Work Session i x ., , , e €
1
1
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
WEDNESDAY, MAY 5, 1993, 5:30 P.M.
CHANHASSEN CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1
1 1. Mission Statement
•
2. Update on City -wide Garbage Collection
I 3. Update on Shorewood Landswap - Verbal
P P
I 4. Comprehensive Sewer and Water Policy Plans
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 CITYOF _2.
1
s ClIANHASSEN —
1 6 90 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
1 — It
MEMORANDUM Update: The Council selected
1 May 5, 1993, to continue the
TO: Mayor and City Council discussion on this item.
I FROM: Don Ashworth, City Manager DWA
I DATE: March 26, 1993
SUBJ: Goals Session- -March 27, 1993
I tried to take a positive position setting the agenda for Saturday morning; however, my notes
I are confusing. One note says that we are not going to have additional goal sessions, with another
stating that the goals to date are staff goals, not the Council's. Another note refers to this being
a work session. Finally, another note refers to the fact that we would not have the meeting
I Saturday morning if Council members had not called in specific work session items by last
Friday. On Monday evening, the Council confirmed that it did want to proceed with the meeting
Saturday morning.
1 Two points did appear to have consensus, i.e:
I - April 7 Would Be a Work Session - -City Staff: It is anticipated that the work session
items will be most of the tabled items from this past Monday, as well as three items that
staff have identified as key issues which the Council should be involved with. Each of
I the items will have background reports and staff members will be there to provide
background information. As staff members are scheduled to be here Wednesday evening,
April 7, staff would not need to be to be present for our Saturday meeting; and
I - Mission Statement: There appeared to be a consensus that Saturday morning's meeting
should include establishing a mission statement for our community. Attached are several
I examples of mission statements from other communities.
I See you at 8:00 a.m., Conference Room, City Hall. f-D i
i �i
,c .�
1 ), ,
.
1 t4: PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
i '
RICHFIELD MISSION STATEMENT 1
Richfield's mission is to both effectively and efficiently provide the quality and variety of I
services to our residents and other customers that will distinguish Richfield as the best
place to live, work and do business in the metro area. In the spirit of cooperation and
mutual respect we will:
1
• promote growth of diverse housing and business opportunities through innovative 1
programs.
1
• promote quality in City programs, products and services.
• promote neighborhood empowerment, unity, health and safety through emphasis I
• on community organizations, schools and programs.
Recognizing that we exist in a rapidly changing environment requires Richfield to: I
• aggressively market services to both residents and nonresidents alike.
1
1
• attract energetic and visionary residents to serve on advisory boards and
commissions.
1
• recruit, train, develop and retain top —notch staff. 1
1
1
1
1
•
1
1
1 Figure 3
MISSION STATEMENT •
1
The City of St. Louis Park is a municipal organization
distinguished by a tradition of innovative policy - making and a
dedication to providing a high level of personalized service to
its residents.
The City of St. Louis Park is a leader in the development of
public policy and programs through its efforts to respond
' creatively to changing community values and trends. The City
exhibits a willingness to experiment with new ideas presented by
citizens, the City Council and members of City staff. It
' recognizes that a reasonable assumption of risk is often a
prerequisite for addressing community problems.
Citizens are encouraged to express their opinions freely and to
become active participants in the decision- making process. The
City strives to be attentive to the concerns of residents and the
business community. Policies and programs are shaped according
to articulated community and neighborhood needs.
The City of St. Louis Park is pledged to provide a full range of
I municipal services that respond to the health, safety and well-
being of all who live, work and visit the City. The City is
committed to providing cost - effective municipal services
emphasizing a personalized approach that accommodates the special
' needs of individuals and neighborhoods.
1
1
1
1 9.
1
1
CITY OF ROBBINSDALE
MISSION STATEMENT
1
The City of Robbinsdale is a municipal organization serving the community with
policies and principles designed to represent its citizens while preserving the
rights of the individual. We are proud of our success in maintaining a. -Xte.e 1
town environment within the metropolitan framework. Our citizens possess a
• high level of community pride exemplified by their loyalty and by their 1
willingness to participate in the activities and in the governance of the
community. 1
We believe in a government that is accountable, accessible, and compassionate;
one that seeks to listen to and communicate with its residents; and, one that 1
strives to treat everyone with fairness and equity.
1
We envision a community that is committed to a residential orientation, to an
active and dedicated citizenry, and to a desire to maintain a hometown 1
environment. We will strive to meet the needs of citizens of all ages from
diverse social and economic experiences. Our primary objective will be to 1
thoughtfully and prudently allocate our available resources for the betterment of
all of our citize rat i , I j
5 f ��f
1
1
1
CITYOF
I I CHANHASSEN
i
' 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
�'♦ e
MEMORANDUM .1-4
TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager 1,.„.J / An } Y
1
FROM: Scott Harr, Public Safety Director
DATE: March 5, 1993
SUBJ: Mission Statement
1
1 At the work session this week the concept of developing a mission statement for the City
was addressed. Last year, as a part of our reviewing our departmental goals and objectives,
we thought it would beneficial for our staff to develop a mission statement.
1 We developed a group that worked with the entire department to develop the attached
mission statement.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 ,s
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
✓ 1,1
y
•1:4 E f,9 + f
NNHAS
S
r � G , ti 5,4 r, '1 , 0 4 F
II
'. CHANHASSEN
MN
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION
1
1
PACKET FOR: THURSDAY, MARCH 11, 1993 1
7 P.M.
LOCATION: COURTYARD CONFERENCE ROOM 1
CITY HALL
CHAIRPERSON: Brian Beniek 1
ALTERNATIVE: Dave Johnson 1
MEMBERS: Craig Blechta
Dave Dummer
Bill Bernhjelm 1
Don Chmiel
Eldon Berkland
STAFF: Scott Harr, Public Safety Director 1
Steve A. Kirchman, Building Official
Steve Nelson, Building Inspector
II Steve Torell, Building Inspector
Carl Barke, Mechanical Inspector
Randy Debner, Mechanical Inspector
Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal 1
Bob Zydowsky, Public Safety Officer
Rob Nordlund, Community Service Officer
Adam Stepney, Community Service Officer 1
Carol Dunsmore, Support Services
Beth Koenig, Support Services
CHANHASSEN PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT ,
MISSION STATEMENT
p
To foster Public Safety by efficiently providing 1
•
Safety Related Community Services
Education to Staff and the Community 1
Fair Enforcement of Statutes and Codes
Professional and Personal Staff Development 1
..for the benefit of those
visiting, working and living in the City of Chanhassen.
1
1
CITYOF
--
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jo Ann Olsen, Senior Planner
1 DATE: April 29, 1993
1 SUBJ: Update on Organized Collection of Solid Waste
' Staff has met with a consultant who has experience in the steps necessary to develop organized
collection of solid waste. Dean Johnson of Resource Strategies Corporation (not to be mistaken
for the Dean Johnson involved in the Oaks project), has submitted a proposal for organizing the
1 process. This issue is one in which a knowledgeable consultant is required. Staff alone cannot
take on this size and sensitive a project. Dean Johnson and myself have worked with Roger
Knutson on the process which must be followed (see attached). There are specific statutes which
1 detail the necessary steps. In general, there are two 90 -day periods. The first period studies the
existing situation and determines what alternatives there are, and which alternatives, if any,
' should be implementated. The second period develops the alternatives chosen. In both periods,
the haulers must be involved. Dean Johnson's proposal is for the first 90 -day period. A second
proposal will be presented should the City Council decide to pursue an alternative.
As staff has been saying from the start, there is no question that pursuing this issue will result
in a lot of complaints from the haulers and even the residents. We may all be surprised by what
' the impacts will be. The first 90 -day period brings to light all of these issues, and also shows
us what our options are. Should the City Council wish to begin this process, staff will prepare
an item on accepting the proposal from Resource Strategies Corporation on the May 10, 1993,
' City Council agenda. The public hearing beginning the first 90 -day period will be on the May
24, 1993, City Council agenda.
' At this work session, staff would like the City Council to comment on the hiring of a consultant
and initiating the process. We have heard good things of Dean Johnson, and after meeting with
him, feel he would be successful with this project. We have not asked Dean Johnson to attend
1 the work session, but he will be at the May 10, 1993, City Council meeting.
1
If'
t4: PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
1
CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT & FUCHS, P.A.
Attorneys at Law 1
Thom1 Campbell (612) -}52 -; V\
Ro_er N Knut Fax (612) 452.5550
Thoma NI Scoot
Gar G Fuchs
James R. Walston
Elliott B. Kner.ch April 19, 1993
II
Michael A. Bnt}
Renae D Steiner
1
Ms. Jo Ann Olsen
City of Chanhassen
II
690 Coulter Drive
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
II
Re: Organized Collection of Solid Waste 'APR 2 '1'1993
CITY Ur l•rira•tiys', 1
Dear Jo Ann:
Minn. Stat. §115A.94 authorizes cities to organize II
collection of solid waste as a municipal service. "Organized
Collection" means a system for collecting solid waste in which a
II
specified collector, or a member of an organization of
collectors, is authorized to collect from a defined geographic
service area or areas some or all of the solid waste that is
II released by generators for collection. A city may organize
collection as a municipal service or by ordinance, franchise,
license, negotiated or bid contract, or other means, using one or
more collectors or an organization of collectors. The procedure
II
for organizing collection of solid waste is as follows:
1. Provide two weeks public notice and mailed notice to II
persons known by the City to be operating solid waste
collection services in the City of a public hearing on
organized collection. The statute provides no
II
direction regarding what kind of "public notice" is
required. Two weeks published notice in the City's
legal newspaper is recommended.
2. Hold a public hearing. The purpose is to get ideas and 1
comment or other help in planning and establishing your
organized collection system.
II
3. Adopt a "resolution of intent" to announce your intent
to organize collection, taking into account any input
you received at the public hearing. 1
4931
1
Suite 31; • Ea_anklale Office Center • 1380 Corporate Center Curve • Ewan, A 55121
1
11
4. During ninety days after adopting this resolution the
City must develop or supervise the development of the
plans or proposals for organized collection. You can
' ask for and use the help of people who are already
licensed to operate solid waste collection in your City
on the day you adopted your resolution.
1 5. After the planning period is over you have another
ninety days to discuss your organized collection
arrangements with all the City's licensed collectors
' and come to an agreement to enact your plan. You must
complete the waiting periods in steps (4) and (5), that
is, a full 180 days before adopting your resolution of
1 intent, before implementing your organized collection.
6. The City shall make specific findings that:
(a) Describe in detail the procedures it used to plan
and to attempt implementation of organized
collection through an arrangement with collectors
1 who have expressed interest; and
(b) Evaluate the proposed organized collection method
' in light of at least the following standards:
Achieving the stated organized collection goals of
the city or town; minimizing displacement of
collectors; insuring participation of all
' interested parties in the decision - making process;
and maximizing efficiency in solid waste
collection.
1 7. Upon request, the City shall provide mailed notice of
all proceedings on the organization of collection in
the City;
' 8. If the City and all the persons licensed to operate
mixed municipal solid waste collection services in
' doing business in the City agree on the plan, the City
may implement the plan without regard to the 180 day
period.
1 The City must not establish or administer organized
collection in a manner that impairs the preservation and
development of recycling and markets for recyclable materials.
' Organized collection accomplished by contract or as a municipal
service may include a requirement that all or any portion of the
solid waste, except (1) recyclable materials and (2) materials
' that are processed at a resource recovery facility at the
capacity in operation at the time that the requirement is
imposed, be delivered to a waste facility identified by the City.
1
4931
1
1
The City that organizes collection under this section is
It
authorized to engage in anti - competitive conduct to the extent
necessary to plan and implement its chosen organized collection
system and is immune from liability under state laws relating to
anti - trust, restraint of trade, unfair trade practices, and other
regulation of trade or commerce.
An organization of solid waste collectors, an individual
collector, and their officers, members, employees, and agents who
cooperate with the City that organizes collection under this
section are authorized to engage in anti - competitive conduct to
the extent necessary to plan and implement the organized
collection system, provided that the City actively supervises the
participation of each entity. An organization, entity, or a
person covered by this paragraph is immune from liability under
state law relating to anti - trust, restraint of trade, unfair
trade practices, and other regulation of trade or commerce.
The city is not required to institute competitive bidding 1
procedures with respect to refuse hauling contracts. Schwandt
Sanitation of Paynesville vs. City of Paynesville, 423 N.W.2d 59
(Minn. Ct. App. 1988); Op. Atty. Gen., 707a - 15, Dec. 23, 1977.
If the City chooses to adopt a method of competitive bidding, it
must do so by a method reasonably designed to give all
contractors equal opportunity to bid and to assure that taxpayers
get the best bargain for the least money.
Enclosed please find a 1985 Metropolitan Council study on
organized collection.
If you have any questions or comments, please do not
hesitate to call. 1
Very truly yours,
CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT
& FUCHS, P.A.
BY: //I�.�4. //z
ichael A. :ro.ack
MAB:ses 1
Enclosure
1
1
1
4931
1
1
1
1
CITYOF Li-
t
1
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
I (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
- , Action tr Ci;1 A;+�!n:rt e
1 MEMORANDUM DOA " `"
Aejecte.
Det
I TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager ate sue to Commitsfoll
FROM: Charles Folch, City Enginee Debi submitted to Council
DATE: April 20, 1993
I SUBJ: Receive Comprehensive Draft Sanitary Sewer and Water Policy Plans
Project No. 91 -12
1 The draft plans for the comprehensive sanitary sewer and watermain policy plans have been
prepared by Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates (BRA). A great deal of effort has
I gone into the preparation of these policy plans and the associated preliminary
recommendations. These documents are intentionally being presented to the City Council
in draft format since there are a number of elements which will involve policy issues. Staff
1 believes it would be appropriate to provide a brief overview presentation of these documents
and some specific elements which will likely require in -depth discussion. Due to the
complexity of these issues, it is not likely that they could thoroughly be discussed during the
1 time constraints of a Council meeting. Therefore, it is staffs recommendation to have the
City Council formally receive the draft documents of the comprehensive sanitary sewer and
I watermain policy plans and call for a future workshop for which this item could be discussed
in greater detail.
I ktm
Attachment: 1. Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Policy Plan.
I 2. Comprehensive Water Policy Plan. -
c: Dave Hempel, Assistant City Engineer
I Jerry Boucher, Utility Superintendent
Phil Gravel, BRA
1
1
n
t 41, PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER