11a. AMM Policy Adoption Meeting -e /*A e 4
/ r"
I M 1.
il l
1 V 1 i I/ a.
1
AMM Policy Adoption Meeting
1 When: Thursday, Nov. 5,1992
Where: The Decathlon Athletic Club
1 7800 Cedar Avenue
Bloomington, Minnesota 55438
1 4:15 p.m. Insiders tour of the
P
>
•
1
MALLOFAMERICA.
I 5:45 .m.
p 6:30 p.m. 7:30 p.m.
Social9four Suffat Pinner roacy Adoption Muting
(Cash bar) 'Io[as styaBanccuc
Barbecued Ribs and Chicken • Chefs Catch of the Day
• Fruits, Salads and Vegetables
Apple Pie and Cherry Cobbler
I Spouses, significant others and guests are welcome!
Price: $25 per person.
I Before taking on the serious business of adopting AMM's 1993 Legislative Policy, treat
yourself to an insiders tour of the Mall of America.The tour begins at 4:15 p.m., and
you'll arrive at the Decathlon Club about 30 minutes before the buffetfdinner
1 begins.
1. Reservations for the dinner and the Mall of America tour must be made to
I Carol Williams (490-3301) no later onday,-Noy.2. (Reservations are not
needed if you plan to attend the business meeting portion only. Please channel all
reservations through the office of your City Manager /Administrator.)
1 2. Some of the Metropolitan Governance Task Force recommendations have gener-
ated spirited commentary. Adding to the discussion will be Metropolitan Council Chair
I Mary Anderson, who will offer her opinions on the recommendations.
Specifics for Mall tour, map of the area
and meeting agenda on reverse.
DISTRIBUTION 1
U ON NOTE. This invitation has been mailed to Mayors.
Council Members and Managers/Administrators individually.
"7[MI 3O0'Ca' Tirglo' n'7Cvan' ai�"11611h;'Sf: PAT VIN - 55176
1
1
The AMM Board of Directors is scheduled to consider and adopt this
section of policies at its Oct. 29 meeting
•
VII
' METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE REORGANIZATION
' VII -A LEGISLATIVE REORGANIZATION OF METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE
The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities' Metropolitan
Governance Task Force has suggested broad -based changes in
the make -up and operation of the Metropolitan Council so it
may become more responsive and responsible to the current
climate and to help lead the metropolitan area into the 21st
Century and beyond.
The types of recommendations are divided into two main
' categories: Those requiring legislative action and those
needing action by the Metropolitan Council. (There are also
suggestions for AMM action that are not listed in this
document.)
1 A-1 ELECTION OF METROPOLITAN COUNCIL /METROPOLITAN AGENCIES
APPOINTMENTS
The Metropolitan Council has substantial taxing authority
and supervises other metropolitan agencies that have
considerably more taxing authority. This taxing ability
' requires accountability that cannot be achieved through
current appointment process. Direct election would give the
accountability the citizens need to balance the Council's
' taxing authority and other responsibilities it now has or
may have. As a side benefit, the election process would help
address the general lack of understanding about the
' Metropolitan Council and its role in the region.
THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MEMBERS BE ELECTED
' DIRECTLY TO THEIR POSITIONS TO BALANCE ACCOUNTABILITY WITH AUTHORITY AND
RESPONSIBILITY. (THE ELECTION PROCESS SHOULD BE IN SUBSTANTIAL
CONFORMANCE WITH THE TASK FORCE REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ELECTION OF
COUNCIL MEMBERS.)
THE AMM ALSO RECOMMENDS THAT THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL CHAIR BE ELECTED
BIENNIALLY FROM WITHIN THE COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP, NOT APPOINTED BY THE
GOVERNOR. THE AMM FURTHER RECOMMENDS THAT THE COUNCIL HAVE THE
AUTHORITY TO APPOINT ALL CHAIRS AND MEMBERS TO REGIONAL AGENCIES UNDER
THE COUNCIL'S PURVIEW. THESE AGENCIES ARE METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS
COMMISSION (14-A.C.), METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION (MWCC) ,
METROPOLITAN TRANSIT COMMISSION (MTC), METROPOLITAN PARKS AND OPEN
SPACE COMMISSION (MPOSC) AND THE REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD (RTB).
' A -2 METROPOLITAN AFFAIRS COMMITTEES IN THE LEGISLATURE
is �: r � •,
The state Legislature frequently is asked to review and pass If
legislation that affects only the seven - county metropolitan
area. The Senate currently has a Metropolitan Affairs
Committee to address these matters. At one time, the House
of Representatives also had a committee whose purview was
metropolitan affairs, but since has folded its duties in
with its Local Government Committee.
TO BETTER ADDRESS THE PROBLEMS AND SITUATIONS THAT ARE TRULY OF TWIN
CITY METROPOLITAN SIGNIFICANCE AND INTEREST, AND NAVE NO DIRECT BEARING
ON OTHER REGIONS OF MINNESOTA, THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT THE HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES REVIVE ITS METROPOLITAN AFFAIRS COMMITTEE AND THAT THE
SENATE CONTINUE ITS METROPOLITAN AFFAIRS COMMITTEE. MEMBERSHIP ON
THESE COMMITTEES SHOULD BE PREDOMINANTLY METROPOLITAN LEGISLATORS.
A -3 REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITIES /TRANSIT - •
The regional rail authorities - as they affect transit
matters in the metropolitan area - have outlived their
usefulness. No one rail authority has the broad metropolitan
perspective to plan a transit system. As a group, the rail
authorities duplicate and complicate transit planning of the
existing metropolitan agencies.
THEREFORE, THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT THE ROLE OF THE REGIONAL RAIL
AUTHORITIES AS INVOLVED IN TRANSIT IN THE SEVEN - COUNTY METROPOLITAN
AREA BE ELIMINATED.
1
A -4 RESTRUCTURING OF METROPOLITAN AGENCIES
The AMM believes that to better meet the needs of current
and future delivery of regional services and developing and
implementing regional policy, some changes should be made to
the structures and responsibilities of the regional
agencies. The detailed reasons and rationales for such
changes are contained in the aforementioned Task Force
report.
THE AMM RECOMMENDS THE FOLLOWING STATUTORY CHANGES WITH RESPECT TO
METROPOLITAN AGENCIESS
- REMOVE THE METROPOLITAN SPORTS FACILITIES COMMISSION AS A
METROPOLITAN AGENCY SINCE THE BACK -UP TAX LIABILITY IS LIMITED TO ONE
CITY WHICH ALSO APPOINTS ALL COMMISSIONERS EXCEPT THE CHAIR/
- MODIFY THE STATUS OF THE M.A.C. 80 THAT IT EITHER BECOMES A TRUE
METROPOLITAN AGENCY OR A STATE DIRECTED AGENCY. IF THE BACK -UP PROPERTY
TAX IS ONLY LIMITED TO THE SEVEN- COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA, THEN IT
SHOULD BE CONSIDERED A METROPOLITAN AGENCY AND ITS COMMISSION MEMBERS
APPOINTED BY AN ELECTED METROPOLITAN COUNCIL. THE BACK -UP PROPERTY TAX
SHOULD BE STATEWIDE IF THERE IS STATEWIDE REPRESENTATION ON THE M.A.C.
AND IF A STATEWIDE ENTITY IS THE APPOINTING AUTHORITY. '
2
- CONVERT THE LAND USE ADVISORY COMMITTEE INTO THE LAND USE ADVISORY
COMMISSION SIMILAR IN STRUCTURE AND RELATIONSHIP TO THE METROPOLITAN
' COUNCIL AS IS THE MPOSC.
- GRANT THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL THE AUTHORITY TO REORGANIZE THE
TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSIT STRUCTURE AND OPERATION IN THE REGION. THIS
COULD INCLUDE REVISING THE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE RTB AND
' MTC, AND MAY INVOLVE SHIFTING OF FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES BETWEEN
THE TWO AGENCIES AND ITSELF. UNDER SUCH REORGANIZATION THE RTB CHAIR
SHOULD BECOME PART -TIME AND THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MUST NOT BECOME
' THE SHORT - RANGE, DAY -TO -DAY PLANNING AUTHORITY. RECOMMENDATION FOR
ELIMINATION OF EITHER THE RTB OR MTC WOULD REQUIRE SPECIFIC
LEGISLATIVE APPROVAL.
' VII -B RE- ENERGIZING THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
The Metropolitan Council was formed to address specific
' problems, such as providing an adequate sewer system for
Minneapolis, St. Paul and the surrounding suburbs, but it
had a broader focus. Its mission was to serve the
' metropolitan area. Its first members took what could be
called a pro- active stance and, over time, became involved
in issues such as land use planning, parks and open space,
and transportation to allow for the orderly expansion of
' growth in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.
During the years since its inception to the present,
' however, the Metropolitan Council is perceived to have
become more politicized and is offhandedly referred to as
the "State Department of Metropolitan Affairs." It has,
either by design or happenstance, become an enforcer of
rules and regulations. It has become enmeshed in minutia and
dealing with the here - and -now, functioning less as an
institution of forward- thinking planning.
When the Council was created to address the issues of
sewers, transit, and parks and open space, it seemed natural
' for the Council to engage more heavily in the day -to -day
activities of the systems and agencies it envisioned. The
Council did nothing wrong, per se. Rather, it seemed to
institutionalize its vision, which pulled it back from
' forward- thinking. The AMM believes the Council should become
re- energized.
1 THEREFORE THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT:
- THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL RE- EMPHASIZE ITS VISIONARY ROLE AND
' APPOINT A PERMANENT COMMITTEE WHOSE SOLE CHARGE IS TO SEEK OUT
OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES THAT THE COUNCIL MAY ADDRESS. THE COUNCIL
HAS AN OPPORTUNITY TO HELP ADVANCE THE METROPOLITAN AREA INTO THE NEXT
CENTURY BY FOCUSING ON VISION AND LONG -RANGE PLANNING
- THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WORK ACTIVELY TO GET CITIES AND OTHER
ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE IN THE ACTUAL DELIVERY OF
SERVICES. TO THIS END, THE COUNCIL NEEDS TO WORK WITH CITY OFFICIALS
3
TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE AS NEEDED AND TO GET A LOCAL PERSPECTIVE ON
ISSUES.
- TEE COUNCIL EXAMINE SEVERAL ISSUE AREAS THAT HAVE METROPOLITAN WIDE
SIGNIFICANCE. THE COUNCIL WOULD PROVIDE OVERSIGHT AND BE RESPONSIBLE
FOR REPRESENTING AGENCIES UNDER ITS CHARGE AT THE STATE LEVEL. IT WOULD
FACILITATE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT OF THESE ISSUE AREAS. SOME OF THE
ISSUES AREAS INCLUDE LAND USE PLANNING AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT; HOUSING
COMMUNITY PRESERVATION AND NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION; ENVIRONMENT,
TRANSPORTATION, HUMAN RESOURCES, PUBLIC SAFETY SUPPORT, AND REGIONAL
AND LEISURE SERVICES. '
- THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL STRENGTHEN THE AUTHORITY OF THE EXECUTIVE
DIRECTOR IN RUNNING THE DAY -TO -DAY OPERATIONS AND THAT THE COUNCIL
MEMBERS BECOME MORE • BIG PICTURE" ORIENTED AND LESS INVOLVED IN
DETAILS.
•
t
4