The URL can be used to link to this page

Admin Section ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION Letter to Yuma Road and Fox Path Area Residents dated April 29, 1993. Letter to Urban Wetland Coalition dated April 6, 1993. Letter to William G. Moore, MWCC dated April 12, 1993. Memo from Scott Harr dated April 23, 1993. Letter to Lynda Voge, Metropolitan Council dated April 22, 1993. Letter from Representative David Minge dated April 23, 1993. Letter to Marcia Wilda, Hennepin County dated April 27, 1993. Article from Impact regarding Affordable Housing dated Spring 1993. Letter from Gordon Voss, MWCC dated April 15, 1993. Training Certificates from Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc. Letter from Edward and Mary Ryan dated March 2, 1993. Memo from Paul Krauss dated April 26, 1993. CITYOF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 April 29, 1993 To: Yuma Road Area and Fox Path Area Residents Re: Water Quality Improvements, City Project No. 93 -6-1, File No. PW -201F Dear Resident: The City of Chanhassen has developed a Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) in an effort to protect the water quality of the City's wetlands and lakes. One of the primary goals of the Surface Water Management Plan was to establish a City-wide water quality improvement priority list. A wetland in your neighborhood has been identified as a potential area for water quality improvements. The proposed improvements include some excavating to provide additional water storage and possible raising of the wetland's water level. At this point the improvements are in the planning stage. As such, a topographic survey of the wetland is required to aid in planning. In the next few weeks a survey crew will be surveying the wetland and surrounding area. This survey will include establishing the ground elevations of the homes near the wetland. Survey crews will need to enter your yard to accomplish this. Once the planning phase of the project is completed we will inform you of the scope of the proposed improvements and solicit your comments. The project does not involve any additional assessments to your property. Funding will be through existing City water quality programs. Please contact me or the project's consultant engineer, Phil Gravel, if you have any questions. Phil can be reached at 636 -4600. Sincerely, CITY OF CHANHASSEN Charles D. Folch, P. . City Engineer CDF:ktm c: Dave Hempel, Assistant City Engineer Paul Krauss, Planning Director Mike Wegler, Street Superintendent Phil Gravel, Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates City Council Administration Packet (5/10/93) is to 4: PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER C ( - c.L JAMES P LARKIN LARHIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. D. PAUL B. PLUNKETT ROBERT HOFFMAN A T T O R N E Y S AT LAW KALAN LEEN M. NEWMAN 0. F D KENNETH LINDGREN MICHAEL B. LEBARON GERALD H. FRIEDELL GREGORY E. KORSTAD ALLAN E. MULLIGAN GARY A. VAN CLEVE• JAMES C. ERICKSON DANIEL L. BOWLES EDWARD J. DRISCOLL 1500 NORWEST FINANCIAL CENTER TODD M. VLATKOVICH GENE N. FULLER TIMOTHY J. McMANUS JOHN D. FULLMER 7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH TIMOTHY .1 KEANE ROBERT E. BOYLE ALAN M. ANDERSON FRANK I. HARVEY BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 -1194 DONNA L. ROBACK CHARLES S. MODELL MICHAEL W SCHLEY CHRISTOPHER J. DIETZEN TELEPHONE (612) 835 -3800 MICHAEL A. ROBERTSON JOHN R. BEATTIE FAX (612) 896-3333 USA A GRAY LINDA H. FISHER GARY A. RENNEKE THOMAS P STOLTMAN SHANNON K. McCAMBRIDGE MICHAEL C JACKMAN CHRISTOPHER J HARRISTHAL JOHN E. DIEHL WILLIAM C. GRIFFITH. JR JON 5. SWIERZEWSKI JOHN J. STEFFENHAGEN THOMAS J. FLYNN DANIEL W VOSS JAMES P QUINN p., 1 MARK A. RURIK JOHN R. HILL TODD I. PETER 1 t` MICHAEL J SEYM UR EROMEOME H. KAHKE S GERALD L. BECK JOHN B. LUNDQUIST FREDERICK K. HAUSER III TOP • Q P '1 ' 1 JANE E.. MARTIN MARY E. VOS THOMAS 5, B. H UMPHREY, FIREY, JR. LARRY D JOHN A. COTTER• /'� BEATRICE A. ROTHWEILER G� 1 MARCY R. KREISMAN 1 �] MARIEL E. PIILOLA F C HA1VHq '— F JAMES K. MARTIN J r' OF COUNSEL WENDELL R. ANDERSON JOSEPH 01115 _ ALSO ADMITTED IN WISCON MEMORANDUM TO: Urban Wetland Coalition FROM: Mike Robertson DATE: April 6, 1993 RE: Update on Recent Legislative Activity The debate continues at the Capitol on the issue of amendments to the Wetland Conservation Act. I would like to summarize action in the House and Senate Agriculture Committees and the Senate Environment and Natural Resources Committee. The House Agriculture Committee has passed a bill authored by Representative Jeff Bertram to extend the interim program and the effective date of the new Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) Rules until March 1994. This bill has been re- referred to the House Environment and Natural Resources Committee, chaired by Representative Munger. Last week I met with Representative Munger and Ron Harnack, Director of BWSR, to discuss the legislative situation and the potential for action in the 1993 session. Representative Munger indicated that he did not agree to the March extension as proposed by Representative Bertram. Harnack said that he would support an extension of the interim program until January 1994 in order to provide time for training and planning to implement the new rules. Harnack is concerned that if the rules are not adopted, the mitigation banking program does not go into effect as well as provisions allowing compensation and tax credits. We also discussed an effort on the part of northeastern Minnesota legislators to further amend the Act to eliminate the 2 to 1 replacement ratio for counties in northeastern Minnesota. This new replacement ratio would apply in counties that have at least 80% of their pre - settlement wetland acreage. Munger said that he agrees with this change, but does not want to entertain LARHIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. Memorandum April 6, 1993 Page 2 further amendments to the act. A bill introduced by Senator Stumpf and Representative Iry Anderson (S.F. 1363) includes several amendments to the Act. Representative Munger is worried that other amendments which he would oppose would be added to the bill. Harnack indicated that the governor would probably veto any bill that made significant changes to the law. On Friday, April 2, 1993, the Senate Environment Committee considered Senator Stumpf's S.F. 1363 which had previously been amended in the Senate Agriculture Committee. An amendment by Senator Dille in the Agriculture Committee further complicated the situation by amending the law to make the program only optional in counties that have at least 801 of pre - settlement wetland acreage. Before motions could be offered to delete Senator Dille's amendments from the bill, Senator Merriam moved to send the bill to the Environment Subcommittee for further discussion. Committee members were concerned that this action would kill the bill for the 1993 session because Friday, April 2 was the deadline for the passage of bills from policy committees. Senator Merriam argued that this was an important issue that needed further discussion and that exceptions could be made to the rules to allow a bill to move forward. Senator Merriam's motion passed and the bill was referred to Senator Chandler's Environment Subcommittee. Senator Chandler has tentatively scheduled a hearing on the wetlands bill for Wednesday evening at the Capitol (time uncertain as of this writing). We are organizing an effort to provide a panel led by Linda Fisher to express the views of the Urban Wetland Coalition at this hearing. It is clear that Representative Munger is the key to action this year. If too many amendments are proposed, Munger will kill the bill and the rules will go into effect on July 1. Our strategy is to simply argue for extension of the interim program in order to give time to thoroughly review the ramifications of implementation of the new rules. If you have questions or would like further information, please give me a call at 896 -3388. MAR:BB5s CITYOF 01,, 01 CHANHASSEN 6 90 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 April 12, 1993 • Mr. William G. Moore Director of Engineering and Construction Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 -1633 Re: MWCC Infiltration /Inflow Project Grant Application Project File No. 93 -7 Dear Mr. Moore: Enclosed please find a completed grant application form and City Council resolution in consideration for a $10,000 grant recognizing the City of Chanhassen's continued commitment to infiltration /inflow reduction. I have also attached preliminary information concerning the 1993 sanitary sewer rehabilitation program, a copy of the original sanitary sewer rehabilitation study completed in June of 1989 and an update map showing rehabilitation work performed in 1989 and 1990 which resulted from the original repair study. I believe it would be of benefit to provide you with a brief background history of the City's concern for and commitment to the reduction of I/I within the City's sanitary sewer system. Back in June of 1989, a sanitary sewer repair study was completed by BRW. This study identified a number of problem areas and associated repair strategies in the City's sanitary sewer system as identified from the implementation of a television camera inspection. Work tasks were then prioritized and a number of these problem areas were repaired during the 1989 and 1990 sanitary sewer rehabilitation programs which totaled nearly $500,000. In 1991, the sanitary sewer rehabilitation program was delayed in order to allow time for the completion and coordination of work efforts with the City's Pavement Management Program. In 1992, the sanitary sewer repair fund was limited to $100,000 and a program was designed and developed and put out for bids in the fall of 1992. However, due to a number of factors, the project bids received were not favorable and the City Council I t 0 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Mr. William G. Moore April 12, 1993 Page 2 directed that the 1992 program and funds be incorporated into the 1993 program which is currently budgeted at $350,000. During the next month, the remaining work scope for the 1993 I/I program will be defined. Each year since 1989, the City has spent nearly $10,000 continuing to televise additional sewer lines within the City and identify needed repair areas. It would be an understatement to say that there is a substantial amount of repair work that could be performed over the next few years. As mentioned previously, the 1993 Sanitary Sewer Repair Program has been budgeted at $350,000. The work efforts would be contracted out through a formal bidding process as has been conducted in the past. I trust the supplemental information I have provided will clearly show the City of Chanhassen's strong commitment to reducing I/I within the sanitary sewer system. On behalf of the City, I would respectfully request your consideration for the maximum $10,000 grant amount to the City of Chanhassen's 1993 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Program. Sincerely, CITY OF CHANHASSEN Charles D. Folch, P.E. City Engineer CDF :ktm Attachments: 1. MWCC Grant Application. 2. City Council Resolution No. 93 -26 dated April 12, 1993. 3. Page 93 from 1993 Chanhassen City Budget. 4. Letter from Jon Horn of BRW dated April 8, 1993. 5. Letter from Jon Horn of BRW dated August 10, 1992. 6. Chanhassen Sewer Study dated June, 1989. c: Dave Hempel, Assistant City Engineer Jerry Boucher, Utility Superintendent Gordon Voss, MWCC Wayne Rikala, MWCC City Council Administrative Packet (4/26/93) sJ e P�c/ TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager FROM: Scott Harr, Public Safety Director DATE: April 23, 1993 SUBJ: Adam Stepney Following is a thank you I received regarding animal control work done by CSO Adam Stepney. cc: Personnel File 14,s - is "t 41 c,; <, -7/ E � r , �� . // �%�, s / w 4. F C_4 5 '7 cc dC o� —1-v- - " 24 7 44 /r5/' P -7,cA) ,/j• P5',/ �� , �. • 7 22 71Z AjAyJ C ITYOF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 April 22, 1993 Ms. Lynda Voge Referral Coordinator Metropolitan Council Mears Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 RE: Chanhassen's Response to the Proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the City of Chaska's 2000 Comprehensive Plan Dear Ms. Voge: f . On behalf of the City of Chanhassen I have reviewed the document mentioned above. The requested MUSA Line amendment is located adjacent to Chanhassen's City line in the southwest corner of our community. Chanhassen has no objections to Chaska's proposal believing it to be consistent with the orderly development of that City. It is adjacent to an area of Chanhassen that remains outside the MUSA line but which is likely to be brought into the system by the end of the decade. The Chaska proposal does not represent any direct impact to our community that we are aware of. We do however request that proper precautions be taken to ensure that the rate of storm water runoff and quality of the storm water flow be appropriately managed before being discharged over the Minnesota River bluff line. We would also like to see significant vegetation preserved along the bluff line in a manner similar to that which is currently undertaken in Chanhassen. A copy of this letter is being forwarded directly to Chaska and I feel confident that they will positively respond to these concerns._., .. In the recent past our City Council has voiced concerns over a proposed realignment of Hwy. 41 east of the subject property in the vicinity of the Chanhassen City line. These concems were sent to Metropolitan Council staff. The proposed MUSA line amendment does not directly raise this issue, although portions of the future ROW are being protected by the underlying plat. We have already made our position known on this issue and see no need to belabor the point. Is t PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Ms. Lynda Voge April 22, 1993 Page 2 Based upon the foregoing, 1 am recommending that our City Council adopt a position in support of Chaska's request. Please feel free to contact me directly if additional comments are required. Sincerely, //./ Paul Krauss, AICP Director of Planning c: City Council Planning Commission ` City of Chaska 1 fr►��wi . -a Ch aska April 14, 1993 Ms. Lynda Voge Referral Coordinator Metropolitan Council Mears Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 RE: MINOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF CHASKA'S 2000 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Dear Ms. Voge: Enclosed for your consideration is seven copies of an Information Submission for a Minor Comprehensive Plan amendment to the City of Chaska's 2000 Comprehensive Plan. This amendment requests an expansion of the MUSA line for an additional 32.5 acres which would accommodate the Sixth Addition of Hazeltine Bluff residential development. The total number of dwelling units proposed for the expansion is 46 units for an overall density of 1.4 units per acre. Please contact me if you have any questions or require further information. Sincerely, Kermit V. Crouch Director of Planning and Development KBC:jai Enclosure C: Paul Krauss, Director of Planning, City of Chanhassen ✓ RECEIVED APR 151993 CITY OF CHANHASSEN City Of Chaska Minnesota One City Hall Plaza 55318 -1962 Phone 6121448 -2851 • INFORMATION SUBMISSION FOR MINOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS This summary worksheet must be filled out and submitted to the Metropolitan Council with a copy of each proposed minor comprehensive plan amendment. Minor amendments include, but are not limited to: 1. Changes to the future land use plan where the affected area is small or where the proposed future land use will result in minor changes in metropolitan service demand. 2. Changes (land trades or additions) in the urban service area involving less than 40 acres. 3. Minor changes to plan goals and policies that do not change the overall thrust of the comprehensive plan. Please be as specific as possible; attach additional explanatory materials if necessary. If a staff report was prepared for the Planning Commission or City Council, please attach it as well. Communities submitting regular plan amendments may wish to enter this form or a reasonable facsimile into their word processing menu for ease in preparation of the form. Send plan amendments to: Lynda Voge, Referrals Coordinator Metropolitan Council, Mears Park Centre 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul, MN 55101 - 1634 ._ _ I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Sponsoring governmental unit City of Chaska Name of local contact person conOane pCity Kermit Crouch a aza, Chas a, MN 55318 -1962 Address 446 Telephone Name of Preparer (if different from contact person) same Date of Preparation 4/13/93 B. Name of Amendment MUSA Expansion - Hazeltine Bluff Description/Summary - see attached- - C. Please attach the following: 1. Five copies of the proposed amendment. 2. A city-wide map showing the location of the proposed change. 3. The current plan map(s), indicating area(s) affected by amendment. 4. The proposed plan map(s), indicating area(s) affected by amendment. D. What is the official local status of the proposed amendment? (Check one or more as appropriate.) X Acted upon by planning commission (if applicable) on March 23. 1993 _. Approved by governing body, contingent upon Metropolitan Council review, March 29. 1993 • _ Considered, but not approved by governing body on Other E. Indicate what adjacent local governmental units and other jurisdictions (school districts, watershed districts, etc.) affected by the change have been sent copies of the plan amendment, if any, and the date(s) copies were sent to them. City of Chanhassen II. LAND USE • :? Describe the following, as appropriate: 1. Size of affected area in acres 32.5 a cres 2. Existing land use(s) agricultural, woodland 3. Proposed land use(s). low density residential �. Number and type of residential dwelling units involved 46 units 5. Proposed density 1,4 unit /acre 6. Proposed square footage of commercial, industrial or public buildings none III. METROPOLITAN DEVELOPOMENT GUIDE A. Population, Household and Employment Forecasts Will the proposed amendment affect the city's population, household or employment forecasts for 2000, or any additional local staging contained in the original plcn? X No/Not Applicable Yes. Describe effect. ii . a..: --� B. Changes to Urban Service Area Boundary Will the proposed amendment require a change to the boundary of the community's urban service area? No/Not applicable. Yes. Under I. C., a map should be attached to show the proposed change. C. Changes to Timing and Staging of Urban Service Area Will the proposed amendment require a change to the timing and staging of development within the urban service area? X No/Not Applicable. Yes. Under I. C., a map should be attached to show the proposed change. D. Wastewater Treatment 1. Will the proposed amendment result in a change in the projected sewer flows for the community? No/Not Applicable. _ Yes. Indicate the expected change. Total Year 2000,2010 flow for community based on existing plan million gallons /day Total 20002010 flow for community based on plan amendment million Gallons /day 2. If your community discharges to more than one metropolitan interceptor, indicate which interceptor will be affected by the amendment. Chaska Wastewater Plant 3. Will flows be diverted from one interceptor service area to another? No/Not applicable. Yes. Indicate the change and volumes (mgd.) involved. . iii E. Transportation 1. Will the proposed amendment result in an increase in trip generation for the affected area? X No/Not applicable. _ Yes. Describe effect. 2. Does the proposed amendment contain any changes to the functional classification of roadways? _y_ No. _ Yes. Describe which roadways F. Aviation Will the proposed amendment affect the function of a metropolitan airport or the compatibility of land uses with aircraft noise? --_ No/Not applicable. Yes. Describe effect. 0. Recreation Open Space Will the proposed amendment have an impact on e;dsting or future federal, state or regional recreational facilities? X No /Not Applicable. Yes. Describe effect. H. Housing Will the proposed amendment affect the community's ability or intent to achieve the long -term goals for low- and moderate - income and modest -cost housing opportunities contained in the existing plan? X No/Not Applicable. — Yes. Describe effect. N Water Rcsourccs 1. Does the plan amendment affect a Minnesota Department of Natural Resources or U.S. Army Corps of Engineers protected wetland? If yes, • describe type of wetland affected and show location on a map. Yes. X No. 2. Will the wetland be protected? HA Yes. Describe how. _ No. Describe why not. 3. Will the plan amendment result in runoff which affects the quality of any surface water body? If yes, identify which ones. Yes. X No. 4. Will the water body be protected? _ 'Yes. Describe how. NA No. Explain why not. IMPLEME.:TATION PROGRAM A. Official Controls 1. Will the proposed amendment require a change to zoning, subdivision, on- site sewer ordinances or other official controls? X No/Not Applicable.' Yes. Describe effect. ADDENDUM TO INFORMATION SUBMISSION I.B. Description Hazeltine Bluff Planned Residential Development was approved in March 1990 and included 229 single family lots and a multiple family housing area. Its phased development has proceeded on schedule with four of six additions completed or under development. Currently only 11 of 151 platted lots remain unsold. Building permits have been issued for 121 lots. The developer, Builders Development, Inc. (BDI), now wishes to plat the remaining 57 lots in the 5th and 6th additions for development and sale in 1993; however, 25 of the 57 lots are outside of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) line. BDI has requested the City to make application to Metropolitan Council for expansion of the MUSA to include the 25 single family lots. The expansion would also logically involve a 3.5 acre tract which is concept approved for single family attached housing at 6.0 units per acre for a total of 21 multiple units. As shown on Chaska's Comprehensive Plan map, a 100 acre area at the southeast edge of the City is within the Rural Service Area. The subject application would bring 32.5 of the 100 acres within the MUSA line to accommodate the final phases of an ongoing development project. The balance of the area is either undevelopable Minnesota River valley bottomland /wetland, is a steep wooded ravine, or is within the corridor of the future T.H. 41 river crossing. City staff supports the proposed MUSA expansion. Such expansion was includedin Chaska's 2000 Comprehensive Plan update but was denied by Metro Council because of the capacity problem at the Chaska Wastewater Treatment Plant. That problem will be eliminated by the construction of the Chaska /Chanhassen sewer force main scheduled for completion by September 1, 1993. In the meantime, a condition is being placed on all new plat approvals prohibiting issuance of Certificates of Occupancy until completion of the Chaska /Chanhassen Interceptor. While there is generally enough land within Chaska's MUSA line to accommodate housing development at the present time, the subject property is the only land owned by and available for development by BDI. Approval of the Concept Plan /Rezoning in 1990 assumed a phased development which would require expanding the MUSA for the 6th Addition. To disallow logical completion of this planned development would not be in keeping with sound planning and development principles. The City of Chaska is aware that Metro Council prefers to consider MUSA boundary change requests in the form of land trades rather than expansion, unless a five year land supply does not exist. We have explored the land trade approach but have found that option to be unavailable due to land ownership situations. In effect, all of the undeveloped land with residential potential is either owned by other developers or by active farmers, neither of which want to give up land within the MUSA. As Metro Council is aware, the pace of single family housing development, and the demand for undeveloped land by developers, has increased substantially in Chaska in the 1990's. For perspective purposes, building permits issued for single family houses in Chaska since 1980 are shown below. Year No. of S.F. Permits 1980 22 1981 11 1982 27 1983 59 1984 28 1985 40 1986 109 1987 130 1988 100 1989 123 1990 116 1991 171 1992 320 1993 80 (as of 4/15/93) There are three small farms still operating within the MUSA (about 175 acres total) and none of the owners are interested in selling for development at this time. All the remaining land with residential potential is owned by five developers. 1 • _ ,- - _ _ 11 e • IN , . t'1.-1 I Am \ � - - i • 1i ( H _...:1.......2_4 i- Imo N____i 7 i '�1 V i ,..., 1. __,...,..._.::::„.-..--....., ,, , ... ../ - to! , \ A t - --; r / : r- - - ' N—.. SE - .. - - . - - - - 1.-n ..-..-.-- __?_ __I -' 17. - - Sr .' : iY • ! -,....,..-• ( Itt -. 1 :,-.---- , 1-- !! ",-..,::...._ _ . ___.__ . ___ - -.., \ �� hfti �. / � 1 \ - ' il //� �/�) 111 ` •/• ,/ • r. 1 - '140 ,,,,,>-.., • ..i - ,,,,....•..; ..; / an ' 1 ` tam\- 4 is : • .ti, .., , a. • 1 , . - • Ov —' ■ :,),;!;•", -- 7 -:;It ' 1 ' -...7s . or ; 5,:fle . ii , { l i ' ,_ CHASKA I T1 / It \ . 1 ----"--T."'"'"^'..74pp ern' -eti ir) e `• ►`►`►■►■►■►■►p►.►■►.►■►■►■ a • !W .. C/ to • •• •J N !K W „,°''''Pl) w_ - -- — — ^ IN0111.1 t�ti — �• f1 o < w � 1 o c I ' • I __ • . .. W r • / r i 7 , I \ \ -2/-\> \ t - 7 -____ . .. .., ; , . .. ,. , .I \ • • •..-- . 0 (_______ \ I-..,........... ? 1\ \ 2 _ /. / % ..: t • ' -.•-•■ a . ) , \ r . _ . _ . ' 114 . , .„; .. . s _____.-----: -- -------j\-• _ .,...: ... w t., . . •.� �O.01r w .. • w w • ^ O F bi j M F .. O N • 6 v • N . s • p • ' f 4,— ' \ 4 ,\. 1 s \ \irfh : • _ 1.• yYl17J 91tnfW1: Q = \-a.r • e 4 ./ - ,> . p- ) Olt 111:111 Ali 2 = r f _____. T _. p 1 - AiliF Ell . .1. r s .. 6 0 , ` g - J A vrc - -� vc N p < v _ �n 0 ^ • w 1 � w Y s .1 « b4, O °^ �y. = o J � —ff• i ...0 . v [ O :r, a :e s' i I . 'L 7... ::" ( /77. - , 1 *‘; ‘ _ ---- -;:' ------7:. - ---,161110.11.• •• ' s . I _411 ---- I 4 "A" . \• .,•11:6111;' - .---7Z ..---- • ---• imbleill ,,.. .......-- 1 : . - . r . , / /0/41.11SAM Niorz........./1/-----;„0001■. doweillict ' `, % ... 1.---.... -- - - - ' --•-...-. V.. . --•......- - • . . - --, v --;-- --- . ....---•-., - - "--. :-.,,,,-. ..--,.• . \ ---1,-, •-,.... \N 0 - %-. . \. \ 1 .....D....n %-T.,„.." , - -__......-,....:......./ N \ - . .7" 1 ) • - t . 1. \- . ,...._.../ .s. .. , '. 1 if ' if \ I z - . , : i( (1 . .,.......: / \ — • • "- — • - • r. r \' / -- -- --...-i- —\)"-- , ....4 --- --- - *\, --- _L_J--1-, / ''. \ • ••• • ' '' S : '''') , ..< -- : -_ -N -1---'---:' 3 's::: i ftmsors e .,. \ ,.....;.•,,... • ,-------\.. .,.....: ......4 --- --1- osot .,k • 1- ,,,,. . s - .... .., -. \ 1 — • .. .. - .1-• -.,, . A ,-. ! (i i --... 1 _ 1 — \ s.isi s.;\ . 1...) %-...),: '.......(,. ,,;.\\, \ .. 1/4 ;:,- 4 - 7 • 4. ,-.±:: (... ..."( , , . . ,■• ' . c-. ,/1 --4 '$ ... . •.,,s,*, 04 - - '.,. ,N . . , 1 ...„.. i 6 --- i....:-4,. / 3 , • . 1 . 1 12 .14: t tk : 2 4 ' ' 41111,- . -477- - :>., 1 ' 1 / ,..) '‘._ 1 i r oc ilgi-ta II ;4 , zp -- s ‘- 4 le , . . j» 1 \• I / -4 l I , --- I I T ' t''".0 iiik .---.;,,,,- ..,_ ,, , ' t .., .. ' I I —1 ..41 ....i.-• .- • 11E!. OM , • i Ir ,..... • - 1. 1 ; II 1 12 --7 .--......... , . „ 0, , .-. , ) i * , TE IA V ......- , ,,,.. ' • 1 Ot 1 ..... . , , r ,...• • I - 1 r—,- i — 1-- , • j -ior . si, , \ ; • 1 ,:( , i . f • ----/ 1--41 116 \ d ' "At "47it -, 1 l te • " --- 1 I - i 1 . z i -: s ) I ::.. ri : ( .: st .c.;-: ? ...r.y ,., 11.;,•0. •"\ ‘1 Sli ‘ AP I i t 7 B.1 / --..., • ii... •,. lq.,,.. ,, ...... I .1,..• Iti! v,4 • I,) /0-' '...sx-_''.;' 4/ : ,. i 1,1t )\ i • A.- - f,„ - , ', 'ii‘vv,..111A,' ; tit.:.' -....-. ,- I I , .•..,...,..c,,,,4 , .,... tt , i - 11 - .1-,-- - - .v. t - 414 ■ ' a ' ) I II i %.%.*•• :1) = I I-. 1 •cl 1 I . a .1 ,. .. , \',, ■ii wit — ---1. -L. • 1 - -:. - V;31111 i 1.,..z.N it ' - - ,N- • * : 1 ; i:V• 4 ' N..: .'.. , '. Vt ' • It 1 1 !--' ..‘'.,‘• ' -:': T - • '471' • • ::4 \ .' Ilk Viii ' t'. .. \i,, 1:, \ ,. i ...,0 ...,.,,,„.;:'- ,,,\;, vIkus.o. __„,,,.. - .‘-ia;-.4 - ,.,..,,'•,■:•,..,c,.."• ..' : . 1 ...'. . ■•*: ■• Z•'... • ,.. - • • ... :::::' • - --) ht•:•••■,N,, ... . ..:..-.. ...• ....... .., , .... „ . 2 ...,-- .-, -- . .-• ---- ...,-....- ,. , : \,- . i ,,,:, - • ,... :...- -,---77:....• ..,,,,,,,,,,,.... . 41 , 1 - ,.ii, ,. • ,...... - v ---- ,.. -- !:. F . , '...: -:- t. I • *- .4 :..., ..,,,. tr..c.:i- ". .-- -- . .: \ s ., s i 1 ,.' , A I f i n Z.0.),1 - , ..----- r •.1::: - ..4.---....s;--! ..- ..,/ / ---\ \ ‘ ' , ...... N.- 's ' • 1 1 • , ...- • ---•-......!.n. / / \•••-• - • ------- .....—_ ..---. .— ---_ -- -- -- -- -- - I ._ . ,.. ,.. 1 1?It • ._----------- -- 1 t i ----r- 1 . r-- --=7— --- I f • 1 ..IIPO "Illill° Si). " 1.14T CIF Iligir . ... . _ .... • 1 1 , e .,. l• 1 1 i 1 ...../\ -4 .-,-..... ---j"-----7- a 1 i i 1 \ ili 1 I lt / ... . :1 I \,.....-L I f 4441121 • • ' ....' --*/ \ —1_—)._1_, / . 1 , I I, . . . _i_ 'co / 1 1 ---\ , 1 i 1 I .... ' ‘,..,.......,,,,.. . . . . • , .........,c, ..„..... ..„,_....„ . , _._ . . . ,,, ,,,,,•.:„,:,,, , . - ;et. I a ' */%1 6 ell i 6 5 ' _ ,..• ---- / - - -4 ..., --/ wst. I \%•.\ . / i i....,:r"w' • ;..,.C1. ' 7 _I —1 " / / **7 / . -..\*. %--°-- T 3 f• 1 L‹ Pfr:1 ., ::..4 ,. • ‹ ..., 71 , • „ :-. • LI I It I 'mut t I 33 it 1 i .X " t k... •Z °"?" i '''' . eV 4 , : . ). • V ___ r __ 4. .....4 ., .. ,, I 3 V • . • C • 1 8 1 • . , — .4 ... ...-r- • -- 4!, -- 4..V -;–..... i 1 • 1 11..1e4--ii a • < • /2 ... ' '",•-• -- 1 I :4 • x ...' 1 ' i Pi i H ,...■ ...I i • % ...... V • .. % . MIA g . 11 I T i I= . - z i GINERAL MOTES F .. is 1 1 1 lz ' ......% U I 1.• I UMW WV 11110141111411IM gi • V) • OMR WW1. SO MT \ .....) / 1 \ 1 4 ;34 'Iv a "ems so ... S ISSLIi IMO WM III NW . • . 4 4 asr IMO II PIET ..■ < ,., II ! . $." le' .,,,..... . • te Eli MOWN UN 11114 1114411 IR ft \ \ki I ee. V \ .... es E Tr MOW NM 110.41101i I la .1 I ail ; ‘ cOal IDYLLIST Lor MLA /Sae 131. Pt ‘ f 1 1 1 74.I.4 le . • , _ t eli NORM UN MIA Stele IDYL % I 1 t teemin ii1 IIIIIIITY L114 VMS MI AM ••■■• eel.L. ../....2 4 1' . 6 1* . , , mitt 1 7-...... " %::::.: " ..T.. • ."..S.‘7 .." :.=% ". 1.1'.".. -"- V= "- ...?"=%.-.1"'":11.1..-'.1.777...7...L i I MR / 7 .... s i oe si. .; II . ."..1• .''' ' "" .":: v ''' : '' ""'".. . '". v 4. ._ 4A ' Eig• te: ":' = r..... .1-- —.:—:..—.1..-7-..s.:"...I.E.F"-: f o' .-- _._._._......„..z..t.,.....„,.:_-.......7.:___..-.:.....: . • _______,...,,......„.=.. 1 .. . Itt : .._ _...r_ .._. , ,.;... I ie . 1 I 1 .,. . • ==.__ ,.... ■....".. , . 01 ....,,,,. 1DEE 1 SA ws WIC 1 I MI WI It Omen i I 111111AP 411147414 41110 1 1 ... WM. 11114 NAM ...- . ......e.e.- •••- - - --•-e- _ . ............___.__ _____ - .1- ow. .., -..... el. -....- ...--....e.... - .• ..... — .....ee DAVID MINGE 1.4 ei, 20 DISTRICT, MINNESOTA e Q O // _ t / Congrecks of t je states Xou a of ittpre entatibts% aOington, NiC 20515 - 2302 April 23, 1993 Donald Ashworth Adminstrator, Chanhassen 690 Coulter Dr. Chanhassen MN 55317 Dear Donald, I want to extend a special invitation to you to join other area residents in voicing concerns to me at an Open Meeting at our Congressional Office in Chaska on Saturday May 8, 1993. The Chaska Office serves the counties of Carver, LeSeuer, a portion of McCloud. Scott, Sibley, a portion of and all of Wright County. Please come and discuss your \ iews and concerns with my staff and me. I welcome your input on such issues as the Budget, Health Care Reform, the President's Economic Agenda. Agriculture. Transportation or anything else that is of interest to you. The Open Meeting is scheduled to run from 10:00 am to 12:30 p.m. There will be a brief program featuring Chaska Mayor Bob Roepke also. Our Congressional Office is located at 108 East 3rd Street. across from City Square Park. The telephone number is 448 -6567. I hope to see you May 8th in Chaska. Sincerely, 4111111" L- t.C. David Minge Member of Congress JZD PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER AI" RECFI " r • ee 4cit -/t/4" CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT & FUCHS, PA. APR ° 1993 AttL,rt,c\' .tt Lal\ CITY OF CHANIHASSFi Th n,a. I (...1x1,11 (612) 452-5000 Rover \ knur.,>n FIN (612) 452.555 ■1 ott (Atr% ( Fu_ it Jame R \ \',thton Elliott R. Knetsch April 27, 1993 Michael A Rn,l -ack Renac L` �n mrr VIA FACSIMILE AND FIRST CLASS MAIL Ms. Mar. a Wilda Henne•'n County Property Management A -220= Government Center Min eapolis, MN 55487 -0228 Re: City of Chanhassen /County of Hennepin Transfer of Part of Lot 9, Crane's Vineyard Park, Carver County, MN. Dear Ms. Wilda: Enclosed please find original Purchase Agreements for the above - referenced matter. At your earliest convenience please have the Purchase Agreement signed and return one copy to this office. Prior to closing this transaction, the City is requesting the following to be completed with respect to the issue of wells located on the property: 1. That the Well Disclosure Certificate attached to the Agreement as Exhibit B be completely filled out. The City has no information with respect to the wells that you had requested earlier; 2. If there are wells on the property the City wants documentary assurance that the any wells have been or will be capped prior to acceptance of the deed for the property. If there are wells on the property and if they have not been capped, the City expects Hennepin County to pay for the cost of capping the same. • Ot 'ce Center • Corporate Center Cur\ e • Ea \t\ 551'1 If you wish to discuss this matter upon receipt of the document, please call me. Very truly yours, CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCO T & FUCHS '.41F r 17: James R. Walston JRW:ses Enclosu e cc: on Ashworth, City Manager Charles Folch, City Engineer - • Who needs needs housing? Q aving•safe, decent and affordable housing is a given in this • at country, isn't it ?. The answer is a resounding no—and the - '' • lack of affordable housing is norsolely a problem of peop • • C • who live in our cities. Finding a decent place to live affect- • •_ • our neighbors in the suburbs and surrounding counties, as well. It is a also a concern ofyoung people, older adults, families and people wit , • In . disabi Finding affordable housing is the biggest barrier that stop . people from being sel . . The e consequences of tack of . • • d affordable housing • are far reaching Z "People experience extreme stress when they must constantly search for a place to stay;' says Chip Halbach of the Minn esota Housing Part- nership. People under stress stop paying attention to health and other 0 • basic needs, Halbach noted, citing a 15 -year study by the Center on • . • > Budget and Policy Priorities. . ' • The study finds that between 1974 and 1989, the shortage oflow.' • • •rent housing.in the Twin Cities area nearly doubled. About 37,000 w more units are needed in the area, and people stay on aiting lists for '.* U• C up to •five years before they get Sion 8 housing. . "When people are homeless, taxp pay $40 a night or $600a • month per individual for a shelter stay, which is more expensive than N ' renting them an says Becky Fink, from'Rise, Inc • n The city of Minneapolis has had a 36.4 percent increase in the nu ber of people living in poverty in the past 10 years,•almost equaled in CC ect the surrounding suburbs with an increase of 33.7 percent. : • • ontrary to what you centers, industrial parks and . • • might think, federal and retail franchises. As advocacy • . . ' state governments are organizations, they. press city • a) not the sole —or even . government for better municip_ . major — sources of low- incotne • services .and challenge banks to • a housing units in our area. Most lend more money to people . • _ 4 neighborhood revitalization living in low- lricome neigh- (� efforts undertaken in the last borhoods. . . • 10 -15 years have been done by CDCs have developed alli- • var ious non - profit c antes with a variety of agencies • development corporations including state and local govern , • (CDCs). ' . • merits, churches; foundations • m O CDCs are community-based banks, United Ways, private . f) institutions working to revitalize corporations, universities and . . Q) ' distressed urban neighborhoods •hospitals. In the last 10 years; t� and rural communities through- - CDCs, with churches and their . N L out the United Sates. Also called other non -profit partners, nave- . neighborhood development or- -. become the principal suppliers • a.. ganizations and economic devel - -. of our xration's low- income opment cotponiro , ConcDCs are • ' housing. z phenomenon of the 19 ere are approximately 20 Th are b ase d on cept CDCs and similar o C tha ey co re sidents should in the Twin Cities area Th C define and co ntro l development • larg of these incl VRcst- • - e In their own c rn Project for Pri de in Liv Nearl all CDCs percent) . ing, Inc. t and Twin Cities -Mous- . • are not for profit organizations. ' . frig Development Corporation. . . 0 111/11.111111 4 . 0 • Today,. there are several thousand • ' Between 1988 and 1992, • . CDCs across the nation, with the United Way of Minneapolis • 3 . gr eatest concentration in the Area has provided a series of older cities of the Midwest and one -year grants through the • the Northeast. . Affordable Housing Initiative ' • • In addition, CDCs often • to over a dozeri locally based • finance and operate shopping • . CDCs. ' • • • . .Q 7 Consequences of the • . .affordable housing shortage • : (continued from page 1) • • 90 percent of single-parent families who pay more than 30 percent of their income for housing had to, skip meals; dren are smaller in size, they are • over one =half of the low - more sensitive to being poisoned. income households with Rodents and cockroaches are children had difficulty paying'. . hazard. A recent survey for basic utilities such as heat in the Philips neighborhood in and electricity. South Minneapolis found that Any unexpected expense.can • 47 percent of the families who push these families into home- lived in substandard housing had . Neighborhoods and .Iessness. significant rodent and/or roach • communities also • . Children feel effects of infestations • affected by substandard housing Common structural defects, • .homelessness such as holes and cracks in floors • • When children live in substan- . • and walls, are also common in Not all of the consequences of dard housing, virtually every • substandard housing and result inadequate affordable housing . aspect of their life is disrupted— in higher heating costs.• are home by the individuals. The their health, emotional and . . housing shortage also affects educational well -being One • Families often split neighborhoods and communi- issue they face is that people . up when they lose ties. According to Joe Selvaggio, . who have inadequate housing , their homes executive director of Project for . often move frequently. In fact, Families that lose their homes • Pride in Living, there is a direct 1 of every 3 low- income house- relationship between crime and holds will have moved in the last - affordable housing. In areas two years, compared to 1 in 5 - ' often have to. split up to find • • where basic needs such as hous- ' for the general population. - . housing —two family members • • ing are not met, crime rates • Frequent moving results in to this relative, three to that one, • increase. . erratic school attendance. Inner... ' or mother and children to one Property -values also decline • city teachers say frequent moves • emergency shelter, father to when housing is'poorly main - anothex. impede the progress of children tained..If substandard housing is in special education programs. Children may even be placed investigated by housing inspec Attending school is even more in foster care because of substan -. tors and found to be in violation difficult for homeless children. dard housing or homelessness. of safety codes, absentee land - Ultimately, poorly housed and According to the Children's , lords often decide that the repair homeless children are more Defense Fund report, The State ` isn't•worth their time or money. likely to fall behind and possibly of America's Children 1992, a This results in boarded up, • ' drop out of school. 1986 study of African American I empty homes. • children in foster care found that As properties are abandoned, Safety risks add substandard, overcrowded, un- property values are reduced. another burden affordable 'housing and home- Eventually, the city's tax base People in substandard housing lessness was a factor in 30 per- decreases as businesses in those face numerous safety risks, in- cent of the placements. Only neighborhoods close. cluding lead poisoning. When • 6 percent of the-families were As a neighborhood declines, ingested by children, lead can • offered housing assistance be- - : the sense of community also cause nervous system and kid- fore their children were taken declines. If resident turnover is . ney damage, mental retardation, .from them. . • • high, solidarity breaks down •convulsions and death. Children The emotional stress experi-. . because there is no time to form do not have to eat Lead -based enced by the homeless and . :lasting relationships with neigh - paint chips to get lead poison - poorly housed is often com- born. People feel isolated and • ing. They are exposed to lead pared to post trautnatic stress fear for their own safety. These ' innsoil, dust, fallout from auto disorder (commonly expert -,' . ' consequences should be of . exhaust, and in water from old enced by war.veterans). ; concern to people concerned • oir.es and solder. Because chil about our communities, neigh borhoods, children and families. . _ . - How much does . it cost i to live these days? . . . nterest rates are the low . • emergency budget plan. It is • they have been since the based on the amount of money . " 1970s and sales of single an expert shopper and.nutrition- • ' . _ I family homes are booming. . ist might spend if they had ample • . But despite this good news, • cooking and food storage facil- many individuals can't afford.to ities. Unfortunately, this food buy —or even rent— decent plan does not provide adequate housing. What does it cost to . nutrition over the long term.. ' live these days? Keep in mind It should also be noted that that federal guidelines recom- a two - bedroom housing unit • mend that the percentage a per- - means that two children share • son or family should pay for one bedroom. This may not be • housing is 28 percent of gross • practical if they are a girl and • income. boy. What's more there is no . . A typical budget for a low- ' money in this budget for savings, . • income familyconsisting of one , recreation, gym clothes fot adult and two children, ages 6 children, furniture, an occasional and 9, would look like this treat or even a telephone.. . • If this family of three was on • . Per Month 'Aid to Families with Dependent Rent (2 bedroom). • $479 • Children (AFDC), their grant Food (USDA would be 5532 a month plus . Thrifty Plan) . _ $23 5254 in food stamps, for a total of 5786 per month or 59,432 per • Utilities (does not year. Even this Spartan budgei include telephone) ...... .... - ... .... '. $ 60 would have-to be cut back • Transportation, • • another 5200 a month. . . , (10- year -old car) • $ 58 Whether living on 511,832 a Clothing, household • • year, or on AFDC at 59,432 per personal items • • $135 year, the cost.of housing plays • a critical role in being able to • (511,832 per year). , Total: 5986 afford food, health care and other necessities. Since housing ' Although this budget covers 'is a fixed costa—you get evicted . the bare necessities, it must be if you don't pay on time —it is noted that the amount budgeted • often the other basic needs, such for food is the same number used aS food, where people cut corn- by the United States Department ' ers— especially when 30 to 50 • of Agriculture . (USDA) in the percent of their income is going Thrifty Food Plan, a short-term, for rent or mortgage. /44 \ ,.......„" i Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1633 ____ 612 222 -8423 RECEDE- April 15, 1993 APR 2 1993 CITY OF Cr iivr S SE r: Dear City Manager, I would like to thank the people who participated in the recent series of pre- budget planning meetings hosted by the MWCC. I think we all learned something from the give and take that occurred during these meetings. In addition, I want to share some of the feedback from these meetings with all the city managers in the metro area. The results from our issue survey clearly established the following as the top three priorities of our ratepayers: initiating long term cost savings measures, environmental protection, and avoiding major fluctuations in sewer bills. Participants also clearly stated that if the MWCC has a budget surplus at the end of the year they would like to see the surplus applied to debt reduction. We will keep these priorities in mind as we develop the 1994 budget. Of the oral comments at the meetings, the concerns most commonly discussed were inflow and infiltration (I &I), flow metering, and adjusting the billing system to avoid major fluctuations in charges from year to year. All of these are interrelated. I want to make you aware of some of the steps we have taken to deal with these issues. 1) A staff team has been put together to look at ways we can change our billing procedures to avoid major fluctuations in charges and still stay within the current law. This group is headed by Lois Spear, MWCC Comptroller, and hopes to be able to make adjustments in time for the 1994 budget. We will have a preliminary report at the budget presentation meetings in June, and will schedule separate meetings with city finance directors shortly thereafter to discuss possible options. 2) A team from the Finance and Administrative Services Department is available to help with sewer service cost projections and the establishment of sewer rates if requested by individual cities. If you are interested please call Lois Spear at 229 -2017. 3) Don Bluhm, Municipal Services Manager, has assembled a team of engineers and operations staff to advise municipalities on some of the ways they can begin to address I &I problems. This group has already met with some municipalities in the Lake Minnetonka area, and is available to confer with other municipalities if requested. If you are interested please call Don Bluhm at 229 -2116. Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer es C ‘Bit 4) Several cities with I &I problems have recently enacted programs to address the issue of sump pumps that are hooked up to the municipal wastewater system. These programs have proven to be very successful in reducing I &I. If you would like more information about ways your municipality can approach this problem, please call Don Bluhm at 229 -2116. The next series of budget presentation meetings will be scheduled in early June throughout the metropolitan area. At that time, the MWCC will present its proposed 1994 budget. We hope to see you there. Sincerely, Gordon Voss Chief Administrator - WARNING LITES OF MN, INC. ; ` This is to Certify that Y MIKE WEGLER a a six Flour training course including an introduction to Temporary Traffic Control on tro - and � _ i instruction on the use of Minnesota's 1.992 Appendix 'B' ' I March 31 1993 `, i D ate of Program V' . � Ion _Jackels MnDOT ��.:. ' �-` ; Program D ir Appendix 'B' Trainer ' - -- i ' _ dy, { _ , 1'. � / �._ r ; v' - -�i',•'-' �� $'- � " \V NC,' `•, ,� ` \ !r.� ' v � 1 u�� \ - ‘/ / � l'�l `f1't\:% ,a, ,, ,4;,,G . a `' Q'1 - � F ,• �"1 , � e " ; , i \ .vi" \� �+� '\♦ '= OF MN, INC. z_ WARNING LITES , 7i "14 „ 1 - 7 .4\ - ` This is to Certify that - r."° STEVE SAUTER : -: -. , attended a six Flour training course inc ? an introduction to Temporary Traffic Control and --- _' i instruction on the use of Minnesota's 1992 A ndix 'B' r f _ -� March 31,1993 - .r- Date of Program , .. _r '.� Ton jackels MnDOT_ I ., ` I Program D Appendix' B Trainer ( --... „ 41 ‘. ' ''- '141 r i iM-- - '•.'e.''''-:,..N-‘'-:'!""j.. k * 4'.:-' ;./''' ..6, r ' ' ' ''116: ' ' ' 11 ' r - ' P' *‘' 1. rr i . �i^ mow." .. ; ..,,N ,ri ,, , , f 7 WARNING LITES OF MN, INC. This is to Certify that ... l: = ARP KERBER : >0 attended a six hour training course including ! - an introduction to Temporary Traffic Contrail and ; F -° ` instruction on the use of Minnesota's 1.992 Appendix 'B' • I ik Minch 31,1993 1 Date of • I Progr am 1 j I,__, Jon jackets MnDOT V Program Dir • ., j' Appendix 'B' Trainer i ._/ - ��\t ?r '�� 1 - • ,,..% F Y G A H J J \ r J i l y i y: G " \. ,S R ' oat , YN � r' .� .� ' 1 / ri•. � Y' ... ` e �a x` , 44 , ∎ , v • " -.i s` - ._ WA RNING LITES OF MN, INC. == $ This is to Certify that _- JIM THEIS -f attended a six hour training course including j .= an introduction to Temporary Traffic Control" and instruction on the use of Minnesota's 19.92 Appendix 'B' ; L I. ,.„. , • , _...,, , ,.. i 1 k March 31, 1993 f Date of Program Jon Jackals MnDOT L .; i r ., ..._e_d_Rti ., ` � Program Dir Appendix 'B' Trainer E • 1 fL ir =. H. AL r A fl if" J ' �-�, }/' / ff 1 r t f • f r..L t' A. 1 , l: f `' i.; J'NJac�.: , is 1 .v C .� .. I AI, j' /�F.A'bt . /l 1,„' ' /'' . ijt i \ ' ` ! � ` ( ;-- I _ 1 WARNING LITES OF MN, INC. _ = - .,-.; 2 ,, _,. This is to Certify that -T4 C= -';, , GARY PETERS attended a six Flour training course includi 1 " , ii,,, `.. - ' an introduction to Temporary Traffic Contrd and 7 I instruction on the use of Minnesota 1992 Appendix 'B' Much 31,1993;. . ` _ f, . Date of Program �- . i #104W-1- Jon Jackels MnDOT 'I _F =y I Program Dir . •, Appendix 'B' Trainer 1 , - J a• 1 I l i p r � i n r 5 t s � tt l . N : fr - 41 x.13 A 9 t r \ Y \� i \ f f „<*.',.,, ' ., � ! f "ter • ` . !, �f.,l .. \p /�� { ,�, .� _ l` ] @ \any \ .. 44,, �' t i `,� l7/ �.` \.'. % . \� ivr \% � } ' � .� �'` r - \ \ ? �� "�Y\� "Q. 7 { \1� ";, - �'�M Y `� r n`�v ' 3 f el l it• r.: e � 1 \ Z t t • t i s r r r r r r y WARNING LITES OF MN, INC. i F = =_F ::: . This is to Certify t , - I k." ‘;--4 DEAN ' SABINSKIE ', t _r - ' attended a six Flour training course including � an introduction to Temporary Traffic Contra( and ' , ` 1 instruction on the use of M 1992 Aendix 'B' Appendix _ Yom, I n � Y . 1 March 31, 1993 Date of Program ' ' ;J:Ni: :-- :-'' Y� _4 . , on jackets MnDOT 1 T J { z. v _ E ■ Program Dir Appendix 'B' Trainer T I _ at -•.`, - 1 e t t l t ‘,;.;...s. , t r r f ;. � Ia - L. / / , ,pp,c i / - '��` -� ✓. \ vim. �,. ' irr �`'4/ � r r x�� ",`r i �.x %! F`� t�.'f � ' .,� F � �\ :, � y .c: � i �� s .. 1 +� , aN� y ,, f , c, , �; a,` v Ifs. ,� a �' -� ,r . :; fir, r ;. d f % _ W ARNING LITES OF MN, INC. f� • .. _ This is to Certify tha = iv STEVE OLEN ; I attended a six flour training course including f r an introduction to Temporary Traffic Control' and ! ., & � instruction on the use of Minnesota's 1992 Appendix 'B' # ,'; .- 1 i i Much 31,1993 ; I Date of Program � � ./, Jon jackels MnDOT ' - - - Appendix 'B' Trainer Program Dir • j 1 I I NI 1 \ f . i ♦mo 1' r' 0' r r f J r 4 1 •' , , • _ 0t _CO•1.:. - :_. :_,JJCJJJJJJJJJJ••• C•.- .00••- - - , :,:.,:;_ "Si JSJJJJJJJJ O( ..,CC•l_;.:_: :.;::::,:JJJJJJJJJJJJ _i••• C• COO. ._._.: .:;JJC)>JJJJ_) ) )001 O( LC 00( : "' ::,'� 7JJ/►JJJJJJ )••• CO. Cc•• 1 ._;";1.2';J71):)_)J_ )J 5••1 _ 0L•L_ ` CC' -- _ _ -- _ . , . _ ) _ 1 _ ) " _ " , . 3 i _ ) _ ) . . ) 3 • • • I c k — ., Edward and Mary Ryan 6730 Galpin Boulevard - Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 March 2, 1993 Mayor and City Council Members RE: Lake Lucy Road Extension Dear Mayor and Members of the Council: We were invited to a neighborhood meeting concerning the proposed alignment of the Lake Lucy road extension. To our surprise the presentation proposed the continuation of Lake Lucy Road mapped directly through the middle of our property. The only discussion regarding the placement of the road was to where potentially the road would be placed from Hwy 41. We assumed the meeting was to discuss various alternatives as to where the Lake Lucy Road may be mapped in the future as development occurs. Our concerns as to this particular proposal include the following: 1. The proposed collector road at this time is not a proposal supported by any of the petitioners for development of their particular property. This is a proposal by the city to designate this location as the collector area irrespective of the developer or our concerns. 2. As explained to us at the meeting, there exists a financial incentive to map the road. By mapping the road the city collects additional revenues from the state to support the road system. We feel this is an inappropriate reason to designate the location of the road at this time. Mayor and City Council Members March 2, 1993 Page 2 3. We owned our property before the present Lake Lucy Road was built. Because of our growing family we have considered the option of building a home on the hill directly where the proposed extended Lake Lucy would pass. This proposal would make it virtually impossible for us to even consider such an option. 4. The designation of this extension in this particular location dictates that our property would be split in two, and because of this, any future use will always be required to contemplate this proposed road. This would restrict the use of our property now and into the future. 5. In our discussions, it was presented that there would be a major collector road built to the south of us developed this year to provide traffic connections between Galpin Boulevard and Hwy 41. This collector road should serve adequately for traffic movement now and into the future as a East -West connector. 6. If our neighbors to the north or south would choose to develop at a future time, then at that time it would be appropriate to consider the mapping of the Lake Lucy Road extension. It is not absolutely required that the extension of Lake Lucy Road begin on Galpin Boulevard directly across from the existing Lake Lucy Road. With a major collector to the south, a new collector, if needed in the future, could be planned as development occurs. As the city grows, we understand and appreciate the importance of a measured and comprehensive planning process. This is why it is important that we share with you how very much opposed we are to this proposal and that we need to plan now to reconsider the placement of the proposed extension. Mayor and City Council Members March 2, 1993 Page 3 We would appreciate your consideration of our concerns and look forward to discussing them more completely with you on the evening of March 8, 1993. Sincerely, L; II :11/ kJ" ().-Y Edward M. Ryan Mary . Ryan EMR /jb cc: Don Chmiel, Mayor Mike Mason, Councilman Richard Wing, Councilman Colleen Dockendorf, Councilwoman Mark Senn, Councilman Charles Folch, City Engineer William Englehardt, William R. Englehardt and Associates CITYOF 01 CHANHASSEN 6 90 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Paul Krauss, Planning Director (2x-- DATE: April 26, 1993 SUBJ: Upcoming Eckankar Conference I recently received a call from Doug Kunin at the Temple of Eckankar. He informed me that they were planning to hold a national conference in Minneapolis from June 11 -13. During this time, they will be busing people out to the Temple. He feels that many of these visitors will wish to walk their "contemplation trails" (refer to attached pamphlet). He inquired as to whether there would be any problem if they erected a few temporary shelter tents. Many of the visitors may be elderly and the tents would be used to provide a short rest and liquids. I informed him that this use appeared to be consistent with the approved conditional use permit, but indicated that I would inform you and city staff about the event. I seem to recall they had a similar event that was held during the 1991 World Series and am not aware that there were any difficulties. pc: Scott Harr, Public Safety Director If t 4 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER