separation of pedestrian, cycling, automobile, and delivery traffic, and the safe convenient, and practical arrangement of parking spaces. (i) Adequate separation and protection of each site from adjacent properties, access boulevards, and Highway 5 and vice - versa, through reasonable provisions for surface water 4 S drainage, sound and i g , sight buffers, view protection, privacy, and other aspects of design that may not be specifically covered by these or other regulations but are found to have significant effect on any or all of the properties and roadways. ' Sec. 20 -1452. District Application. The "HC -1" district shall be applied and superimposed (overlaid) upon all zoning ' districts as contained herein as existing or amended by the text and map of this ordinance. The regulations and requirements imposed by the "HC -1" district shall be in addition to those established for districts which jointly apply. Under the joint application of the districts, the more restrictive requirements shall apply. Sec. 20 -1453. Building and Parldng Orientation. ' (a) For the purpose of determining front, rear, and side yards, the following shall control: 1. In any lot that abuts Highway 5 directly, other than a single family residential lot, the lot line abutting the highway shall be considered the front lot line. 2. In any lot that abuts either of the access boulevards parallel to Highway ' 5, including any existing single family residential lot, but excluding any new single family residential lot, the lot line abutting the boulevard shall be considered the front lot line. I I 0 n 3. In any lot that abuts both Highway 5 and one of the access boulevards, other than a single family residential lot, the lot shall be regarded as having two front lot lines. The lot line abutting the boulevard shall take design precedence. Such a lot shall be regarded as having no rear lot line or yard. 4. No new single family residential lot may have a front yard that faces Highway 5, nor a front yard that faces either of the access boulevards. No new or existing single family residential lot shall provide driveway access directly from Highway 5, nor shall any new single family residential lot provide driveway access directly from Highway 5 or either of the access boulevards. r FRO,ff LOT LNE r FRONT LOT UK IOTA 7 LOT D I LO • �E,6 TOTE 5 .0. LOT FRONT LOT LNE FRONT LOT LINE TWS FROWT LOT L SKILL TAKE DES*N PRECE DE M:E (b) Parking areas shall not be located within the required minimum front (primary or secondary) yard setback of any lot. o ' MGMVAYS �. 0 Y l a ^ O Z_T NO VNOCN6 N FROW YM0 S 6UlDNG , IIIIIIIIIIitI ' O wr /Y�CN G � NFRt)Nf'Y/Jt0 3 Sec. 20 -1454. Architectural Design Standards. sUILDINC SETBACK Standards governing architectural design shall apply to all new and renovated buildings within the district with the exception of single - family residences on individual lots. (a) Architectural style shall not be restricted. Evaluation of the appearance of a project shall be based on the quality of its design and on its relationship to its surroundings, guided by the provisions of this section. Site characteristics to be evaluated for this purpose include building and plant materials, colors, textures, shapes, massing, rhythms of building components and details, height, roof -line and setback. Designs that are incompatible with their surroundings or intentionally bizarre or exotic are prohibited. e- i a - "4 (b) Monotony of design, both within projects and between any project and its surroundings, is prohibited. Variation in detail, form, and siting shall provide visual interest. Site characteristics that may be used for this purpose include building and plant materials, sizes, colors, textures, shapes, massing, rhythms of building components and details, height, roof -line, and setback. N 1 0o nas_ ► Go flay_ AVOIDING MONOTONY MOT M5 (c) Within the district, particular attention shall be paid to architectural compatibility r with the existing environment. (1) Each building shall contain one or more pitched roof elements. (2) All new construction and redevelopment shall conform to the established building scale, range of building materials, pedestrian orientation, and relationship between buildings and the streetscape. Fi I (d) Building heights shall be limited to three (3) stories or forty (40) feet. Measurement of the highest point shall exclude antennas for television and radio reception, but shall include architectural details (e.g., parapet walls), transmission antennas, satellite dishes and transmission equipment, microwave - transmission equipment, and other non- structural building elements. (e) All man-made architectural, landscape, and paving materials shall reflect the highest quality possible and should be used in a manner suitable to the nature of the material, its role in the design, general durability, expected level of use or abuse, weathering characteristics, and ease and frequency of maintenance. Major exterior surfaces of all walls 7 ,011"5 I &MVWc shall be face brick, stone, glass, stucco, architecturally treated concrete, cast in place or pre -cast panels, decorative block, or approved equivalent, as determined by the city. The following may not be used in any visible exterior application except when specifically permitted by the City in areas with limited public view: ♦ Exposed cement ( "cinder ") blocks. ♦ Fabricate metal or pole construction structures, including mobile homes, sheds, warehouses, and industrial buildings constructed either on or off -site of corrugated metal panels. ♦ Exterior brick that is painted over. ♦ Experimental materials with no proven record of durability or ease of maintenance in the intended application. ♦ A solid wall unrelieved by architectural detailing, such as a change in materials, change in color, fenestrations, or other significant visual relief provided in a manner or at intervals in keeping with the size, mass, and scale of the wall and its views from public ways. A change in texture is not sufficient to meet this requirement. ♦ Materials or construction methods used for one aspect or portion of a project that are significantly lower in quality than those used for the balance of that project, such that this one aspect or portion is or rapidly becomes an eyesore or detriment to the project as a whole. ♦ A distinct and different material or combination of materials for each exposed exterior wall. No more than two (2) principal materials or two (2) principal combinations of materials should be used to construct any one building. Addition of other materials for accent use is permissible. ♦ As building element, combination of elements, or another site structure that acts as a conspicuous building emblem or signature. Examples include single garish elements (e.g., orange roofs); use of bricks, blocks, or tiles to turn a wall into an outsized sign or logo; and other attempts to use a building or wall as an advertisement. (f) Site designs and configurations that tend to catch and accumulate trash, leaves, and dirt shall be avoided. In addition, provisions for washing and cleaning buildings, other structures, and building grounds shall be considered and included in the design. (g) All building components, such as windows, doors, eaves, soffits, and parapets, shall have good proportions that relate to the facade of the building and shall relate well with ' one another. PROPORTIONS OF BUILDING COMPONENTS (h) Colors shall be harmonious. Bright or brilliant colors and sharply contrasting colors may be used only for accent purposes. ri ' (i) Mechanical equipment, satellite dishes, and other utility hardware, whether located on the roof or exterior of the building or on the ground adjacent to it shall be screened from the public view and with materials identical to or strongly similar to building materials or by ' heavy landscaping that will be effective in winter or they shall be located so as not to be visible from any public way. Use of parapet walls or pitched roof elements to screen equipment is encouraged. In no case shall wooden fencing be used as a rooftop equipment ' screen. 0) Screening of service yards, refuse, and waste - removal areas, loading docks, truck parking areas, and other areas which tend to be unsightly shall be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, dense planting, or any combination of these elements. Screening shall block views from public right -of -way and shall be equally effective in winter and summer. 0 USING COLOR 6CREEN FENCE OR WALL r 6HZU56 REFU6E COpr(ANER Qtff C L u x --- -61REET HMCONTAL %WD 1RELL TiEROOF VENTED 6GREEN WALL EQW. FLAT ROOF SCREENING MECHANCAIEQUPME 6CREENFENCE OR WAIL 10 Sec. 20 -1455. Landscape Design and Site Furnishings. The following standards governing design and placement of landscaping and site furnishings shall apply to all new and renovated buildings within the district, with the exception of single family residences on individual lots. (a) Where natural or existing topographic patterns contribute to the beauty or utility ' of a development, they shall be preserved to the greatest extent possible. Modification to topography will be permitted where and to the extent that it contributes to good design. All topographic modifications shall adhere to the practices delineated in the City's Best ' Management Practices Handbook. COFTNG TREE6 0 ' (b) The grades of all walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas shall conform with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. In addition, they shall provide an inviting and stable appearance from walking. Stairs and ramps may be substituted for slanted pavement when necessary. (c) All landscape shall preserve and enhance natural features (such as wetlands, drainageways, mature stands of trees, and the like), enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axes, and provide shade. ' (d) Landscaping shall emphasize massing of plant materials over isolated or scattered placement of individual specimens. Reforestation as prescribed by the City's Tree Preservation and Reforestation Ordinance is encouraged. r w flay _ LANDSCAPE MASSING 11 WT flab PRESERVING TOPOGRAPHY (e) Unity of design shall be achieved by repetition of certain plant varieties and other materials, and by correlation with natural existing materials and adjacent developments where appropriate. r ROIETMON OF M- kTFRVA15 UNITY OF DESIGN (f) Plant material shall be selected for interest in its structure, texture and color, and for its ultimate growth size. Plants that are indigenous to the area and others that will be hardy, harmonious to the design of good appearance, and of relatively easy maintenance shall be used. (g) In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, they shall be protected by appropriate curbs, tree guards, or similar devices. sec[ G-11 TREE PROTECTION (h) Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees in parkways, gardens, or paved areas is encouraged. Trees should be clustered whenever possible, and consideration shall be given to the special needs of plants surrounded by impervious surfaces. ID CE TREE PLACEMENT 12 0 (i) In areas where general planting will not prosper, other solutions- -such as fences, walls, rock gardens, raised planters, or pavings of wood, brick stone, gravel, or cobbles - -shall be used. Carefully selected plants shall be included. EOMIiC ZOO SCREENFENCE ORWALL YEDGE pRa PAVMI ORNAMENTAL 1REI CONXWETE wAEJ GRAS ALTERNATIVE LANDSCAPE TREATMENT ROCK GARDEN 6TREETTREE 0) Exterior lighting shall enhance the building design and adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures shall be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent areas. Lighting shall be arranged and focused so that minimal light falls on adjacent property and no light shines directly at or into any adjacent building. Excessive brightness and glare shall be avoided. LIGHTING CONTROL (k) Site furnishings located on private property shall be designed as part of the site's architectural concept and landscape. Materials and colors shall be in harmony with buildings, surroundings, and other furnishings; scale shall be appropriate to the site and the design; and proportions shall be attractive. ' (1) Site furnishings and landscaping located in any public way or on other public property shall be harmonious with the design of adjacent buildings, with the appearance of the highway in the vicinity, and with the generally character of the City. (m) Lighting in connection with site furnishings (e.g., to highlight a ground sign) shall meet the criteria applicable to site, landscape, buildings, and signs. (n) All provisions of the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance, to the extent that they directly affect the appearance, design and utility of a particular site, and to the extent that they do no conflict directly with the standards delineated here, shall be a part of the criteria of this subsection. 13 t .an . .1.��_ �� 1 r�•r LIGHTING CONTROL (k) Site furnishings located on private property shall be designed as part of the site's architectural concept and landscape. Materials and colors shall be in harmony with buildings, surroundings, and other furnishings; scale shall be appropriate to the site and the design; and proportions shall be attractive. ' (1) Site furnishings and landscaping located in any public way or on other public property shall be harmonious with the design of adjacent buildings, with the appearance of the highway in the vicinity, and with the generally character of the City. (m) Lighting in connection with site furnishings (e.g., to highlight a ground sign) shall meet the criteria applicable to site, landscape, buildings, and signs. (n) All provisions of the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance, to the extent that they directly affect the appearance, design and utility of a particular site, and to the extent that they do no conflict directly with the standards delineated here, shall be a part of the criteria of this subsection. 13 t DIVISION 2. HC -2 DISTRICT Sec. 20 -1460. Purpose and Intent. The purpose and intent of the HC -2 district is the same as the HC -1 district with certain modifications to the district standards reflecting that the area within the HC -2 district is not part of the City's central business district. Sec. 20 -1461. District Application. The "HC -1" district shall be applied to and super imposed (overlaid) upon all zoning districts as contained herein as existing or amended by the text and map of this ordinance. The regulations and requirements imposed by the "HC -1" district shall be in addition to these established for districts which jointly apply. Under the joint application of districts, the more restrictive requirements shall apply. Sec. 20 -1462. Building and Parking Orientation. The building and parking orientation standards for the HC -1 district shall apply, together with the following additional requirements: (a) On building lots that abut Highway 5 directly, the minimum building setback from the highway right -of -way shall be seventy (70) feet. The maximum building setback from the highway right -of -way for all buildings except single family residences shall be one hundred fifty (150) feet. No maximum building setback shall apply to single family residences. (b) On building lots that abut either of the access boulevards parallel to Highway 5, the minimum building setback from the boulevard right -of -way shall be fifty (50) feet. The maximum building setback from the boulevard right -of -way shall be one hundred (100) feet. Sec. 20 -1463. Architectural Design Standards. The architectural design standards for the HC -1 district shall apply, with the exception of Section 20- 1456(c) which shall not apply. Sec. 20 -1464. Landscape Design and Site Furnishings. The landscape design and site furnishings standards for the HC -1 district shall apply. SECTION 9. The boundaries of the districts established by this chapter are delineated on the zoning map; the map and all notations, references, and date shown thereon are hereby adopted and made part of this chapter and will be on permanent file for public inspection at the Chanhassen City Hall. 14 SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of July, 1994, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen. ATTEST: AQ Don Ashworth, City anager Aonald el, ayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on July 21, 1994.) 15 �• �_ O FF , u � o?F?FN WW v a C � W -�. •�3 n � � � r� r1` J J N k 3 i 2 - � Q� Lr, r ��� n rse7► �...1� n w= n ., s 11 I i 1 �• Aw �'.'� 4 i�o1 a. u , I� • • � • g� ° nn.rn • iL'R' �r �� s� R. WIT �• �_ O FF , u � o?F?FN WW v a C � W -�. •�3 n � � � r� r1` J J N k 3 i 2 - � Q� Lr, r ��� n rse7► �...1� n w= n ., s 11 I i 1 �• Aw �'.'� 4 i�o1 a. u , I� •