9. Discussion of Water Surface Usage Ordinance 1 / % -c < 2 3 9
ee ZA4
1
1 March 9, 1992
1 FOR DISCUSSION ONLY
REGARDING SECTION 6- 27(B), PAGE 333 OF CITY CODE
1
1 1. Old definition was owner or family member.
_
I Problem: Did not specify storage in front of owner's property.
2. New Change: Only added "must be moored...in front of owner's property".
1 3. Last change: Specified owner or owner's permission - -that is the current ordinance
in effect. .
1 4. Recommendation:
I a. Use old, original statement which was owner /family member specific
b. Leave as is- -owner or owner's permission
c. Owner's permission, but all non -owner boats count 2 for 1
1
1 •
Richard Wing
1
1
1
1
1
1
1