Loading...
4 Swings ProposalCITYOF CHANHASSEN 7700 ~larket Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 Administration Phnn~.,: 9522271100 Fax 9522271110 Building Inspections Phone 952 227 1180 Fax 952227 1190 Engineering Finance Phone 9522271140 Fax 952227 1110 Park & Recreation P~one: 9522271120 Fax: 9522271110 Recrea!ion Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone~ 952 227 1400 Fax 9522271404 Planning & Natural Resources P%ne: 952 227 1130 Fax: 9522271110 Public Works !591 Park Road PI/one 9522271300 Fax 952 227 1310 Senior Center Pilone: 952227 1125 Fax: 952 227 1110 Web Site ;~,ww ci char~hassen n~,r~ tls MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Bob Generous, Senior Planner October 13, 2003 SUB J: Swings (Przymus) #2003-2 PUD and 2003-2 LUP EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The property owner is requesting a land use amendment for a portion of the site from Residential - Low Density to Commercial on the 8 acres south of West 78th Street to permit development of a family activity center and Concept Planned Unit Development (PUD) review for a mixed use development including a family activity center and town homes. While staff recommended denial of the land use map amendment and concept PUD, the Planning Commission strongly believed that the commercial guiding of the property was appropriate and recommended approval of the land use amendment and concept plan for the commercial portion of the development. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 16, 2003, to review the proposed development. The Planning Commission voted 5 to 0 to recommend approval of the land use amendment from Residential - Low Density to Commercial on the 8 acres south of West 78th Street to permit development of a family activity center and Concept Planned Unit Development (PUD) review for a family activity center as provided in the motion on page 11 of the staff report based on the findings of fact and recommendation on pages 14- 16 of the staff report. The summary and verbatim minutes are item la of the City Council packet for October 13, 2003. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the motions on page 11 of the revised staff report. Since this is a legislative decision of the City Council, staff will defer to the Commission's recommendation. ACTION NEEDED Concept approval requires a simple majority vote; however, at the development stage, approval will require 4 affirmative votes of the City Council. ATTACHMENTS Planning Commission Staff Report Dated September 16, 2003 Letter from Brigid Gombold (MnDOT) to Sharmeen AI-Jaff dated 9/25/03 The City of Chanhassen · A growing community with clean lakes, qualily schools a charming downtown thriving businesses, winding trails and beautiful parks A g~at place to li',/e work and play PC DATE: September 16, 2003 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CC DATE: October 13, 2003 REVIEW DEADLINE: 10/14/03 CASE #: 2003-2 PUD and 2003-2 LUP BY: RG, et al STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: LOCATION: APPLICANT: Request for a land use amendment from Residential Low Density to Commercial on 8 acres and Concept Planned Unit Development (PUD) review for a mixed use development including a family activity center and town homes on 14 acres, Swings. Northwest comer of TH 5 and Galpin Blvd. John Przymus 12174 176th Avenue Villard, MN 56385 (320) 554-2592 PRESENT ZONING: Agricultural Estate District, A2 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential - Low Density, Bluff Creek Overlay District ACREAGE: 14 DENSITY: 3.3 units per acre SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a land use amendment for a portion of the site from Residential - Low Density to Commercial on the 8 acres south of West 78th Street to permit development of a family activity center and Concept Planned Unit Development (PUD) review for a mixed use development including a family activity center and town homes. Staff is recommending denial of the land use amendment and concept PUD. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings, PUD' s, and amendments to PUD's because the City is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A rezoning or PUD, and amendment thereto, must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 7424 / / /~--J \ ~ ....... X," 2369 L '~ ~ -'--~ J'7434/ /~- 7476 ~ t 7487~ -~~ ~ ~ 7465 ~/ /~444 ~ 749~ ~ ~ 750~~~57 2345 2;~1 2319 730O ~_ 159 7701 7305 26O0 STATE HW¥ 5 '---""-% ¢~i~847 2201 2211 2310 821 O/ 2320 2260 2230 Swings Conceptual PUD September 16, 2003 Page 2 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY John Przymus is requesting a land use amendment from Residential - Low Density to commercial on the eight acres south of West 78th Street to permit a family activity center development. At this stage of the development review, the primary issue to be resolved is the land use designation of the property. Staff is recommending denial of the land use amendment due to inconsistency with the comprehensive plan, incompatibility with surrounding development, and noncompliance with the performance standards. Without the land use amendment, the concept Planned Unit Development is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan and must also be denied. BACKGROUND In 2000 and 2001, West 78th Street was constructed through the property, bisecting it into six and eight acre parcels. Additionally, the city extended sanitary sewer for the BC-7 and BC-8 sanitary sewer subdistricts across the northern portion of the property. December 12, 1998, the Chanhassen City Council adopts the Bluff Creek Overlay District. December 1996, Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan is completed. 1996, City Council adopts the Land Uses for the North 1995 Study Area. In August 1995, the Highway 5 Corridor Land Use Design Study was completed. The bulk of the area was recommended for single-family residential. Multi-family residential was recommended as appropriate for all Highway 5 frontage to the north access road. Retail/commercial was recommended as inappropriate for the bulk of the site. A portion of the Mills property (Arboretum Village site) was recommended for neighborhood convenience retail center, but only ancillary to office, institutional or multi-family residential. Highway 5 Corridor Design Standards adopted July 11, 1994. As part of the 1991 Comprehensive Plan, this property was included as part of the 1995 study area for determination of the land use of the property. On February 12, 1990, the Chanhassen City Council approved a zoning ordinance amendment making golf driving ranges interim uses in the A2 district. On November 16, 1987, the Chanhassen City Council approved a zoning ordinance amendment to permit golf driving ranges as a conditional use in the A2 zoning district and a conditional use permit for John Przymus for a golf driving range and miniature golf course at the subject property. Swings Conceptual PUD September 16, 2003 Page 3 On November 4, 1985, the Chanhassen City Council revoked the conditional use permit for a golf driving range at the northwest comer of Highway 5 and Galpin Blvd. Due to non-compliance with the conditions of the conditional use permit. On December 19, 1983, the Chanhassen City Council approved a conditional use permit for a golf driving range at the northwest comer of Highway 5 and Galpin Blvd. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 18 Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 2. Amendments Section 20-106 through 20-122, Site Plan Review Section 20-231 through 20-237, Conditional Use Permits Chapter 20, Article VIII, Planned Unit Development District Section 20-1551 through 20-1564, Bluff Creek Overlay District LAND USE AMENDMENT The following information and discussion investigate the potential impacts of the proposed land use amendment. Figure 4 Current Przymus Land Use Land Use Acres % of Total Proposal Land Use Percent Commercial 214 1.45% 222 1.5% Office/Industrial 1,229 8.3% 1,229 8.3 % Office 117 0.8% 117 0.8% Parks & Open Space 1,466 9.9% 1,466 9.9% Public/Semi-Public 1,242 8.4% 1,242 8.4% Residential Large Lot 2,247 15.2% 2,247 15.2% Residential Low Density 5,471 37.06% 5,463 37.01% Residential Medium Density 669 4.5% 669 4.5 % Residential High Density 398 2.7% 398 2.7% Mixed Use 134 0.9% 134 0.9% Undevelopable 1,573 10.6% 1,573 10.6% TOTALS 14,760 99.81% # 14,760 99.81% # (# Does not equal 100 due to rounding.) The proposed development would increase the potential impacts on the surrounding road system due to Swings Conceptual PUD September 16, 2003 Page 4 the increase in the daily traffic generation. Traffic Analysis Land Use Avg. Daily Trips AM Peak PM Peak Townhomes 105 8 10 Commercial 723 23 92 Subtotal 828 31 102 Low Density Residential 316 25 33 From a traffic standpoint, the proposed concept PUD would increase the average daily trips by 162 percent and the p.m. peak hour traffic by 209 percent. Fiscal Analysis Use Tax Capacity Taxes City's Share Commercial $ 77,250 $ 92,515 $11,657 Town homes $ 45,000 $ 53,892 $11,317 Subtotal PUD $122,250 $146,407 $ 22,974 Twin homes $ 82,500 $ 98,803 $ 20,749 Staff has used the valuation of $200,000 per unit in calculating the residential taxes. Staff assumed $65 per square foot for the commercial building since it would be constructed similar to a warehouse building. Based on this analysis, the proposed development would increase city tax revenues by $2,225 annually. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Goals and Policies "The city's highest land use goal is to achieve a mixture of development which will assure a high quality of life and a reliable tax base." (2020 Comprehensive Plan p. 11) In doing so, we need to assure that land is provided for various land uses. The property is guided in the city's comprehensive plan for Residential - Low Density uses which permit a net density of 1.2 to 4.0 units per acre. Net density is calculated after subtraction of public parks, streets, and wetlands. This land use was determined after completion of the Highway 5 Corridor and Design Study. Staff estimates that the site could support 33 residential units, total. The applicant is proposing 18 units and 60,000 square feet commercial building. This is a reduction in potential residential units by 15 units. "The city encourages low density residential development in appropriate areas of the community in a manner that reinforces the character and integrity of existing single family neighborhoods while promoting the establishment of new neighborhoods of similar quality." (2020 Comprehensive Plan p. 12) As part of the Highway 5 Corridor and Design Study, it was concluded that this area would be appropriate for single family homes. The property could be developed for twin homes, which would provide for a transition from Highway 5 to the single-family residential to the north and west. Twin homes would be consistent with the housing Swings Conceptual PUD September 16, 2003 Page 5 development in the southeast comer of the Vasserman Ridge development, immediately west of the site. Appropriate zoning for twin home development is Mixed Low Density Residential District, R4, which would be consistent with the comprehensive plan. The minimum standards for R4 developments require a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet per unit, a minimum frontage on a street of 50 feet per unit, and a minimum lot depth of 125 feet. The development would be required to maintain a minimum building setback of 30 feet from Galpin Boulevard, 50 feet from West 78th Street and 70 feet from Highway 5. A minimum 40 foot building setback is required from the Bluff Creek primary zone and a 50 foot setback is required from wetlands. This will limit the buildable area on both the northern and southern portions of the site. The northerly portion of the site is particularly constrained due to setback requirements and may result in the loss of buildings. The city will "encourage the development of neighborhood service centers where appropriate. These will be developed as part of a mixed uses development or a PUD. Development of unplanned or strip commercial centers shall be discouraged." (2020 Comprehensive Plan p. 12) Neighborhood service centers are currently provided or proposed at the northeast comers of Highway 5 and Galpin Boulevard and at Highway 5 and Century Boulevard. Additionally, the proposed development would not perform as a neighborhood service center, but as a community wide attraction. The city's highest housing goal is "to provide housing opportunities for all residents consistent with the identified community development goal." (2020 Comprehensive Plan p. 30) In meeting this goal, the city shall determine that "plans and ordinances of the City of Chanhassen should ensure that adequate amounts of land are designed to accommodate projected housing growth." (2020 Comprehensive Plan p. 30) The proposed development would reduce the potential number of dwelling units in the city. Additionally, "new residential development shall be discouraged from encroaching upon vital natural resources or physical features that perform essential protection functions in their natural state." (2020 Comprehensive Plan p. 30) This policy requires that the development scenario proposed for the property strive to preserve and enhance the Bluff Creek Corridor. The current proposal does not adequately protect the Bluff Creek Corridor. CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW The applicant is proposing a mixed use development consisting of a family activity center and 18 town house units. GENERAL SITE PLAN/ARCHITECTURE The development would need to comply with the Design Standards for Commercial, Industrial & Office Institutional Developments. Additional detail would need to be provided to ascertain the quality of the proposed development. Planned Unit Developments require that development design standards be developed for the project. If this process proceeds further, these standards will need to be developed. Swings Conceptual PUD September 16, 2003 Page 6 Staff believes that outdoor commercial uses are incompatible with the residential development existing and to be developed to the north and west of the site. Additionally, should the project not be successful, the city would need to address other potential re-uses of the site. Staff recommends that a limited number of neighborhood support uses be included, such as institutional uses and offices. However, staff does not support retail type uses. WETLANDS There are three wetland areas on the property. All three basins were delineated by Schoell & Madson, Inc. in 2003. Two of the basins (adjacent to West 78th Street) are a result of the concentration of water in conjunction with the construction of West 78th Street. These basins are therefore exempt from wetland mitigation requirements under the incidental wetland provision of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. A wetland exemption has been issued. The remaining wetland is an ag/urban wetland adjacent to Bluff Creek. A wetland buffer 0 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average width of 10 feet) must be maintained around the wetland basin. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant must install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a 40-foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. The grading and erosion control plan should show the actual wetland buffer widths proposed to meet the minimum average buffer width requirements as well as the 40-foot wetland buffer setback. BLUFF CREEK NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN The site is partially within the Uplands Region of the Bluff Creek Overlay District. This region of the overlay district is characterized by impaired ecosystems and includes the headwaters for Bluff Creek. The goals set forth in the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan (BCWNRMP) for the Uplands Region are to: 1. Improve and connect the natural systems that currently exist. Preserve high-quality wetland systems, riparian areas and remaining forests; 2. Regenerate impaired ecosystems, especially wetlands, to the extent practical under the present land use constraints; 3. Re-create natural links between major natural features within the Bluff Creek corridor and major natural features outside the Creek's watershed 4. Develop environmental educational opportunities within the corridor. The applicant should keep these goals in mind as a plan is developed for the site and should work with staff to achieve these goals for this property. Swings Conceptual PUD September 16, 2003 Page 7 The purpose of the Primary Corridor is to delineate a conservancy zone where undisturbed conditions are desired, since any type of human activity in this area may directly impact Bluff Creek. The Secondary Corridor is a management zone where development and/or urban activities directly affect Bluff Creek's ecosystem. The mapped boundaries of the primary and secondary corridors of the Bluff Creek Overlay District vary between those shown in the Plan and those included on City maps. The applicant shall arrange for the boundaries to be field-verified by staff prior to the development of a more detailed plan for this site. In determining the boundaries, wetland adjacent to Bluff Creek have, historically, been included within the primary zone. Accurate location of the corridors is essential for proper planning of the site. There are a number of items that are directly influenced by the corridor, for instance, minimum structure setbacks of 40 feet from the primary comdor, preservation of all natural features within the primary COlTidor, a detailed plan identifying the resources located within the corridors, etc. No development is allowed within the Primary Corridor or within 40 feet of it. In addition, no grading is allowed within 20 feet of the Primary Corridor. Conditions of any approvals can be expected to include the restoration of native vegetation within the Overlay District. Development would require a conditional use permit for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. BLUFF CREEK The proposed project is adjacent to Bluff Creek, which is a DNR Protected Water. A 50-foot structure setback is required. The creek and the required setback should be indicated on the grading plan. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL Any future development proposal must include a grading, drainage, & erosion control plan for review and approval. The applicant must provide storm water calculations for any proposed subdivision. The development will need to provide storm water ponding on site for treatment prior to discharge in to the wetlands or creek. The development must meet pre-development runoff rates for the 10-year and 100-year storm. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT The applicant has not incorporated storm water management into the proposed project. Storm water quality and quantity control must be provided for the proposed project. Storm water calculations should be submitted for review. The last storm sewer catch basin prior to discharge into any surface water feature (e.g., storm water pond) should be a sump catch basin. This will facilitate maintenance of the surface water features. Swings Conceptual PUD September 16, 2003 Page 8 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT FEES The proposed project is subject to Surface Water Management Fees. UTILITIES Sanitary sewer is available to the north and south halves of the site. Watermain is also available to serve the site from Galpin Blvd. and West 78th St. A minimum 20-foot wide public drainage and utility easement will be required on all public utilities outside of the public right-of-way. All buildings must be outside any existing or proposed easements. STREETS Access points to West 78th St., a designated collector route, shall be limited to one access on both the north and south side of the street. The access location must be offset a minimum of 600-feet from Galpin Blvd. and the north/south access shall be aligned in the same location. A Mn/DOT and Carver County permit will be required for access to the site. The proposed access onto Galpin Blvd. will not be allowed in its current location. The access would need to be offset a minimum of 300-feet fi'om the intersection of W. 78th St. City approval of the access location would still be contingent upon Mn/DOT and Carver County approval of the proposed access. OTHER AGENCIES The applicant must apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley- Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) and comply with their conditions of approval. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE The city does not anticipate the need for land dedication for parks and trail. The applicant would be required to pay park donation fees pursuant to city ordinance. The applicant should provide sidewalk connections from the interior of the development to the city's trails on Galpin Boulevard and West 78th Street. LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION The development will require a landscaping plan. Of particular importance is the need for buffer yards from West 78th Street, Galpin Boulevard and Highway 5. Staff recommends that significant landscape screening and berming be incorporated along Highway 5 as well as West 78th Street. The development will be required to develop a reforestation plan. The developer will be directed to the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan for a list of appropriate species for planting. Swings Conceptual PUD September 16, 2003 Page 9 The developer would need to locate all significant trees on the site and provide a calculation of existing canopy coverage as well as proposed tree removal. The tree removal will be determined based on the grading plan. Staff estimates that a minimum 20 percent canopy coverage will be required of the development. REZONING Justification for Rezoning to PUD The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 14 acres from A-2, Agricultural Estate, to PUD, Planned Unit Development. There are two components to the PUD: commercial for a family activity center and town houses. The following review constitutes our evaluation of the PUD request. The review criteria is taken from the intent section of the PUD Ordinance. Section 20-501. Intent Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for a greater variety of uses, internal transfer of density, construction phasing, and a potential for lower development costs. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the other more standard zoning districts. It will be the developer's responsibility to demonstrate that the City's expectations are to be realized as evaluated against the following criteria: Preservation of desirable site characteristics and open space and protection of sensitive environmental features, including steep slopes, mature trees, creeks, wetlands, lakes and scenic views. Finding. Development must consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed development is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan designation of the property for low density residential uses. The proposed development does not conform to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance for development of Commercial projects. The development of the site for residential townhouses does not preserve the bluff area as required by the bluff protection ordinance, nor adequately preserve the Bluff Creek Corridor. More efficient and effective use of land, open space and public facilities through mixing of land uses and assembly and development of land in larger parcels. Findinl~. This property is highly visible and in a unique area within the community. It is in an area of transition from the busy Highway 5 corridor on its south, commercial development to the east Swings Conceptual PUD September 16, 2003 Page 10 across Galpin Boulevard, Btuff Creek on its north, and the residential development that expands from the area to the north and west. High quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned. Site planning, landscaping and building architecture should reflect higher quality design than is found elsewhere in the community. Finding. The developers are proposing to submit individual building plans. The city will utilize its normal site plan review procedure for each. The PUD will establish development standards to ensure that the site is developed in a consistent and well-planned manner so that a higher quality of development will result. Sensitive development in transitional areas located between different land uses and along significant corridors within the city will be encouraged. Finding. The development is in an area of transition from the busy Highway 5 corridor on its south, and the residential development that expands from the area to the north and west. 5. Development that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Finding. The Comprehensive Plan guides this area for residential - low density use. The proposed development is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. Parks and open space. The creation of public open space may be required by the city. Such park and open space shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Park Plan and overall trail plan. Finding. The proposed development would be required to preserve the Bluff Creek primary zone. 7. Provision of housing affordable to all income groups if appropriate with the PUD. Finding. It is not anticipated that this project, as proposed, would develop with affordable housing. Energy conservation through the use of more efficient building designs and sitings and the clustering of buildings and land uses. Finding. It is not anticipated that energy conservation would be incorporated in the development. Use of traffic management and design techniques to reduce the potential for traffic conflicts. Improvements to area roads and intersections may be required as appropriate. Swings Conceptual PUD September 16, 2003 Page 11 Findinz. The use of traffic demand management techniques for the developer and site users will be a condition of approval. Summary of Rezoning to PUD Rezoning the property to PUD provides the applicant with flexibility, but allows the city to request additional improvements and the site's unique features can be better protected. The flexibility in standards allows the disturbed areas to be further removed from the unique features of the site. In return for the flexibility, the city is receiving: Consistency with Comprehensive Plan; Corridor sensitivity on Highways 5; Preservation of desirable site characteristics (wetlands, the Bluff Creek corridor and trees); Improved architectural standards including, uniform signs and architecture; Traffic management and design techniques to reduce potential for traffic conflicts; The existing PUD ordinance does not permit town home projects on property guided Residential - Low Density. Instead, it permits minimum lot sizes of 11,000 square feet with an average lot area of 15,000 square feet. Lot area is calculated on a net basis. The proposed development is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. At this stage of the development review, the applicant does not provide sufficient detail to determine compliance with commercial standards. If the project were to progress, more detailed design standards would be created. RECOMMENDATION Staff The Planning Commission recommends that the Planning Commission City Council approve the following two motions: "The Planning Commission recommends denial of Chanhassen City Council approves the Land Use Map Amendment from Residential - Low Density to Commercial for the eight acres south of West 78th Street based on the findings in the attached findings of fact and recommendation contingent on of the development stage Planned Unit Development and Metropolitan Council review and approval. "The Planning Commission recommends denial of Chanhassen City Council approves the Concept Planned Unit Development (PUD) review for a mixed use development including of a family activity center and townhomes for the eight acres south of West 78th Street based on the findings in the attached findings of fact and recommendation and subject to the following conditions: ALTERNATIVE Should the Planning Commission approve the land use amendment and concept PUD, the following issues will need to be addressed by the developer. Swings Conceptual PUD September 16, 2003 Page 12 The development would need to comply with the Design Standards for Commercial, Industrial & Office Institutional Developments. Additional detail would need to be provided to ascertain the quality of the proposed development. 2. Planned Unit Developments require that development design standards be developed for the project. 3. The goals set forth in the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan (BCWNRMP) for the Lowlands Region are to be incorporated in the further development of the plan. The Bluff Creek Corridor primary and secondary zone boundaries will need to be determined and surveyed. The applicant shall arrange for the Bluff Creek Overlay district boundaries to be field- verified by staff prior to the development of a more detailed plan for this site. In determining the boundaries, wetland adjacent to Bluff Creek have, historically, been included within the primary zone 5. Drainage and utility easements should be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used as PVC and storm water ponds. 6. A preliminary grading plan must be prepared. The applicant must provide storm water calculations for any proposed subdivision. The development will need to provide storm water ponding on site for treatment prior to discharge in to the wetlands or creek. The development must meet pre-development runoff rates for the 10-year and 100-year storm. On-site storm water ponding must be sufficient to meet all City water quality and quantity standards. An erosion and sediment control plan should be submitted. Type III silt fence should be provided adjacent to all wetland fill areas, areas to be preserved as buffer or, if no buffer is to be preserved, at the delineated wetland edge. 9. A minimum 20-foot wide public drainage and utility easement will be required on all public utilities outside of the public right-of-way. All buildings must be outside any existing or proposed easements. 10. Access points to West 78th St., a designated collector route, shall be limited to one access on both the north and south side of the street. The access location must be offset a minimum of 600-feet from Galpin Blvd. and the north/south access shall be aligned in the same location. 11. A Mn/DOT and Carver County permit will be required for access to the site. 12. The proposed access onto Galpin Blvd. will not be allowed in its current location. The access would need to be offset a minimum of 300-feet from the intersection of W. 78th St. City approval of the access location would still be contingent upon Mn/DOT and Carver County approval of the proposed access. 13. The applicant will need to submit a survey showing existing trees and woodlands along with canopy coverage calculations and proposed reforestation. 14. The applicant would be required to pay park donation fees pursuant to city ordinance. Swings Conceptual PUD September 16, 2003 Page 13 15. The applicant would need to provide pedestrian connections from the site to adjacent trail and sidewalks. 16. A wetland buffer 0 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average width of 10 feet) must be maintained around the wetland basin. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant must install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a 40-foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. The grading and erosion control plan should show the actual wetland buffer widths proposed to meet the minimum average buffer width requirements as well as the 40-foot wetland buffer setback. 17. The creek and the required setback should be indicated on the grading plan. 18. The development will require a landscaping plan. Staff recommends that significant landscape screening and berming be incorporated along Highway 5 as well as West 78th Street. 19. The developer would need to locate all significant trees on the site and provide a calculation of existing canopy coverage as well as proposed tree removal. 20. Development would require a conditional use permit for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 21. The applicant shall incorporate stepped back roof lines as presented in the renderings." ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation 2. Development Review Application 3. Swings Narrative 4. John Przymus Traffic and Tax Analysis dated 9/5/03 5. Highway 5 Corridor Land Use Design Study, Site Analysis, Figure 4.6 6. Highway 5 Corridor Land Use Design Study, Site Development Concept A, Figure 4.7 7. Highway 5 Corridor Land Use Design Study, Site Development Concept B, Figure 4.8 8. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List 9. Letter from Brigid Gombold, MnDOT dated September 25, 2003 Swings Conceptual PUD September 16, 2003 Page 14 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of John Przymus for a land use amendment for a portion of the site from Residential - Low Density to Commercial on the 8 acres south of West 78th Street to permit development of a family activity center and Concept Planned Unit Development (PUD) review for a mixed use development including a family activity center and town homes On September 16, 2003, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly schedule meeting to consider the application of John Przymus for a land use amendment for a portion of the site from Residential - Low Density to Commercial on the 8 acres south of West 78th Street to permit development of a family activity center and Concept Planned Unit Development (PUD) review for a mixed use development including a family activity center and town homes. The Planned Unit Development would rezone the property from Agricultural Estate District, A2, to PUD south of West 78th Street and PUD-R north of West 78th Street. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Planned Unit Development preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 2. 3. 4. The property is currently zoned Agricultural Estate District, A2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential - Low Density. The legal description of the property is: see Exhibit A. "The city encourages low density residential development in appropriate areas of the community in a manner that reinforces the character and integrity of existing single family neighborhoods while promoting the establishment of new neighborhoods of similar quality." (2020 Comprehensive Plan p. 12) As part of the Highway 5 Corridor Swings Conceptual PUD September 16, 2003 Page 15 and Design Study, which included the West 78m Street roadway alignment, it was concluded that this site would be appropriate for single family homes. The designation of the subject property for Residential - Low Density use was nat a mistake, nor have there been any changes in circumstances which would lead to and the re-guiding of the property to commercial is appropriate. It is consistent with the uses along the West 78th Street corridor. Neighborhood service centers are currently provided or proposed at the northeast comers of Highway 5 and Galpin Boulevard and at Highway 5 and Century Boulevard. Additional neighborhood commercial centers are not necessary in this area. o The proposed development would reduce the potential number of dwelling units in the The proposed land use amendment has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of the comprehensive plan and has been found to be/~consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The proposed commercial portion of the Planned Unit Development has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of the comprehensive plan and has been found to be i~consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The planning report #2003-2 PUD and 2003-2 LUP dated September 16, 2003, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council dem-y approve the land use amendment for a portion of the site from Residential - Low Density to Commercial on the 8 acres south of West 78th Street to permit development of a family activity center and the Concept Planned Unit Development for a family activity center. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 16th day of September, 2003. Swings Conceptual PUD September 16, 2003 Page 16 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: Its Chairman ATTEST: Secretary CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION TELEPHONE (Daytime) OWNER: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: 7os/ I..~omprehensive Plan Amendment __ Temporary Sales Permit Conditional Use Permit Vacation of ROW/Easements Interim Use Permit Variance Non-conforming Use Permit [,/'~anned Unit Development* Rezoning Wetland Alteration Permit __ Zoning Appeal __ Zoning Ordinance Amendment __ Sign Permits __ Sign Plan Review ~N°tification Sign Site Plan Review* Subdivision* X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost** ($50 CUP/SPR/V A CN AR/W AP /Metes and Bounds, $400 Minor SUB) TOTAL FEE $ A list of all property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the application. ,~.~ ? ..... ~- ~. $~/ f Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. *Twenty-six full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8Y=" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet. ** Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract NOTE - When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. PROJECT NAME LOCATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION TOTAL ACREAGE REQUESTED ZONING p U ~ PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION L/ REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION NO REASON FOR THIS REQUEST Prot~.,._: (" C,,n.1. ~'3 c/,k ,"/'1 This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Depadment to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the appliCation shall be made within ten business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within ten business days of application. :',: This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. The city hereby notifies the applicant that development review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public hearing requirements and agency review. Therefore, the city is notifying the applicant that the city requires an automatic 60 day extension for development review. Development review shall be completed within 120 days unless additional review e:i~ ire/~°v~ applicant' The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting. If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address. SWINGS NARRATIVE Applicant Johrl Pryzmus is the owner and applicant. Mr. Pryzmus has owned the land since 1981 and had previously operated the Swings miniature golf course and driving range. The business had ceased in 2000 due to the condenmation by the state for the construction of West 78th Street. Project Description The project consists of creating a 14-acre Planned Unit Development (PUD) that will include a family activity center and townhomes. The site was divided by the newly constructed West 78th Street, thus creating two separate lots. The family activity center will be on the south lot and the townhomes on the north lot. Request 1) Concept Plan approval for a mixed use PUD 2) Reguide the south lot from Residential Low Density to Commercial 3) Rezone the 14-acre site from Rural Residential to PUD Development Data Total Site Area South Lot North Lot 14 acres 8 acres (5 acres buildable) 6 acres (2 acres buildable) Guided Proposed South Lot North Lot Low Density Residential Commercial Low Density Zoned Rural Residential Proposed PUD Surrounding Land Uses North/Northwest Bluff Creek/Vasserman Ridge Mixed Use Residential South Highway 5 with a school, recreational center and medium density beyond East/Northeast Galpin Blvd. with a gas station, a vacant commercial lot and medium density beyond West MNDoT pond and a commercially guided parcel beyond * The two sites are divided by West 78th Street (collector street) Density Allowed Proposed 1.2-4 units per acre, minus the wetlands and r-o-w (6-21-units) 3.3 units an acre (18 units on 5.4 acres) Concept Plan Introduction The proposed plan is harmonious with the surrounding land uses and will meet the criteria of the related city zoning ordinances. With a family activity center, the site would be utilized similar to its use for the last 20 years. However, improvements would be made to the site by the addition of landscaping and a building that meets the architectural standards of the Highway Corridor Overlay District. This type of commercial use is appropriate for the site due to its location and the services it will provide to the surrounding residential neighborhoods. The family activity center will cater to families, young adults, birthday parties and other events. The facility would compliment the outdoor/indoor activities at the Chanhassan Recreation Center across Highway 5. The residential component of the plan is also compatible to the surrounding land uses, which include the Vasserman Ridge development to the west, Bluff Creek to the north and the surrounding townhome developments to the south and east. Reguiding Request (South Lot) The current guiding of low density residential does not seem to be appropriate for the south lot. The 8-acre site is at the comer of a signalized intersection bounded by high volume roads on all sides. There is a state highway on the south, County Road 117/Galpin Boulevard (collector) to the east and West 78th Street (collector) to the north. The land uses adjacent the site are also at a higher intensity. To the east there is the Kwik Trip gas station and car wash plus another vacant commercial lot. West of the site is a MNDoT pond with a parcel guided for commercial just to west of it that is at a similar size as the Pryzmus site. To the south there is medium density housing and the Bluff Creek Elemantary School and Chanhassan Recreation Center. We recognize the city's desire to use the site as a transitional area between the highway and the residential uses that are to the northwest of the site, across West 78th Street. However, in review of the site, it is apparent that low density residential is not feasible with the surrounding land uses. This also became evident with Lundgren Brothers refusal to include the Pryzmus site with their Vasserman Ridge development. In addition to not wanting the site, Lundgren Bros. constructed a berm as a barrier from Highway 5 for their residents, who are a lot further away than the residents would be on the Pryzmus site. The proposed family activity center creates a nice transition/buffer for the residential areas. The use would provide a low-intensity recreational service to the surrounding neighborhoods. The activities on the site are all enclosed except for the miniature golf courses, with the potential of outdoor batting cages and skate park. This will compliment the outdoor activities at the Recreational Center across Highway 5, which include; 4 softball fields with bleachers, a soccer field, 4 tennis courts and 2 hockey rinks. The tennis courts, hockey rink and a softball field have lights. Because the two facilities provide different activities, they are able to meet a wider range of the community's recreational needs. With the long-standing operation of the previous mini- golf course and driving range, it is apparent that the community supports this type of use. The proposed use also falls in line with other uses permitted in the neighborhood and highway commercial zoning districts. Both districts allow community centers and the Highway Business District specifically allows miniature golf courses. Rezoning from Rural Residential to PUD A PUD is proposed to ensure that an appropriate use is developed that meets the transitional needs envisioned by the city. Reguiding the site to commercial with a PUD zoning does not tie the city to the permitted uses, which may not be an appropriate use, or the standards established within a specific zoning district. The PUD enables the city's policy makers to consider all future application requests and to establish specific site criteria for any potential future uses. The PUD request is not used to include uses that are not already allowed in related zoning districts or used to create a higher density than allowed under the current guide plan. In general, the PUD would benefit the project by allowing outdoor activities as part of the family activity center and to incorporate 4-unit townhomes within a low-density district. As a PUD it is understood that the project will be held up to higher development standards. The proposed concept plan has incorporated the nine criteria that are encouraged for all PUD projects. In designing the concept plan attention was focused on creating a development that is harmonious with the surrounding uses, specifically xvhen transitioning from commercial to residential and along the environmentally sensitive areas. The proposed plan embraces the natural amenities and includes large open areas as natural buffers. The plan incorporates a mixture of uses that provide housing choices and recreational services to the surrounding neighborhoods and the community. Wetlands/Bluff Creek Three wetlands have been identified on the site. The northwest basin is classified as an Ag/Urban wetland and requires a 40-foot setback and a buffer of 0-20 feet with an average of 10 feet. The two wetlands located on the western edge of the site on both sides of West 78th Street were incidentally created with the construction of West 78th Street and are exempt from the State Wetland Rules. The exemption forms have been submitted to city staff. The natural significance of the site is limited to the northwest wetland, Bluff Creek and the mature trees adjacent Bluff Creek along the north property line. The other mature trees on the site are along Highway 5 and Galpin Boulevard and were used as a buffer for Swings miniature golf and driving range. In discussion with city staff, the concept plan was designed with the Bluff Creek primary zone following the edge of the northwest wetland and along the north property line. With the sanitary easement, there is an 80-foot setback from the north lot line to the townhomes. This 80 foot green space serves well as the setback for the Bluff Creek primary and secondary zone. SPECIFIC CONCEPT PLAN INFORMATION South Lot (community recreational facility) The south lot is an 8-acre parcel bounded by Highway 5 to the south, Galpin Boulevard and a gas station to the east and a MNDoT stormwater pond to the west. The site contains a small building, parking lot and the golf greens from the previous use. Access is from Galpin Boulevard, which has been changed to a fight in/right out by the recent road improvements. The proposed use is a 60,000 square-foot enclosed family activity center catering to families, young adults, birthday parties and other events. The site will have 2 outdoor miniature golf courses. The golf courses will be located in the southeast comer of the site, the same area as the previous course. One golf course would be a mountain course and the second being a traditional course. Batting cages and a skate park may also be included as part of the outdoor activities. Inside the facility would be a miniature golf course, golf reality, batting cages, skate park, BMX bicycling, go-carting, swimming pool, and other activities. The building would be multi-purpose ;vith the potential of moving walls to accommodate group parties and other events. The site will have access from Galpin Boulevard and from West 78th Street. Parking will be located in the northeastern portion of the site. The site was designed to have the developed area pushed to the eastern portion of the lot ;vhere it abuts Highway 5 and Galpin Boulevard. The commercial use would be consistent with the gas station across Galpin Boulevard and the commercially guided site just west on Highway 5. The western portion would be left open and used for stormwater ponding and landscaping. This area would become a transitional buffer between the recreational facility and the residential development to the northeast. The building itself would also provide a physical buffer from the outdoor activities and the residential areas. The building will be designed to meet the architectural standards of the Highway Corridor Overlay District. A 50-foot buffer yard will be maintained along West 78th street as the land uses transition from commercial to residential across the street. Zoning/Parking standards The project will meet the PUD, Highway Corridor, Buffer Yard and parking standards. In the effort to preserve as much of the western portion of the site, the outdoor miniature golf greens are proposed at the same setbacks required for parking. It appears reasonable that the golf greens are seen as having a similar, if not less, of an impact as a parking lot. North Lot (Townhomes) The north lot is a triangular 6-acre parcel that is bounded by West 78th Street to the south, Bluff Creek to the north and the Vasserman Ridge development to the west. A wetland basin exists in the northwest comer of the site. With 2 acres of buildable area and the amenities of the wetland and Bluff Creek the site is well suited for a residential setting. Because of the development constraints, such as; the configuration of the lot being narrow on the east end; the environmental setbacks from the wetland and Bluff Creek, the sanitary easement dissecting the north half of the site and the heavier traffic and commercial uses to the east, it is appropriate to have a mixture of townhome styles. The proposed use for the site is a combination of two townhome styles. The east (narrower) side of the lot is proposed with three, 4-unit townhomes while the western end will consist of twin homes. The twin homes would be similar in size as the Vasserman Ridge twin homes and would act as a nice transition between the two sites. Both types of townhomes would have their own private access off of West 78th Street. The 4-unit townhomes are proposed in order to provide a reasonable use that is sensitive to the environmental and lot configuration constraints. These type of units fit nicely with the overall plan as the site transitions from commercial and heavier traffic from the east and south to the more residential neighborhoods to the northwest. They would also compliment the townhouse development across Galpin Boulevard that consists of 4 to 6 unit townhome buildings. Other conceptual plans had included twin homes within the entire parcel. However, it became infeasible under the city's R-4 zoning standards. Zoning Standards The project will meet the PUD, Highway Corridor, Bluff Creek and Wetland buffer standards. The proposed density of 18 units (3.3 units per acre) is within the 1.2-4 units an acre density allowed for Iow-density guided lands. ?/ \ )deouoo SnuJ/~ZJd\~e!^eJ ~UeLUdOleAep\§q\UelC~:6 ea!jjo/le!j~snpu!/]!oJeuJLuoo Joj Iood se!l!Jeds!p leOS!~ o~ sexai ~o %01~ sexui ~o %~8 /qloed~a x~l ~o %~9Z'6~ ~ ~!un Jad O00'OOg$ ],e panle^ :l!un Jed O00'OOg$ le pen[e^ '1t bs Jed 00'995 le penle^ /~I!LUR~ eI§U!S ],jun Jed 89 gg aLUOq LIMO], l!ur~ Jed OJ 9 e§ee~oe uo peseq 96 89 ~ed ~d ~ed tN¥ Sdl~l $ $ 6g'~ZZ'Z $ leOS!_-I o£ SOL 69'9tL'08 $ 99'809'96 Lt'/j,8' j, j, $ eJeqS s,Al!O ~ 9Z'O S3.LV~ NOI.LVkJ::IN:I9 dl~/ eoueleq jo %9~' j, '000'0095 lsJ!t Jot % L JelieaJeql %8 'O00'OS j,$ lsJlt Jo~ %S'~ $ 00'009'89 $ O0'O00'g~ $ O0'Og~'ZZ le!],uep!se~ :~!oedeo Xe_L A~!oeaeO Xel zg'6 99'9 8806 $ 00'000'008 $ 88 9'8 $ 00'000'00~ $ gj' g'j' $ 00'000'006'~ $ 00009 0'~ ],!un ]ed 000'00~$ le!luep!se~ · ~ 'bs ~ed 00'995 le!omuJtu°o :uo!lenle^ j,'8 ff j, sewoH U!MJ. 6'0 9 sewoq UMOI ~' j, 9 II~!oJeWW°C) Sl!uJq/l~eJ¥ eoeaS ueao MO~ ~ SIS,kqYN¥ A/IOVdVO XV.L es~ pue3 Z66J, 'uo!l!p3 q],9 uo!leJaue9 dP1 'SJ@eU!bLI~ uo!lelaodsueJl ~o elnl,!lSUl :aomos 88 ~ 9'8 j,'~ '¢J- U!M/ 9j, 8'g 9' ~ 6'0 9 setuoq UMO± 000'09 /- j,'O O'g Z' L g le!oJeww°O s~!u~ ~eJv bu!pl!n~ ~!sueQ/MV3 eoedS uedo MO~ ~ es~ pueq 800~/g/6 s!S,~leU¥ SnLU/~ZJd uqop 9't, 3htflgld ~7I~ 7VNV ~tZIS VA¥S It' H_L ~01. ~d'TVD : -' - i t' H_L O-L NldqVO g'l, ~tflDhI ,/,N~-~NDITV '~A ?~I ~£~tDDV H..t~O~ ~] dd~IDNOD iN~.4~dOT~IA~t(~ ~iIE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2003 AT 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7700 MARKET BLVD. PROPOSAL: Swings Concept Plan APPLICANT: John Przymus LOCATION: West 78th Street & Galpin Blvd. NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a proposal in your area. The applicant, John Przymus, is requesting a land use amendment from Residential Low Density to Commercial on 8 acres and Concept Planned Unit Development (PUD) review for a mixed use development including a family activity center and townhomes on 14 acres zoned Agricultural Estate District (A2), located at the nodhwest corner of TH 5 and Galpin Blvd., Swings. What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob at 227-1131 or e-mail bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on September 4, 2003. City Review Procedure Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. Staff prepares a report on the subject application. This report includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. g:\plan\forms',review procedure Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5160® LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BLV~)~ WAYZATA ..-.~ MN 55391 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BLV. D~ WAYZATA.J MN 55391 CARVER COUNTY HRA 705 WALNUT ST N CHASKA MN 55318 LUNDGREN BROS C~)NSTRUCTION 935 WAYZAT_.~D E WAYZATA ~ MN 55391 CONVENIENCE STORE INVESTMENTS PO BOX 2107 LACROSSE WI 54602 JULEE A BUCKLEY 7828 HARVEST LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CIO BRUCE DEJONG/ 7700 MARKET B~L.V-D~ PO BOX 147 CHANH~ MN 55317 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA B~MN WAYZATA~ . 55391 IND SCHOOL DIST 112 & CITY OF CHANHASSEN 11 PEAVEY RD CHASKA MN 55318 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA WAYZATA~.~/,,~V-~ MN 55391 LUNDGREN BROS ....CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZAT~.,A~iNL-'VD E WAYZAT,~'/ MN 55391 GUY W & JUNE M BLESSING 7844 HARVEST LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BL~J;;)'E~ WAYZAT¢~/-'/ MN 55391 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CIO BRUCE DEJONG 7700 MARKE~ PO BOX 147 CHANHA85~N MN 55317 JOHN D WILSON 2392 HARVEST WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BLV~;;P~ WAYZATa.// MN 55391 I"MODEL HOMES LLC 411 ZACHARY LN PLYMOUTH MN 55441 PATRICIA S DEZIEL 2382 HARVEST WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BL~q WAYZATA 55391 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA WAYZAT~.~L'y'E~I~ MN 55391 DANIEL M RYAN & KAREN L THARALDSON-RYAN 7842 HARVEST LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BL~ WAYZATA __ 55391 CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT LLC 1434 SALEM LN SW ROCHESTER MN 55902 KATHERINE M KORPI & JOANNE R SCHMIEG 7845 HARVEST LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BLVD~.E WAYZAT~.~ MN 55391 LONNIE G & JAN M JOHNSON 7834 HARVEST LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 THOMAS R BREKKE 2400 HARVEST WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LUNDGREN B RO.,S,,~0 N STR U CT I O N 935 WAYZATA/BI.VD E WAYZATA/ MN 55391 BRENDAN E & MOLLY R KOOP 7832 HARVEST LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CARVER COUNTY~:J, RA 705 WALNU~...8'T'N CHAS~K~/' MN 55318 AVERY® Address Labels Laser 5160® Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5160® LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BLVD E WAYZATA MN 55391 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BL~ WAYZATA~/'~ MN 55391 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BLV~).E-- WAYZATA / MN 55391 THEODORE F & MARLENE M BENTZ 7300 GALPIN BLVD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BLVD E~.~ WAYZATA ~ 55391 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BLVD E ~. WAYZATA ~ 55391 MARK A & SARAH L PLETTS 7517 BENT BOW TRL CHANHASSEN MN 55317 WALNUT GROVE HOMEOWNERS ASSN C/O GITTLEMAN MGMT. D6)RP 1801 E 79TH ST~--"~ SUITE 21 BLOOMI~N MN 55425 SHAWNA M GRIEP 2197 BANEBERRY WAY W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 THEODORE F & MARLENE M BENTZ 7300 GALPIN BLVD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 KLINGELHUTZ DEVELOPMENT CO 350 HWY 212 E PO BOX 89 CHASKA MN 55318 WALNUT GROVE HOMEOWNERS ASSN C/O GITTLEMAN MGMT~CORP 1801 E 79TH S// SUITE 21 B LOO M~If~TO N MN 55425 THEODORE A & ANGELA M ELLEFSON 7609 WALNUT CRV CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DENNIS E & ELISSA K ELLEFSON 2194 BANEBERRY WAY W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 NATHAN R JOHNSON & BRANDILYN E BAWEK 2193 BANEBERRY WAY W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ELDEN E & GLORIA A BOTT 7626 PRAIRIE GLOWER BL CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BLVD WAYZATa55391 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BLVD~-~~' WAYZATA~.~~' MN 55391 KLINGELHUTZ DEVELOPMENT CO 350 HWY 212 E PO BOX 89 CHASKA MN 55318 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BLVD WAYZAT~ 55391 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BLV~ WAYZAT~ MN 55391 WALNUT GROVE HOMEOWNERS ASSN C/O GITTLEMAN MGMT CORP 1801 E 79TH ST SUITE 21 BLOOMINGTON MN 55425 J P'S LINKS INC-JOHN PRZYMUS C/O PAT NEATON 601 CARLSON PKY #620 MINNETONKA MN 55305 HANG CHAN & CHEUKWAICHONG 2201BANEBERRY WAY W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LUNDGREN ~ BROS STRUCTION 935 WAYZATA B WAYZA~ MN 55391 SUSAN M ERICKSON 2198BANEBERRY WAY W CHANHASSEN MN 5,5317 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BLVD~ WAYZA~----~ MN 55391 LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 935 WAYZATA BLV~ WAYZATA _ J MN 55391 LUNDGREN BROS CON_..STRUCTION 935 WAYZATA ~ WAYZATA,/ MN 55391 CITY OF CHANHAS~,~t~ C/O BRUCE D_~G 7700 MARcK'ETBLVD PO BOX147 CHANH~SSEN MN 55317 AVERY® Address Labels Laser 5 ~.60® Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5160® MARK C GOODMAN 2370 HARVEST WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ROBERT A & TAMMARA S ROSENGREN 7846 AUTUMN RIDGE AVE CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHRISTOPHER A WILLADSEN 2386 HARVEST WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JULIA A WOLTER 7849 HARVEST LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEVEN B BUJARSKI & SHARON L KING 2376 HARVEST WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DENEEN D YOUNG 7852 AUTUMN RIDGE AVE CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARY J COLEMAN 7838 HARVEST LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JOHN T & DIANE M PERRY 1380 THRUSH CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TERRA L SAXE 7845 AUTUMN RIDGE AVE CHANHASSEN MN 55317 THOMAS S BLUSTIN 2394 HARVEST WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CARVER COUNTY HRA 705 WALNUT ST ~ CHASKA / MN 55318 BRAD L & ELAINE N DALAGER 7847 AUTUMN RIDGE AVE CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PAUL A & KIMBERLY MONSEN 2384 HARVEST WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KAREN ANN OLSON 7850 AUTUMN RIDGE AVE CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LINDA A KOENIG 7851 AUTUMN RIDGE AVE CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DANIEL D & KRISTAL L EHRKE 7847 HARVEST LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ROBERT M & PATRICIA L PETERSON 2398 HARVEST WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CARLOS J ME JlA & MARIA C MONTEALEGRE 7853 AUTUMN RIDGE AVE CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JEFFREY GIBBS 2402 HARVEST WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STACY ANN BENNET , 2388 HARVEST WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CENTEX HOMES 12400 WHITEWATER DR #120 HOPKINS MN 55343 DAWN N HUEBERT 2372 HARVEST WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SCOTT M TIMMONS 7851 HARVEST LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JUSTIN C ANDERSON 7848 AUTUMN RIDGE AVE CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID J & TASIA M CLOUTIER 2406 HARVEST WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RODNEY DORSCHNER 2396 HARVEST WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVIDJ HAPPE & SUSAN A ARRELL 7850 HARVESTLN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 AVERY® Address Labels Laser 5160® Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113 September 25, 2003 Sharmeen Al-Jaff Senior Planner, City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: Swings, Mn/DOT Review #S03-044 NW Quad of TH 5 and Galpin Boulevard Chanhassen, Carver County Control Section: 1002 Dear Ms. AI-Jaff.' The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the above referenced site plan. Please address the following issues before any further development: The site plan shows an access onto Gaplin Boulevard that crosses Mn/DOT right of way. This access is too close to TH 5 for safe signal operation at the intersection. Mn/DOT does not support an access at this location. The property should have sufficient access at 78® Street. We strongly encourage the city to require the developer to modify the development plan and remove the access onto Gaplin Boulevard which is within Mn/DOT's right of way. · A Mn/DOT Drainage permit will be required. The following additional information must be submitted: · Detailed drawing of the development including proposed contours and storm drainage features. · Site map showing the existing condition of the site. · Before/after hydraulic computations for both 10 and 100 year rainfall events. The proposed development will need to maintain existing drainage rates (i.e., the rate at which storm water is discharged from the site must not increase). Please direct questions concerning these issues to Chris Horsemann (65 ! ) 634-2408 of Mn/DOT's Water Resources section. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence tbr development activity such as plats and site plans to: Paul Czech Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a An equal opportunity employer plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's review and response to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any questions concerning this review please feel free to contact me at (651) 582- 1378. Sincere~ly, ,,,, ~ ~ Brigid Gombol~t' J Senior Transportation Planner Copy: Roger Gustafson / Carver County Engineer John Przymus / Owner Schoell & Madson, Inc.