The URL can be used to link to this page

1a-1 Prairie Creek Final Plats 1 /CC. / C ITYOF I .,, 1 CHANHASSEN ,,, , _ 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 1 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 Action by DIY Administrata0 MEMORANDUM Endo s'?d - -V__1) Rejected TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager Date t - A4 - 9 I FROM: Dote Submitted to Commissioft Jo Ann Olsen, Senior Planner a ,1 r Dave Hempe Assistant City Engineers Date SunTitted to Coma 1 DATE: June 23, 1993 __ 93 1 SUBJ: Prairie Creek Addition and Prairie Creek Second Addition Final Plats On April 26, 1993, the City Council approved Prairie Creek Townhomes as shown on the revised 1 plans dated March 25, 1993, with the following conditions: 1. Change Lot 25, Block 1 to Outlot A and Homeowners Association By -laws shall be 1 submitted to staff for approval and filing against the subject site. * The lot has been changed to Outlot A on the final plat. The applicant must still 1 submit the Homeowners Association By -laws for approval and recording. 2. Amend the PUD Contract to state the impervious surface coverage of this site cannot 1 exceed 40 %. * This condition still needs to be completed and is required as a part of the 1 development contract. I 3. The city shall petition Carver County to vacate any unnecessary right -of -way along Powers Boulevard (CR 17). 1 * This condition is no longer applicable. 4. The townhome units shall conform to the design and architecture as proposed by the 1 applicant in their attached narrative dated March 24, 1993. * This condition shall remain as part of the development contract. 1 1 tOf PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 1 Prairie Creek Final Plat June 23, 1993 Page 2 ' 5. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and provide a financial security to guarantee installation of the public improvements and compliance ' with the conditions of approval. ' * This condition shall remain as part of the development contract. 6. The proposed walkway along Powers Boulevard shall be constructed within the development in accordance to the City's typical 8 -foot wide bituminous trail standards, unless it is to be relocated within the County right -of -way by Carver County and City. ' * This condition is no longer applicable. Staff has met with the Carver County Engineering Department and resolved that the trail could be put in the county right - of -way in conjunction with the city /county upgrading of Powers Boulevard. In lieu ' of the construction, a cash contribution of $7,413.00 shall be made to the trail dedication fund. Park fees shall be paid in accordance with the planned unit development contract. 1 7. The applicant shall supply detailed storm sewer calculations for a 10 -year storm event for the City Engineer to review and approve. The applicant shall construct an interim ' sedimentation basin at the storm sewer discharge point (Outlot C). The basin shall be sized based on contributing area and land use, approximately 0.30 to 0.50 acre /feet in size. In addition, the applicant shall pay a cash contribution into the City's storm water ' management program in lieu of constructing a retention pond on site for water quality purposes. The City's surface water management consultant, Bonestroo & Associates, will determine the cash contribution amount. ' * Part of this condition has been met. The condition should be amended as follows: The applicant shall pay a cash contribution into the city's Storm Water Management Fund in lieu of constructing permanent retention ponding on site for water quality purposes. The city's Surface Water Management consultant, Bonestroo and Associates, have determined the cash contribution at $7,100.00. In addition, the ' applicant shall pay the city for future restoration of the sedimentation basin which is estimated at $2,500.00. 8. The applicant shall supply detailed construction plans for sanitary sewer, watermain, street access points and storm sewer improvements for the City to review and approve. All ' utility improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the City's 1993 Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. ' * This condition shall remain as part of the development contract. 1 Prairie Creek Final Plat 1 June 23, 1993 Page 3 I 9. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining and complying with all necessary permits such as MWCC, Health Department, Watershed District, PCA and Carver County I Highway Department. * This condition shall remain as part of the development contract. I 10. Parking shall be prohibited along Lake Susan Hills Drive adjacent to this development. The City will proceed in preparing a resolution restricting parking along Lake Susan Hills I Drive. * This condition shall remain as part of the development contract. 1 11. The applicant shall incorporate the City's Best Management Practice Handbook for site restoration and additional erosion control measures during the construction process. 1 * This condition shall remain as part of the development contract. 12. A cross - access easement should be conveyed to all the lots for use of the private street. I * This condition shall remain as part of the development contract. 1 13. Fire Marshal conditions: a. The marking of fire lane on private and public property shall be designated and I approved by the Fire Chief [pursuant to 1988 UFC Sec. 10.207(w)]. See site plan submitted by Fire Marshal for exact location. 1 b. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs shall be installed as per indicated on submitted site plan [pursuant to Chanhassen City Policy #06 -1991 (copy enclosed)]. I c. A 10 foot clear space shall be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e. NSP I transformers, telephone, cable boxes, all landscape trees and shrubs. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance. d. Submit a Fire Marshal approved "Pre -Fire Plan," pursuant to Chanhassen City 1 Policy #07 -1991 (copy enclosed). e. Add and/or relocate fire hydrants as indicated on submitted site, pursuant to 1988 1 UFC Division 3. 1 1 1 1 Prairie Creek Final Plat June 23, 1993 Page 4 f. Fire apparatus access road shall be designed, built and maintained before and during construction of the townhouse units. The driving surface must meet 1 Chanhassen Engineering specifications, pursuant to 1988 UFC 10.207(f). g. Premise identification Policy #29 -1992 (copy enclosed). ' * This condition shall remain as part of the development contract. 14. Building Official conditions: a. Indicate lowest floor elevations and garage floor elevations for each house pad on 1 the grading plan prior to final plat approval. ' * This condition has been met. b. Submit details on corrected pads including compaction tests, limits of the pads and ' elevations of excavations to the Inspections Division. A general soils report for the development should also be submitted to the Inspections Division. This must be done prior to issuance of building permits. 1 * This condition must be met prior to issuance of a building permit and shall be part of the development contract. 1 c. Adjust property lines, building sizes, wall openings or a combination of all three to comply with the building code prior to final plat approval. ' * This condition has been met. ' d. Provide easements for driveways and private roads to a public way prior to final plat approval. * This condition remains and shall be required prior to signing the final plat. e. Submit proposed street name(s) for review prior to final plat approval. * This condition remains and shall be required prior to signing the final plat. q P � g P 15. The applicant shall submit sight line details for the northern portion of the development and work with staff to agree on species of trees along Powers Boulevard and internally ' to the project. * This condition has been met. 1 Prairie Creek Final Plat 1 June 23, 1993 Page 5 I RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council adopt the following motion: 1 "The City Council approves the final plat for Prairie Creek Addition and Prairie Creek 2nd I Addition as shown on the plans dated June 7, 1993, and subject to the following conditions: 1. Homeowners Association By -laws shall be submitted to staff for approval and filing I against the subject site. 2. Amend the PUD Contract to state the impervious surface coverage of this site cannot I exceed 40 %. 3. The townhome units shall conform to the design and architecture as proposed by the I applicant in their attached narrative dated March 24, 1993. 4. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and provide a I financial security to guarantee installation of the public improvements and compliance with the conditions of approval. 5. In lieu of the construction of a trail, a cash contribution of $7,413.00 shall be made to the I trail dedication fund. Park fees shall be paid in accordance with the planned unit development contract. 1 6. The applicant shall pay a cash contribution into the city's Storm Water Management Fund in lieu of constructing permanent retention ponding on site for water quality purposes. I The city's Surface Water Management consultant, Bonestroo and Associates, have determined the cash contribution at $7,100.00. In addition, the applicant shall pay the 1 city for future restoration of the sedimentation basin which is estimated at $2,500.00. 7. The applicant shall supply detailed construction plans for sanitary sewer, watermain, street I access points and storm sewer improvements for the City to review and approve. All utility improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the City's 1993 Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. I 8. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining and complying with all necessary permits such as MWCC, Health Department, Watershed District, PCA and Carver County I Highway Department. 9. Parking shall be prohibited along Lake Susan Hills Drive adjacent to this development. I The City will proceed in preparing a resolution restricting parking along Lake Susan Hills Drive. 1 1 Prairie Creek Final Plat June 23, 1993 Page 6 ' 10. The applicant shall incorporate the City's Best Management Practice Handbook for site restoration and additional erosion control measures during the construction process. 11. A cross - access easement should be conveyed to all the lots for use of the private street. 12. Fire Marshal conditions: a. The marking of fire lane on private and public property shall be designated and 1 approved by the Fire Chief [pursuant to 1988 UFC Sec. 10.207(w)]. See site plan submitted by Fire Marshal for exact location. 1 b. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs shall be installed as per indicated on submitted site plan [pursuant to Chanhassen City Policy #06 -1991 (copy enclosed)]. 1 c. A 10 foot clear space shall be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e. NSP transformers, telephone, cable boxes, all landscape trees and shrubs. Pursuant to ' Chanhassen City Ordinance. d. Submit a Fire Marshal approved "Pre -Fire Plan," pursuant to Chanhassen City Policy #07 -1991 (copy enclosed). e. Add and /or relocate fire hydrants as indicated on submitted site, pursuant to 1988 1 UFC Division 3. f. Fire apparatus access road shall be designed, built and maintained before and during construction of the townhouse units. The driving surface must meet Chanhassen Engineering specifications, pursuant to 1988 UFC 10.207(f). g. Premise identification Policy #29 -1992 (copy enclosed). 13. Building Official conditions: ' a. Submit details on corrected pads including compaction tests, limits of the pads and elevations of excavations to the Inspections Division. A general soils report for the development should also be submitted to the Inspections Division. This must be done prior to issuance of building permits. b. Provide easements for driveways and private roads to a public way prior to final plat approval. c. Submit proposed street name(s) for review prior to final plat approval. 1 1 1 Prairie Creek Final Plat 1 June 23, 1993 Page 7 14. Utilities and street improvements outside of the dedicated right-of-way and utility and P g Y tY drainage easements as shown on the final plat shall be privately owned and maintained by the Homeowners Association and not by the City. 1 15. Inspection for the construction of the private utility lines (sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewers) shall be performed by the City's Building Department. The appropriate building permits shall be obtained and complied with." ATTACHMENTS 1 1. City Council minutes dated April 26, 1993. 2. Prairie Creek Addition and Prairie Creek Second Addition final plats dated June 7, 1993. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 City Council Meeting - April 26, 1993 II Councilman Wing: That is clearly a record for this Council. Just on the II record. CONSIDER PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO CREATE 27 TOWNHOME LOTS, LOCATED DIRECTLY EAST OF POWERS BOULEVARD S AND ADJACENT TO LAKE SUSAN HILLS PUD, PRAIRIE CREEK TOWNHOMES, JASPER 1' DEVELOPMENT. lif ')\1) Public Present: ` Name Address James Domholt 8251 West Lake Court Andrew K. Olson 8290 West Lake Court Tom Nilsson 1060 Lake Susan Hills Drive II Kirby Paulson 8410 West Lake Drive Jo Ann Olsen: I'll just give you a brief summary on this one. It's actually I down to 24 units now. This was reviewed two times by the Planning Commission. The main issues that the Planning Commission had with this was the density. That the PUD contract stated that it could only be 31% impervious coverage and what I they are proposing was closer to 45%. There's also discussions on whether or not we should be applying the new PUD regulations. If that would be changing or giving the city more than what they were getting currently with the proposal. Ar:d then also there was some issues with the architecture of the buildings that I sDme of the residents had some concerns with. They wanted it to be added to a little bit to, the rear of the buildings they thought were kind of plain. 5o the Planning Commission did review it a second time. The applicants had removed II 3 of the units. They've even added more to the landscaping plan. The - coverage is now down to 40%, which is what staff had recommended ar of originally. As far as the impervious coverage, the reason that it's II h_y`,er is the type of units that they're proposing. It's not the stacked units. It's more kind of a single family type of unit and that's what they're going for is the, for the people who want those type of units. The impervious coverage is rot that much in excess that we feel it's that much of a problem. They're I really adding a lot of landscaping. It's going to actually be a very nice looking project. One of the reasons that there is more impervious coverage is Lecause of the looped street that we are requiring for safety. Also staff has I recommended that there be visitor parking on this, so that added to some of the impervious coverage. So as just a real short synopsis, the Planning Commission dio recommend approval of the revised plan. The applicant is here if you have I an question. I see that some of the residents are also here too. We are still recommending approval with a couple of changes made to the conditions that the Planning Commission added. Other than that, I'll answer any questions that you have. I Mayor Chmiel: Thank you. Is the applicant here at this time? Wish to make a proposal? II Larry Harris: Thank you Mr. Mayor. My name is Larry Harris. I'm the attorney representing the applicant, Jasper Development. The applicant is pleased with the action taken by the Planning Commission and would like to see the Council II act and follow the recommendations of it's Planning Commission with one 11 15 II Cit;' Council Meeting - Apr'' 26, 1993 exception. The staff memorandum prepared by Ms. Olsen dated March 30th of 1993 also asked the Planning Commission to consider increasing the impervious lot density to the 40% figure on Outlot D. The PUD agreement for Outlot D sets the impervious surface density at 27% for that particular outlot. For Outlot C, which is the subject of the preliminary plat in front of you, it's 31%. That's important for a very significant reason to my client. Jasper Development holds �. an option on Outlot 0 and anticipates coming back to the City in a relatively near future, perhaps within the next 12 to 18 months with a preliminary plat for that site for townhouses that will be configured in the same manner as the townhouses which you have before you now. The reason that issue is important is the PUD agreement sets an even lower impervious density, that is 27% as opposed to the 31% which is in the agreement for Outlot C. Jasper Development needs to know what the position of the Council is going to be in relation to Outlot D because it has a significant impact, to be very blunt, in terms of whether or not to exercise their option on the other outlot. If the impervious density is not set at the same 40% figure that the Planning Commission recommends on Outlot C. this type of a townhouse project, that is detached, high quality units, 1,400 plus square feet cannot be built. The only thing that you can build and meet the 27' density that is set forth in your planned unit development agreement is essentially stacked, very high density units. I realize that's somewhat of an anomaly but the only way to keep the impervious surface requirement and meet it at 27% is to put in high density stacked units which Jasper Development, and I cicr:'t believe the City's planning staff feel is the best use for this. property. Cit; staff had recommended to the Planning Commission that they also go with the e10% on Outlot D. Planning Commission was relunctant to do so and I think their rationale was that they wanted to look at it again at a later date. The problem is that leaves the developer in quite a quandry. The developer is very certain that it wants to come back with a proposal that is, I don't want to say it's yninn to be identical to the proposal they're making on Outlot C but it will certainly be units that are essentially the same. If the City Council is not willing to do it, it's going to have some impact on whether the developer's grim to be willing to proceed. Not with the portion of the project that's in front of you but with the additional portion. And accordingly we would ask that Council act in accordance with staff's recommendation to the Planning ConT,ission on the Outlot D issue. Other than that, representatives of Jasper Development are present. I'm present. We could answer any questions that the Council might have about the proposal. Mayor Chmiel: Thank you. Jo Ann. Jo Ann Olsen: Staff's original condition was realizing that the impervious coverages were low and that to take away any feelings that they might be setting nr €ceJent was just to establish for all the medium and high density outlots left within the PUD just to make it a uniform 40%. Planning Commission was not comfortable with that. They want to see the plan first and that, I agree you know with what they're doing. And that's not to say that they won't get the 40% but I don't know that that's something you just want to flat out give them right nnw. Mayor Chmiel: I think at this particular time it gets a little difficult for us to give a decision on what's going to be coming in at a later time. 1 16 1 1 City Council Meeting April 26, 1993 Jo Ann Olsen: The Planning Commission was very strong on that and I think that they would. Councilman Senn: Could you do one thing for us because at least nothing I had in the packet gives me the reference points that he was just talking about. Outlot D and. ' Jo Ann Olsen: Oh, Outlot D is way in the back. Councilwoman Dockendorf: It's on the other side of Lake Susan Hills Drive. Councilman Senn: No, but I meant I was just looking for where the outlets were. Jo Ann Olsen: It's on the end of your PUD contract. ' Mayor Chmiel: I think the last two or three sheets. ' Councilman Senn: Okay, and that's C and D then. Mayor Chmiel: Well, before we go any further. I'd like to see if there's anyone who would ilk:: to address this as well at this particular time. Okay. If ' not, then I'd like to go to Council. Mark, do you have anything more in addition to what you indicated? ' Councilman Senn: I guess I would have a difficult time I guess at this point acting on something that's not before us. As far as the outlots go. I guess I don't really see the need to do that at this point in time. But as far as what is before us in staff's recommendations, I see no problem with that. ' Mayor Chmiel: Okay. Michael. ' Councilman Mason: Reading through the both sets of Minutes on the Planning Commission, there's some pretty interesting discussions going on about 35% to 40. and I do agree with the thought that just because something was passed 5 years ago, it doesn't mean it works now. I'm uncomfortable with the 40% impervious coverage but given this circumstance, and that's what I like about the PUD, clearly if we had a smaller percentage, we'd have a higher units and I know for a fact nobody that lives in the residential area wants that and I ' certainly wouldn't if I want to. I'm under the impression that by and large the residents in the area are okay with what's going on here? I mean obviously you don't want anything there. I mean I don't fault you for that but you know, but ' things seem like, yeah. It looks like a pretty good development. I agree with Councilman Senn. I don't think we're in a position to be saying what will be happening on Outlot D right now. I'd certainly not to say that it won't happen ' but until we see a plan. No, I'm going to get my kick in here for affordable housing also. This is alternative housing. It's not affordable, as you stated Jo Ann. And that is something that I want to keep hammering away at but this is an alternative that apparently people are looking for. And it does, you know ' the landscaping looks good. I'll pass my landscaping comments onto the tree man here, and I'm sure he'll be getting his crack at it pretty soon. But it looks like things are pretty well thought out. Mayor Chmiel: Good. Okay, Colleen. ' 17 City Council Meeting - Ap'il 26, 1993 Councilwoman Dockendorf: Well, Mike touched on pretty much everything I wanted to say. There was lots of good discussion generated in most of the Minutes and I think everything was pretty much covered there. There wasn't what I could see any resolution to the drainage issue. Is that an issue or was it just? Jo Ann Olsen: That was never really an issue. There was the discussion a lot about the ponding. The temporary ponding. Some of the residents were concerned where exactly it was going to be. What's the depth. What's the size and they're still, when the plans and specs come through then we'll have those details. We don't have them yet but. Councilwoman Dockendorf: So it's not really? Jo Ann Olsen: Yeah, it shouldn't be a concern. We won't be taking down trees for it. Councilwoman Dockendorf: And as far as the impervious coverage, as stated in the Minutes, if it's 10,000 square feet, which isn't a lot, but it makes we wonder why we're requiring visitor parking. ' Jo Ann Olsen: Well we still feel that's a concern. There's no really areas for street parking along there so if people go beyond their driveway area, there is a need. Councilwoman Dockendorf: Alright, so there is a need there. And my other question, and I don't know if we're at it yet but we're going to be putting a trail there. There's currently a sidewalk at least right there. Jo Ann Olsen: It's going to be replaced. It's actually going through their lot right now so it has to be adjusted and fixed. It's not very good now. Councilwoman Dockendorf: And as far as the other outlots in the area, I'd certainly like to leave that option open because I am looking, I think that's, whether it be on the east or west side of Powers, I think there's good opportunity there for affordable housing. I don't want to scare everyone in the neighborhood abcat that but I'd like to leave that option open. Otherwise I'm fine. Mayor Chmiel: Thank you. Richard. Councilman Wing: Planning Commission said it all. I support where they're at. That's all I have to say. Mayor Chmiel: I guess I don't have anything more to add to it either. I would request an approval for the proposal. Councilman Senn: I move approval. Councilman Mason: With conditions as stated? Councilman Senn: Yeah, as per staff's recommendation. Mayor Chmiel: Is there a second? ' 18 1 City Council Meeting - 'pril 26, 1993 Councilman Mason: Second. Mayor Chmiel: It's been moved and seconded. Any other discussion? Councilman Senn moved, Councilman Mason seconded to approve Prairie Creek Townhomes as shown on the revised plans dated March 25, 1993, with the following conditions: 1. Change Lot 25, Block 1 to Outlot A and Homeowners Association By -laws shall be submitted to staff for approval and filing against the subject site. I 2. Amend the PUD Contract to state the impervious surface coverage of this site cannot exceed 40%. 3. The city shall petition Carver County to vacate any necessary right -of -way along Powers Boulevard (CR 17). 4. The townhome units shall conform to the design and architecture as proposed by the applicant in their attached narrative dated March 24, 1993. 5. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and I provide a financial security to guarantee installation of the public improvements and compliance with the conditions of approval. I 6. The proposed walkway along Powers Boulevard shall be constructed within the development in accordance to the City's typical 8 foot wide bituminous trail standards, unless it is to be relocated within the County right -of- way by Carver County and City. ' 7. The applicant shall supply detailed storm sewer calculations for a 10 year storm event for the City Engineer to review and approve. The applicant shall construct an interim sedimentation basin at the storm sewer discharge point (Outlot C). The basin shall be sized based on contributing area and land use, approximately 0.30 to 0.50 acre /feet in size. In addition, the I applicant shall pay a cash contribution into the City's storm water management program in lieu of constructing a retention pond on site for water quality purposes. The City's surface water management consultant, Bonestroo & Associates will determine the cash contribution amount. C. The applicant shall supply detailed construction plans for sanitary sewer, watermain, street access points and storm sewer improvements for the City to review and approve. All utility improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the City's 1993 Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. 9. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining and complying with all necessary permits such as MWCC, Health Department, Watershed District, PCA and Carver County Highway Department. 10. Parking shall be prohibited along Lake Susan Hills Drive adjacent to this development. The City will proceed in preparing a resolution restricting parking along Lake Susan Hills Drive. I 19 I City Council Meeting - Apr 26, 1993 11. The applicant shall incorporate the City's Best Management Practice Handbook for site restoration and additional erosion control measures during the construction process. 12. A cross - access easement should be conveyed to all the lots for use of the private street. 13. Fire Marshal conditions: a. The marking of fire lane on private and public property shall be designated and approved by the Fire Chief [pursuant to 1988 UFC Sec. 10.207(w)]. See site plan submitted by Fire Marshal for exact location. b. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs shall be installed as per indicated on submitted site plan [pursuant to Chanhassen City Policy #06 -1991 (copy enclosed)]. c. A 10 foot clear space shall be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e. NSP transformers, telephone, cable boxes, all landscape trees and shrubs. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance. d. Submit a Fire Marshal approved "Pre -Fire Plan ", pursuant to Chanhassen City Policy #07 -1991 (copy enclosed). e. Add and/or relocate fire hydrants as indicated on submitted site, ' pursuant to 1988 UFC Division 3. f. Fire apparatus access road shall be designed, built and maintained before and during construction of the townhouse units. The driving IC surface must meet Chanhassen Engineering specifications, pursuant to 1988 UFC 10.207(f). ' g. Premise identification Policy #29 -1992 (copy enclosed). 14. Building Official conditions: ' a. Indicate lowest floor elevations and garage floor elevations for each house pad on the grading plan prior to final plat approval. b. Submit details on corrected pads including compaction tests, limits of the pads and elevations of excavations to the Inspections Division. A general soils report for the development should also be submitted to the Inspections Division. This must be done prior to issuance of building permits. c. Adjust property lines, building sizes, wall openings or a combination of all three to comply with the building code prior to final plat approval. d. Provide easements for driveways and private roads to a public way prior to final plat approval. 20 , 11 City Council Meeting - )ril 26, 1993 e. Submit proposed street name(s) for review prior to final plat approval. 15. The applicant shall submit sight line details for the northern portion of the development and work with staff to agree on species of trees along II ' Powers Boulevard and internally to the project. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVE DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE SANITARY SEWER AND WATER POLICY PLAN. I ( Charles Folch: Mr. Mayor, members of the Council. These draft documents represent nearly a year's worth of effort by both staff and our consultants on this study. These plan will involve some policy issues on how we plan to provide for future utility infrastructure to serve the community. The intent I for tonight's meeting is to provide sort of an executive summary of these draft documents and to basically get them into your hands for your review. More in depth discussion will likely need to occur between the Council, staff and the I project consultant prior to finalizing and approving these documents. Staff has recommended and established this as an agenda item for further discussion at an upcoming work session scheduled for Wednesday, May 5th. Our projection consultant engineers, Mr. Bob Schunicht and Mr. Phil Gravel of Bonestroo are II here tonight to provide you with a brief presentation of these draft documents. Mayor Chmiel: Okay, thank you. Just one question Charles. For the amount of I paper that we have here, are we being compensated accordingly for what we're paying them in salary? Bob Schunicht: You want Charles to answer that or do you want me to answer I that? we have that discussion a lot when we're preparing our reports and we say the thinner the report, the more time we have to put into it to give you the information that you need. Not everything that we know. So we could come with I something like that, it'd be cheaper to do it than the short ones. At any rate, we're here tonight just to give you a brief overview of the comprehensive plans that we did and as Charles said, these plans are your roadmaps or plans for the I ultimate finishing or completion of the city of Chanhassen in accordance with your comprehensive plan, your land use plan. And really the goals of these plans is to do two things. First of all, when the city of Chanhassen is finished in whatever ultimate state it becomes, the systems work. Your sanitary I sewer system works. Your water system works. You can deliver the product to provide the service that you intended to do when you started this. And the second, and more critical thing is that the system is paid for. That the systems I are paid for as development occurs and when you get done you have a little bit of money in the bank to deal with minor changes and additions that require as you get out 30 or 40 years. So tonight Phil's just going to hit some of the II highlights of the plan and then we'll be back here in a couple weeks and talk about them in some detail. Thank you. Phil Gravel: Thank you Bob. What you got in your packet were two reports. You I have to look close to realize that they're two separate reports. There's a comprehensive sewer policy plan with the sanitary sewer and there's a water supply distribution plan which looks at the water distribution. The two reports I look a lot alike because in fact the methodology for preparing them is a lot alike. The first thing we did was look at the land use plan for the city and II 21 II / E Illid,,,.., a o 1 ., 11 • // / of -- /; i ll X59 a � / � `O 1_- } Q _ ; 1. /i B NN1: �t� $ ° I A 1 l' a 1 / / / Uau:' S' o 9 ' � a • o __ 1 � 1 411 7 , 7 3 = .i / AIi N \/ / ; =vA� vim' \ 3 llik / / hi / /b . ,,, -,,. :, it.; / ; �_ 1 1% l : , , , \ N , 8 \ ig. '.! ' 1 r '• - ', - , VI, - --- ___ • y ^ / i // % , 1 Y if , ' O / 0 -'--„I :2-- ‘ V VI O r— • • ;' , / 1/ a - 1 I f / r - 'b - - 1 , i 11 . 11 1171 t 1 // '. - :;! F ?i¢'A , , , Q i zb= P.,' 3 s 1 1 / /J / ' g 1. r f �' r te ; _ I fll ! ' ' ; 1 / Ni i, , ! , §..i.„ ,;- I , i SI XI £ - , 11 I � �, fi / 1 la `� I 3,1 c,' ° � I : z'I cf F 72 4Ua. 4 1,8 0�� _.. //. / " a _� y F1 1 1 1 J cA's , : / I ,_ —y .mss f E 1 , _ ; _ 1 D m y '.aAxs m s a I 1 2 ii WM ,frilM1,17•11(IN PIMP. f117. 11 1,70,1,1 LEGEND . .•••,-..--...,--•---------.•.-- 15 MR.N11(.17 ION!. (0•181911. NM 04 CO, \ 1\ i, \\\\\ \ \ 4. • Foucto.ni u.n*Nry IN ,J•kloi Pl.. A' kr, 014.0Nlif 1) 1, 011 .11,,, , -.....--V,-ailmilit 1 FR AND 011 ift . Of 1' 1,1 1,,N1 .. , . 4, ' 1 \ • nat.POSED .00nosr , r= :::: roue ■■• in•ww •o• ,,,, , 4,... .1•1.1 VOW .0 011,0 PI Ii.NALENI I \„ \ \,. I or.....1., ..... h.,. t,......„....1 '•1•11 Id ■..II 1lb u11111 NI •.11 NI,. , ,IAI■11...P.ol'iN 011 . ..11 1 1 'PR/MI P1.190fr ' '-,. ' I \ ' ''', ''' .,' /imma•••••••• f.v • Wm:4,M c.ort vAr.w co f uS.9. 14. ,N1 INI. ,r r.1,1fN1■411 PA, 1 1100 A, , nt; . .;1.1: -- :,: ,-, 7: , ..:,:=77,....11:1 " ......... - wel . . - I • ', l't.',,. „ a„,,,,44 ,,,,,,,,, . owmo 4 w.rwt. tow.. '""". "" "" '''. ' " ' .:1 " otfoll r• o r ,.„10 S ....,‘ \ ''., 4., / ,,,,, / ,,,,,, • \ \ ow Fus.G. C.Ormone ' ennotn,.rtt"o:71 ow e ,,.. on l ' 1.1( ,,X • \ \ ' P..., , ,,,, . ,, ,.. . ,„, ,„ i i --°---."11 " ." II .1 4.1 MI , WAPP .1. DM... - - twi.rtruc ou■11 PAW ' r.:,÷"F...4::,,,,,:n;:::.t!..":„mnr,;:t.'1,17.,:l.t.°V,7::''' S N V \ • rli• ws.r1,1:7.4;177Z ou I •on 1.4 1„•■•••• ,w,....,,wa.m... ) .. .,55 WO ,11211,111., .... • 1.8.111...101/•■ • VP • \ '''1.1.1.,1,0-''' . „„ • .1, \ '■ 0 \ e ,, .:7".".t."''' ..aeoh.,-• \ r e„ „ tlik i k \ \ 1.1,111111. A.,00.44.5.. ;ItJ UO4.4 OWL stra NO - ' ^ .. 11:0' •\ s 1 \ I.., /A 551, - 4 SAWN OACW81- LIN. , II■Mill 1110.N1 MI .4. ••....„-- • • , -........> • • • 11 ,,,,, . IIC' ''''. / '''S ' ' •"...... 4 4. T:'•,t; \, s \ . \‘'..\\ C\s \\,. i i \ ' \ 11. , 1 .e. MA.. Iriavnit. L34. ammo.. ■ rtwct • . alrlaTI/V1==:01101 ,,,... 'LL ea' , , ':, k , ''' , ' 4.' ■ \ 7rd>.....:\,,, 14,,4,4 4A, ENNUNPFS \ \'',,. ,C) r • '.■ ' -4 4 ' '''„ - i'r , \ \ .i?' g ) , 4; .17M1 • ' \ \ , • , , , „ , A , ..,. • , , , ...... NOM STOCIWILE `,ALVI....1) WPSOIL 108 1:10641. f OP 1,0,1054.8PINC A1ONG PFIRIIVW, Of PPM, ....,... 4. 4 . ' ' Ag ‘ ' . 1 i ... ''''' \.H , •114 e ....- ce,, *) \ , -. -.... 1.31CLN ANUS I, PRAC11,1. / -: ,------- '"? 44.,. j, , kik .‘," ) \ , 1 ,,-. ,,.• , 113 " , ..... ... ■ \ , - NM, 41 Al,f ALMITIoN.Ai 111 1 10 AI 1 1,iNt , , ..lieri ",,,,, , ',..,,,...',..„,.. ,....,„, Mt N NOL.I WWII. IS "MAU IELI AND 1.INNIAIN ON111 PHASE I 17.[STORANON IS COMPLETE 1-, , a, ' ,. %I '-..."......, ' .., '''.... `..... „. - ' " , , - ' . 'Voi;;; ..-• ,., -,--, -0430, , ... . , -.4? - . • . , ..... . \ ‘ ''.,■W , , VOils, ' • <7 I , --- __ ..... ••..,•., - • . ---,„*.,, ,....., . . '' ''''' ' N ' „ • -- lt;• '4> \ . - - 22 •,.4. " .41 '--, ' • -„, `. ..„. 4 4 - , \ , ' Mil• . . / . ..,:, .. . . '.....„ •Itga • i / \ ,, '''.., ''' 4 44, 0 s, ■• . - i *--••• ,••••., ---, . _.• 41t ,':% ., 15 dAn s e • ---,,, \ '\ \ -\, i NOR PUCE 111.1,10>80QT 1 IN NEW 011CNIW4 111141111114.1, s ,, -„ -' '''4 • \ 12 ' , :pro 4 ---I L ..________-- , \ \ 13. / )111L11,. -- , •-......„, ' . -;•1/4,,. \ -,, -...„. . ' • , ... \ 4 . .,,..1,.. ■Srli317 • • 1 7 \ ,... - - .. . .. .... , .... . , , , 4 • ' 7 II*41P liti , i 4,6 , - ,Le - 19 16 ' \, , b ..... -..., . ...'"N .r,''^, 4 . 4 ----- l /*RAMAT IMO 106 8930 , , . • , ' .""., .7) .7 ." ..."..."'",......... \ \ ' 7 . , ,,,,, 4 (g WIDTH) „ . L ,.1 , ' ''T'f.' . • , 7 ' '.". \„.....s...... '....„„ ' LI .' , .,. I g ..... r e 61“ 11:5 . • PROPOSED GRAM - , OPEN ... .... \ ...1 .. -- - , • , _,.. - /.. .. . . - \ Vfo •.-......-,- 01.1 " / INV [LEV 709 5 C. 7.... „. nr,Arl. 1 AT , / , / 1-3... , \ . ‘ ,r iii,..-.--___ - el* RISER DETAIL . i / ,,.. , • ,,,.., (Al SF.011.1.1Arr. BASIN) C i ...., -' --..... - • '..... „,1 ) \ 10 FABRIC .- .,•••' --.--. t use, - - ---- ___1 , 101. ■V 1,1118I -,... . .- ....- EROSION CONTROL SECTION Revised Rehder and Associates, Inc. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL (AT DRIVES) SILT FENCE DETAIL . ,,,• 1.141.8411., MO 1.0 ',NNW ro It, PRAIRIE CREEK .... • , '. 7 . ,7 '‘e 1. CITY OF CEIANHASSEN Project No. 931-144.84 Sheet 3 of 4 Sheets 111 MI - MI 11111 MI 1.1111 11111 11.11 11.11 NE IIIIIIIII Ell MI MN IIIIIII MIN 11.11 - ......., iE ;8 /I.'. / / / / / 1 i / d / / , 1 1 El7 / / / / / li, 1,15! / / 1 i 1 1 1 g 5 1 * R. !I I > g .r.• 7 i 7 -c ;: // z 14 ill , ,,, k 1 i 0 . - z / , , 1 ! -]--- ' I 1 / 1 1 i , . i , \ , 21041 i I tllup 1 i 0 , / z - /0■ / / J A . / . / / ,- :1 4 * pi- i, ______ / V* , 1 OK _i_ • , ' i'■ • W. / 1 / / .), / . 't:' L i : / N- // Ki I, , / 4 /1 / 4 1 4 4 / 2RP / p / •1 I i --- — / 4 . , , * - ----,--- 1 / , feti / :44. ". 4 • ..-- , L, ,—,.___ 4 /ff / / fi/ / et 1 ! / ' / * I ' / I tilf / . t ig / , k / ,- ! s i / ti . . , , i OW rt / & / .. / / / / .„.. , , i ... „,,/,/ , „.. , 1 q VI / / 4 i 1 I °/ :. / / 1 1 II 1 ! I l 1 I fi / ' iki IP - 1 i Y I ' / ME N 1 4 i if 1 4t : Hint I I : i - / / , - , / 1 / - I i il 4i . 1 ! i I I I 1Pa" -----.,;,..< •• • j / qr./ ' qx II? i 1 / I / i : / ' / e 1 0 Is El: 1 c /..! ' / s 0 - . 1 4' q i i e , • 9 , e. / — to•—•---e „...-P Z i a' _ 1 It oo 0 a X iliiiii 1 [ Rim I 7 — — — ---- ---- a ,,,. - 1 i 1 I V z i C * ! n I :i y t i Q Z I O i J o ; j _ -- Nz 4 E / l LI c " / fi _ o - ` I p 4QZ y L F 9y y} �[ yoO. ` �CAV 0 J i 1 ' 1 �wl.t541-z„, QILN �1 �� •�� Z i V 222 �V�V�V / / it. ® � , e / ' " IL .. . U "saws / .A, t !Ir 'iit O o}g3 ^ ' X J xy 2 i i 4 lictle 0 4, � � z g / �" of - 1 1� i1a� ijlf 1 I _ - a�� p y o 0 o Y y 0 p p 0 / 1, W p - �p �,IiI ', 0 A .-# ■Vf* f:4 Or' '..i t i4= 4.NPt..04■mJO% ' / • IrnatItt / •4 11$ , * 4 „IP / A ffa h V O 1 1 e ‘, AV ' 4 ( I / 0 \ . __- ■44% ,A 1 t 0 - te 0 !It . ' ti / 1 ■ - v- e4pA 6 -' iryfe/ ...,...../0 0 , 0 , t /, 2 1/ i 4;) 1 . _._.,..„.• tri ,,,, �I / Q . 0 O -� NJ o C 0 . _, 4 ..: 4 : 1 . 1 , ! ./. o / I !"' - ,.. 40 c - - ' 4. , f ------ ---- ittl# , Ad hi k 8 I WIZ ? 0 . 4:Wik , 1 j et --- 91. - 44 1 '' p rA.� c, (V . / i ' NY - ",// 4tf,'' ' A 1 / 1 44 14 /1 / / / Fi. : , 1 1 * ./ gg - / Elk 8 1 I / / ,r, // a , 1 • 1 - / / -Z_.... 0 41 1 i3 L 1 1 ? 1° 1 1 • i 1 1 ! h 1 l N ni S 4J! 4 tok c • r 1 MV - 4 't* tyl 4 S i 1 I il Ai a h fl i 3- Ic li j i - illIk-g- dddd LL ,-t WiIt 1 gglikalliM AI s # ; VI Ni 61%p?Vn 21' itl2ION II