Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Correspondence
The Canada Goose Program dated Friday, September 19, 2003. Letter to Ms. Connie Hargest dated September 23, 2003. Chanhassen Fire Department call sheet dated September 22 - 28, 2003. Review of Claims Paid dated October 3, 2003. Memo to Todd Gerhardt from Jill Sinclair dated July 7, 2003. THE CANADA GOOSE PROGRAM Dedicated to Urban Canada Goose Research and Management Friday, September 19, 2003 Mr. Todd Hoffman Park and Recreation Coordinator City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Todd: Attached is the 2003 report on the Metropolitan Twin Cities Canada goose management and research activities and an invoice for our services. The report contains an overview of the 2003 summer trapping program and updates on goose meat contaminant research. Metro goose population data, nests and eggs destroyed for the Metropolitan Airports Commission, and information on the recent proposed changes in resident Canada goose management published in the Federal Register by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service are also discussed. We trapped and removed the following number of geese from City of Chanhassen sites in 2003: Site Date Young Adults Total LAKE LUCY 7/9/2003 5 5 10 LAKE LUCY 7/19/2003 5 3 8 LAKE LUCY 7/9/2003 7 2 9 LAKE MINNEWASHTA 6/18/2003 5 2 7 LAKE MINNEWASHTA 6/18/2003 3 1 4 LAKE MINNEWASHTA 6/18/2003 14 4 18 LOTUS LAKE 7/24/2003 34 14 48 Total 73 31 104 No geese were found in the Hunter Drive neighborhood and only a single family of 7 in the Near Mountain area this summer. Lucy is a hard trap site because the residents chase the birds off in the early morning and the geese are in the cattail by the time the crew arrives. We encouraged the folks to start feeding the geese a day or two before we plan to trap and it work great for the last trap. We'll use the approach next year. 2195 DUDLEY AVE ST. PAUL, fflN 55108 If you have questions, please feel free to contact me at 651-644-6206 or email me at jac@fw.umn.edu. Sincerely yours, D Cooper Professor Emeritus, University of Minnesota Director of the Canada Goose Program 2 Friday, September 19, 2003 Canada Goose Management Services Mr. Todd Hoffman Park and Recreation Coordinator City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, M/~ 55317 2003 Canada Goose Removal Services 3 site(s) at $1,000 per site 31 adult geese @ $15/bird processing cost Total $3,000 465 The Canada Goose Program 2195 Dudley Ave. St. Paul, MN 55108 Thank you! Please make check payable to The Canada Goose Program and mail to: THE CANADA GOOSE PROG Dedicated to Urban Canada Goose Research and Management 2 003 PROGRA REPORT Far fewer Canada geese were captured and removed from Twin Cities locations in 2003 compared to 2002. The change appears to have resulted from nest flooding in mid-May and the accumulative effect of past goose removals. Nesting conditions in 2003 were excellent until just before the peak of gosling hatch in mid-May. In warm early springs such as 2003, ice-free ponds are present by mid-March and the older dominant pairs establish nests early. These birds become progressively less territorial once the females begin incubation, and younger pairs seeking nest sites in April can often "squeeze in" and breed. In contrast, in late springs, all geese are delayed in nesting and when the warm weather does come, all try at once, resulting in fewer nesting attempts and higher nest desertion rates. The low 2003 winter snow pack and a lack of rain produced favorable conditions for high nest flooding loses. Geese prefer nest sites close to the water and if early spring water levels are low, the nests are vulnerable to flooding if heavy downpours occur before the hatch--the case in 2001. But unlike 2001, the rains held off until the second week of May, just prior to peak of hatch, so while some nests (up to 25%) were lost in small ponds, the overall production was still relatively good. A total of 79,200 birds have been trapped and removed from Twin Cities lakes, marshes, and ponds since 1982 (Table 1). The magnitude of this effort combined with hunting mortality is believed to be a significant factor in the population decline. Trapping--Geese were trapped at 106 sites and 3,753 geese (2,584 goslings and 1,169 adults) removed in 2003, compared to 107 sites and 5,299 geese (3,564 goslings and 1,735 adults in 2002 (Table 1). The 2003 decline of 1,546 birds is exceeded in magnitude only by the drop of 3,239 birds in 2001 (Figure 1). The number of young geese hatched per nesting female and per adult in 2003 remained high (Figure 2). The 2003 crews caught 96.5% of all flightless Metro geese they attempted to trap, 3% lower than 2002 crews (Figure 3). The primary cause of the lower success was the shift from 5-member to 4-member crews in 2003 to reduce costs. We found that 4- member crews were effective in small ponds and wetlands but had lower success in the larger marshes and lakes. We will likely return to 5-member crews next year. Mortality during trapping and transport remained very low (T~ble 1). Two goslings died during trapping or transport, and ten birds were captured with pre-existing injuries so serious that they had to be euthanized. Trap injuries were also low, 0.57%. Of the 1,169 adults transported to the processing plant, none were lost. A total of 1,049 geese were trapped at 15 Metro and north central Minnesota locations for the Department of Natural Resource's banding program (Table 2). The banding contracts made up for the lower removal trapping and kept the student crews fully employed during the summer, a factor in recruiting and retaining skilled crew members. Twin Cities goose population changes--Like 2002, most of the trapping sites were locations where capture was done the previous year (Figures 4a and 4b). However, the proportion of new sites declined from 25% to 12%, whereas sites trapped two or more years ago increased from 3% to 22%. The decline in new sites is expected to continue because there are few cities with substantial goose populations that have not implemented a management program. Indicators of population change, such as the mean number of geese trapped per site (Figure 5), and the number of new damage sites reported (Figure 6), continue to suggest a long-term Twin Cities goose population decline. Changes in geese removed from individual locations also reflect the efficacy of the removal program. For example, the goose populations at Lake of the Isles in Minneapolis and Normandale Lake in Bloomington have been managed since 1982 and 1987 respectively. Summer populations at these two lakes have declined dramatically (Figures 7 and 8). Sites surrounded by unmanaged populations such as Lake Minnewashta in Chanhassen (Figure 9) have been more variable but have declined also. Overall, after a peak of nearly 8,000 birds in 1998, the numbers ~aught has declined by more 4,000 (Figure 1). Canada Goose Program Report 2003 2 The average number of geese caught per trap also shows the same downward trend. The number per trap averaged 50-70 through much of the early 1990s but has been less than 30 for past three years (Figure 5). Because most cities with significant goose populations are now managing the birds, and it appears that the Twin Cities population is stable or declining, I anticipate that the annual number removed will decline to the 2,000-3,000 range within two years and remain fairly stable thereafter. Five-year Metro Population SurveY--In 1984, a Twin Cites Canada goose population survey was initiated. More than 300 Metro permanent wetlands and lakes were randomly selected and geese present in June counted. Since 1994, this survey has been repeated every 5 years and the results indicate that the summer population has not grown as expected (Figure 11). Next summer, the survey will be repeated and we will know if the indicators of a goose population decline are correct. PCB study results--Since southern states (Oklahoma, Kansas, Kentucky, etc.) stopped requesting adult Metro geese for relocation in 1996, adult geese have been processed and donated to the Twin Cities food shelves (Figure 10). In 2003, 9,352 lbs. of frozen geese were delivered to the Twin Cities food shelves, bringing the total to 110,608 lbs. since 1996. In 1995, a goose meat contaminants (lead, PCB, and insecticides) monitoring program was implemented by the MNDNR and the University of Minnesota. While contaminant levels found in 1996 were within consumption limits, the MNDNR and I agreed that additional research on lead and PCBs was needed. Lead was of concern because the element is widespread in soils and because citizens using the food shelves, particularly children living in homes with lead-based paint, were suspected of having higher than normal lead exposure. PCBs bio-accumulate, have a long half-life (1 year), and therefore may build up in the fatty tissues of long-lived animals such as geese. PCBs are known to cause cancer in animals and humans. In past years, I reported that insignificant levels of lead and mercury were found in the Twin Cities geese, including birds trapped at known contamination sites. This summer, the organochlorine pesticide and PCB analyses were completed. I'm happy to report that no hard pesticides were detected (detection limit of 0.010 PPM), and that 7 of 30 g~ese had PCB above the detection level of 0.050 PPM. Only 1 was high enough (0.86 PPM) Canada Goose Program Report 2003 3 to require a consumption advisory. These results will be forward to the Minnesota Department of Health for review. Air~ort nests--Included in the summary data are the number of nests and eggs destroyed and breeding geese shot as part of the goose hazard reduction effort at the Minneapolis St. Paul International and Downtown St. Paul Airports (Table 3). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Resident Canada Goose Management Permit--In the spring of 2002, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposed changes in the Migratory Bird Management regulations to allow states more options in managing Canada geese. After holding hearings and soliciting comments, the Service recently published the proposed changes in the Federal Register (Vol. 68, No. 162 August 21, 2003, pages 50496-509). Because Minnesota has been operating under these rules since 2000, the changes will not affect the Twin Cities program, but the publication contains useful information about goose populations, damage, and management elsewhere. In summary, we had an excellent trapping and banding program in 2003. I'm looking forward to conducting the 2004 Metro population survey and finding out if our population is declining. The program will continue to address all requests for goose management, and time permitting, additional contract banding for MNDNR. If you have questions, please feel free to contact me at 651- 644-6206 or email me at jac@fw.umn.edu. Canada Goose Program Report 2003 4 Table 1. Immature (I) and adult (A) Canada geese removed from the Twin Cities of Minnesota and mortality during trapping and transport, 1982-2003. Year I A Total Mortality Percent 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals 195 0 361 507 636 740 1 714 1 680 1 766 1 685 3 005 2 224 2 834 4 747 3 982 3 978 5 183 4 250 4 696 2 335 3 564 2 584 52,666 261 0 492 396 379 375 864 1 294 1 054 1 196 1 248 1 083 1 352 2 189 2 256 1 676 2 395 1 925 2 042 1 164 1 735 1 169 26,545 456 0 853 903 1,015 1,115 2 578 2 974 2 820 2 881 4 253 3 307 4 186 6 936 6 239 5 642 7 578 6 175 6 738 3 499 5 299 3 753 79,200 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 0 2 1 0 1 1 1 2 2 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 4 2 1 3 2 1 3 1 1 2 6 2 8 1 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 3 0 1 1 4 1 5 0 1 1 5 1 6 2 0 2 39 15 54 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.30 0.09 0 08 0 10 0 03 0 14 0 07 0 09 0 05 0 12 0 03 0 03 0 04 0 02 0 07 0 03 0 11 0 02 0.07 a a Percent mortality is less than 1 goose per 1,000 trapped and transported. Canada Goose Program Report 2003 5 Table 2. Locations and number of Canada geese captured for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources banding 2003 program. Location City/Town I A Total Albion WMA Greenhaven Golf Course South Stanchfield Lake Mi]i Pond Rocket Turf Forest Lake Bohrer Pond Sim~ei' Pond KD~e Lake Wasuewater Ponds Snake River Williams Pipeline Rush Lake Mississippi River Ba~e~ly Gravel Pits Annandale 29 11 40 Anoka 22 12 34 Carmody 39 10 49 Champlin 43 16 59 Coon Rapids 131 24 155 Forest Lake 29 30 59 Inver Grove Hts. 27 9 36 Inver Grove Hts. 26 7 33 Kanabec 37 14 51 Paynesville 15 11 26 Pine City 98 40 138 Roseville 72 54 126 Rush City 82 43 125 Sartell 26 18 44 St. Cloud 42 32 74 Total 718 331 1,049 Canada Goose Program Report 2003 6 Table 3. Canada goose nests found and the number of breeding geese and eggs removed for the Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport hazard reduction, April-May, 2003. Location Nests, Eggs Geese Apple Lake 0 Bass Ponds & Long Meadow Lake 54 & Long Meadow Lake Black Dog Lake 4 Crosby Lake 4 Gun Club Lake North of I494 15 Gun Club Lake South of I494 9 Hwy 110 & 55 Pond 1 Legion Lake 4 Mother Lake (MAC Operations) NA Old Hwl; 13 & 55 Wetland 1 Pickerel Lake 4 Richfield lake 3 Running Park 0 Smith Park 0 Snelling Lake 2 Snelling National Cemetery 0 Upper Lake 0 a Wood Lake 15 Wrights Park Pond 0 , 0 0 293 0 18 0 24 0 62 3 46 1 6 0 20 0 NA NA 1 0 19 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 72 0 0 0 Total 116 593 4 a Two nests containing a total of 11 eggs were left at the request of the Wood Lake Nature Center Staff. Canada Goose Program Report 2003 7 80O0 6000 4000 2000 0 · TOTAL= 79,200 YEAR Figure 1. Canada geese captured and removed from the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, Minnesota, 1982-2003. Canada Goose Program Report 2003 8 8 7- 6- 5- ,,El Young Per Adult Young Per Brood Patch Female IlllllllJlllllllllJll YEAR Figure 2. Canada goose productivity indices, Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, Minnesota, 1982-2003. Canada Goose Program Report 2003 9 100 99- 98- 97- 96- -- Capture Rate 95 t I J ~ I I I I i ~ I YEAR Figure 3. Flightless Canada goose trapping rates (percentage of flightless geese captured at all sites), Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, Minnesota, 1982-2003. Canada Goose Program Report 2003 10 2002 Canada Goose Removal Site Classes 72% ;% 3% [] NEW · LAST YEAR [] REPEAT Figure 4a. Status of 2002 Canada goose trap sites, Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, Minnesota. 2003 CAPTURE SITE STATUS 66% NEW LAST YEAR REPEAT Figure 4b. Status of 2003 Canada goos~ trap sites, Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, Minnesota. Canada Goose Program Report 2003 11 50O 450 - 400 - 350 - 300 - 250 - 200 - 150 - 100 - 50- 0 [] Mean Number of Geese Trapped YEAR Figure 5. Mean number of Canada geese captured per trap, Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, Minnesota, 1982-2003. Canada Goose Program Report 2003 12 8OO 600 400 200 0 [] Complaints [] Total Complaints Year Figure 6. Damage complaints resulting from Canada, Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, Minnesota, reported during the 1982-2003 period. Canada Goose Program Report 2003 13 500 400 - 300 - 200 - 100 - - S Pplti _ ummer o ua on 0 I I I i I i I I I I I I I I I I I ! Year Figure 7. Canada goose population at Normandale Lake, Bloomington, MN, July 1988-2003. Canada Goose Program Report 2003 14 600 500 - 400 - 300 - 200 - 100 - Summer Population I. I I I I I I I I I I Year Figure 8. Canada goose population at Lake of the Isles, Minneapolis, MN, July 1982-2003. Canada Goose Program Report 2003 15 150 - 125 - 100 - 75- 50- 25 -- Summer Population I I I I I I I Year Figure 9. Canada goose population at Lake Minnewashta, Chanhassen, MN, July 1986-2003. Canada Goose Program Report 2003 16 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 15oo 1000 5OO 0 [] Food Bank Young [] Food Bank Adults Total = I 3,568 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Year Figure 10. Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Canada goose processed and delivered to Minneapolis- St. Paul Food Banks, 1996-2003. Canada Goose Program Report 2003 17 350000 325000- 300000- 275000- 250000- 225000- 200000- 175000- 150000- 125000- 100000- 75000- 50000- 25000- 0 1960 A = PROJECTED POPULATON GROWTH B= ACTUAL POPULATION CHANGE y = 8.7861e-177 * 10^(9.0836e-2x) R^2 = 99.7 1970 1980 1990 2000 Year 2010 Figure 11. Projected Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Canada goose population growth (A) and 1968, 1974, 1984, 1994, and 1999 population estimates (B). Canada Goose Program Report 2003 18 CITYOF CH H SE 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www. ci.chanhassen.mn.us September 23, 2003 Ms. Connie Hargest Local Government Relations CenterPoint Energy - Minnegasco 800 LaSalle Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55459-0038 Dear Connie: On behalf of the Chanhassen City Council I would like to thank you for presenting the City of Chanhassen with a Community Partnership Grant in the amount of $2,116.00! It is always a good day when partnerships can be created or strengthened. The addition of the four little leaf linden trees made possible by this grant will have a dramatic impact on our City Center Park project. Please come back in the spring and I will be pleased to give you a tour of the new park. We can look at the four linden trees and you will be able to see for yourself what a great addition they were to the plan. Again, thank you for attending the September 22 Chanhassen City Council meeting. Sincerely, Todd Hoffman Park and Recreation Director c: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Mayor and City Council g:\park\th\connie hargest The City of Chanhassen, A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE/RESCUE WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 22 - SEPTEMBER 28, 2003 Moil Mon Tues Tues Tues Tues Weds Weds Weds Weds Fri Fri Fri Fri Sat Sat Sun Sept 22 2:04 PM Sept 22 5:15 PM Sept 23 10:39 AM Sept 23 12:57 PM Sept 23 3:28 PM Sept 23 11:04 PM Sept 24 1:34 PM Sept 24 5:48 PM Sept 24 10:19 PM Sept 24 11:13 PM Sept 26 12:34 AM Sept 26 1:37 PM Sept 26 3:46 PM Sept 26 9:22 PM Sept 27 1:22 PM Sept 27 5:04 PM Sept 28 4:32 AM West 63rd Street Stone Creek Lane West Chan Hills Drive No Redwing Court Arboretum Village Circle Hwy 101 & Hwy212 Lake Drive Lake Point Santa Vera Drive Pima Lane Utica Lane & Tecumseh Ln Dakota Circle Alisa Court Near Mountain Blvd Santa Vera Drive Laredo Drive Ithilien Ct Medical- possible stroke Medical - seizures Medical - bee sting Medical- chest pains Gas line break Motorcycle accident, unfounded Medical - possible heart Fire alarm - false alarm, no fire Medical - unknown problem Medical - possible heart Person laying in street Medical - child fell Medical - seizures Possible electrical fire Oven fire Sewer smell Medical - difficulty breathing, cancelled CITYOF CHAN SEN 7700 ~'.&rXe~ PO Box 147 Cna~rhassa~ MN 55317 Administration P!,,er-e 952 2271100 Fax: 952 227 1~10 Building Inspections Phone 952227 Fax; 952 22711~0 E~gineering Fax: 952 2271~70 Phone: 952 22X 1~40 Fax 952 227 ~ ~ 1 Park & Recreaiian Phsne: 952 227 1120 ~ax: 9522271 H8 2310 Cocter Boulevard Phoz~e: 952227 1400 Fcax 952 227 t 404 Planting ~ Natural Resources Phore 952 227 1~% Fa~ 952 227 11~0 Public Works Pr~one 952 227 ~300 Fax: 952 227 Senior Cenier Phone: 952 227 ~125 F~:x: 957 22~ 1H0 Web Site ww¢, si chanhassen mn us MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor City Council Bruce M. DeJong, Finance Direct~ October 3, 2003 Review of Claims Paid The following claims are submitted for review on October 13, 2003: Check Numbers Amount 117598-117851 Total Payments $666,645.25 $666,645.25 Attachments: Check Register Invoice Listing The 6ity o! Chantlassen ,, A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charmieg downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails and beaulltul parks A great piace to live '~,%:k a,~d play CHECK REGISTER REPORT Date: 10/03/2003 117598-117851 Time: 1:57pm City of Chanhassen Page: 1 BANK: CHANHASSEN BANK Check Check Vendor Number Date Status Number Vendor Name Check Description Amount 117598 09/18/2003 Printed 10000 10,000 LAKES CHAPTER NOVEMBER REGISTRATIONS 875.00 117599 09/18/2003 Printed AARP AARP DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS 250.00 117600 09/18/2003 Printed ACHEA AC & HEATING BY GEORGE REPLACE AC AT FIRE STATION 1,500.00 117601 09/18/2003 Printed ADVMOD ADVANCED MODULAR POWER SYSTEMS PUMP 2,015.16 117602 09/18/2003 Printed ALTREB ALTERNATOR REBUILD CO ALTERNATOR 42.60 117603 09/18/2003 Printed ANDON ANDON, INC HELIUM 75.61 117604 09/18/2003 Printed ANNLEN ANN LENDINO REFUND-DANCE, BALLET/TAP 2 78.00 117605 09/18/2003 Printed AUTGAR AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR & REFUND CANCELLED PERMIT 87.19 117606 09/18/2003 Printed BATPLU BATTERIES PLUS BATTERY 16.99 117607 09/18/2003 Printed BAYWES BAY WEST PADS/8OOM 764.00 117608 09/18/2003 Printed BLAVEA BLACK & VEATCH CORPORATION MASTER PLAN 9,035.94 117609 09/18/2003 Printed 80YHEA BOYER HEAVY TRUCK SALES & SERV 03 STERLING L8500 CHASSIS 55,553.00 117610 09/18/2003 Printed BRILEE BRIAN LEE ADULT SOFTBALL UMPIRE 40.00 117611 09/18/2003 Printed BROAMO BROWN'S AMOCO VEHICLE WASHES 53.55 117612 09/18/2003 Printed BUSSOL BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS MS OFFICE PRO 424.94 117613 09/18/2003 Printed CAMKNU CAMPBELL KNUTSON SCOTT & FUCHS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,766.97 117614 09/18/2003 Printed CHAGO0 CHANHASSEN GOODYEAR MISC PARTS 227.36 117615 09/18/2003 Printed CHAVIL CHANHASSEN VILLAGER SUBSCRIPTION 50.00 117616 09/18/2003 Printed CONSOL CONNECTIVITY SOLUTIONS OVERHEAD PAGING SYSTEM 1,623.25 117617 09/18/2003 Printed COREXP CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES 65.26 117618 09/18/2003 Printed COUMAR COUNTY MARKET MISC FOOD/SUPPLIES 741.15 117619 09/18/2003 Printed DAVPER DAVID P. PERKINS FINAL BILL OVERPAYMENT 5.02 117620 09/18/2003 Printed DAWBEI DAWN BEITEL MENS 8REAKFAST/DEF DRIVING 31.26 117621 09/18/2003 Printed DELTO0 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY MISC SUPPLIES 599.64 117622 09/18/2003 Printed DUOSAF DUO-SAFETY LADDER CORPORATION HEAT SENSOR/LADDER LABELS 15.65 117623 09/18/2003 Printed ELKRIV ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODUCTS ADJ RINGS 637.46 117624 09/18/2003 Printed ELLBOM ELLEN BOMPANE REFUND-MAGNETS/MUSICAL SCIENCE 30.00 117625 09/18/2003 Printed FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY RETURN-MISC SUPPLIES/PARTS 783.89 117626 09/18/2003 Printed FESSOU FESTIVAL SOUND AND LIGHTING STAGE 320.00 117627 09/18/2003 Printed FOCONE FOCUS ONE HOUR PHOTO FILM DEVELOPING 8.67 117628 09/18/2003 Printed GOPSTA GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC UTILITY LOCATES 951.70 117629 09/18/2003 Printed HANTHO HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON HIGHWAY 101 TRAIL 229.00 117630 09/18/2003 Printed HEWPAC HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY TABLET PC/CARRY CASE/DRIVE 2,360.04 117631 09/18/2003 Printed HOIKOE HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP MARSH GLEN TRAIL 164.40 117632 09/18/2003 Printed ICMA ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 EMPLOYEE DEFERRED COMP 406.00 117633 09/18/2003 Printed IMPPOR IMPERIAL PORTA THRONES PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 3,613.78 117634 09/18/2003 Printed INDLAN INDOOR LANDSCAPES INC SEPTEMBER PLANT SERVICE 199.16 117635 09/18/2003 Printed INFRAT INFRATECH EMERGENCY VAC LIFT STATION 1,110.00 117636 09/18/2003 Printed ICC INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL BUILDING OFFICIAL RENEWAL 30.00 117637 09/18/2003 Printed ICC INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL PLANS EXAMINER RENEWAL 40.00 117638 09/18/2003 Printed JEFFIR JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC BATTERY PACK 249.00 117639 09/18/2003 Printed KIMEIC KIM EICKERT ADULT SOFTBALL UMPIRE 40.00 117640 09/18/2003 Printed KINKOS KINKOS PAPER 616.63 117641 09/18/2003 Printed KMCTEL KMC TELECOM TELEPHONE CHARGES 2,471.91 117642 09/18/2003 Printed KRIWIL KRISSY WILLOCK REFUND-PRESCHOOL B-BALL 40.00 117643 09/18/2003 Printed LARELE LARRY'S ELECTRIC INC LAKE ANN PARK SHELTER 6,711.99 117644 09/18/2003 Printed LORJUE LORI JUELICH REFUND-DANCE, COMBO 2 115.50 117645 09/18/2003 Printed MARHEB MARY BETH HEBEISEN REFUND-MUSICAL SCIENCE 15.00 117646 09/18/2003 Printed MELWAC MELISSA WACHUTKA REFUND-DANCE, COMP 3 231.00 117647 09/18/2003 Printed MENARD MENARDS - EDEN PRAIRIE SUPPLIES-PAINT ENTRY 90.47 117648 09/18/2003 Printed METC02 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICE 108,194.67 117649 09/18/2003 Printed METCO METROPOLITAN COUNCIL, ENV SVCS SAC 20,196.00 117650 09/18/2003 Printed MNGIS MN GIB-LIS CONSORTIUM WORKSHOPS 760.00 117651 09/18/2003 Printed MNTREA MN STATE TREASURER SURCHARGE 4,591.17 117652 09/18/2003 Printed MOOMED MOORE MEDICAL MISC SUPPLIES 111.30 117653 09/18/2003 Printed MSRS MSRS EMP HCSP-PAY DATE 8/22/03 1,567.68 117654 09/18/2003 Printed MTIDIS MTI DISTRIBUTING INC FAN CLUTCH 244.12 117655 09/18/2003 Printed NAWATE NATIONAL WATERWORKS INC METERS/FLANGE KITS 4,877.70 117656 09/18/2003 Printed USCM NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION EMP DEFERRED COMP 5,741.95 117657 09/18/2003 Printed NEXTEL NEXTEL CELLULAR PHONE CHARGES 66.37 117658 09/18/2003 Printed NOCOMP NORTHCOTT COMPANIES RETURN PICNIC DEPOSIT 200.00 117659 09/18/2003 Printed OFFMAX OFFICE MAX OFFICE SUPPLIES 98.98 117660 09/18/2003 Printed ONYSPE ONYX SPECIAL SERVICES INC BALLAST 4.36 117661 09/18/2003 Printed PIPSER PIPE SERVICES, CORP. EMERGENCY PUMPING-LB 10 1,365.00 117662 09/18/2003 Printed PRARES PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC COMMUNITY GARDEN PRAIRIE MAINT 150.78 117663 09/18/2003 Printed RADSHA RADIO SHACK MISC SUPPLIES 66.00 117664 09/18/2003 Printed RHODOL RHONDA DOLAN REFUND-DANCE, KINDER I 71.50 117665 09/18/2003 Printed RIDYMC RIDGEDALE YMCA T-BALL INSTRUCTION 9,178.00 117666 09/18/2003 Printed RIDBUS RIDGEVIEW BUSINESS HEALTH HEALTH CONSULTATIONS 187.00 117667 09/18/2003 Printed SARHIP SARA HIPSKIND REFUND-PRESCHOOL SOCCER 80.00 117668 09/18/2003 Printed BEH SEH 2003 MBA STREET PROJECT 4,687.22 117669 09/18/2003 Printed SENSYS SENTRY SYSTEMS, INC. ANNUAL INSPECTION 750.00 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO CHECK REGISTER REPORT Date: 10/03/2003 117598-117851 Time: 1:57pm City of Chanhassen Page: 4 BANK: CHANHASSEN BANK Check Check Vendor Number Date Status Number Vendor Name Check Description Amount 117814 10/02/2003 Printed MRPA MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC. ANNUAL CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 320.00 117815 10/02/2003 Printed MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP ELECTRICITY CHARGES 570.45 117816 10/02/2003 Printed MSRS MBRS EMP HCSP PAY DATE 10/03/2003 1,565.22 117817 10/02/2003 Printed MTIDIS MTI DISTRIBUTING INC PIN-SPRING/LEVER-PUMP/SPRING 113.92 117818 10/02/2003 Printed NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS BULBS/HEADLAMP 6.39 117819 10/02/2003 Printed USCM NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION EMPLOYEE DEFERRED COMP 5,741.95 117820 10/02/2003 Printed NEXTEL NEXTEL CELLULAR PHONE CHARGES 1,470.95 117821 10/02/2003 Printed NORLAS NORTHWEST LASERS INC ALUM ROD 93.98 117822 10/02/2003 Printed OLIHOM OLIVEWOOD HOMEOWNERS ASSOC REFUND BARRICADE ESCROW 100.00 117823 10/02/2003 Printed PAUEKH PAUL EKHOLM REIMBURSE EXPENSES 67.66 117824 10/02/2003 Printed PIORIM PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO. DISC PAD SET/BRAKE ROTOR 81.23 117825 10/02/2003 Printed POLAR POLAR ARMREST 298.00 117826 10/02/2003 Printed PRTURF PRO TURF FERTILIZER 1,001.95 117827 10/02/2003 Printed RBMSER RBM SERVICES INC LIBRARY NIGHTLY CLEANING 4,553.87 117828 10/02/2003 Printed REYWEL REYNOLDS WELDING SUPPLY CO ARGON 58.91 117829 10/02/2003 Printed SENSYS SENTRY SYSTEMS, INC. MONITORING SERVICES 78.96 117830 10/02/2003 Printed SHEKEL SHER] KELLY REFUND-LITTLE SHOOTERS BB 65.00 117831 10/02/2003 Printed SHEWIL SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 88.70 117832 10/02/2003 Printed SHEBJO SHERYL BJORK REFUND-TKD, YOUTH FALL 1 58.00 117833 10/02/2003 Printed SKISEM SKILLPATH SEMINARS REGISTRATION 299.00 117834 10/02/2003 Printed SKYSPR SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY ROLLER HOCKEY 1,482.00 117835 10/02/2003 Printed STATRI STAR TRIBUNE SUBSCRIPTION 112.58 117836 10/02/2003 Printed STEHAT STEPHANIE HATTEBERG REFUND-PILATEB, ESSENTIAL FALL 110.00 117837 10/02/2003 Printed SUBCHE SUBURBAN CHEVROLET HANDLE 78.29 117838 10/02/2003 Printed SUSAND SUSAN ANDERSON REFUND-PARENT/CHILD EXPLORE 10.00 117839 10/02/2003 Printed SYNSAL SYNDICATE SALES CORP PRUNER/EXT RATCHET LOPPER 295.18 117840 10/02/2003 Printed TERDEC TERESA DECKARD REFUND-HARVEST TIME CRAFTS 21.00 117841 10/02/2003 Printed CANGO0 THE CANADA GOOSE PROJECT CANADA GOOSE REMOVAL SERVICE 3,465.00 117842 10/02/2003 Printed ROTCOM THE ROTTLUND COMPANY INC. SECOND HALF TIF PAYMENT 23,748.45 117843 10/02/2003 Printed TIMTIL TIM TILLSTON LANDSCAPE/EROSION ESCROW 1,250.00 117844 10/02/2003 Printed UNIUNL UNIFORMS UNLIMITED BADGE SHIELD 106.50 117845 10/02/2003 Printed UNIWAY UNITED WAY SEPTEMBER CONTRIBUTION 114.00 117846 10/02/2003 Printed UNIMIN UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA REGISTRATION 360.00 117847 10/02/2003 Printed VERIZO VERIZON WIRELESS CELLULAR PHONE CHARGES 49.44 117848 10/02/2003 Printed VICHAN VICKI HANDLER REFUND-DANCE, BALLET/TAP 2 42.55 117849 10/02/2003 Printed WILNUR WILSON'S NURSERY INC TREES 57.00 117850 10/02/2003 Printed WWGRA WW GRAINGER INC VALVE/COIL 113.36 117851 10/02/2003 Printed XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC ELECTRICITY CHARGES 149.68 Total Checks: 254 Bank Total: 666,645.25 Total Checks: 254 Grand Total: 666,645.25 ]17759 117781 117777 117827 50181 0q/11/2003 33902] 09/26/2003 99000903 09/30/2003 002603 09/26/2003 8556 09/30/2003 333420 09/12/2003 338946IN 89/17/2303 rr~v/Train Trev/Tr ~in Tray/Train 08/ ~/2383 o9/01/20o ~ {', 5 / 11/2003 09/09/2883 0e/11/2003 (: ~/23/2023 08/0i /2003 0e/09/200~ Books/Per- MEDi 2A TPt21AEizal Control 117d53 082203 08/22/200J i17~16 200303 20/02/2003 117722 74101050 39/12/2003 EMP HiS} PAY DATE 8/22/03 EMP HCSP PAY DATE 18/33/2003 Irlsuranoe MEDI CA 117722 OCTOBE~ HEAL--P[ INSURANCE LONG TERM DISAPILIUY !ns~/F~rlce H I NNESOTA LIFE 117724 082203 08/22/2003 !8C383 18/:12/2003 EMP H:'SP PAY DAiE 3/22/n~ MSNS E~P HiS? PAY DATE MilT} [ {2A I i?722 /iMP HqS~ PAY DATE 8/22/3% MSRS 117816 EHP HCSP PAY 3ArE ME31 A i 17722 OCTOBER HEALTH i NSiJ~ANCE FORTIS BENEFITS 117791 LONG TERM DiSABILiTY MINNESOTA LIFE 117724 LIFE INSURANCE THE CANADA GOOSE PROJECT 117841 ANADA G~7}S7 REMOVAL SERVICE T MOBILE 117678 2ELLULAR PHONE C}UIRGES SPRINT PCS 117744 MSRS EMP HCSP PAY DATE 8/22/0 100303 10/02/2003 100103 10/01/2003 093003 09/30/2003 Telephone V~NT/ORI NG 07/28/2003 Prog S:pp HOME DEPOT MiSC SUPPLIES MSRS EMP HCSP PAY Z~ZE 3/22/03 MSRS EMP HCSP PAY DATE 10/03/2003 MEDiSA OCTOBER HEALTH iNSUR~ANCE FORTIS ~ENEFiTS LONG TERM DISABILITY 117711 091703 ',} 9/17/2003 Tote} Recreation Pl?ograms 0'91703 09/17/2003 1176S3 082203 08/22/2003 i17~16 100303 10/02/2003 117'722 741810~C 09/12/2003 11'77%1 100103 10/0!/2003 939.48 47,13 0 ,45 143.56 5.47 De~T: SUMMER SOFi~ALL i01 !7C6 4300 De~t: FALL SOFTBALL 101-1767 4308 KRTST!NE CHR ISTTANS REFUND 'T'KD YOUTH SHIRT KELLY REFUND LiTTlE SHO()TE~S WilLiAM 3 TLLER :3(l:L E LESSONS ~KYNLAWKS SPORTS A,iADi~MY ELLEN POM PANE REFUND F~AGNE rs/MRS ! ,iAL MARNEE SHE PAR3 REFiiN3 PARENi/CHiLD EX~Li:RSi ?IUNTY MARKET MiS{ ~ f,OD/SUPPLiES KlM EZCKERT ADULT SOPTPALL UMPIRE BRIAN LEE ADULT SOFTBALL UMPIRE JENNY CHALUPSKY ADNLT SUFTBALL UMPIRE 3ORDON HART ADULT SOFTPALL UHPIRE 117717 11761O l]771J 117708 0917C3 l}/i 7/2003 4 C . 8S BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS MS OFFICE PRO 3080214 06/31/2003 3688151 09/17/2003 134291 08/28/2003 PONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLiK 2OO4 RESIDENTiAl ST TMPROV~ METROPOLITAN COUNCIL, ENR/ SVCS SAC MSRS EMP HCSP-PAY DATE 8/22/03 MSRS EMP HCSP PAY DA%E 18/33/200S MEDICA ,TAP/kOT,L'/WiRE SET/SPARK 117649 117653 117816 117722 117'7:;i 117724 i1762f 117825 853103 08/31/2SS3 332203 08/22/2883 135303 10/02/2883 74101050 0~/12/2883 100103 ]0/01/20d:~ 092403 09/24/2003 410.50 2,077.22 2,077.22 2,487.72 117722 117724 117695 117641 74101050 09/12/2003 092403 {~9/24/2003 101510 $9/15/2003 081903 08/19/2003 092703 09/17/2003 09232003 0e/23/2003 090903 09/09/2003 091603 09/i~/2003 2,125.41 42.41 888.50 122.42 Tr~v/Tr~ i n Escrow Pay Escrow P~y Escrow P%y NL~RCON INC ] 1780~ EROSION ESCROW 6378 M~LSiY NN LECY Ct>NSTRUCTION 117801 EI~OSION/2J~N3SCAPE 6~5I~KO?A TiM TiLLSTON 117843 !~ANDSCAPE/E ROS I ON ESi;ROW LEC¥ CONST~UCTi C:N DR!%reiWAY ES 'ROW 615 [~KOTA LN OLiVEWOOD HOMEOWNERS ASS(DC 117822 REFUND BARRI<~OE ESCROW CHRiSTOPH~iR HELSENE 117780 REFUND SIGN ESCROW 0/12/200% ( e/30/2(n} 3 dl5LL 09/23/2003 {6~0D 09/23/2003 To~al LANESUAPE e578Hh 09/16/2003 615~L 09/23/2003 6690B 89/23/2003 EE3376 10/81/2003 i 00. o 0 09/1 /2003 CITYOF CHANHASSEN Administration Building Inspections Engineering Finance Park a Recreation Ph,cu '6', 227 1!20 F":r )'.,~227141J0 Planning & Natural Resources ~ e )52 22713~ Senior Center ~, %2227~125 Wek Sil~ MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resources Specialist DATE: July 7, 2003 SUB J: Update on recycling coupon program In the summer issue of the city newsletter, The Connection, a $10.00 coupon was printed for use by Chanhassen residents at the Carver County Environmental Center. The newsletter was delivered the first week of May. As of the end of June, residents have redeemed 124 coupons totaling $1,122.00. Attached is a detailed list of the items and amount tallied at the center. The city is only charged for the amount the customer uses. For instance, if a resident uses the $10 coupon to pay for an appliance, the city is billed only $9.00 for the appliance. Funding for this program comes from an annual grant from Carver County. For 2003 the grant total is $13,017.00. The city's 2003 recycling budget has allocated $10,000 for the coupon program. Since only slightly over $1,000 of the budget has been spent, more coupons were printed and distributed at the Fourth of July parade. The coupon will also be reissued in the fall newsletter. Expiration dates for the summer and Fourth of July coupons are August 31, 2003. The expiration date for the fall coupon will be December 31, 2003. The City of Chanhassen,, .. . ' , '~:: ,: :, · 2003 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SW GRANT Coupon Redemption $ 13,017.00 4/30/2003 2 YDS YARD WASTE 16.00 $10.00 6.00 $ 13,007.00 4/30/2003 1 MONITOR $10.00 $10.00 - $ 12,997.00 5/1/2003 1 LAWNM©WER $5.00 $5.00 - $ 12,992.00 5/1/2003 2 YDS YARD WASTE $16.00 $10.00 6.00 $ 12,982.00 5/1/2003 5 Truck Tires and 1 Semi Tire $15.00 $10.00 5.00 $ 12,972.00 5/1/2003 20 Bags of Grass/Leaves $20.00 $10.00 10.00 $ 12,962.00 5/2/2003 1 TV $10.00 $10.00 - $ 12,952.00 5/2/2003 1 TV $10.00 $10.00 - $ 12,942.00 5/2/2003 1 APPLIANCE $9.00 $9.00 - $ 12,933.00 5/2/2003 10 Bags of Grass/Leaves $10.00 $10.00 - $ 12,923.00 5/2/2003 1YD YARD WASTE $8.00 $8.00 - $ 12,915.00 5/2/2003 10 Bags of Grass/Leaves $10.00 $10.00 - $ 12,905.00 5/3/2003 1 YD YARD WASTE $8.00 $8.00 $ 12,897.00 5/3/2003 1 YD YARD WASTE $8.00 $8.00 $ 12,889.00 5/3/2003 10 Bags of G rass/Leaves $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,879.00 5/3/2003 19 Bags of Grass/Leaves $19.00 $10.00 9.00 $ 12,869.00 5/3/2003 1 TV $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,859.00 5/3/2003 2 Appliances $18.00 $10.00 8.00 $ 12,849.00 5/3/2003 8 Bags of Grass/Leaves $8.00 $8.00 $ 12,841.00 5/3/2003 1 TV $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,831.00 5/3/2003 1 APPLIANCE $9.00 $9.00 $ 12,822.00 5/3/2003 1 YD YARD WASTE $8.00 $8.00 $ 12,814.00 5/3/2003 6 Bags of Grass/Leaves $6.00 $6.00 $ 12,808.00 5/3/2003 1 Appliance/1 Lawnmower $14.00 $10.00 4.00 $ 12,798.00 5/3/2003 2 YDS YARD WASTE $16.00 $10.00 6.00 $ 12,788.00 5/7/2003 2 LAWNMOWERS $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,778.00 5/7/2003 1 APPLIANCE $9.00 $9.00 $ 12,769.00 5/7/2003 1 TV $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,759.00 5/7/2003 $9.00 $9.00 $ 12,750.00 I AWNMt3W FR 5/7/2003 2 YDS YARD WASTE $16.00 $10.00 6.00 $ 12,740.00 5/7/2003 1 TV/2 SMALL ELEC $14.00 $10.00 4.00 $ 12,730.00 5/7/2003 3 Bags of Grass/Leaves $3.00 $3.00 $ 12,727.00 5/8/2003 9 Bags of Grass/Leaves $9.00 $9.00 $ 12,718.00 5/8/2003 1 TV/1 Small Elec. $12.00 $10.00 2.00 $ 12,708.00 5/8/2003 1 TV $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,698.00 5/8/2003 20 Bags of Grass/Leaves $20.00 $10.00 $ 12,688.00 5/8/2003 1 Appliance $10.00 $9.00 $ 12,679.00 5/8/2003 1 Monitor $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,669.00 5/9/2003 1 TV $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,659.00 5/10/2003 1 YD YARD WASTE $8.00 $8.00 $ 12,651.00 5/10/2003 2 ELECTRONICS $20.00 $10.00 10.00 $ 12,641.00 5/10/2003 10 Bags of Grass/Leaves $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,631.00 5/10/2003 1.5 YDS YARD WASTE $12.00 $10.00 2.00 $ 12,621.00 5/10/2003 3 Bags of Grass/Leaves $3.00 $3.00 $ 12,618.00 5/10/2003 1 TV/6 Bags of Grass/Leaves $16.00 $10.00 6.00 $ 12,608.00 5/10/2003 1 TV/1 Lawnmower $15.00 $10.00 5.00 $ 12,598.00 5/10/2003 10 Bags of Grass/Leaves $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,588.00 5/10/2003 2 YDS YARD WASTE $16.00 $10.00 6.00 $ 12,578.00 5/10/2003 1 1/4 YDS YARD WASTE $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,568.00 5/10/2003 2 YDS YARD WASTE $16.00 $10.00 6.00 $ 12,558.00 5/14/2003 2 ELECTRONICS $20.00 $10.00 10.00 $ 12,548.00 5/14/2003 1 ELECTRONIC $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,538.00 5/14/2003 1 Tire/6 Bags of Grass/Leaves $7.50 $7.50 $ 12,530.50 5/14/2003 7 Bags of Grass/Leaves $7.00 $7.00 $ 12,523.50 5/15/2003 2 YDS YARD WASTE $16.00 $10.00 6.00 $ 12,513.50 5/16/2003 10 Bags of Grass/Leaves $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,503.50 5/16/2003 5 Bags of Grass/Leaves $5.00 $5.00 $ 12,498.50 5/16/2003 2 Appliances $18.00 $10.00 8.00 $ 12,488.50 15 I FUCK I~res 1.b YU5 Yard 5/17/2003 W~.~t~ $24.00 $10.00 14.00 $ 12,478.50 511712003 1 ELECTRONIC $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,468.50 511712003 1 LAWNMOWER $5.00 $5.00 $ 12,463.50 5/17/2003 10 Bags of Grass/Leaves $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,453.50 5/21/2003 10 Bags of Grass/Leaves $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,443.50 5/21/2003 1 ELECTRONIC $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,433.50 5/21/2003 10 Bags of Grass/Leaves $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,423.50 5/21/2003 1 CONSOLE TV $20.00 $10.00 10.00 $ 12,413.50 5/21/2003 1 ELECTRON lC $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,403.50 5/22/2003 1 ELECTRONIC $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,393.50 5/22/2003 1 ELECTRONIC $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,383.50 5/22/2003 1 ELECTRONIC $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,373.50 5/22/2003 ~ Passenger l lres/1 I-arm R~.~r $26.00 $10.00 6.00 $ 12,363.50 5/23/2003 1 Appliance $9.00 $9.00 $ 12,354.50 5/23/2003 10 Bags of G rass/Leaves $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,344.50 5/23/2003 3 Small Electronics $6.00 $6.00 $ 12,338.50 5/23/2003 1.5 YDS YARD WASTE $12.00 $10.00 2.00 $ 12,328.50 5/23/2003 8 Bags of Grass/Leaves $8.00 $8.00 $ 12,320.50 5/23/2003 9 Bags of Grass/Leaves $9.00 $9.00 $ 12,311.50 5/23/2003 1 ELECTRONIC $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,301.50 5/28/2003 10 Bags of Grass/Leaves $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,291.50 5/28/2003 1 Appliance/11 1Sags ot C11m.~.~/I ~.~vg.~ $20.00 $20.00 $ 12,271.50 5/28/2003 10 Bags of Grass/Leaves $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,261.50 2 bLbL; I HL)NIE;tS/1 tSmall 5/28/2003 FIc. ntmni¢./1 I awnmnw~.r $27.00 $10.00 17.00 $ 12,251.50 5/28/2003 1 Appliance $9.00 $9.00 $ 12,242.50 5/28/2003 18 Bags of Grass/Leaves $18.00 $10.00 8.00 $ 12,232.50 5/29/2003 10 Bags of Grass/Leaves $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,222.50 5/29/2003 12 Bags of Grass/Leaves $12.00 $10.00 2.00 $ 12,212.50 5/29/2003 1 Computer $20.00 $10.00 10.00 $ 12,202.50 5/30/2003 1 Appliance $9.00 $9.00 $ 12,193.50 5/30/2003 1 ELECTRONIC $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,183.50 5/31/2003 10 Bags of Grass/Leaves $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,173.50 5/31/2003 10 Bags of Grass/Leaves $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,163.50 5/31/2003 ;¢ Appliances/1 5mall $34.00 $10.00 24.00 $ 12,153.50 Fl~.ctrrtnjo/1 I awnmn~z~.r 5/31/2003 1 yU YAHU WASI b/2 1Sags ot G ra.~.~/I ~v~..~ $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,143.50 5/31/2003 2 LAWNMOWERS $10.00 $10.00 $ 12,133.50 6~4~2003 1 LAWNMOWER/1 TIRE $7.25 $7.25 $ 6/4/2003 1 APPLIANCE $9.00 $9.00 $ 1 AI-Ct-'LIAN E;b/2 6/4/2003 $34.75 $10.00 24.75 $ FI FC, TRONIC, R/1 RMAII 6/4/2003 10 Bags of Grass/Leaves $10.00 $10.00 $ 1 YU WA5 1 I-/2 15AG5 UP 6/5/2003 $10.00 $10.00 $ G R A,g,c:;/I FAVF,Q; 6/7/2003 12 Bags of Grass/Leaves $12.00 $10.00 2.00 $ 6/7/2003 1 YD WASTE $8.00 $8.00 $ 6/7/2003 2 LAWNMOWERS $10.00 $10.00 $ 6/7/2003 1 APPLIANCE $9.00 $9.00 $ 6/7/2003 1 ELECTRONIC $10.00 $10.00 $ 6/11/2003 5 Bags of Grass/Leaves $5.00 $5.00 $ 6/13/2003 1 Passenger Tire $1.25 $1.25 $ 6/13/2003 1 Appliance $9.00 $9.00 $ 6/14/2003 1 Appliance $9.00 $9.00 $ 6/18/2003 2 Bags of Grass/Leaves $2.00 $2.00 $ 6/18/2003 4 Bags of Grass/Leaves $4.00 $4.00 $ 6/18/2003 1 YD Yard Waste $8.00 $8.00 $ 6/18/2003 3 Small Electronics $6.00 $6.00 $ 6/18/2003 2 YDS YARD WASTE $16.00 $10.00 6.00 $ 1 15~cycle/1 Lawnmower/Z 1Sags $10.00 $10.00 $ 6/18/2003 6/19/2003 10 Bags of Grass/Leaves $10.00 $10.00 $ 6/19/2003 12 Bags of G rass/Leaves $12.00 $10.00 $ 6/20/2003 3 Bags of Grass/Leaves $3.00 $3.00 $ 6/21/2003 1 Lawnmower $5.00 $5.00 $ 6/27/2003 10 Bags of Grass/Leaves $10.00 $10.00 $ 6/27/2003 10 Bags of Grass/Leaves $10.00 $10.00 $ 6/27/2003 7 Bags of Grass/Leaves $7.00 $7.00 $ 6/27/2003 1 Appl~ance/:J 1Sags ot C~ r.-q.~.~/I ¢.;av¢..~ $12.00 $10.00 $ 6/27/2003 1 Printer $15.00 $10.00 5.00 $ 6/28/2003 6 Bags of Grass/Leaves $6.00 $6.00 $ $ 12,126.25 12,117.25 12,107.25 12,097.25 12,087.25 12,077.25 12,069.25 12,059.25 12,050.25 12,040.25 12,035.25 12,034.00 12,025.00 12,016.00 12,014.00 12,010.00 12,002.00 11 996.00 11 986.00 11 976.00 11 966.00 11 956.00 11 953.00 11 948.00 11 938.00 11 928.00 11,921.00 11,911.00 11,901.00 11,895.00 11,895.00 TOTAL COUPONS $1,122.00 $ 11,895.00 CHANHASSEN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SPECIAL MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES JULY 28, 2003 Chairman Furlong called the meeting to order at 8:35 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Tom Furlong, Brian Lundquist, Bob Ayotte, Craig Peterson and Jim Bohn MEMBERS ABSENT: Steve Labatt STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Roger Knutson and Justin Miller CONSIDER REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS FOR RED-E-MIX SITE. Justin Miller provided the staff report. Dick Allendorf with Allendorf Real Estate provided the New Horizon proposal. Commissioner Peterson asked for clarification on the color of the roof and the location of the playground. Chairman Furlong asked the applicant about their time line for construction of the office building based on the comment that construction would begin after one-half of the building is pre-leased. Commissioner Bohn asked about signage for the office building. John Westby with Arima LLC presented their townoffice park proposal. Commissioner Peterson asked for clarification on parking and if it meets city standards. Chairman Furlong asked how the pedestrian bridge fits in with the site, leasing projections, and the purchase price for the property. Ernie Peacock with Arima suggested they could possibly work together with New Horizon for a solution to developing on this site. Commissioner Ayotte stated he would like to get testimonials from other cities that have received buildings "gifted" to them and find out more about that process. He also stated he like the idea of the two parties working together. Commissioner Lundquist stated he was concerned with the purchase prices being offered by both parties, and wanted to see the price get up in the $9 to $11 range. Commissioners Bohn and Peterson agreed with Mr. Lundquist. Chairman Furlong felt both proposals fell short of the City's expectations. Lundquist moved, Ayotte seconded that the Economic Development Authority direct staff to negotiate with both parties and present a final purchase price to the commission within 30 days. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Lundquist moved, Bohn seconded to approve the Minutes of the EDA meeting dated July 14, 2003 as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Lundquist moved, Ayotte seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried. The EDA meeting was adjourned at 9:10 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt Executive Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SPECIAL MEETING JULY 28, 2003 Chairman Furlong called the meeting to order at 8:35 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Tom Furlong, Brian Lundquist, Bob Ayotte, Craig Peterson and Jim Bohn MEMBERS ABSENT: Steve Labatt STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Roger Knutson and Justin Miller CONSIDER REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS FOR RED-E-MIX SITE. Miller: Good evening Mr. Chair, commissioners. About two months ago the City received a proposal from New Horizon Daycare to relocate their existing facilities to the comer of Highways 101 and Highway 5. The former Apple Valley Red-E-Mix site and the Chanhassen Taco Shoppe. This is city owned property. At the time that we received their request, it was the EDA's direction to send this out for an RFP to see if there were any more proposals out there. We did send that out. We received two and those two proposals are here tonight before your, for your consideration. The two presentations came from Allendorf Real Estate which is the New Horizons proposal and Arima LLC which is a town office proposal which they'll explain more during the presentation. We did flip the coin earlier to select who would go first, and the first will be the Allendorf Real Estate and New Horizon proposal. Each proposal will have about 5 minutes to go over their project. Furlong: Okay. Thank you. Are there any questions for staff before we begin the presentations? If there are none, Mr. Allendorf. Good evening. Dick Allendorf: Chair Furlong, commissioners. My name is Dick Allendorf, 4624 Mounthall Terrace, Minnetonka and I represent Mr. Gene Peterson, the developer. First of all I want to thank staff for guiding us through the process. They're very professional and you should feel proud. Our proposal is a two building proposal. Let me see if I can. We have a two building proposal. In the east side of the property you'll find a 10,500 square foot New Horizon. That New Horizon is meant to replace the smaller New Horizon currently within your city but to maintain the service of New Horizon for your citizens. The second building is a two story, 25,000 square foot total office building with underground parking. It's meant to serve the small businesses of Chanhassen and therefore it will be Class A in nature. The materials are all according to the City's design standards. We have brick in beige color and that beige color. We have stucco and we have 50 percent glass. You'll see that the roofs are light blue on the New Horizon. They are all metal and that's so the 50 percent of the roof that can be seen from the highway will be of a quality nature. The building design has, and now I'll switch just for a minute. This is the look of the New Horizon. It is in fact the prototype which is being used now by New Horizon. You'll see that all of the faces are modulated so that you don't just see a straight line as you coming down 101. You do see some interest Also, if I now switch to the office building, hopefully it's obvious from that photo that the windows are in fact different sizes and they have a pitched roof to them. The two buildings again together should make a statement to those coming into Chanhassen. If I go back here to the layout. The buildings are sited as to not provide a continuous wall look. With the two building complex, the parking lot is split in two Economic Development Authority - July 28, 2003 smaller lots, thus reducing the impact of surface parking and surface parking is also reduced because we do in fact have underground parking for the office building. The site layout is designed to work with the natural slope of the site, thus reducing considerably the need to level the site. For example, if we expose part of the lower level of the office building we can provide a short ramp for underground parking. There' s also the possibility at the east side of the site where we have a potential wetland to make that be a design and interesting feature even if it isn't a wetland, and that hasn't been determined yet. We would like to make that a design feature for the property. The development will be built on the 3 parcels and constructed without any request for a variance. There is no request for a variance, nor is there any request for help from the City. Nor is there any...legal difficulties. We intend to have this be a simple purchase agreement. We also would fence the development using materials from your bridge. We think that interest will tie all the way around the property. On the east side of the property, that is the 101 side, we would also intend to have an entry feature which would include the Chanhassen leaf logo, along with the words Chanhassen New Horizon Child Care. The west piece of property, although it would be incorporated into the developer would have a perpetual conservation easement to the City so that it would always remain in it's green state. I was asked to end on the time line, and I will end there. The current New Horizon prototype has been built in a number of communities. Therefore the architectural drawings exist and adaptation to this site has already been done. In addition in the existing New Horizon site on Lake Drive East is being offered to Park Nicollet to allow them to move forward with their construction. Any delay in building this child care facility will delay Park Nicollet's plans, therefore the developer would intend to begin construction as soon as city planning and approval process is completed. The office building would commence as soon as half of that office building, half of that 25,000 square foot office building is pre-leased and currently we have letter of intent interest from a 5,000 square foot user. So in conclusion out of our last session we were asked to bring something clear and crisp. Something where you, as an EDA could choose the best, or in this case better plan for a very prominent area of your city. We hope we have done that. It was not our intent in these RFP response to negotiate a price. This piece of property is quite unique in that it does have one access and an active railroad associated with it. However we're very confident that if this is chosen as the best use for the property, we can meet with your staff and come to a fair market price for the property. Thank you. Furlong: Thank you. Are there questions of Mr. Allendorf? Mr. Peterson. Peterson: I wanted to...talked about the building material. Specifically, what are the roof lines and the roof going to look like? Is it going to be a metal roof? Is it going to the standard bright blue, or is it? Dick Allendorf: Well it certainly will not look like Culver's, if that was the question. I have been told commissioners so I was prepared for that. What we really want to have is a light blue tint to the roof. That does in fact carry the New Horizon look. It is not meant however, you can see it much better if you were to zoom in on that picture. It was not meant to be anything that is a dark blue. It's a light blue tint. Gene Peterson: Dick, we had this basic... Furlong: I'm sorry sir, if there's other comments if you'd come forward. Otherwise if there are other questions from the commissioners. Excuse me. Peterson: I think the only other one is, as we, the last time we met we voiced a general concern about safety of that playground out there. I still am concerned about that. Maybe you could 2 Economic Development Authority - July 28, 2003 address that but could you spend just a minute or two talking about maybe... Are there any options for removing that from that comer or is that a prerequisite? Dick Allendorf: Chair Furlong, Commissioner. There is no thought about removing it. We did look at the safety aspects of the site itself. Certainly there, as you can imagine, there's no one who would be more concerned about safety, or the perception of safety than New Horizon if they tried to keep this center filled with kids. But if you look at the wall, as we talked about the wall along here. That wall, the grade difference and the ponding element, everyone we have had look at this from an engineering standpoint have said safety is addressed through those means and the kids are not going to be in peril. But it's a very good question. We did hear you ask it last time and we attended to it. Peterson: Thank you. Furlong: Other questions? I guess one question I had was with regard to the, in addition to others posed, with regard to the office building, and you specifically state that you would begin construction after one half is leased or commitments to, what you have about 5,000 right now of the 12,500 needed. I guess my question is what have you looked at in terms of current office vacancy rates and expected absorption of those vacancies? And specifically I'm, the EDA has, as well with the redevelopment of downtown bowling alley site which will include some office space as well, which will come to the market. I guess my question is what's your expectation in terms of the timing of receiving those commitments and beginning construction. Dick Allendorf.' Chair Furlong, this office building is meant to be a Class A little gem sitting right where it can be looked at. The access may be tough to it, but it's designed for the small professional. 2,000 to 3,000 to 5,000 square foot user in Chanhassen and we don't think there's any other space which can compete with it. That being said, you put your finger on the softest area of real estate within the Twin Cities and that's the office market. However, something this small, this unique with underground parking, we believe that we can lease it up, we would think, well we know that you have a one year window on any improvement. We don't think we would encroach on that window at all. Furlong: So you would expect to obtain the commitments and begin construction within a one year time frame for this office building? Dick Allendorf: Oh, very safely within one year, yes. Given approval, what we will do is we'll start the New Horizon right away. We will put the sign up and take reservations for the office. Gene Peterson: ...in addition to the 5,000 that just approached me. A national company...but it's more than just a passing... Furlong: Okay, thank you. Dick Allendorfi That's Gene Peterson, the developer. Furlong: Thank you. Thank you, any other questions? Bohn: Yes I have one. These office, are there going to be any signage or anything for this office building? Permanent signage. Economic Development Authority - July 28, 2003 Dick Allendorf.' Well, we fully intend to meet all your signage ordinance for the office building. You can see that there is space on the front. This is the west, oh I'm sorry. You can see that the facade does have room for signage, but again your staff has been very vigilant in telling us that we must stay within your sign ordinance. We're going to ask for no variances for either one of these buildings to include signage. Furlong: Any other questions Mr. Bohn? Bohn: No, that's it. Furlong: Okay. Any other questions for the applicant? Okay, thank you. Is Mr. Westby here? Good evening. John Westby: Good evening gentlemen. I also wish to thank you for this opportunity to make this presentation and my thanks also in a particular way to Justin, and the way that he has led us through this process. What you have before you is a project that has some of it's roots in some other projects in townoffice parks that the companies of, a gentleman by the name of Amir Marafie that brings together a series of businesses, one of which is Arima LLC, and the project really took it's conception off of one piece of your information that you made public when you said that you wanted something to beautify the entrance to Chanhassen. We took that as seriously as we possibly could and put together what we believe would be a wonderfully beautiful townoffice park as a statement to the beauty of Chanhassen itself. The townoffice park is divided in such a way that we have approximately 80,000 square feet of office, but it's divided into different segments. I believe one of the statements in your preliminary material indicates that there are 4 smaller buildings. Actually there are 3. Each of the smaller buildings are approximately 6,080 square feet and in our proposal that we made in terms of presenting a gift of one of those buildings to the City, it was the center one. If you look upon this part of your presentation, that center building is a 6,080 square foot building, approximately. And then if you flip that over and take a look at the artist's conception on the other side you will see that it really was designed in such a way to make a statement for Chanhassen. The buildings are designed in such a way that we would have a number of those units available for sale. We would have a number of those units that would be retained and used as leased property. At the present time we have I believe 3 letters of intent to engage property here by people who are interested in this property. The interest that we have was to do everything possible to make a contribution to the City of Chanhassen in terms of the creation of new jobs, and the creation of a beautiful place, Class A office space in which to work. So that was the idea that brought us to this table. If you take a look again at this conception, I believe originally there was an idea in the artist's mind of being able to enter the parking area from this side. We know that's not possible and so we'll just simply re-direct the area of entrance into the property. I think that I will leave the presentation with that. If there are questions that you may have, we'd be glad to entertain them. Furlong: Okay, thank you. Questions. Peterson: Do we know whether or not, if you're talking about 100,000 square feet, did I hear that? John Westby: No, 80,000. Approximately 80,000. Peterson: 80,000. So the parking that you've got noted here, does that meet our current code for parking do you know or not? Economic Development Authority - July 28, 2003 John Westby: The parking was put together with the understanding of the square footage that was available, so the design should take care of that particular requirement, yes. Peterson: There is no underground parking? John Westby: There is none. Furlong: Other questions? A quick question with regard to the pedestrian bridge that crosses there. I see the hash marks there. Has there been thought at this point in terms of redirecting that or dealing with the grade at all? To accommodate that point on the property. Has that been done yet? John Westby: I don't believe we've addressed that. You're talking about this? Furlong: At the west end of the last building there's little hash marks across the highway which may or may not be the exact location. John Westby: Oh I see. Yeah. To be perfectly honest with you Mayor, I'm not sure if that's been addressed or not but it certainly would be. We're asking no, nothing within this proposal would require any additional variances from the City, that I'm aware of. Furlong: Okay. With regard to again office space and projected absorption rates, when would you anticipate. John Westby: In terms of construction? Furlong: Construction and this type of new office space in terms of the current market. John Westby: Were we awarded the opportunity to proceed with this proposal, we would be prepared to move almost immediately upon the acceptance of the council. Immediately. Furlong: Okay. Another question I would have, you proposed, and I don't want to use the wrong terms here but with regard to providing the City with the center building and in lieu of payment. Would you be interested in proceeding at the, with the proposal, if that was not part of the proposal in terms of what that does to the purchase price? John Westby: Just one word of a prelude to that. The idea of this gift comes out of the way in which Mr. Marafie has presented himself to several cities within the Twin Cities, and we were just simply unaware of the fact that there may be some legalities prohibiting that kind of a transaction. But by all means, that not being possible, whatever would have to be worked out we would be delighted to negotiate it. So yeah, we're not stuck on that idea. We just thought it was an appropriate way to proceed at that time. Ernie Peacock: One other thought. My name is Ernie Peacock. I'm also with Arima. It came to my thought when I looked at the previous presenter that these, the concept seems to be very much similar and it would appear that maybe we, the City wants to act to retain the New Horizon concept for a facility here. I think with this we'd be willing to work with the other fellows and try to accommodate their needs for a New Horizon facility. Maybe you could have both .... under this scenario. Furlong: Okay. Economic Development Authority - July 28, 2003 John Westby: It is evident that one of the things that we would be just very pleased with would be the opportunity of working with continuing in this negotiation with EDA and carrying on. We're not in concrete with this, but this is, we're prepared to go forward with it with any of the other nuances required through those negotiations. Furlong: Okay, thank you. Any other questions? No? None, thank you. John Westby: You bet. Furlong: Are there any follow-up questions for staff. I guess one I'll have Mr. Gerhardt or Mr. Miller. I hate to put you on the spot but I've asked both applications questions about current office vacancy rates. Are we familiar with the process in terms of specifically with regard to the EDA's issue perhaps with the redevelopment of the bowling alley or other vacancy rates for office space here in town? Both of these proposals would bring us new office space. Gerhardt: I'm not familiar with what the percentage of vacancies are in Chanhassen. The last I heard in the southwest metro area they were running around 18 to 20 percent. The second proposed development, the way I understand it is more for the individual business person. Not so much like a real estate agent or anything of that sort. Am I correct in how your product works? John Westby: There are any number of things. We're open to use...smaller office type of thing. Furlong: Alright. Okay. Any other questions for staff? If not, we can open it up to discussion. Do you have any questions or discussion items? Would anybody like to start? Ayotte: Sure. I like the idea of maybe getting some testimonial on where else these folks have provided a gift to a city. I'd be curious what that's all about. I certainly like the flexibility of doing anything it takes to make a sale, but right now in going back to staffs point about getting, going out with negotiations with both, I think it's a starting point. And then bring them up to a... see if there's a combination. So if there is some possibility of reciprocity between the two parties, that certainly should be something to consider. I like the idea of continuing the negotiations and bring it back to the EDA. Furlong: Okay, thank you. Other comments. Mr. Lundquist. Lundquist: I'll keep mine brief. I think both proposals have merit. However I'm concerned about the offer price on both of them and I think at this time for me neither one, although I know that New Horizon hadn't proposed anything other than you know fair market value, and that I guess is up for debate but until we approach that 9 to 11 dollar range, I'm not real excited about proceeding with either one so, if we want to go back and do some negotiations on price, that would be fine. If not, I think we say no tonight and keep it in the cue until some, until we find a party that's willing to offer that range. Furlong: Okay. Thank you. Other comments Mr. Bohn? Bohn: I agree with Mr. Lundquist. Furlong: Okay, thank you. Mr. Peterson. Economic Development Authority - July 28, 2003 Peterson: Sure. I think I agree. I think I'd be willing to sit on the property if we can't get it for... I'm not overly motivated to give it a fire sale. I think my perspective is $9 is the lower range, taking into consideration some of the unique nuances of the property has to offer. I like the office building on the first presentation. I think it had a little bit of creativity. I'm still not sold on whether or not I want a child care facility being one of the first visual aspects of Chanhassen. It is one of the, if not the primary entrance that our community has and ! just don't know whether or not that's what I want in there, and maybe if I saw different renderings of the buildings it may change me. But I think for me to make a decision, I do need to see numbers. Just as we had numbers in the bowling alley site. I don't know how we can make a decision tonight without clearly saying this proposal is going to offer this. This kind of building. This proposal's going to offer this with this kind of building so, we're not there yet. With that I'd, as far as the gift of the building, you know I can't fathom that we would want a building. I don't know either of these two gentlemen to be subleasing space. I don't think we need to, although it'd be nice... Those are my... Furlong: Okay, thank you. I think from my standpoint, we started this process when New Horizon approached the city in terms of seeking to acquire it and I think we properly went out and sought other proposals. We have two. Both of them, or both of which fell short on the financial aspects and in both cases and I'm not inclined, from my view we don't need to be selling this property at this time. In responding to a request, I think we went through the process. At this point I wouldn't exclude either one if it was the EDA's decision to go forward in terms of trying to negotiate out a price, or the financial aspects of it. At the same time we seem to be pretty far apart on both of them in terms of what we include and what, we had the discussion before in terms of what we thought as an EDA was reasonable financially, and these have come in less than that. Substantially less than that. My questions with regard to adding more office space, while I like the concept of the town offices and the smaller office, 80,000 square feet's quite a bit to bring on the market at this point. ! don't know if, given the area vacancy rates, if this is the time to be selling land for office buildings. Or if we should wait when office vacancy rates are lower and then if we choose to go forward, that might be the time to be able to support the price better. So my sense is, and I'll be open if the rest of the members of the commission want to proceed, I would recommend that we have staff continue negotiations with both of them with regard to price. I would concur with Mr. Peterson's comments with regard to having a daycare at this location. Entering the city. Concerned about it from a safety standpoint. Clearly there's no motivation for New Horizon to build facilities in an unsafe location, but nonetheless, I'm concerned about that. And as well the looks of both of these. I'd need to see some more to be convinced that these are the looks that we're looking for at that gateway. So I would be comfortable at this point either proceeding with both, and saying let's continue the negotiations, or if the EDA would prefer to just say well we looked at it and now doesn't seem the time from a financial standpoint in terms of the two proposals we received, I'd be happy with that too. So from that standpoint. Lundquist: A question? Furlong: Absolutely. Lundquist: How much time Justin, Todd would you guys like to have for negotiation? What would be a reasonable, 2 weeks? A month? Gerhardt: 30 days. Furlong: Okay. Is there, I mean that's be fine if somebody'd like to move that. 7 Economic Development Authority - July 28, 2003 Lundquist: I would move that we direct staff to go back in negotiation with either party as a final offer on a purchase price and within 30 days and come back with the proposal with that updated final purchase price. Furlong: Okay. Is there a second? Ayotte: Second. Furlong: Any discussion? Point of clarification I guess Mr. Lundquist. When you say with either party, are you really dictating with both parties? Lundquist: With both parties, yeah. Furlong: Okay. So we can amend that to read both parties as opposed to either party. Okay. Alright, is there any other discussion? If there's none, we'll proceed with the vote. Lundquist moved, Ayotte seconded that the Economic Development Authority direct staff to negotiate with both parties and present a final purchase price to the commission within 30 days. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Furlong: Motion prevails. Thank you. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Lundquist moved, Bohn seconded to approve the Minutes of the EDA meeting dated July 14, 2003 as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carded unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Lundquist moved, Ayotte seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried. The EDA meeting was adjourned at 9:10 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt Executive Director Prepared by Nann Opheim