B. Strategic Plan Update MEMORANDUM
TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager
CITY OF FROM: Justin Miller, Assistant to the City Manager-~/~
CH~I~SEN DATE: October 2, 2003 ~~, ,,
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147 RE: Strategic Plan Update - Economic Development
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Adminislration
Phone: 952.227.1100 One of the goals addressed in the City of Chanhassen Strategic Plan is:
Fax: 952.227.1110
Building Inspections "Economic Development: to maintain the quality and accelerate the speed
Phone: 952.227.1180 with which our economic development occurs."
Fax: 952.227.1190
En0ineerin0 The specific strategies and the progress towards each are outlined below:
Phone: 952,227.1160
Fax: 952.227.1170
2005 MUSA Issues
Finance 1. Expedite review process in order to accelerate opening of 2005
Phone: 952.227.1140 MUSA
Fax: 952.227.1110 The draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) has been
Park & Recreation presented to the planning commission and will be open for public
Phone: 952.227.1120 comment through October. It is planned to be presented in November for
Fax: 952.227.1110 City Council review. While this AUAR does not approve any specific
Recreation Center development, it sets the framework for opening the 2005 MUSA area
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone: 952,227.1400 earlier than would have been possible without an AUAR process in place.
Fax: 952.227.1404
2. Evaluate methods to replace commercial/industrial land that could
Planning &
Natural Resources potentially be used for Town and Country housing development
Phone: 952.227.1130 It is anticipated that there will be an industrial/commercial development
Fax: 952.227.1110 component in the 2005 MUSA area. While the overall land use mix has
Public Works not been established for the area, staff continues to look at all possibilities
1591 Park Road and if an overabundance of commercial or industrial land is proposed,
Phone: 952.227.1300 alternative areas will be evaluated. It is worth noting that according to
Fax: 952.227.1310 information presented by Ehlers and Associates during the Key Financial
Senior Center Strategies process, the City is closely in line with similar communities in
Phone: 952.227.1125 terms of the amount of commercial tax base as a percentage of total tax
Fax: 952.227.1110 base (see attached Ehlers information).
Web Site
,,w,,w. ci.chanhassen.mn.us Highway 212/312
1. Establish vision of the corridor
When the first section of 212/312 was built through Eden Prairie,
an "Aesthetic Design Guide" was established. This design guide
presented architectural and aesthetic design recommendations
which were coordinated with Eden Prairie, Chanhassen, Chaska,
The City ol Chanhassen * A growing community wilh clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play.
Carver County and Hennepin County. These recommendations
addressed issues such as bridge design, street lighting, landscaping,
etc. It is staff's recommendation that the City continue to work
with MnDOT and neighboring communities to ensure that these
design standards are incorporated into the final 212/312
construction plans. (Aesthetic Design Guide attached)
2. Continue to work with MnDOT and other agencies to ensure that
the final alignment meets our needs in terms of:
a. Access to downtown Chanhassen
b. Appropriate number and location ol~ intersections
c. Reduced impact on residential developments already in place
Reviews of the alignments are being conducted by each community
impacted by the construction. Engineering and Community Development
staff are reviewing the plans and submitting comments to MnDOT. Issues
that are being addressed include noise barriers, wetland mitigation, trail
connections, and intersection locations. The new schedule will clearly
speed up the review timeline, which will require added staff resources.
However, staff sees this project as a priority and will spend the necessary
time to protect the City of Chanhassen's interests as planning continues
and construction begins.
3. Monitor legislation and maintain contact with state representatives
to encourage a more rapid timeframe in highway construction
In early August, MnDOT announced that Highway 212/312 construction
will be advanced by eight years, with construction beginning in 2005 and
expected to conclude by 2008. This schedule is many years ahead of
schedule, and this acceleration will help spur economic development
throughout the City. One of the main reasons for this accelerated schedule
is due to the support and diligence of our state representatives, our
participation in the Southwest Transportation Coalition, and our working
relationship with MnDOT. (Accelerated project fact sheet attached)
4. Maintain an exceptional and ongoing communications system with
the community that informs them of the highway's current status
The accelerated progress of Highway 212/312 received a high level of
local press coverage so it is believed that the general public is aware of its
progress. However, we will continue to be vigilant in updating the public
about the project through many forums. Links to the MnDOT project
website will be provided on the City website, updates will continue to be
given to the Council through presentations which are televised on Channel
8, and we will also use the quarterly newsletter to update the public. Other
possibilities could be open houses/forums where City and MnDOT
officials can be available for questions.
Support the marketplace driven development o. f industrial land
I. Continue to market available land to potential developers
Staff is called upon almost daily for questions regarding available land in
the City. We have provided the "Available Land Inventory" on the City's
website, and have also updated the City's profile on the State's
Department of Trade and Economic Development website. This resource
provides demographic information (incomes, workforce, transportation
capabilities, amenities, etc.) to developers looking for information about
Minnesota communities. (Land inventory attached)
2. Coordinate economic summit of major landowners/developers to
determine strategies for timely development
The idea of an economic summit is being considered for Fall 2003. Local
landowners, developers, realtors, and other interested parties will be
invited to discuss topics and generate ideas to how the City can help
facilitate economic growth. The format of the summit will be similar to
the housing summit held by the City in 2002.
Leverage City property as much as possible
1. Evaluate City-owned parcels and determine how to best develop
them
Staff is approached often about selling City-owned property, namely the
former Apple Valley Red-E-Mix and Pony-Pauly Pryzmus sites. Many
times the proposed uses are ill-suited for the property. Staff will continue
to market City-owned property but will require that appropriate uses are
proposed before serious negotiations are begun.
2. Conclude sale of bowling alley and Pony-Pauly-Pryzmus
properties
A purchase agreement with Bloomberg Companies was executed on May
th
29 and they have recently submitted their site plan for the redevelopment
of the area. The planning commission is scheduled to review it on
September 16th with City Council review planned for October. Pending
site plan approval, final sale of the property is scheduled for November
14th. The developer is still planning on demolishing the existing building
before the end of 2003, with construction beginning in Spring 2004.
Staff continues to receive interest from potential developers on the Pony-
Pauly-Pryzmus site (adjacent to Old Village Hall). This is a difficult site
to develop due to the architectural character of neighboring uses, so a
unique project will be required. Staff will continue to market the site and
entertain offers from interested parties.
AESTHETIC DESIGN GUIDE
~r MINNESOTA
I
1
I
I
i
i
REPORT PURPOSE
THIS DESIGN GUIDE PRESENTS ARCHITECTURAL AND AESTHETIC DESIGN
recommendations which have been coordinated with the Cities of Eden Prairie, Chnnbassen
and Chaska and Carver and Hennepin County for the T.H. 212 Transportation Corridor.
This corridor is located in the southwestern region oft. he Twin Cities metropolitan area. The
corridoz location is shown in Fig-ttre 1.
T~ty Metro Area
~''"'% WASHINGTOR
Minnesota
I I HEHH;PIN ~ o
, CARV~
, ,
T.H. 212 SO~EST CONDOR
Figure 1 - Project Location
The Aesthetic Design Guide addresses the architectural details of those highway elements that
will have an effect on the visual environment created by this project. It is based upon the
principle that choices can be made to improve the appearance of our highways, as well as,
enhance the environments through which they pass. The aesthetic design recommendations
of this guide will make clear the relationship between highway engineering and aesthetic
design, and how attention to pleasing aesthetic solutions, together with functional and
economic considerations, can satisfy the broader requirements of promoting visual quality and
improving quality of life.
6
This Aesthetic Design Guide establishes the architectural and aesthetic design
recommendations for the major design elements of the T.H. 212 highway corridor. It has
been prepared as a guide for designers who will be responsible for the final design of this
project. The guide incorporates local community ideas concerning this project and is intended
for typical design situations. When unique sitl,l;ations al~e, where standard solutions are not
appropriate, designers should apply the principles of these guidelines so that approved
aesthetic design alternatives blend with the project as a whole. All design modifications and
alternatives to the architectural and aesthetic recommendations contained herein should be
coordinated with the Site Development Unit, Office of Technical Support, through the T.H.
212 Corridor Manager.
The recommendations of the Aesthetic Design Guide for the T.H. 212 Transportation
Corridor should be applied during all final design phases of this project.
DESIGN ELEMENTS
Th~ highway design process includes a number of disciplines, each contributing to th~ quality
of thc highway corridor. An important aspect of the highway design process is visual quality
and a~sthetics of individual design elements, which collectively must be coordinated in a
complimentary wnnner to provide a clear sense of order, harmony and continuity.
The following highway design elements will establish the archkectttral and visual fi'amework
for the T.H. 212 Highway Corridor. They are the primary aesthetic design elements
throughout the corridor that most directly will affect perceptions concerning the relationship
between th/s highway and the surrounding environment. These elements include:
Bridges and Structures
Retaining Walls
Noise Walls
Grading
Barriers
Special Surface Treatment
Signing
Lighting
Landscaping
Fencing
Wetlands and Ponds
Transit Facilitie~
Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities
Collectively, these aesthetic recommendations will create the desired visual expression of the
highway corridor. Application of these corridor-specific architectural guidelines should be
fully integrated with the engineering requirements of the highway design elements.
10
BRIDGES & STRUCTURES
Bridge structures are typically the strongest visual and physical design elements in
txansportation corridors. Unlike the long-span bridge in a spectacular setting, most highway
bridges are short-span structures occurring at frequent intervals and are part of a highway
corridor or larger transportation system .in which individual structures are designed uniformly
for visual continuity. Repetitive use of materials and architectural treatments that exhibit
strong visual character and quality will help to achieve consistency and an attractive
appearance.
The blending of a bridge structure into its setting is also an important aesthetic consideration.
Once a highway corridor, bridge or interchange is constructed, it becomes a prominent
landscape feature that immediately changes the character of the physical environment.
Designers must understand these changes and incorporate aesthetic values into the designs of
bridges and highway corridors so that compatibility with the surrounding area or community
results. On projects where there is local demand for special bridge design treatments, cost
sharing may be required by the local government agency.
The design of the T.H. 212 bridges should also be developed in accordance with the
Minnesota Department of Transportation Aesthetic Guidelines for Bridge Design manual
available from the Office of Bridge and Structures.
AESTHETIC DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
Hierarchy
Continuity between bridge components is an important aesthetic consideration in the urban
highway corridor. Unlike their rural counterparts, freeway bridges occur much more
frequently and are often viewed in rapid succession in an urban highway corridor.
Consequently, they must be designed with a similar appearance so that when the bridges are
viewed together, they appear to belong to one group or design of structures. See Figures 3
through 6. Continuity of appearance is achieved in visual treatment of the railing system.
A design hierarchy for the bridge railing systems will announce key bridges within the
highway corridor. Three levels of aesthetic design t[eatment will be provided corresponding
to the impomuce of the bridge and/or interchange within the community. Bridge structures
receiving the highest level of architectural and visual enhancement are those considered
gateways to the community from the highway corridor. They will be distinguished by arching
decorative metal railings and stylized lighting fixtures, which vary with each community.
Bridges considered secondary community entrances will share a similar railing design, but
will not include decorative lighting. Color will be used on these components to reinforce
dominant visual themes and add interest to the appearance of these structures. All other
bridges in the highway corridor should receive the basic architectural and aesthetic treatments
recommended for this project.
11
I
I'
i.
!
- - - -~:,,,T...,~.~.~: .... ~: ....
I
i Bridge No. 27148 - ~e Center Drive over T.H. 212 ~ ~en ~e
Bridge No. 1~ - T.H. 101 over T.H. 212 ~ ~anh~sen
I Bridge No. 1~32 T.H. 41 over T.H. 212 ~
I
1
I
1
~ ! ~e 4 - ~i~ ~~y ~ 2 Bridge)
I
] Bridge No. 27147 - Mitchell Ro~ over T.H. 212 ~ ~en
B~dge No. 1~4 - Co~ RoM 147 Co~on over T.H. 212 ~ Ch~ Tomhip
I
1
~ ~ 5 - ~i~ ~~y ~ 3 Bddg~)
1
Figure 6 - Design Hierarchy (Type 4 Bridges)
Design Type General Description
1 Arching, decorative metal protective screen with City symbols and
decorative lighting on concrete railing (11'4" Total Height).
2 Arching, decorative metal protective screen on concrete railing
(11'-4" Total Height).
3 Non-arching, decorative metal protective screen on concrete
: railing (8'-4" Total Height).
4 Concrete traffic railing only (2'-8" Total Height).
Figure 7 - Design Hierarchy Summary
All bridges in the T.H. 212 highway corridor are classified as 'Level B' structures for
aesthetic design purposes in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Transportation
Aesthetic Design Guidelines for Bridge Design manual. AS such, the maximtlm increased cost
for aesthetic design enhancement of each bridge is limited to 7 percent of the structure cost,
but not to exceed $300,000 as defined by Technical Memorandum No. 96-37-B-04, December
11, 1996.
I3
J ~ ~ i ~ mrna ~ m,,,.m mm i m ..m ~ ~ ..............
Bridge No. Design Type General Location Reference (Listed in Order of Scheduled Letting)
Bridge No. 97258 3 Technology Drive over Purgatory Creek (Inplace)
Bridge No. 27141 4 T.H. 212 "Ramp A" over Bus Connection
Bridge No. 27X01 4 Loop A from T.H. 212/Co. Ditch 43
Bridge No. 97153 4 Prairie Center Drive from T.H. 212/Co. Ditch 43
Bridge No. 27148 1 Prairie Center Drive/T.H. 212
Bridge No. 8733 4 T.H. 212/Purgatory Creek
' Bridge No. 27X02 5 T.H. 5 W.B./Bike Trail
Bridge No. 27144 4 T.H. 5 W.B./Wallace Road
Bridge No. 27145 4 T.H. 212 W.B./Wallace Road
Bridge No. 27146 4 T.H. 212 E.B./Wallace Road
Bridge No. 27147 2 CSAH 60 (Mitchell Road)/T.H. 212
Bridge No. 27150 4 Prop. T.H. 5 E.B./Wallaee Road
Bridge No. 27194 4 T.H. 212 E.B. and W.B. on Ramp under T.H. 5
Bridge No. 27138 3 CSAH 4/T.H. 212
Bridge lqo. 10017 3 Prop. T.H. 212 under Co. Rd. 140
Bridge No. 10019 4 Prop. T.H. 212 W.B./Co. Rd. 147
Bridge No. 10020 4 Prop. T.H. 212 E.B./Co. Rd. 147
Bridge No. 10024 2 Prop. T.H. 212 under Co. Rd. 147 Connection
Bridge No. 10027 4 Prop. T.H. 212 W.B./Inplace CSAH 10
Bridge No. 10028 4 Prop. T.It. 212 E.B.flnplace CSAH 10
Bridge No. 10029 4 Prop. CSAH 10 under Prop. T.H. 212
Bridge'No. 10030 3 CSAH 11/Prop. T.H. 212
Bridge No. 10031 3 Bavaria Road/Prop. T.H. 212
Bridge No. 10032 1 T.H. 41/Prop. T.H. 212
Bridge Ho. 10033 4 Prop. T.H. 212 W.B./Creek
Bridge No. 10034 4 Prop. T.H. 212 E.B./Creek
'Bridge No. 10035 4 Prop. T.H. 212 W.B./Ravine
Bridge No. 10036 4 Prop. T.H. 212 E.B./Ravine
Bridge No. 10037 3 CSAH 15/Prop. T.H. 212
Bridge No. 10038 3 --'Prop. CSAH 17 (Audubon Road)/T.H. 212
-Bridge No. 10039 3 -Lyman Blvd./Prop. T.H. 212
Bridge No. 10040 I Prop. T.H. 101/Prop. T.H. 212 ....
Bridge No. 10041 3 Co. Rd. 14 (Pioneer Trail)over T.H. 212
Bridge No. 27137 3 T.H. 212/Dell Road
Bridge No. 27139 3 T.H. 212 nnder Mitchell Lake Drive
Figure 8 - Bridge Design Types
I I I-'I'-I~--~'"'L"J I~.1~1= ..1_1_-I -!~_1~1__1 '
I I-.1"1~= -': ~'~ 7 - -' ::= :':
~[[[ 17 I-11 I-l-.~I=11= :~--'
Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll I tllllllll IIIIIIIIIlllll Illlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
BRIDGE NO. 10040 - T.H. 101 OVER T.H. 212
CHANHASSEN LOGO
(SIZE - 5 FT) :
LIGHTING
Continuous roadway lighting will be provided in the freeway section of thc T.H. 212 highway
corridor between C.S.A.H. 4 and 1-494 in FAen Prairie. It will also be provided along the
T.H. 5 connection near Wallace Road. Interchange lighting will be provided throughout the
remah~der of the highway corridor, including the gore areas of interchange ramps and ramp
terminal intersections. While the primary function of this lighting is to assist motorists in
guidance and navigation tasks required to travel safely, an orderly and visually pleasing
lighting design also contributes to the architectural and visual success of an urban highway
corridor. For this reason, lighting elements also need to be visually coordinated.
Lighting can also be used exclusively for architectural treatment of transportation structures.
As a result of public involvement in the bridge planning and design process on thi~ project,
a corridor-specific architectural concept has been established involving use of ornamental
bridge railings and stylized lighting fixtures. These treatments correspond to the symbolic
importance of various bridge structures within the communities through which the highway
corridor passes. Also refer to the Bridges and Structures Section of this Aesthetic Design
Guide.
When the local governmental agency desires to have lighting units on bridge structures or
along local roads within the highway corridor, they will be responsible for cost participation.
When decorative units are placed on bridges, the cost will be considered part of the aesthetic
enhancement as defined by Technical Memorandum No. 96-37-B-04, December 11, 1996.
Designers should consult local officials regarding specific requirements. Technical
Memorandum No. 94-33-T-07 dated August 22, 1994 outlines Mn/DOT's roadway lighting
cost participation policy applicable to this project.
AESTHETIC DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
Type
The recommended lighting unit for continuous roadway lighting is the MrffDOT standard high
mast galvanized steel unit. Davit poles with the cobra head fixture will be used for
interchange lighting systems. See Figure 34. The architectural lighting units recommended
by the local communities for tile gateway bridges are shown in Figures 35 through 37.
Location
Highway lighting systems should be designed to protect adjacent properties from unnecessaI~
illnmlnadon and glare. High mast lighting units will be typically located in median areas.
Davit poles will be located in side grass berm areas. The architectural lighting units will be
placed on bridges and should be designed as a component of the bridge railing system. See
Figure 3. Conduits on bridges should be designed so that they are hidden from the direct
view of motorists and pedestriam.
39
Specifications
* Stainless Steel Lowering
System
* Flood Lighting Fixtu~s
1000 W~tt HPS T ~,mps
* Millerbernd Mf~r, Inc.
Ta~-'~i, 10-Sided
G-~lv~ized Stol Pole
(100-129 Ft Hr)
H-Bas~
Specifications
* Cobra Head Lumindre
200 Watt I-[PS Lamp
* Millerbemd Mf~r, Inc.
Tapered, 16-Sided
S~nless Steel Davit
Style Pole (30-50 Ft Hr)
H-Base
* Lexin~on, Inc.
Tapered, Round
Alum~nllm Davit
Style Pole (30-50 Irt Hr)
T-Base
LIGHTING UNIT TYPE 3-100 LIGHTING UNIT TYPE 9-40
Figure 34 - Roadway Lighting Unit Designs
4O
S~ifieations
* Antique Street Lamps, [tlc.
Hartford Series Post
Model H12/10-CA/BK
12 Ft Ht
Fluted, Tapered Cast Alumiqul~ ShaR
Polyearbonate Prismatic Sphere Refractor
10 Inch Ba~e
Figure 35 - Eden Prairie Lighting Unit Design
Antique Street lamps, Inc.
Central Park Sc'ties Post
Model CP I2/18-CA/BK
12 Ft Ht
10 Inch Base
Figure 36 - Chanhassen Lighting Unit Design
41
Specifications
* Holovhane Comvanv. Inc.
tT-~pital Cast Aluminum Post
12 Ft Ht
Albany Arm Bracket
without Finial, 150 Watt, Type
10 Inch Base
Figure 37 - Chaska Lighting Unit Design
Painting and Finishing
Al1 highway lighting units will be aluminum or galvanized or stainless steel.
The color of the architectural lighting units placed on bridges should be coordinated with the
metal railing systems of these structures and should Jade Mist Green conforming to U.S.
Paint Corporation color chip H4089. See painting and finishing recommendations in the
Bridges and Structures Section of this Aesthetic Design Guide.
The type and finish of lighting units placed along city streets should match local design
themes.
42
The Pawlenty/Molnau Transportation Package
· '~' Building More.
~.~, I~ Building Faster.
-o~"-~-~,,~ Meving Better.
Highway 212
"~P~ Hennepin and Carver Counties
Project Location:
Highway 212 from Hennepin County Road 4 Design Build Time Savings:
to Carver County Road 147, in Eden Prairie, 18 months
Chanhassen, Chaska, Carver and
Dahlgren, approximately 10 miles
Previous Start Date:
Project Description: 2013
Construct four-lane freeway on new
alignment Accelerated Start Date:
2005
Average Daily Traffic Volumes:
Current: 22,000; projected 2025:43,500 Number of Years Advanced: 8
Total Construction Cost: Benefits:
$225.4 million total Improve traffic flow, increase capacity,
create a vital link to Western Minnesota and
Design Build: Yes South Dakota.
Mn/DOT District 8 and Metro
(651) 582-1409
July 31, 2003
0
City of Chanhassen
Available Land Inventory
Com mercial/I nd ustrial
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
1 2.93 Century Blvd./West 78th Street
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
Outlet D, Arboretum Village PUD- Commercial Yes Yes Yes
Neighborhood
Commercial
TIF Access Via Miscellaneous
No Century Blvd./West 78th Street
Contact Name
Pulte Homes
651-452-5200
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
2 25-0101800 15 acres 7750 Galpin Blvd.
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
SE lA of Section 9 A-2 Low Density Y Y Y
TIF Access Via Miscellaneous
N West 78th Street Bluff Creek Primary Zone
Contact Name
J. P. Links
c/o John Przymus
642 Santa Vera Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
3 25-0750090 27 Hwy. 5 & 41
Lo,al Description Zonin[! Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
Outlet, Arboretum Business PUD Office/ Y Y ?
Park 2nd Industrial
TIF Access Via Miscellaneous
Y Future local street 23 acre corporate site and 4 acre commercial site
Contact Name
Chaska Gateway
3610 Co. Rd. 101
Wayzata, MN 55391
(952) 473-5650
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
4 25-0750010 4.4 2932 Water Tower Place
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
Lot 1, Block 1, Arboretum PUD Office/ Y Y ?
Business Park 2nd Industrial
TIF Access Via Miscellaneous
Y Water Tower Place
Contact Name
Chaska Gateway
3610 Co. Rd. 101
Wayzata, MN 55391
(952) 473-5650
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
5 25-0760020 2.3 2910 82nd Street
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
Lot 2, Block 1, Arboretum 3rd PUD Office Y Y ?
Industrial
TIF Access Via Miscellaneous
Y 82nd Street
Contact Name
Chaska Gateway
36t0 Co. Rd. 101
Wayzata, MN 55391
(952) 473-5650
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
6 25-0740040 12.2 xxxx Century Blvd.
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
Arboretum Business Park PUD Industrial Y Y ?
TIF Access Via Miscellaneous
Y Century Blvd.
Contact Name
Ghaska Gateway
3610 Go. Rd. 101
Wayzata, MN 55391
(952) 473-5650
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
7 25-0160800 44.75 8470 Galpin Blvd.
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
A2 Office/ Y Y Y
Industrial
TI F Access Via Miscellaneous
N Galpin Blvd./Lyman Blvd.
Contact Name
Merle Volk Pat Minger
16925 Co. Rd. 40 (952) 867-2733
Carver, MN 55315
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
8 25-0100900 126.5 acres 1680 Arboretum Blvd.
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
SE ¼ of Section 10 Ag
TIE Access Via Miscellaneous
Contact Name
Michael Gorra
1660 Arboretum Blvd.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
(952)474-7124
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
9 25-0101100 2.42 1660 Arboretum Blvd.
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
TIF Access Via Miscellaneous
Contact Name
State of Minnesota - DOT
395 John Ireland Blvd.
631 Transportation Bldg.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
10 25-0101000 1.16 1620 Arboretum
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
TIF Access Via Miscellaneous
Contact Name
State of Minnesota - DOT
395 John Ireland Blvd.
631 Transportation Bldg.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
11 25-0150300 23.43 1891 Arboretum Blvd.
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
N Section 15
TIF Access Via Miscellaneous
Contact Name
Creek Five Assoc.
c/o Land Group, Inc.
123 3rd Street N.
Minneapolis, MN 55401
(612) 333-2244
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
12 25-1210030 61,290
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
Bluff Creek Corporate Center
TIF Access Via Miscellaneous
Contact Name
Bluff Creek Partners
c/o Land Group, Inc.
123 3rd Street N.
Minneapolis, MN 55401
(612) 333-2244
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
13 25-4520020 22.85
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
McGlynn Park
TIF Access Via Miscellaneous
Contact Name
Love 4 One Another
7801 Audubon Road
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
14 25-0151210 38.76 Audubon Road
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
SE ¼ Section 15 A2 &IOP Office/ Y Y Y
Industrial/Park
/
Open Space
TIF Access Via Miscellaneous
N Audubon Road future Extensive wetlands on west
Contact Name
Osmonics, Inc.
5951 Clearwater Drive
Minnetonka, MN
952-933-2277
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
15 25-1790040 Lake Drive West
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
Outlet B, Chanhassen Business PUD Office/ Y Y Y
Center Industrial
TIF Access Via Miscellaneous
Y Lyman Blvd. Must be accessed through property to west.
Contact Name
Dennis Dirlam
Audubon 92
15241 Creekside Court
Eden Prairie, MN
(952)474-7626
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
16 25-0220100 48.48 Lyman Blvd.
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
N ½ Section 22 A2 Office/ Y Y Y
Industrial/Park
Open Space
TIF Access Via Miscellaneous
N LTman Blvd. Bluff Creek bounds on east.
Contact Name
Marsha Lawrence
(952)829-2900
(Charles Mattson - owner)
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
17 25-0140900 7.47 Audubon Road
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
;
I
SW ~A Section 14 IOP Office/ Y Y Y
Industrial
TIF Access Via Miscellaneous
N Audubon Road Existing farm structures on site.
Contact Name
Dave Stockdale
7210 Galpin Blvd.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
(952)474-7626
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
18 25-1900370 17 Powers Blvd.
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
Outlet F, Chanhassen Business IOP & HC2 Office/ Y Y N
Center Industrial
TIF Access Via Miscellaneous
Y Powers Blvd.
Contact Name
Edward Pauls
8827 Top of the World Drive
Salt Lake City, UT 84121
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
19 25-1500090 0.92 Kerber Blvd.
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
Lot 2, Block 3, Burdick Park PUD & Commercial Y Y Y
HC1
TIF Access Via Miscellaneous
Kerber Blvd.
Contact Name
Jim Burdick
684 Excelsior Blvd.
Excelsior, MN 55331
(952)474-5243
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
20 25-1950021 0.95 Market Blvd./Pauly Drive
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
Lot 2, Block 1, Chanhassen CBD
Mall
TIF Access Via Miscellaneous
Market Blvd./Pauly Drive
Contact Name
Todd Gerhardt
City of Chanhassen
(952)227-1100
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
21 25-2490020/25-2490030 550 West 79th Street
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
Lots 2 & 3, Block 1,
Crossroads Plaza 3rd
TIF Access Via Miscellaneous
Contact Name
Todd Gerhardt
City of Chanhassen
(952)227-1100
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
22 25-0130800 0.30 421 West 78th Street
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
Section 12 CBD Y Y
TIF Access Via Miscellaneous
Contact Name
Todd Gerhardt
City of Chanhassen
(952)227-1100
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
23 25-8460020 Lake Drive and Main Street
25-8460030
25-8560030
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
Outlet, Village on Ponds 2nd PUD Y Y
Outlets, Village on Ponds 4th
TIE Access Via Miscellaneous
Contact Name
Ausmar Development
C/o Lotus Realty
P.O. Box 235
Chanhassen, MN 55317
(952)934-4538
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
24 25-5300400 8+ Great Plains Blvd.
25-0242400 36.6
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
Outlet E, Mission Hills PUD Commercial Y Y Y
NW '/4, NW ¼, Section 24 RSF Low-Mad
Residential
TIF Access Via Miscellaneous
N Great Plains Blvd. Pending water/sewer project. Hwy. 101 realignment.
Contact Name
Al Klingelhutz
8600 Great Plains Blvd.
(952)934-8915
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
25 25-0242410 59.57 Lyman Blvd.
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
W 1/3, NW %, Section 24 RSF Mixed Use Y Y Y
TI F Access Via Miscellaneous
N Lyman Blvd. Hwy. 101 corridor on west and Hwy 212 corridor on
north
Contact Name
James Curry
4817 Upper Terrace
Edina, MN
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
26 25-0231600 17.27 Great Plains Blvd./L, ~man Blvd.
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
SE ¼, NE ¼, Section 23 RSF Residential Y Y Y
High Density
TI F Access Via Miscellaneous
N Great Plains Highway 212 corridor
Contact Name
James Curry
4817 Upper Terrace
Edina, MN
Site # PID Number Acreage Site Address
27 25-0240100 9
Legal Description Zoning Land Use Water Sewer Assessments
NW ¼, Section 24 RSF Residential Y Y Y
High Density
TIF Access Via Miscellaneous
N Lyman Blvd. Existing apartments. Area for development.
Contact Name
Steve Liefschultz
Lakeview Hills Investment
7630 West 78th Street
Bloomington, MN
(952)942-6332
5/02