The URL can be used to link to this page

04 20 1992 fl : Ar )pc,er teil ' AGENDA CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, APRIL 20, 1992, 7:00 P.M. 1 CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 690 COULTER DRIVE • 1. Board of Equalization and Review: - 1 - Opening Statements 1 - Comments from the Public - Announce that Final Action will be taken by the Board of Equalization on May 11, 1992 (special City Council meeting). 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 • . 1 CITYOF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 1 MEMORANDUM 1 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Don Ashworth, City Manager DATE: April 20, 1992 1 SUBJ: Board of Equalization and Review At this meeting, the City Council sits as the Board of Equalization and Review to listen to citizen comments regarding the estimated market value of their property. Property valuations represent the work efforts of the County Assessor's office from 1991. Although 1 the City Council does have authority to modify these valuations, changes cannot be more than 1% of the total gross values within the community. Values set by the local board are forwarded to the county for them to conduct a county -wide assessment hearing to ensure that each of the cities /townships are equalized. All counties must submit their values to the Commissioner of Revenue who is to verify that equalization exists between all counties in the state. The Commissioner must finish this work before October so that those equalized values can be used by the auditor in calculating taxes payable in the following year. I have attached information from the Handbook for Minnesota Cities regarding property taxation which may be of help to Council members. Also attached is a blank form to enter citizen comments. It is recommended that the procedures used in previous years be followed again this year, 1 i.e: Persons wishing to speak be informed of the necessity to sign -in in the back 1 of the room (a sign advising citizens to do such will be at the entrance door and forms will be on the rear counter). 1 The Council should announce its intent to listen to each person, but that no responses are anticipated this evening. Prior to closing the Board of Equalization and Review meeting, the Council will instruct the Assessor's office to review each comment received and to make a recommendation back to the Board for their next meeting. This closing procedure should include 1 announcing that the Board will review and take final action on citizen concerns /Assessor recommendations at a special meeting on May 11, 1992. isa N PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 1 .1 Mayor and City Council April 20, 1992 Page 2 ' - Persons not wishing to speak, but wishing to have their values reviewed, can do so by filing out a "Request for Review" form located on tables outside the Council Chambers. 1 This could be another big attendance year. Taxes increased an average of 18% (the city portion decreased for most owners). Western Hills, my neighborhood, was reviewed last ' year so those owners saw the biggest increase, i.e. Betty Eidam up 50 %, Jean Meuwissen up 75 %, and mine up 100 %. The fact is that that neighborhood has not been adjusted for many years and should have been taxed at a higher level for several years. (1) • ' e 1 I Sources of Revenue • 1 1 Chapter 20 1 I 1 - 1990 Supplement 1 There are several major sources of revenue for This section will discuss the property tax as a rev - cities, including the property tax. This chapter will enue source. Chapter 22 will explain the process of 1 discuss these sources. In order to develop and im- making the tax levy. Due to significant changes the plement a city budget, the council should consider 1988 legislature made, the property tax system is all of these sources. These sources of revenue are changing, with most changes effective in 1990. as follows. Since the legislature may change the system even 1 more in 1989, the 1989 Supplement will include an A. Property Taxation update of those provisions. B. Local Government Aid 1 C. Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid Authority to Tax (HACA) D. Equalization Aid The essential features of Minnesota's tax system E. Disparity Reduction Aid are in the Constitution which vests all taxing au-1 F. Fire and Police Service State Aid thority in the state legislature. 1 Lacking legislative G. Highway User Fund authorization, cities may not levy any taxes under H. Federal and State Grants -in -aid their own authority. The Constitution dedicates the I. Charges for Services revenues from specified taxes to certain purposes. 1 J. Regulatory Revenues For example, the proceeds from the taxes on motor K. Gifts vehicles, gasoline, motor fuels, and iron ore pro - L. Interest Income duction must, in whole or in part, go to support I M. Investment of Idle Funds certain state functions. The Constitution desig- N. Enterprise Funds nates certain state taxes as being in lieu of all other 0. Borrowing taxes on property. P. How This Chapter Applies to Home Rule 1 Charter Cities Within this constitutional structure, the legisla- ture alone has the authority to establish a state and A. Property Taxation local tax system. All city taxing authority is subject 1 to legislative change or revision. The property tax no longer is the major source of revenue for Minnesota cities. Less than 30 per- A consequence of this authority is annual legisla- cent of city revenue comes from the property tax. tive action substantially changing the property tax I system. Handbook for Minnesota Cities Page 313 1 1 1 I Sources of Revenue 1989 Supplement I Role of the Property Tax Equalization of Assessment Ratios There are, essentially, only three kinds of taxes: Another intergovernmental problem is the I those levied against what a person earns, owns, or equalization of assessment ratios between taxing spends. The income tax is an example of the first while the sales tax represents the last . The prop- districts. Taxpayers in assessment districts which have a high ratio of assessed value to market value, erty tax, levied against real or personal property, pay proportionately more property taxes than tax- ' is a tax against the wealth a person owns. payers in assessment areas with a lower ratio, as- suming equivalent actual values in properties. The Because most property is relatively fixed in lo- state uses several methods in trying to equalize cation and because the U.S. Constitution makes its these assessments. I use impractical on the national level, the property tax has been primarily a tool for local govern- Real and Personal Property Taxes ments. Consequently, it has become the backbone of local revenue systems. Minnesota law defines the term real property as State law has restricted city governments to the land itself including all buildings, improve- ments, and other fixtures on it; all rights and levying taxes against property. Most cities depend privileges pertaining to it; and all mines, mineral I on it for much of their operating revenues. Many quarries, fossils, and trees on or under it . The considerations of equity are involved in the prop- statutes state that wealth connected with the land, erty tax concept and process. For these reasons, such as minerals, may be separately owned and local officials should be familiar with the tax itself, taxed as real estate. 3 I with the tax levy limits and authorizations, with the details of its execution, and with the maintenance The term personal property refers to all and improvement of the tax base. detached or detachable moveable property, includ- ' Intergovernmental Problems ing furniture and other personal belongings, as well as commercial inventories and equipment a busi- ness uses to produce income. 4 Virtually all per - The property tax supports many governmental sonal property is exempt from taxation. I jurisdictions. The average homeowner pays, through the property tax, for the support of the city, All real property in the state is taxable as prop - school district, county, and any special districts erty under the laws of Minnesota, with certain ex- ' such as sanitary districts, housing and redevelop - ceptions. 6 The city has no authority to determine meat authorities, hospital districts, watershed dis- what property is taxable, nor in what proportions tricts, soil and water conservation districts, and or amounts. The legislature alone prescribes the park districts. procedures to follow and sets all rates and exemp- t tions. The assessor and the local board of review This multiplicity of taxing jurisdictions creates have authority only to determine valuations in ac- problems, including the taxpayers' confusion re- cordance with the procedures the legislature has garding who is using their money. For example, prescribed. I people often criticize city governments for tax in- creases when, in fact, the city decreased its tax rate Assessors must list all real property subject to while other taxing jurisdictions were increasing taxation. The county or city assessor must assess I theirs. This sharing of the tax base hampers inter- at least one - fourth of the listed parcels each year, governmental coordination and limits the council's power to increase tax rates within its own levy providing reappraisal of each parcel at maximum intervals of four years. The assessor's list must in- limitations . elude all real property becoming taxable in any year 1 with reference to its value on January 2 of that year . 7 Page 314 Handbook for Minnesota Cities JI 1 1 1 1 1989 Supplement Chapter 20 I Property Tax Process official believes the amount is incorrect . The steps in levying property taxes start with in- Assessment of Property 1 structions to local assessors and end with the tax settlements the county auditor makes. There are four steps in the assessment of prop- • erty: appraising property to determine its full and I Between April 1 and June 30, or later if the com- • true value; classifying property to establish its tax missioner of revenue gives an extension of time, capacity category; equalizing valuations to reduce the local board of review must hold a meeting. inequities; and reassessing property. The board examines the assessor's list to determine 1 if it accurately lists all taxable property. Assessment Officials By the first Monday in May, the assessor must - In addition to members of boards of review or have delivered the .completed assessment books to equalization, the state, each county, and some cities ' the county auditor. 9 have an official responsible for property assess- . State statutes specify when county boards of ment . Any county may require the county assessor to assess all property, except for property in cities 1 equalization must meet to examine and compare over 30,000 population. 16 the assessment of property within the county, and equalize them so that each tract or lot is assessed State and County Officials 10 at its market value. Action a board takes after adjournment is not valid unless the commissioner The state commissioner of revenue administers of revenue approves a longer session. The law also assessment laws, striving for a fair and equal as- ' tf- specifies when the state board of equalization 11 sessment of all property in the state. The commis- s.- meets. sioner's duties include instructing assessors, I Before October 25, the city council must set the satisfying grievances, and refunding taxes if the tax levy for the next year and send a certified copy county board and the county auditor recommend' to the county auditor. If a city fails to do this, the such action, 17 ordering the reassessment of any county auditor will levy the that the city real or personal property, 18 and requiring cities to I levied in the previous year. supply information relating to property assessment Before the first Monday in January, the local as- and tax collection. The city or any person directly interested in the order may appeal an order to a I se 13 sor must receive the property assessment books . special' board of tax appeals . 1$ Also before that date, the county auditor spreads the city's tax levy on all taxable property The assessment official at the county level is the in the city. On the first Monday in January, the county assessor. It is his or her duty to make the I county auditor delivers the tax records 14 to the final determination of the value of all property sub - county treasurer who then collects the tax. ject to assessment and taxation. 20 If the city has As soon as possible after March 5 and May 20 its own assessor, he or she views and appraises the I property, 21 but the county assessor assigns all of each year, the county treasurer pays to the city book work and final evaluations. The county as- its portion of all monies the county received from sensor must determine the assessed value of all levy and collection of taxes. 15 property in the county and prepare all necessary Property tax distributions, the ,estimated collec- assessment books and records. I tions that the county treasurer makes to local juris- The county assessor must examine the assess - dictions, must include taxes, special assessments, went appraisal records of each local assessor any II I and any penalties and interest due to the taxing time after January 15 of each year and must notify II I jurisdiction. The treasurer or fiscal officer of any the local governing body of any deficiencies. 22 If taxing district may appeal to the county board the the local assessor doesn't correct the deficiencies county treasurer's estimated collection, if the local within 30 days, the county assessor, with the ap- ' Handbook for Minnesota Cities Page 315 1 1 1 1 j .) 1 Sources of Revenue 1989 Supplement proval of the commissioner of revenue, may do so. or town. Under such an agreement, either The auditor may charge the local unit for the work, governmental unit could employ an assessor or they I and if the local unit doesn't pay by September 1, could jointly employ an assessor to assess property the county auditor may levy a tax against property in both jurisdictions. in the local unit . 23 I The local units must make these contracts or If districts do not complete their assessments by agreements under the terms of the Joint Powers May 1, the county assessor will do the work and Act, 27 and the commissioner of revenue must ap- charge accordingly. 24 These provisions do not ap- prove them 1 ply in cities over 30,000 population. City Assessor Valuation of Property Assessors must value all property at its market I If a city has a local assessor, that person must value. The statutes define market value as the place valuations on all taxable real property in the usual selling price in that location at the time of city. 25 To do this, the assessor receives annually assessment . It is the price which a seller could ob- from the county auditor, on or before the first tain at a private sale and not at a forced or auction I Monday in December of each year, the necessary sale. Market value is not necessarily the same as assessment books and blanks. The city assessor original cost or intrinsic value. The assessor has must complete the work and return the books to authority to consider other value - producing factors I the county auditor either on or before the first in assigning value to property. Monday in May or after the last meeting day of the city board of review, whichever is later. Property Tax Classifications I Instructions in these duties are available from The 1988 legislature eliminated the current clas- several sources, including an annual meeting with sification structure which applied varying assess - a representative from the state department of rev- ment ratios to market values, depending upon the enue. Assessors may obtain valuable assistance property type. 29 The new law creates "net tax ca- I from the book, Assessor's Manual, from the com- " missioner of revenue. The state board of assess- pacities for each property type. These tax capaci- ment establishes courses and approves classes that ties are tax rates applied to a property's market value in order to calculate the tax. Taxes are now 1 schools, colleges, and universities offer. based on a fixed percentage of a property's market When in doubt about the valuation of a parce�� value. of property, a local assessor should seek aid from, Exempt Property I the county assessor. The local assessor should al- ways be reasonably certain before placing valua- Several classes of property are exempt from tions on property and should not hesitate to seek ro ert taxation (but not necessarily from special whatever aid is necessary. a ssessm e nts). assessments). T hese include: y p 1 Joint Assessment Under Contract 1. All u li p b c burying grounds; I Any city which is wholly within a county and 2. All public schoolhouses; separated from a township for assessment purposes may enter into either of two kinds of agreements 3. All public hospitals; allowing someone other than a local assessor to as- ' sess the property. 26 4. All academies, colleges, and universities, The city may contract with the county to have and seminaries; the county assessor assess property. Or, the city 5. All churches, church property, and houses I may participate in an agreement with another city . of worship; 1 Page 316 Handbook for Minnesota Cities ) 1 1989 Supplement Chapter 20 6. Institutions of purely public charity; 32 The city council may appoint a special board of review. It may delegate to the board all of the I 7. All public property, including all city -owned powers and duties the council would have if it acted • property, for exclusive public purpose use; as the board of review. The members of the special and 33 board of review serve at the direction and discre- tion of the council . The council determines the 8. Real and personal property for the abate- number of members, the compensation and ment and control of air or water pollution. expense payments, and•the term of office. At least one member of the board must be an appraiser, I Local governments in Minnesota may not exempt realtor, or other person familiar with property any land from taxation for the purpose of attracting valuations in the assessment district . or keeping industry. 34 The city council, however, may offer a developer a deferral of property tax The board of review meets in the city clerk's of-, on property improvements during the construction fice. The city assessor and the county assessor period until the improvements are complete and 50 must attend this meeting with their assessment percent of the area of the building becomes occu- books and papers. These officials may take part in pied. 35 Once this occurs, the developer will be the proceedings, but may not vote. I subject to the full property tax plus the property tax on the property at the time the deferral took The meeting date of the board of review, which effect, times the number of years of the deferral . must be between April 1 and May 31, is fixed by I the county assessor on or before April 1 of each Equalization Procedures, year by giving written notice to the city clerk. After receiving the notice, the clerk must give published L Once the assessor has completed his or her work, and posted notice of the meeting at least 10 days the city, county, and state levels of government before the date of the meeting. I review and modify, with limitations, the assess- ments. During this review, two kinds of corrections A majority of the members may take action at are possible: the governing body may check the as- the board of review meeting and may adjourn the I sensor's lists for accuracy, hear individual com- meeting from day to day for a period of 20 days plaints, and make any necessary adjustments; and until they complete their work. After 20 days, the it may equalize the ratio of market to assessed board has no authority and any action it takes is I market values. The first function is the sole con- invalid unless the commissioner of revenue has cern of the city board of review, while the county granted an extension. and state boards devote more time to the latter task. In fulfilling its role, the board of review has three I main functions. When the entire procedure is complete, the county auditor puts the valuations in his or her 1. It must review the assessor's list, making - records to use when making up the tax rate figures . sure that all taxable property in the city has I Only when all three levels of government have been properly placed on it . reviewed and equalized the assessments, do they become the official assessed values. 2. It must review the assessor's valuations, I striving to standardize the ratio between City Board of Review • market value and adjusted market value for each individual piece of property. To ac- The city council may serve as the board of review complish this, the board may raise or lower I in cities which have been separated from the town. valuations on individual properties, but it 36 In cities which have not been separated from the cannot increase valuations without notify - town for assessment and election purposes, the ing the property owner and giving that per - town board serves as the board of review. son an opportunity to be heard. 1 Handbook for Minnesota Cities Page 317 , 1 . 1 ) I Sources of Revenue 1989 Supplement 3. The board must hear and settle the com- Upon the property owner's application, the I plaints of individual property owners re- board may change a property's homestead classifi- garding the valuations on their property. cation or reduce its market value by as much as $300, reducing or refunding any taxes the person If a person fails to appear in person or through has already paid. 38 I counsel or written communication before the board of review after receiving notice of intent to raise State Board of Equalization the assessment, or if a person fails to apply for a review of the assessment, he or she may not appear The commissioner of revenue acts as the state I before the county board of equalization for a board of equalization. 39 The commissioner's pri- review of the assessment . An exception is when the mary assessment task is to assure uniformity of assessment takes place after the meeting of the valuations between counties. The commissioner I board of review or when the aggrieved person can may adjust valuations between districts and be- establish that he or she did not receive notice at tween classes of property. The commissioner may least five days before the local board of review raise or lower individual assessments, but may in- meeting. crease individual assessments only after the tax- . I payer has received notice and has had an The local board of review may not reduce the opportunity to be heard. The commissioner may total or aggregate amount of the county assessor's not reduce the aggregate value of all property in assessment by more than one percent . This means the state by more than one percent below the total I that the board must often compensate for reduc- the county boards of equalization have reported. lions in assessed values by making comparable in- The commissioner may order a reassessment of creases in assessments against other parcels of property in any district. property. =1 Appeals to Tax Court After the final adjournment of the board of review, the city assessor may make additional as- The tax court is the final authority for the sessments, but the board cannot make further hearing and determination of all questions under review. Complaints on these later assessments can the property tax laws of the state, except for an go to the county board of equalization. appeal to the Supreme Court .'w The tax court has jurisdiction in cases dealing with property taxes I County Board of Equalization only after the taxpayer has appealed the valuation or assessment to the town or city board of review The county board of equalization consists of and to the county board of equalization, except for either the county auditor and the county commis- those taxpayers whose original assessments came I stoners, or a special board of equalization that the from the commissioner of revenue. The tax court auditor and the board of county commissioners ap- has no jurisdiction involving an order of the state points. 37 The statutes establish meeting dates. board of equalization unless a taxpayer contests 1 the valuation of the property. Although the county board of equalization may decrease and, after notice to the taxpayer, increase The tax court must hold hearings at any place in individual valuations, its primary task is to equalize the state so that taxpayers may appear before the I the ratio between market value and assessed mar - court with as little inconvenience and expense to ket value in the various districts. Its main purpose the taxpayer as possible. . is to secure uniformity of assessed value from dis- trict to district with only occasional attention to The small claims division of the tax court has ' uniformity between taxpayers within any one dis- jurisdiction in any case concerning the valuation, trict . It may not reduce the aggregate valuations assessment, or taxation of residential property the of either real or personal property in the county taxpayer has homesteaded. It also hears cases con- ' below the amounts the assessors have determined, cerning the tax laws in which the amount in con - but it may increase these amounts. Page 318 Handbook for Minnesota Cities 1 1 1 1 1 1990 Supplement Chapter 20 troversy does not exceed $5,000, including penalties adequate adjustment of sale prices for terms of 1 and interest . financing, inadequate adjustment of sale prices to reflect the difference in the date of sale compared The notice that goes to the taxpayer of the as- to the assessment date, and inadequate sale size. sessment, determination, or order of the commis- 44 sioner or the appropriate unit of government, should include written notice that the taxpayer has Cities receive their LGA in two equal payments the right to appeal to the tax court, and if applica- on July 20 and December 15. A city may request ble, to the small claims division. The notice must an advance from the commissioner of revenue if it state that the taxpayer must appeal to the town or has a cash flow problem. city board of equalization and to the county board 1 of equalization before appealing to the small claims Since the stated purpose of local government aid division of the tax court, except in those cases is to provide property tax relief to local govern - where the commissioner of revenue determined the ments, the law provides for uniform accounting and 1 assessment . 42 reporting standards for cities over 2,500 and uni- form reporting requirements for cities under 2,500 B. Local Government Aid population. 45 Local government aid (LGA) is a state aid to lo- C. Homestead and agricultural i cal governments. LGA has undergone several credit aid (HACA) changes since its creation in 1971. It has replaced 1 most of the individual taxes such as cigarette, liq- Homestead and agricultural credit aid (HACA) uor, bank excise, and gross earnings taxes which the replaced the homestead-and agricultural credit pro- state previously din ri uted to local governments grams in 1988. 46 The distribution design of the i under various laws. . program is different, however, whereas the original 1 credit programs provided relief directly for the tax- LGA, like other aspects of the state tax system is now manipulated by the legislature annually. payer, HACA is designed to provide relief to local governments to pay for tax rate reductions for cer- I LGA amendments are extensively discussed in tain classes of property. For example, under the credit programs, if the class rate on low- valued . the Preparing City Budgets memo, homes were reduced, it would usually cause an in- I One of the figures used to calculate a city's LGA crease in taxes for other property. In contrast, un- is fiscal capacity, measured in terms of a city's der the new system, HACA payments would increase in an attempt to prevent such tax burden equalized assessed value (changed to "equalized -tax shifts. (Note: Not all reductions in class ;ate capacity" under the 1988 tax law.) Equalized as- changes will be paid for through the HACA pro- I sensed value (tax capacity) is the assessor's esti- mate of market value of all taxable property in a gram.) city divided by the city's sales ratio. I D. Equalization aid A city's sales ratio is a percentage figure the state department of revenue derives by dividing the as- Equalization aid was first distributed through sensor's market value figure by the actual selling the 1989 Special Session tax law. It is intended to .1 price for property sold during the year. Its purpose reduce tax burdens in cities which have lower than is to equalize the tai capacity of property in one average tax bases. For Pay 1990, the program dis- taxing jurisdiction to make it comparable with tributed approximately $19.5 million. Under the other taxing jurisdictions throughout the state. A 1989 law, the program was to be eliminated and the I city may appeal its sales ratio determination. The aid distributions folded into the LGA base. The law provides that no sales ratio study shall be con- 1990 tax law changes this plan and retains equaliza- clusive or binding on a court . Any party may in- tion aid as an annual aid formula. Distributions for 1 troduce evidence of the unreliability of a sales ratio Pay 1991 are frozen at the 1990 levels, but if addi- study, including, but not limited to, evidence of in- tional appropriations are made to the program, dis- Handbook for Minnesota Cities Page 319 1 1 • 1 1 Sources of Revenue 1990 Supplement .0 I tributions would be made according to the follow- sociation, then the city must use the fire aid to ing formula. maintain the fire department . 49 The increase over the 1990 distribution would be Fire State Aid 1 equal to: • 30 percent of the city's average levy for the To qualify for state aid for fire service, a city must have had for one year or more before the last three years minus the citys share of dis- March 15 reporting date, an organized fire depart- I parity reduction aid and the city's equaliza- ment or an independent non - profit firefighting cor- tion aid for the previous year, poration providing relief and pension benefits . • multiplied by, Those organizations must meet the following min- 1 • one minus the ratio of the city's net tax imum requirements: 50 1. An active force of at least 10 firefighters, capacity to 900. who may be salaried, volunteer, or a com- . 1 The increase may not exceed 12 percent of the bination of each, including a fire chief and total of LGA plus equalization aid for the previous assistant fire chief; year . 2. A schedule of regular meetings and fre- _1 quent drills which include instructions in E. Disparity reduction aid firefighting tactics and in the operation, deployment, and care of firefighting appa- 1 Disparity reduction aid (DRA) was created in ratus and equipment; 1988 to address the problem of areas of the state where total mill rates exceeded 125 mills a rox- 3. Adequate firefighting apparatus and equip- (PP q gh g PP - q �p II imately a 100 percent tax capacity rate). The aid went, including a motorized fire truck was calculated on the total mill rate of the city or equipped according to state standards; town, school district (excluding debt and referenda levies), and county of a unique taxing district . The 4. A building of sound construction, suitable II calculated aid is then distributed in proportion to for housing firefighting apparatus with their levies to each local government . Aid through facilities for the care , of a fire hose and this program is calculated after local governments firefighting equipment; certify their levies to the county and do not provide I additional revenue, but do serve to reduce the tax burden on taxpayers. 5. A reliable adequate method of receiving fire alarms and sounding alarms; I F. Fire and Police State Aids 6. An additional piece of motorized firefight- ing apparatus for use outside the corporate Another important source of intergovernmental limits of the city; and revenue is state aid for police and fire service. 47 I 7. Other requirements the commissioner es- The state collects a premium tax of two percent tablishes by rule. from insurers with authority to write fire, lightning, sprinkler leakage, and extended coverage insurance The state fire marshal has the right to inspect I on risks within the state. Similarly, a premium tax the fire department of any city or non - profit of two percent applies to fire and casualty insurers firefighting corporation to insure that it meets the for insurance premiums insuring against the risks above requirements. 51 I of auto liability /bodily injury, auto liability /property damage, and auto physical In order to receive fire state aid, the clerk of each • damage. The state apportions these monies as state city having an organized fire department, or the aid to qualifying cities for fire and police retirement secretary of each independent non - profit firefight- l and relief . 48 If there is no firefighters' relief as- mg corporation and the secretary and treasurer of the firefighters' relief association must jointly cer- Page 320 Handbook for Minnesota Cities 1 . 1 . BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND REVIEW April 20, 1992, 7:00 p.m. Ref. Name and Parcel 1 No. Address No. Comments 1 1 1 1 1 1 � • 1 1 I 1 / 1 1 1 1 • 1 • BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND REVIEW April 20, 1992, 7:00 p.m. 1 Ref. Name and Parcel No. Address No. Comments 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND REVIEW April 20, 1992, 7:00 p.m. Ref. Name and Parcel 1 No. Address No. Comments 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II • 1 1 1 BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND REVIEW April 20, 1992, 7:00 p.m. Ref. Name and Parcel No. Address No. Comments 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND REVIEW April 20, 1992, 7:00 p.m. Ref. Name and Parcel 1 No. Address No. Comments 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1' 1 BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND REVIEW April 20, 1992, 7:00 p.m. Ref. Name and Parcel ' No. Address No. Comments 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND REVIEW April 20, 1992, 7:00 p.m. Ref. Name and Parcel 1 No. Address No. Comments 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '1 1 1 1 I BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND REVIEW April 20, 1992, 7:00 p.m. 1 Ref. Name and Parcel No. Address No. Comments 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND REVIEW April 20, 1992, 7:00 p.m. Ref. Name and Parcel 1 No. Address No. Comments - 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND REVIEW April 20, 1992, 7:00 p.m. . Ref. Name and Parcel 1 No. Address No. Comments 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 • BOARD OF EQUALIZATION. AND REVIEW April 20, 1992, 7:00 p.m. Ref. Name and Parcel 1 No. Address No. Comments 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I , • 1 Ir BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND REVIEW April 20, 1992, 7:00 p.m. 1 Ref. Name and Parcel ' No. Address No. Comments 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND REVIEW I April 20, 1992, 7:00 p.m. Ref. Name and Parcel 1 No. Address No. Comments 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND REVIEW April 20, 1992, 7:00 p.m. Ref. Name and Parcel No. Address No. Comments 11 BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND REVIEW I April 20, 1992, 7:00 p.m. I 1 Ref. Name and Parcel I No. Address No. Comments l ' I rl ' ! I I r . I I 1 LI !I I I v 1, • ' BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND REVIEW April 20, 1992, 7:00 p.m. 1 Ref. Name and Parcel No. Address No. Comments 1 1 1 1 1 1 .t1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND REVIEW April 20, 1992, 7:00 p.m. Ref. Name and Parcel No. Address No. Comments 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AND REVIEW April 20, 1992, 7:00 p.m. 1 Ref. Name and Parcel No. Address No. Comments 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 • 1 CITIZEN COMMENTS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 I 1 1 1 # (ofc�� 1 Aa APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 CITY OF t;hAilvriim sEry 1 Name: Ch^; S / / // v * Ju Address: c bane City: C1 sPn Zip: 55 i7 I Home Phone: 470 - I'i Work Phone: 9 3 '7 - 3 a c9 v /1 q a X -se ;, Parcel I.D. Number: 2 a,s ,OR/ Li o I want property reviewed because: 4 a/0 . 1 1 1 1 I Data reviewed by Assessor: / / (Initial & date /time) 1 1 1 • Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Y App mmended Adjusted as Noted 1 1 47. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS shall be paid as folbws: Thh REALTORSt d a REALTORS* . trlY t Da. _ 'Tart or misuse of Mt • i , ` 2. Page la 3. RECEIVED OF (1St?) • Alter .. (,(d A-, al/A • e / I 4. 6. the s r 6. by �:1 ? _.,• 1 as same � Dollars ($ ♦ �� r'- • ono aoosPtana of Purchase Agreement by all parties, • • 8. Purchase 7. before the next business day after eoc ptantb, In a trust account of Hating broker but to be r$um.d to Buyer It • 9. Street AddrAgr rent I. no - lned Set . Said earnest money is part payment for the purchase a the property batted 10. City of ... • - 11. Legally described as: �T. • Count State of Mime 12. V. , i.. 13. including the following properly, it any, owned by Seller and used and boated on said 14. trees; storm sash, storm doors, screens and awn propert garden butts, plants, s 15. Endures and bobs; �; window shades. blinds, traverse and curtain and drapery recta; attached light 16. conu n and bulbs; plumbing u bii elf fixtures, heater, heating plants (with any burners, otters and other Mg equipment, electronic airfifter Sotbre equipment used in bulk •M humidifier l 17. and dehumidifier, liquid gas tank and controls (if the property of Seiler), sump pump; attached television anten 18. and wiring; BUILT-INS: dishwashers, garbage disposals, trash compactors, ovens, cook bp stoves, m na cable N 19. intercoms; ATTACHED: carpeting; mirrors; garage door rag Personal property: openen and all controls; p fireplace s ovens, door and to 20. heatotators; AND: the bilowt r ols; smoke detectors; fireplace plap screens, doom 21. 22. 23. all of ich props Seller has this 24. / ' _ der Y a9 g manner: to sell to * �� w foL the . um of: (S j,: • . �. i r ., 4_ ( 25. which Buyer agree to pay . the followinr. Earnest money of ' ° r 0 Doi 26.andt /YSD, cash on or before - 27. the balance a % 8 , 1 7 / P 1 0 • ' -141 14 lit I n the dal. a seeing. 28. by financing in accordance with the attached addendum: lase.• rr 29. This Purchase Agreement % subject to a hour contingency addendum. (it answer is IS, see attached addendum.) 30. This Purchase Agreement ubject to canoellation of a 31. Attached are other addenda whe erre mods a pay written Purchase Agreement es on line dated part a this Purchase Agreement. (Enter page or pages on line 2) 32. DEED/MARKETABLE TTTLE: Upon performance by Buyer, Seller *hail deliver a 33. pined in by spouse, it any, conveying marketable title, subject to: Warranty Deed 34. (A) Building and zoning laws, ordinanoes, state and federal regulations; (B) Restrictions relating to use or improvement 35. affective forfeiture provisions; (C) Reservation of any mineral ge the easements which 36. not interfere with existing improvements; a by State of Minnesota; ( and tenancies): easements which do 37. (E) Right of tenants as follows (unless specified, not subject b bnand«): 38. (F) Others (Must be specified in wining): 39. REAL ESTATE TAXES _I 1 • • : I 40. Buyer shall pay, . •..•., , .• „•., ,, real puts texas due and payable In the year 19 41. Seller shall • 4 •., ,,... ,. ' • • 1,, real estate taxes due and payable let the year t . M the want t 42. the closing date is changed, the real estate taxes 43. taxes due and payable b the year 19 w$ E prorated, be adjusted to the new dosing dab. Seller warrants 7.1.. ow err, -homestead classification. In the wen part or nor►•tromestead 44. ctassaication Is circled, Seller egress to pay Boyar at dosing = 45. toward the non -homestead portion of the reel estate taxes. Buyer sprees b 45. become due and payable. Neither Seller nor Agents) make any reprsent n " balance a f sub subsequent ad taxes when to they concerning the amount a subeequ.nt real estate taxes. 47. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS shalt be paid as follows: 48. - , • I • 49. all installments of special assess • " • • , meet with the raal estate taxes due and payable in the year of closing. 50. - - . - y data a dos' ale other Kw, ... �� m9 special assessments levied as a the date a dosing. 51. i . _ - - . - .d: • I ••.. ■ e -1 . ' assessments pending as of the date of this agreement 52 . for knprov m.nts that have been ordered by the City Counol or other assessing Payment into .screw a 2 tirtea t u nt a the assessments, or less as authorities. s ► b by y Buyer's ) br �m.d .hall be by E 54. Illas dab of doing any deferred real estate axes or special assessments payment of Mich is II 55, requited as a r«uit a the � doelnp a this eats. Buyer shall 55. and any uspar •pedal amount* real estate taxes due and payable in the year following payable therewith and thereahe t p ayment of which Is not other�vi thereafter 57. Seller and Buyer Initial: S.iter(s) 1 Ca a fib. and 58. ER 170 -1 B Oat. ray Buyer(s) Dat. //7�9 ASS • 1 ' .o. TIRE 11 EXAsmu110N: Seller shat %Iddn • reasonable time attar aoospteroe cf this agreement; furnish an abstract of title err a registered 61. property abstract *stifled to date b include nclude proper searches covering bank wades, stale and lectern) )<udgmerts and Sens, and levied and 62.pending spacial assessments. Buyer shall be albwed 10busk»ssdays after receipt al abstrectfor examination of Me and nuking anyobjectbns 63. which shall be made in twking or deemed waived. K any objection is so made, Seller shall have 10 business days from receipt d Buyer's written ' 64.ttie objedbrts to notify Buyer o f Seller's intention to make*. marketable within 120 days from Belles r e c e i p t of such written objsotbn. k m a c e 95.1 given, payments hereunder required shall be postponed pending correction of title, but upon correction of the title and *thin 10 days ate IS. written nibs b Buyer the parties shell perform•his Purchase Agreement awarding to is terms.1 no such notice is given or 1 notice ls given 67. but title le not corrected within the time provlded for, this Purchase Agreement shall be nut and void, at option of Buyer, nether party shall be I 68. liable for damages hereunder to the other and earnest money shall be refunded to Buyer, Buyer and Wier agree to sign cantellatbn of 89. Purchase Agreement. BUYER AGREES TO ACCEPT AN OWNER'S TITLE POLICY IN THE FULL AMOUNT OF THE PURCHASE PRICE • 70. IN LIEU OF AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE F THE PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO A MASTER ABSTRACTOR F NO ABSTRACT OF TITLE IS 71.84 SELLER'S POSSESSION OR CONTROL. X Buyer is to receive such policy (1) the title examination period shall commence upon Buyer's i I 72. receipt of a current title insurance commitment and (2) Seiler shall pay the entire premium for such policy K no lender's policy is obtained, 73. and only the additional cost of obtaining • simultaneously issued owner's policy K a lender's policy 1 obtained (Buyer shall pay the 74. premium for the lender's policy). I 75. SUBDIVISION OF L. AND: K this sale constitutes or requires a subdivision of and owned by Seller, Seiler shall pay all subdivision expenses ii 76. and obtain all necessary govemnw Seller warrants the legal description of the real property to be conveyed has been or will I 77. be approved for recording as of thediate of closing. I 78. SELLER WARRANTIES: SELLER WARRANTS THAT BUILDINGS, ARE OR WILL BE CONSTRUCTED ENTIRELY WITHIN 'THE 79. BOUNDARY LINES OF THE PROPERTY. SELLER WARRANTS THAT THERE IS A RIGHT OF ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY FROM A 80. PUBLIC RIGHT WAY. THESE WARRANTIES SHALL SURVIVE THE DELIVERY OF THE DEED OR CONTRACT FOR DEED. ' 81. SELLER WARRANTS THAT PRIOR TO THE CLOSING, PAYMENT IN FULL WILL HAVE BEEN MADE FOR ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, 82. 1AACHINERY, FIXTURES CRi TOOLS FURNISHED WITHIN THE120DAYSI MEDIATELYPRECEDINGTHECLOSINGINCONNECT ION I 83. WITH CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION OR REPAIR OF ANY STRUCTURE ON OR IMPROVEMENT TO THE PROPERTY. ', 84. SELLER WARRANTS THAT SELLER HASNOTRECBVEDANYNOTICE FROMANYGOVERNMFMALAUTHORITYASTOVIOLATION 85. OFANY LAW, ORDINANCE OR REGULATION. IF THE PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, SELLER WARRANTS 86. THAT SELLER HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY NOTICE FROM ANY PERSON OR AUTHORITY AS TO A BREACH OF TIE COVENANTS. • 87. ANY NOTICES RECEIVED BY SELLER WILL BE PROVIDED TO BUYER BAL EDIATELY. 88. RISK OF LOSS: K there 1 any loss or damage to the property between the date hereof and the date of dosing, for any reason including I 89. fire, vandalism, flood, earthquake or act of God, the risk of boss shall be on Sailer K the property 1 destroyed or substantially damaged before 90. the dosing date, this Purchase Agreement shall become null and void, at Buyer's option, and earnest money shall be refunded b Byer, 91. Buyer and Seiler agree to sign cancellation of Purchase Agreement. - _ • 92. TIME OF ESSENCE: Time is of the essence in this Purchase Agreement. _ 93. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Purchase Agreement, any attached exhibits and any addenda or arnerdmats signed by the parties, shall oonetlute 94. the entire agreement betweenSellerandBuyer andsuperoedesw h. r written or and agreements between Seller and Buyer .ThisPurchase I 95. Agreement, ean bembdlied only in writing signed by Seiler and Buyer. ' I nd 96. ACCEPTANCE: Buyer understands and agrees that this Purchase Agreement 1 subject to acceptance by Seller in writing. Agents are not 97. liable or ressoonsble for any covenants, cbligatbns or warranties made in this Purchase Agreement, except the agents are liable to return or 98. account forth. earnest money and to arbitrate, K so agreed. The delivery of ail papers and monies shall be made at the listing broker's office. 99. DEFAULT: 1 Buyer defaults In any of the agreements herein, Seller may terminate this Purchase Agreement, and payments made hereunder 100. may be retained by Seller and Agent as Siuidat.d damages, as their respective Interests may appear. If this Purchase Agreement 1 not I 101. so terminated, Buyer or Seller may seek actual damages br breach of this Agreement or specific performance of this Agreement; and, as b -102. specific performance, such action must be commenced within six months idler such right of action arises. - -- - - -' - - - - - - -- - rte, This form approved by the Minnesota Association of REALTORS' Minnesota Association of REALTORS . disclaims any Iiibilitraristtiz,1 of use or misuse of this form. • • • 1. Date 11 • 2. Page of Pages 3. Addendum to Purchase AgreerVeht bety En t) ai ies dated - • , 19 pertaining to the purchase 1 4. and sale of the property at 6. Buyer will apply for and secure at Buyer's expense an FHA INSURED 3 u mortgage in the 7. amount stated in the Purchase Agreement amortiz onthly over a period of not more t han years with 8. an initial mortgage interest rate at no more than percent per annum. 9. MORTGAGE APPLICATION: The mortgage application IS TO BE MADE WITHIN FIVE BUSINESS DAYS after the 10. acceptance of this Purchase - Agreement. Buyer agrees to use best efforts to secure a commitment for 11. such financing and to execute all documents required to consummate said financing. In the event Buyer cannot secure 12. a commitment for said mortgage, this agreement shall become null and void and earnest money paid by the Buyer shall be 1a refunded to Buyer; Buyer and Seller agree to sign a Cancellation of Purchase Agreement. 14. MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUMS: Pursuant to Federal Regulations, a one time Mortgage Insurance Premium (MIP) 15. must be paid to FHA at the closing of this transaction. The said Mortgage Insurance Premiumwill increase the mortgage 16. amount unless paid in cash at the closing. This provision may not be applicable to condominium transactions. 17. DISCOUNT POINTS: Mortgage discount points ( "Points ") not to exceed _O% of the total of the mortgage amount 18. including i4IP, if added to mortgage, shall be paid as follows: 19. paid by Buyer. NOTE: Do not exceed maximum Seller 20. 0 paid by Seller. contribution allowed by FHA. I 21. If the Points charged by the lender are less than the Points agreed to on line #17: (initial option 1,2 or 3) 22. 1. The Points shall be charged first to the Seller and the balance to the Buyer. 23. If the Buyer is not contributing towards the Points and the Points are less than agreed to on line 420, then: 24. (initial option A or B) 25. 1 A. Seller shall pay total amount agreed to in line 420 and Buyer may use it at their discretion towards 26. Points, buy -down fees, or costs of closing. 27 .,. 1 .r B. Seller shall pay only Points. 28. � 2. The Points shall be charged first to the Buyer and the balance to the Seller. 1 29. �� 3. The Points shall be paid proportionately by both Seller and Buyer as agreed on lines 417-20 above. 30. LOCKING/FLOATING OF MORT TEREST RATE ( "RATE ") AND POINTS: Seller and Buyer agree the Rate 31. and Points shall be LOCKED / • on the date of application. If the Rate and Points are to be floated, it shall PRY Mr 32. be the sole discretion of SELLER '(j o lock in the Rate and Points. If Seller has sole discretion to lock Rate and 33. Points, Buyer agrees to sign lender's lock -in documents immediately upon notification from Seller. 34. FHA COMMITMENT WORK ORDERS: Nothing in this Purchase Agreement shall be construed as a warranty that the 35. Seller will make repairs required by the FHA commitment. However, the Seller agrees to pay up to $ 4-CO ' 00 36. to make repairs as required by the FHA commitment. If the FHA commitment is subject to any work orders for which the 37 cost of making said repairs shall exceed this amount, the Seller shall have the following options: I 38. (A) Making the necessary repairs; or 39. (B) Negotiating the cost of making said repairs with the Buyer; or 40. (C) Declaring the Purchase Agreement null and void and earnest money paid shall be refunded to the Buyer; 41. Buyer and Seller agree to sign a Cancellation of the Purchase Agreement. 42. LENDER PROCESSING FEES: Seller agrees to pay miscellaneous processing fees which the lender cannot charge 43. to Buyer, not to exceed $ /& S • v l) 44. FHA ESCAPE CLAUSE: "It is expressly agreed that, notwithstanding any other provisions of this contract, the purchaser 45. shall not be obligated to complete the purchase of the property described herein or to incur any penalty by forfeiture . 46. of earnest money deposits or otherwise, unless the mortgagee has delivered to the purchaser a written statement.issued 47. by the Federal Housing Commissioner or a Direct Endorsement lender setting forth the appraised value of the property 48. (excluding closing costs) of not less than $ '7 s?. t) 00 , NM* t) 49. which statement the mortgagee hereby agrees to deliver to the purchaser promptly ly after such appraised value statement 50. is made available to the mortgagee. The purchaser shall, however, have the privilege and option of proceeding with 51. the consummation of the contract without regard to the amount of the appraised valuation. The appraised valuation 52. is arrived at to determine the maximum mortgage the Department of Housing and Urban Development will insure. 53. HUD does not warrant the value nor the condition of the property. The purchaser should satisfy himself /herself that 54. the price and condition of the property are acceptable." 55. ie�A V 1) 440 4 /462_ 4 J / / [ .. a Y r /7A 56. ,....0 1 . , Cl // 1/, l /' . /nM.;� ! F..2 1 roe., 57. THIS IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT $ETWEEN 5UYER$ AND SELLERS. , . 58. ER 174 (1 /91) W YOU DESIRE LEGAL 011 TAX ADVICE, CONSULT AN APPROPRIATE PROFESSIONAL. Sins t) 1 ' );;;Inaz Rea i PURCHASE AGREEMENT A.,.........._,...tr- , . 10p. Addrep an ,,4 c , Lit/ 103, Pap. 3 of I 105, AS OFTHIS 104. Date Papas THE DATE OFAGR REPRESENT 106.FORANEWPUBUCIA�ROV EEUIENT ,SELLERT.THATSELLER. - :�,-ECEfVEDA NOTICE OFHEARING 107. PRO, IECTMAY M NO�EOFPENpIASSES + 108. DATE YEf ENTAI ASSESSING AUTHORITY, TI WHICH THE I 109. IS AGREEMENT AND ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF CLOSING, t AS S H S ASSUME PD • EWER SHALL ASSUME PAYMEtdTR > OF ANY SUCH SPECIAL ASSE 110. ON DATE OF CLOSING (OR ESCROW �• AND SELLER SHALL PAY I FOR PAYMENT AS PROVIDED ABOVE) 011m. ane) 111. E Y SUCH S OF ANY ASSESSMENTS. 112. OF At, RCHASEA SH,4 111,�►Ip H S EaAL A EXCEED i _ ASSESSMENTS SHALL EXCEED �� 14. A ALL L W R NESTM o PAI HEREUNDER DA SHAH CLOSING, PAY BE REFUNDED TO BUYER, 7 BOTH OF EAGREE TIES I 15. POSSESSION: TOASSUME YER' VI EFO ONE OR BOTH OF THE PARTIES .OR PROVIDE FORTHE PAYME ►ITOF SUCH EXCESS. Seller shall delhror possession of the 16. All interest, homeowner hall diatbn dues, rents, of - il property not If of than 5 17. gas shall be prorated between the parties as of liquid petroleum gas and all charges for water, city sewer, elect Sher closing. ' 18. Seller agrees to remove ALL - -' �' • . DEBRIS AND ALL PER ONAL PROP -'- electricity, andn date. TY NOT INCLUDED HEREIN from the property by possession date. 9 ENVIR no 1. AL CONCERNS: Tothebesioi the azardousw I 0. heroin noted: edge there are noh antes, orunderground storage tanks, exempt ?. SPECIAL WARRANTIES: 1. SELLER WARRANTS THATTHE PROPERTYIS DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO: CITYS 1 I SELLER AGREES TO PROVIDE WATER QUALITY TEST RESULTS AND/OR SEPTIC SYSTEM GOVERNING AGREES AUTHORITY PROVI WATT O SELLER WARRANTS ES EFM CITY ON IF WATER AND PLUMBING SYSTEMS USED AND LOCATED ON SAID PROPERTY WILL BE IN WORKING OR ON THE T O RE (HOED BY : RANTS THATALLgppLWNCES, HEATI WIRING ADDENDUM. BUYER I TY HAS THE RIGHT TO INSPECT PROPERTY PRIOR TO C( - SING. SING, EXCEPT AS NOTED ON ATTACHED ADDEN 11: BUYERACKNO WLEDGES TIfATNO REPRESENTATIONS HAVE BEEN POSSIBLE PROBLEMS OF WATER IN BASEMENT OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY WATER OR ICE BUILD-UP ON THE ROOF r PROPER MADE BYERHER SELLERORAGENT (S)REGggpING PROPERTY BASE THAT RE - ._ • ; • E FOLLOWING STATEMENT BY SE OF THE ' OR ICE BUILD -UP. BUYER PITAN . _ . , .H AD ROOF, W ALLORCE t LLER: D AMAG ECAUSEDBY WATER ' 9UYEA HAS RECEIVED THE TRUTH IN a..1 RECEIVED A REAL ESTATE TRANSFER DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. ' tUYER HAS RECEIVED THE WELL DI Mf.SM�IG STA TEMENT REOUIREp BAY GU1RE0 BY I IUYER i SELLER uy () MUNICIPALITY ut INITIAL: B era MINNESOTA STATUTES SEC. 1031235, h ME C UYER/HOME SELLER ARBITRATION SYSTEM: Selkr(s) ...-7 OR DEMAND OFSELLE E��(g, O THE PHYSICAL CONDITION PROPEq y �R(S)ORAGENT_ (g1� O��R� ANY OF IATATIOH CLAIMS OF FRAUD, MISREPRESENTATION, COVERED DO +— 0 IONI THE PHYSICAL A ED BY U RCHASE AR (GOUT DING WITHOUT CCORDAN ENTATION, WAR RANTY AND NEGUtiENCE ), AGREEMENT [[INCL UDING WITHOUT ID THE N MINNESOTA NCEWI HT ERULES THENINEFFECT ALL BE SETIONASS BINDING E DATE IN WHICH THE RELEVANTFACTg REGARDING � A T} RE �E CUJ A g THE ARBITRATION MUST A WITHIN 6 ATi0N .?&, ' AGRETHEDEUV Y0F7H DEED OR T RACTF � E IN THIS PURCHASE R UBE OF COVERED. THIS ISA SEPARATE VOL E FOR DEED PROM WHICH S evert STEM IS ONLY EN FORCEABLE IFALLPA THIS PURCHASE AGREEMENT. DISPUTE RESOLUTION DTO AGREEMENT. FAILURE IITRATE A' OW BELOTHEPUR AGREEMENTANDBROKERS/AGENTS Tp HAV RESOLUTION TERM) 1 - SELLER(S .0 - BELOW RESOLU turartts / LISTING BROKER/AGENT plead I tENCY DISCLOSURE: (/, , G BR aAGEN _ Aviv g . STIPULATES HE OR SHE IS REPRESENTING ^ they R ESeNTwG THESE� I THIS TRANSACTION. THE LISTING AGENT p .e. I owner • the SACTION. BUYER & BELLER OR Ssib.... T STIPULATES HE OR SHE S sting broker to withdraws accept the agreement and auttwrize agree 1i Bt y (s ' " Sellers) ^strutted o • properly from the market, purchase the • fly • . r the prbe and on the writing. terns and conditions set forth above. ti sv.rw.) / -...o ) �� / 7 f. dosing. 1 ;11Z-4121214Z2_______ *ow. Pallid wary Q r • c ally I .. ' - � . / mass maul maw emit, ) 0 G . r1- �, ei em u+ a») ..,�, / •... / G ` J/�,, 7 /oI w$4chis Wera N W.) I - 3�y� � _ r` 1 ♦ thereafter CCEPTANCE DATE maul awl, THIS IS A LEGALLY BIN CONTRACT s�ANY _ BUYERS N _ i° :at a,„„ m ei 'ail) IF YOU DESIRE LEGAL OR TAX E7IMEEN BUYERS ANp - I ADVICE, t;OIISULT PROFERtzrnu•. ' • I CARVER COUNTY 1 600 E,A$T_ALT.H STREET BOX 10 e �.�• �EgT � _`�_ CHASKA, Mt RE 1R ! are � : +l ' . 1 • NOW r -f tilt ntILFOR 1 92 PRQ2E.RTV yet 1IF: _28 +50 - -: L. , - GREEN ACRE: CHAPARRAL 2ND ADD PROPERTY CLASS PARCEL# R 25.2021440 RES. HSTD p E C l� r r> 1vp r /vl t l -e J t.tQ,y 811 PONTIAC LN ��fJ CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 t You may make an appeal by attending in person, by representation or by sending a lette r to the Board of Review on APRIL 20. 1992 7PM CHANHASSEN CITY HALL If you disagree with their decision, you may then appeal to the County Board of Equalization 9:30 AM JUNE 22. 1992 CARVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE Please call the County Auditor's office to set up an appointment for County Board of Equalization I 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 April 6, 1992 1 Board of Review Chanhassen City Hall 1 690 Coulter Drive P.O. Box 147 ' Chanhassen, MN 55317 • Dear Board 1 We will be unable to attend your Property Tax Review Meeting on the 20th of April so are hereby requesting a written explanation for a 21% 1 increase in our property value from 1991 to 1992 (from $130,200 to $157,000). 1 For those of us who are now living on fixed incomes, you are going to force us out of our family homes. How could our property value increase almost $30,000 in a one year period? This is unconscionable in our estimation. We have lived here for nearly 30 years and have raised our family in this ' home. It is essentially the same home today as it was when we purchased it in 1964 and it certainly is the same home this year as it was a year ago. 1 There must surely be some mistake and would ask that it be corrected. Thank you. 1 Sincerely 1 IY d_ ) Warren • . & M. Hanson 1 3241 Dartmouth Drive Excelsior, MN 55331 1 474 -7607 Enclosure • 1 • APR o 7 1:,22 C!TI' Or 1 CARVER COUNTY ' 600 EAST 4TH STREET .30X 10 .... �. CHASKA, Miy , r NOTIG, . A S$E S$ E i f . 1 t e � iL .3 `: M FOR 991 / � . . PRUP. ,. - • j h, ;41 GREEN ACRE: _ - , REG LANG SURVEY #7 PROPERTY CLASS °PARCEL# R - 25.6700070 1 RES. HSTD WARREN R C M HANSON 3241 DARTMOUTH DR EXCELSIOR♦ MN 55331 • You may make an appeal by attending in person_, by representation or b sending a letter to the , APRIL 29, 1991 7PM .CHANHASSEN C g CITY HALL eBoardofReviewon If you disagree with their decision, you may then appeal to the County Board of Equalization JUNE 17, 1991 -CTY COURTHOUSE Please call the County Auditor's office to set up an appointment for County Board of Equalization CARVER COUNTY '600 EAST 4+H- -44 BOX 10 M r' f : cn ;I' asK •� :; "�` ..._ ',;�` t:, t t6 / `:.•�: CHASKA? NCrfiqq; IF gEnS FOR - 92 PROPER " • • . 457,500 '- - GREEN ACRE: - REG LAND SURVEY • ' PROPERTY CLASS PARCEL# R 25.6700070 RES. HSTD WARREN R C M HANSON 3241 DARTMOUTH DR • EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 You may make an appeal by attending in person, by representation or by sending a Ietterto the Board of Review on APRIL 20, 1992 7PM CHANHASSEN HALL If you disagree with th decision, you may then appeal to the County Board of. Equalization I 9:30 AM JUNE 22, 1992 CARVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE Please call the County Auditor's office to set up an appointment for County Board of Equalization 1! • • aiLo •-th.t vyvQ.A.,t_ n-yu , OrtjaLA vezi_xc, RECEIVED . cte ef-(44APR 1 5 7992 heLo n(9-1- (/ri,c/L-eQtee (4)-05ITY °F LtitilNriliSSEN • 1 0-t- - 7`v sza tp , vyvt..A...e A OA j c20 0 06 a-0 noz-koc 7`z) w:t..±_e, zt, • „1-14,-r/tz-c. AtAt into-u azu,t IL/2e) • zr A too s_rc filteru t,,e- nee-ILA „euxi- ,112-(A_ • 7 dc k/-/-k,ea he • e Q - Th t-- Olt2 gretee • • vaiaL ,x toe9t;1- 40 d t,aA.et a.“ 171-e4.- e7t g ho-tAzit W - 11.c •- Vi _ ci i>a_twe ao bcd-65 .e9 j --7-yuze • 51) . 1 /0 / • - 1 1 JAMES L. REYNOLDS, P.E. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER 1 7660 CRIMSON BAY ROAD TELEPHONE (612) 474 -7060 CHASKA, MN 55318-9603 • April 11, 1992 Chairman of the Board of Review Chanhassen City Hall I 690 Coulter Drive RECEIVED Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 RE: Parcel # R 25.2610030 APR 14 199c Address: 7660 Crimson Bay Road I r r UH �4ht' 1 . Ur K,. n SSE Chairman and Members of the Board: ' The above referenced property has been valued at $570,000. That valuation is grossly over the current market value of the property. As you are no doubt aware, the market for large homes in the Twin Cities has suffered a severe collapse in the last two years. The comparables we will cite clearly demonstrate that market values are currently well below what they were a year or two ago. On the basis of current market values, the valuation of this property should be no greater than $465,000. 1 This appeal is not made lightly. We are very much aware of the financial problems facing many of the government agencies which receive their funding through real estate taxes. Not withstanding that, however, the current valuation is so outrageous that we feel compelled to appeal. We will not attempt to mislead the board. When this house was built it cost more than the value we claim is now appropriate. If we were to attempt to sell it, we would hope to realize a sales price greater than that amount. The current realities of the market place, however, make those prospects very remote. It is, of course, the current market value that must determine the valuation for real estate tax purposes. The comparables tell the tale of how depressed the market actually is. • Comparable Number One: 7640 Crimson Bay Road ' • Parcel #25.2610040 This property is a solid direct comparable. It is right 1 next door. It is approximately one year older than our home, and was first valued by the assessor at $530,000. Upon appeal, the Board properly reduced the valuation to $464,900. It remains at that value today. This comparable property is of similar or superior construc- tion. It has a brick facing which our home does not, Board of Review April 11, 1992 Page Two and it is located on a 3.5 acre lot compared to our 3.0 acre lot. It is also further from the noise of highway five, and has somewhat easier access to Lake Minnewashta. ' Comparable Number Two: 7620 Crimson Bay Road • Parcel #25.2610050 This property is another direct comparable. It is two doors away. It was placed on the market in April ' of 1989 at a price of $524,900, but did not sell until September of 1991 at a price of $460,000. That property is on a superior lot. It has a level walkout lot with easy access to the main portion of Lake ' Minnewashta. Our home has a steep inclined lot which provides access to the lake only through a pond and narrow channel. This comparable is of similar con- struction and was built by the same builder. Comparable Number Three: 9061 Victoria Drive ' Eden Prairie, Minnesota This comparable has the same floor plan as our home. It was placed on the market in September of 1989 at ' a price of $519,900. It finally sold fourteen months later for $385,000. This is a whopping 26 percent reduction, and is reflective of how depressed the large home market is in the area. Comparable Number Four: Lot 10, Block 2, Boulder Point This comparable was built by L. C. Cramer as a 1989 entry in the Parade of Homes, and carried a price of $759,000. It finally sold in September of 1990 at a ' price of $619,000, an eighteen percent - $140,000 reduction. Comparable Number Five: Lot 1, Block 3, Boulder Point This comparable was built by Bruce Bren, and was com- pleted in September of 1989. It is on a wooded lake lot and is a very attractive walkout rambler. It was listed at $625,000 but eventually sold for $500,000 in March of 1991. This is a twenty percent - $125,000 reduction. 1 All of these comparables are similar to our home. The design and details are, of course, different in some respects. They ' are, however, all large, new homes built at about the same time as ours. They have suffered substantial demonstrated losses in market value. Undoubtedly ours has as well. The ' clear and undisputable facts of these comparables cannot be ignored. The assessed value of our home must be reduced to $465,000 or less to reflect the true market value. We respectfully request that the Board make that reduction. 1 Board of Review April 11, 1992 Page Three II Our appeal to reduce the valuation of our home to $465,000 is based on the clear indication through direct comparables II that the true market value is at that level. That would be the appropriate assessed value if all the properties in Carver County were assessed at 100 percent of market value. II If the average assessor's value is less than 100 percent of true market value, our home should be reduced to below $465,000 assessed value. If you have any questions, please contact us. We look for- II ward to your favorable response to this appeal. 1 1 Ver -u truly yrs, 0,a.s. e r / , c / 1 James and oan Reynolds Home Phone: 474 -7060 II 7660 Crimson Bay Road Work Phone: 733 -6362 Chanhassen, Minnesota II Chaska, Minnesota 55318 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 re- tax1.92 II 1 1 88 Cascade Circle Chanhassen, MN 55317 April 12, 1992 Board of Review ' Chanhassen City Hall 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Evaluation of Residence at 88 Cascade Circle ' Parcel # 25.5500090 Near Mountain I have received your Notice of Assessment for 1992 for the above listed residential homestead property. I believe that ' your assessment is above market value for the following reasons: 1) We have made no improvements or modifications to the residence since purchase in August 1985 ' 2) At 90% of market value, the house would have to sell for approximately $147,000. I am not aware of a comparable three - bedroom home in the neighborhood that has sold in excess of $140,000. The one exception may be the residence at 87 Cascade Circle which has had substantial improvements and additions. ' 3) I do not believe that there would be any chance whatsoever that we could sell our home for close to the assessed valuation that you have established for 1992. b I will be unable to attend your meeting on April 20th. ' Sincerely yours, RECEIVED Dana M. Dudley APR 14 199% - CITY 0r 1 1 1 April 10, 1992 Board of Review Chanhassen City Hall 690 Coultier St. Chanhassen, Minn. Property ID 4989 250040900 Gentlemen: ' Since I will be out of town at the time of your Bd. of Review I am appealing by letter. I wish to appeal the assessed market value an 6 acres of barren ' land which jumped from 68,000 to 118,300 in just 1 year, thus raising my taxes on this property by twee $3,500.00. ' A gradual increase in taxes over a period of time we can understand, but such a drastic increase puts us in financial hardship. We are both retired and therefor on a fixed income and cannot simply absorb this unpredictable hardship. Market value on properties surrounding this property were not raised. Please consider this plea. ' Yo ors truly, Losegyf N. Bayer 0 1 1 1 1 RECEIVE ' APR 14 1992 CITY OF 1 1 March 27, 1992 To: City of Chanhassen Property Tax Board of Review 1 From: Robert Shumer Re: Property Located at 6570 Pipewood Curve, Chanhassen 1 In January I filed my homestead form on my property at 6570 Pipewood Curve, Chanhassen (Parcel # R 25.610080). I was in residence in the property in January, as required, and was eligible for the homestead property classification. 1 Unfortunately, I have been separated from my wife, Marsha for over two years, and was in the process of filing for divorce in December. The filing was to occur in California because that is where Marsha resides and where the bulk of our assets are. However, the papers were not filed in a timely manner, and according to my attorney, my filing would become invalid if I were a resident of Minnesota (as per my filing). I called to speak to a woman at the Chanhassen tax assessor's office to explain my situation and request that the homestead exemption be suspended because I could not claim Minnesota residency. I spoke with Marsha about the technicality and she agreed to do the filing in California (we are on good terms), thus allowing me to assume the Minnesota residence status. She filed on February 27, 1992 and the divorce proceedings are occurring in California. Therefore, I am requesting that the homestead filing be reinstated as I originally filed it. I continue to reside in the Pipewood Curve house. 1 I apologize for the inconvenience caused by my situation. I hope you will understand and grant my application. Sincerely, Robert Shumer 6570 Pipewood Curve Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 APR 081922 474 -5387 CITY OF CHANHA.:S' • SGJ D C ha h h s s � C ha r111 a 5sr►'t ' 7'V 9y E d I ` e rd o �e serrbin G t Ao e ere P er I, 4y h Cl/am hash ,ysT toCr 0,c,t- f r p Per ?n �Y�7 >ti ' �� soue hem hc�P 5• Where t,ve hoet eA sit;ce (rj i p ✓Q �'! to 4- ki c flea. h oc4-se —I sPf e o/ h Prark jl k.c -Fa 14,x s kyle 7 ( he 14u-, 1 ` Sc YT's ee f✓I is-/a ke r OL ,.,1 L is ur l ,V. [ 7 )) et. 8(14-%942.`-e41- hdG�se rv1 t eoreu • -4, f�.dok4 I y 11 �r' �7c( UN.r 6 cc. /Lee f G ..P�roX. �2 1_e- ,jvc -v-e ihQ t f ha/4 / a f7 ewd f y e N ee f4, O r 50 T 3ki✓Iedl r-a D phone ow ria,j1_5con, QC. -ecru, q3I -,s0 ! 3 • ha,' ��e Gt�C; � e � l b _CLSSQ SSo r J erC [1 I � i A f • Board of Review [1 Carver County Assessor April 9, 1992 Page 2 1 We certainly do not object to paying our fair share of real estate property tax. However, we do feel that an assessed value of $120,500 would be more appropriate. The $120,500 represents I the 3119,500 we paid for the home plus an additional $1,000 for our share of a new furnace that • was installed as part of the purchase agreement. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely • Robert J. Thielges .� Terese W. Thielges 7208 Frontier Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 L I f1 1 11 r t l t J i1 r: j 1 1 1 April 14, 1992 1 Board of Review Chanhassen City Hall 1 % County Assessor's Office 600 East 4th Street Chaska, MN 55318 Duane L. Bicek 1231 Bluff Creek Drive 1 Chaska, MN 55318 1 Property Class Res. HSTD Parcel # R 25.3250050 1 1 wish to appeal the estimate of the market value of my property located in Carver County. The property tax has had a drastic increase do to the increase in the estimated value of my home. The 1991 estimated value was $84,000 but for 1 some reason jumped to $124,100 in 1992. I believe the property's market value is wrong. I have enclosed a copy of an appraisal dated March 27, 1992 which indicates a fair 1 market value of $108,000. The appraisal was made at the request of my mortgage company and not by me. I ask that the Board of Review reduce my estimated properties market value 1 and request the County Auditor's office to issue a corrected Statement'of Property Tax Payable. 1 Thank You for your help, C i„gA Duane L. Bicek 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 F 1 '� '� O I Z �� .�'1�I. n A PPIZt1 15A A. Imo, INC. NC .Y era_ REAL ES7i1TE SPECIALISTS POI? 01 50 YEARS 1 , IO'.' • ' II =F \ NIUI, \Rt) I t". II , -N.\ FIt.F.F' MA =c cg I KATIU Fn . . rcyT1tF SRA . 1 March 30, '1992 I Knutson Mortgage Corporation 12941 Ridgedale Drive II Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343 Attention: Lisa Lueck II Attached is the appraisal for the property located at: #824365 -7 1 Bicek, Duane 1231 Bluff Creek Drive I Chanhassen, Minnesota 55318 The subject was inspected on March 27, 1992. The estimated -- "fair -- market value" as of -- March -- 27, 1992, (effective date) is $108,000. The property was appraised by Ted W. Carey, Appraiser. II No responsibility has been assumed for matters which are legal in nature, nor has any opinion on them been rendered, other than II- assuming marketable title. Liens and encumbrances, if any, have been disregarded and the property was appraised as though free of indebtedness. I Please feel free to call us if you have a question. We appreciate your business. I Sincerely, Forsythe Appraisals, Inc.' I TWC /bf I 922929 I • I 1 ! 1 11 # (office use only) 1 PiAIA.0 PPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME /1 /et u- n ,J PHONE 1 ADDRESS 2 03 0 c_,Ler Twn /City CL1I 9aG24,„ S il l PARCEL ID# 02-S e-S-D el / (j I I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: 1 lie hi , - 4 ,---e ? 026c) 'r - /e 4r-41-- CL5 I • tc4-1" 7 /r w (c=4-04 '' %) c c U 1 1 ,lam .2%--? L . �a � et D ATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: / / (Initial & date /time) // / 1 og-4 i �2d �. Qi�2e .. �v. Oz.y 1 • 1 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: ilk,c,./ a? 1 fse . ---.F4 L5 ,---- 4 12 1 c -I A cSf JA — 1 A m: 4.73, J) koW AJ ( o.4rc.JVGrk 44, 1 rc--I a s.a's aoitio GCS 444,e.. PI sr 7�� 1 1 ,' is e--e, ci %a v..- 4 v 14 !- cuss, A �� A 1 p , ,f � t I_ 1 -- h/ yh A-; / a 4 ccj 6-A -.1 C'Fu...lt G,.1 ' bL.:.f i`•.12 S) f' /z-e /'mil J- 4 -- F 4r; / ( y -3 -7 .7 ) . W • A'd 04.4.. Ate.. %4 0,44_,,,)A :. 4u -, p (4 , 1't ® ..-. « wa-) 4 a 6'o, 900 . S, s , ,r o e u s�.ti 1 I _ � 1 © .e,. 0�tii/ Q -b �e/' 1-> • f r.) G-1-a, / / C..e �- 4-f�t [v de N 15 . g Jr�4. �� - 404 ; 4,e J.;-1 C 1 4 z� 1C ., _ ,4 ^'soon I ,t 0 -1-4. 0 urti -- Grol -- . t-/ /{.6 c-s -e ; a s 3 9c) o "r/L.., 5 c -t,- z' 1c.) qua Lei w yo L.' 1S� M �, y 1 C� Q� � ., j L. 3+: rt /4-,`,../1" i j 4 4-4" -1 "6, Zil 1 -14u` rJII IA. Or =ice/ 1 -P, .t j A at t. -1 e 1 j ....,, ,,, ---A: - ..k_ A---1 ( 2 c A„.-- , --/............ i 2: e „....„ _c 4-4,_ cr ,.....i- /.4,4 : 0-...k, A .... 5 0,:-.$ ......-4 A., 7 ce 41 C-A--1 (r t-CI --/-+ _----.---- c_ZierA 4>y"4 ‘ - La .4 0 .4 t�3 . .-. , .. 1 1 11 7 L✓ A-s /H-a/t 14 S A-7 n ar 61 •�zti2 u' �` 't s' /`z- 2,4 ur J ' ,,,_Q��,.� ,�.,{ // ►� S > J ' 0-d _ A r-s - s .,,t`, v 4,,413 4a La A AJ J'cid-ts - ' /� f c,. a, !�-� } z.. �-'{e r A.•- °� era c- 4 L ,�1eQ u si k -4 X11 % O ,toff ea-t-t, c.res24 -3 U- 17 /- -�-,� J /55 L- ) a - 4--i _ ° 17 ,/ 14- / f f .2- A,2 J _. No -M1,1 • 41( - hi-1k, 1' IC? 5 /e S 4 - /4) ^Ides w � 1 4 J 1 CL-P7 g % C J') Odd A4-J.e._ i / 1 A) A 4.. /f J am- - f� �,,� 4 .,/ - 4-e : I w.elI k e) 444/rs 4 Y►'z An k<4 c1 cis pry 1 J 6 AAA (s 7e- I1 S Qc„-1 , q'/ i n,✓ ' I II • ' i i , .^r 1 P 1 1 i ‘ 7 5 f7lr-f : I 1 ) roL 40., ) ,74";(..1 c24-4"4/( /1_. yhae_ -(--ti 1 , 4,J A93 a._ 70-105- % ,--, 4., J .4,44_, yo ,A. c:_,- f,-1-i-_ i 471-0 /7 e--4 1'47 fAy -e /o9 QZ 1 L 4-4, iao% c.„ _i j •,,,i-- -- 1 -Z 4 Z4 -14 A- k.— 0 443 I 2) 1 n d 4 4 — tx.,___ s i f„.„ --&..... — O 0 2414 j S COP1e 44 ' 1 1 SpC rt7 5 '. A- r-e—S4---4 (>1- 4, Afi°1 s--*9 it44-les.01" (Jo i L - 1 `, 1 . I I 1 - A4 4 4-8e- , -.-S":" - j 44-imil,k.--s/ o-1 - v/ 4 / 0 ) / , 1 - — L)--ilt d 6 a,--Ak- cp i',J,- ;41/44A 1 AT 14 iza--, 0->v> 1 -14..a,„ i 4.-41 1 ,i-4.,..„-Ls • I : _ , ?c ) I , . i . . , 0080 • 1 1 i April 7, 1992 Board of Review Carver County We are appealing the increase in our Real Estate tax for 1992. In 1991, our taxes more than doubled (from $806 It to $1638 — an increase of $832). In 1992, the tax has increased from $1638 to $1820 ' an increase of $182. We are retired and on a fixed income — our home is a very modest home. We feel the tax is increasing faster ' than the value of our home. Thank you for your consideration. 1 Louis and Gladys 7,akariaser. � 3861 Red Cedar Pt. Rd. Excelsior, MN 55331 • • 1 1 1 1 • 1 • 1 April 3, 1992 Chanhassen Board of Review 1 City Hall Chanhassen, MN 55317 I would like to appeal the value of my property located at 7000 11 Utica Lane. It has been set at $172,600 for taxes payable in 1993. 1 In negotiations with the County Assessor, the value which had been agreed upon in March 1992 for taxes payable this year, was $161,700, and I feel that figure should be applicable for 1993 • also. Sincerely 1 1 James •Buehring 7000 Utica Lane Chanhassen PID 25- 3000200 • • ' • . 1 1 1 1 - ! 1 1 • \ 1 ,1 , 1 j 1 ' /-Y-s---t-- , jt.e.. .(L',.r•'--"-‘k.,,ilLs,..ta., / r , 1 -tt i.s2crt,&- 1 I . (e'-/vt-L_ - €1 ' .4...3 C, " LP .}, 1 , /4-6•L.W.L...), L etTe-c-- t) -1-1- •-;z-A.a.) 0--vicck-e--)--- , . d-V1-1),I-LC, 1 lL---L. VC:Z. .k_4...-■. J..41:- 6-12-14/14-,-- 1 , ■ AAA-C1.3..,, ,, : 1 -- rg - AF A r4 1 . . I I P -J-. 1 1 1 , a Ftz jizt.1■-C—. 1 L t) 6.iclecrLs ,A- --1 - ,*& 6- t - ECU- N , 1 • .1 Jui4-L.8L • (14_,?0,L2o2:1-:' 5)7, , s-g, ---&: (2,..._\„......, fr 1 . • ' ■ ,-- °-Z-v -ct_N-e-i-zis-v-e9—. „,..,. -re 4A----tz--LA) -1'' .. 1 1 — . 1 1 ej .,i' 2.4.-0-----111-1---1 6 c-LA....1./ 4KZ.1-1-Pc.1-1,"..i•M-5""e-* 0 1 • ii A 1 ; . v , 1 • II At! .- ' t--, - -- - ' €' - 1 _ ,,,,,, 4 _,,..„.. (...,,,. , - (J c ',4,0a : , III , I . .. , . . . 6 -2cd-\-y- 1 (1 ( v Rc Ca5e, I 5506 Great Plains Blvd. Chanhassen Minn. 55317 I 1 1 1 1 I - 1 1 . 1 1 • • 1 1 CARVER COUNTY 630 CHASKA, Mr ` " ' . .. . -, , iii Ej 1 J r. + NOTIOf r m.) 1 UL. 3 .Eklf FOR 992 I - T i li'i .�, • I , P .' QP A TV VA! l 11 t 40 '_ 'i' , • a GREEN ACRE: L ;SECT -13 TWP -116 RANGE -023 '1.26 ACRES IN LOT 3 - - PROPS -RTY- CLASS - -P ASCEL:- R- 25.C13r6O -0 - - - -- - RES. HSTD 1 , ROGER 6 N CASEY 8506 GREAT ,PLAINS BLVD :_.. _ ... c. a A.1 L S C. 1 1 7 _•, r O- ) NO -' ' E• �t�.l'iiE_i'. OF i• =i ?:E i'tlT•Et_Sn =� Cif S E f ... 1 3q - 1 1 8 4 ;14 RI uNc CT You may make an apps IN � i A 9P2 .1. — ```E` Z iev. E I • • APRIL 20, I f you disagree with 9:30 AM Jul IliliiiElilEElillliimillliiElil +liilliiiiillliitll } Piease calf the Count, ...._.__ _ _ - 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 November 18, 1991 City of Chanhassen: • After twice protesting the assessed value of my property at 620 1 Carver Beach Rd. # and getting no relief, I am asking the assessor to explain what the increase in general property values for Chanhassen is during the past year. I assume an increase. T was informed that the 1990 increase was 10 per cent, which 1 also question. How is this figure established? Thank you for taking the time to respond to my question. Sincerely, Phyllis Pope Bofferding ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II, .A - a C ITYOF • .c., :.:..) • , 1 . 1 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 II January 17, 1992 • 1 Ms. Phyllis Pope Bofferding 620 Carver Beach Road I Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Phyllis: I I apologize for the time delay in responding to your letter of this past fall. The meeting you attended was for the u establishing the 1992 Budget, and, as such, did not include of 1 reviews of individual parcel valuations. Your letter has now become timely. Specifically, the Board of Adjustments and Appeals meeting `(review of individual parcel I values) has been set for April 20 and May 11, 1992. The April 20 meeting will be for the sole purpose of receiving citizen concern and questions in regards to their value. As I have your concerns, I you need not attend that meeting. The second meeting, May 11, will include two parts - -1) the opportunity for the assessor to respond to each of those questions, and 2) for *he Board of Equalization to I determine whether adjustments to values are warranted or not. In previous years, the assessor has been ;successful in meeting with the residents between the first and second meeting dates to verify I their concerns. These meetings have generally resulted in the owner /assessor agreeing to a value and, thus, usually only 10% to 20% of the initial concerns need to be arbitrated by the Board of 1 Equalization. W _: Should you have an regards ��-: x� ..y:,: ,_:._... ,;,:.� �: feel free to contact ae you the best his letter, please I Y t in the new year. Sincerely, ; . :.:; ... .. ( i 1 t v . 1 Don Ashworth City Manager DA:k 1 1 % IP PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER . 1 CLIA): 14, 1 fq 1 C;(-4 " p fd e&-‘4.tte,c,. . sr3 r 1 -- CL-4 2 —. I / GiMf- CW 0 0 I ' + • • 7 i Ay Gtiv. va-t2 � 1 L a n r‘ c& Sc \kl2.. c& V\ YYYl a r).Y1 R ra( 1-121 revenraD cam, &STS- 71 eFWi11rarAST1 /� (ay i_A) (e- ‘e_scir-e_ - I i RECEIVZn APR 16 199 2 CITY OF CHAN HA 1 1 CARVER COUNTY.- - .. - - 600 EAST 4TH STREET n CHASKA, MN G '•,/ -` r- . _ ,: � 7i, it �� 1 • P�;� 1 7 1:, . _ ,.' I :. r 1 / ' f.' NOTI F., 1•il~, JJNm14it i _ ' i " ` • . _ : PROP i O R 19 2 � ! ,-'j,.; r . ..�a _ 55 9400 /115 ( , , GREEN ACRE. CITY LOTS • • 1 .. PROPERTY CLASS PARCEL# R 25.0500080 RES. NON -HSTD WILLIAM J C LOIS STODOLA _ : 4421 HIGHLAND RD MINNETONKA, MN 55345 .1. i You may make an appeal by attending in person, by representation or by sending a letter to the Board of Review on APRIL 20. 1992 7PM CHANHASSEN CITY HALL } If you disagree with their decision, you may then appeal to the County Board of Equalization 9:30 AM JUNE 22. 1992 CARVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE • Please call the County Auditor's office to set up an appointment for County Board of Equalization j • r� `- ----- - _ - __ _ + . ',-*:, :�•. , •l CARVER COUNTY 1 600 EAST .,!t _.SSREEI...._.. . BOX 10 q � . uS °CSIAGt�y,•. i ;5 5.33 1RT 'CHQSKA MN : -iii n 7 �i APR 3 2 pp gggg�� LL : ::2 NOT �Pi.11 A tE1.A TIAlkOR 19 2 t . - fl ' '. , • { . PROPERTY --Vail UUc• 4.9.100 INN f GREEN ACRE: - 'CITY LOTS PROPERTY CLASS PARCEL# R 25.0500070 • . i . : RES. NON -HSTD WILLIAM J C LOIS STODOLA I 4421 HIGHLAND RD MINNETONKA, MN 55345 11( 1 ' You may make an appeal by attending in person, by representation or by sending a letter to the Board of Review on APRIL 209 1992 7PM CHANHASSEN CITY HALL If you disagree with their decision, you may then appeal to the County Board of Equalization - 1 9:30 AM JUNE 229 1992 CARVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE Please call the County Auditor's office to set up an appointment for County Board of Equalization , 1 1 1 • 1 •