C Strategic Plan UpdateMEMORANDUM
CITYOF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone: 9522271100
fax 952227.1110
Building Inspections
Fax 9522271190
Engineering
Phone 9522271160
Fax: 9522271170
Finance
Fax: 9522271110
Park & Recreation
R',one: 9522271120
Fax: 9522271110
Becreation 6eoter
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone: 9522271400
Fax: 9522271404
Planning &
Natural Resources
?hone: 9522271130
Fax: 952 2271110
Public Works
159! Park Road
Plsone: 9522271300
Fax: 952 2271310
Senior Center
Fax: 9522271110
Web Site
,,~ww ci chanhassen mn us
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Todd Gerhardt, City Manager
Justin Miller, Assistant to the City Manager ,--5,,e~
October 2, 2003 ~~
Strategic Plan Update - Economic Development
One of the goals addressed in the City of Chanhassen Strategic Plan is:
"Economic Development: to maintain the quality and accelerate the speed
with which our economic development occurs."
The specific strategies and the progress towards each are outlined below:
2005 MUSA Issues
1. Expedite review process in order to accelerate opening 0{'2005
MUSA
The draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) has been
presented to the planning commission and will be open for public
comment through October. It is planned to be presented in November for
City Council review. While this AUAR does not approve any specific
development, it sets the framework for opening the 2005 MUSA area
earlier than would have been possible without an AUAR process in place.
2. Evaluate methods to replace commercial/industrial land that could
potentially be used for Town and Country housing, development
It is anticipated that there will be an industrial/commercial development
component in the 2005 MUSA area. While the overall land use mix has
not been established for the area, staff continues to look at all possibilities
and if an overabundance of commercial or industrial land is proposed,
alternative areas will be evaluated. It is worth noting that according to
information presented by Ehlers and Associates during the Key Financial
Strategies process, the City is closely in line with similar communities in
terms of the amount of commercial tax base as a percentage of total tax
base (see attached Ehlers information).
Hiehwav 212/312
1. Establish vision of the corridor
When the first section of 212/312 was built through Eden Prairie,
an "Aesthetic Design Guide" was established. This design guide
presented architectural and aesthetic design recommendations
which were coordinated with Eden Prairie, Chanhassen, Chaska,
The Cily of Chanhassen · A growing community with clean lakes quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks A great place to live work and play
Carver County and Hennepin County. These recommendations
addressed issues such as bridge design, street lighting, landscaping,
etc. It is staff's recommendation that the City continue to work
with MnDOT and neighboring communities to ensure that these
design standards are incorporated into the final 212/312
construction plans. (Aesthetic Design Guide attached)
2. Continue to work with MnDOT and other agencies to ensure that
the final ali~,nment meets our needs in terms of'
a. Access to downtown Chanhassen
b. Appropriate number and location of intersections
c. Reduced impact on residential developments already in place
Reviews of the alignments are being conducted by each community
impacted by the construction. Engineering and Community Development
staff are reviewing the plans and submitting comments to MnDOT. Issues
that are being addressed include noise barriers, wetland mitigation, trail
connections, and intersection locations. The new schedule will clearly
speed up the review timeline, which will require added staff resources.
However, staff sees this project as a priority and will spend the necessary
time to protect the City of Chanhassen's interests as planning continues
and construction begins.
3. Monitor legislation and maintain contact with state representatives
to encourage a more rapid timeframe in highway construction
In early August, MnDOT announced that Highway 212/312 construction
will be advanced by eight years, with construction beginning in 2005 and
expected to conclude by 2008. This schedule is many years ahead of
schedule, and this acceleration will help spur economic development
throughout the City. One of the main reasons for this accelerated schedule
is due to the support and diligence of our state representatives, our
participation in the Southwest Transportation Coalition, and our working
relationship with MnDOT. (Accelerated project fact sheet attached)
4. Maintain an exceptional and ongoing communications system with
the community that informs them of the highway's current status
The accelerated progress of Highway 212/312 received a high level of
local press coverage so it is believed that the general public is aware of its
progress. However, we will continue to be vigilant in updating the public
about the project through many forums. Links to the MnDOT project
website will be provided on the City website, updates will continue to be
given to the Council through presentations which are televised on Channel
8, and we will also use the quarterly newsletter to update the public. Other
possibilities could be open houses/forums where City and MnDOT
officials can be available for questions.
Support the marketplace driven development of industrial land
1. Continue to market available land to potential developers
Staff is called upon almost daily for questions regarding available land in
the City. We have provided the "Available Land Inventory" on the City's
website, and have also updated the City's profile on the State's
Department of Trade and Economic Development website. This resource
provides demographic information (incomes, workforce, transportation
capabilities, amenities, etc.) to developers looking for information about
Minnesota communities. (Land inventory attached)
2. Coordinate economic summit of major landowners/developers to
determine strategies for timely development
The idea of an economic summit is being considered for Fall 2003. Local
landowners, developers, realtors, and other interested parties will be
invited to discuss topics and generate ideas to how the City can help
facilitate economic growth. The format of the summit will be similar to
the housing summit held by the City in 2002.
Leverayte City property as much as possible
1. Evaluate City-owned parcels and determine how to best develop
them
Staff is approached often about selling City-owned property, namely the
former Apple Valley Red-E-Mix and Pony-Pauly Pryzmus sites. Many
times the proposed uses are ill-suited for the property. Staff will continue
to market City-owned property but will require that appropriate uses are
proposed before serious negotiations are begun.
2. Conclude sale of bowling, alley and Pony-Paul¥-Prvzmus
properties
A purchase agreement with Bloomberg Companies was executed on May
29th and they have recently submitted their site plan for the redevelopment
of the area. The planning commission is scheduled to review it on
September 16th with City Council review planned for October. Pending
site plan approval, final sale of the property is scheduled for November
14th. The developer is still planning on demolishing the existing building
before the end of 2003, with construction beginning in Spring 2004.
Staff continues to receive interest from potential developers on the Pony-
Pauly-Pryzmus site (adjacent to Old Village Hall). This is a difficult site
to develop due to the architectural character of neighboring uses, so a
unique project will be required. Staff will continue to market the site and
entertain offers from interested parties.
S Io S o6ed
%8'88
%0'0
%0'8
%S'8
%8'09
%0'0
%6'ff
%8'8
%0'0
%8'8
%§'9
999'9 !-
6Z9'8
C88'8
8L8
OS'c' L
89t,
690' L
eNuolauuIIN
%§'SI.
%0'0
%99
%0'0
%~"6t~
%0'0
%9'9
%8'LL
%0'0
%9'g
%§'9
lu~3J~d
Off2'O L
989' t
L99
SSO'S
869
602' t
998
ff99
seJo¥
eu!p3
8008/6 t/Z
3NI $]IVl3OSSV "~
SB3'lH3
088'88 0t,8'88 60 I. '9 8 t ff'Z !.
%~-'01- 8 LC'8 %S'Og 0'S89'~ %g'89 ~Sg'g %90 L ZffS' L
%frO 98 %90 g'Sg L %9'g 968 %8'~ SSg
%0'~ 8~ %8'~ 9'960' L %6' L 09 ~ %0'9 OZ8
%8'L LO~ %~'6 ~'g0~'8 %8'g 998 %0'0
%8'S~ Z~'O~ %8'09 6TgO'Z %0'Zg 666'g %g'lg 069'g
%L'LL O~S'~ %L'8 O'L9D'L %0'0 %0'0
%8'~ 0~9 %~'~t ~'~tO'~ %8'~ 909 %~'~ t98'g
%S'8 t 098'~ %0'0 %0'8 t 99~' t %6'6 9~Z' [
%0'0 %Z'8 6'6 L9 %Z'O 09 %Z' L ff6~
%9'6 66t'g %6'Z t'~ t8' t %k'~ t6 t %t '9 SgO' t
%0'~ 0 L6 % t'g 8' tg~ %~' t 86 %8' t8 069'8
~nqpoo~ qlno~Aid ~aiAaJOqS e6eAes
qVl01
elqedole^epun
ash pex!l~
/qfsuea H6!H le!luepfsebl
XUsue(] um!pe~l le!luep!sebl
/~l!sueO MO] leiluepfsel~
lO-I e§J~-I le!luep!sal=l
oilqnd-fUJeS/o!lqnd
coeds uedo ~ sNmd
eo!llO
leiJlsnpul/o3ylO
9sn pu~
%§'t
%t'8
%Z'g
%~"6
%0'81;'
%0'0
%691.
%8'0
%8'6
%8'S
080'9
06
88l,
988
'~9S
020' t
9ff
9ti
269
098
Se Joy
%0'0
%9'0
%8'0
%9'28
%9
%8'9 t
%g't,
%0'0
%9'0
OZS' t 8
80t
LZ
808'k
898'9
OgS'g
t,86
se)te-I ou!'l
9Z8'8 009'6 99£:'28 ogz't,
%8'L8 8 t t,'8 %8'Z8 069'8 %Z'8 t 899'8 %Z'O t 8ZS'
%0'0 %8'0 b8 %0'0 %6'0 t'8 t
%Z'O 89 % L '8 96 t %9'0 80 L %Z'8 86~
%Z'6 098 %0'0 %g'0 tZ %8'k 689
%Z' t 8 086' t %t~'98 6g1~'8 %6'88 tgg's % t 'Zg gZt,'S
%Z'§2 6Z8'8 %Z'S t Zgb' t %9'09 t l~g'g t %8'9 t Zing'8
%0'9 Zt, t, %g'C t LC %0'0 %t,'8 8t~8'
% t'g gZ8 %0'g t 608' t % t'O 88 %6'6 99t,'
%0'8 9ZL %0'0 %0'0 %8'0 ZL t
%Z'g OCl~ %S'8 t~6Z %8'0 Z9 %9'8 698'
%~-' t 86 %8'8 098 %9' t I~9~ %fi' t 8t8
JuegJSd $8J3¥ lueoJ8d $ojov lueoJed s8J3¥ lueoj8d seJOV
uol6u!tuJeJ e)iseqc) Ja^opuv uassequeqg
(eeJe lelOI ]o lUeOJed)
zees- sm J40 03~03-135 I~0=1 Al~o93J.~o 35n aN~'l
se!beleJlS le!Oueu!_-I Xayl ~ LJeSSeLtueqo to Xl!O
REPORI PURPOSE
THIS DESIGN GUIDE PRESENTS ARCHITECTURAL AND AESTHETIC DESIGN
recommendations which have been coordinated with the Cities of Eden Prairie, Chanhassen
and Chaska and Carver and Hennepin County for the T.H. 212 Transportation Corridor.
This corridor is located in the southwestern region of the Twin Cities metropolitan area. The
corridor location is shown in Figure 1.
Twin City Metro Area
Minnesota
T.H. 212 SOUTH%'EST CORRIDOR
Figure 1 - Project Location
The Aesthetic Design Guide addresses the architectural details of those highway elements that
will have an effect on the visual environment created by this project. It is based upon the
principle that choices can be made to improve the appearance of our highways, as well as,
enhance the environments through which they pass. The aesthetic design recommendations
of this guide will make clear the relationship between highway engineering and aesthetic
design, and how attention to pleasing aesthetic solutions, together with functional and
economic considerations, can satisfy the broader requirements of promoting visual quality and
improving quality of life.
This Aesthetic Design Guide establishes the architectural and aesthetic design
recommendations for the major design elements of the T.H. 212 highway corridor. It has
been prepared as a guide for designers who will be responsible for the final design of this
project. The guide incorporates local community ideas concerning this project and is intended
for typical design situations. When unique situations arise, where standard solutions are not
appropriate, designers should apply the principles of these guidelines so that approved
aesthetic design alternatives blend with the project as a whole. All design modifications and
alternatives to the architectural and aesthetic recommendations contained herein should be
coordinated with the Site Development Unit, Office of Teebnlcal Support, through the T.H.
212 Corridor Manager.
The recommendations of the Aesthetic Design Guide for the T.H. 212 Transportation
Corridor should be applied during all final design phases of this project.
7
I
I
1
1
DESIGN ELEMENTS
The highway design process includes a number of disciplines, each contributing to the quality
of the highway corridor. An important aspect of the highway design process is visual quality
and aesthetics of individual design elements, which collectively must be coordinated in a
complimentary manner to provide a clear sense of order, harmony and continuity.
The following highway design elements will establish the archkectnral and visual framework
for the T.H. 212 Highway Corridor. They are the primary aesthetic design elements
throughout the corridor that most directly will affect perceptions concerning the relationship
between this highway and the surrounding environment. These elements include:
I
i
!
I
I
1
I
I
I
i
Bridges and Structures
Retaining Walls
Noise Walls
Grading
Barriers
Special Surface Treatment
Signing
Lighting
Landscaping
Fencing
Wetlands and Ponds
Transit Facilities
Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities
Collectively, these aesthetic recommendations will create the desired visual expression of the
highway corridor. Application of these corridor-specific architectural guidelines should be
fully integrated with the engineering requirements of the highway design elements.
I
I
1
!
!
10
BEIDC ES STEUCTUEES
Bridge structures are typically the strongest visual and physical design elements in
transportation corridors. Unlike the long-span bridge in a spectacular setting, most highway
bridges are short-span structures occurring at frequent intervals and are part of a highway
corridor or larger transportation system.in which individual structures are designed uniformly
for visual continuity. Repetitive use of materials and architectural treatments that exhibit
strong visual character and quality will help to achieve consistency and an attractive
appearance.
The blending of a bridge structure into its setting is also an important aesthetic consideration.
Once a highway corridor, bridge or interchange is constructed, it becomes a prominent
landscape feature that immediately changes the character of the physical environment.
Designers must understand these changes and incorporate aesthetic values into the designs of
bridges and highway corridors so that compatibility with the surrounding area or community
results. On projects where there is local demand for special bridge design treatments, cost
sharing may be required by the local government agency.
The design of the T.H. 212 bridges should also be developed in accordance with the
Minnesota Department of Transportation Aesthetic Guidelines for Bridge Design manual
available from the Office of Bridge and Structures.
AESTHETIC DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
Hierarchy
Continuity between bridge components is an important aesthetic consideration in the urban
highway corridor. Unlike their rural counterparts, freeway bridges occur much more
frequently and are often viewed in rapid succession in aa urban highway corridor.
Consequently, they must be designed with a similar appearance so that when the bridges are
viewed together, they appear to belong to one group or design of structures. See Figures 3
through 6. Continuity of appearance is achieved in visual treatment of the railing system.
A design hierarchy for the bridge railing systems will announce key bridges within the
highway corridor. Three levels of aesthetic design treatment will be provided corresponding
to the importance of the bridge and/or interchange within the community. Bridge structures
receiving the highest level of architectural and visual enhancement are those considered
gateways to the community from the highway corridor. They will be distinguished by arching
decorative metal railings and stylized lighting fixtures, which vary with each community.
Bridges considered secondary community entrances will share a similar railing design, but
will not include decorative lighting. Color will be used on these components to reinforce
dominant visual themes and add interest to the appearance of these structures. All other
bridges in the highway corridor should receive the basic architectural and aesthetic treatments
recommended for this project.
11
!
I'
!
!
!
I
I
!
!
i
I
I
i
I
i
!
!
!
i
I
I
i
I
I
I
!
!
!
!
·
ii
Figure 3 - Design Hierarchy (Type 1 Bridges)
Bridge No. 27148 - Prairie Center Drive over T.I-I. 212 in Eden Prairie
Bridge No. 10040 - T.H. 101 over T.H. 212 in Chanhassen
Bridge No. 10032 T.H. 41 over T.I-I. 212 in Chaska
Figure 4 - Design Hierarchy (Type 2 Bridges)
Bridge No. 27147 - Mitchell Road over T.H. 212 in Eden Prairie
Bridge No. 10024 - County Road 147 Connection over T.H. 212 in Chaska Township
Figure 5 - Design Hierarchy (Type 3 Bridges)
12
Figure 6 - Design Hierarchy (Type 4 Bridges)
Design Type
General Description
2
4
Arching, decorative metal protective screen with City symbols and
decorative lighting on concrete railing (11'-4" Total Height).
Arching, decorative metal protective screen on concrete railing
(11'-4" Total Height).
Non-arching, decorative metal protective screen on concrete
railing (8'-4" Total Height).
Concrete traffic railing only (2'-8" Total Height).
Figure 7 - Design Hierarchy Summary
l
1
1
1
All bridges in the T.H. 212 highway corridor are classified as 'Level B' structures for
aesthetic design purposes in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Transportation
AeszheticDesign Guidelines for Bridge Design manual. As such, the maximum increased cost
for aesthetic design enhancement of each bridge is limited to 7 percent of the structure cost,
but not to exceed $300,000 as defined by Technical Memorandum No. 96-37-B-04, December
11, 1996.
13
sodA~,L u~!so(I o~p!.qI - g a.m~]d
(~u!Do'-I poinpaqaS JO .~ap.~0 u! pals!q) oauo.ioJOll uo!lgaoq iu.~ouoD
(IJ c~ - 3ZIS)
090'1 N:ISSVHNVH:3
IIII
I'l--I I I I I I
i i i i II I ! I I
LIGHTING
Continuous roadway lighting will be provided in the freeway section of the T.H. 212 highway
corridor between C.$.A.H. 4 and 1-494 in Eden Prairie. It will also be provided along the
T.H. 5 connection near Wallace Road. Interchange lighting will be provided throughout the
remainder of the highway corridor, including the gore areas of interchange ramps and ramp
terminal intersections. While the primary function of this lighting is to assist motorists in
guidance and navigation tasks required to travel safely, an orderly and visually pleasing
lighting design also contributes to the architectural and visual success of an urban highway
corridor. For this reason, lighting elements also need to be visually coordinated.
Lighting can also be used exclusively for architectural treatment of transportation structures.
As a result of public involvement in the bridge planning and design process on this project,
a corridor-specific architectural concept has been established involving use of ornamental
bridge railings and stylized lighting fixtures. These treatments correspond to the symbolic
importance of various bridge structures within the communities through which the highway
corridor passes. Also refer to the Bridges and Structures Section of this Aesthetic Design
Guide.
When the local governmental agency desires to have lighting units on bridge structures or
along local roads within the highway corridor, they will be responsible for cost participation.
When decorative units are placed on bridges, the cost will be considered part of the aesthetic
enhancement as defined by Technical Memorandum No. 96-37-B-04, December 11, 1996.
Designers should consult local officials regarding specific requirements. Technical
Memorandum No. 94-33-T-07 dated August 22, 1994 outlines Mn/DOT's roadway lighting
cost participation policy applicable to this project.
AESTHETIC DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
Type
The recommended lighting unit for continuous roadway lighting is the Mn/DOT standard high
mast galvanized steel unit. Davit poles with the cobra head fixture will be used for
interchange lighting systems. See Figure 34. The architectural lighting units recommended
by the local communities for the gateway bridges are shown in Figures 35 through 37.
Location
Highway lighting systems should be designed to protect adjacent properties from unnecessary
illnmination and glare. High mast lighting units will be typically located in median areas.
Davit poles will be located in side grass berm areas. The architectnral lighting units will be
placed on bridges and should be designed as a component of the bridge rafting system. See
Figure 3. Conduits on bridges should be desigued so that they are hidden from the direct
view of motorists and pedestrians.
39
Svecifications
* Stainless Steel Lowering
System
* Flood Lighting Fixtures
1000 Watt HI~S Lamps
* Millerbemd Mfgr, Inc.
Tapered, 16-Sided
Cmlwmized Steel Pole
(100-129 rt m)
H-Base
LIGHTING
UNIT TYPE
3-100
5
Svecifications
* Cobra Head Luminaire
200 Watt HPS Lamp
Millerbemd Mf~r, Inc.
Tapered, 16-Sided
Stainless Steel Davit
Style Pole (30-50 Ft Hr)
H-Base
LexinHon, Inc.
Tapered, Round
Alumi-lllI1 Davit
Style Pole (30-50 Ft Hr)
T-Base
LIGHTING UNIT TYPE 9-40
Figure 34 - Roadway Lighting Unit Designs
Specifications
* Antique Street Lamps, Inc.
Hartford Series Post
Model H12/10-CAfBK
12 Ft Ht
Fluted, Tapered Cast Aluminum Shaft
Polycarbonate Prismatic Sphere Refractor
10 Inch Base
Figure 35 - Eden Prairie Lighting Unit Design
Specifications
* Antique Street Lamps, Inc.
Central Park Series Post
Model CP 12/18-CAfBK
12 Ft Ht
10 Inch Base
Figure 36 - Chanhassen Lighting Unit Design
41
Specifications
* Holophane Company, Inc.
Capital Cast Alu~-~-,nn Post
12 Ft Ht
Albany Arm Bracket
Utility Crra~ville r
without Fin/al, 150 Watt, Type 5
10 Inch Base
Figure 37 - Chaska Lighting Unit Design
Painting and Finishing
All highway lighting units will be aluminum or galvanized or stainless steel.
The color of the architectural lighting units placed on bridges should be coordinated with the
metal railing systems of these structures and should Jade Mist Green conforming to U.S.
paint Corporation color chip H4089. See painting and finishing recommendations in the
Bridges and Structures Section of this Aesthetic Design Guide.
The type and finish of lighting units placed along city streets should match local design
themes.
42
The Pawlenty/Molnau Transportation Package
~\~NESo~
¢~ Building More.
~ ~ Building Faster.
o.~ Moving Better.
Map #9
Highway 212
Henne3in and Carver Counties
Project Location:
Hi0hway 212 from Hennepin County Road 4
to Carver County Road 147, in Eden Prairie,
Chanhassen, Chaska, Carver and
Dahlgren, approximately 10 miles
Project Description:
Construct four-lane freeway on new
alignment
Average Daily Traffic Volumes:
Current: 22,000; projected 2025:43,500
Total Construction Cost:
$225.4 million total
Design Build: Yes
Design Build Time Savings:
18 months
Previous Start Date:
2013
Accelerated Start Date:
2005
Number of Years Advanced:
Benefits:
Improve traffic flow, increase capacity,
create a vital link to Western Minnesota and
South Dakota.
Metro
Mn/DOT District 8 and Metro
(651) 582-1409
,/ )
July 31, 2003
uasseque40 jo XI!O
uu,~
/~JO~UOAUl pue9 alqel!eAV
City of Chanhassen
Available Land Inventory
Commercial/Industrial
Site #
PID Number
Acreage
Site Address
l
Legal Description
2.93
Zoning Land Use
Century Blvd./West 78th Street
Water Sewer Assessments
Outlot D, Arboretum Village PUD-
Neighborhood
Commercial
TIF Access Via
Commercial Yes Yes Yes
Miscellaneous
No Century Blvd./West 78th Street
Contact Name
Pulte Homes
651-452-5200
Site # PID Number Acreage
Site Address
2 25-0101800 15 acres
Legal Description Zoning Land Use
7750 Galpin Blvd.
Water Sewer Assessments
SE lA of Section 9 A-2
TIF Access Via
Low Density
Y Y Y
Miscellaneous
N West 78th Street
Contact Name
J. P. Links
c/o John Przymus
642 Santa Vera Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Bluff Creek Primary Zone
Site # PID Number Acreage
Site Address
3 25-O75OO9O
Legal Description Zoning
Outlot, Arboretum Business PUD
Park 2nd
TIF Access Via
27 Hwy. 5 & 41
Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
Office/ Y Y ?
Industrial
Miscellaneous
Y Future local street
Contact Name
Chaska Gateway
3610 Co. Rd. 101
Wayzata, MN 55391
(952) 473-5650
23 acre corporate site and 4 acre commercial site
Site # PID Number Acreage
4 25-0750010
Legal Description Zoning
Lot 1, Block 1, Arboretum
Business Park 2nd
TIF Access Via
PUD
4.4
Land Use
Office/
Industrial
Y Water Tower Place
Contact Name
Chaska Gateway
3610 Co. Rd. 101
Wayzata, MN 55391
(952) 473-5650
Site Address
2932 Water Tower Place
Water Sewer Assessments
y y 9
Miscellaneous
Site # PID Number
5 25-0760020
Legal Description
Lot 2, Block 1, Arboretum 3rd
Contact Name
Chaska Gateway
3610 Co. Rd. 101
Wayzata, MN 55391
(952) 473-5650
Access Via
82nd Street
Zoning
PUD
Acreage Site Address
2.3 2910 82nd Street
Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
Office Y Y
Industrial
Miscellaneous
Site # PID Number Acreage
6 25-0740040
Legal Description
Arboretum Business Park
TIF I Access Via
Y [ Century Blvd.
Contact Name
Chaska Gateway
3610 Co. Rd. 101
Wayzata, MN 55391
(952) 473-5650
Zoning
PUD
12.2
Land Use
Industrial
Site Address
xxxx Century Blvd.
Watery [ Sewer I AssessmentSy
Miscellaneous
Site # PID Number Acreage
7 25-0160800 44.75
Legal Description Zoning Land Use
A2 Office/
Industrial
TIF Access Via
N Galpin Blvd./Lyman Blvd.
Contact Name
Merle Volk
16925 Co. Rd. 40
Carver, MN 55315
Pat Minger
(952) 867-2733
Site Address
8470 Galpin Blvd.
Water Sewer Assessments
Y Y Y
Miscellaneous
Site # PID Number Acreage
8 25-0100900 126.5 acrcs
Legal Description Zoning Land Use
SE lA of Section 10
TIF Access Via
Contact Name
Michael Gorra
1660 Arboretum Blvd.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
(952) 474-7124
Ag
Site # PID Number Acreage
9 25-0101100 2.42
Legal Description Zoning Land Use
Site Address
1680 Arboretum Blvd.
Water Sewer Assessments
Miscellaneous
Site Address
1660 Arboretum Blvd.
Water Sewer Assessments
TIF Access Via
Miscellaneous
Contact Name
State of Minnesota - DOT
395 John Ireland Blvd.
631 Transportation Bldg.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Site # PID Number
lO 25-0101000
Legal Description
Acreage
1.16
Zoning Land Use Water
Site Address
1620 Arboretum
Sewer Assessments
TIF Access Via
Miscellaneous
Contact Name
State of Minnesota - DOT
395 John Ireland Blvd.
631 Transportation Bldg.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Site # PID Number Acreage
11 25-0150300 23.43
Legal Description Zoning Land Use
N Section 15
TIF Access Via
Contact Name
Creek Five Assoc.
c/o Land Group, Inc.
123 3rd Street N.
Minneapolis, MN 55401
(612) 333-2244
Site # PID Number Acreage
12 25-1210030 61,290
Legal Description Zoning Land Use
Bluff Creek Corporate Center
TIF Access Via
Site Address
1891 Arboretum Blvd.
Water Sewer Assessments
Miscellaneous
Site Address
Water Sewer Assessments
Miscellaneous
Contact Name
Bluff Creek Partners
c/o Land Group, Inc.
123 3rd Street N.
Minneapolis, MN 55401
(612) 333-2244
Site # PID Number Acreage
13 25-4520020 22.85
Legal Description Zoning Land Use
McGlynn Park
TIF I Access Via
Contact Name
Love 4 One Another
7801 Audubon Road
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Site Address
Water Sewer Assessments
Miscellaneous
Site # PID Number Acreage
14 25-0151210 38.76
Legal Description Zoning Land Use
SE 1/4 Section 15
A2 & lOP
Office/
Industrial/Park
/
Open Space
TIF Access Via
N Audubon Road future
Contact Name
Osmonics, Inc.
5951 Clearwater Drive
Minnetonka, MN
952-933-2277
Water
Y
Site Address
Audubon Road
Sewer Assessments
Y Y
Miscellaneous
Extensive wetlands on west
Site # PID Number Acreage
15 25-1790040
Legal Description
Outlot B, Chanhassen Business
Center
TIF Access Via
Y Lyman Blvd.
Contact Name
Dennis Dirlam
Audubon 92
15241 Creekside Court
Eden Prairie, MN
(952)474-7626
Zoning
PUD
Site Address
Land Use
Lake Drive West
Water Sewer Assessments
Office/
Industrial
Y Y
Miscellaneous
Y
Must be accessed through property to west.
Site # PID Number
16 25-0220100
Legal Description
N ½ Section 22
TIF Access Via
N Lyman Blvd.
Contact Name
Marsha Lawrence
(952)829-2900
(Charles Mattson - owner)
Zoning
A2
Acreage
48.48
Land Use
Office/
Industrial/Park
Open Space
Water
Y
Site Address
Lyman Blvd.
Sewer Assessments
Y Y
Miscellaneous
Bluff Creek bounds on east.
Site # PID Number Acreage
17 25-0140900
Legal Description
SW % Section 14
TIF
Access Via
N
Contact Name
- Dave Stockdale
7210 Galpin Blvd.
Chanhassen, MN
(952)474-7626
Audubon Road
55317
Site # PID Number
18 25-1900370
Legal Description
Outlot F, Chanhassen Business
Center
TIF Access Via
Y Powers Blvd.
Contact Name
Edward Pauls
8827 Top of the World Drive
Salt Lake City, UT 84121
Zoning
lOP
7.47
Land Use
Office/
Industrial
Site Address
Audubon Road
Water Sewer Assessments
Y Y Y
Miscellaneous
Existing farm structures on site.
Zoning
lOP & HC2
Acreage Site Address
17 Powers Blvd.
Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
Office/ Y Y N
Industrial
Miscellaneous
Site # PID Number Acreage
19 25-1500090
Legal Description
Lot 2, Block 3, Burdick Park
Zoning
PUD &
HC1
TIF Access Via
Kerber Blvd.
Contact Name
Jim Burdick
684 Excelsior Blvd.
Excelsior, MN 55331
(952)474-5243
0.92
Land Use
Commercial
Site Address
Kerber Blvd.
Water Sewer Assessments
Y Y Y
Miscellaneous
Site # PID Number Acreage
20 25-1950021 0.95
Legal Description Zoning Land Use
Lot 2, Block 1, Chanhassen
Mall
TIF Access Via
CBD
Market Blvd./Pauly Drive
Contact Name
Todd Gerhardt
City of Chanhassen
(952)227~1100
Site Address
Market Blvd./Pauly Drive
Water Sewer Assessments
Miscellaneous
Site # PID Number Acreage
21 25-2490020/25-2490030
Legal Description Zoning
Lots 2 & 3, Block 1,
Crossroads Plaza 3rd
TIF Access Via
Land Use
Site Address
550 West 79th Street
Water Sewer Assessments
Miscellaneous
Contact Name
Todd Gerhardt
City of Chanhassen
(952)227-1100
Site # PID Number Acreage
22 25-0130800
Legal Description
Section 12
TIF J
Contact Name
Todd Gerhardt
City of Chanhassen
(952)227-1100
Zoning
CBD
Access Via
0.30
Land Use
Site Address
421 West 78th Street
Water Sewer Assessments
Y Y
Miscellaneous
Site # PID Number Acreage
23 25-8460020
25-8460030
25-8560030
Legal Description
Zoning
Outlot, Village on Ponds 2nd
Outlots, Village on Ponds 4th
TIF Access Via
PUD
Land Use
Site Address
Lake Drive and Main Street
Water Sewer
Y Y
Miscellaneous
Assessments
Contact Name
Ausmar Development
C/o Lotus Realty
P.O. Box 235
Chanhassen, MN 55317
(952)934-4538
Site # PID Number Acreage
Site Address
24 25-5300400
25-0242400
Legal Description
Zoning
8+
36.6
Land Use
Great Plains Blvd.
Water Sewer Assessments
Outlot E, Mission Hills
NW '/4, NW %, Section 24
TIF Access Via
PUD
RSF
Commercial
Low-Med
Residential
Y Y Y
Miscellaneous
N Great Plains Blvd.
Contact Name
Al Klingelhutz
8600 Great Plains Blvd.
(952)934-8915
Pending water/sewer project. Hwy. 101 realignment.
Site # PID Number
25 25-0242410
Legal Description
W 1/3, NW ¼, Section 24
TIF Access Via
N Lyman Blvd.
Contact Name
James Curry
4817 Upper Terrace
Edina, MN
Acreage
Zoning
RSF
59.57
Land Use
Mixed Use
Site Address
Lyman Blvd.
Water Sewer Assessments
¥ ¥ ¥
Miscellaneous
Hwy. 101 corridor on west and Hwy 212 corridor on
north
Site # PID Number
26 25-0231600
Legal Description
SE ¼, NE '¼, Section 23
TIF
N
Contact Name
James Curry
4817 Upper Terrace
Edina, MN
Access Via
Great Plains
Zoning
RSF
Acreage Site Address
17.27 Great Plains Blvd./Lyman Blvd.
Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
Residential Y Y Y
High Density
Miscellaneous
Highway 212 corridor
Site # PID Number Acreage
27 25-0240100
Legal Description
NW ¼, Section 24
TIF Access Via
N Lyman Blvd.
Contact Name
Steve Liefschultz
Lakeview Hills Investment
7630 West 78th Street
Bloomington, MN
(952)942-6332
Zoning
RSF
9
Land Use
Residential
High Density
Site Address
Water Sewer
Y Y
Miscellaneous
Existing apartments.
Assessments
Y
Area for development.
5/02