Loading...
3a. Lakeside 7th Addition PUD Zoning Standards, Preliminary Plat & Site Plan0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner DATE: September 24, 2012 WZP SUBJ: Lakeside 7 Addition Planning Case #2012 -11 PROPOSED MOTION "City Council approves the ordinance amending the PUD Zoning Standards for Lakeside." "City Council approves the preliminary plat for Lakeside 7 Addition creating 17 lots and 7 Outlots subject to conditions of the staff report." "City Council approves Site Plan #2012 -11 for a 17 -unit townhouse project in the Lakeside development with setback variances to permit decks to encroach into setbacks subject to the conditions of the staff report." And adoption of the Planning Commission Findings of Fact." City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The developer is requesting a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment to convert a condominium building into 17 townhouse units as well as revisions to the design standards regarding setbacks; Preliminary Plat of 17 Lots; and Site Plan Review for 17 Townhouse Units with Variances to setbacks for decks on the east and west sides of the development. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 4, 2012 to review the proposed development. The Planning Commission voted four for and none against a motion recommending approval of the development. There were no issues or concerns expressed regarding the proposed development. Additionally, approximately 12 residents from the development were present in support of the project. The Planning Commission minutes are item 1 a of the September 24, 2012 City Council agenda packet. Q� Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Todd Gerhardt Lakeside 7 th Addition — Planning Case 2012 -11 September 24, 2012 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the development subject to the conditions in the staff report dated September 4, 2012, for Lakeside 7 th Addition. ATTACHMENT Planning Commission Staff Report Dated September 4, 2012. gAplan\2012 planning cases\2012 -11 lakeside 7th addition \executive summary.doc PC DATE: September 4, 2012 CC DATE: September 24, 2012 REVIEW DEADLINE: October 2, 2012 CASE #: 2012 -11 BY: AF, RG, TH, TJ, ML, JM, JS PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends: ©� "City Council approves the ordinance amending the PUD Zoning Standards for Lakeside." "City Council approves the preliminary plat for Lakeside 7` Addition creating 17 lots and 7 Outlots subject to conditions of the staff report." "City Council approves Site Plan #2012 -11 for a 17 unit townhouse project in the Lakeside development with setback variances to permit decks to encroach into setbacks subject to the conditions of the staff report." And adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The developer is requesting a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment; Preliminary Plat of 17 Lots; Site Plan Review for 17 Townhouse Units with Variances to setbacks for decks — Lakeside 7 t Addition. LOCATION: Outlot D, Lakeside between Lake Riley Drive and Highway 212, along with part of Outlot A, Lakeside, and part of Outlot A, Lakeside 2 °d Addition. APPLICANT: Ron Clark Construction 7500 West 78` Street Edina, MN 55349 (952) 947 -3022 mike&ronclark.com PRESENT ZONING: Planned Unit De �J sr Home Federal Savings 1016 Civic Center Drive NW Rochester, MN 55901 (507) 280 -3419 laurie.keithghfsb.com velopment - Residential (PUD -R) 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential High Density ACREAGE: DENSITY: NA LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION - MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings, PUDs, and amendments to PUDs because the City is acting in its legislative or policy - making capacity. A rezoning or PUD, and amendment thereto, must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. CITY OF CHANHASSEN SCANNED Planning Commission Lakeside 7 Addition — Planning Case 2012 -11 September 4, 2012 Page 2 of 21 The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets those standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. PROPOSAUSUMMARY Th d 1 d e eve oper is proposing an amen ment to the PUD to convert a condominium building into 17 townhouse units as well as revisions to the design standards regarding setbacks. The current project also includes subdivision approval to create 17 lots as well as site plan approval for the 17 townhomes with a setback variance to permit decks to encroach into the setback. Although a twin home project would not normally require site plan approval, because the project is altering an approved site plan for 7 7 77 4 the site and included two three -unit buildings, a new site plan review is necessary. The Lakeside project was originally approved to include 231 units in 28 structures: 15 twin homes (30 units), 6 three -unit townhouses (18 units), 4 four -unit townhouses (16 units), condo A - 39 units, condo B - 53 units condo C - 77 units, a community building with a pool and a recreational beach lot. As part of the Fourth Addition, the 92 condominium units for buildings A and B were replaced with 22 twin -homes units. The proposed development being currently reviewed would replace the 77 condominium units in building C with 17 townhouse units. The net result would be a development with a total of 103 dwelling units. The developer held a homeowners meeting on August 6, 2012, at the clubhouse at Lakeside and had a great turnout from the homeowners. The homeowners overwhelmingly supported the proposed plans. The proposed development continues the style and type of housing Ron Clark built in the southern portion of the development. Staff is recommending approval of the proposed development. Planning Commission Lakeside 7 Addition — Planning Case 2012 -11 September 4, 2012 Page 3 of 21 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 2, Amendments Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3, Variances Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article VI, Wetland Protection Chapter 20, Article VII, Planned Unit Development District Lakeside Design Standards BACKGROUND On February 13, 2012, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: • The vacation of the drainage and utility easement over Outlot B, Lakeside Fourth Addition; • The final plat for Lakeside Fifth Addition: • The First Amendment to the Development Contract for Lakeside Fourth Addition. On July 12, 2010, the Chanhassen City Council approved the amended final plat for Lakeside Fourth Addition. On May 24, 2010, the Chanhassen City Council approved the final plat for Lakeside Fourth Addition with a variance to permit a 20 -foot wide private street to access Block 3. On April 12, 2010, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: • The ordinance amending the PUD Design Standards for Lakeside. • The preliminary plat for Lakeside Fourth Addition. • Site Plan #10 -06 for a 22 -unit twinhome project in the Lakeside development. On November 26, 2007, the Chanhassen City Council approved the amendment to the Planned Unit Development (PUD 06 -26) development design standards Section c. Setbacks to change the separation between townhouses from 20 to 15 feet, and revised the wetland setback to be consistent with City Code. (Planning Case 2007 -23) On August 13, 2007, the Chanhassen City Council approved the Final Plat for Lakeside Third Addition creating five outlots. Two outlots will be further developed (C and E), which must be submitted for final platting with lots and blocks prior to development. The remaining outlots (A, B and D) will be common open space. On January 8, 2007, the Chanhassen City Council approved the Final Plat for Lakeside Second Addition creating 39 lots and 3 outlots. The second phase of Lakeside consisted of 41 lots and 1 outlot. Seven of the lots were for Wooddale Builders, 32 of the lots were for Charles Cudd Company, 2 lots were for common open space and Outlot A was for future platting for building sites. Planning Commission Lakeside 7 Addition — Planning Case 2012 -11 September 4, 2012 Page 4 of 21 On October 23, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council approved the Final Plat for Lakeside. The final plat approval for the first phase of Lakeside consisted of 18 lots, 10 outlots and right -of- way for public streets. The first phase of the development included the community building and stormwater pond, 11 lots for townhouses on the west side of the development (Wooddale Builders, Inc.), 4 lots for twinhomes on the east side of the development (Charles Cudd Company), Outlot A which will contain the private street and utilities for the project, and Outlots I and J, the recreational beachlot site. The balance of the Outlots will be platted in the future for additional residential development. The developer performed the subdivision improvements as part of the original plat. On July 24, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: A. Rezoning of the property located within the Lakeside development from High Density Residential District (R12) to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD -R) incorporating the development design standards contained within the staff report subject to the final plat approval for the Lakeside development. B. Preliminary Plat for Lakeside. C. Site Plan for 231 housing units and a community building with pool, with a Variance for building height for the condominium units consistent with the building elevations prepared by Harriss Architects. D. Conditional Use Permit for a recreational beach lot with a Variance from the requirement that 80 percent of the units be within 1,000 feet of the recreational beach lot. REZONING The developer is proposing an amendment to the PUD to convert a condominium building into 17 townhouses as well as revisions to the design standards regarding setbacks. Due to housing market conditions, development of condominium units is not feasible within the project and is unpopular with the existing residents. Changes to design standards are amendments to zoning district standards, since the PUD is the zoning of the property. EXISTING STANDARDS: a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for a mix housing type multi - family development. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher- quality and more - sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Ancillary uses may be permitted as listed below once a primary use has occupied the site. Except as modified by the Lakeside PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the R -16 High Density Residential District. Planning Commission Lakeside 7 Addition — Planning Case 2012 -11 September 4, 2012 Page 5 of 21 b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be twin homes, townhouses, and one condominium buildings and their ancillary uses. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Planning Director shall make that interpretation. The type of uses to be provided on common areas shall be low- intensity neighborhood- oriented accessory structures to meet daily needs of residents. Such uses may include a bus shelter, community building, development signage, fountain, garden, gazebo, maintenance shed, picnic shelter, pool, playground equipment or tennis courts. C. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. # Decks, patios, porches, and stoops may project up to seven (7) feet in to the required yard. * The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 50 percent hard coverage. Individual lots will exceed the 50 percent site coverage. d. Building Materials and Design 1. Townhouses • Building height shall be limited to 35 feet. • Building exterior material shall be a combination of fiber - cement or vinyl siding or shake and brick or stone. • No two adjacent structures shall be of the same color scheme. • Colors used shall be varied across color tones. • All units shall utilize minimum timberline 30 -year asphalt shingles. • Each unit shall have a minimum of one overstory tree within its front landscape yard. Setback Standards Highway 212 50 feet East(Perimeter) Lot Line 50 feet - townhouses; 30 feet - twin homes; Building Height of the Condominiums with a minimum of 30 feet Lyman Boulevard 30 feet West (Perimeter) Lot Line 50 feet Twin Home separation between buildings 15 feet Townhouse separation between buildings 15 feet Minimum Driveway length to back of curb, trail or sidewalk) 25 feet Hard Surface Coverage 50%* Wetland: Buffer and buffer setback 20 feet and 30 feet Lake Riley 75 feet # Decks, patios, porches, and stoops may project up to seven (7) feet in to the required yard. * The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 50 percent hard coverage. Individual lots will exceed the 50 percent site coverage. d. Building Materials and Design 1. Townhouses • Building height shall be limited to 35 feet. • Building exterior material shall be a combination of fiber - cement or vinyl siding or shake and brick or stone. • No two adjacent structures shall be of the same color scheme. • Colors used shall be varied across color tones. • All units shall utilize minimum timberline 30 -year asphalt shingles. • Each unit shall have a minimum of one overstory tree within its front landscape yard. Planning Commission Lakeside 7 th Addition — Planning Case 2012 -11 September 4, 2012 Page 6 of 21 • All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building, landscaping or decorative fencing. • Garage doors shall be decorative and have windows. 2. Community Clubhouse • Building height shall be limited to 35 feet. • Building exterior material shall be a combination of stone and stucco and fiber - cement. • Natural cedar shakes roofing. 3. Condominium Building • Building height shall be limited to 48 feet. • Building exterior material shall be a combination of 80 percent or greater stone and brick. Accent and trim areas in fiber- cement lap siding and shake. • Roofing shall be a minimum timberline 30 -year asphalt shingles (pitched roofs). e. Signage Signage shall comply with city standards for Residential Districts. L Landscaping Landscaping shall comply with the landscaping plan prepared by Pioneer Engineering, dated May 19, 2006, revised June 7, 2006. AMENDMENT The proposed changes to the Lakeside PUD standards affect sections b and c. The proposed change to the development eliminates the specification of "one" condominium as a permitted use, deletes the Planning Director's discretion in determining if uses meet the definition of permitted or accessory use, which is a prerogative of the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, and reduces the setback along Highway 212. Since the City first reviewed the Lakeside development, we have revised the setback requirements in PUDs to be project specific, rather than prescriptive. Not only is the proposed change less dense, but it continues the twin homes along the northern portion of the development. As part of the Highway 212 project, the noise wall is located approximately 50 feet north of the property line. This results in a perceived setback of approximately 70 feet. Highlighted below (changes are shown in bold and strikethrough format) is the proposed change to the development design standard. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be twin homes, townhouses, —and condominium buildings and their ancillary uses. if there i a qu estion as to whether „ n et a o Bets t h e d the Planning Commission Lakeside 7 Addition — Planning Case 2012 -11 September 4, 2012 Page 7 of 21 Planning Dir-eaer- shall make that intefpr-etat The type of uses to be provided on common areas shall be low- intensity neighborhood- oriented accessory structures to meet daily needs of residents. Such uses may include a bus shelter, community building, development signage, fountain, garden, gazebo, maintenance shed, picnic shelter, pool, playground equipment or tennis courts. C. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. # Decks, patios, porches, and stoops may project up to seven (7) feet in to the required yard. * The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 50 percent hard coverage. Individual lots will exceed the 50 percent site coverage. SUBDIVISION REVIEW The developer is requesting preliminary plat approval to create 17 lots for a townhouse project at the northern end of the Lakeside development. Setback Standards Highway 212 650 20 feet East(Perimeter) Lot Line 50 feet - townhouses; 30 feet - twin homes; Building Height of the Condominiums with a minimum of 30 feet Lyman Boulevard 30 feet West (Perimeter) Lot Line 50 feet Twin Home separation between buildings 15 feet Townhouse separation between buildings 15 feet Minimum Driveway length to back of curb, trail or sidewalk 25 feet Hard Surface Coverage 50 % * Wetland: Buffer and buffer setback 20 feet and 30 feet Lake Riley 75 feet # Decks, patios, porches, and stoops may project up to seven (7) feet in to the required yard. * The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 50 percent hard coverage. Individual lots will exceed the 50 percent site coverage. SUBDIVISION REVIEW The developer is requesting preliminary plat approval to create 17 lots for a townhouse project at the northern end of the Lakeside development. Planning Commission Lakeside 7 Addition — Planning Case 2012 -11 September 4, 2012 Page 8 of 21 I p[AKFaTN 301 aD1111on • i r L A agog 001LaT t rt LA KESIaa \TL L� o I {][ OMb i A ffD i i 6 1 I N!!M°"�r1OiA LaKasIDL 'a °o-�B'o 24W tit \ LAK[SIDG ]iCOMD ApD1T / O y / Aft Y it it it it� �O SIXi N ID[ i LLDOnD / L O S ` y /`° ` ♦ AODITIOM ADOIt10M 1 2 / ♦. _ LAK L]IDC [[a { La KESIC[ 0'1 i pDli' 1 ____ - -- t —__ z LAZE [LET wC * aa]T 1 1 M;M 69C AT;Atr ---- - - - - -- The project replats Outlots A & D, Lakeside, which includes the private street for the entire development and the undeveloped lot on the northern portion of the project, and the open space for the homes along the east side of the development, Outlot A, Lakeside Second Addition. The Outlots for the 7 Addition will include private streets and the common open space areas for the project. PARKS AND RECREATION This item was presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission on August 28, 2012 for review. The Commission recommended the following conditions be approved: The developer shall pay $78,600 in park dedication fees for the 7 Addition concurrent with or prior to recording the final plat in lieu of parkland dedication or donation. The sidewalk south of Lot 7, Block 4 connecting the Lakeside area to the newly installed Eden Prairie trail, as depicted in the applicant's plans, shall be installed concurrent with development of Lot 4 units and a 15 -foot wide public walkway easement centered on the newly installed sidewalk be dedicated to the city. C 1 : Grading and Drainage A substantial export of materials will be required from the site. The City requires that the owner provide the destination of the materials and provide a haul route. This is not necessary for preliminary approval but will be required prior to final approval. A review of the drainage plans indicates that the drainage boundaries remain relatively consistent with the existing watershed boundaries. A minor exception can be found in the northeast and northwest corners but is accounted for within the drainage design summary. There are two sub - drainage boundaries that are not delineated on the drainage plan and should be. These are the boundaries for rain garden A and rain garden B. 1 ] rt i ] rt • i ] t • rt \TL L� u E�Ip� I I I {][ OMb i A ffD i i 6 1 I Planning Commission Lakeside 7 Addition — Planning Case 2012 -11 September 4, 2012 Page 9 of 21 The design provides for an emergency overflow (EOF) from both rain gardens with drainage being directed west towards the existing wetland. According to the plan there is 1.5 feet of separation between the EOF and the low floor elevation. A review of the trail connection seems to indicate that there is a potential for ponding north of the trail along the eastern property line. Measures should be taken to assure that this does not occur. The grading plan must be revised such that the grades do not exceed 3:1. The preliminary grading plan shows grades in excess of 3:1 at the following locations: • Between Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, • East of Lot 3, Block 2, • West of Lot 1, Block 3, • East of Lot 3, Block 3, • Between Lots 4 and 5, Block 4, and • North of Lot 7, Block 4. The grading for the proposed sidewalk connection from Lake Riley Drive to the regional trail in Eden Prairie must be revised to reduce /eliminate the retaining wall and eliminate the drainage directed to the side of the unit on Lot 7, Block 4. The developer's engineer and staff discussed adjusting the grade of the sidewalk and possibly adding stairs. The proposed rain garden and storm basin on the north of the site are flow - through systems; therefore, the three -foot separation between the high water level and the lowest floor elevation of the adjacent properties does not apply. The lowest openings of the adjacent units must be a minimum of 18 inches above the emergency overflow elevations, as is shown on the plan. The lowest openings for Lots 1 through 3, Block 3 must be a minimum of 18 inches above the emergency overflow. Erosion and Sediment Control The site will exceed one acre in total disturbance and will require that a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for Small Site Construction be obtained. This will require that a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is developed. The City requires that the SWPPP be submitted for review and comment. The erosion control plan should have all of the elements required by the SWPPP shown. The erosion control plan must meet the requirements of Section 19-145 of the Chanhassen City Code. Specific items to be addressed include, but are not limited to, the following: There are two piles of soil on the site. The western pile is the largest and is approximately 18 feet high. The eastern pile is approximately six feet high. This material will be removed in conjunction with the site grading for Lakeside 7 Addition. Soils testing indicate that some material is unsuitable for footings /foundations. The developer must provide staff with the estimated amount of material that will be hauled off of and onto the site, the schedule for the hauling, and the haul route. Planning Commission Lakeside 7 th Addition — Planning Case 2012 -11 September 4, 2012 Page 10 of 21 1. Detail sheet showing appropriate installation of erosion and sediment best management practices. 2. Blanket should be used between lot 2 and lot 3 of block 1. Sod may be used in lieu of blanket. 3. The rock construction entrance must meet the minimum city standards. 4. Streets shall be kept free of sediment. 5. Wetland shall be called out with a note that the area is to be protected from all discharges and impacts. 6. The plan should address how the rain gardens will be protected from additional compaction and sediment deposition throughout the duration of the construction project. The city reserves the right to make additional comments as needed. This includes comments on behalf of the Carver County Soil and Water Conservation District. Surface Water Management The site design proposes to send the water to either pond 3P in the southwest corner of the site, to MnDOT right -of -way and the City of Eden Prairie in the northeast corner of the site, or to one of two rain gardens which will discharge to the existing wetland in the northwest corner. The applicant should provide rational method calculations to demonstrate that the existing conveyance system has adequate capacity to handle the new stormwater inputs without surcharge or erosion issues. This site shall meet the water quality criteria required under the NPDES permit. This includes meeting the water quality volume requirements of 0.5 inch off new impervious surface. The design of the rain gardens should be consistent with the Minnesota Stormwater Manual and in particular Chapter 12 -6. Some specific comments are as follows: 1. The underdrain should be 8- inches in diameter. 2. The underdrain should not be wrapped in a sock. 3. The underdrain should be in a minimum of one foot of double- washed, 1 - % 2 inches in size. This should be wrapped in high permeativity blanket or a choker course of washed pea gravel. 4. The timing of construction shall be clearly spelled out on the plans and specification manual and shall be consistent with the Minnesota Stormwater Manual. This means that the impervious surfaces shall be constructed and the pervious surfaces covered with dense vegetation prior to introduction of water to the system. 5. Minimum depth of the prepared soils shall be 30- inches. 6. Provide water quality volume (W calculations. Include new impervious surface calculations used to calculate W qv . 7. The model should be run with an assumed infiltration rate no higher than 0.2 inches per hour unless data from an infiltrometer or other suitable field data is provided confirming the higher infiltration rate. Planning Commission Lakeside 7 Addition — Planning Case 2012 -11 September 4, 2012 Page 11 of 21 8. The developer shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City making the developer or their proxy responsible for maintenance of the rain garden areas. 9. The outfall for the drain tile shall pulled back such that it discharges at the edge of the buffer rather than in the wetland. Energy dissipation shall be provided and shown on the plan. The profile of the underdrain needs to be shown on the utility plan. 10. Energy dissipation shall be provided at the outfalls into the rain gardens. A forebay is highly recommended to minimize future maintenance needs. Surface water management fees will be required as part of this plat. At this time it is difficult to ascertain the exact area to be used in the calculation as we do not include the treatment area of pond and other features, nor do we include the area protected under the wetland protection rules including the buffer area provided signage is installed. Surface water management fees have two calculations: water quality and water quantity. Both are calculated using land area multiplying it by a land use factor and deducting any credits. Because no area for the wetland and buffer was provided, the area will be estimated to be 32,000 square feet or 0.73 acre. The rain garden features total an additional 0.05 acres. These areas will be excluded from the calculations. The site is 3.54 acres so the fees will be based upon a net buildable area of 2.76 acres. Given these assumptions, the water quality fees would be calculated as follows: 2.76 acres ($5,030.00 /acre) = $13,882.80 The water quantity fee would be calculated as follows: 2.76 acres ($8,170 /acre) = $22,549.20 The development would receive a credit for the water quality volume in the rain gardens. This is equal to the area treated by those features multiplied by the water quality rate multiplied by one- half. The credit in this case would be: 1.31 acres ($5,030 /acre) *0.5 = $3,294.65 The estimated surface water management fees due at the time of final plat would be $36,432 - $3,294.65 = $33,137.35 Wetland Protection The basin was delineated prior to June of 2006. Site conditions have changed substantially since this initial delineation. City staff will review the site to determine that this boundary still accurately reflects the jurisdictional boundary. To avoid encroachment into the wetland and the wetland buffer, the city requires that wetland buffer monuments are placed along the wetland buffer. The location of these monuments shall be shown on a plan. Further, the buffer must have at least 50% native vegetation. The existing overstory should be adequate but staff will need to verify this to be true. Planning Commission Lakeside 7 Addition — Planning Case 2012 -11 September 4, 2012 Page 12 of 21 The wetland and the required buffer shall be placed into a outlot separate from Outlot C. This outlot shall be dedicated to the city. An escrow will be required to assure that the buffer monuments have been installed according to plan. 1 C7 By III 1►1 I I 1�IE.� The proposed retaining walls are as follows: Location Length ( approximate) Maximum Height (approximate) South of the storm water basin 100 feet 3.5 feet North of Driveway A 125 feet 5 feet West of Lots 4 through 7, Block 4 160 feet 6.6 feet North of proposed sidewalk 90 feet 4.5 feet South of proposed sidewalk 70 feet 6.6 feet As mentioned in the grading section of the report, staff is working with the developer to reduce /eliminate the retaining walls along the sidewalk. If retaining walls are necessary along the sidewalk, fencing may be required. Building permits are required for all retaining walls four feet tall or higher and must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. UTILITIES The developer proposes to extend lateral sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer within the development. All utilities within this site shall be privately owned and maintained. The watermain within Driveway A and Driveway B shall be extended to the north end of these private streets with hydrants installed at the end. Each new lot is subject to the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges in effect at the time of final plat approval. The developer will be responsible for extending lateral sewer and water service to the lots, therefore, the sanitary sewer and water connection charges will be waived. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. The applicant must be aware that all public utility improvements will require a preconstruction meeting before building permit issuance. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will be required, including the MPCA, Dept. of Health, Carver County and Watershed District. Planning Commission Lakeside 7 th Addition — Planning Case 2012 -11 September 4, 2012 Page 13 of 21 EASEMENTS The developer proposes to vacate three drainage and utility easements and a trail easement. The drainage and utility easements were granted with the Lakeside plat with the intent to build one condominium building on the property. Gopher State One Call locates have been done for the easement areas. The developer must provide an exhibit showing the location of the utilities and the proposed drainage and utility easements in order to determine if the easements can be vacated. If there are any conflicts with the small utilities location, the developer will be responsible for any relocation costs. The trail easement was also granted in conjunction with the Lakeside plat. Given the changes in the proposed development of this site staff has agreed to reconfigure the pedestrian connection to the existing trail to the east. STREETS Access to the site will be from Lake Riley Drive, a 24 -foot wide private street that was constructed in conjunction with the Lakeside plat. The developer proposes to construct 24 -foot wide private streets to provide access to the units within Lakeside 7th Addition. Ingress to Lot 3, Block 3 cannot be achieved using Driveway A since the unit's driveway is located too close to the intersection. The development team worked with staff to design a private street system that provides the best sight distances possible. If the unit on Lot 3, Block 3 was flipped to provide greater separation from the unit's driveway to Driveway A, the building on Lot 3 would be within the sight triangle. Considering the options available, restricting ingress to Lot 3 via Driveway B is the preferred alternative. This development is adjacent to Lyman Boulevard; therefore, the Collector and Arterial Roadway Improvement Charge shall be collected with the final plat. COMPLIANCE TABLE Lot Areas . ft. Width ft. De th ft. Notes PUD -R 2,700 NA NA Ll BI 4,046 42 98 Twin unit L2 BI 4,046 41 98 Twin Unit L3 131 4,046 41 98 Twin Unit L4 BI 4,031 41 98 Twin Unit L1 B2 3,569 43 83 Three Unit L2 B2 3,154 38 83 Three Unit L3 B2 3,555 42 83 Three Unit Ll B3 3,478 41 81 Three Unit L2 B3 3,154 38 83 Three Unit L3 B3 3,555 42 83 Three Unit Ll B4 4,005 42 97 Twin unit L2 B4 4,005 41 97 Twin unit Planning Commission Lakeside 7 Addition — Planning Case 2012 -11 September 4, 2012 Page 14 of 21 Lot Areas . ft. Width ft. Depth ft. Notes L3 B4 4,005 41 97 Twin unit L4 B4 4,005 41 97 Twin unit L5 B4 4,005 41 97 Twin unit L6 B4 3,860 40 97 Twin unit L7 B4 5,074 50 103 Villa Home Outlot A 139,344 Private street serving entire development (3.1989 acres Outlot B 40,182 Open space for 2 nd Addition 0.9255 ac.) Outlot C 42,161 Open space for 7 Addition (1.6558 ac. Outlot D 13,587 Private street for 7 Addition (0.3119 ac.) Outlot E 1,665 Open space (0.0382 ac. Outlot F 643 Driveway area (0.0148 ac.) Outlot G 669 Driveway area (0.0154 ac.) Total 303,844 6.97 ac. Total Site Area 124,318 2.854 ac There are no specified minimum lot frontage or depth requirements, only lot area. Setbacks are from the perimeter of the development and between buildings, rather than to individual lot lines. GENERAL SITE PLAN /ARCHITECTURE The developer is proposing 17 townhouse units instead of the 77 condominium units that were originally approved on this site as part of the Lakeside development. The units include 3 lookout and 14 walkout units. There are 10 twinhome units, one Villa Home and two three -unit townhome buildings with floor plans that range from 1800 square feet to 2500 square feet. Units are proposed with widths of 34 and 38 feet. The `prairie style' architecture is a variation of the existing twinhome units. Exterior materials are to be a combination of cement board trim and stone accents with premium vinyl siding. The roofing is to be Architectural Series asphalt. The exterior colors are to be of rich natural earth tones complimenting the colors of the existing development. The proposed architecture should complement the existing and proposed housing within the project. The design and materials match those required for the townhouse development of Lakeside. There are three pallets of colors proposed for the project. All units incorporate projecting porches and decks. The twin homes comply with the Lakeside PUD design standards. Planning Commission Lakeside 7 Addition — Planning Case 2012 -11 September 4, 2012 Page 15 of 21 The building design includes a 1' -4" cantilever in the den/bedroom. These cantilevers are architectural features which are permitted to project into the required yard up to 2.5 feet (section 20 -908 of the City Code). Additionally, the standards adopted for the Lakeside PUD permit decks, patios, porches, and stoops to project up to 7 feet into these required yards. However, the developer is requesting variances to permit the decks to encroach an additional 1.5 feet into the setback on the east side of the development as well as a variance to permit the decks to encroach 8.7 feet into the required 30 -foot wetland buffer setback on the west side of the addition. These encroachments are due to the housing dimensions and the required street widths to service the development. LANDSCAPING The applicant has provided one tree per unit as well as foundation shrub plantings. Also required, but not provided, are buffer plantings for the proposed development. The east bufferyard should be consistent with what has been installed south of this outlot, regardless of quantity. The following table summarizes the minimum requirements: The applicant is required to meet the minimum requirements for landscaping. There are additional locations where strategically placed landscaping would provide screening from headlights and privacy for the proposed homes. These locations include south of the homes in Block 3, on Outlot E, as well as south of the homes in Block 1. The applicant has provided one tree for the front yards, as required by ordinance, as well as foundation plantings. Required Proposed East property line - 7 overstory 0 overstory Bufferyard C, 320' 14 understory 0 understory 30' width 21 shrubs 0 shrubs North property line 7 overstory 0 overstory Bufferyard B, 390' 11 understory 0 understory 20' width 19 shrubs 0 shrubs The applicant is required to meet the minimum requirements for landscaping. There are additional locations where strategically placed landscaping would provide screening from headlights and privacy for the proposed homes. These locations include south of the homes in Block 3, on Outlot E, as well as south of the homes in Block 1. The applicant has provided one tree for the front yards, as required by ordinance, as well as foundation plantings. Planning Commission Lakeside 7 Addition — Planning Case 2012 -11 September 4, 2012 Page 16 of 21 MISCELLANEOUS 1. A three -foot clear space shall be maintained around the circumference of the fire hydrants per MSFC Section 508.5.5. 2. Nothing shall be placed in a manner that would prevent or hinder operation of the fire hydrant by firefighters per MSFC section 508.5.4. 3. Submit proposed street name(s) to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. Note: duplicate street names will not be accepted. 4. Prior to building construction, approved temporary street signs must be installed. 5. Buildings over 9,250 square feet in area (floor area to include all floors, basements and garages) must be protected with an automatic fire protection system. 6. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. 7. Retaining walls over four feet high require a design by a professional engineer, a building permit, inspections and final approval. 8. Walls and projections within 5 feet of property lines are required to be of one -hour fire - resistive construction. 9. Buildings are required to be designed by an architect and engineer (licensed in the State of Minnesota) as determined by the Building Official. 10. The developer and/or their agent shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the project subject to the following conditions and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. A. Planned Unit Development — Residential Amendment revising sections b and c of the zoning standards as follows: b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be twin homes, townhouses and condominium buildings and their ancillary uses. , the The type of uses to be provided on common areas shall be low- intensity neighborhood- oriented accessory structures to meet daily needs of residents. Such uses may include a bus shelter, community building, development signage, fountain, garden, gazebo, maintenance shed, picnic shelter, pool, playground equipment or tennis courts. Planning Commission Lakeside 7 Addition — Planning Case 2012 -11 September 4, 2012 Page 17 of 21 C. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. # Decks, patios, porches, and stoops may project up to seven (7) feet in to the required yard. * The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 50 percent hard coverage. Individual lots will exceed the 50 percent site coverage. B. Preliminary Plat Creating 17 lots and 7 outlots, plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering, dated 08- 03 -12, subject to the following conditions: Engineering Conditions: 1. The developer must provide staff with the estimated amount of material that will be hauled off of and onto the site, the schedule for the hauling, and the haul route. 2. The grading plan must be revised such that the grades do not exceed 3:1. 3. The grading for the proposed sidewalk connection from Lake Riley Drive to the regional trail in Eden Prairie must be revised to reduce /eliminate the retaining wall and eliminate the drainage directed to the side of the unit on Lot 7, Block 4. 4. The lowest openings for Lots 1 through 3, Block 3 must be a minimum of 18 inches above the emergency overflow. 5. If retaining walls are necessary along the sidewalk, fencing may be required. Setback Standards Highway 212 -50 20 feet East(Perimeter) Lot Line 50 feet - townhouses; 30 feet - twin homes; Building Height of the Condominiums with a minimum of 30 feet Lyman Boulevard 30 feet West Perimeter Lot Line 50 feet Twin Home separation between buildings 15 feet Townhouse separation between buildings 15 feet Minimum Driveway length (to back of curb, trail or sidewalk ) 25 feet Hard Surface Coverage 50 % * Wetland: Buffer and buffer setback 20 feet and 30 feet Lake Riley 75 feet # Decks, patios, porches, and stoops may project up to seven (7) feet in to the required yard. * The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 50 percent hard coverage. Individual lots will exceed the 50 percent site coverage. B. Preliminary Plat Creating 17 lots and 7 outlots, plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering, dated 08- 03 -12, subject to the following conditions: Engineering Conditions: 1. The developer must provide staff with the estimated amount of material that will be hauled off of and onto the site, the schedule for the hauling, and the haul route. 2. The grading plan must be revised such that the grades do not exceed 3:1. 3. The grading for the proposed sidewalk connection from Lake Riley Drive to the regional trail in Eden Prairie must be revised to reduce /eliminate the retaining wall and eliminate the drainage directed to the side of the unit on Lot 7, Block 4. 4. The lowest openings for Lots 1 through 3, Block 3 must be a minimum of 18 inches above the emergency overflow. 5. If retaining walls are necessary along the sidewalk, fencing may be required. Planning Commission Lakeside 7 Addition — Planning Case 2012 -11 September 4, 2012 Page 18 of 21 6. Building permits are required for all retaining walls four feet tall or higher and must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. 7. The watermain within Driveway A and Driveway B shall be extended to the north end of these private streets with hydrants installed at the end. 8. Each new lot is subject to the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges in effect at the time of final plat approval. 9. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. 10. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 11. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will be required, including the MPCA, Dept. of Health, Carver County and Watershed District. 12. The developer must provide an exhibit showing the location of the utilities and the proposed drainage and utility easements in order to determine if the easements can be vacated. If there are any conflicts with the small utilities location, the developer will be responsible for any relocation costs. 13. This development is adjacent to Lyman Boulevard; therefore, the Collector and Arterial Roadway Improvement Charge shall be collected with the final plat. Park & Recreation Conditions 1. The developer shall pay $78,600 in park dedication fees for Lakeside 7'' Addition concurrent with or prior to recording the final plat in lieu of parkland dedication or donation. 2. The sidewalk south of Lot 7, Block 4 connecting the Lakeside area to the newly - installed Eden Prairie trail, as depicted in the applicant's plans, shall be installed concurrent with development of Lot 4 units and a 15 foot -wide public walkway easement centered on the newly installed sidewalk be dedicated to the city. Planning Conditions 1. The developer shall designate Lots and Blocks on the final plat. Water Resources Specialist Conditions: 1. The developer shall obtain an NPDES Construction Permit. Planning Commission Lakeside 7 Addition — Planning Case 2012 -11 September 4, 2012 Page 19 of 21 2. The city shall be provided with a copy of the SWPPP for review and comment. 3. The erosion and sediment control plan shall be amended to be consistent with Chapter 19, Section 145 and the NPDES Construction Permit including Appendix A and Appendix C. 4. The site shall meet the water quality requirements of the NPDES Construction Permit. 5. The design of the rain gardens should be consistent with the Minnesota Stormwater Manual and in particular Chapter 12 -6 including; a. The underdrain should be 8- inches in diameter. b. The underdrain should not be wrapped in a sock. c. The underdrain should be in a minimum of one -foot of double washed, 1 -% inches in size. This should be wrapped in high permeativity blanket or a choker course of washed pea gravel. d. The timing of construction shall be clearly spelled out on the plans and specification manual and shall be consistent with the Minnesota Stormwater Manual. This means that the impervious surfaces shall be constructed and the pervious surfaces covered with dense vegetation prior to introduction of water to the system. e. Minimum depth of the prepared soils shall be 30- inches. f. Provide water quality volume (W calculations. Include new impervious surface calculations used to calculate W qv . 6. The model should be run with an assumed infiltration rate no higher than 0.2 inches per hour unless data from an infiltrometer or other suitable field data is provided confirming the higher infiltration rate. 7. The drainage map should show drainage areas for both rain garden A and rain garden B. 8. The developer shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City making the developer or their proxy responsible for maintenance of the rain garden areas. 9. The outfall for the drain tile shall be pulled back away from the wetland such that it discharges at the edge of the buffer rather than in the wetland. Energy dissipation shall be provided and shown on the plan. The profile of the underdrain needs to be shown on the utility plan. 10. Energy dissipation shall be provided at the outfalls into the rain gardens. A forebay is highly recommended to minimize future maintenance needs. 11. Surface Water Management fees due at the time of final plat are estimated to be$33,137.35. The applicant shall provide a breakdown of the necessary areas. 12. The wetland and the required buffer shall be placed into a outlot separate from Outlot C. This outlot shall be dedicated to the city. Planning Commission Lakeside 7 Addition — Planning Case 2012 -11 September 4, 2012 Page 20 of 21 13. Indicate the date of the delineation and the entity responsible for the delineation on the drawing. 14. City staff must review the site to determine that the delineated wetland boundary still accurately reflects the jurisdictional boundary. 15. City staff must review the wetland buffer to assure that at least 50% of the remaining vegetation is native. If not, the applicant must develop a management plan to accomplish this goal. 16. Wetland buffer monuments are required. The location of these shall be indicated on a plan sheet and surety funds shall be provided at the time of final plat to ensure that these monuments are installed. 17. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will be required, including the MPCA, NPDES, Dept. of Health, Carver County, MnDOT and Watershed District. C. Site Plan with Setback Variances: Approve a 17 -unit townhouse development consisting of 10 twinhomes, 1 detached townhouse (Villa) and 6 three -unit townhouses, plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering, dated 08- 03 -12, with a 1.5 -foot variance to permit the decks to project 8.5 feet into the required yard along the eastern project boundary (21.5 -foot setback), and a 8.7 -foot variance to permit decks to be set back 21.3 feet from the wetland buffer edge subject to the following: Building Officials Comments: 1. Buildings over 9,250 square feet in area (floor area to include all floors, basements and garages) must be protected with an automatic fire protection system. 2. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. 3. Retaining walls over four feet high require a design by a professional engineer, a building permit, inspections and final approval. 4. Walls and projections within 5 feet of property lines are required to be of one -hour fire - resistive construction. 5. Buildings are required to be designed by an architect and engineer (licensed in the State of Minnesota) as determined by the Building Official. 6. The developer and/or their agent shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Planning Commission Lakeside 7 th Addition — Planning Case 2012 -11 September 4, 2012 Page 21 of 21 Environmental Resource Specialist Conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide 7 overstory, 11 understory and 19 shrubs along the north property line; at least 7 overstory, 14 understory and 21 shrubs along the east property line of outlot C or landscaping consistent with the existing buffer to the south. 2. A revised landscape plan that meets minimum requirements must be submitted to the city before final approval. 3. Provide screening for proposed homes adjacent to Lake Riley Drive. Locations include south of the homes in Block 3, on outlot E as well as south of the homes in Block 1. Fire Marshall Conditions: 1. A three -foot clear space shall be maintained around the circumference of the fire hydrants per MSFC Section 508.5.5. 2. Nothing shall be placed in a manner that would prevent or hinder operation of the fire hydrant by firefighters per MSFC Section 508.5.4. 3. Submit proposed street name(s) to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. Note: duplicate street names will not be accepted. 4. Prior to building construction, approved temporary street signs must be installed. Planning Conditions: The developer shall enter into a site plan permit with the City and provide the financial security required by it. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 2. PUD Amendment Ordinance 3. Development Review Application. 4. Architectural Design Package including Coversheet, Project Data Sheet, Narrative, Overall Site Plan, Project Site Plan, Building Elevations, Civil and Landscaping Plans. 5. Letter from Tod Sherman, MnDOT to Robert Generous dated August 23, 2012. 6. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List. gAplan\2012 planning cases\2012 -11 lakeside 7th addition \staff report 7th add and site plan.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION 1!0 7� Application of Ron Clark Construction and Home Federal Savings for an amendment to the Lakeside Planned Unit Development to convert the condominium building on the north end of the development into 17 townhouse units and revisions to the design standards regarding setbacks; subdivision approval for 17 lots and 7 outlots; and site plan approval for 17 townhouse units with a variance to permit decks to encroach into setbacks. On September 4, 2012, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Ron Clark Construction and Home Federal Savings for an amendment to the Lakeside Planned Unit Development to convert the condominium building on the north end of the development into 17 townhouse units and revisions to the design standards regarding setbacks; subdivision approval for 17 lots and 7 outlots; and site plan approval for 17 townhouse units with a variance to permit decks to encroach into setbacks. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Planned Unit Development which was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD -R). 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential -High Density. 3. The legal description of the property is: Outlots A and D, Lakeside Addition and Outlot A, Lakeside Second Addition. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. b. The proposed use is compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. c. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d. The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; c. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; e. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage;. f. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and g. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. 2. Lack of adequate roads. 3. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4. Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. 6. Site Plan Findings: a. The townhouse project is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; b. The townhouse project is consistent with this division; c. The townhouse project preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas; d. The townhouse project creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; e. The townhouse project creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; 2. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; 2 3. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and 4. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. f. The townhouse project protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 7. Variance — Section 20 -58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Finding: The granting of the variance is in keeping with the purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance. The setback standards are to assure adequate separation between structures. In this case, there are no structures to separate, only project perimeters. Additionally, the wetland setback requirements have been revised to permit accessory structures to encroach up to half the required setback, which would allow a 15 foot setback from the wetland buffer edge. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The practical difficulty with the construction of the decks is due to the wetland in the western portion of the property, the city standards for street widths, which requires a 24 -foot wide drive aisle, and the dimensions of the house and decks. Only the decks encroach into the setback. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The purpose of the variance is not based upon economic considerations, but is to permit the owner to utilize the property in a reasonable manner. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The property a wetland complex on the western 30 percent (approximately 200 feet). Due to the property the wetland in the western portion of the property, the city standards for street widths, which requires a 24 -foot wide drive aisle, and the dimensions of the house and decks, a variance is needed to accommodate a 10 foot wide deck. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The construction of decks is a normal use associated with a townhouse and would be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 8. The planning report #2012 -11 dated September 4, 2012, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development amendments, subdivision and site plan with variances for deck setbacks for Lakeside 7 th Addition. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 4th day of September, 2012. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION IC Its Chairman 4 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. - - - -- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - RESIDENTIAL LAKESIDE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by amending the Lakeside Planned Unit Development Design Standards Section b. Permitted Uses, as follows: b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be twin homes, townhouses, and one - condominium buildings and their ancillary uses. if there i a est as to whether of a use etAs the definition the Planning Direetar- shall make that inter-pr-etation., The type of uses to be provided on common areas shall be low- intensity neighborhood - oriented accessory structures to meet daily needs of residents. Such uses may include a bus shelter, community building, development signage, fountain, garden, gazebo, maintenance shed, picnic shelter, pool, playground equipment or tennis courts. Section 2 . Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by amending the Lakeside Planned Unit Development Design Standards Section c. Setbacks, as follows: C. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Setback Standards Highway 212 -50 20 feet East(Perimeter) Lot Line 50 feet - townhouses /; 30 feet - twin homes; Building Height of the Condominiums with a minimum of 30 feet Lyman Boulevard 30 feet West(Perimeter) Lot Line 50 feet Twin Home separation between buildings 15 feet Townhouse separation between buildings 15 feet #Decks, patios, porches, and stoops may project up to seven (7) feet in to the required yard. *The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 50 percent hard coverage. Individual lots will exceed the 50 percent site coverage. Section 3 . This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 24 day. of September, 2012. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, Clerk/Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on , 2012) gAplan\2012 planning cases\2012 -11 lakeside 7th addition \pud amendment ordinance.doc Setback Standards Minimum Driveway length (to back of curb, trail or sidewalk) 25 feet Hard Surface Coverage 50%* Wetland: Buffer and buffer setback 20 feet and 30 feet Lake Riley 75 feet #Decks, patios, porches, and stoops may project up to seven (7) feet in to the required yard. *The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 50 percent hard coverage. Individual lots will exceed the 50 percent site coverage. Section 3 . This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 24 day. of September, 2012. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, Clerk/Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on , 2012) gAplan\2012 planning cases\2012 -11 lakeside 7th addition \pud amendment ordinance.doc Planning Case NoA —L1 PLEASE PRINT CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 — (952) 227 -1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED AUG 0 3 2012 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Applicant Name and Address: Ron Clark Construction 7500 West 78 Street Edina, MN 55439 Contact: Mike Roebuck Phone: 952.947.3022 Fax: 952.947.3015 Email: Mike @ronclark.com Property Owner Name & Address: See attached Home Federal Savings 1016 Civic Center Drive NW Rochester, MN 55901 Contact: Laurie Keith Phone: 507.280.3419 Fax: Email: laurie.keith hfsb.com NOTE Consultation with City staff is required prior to submittal, including review of development plans Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Interim Use Permit (IUP) Non - conforming Use Permit X Planned Unit Development* - 7 al-) Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Plan Review X Site Plan Review (SPR)* ad3 X Subdivision* b ors 4 (► 5 A ° - j) t 5� J Temporary Sales Permit X Vacation of Right -of- Way /Easements (VAC) 3oo (Additional recording fees may apply) X Variance (VAR) 2 Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment X Notification Sign (City to install and remove) An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be Invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. *Five (5) full -size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8 %" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital co pv in TIFF -Group 4 ( *.tif) format. * *Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNED PROJECT NAME: Lakeside Outlot D LOCATION: Lyman Blvd & Lake Riley Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PID: Lakeside Outlot D TOTAL ACREAGE: Total Area= 7.66 acres. Total Site Area = 3.54 acres WETLANDS PRESENT: X YES NO PRESENT ZONING: PUD -R REQUESTED ZONING: PUD -R PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: High Density Residential REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: High Density Residential REASON FOR REQUEST: Change of Developer Change of product with site plan review Amendment to PUD Standards Subdivision Approval FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW. Include number of existing employees: and new employees: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or dearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owners Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of m knowledge. e e It b�. re,,tb1e- c Cow G v�r�n-f��5. Sig ure of licant Date //;;x- b ate h:llakeside outiot dldevelopment review application - lakeside 7th with hoas addedddoc SCANNED P . Property Owner Name & Address: Additional Owners of Land included in the Application: The Lakeside Master Association, a non - profit corporation owns Outlot A, Lakeside A Si nature of Fe6 OhneK Date The Lakeside Master Asso_ 'ation A,l Its: The Highlands at Lakeside Owners Association, a non -profit corporation owns Outlot A, Lakeside Second Addition Signature of Fee Owner Date The Highlands at Lakeside Owners Association By: Its: Udakeside outlot dldevelopment review application- lakeside 7th with hoar added.doe SCANNED Property Owner Name & Address: Additional Owners of Land included in the Application: The Lakeside Master Association, a non -profit corporation owns Outlot A, Lakeside Signature of Fee Owner Date The Lakeside Master Association By: Its: The Highlands at Lakeside Owners Association, a non -profit corporation owns Outlot A, Lakeside Second Addition A o" Signature ogee Owner The Highlands at Lakeside Owners Association By: C A A too a +-fit � c Its: Pee,r,`dtra.f '? / -/ 2 Date h!llakeside outlot dWevelopment review application - lakeside 7th with hoar added.doc SCANNED 1.Ahi,SSIIUF__ .. L r Lakeside '7t" Addition P.U.D Amendment August 03, 2012 ! t \IRF:A 2008 Rrcipwne '�' ^•'• ' MN Builder License # 1220 www.RonClark.com 7500 West 78 Street Edina, MN 55439 (952) 947 -3000 fax (952) 947 -3030 Lakeside 7" Addition Project Data: 17 Total Units: Architecture: 10 — 34' units paired as Twin Homes 1800 -2500 SF, 2-Car Garage Rambler Walk -outs 1 — 34' unit Villa Home 1800 -2500 SF, 2-Car Garage Rambler Walk -outs 6 — 38' units combined as two 3 unit Town Home buildings 1800 -3000 SF, 2-Car Garage Rambler Walk -outs & Look -outs Exterior design features that were used in our town homes on Riley Ridge will be incorporated in the design of these homes including: Vinyl & Cement Board Siding ➢ Cement Board Trim & Corners ➢ Natural stone veneer ➢ Architectural Shingles ➢ Designer Overhead Doors ➢ 3 Color Palettes in similar dark tones Project Overview: Our proposed project will complement the current development by adding seventeen additional high quality homes to finish out the development. We investigated many different product types for this remaining development parcel and feel we have selected a product that will provide the best use. The surrounding existing features of the wetland and the golf course will provide a variety of beautiful settings for our homes and also blend in very nicely with the adjacent homes. The project landscaping including boulder walls, trees and plantings will provide a crowning element to this exquisite development. Zoos Rectpiont •_�.•.. MN Builder license # 1220 www.RonClark.com SCANNED t tx:ARPnrtt G & cc t MTV � yy► . x , _ L I ' I ut + RILEY LAKE N 20) TT .. •tiiJl .. LAKESIDE ENTRANCE & CENTRAL PARK 17! ' ie beau'tif ul lancl of Lakeside is a work of art in itself. The dramatic waterfalls of the m1 In entrance aiid the central pail: are the comerstories othe landscape plan that sets the lone of beauty and the quality of Lakeside.'1'he central park, loaded with lush landscape, has over :,000 feet of sirean, bed that offers soothing sounds and ambiance to the winding trail and to the bridge that uosscs the park. LAKESIDE CLUBHOUSE LAKESIDE BEACH & PARK Lle ant and spacious, with specLicular lake views, the Lakeside com irriunity clubhouse is lt's your choice: fish, ski or spend the day soaking up the sun on beautiful Riicy" Lrti:e. :i grC iL pl,.CC to Clitel'arn. C. ?.IC a w orkout or just relax poolside with your famil and Lakeside residents have exclusive use of associ�tlun o'v+rlico' and nminmined h, }att:I Ci;ili Friends. From a sn;all intin alt' gathering 10 all elegant full service dining experience from docked just steps from your home. The be- ;�utiful Lakeside park has over 1,_;00 i 'et ;;f the ;acclaimed stall at 13earpath, you will find the Lakeside Clubhouse first class facili- sl ill a n;ajestic setting of h"rdwood forest, gardens �:nd while :::u:d bcae h( s L) designed especially for vou. Lakeside lakes care of it all so you don'r have r0. It's yrt.r li'l DIRECTIONS Fro n; Ecicn Prairie: 1 ^,'est on Pioneer'frad to the western edge of Bear C &CC and torn right (nonh) on to Idler Lake From Hwy 5 in Chanhassen: go south on Hwy 101 for 2 miles to Lyn, v_-rd, turn to Lakeside. fir°'- k �rt _ s •- +` L l 1 aaM _ k 171W- ziZ 15'elaWir" Wad 1- = =E v G� S •2 •�y T TT amm- ^a Ail t I� ,r.� 3 • aT s � ,sr I�fil� i=ii1�. n � ■ �r■�rw .. was 111129101 1 "twig -- no Ifn■V ■ ---a■ h 1 � 1 �w ■I MI I/If tai ■ii! ■ii i .'■I 1 �■■ ■NIMS lfii �■1■ ■1tt��� IN ■ ■■! ■ ■ //■ ■ ■� ■�if� fir. wild ffpqftm OIL „41 ■ femi ■ifrr■]fllrfiill■li■r ■11 ■I ►. r. �1� IIV ■ ■tMfl ■ / ■ ■ / ■ ■ ■Y ■�1 ■fll■11 ■1. � V n t r� 1 ■ ■1■1c+'`, Imams IMMINI NONE Uo ■n ■Ulr . 1 u�ufH■■■�iln - 1 ■ 1/tl ■11■11W 1 ■If■1■1■■■ffA . L - •. l "^f ti �i'��-r. � -r. r r' r / r�r, rr /rr %r /rr /r LEND LAKESIDE 7TH ADDITION EX 0 PROPOSED FIRURE OE5CRPTION O • • SANITARY E A _ NITAR [XISTNG SA NITAR Y W —�)— PROPOSED SANITARY SENEfl PRELIMINARY PLANS \[ � Y2 ) YQ X DRMT ANITMY SEWFA " " GATE "GW D � � REDUCER CHANHAS SEN, MINNESOTA ------ - - - -I- EXSTNG WATERMNN ��♦— PROPOSED Y/ Al N+ CA W N —I I— T CH WATENN RAINN y ?erg^ q;'P,FT t • • I%[ BEEH � •> O • • STMMI MMHME 1 D ► 1. MARED END SECRON • • • CGMTROL S-cTME -- >- E s10RN SEWER XITING �7►�1p— PROPOSED s— SEWER ' 1 NTUNE STORM SEWER 1 ��B-- SIRMWM CURB Q CUT1Ef1 B - h 1'I PoBBON RB t TIER CURB GUTTER _--- _ - PH ASE U NE - - -_ EASEMENT ME - -- -- EXISTING 2' CONTOUR LINE Q' ♦• 8 Y •% 0 -- -- - - - -- - - EXISTING 10' CONTOUR ME PROPOSED 2' CONTOM UNE PROPOSED 10' GONTOM LINE 8 S • 0 -- �- / �3 a te, LOCATLON MAP °%S•`s•'� POND OUTLET UNE -__ - P HIGH WATER ME L H ' k£ - PROPOSED SPOT ELEVABCN ► DEM A ICY —ow - - - - DELINEATED WETLMD ME I P - - — TEMA FLOOOPLNN BOUNDMY ST CONTROL ...... . - m . CONTROL -----�---� �� RETNNUIC WNL r CONSERVADMI AREA 9GN 11ENN0 BUFFER SICK I - I _ w _ = -- EX gILNERT -d�— EX OVERHEAD UN ME' - 1 — E% UNDEXX D TELEYUON ME L J — EX UN DERgtOUHD lE1EPILONE ME —ro ro— EX UNOERptWND RBER OPDC l% —• •— EX UNDERGROUND flEC1HIC ME — E %. UNDERCRWNO CAS ME — E%. FENCE (BARBED •RE) — :— EX. FENCE (01- UNK) _ _0 EX. "a (.w) ® EX . CAST IRON MONUMENT • EX. EDECINX: BOX EX FUG ff L = I & • EX NATURAL GAS METER I L __ J 4 EX. HAND FOMD PIPE ® EX � � _ r � La E%. JUgDAL LAND MAIM n EX u T PaE I - I — ° _ J _ ° _ < � El BENCHMARK X PX N AIL E X UDuTY POLE E iIYIO O EX IANN SPPoNIQER VALYE -1 _ - YN Tt�eO Fli-F sBIE aP sOUREASTAiY OF THE I) ILTIFSECBpi GP L/JQ EX LAWN S -NIQER HEAD �[ EX SEMAPHORE \ \ \ L _ _ 1 _ _ - 1 M LYMAN BOLAEVMO. m EX EX TE SERMCE E BOX ` - J I - I LYMAN TOP Nu OF BOUEVAM LTNO 1180 FEET • EX TE9IDNO O EX TELE -- BOX y' EX WATER WELL \ = J El SgR1 ROAD ALT LYMAN BNOVL.EVVAM OF 1A10: ETEVATM]�15 EX MOXITORING WELL $ / B EX CONTROL PMNT • EX. SPIKE EX. OCN MOUT EX IXE EX CMTTHEE Y ¢k i ` J t SHEET INDEX V I i 1. COVER SHEET TNEE "E I �♦ L - J i 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS EX DRA ] SR AGE Ef 3. PRELIMINARY PLAT 4. PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN D EX �RMP 005 SURFACE - 1� 5. PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 6. PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN �RF \ Ll. PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN SELECT BACKFlLL ORAVEL CoHSi. L PISNEMR .wig �• ��mar "„"�„ �,°,,,�';R mr ,'w N n+<m ��•' COVER SHEET RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION R. DESIGN LAKESIDE 7TH ADDITION 1 oP 6 wli-rTmTSTHFRr 6 ..,•.N�ercrc.mm NN�m.., ®INh AoNNB50TA 55119 LEGEND y d n — UOS PRO: D FlRURE W—Y MMMNRE —_ EASIING SANITARY —t —�)— mwn SANITARY SEWTM SA ..A A p/ \� f g 00 / g 0 0 �90 4 / 901 � YQ SIC HYDRANT ..AA DG N N 'AM V& „TOE ^ . .. .. . / D 1 ► REDUCER rF• EMSTNC WALE —A ♦1C�v� J .� ��� / / / / / / % - / / / — I I— PRWOSEO WATERNAIN —I I— n T"m WATERMNN ,. `C j.^iT r U '•A'i. �Wp MW M . R A ~ �•• iii % / / / / / / ! / / / / ® GATGH A9N �rC EEEHI ..A••i ® • • VE 1v ,flt U .. ...1•. O • • SfOR11 MANHPE n.A ' ,'� i / -� / / / _ a D ► ► 1APED LAD SECTION �._ • • • CIXIIRR SIRUCNRE — — — — — _ / 0� 0 � i - — / \ m —_ - L it v Pg' S \ J \ \ \ - -� weROe mm a mrTw SE —_ _ -- -- -- — — � � _ _ — — _� � \ \ I i I \ \ I \ `\ A. PHA ME — _ �_ � _— .— — ) I m -- - -- __ E NG 2 CONTOUR ME EMSII 'Gi 9' \ C� ] .. ..... .- — -- NG W CONTWR ME / / / i ' X PROPOSED 2 CP11Wt NNE U PRCPOSEO O' Cm_ NNE T N --- POND — __ ME / — — I-'� %' — __ — PROPOSm sPOT EEEVanm ' / / �9xs"' — // /// // — — I ♦ ♦ ♦ EMERGwCY —ow OPJNEAlEO WETLAND NNE — sr N DAR R .. xEAw -Wrr E .. RR ( / ! / ! ( / / " s I f T m TwcE I I / T / 9 " � g W �uo s�P9 EX WLVERT i IX DYERNEAO UTI.1 LANES IX UNDERGRWNO TE"SIDN INS GERGR.ND BER OPnO UN ME —�— EX UNOERPIWND E CTEC ME i— EX UHDE WNO CAS ME `E 1 \ I I \, \ s\ \m \ / / / I I 1 / /• / — / / / / //' / / — EX FENCE (BARRED 11) Q `I WETLAND (aaN IN —� �— EK K" K) IX CAST rsm Ya+uw wr 3,s•1 IXNAIURAL GAS METFA I \ BOA /� / I °\, � -_ - .10 uT%fIY EAgTm1i - - - 1 \ / / J /(� /III/ /)/ / 1 /l • IX H.D HPE _L EX TOIRID IRON PIPE EX JUPPAL LAND MARK cr E n �, / c�na c� i 6 �. / ` // / % UTIUTY PR EE = EX FAWN —NKIER NAL1E V E NKNTt % LAWN SPPoHEAD l`I EX SEMAPHORE ■ E Z 0 TE E% ST HRE .— I-_ — -_ O EK TELL:N90N BO% i 1 v EX EX MCM1— G ® EX NA— E% CIXITRR ­NT 1 / / ' / L n IC E . 1 D E EX sw 4 i 1 L „ fl I R v EX 1 IX .T EX .-I I / ' T n v u 1 1 1 'I NT TREE rYY - WYl IX TI✓EE NNE i n I( 1 1l G / 1 / / \ \ • I I I ` \ ^ ^ T \ 1 1 1 IX GRAVEL suaPAa _ 1 .. n n D I 1 .. N / 71, /� (� _ \\ n I I I I f I �'� \� D 1 1 1 EX m7 Mmms 1 n I< 1 SURFACE .. .. EX C 1 r 1 U N ONCRETE SIREACE .AWFt YAIXFlLL MATERIAL GRAVEL WNST. w..m N .��1 . F . T ( a:_ __ RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION &DESIGN LAKESIDE 7TH ADDITION mOm. > :x 6 EXISTING CONDITIONS CONSTRU ,T 7 THA D 2 �P 6 N B E A R P A T H 1 2 3 4 5 [, 6 \7 ( E SI 1 3 ` I I I I I �.,. OUTLOT A L. A K E S: 0 E W TLOT a a « DSE DID1 E I a a E a I T I AK ESI1) E _J— ez w 4 J 91 ' 3E iD 00 ' / � J o � I 'J L.AKES1 E A K E H I ..� E., .. ,. 1 'D zs I LAKESIDE YES 103 W TLOT C , \ ,R I x T H DI T 10N' 133 — ,.CRTFi BAY 3RD ADDIT 1 C"3�Q 800 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET t1 — _ — — — _ _ — — — _ Z / LAKE RILEY ROAD EAST / __ __ NORTH BA 3RD AD DIT I ON DI ON — — A R F A A P R WTLOT A AND WTLOT D, LAKESOE, AND WTLOT A. LAKESDE SECOND A Dg ON, ACCORDING TO THE REOUENED PLAT THEME Di HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. k F„ " ;r J cj 11 / a TOTAL AREA 2 M,'- 2AM'- ACRES TOTAL STE AMA a34 ACNE TOTAL LOT AREA 1S0 ACRE - W L013 17 LARGER LOT 4074 S0. Ff. -°- { 1 2 3 4 a b AVaUGE LOT 4 SQ R. TOTAL OU7= AREA 8.15/3 ACNE 4 AKE : DE 1 TOTAL STE WRDT AIIF.A 20381 I �.,. OUTLOT A L. A K E S: 0 E W TLOT a a « DSE DID1 E I a a E a I T I AK ESI1) E _J— ez w 4 J 91 ' 3E iD 00 ' / � J o � I 'J L.AKES1 E A K E H I ..� E., .. ,. 1 'D zs I LAKESIDE YES 103 W TLOT C , \ ,R I x T H DI T 10N' 133 — ,.CRTFi BAY 3RD ADDIT 1 C"3�Q 800 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET t1 — _ — — — _ _ — — — _ Z / LAKE RILEY ROAD EAST / __ __ NORTH BA 3RD AD DIT I ON DI ON — — A R F A A P R WTLOT A AND WTLOT D, LAKESOE, AND WTLOT A. LAKESDE SECOND A Dg ON, ACCORDING TO THE REOUENED PLAT THEME Di HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. k F„ " ;r J cj 11 / a TOTAL AREA 7.88 ACRES TOTAL STE AMA a34 ACNE TOTAL LOT AREA 1S0 ACRE - W L013 17 LARGER LOT 4074 S0. Ff. WALLET LOT 3.134 SO. FT. AVaUGE LOT 4 SQ R. TOTAL OU7= AREA 8.15/3 ACNE Null OF WTLOTS 7 TOTAL STE WRDT AIIF.A 20381 ACNE NUMBER OF STE wrwm 3 GLOSS STE DENST 4-0 LDTS/AORE PROPOSED ZOMM POD EIOSRNO ZOMlG PAID U1811N5 AVA a R C �N Onnuw iueuwr�s •�I16H1 oew l4N6i.. wlH SSIAI I P�: WI ................. . . ...... . . . .. . ..................... ........... 2 2 3 @ 0 2 OUIIL_OTD 4 is WETLAND OUTLOT C (D 3 2 1 — 5 5 4 6 tM T A 7 -- -- — -- — -- — -- — - Mr — A;D cn lam PIONEERmonming .-o-551 M PRELIMINARY SM PLAN RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN LAKESIDE 7TH ADDMON a I o NNwa.DE I I Iv I -T ROOK � (T>sKx snlal ) �1 21 OIA/ /g o N r. x/ kOJ . 0 p 0 / 1. ORNNIRE LIENNWT SHNL BE RmNLEn A uxuuu a �� ABO\E dtdND FUR F1R6T YlA BNG Y.L PWC (CASE IR -) FNlsxm� n sEi z• mow Dxlsm mrnE. DRADE 6 r YEpUY J / ^ 6 SWO HDPE RRR ENSDNC AIBUME/ ENGNEERm SOIL ORNHIRE 6• e' HOPE PEfEgiPTm YO'E HOPE 1. E. s d RISER TO SE SAME . AS DHANTLE YNN. Z. VE E Em s 91NL BE INSTAUfO EVERT IW LF. !: k AT ON/ ENO$ OF DR UNES. ]. ADJUSTYENi OP ORNHTLE Q ON . 91N1 E MADE -E YEAR AFTDt NIRAL NSTALLNR- k AT SWE TINE 0.s RIE FINN. sRIWI SEYhR IxsPECIIW. .. E LOT MLL BE LO CUIN WT 4 ME N fP -T OP Ax NO E KST. O l0MERm Q NNtl(m N1TH N FENC POSE. DRAINTILE CIEANONT (ill' & SCO- NOT TO SCALE) >sm mPi Q SRSEi INLET PROTECT - V YARD INLET MTECR- bsluem ER09 OL 0N OONIR NOTES ® E ON C - TRW BLANItET 9x (sl nom 6 w�m. I I. xT � Krtx xN�dBFx I. _ IwR ri K [.nPt� _ �e N� 1� Mo smvi Ia1 rrnw IT o.n 9wL Z NANTNxFO UN av NL PIONEER ND PN6R -T TD NN A�RTNx x 6x L_ Z IN.Y.,�w x. +..rwWa RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION & D LAKESIDE7TH ADDITION > DW PRELIMINARY GRADING wTSTmxsTxP� 5 a< 6 cTU ct u.emrNPSar• i eiso I a / \ PIONEER.,gi..i.g 1 KEY 1 COMMON NA SCIENTIFIC N AME ROOT QUANTITY SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS I SM I SIENNA GUN MFW�Nl X 'SIENNA QEW 2W B IB a ORNAMENTAL TREES I WC I R RIIW CRAB AIM VRAIRFW I 26 BIB I a I FRONT YARD DECIDUOUS TREES MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 2.5'. ALL OTHER DECIDUOUS TREES TO BE MINIMUM 1.5' WITH AN AVERAGE OF 2.5" DISTURBED AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED. IRRIGATION DESIGN BY OTHERS FOUNDATION PLANS BY OTHERS CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL %=2 VIM PIONEFRoonming saNO LANDSCAPE NOTES wN °E 11gI5E F9 El 00 llOQRFBQ ��I�Ix��iPRINT - F eT�.l YKL• VW =1'-P ono C-) Q)l0l � lk upUSE HOUSE GARAGE 6ARAGf # Q A T:; 1. 1$ J o Q .— O L Z t— N IL r W K w u J Vl f �bx - I s 6. 5 �a 1 : so :flag m a a i e $ 8 Z O Q O ~PO LL Lo QIx w FZ � 0 w j Q wow U Z V g goo , '"' ES° '+ Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District �� Waters Edge Building °��`� 1500 County Road B2 West Roseville, MN 55113 August 23, 2012 Robert Generous, Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: Lakeside 7th Addition Mn /DOT Review # P12-02S South of US 212, East of TH 101 Chanhassen, Carver County Control Section 1017 Dear Mr. Generous: AUG 2 7 2012 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Thank you for the opportunity to review the plat for the proposed Lakeside 7 Addition development. Before any further development, please address the following issues: Water Resources: A MnDOT Drainage permit is required. The proposed construction will need to maintain existing drainage rates to MnDOT right -of -way. Along with the permit, please provide the following: 1) A grading Plan of the existing & proposed project. 2) Drainage area maps for the proposed project showing both existing and proposed drainage areas and flows (with flow arrows) 3) Hydrologic, and hydraulic computations /modeling before and after proposed reconstructions (ie., Hydro -CAD input assumptions, calibration data, results for 10 and 100 year storm events). 4) An electronic copy of any computer modeling used for the hydraulic computations. Please submit plans to: Arash Moin MnDOT Metro Distict 1500 W. County Road B -2 Roseville, MN 55113 Or send the plans electronically as Adobe Acrobat (.pdf), and HydroCAD (.hc) files to arash.moin@state.mn.us . For questions concerning the drainage permit, please contact Arash Moin, 651- 234 -7542 of Mn/DOT Metro District's Water Resources section. Surveys: Please label Mn/DOT right -of -way on the plat and show the existing access control and monuments found. For questions concerning these comments, please contact Bruce Wetherbee (651- 366 -5176) in MnDOT Metro District's Surveys Unit. Noise: MnDOT's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and highways. Residential uses located adjacent to highways often result in complaints about traffic noise. Traffic noise from this highway could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030.0030 states that municipalities are responsible for taking all reasonable measures to prevent land use activities listed in the MPCA's Noise Area Classification (NAC) where the establishment of the land use would result in violations of established noise standards. MnDOT policy regarding development adjacent to existing highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures in such areas. The project proposer should assess the noise situation and take the action deemed necessary to minimize the impact of any highway noise. If you have any questions regarding MnDOT's noise policy please contact Peter Wasko in our Design section at (651) 234 -7681. Permits: As previously stated, a drainage permit is required. Additionally, any use of or work within or affecting MnDOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's utility website at http://www.dot.state.mn.us/utili include one 11 x 17 plan set and one full size plan set with each permit application. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651- 234 -7911) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section Review Submittal Options: Mn/DOT's goal is to complete the review of plans within 30 days. Submittals sent in electronically can usually be turned around faster. There are four submittal options. Please submit either: 1. One (1) electronic pdf version of the plans. Mn/DOT can accept the plans via e-mail at metrodevreviews .dot(cr�,state.mn.us provided that each separate e-mail is under 20 megabytes. 2. Three (3) sets of full size plans. Although submitting seven sets of full size plans will expedite the review process. Plans can be sent to: Mn/DOT — Metro District Planning Section Development Reviews Coordinator 1500 West County Road B -2 Roseville, MN 55113 3. One (1) compact disk. 4. Plans can also be submitted to Mn/DOT's External FTP Site. Please send files to: ftp:/ /ftp2. dot. state. mn. us / pub / incoming /MetroWatersEd;ze/Planning Internet Explorer doesn't work using ftp so please use an FTP Client or your Windows Explorer (My Computer). Also, please send a note to metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us indicating that the plans have been submitted on the FTP site. If you have any questions concerning this review please feel free to contact me at (651) 234- 7794. Sincerely, � r Tod Sherman Planning Supervisor Copy sent via E -Mail: Robert Generous, baenerouskci.chanhassen.r n.us Kim Meuwissen, kmeuwissenkci.chanhassen.mn.us Buck Craig, Permits Nancy Jacobson, Design Arash Moin, Water Resources Hailu Shekur, Water Resources Dale Matti, Right -of -Way Diane Langenbach, Area Engineer David Sheen, Traffic Bruce Wetherbee, Surveys Pete Wasko, Noise Ann Braden, Metropolitan Council CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on August 23, 2012, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Lakeside 7 th Addition — Planning Case 2012 -11 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A ", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Kar,d J. Enge ar , Depu A Jerk Subscribed and s before me this orn to day of , 2012. Notary Pub °`' = ' KIM T. MEUWISSEN 3. Notary Public- Minnesota My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2015 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, September 4, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment; Proposal: Preliminary Plat of 17 Lots; Site Plan Review for 17 Townhouse Units; and Variances on property zoned Planned Unit Development-Residential PUD -R Applicant: Ron Clark Construction Property Outlot D, Lakeside along wit part of Outlot A, Lakeside, and Location: part of Outlot A, Lakeside 2 Addition A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: ' Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /2012 -11 If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by Questions & email at bgenerous ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Comments: 952- 227 -1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial /industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, September 4, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment; Proposal: Preliminary Plat of 17 Lots; Site Plan Review for 17 Townhouse Units; and Variances on property zoned Planned Unit Development-Residential PUD -R Applicant: Ron Clark Construction Property Outlot D, Lakeside along wih part of Outlot A, Lakeside, and Location: part of Outlot A, Lakeside 2 nd Addition A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /2012 -11 If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by Questions & email at bgenerous()-ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Comments: 952- 227 -1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial /industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. AMY L FREDRICKSON ANDREW & SARAH PUNCH ANDREW B HOPPER 8611 LAKE RILEY DR 8724 NORTH BAY DR 181 LAKEVIEW RD E CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4501 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7625 ANDREW N STRAUSS 8753 N BAY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 ANGELA L CILIBERTO 248 APPLEBLOSSOM LN SHAKOPEE MN 55379 -8248 ANTHONY C BELL 8716 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 BEVERLY AGHELNEJAD 8659 LAKE RILEY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4501 CAROLYN V MORIMITSU 8769 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 DAVID GORONKIN 412 ARENOSO LN # 310 SAN CLEMENTE CA 92672 -1651 DIANHAI DU 7463 TRISTAN KNL EXCELSIOR MN 55331 -7404 FRANK & JULIANA HAVERTY MOLEK 8620 LAKE RILEY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4501 BILL & MARY BETH KITTELSON 8791 LAKE RILEY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4562 CATHI M LEE 110 E 1ST ST APT 224 CHASKA MN 55318 -2198 DAVID ST PETER 8619 LAKE RILEY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4501 EDWARD M RYAN 2062 TINDRA CIR ERIE CO 80516 -4041 GARY F & JOAN M ROETHLE REV TR 8776 LAKE RILEY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4562 HIGHLANDS AT LAKESIDE OWNERS HOME FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK A 5201 EDEN AVE #170 7100 MADISON AVE W EDINA MN 55436 -2356 GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55427 -3602 JAMES B & MARIANNE TIFFANY 8612 LAKE RILEY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4501 JAMES N AKERHIELM 8728 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 CAROLE K BASTASZ 179 LAKEVIEW RD E CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7625 CRAIG M SHAFFER 8768 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 DIANE E HOFF 8740 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 ELIZABETH J SARNESE 8791 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 HELEN ZWAK 8636 LAKE RILEY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4501 JAMES A & DENISE A CADRES 8751 LAKE RILEY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4562 JAMES T & SUZANNE FRANKLIN 8735 LAKE RILEY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4562 JASON R EIDE JEFFREY JORGENSEN JEFFREY R MALLOW 8761 NORTH BAY DR 8667 LAKE RILEY DR 9565 TIMBERWOOD RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4501 CHASKA MN 55318 -9410 JEREMY LAUGHLIN JONATHAN D MUSBERGER JOYCE A BENNETT 520 CASCADE DR 8735 NORTH BAY DR 8789 NORTH BAY DR CHASKA MN 55318 -1884 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 JOYCE G GLEASON KEITH W & STACY A CARLSON KELLY R MORRISON 3125 W SUMMIT BLVD 8743 LAKE RILEY DR 8773 NORTH BAY DR LINCOLN NE 68502 -7624 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4562 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 KURT R SCHNEIBER LAKESIDE MASTER ASSOCIATION IN LAND HOLD CO LLC 8759 LAKE RILEY DR 7100 MADISON AVE W 3080 CENTERVILLE RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4562 GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55427 -3602 LITTLE CANADA MN 55117 -1185 LEE N GOLDSTEIN LESLIE M BERGSTROM LYNN A BUCHHOLZ 8747 NORTH BAY DR 8781 NORTH BAY DR 8744 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 MARK MOILANEN MARK W LINDNER MARY J BACHEL 8635 LAKE RILEY DR 8785 NORTH BAY DR 8739 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4501 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 MATTHEW J THILL MATTHYS J COETZEE MELISSA KAY BROWN 8790 NORTH BAY DR 8768 LAKE RILEY DR 8751 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4562 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 MICHAEL J LEEMAN MITCHELL S & CINDY L VENESS NANCY A SAMPSON 8711 NORTH BAY DR 8794 NORTH BAY DR 8765 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 NATHAN & HILARY TREGUBOFF NATHANIEL R PAYNE NORTH BAY HOMEOWNERS ASSN 8720 NORTH BAY DR 8767 LAKE RILEY DR INC CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4563 2681 LONG LAKE RD ROSEVILLE MN 55113 -1128 RICHARD A POWERS ROBERT MORROW ROBERT W JACOBSON 8627 LAKE RILEY DR 8731 NORTH BAY DR 8628 LAKE RILEY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4501 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4501 RYAN A & JANE M WENNING SALLY O'HALLORAN SCOTT B & SHANNON MCWHITE 7284 ROLLING ACRES RD 8707 NORTH BAY DR 8772 NORTH BAY DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 -7745 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 SHEILA ISAACSON STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT SUSAN M LETNER 8736 NORTH BAY DR 1500 W COUNTY ROAD B2 PO BOX 220 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 ROSEVILLE MN 55113 -3174 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -0220 TERI R HELLING 8780 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 TERRI LYNN BAUMBERGER 8719 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 THE LAKESIDE MASTER ASSN 7100 MADISON AVE W GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55427 -3602 THE LIBERTY AT LAKESIDE OWNERS 6109 BLUE CIRCLE DR MINNETONKA MN 55343 -9140 TONYA L BATES 8755 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 WOODDALE BUILDERS INC 6109 BLUE CIRCLE DR STE 2000 MINNETONKA MN 55343 -9185 MID & WARREN BIELKE 18718 BEARPATH TRAIL EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 8080 MITCHELL ROAD EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 THOMAS C WITHAM 8727 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 WALTER E KOTCH 8757 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 BEARPATH GOLF /COUNTRY CLUB LP 18100 BEARPATH TRAIL EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 MARK & JANE WAGNER 18743 BEARPATH TRAIL EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 TINA A PENN 8759 NORTH BAY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -7624 WILLIAM & JOANNE EDLEFSEN 8775 LAKE RILEY DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4562 RANDALL K ZANATTA & NANCY S RINGEISEN ZANATTA 18707 BEARPATH TR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 DONALD & VIRGINIA EAMES 18755 BEARPATH TRAIL EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347