Loading...
3f 1994 Animal Control 1 CITYOF -4-- 4 3 i CHANHASSEN 1 0 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 I `- (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 maw 1 OW mQC 1 moth e MEMORANDUM Reiecte' i Dat 1 TO: Mayor pate Su bmitted to � City Council pate Submitted to ��� 1 Don Ashworth, City Manager FROM: Scott Harr, Public Safety Direct 1 DATE: July 27, 1993 1 SUBJ: 1994 Animal Control 1 This memo is to seek direction from the City Council regarding our continuing to provide animal control services to the cities of Victoria, Greenwood, Tonka Bay, Excelsior and 1 Shorewood. BACKGROUND I The City of Chanhassen has been providing animal control services on a contractual basis to the above cities for 5 years. In 1989, we were approached by these cities and asked to 1 provide animal control services because the private organization that had been doing so suddenly stopped, and we had an established animal control program. The Chanhassen City Council did authorize Public Safety to provide animal control services for the remainder of 1 1989, and then to enter into a 3 year contract with these cities. At the end of 1992, I did ask the Public Safety Commission to endorse, which the Council later authorized, Public Safety to continue providing these services in 1993 on a 1 year basis, while we evaluated the possibility 1 of continuing on in the future. I During the last several months we have had two meetings with the administrators of the 5 cities that we are providing animal control services. The consensus has been that they would like to continue contracting with the City of Chanhassen to receive animal control services. I However, there has been a concern developing regarding the quality of service that is being provided, which is directly attributable to how busy we are. 1 es t PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 1 1 1 July 27, 1993 Page 2 1 1 ANALYSIS ' The benefits of the City of Chanhassen being involved in such a contractual arrangement remain that it does permit us to have a Community Service Officer on the road and available to respond to Chanhassen calls when providing animal control services elsewhere, and that the ' program is financially beneficial to Chanhassen. (In addition to paying for the costs of a CSO for 20 hours per week plus ancillary costs such as uniforms, secretarial support, office supplies, fuel, vehicle maintenance, etc., the fee charged also has been calculated to pay for 1 50% of the vehicle that is used, plus we make approximately another $5,000.00 .) The only negative aspect of continuing with the program is that the Community Service 1 Officers are considerably busier than they were in 1989. Since that time, population has increased in Chanhassen by approximately 30% or 3,000 people, not to mention the increase in businesses. Population growth is expected to continue each per year. Without question, the opening of Target within the year, and other proposed businesses, are going to have a pronounced affect on the number of calls that our Community Service Officers are involved with. I should also add that since 1989, our Community Service Officer & Animal Control 1 Program has become very well accepted by not only our City, but the cities that we contract with, as well as the various law enforcement agencies with whom we work, so that we are being called upon more each and every year. My first commitment is to ensure that the City of Chanhassen is receiving sufficient public ' safety services. Because of the reasons listed, I believe we are too busy to continue providing contractual animal control services with the staff we now have. Because of the level of activities that our Community Service Officers are involved with, both Chanhassen and the ' other cities are experiencing the tension of what has become 'doing too much with too little'. The CSOs are finding themselves unable to complete their tasks in as timely a manner as necessary, which results in frustrations by the community and our employees. I am the one ' that gets complaints from residents that don't feel that their complaints are being responded to quickly enough, and I feel terrible about a recent questionnaire sent out by the City of Shorewood soliciting input on their city services, which resulted in our animal control program being listed as the most unsatisfactory. This is a result of our CSOs being too busy to provide the same level of service that we have been able to provide. 1 RECOMMENDATION The "which came first -- the chicken or the egg ?" question is WHICH IS STRESSING THE 1 SYSTEM (i.e., Chanhassen or the contractual cities)? In all fairness, I would have to say it is a combination, and I think both are being short changed as far as the quality of service right now. 1 1 1 July 27, 1993 1 Page 3 1 Because we have benefitted, and continue to benefit financially from the program, it is my recommendation that the Council consider the hiring of an additional part -time (30 hours per week) Community Service Officer. As in the past, I would recommend hiring someone that is pursuing their law enforcement training, and to seek someone that has particular knowledge and experience with animals, (for example, someone on a career track to become a Conservation Officer). As the City of Chanhassen continues to grow, a reasonable increase in personnel needs to be anticipated -- particularly when we are providing services to five other cities as well. This position would pay approximately $9.00 per hour, with no benefits included. Two other alternatives exist. One is to increase the hours worked by our two part-time Community Service Officers to 40 hours per week; thus, benefits would be included. The two CSOs would like to see this occur. I am concerned about this option because part -time CSOs are generally involved in schooling, or seeking another job once they have completed their training, both of which are time consuming endeavors. Also, our CSO program is not presently designed to be a permanent, full -time position. Another option that has been discussed over the years is that if we are going to continue providing animal control services, perhaps we should consider hiring a full -time animal control specialist. I think this is an excellent idea because then one person that has 1 professional knowledge in this area could coordinate the program, while receiving support services from the CSOs. This position could be offered on the basis that whenever Chanhassen decides to no longer provide animal control services on a contractual basis to 1 other cities, that the position would possibly be eliminated at that time. I have not pursued this alternative aggressively, though it does have merit, because of the costs associated with 1 such a position, but would examine it further if the Council desires. I should add that the contract cities would like to know our decision as soon as possible so 1 that they can plan their budget. It is the recommendation of staff that the City Council give approval to enter into a 3 year contract (1994, 1995 & 1996) with the above listed cities to provide animal control services to be billed at a rate similar to that which has been charged, and to authorize the inclusion of an additional 30 per week community service officer position in the 1994 budget. 1 1 1 1