1a Y2K Public Works IssuesCIT OF
690 Ci{y Center Drive, PO Box 147
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
TO:
Phone 612.937.1900
General Fax 612.937.5739 FROM:
Engineering Fax 612.93Z9152
Public Safe~y Fax 612.934.2524 DATE:
Web www. ci. chanhassen, mn. us
MEMORANDUM
Scott Botcher, City Manager
Charles D. Folch, Public Works Director//~/
July 1, 1999
SUBJECT:
Potential Y2K Issues for Public Works Utility Department Operations -
PW File 385
First of all, if I have given anyone the impression "that the sky was falling" that was
not my intended message. Make no mistake though, any time there are issues related
to provic[ing sewer and water services to this community, they should be taken very
seriously. However, ! am not claiming that the sky is going to fall particularly at 12:01
on January 1, 2000.
There seems to be some general questions and concerns that have been expressed by
Council at the previous worksessions regarding this matter. Several of the questions
lead me to believe that I have not explained this issue in a manner that would provide
the Council with a clear and accurate understanding of the situation. Therefore,
without beating this issue to.death, I woUld like to take a step back and walk through
some of the key questions and concerns that have been brought to my attention.
Ouestion:
Why are these repairs being brought to the Council's attention at this time of the year.
Shouldn't they have been addressed earlier'?
Response:
Preparation for the process to address the Y2K issue as it relates to the Public Works
Utility Operations actually began late last fall with the implementation of a rather
lengthy and tedious inventory of the utility infrastructure. This involved identifying all
electronic parts, their function, model numbers, serial numbers, etc. Once this data
base of information was collected, a great deal of time was then spent during the early
part of this year contacting vendors, manufacturers, and professionals in the field to
get written or verbal information as to Y2K compliance for all of the electronic
components. For manufacturers that were found to be no longer in business, searches
were made to find out if the manufacturers had reorganized under a different name.
Additional time was also spent contacting other vendors and suppliers to find out if
any companies were providing services and parts for the equipment that had been
manufactured by the companies that had gone out of business.
The City of Chanhassen. A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, and beautifiul parks. A ~reat place to live, work, and o,
Scott Botcher
July 1, 1999
Page 2
All of this work was completed during the spring of this year. However, before a complete presentation
could be made to the Council, which would include estimated costs to conduct proposed repairs, a great
deal of effort was spent on establishing mini specifications for equipment in order to get reasonably
accurate phone quotes from vendors and/or manufacturers. Ail of this work did take a significant amount
of time to complete, and it had to be integrated with all of the other day to day work loads and demands
occuring.
Question:
Is this really a Y2K issue or is it a pre-existing problem for which Y2K is being used to solve it?
Response:
As we have all heard many times over the past year, the primary Y2K concern for electronic equipment
involves those devices, functions, or programming which are based upon or dependent upon an electronic
clock or date code, etc. However, so called experts have also cautioned that the potential problem may
not end with easily seen clocks and date codes. Imbedded chips which can often only be checked through
known programming protocol could also be affected by the year 2000 change.
The issues brought to the City Council's attention have primarily focused on electronic control equipment
for which the original manufacturers have gone out of business, therefore, we have not been able to
obtain, from any source, a Y2K compliance statement. There in lies the issue of required documentation
and due diligence upon governmental agencies such as the City. These systems may in fact operate
completely normal during the millenium change, however, neither staff nor the telemetry consultant nor
any available vendor or manufacturer can guarantee that there will not be a problem. The bottom line is
we just don't know.
Question:
If this is a Y2K issue, isn't it similar to a power outage situation, which the City has dealt with many
times in the past?
Response:
Not exactly. Both situations will necessitate an emergency response from the Utility Operations
Department. However, from that point the situations are different. For a localized power outage, unless
lightning has struck within ten to twenty feet of the lift station, the station can be put back on line very
quickly by connecting the station to an alternative power source, such as one of the City's mobile
generators. With this alternative source of power, the system will operate in its normal fully automated
mode during the duration of the outage.
Should one of the identified lift stations become disabled due to an internal control panel Y2K problem,
then the station would, in effect, have lost its "brains" for operating in an automated fashion. The station
would then need to be operated in a manual fashion.
Here in lies the difference between a power outage and a Y2K problem, in that without manufacturer
programming information and/or replacement parts, if one of the identified control panels became
Scott Botcher
July 1, 1999
Page 3
disabled it is likely that it would result in a permanent disablement and the fix would be to have the
control panel replaced. As was indicated in previous staff reports, the lead time to prepare specifications,
order the unit, have it manufactured, and have it installed is likely to be eight to ten weeks. This means
that that particular lift station would have to be manually operated during that entire time period. Therein
also lies the reason for previously indicating the short response time requirements at a couple of these lift
stations. This was not intended to claim that our emergency response to these lift stations has been
inadequate in the past (which it has not been). The intent was to convey that the operation of the
identified lift station is of a very important nature and would require around the clock supervision in a
manual mode.
Question:
What happens if we do nothing?
Response:
There are a couple of scenarios that have been identified. The first scenario is that absolutely nothing out
of the ordinary will occur and these stations will function completely normal through the new year
change. The second scenario is that any one or more of these stations could experience a power failure.
NSP is telling us that they do not anticipate any problems, however, should this occur the existing
contingency plan would be activated for providing standby power at the most critical station and making
use of in-house and contracted vac trucks to pump down any of the other stations which may be out of
power. The third scenario is that any one or more of the stations identified may experience a control
panel shut down which may not be able to be reactivated or repaired. In this case the station would have
to be switched over to the manual operation mode and, depending on its critical nature, may necessitate
around the clock supervision.
In the third scenario, the cost to replace a Y2K debilitated lift station control panel at any one or more of
the identified lift station locations would likely be the same as what is being estimated for potential
replacement at this time. However, the major factor, which would affect the total cost difference
between replacing prior to the new year versus under an emergency situations afterwards, would be the
significant cost of extended overtime supervision. To give an example, if one of the identified critical lift
stations experienced the third scenario, we could expect that approximately sixteen man hours per day
(this is above the normal eight hour day) being actually paid out at twenty-four hours per day (due to
time and a half compensation) seven days a week for a ten week period at an average rate of $20.00 per
hour would total $34,000 of in-house labor cost in addition to the contracted control panel replacement.
Herein is the quintessential reason for bringing the matter to the City Council's attention. The Utility
Operations Department can and will deal with any problems that may result, due to Y2K or otherwise.
However, if the Council's preference is to wait and see what happens then we all have to understand and
accept that if indeed a Y2K problem occurs, significant in-house labor cost will likely be added to the
cost of any potential repairs.
Having said that, it is also important to reemphasize that the control panels for Lift Stations 9, 10, 11, 12,
and 13 were all constructed during the mid to late 1970's and had control panels installed from the same
company (Edison Controls) which has been out of business for a number of years now. The control panel
for Lift Station 10, during recent years had become very problematic and as such it was replaced earlier
Scott Botcher
July 1, 1999
Page 4
this year. Given the inability to be able to obtain parts and/or service on the remaining Edison Controls
lift station control panels and the need to maintain a high level of reliability in the system, the remaining
four control panels were going to be programmed by staff to be replaced systematically over the next four
to five years. Knowing this, staff.has brought this matter to the Council for direction as to whether it
makes sense to advance the capital replacement schedule to this year and, in doing so, add some
additional insurance for the Y2K issue.
Question:
Will this be all of the telemetry and SCADA upgrades needed for the utility system into the near future?
Response:
The computer system and the electronic controls associated with the telemetry and SCADA systems of
the utility infrastructure are very similar to the general business and personal computer technology in that
it does not take long for current technology to become outdated and/or obsolete. In general, though, as
it relates to the telemetry and SCADA systems, future upgrades will be more or less tied to the issue of
maintaining and/or improving system reliability rather than upgrading software every other year just
because a new version has come out. As discussed earlier in this report, some of the technology
companies who manufactured and supplied electronic controls and parts for the utility system in the 70's
and early 80's are no longer in business, and as these electronics continue to age and weather through the
seasonal conditions of an outdoor environment in Minnesota, reliability concerns will generate the need
for replacement and/or upgrading.
It is likely that the Five Year CIP submitted during the fiscal year 2000 budget process will include funds
to begin switching or upgrading the old LMX control technology to the PLC (Programmable Logic
Controller) technology. Staffwill also be recommending a program to switch over and eliminate the lease
line communication system to a radio system over a period of time. It is important to keep in mind that
the City's utility system currently includes 29 Lift Stations, 7 Water Supply Wells, and 3 Water Storage
Tanks. Therefore, system upgrading will take some time to complete.
In conclusion, this issue is no doubt a challenging one for the City Council to draw a conclusion on. This
is probably due, in large part, to the fact that no one, including staff, outside professionals or otherwise,
can give a thumbs-up or thumbs-down with regard to Y2K compliance with the identified system issues.
As indicated, staff.is planning on requesting funds over the next four to five years to replace the identified
existing controls. What it really boils down to is, should this replacement work be completed this year,
and adding the additional insurance with regard to the Y2K issue? Or, wait and see what happens and
accept the fact that if there are some Y2K problems the total cost for replacements will be higher due to
the overtime labor that will be required.
Attachment: Staff.Report dated 6/23/99
Jerry Boucher, Utility Superintendent
Brad White, First Systems Technology
g:\pw\charlcs\cc\Y2K Issues.doc
MEMORANDUM
CITYOF
690 CiO, Center Ddve, PO Box I47
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
?hone 612.937. I900
Ge,erat Fax 612.937.5739
E, gineering Fax 612937.9152
?,blic SagO, Fax 612. 934.2524
~b www. ci. chanhasse,.mn, us
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Scott Botcher, City Manager
Charles D. Folch, Public Works Director
June 23, 1999
Update Financing Options for Y2K Improvements for the Public Works
Utility Infrastructure - PW File 385
This item was tabled from the June 14th City Council Meeting based upon two primary
areas of concern, the first of which involved establishing a priority list of city-wide
needed Y2K repairs and how this work rated in that list. The other issue involved
how much contingency money was available to meet not only the utility infrastructure
needs but other city-wide Y2K issues as well.
Rick Rice is preparing a report on the overall city-wide Y2K needs known at this time
and will present this report to City Council at the meeting. With regards to funding
the recommended utility infrastructure repairs, the previous staff report suggested that
a portion of the city's Y2K contingency fund (approximately $229,000) be allocated
for this work. However, after further deliberation and discussions with the City's
bonding consultant, Springsted, it seems to make some sense to fund this work via a
bond sale for the following reasons.
This work primarily involves the replacement of electronic control panels,
which are considered a capital investment, and have a life expectancy in the
fifteen year range.
These improvements are considered a community-wide benefit and, therefore,
new residents and businesses entering the community during the equipment's
life-span will also benefit.
o
The bonded debt can be retired over a period of approximately eight to ten
years with annual payments being made from the Sewer and Water Expansion
Fund 710.
It is, therefore, recommended that the City Council authorize the preparation of plans
and specifications for the identified Y2K upgrades for the City sanitary sewer and
water system identified in the memo dated June 8, 1999, at an estimated cost of
$229,000 with the funding to be served through the sale of city utility bonds, PW File
385.
Attachments: Staff Report, dated June 8, 1999
C:
Jerry Boucher, Utility Superintendent
Brad White, First Systems Technology
The Ci~, of Chanhassen. A g~vwing communiO, with clean lakes, quality schooh, a charming downtown, thriving, businesses, and beautiful parks. A ereat p/ace to live, work, a,d pL
CITYOF
HAN NEN
';O' Center Drive, PO Box I47
nhassen, Minnesota 55317
Phone 612.937.1900
neral Fax 612937.5739
,eering Fax 612.937.9152
'c SafeO, £ax 612. 934. 2524
wwtv. ci. cha,hassen, mn, us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Scott Botcher, City Manager
Charles D. Folch, Public Works Director(~.~
June 8, 1999
SUBJECT:
Update on Y2K Assessment for Public Works Utility Department;
Authorize Preparation and Specifications for Needed Upgrades and
Repairs - PW File 385
Public Works Staff have been preparing for the Y2K issue since late last fall. The
primary areas of focus for the Y2K issue are the sewer and water maintenance
division, street maintenance as it relates to the traffic signal and lighting, the mechanics
department which maintains the city fleet, the phone system and finally the computer
system. As discussed at a recent council worksession, the phone and computer system
issues are planned to be addressed as an integral part of the overall city phone and
MIS upgrades to be discussed at an upcoming council worksession. Potential Y2K
issues with the mechanic and street maintenance divisions are much more limited and
will be discussed in the future as part of the overall contingency planning process. The
focus of this report will be the utility (sewer and water) maintenance department.
First Systems Technology, the City's SCADA system consultant began an inventory
process of the SCADA system by identifying all pertinent hardware controls located at
each of the City's 6 water supply wells, 29 sewer lift stations, 3 water storage
facilities. Contacts were then made with the numerous manufacturers, vendors and/or
suppliers to obtain information on Y2K compliance (see attached inventory). Upon
completion of the inventory process, First Systems Technology and staff then began
the assessment process of identifying both known and potential problem areas and
then prioritizing these into categories ranging from "incOnvenience" type problems to
"catastrophic" type problems which could endanger public safety, health, and welfare.
One of the challenges with the inventory process was that a number of the
manufacturers who supplied hardware and controls for the City's older infrastructure
are no longer in businesses. In addition, some of the potential problem areas can not
be readily tested for compliance. Written statements of compliance have been obtained
from those manufacturers and/or vendors who were willing to submit one. Others
have been documented as verbal compliance statements. This has been a very
challenging process, since this system has been built over many years with various
;iff of Cha,hasse,. A gww/ng commum'ff w/th clean lakes, ¢ualio' schools, a cha,nin~ downtown, thrivin~ businesses, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play.
Scott Botcher
June 8, 1999
Page 2
companies supplying parts and hardware for each project as the infrastructure has grown.
One of the big concems for staff earlier this year was the issue of whether or not the power companies
(gas and electric) would be fully Y2K compliant and be able to maintain a full supply of power to the City
needed to operate the wells and sewer lift stations. The City's primary supplier of electric power,
Northern States Power Company (NSP), has indicated that they are Y2K ready. However, to provide an
additional measure of insurance not only for Y2K but also in situations where storm events occur and
power is lost for extended periods of time, the City was proactive in authorizing the acquisition of a
trailer mounted mobile generator. This generator will have the capabilities of operating any of the water
supply wells. It is also planned to be used in the coming years as a part of an NSP peak shaving program.
This will result in annual energy cost saving, which can be used to off-set the initial capital investment in
the generator.
Specific discussions on the findings of the Y2K inventory and assessment processes are best
accomplished by separating the water system from the sewer system.
Water System
The inVentory of the water system involved inspecting each of the City's 6 water supply sells and 3 water
storage facilities to identify potential problems with any of the automated controlling devices. The
majority of the water system controls were found to be either compliant or not affected by the Y2K (i.e.
no imbedded chips or calendar date dependent programming or functions). There are, however, a couple
of areas of concern. First and foremost are the telemetry control units at Well No. 2 and the Lake Lucy
Reservoir and the associated communication function between both sites. This is an issue that can not be
over looked, since it could have a significant impact if there is a Y2K problem. It is important to note that
five of the City's six wells operate in what is termed the "low pressure zone" of the city. The low
pressure zone makes up the vast majority of the currently developed land area of the community. The
Lake Lucy water storage tank provides 95% of the water storage capacity for the low pressure zone.
The water level of the Lake Lucy storage tank and any refilling process is dependent on the
communication from the telemetry control panel at the water tank and a similar telemetry control panel
located at Well No. 2. The control unit at Well No. 2 constantly monitors the level of the Lake Lucy
storage tank and will subsequently determine which and how many wells in the low pressure zone are
needed to be activated automatically to meet the demand at any time during any given day. These control
units at both sites are critically important to the automated water system operations for the low pressure
zone.
Unfortunately, the manufacturer of the telemetry control panels at these two sites (Teleproducts) is no
longer in business and therefore obtaining a Y2K compliance statement is impossible. There are no other
known manufacturers supplying parts and services for these units should these systems fail due to Y2K,
lightning strike, age, etc. Should this telemetry system fail due to Y2K or experience any other
permanent failure, the system could be operated manually by manning each site around the clock until the
needed repairs could be made. This manual operation, however, would be difficult to sustain for the
eight to ten week lead time needed to have new telemetry control panels manufactured and installed.
First Systems Technology has provided a budgetary cost estimate to replace the control panels and
Scott Botcher
June 8, 1999
Page 3
incorporate a radio telemetry system which will eliminate the existing Teleproducts hardware and the
associated lease-line communication system between the Lake Lucy water tank and the master controller
at Well No. 2. First Systems Technologies has estimated that this work effort will cost approximately
$66,600.00 to manufacture, install, and test (see Item No. 3 of attachment).
There may also be an issue regarding the Rockwell Westcom telemetry phone system at Well No. 2, and
Well No. 3, and the Westell RA telemetry control unit at tower No. 1 (West 76th St.). Staff is still
exploring these issues.
Sanitary Sewer
Most of the control elements inventoried for the sanitary sewer system were also found to be either in
compliance or not affected by the Y2K dilemma, with exceptions of Lift Stations 9, 11, 12, 13, and 24.
The needed upgrades to Lift Station No. 24 involve a rather simple and basic fix to the operator interface
for the real time clock at this site. This is listed as Item No. 2 in the attachment from First Systems
Technology with a total estimated cost for materials and labor of $675.00.
The solutions to the potential problems with Lift Stations 9, 11, 12, and 13 are more involved and
correspondingly more expensive. These four lift stations were constructed back in the mid to late 1970's
and were installed with Edison brand telemetry control units. Edison Controls is another company that
has been out of business for a number of years now, and there are no other known companies providing
parts and/or service for these control units. Without a Y2K compliance statement or way of testing, a
potential problem of a significant nature exists. Past power outages due to storms have documented that;
an overflow at Lift Station No. 9 will go into Lotus Lake, Lift Station No. 11 has only a limited number
of hours before a backup will occur into homes, Lift Station No. 12 has approximately a twelve (12) hour
buffer before backup, and Lift Station No. 13, most critical, only takes twenty (20) minutes before
backups will occur in homes. From a power-fail standpoint, these issues have been dealt with in the past
by a combination implementing of a mobile electric generator and the sewer vac truck to pump down the
lift station. If one or more of these lift stations has a Y2K problem or some other long term failure in the
future, they could be manually operated, but this situation would again be very labor intensive given the
eight to ten week lead time needed to manufacture and install a new control panel.
It is also important to note that the control panel for Lift Station No. 10 was replaced this year as
programmed. This control panel was also manufactured by Edison Controls and, over the last few years,
had become very unreliable due to age and other external factors. These identified lift station control
panels are currently twenty plus years old and will likely need to be programmed for replacement during
the next two to five years with or without Y2K. First Systems Technology has provided a total cost
estimate to replace the control panels at each of these lift stations with totally installed and operated cost
of $162,000.00 (see Item No. 1 of attachment) or roughly $40,000.00 per site. Given the circumstances
expediting the replacement schedule to this year would add additional insurance with regard to the Y2K
issue.
ScoR Botcher
June 8, 1999
Page 4
Software
The only other potential Y2K problems discovered during the inventory involved the SCADA system
software. The upgraded version of the WIN-911 alarm dialer software has been installed. The only other
known SCADA software issue involves updating the Windows application. This will be done in-house by
Rick Rice.
Conclusions
The total cost to complete the identified Y2K upgrades and repairs to the City's sanitary sewer and water
system is estimated to cost $229,000.00. These cost estimates are intended to be used for budgeting or
planning purposes. Once these projects have gone through the bidding process, actual cost will then be
known. The preparation of plans and specifications for this work needs to be ordered in order to
accomplish the work by the end of this year. If, however, sufficient Y2K contingency funding is not
available for all of the work identified at this time, Staff would recommend that Items 2, 3, and repairs to
Lift Stations 11 and 13 be authorized at this time at a cost of approximately $148,000.00. The needed
repairs to Lift Stations 9 and 12 could be programmed for the fiscal year 2000.
Attachments: Utility System Y2K Inventory (9 pages)
Y2K Repair Estimates from First Systems Technology, dated June 8, 1999
C:
Jerry Boucher, Utility Superintendent
Brad White, First Systems Technology
g:XpwXcharlesXcc\Y2K Update.doc
JOB: CHANHASSEN, CITY OF YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE
Delcdptlon Model Number
Will 2&5 Telep~clucts Telemetry Un~ ESR 808-00-003
Well 2&S Telel:m~uc~ Telemetry Un~ PRR 81~
Will 2&5 T~ Tet~ Un~ P2GPI
Will 2&5 R~ R~ MDS
Serial Number Y2K Prepared
Not Availab4e Bu~me~ C~o~ed li~e~'y
NOt Ava~b~e Business ClOsed I~kety
NOt Available Su~me~ C~osed ~ely
NOt Available Yes *
Not Available Yes
Not Available Yes
Not Available Yes *
FIRST SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY
CRanha.ssen Y2K mi)Off for emait to Rick RiCe
Page 10t~ 9
Locallon
Number
JOB: CHANHA$SEN, CITY OF YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE
DllcrlptlOrl MMII Number
42 Will 3 SO~. Power Supply SOL-V-15-5
Se~lNum~r
Y2K Prlpamd
NO Afl,Wet
NO Answer #ke~y
Yes
Yes
Yes +
Yes +
No Answer likely
FIP~T SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY Cbanha$$en Y2K report for emal~ to Rick Rice Page 2 of g
Line Location
Number
108 Tower I PowerOne pw~ supply
109 Tower 1 ScanData
110 Tower I ScanData
113 Tower I OPTO 22
114 Tower 1 OPTO 22
115 Tower 1 OPTO 22
116 Tower I OPTO 22
(Motorola)
JOB.' CHANHASSEN. C~l'Y OF YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE
Delcrtptlon
Model Number
PLC
Input Module
Input Module
Aan;tIog Module
VFD
UPS
PT-20~KG
A1SJH
A1SXSO-S1
AISY10
A1S64AD
MT-A 140E-28OK-O2UL
FR*PU02E-1
MTA.250L type 00920A
INFCP*000
LMX-202C
LI720VU15121
MDSlO00u1310RN10120
1650
1640
1361113618
201C3/VR602C
EC40OO41120
Power Supph/
Power Suppty
Power Supply
Power Supply
Modem
Telemetry Unit
Radio
PLC
Module
Telemetry Unit
Modem
UPS
HB 24-t .2
MDM 202A
FSD 202A
LMX OPTOB
MOS 1000u
M4
(;4 A~4
04 DA5 (2)
G4 AO6
4420DST
6024-01
V.3225
L1720VU1501
Pressure TransduCer
1151DP6EI2B2
Not Ava~able
NOt Availatde
NOt Available
NOt Ava~tab~e
NOt Avadable
Not Avadab~e
Not Avadable
Not Available
NOt Avadable
Not Available
Not Avadabie
Not Available
Not Ava~b4e
Not Available
Not Available
NOt Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
NOt Avaitable
Not Available
Not Avai[able
Y2K Prepared
Yes +
Yes +
Yes +
Yes *
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes +
yes +
Yes +
Yes +
Yes +
No Answer
No Answer liken
Yes
Yes +
yes +
FIRST SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY Chanhassen Y2K t'epon lot emai~ to Ric~ Rice Page 3 of 9
Line Location
Number
t23 Re~e~vok Honeywell
133 Tower 2 Scan Data
134 Tower 2 MK~'owgve Data
135
138 L $ I ScanData
.lOB: CHANHASSEN. CITY OF YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE
Delcllptlon Model Number
M. ATT
~rlal Numblr
Thermosta~ (2) 11~em~ostats NO( Avaaab4e
Thermostal {2) ti'a.~+'mo s tat s No~ AvaJla~4e
Telemetry Uni~ LMX OPTOB Not Availat:4e
Rads) MDS lO00u Not Availab4e
Power SUpply IHD 15-6 Not Available
Y2K Prepared
Yes
8u~ess ~ li~eiy
Yes
Yes +
Yes
B~s~e~s Close~ likely
Yes
Yes +
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
YeS
Yes
Yes
Yes
yes +
Yes
Yes +
YeS
F~RST SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY Ctlanhassen Y2K re~x3,'t for ernail to R~k Rice Page 4 of g
183
191 L S 10
198
19g L S 12
200 L S 12
202 L S 12
203
ScanData
Square O
Square D
ScgnOata
JOB: CHANHASSEN. CITY OF YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE
Delcrlptlon
Power S upp~'
Radio
Power $ upph'
Radio
MOS 10OOu
IHD 15-6
LMX OPTOB
MDS 100Ou
IHD 15-6
1564;
LMX OPTOB
MDS 10(X)u
IHO 15-6
LMX OPTOB
MDS 1000u
IHD 15-8
MOdel A
B430
257B
LMX OPTOB
MDS lOOOu
IHD 15-6
150-A135NBO
Not Available
Model A
65013-008-87
258B
LMX OPTOB
MDS 10OOu
IHD 15-6
Model A
257B
LMX OPTOB
MOS 10OOu
IHD 15-6
Model A
LMX OPTO8
Serial Number
Not Availal~e
Not Availat~e
Not Avaaab~e
NOt Avaitable
Not Availal~e
NOt Available
NOt Avai~atge
NOt AvailaD4e
NOt Available
NOt Aveila~e
NOt Available
Not Available
Not Available
NOt Available
Y2K Prepared
Yes
Yes +
B~.ir'~ess Closed likely
Yes +
Yes +
Yes
FIRST SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY Chant~ssen Y2K rel~rt for email to RiC~ Rice Page 5 of 9
20~ LSl$
206 L$13
207 L$13
20~ L$13
2O9
210 L $ 14
211 L514
212 L S 14
213 L $14
214 L~14
215
216 L 5 15
217 L $15
218 L $15
219 L $15
2~0 L $15
221
222 L$1~
238
242
Manufa~umr
JOB: CHANHASSEN, CrTY OF YEAR ~000 COMPLIANCE
Diicflptlon
Modll Number
Power SuPPly
MDS 10OOu
MOd el A
2578
LMX OPTOB
MDS 1000u
IHD 15-6
207
2O9
LMX OPTOR
MD$ 1000tJ
207
2O9
LMX OPTOB
MDS 1000u
Not Available
Nol Available
Not AvadatY, e
Not A vailatY, e
Y2K Pi'Il)amd
Bus~e~ Cloee~ #ke~,
Ye~
Ye~
FIRST SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY Chanhassen Y2K repod ~or email to Rick Rice Page 0 of 9
LIn~ Location
Number
246
247 L S 21
248 L S 21
24i3LS21
250 LS21
251 L $ 21
252 L S 21
253
254 LS22
NCC
NCC
NCC
JOB: CHANHASSEN. CITY OF YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE
Dllcriptlon Model Number
Power S uppty
Controller
Radio
Power Supply
CPU
LMX OPTOB
MDg 1OOO~
IHD t5-6
C82C
G404 moo 4B
PC 1270
LMX OPTO8
MDS lOOOu
IHD 15-6
CB2C
6Ol173-01
SLA.440-ALE
80E3A607
LMX O~TOC
MDS 100Ou (1310RNIO120)
IH[:) 15-§
CE2D
IS6
CME1
89002
LMX OPTOMUX
MOS lOOOu
IHD 15-6
IH? 2~,.7.2
SLA-440-ALE
C320TM30A
C$15ZNY1
C515HSE2
A1SCPU
AlS62P
A1SXSO (2)
A1SYI0 (2)
AISY18A
AlS64AD
T3K.180-4§2
T3K.60-461
TtK-30-4§1
NOt Available
Not Available
Not Available
NOt Available
Not Available
NOt Available
Not Available
Not Available
NOt Available
Not Availat~e
NOt Available
Not Available
NOt Available
NOt Availat~e
Not Availa~e
Not Available
NOt Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
NOl Available
Not Available
Y2K Pre~ared
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes +
Yes
Yes +
Yes +
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes ~-
Yes +
Yes +
Yes +
Yes +
Yes +
Yes +
FIRST SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY Chanhassen Y2K ~epor~ for email to Rick Rice Page 7 of 9
Line LocJtlon
Number
2B7 LS24
288 L S 24
289 L $ 24
~ L524
291 L S 24
292 L 5 24
293 L S 24
JOB: CHANHASSEN, CITY OF YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE
Model Number ~erlal Number Y2K Pmbemd
Display
ATS Sw~t ct1
Radio
Safely Swdch (5)
Radio
~owe,' mon~or (2)
M~r~i Control end Status
Radio
HOA switch gssy (2)
Relay Board
ST.22445 Not Avait atY, e
LCSIO Not Available
MTA.250 lypeOO521 Nol Available
OMP-MM NOt Available
DMP-DM Not Aveilable
ZT5H80E C-5AAAAE LLPRSTUWYNYE Not Available
47P- 1053 F Not AvgJtable
R4 NOt Availeb4e
Dynamic Systems InC. Not Avadable
0401-0098 NOt Availat~e
LMX OPTOC NOl Available
MOS 100Ou (1310RNI0120) NOI Available
ARA.120-ABA NOt Available
tSO-24oAFN Not AvaUable
LMX OPTOC Not Available
MDS lOOOu Not Available
IHD 15-5 Not Available
ARA-120-ABA Nol Available
Nol Ava~table Not Available
2644 Not Available
67 A 1AOA NOt Available
Not Available Not Available
LMX OPTOC NOl Available
MDS 1000u Not Available
IHD 15-6 Not Available
CB2D Not Available
F6OO. PCDM NOt Available
ADM6 Not Available
Not Available Not Available
CMK 30 Not Available
18BIA0 NOt Available
LMX OPTOC Not AYai[able
MDS lOOOu Not Available
D152 mod 601373-21C Not Available
CBIT. Tg87 NOl Available
Yes +
V~,2.21 nee~
NO Ar~w~' I~eh,
NO Answ~'
Yes +
yes +
Yes +
Yes
Yes
Yes
Ye~
Yes
Yes
Yes +
yes +
Yes
Ye~
FIRST SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY Chanhassen Y2K report ~or email to R~c~ R~ce Page 8 of 9
Line LocaUon
Number
JOB: CHANHASSEN, CITY OF YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE
Delcrtptlon Model Number
Serial Number
Y2K Prepared
326 L S 26
32~ LS26
330 L S 28
331
332 L S 29
333 LS2~
334 LS29
335 LS29
Consolidated Electric IntnnSic SwitCh IS6 NOt A'eattab~e
Consolidated Elec~nc Intnnsic Anak~ ISI-3 Not AvaitaMe
Yes
Yes
Ye~
FIRST SYSTEMs TECHNOLOGY Cnanhassen Y2K report for email to Ric~ Rice Page g of 9
From: Brad White To: Charles Folch Date: 06/08/1999 '13me: 2:08:50 PM Page 1 of:
:TEMS TECHNOLOGY
FO~ YOUR COMPUTER, AUTOMATON AND SERVICE NEEDS
FAX COVER SHEET
Date: June 8, 1999
From:
To:
Company:
Brad White
Charles Folch
Chanhassen, City Of
Fax: 474-1687
BUDGETING ESTIMATE
It is my pleasure to submit this estimate for the following projects. After reviexving the
information supplied to First Systems Technology, we have detemfined that this estimate will
include the items shown below. Since we are dealing w'ith an existing system we xx'ill need lo be
somewhat fle.,dble as we may encounter problems that are not readily apparent (sofixvare x'irttse.~.
incorrect wiring, inaccurate documentation etc):
Y2K Update of Lift Stations 9, 11, 12, and 13:
Replacement of main lift station control panels. This will involve replacing file enclosu,'c. Ibc
enclosure devices to operate the pumps, installation ora PLC for controls, inslallalion and
connection of the panel, testing and commissioning of each system.
The price for the aforementioned items is ......................... $162,000.00
Y2K Update of the MTA-250 at Lift Station 24:
The real time clock in the operator interface unit needs to be upgraded in order to make lhc
system Y2K prepared.
The price for the aforementioned items is ................................ $675.00
o
Y2K Update of Reservoir level infom~ation:
This system will consist of replacing the reservoir control panel, installing a panel at tower 3.
and installing additional equipment at Well 2. The system will incorporate radio telemetry
and will eliminate the existing Teleproducts hardware and associated leased line. This radio
FIRST SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY
5{:}92 C. OUNTRY CIRCI.E
LORETTO, MN qq~q'~ or, lc~
Phone: 612-479-10~ d
m: Brad White To: Charles Folch Date: 06108/1999 Time: 2:08:50 PM z~.:~e '2 c,f 2
;YSTEM$ TECHNOLOGY
F~)R YOUR C,..'},,,?UT,'~ ,.. AUTOM,AT,C,tl A,~'I.D ~: "',r-- ~, ~ ~'
telemet~3' system will be used to transmit level infom~ation t?om the reservoir to \.Veil 2 x i:=
tower 3 in order to control the foxy zone system.
The price for the aforementioned items is ........................... S66,600.00
Regards.
Brad White