Loading...
2. Liq License transfer Pauly's Bar location CITYOF ---� CHANHASSEN 1 0 1 Pir4 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 1 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 • ' MEMORANDUM TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager 1 FROM: Karen Engelhardt, Office Manage - v ' DATE: December 13, 1993 SUBJ: Request for Liquor License Transfer from 401 West 78th Street to 410 West 78th 1 Street (former Kenny's Building), Pauly's Bar and Restaurant, Russell Pauly Russ Pauly, President of Pauly's Bar and Restaurant has requested that his on -sale intoxicating ' liquor license be transferred from his existing location at 401 West 78th Street across the street to the former Kenny's building. The Pauly/PonylPryzmus site was purchased by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority almost four years ago and was leased back to the tenants. The lease expires in June 1994. For financial reasons, Mr. Pauly has to make a decision about whether or not to purchase the former Kenny's property before the end of 1993, and thus requests council 1 action on whether or not the city will transfer his license to the new location. Since Mr. Pauly needs to know if the council will transfer his license before he purchases the 1 building, he has submitted a proposed floor plan which is preliminary in nature and subject to change (attached). He does not wish to invest a large amount of money on plan preparation if the council is unwilling to transfer the license. ' In an effort to P rovide the council with information about Mr. Pauly's new location, I prepared a questionnaire attempting to compare various aspects of his current business to the proposed operation (attached). Mr. Pauly states that his current facility derives 25% of its profits from food and 75% from liquor sales. He is proposing to enlarge the kitchen area in the new location and hopes to increase the amount of profit he derives from food. The proposed site will seat ' approximately 250 people; 75 of which are in the dining area and 175 in the bar /music/ entertainment area. This compares to his current seating capacity of 200. Pauly's current location contains 6,200 sq. ft. with some office/storage space in the basement area. The Kenny's site contains 9,000 sq. ft. with no basement. Live music is currently available at Pauly's on Thursday, Friday and Saturday evenings, and Mr. Pauly plans to continue this schedule at the proposed site. At the present time Mr. Pauly intends to continue the lease for the dry cleaning establishment which is currently in the building. 1 1 1 1 Pauly's Liquor License Transfer December 13, 1993 Page 2 I Ultimately, more than the liquor issue must be addressed by the City Council. Therefore, Paul Krauss has provided information about the site plan and Steve Kirchman has provided 1 information about the structure itself (attached). Also attached is a report from Fred Hoisington of Hoisington - Koegler Group which addresses parking issues and the Vision 2002 meetings. Don Ashworth has also provided some history on this issue (below). I Tonight's meeting is a public hearing on the liquor license transfer request. As per city code, all property owners within 500 feet of the proposed site have been notified of the hearing. I have I received several calls regarding this issue and their comments ranged from concerns about littering, loud music, and its proximity to St. Hubert's Church and School and Colonial Church at Heritage Square. The callers indicated that they will attend tonight's meeting to express their 1 concerns. I As noted in Mr. Ashworth's comments, the transfer of Mr. Pauly's liquor license is at the sole discretion of the City Council and therefore no recommendation is being made by staff. If the Council approves the transfer, I will work with Mr. Pauly for submittal of a new liquor bond and 1 liquor liability insurance. 1 Manager's Comments: There are a number of historical factors which may arise during the discussion of this item. Accordingly, I believe it is important the City Council is aware of those factors and has reasonable understanding of what occurred and why it occurred, i.e: 1 - Pauly/Ponv/Prvzmus Acquisitions: The Redevelopment Plan called for the removal of all three businesses. The immediate goal was to relocate Great Plains Boulevard and to I develop a parking lot which could serve some new use on that site. There was not a clear definition as to whether or not that future use would be a library, expanded park area, etc. Accordingly, the condemnations dealt solely with the land necessary for the parking I lots /street. The Pauly acquisition was stalemated for well over a year as Mr. Pauly was seeking an award for "loss of going concern." The city prevailed in that counter suit and that award paved the way for a settlement with Mr. Pauly for the entire parcel including I the buildings and relocation payments. The secondary factor which helped achieve a settlement with Mr. Pauly was the agreement that he could stay in that building for four years at a lease cost of $1.00 per year with him being responsible for paying all costs 1 associated with continuing his business, i.e. utilities, taxes, insurance, etc. The four year extension ends this next summer - -June 1994. It is important to emphasize that the settlement did include all relocation costs anticipated by the seller (Pauly). The I settlement did not include any language giving him any privileges over and above any other person applying for a new on or off -sale liquor license. It was clear that he would have to meet all zoning and liquor license ordinances. He did have the advantage over I other on -sale liquor license applications in that at that time we were limited to six on -sale licenses. As we were then issuing five on -sale licenses, the council was concerned as to 1 1 I Pauly's Liquor License Transfer 1 December 13, 1993 Page 3 whether they should reserve that final license for some type of major facility should that occur. Mr. Pauly's advantage was that he would simply be transferring that license and I not really affecting that last license. Ironically, as time has gone by, the total number of licenses that the city can have (currently 12) has significantly increased while the actual number of licenses has decreased (currently 4); and 1 - Mason Property (Kenny's): In the hay day of the bars, significant parking problems existed affecting the parking lots behind Pauly/Pony/Pryzmus, Kenny's, and even St. Hubert's Church. To insure that all of the parking lots would have a similar design (lighting, landscaping, drainage, etc.), it was proposed that all of the parking lots from St. Hubert's Church to the Riviera and the parking lots behind Pauly/Pony/Pryzmus would I be public parking lots. This gave us the additional advantage of being able to clean these lots on a regular basis and to assess the costs of that back to each of the owners on a more equitable basis than existed by private arrangements. Mr. Mason was willing to allow the city to acquire the property in front of his building and to assess the costs of that acquisition and improvement back to him, but he wanted a clause which would allow him the right to repurchase that parking area for $1.00 if the city did not maintain it at I a proper level. Another point related to the thought process associated with the Kenny's acquisition was I the recognition that there was limited parking given spill-over of the bar businesses. To reduce this concern, the amount of landscaping included in the parking lot design for the Mason parking lot was far less than included in any of the other municipal parking lots. Should the Pauly request for a liquor license transfer be approved, the city should look to including conditions of re- establishing some of those islands and landscaping which 1 were deleted because of the parking concerns from yesteryear; and - Liquor License Regulations: Over the course of the last 15 years, the city council has I questioned whether our liquor license regulations should be strengthened, i.e. should we reinsert the requirement that no on -sale establishment could be within "x" feet of a church or school (1 state reinserted as Karen Engelhardt and myself both believe that that was I in city ordinances prior to codification which occurred in the early 1980's. Karen Engelhardt is checking old records to see if our recollection is correct or not); regulate how close bars could be to each other; etc. In each instance, the questions were put back I to the Public Safety Commission with the conclusion being that the regulations were comparable to other communities which have a similar downtown to ours. One issue which was not addressed in those previous reviews was the number of licenses which could be issued. This was not an issue as there was only one remaining license and state law appeared to be the primary regulating factor. With our unbelievable growth, the current allowance to have up to 12 on -sale licenses may be an issue which should be I readdressed by the Public Safety Commission if not all of the issues previously reviewed. In defense of the Public Safety Commission, it was probably difficult for them to foresee 1 1 1 1 Pauly's Liquor License Transfer December 13, 1993 1 Page 4 that Kenny's would vacate the Mason building and that an on -sale liquor establishment would look to that as its new home; and Vision 2002: Although the Vision 2002 process is far from over, there are various generalized goals which appear to be emerging, i.e. many of the elements associated with the downtown can be thought of as "nodes." Each of these nodes represent the identification factors for the downtown and need to be reinforced. For example, the four entries (TH 101, Great Plains Boulevard, Market Boulevard and Powers Boulevard) represent identification nodes as to the boundary of the district and need to be reinforced. We need much stronger connections from each of our residential neighborhoods into the downtown area. St. Hubert's Church and Chanhassen Elementary School represent educational nodes and again are a part of that pedestrian linkage. The government center node needs to work in concert with the retail nodes both to the west, south, and east of 1 the center. I truly believe that the Vision 2002 process will conclude a plan which in fact identifies these nodes and their linkages to the residential areas. The St. Hubert's node will have St. Hubert's Church as well as the historic area as a node and will place an emphasis on the interconnection of that node to the residential neighborhoods. Assuming that all of this does transpire, I question the introduction of a bar into that node and/or the negative effects that may occur as a result of doing that and - Maintenance: Parking lot maintenance in the area of Kenny's, St. Hubert's Church, and behind the bars used to be a major issue. No less than twice each year the item of "parking lot maintenance by the bars" would appear on a city council agenda. Council members would regularly bring in bags of trash and say, "Don, what are you going to do about this ?" These issues were virtually eliminated by our constructing the lots in such 1 a fashion that they could be maintained, taking them over as municipal lots, assessing the costs for maintenance back to benefitting owners, etc. The maintenance issue has also been reduced by virtually assigning a maintenance person to the downtown area as his sole responsibility. Finally, the issues were diminished by the fact that people wanting to lease the old St. Hubert's Church had an opportunity to see what it was they were getting into before signing that lease and when complaints do arise we can remind them of that fact. Although we may not incur the same level of problems that existed prior to our turning those lots into public parking lots, I strongly believe that if Pauly's does move into the Kenny's building that the outrage of having to observe and walk across broken beer bottles, liquor bottles, etc., will resurrect itself. Should the council act to approve the transfer, I would recommend that it be conditioned upon staff working out some form ' of maintenance agreement with Mr. Pauly to insure that Sunday service worshippers are not faced with litter strewn parking lot scenes; and ' - City Council Authority: City staff had no option but to advise the city council that an application by a commercial business could not be denied if they made application on a lot which was commercially zoned -- Abra/Goodyear. We advised the council that they 1 1 1 Pauly's Liquor License Transfer 1 December 13, 1993 Page 5 1 could add any form of conditions regarding landscaping, move the building north or south, add whatever forms of facia or building material conditions, etc; but the council could not deny the use. As it deals with liquor license applications, the opposite story unfolds, i.e. the determination as to whether a liquor license can or should be approved at a particular location is solely under the discretion of the city council. You need not state a specific reason for why you are making that denial, but I would anticipate that Roger Knutson would prepare such findings if denied. As this decision is solely a decision of a city council, staff is not making a recommendation on the Pauly liquor license transfer request. 1 • • 1 1 4 CITYOF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 1 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 MEMORANDUM TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager FROM: Paul Krauss, Planning Director DATE: December 9, 1993 SUBJ.. Pauly's Liquor License Transfer Request 1 BACKGROUND 1 The Council is being asked to review a request to relocate the Pauly's operation to the former Kenny's site. Staff's first involvement with this proposal came last winter when we were 1 approached by Russ Pauly. Believing parking to be the primary issue, we commissioned Fred Hoisington to undertake an analysis. Parking in the CBD is a confusing mix of privately owned and publicly owned lots, cross parking arrangements, and new and old development that makes an analysis of parking difficult. Since Fred has worked with the City on this matter for years we believed he was in the best position to draw some conclusions. His report is attached. He generally concluded that parking should be adequate based upon what were then Mr. Pauly's ' plans and assuming cross parking behind the Medical Arts Building. We have had no further contact until Mr. Pauly submitted his liquor license a few weeks ago. 1 Staff has a number of concerns that remain unresolved, but guidance is needed from the Council as to how to proceed. The first question we asked ourselves is whether a Site Plan Review is required. Our initial conclusion is that it was not. The restaurant/bar operation is a permitted use in this district. No new expansions of the building are being proposed which is what normally triggers a review. We can require a review when the use of a structure will intensify to the point where additional parking demand is generated. This is clearly the case here. More parking demand will be generated from the Kenny's site than in the past. However, this is by and large not new demand within the CBD due to the relocation and Fred's initial analysis 1 appears to indicate that it could be accommodated. SITE PLAN VS. LIQUOR LICENSE 1 As noted above, the Council may be able to determine that a site plan review is required. You also have a great deal of latitude to place conditions against the requested liquor license that 1 Mr. Don Ashworth 1 December 9, 1993 Page 2 would otherwise be attached to a site plan request. It is the Council's call. While we have several concerns with the request, it should be remembered that it is a permitted use in this district and this is not in question. PARKING 1 While we realize that Fred's analysis indicated that parking should be adequate, this analysis is based upon a number of assumptions. This included limiting the operation to 7,700 sq. ft. and utilizing a centrally located door rather than the new western entrance that is proposed. It was also based upon the operation changing over to one where a significant portion of the revenues were derived from food rather than liquor since establishments where liquor predominates generate significantly greater parking demands. From the materials currently submitted by Russ Pauly I do not believe we can assume this is the same operation, it may be, it just isn't clear. The final assumption is that all of the Medical Arts Phase I parking will be used in conjunction with the Kenny's lot. Many of these stalls are farther away from the restaurant than St. Hubert's lot, thus it is reasonable to assume that some people will elect to park illegally near the church. Even if they don't, the use of the Medical Arts lot raises issues of late night disturbances near Heritage apartments and possible conflicts with the Medical Arts tenants themselves. In spite of Fred's work, I continue to have reservations over parking adequacy. Today Pauly's has the use of two lots, one in front, the other behind the building. The rear lot, which is owned by the City, will become more remote and is likely to be redeveloped at some time in the future in any case. There is no safety valve to resolve parking problems that may arise and the City's ability to redevelop the old Pauly's block may be compromised. If the assumptions are wrong or if the operation changes from what was assumed, there could be major problems. I have seen this happen before in other communities. In this case the only overflow parking is in the 1 surrounding neighborhood or church lot, neither of which is acceptable. Staff would prefer to have the operation better defined and gain some input from the Council and our residents before the parking issue is considered to be resolved. NOISE That this type of operation generates noise is not in question. Noise comes from loud music, people in parking lots late at night, trash pick up, etc. It also is obvious that the source of the noise would be moving closer to a residential neighborhood, increasing the potential for conflict. Will problems arise? We don't know. However, it would be advisable for the Council to build in safe guards. For example, you may want to reserve the right to limit hours of operation or otherwise modify the business if problems arise. 1 1 1 1 1 Mr. Don Ashworth December 9, 1993 1 Page 3 TRASH 1 Restaurant operations produce large volumes of trash that can cause problems with noise from its removal to odor. No provisions for trash storage are indicated. Since there is minimal space 1 to handle new construction to deal with this outside of the building, internal storage should be provided. Pickups should be limited to normal business hours and the design of the enclosure should control odors and vermin. plan\pk\paulys r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 It C ITYOF ,i , i II I 1 6 90 COUL DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN(612) 937 -5739 , MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX I s MEMORANDUM 1 TO: Paul Krauss, Planning Director I FROM: Steve A. Kirchman, Building Official kOf . 'r ' DATE: December 8, 1993 • 1 SUBJECT: Pauly's relocation I I have been asked to review a floor plan submitted in conjunction with the request to transfer the Pauly's Bar, Inc. liquor license to 410 W 78th St. 1 Background: The existing building is a type V -N unsprinklered building currently being occupied by two I businesses, each classified as B -2 occupancies. The building is approximately 12000 square feet, with the existing businesses occupying about 5000 square feet. Proximity to property lines is I unable to be determined with documents submitted. Analysis: 1 The proposed occupancy will be classified as a mixed occupancy, B -2 & A -3, or B -2 & A -2.1 and, as such, represents a change in occupancy. The Uniform Building Code (UBC) requires that t rooms used by the occupants for the consumption of alcoholic beverages and unseparated areas be fire sprinklered. The Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC) requires that A -2.1 occupancies be fire sprinklered. Fire sprinklering required by the MSBC will require the entire building, 1 including the exterior canopy to be fire sprinklered. I am unable to determine wall and opening protection based on proximity to property lines with I the documents submitted. Wall and opening protection must comply with UBC Chapters five and six. . 1 All demolition and construction plans including site, building, plumbing, HVAC and fire protection must be prepared by or under the supervision of architects or engineers licensed in I Minnesota and qualified to practice in the areas for which they submit designs. 1 1 1 Paul Krauss, Planning Director December 8, 1993 ' Page 2 The Inspections Division has a number of informational handouts listing requirements that may ' be obtained and should be consulted prior to completing designs for the space. I can point out a few items at this time that must be considered during the design process. The building code requires that recycling space be provided within or adjacent to a significantly remodeled structure. ' Current plans do not indicate any provisions for recycling. The building code also requires that stairway be provided to provide acces's to rooftop equipment, and City code requires that such equipment be screened. Recommendation: ' Staff has no recommendations at this time relative to the building code. Hopefully the information provide will be helpful to the applicant in planning the construction portion of the project. 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 612- 835 -3160 HOISINGTON KOEGLER 170 P02 DEC 08 '93 12:0© Hoisington Koegier Grow) Inc. 1 December 8, 1993 Mr. Paul Krauss, Planning Director City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive 111 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 RE: Paul 's Relocation to Colonial , Y o orual Center Dear Paul: Enclosed is a copy of our February 25, 1993 report which concludes that a 7,700 square foot Pauly bar could be accommodated and be adequately served by the 194 parking spaces available in the Phase I Ridgeview Professional Building and Colonial Center , parking lots. Based on actual parking counts in January of 1989, we are still comfcirtable with that conclusion. On the other hand, we raise some issues that need to be addressed before any approvals are granted. First is the issue of live music. If Pauly's is allowed to occupy te space, they should guarantee that noise will not be a problem for nearby residents. ' I am especially concerned about the effects of loading and unloading at the rear of the building and how it can be made to be compatible with the adjacent apartment building. I am also concerned about the use of the existing Pony /Pauly /Przymus site and the demand it may place on the Colonial Center parking lot. If that use has a similar peak demand period to Pauly's, the two uses may not be compatible. Another concern, is the proximity of a new Pauly's bar to the existing Colonial Church and St. Hubert's School. The City used to require spacing between bars, churches and schools but may have inadvertently eliminated that provision from the City's ordinances during codification. Of course, the current Pauly's bar would have been grandfathered. Finally, at the time of our February assessment of parking demand, the Vision 2002 process had not yet begun. While we are only now arriving at the concept formulation 1 stage, the possibility exists that Vision 2002 may not support Pauly's in the Colonial Center location. While we know a lot about the current Pauly's operation and the uses that surround it, we know little about the future Pauly's bar and the use that may occupy the existing Pauly's site. So long as these questions persist, projecting parking demand is difficult. 1 Land Use /Environmental • Planning /Design 1 612 —S35 -3150 HOISINGTON KOEGLER 170 P03 DEC 08 '93 12:00 Paul Krauss 1 December 8, 1993 Page 2 1 We believe the Colonial Center location is more sensitive, given its proximity to residential and school uses, than the existing Pauly's site. If you have any questions or concerns, please give me a call. f Sincerely, ' Fred L. Hoisington, AICP Planning Consultant 1 FLH /co Enclosure 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CHAN \93- 4\KF.AVSS.crtj 3[ 1 SURVEY OF PAULY'S BAR CURRENT SITE AT 401 WEST 78TH STREET vs. 1 PROPOSED LOCATION ON THE FORMER KENNY'S SITE November 1993 1. Describe your current operation at 401 West 78th Street and your proposed operation on the Kenny's site. Include a narrative of the nature of business, hours of operation, percent 1 of sales to liquor and food, use /activity with dance floor and live music, and anything else appropriate. 4 cg // .5.4=4-ci. C G SY vr,rn � -1- A Current Site: / �"` r 7.5 '" F �' d,./ s � ard9 - 74 P` - S 2 :�/r� �4 stA, .. /,► - 77 4 ' .0 • ,Iii . v '� - / - — ''' ''' -1du -z r r 7 � s� t we 04,....- Na 1 - e 1 ,.., 5-_,,,,,,,,,,- , .. ---7 el .f ,A 4, e 1 , e::: , A /e � � I 5 Proposed Site: C - Y c.„ ... ,, / 7 ' 4 .-- d ' `� t C 1 2. How many seats are located in the bar area and restaurant area: 1 Current Site: 0 0 1 Proposed Site: 5 - 2) (75 LA cu - - u ' u ' '�' / 76 ,tsr.. At4.4, ,6-0_,,, 1 , ' , . . 4 h' 4 ) 1 3. What is the square footage of the building: Current Site: � ,2 o o s /5". -''7° �" Proposed Site: C / 1 • Joao /� s,.�•��- C� 1 1 1 1 4. What is the size of the dance floor: Current Site: /( ,Y e 1 Proposed Site: ' :-- 1 Will there be live music? If so, how often: Current Site: y'-r t • r " Proposed Site: 7e f - �--r� I 1 5. Describe the food operation and attach a sample menu: , ,,,; �. t L,,,, '"t'a'r- l". • 1 Current Site: _ r -'r' e -'`i i€, s - o ....53-7ria . • 14i,. / r 7/ C, 1 d 0if - "A j Z- /a • „ 1 Proposed Site: ---' - ' ,/, 7 4- ' ., , . 0 1 . - A . IA A , - 7 cite. S 97' cjit"...... /,', 7 7 4... :‹Aii 1,.....4 / , 4 ---- - 5 , K.. 2 -) ,.. , - / 4 . 4 4 -7 ,1 / y--,- •• _ ""e" ,5 /..-- , /Id 7--' = ,.K s . 1 6. How many people do you employ: Current Site: c; ,-76 — ?t Propose Site: r , 1 7. Name the officers of your corporation and their titl •• f /� 1 Current Site: vs-.S, // -./ - ra c $11 /72 74:144 9 ' -5 C',A 5° 44 et.5;,-- 1 Proposed Site: 1 r',`"frii KT:— -2- 1 1 1 8. State the number of required parking spaces versus the number of actual parking spaces (I understand you have had discussions regarding this with Fred Hoisington): Current Site: 81 et, a--1444-4 1 1 :" 0 0 ` 9. 0 • 1 Proposed Site: ei g ez t / 46, , eLetia.A.1- 4ft-L - J1WJd 0 # •ce 0 4 • 1 9. Describe your outdoor signage: Current Site: // 1- r‘e 1. 1 il Proposed Site: 1 ig,y ct /0 6 7. `"r ( 11fre-e 7 '1 a't Please submit the following information: 1. Eight copies of the proposed interior floor plan, as well as eight copies of a plan showing how the exterior of the building will be altered (if available) 2. Names and addresses of all property owners within 500 feet of the proposed site. This 1 information must be submitted by Wednesday, December 1 in order to meet public hearing notification requirements. 1 -3- 93 -7 s? Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. 9 3 _ , (2 k H I( g 1 MEMORANDUM Date: 10 December 1993 To: Robert E. Generous, Planner City of Chanhassen From: Michael Schroeder • RE: Review of West Vi (its Center, Revised Landscape Plan Chanhassen, Minnesota I have reviewed the updated Landscape Plan (dated December 7, 1993) for West Village Center. The following comments should be referenced to the original review in my memorandum of 23 November 1993. Unless noted and to the extent that items previously identified are shown on the Landscape Plan, the revised plan appears to respond to concerns and issues noted in that memorandum. 1 General Comments 1.1 Design 1.1.2 Unless there is a functional reason for not doing so, I would recommend that tree plantings at the south side of the site take advantage of the entire setback area (from the property line to the curb at the parking lot, and in the area to the south of the commercial building). 1.2 Street Trees 1.3.1 Most experts would identify a Northwood Maple as a variety of Acer rubrum (Red Maple), not Acer platanoides (Norway Maple). 1.5 Turf Areas 1.5.2 The berm along the east side of the site, at Kerber Boulevard, may be too steep for mowing. It appears from this plan that the slope is between 3:1 and 4:1, with 4:1 being the limits for mowing. 2 ,Specific Comments 2.1 Site Entries 2.1.1 While not critical, tighter spacing of the Northwood Maples along the main drive aisles would still be preferred. There may be an opportunity to "trade" for some of the trees shown at the south side of the site along West 78th Street. These appear to be very closely spaced, especially to the east end. 2.1.2 The use of a more colorful species may create a more significant marker at site entry points than groupings of Northwood Maples. The applicant might consider 110411r,eirliED . Land Use / Environmental , • Planning / Design OF CHA(VHA 7300 Metro Boulevard / Suite 525 • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439 ' (612) 835 -9960 ' Fax: (612) W-5100 CITYOF CHANHASSEN 1 ' 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 ' MEMORANDUM 1 TO: Charles Folch, City Engineer Scott Harr, Public Safety Director FROM: Bob Generous, Planner II i M """ ' DATE: December 8, 1993 SUBJ: Byerly's Site Plan 1 The Planning Commission at their December 4, 1993, meeting regarding the Byerly's site plan ' expressed some concern about the impact of traffic at the northern driveway on Kerber Boulevard with users of the City Park located north of City Hall. They requested that this issue be reviewed and formal comments be provided to the City Council for their deliberation. ' Specifically, the Planning Commission was concerned about traffic conflicts between the hours of 4:00 P.M. and 9:00 P.M. when the park is in use. ' Please review the plans and provide any comments to Planning prior to the public hearing on Monday, December 13, 1993. If you have any questions or need additional information, please let me know. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 /Pea, /.3, Div 1 t:::10.... i : 2., r e / y fi' 4. " X-47446 / "04/, , ,. ,,, 4 1 . 4 ,y ,i -e-4 • 13, // reS - j r r day 4i.r - /y s 1 3 0 - y O! y + , css G jsi -5 1 1 4,-'",: e ,r 1 <- Li Cr \ 1 ea 6 i‹ _ e I • ,,3 .1r- ti 1= r- (7 Z $ a r 3.1.0 a 1,..i 1 ° ,r /7 e..1—ff . ..rA 1 - 7:1r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1