Loading...
2. Lake Lucy Road Street and Utility Extension Hwy 41 to Galpin 1 i.,. CITY 0 F -- 1 1 CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • • P.O. BOX 147 • • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 1 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 Action by City Administrator 1, Dell A 1 MEMORANDUM Endorsed Modified_ Rejected Deter a-':L• l_ 1 TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager Dote Submitted to Commission FROM: Charles Folch, City Engineer C Date Sr —,i ted to Council DATE: February 22, 1993 1 SUBJ: Public Hearing on Lake Lucy Road Street and Utility Extension (Trunk Highway 41 to County Road 117 /Galpin Boulevard) i Project No. 92 -12 I This is the public hearing on the feasibility report for the Lake Lucy Road street and utility extension Project No. 92 -12. The City Council authorized the preparation of this feasibility study on July 13, 1992 following receipt of petitions for these improvements by the Westside Baptist Church property located on Trunk Highway 41 and the property located immediately I to the east which is zoned for residential single family and currently owned by Gestach /Paulson /Klingelhutz. The primary objective of the feasibility study was to identify I those public improvements which need to be constructed to allow for development of the church and proposed residential property and define the official alignment for this Lake Lucy Road extension between Trunk Highway 41 and Galpin Boulevard /County Road 117. 1 Based on the feasibility study, it has been determined that only the westerly half of the road extension would need to be constructed in order to allow development of the petitioning I properties. The easterly half of this road segment is not proposed to be constructed at this time. In the future, if the property owner to the east (Ryan) should petition for the road improvement or if future development pressures in the area should warrant, construction 1 of this easterly section could be considered at that time. On Wednesday, February 17, 1993, an informational neighborhood meeting was held with 1 affected property owners to discuss the elements of the proposed project, the associated costs and potential special assessments. Although no representative of the Westside Baptist Church was present at the neighborhood meeting, they did contact staff to formally withdraw 1 their original petition for this improvement project. At this time it is not known what the Westside Baptist Church's intentions are for their property; however, staff is a aware that 1 is 1 tot PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 1 1 Don Ashworth February 22, 1993 1 Page 2 I inquiries have been made by other area property owners to potentially purchase this property. I The project consultant engineer, Mr. Bill Engelhardt of Engelhardt & Associates, will be making a formal presentation of the feasibility report and its findings at the public hearing. At this point it would seem prudent to conduct the public hearing to receive public 1 testimony on the proposed project and determine whether it is appropriate to proceed with the authorization to prepare the project plans and specifications, or otherwise identify any remaining issues which need further investigation. I ktm 1 Attachments: 1. Location map. 2. Staff report dated January 20, 1993. 3. Staff report dated July 9, 1992. 1 4. Phase I and Phase II preliminary cost /revenue schedules. I c: Dave Hempel, Assistant City Engineer Mr. Bill Engelhardt, Engelhardt & Associates Mr. Allan Larson, Engelhardt & Associates 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N 1 LOCATION MAP 4\-\ i NO SCALE I R N E ° v� i 1 - - r EMS ' KOE.7"�;� • 111111111P 1111 NIL -• ..„.4 ... - - .... sty maw, RieTA *111 ' � �� I Eit / ��� 4 S ��. ma c., r ara► ` r _, .5. fl i t ' HERMAN F /ELD !� qulla _ r • or �.�; vs litti.k.u... PARK I 1 MAIDEN. k4ii . Z - oGE 41 1 ,. . . O l Z b 16M1M1 11....4i i iall al' • alEr____mcIr . •., 4kil . C4 4 .! 3 IIIIWi,1 c Y , ilk•: . Ilk. _ _ _ _ _ _ ________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,_-_-_ _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- - - _ r a v - - Of{ E ct: a NM. ....., ARR/ ,SON `. . Mil 4 1 ca et ■ g) iv O 1 m 1 9 1 C ITYOF -- 1 CHANHASSEN 1 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 MEMORANDUM 1 TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager = , " FROM: Charles Folch, City Engineer --aw.-- 1 DATE: January 20, 1993 I SUBJ: Receive Feasibility Report on Lake Lucy Road Street and Utility Extension; Call Public Hearing Project No. 92 -12 1 At their regular meeting on July 13, 1992, the City Council authorized the preparation of 1 a feasibility study for extension of street and utilities for Lake Lucy Road between Trunk Highway 41 and County Road 117 (Galpin Boulevard). I have attached a copy of the July 9, 1992 staff report which provides some background on the impetus and some of the issues 1 involved in this improvement project which has been previously identified as a future road element of the City's comprehensive guide plan amended in May of 1991. It is not staffs' intent to recommend construction of this entire road segment at this time; however, the I proposed development on the west end of this general area forces the City into at least defining an appropriate alignment for the entire collector road and constructing the public I improvements needed for the development. In this manner, the City is able to pro- actively plan for this road improvement prior to development. This philosophy is also being implemented on other projects such as the Trunk Highway 5 north boulevard access road 1 and Trunk Highway 101 south. The specific elements of this proposed improvement project are identified in the study along I with estimated project costs and associated special assessments to benefitting properties. Staff and the project engineer have scheduled an informal neighborhood meeting to be held on Wednesday, February 17, 1993 at 7:00 PM in the Courtyard Conference Road to discuss 1 this proposed project. At the formal public hearing for this project, the project engineer will provide a presentation I of this feasibility report and its findings. The only action necessary for the Council tonight would be to formally receive the feasibility study and call for a public hearing at their regular meeting on March 8, 1993. 1 tot/ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 1 1 Don Ashworth January 20, 1993 I Page 2 It is therefore recommended that the City Council formally receive the feasibility study for 1 street and utility improvements for the extension of Lake Lucy Road and officially map the alignment between Trunk Highway 41 and County Road 117 (Galpin Boulevard) Project No. ' 92 -12, and call for a public hearing on March 8, 1993. jms 1 Attachment: 1. Feasibility study. 2. Staff report dated July 9, 1992. 1 c: Dave Hempel, Assistant City Engineer Al Larson, Engelhardt & Associates I Brian Pike, Westside Baptist Church David Gestach, Gestach & Paulson Construction Brian Klingelhutz, Klingelhutz & Geis 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CiZ -1 • r C ITYOF -- i‘ CHANHASSEN ' 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 �f (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 - Action by City Administrator ' Eadorsad_ ✓ D tA1 MEMORANDUM sew Deta._..7 - q 1 TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager ate submitted to CommiallY1 FROM: Charles Folch, City Engineer eij at'' Submitted to C ter DATE: July 9, 1992 1 SUBJ: Authorize Preparation of Feasibility Study for Extension of Lake Lucy Road Between Galpin Boulevard (County Road 17) and Trunk Highway 41 Project No. 92 -12 ' The City has recently been contacted by two adjacent property owners located in the southeast quarter of Section 4 and southwest quarter of Section 3 concerning development proposals. Both properties are located on the east side of Trunk Highway 41 immediately ' south of the Minnetonka Middle School property. The property immediately adjacent to Trunk Highway 41 is approximately 10 acres in size and is the location for a new church site. The adjacent property to the east is approximately 26 acres in size and is tentatively ' proposed for residential single - family development. Road access is a key element for both developments. The church property has a pre - existing driveway access on Trunk Highway 41. The single - family development may also have a cross- access easement over the church ' property out to Trunk Highway 41. Both are believed to be inappropriate access facilities to these sites given the proposed developments. 1 The City's comprehensive guide plan amended in May, 1991 identified the extension of Lake Lucy Road from Galpin Boulevard (County Road 117) west to Trunk Highway 41 as a needed future collector street improvement. The topography and environmental features of this area make routing a roadway alignment very challenging, particularly on the west end towards Trunk Highway 41. It is not staffs intent to recommend constructing this entire road segment at this time; however, the two proposed developments on the west end which lie within the general area of the Lake Lucy Road extension sort of force the City into, at a minimum, defining the most appropriate alignment for this collector road through these sites. In effect, the City needs to be in the position of proactively determining the 1 alignment. 1 et 1 ov PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 1 Don Ashworth 1 July 9, 1992 Page 2 1 The length of the future Lake Lucy Road between Galpin Boulevard and Trunk Highway 1 41 is a little over a half -mile. At this time it would be appropriate to define and officially map the entire future collector road alignment and perform a feasibility study on only the westerly quarter -mile of this road segment which will initially serve these two development 1 sites. I have contacted Bill Engelhardt of William R. Engelhardt & Associates, who has some familiarity from previous involvement associated with this road to provide a cost estimate to perform this feasibility study and official mapping. Bill has estimated this work I to cost approximately $ 10,000. Being that this future roadway will ultimately serve as more of a community -wide roadway system and is in the City's long -range comprehensive I transportation guide plan, the cost to perform this study will have to be up- fronted by the City; however, it will likely be recovered over a number of years as tracts of land abutting this roadway develop and the corresponding construction projects take place and pay their 1 share of the roadway improvement costs. It is therefore recommended that the official mapping of the extension of Lake Lucy Road I between Galpin Boulevard (County Road 117) and Trunk Highway 41 and the preparation of a feasibility study for the road improvement project of approximately the westerly quarter -mile of this segment be authorized, Project No. 92 -12, and that the consulting engineering firm of William R. Engelhardt & Associates be assigned as the engineer on the project. ktm Attachment: Location Map 1 c: Dave Hempel, Sr. Engineering Technician Brian Pike, Westside Baptist Church I Dave Gestach Brian Klingelhutz Bill Engelhardt 1 1 1 1 1 1 FINANCING: The financing for this project is proposed from several sources: State Aid, local funds, storm sewer funds and special assessments. State Aid /local funds may be utilized for a portion of the cost for street construction, storm sewer costs and sidewalk costs within the proposed right -of -way. The total cost of State Aid /local eligible improvements are: Alternate No. 1 Alternate No. 2 Street Construction 28% $107,199.79 $ 99,581.72 Storm Sewer Construction 50% $ 69,508.00 $ 69,508.00 Sidewalk Construction 50% $ 35,484.80 $ 34,651.50 STATE AID /LOCAL ELIGIBLE $212,192.59 $203,741.22 Assessable construction cost: Street Construction 72% $272,656.61 $256,067.28 Storm Sewer Construction 50% $ 69,508.00 $ 69,508.00 Sidewalk Construction 50% $ 35,484.00 $ 35,484.00 Sanitary Sewer Construction $ 54,873.00 $ 54,873.00 $435,522.41 $415,099.78 NOTE: 1) Street construction, State Aid and local share includes street widening and typical street section greater than standard section (28 %). 2) Street construction, assessment includes standard residential street and section (72 %). 3) The above estimated costs do not include costs associated with right -of -way acquisition. 10 NJ 11 FINANCING OPTION: Alternate No. 1 Alternate No. 2 11 Total Project Cost $647,715.00 $618,841.00 State Aid /Local Share < - $212,193.00 > < - $203,741.00 > Assessment Amount $435,522.00 $415,100.00 Street, Storm. Sidewalk $380,645.00 $360,227.00 Sanitary Sewer $ 54,873.00 $ 54,873.00 Assessment Amount $435,522.00 $415,100.00 Construction Cost /FF = Alternate No. 1 $67.24/FF - Street, Storm, Sidewalk $29.69/FF - Sanitary Sewer Cost /FF = Alternate No. 2 $78.34/FF - Street, Storm, Sidewalk 11 $50.57/FF - Sanitary Sewer 11 A detailed assessment roll is presented in Appendix B of this 11 report. 1 01 1 1 11