The URL can be used to link to this page

05 11 1992 ' DON A. 1 1 1 AGENDA CHANHASSEN BOARD OF REVIEW AND EQUALIZATION MONDAY, MAY 11, 1992, '1;.00, P :M.i 1 CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 690 COULTER DRIVE 1 Call to Order 1. Approval of Board of Equalization and Review Minutes dated April 20, 1992. 2. Continuation of the Board of Equalization and Review. 1 Adjournment 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 02. 1 CHANHASSEN BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING MAY 11, 1992 1 PROPERTY OWNERS COMING TO AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY ASSESSOR I Ref. to No. Name PIN Value I 1 Adler, Leonard L. 25-2300290 $202,400 Amick, Robert 25- 0010200 $118,300 in ,0�- e� 3 Anderson, Larry J.___.____ _ _ _ 25- 8810220 _ $112,000 �� 4 Anderson, Robert & Eliz. 25- 2300030 $375,800 w 5 Baker, Mike 25- 8810600 $ 99,000 I 6 Bardal, Curtis & Carol 25- 3320200 $229,700 7 Benz, Berney 25- 5350070 $ 98,200 8 Bicek, Duane L. 25- 3250050 $108,000 I 9 Bjorlin, Peter J. 25- 1601170 $ 68,300 10 Blom, Steve 25- 3600010 $135,300 I 11 Borns, Jeff 25- 8400070 $139,500 12 Braden, John R. Jr. 25- 3900020 $ 96,900 13 Brill, Terry 25- 2730320 $125,800 I 14 Brokke, Bernice 25- 0500200 $ 45,800 15 Buchanan, Stephen C. 25- 4200400 $162,600 16 Buehring, James 25- 3000200 $172,600 1 18 Callaway, Marilyn 25- 2700010 $192,700 19 Carlson, Gary 25- 7700070 $175,500 ' 20 Chandler, George /Carlson, Sharon 25- 8800160 $114,200 21 Carlson, Robert F. 25- 5080130 $128,000 22 Carrica, Joseph & Andrienne 25- 6100010 $192,600 23 Casey, Roger 25- 0134600 $111,400 24A Chanhassen Bowl 25- 1950020 $1,350,000 24B Chanhassen Bowl 25- 1950021 $137,600 I 25 Clasen, Herbert F. 25- 0023700 $112,900 26 Coffee, Charles 25- 7610090 $140,000 27 Colvin, Kyle 25- 0252000 $132,900 28 Daniel, John T. 25- 7610070 $115,000 29 Deaver, David W. 25- 6170010 $ 25,800 I 30 DeSantis, Harry 25- 6850010 $ 77,800 32 Dorweiler, Albert 25- 0270200 $ 88,800 33 DuChene, James P. & Susan 25- 1620200 $174,600 I 34 Durr, Ken 25- 0051100 $201,700 25- 0050400 $204,300 1 35 Epping, Joe & Paula 25- 8610030 $157,600 1 Ref. Agreed to No. Name PIN Value 1 38 Flaherty, Dennis & Toni 25- 2380070 $356,600 1 39 Foster, Mark 25- 8520070 $239,200 40 Fuhrmann, Charles 25- 7610060 $128,700 41 Fundingsland, Daniel 25- 2000850 $ 88,000 I 42 Galas, Pam Roberts Mike 25- 8210200 $142,400 43 Gale, Donald 25- 0133700 $ 98,600 1 44 Gavert, Richard 25- 0500380 $ 62,300 I 47 Hagman, Wayne 25- 0122700 $128,900 48 Hall, Jeffrey & Cynthia 25- 2730850 $110,300 4• Hall, Ken 25- 7900080 $ 92,200 u.(- 40 Hartmann, Helen R. 25- 6300230 $102,500 - I 51 Hedtke, Joel 25- 7900380 $ 88,900 52 Hendrickson, Jim & Jan 25- 7950070 $205,400 I 53 Hobbs, Walter B. 25- 2500030 $202,800 54 Horn, Clark and Linda 25- 0123200 $115,000 55 Horstman, Robert 25- 0800320 $212,200 1 58 Jamieson, Thomas & Dorothy 25- 2400040 $201,800 59 Jeurissen, Georgia 25- 3650010 $113,200 I 60 Johnson, Alva 25- 8520140 .$236,300 61 Johnson, Dana 25- 0050300 $115,000 62 Johnson, Donald M. 25- 1620110 $ 97,500 I 63 Keller, Mark & Connie 25- 1860040 $113,800 64 Kelly, Thomas F. 25- 4200280 $141,500 1 65 Kottke, Thomas 25- 3900180 $110,400 66 Kraus, Earla 25- 1800370 $102,900 68 Kuder, Martin 25- 6930010 $138,000 1 25- 6930020 $ 22,000 69 Kurvers, Melvin 25- 3920050 $182,900 1 70 Lang, Kenneth 25- 5150070 $128,500 71 Lantto, Todd M. 25- 1620190 $139,000 I 72 Linder, Wyck & Lorali 25- 3890010 $119,000 25- 3890020 $ 24,500 73 Loos, Jane H. 25- 1820340 $ 91,200 I 75 Luebke, Gerald & Rosemary 25- 0134810 $199,200 76 Maloney, Richard & Diane 25- 3250010 $145,200 I 77 Manteuffel, Betty 25- 7900160 $ 70,400 78 Marsh, Thomas L. 25- 8580130 $236,500 79 McCary, Elwood 25- 2300040 $248,400 I 80 McHugh, Timothy & Diane 25- 8400040 $168,000 81 McNeill, Shawn & Sandy 25- 7550590 $103,800 82 Melby, John 25- 8400120 $132,600 1 Ref. Agreed to No. Name PIN Value I 83 Merz, Tom 25- 1400130 $262,000 84 Metro Lakes Mini- Storage 25- 7510010 $1,150,000 I 85 Meuwissen, Howard 25- 8200210 $101,900 86 Midthun, Steven 25- 2700250 $215,000 87 Miller, Christopher 25- 4040130 $166,100 88 Mingo, Richard T. 25- 0123000 $100,900 89 Natoli, Florence 25- 0021900 $ 85,600 I 90 Newhouse, Tom & Judy 25- 2730590 $112,600 91 Nichols, Wm. & Sheri 25- 2080130 $119,600 92 Nieland, Richard & Marion 25- 0135300 $135,600 I 93 Niemi, Richard & Jane 25- 3320240 $537,400 94 Nord, Bruce A. 25- 6300090 $128,800 1 95 O'Neill, Diane 25- 6070200 $148,000 96 Olson, Andrew K. 25- 4060600 $137,100 1 97 Peka, Michael 25- 2020450 $ 75,000 98 Peters, John 25- 0500160 $ 6,000 I 99 Peterson, Robert M. 25- 1800050 $101,100 100 Peterson, Robert J. 25- 0240810 $141,900 101 Pfeffer, Herbert J. 25- 5050350 $156,600 I 102 Powers, Richard 25- 8400100 $131,300 103 Randall, Thomas S. 25- 4200430 $201,800 I 104 Richmond, Rhonda & John 25- 2730660 $124,100 105 Robinett, Robert W. 25- 8810250 $119,000 106 Rossing, Margaret D. 25- 1602060 $ 8,000 I 25- 1602070 $ 7,000 25- 1602080 $ 7,000 I 107 Sathre, Robert 25- 7660030 $201,600 108 Schmidt, Mike 25- 6850040 $100,000 109 Schmidt, Roger 25- 0150800 $119,000 1 110 Schmieg, Donald 25- 0500221 $ 10,000 " 111 Scholer, Robert 25- 8230020 $ 24,800 113 Schott, Wendal 25- 4110070 $151,300 I 114 Schrempp, Teresa & Daniel 25- 1620160 $161,000 115 Schroeder, Larry 25- 0500020 $111,200 I 116 Schroeder, Albert 25- 2080120 $107,600 117 Schueren, Gladys 25- 0122500 $ 69,700 118 Schuette, Richard 25- 2630200 $116,300 I 119 Schumacher, John 25- 5200010 $ 29,700 120 Schwartz, Michael 25- 2700080 $238,000 121 Scott, Judith 25- 5050170 $ 84,400 I 122 Segner, John 25- 8400110 $118,600 123 Shorba, George & Margaret 25- 0133600 $ 14,800 124 Shorba, George P. 25- 0500400 $ 95,000 I Ref. Agreed to No. Name PIN Value II 125 Smith, Donald T. 25- 1820280 $121,500 126 Spliethoff, Wm. & Margarie 25- 2380030 $361,500 1 127 Spohr, Clifford & Darcee 25- 8810350 $101,700 128 Stedman, Denis 25- 8800050 $114,600 130 Stockdale, David 25- 0140900 $159,300 ' 131 Sulerud, James 25- 1220020 $125,800 132 Sullivan, Ross 25- 0800190 $104,900 I 133 Swanson, Bruce & Tauna 25- 2550040 $112,300 134 Swedberg, Einar 25- 1800330 $109,500 I 136 Thielges, Robert & Terese 25- 8210150 $120,500 137 Thies & Talle /Heritage Park Apts. 25- 3150010 $2,050,000 138 Thies & Talle /Medical Arts Bldg 25- 0121900 $1,450,000 139 Tritz, Kevin & S. 25- 8060150 $ 65,000 d ' d" 140 Wagner, Charles 25- 0270300 $102,400 .. 41 Wildermuth, Jim 25- 2300120 $173,800 I 142 Winkel, Conrad 25- 8810060 $117,300 Si 143 Wrase, Henry 25- 0160200 $164,900 1 144 Zakariasen, Louis & Gladys 25- 0080700 $ 95,000 145 Zamjahn, Louise etal 25- 0351000 $ 2,100 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 P il h CHANHASSEN BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING MAY 11, 1992 PROPERTY OWNERS WHO HAVE NOT COME TO AGREEMENT WITH THE 1 I ASSESSOR AND REQUEST BOARD CONSIDERATION Ref. Assessor's Il l - No. Name PIN Rec. Value I 17 Burchet, Don 25- 0250700 $ 84,700. 31 Dingel, James & Janet 25- 1220010 / $113,100 1 ,- F' c Stey,�11 25- 003050 0. 1 Yee a 6 .* $123,100 7 Finley, Robert & Debra 25 -12 11 0 o re 1 45 Goetze, Donald 25- 0124000 $123,100 46 Gorrill, Deb /Degner Terry 25- 2730570 $110,500 ' I N � 56 Hovanec, Jeffrey J. 25-2540020 $232,000 of ` '57 Hultner, Charles 25 61'50190 $•114,600 67 Kubitz, Cecil '& Jane 25- 7600070 $100,700 1 74 Lord, Miles & Maxine 25- 2600110 $293,500 112 Scholer, Robert & C. 25- 8210170 $103,800. I 129 Steward, Thomas & C. 25- 0022800 $208,800 I 135 Swenson, Ben &'Pat 25- 0240300' $137,600 1 Larry Anci-ero r- 2.4 88 / o a a D 411 2. do0 , - �PYl4 1 L+ 1 (-__Q4 )A., el k • V '' I II II CHANHASSEN BOARD OF EQUALIZATION �, �' AND REVIEW / . rw. "' 1 APRIL 20, 1992 Mayor Chmiel called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m.. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. II MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Chmiel, Councilman Mason, Councilman Workman, Councilman Wing and Councilwoman Dimler 1 STAFF PRESENT: Don Ashworth, City Manager and Todd Gerhardt, Asst. City Manager 1 COUNTY ASSESSOR'S STAFF: Orlin Schafer, Steve Just and Ann Wyse Mayor Chmiel: This evening for our Board of Equalization and I Review, we're going to go through a process of taking people as they have signed in for one. What I'd like to try to do, so we can leave here hopefully by midnight or 1:00 or so, is to allow at I least a minimum of 5 minutes. The Council this evening will not respond to your respective statements. These statements will be taken and taken by our Assessor from the County. He will then il review your request and possibly come up with a conclusion of being in favor or leaving where the particular tax portion is at with the valuation of your property. After that, we will go through the process of hearing and listening to each one and then move from I there. Persons that are not wishing to speak and maybe have signed up, hopefully they have filled the forms that were on the outside which gives you the right to come back at the May llth meeting that I we will here again. And at that time determinations will be made as to where the total valuation is on your property. So with that I would like to maybe, Orlin, do you have something to say prior to taking? I Orlin Schafer: Probably just this Mayor is that everyone that signed up and is going to address the Council, this is taped and it I is also transcribed for us so we do understand what you're saying. We do have the ability to go back and check the tape if we're a little confused at what you said. Those people who have written I letters to us and those people who have filled out the forms and have made their appeal known in writing, we will address all of these issues. We'll contact you by phone if you've given us a phone number. If you haven't, please do so or call our office and I remind us or give it to us there if you haven't put it on the form. But do make yourself available for it. Again this is a meeting concerning the 1992 assessment for taxes payable in 1993. We're I really not here to take the time of your neighbors and your Council to talk about what happened in 1991 for taxes payable in 1992. That appeal was last year. Same place, almost the same time. If I you missed it last year, your recourse right now would be to file in tax court. These people cannot address any issue that should have come up in 1991. So if you feel offended by that, I apologize for it but that's a State law. These meetings are run according to I the Statutes and the State law prevents this Board from acting on anything that would affect any other year's assessment. So we're dealing only with 1992's assessment. The value that was on your I card for payable in 1993. And please do.not belabor the tax issue if you can at all help it. If you're really incensed about it, perhaps contact my office or we might advise you to file with tax II Board of Review and Equalization Minutes -2- April 20, 1992 court. I mean that might be your only avenue of appeal to open the door. It's not something that we treat lightly. We do respect I! your wishes and we try to work very well with the general public. Overall, maybe for the Council's information, the assessment level this year started out prior to our assessment we ran some numbers in early summer and it looked like our assessment was going to be somewhere around 86 %, which means 86% of the market value. We zeroed in on that and isolated some areas and Scott Winter was still with us at that point and he begun to view property last fall in those areas we knew we were really going to have a problem with. Ironically he moved on to another district out of our county in January so Steve Just and Ann Wyse took over instead and have continued to work with it. Right now our ratio charged against the last sales study has risen to 94 %. We're charged by law to be at market value. Now they didn't say a percentage of market value. They said market value and it's been that way for years. If you looked at your card and you feel that we're somewhere close to what ' you would expect to get for your house, then we're doing our job. It's as simple as that. If you paid more for your house in the last year or 18 months than what we have your house valued at, look for very little if any relief unless there's major problems with your house and you overpaid. Then we would adjust. We're reasonable. We understand these things. There are some procedures you can't do. Again, on an individual basis we might have to discuss them with you privately. Again the sales have indicated that Chanhassen as a result of the 1992 assessment should be somewhere around the 93% to 94% percentile. We hope that's true because the State Commissioner of Revenue does audit our books and if we're not somewhere near close to that, we could get a State increase. We haven't for the last several years. We've been able to head that off and have been doing a fairly good job. I think that's probably it unless the Council has any questions for me at this point. Mayor Chmiel then opened discussion from the audience. The 1 following people spoke regarding concerns they have about their property valuations. The specific comments from each property owner are contained in File A -31 at City Hall. Persons interested may review these comments during regular business hours. Councilman Mason moved, Councilman Workman seconded to continue the hearing by the Board of Equalization and Review until May 11, 1992. All voted in favor and the motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 9:35 p.m. 1 Submitted by Don Ashworth City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim 1 I ,# i (office use only) Y--// 7 /7 2-- , APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 1 NAM4E Levis & L. • AA 1 - / --• PHONE 935I - mC/ I ADDRESS &JO JilN11r �®n too Twn /City ei4.4NffASSl N PARCEL ID# R 5, 2 360 2 ` ' O 1 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: 6- JUL-y) f . t I E / Nor F ' ► tfaw/E rAlttEN AS'S33Son Ni As /,U A4Z4 iteeDID ,6 s 7FiF -R ' 4 a 4 we 'eE:7'V/21l (Ey '11:7() €The-74 CI J C /F ar) W'/is /tea In 14 - p/1 - ,01 res,,E d ID Ai 11-- '- Kko141 4 u Y! U ioiC) ("47 1 ' y1.-717-0204 AA y AFT'Q k l ij - al ` G� /V LcUea rsafs 77 Q .JUF 7ia - 7 -� Aft ASs s . e. 2 33 ( , e o (R03 u G-- r 3 9 o e g is Eicewssiva ir>41/1- Ticvtg2&y A) 337 /u c2 *E._ nj r 4 Ot .5 4(.1-).. a e g• 1 ,L)s- A 5-1"-es. MEAT IS /x10 ArLEASE' A Y'v-6,fi /I.1 VIDE D c41LS _.l _dA--s, 1 L).. m-4,-,° - t -- ; - . ,-- c' 7- r' • r DATA RE EWED BY ASSESSOR: Ott) / t� " (Initi� l & date/time) 1 25.2300290 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $233,900 1 Leonard L Adler 210 Sandy Hook Road Chanhassen MN 55317 I Property data was updated and recalculated to equalize market value with neighborhood. Recommendation to reduce building value from $183,900 to $152,400. I RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $31,500 to $202,400 NOTE: Owner agreed with reduction. 1 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as I noted: 1 1 . ee.• J 1 APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: L Adler Address: 210 Sandy Hook City: Chanhassen Zip: 55317 Home Phone: 934 -5691 Work Phone: Parcel LD. Number: 25.2300290 I want property reviewed because: Went to Assessor's office with Mr. Spliethoft and concur with his conclusions. Property tax rose • 34 %, land plus the house. 20% for the land, 38% for the house between 1991 and 1992. 38% for house is out of line. Have examined all the other lots in the neighborhood and have discussed it with realtor and the 38% is excessive and would propose that it should be lowered to 20 %. The same level as that of the land. Even so would probably have a hard time selling it for that but would accept that. Assessor's have never gone through the house. Would like to add to written request that the assessed value be lowered to an increase of 20% only. Even so it would be higher - than estimate that we got from realtors. Data reviewed by Assessor: / / (Initial & date /time) • Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • # (Office Use Onl 1 Y) 1 1 • 1 1 # Z (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: -0gK k=c A1-4 Address: sf.4 rnx ± k L �� J ' Cit CAP N ttA;ssr-z ) Zip: Jam? t 7 Home Phone: 474 (0 Work Phone: Oik. Parcel I.D. Number: 4'— to2bC � - I I want property reviewed because: ' t iks- - ==0;i1. mVuv.c.TS L S otvi; 1.11 Tom- VAd.0 knot3 t94sc S 2 -1-14, I ut.ticAvolis . NC. TIk 1 Data reviewed by Assessor: / ti - / / ) (Initial & date /time) 2 25.0010200 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $118,300 ' Robert Amick 581 Fox Hill Drive I Chanhassen MN 55317 Talked with Robert Amick and explained market value concepts and the tax structure. Mr. Amick feels comfortable with the value. 2ECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE: 1 Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • • 1 1 • IF # 3 (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: L o s 5 Pt- S o �. Address: 4-0 v , w. a , or Nr o „�, ; r City: C-�a � SS e Zip: S5 17 Home Phone: C,12 — Q 34 — 44 Work Phone: 2 — q — 52.5 4 Parcel I.D. Number: e_. ZY P 8 t O 2, 2.. (3 I i I want property reviewed because: S 0._A Data reviewed by Assessor: /1 / (Initial & date /time) • 3 25.8810220 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $119,300 Larry J Anderson 400 Cimarron Circle Chanhassen MN 55317 • Internal inspection of property and a review of neighboring properties and sales in the area indicates a reduction in the building value from $97,300 to $90,000. Owner disagrees. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $7,300 to $112,000 NOTE: Board Consideration Requested i • Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • 1 i e, ,._f e II il 4 -6 -92 In comparing the two adjacent houses, the following was I considered: 1) All three homes are on the same street II 2) All were built by the same builder 3) All are the same age II - 4) All are three bedrum, "L" shaped, walkout, ramblers with a livingroom, dining room, kitchen, and two bathrooms I upstairs. 5) All have a finished family room and one other room I finished on the walkout level. ) All have a two car attached garage I 7) All have a rear deck 8) All have a single fireplace on the lower level . il There are some differences and they are as follows: - "One has a storage room below the garage, aluminum siding '' and brick exterior on the fireplace - One has vaulted ceilings, tile entry, all new carpeting, I kitchen bay window, cedar siding, and brick exterior on the fireplace II - One has a enclosed porch The values listed are as follows: II Lot 11 $119.300 , ecee-, �� Z Lot 14 $105. 900 ✓" - - • II Lot 16 $102,800 II I believe the similarities outweith the differences and the market value of all is similar. II 1 1 60A,(..0 0 , /9 • # "T (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: 6 e �/? ✓fit .ice Address: /U 1. «f ;r /Jft 4 ,a ,D, City: 0 -K/ .5 e- Zip: 3 � 7 Home Phone: 9` 9 t / Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: / o ? S, 0 o _3 0 i 1 I want property reviewed because: / eD a.e _ • Data reviewed by Assessor: / ` � " l ' / (Initial & date /time) j 4 25.2300030 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $375,800 Roger & Elizabeth Anderson 106 Sandy Hook Rd Chanhassen MN 55317 TT owner. Reviewed neighboring values, field data and information in CAMA. Sale price of $391,000 on 12/11/89. Field card indicates some maintenance completed since sale. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • 1 I i 1 1 # (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: i /"Q c 2Y-if (- Address: sr-0 o City: C I„ � .� ✓v► Zip: S s 3 7 Home Phone: ,3 Y -o//y Work Phone: 9 5 - �l.s o Parcel I.D. Number: A a Sr. � / 7 60 c) I want property reviewed because: k t P° vie - s � M i tOvS2 o,t., 9 7- 5 0 � r- o— p V5. 'Apo ' . 1 Data reviewed by Assessor: / / (Initial & date /time) 5 25.8810600 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $104,600 1 Mike Baker 500 Del Rio Chanhassen MN 55317 Talked with Mr. Baker; reviewed an appraisal; reviewed records; sales data; adjustment to building value indicated. Recommendation of reducing building value from $82,600 to $77,000. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $5,600 to $99,000 NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted 1 1 1 # 6 (Office Use Only) • APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Q i Name: 6 u 2 T f S U - ro ,W A Address: / d / City: - K A - SS / - (c' Zip: • Home Phone: yS - 2 S _ 3 Work Phone: ' q Parcel I.D. Number: a5 , �� 2,0 0 I want property reviewed because: I u-- h‘i ).\(\ 0 yin 1 k-7 . 1 ) h r\ _, \,\ \I Data reviewed by Assessor: J / '00P 4 (Initial & date /time) 6 25.3320200 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $229,700 Curtis W & Carol J Bardal 10301 Heidi Lane Chaska MN 55318 -9516 Talked with owner of property regarding market values in the neighborhood. Discussed recent sales and cost approach to value. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • i � # 7 (Office Use Only) - APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: 13 e r Address: () l o 1 1 I,/ Je s - to 5 S+ . City: E K c_10 / 3 , Zip: S 3.3 Home Phone: '/7'/ — Work Phone: : 1D - 3 Co S Parcel I.D. Number: �S. 5 3 5 - vo - 7 () I want property reviewed because: t,Je u sTCind A i 4 o u_ ' va 1 ue ht-A /?, OD() .t: r, Drl e L I I 1 Data reviewed by Assessor: ' (Initial & date /time) 7 25.5350070 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $98,200 I ' Berney Benz j 2061 West 65th Street Excelsior MN 55331 Talked with owner and answered questions regarding increase and appreciation in market. Owner indicated agreement with values. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE: 1 I Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended' Adjusted as Noted 1 1 1 (off ice use only) ,• APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 r NAME D LL&V P . (Ce—k PHONE • - ADDRESS 1;) B (u.f 1 e reZk Dr Twn/City C1 (< C, PARCEL IDS ; 3 Z .ri O D 5O I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: 1 1 1 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: / S Y / /O'��(Initial & date /time) 1 8 25.3250050 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $124,100 Duane L Bicek 1231 Bluff Creek Drive Chaska MN 55318 Reviewed property, owners appraisal;updated field data; recalculated II value, adjustment by reducing building value from $16,100 indicated. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $16,100 to $108,000 NOTE: - • 1 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 1 April 14, 1992 Board of Review Chanhassen City Hall % County Assessor's Office ' 600 East 4th Street Chaska, MN 55318 Duane L. Bicek 1231 Bluff Creek Drive Chaska, MN 55318 Property p y Class Res. HSTD Parcel # R 25.3250050 I wish to appeal the estimate of the market value of my property located in Carver County. The property tax has had a drastic increase do to the increase in the estimated value of my home. The 1991 estimated value was $84,000 but for some reason jumped to $124,100 in 1992. I believe the property's market value is wrong. I have enclosed a copy of 11' an appraisal dated March 27, 1992 which indicates a fair market value of $108,000. The appraisal was made at the request of my mortgage company and not by me. I ask that the ' Board of Review reduce my estimated properties market value and request the County Auditor's office to issue a corrected Statement of Property Tax Payable. 1 Thank You for your help, C tucv, , QA Duane L. Bicek 1 1 1 1 /�.�� C ha l 'man %='; j� 1 ti I 11111 „„,N, It,,,",, 1111 o l'il FORSYTH A P PRAISALS IN C. All c.Ai :; 1. Po III REAL ES7A7'L SPECIALISTS FOR OVER 50 YEARS - MARY I°(7RSYII IF SRA RIO IART) I ORSYI I IF SRA FILFVN MASSIF, SRA KATI III IN rORSYT IIF SRA 1 • 1 March 30, 1992 Knutson Mortgage Corporation II 12941 Ridgedale Drive Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343 II Attention: Lisa Lueck Attached is the appraisal for the property located at: 1 #824365 -7 Bicek, Duane • 1231 Bluff Creek Drive II Chanhassen, Minnesota 55318 The subject was inspected on March 27, 1992. 1 The estimated "fair market value" as of March 27, 1992, (effective date) is $108,000. 1 The property was appraised by Ted W. Carey, Appraiser. No responsibility has been assumed for matters which are legal 1 in nature, nor has any opinion on them been rendered, other than assuming marketable title. Liens and encumbrances, if any, have been disregarded and the property was appraised as though free of indebtedness. Please feel free to call us if you have a question. II We appreciate your business. Sincerely, 1 Forsythe Appraisals, Inc.' TWC /bf 1 922929 1 1 1 1. # y (Office U I �En . • APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 APR 2 0 1 992 1 Name: • Pt:702 I. 8f//) „ . Address: 8'I1 Le4re 6 ' c ,0 /2. - /,(-- - City: (..ietwi- •tM' Zip: 553 / 7 Home Phone: Work Phone: W /� 38 - to 3 v Parcel LD. Number: 25.1 6 D 70 <1,5 - s -D t= 7 ; ,,,,;., f s 1.- I want property reviewed because: / Pv12 - 0 /$ r 0 / 20, 6 T r o/„ JAA4 10, /9 9Z, 1 • , /44,0 rXE Ass r ssd, cas a Vr / ti Ji / 1” AA ' acV F/ . AA-77 gt A , jG t ra G 7 4 ,oet3/6 /J E / ,e Hi A i,, 7 • .!r$ $(2 G c vc JS 75 Ton ./4,' / ��id � � 3 q w)- /fC� y 4-t'•v • i-v4-v� .674/ N�GAK dam re rii& /',e I CG'. - )7 /ov Of `!E A c/47/44 ►/. t'f �✓ haws/ 1.t , cr L ,eD T 4 e 4-c vg /� dV 7`4/(j ,, -72-, ,o L. -�� ,,, ., Data reviewed by Assessor: , � / .. / �Paa, _ (Initial & date/time) 9 25.1601170 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $75,200 I • Peter J. Bjorlin 841 Lone Eagle Drive Chanhassen MN 55317 • •, I. Reviewed $68,300 purchase price of property on 01/01/92. Recommendation of reducing building value from $53,200 to $46,300. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $6,900 to $68,300 1 NOTE: 1 Action Taken by Board: • Approved as Recommended 4 Adjusted as Noted 1 1 1 1 ■ • ° 1 # / (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: z ur _ C1AA. Address: • City: : cP l r . . _ - • • Home Phone: - • Work Phone: . _ Zip. Parcel I.D. Number: g 25 . 36, r^e o ! I want property reviewed because: • m9 pro pert - c 0A.tue has cmereasec _ -Prc , lc (00 - -o 1 35, 3cc- v,n 15 u- ic_A -1-1 & *t -,1.. 410* c -a_ viol - C-e e . / awl, , I .aho-uszel. 43, Ea w�. o arz. t ,a_ b o-v at- 025,21 Q f cke vd La,v Q � how ea-inn par(afp(..L beeaaze_ sp mc2_ -{- c;viru .. .S& rn-Q_ i . L. i c v�,C L�'1 +L 5 25-e c ew hQ-e . C19.-6, U -E- & k o a rotuvA w� CULL- , w e� h¢a�, i 35, ccYD wi t try_ Data reviewed by Assessor: / / (Initial & date /time) 10 25.3600010 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $135,300 Steven Blom 2511 Orchard Lane 13xcelsior MN 55331 Talked with owner about the increase in valuation and explained review Df neighborhood. Reviewed sales data 5/91 $155,000. Owner was ;omfortable with value. .kECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV . DOTE: • Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended . Adjusted as Noted 1_!) (' (office use only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 �} p / �-- 1 NAME ..J C ff - i3arrt S PHONE 937 - //f ADDRESS may/ o 1 ) / /O/ Twn /City Cwt tiX j e#k 1 PARCEL ID/ a g07 Dojo I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: UO. I t4e i'lcrea)ec( d task( / j y C °eiCern -4 a a too c4' • b rctc f e f s Hw /0/ / v 0 4 : 5 ‹ . / 1 1 _• DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: S_t/ y J & date /time) 11 25.8400070 Res Hstd 1992 Emv $155,000 ' Jeff Borns 7490 Hwy 101 Chanhassen MN 55317 A recalculation in CAMA was done on this property. Recommendation of reduction of building value from $97,800 to $82,300. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $15,500 to $139,500 _ NOTE: 1 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as 1 noted: 1 r• • # / v (Office Use Only) • APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: 5o 1ir a b r-- ra cie n Addres 7 2 r E' c( el 6 r, City: Zip: S • Home Phone: - O S -4 7 Work Phone: MiliP.Vir Parcel I.D. Number: 5 • 9Cb h d • I want property reviewed because: a k7q U_e, vn ,e, v Q ck r h Q 7 h i n 4.00 .13,c_ / '3 UUS l-S- y. ` Q- Q v s c o (if \te9r ;s h a oSc r i ow. Data reviewed by Assessor: 4 / y - / (Initial & date /time) • 12 25.3900020 1992 EMV $97,900 John R Braden 502 Laredo Lane Chanhassen MN 55317 Internal review of property indicates reduction in building value from $77,900 to $76,900. Owner mainly concerned about tax level. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $1,000 to $96,900 NOTE: Action Taken by Board: _ Approved as Recommended . Adjusted as Noted • • • 1 1 #__ (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 1 Name: eY A - FR L L_ Address: 654o u,4i L c .J G City: cNhrvN�tss6t.I Trip: 5'53/7 11 T Home Phone: q 3 4 - 2 3 Work Phone: 6 41- 44 Parcel I.D. NumberK 2 5, 27 3 v 32a 1 i • I want property reviewed because: W - e4/1446/111/?‘ a4'? -11J- 41712-4"‘ I/7kt- 01 -- ..entzt.ea.,2.6 axe 2 4-.0 )1-<snA Atz-t• -94;2 -16 1 - C am- o l - r: � -1-€44A-e; ? M ' 441" 1 "-- (Y 57: /D fri A ./947, 4 g r r eA , Data reviewed by Assessor: / / (Initial & date /time) 13 25.2730320 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $136,300 Terry Brill 6540 Quail Crossing 1 Chanhassen MN 55317 Inspected property, updated field data, recalculated value; indicates a reduction in the building value from $108,800 to $98,300. 1 RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $10,500 to $125,800 NOTE: • Action Taken by Board: _ Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted I 1 1 tL� # / 1 (Office Use Only) • APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: e o f Bro kkr Address: c 7 C f / p - rJ V I< <J City: k.i f-rv- s e Zip: S 3' r `7 Home Phone: L/7 - 6/73 Work Phone: Tce J 1?re 55 - 0 , /o f Parcel I.D. Number: 2 050 0 :t c c.` Y77- tia5" I want property reviewed because: e exv -I Vn t c11,.-1—; o h U t. i 4 CrL -Oa ,S / 2 .r° 37,0> . s , I " aoS 4- 0 �v}�t Data reviewed by Assessor: 4 4-J / 4 /7) 3 / (Initial & date /time) • 14 25.0500200 Res NonHstd 1992 EMV $59,800 Bernice Brokke 207 Chanview Chanhassen MN 55317 Inspect property, reviewed realtors opinion of value, updated field data, recalculated value; indicated reducing building value from $38,800 to $24,800. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $14,000 to $45,800. NOTE: I I Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • • I 1 1 L M 2 -1 j?(t� iP # /- (office use only) ii APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME 5�'2 I n of 1 a • B U, cJ) a. f1 a f PHONE L ADDRESS / / e.h ne , fa. 1,1 W � rr ! P� Twn /City C` h4 -S5el7 PARCEL IDS a c , a oo'/oo 1 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: i 1 . 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: ,J? / 7 o ? f / /s 4 (Initial & date /time ) 1 15 25.4200400 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $180,700 1 Stephen C Buchanan 141 Choctaw Circle Chanhassen MN 55317 Reviewed property, sales in area; noted typography of lot; recalculation of value indicates reducing land value from $81,100 to $63,800 and building value from $99,600 to $98,800. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $18,100 to $162,600 NOTE: 1 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 1 • 1 Stephen C. Buchanan 1 141 Choctaw Circle Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 April 15, 1992 1 Board of Review Carver County 1 600 E. 4th Street Box 10 Chaska, MN 55318 1 Subject: 1992 Real Estate Assessment for Parcel #R25.4200400 Gentlemen: As I will be unable to attend the April 20 meeting, this is to advise you that I feel my 1992 1 assessment is not equitable, as compared to the other "waterfront" homes in my community. I did not check the reassessment values of the other homes in the community, but I feel the "waterfront" homes abutting the community outlot, like mine, are more indicative of comparable _ values. There have been four recent resales in 1990 and 1991, all of which should represent the market 1 values for comparison to assessed values: Selling Price 1992 Assessment % Valuation $220,000 in 2/90 201,800 92 $220,000 in 11/90 201,800 92 $204,00yin 5/91 172,400 85 $230,000 in 8/91 198,400 86 Additionally, two others of significance are: Selling Price 1992 Assessment $270,000 in 1/87 287,000 1 $256,500 in 4/88 256,700 In the first case, only a 6% increase in 5 years on a large, prime "waterfront" property? 1 In the second case, no increase in assessed value in four years on another large, prime "waterfront" home? Other "waterfront" homes have not resold within a reasonable time period.. 1 1 Considering the topography of my lot, which has a steep hills in front of and to the rear of the house, and access provided by a steep driveway, I feel that the re- evaluation of my property value ' of 135% is too high. Realizing that the total assessment is the criteria, it's still high and at best is equal to and is perhaps higher than the market value. Other properties above are discounted from market value. 1 I therefore feel that my assessment should be adjusted downward accordingly. ' Sincerely, 2 / Stephen C. Buchanan 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 #_ t t (office use only) 1 APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME c uikt es t= tU, e h r( VI) PHONE f ADDRESS 7 000 LL t I ( R. t -C.v e Twn/City C. 1v4 hon---Ser) PARCEL ID! - 5 , 3 00 0 a- 0 0 , I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: 1 • 1 1 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: 6 / 4 Zv (Initial & date /time) 1 16 25.3000200 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $172,600 James Buehring 1 7000 Utica Lane Chanhassen MN 55317 Estimated market value should have been $161,700 instead of $172,600. 1 Owner received a corrected notice. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE: 1 • 1 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 1 1 1 1 April 3, 1992 ' Chanhassen Board of Review City Hall Chanhassen, MN 55317 I would like to appeal the value of my property located at 7000 Utica Lane. It has been set at $172,600 for taxes payable in 1993. In negotiations with the County Assessor, the value which had been agreed upon in March 1992 for taxes payable this year, was ' $161,700, and I feel that figure should be applicable for 1993 also. Sincerely `' James Buehring 7000._ Utica Lane ' Chanhassen PID 25- 3000200 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • - -- # I ° (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 nn Name: `' ar1 r N ( cC /(au.):7 Address: 6 3 Ci ty: N/asse Zip: Sal Home Phone: y 70 0c, 6 Z-- Work Phone: c5 - 72 2 Parcel I.D. Number: `R �5' c 70ere) o I want property reviewed because: 4, Was , , eXOPss V0 c L.¢Aid- /14) )41/Orel/MI "17, 7 `0/ L 4/ ks e or V, e sor -cl�� S G `l o�ts - /e,, l Ps r/a ILA.1 holes • • ; /pled d 7e a r c e\ // d P c ruse et Act �� % 0- 7'a X- ; Arc reef Se Oco reack gp053 6 i CN�o. et Data reviewed by Assessor: /7cv / (Initial & date /time) •!18 25.2700010 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $199,600 !Marilyn Callaway 6320 Fox Path ;Chanhassen MN 55317 Talked with property owner regarding sales of property in the area. Reviewed property data, recalculated value indicates an adjustment reducing building value from $153,300 to $146,400. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $6,900 to $192,700. NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted 1 - - # /9 (Office Use Only) I '� APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 APR 2 0 1992 Name: l • ' ' - to• v ` • a • v -- S c) A.) v r- • ' - - = I Address: .. S{ 1 Ltl h • I _ City: T N.,- ..- Zip: . Home Phone: _ • . - , ? c Work Phone: - vv) -f 1 Parcel LD. Number: 1' _ . ' G 00 C 1 I want property reviewed because: 7 L.� , v.. c ., ,c - c d . ;�6 t, • G �" " �. -_`I `I 0 0 -7/1 ` SAD ®6 ,1. w aJ cJ I / i; e IA 1 -4-4.) (4_41 re-c-ec..0, - 57,• c . i 7 - 1 1-4' -f 7 c c r H c to b...3 F- -w• -, c. R 1 d' 1 ,� ' c /%-�`C S ‘70.-4.-7 ' t acjet. L . 7 • C - Z )C c 11n v Lf am' ; 7 .! / � C v t 13 , ' (c) A- s 0--/-..r lam, 4) c c ( ,' . ; 4 i 1 it er1o/ u 7 L rift& 1 c g •; t I Data reviewed by Assessor: Cr L-- / f (Initial & date /time) II •L9 25.7700070 Ag Hstd 1992 EMV $194,900 II 3ary Carlson 3831 West 62nd Street excelsior MN 55331 1 Reviewed properties in neighborhood, recalculated values indicate a reduction of land value from $54,400 to $35,000. • RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $19,400 to $175,500 II !TOTE: . I Action Taken by Board: Approved as .Recommended -+r;. 1 Adjusted as Noted - 1 . • 1 • • 1 . 1 , 1 --66721gRE*36 te /1-42—tt vu( 6ulxi,), - 1 4 a 1 ;;V ! al 5 .;;In-.S,t -2-6-- a) - 7Vk/L_t s; A-Jo 0:=1-5 Lv\ r Tft: (kick,* §-/00-t) S 41 k6 /„-- a L trt 9. ot 73; 1 y � �- /,dr )(: 04L-Lt 7/4- e I ` aAa yi-‘4, 1 1 1 1 1 1 • # 24-) (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: . ��.reir 9. dZ/.ttat £ Address: � City: - -%-� Zip: .7 7 Horne Phone: 1 7 - 0 4 . Y 42'7 Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: J /t7 ' /6O 17,fa • I want property reviewed because: �% � Zr V74 ti /4G5 eiecize. a I Q ar etr Ate, &/ a " 44 • �� /i.z /,Gp % GkGrP.(�� u+ Di29 .� m oo G Jl� .� (�LLIG� it � I7Ce�- �.� lu ,' 1 , dic I evezy pot- 0 ir; 4e /ate rtm- elsec� '.-�, , ' - c 4k e6e a Data reviewed by Assessor: ;7"1_ / f f (Initial & date /time) 20 25.8800160 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $114,200 Geo Chandler & Sharon Carlson 411 Santa Fe Trail II Chanhassen MN 55317 Talked with Mr. Chandler. Explained why the tax increased and explained market value. Property was purchased 04/14/89 for $124,000. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV II NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • 1 1 1 1 of ' 1 f at Q /Zkgiized /if ,-m Acf4,q/' 7 kwat hti 4"; - ; eae - - - "! �v 4,3 wiz( 05 Ad'L ae..3ser �' 11r �G fe_eOret. f ew • 4,4/ --Z itel'e .2: arX - 6 AP t Oe at% ate. 4 .t(e rer Ai) 1 tqc rot- aaiee • ie. we 711AY /4-e 7caLle aezti Age 4k ae eveked 16, %saexrrs G 1 W 1 doe._ 4_4„ 1 . # -__24_. (Office Use Only) I APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 APR 1992 Name: 1 K C u C L �� y!TY OF CHkNHA4C �, 1 Address: , C A. 1 F r: r (t �. ) I___ A) F City: c / s, c, v. : k tick q. c Zip: S5 5 Horne Phone: / > (/ 3 Work Phone: 1 Parcel LD. Number: 1 4 , r, '() j -2 ,e) $ I I want property reviewed because: , 7 hz. 2 1 .�, r f--e �--� -� J 4 Ca •�'/ _,`l 0 c)(_) c� i't4.4- Na T lam-' - r' s ' r c 11 ts. 6 L4)- 1 ,.. L.Z.,L.....4.:•----C 6-Cf Ct."' 1 ' 7 L G-r)\-iliv-t-ct..,(. c'>---- -C=c t / c /A' y I Data reviewed by Assessor: -, q - 2-V / (kid /. & {"L 0 1 21 25.5080130 1992 EMV $163,400 I Robert Carlson 3801 Meadow Lane Excelsior MN 55331 I Interior inspection and recalculation indicates reduction in building value from $130,900 to $95,500. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $35,400 to $128,000 • 1 NOTE: AININIIMINI Action Taken by Board: - Approved as Recommended ; 1 , Adjusted as Noted • . 1 , 1 1 • . 4 1 # 2 2 — (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: -,t a- Address: gnz2 fft e ; / . A_ L1 i .- e _ City: 01,6-... Zip: Home Phone: 4' - 1 3 Z L Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: (;..5 I,, / O 0 0 I want property reviewed because: inackls 7 -- bLJitH �ec.c,-✓� -� `- i 1 .4.er Q C c. -t-'ti °� - t_i\- Q. c&__. . Data reviewed by Assessor: 6L-- / t f -- / — i��^ ( & date /time) 22 25.6100010 Res Hstd 1992 Emv $205,600 i f Joseph & Adrienne Carrica 900 Homestead Lane Chanhassen MN 55317 ! Reviewed field data, sale data noting 3 -3 -92 purchase $195,000, 1 recalculated value indicates and adjustment reducing the building value from $163,600 to $150,600. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $13,000 to $192,600 NOTE: owner acknowledged value reduction. Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted 1 1 1 1 April 20, 1992 I Dan Dalke, County Treasurer Carver County 600 East 4th Street Box 10 II Chaska, MN 55318 Dear Mr. Dalke: 1 This letter is to submit our objections of the property taxes levied on the property of 900 Homestead Lane (Jhanhams.n, MN. Wo M ?Woof to tho tAltiAA for tho following 1 reasons: 1. Your assessment states that the property is valued at I '$205,600. The property was purcahsed from Gerald and Bjorg Hendrickson on March 3, 1992 for $195,000. The purchase price included $1700 worth of appliances making the fair market value at $193,300. This puts the Carver II County assessment at $12,600 over the market value. 2. The lender (Penny Rodgers with Metropolitan Federal), II the title company (Equity Title) and myself contacted your office in regards to property taxes. We were all told that the 1992 levy would be assessed on the existing ;' property value of $183,500. I personally spoke with the County treasurer - Dan Dalke and was told the same information, but that the valuation would increase in 1993 since there had been a purchase. We also discusssed the ' possiblity of special assessments and was told there would be none. I We would like to resolve this matter as in a timely fashion as possible. We are new to the state of Minnesota and had researched the taxes before agreeing to purchase, I and we are concerned that the taxes would change within three weeks of the purchase date of this property. If you require additional information I would be happy to provide it. Sincerely, I Joseph and Adrienne Carrica 900 Homestead Lane 1 Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 # - (office use only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME g5get acv5e PHONE 9 ADDRESS ci 53 5 0 6 G (12at . At n5 ti Twn/City Chas 17 ev, Sefrl PARCEL ID# ,2 5. O/3 Y600 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: 1 r6t 1 1 • 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: ( / "j.'/ (Initial & date/time) 23 25.0134600 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $111,400 Roger Casey 8506 Great Plains Blvd Chanhassen MN 55317 Talked with housesitter on 04/30/92. Owner is out of town and will not return until May. Mr. Casey does not have a problem with the market value of property, does feel taxes are excessive. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE: 1 1 I ! ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended/adjusted as noted: 1 1 1 e-;kki ALL4AR_ 't-e/A),e,t,46 1 de 1.e0.L, .zit a) i - 9 - tit0/2.e-d :L4,4-444-LAr-km&44,--- k I ' - c b_ 8 _L. 1 7RA A , - 0_,L1) ,114,-e___ fryz-t-(._ aivt_t ttL4.4 0 - - 0 - 4 )- t i - , --tLJ, (fr 0,__84.)-#tk. I /tei: - &Ns-, , ' 841 t oil,r ,, Ld (, r ,,,,61Lei— I ` 1 1 • I. - i - - tr._ii._,. .A.u3aa- tab ' ' i' -t Iftlr I: tv-z^ r , Ul.,ee 4, AurrA 4,(, I fra._, 44,4-vv&-4-Al g)20.NA 444 te<say I 1 ?/t - Q-- e2g-A> ,--tf 1 0-f \A-- ''' 6.lf/CUAt,/ -- 711A1;444-eti fie e&JR-- I : ' 4ti s _19 4/1/ ..6 JA cz5fir) P-vv-- I - .}1,01 ./hP-6-Ai-tIM-ey/ZL thd*Pz )161. 1 g ., ce4 J(4-v-z-Scs-A-&_. iiiM-I - EL- kg.&- ,t-t 43i,,,,,t c ,..„ i _ 1,,,:k -6L±tt4) ite_o_k_ msµ 1 u 7.� 6-Ne-, 1 �� µw 1 1 1 1 A W-"& 1 4 &s V t ( r — /vv--- .f,d)-u a4,94,ext -r&it e*AAAdyaJIL- 144-t Ate.etwJe ez441 66../3 Actri.j. DAgjli Cid' 4 I 4 4J'LL • ./'‘.■ Q/V1--) A)-etitAL-VAA-3 f I 1 due-ef-c-k-V-1Z-5r I C 06 An/w/1 67.. 4 1 ' Roger Casey 1 8506 Great Plains Blvd, Chanhassen, Minn. 55317 1 1 1 1. loo 1 1 1 1 I. 1 1 11 . - CARVER COUNTY 630 EA.U.4-TH—TREET_ BD( 10 ' CHASKA, Mte- NOTIC,I.OF ASSESSMENT FOR 1992 PRCIREFLLY—ItALLLE.L...v.ee,..awL.,1.11,400.,J.' 4 GREEN ACRE: SECT-13 TWP-116 RANGE-023 1.26 ACRES IN LOT 3 PROPERTY CLASS PARCEL # R 25.0134600 RES. HSTD ROGER & N CASEY 8506 GREAT PLAINS BLVD ,Am cc117 • NOTIFY ZENLY=A OF NEW i-41) ccr:z.Ey GARLANn ST You may make an appe INnTo rA LIPEn1 APRIL 20, If you disagree with 9: 30 AM JU1 Please call the Count, _ _ ,# 024 ` (office use only) � APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 / NAME ( 44,,/ 4 d,�i. / -77 PHONE ADDRESS Twn /City ' PARCEL IDi I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: 11 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: 7--/ / (Initial & date /time) 24a 25.1950020 Comm 1992 EMV $1,683,700 ' Chanhassen Bowl, Inc. c/o Gerald C. Rummel Suite 1100, Capital Centre 386 North Wabasha St St Paul MN 55102 Property owner concerned with the EMV. After reviewing property a reduction of $333,700 to building market value due to depreciation of 1 property is indicated. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $333,700 to $1,350,000 NOTE: 1 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as ' noted: 1 -� ��• VIGLLJOlJl Lf-W) Urr NAGE 03 • D ' •i -- - -- - - - - -- - -- - ATTORNEY AT LAW AND - COUNSELOR ;?4 Ma/MOMS/ SUITE 1100 CAPITAL CENTRE , 366 NORTH WAOASMA 6TREET ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 5510E TEL (912) 223 -8100 FAx (5121223-81$1 April 20, 1992 Board of Review Via Facsimile and U.S. Mail , Chanhassen City Hall 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 ' Re: Notice of Assessment Parcel No. 825.1950020 1 Dear Sir or Madam: Please be advised, my clients are owners of the above- , referenced property. — This letter hereby constitutes an appeal as to the property 111 valuation in the amount of $1,663,700.00 on the above - referenced parcel. My clients feel this valuation is extremely high and unrealistic and should be reduced to the sum of $1,000,000.00. If further information is desired by the Board of Review regarding this valuation, I would be happy to furnish same on behalf of my client. Very truly yours, GERALD C. RUMMEL GCR:rt ' cc: Chanhassen Bowl, Inc. 1 1 1 • 1 ' #02 (office use only) f j APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 N - Al4E e z CC U✓ , , PHONE ADDRESS Twn /City ' PARCEL ID# I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: 1 DATA-REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: / / (Initial & date /time) ' 24b 25.1950021 1992 EMV $ 137,600 ' Chanhassen Bowl, Inc. c/o Gerald C. Rummel Suite 1100, Capital Centre 386 North Wabasha St St Paul MN 55102 After reviewing property no change in the EMV is indicated. Property is valued consistently with neighboring land in area. ' RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as ' noted: ■� J. . 0l14GJ01J1 L-f-iW urrll,t F"f-bt 171 - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - ATTORNEY AT LAW AND , COUNSELOR S1 " SUITE 1 100. CAPITAL CENTRE 3P$ NORTH WABASiiA STREET ST PAUL. MINNESOTA $$1 O2 TEL, 1812) 223-8100 Fox 4812)223 -8151 April 20, 1992 Board of Review Via Facsimile and U.S. Mail Chanhassen City Hall 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Notice of Assessment -- Parcel No. R25.1950021 Dear Sir or Madam: Please be advised, my clients are owners of the above- referenced property. This letter hereby constitutes an appeal as to the property valuation in the amount of $137,600.00 on the above referenced parcel. My clients feel this valuation is extremely high and unrealistic and should be reduced to the sum of $50,000.00. If further information is desired by the Board of Review regarding this valuation, 1 would be happy to furnish same on behalf of my client. Very truly yours, 1 .mY Of GERALD C. RUMMEL GCR:rt 1 cc: Chanhassen Bowl, Inc. ' r • # �� (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: 44' j ' Address: . '3 5 � % =-� i . ; : t .. e City: � -11-- Zi 5 Home Phone: - ' s Work Phone: �"�"` p• Parcel I.D. Number: 4. Una 1 7 O O I want property reviewed because: /}fir fi.,6.-2 A 61 - 1 .? D 1 Data reviewed by Assessor: 34 ' / ' = if / /,1 (( Initial & date /time) 25 25.0023700 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $117,500 Herbert F Clasen 6351 Yosemite Avenue Excelsior MN 55331 Recalculation of property in CAMA and consideration of sales in neighborhood. Recommend reducing building value from $90,000 to $85,400. I RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $4,600 to $112,900 • NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended . Adjusted as Noted • '. • i 1 1 # 'e (Office Use Only) 1 _ . _ • APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 1 ■ . I Name: 4 I I , Address: City: (4, 0 ......„ f...... (1,4 : , 7 C/ ( ZAP : 4.:. A.. ' 1- i -'-' 1 • Home Phone: '934- '"75 Work Phone: eF, 1 - i ‹...v -3--,•_, 1 I Parcel I.D. Number: ,....2.C / 0090 ■ I I want property reviewed because: /4.-.,7' e„.. Z --6. 7 4 '; e-) - : 1 • ---2,,_ ' f „ 0'-,:, j .,,,,,7%; 1 ,;,( a l . ..kJ.: Af.-,-", _. ._ -" , 1 e./ , / 1 4 4 7 ) trt" \---.---• 4: ' .....- _ 6,1 ei. . L.... , 7. <5,-&u -- C4 r ; - .,„ e/-...-------- a..--' )...)1LAA.Jet/e 1 . ) L i t,./ ., ---C— , :-.._ 7 •,,,,,. A. el," 7 :,., ... et... \.,4-X ":..eek . nt- /6,(..,-,----- , d • e , 1 _-,....- e..._ / ..,.,- ; . k,., , /A-AA--; t.. e.....-,., i --, J (3 a!) -- e % n e7 ,/, •• 'I e /,..,,..,,,_ - ' 0 .-...,, e,./.. e .,,,,z,,, 1 * V, ( , tt_t..,,, •-. 1 .,: %., .1!.. 1 A Data reviewed by Assessor: 74-0. 1 `I ),--) / (Initial & date/time) : 26 25.7610090 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $149,000 Charles Coffee ■ i I 7474 Saratoga Drive Chanhassen MN 55317 Talked with Mr. Coffee, reviewed property data, sales and assessments in the neighborhood, recalculated value indicates reducing the building value from $124,700 to $115,700. i RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $9,000 to $140,000 liSjILE:_ I 1 Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended - 1 Adjusted as Noted , I • I • 1 1 I 1 ;2_7 1 . APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: Kyle L. Colvin ' Address: 701 West 96th Street City: Chanhassen Zip: 55317 Home Phone: 229 -2151 ' Parcel I.D. Number: 25.0252000 Work Phone: 445 -2972 I want property reviewed because: In 1990 assessment was $88,000. In 1991 it increased to $141,000, which was 60% increase. I Currently refinancing mortgage and as a part of that process had to have an appraisal done. The appraisal came in at $137,000. which represents fair market value. Appraisal was conducted by independent property assessor and was completed last month. Would like to submit assessment for 1 reconsideration. As result of 60% increase in value, taxes came close to doubling. I I 1 1! Data reviewed by Assessor: f? L. / - ' z ' � _ 2- '5 c) (Initial & date/time) 27 25.0252000 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $141,200 Kyle L & Sandra L Colvin i 701 West 96th Street Chanhassen MN 55317 Reviewed sales data, owner's appraisal, property data, recalculated j value indicates reducing the building value from $114,700 to $106,400. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $8,300 to $132,900 NOTE: owner acknowledges reduction in value. I Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended I Adjusted as Noted ' # (Office Use Only) I 1 1 �V # (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: jr. P Address: - 7'/ .7 t -S n r City: C --cc Zip:. -s71.3/ 7 Home Phone: 9134 ad Work Phone: 9d a 90 7 — Parcel I.D. Number: R 2s , 2 6 / 70 c1/4 ,-/e • I want property reviewed because: s-vo �1 ou/ -�% � ,ne (,v r //S 00 O . a2 4 - / Z r- �f e_o_c_th ct_ 2 9 - ' a /,�1-e-t-ur-t • ��. GU 4, -C / X- e G � . Ge, £e-v -c r2 ure G� e. ` a e-c-fry r - Data reviewed by Assessor: / `1 ' / 3 0 5 (Initial & date /time) 28 25.7610070 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $123,000 John T Daniel 7478 Saratoga Drive Chanhassen MN 55317 Reviewed field data, owner's appraisal, recalculated value indicates reducing building value from $103,000 to $95,000. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $8,000 to $115,000 NOTE: Action Taken by Board: _ Approved as Recommended • Adjusted as Noted • • • 1 1 1 # (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: Af 0.- Address: 4/// -0Wmex z_,4/ City: L'Li it)4 /-55 44 Zi S 5 331 Home Phone: 70 3 Y / Work Phone: 4 2 2 77 Parcel I.D. Number: -- 00/0 , of,/ e:2`t/L y I want property reviewed because: 2 -4 111 / /oo A 3 B ' /A/ /2/2 -- u = +47 7 - e--27>hr-7 a.te-At-0 • • ' . . �; v ie � - a- 7 7/ 4L4-e„ifr-t, 1 f .,e a,kv'frA,4 • - y /. - x i Data reviewed by Assessor: �J �. / - 2 i ; 1 Y f / (Initial & 29 25.6170010 Vac Land 1992 EMV $32,800 1 David W Deaver 4111 Paddock Lane Excelsior MN 55331 I Talked with owner regarding vacant lot market value. Lot abutts to Hwy 7. Reviewed data, area land sales, location depreciation, recalculated value indicates a reduction. 1 RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $7,000 to $25,800 NOTE: I Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted 1 1 1 • # , (Office Use Only) APP TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: i' r ( 9e4d Address: 44 0 / c C�,P City: Zip: 7 / Home Phone: 7 l Z ri Work Phone: / Parcel I.D. Number: Z- Cr 4 1 f o / I want property reviewed because: ,e _ g te. A .._e, ro r 6 , c /, I � Data reviewed by Assessor: 13 L / 4 / 3 G a (Initial & date /time) 30 25.6850010 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $77,800 Harry & J DeSantis 6440 Yosemite Avenue Excelsior MN 55331 Property is in line with others of similar size and age. Talked with owner and his main concern is the taxes not the value of his home. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE: • Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted / -2 j d C ' ' APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 - ' Name: Albert Dorweiler Address: 1565 Bluff Creek Drive City: Chanhassen Zip: 55317 Home Phone: 445 -3321 Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: 250130200 p;7 1 I want property reviewed because: City portion of taxes increased 22 %, not the 1% that the City Manager had stated the city's taxes had increased. Road improvements in front of home are only improvements made, which I don't consider an improvement because driveway was rasied too high, blind hill, traffic speeds, dump trucks pounding the road in the summertime. Unsafe situation and feel property 1 is devalued because of the new road. Property tax increase is strange with recession hitting a lot of people and taxes are going up. Will probably have to sell house because can't afford taxes. 1 1. Data reviewed by Assessor: � / 7/ - (Initial & date /time) 32 '25.0270200 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $93,500 Albert & K Dorweiler 2565 Bluff Creek Chaska MN 55318 Talked with Mr. Dorweiler regarding the problem he has with blind access to road. Noted locational depreciation, recalculated values indicate reduction in land value. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $4,700 to $88,800 1 NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended ' Adjusted as Noted 1 # (Office Use Only) 33 (office use only) ^ J �' APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 L ,�/ NAME 6, 6/e_ S P, k u soh D u.CI'1 en PHONE - I ! ia, q ! 1 ADDRESS !i I 4 t e. h y /� Twn /City C h4zi '11P. Sse PARCEL ID# ,2 5 • / 6 © 2. © Q I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: 1 /4) . 1 _ 1 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: / / (Initial & date /time) 33 25.1620200 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $194,900 James P & Susan DuChene 1 961 Lake Lucy Road Chanhassen MN 55317 Note letter acknowledging prior value settlement. 1992 EMV should have 1 been $174,600. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $20,300 to $174,600 NOTE: 1 .1 II ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 1 1 April 14, 1992 6/ -)11- g �a-7 RECEIVED I 2 APR 01992 Steve Just A County Assessor (11 ti u� GhHiv 1A SEA 600 East 4th St. Chaska, MN 55318 ' Dear Steve; This letter is to follow -up on a telephone conversation I had with you and Mr. Orlin Schafer on April 3, 1992, about the assessed value of my homestead property. ' As you will recall from our conversation, the assessed value established for 1992 is incorrect. The value listed in this assessment does not reflect the out of court settlement or adjustment that was reached with Mr. Schafer on October 4, 1991. At that time, it was agreed the ' assessed value established for taxes payable in 1991 and 1992 was incorrect and would be lowered from $194,000 to $174,600. This settlement still allowed for an assessed value increase from $167,400 to $174,600 or close to a 5% increase. The increased property valuations presented by Mr. Schafer to the Chanhassen City Council on May 20, 1991, was property values in the Chanhassen area had risen 3 - 5 %. Based on this assumption, our property value was increased close to the maximum amount on the out of court settlement. ' In reviewing this years property valuation for taxes payable in 1993, both you and Mr. Schafer agree an error was made in not using the out of 1 court settlement property valuation on the 1992 assessment calculation. Upon your request, this letter is being sent to correct this oversight at the April 20, 1992, Chanhasses Board of Review. i It is my desire and understanding, the valuation established in October of 1991 ($174,600) would remain the assessed value for 1992. ' In closing, I want to thank you and Mr. Schafer in advance for correcting this property valuation error. Sincerely, -- J �L. e=' r Jim DuChene attachment , V. ' cc: Mr. Orlin Schafer Mr. Don Ashworth CARVER COUNTY i (' C (`w �� f l . 60 EAS,T...4.1H I ET .. 6' t eV Ai • fi i ' ti r an r }. BOX 10 p � ., �� ; a1 V ' I--� t j CHASKA• MNPPASWJ \ t A ) 0 . � '- , t Er Now. J I 4Lti:� �.N�FOR 1 92 P R O RER -T 1.- atAL11E4.� 4 9 9 0 0 \- - �j 6 GREEN ACRE: 1 .1,, , CARVER BEACH ESTATES 0 ` CARVER I PROPERTY CLASS PARCEL# R 25.1620200 RES. HSTD JAMES P C SUSAN M DUCHENE 961 LAKE LUCY RD 1 CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 11' • You may make an appeal by attending in person, by representation or by sending a letter to the Board of Review on , I APRIL 20. 1992 7PM CHANHASSEN CITY HALL ' If you disagree with their decision, you may then appeal to the County -Board of Equalization 1 - 9:30 AM JUNE 22. 19ki1Plttt}.RUERf1�a61 tiiMi,Gdi iTMii�JSE i I Please call the County Auditor's office to set up an appointment for County Board of Equalization 1 . 1 �;:. :. F, . .. r:: »"%S'v:.a+.. !4%*• + ?'.• . , C 4,•.+ ^'•?i` J: ...t_:S:: }i: r ;w43 4 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 3`I (office use only) �/ APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 �j NAME 7� eel ..Durr PHONE / �S - 7 7 S ADDRESS gal OJe_5 Twn /City �hnl��c� PARCEL ID# 0 �5 o �, o aS7/o 0 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: • 1 1 J DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: x9 / qc-t9 7/3274 Initial & date /time) 34 25.0051100/25.0050400 Vac Land 1992 EMV $201,700/$204,300 ' Kenneth C Durr 4830 Westgate Road Minnetonka MN 55345 Discussed property tax rates on vacant land. Mr. Durr was more concerned about tax implications than assessed value. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV's NOTE: 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 4_35 (office use only) 1 APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME �� r PHONE ADDRESS Twn /City 1 PARCEL ID# I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: ' 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: 3 L, / (( -2Z-/ /030 (Initial & date /time) ' 35 25.8610030 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $179,600 Joe & Paula Epping 7508 West 77th St Chaska MN 55318 Talked with owner, reviewed sales, parcel data, recalculated values II indicate reducing building value from $154,600 to $132,600. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $22,000 to $157,600 NOTE: - • 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 April 16, 1992 Board of Review Chanhassen City Hall Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Board of Review, The purpose of this letter is to formally appeal the property value of $179,600 for 1992 assessed on the property my wife and I bought at 7508 W. 77th Street, Chaska, Minnesota(Parcel # R 25.8610030; Green Acre: Trolls Glen 2nd Add.) in July of 1991. Our appeal is based on the difference between the assessed property value($179,600) for 1992 and the actual market price we paid for the property($158,000) in July of 1991. Prior to the acceptance of our offer($158,000), the property was on the market for approximately two years at an asking price similiar to the assessed property value of $179,600. However, the property received no offers at that price and subsequently drop in the asking price. In fact, the property was listed at $159,900 for approximately 3 months before we made our offer of ,$158,000, which was accepted. ' It is my understanding, that in the state of Minnesota a relationship exists between the market value of property and the assessed value for property tax purposes. If this is accurate, ' obviously the assesssed value of our property($179,600) is too high. I am appealing to the Board of Review and requesting that the assessed value of the property reflect the actual market value of my property($158,000) as determined by the price we paid for the house and the property's history while on the market to be sold. Upon request, I am more than happy to furnish copies of our purchase agreement and other documentation. Please fell free to call ' me at (470 -4049 home) or (937 -7012 work) with any questions you may have. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, c Jo pp g Paula Epping ' 7508 W. 77th Street Chaska, Minnesota 55318 ft PR 17 1952 1 T Y OF CHANHASSEN • # (Office Use Only) 1 APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 _ Name n and Toni Flahorty Address: 7004 Dakota ava _ City: Chanhassen Zip: 55'317 Home Phone: 93/1 0176 Work Phone: 566-1118 Parcel I.D. Number: R 9 5 7.3 R n n 7 n I want property reviewed because: In 1989, 1990, and 1991 our property was valued at $285, 500. For the year 1992 it has been assessed at 356,500 - an increase of $71,000.00. The median sale prices in the Western Suburbs increased at the rate of 3% in 1989, 3% in 1990 and decreased 5% in 1991. We do not • understand how our property value can increase 25% from 1989 to 1992. This 25% increase does not relate to any facts and we believe the value of our house is the same now as in 1989.. • Data reviewed by Assessor: / Y . z / s� (Initial & date /time) • 38 25.2380070 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $356,600 Dennis & Toni Flaherty 7004 Dakota Ave Chanhassen MN 55317 Talked with owner explaining the increase in value due to the review of area and the level of assessment. Property purchased September 1988 for $385,500. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE: 1 Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted 1 1. c # ' ( (Office Use Only) • APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: rYJGrK '1 Address: $ 9110 fF Coe n 4 e City: CA on hose') Zip:SS317 Home Phone: t i7G° - 5 1 i9 5 - Work Phone: VI - 6167 Parcel I.D. Number: S$ 258 Qaru/ 25 gs2 00 70 • I want property reviewed because: • ' ' I I Data reviewed by Assessor: / / (Initial & date/time) 39 25.8520070 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $251,600 i ! Mark Foster 8020 Acorn Lane Chanhassen MN 55317 Talked with owner, reviewed property records, sales study, recalculated value indicates reducing building value from $192,100 to $179,700. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $12,400 to $239,200 NOTE: owner acknowledges reduction in value Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted 1 1 1 Mark J. Foster Karen S. Olsson 8020 Acorn Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 470 -5495 H, 829 -6467W April 20, 1992 1 Carver County Assessor's Office 600 E. 4th Street Chaska, MN 55318 ' Dear Board of Review: Our residential homestead property was assessed at $251,600 on our 1992 Notice of Assessment. We believe this value is approximately 10 to 15% too high based on current assessed values of similar homes in our neighborhood as well as the decline in market values of similar size homes. Our house's assessed value is $192,100 •(without land). This compares to the house across the street (Lot 5, Block 2) with more square footage and 3/4 brick valued at $178,700. Also, the house on Lot 4, Block 1, a similar sized house with similar features is valued at $145,900. Another example is a large rambler on Lot 16, Block 3 valued at $161,100 with similar size and features. From these examples, it is clear that our house is assessed higher than similar houses in the neighborhood. , In addition to the above reasons, the assessed value for our house and land is too high in relation to current market prices. The slow economy and a slump in the real estate industry for homes above $150,000 have caused market prices to fall. This can be seen by the lack of interest in the two "prime" lots adjacent to ours (Lot 1 & 2, Block 2) which have been on the market continuously for over 3 years. Houses have been selling very slowly in our neighborhood as well. We believe that the assessed value of our house exceeds the current market value. Based on the above reasons, we believe that our assessed value is too high and would like to appeal. Thank you for your consideration. 1 Mark J. Foster I 4 ° (office use only APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 II o -rIe.S F Ilrrhonrs PH ONE 9 -- - - NAME n -0 4 2 / ADDRESS ?WO o So v c. -/0 5 g Twn /City 1 PARCEL ID# o��6 Q06o ' I WANT MY PROPERTY—REVIEWED BECAUSE: A 6 1 .1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: ,(Jry , / �' o� r/ �6/(' (Initial & date /time ) v 40 25.7610060 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $128,700 1 Charles Fuhrmann 7480 Saratoga Dr Chanhassen MN 55317 1 Explained market value of assessment vs. market value on tax statement. Owner seemed satisfied with the 1992 assessment. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV ' NOTE: 1 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 1 • i - /7 /9z 1 v Or c 0-7 �,�'I/ /G i 1 . Il ° 0 6 ( , , ' , Ji / - - --- - -- - - - - - - - - --- - - - ---- -7 1 q C II , -L 0 a ( 77/id /_5_ __77) _ te.7 1 c • • , - • e 4 .4)/ 5-7)P7--z-z---/z..-A/ 7-tebi L ... my „eg cl 7-7/e 1 . ,p,e//z-7e/7 44-7 . A2 - "92 1 &04/ Jgd /7e 4-2e-ce- i 2 7/'7d 4a 1 e ' Or `99 77P( // L Li" " - °3c)7 y 1 M A a E G 9t/6'A22 1 o r ,.- _e 7- :-- --- --_-• /,(-7 ,i,,,,i,,x,- z&c,,,r_z________ _._ _ _.._, c ,., __ ___..,„ ___ -; 3 -■.) 3 3 73 3-ji-ji-ji-j1704.0 1 0' 3411 ._..; . _: _;, ∎D_3 ) »,) !•O ∎)) »» ► ;200 i 0 4110 C 1 '/01 ) lam' ) ► ©0 1 1 1 1 #21(___. (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD O REVIEW, 1992 Name: I Ja.�,4e.) t ` 1 �L. ^� N n , .,. c) T 0. h Address: 4o 270 go-, ar rL. \ � / L 0, KQ� City: 0-1,...v. f,o..rre..� CI N Zip: S5 7 1 • - Home Phone: )4 '1 — 3 1 18A Work Phone: Li 7 f - l-{.sAi -24X tar/ Parcel I.D. Number: a Sa Q- o 0 o 8S0 I want property reviewed s because:�' 1‘ e ,- 1-�x es e. 'i'oo l / i A0r+•e 1".. Ter sek. i n 'Fk rr 1 L. Sre..' e-s!ale. bcok 'Po r mare, M a n Li s i a s� <1 a2 So O. o. t o w r /t Ott r- o bne s L c� uu t' i " �p rs ��.e AA 1 - t;,w�, -re(T - #;S wa.T a. reasoK0t.L/ w.o.r velMe..OIXerw`se; . j,,a -ve sot socs Decew►� a -' .' s/ ; 1 a 1-0 -o sc .•tie { / .moo ate ic c�c;. - t - + .wk e 1 �N .c�C r.•or< /14 y I1 te TY�L e,r,0t T OIY... a i✓ 1A� o i�f� 0-.. ►h C. i Q O4 ,„., ( Cc ,, u..5 :1k a7. 1 � ` t r A o yn.e s w e, re if e. s redC. a� 0.- 11 a.� ( ... '.n �,� 9 Q . rea'1S „t, so L� e V alµ e. E t off 1 ess li�K , en 7.,, ,; m p h ekver rs 1 rro i s' ,,,...„.re.,„-e.. a.. 4 S, 7, 0 ey ka � t o j 0 3, S / e.F w rc � o u. s� . s red l y wo.= .. pieo_se re 11 ome„I i'f"cI serto ./ :� ►o (a c i yPerc,�n ce.ssess- rAertt vcIae, br`)r� r.. } axes 10 w €r in aCCar r.C2■ OH I / tkat Data reviewed by Assessor: 0-1 -- / q/ - 2 - 1 (Initial & date /time) I ,/v.4- } . '/J 0,,x. s: sr 41 25.2000850 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $95,700 I David J Fundingsland 6870 Chaparral Lane Chanhassen MN 55317 Reviewed area properties, sale 12 -91 $92,500, property data, I recalculated values indicate reducing building value from $74,700 to $67,000. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $7,700 to $88,000 1 - NOTE: I Action Taken by Board: __ Approved as Recommended . '.- ______ Adjusted as Noted • 1 • 1 1 1 # 4 / Office Use Only) >/ APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 t � _ Name: ! 1/ � ' I �/e / �}- " � (7 Address: 7c9 I �/ � /K f��i ( City: .- zip: 553/7 Home Phone: X;► — / 0 Work Phone:_ Parcel I.D. Number: 025, 3 i I want property reviewed because: &)/7 at v/e VaL e 11 7,9 34 =-'50 oO Q ()e 400 u c t �./ ' `E . 70 ,/1 Why Data reviewed by Assessor: L3 '-- / 6 --/-2-1 / 2 2_3 (Initial & date /time) 42 25.8210200 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $142,400 Mike Roberts & Pam Galas 7218 Frontier Trail Chanhassen MN 55317 . Discussed value increase with property owner; feels the market value of is reasonable but the tax increase is still a concern to him. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • • • 1 I r • • . # 4-7 (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 1 Name: 12.97).Aa «S ) 4-;aLcs- Address: ' t-faesi- PJL2 6-64/ I • City: 441111 - in) W Home Phone: g Work Phone: Zip: / 7 Parcel I.D. Number: aNg 0 3 oo 1 • want property reviewed because: • 1 . g ,„..4.1.....,4,14,4 - . • 1 1 2 Data reviewed by Assessor: 16 ' / 1 /7 (Initial & date/time) 43 25.0133700 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $122,600 Donald L Gale 8402 Great Plains Blvd Chanhassen MN 55317 Reviewed property, updated data noting sturcture defects & additional depreciation, recalculated value indicate a reduction to building from I $70,600 to $46,600. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $24,000 to $98,600 • NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended . Adjusted as Noted • 1 r, .', . y # Office Use Only) Y) • APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name'i ( 11 1 (�'), t/ /' T 1 Address: 7 (i City: a a 1 =r Zip: 6 17 Home Phone: 9 .' I - ?, 1 .7 Work Phone: • Parcel I.D. Number: 0 ()501733 1 I want property reviewed because: %x c 7 f /61 r 4 - f , ' 1 1 1 1 Data reviewed by Assessor: 4,, / _f/-02, / /d 2 F (Initial & date /time) \' 44 25.0500380 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $62,300 Richard Gavert 1 7701 Frontier Trail Chanhassen MN 55317 Mr. Gavert felt market value was not out of line for his property. He 1 would like a lower tax rate on property. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended I Adjusted as Noted 1 1 1 1 f # g7 (Office Use Only) AP EAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 1 Name: W/7 > CI 5747 Address: 7 ' Z E J� City: __ . "✓,.s- • Home Phone: `3 Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: 2_5 U / =.:. j •:; • I want property reviewed because: . / / --� I Data reviewed by Assessor: (Initial & date /time) 47 25.01 700 s tLMV 1 1 Wayne H n 7602 eC ue ' Chanhassen MN 55317 Owner is not concerned about assessed value, but about taxes. RECOMMENDATION: no change in Emv NOTE: I • Action Taken by Board: roved as Recommended App d d , Adjusted as Noted • • # ' (Office - Use Only) 1 I *- APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: J i=F i EY �J . Address: i4 \--kcp totztJG City: 0, 4 - t om►. ZipR55�1.'�- Home Phone: ec. z -- ca L4 — 8g 8 L Work Phone: t 1z - 3 i - 2zzZ Parcel I.D. Number: 1Z ZS . gS'o I want property reviewed because: \9. ��_ -r- !�(�.DE Aoy Sc�Bs't ►.�'rtAt It- tPrZ.o M, TS To - n4 C' T �c c�+-'C.2�T'� O 1 r 1 p.A.1►JT "' r A s -- kYr�R tC�tZ AS vvOtZ & . A EC, - (' S 4 vv S ? -E A.7—i.l'.D r> e CA r-b fl A }�.DP e IZT y TA,C s T .4'TE t-t t ,4l UAtz'si 1.0ab A , rOrr t fJ � i L s A 2.6% 1,) CtZ.-1 =,4,5 E t ►J '1-S S 45 �P >> -- Data reviewed by Assessor: /1 / y - 2 7 / (Initial & date /time) 48 25.2730850 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $123,300 Jeffrey B & Cynthia S Hall 41 Fox Hollow Drive Chanhassen MN 55317 Inspection of property on 04/27/92. Reviewed and updated property data. Recalculation of value indicated reducing building from $95,800 to $82,800. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $13,000 to $110,300 • NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended . Adjusted as Noted • 1 1 1 - Property Tax Worksheet -- Date Received Initial Notice - - -1/18/92 - - - _. 1 ,. Date Received Notice 4/2/92 Number of Days Since Previous Valuation 75 1 Previous Valuation $96,200 Current Valuation $123,300 1 Difference $27,100 Overall Percentage Increase 28.17% 1 Value @ 01/18/92 $96,200 Value @ 04/02/92 $123,300 ' Annualized Rate from 01/18/92 234.63% Rate per Day 48.21% 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • # Lt i (Office Use Only) .,..._ APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: JI / Address: . .571 City: C.1-■ t Home Phone: 9 i-11 I 1 Work Phone: N r Parcel I.D. Number: ' 0:5. 79aco 5 I want property reviewed because: • Thy TAX / & USecL 7 / /LA f&. t5 La PAO imeiNTiy4 141 � �e n . T h r2 m a v i o r T i , c 1 t t 4q , v o A.) . - itt. J / 0 i? F t c> r t E L e. e. && S A1 or G' f � '7ti.t. Q rc P�-I'Y N - C\ i Th c ir55c5o'( - IJt , V ; €q e, I` k1 t t' C *Z ,y Data reviewed by Assessor: ii L 9` (Initial & date /time) . !49 25.7900080 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $98,000 Ken Hall :1 .501 West 76th Street Chanhassen MN 55317 Talked with property owner on 04/22/92 regarding market value of property. Reviewed sales data and comparable properties of owners appraisal. Recaciculation of value indicates reducing the building from $77,000 to $71,200. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $5,800 to $92,200. NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • � I I CLiatalabdcuc_. L t9v 1 1U1- cu-a OcuLe_4p401/c- vu. 7L -- L - v.,1Q3 - 0--ta_,Li r 1,1! hLia -L,k-11J -1 (../) 1 a-t ` c3J,-cu_k_ L tlYtthi VCd.0-k_ 1 Luck,3 ,13 tc/ L. L)W ° 1. 11 1 1 Pror'erty DsiCription & Analysis UNIFr'•iM RESIDENTIAL APPRAISAL "ZEPORT Fil• No. 1 Property Address 501 West 7_8th S.trer, _ Census Tract 5120 9,.,,, LENDER DISCRETIONARY USE City r$lanhasserl _ County Carver State MN Zip Code 55317 Sale Price $ Legal Description Tot. 1 , Block 2. SCholer's 2nd Addn. Date o Owner/Occupant Kenneth C. and Darcy N. Hall Map Reference 39-4C Mortgage Amount $ --) Sale Price $ 80, 000 ' Dcte of Sale PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED Mortgage Type j Loan charges /concessions to be paid by seller $ © Fee Simple Discount Points and Other Concessions o! R.E. Taxes $ 860.00 / Tax Year 1991 HOA $ /Mo• NA ❑ Leasehold Paid by Seller $ t Lender /Client wiway Federal Credit Union ❑ Condominium (HUD /VA) 111 Fmni re Driv , St. Paul, �( ,, 55103 n De Minimis PUD Source U LOCATION Urban LJ Suburban CrRural NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS Good Avg. Fair Poor BUILT UP ❑ Over 75% 5025-75% ❑ Under 25% Employment Stability ❑ ® ❑ GROWTH RATE ❑ Rapid ® Stable ❑ Slow Convenience to Employment ❑ ® ❑ PROPERTY VALUES ❑ Increasing ® Stable Declining Convenience to Shopping ❑ © ❑ DEMAND /SUPPLY O Shortage ® In Balance Over Supply Convenience to Schools © ❑ 0 MARKETING TIME _Q Under 3 Mos. IL 3-6 Mos. Over 6 Mos. _ Adequacy of Public Transportation ❑ ©❑ D C PRESENT LAND USE % LAND USE CHANGE PREDOMINANT SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING Recreation Facilities ❑ © ❑ 4 0 Single Family 55 Not Likely ® OC CUPANCY PRICE AGE Adequacy of Utilities ❑ © L cc 2-4 Family ,.Likely ❑ Owner ® S (000) (rts) Property Compatibility ❑ XM ❑ m Multi -family ,' M process ❑ Tenant ❑ 70 Low 0 Protection from Detrimental Cond. ❑ © ❑ ❑ x Commercial 1p To; Vacant (0 -5 %) ® 130 High 60 Police & Fire Protection ❑ © [! w Industrial _I - Vacant (over 5 %) ❑ Predominant General Appearance of Properties ❑ © 0 = Vacant • 25 100 /— 25 Appeal to Market n n Note: Race or the racial composition of the neighborhood are not considered reliable appraisal factors. COMMENTS: • •, y • •_ - • . - - dom'natel sin•le famil residential nei•hborhood of mostl splits and ramblers. Tt is an older subdivision with newer homes located a few blocks north. Schools and the main street commercial activity are within walking distance. T.H. #5 provides -asy arress to other commuter roads., Dimensions 96'x150' Topography Level— Typical Site Area 14,400 / Comer Lot No Sae 14,400 S.F.— Typica Zoning Classification RSF (Single Family Res.) Zoning Compliance Yes - Shape Rectangular — Averag HIGHEST & BEST USE: Present Use Yes Other Use None Drainage Appears Normal UTILITIES Public Other SITE IMPROVEMENTS Type Public Private View Average for neighborhood Electricity ® Street Bituminous © ❑ Landscaping Ave.ga for area Gas E Curb /Gutter Concrete ©(---- ❑ Driveway Bituminous Water ® / Sidewalk None ❑ ❑ Apparent Easements None Noted Sanitary Sewer ® Street Lights Mercury Vapor © 0 FEMA Flood Hazard Yes' No X Storm Sewer 7�{ Alley None n n FEMA' Map /Zone C Panel #27O051O0O5B COMMENTS (Apparent adverse easements, encroachments, special assessments, slide areas, etc.): No adverse easements or encroachments were noted...--- GENERAL DESCRIPTION EXTERIOR DESCRIPTION FOUNDATION BASEMENT INSULATION Units One — Foundation Sonc.Blk.JSlab No Area Sq. Ft. 1200 Roof 4 Stories Two above grade Exterior Walls Stucco,Brick Crawl Space No % Finished 54 Ceiling link. - Type (Det. /Att.) petached Roof Surface Asph.Shq. Basement Yes Ceiling Tile Walls Unk. - Design (Style) Multi —Level Gutters & Dwnspts. Vinyl Sump Pump No Wafts Sheetrock — Floor ❑ - Existing yes Window Type Casement Dampness None - Floor Carpet None _ Proposed No Storm Sash . Settlement None _ Outside Entry Yes Adequacy Under Construction N Screens Yes Infestation None — Energy Efficient Items: Age (Yrs.) 1963 29 -- Manufactured House No Effective • . - (Yrs.) 23 , ROOMS Foyer Living Dining Kitchen Den Family Rm. Rec. Rm. Bedrooms # Baths Laundry Other Area So. Ft. Basement 3. 552 • • Levell 1 1 1 648 Level2 1 1 1 552 — • - vel 3 3 1 648 — Finished area above grade contains: ( 6 Rooms; 3 Redroom(s); 1 Bath(s); 1200 Square Feet of Gross Living Are SURFACES Materials /Condition `- HEATING KITCHEN EQUIP ATTIC IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS Good Avg. Fair Poor FloorsVinyl ,Caro.,Tile—Fair Type H.W. _,Refrigerator ❑ None ❑ Quality of Construction El ®o ❑ Walls Panel &Sheetrock— Gd /Fa[sI Gas Range /Oven Stairs Condition of Improvements ❑ ❑ ❑ Trim /Finish Hardwood Stain— Fairidition Good Disposal ❑ Drop Stair n Room Sizes /Layout ❑ �-� ❑ , Bath Floor Tile —Good Adequacy Good Dishwasher ❑ Scuttle ❑ Closets and Storage ❑ ® E ❑ Bath Wainscot Ceramic Tile —Gd C Fan /Hood © Floor ❑ Energy Efficiency Doors Hardwood Central _ None ❑ © ❑ Stained Other None Compactor Washer /Dryer❑ Finished ❑ Electrical- Adequacy & Condition ❑ i--1 pactor ❑ Heated ❑ Pkunbing•Adequacy & Condition ❑ ❑X � . Condition Microwave ❑ ❑ Kitchen Cabinets - Adequacy & Cond. O 2 r. ❑ Fireplace(s) None — 7 # Adequacy Intercom 1 1 Compatibility to Neighborhood (T II Yj ; ; ❑ I CAR STORAGE. Garage it Attached M Adequate LJ House Entry j Appeal & Marketability ❑ 01 O No. Cars 1 Carport O Detached ❑ Inadequate ❑ Outside Entry © Estimated Remaining Economic Life 52 Yrs. Condition Good None n Built -In 7 Electric Door IT Basement Entry[ _ Estimated Remaining Physical Lite 57 Yrs. Additional features: Subject is a three bedroom multi level dwelling. Floors in bedrooms are hardwood. 1st level is finished with walkout. Basement is unfinished. No house entry from single car attached garage. Yard is fenced. modernization, Depreciation (Physical, functional and extemal inadequacies, repairs needed, modernization, etc.): Subject suffers no functional or economic obsolescence. Physical dep © reciaiton is about average for its ag jC e and is estimated by the age —life method. - General market conditions and prevalence and impact in subject /market area regarding loan discounts, interest buydowns and concessions: Normal market conditions prevail with no unusual discounts, buydowns or concessions. Rates are currently in the 7 to W% range with U to 2 points. — cote Mao Form 70 10/86 12C5. Fours ano Worms 4 C • 315 Weenev Ave. New Haven CT nP511 1,PM. 9A'.ASAS n......,. -.... _ - - -.- • ... -.__ . . ...,.,,. e Valuation section UNIFORM RESIDENTIAL APPRAISAL REPORT File No. Purpose of Appraisal is to estimate Market Value as defined in the Certification & Statement of Limiting Conditions. BUILDING SKETCH (SHOW GROSS LMNG AREA ABOVE GRADE) ESTIMATED REPRODUCTION COST -NEW -OF IMPROVEMENTS. M for Freddie Mac o Fanv.e Mae. flow any souare Ent calculations and cost approach comments m this space. Dwelling 1200 Sq. Ft. $ 65.00 = $ 78,000 First and Second j�evel L.Lev. 1200 Sq. Ft. CD $ 8.00 = 9,600 23'x24' = 552 S.F. Extras Kitchen Builtins 2,000 II 3rd Level and Basement 27'x24' = 648 S.F. Special Energy Efficient Items None Porches, Patios, etc. Patio = = 1,000 Garage /Carport 384 Sq. Ft. @ $17.00 = 6,500 Garage 16'x24' = 384 S.F. Total Estimated Cost New ... = $ 97,100 I Less 3 Physi Functi nal External All costs were obtained from Marshall and Swift 'Depreciation 29100 0 0 $ 29,100 Cost Service. / Depreciated Value of Improvements . . - =''''s 68,000 Site Imp. as is (driveway, landscaping, etE) 2 _ $ 5,000 1 ESTIMATED SEIE VALUE (/ $ 25,000 (11 leasehold, show only leasehold value! i INDICATED VALUE BY COST APPROACH = $ 98,000 (Not Required by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae) Construction Warranty ❑ Yes ® No Does property conform to applicable HUD /VA property standards? E Yes ❑ No Name of Warranty Program If No, explain: Warranty Coverage Expires The urdB s1gned has reefed Wee recent sales of properties most similar and proximate to subject and has considered these in the market analysis. The description includes a dollar adjustment reflecting market reaction to those items of significant variation between the subject and comparable properties. R a significant Rem in the comparable property is superior I to, or more favorabe than, the subject property, a minus (—) adjustment is made, thus reducing the indicated value of subject; if a significant Rem in the comparable is inferior to, or less favorable than, the Subject property, a plus (+) adjustment is made, thus increasing the indicated value of the subject. ITEM I SUBJECT COMPARABLE NO. 1 COMPARABLE NO.2 COMPARABLE NO.3 Address 501 W. 76th St., 520 Laredo Lane, 620 Fox Hill Dr., 710 Sierra Trail, thanha - Chanhassen Chanhassen Chanhassen II Proximity to Subject III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 3 :locks - +1 Mile — 4 1 Mile - ales Price : e e e e IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII $ 105 000 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII $ 95, 000 IIIIIIIII $ 106,500 'Gross Liv. Area $ . • Os • . , 5 o IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIM $ 91.97 (7J IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII $ 82.56 M1111111111111111111111 .rce Tnspprtion MLS MLS MLS I VALUE ADJUSTMENTS DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION ( -)S Adjustment DESCRIPTION I • ( -)S Adjustment DESCRIPTION I • ( -)5 Adjustment it _ Illl III till II 'III Asum. + 500 Cony. FHA C onc ess ions Date of Salealme nn- to r^1 nsP 7 -91 - 8 -91 10 -91 N Location r ...,. -I. • r -2000 Similar Similar �' } Site/View� a Similar Similar a Desisn and Appeal .1 ;, a _ e , - •= Similar — ' Similar Z Quality of Construction Similar Similar a Age 79 Ypar, 4 Years -2000 Eff. 10 Yrs. -2000 3 Years -8see I p N Cond -ritr -2000 Superior -3000 Superior -5000 Above Grade brat , Banns Baths Total i edmts i Baths I Total i BC/MIS , Baths Total ' Bs i Baths Q Room Count MEOW. •' 3' 6' 3 ' 2 -2000 6 i 3 : 1 E Gross Living Area 1 200 Sq. Ft. 1100 Sq. Ft. +1000 1033 Sq. Ft. +2000 1290 Sq. Ft. I . Basement & Finished Fin. FR, Fin. T Unfin. C.) Rooms Below Grade R ,.. , WO FR +1000 Partial +5000 WO +3000 i t Functional Utility „' ar Similar Similar Heating /Cooling q•l, i� e f _ a � � entrap -1500 GFA -None GFA -None Garage /Carport alr . ached -2000 2 Attached -2000 2 Attached -200 Porches, Patio, Pools, etc.r - .• _ h — 2000 None +1000 None +1000 Special Energy Efficient Items a .. _ . - None None 1 Fireplace(s) NnnP e f -2000 One -2000 None Other (e.g. kitchen R&0, Dos . , Dws . , Dws . , Dsp . , equip., remodeling) gyp, F&H Net Adj. (total) I + X —?$ ' 11000 + Sr —.$ 3000 + Indicated Value .. r I(J 5 11000 of Subject I $ 94.000 I tr /' $ 92 000 � f 11 ` I 95 500 �I$ Comments on Sales Comparison: Cpp Addendum. I IIWCATED VALUE By SALES COMPARISON APPROACH $ 93, 000 INDICATED VALUE BY INCOME APPROACH (I Applicable) Estimated Market Rent $ NA /Mo. x Gross Rent Multiplier a $ NA This appraisal is made L70 as is" ❑ subject to the repairs, alterations, inspections or conditions listed below ❑ completion per plans and specifications. Comments and Conditions of Appraisal: Appraised as inspected on January 10, 1992. I • Final Reconciliation: rata was not avai 1 ahl a to develop an Income Approach. Both the Sales Comparison and Co=t Apprnarh s were vaari to estimate fair market value. The most weight is given to the •a •- • ' • • ..• •e he Cost A•.roach. • is appraisal is ..sed upon the above requirements, the certi'cation, contingent and limiting conditions, and Market Value definition that are stated in I ❑ FmHA, HUD & /or VA instructions. . [ Freddie Mac Form 439 (Rev. 7/86)/Fannie Mae Form 1004B (Rev. 7/86) filed with client 19 Li attacned. 1 (WE) ESTIMATE THE MARKET VALUE, AS DEFINED, OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS OF January 10 19 _a_z to be $ az , 000 I (Y) certify: that to the best of my (our) knowledge a c u true ct; f (wersonaly inspected the subject aroperty, 1 both inside and out, and have m e n exterior inspec o 1 lief all the comp � b ( le and sales data cite sed i n this herein report; are and and that I ( h that ave no undisclosed interest, present or prospec'ive therein. • �3' -� /�� /C/�•S� - AporaISer(e), SIGNATURE 1 "MAO Review Appraisan SIGNATURE r � ❑ Did � Oid Not - r- _ NAME W. Steve Evans, L .c. ;T4OOO59$1 applicable) NAME Inspect Prose,'',' • # 57) (Office Use Only) • APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: / c . i •- _ Address: - 41AA4A -1--- City: _. � Ilf .r ) Zip: Horne Phone: - '7 so Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: ,-. • i I want property reviewed because: • ' I i I Data reviewed by Assessor: A4 / 0?3 / r"ii- (Initial & date /time) .0 25. 6300230 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $102,500 lexander & Helen R Hartmann .687 Horseshoe Curve jhanhassen MN 55317 eviewed home and lake lot; updated field data; checked calculations. • jtwner will research property value for comparisons. ECOMMENDATION:_no change QTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted I • 1 1 i'r t. V, ?4 # (Office Use Only) • APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 1 Name: i • •L, 4:e ..�4r Address: `f 13 I La V4 cf. I City: C L c / MN Zip:�s` 3/ Home Phone: _ 4 Q & -O 7 c Work Phone: If ? _ C / -uq Parcel I.D. Number: 2 .0 C. - 7c1....7. ( 0 0 - 7 I want property reviewed because: 89 rc s' /// 6. . �� q a >' e 6 lad./.47; ' Ase s5l J +r e 1 1 . 9 (1'4 (014-7 4 5 C4- C e r 1 are ri rr 7(eat4Pr 1 r 1 h 5 � � G G S QS A•- , 10,./4 Wa 4 t5 00 . a p C i ;rao< I r �► g9 1 " s;, v • X 35 3�. m `' Ov C S 7 L 0 v /of t : -- /900 - ��s� � a + • 4 • Data reviewed by Assessor: A9 / ¥2 V / 1o2` %p (Initial & date /time) 52 25.7950070 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $235,300 James & Jan Hendrickson 9131 Lake Riley Blvd Chanhassen MN 55317 'i Reviewed property data, reviewed neighborhood area, updated records, recalculated values indicate reducing building value $29,900. RECOMMENDATION: reducing EMV $29,900 to $205,400. I NOTE: Action Taken by Board: y Approved as Recommended . Adjusted as Noted • 1 5 APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: Walter B. Hobbs Address: 8850 Sunset Trail City: Chanhassen Zip: 55317 Home Phone: Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: 25.2500030 I want property reviewed because: Would like residents to take a look at the top line on tax bill. My house is assessed at $214,000., ' tax is $ 10,828. before State kicks in lowering it down to $5,440. Someday the State could decide to take that away. Tax increases was actually greater than assessment. Since can't do anything about 1991 assessment, would like to appeal 1992 assessment. Home was built in 1987 and went on tax rolls in 1988 payable in 1989. At that time the County assessed the property at $177,000. which was a fair assessment. In 1991 it increased" to $214,000. What really scares me, and haven't anyone , come out and give an appraisal. As indicated when built the house in 1988, that property should be homestead. Real specific question to County tonight is how can they take a piece of property that they assessed in 1988 at $177,600 and 1990 or 1991, kick it up to $214,700? Would appreciate considerations on that and don't envy your position. Data reviewed by Assessor: / %= 9 / 7t-- & date /time) 53 25.2500030 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $214,700 Walter & Cheryl Hobbs 8850 Sunset Trail Chanhassen MN 55317 Talked with Mr. Hobbs on 04/24/92. Reviewed field data, noted additional depreciation, recalculated value. A reduction in building value of ;1 $11,900 is indicated. • RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $11,900 to $202,800. NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted 1 i �1 (Office Use Only) 1 . 1 1 # �(O ff1ce use only} i r [� APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 p PHONE / 3'/ 02- ADDRESS Twn /Cit r y C J1.lI el t£-S S C 1 PARCEL ID/ g -- fl/ oZ 3 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: F te /time) (Initial & da 54 25.0123200 res hstd 1992 EMV $115,000 1 Clark D Horn 7608 Erie Avenue 1 Chanhassen MN 55317 Unable to contact owner after frequent attempts, left messages with son, owner never returned calls. Reviewed the property, field data, recalculated values, indicate no change. _ 1 RECOMMENDATION: no change. NOTE: 1 1 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 1 4r April 20, 1992 1 Dear Councilpeople: 1 (. I believe that a tax increase of 100% in one year on my property 1 is out of line. My assessed evaluation increased much greater than the price of real estate in the last four years. (If the rules have not changed since I've been off the council, I believe that each property is evaluated every four years.) While I know you are trying hard to hold down the mil rates for the city portion of the total tax, I do not feel that this type of evaluation increase is justified over a four period in recessionary times. t Anything you can do to reduce this exorbitant increase will be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your effort in this matter. It Clark D. Horn 1 7608 Erie Avenue { Chanhassen, Minnesota 1 ( 1 f 1 1 I 1 t i, :4 • 1 { 1. i I' • .% ' i ' 1 11 '. ' • 1 I ,,, t 1 . . 4 . , It., T.14 ... i , •f;f .. f';•i . , • : . . fr. )i , , ' r t . , . . • • 1 0 , .- . - ,..... _ , . . k ' • A ' I ` i., , ,..\.... .1,d, , 4i" ,, I ., • . Tv , • ' 1 / • - , , . • . i '( 4 '..,ltlic*A\ lii,11 4 ) t :47 • '. r ;.''' • - - ''- ' ( t .. • f t 44 4 ;..f.•1411.1 1)-.', . .1 ' .... i • 7$ . • . 'Li s..1 o. ‘ . . ,. r . , - .. ... . ' , I .. .* * ' • • •:' • '' r- .N x‘N`i '. '.: ' , . • ‘ - ry 4 6 '':1: ,-It. 4 ■ ' 4 (irt ti e . ti - im ,, : ,-. • , 1 • ..,- • I , - • v -1. ii.)? 1 •'. .. X:, .1 , t•-•, t; '•, f.,.. . .,14 (.4 4 - .. , , ... , ,. • p ,f „1,.., , • 1:: : . ,.. . ,.. i . ) , ' . , *•' .44 "1,'.*,*: • * . 1' 4:' 1 ,;,.'', • .•, 4 Nti .s'.-,a - 4i, f „ ri TI`t.,.. 1 I i, '.' '.. ' ' 1 L -!..; . ' ' ; .1. •. I • - - A .1 '.6 - • ,,' V , 6 ,41'• P:f*' '' V. t t : ' • • '' / f t. ..4`• ' i ) ". I j... • If` ,..' 4 •. '' ' ? ' it ' ; ' i a •,'" ,4-...1-.77 ' 'I 1,•• - f ' • .4.- ''.- V ' , 4 At.: (1 ' ' '44:•i•f.•'-: 1 ; AV • . . 1 II $ 1 " , l4114-, ,' , ,L$ 1 ',..• \ .., ,•,., „ 4 !" 1 4 .. • i ":' 1: . •,,, ) 1 1‘ - % ' : .• - i 4 t '1 • 0 -. • ill.. •'. 1_ ‘• . . ,-.1 • ,.. r 1.4 •'-- •. .., I • j • of - ' 1 14 t • - 4 ' • ,4 ' if• 4 , . , ..-1 , • • • :•''? '• .-'•::: - . ' . .' ' ' 4 • . ' 4 • 1 i k-,, 4 - ■ ' ' ). ' . '. : l' •• •,: 1. , t, ...!..1 , • :e i . : a A ,,, iiVrt. ,, . 4 ;;.:. . ' ' , ..!- .....,, 1 : • e • e . ---; .- -.-:' ... % • ' • t 14 - c 't'ci i i , 4 ,).,. - a,. 4:.:3 .- .'f .:.• ' ,..:t j' .`4Cs ,. IN‘..,2'yl . f • i/ - • A •',. "i,"'• : • . te . 1:. it (41 1 • Ai, .ii•- "-- , .... g re • ':., 7 ....• ..:- ' 14 •.4' • A; .;. : ... 3. I • -0' , ire: qi : i ,.11 • ••„ , ' NO. • ■ A ' ., 1 . • • % -'''-+: *,.;: • '..1. _.(r..c. - - rip ,. . .. r.,.li .... , :,' Z• 4 , • • , , . , • ••• _, . '-• • 7 . 0111 111 1; '..1 4 . - • - .e, . ..! '4 - .' . . r * * t ; sfi , , 1 ‘' ` ".:.15 .,11 ., ' . -;'-ft'.• , :',' i ''i.„, . -- -,V2i4r.,..-....ar •-•.- ,, yi •,, Id . ...i" 4. 1 , / .• ... - : .., W•44'. .'"1.1111111 ' i . l . * ,; • • . .14„, • * • • !' ' 3f 1 . . ../.. # 4 ' '''•%,.. i ....":•_.,. -',." 4 *, .1 '. .V.4 .1/4 0*•..--,... • _ '' ." ••. "••-. N. of. . • ' ;.' r .'. • '1 4. 1 '.- V 1 1; 4 4 : • • ••• 41114111.■ - _ • ..: ' / ;4 2 ; A'. '' ..., 1. . - i 1 1 1 . 1* 44 4. , • 4 ,.. ,..,i -,,., , . • . - e ` i . '''.' -- a- • . it , • • .,-. f; Ir .. .. • • . ..... . • • • 4:14.• ,..,:_.... . -..--T .• ,, . . .. ... . I ' • .• • I . ' ft :,- Tr.*. ' 1 j? , , :,__._ - . ..:• '', b‘ . ,...' z 1. ,... 0'.. • :.':.. ,.• ...` -4 r . 7 - • •.. I • - i . , . o - - A , , , 0 Z' • ... .` : . ' •,` 4 4'. ‘* I '. ' • t ' ..f -:.$ " '':' .• .• t• c • . - - ': l•gliv .....-- , • - er 1. ' • • . • 4 •"' ' *... ."- . • . ''.; '''' ' ••• • .L1,-.. C . - * - ?. .- e .. '. • "1 . 4 . ' '.. t- -- i• '.:',.`' ''''" % .. . -. - % - ' ;At t - -. • ' • 1 ; ' '..- ' i ' ■-'; , „I - 4 1 1‘. 11111110*: - • ' • . : , - • ••• ` • , a • • . •44-,..1. . Amp, • • . . - ■ % - '''•• ' ... ' I . "146 ' .... • , • ‘. • ...7 .3'• 1 ti't -"%'.-Eillat• ?I •110 .. ...; 2 ...„ L. l• :1104,4,4 .. t 4„je,, -•1 '•<?•••• II ...,. .. 1 . .. * or ! ' 4. .. • ''• • - . ' l '• ?' r v. : ..) I I -. ••••• - juo .a.„ , , ......t... f . • s -11 *,.. ,;,, f ..) ,-1, /,,, • - t . 1 . ,. j / ,!, . 4 • .. .••at i:I. ' ' A .'••• : - A ' i . - '''. . 1 n ' 444". ' '`. ' • ' ''''ti c , - .... '• 4 ' : . 1: .. -.. t " 4 11 ill '. At . ' eil ' c'.. _, .. -.. 4 ., 4 4 _,.. 0 ) ■ :,. I ...■ Of '''' 3 tl 1 ` ..1 ) at;:•:7 , , „t 4 , „. , , ; p : I 7 .., , ft:, • , • - - mii h t , . . „ 41, .. pit‘...4.0.. '''• ,. ••••••kar - , ' ‘ ...e ... . • . 1 • •:.. -4. c/0 i lit 4 Cr /4 i' I li/I I ' ' ' a e 4 .s, :'.■ • ' .6 '': &I '1,ilk ti ,'''' ' fr ' 44------- •-• ';''' ':- Ate' . ' ' ..'. ° . • '''' i -e t 4. : -4, . . _ , „ • -‘, . , ,-....„.. ,...,..-,.. i ,... ,, t, .. .....• „Ik 's I tit , .... ,.. _ ,,,..,, •...... 1 : _.- ;* 1 . . , .• . . • I A • t .. .. . _ •11"" . • ...• . % ‘ N *•' 1 ‘ .. ' . • , . i 1 , t , , . . .. ,... 4. r- 41 4. . ..,„,... ..!.- ... ,-, •• . • . • 1 ' 1 4 • - -i* / lite* - .4 . - - -z. S4 4 ' ''''4 i le• I ••• t • 4 - /r ; '7 *. sg 4.0 . 1 • . . . . l ik . lb .... ,. 4.• -.., 'i• :-.• doe: iiii. , .. . . ;.. i , ... , . .1, .. ... .t. . • . .r ., „. Asi ..., • ' i • • ' k •, ' ' - : - -' • . -. -i Ai 1 .• . . - . % -4 . .. = • .1, . , ; 4, , 11 ,*• .. ki,i:i4 3 I •*; ' . 1 0 1 N• ' ei nir .' • .. 4 ... I fft 4 .' i il 4 •• • i' 4 '''.0','.. . 4.,.. ' • ' .:." ". ell 1 v 1 -4 P. alg t . V 1 1‘.. • . , .„, .... ,,,. -.. ...... - • e. - r ..,,.., •,,... 0 ' . ti .4. 4 . . , , c • . . t, .. I : la 4, : ‘ t.,4 I . ; 1. - 4 4 ,,,,,-. • I ' i 4 • ' 1 i .,4 44. -- c .• .7..- ... kio„ I . it ,. ...• , ' 4 • .:10 . 1,...1 ..... • .Nor., . t14.1 • , .. , 4„,....., , „ .I „; , ,, , . .o t• •;• • 1 4 . 44S4 it .•_....,. . 11 J. ■ •• . * ' 7, • Cll - lc ...... " 4....„,a ,4, , ; _ - roe. //, ; .. :. ' . • 3 . , s , 0 flo4t , vf ,, i.p .! ( 4 4 '4,.;4 i..'` '1 ' ,.• • - Z ' ' 4, 17 ' ,.,.. . „.• ,...., ,. • ,,, .....„ s s- • 1', : ,',. ',II 1 2.0 - 44. 1 3/4 1 :71 i i•ie-‘`,- ■Nt ;.,.„:,:,, A , , ilA . Alpri- t 1 ''.._.f. IA. irk . . Nv, . ' /. 4,)4-Vet, 1 .... s . , _ ;‘.... . i \Not' • ' .1.11..l ...• ii.i. • ' . . . • . ,I6 ■ " * . i .,,,,..■ ,) 4` A, , . - A ‘ A ' ',. • lb. r • 1 • • * • .. et. . ‘ ' r ••• 1 Ilk ■ . ..gr Na• t '" . .. 4 1/4 ' A • • ' t )k ..- • 4, • ■444 , ,,,, . • `,... • , 4 . • , 4 i -r .{ 0 "kJ ` ,,, • • %,,, 'I • . V. ,ts • ,, • •••: ' ' , , . -1' et - • 44t 44 • : .. . . "....*.'"4.44Z••••••. „ ••.. 11 .. .. . • i . { 1r %•' s , r '. a-i t t f ' • • f if\ . , . , •tr a•J!- *„ ., f`h�• rt,;::: • /; .. a i t . i , f ' t tt ''.:w ) ` y A . ' i t r , ~. ` . t om , Y I/. t... : � l til • •• f �j71, r 1• 7 i � ^ � � � t.....\‘,,t I t !_ •i yi - ti' �` ! l x ! r ,rU :tte a • � I • • �r ' t i { �� * o ..,�"]T �`� :• f • ' i _ 1 . 1 • • t `�� t o , � l•� 0.74; - ii; -,--.t1 .- - , • > LT r r,•• ft . . ` \* '. . r`' • 1 1. . I { <: , \:� �.i v , l�1' , �F:Ji,, ,\1• = p %. ' A f .• ' `� . . t i 4 i . .. #.. '! $y ? �j < • .] ` t 'Y } � i ,x _ ' 'L• • ' 1 .K 7 ^ • ~: ,' • a ' j i. .+ r i'' .'2", •t i .1 :ty ` �" :` ` • : ,? • Jib' z ; lt. ..� ■ •4 i , t • � ' s' _'' i 4 • ,r.' $ • ; '`- } `y "" . 7�` .. r4.1 a , Y ♦ � : 4._ uy j > ti ;' ::til .. 40• . ,r , 'Y• 1 . � k••c`t` -,... ari • x � ,, . ,, -+ ` { . , ,, � t\ __t 4 `` _, F -. . _ _ .p'r••,yt� i ylc r r .'r+ fi t. ;,. , -1 I ♦ I~ • s i •'L - a "fit '� 8c: . ! 0 L F f • a Y: I'^ 1 (j, {.� y �I , • � ' • _ _ - }_ e • _ • f -'1 - + � t6. P �(f • "r ' # • • ` ' y • 4 + a ,. '', 4 • • ` •' :, 1 111" ;. !AE r ra'' . ..� / + 7 ��1 - • , ! x a% i:1 r . 1 / ,. -... .. y am �,,. `' J i, 4 1:: ' r 1 • f i _ ' - . - •-' z "4 * _ . rw /4-4_,.. # ,,, r -r — , _ .E. 1 I t 1 1 . F 1 I . M , ' .0. ., ak.. j' . . •i j � } "- i ` ; `•.' • .. , , ss .. .. Tha?e,.. • N. : .._ - ' ' .i 11 4. . .1 - ; ' s ir ,...:, ir..l *Vv.', r . • .4... ( -t 7• 's, ..7.-i - ' k • a ♦ r ` K' fig. 7 �7S ti ? � S ir •. ■ - •� _ • • s � '> < r`. T� It - it Y L. - � Y � � •' 1 cam : }I [ ) ° I ' M • I S • 4. • _,_ . • -- - ' 4 .4.41.... "., •• ( .. '1■' - 1 •F,'•ft,,. 14 _ "k1/4'••:••• I r f 4. . ' r t AlliiiiilliiMIIIIIIIMIlludialimhb-----• -. - - --- --- - - 1 :$-q ? 4 . . ... ( 3 - 4 4 . . iii il.V• . - • ' .'s Jot:: ^ -Y' . -1 •''- t : 4 ' , .." -,;;*c‘'.!; 1/4 • • . - -'4"!-_..".' l i-vi": -.. , - ..:Ai I ite. ' ..• - -„,:',L `1!`,-z i .4 _, , i ' a ' ‘ •••• ilfAV' . . - • '.t. 4 . I, .04 Aril 4 f ', t t • '''`r ...J.* 1.7.1t '• ' „ ■•,, , A "'" .‘ 0 . . , - ,o,'...„_. :-;■• ... •i".'",` 1 • ,,,.^ •4")'E , t .74 ' .ke• 4 .. .'':4.' ' ...„ ....1- r,'Z 1'V.. .•: - 44..." , ' ' ' -', '' ':.'• +Art ..,... ,, - e, , -, -, . *-,,,,,,•-.rA^' :... ‘"" .i „so , •-:,-.;:,■,4,.. ,, I.: )1 ;-. • ,1 **,.. . - . zs- • -, it - ... -.._ s.„ •:•-_ - .:i; 1 . • . k.. ,I.. 0. . ' . 4** b • .." " 3.* • :' cif . ' • i ...4 • • * * 1/4 ftr• r• al 4,. - • i 1. . ' ' • " '. ,,, ... ;•,, . ' in. % . -' ' 744 s - ! - 0 • . _r . .-...h. .44 "rg ‘, --r. / I. ..' '. . : ,- •• .., - Als. .z.. t e'''It* " f 1 - teee; 4 - .. •p• . g- 1-,,Y - . • 41 . ..x :;■■•• i lil ...r 1111 INIO '14 * • _.., -• _ UV... 1. . •-• 4 ", 4 , A '',. ,. 4 ,- e'••• 4. . , ,„ ..._ft4' ....,. • ,. . •0 . .. , 4 . , 7 . . , r c• - .`‘ . . .. .. ‘ 44 1 r$ 7i• ",., -ir ,. - • - - ....;..* •-',- •A..,,, , ,re'.% .,t . 4 1h4t,,, ,,,,, . .s. „Pr*Pe'tv .. - 411k 0 41 • - 4142 . vt.. -• - 7 , ' 4 4- '1' ■-..- t ' ; ...' ."..- • ''''' - . 1. ' ''' $ 4.- •' . a r- '[ , -, ter,,,k i'' •''':r. 1 ;tN'•;.i;V,,Zj1tZr'4 t• ::: ..„.*- . ‘-.:* ' ..- 4 . 4 • i r .. ,..-t,:,f-c.. - -: - . - -, r , •:-. -. ' • .„,' t.'„,.;': , t ..,,-. 1 ' -... , ,. ...*-., .aret- . -,-...• I .: ., • ..",- ,•0 ...,6*-•_..- --. - • t-ez _ • 0 ' `"1- '-',?%4: ,.:.'..- at- - l' -7-1t- , ..-„,.,.-0-z6.,,:w...- ," - -- -..- .- • ; ,,,..: -T-4..,....... - :. 'e ''.' ' - • ' • - ‘4 " 4 ., , t- ...,,;' ,"',. 4 ' st '; -„...;•••• ;..„t' - :5, i , :e`.. ' 4 1 - ` , *4.V. i) • ella,ii •• - ›"V W1 k / „1411r."40"4. ' ti4:4-1:2,-*s.- • 4). ' , A IV s.,, , ,, , ,.. - . . .o.,..- - sev,po, ‘. • , - ..", , " : _NS„„' ...., • • s : op, ' - , -etv W ' ' ;ZAI .... -, # i", : ' ' * -, 2 -. ...., ••• 4- "N - Z .. ` !,-",'. - - '`,.. .. •••e4,3eztor*?"-. ,1,...•,' 4 • • -: • *7! oP - - - - ...r. - 4 - ,, - 4 .. - 111 t - qt..:e; e 40 ''' . 4, *„ . , • ,., e% row- - -•.-12,,, . ".r,......• - _ . -. - - - ,"' .-." - , . ;:- - -7..... loopt-,.•••*".* ,,,, .1. - , - •• •.- -. . 'Ir.': ' --4g * . cc' * - '4 .„. 144'‘ . •,,v.iii , a444,,. - .1 i . - * •-%. -is, - . ,e.,-- .....,- • -s' '''''' • .,' .- - • - t.......,.._...... -- . , i ;.....„. ...,;‘,:is....._ . • ••• ,r- , Awe. 0- ,,,, -•■• , • ...r 5 - --14:0; , 4•„,, " -: ',2t- _., ..:," _ ''''..* calkiciPti- ' "" - ' .• - ' - ' ;:sit , g 2" • • • ''' ' ., 'Ok • ' '••• ' , •••••••:‘., •• ' * • „t . ... , i , •••,. -14 .., , s `• ,, ,.416 ... , s 1••• ■••• '- '. •• • ' , " . ,,,.f . ,; ••• •` 16 e •• 4..e,.. • . • - •• . , it t ?,., ' ,.,, 4r.' ,-...' -- ■ ' 4e".(.0,r ' '-' r . ,_ .., ., - . " '` "r;a: - . 7 ,-..- " , . - - - • _.‘"•" - - ' , ' '''•-••(.' '''t ..a 1 "v't - ...• ,--til!...,,,' -•■.)• : 1 •"" . , , „, • . }.„ - 4149w.,_,,,;.-- •• . .. , n. „. ' -•‘•••,1;1•.•,-- :„.., . - ,,....„ , _ • .::•■ . firt,,:,-.,... , --- .. . ,,!,...- 4 , .-,:_, 4 , „„„ ic...4....-:... 0 . - " - 1.•-• •• - . ••-„, ..„--- „ 3 ....., • *** C... .VI' •i • - ,,leatfr : • .``. • :. . '. ` , •‘• ` -. -,'• A1., -..• - i V -,4•1/4";,(i.:r.'-.^:.; • • - % 4 M, 1 3 , ' '''' AV"; " s ' - . ..„.., .,„, i• • „ ...A. .-.. . •:.-‘• ..4 `; ..A .. • .I, %AI,' . • 7 • `Mt ' ... .r. ' • ,-.... . -4 i -1„ - - - ,-?. • ,. ow' io i 1 7 . - - .44 - - - 7 '-e, * . If ;„„ik-,: : Zara. ...... '''' . .c . ..'.. , . W' r . . ... . . : . , ■ k , .., /I.. i i t k 4, ''. ' • ' ,,.„., ...,,' ''.. ..'.- • ... . I fr... .3, q ,, _-... . - - . ••••• - 1•r-: , 41. ,, ,. - •• ,, ... . • w 's - - ' - ' - - is i - .,.• '‘ ' - ," ‘-aa■" " • r.': i . "SX-Aa• ' " - '. : - - ' e ..**As. ii 4) X 1 1 "41. ' i nt . v -....' .., . .. . t , f . - 41 : .41.s., ,4 .• - - 4 4! **,...,,,, ' 1 ,k ',,...t., ‘. E . . ..ss$ ,....,.....,- - . , 4 -1,-,., * . - .0 - • 1 1 ; 7 V • c ' ' • " .7 1, > .1 , 4 , - • ‘ ' .• 1 - • I tt 4 • • .;•,-- • .•. -N."---L-----------.1 . 7 .• • • t, ... .1. ..0_,.. .,,,,,,,, J.,,...... .., i , ..,,-.. , „..:.„, • 44/0",1••••• *C ' , : - lte 2 . v ;......... / L *...t.. 0 . .7 ,, ' ' '' 4 ., /C '" v • \ •-- .- , • 4...4 -,, ' • ' i , - ., 1 "else - -I . .'t, - 'I" - . *err, - „•;" -* '7. ' . ; ‘ ' s-1 ni1,1. * "' akk • ' , ' " t 1 1 I e " -{Sr •• 1 • / % s es. -• % 7 it L.... i --5- -• .... ' • ' 1" -et i -' #t. - 7 it. ' I - i. 7 • -,. - "bia V"' 7 %. ■ . ..Zak ‘.. • : '.." ; ' . ■• t I . 4,, ', 4 ' ,`.,' - 'c....;.;" • •,••-•• 1, ...• Y' ' ' .. '• . •' •'• ' - "fall •• - ` ** ‘•-• 4 .P'' ' an til l. ' ; C tl , 1-1. -. .7: , -0 -FT .. i . `,.., , - , • : , . , & -‘ - • & . v.:at -,• 4 -4 ' a V '`."`"\‘ - . 2 '''. • ^1., ." .` '‘'1•• I • 1 , . ' ' i •• :' . • ' ••"• • " . *4 t` * .F.,.e. .1 - 1 .t ..S.. , , " e• " T• ‘'''A.P .., • - ,.• ,, t. .! i 1., ..:" • 1 4 # 4 1 - - , '1' ... e - • ' ..... • II • ::` .. 1 ,$ 0. , 0, 4 4 ,^ ■ • _ 4 .. , .• ": (1 I - ;•:,,...,_ 4 ,4 1 t ifit """1110 1 iiii x ., I ;,. .... *,,,,I;N.:,,, 1,0„ ..- - ,..i..,_, ..-,,... -:. ' , ..",,,A 1 ,4-v ... , , , • - 1 ,:. , _ it -- +-4 ., - . •,-- . -3-- v, , i pr. pi _ 111 .., , -„v- - - - '` '''-••• ••".. 4 „ . :s '` • 4 ---- ..-- • • • - . AK.. II - • ' .. • I ,A.; - , , . tm, ., . •\< • - - - -' - ..`t.,:. ,?, r<••%--> , • , '`,..,- ..0 ''"'' ..,,if r • 0P 'ylib 4 1••• •' ...- • ,,,,-4,4, , , , ....., ..., . '• .- , , ' „A:- . • . • ,„.„ 40,-•■•• •J in eeri I •/ a l.&_. e. , 1. ! • .1.• - ''... tr--■,Zt, I . , - 'liter: r ,4,„ ..-,,, -I ,,.,:i P3 4 ‘ I NI i t. - .., .,...,., .. .:.e., A N....... - - . •••• ' ' - - - . . '. .. . ".... ..;...-,-, .........,, ‘. . f 1 ty. titypro - ' f 1 N„ •■• ,.„ 4 •-• ' is I - • I' ' i ■ , v• ,, i ,. ' ..., • ' ' • ii , --,„ , !.,,`, .....,,. • ,, ,, , - .t 'f' 'f • I a/ „. . j , ,7 1 ■I• if .• : % . 7 1014 a I MI •,' ii i i i i ,1 1 4 . . 1 1 .. 111-1 • 11. 1.1 •ei ■ . lei ,1, • llt I • r ia*,' '''' •N‘-' • 'I I . - • , . ii ii -■ 1_ 1- .. , . . • - I■4/' a _ _ , • am . . • "a- ...■ * -"' ilt:t ' "4' 1 le - • - ,-:,- . 11 . ., • IV- 4, t oe t't - . - - - . - - 4 ilit%' - • . - ; • = - l'-- - :.•■ ,!,(.1. sx .- . ,. , ,.• ' , • - •... : . t „ t„ . . • ■ .1. ,.. . 1' I SO . %,..* - - . -• -.'" .1 . ) Ilk ' . •-• ' '• • , 1 • - . 1 .... -' -- -_. f , ••••• • - - ••••• - e. -A. ' • -.4 -!--' • • . ,.... - --• -: - : - ...... - ''''. :-. ,r7,.. - .• -`- - - - • ... ' e .- - - --e - ' ' . _ , •• '•-....c-•' ''''' ''' -- .. • ft ' - -. `'.. •-••• ` '. ' .' '''' ' - , .4 . -*•••ki. ."'-'.....7it'''Ski!"-.1"....." - -- - - - - ".'-...- - .. . .... . '''' : .14r4 - - It'''''';.1 - \.1... - : . ,_ 14 1• ,7.1":::" :::-- - - e'' - - I "I".., .. ,', - 7.1,:-. 1 ;;!7..i* - ok a- ....,,. - • - - ••.. :- . - - -, :l o t ; '- -:: .. - ‘1%, b. ... • • --.., -- - -- . - - • ,, la,i ,...ikei. ..-., „ ''......-. - - ''. v -- - '-- - , . • •-- --Aar- ,- - - t....v.r. - - - -.-. -.-- - -.7 ....z...- - -i - - - -,- - - ...- -- -4, ' " ft- ii - • ,. - -.4.1* -. . Ta. -- -• • .i. .4.- - .... 4.• ■ `''. .• ,.. ""- ' ' * .... • : --)•". * tj I • 7, .. . '"..` '14 • ''. a" C-i '... -Tie: 0' - .-• - , • - -.37 -- .. -. ,.: ".,.- ... % . . A ' . ''. . s'2: I t' ...' ' . t 1 , ...• . ' . rairPr# .1 • •:.: -, - .4-.4,,,...ft4 - 's. : ' 7- :14 ic,,,44.• . .,.(... .; . , ... -_--...;_. „ -.4....,,,..... - ...j„ .y,... .., , ;N, 1;1% _-.:,...,..._. - . ,_ :L.:N....A.4, IV! •-'. .......'.7::": '....z. - - ,- . ..... -. __ 7. ..,„ .4 . -,, . • _ 1 _ . .:---.-. - ..---- - ---•.:-',....- . - .4, --- .v...-•, :. - - -.. . .: 4 +4 -a r• • -., - :'*:. • .i.:- 7- - -: -- „21i '-- - • .-.. • = - - • -_•*--. 1. - - - ' - ;-- r- - --. &:*-1 ' - - - !;,---- ;1'4- • - -- • - :-.•., - t. licz ..., _ - et„-, •••:, .. , - - . - . „srl'• ' - . .....- . .74 ,....... A-, -. - 7 .- 1 ' • -- -a - . - - - , I. - ----• x -. • --s• -....z.--. _.".-.- . • b-!-. :- t - ;4 " 7- - -:-xr,.., - .fs "7.7.4. ' • - -- • .■' • ..' • . -..4- '--- 4 a 4 4 ....) t 's - ..''' • r -.• ^cr.:- i -6 -4 4 1 ' -;-...., L. -'v'-.. -, ,=,_ . ...,.. ... -,.... 4 , . - - - , _-• ,.. 1 C - - _ .._ .." i --•., 4-, ...44. r . ;-1... it 2-.. - - - -,-- a.-••• --!--;.- - - -- :;.‘ • - •- - -.... ''" '''' . -0--r.; ,... • =-4,,e i -,-_- - _ - _ .z......... - .- v -.-- qv-fp...A-I; „.. .- , ., lE _...' : - '1 44- ';_ 1, • • . ,.... 4.7. 46. '''' .. .. , ,,,_- • „,.......r. ,_ . , .,• • ....., _ i •••• 4 ''' ,eel„' ..itme ... r‘" - 1...'-e•Ife -- .. - I ‘ ' 4.."2 . ..Z., L . _ . _ - . . ' P.' ../ ..• - .'. *".^ 41Z ." -., ' .'"-:':,, - 1Z , - „AO elk ---1, ..40.", -,... ... 1 ... _.-":-!) -X.- ,-.• . - ..00: , - - ....., ir_ 4. %., , ' --- .,.1-. --' ••4t•-• • _ ' .-., -',..„.'-'• . '. . k--_-_-...-;.--, c& - 4, .-- u - ' ' ' - -... - - - ..pee ir- ...-- ...% . rvir :47,:- ....4 . ,...... .• ..', ,fr's .-- - ..,. • - -• .. . .... -, .... , 4 .0 . * -.1--.. ..er i j:' .‘ '. ,- •• . I tiriO , d 1 0 , " V " '••• ' - ' .•■ . 1: 1/4 f .1/4 - . -.. ' Ir .••• 5 ,141WF ' ' irgill 4 . At i'.... • 0 1• 7 5 5,05. .. '.4' ' I . •• . 0 .... * C • -% : ..1. '- '-- 4_4 -... - ke , .0., ..... ..... 4 ,....... .,.„. . ...,.„....,,.._„.... • • ..,... . ...., . :.,__..- .- ;ft • k jo• . , _ 40K .0. . ■ . T a. 2. - • ,....• • ....,K;;. -..- 't- ,Ift ' - .... .....4.,, . ` • •./4= 4 ? - - ' -- - " • : 1W'. • '.. . 1". .......... J. :._ c ..: ....„ over ...•,.. . , • 16 ' • 11,.i `"•4:' . -1, , -. .• , .... , , .... -°. ,4"..../....• ..r - 41%'. . ,:t•IA4=a, • 'ia" .• . • . •.• ,. . i ...... • 1st - • . - e ..." ..,.. , .. 41 - .. . . - • . A* • ... - ' 11 - - . • , .d . . , . . ,-..... . • ..- ...v....-. . P- :..... -...t.z Ar 6. ••••calf ..„, • -•.' } • -. '''''c'ib5 - * . , A. • - ... - _.... , ... ..,,,... - • r- ' ,•,A, % kc. ' . • A 'D ' i .... 11,11.491 ,,,,Irl•••, .01111-Esit 1 -;.•,. -dr ,. • 51•. ., . , •. ,1* . • * • f l iV• i ' • '-' - es- P ..- x ,„ : „.........: 4-. 4 . • A .. , • . .•-•%; .. . *414 4 : Z ..-- ' . . ' f - • • . ' _„, _ tf. /i ie e-ir s 4 . "Ja16‘,. AIM • .14 , --- .• •,•• J 1/4. A ow .• • • 4 °).*; 4 '- j -ifit ,•••• /e I .1' *. . )1/4 4 t lb. - .iiil ; • " 4 ;doe . I.. *. < - 4-j oi .'*4..1,_ _.* • . ': - et*: , 4.,,,,,*: u• - .-.' _ .,. . . .z. . $ . .1: ! ' per...,. .,....6.- • --, 4 ,.t . 4. low .41k . ,. 14 ttr t ...am; • .3•• i f •••41 d .4e, „ ,,, a : . a il .. • • . .. - ' - ...•.. - , - , • ...4,11* •. t . -- % ......,..wr ,' ..,;... s . c ,,,?-w. iFir • if f •. 'SIC' .... Or wk. 0 4 0 •• • ipr,, -11 10 , ••• na.-..i ,-. -6-)„.' %,p., • , , - 4 ,. I , . •fr - tit . - ' -, •.'10 , - •,....* it....: ...' IL . 4. %. 41.-J11%, A o bit . f 4111Nd. ,.. • I .1 ."... A . • ak. ... i 4 II. ... • 't AIL 4, , - s. 0 .„ s it . .n. .,,,,...00 4 * ' . - It Coe „ 2 , - I 0 • r . - - "I ■:..• .....,.......t.• ..-- - - ' 1 • # -7 . (Office Use Only) " , • APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: k'tl�l Qobe -rf � is+mcLA Address: 9 3 Fax nr 1 rA,LI City: Claw hasse,n M NI Zip: SS 31 • Home Phone: c131 - GLI-• Work Phone: 370 - SSd-'f Parcel I.D. Number: 4A3,5 2,_,--, O:::OezZ • I want property reviewed because: O ASSc_Ssakailt atscs not re4tee,+ (eeei"t C &u eS (r p v ku C.i: fst " r P PS' rn 5h! c 4 cue n • t KnkSe.. e rev.X.rkQ et rcu 1 ¢G�Sermi f i ntv LAS Laic. Pre , U• M .) has 4 .i e. illiliL revi ou 1) 1iMt'\ vi d.e. 5&r�Z�C.e_ e;. ec ro br 4-k Q t h'rer (eun at-ea_ •Ii've. (�t-om or q-i\L Qcsem ( t n•tb I k. .) ..-iZe±e_ 8 cce t (..f 00r OPst~n laethor , ilet GM SI'1f em ate.. run off no--0 C�ecollottc . s r � . On IL X.CLCL ogieci., PiCS ck.t ( p6-X 0( Q-LL _ ( 1A i.n t 41,4. IG." e•_ CoWict 60' pm 9e , h i i�!ki l .. [Irks r Oo I t-,, _ (i ri+o r d. o1---t - h i I 1 Data reviewed by Assessor: L' L j Cf - 2 - / // / z tial & date tim e f 55 25.0800320 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $232,000 Mr & Mrs Robert H Horstman 7343 Frontier Trail Chanhassen MN 55317 Talked with Mrs. Robert Horstman on 04/23/92. Discussed the easements on • the property, noting additional depreciation for same. Recalculated • a value, a reduction in land value of $19,800 is indcated. Owner was in agreement with value adjustment. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $19,800 to $212,200. NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended . ` Adjusted as Noted • 1 1 111 rf cpic\01.0 Culd, ddyithon Of' cr nur t7c&OK1(:)C OOr 3iCcicLILLY)..- -C*)61: ?aril ift) also 6_1 6- F roLurr, (ANc-i-k 4-1LIL Sdt14‘(-1 0P4-1,1 ctrivuia, okjk ta,fD ci/ up ctOrinco 0)/k- t (k) b- repairek beire 4k (\e,V+ Oin• Ic‘t 0- 9( bV O ch-tes c op)/ wluu. 6txts u3faE., 0- S(hice-1 aro._ cu (n( b h(3$-e-. r ectodric S s 0(1 , moq_A Lo , nt- &b-havic cth ctu-i- So-c 1 da- cbi.cts ck- (\ow breacti'n Told cr mtt'fts ON (44 Fr • inelaits er 4t42 ut1 CO- e S.)(Thk,hclact - 1 ° bri b{ptc: mcis , (1/4_1(1 cuxa-t ((win cciIk, F;As C.4 1 9Seh kzaxcL_, ? cd- (4-L_ 4\vre,l(srte___ 15 c 9D' 1 04A6 Cs' sorrbutrvec( 10, u bric-13YA.c: ( Kecks i ' crece &2irtL Ctrvt dr-Ns.-1/ b 5c-c) VA-L tncret c ; nerrtc , L , ;cfL 70 ' plk-e._ fr) 0._ ITCe5,-51C1 (Del ott- , Wc_ bccLva9-,, 1 kAs (A64- no OR to ts 011(4.2._ Qj i9E?)CI . �.a , . -, �,,, j IJ (Office Use Only) ' ' OP"ARD ; v.• ....VIEW, 1992 Name: - • " D.tirc - 1 - 1-2), 4 TH , S .7 IA • ;".:J= 'Cz.ri d . -,-; P r eh c_hhc.Ss - c.n A / Zip* --- 57/ - Home Phone: c - i - 7 - P 6 5 8 Work Phone: 44. • 7 Parcel I.D. Number/' ._ 5 - Szc 0 cc 5 ,0 1 I want property reviewed because: . 9 / 1 7/ v --.-i-ii rat+ 0-2� t, c� / �' 6, ao O. � -� - t�crx. ate v „„i .• I a, / ('A c -aGr� -104 �l L./�!" �- v - svc.�v1" --1 LE1-r�. - u 7'v / v�.�'� l c q '�C/ G.�-e+ "'�� U r ' . Uti. n- . -IL X.. --C . 2fe � Gt'l tic �� .l -r. „-e ms lives -a.t lire. �i ec. -.--c he —�-'' ivz.�,c.� �" /,' ,.., - e/Y - I ..5d0-' -�a �.e�y' lj ' :c -.i` /[ -.4- -- • = e- flz.„� v-2....4- Y�'�..4-rl� - z,,4 & Cam -emu.` -- - ._i 0._...„. 0._...„. c - �� x a'' '' 2 ,-,.- C .mot -'7, t--fr- - "4, Data reviewed by Assessor: f c- a ? Y � /0 % - e tim �-�--) �' (Ini &date /time) � 58 25.2400040 res hstd 1992 EMV $210,100 II Thomas & Dorothy Jamieson 30 Sandy Hook Road Al Chanhassen MN 55317 Physically reviewed property, updated field data, recalculated values, uc reviewed area assessment level. Reduction of $8,300 for building is indicated. I RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $8,300 to $201,800. NOTE: _1 Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted 1 i 1 1 1 J nQ r / (office use only ) ;J `/ $ 73 7A APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME ,ICJ e r g i cL Qa , :r PHONE W- ADDRESS 75t) 9/; fh St w Twn /City PARCEL ID/ c 1 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: 1 • 1 s1 . 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR:. / / 3O/ 1/0 :4(Initial & date /time) 59 25.3650010 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $113,200 Georgia Jeurissen 750 96th Street West ' Chanhassen MN 55317 Reviewed sales data with Ms. Jeurissen on 4- 30 -92, discussed level of assessment, compared property to neighborhood. Discussed level of assessment and helped Ms. Jeurissen compare her property to neighbors. i Sales support value. Owner indicated satisfaction. RECOMMENDATION: no change. NOTE: 1 1 ' ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended ad' as noted: 1 1 ) 5 3toso 0 a, ✓,h tea £t .1e -tv , i' .216:0 Cc4 Cot.ve CItart-7 frea- Ole t c - a _ �y .. - Its' fie - - - -- - g9 a 7 � 1 6Igq,DD G ?e,(.0 de .. _ la/ eL ici.'/!/ • / , s ,, 7 6 7j _ f /9i / / ; . Sh - 7v a. , g c�v,.e. r/ am= 0`d-Lv a-L - x a,r Goa - .. t 2i, ,- 4 tee. a. ./te, ',Q - aa.x4e - 1 . - w . C t , C,.,-, 5S a , s53 7 - -- 1 1 1 1 1 1 (office use only) ,,�� APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 1 NAME 4/1/t- J o k ASor1 PHONE 4 /70 - V33a -- ADDRESS c2C-57 Oa..Kwood Q Q, Twn /City ' PARCEL ID# W4-O /510 ' I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: — Se-e Leti • 1 1' , DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR:& ,/ /02 *(Initial & date /time) 1 60 25.8520140 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $263,500 Alva Johnson 2051 Oakwood Ridge Chanhassen MN 55317 ' Talked with owner on 05/01/92. Reviewed property, updated field data, recalculated value. An adjustment to reduce the land value $2,700 and the building value $24,500 is indicated. 1 RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $27,200 to $236,300. NOTE: 1 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as 1 noted: 1 1 4 ,,-,./ 0-i A _ Ain: 4 . 73. c�� h� (:).3 .J j 6 2 c.)51 �. 57 O.4r�vt r`I a s . 0� o 1 `� d 111 c-.L �as�E fly sr ?r7 RZ 0,41- a --. Cec..,. ./ J' O 4 r; / ( 9 -3 -/ ). J a R e� 7 �. C a. / iL e ^- ?/5 g- - c1 Cr 1 -f' . 41 JI J 5Oo L ?{0,.“ � ? ,� 3 C/0U `7 CL/1� -�')'- ✓•-.c ( vU Lo C .5T /•- i V , 1 c � N �v�-,, 11 / / // f 7 l!.✓ � �.: 5 T.• /L�il -� Lv�- /4 -,tit" ,'� �" � a 1- -1-� . - ,r4„ w i tr /4 r j c N ic..a -7� %•-> 1a1 + n om. w .4_,j- J 4, e e-r. �- m .-fir 1- Q0. 4-4_ 1 1 1 1 . 1 - 4 k+ A-c IH-c v(t., g C T's 7 w r 4 y &161 I4 . < ' sz 0 -4 L a. L 1 (- 5 -tom £`J C "do /iv /4--. e-) � ,�� Q L �a w L j -jf - 4,1/ Ad k.--1 -- �- / was ,/ / ,�, .� �-�i ;mac 2l� cf," ,1 1 141 - ,•1a/( /k 17 kV 5 s �: J - "4e 0-14 9 cJ Gs T 1 V �� ) jj L„ 4 4./ - c-_. f - 4 /, z L M J • - c r—,D ••fa rces WA A w r /1, Jet Qr -4/L w 5 4-t —�— T �" v .. , Arp -.4tt — 5 � / ,yf e) /-t. 1 1 S J - " o roL, /4, 1,4_ 70 - /° % !4 5 , in? y ,cA < /09 a h �jl.J'� f Co Cam' S� 3 r / - ' a,t,iC '4_ /-'() i ' C'j 44 ; /D O !o , "Jo o s 4-42.4.2.e , A.....0-19 c-oz-4 1 1 /le s „,„, j ,r,,i421 J 4 1 1 r o- Q1) -, - 1 / , / /‘ • A 46. a- SO-AL a?a, S crA/ 44f,f- 414- APit.1 (0 '1 '2-1 S 1 II 1 , 1 . � (office use only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 [� NAME a►1a �Q1\y„sor. • PHONE 7 7/- OZ•55 1 ADDRESS 50 PI f I_ r.P tJ. Twn /City Tvr1Ka &y i131 63331 PARCEL ID/ ,2S_ 0 05 0 3 00 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: — Sew Le r' - 1 A. . • •. .A11 1 1 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: (Initial & date /time) 61 25.0050300 Res Non -Hstd 1992 EMV $146,600 1 Dana Johnson 50 Pleasant Lane West 1 Tonka Bay MN 55331 Reviewed property, noted additional depreciation, recalculated value. Reduction in building value of $31,600 is indicated. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $31,600 to $115,000. 1 NOTE: 1 1 ' ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 1 ^ ------- . • 1 .4-,Ag--9_ 1 - „ ____ __._ . I i _ __ • _ 41/4 v c,Acz/yikk....,, _ _ , , '7l 1G41 il/J d(A.)24/u 1 - - - - 1 j fA,L6'tk -S cl‘ & -z (44tc..i--e 1 . & c f e V ---iv4 - ir A 6---c erk7-62. c-k47.1v-e/z,zeat 16 .xgt 474 °7--1-- 9.‘ 44-- 1 „,_,,....., _ . ? - ,,. A ,d t f,-e-ip2/16- 's . t..fru24.k: 4(.6.443 zazzi kAftiot _" / / 6 , 2 -S; (X) SG 30c, it • , v , i ruicA,occa--A .euV 1 0-124-61??...) ..4, - .' , A ei)(24-,4.Q„J---f—. `71-Lc-ne Jcic.L. AL----i - x x r62 344-119 ie Litc,c1,,, _ _ 1, aft.c.AiLav:_ fti&e) /,cia,va-) i/c d _ . ._ . , <) -- ri , z- i e, „r 0 cdit.,,-ISA _ a _ 0 .3 --7 ht-z,s4 • A JC(_44615fS , , ,a _ _1 A1 . , , 2 J L a- ) • ---TA 5:f5rxS2, - L.Att,7f -z,t,h. i . • , .. 4 /...). - o . --J -t cce1A--) 1c .. ) 6 az ../at-,Q c .-A<r).6 -•• 1 1- - • a 1 ------ - - -- • • ji'` 0 /40 4 -e=Pe-/li/r - - 12&2.( a4.e_ "7 AMA-, 0./n, c i 1 2. . C / _ I -- ------------------- ----------- - -- - - 1 _ • . --- 129 `7 OILd' ikci 'Ijb2- Apo y _ _I _ r) - ------ - . -e e.7.4 _Alti4 ' ) %' r ei.9e--- , 77e'C. _4(_,e,a-0 .._ _ _ 1 i2-2-yr igid . g--44-z1SAzde4, ' • .., 1 r �- ' ,,, j. _ __ _ _ _ ___ _ _ . _ . _ d...,,,, „...mtco i(st, ____ . ,6,.....„ __ _ _ _ vU _ _ . _ _ _ J JI2 ..; c(.6- C /2�Ge 1 1 , G /.-.5-v7 ylA'2AZA.4) CZAii fi 4 '. i'Vea_ o 1 -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- -- IS C ►n.) Cl Ct_ y`1 ` i +mil 0 c� - es- lovv lay r k N 5Y33 ( 1 1 - - - - - - - - -- - 1 -- - - - -- -- - - -- 1 - --- ____ - -___ - a Certificate of Real Estate Value . Buries Last Name, First, Middle Initial .. Present Address • Listed Daytime Phone Number • 1 .12/90) Johnson, Dana L. and Nancy M. 5'0 Ple_c A n+ boll c R i 4 oio3 Seller's Last Name, First, Middle Initial • Address 1 -- Listed D Phone Number 1 Estate of Cecelia E. 7900 .Xerxes Ave. So.,.#1500 89 304 McClenaghan Bloomington, MN 55431 Btnet.Addrsss or Rural Route of Property Purchased City or Township • County • • 6541 Minnewashta Parkway • •• Chanhassen C ar v e r , • L•eg+i Description of Property Purchased (Fill in !ot number, block number and plat name, or attach S copies of the legal description) See attached Exhibit A � ` 1 • _ Type of Acquisition (check all boxes which apply) ' , - ❑ You and seller are relatives ❑ Buyer is • religious or ❑ Your name added to or co-owner's or related businesses charitable organization name removed from dosed (not • Nte) ❑ Property is a gilt or inheritance ❑ Buyer Is a unit of government ❑ You purchased partial interest only ❑ You received property in a trade ❑ You condemned or foreclosed • , ❑ Date purchased agreement signed is on the property ; : _ ; over two years ago (Fill in year If you checked any box above, skip the rest of this form, sign it and fill out schedule 8 • Type of Property Transferred (check all boxes which apply) • - - ❑ Land Only 1E1 Land and Buildings ❑ Construction of a now building completed I .. . after January 1 of year of.aale • Planned Use of Property (check one box) ❑ Residential (single. duplex. triplex) ❑ Apartment (Number of units ) , ❑ Cabin or Recreational I ❑ Agricultural ❑ Commercial- Industrial 1=1 Other Use (describe below) (Type of business ) Financial Arrangements (instructions are on back of yellow copy) -: s I 1 Tot Purchase Price 2 Toai Amount of Per and Property 3 Deb Saar Agreed to Purchase Price (kom schedule A on tack of Mkt sheet) $115,000.00 • -- 2/91 • 4 Down Payment is Points or Prepaid Interest Paid by Saler . . • 6 PoMte or Prepaid Interest Paid by Buyer . . • : 115,000.00 -- -- _ Describe each mortgage and contract for deed used to purchase this property le this a . Contract or Assumed Mortgage or Contract for Deed Monthly Payment for Interest Rate Total Number Gals of Any Lump Sum • • Mortgage? Amount at Purchase Principal and interest (In Effect Now) of Payments (Balloon) Payments I Yes No T ❑ ❑ u 8 ❑ ❑ :'., -1. .. - , a ❑ ❑ ,1 10 11 a mortgage or contract for deed Is not a variable market rate but the terms of payment are scheduled to 0hange,on a fixed date. WI In Its line number Irom above, the I month and year of the change, and what It will change to (Or Inch 3 copies of payment schedule): Fill out schedule B on the back of this sheet to detemmine the amunt.of your deed tax - r 5. I declare that the Information 1111e0 In on this ls form taw m , correct • and complete to the belt *l knowlWge and beltel. ., i - Print or type name of person signing this form Signature Listed Phone Number Date DA r.3 ra SoG.fvsory -- 971/4)/o3 '£ 41/0 /92 Co 1 8 C SD Yr Land Bldg Tot v Pql = Parcel I T Acres Tulle 10EA Use 1 YrBit • Deed Yr' Land _ Bldg Tot . , Department of Revenue Use Only • , • - • X HC ST Adlc Arks U API FM • GA C 1 MV 2 MV ID , : 1 Co 1 CT PT Date ) T Des ' Plat Parcel M f $ Stock No S000400 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE COPY 1 .i Form No. 109 — Personal wpr...nta u. s o..e May 9 Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing soma wn.r.O.vb Co . wm.apar Individual Personal Representative to Individual(s) No delinquent taxes; certificate of real estate value received; and transfer mitered on ,•19 County Auditor by • . Deputy STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ 379.5') Data: April /d ,19 92 (reserved for recording data) • FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Philip A. Dugan , Grantor, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Cecelia E. McClenaqhan Decedent, single ®,married D at the time of death, hereby conveys to Dana L. Johnson and Nancy M. Johnson,. as joint tenants , Grantee(s), real property in Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: See Exhibit A attached hereto (if more space is needed, continue on beet) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belongin: th eto. «��r I_ ' r .L� !s■s_ STATE OF MINNESOTA ,I 1 gam COUNTY OF HENNEPIN -. • The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this A_ day of Ap Estate 9 2 , by Philip A. Dugan , as Personal Representative of the Estate of Cecelia E. McClenaqhan , Decedent. NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL (OR OTHER TITLE OR RANK) 9174f e. its Notary Pu ) MAPG: IET E. REIT NOrP.4y , am • :ice OOJ(LTA COUNT/ My Corm Exar.e Nov in :- .vskrywywv..- -o , SPOUSE OF DECEDENT, CONSENTS TO THIS DEED. Name of Spouse STATE OF MINNESOTA 1= . eisnatse• of spouse COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 319 , by , spouse of , Decedent. I NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL (OR OTHER I1TLE OR RANK) Notary Public l • • "� Statements for real estate taxes on the real property LARKIN, THIS IN W pg L DA& A DG EN, L t eacribed herein should be sent to: STR FFI 7900 Xerxes Ave. S., #1500 Bloomington, MN 55431 (612) 83 (RWL) EXHIBIT A • That part of Government Lot 4 and that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 5, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the most northerly corner of Outlot B, MINNEWASHTA CREEK FIRST ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof; thence on an assumed bearing of North 16 degrees 30 minutes 58 seconds East along the easterly right of way line of county State Aid Highway No. 15 according to said plat, a distance of 266.28 feet; thence South 42 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 231 feet more or less to the shoreline of Lake Minnewashta; thence southerly along said shoreline to the northerly line of said Outlot B; thence North 73 degrees 25 minutes 00 seconds West along said northerly line to the point of beginning. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .1 1 1 EXHIBIT A 1 ' Beginning at a point which bears South 69 degrees 50 minutes East 857.5 feet from the Northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 116, Range 23, said point being on the abandoned right -of -way of the Great Northern Railway ' as it ran through Sections 5 and 6 said Township and Range; thence South 42 degrees 30 minutes east distance of 723.5 feet to the Easterly line of County Road for a place of beginning; thence ' continuing on the last described course distant 153.5 feet to Lake Minnewashta at the boundary point between Benedict Schmidt and Beloit Lewis' land; thence South 7 degrees 56 minutes West along the shore of Lake Minnewashta 189.6 feet more or less (184.6); thence North 73 degrees 25 minutes West distant 160.0 feet to the Easterly line of said County Road; thence Northeasterly on the ' Easterly line of said County Road distant 264.5 feet to the place of beginning, containing 0.81 acres more or less. • Situated in Lot 4 and in Southwest Quarter of Northwest Quarter of Section 5, Township 116, Range 23. 1 1 1 1 A i 1 1 1 1 4 (office use only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 /s i/7g NAME ! A,1 Donald l!• J04450/-1 PHONE WA. 9y 3 7691 ADDRESS / gO 1l/e5ter/1 Dr Twn/City_14WILAALki PARCEL ID# g5 rA 0 //0 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE*.�� ` C / 1 1 1 1 1 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: L L / L f - ' ,2 ?/ P (Initial & date /time) 62 25.1620110 Res Non-Hstd 1992 EMV $97,500. Donald M Johnson 1040 Western Drive Chanhassen MN 55317 Reviewed area sales, neighborhood assessments with Mr. Johnson on 04/27/92. He now feels the value of his property is in line with homes in the area. _ RECOMMENDATION: no change. - NOTE: 1 1 • ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 • 1 1 Carver County Tax Assessor 600 East Fourth Street Carver County Court Chaska, MN 55318 1 Reference: PLT -25162 Carver Beach Estates, Lot -001 Block -003 c.5" /6 A 01 I C' To Whom it May Concern, I am the owner of Lot 1, Block 3 of Carver Beach Estates. In may of 1991 I 1 requested that the property class be changed from non - homestead to homestead as I am the only occupant, and have been for the last three 1 years. I was told by your office that no change could be made until this year. I recently received the "Notice of Assessment" postcard which indicated that the property class was Non - homestead. I am requesting, for the current assessment, that the property class be changed to "homestead ". I also request an abatement for the 1991 tax year. 1 Another matter which concerns me is the assessed value. The assessment card indicates that my property is valued at $97,500, which is well above market value. In reviewing the records, I note that the assessed value increased _from $ 81,200 in 1989 to $ 97,500 in 1990. This is an increase of over 20 %. There have been no substantial improvements since the house was purchased, I don't understand how a 20% increase can be justified. I am requesting that the assessed value be reduced to $ 89,000 which is a fair value. Your consideration to these matters is greatly appreciated. Please advise me of any changes made. Sincerely, 1 1�L fi �. ' Donald M. John 1040 Western Dr. Chanhassen, Mn. 55317 tam. 47q-7 1 W q /3-7? k 1 A. _ II _ 1 1 A 1 1 1 I(/ 1 ? /7 _-- 1 _ c � : , a - 1 _ . : ..c;17 Ao.)-70 . 7,- . ;', , ,,, , cif. .. „:7 . _ _ __ . - I E .. , _ 1 ,,,,,, z ,i6,,,O i %fit 2/0 -62�C- . . .. • : .,, . . _ ,..,0_,„,i_._ 6, ...., 2 -'-} -7 --' - z - ) ° 4 1 � /rte ic4 .., 2,:i --7, :;/ 7 1 4111 "rg./71----te - 1 . r: • 1 _ 1 1 1 :___ 1 I 1 1 • # 6- Office Use Only) Y) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: /4.4 -4-k C0c4fv,E kLt,i.E/ Address: S t ( t ft icy' 5 H-4 C2 c —r City: +4 'i 14-A 55F ri , M, Zip: 5 r 7 Home Phone: (1 2 .3 y 1 -- 10 3 3 Work Phone: (C f 1/ G LI 1— 5 a S a n Parcel I.D. Number: C 1+ 1 -I5Er1 f-t i t LS a 2 a5„ X 8 6 Out, o ' I want property reviewed because: Pvt.-co-14-SE- raAc`' 4 l tci° V4Lv'E OE1MLM Inl 6O (4Y `ri 4 'Fog ov2 4400 15 f1ti°P.20 1 Zo,oeo — �5 coo ,1ortE - ( Al`��11 #h -C L)NV o 2 fM 1 -rrr 1 mf5 ;AJ Atf-A E /1-Ct of - sefatE A r 'N€IZ 4 LA- Y tE SA-41 ' i y LE ,4-14O SIB , "Z:•J 400 - P c / J , Gran► sT71 v (110 . ' E 3E-6+ Ai ; ,. t q 11-t-tr 6u t, OE( , 4) /-f-2) . / 4 E5 64-r LEO To P CcAIST bo 5 -- re) LL(AAA -p1 L Lire - • Gz/vi.P 1y(CoAfTre- JcT13„7 7v1.0.z1 -6G GDAVA A )2ECW5vitE We ri H D/ Fa-06 L- titvg -n/ ' 1...L0160 CD t N 5E ('T erg?, tE2 ! - 21 74-1 O.2 ( 6 , v�1-L. Qv i 2 t c2 L 3� �' I o 5 j ' IN i 0.21 &I esrvvt in/ 1(4--L U E 3 1 • Data reviewed by Assessor: /0 t-- / 4 - 2 L / 2 f) (Initial & date /time) 63 25.1860040 Res Hstd 1992 EMV 126 $ ,300 I Mark & Connie Keller 8831 Lake Susan Court Chanhassen MN 55317 I Reviewed values of neighborhood, sales data, recalculated value, a reduction is indicated. Talked with owner on 04/22/92, he agreed with a reduction in building value of $12,500. II RECOMMENDATION.: reduce EMV $12,500 to $113,800. • NOTE: • ' Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended . Adjusted as Noted • • • # Offic Use Only) �o # ( Office O y) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: 1 N OrJ .s F. KF LL`I' Address: 10 U C 4 c i t u.) C ■ �2CL . City: (� aNIAASS� Zip: 7 Home Phone: of 3 7 - 5- '7 Work Phone: 6/Z - 7 - .sa 7 . ' Parcel I.D. Number: 5 o 4 a v{1 2- 8 n I want property reviewed because: mN h am e cot d r Teri) / u1 e r± c r1 o c� ± � i - 4\ 57Q � cr lc►ci'a, 1 J unclev S +and h s cures is s u fc —cci be q o °/o 04 -H, e value 04 horn 4,- e/ ro r > , f1 h cmt9 `td i )9P rt� c,c c 5 aim tse cwt i cn q - c; g q all ci o 04 .4115 , C( C ct re w cu I cl pc- l 3a 3 0 o , (.0 c u (ci eerrl 4-1 11a,* ( 11c. be cc. mcre reJis� la -fIu.re • lea5e. reo fcnc Data reviewed by Assessor: T L._ / y 22—/ 1 � � / (Initial & date/time) j•4 25.4200280 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $141,500 homas F Kelly 100 Choctaw Circle hanhassen MN 55317 • eviewed owner's appraisal, neighborhood market values, sales nformation, talked with owner on 04/22/92 discussed 1986 purchase price •f $142,500, Mr. Kelly agrees market value is reasonable. •ECOMMENDATION: no change. OTE: 1 Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • • • • 1 # ��4 (Office Use Only) 1 - APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: Jr ,tia,a, 10- Z I Address: G , 1 City: �� 4,� Zip: 5 5317 Home Phone: 9 3 (I- - 4 - 7 y- q Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: R . 3 0 D 1 R n I� I want property reviewed because: awv -)t0 0 . . f - 1 ?..A'"N-a 2 dive- u� a � � � v e /) C_ Q r o-r• . L 0 -` L -K AL 1 1 t-/ ' 5 l O » m,, a 0 b U s ka y i Data reviewed by Assessor: / 1 / " ' ?/ (Initial & date/time) 1 65 25.3900180 1992 EMV $113,400 Thomas Kottke 518 Laredo Lane 1 Chanhassen MN 55317 Inspected property, updated field data, recalculated value, reviewed area sales and assessments; a reduction in building value of $3,000 is 1 indicated. After discussion, owner agrees with reduction. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $3,000 to #110,400. NO E: 1 Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended 1 Adjusted as Noted • 1 1 #__'f (Office Use Only) - - . :PPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name. �, - at.__ j Addres : s . tif , . i , City: _A i / 4 Zip: 5) Home Phone: / _ Work Phone: . Parcel I.D. Number: S /B d e 3 T ( • I I want property reviewed because: ` 7). �•ee" / c, ..e_.-/-r Gr p ` 1. I 6c� a_ 4'G ?D -- t � '1 e r z z- ce_.,� . - / t oL e au i D Gt0 Lc{ • vt ` - _41_ L �„ Q 1 14 ems ' ,44t-e 7a 3 { / o 5 , eLl L 0 "� • ae.....e. cri cere--E40-e ..4--72. avM2 9 -4 ger0--A-4-4-40 4) ."- -- 46 -v-re---- t . / Le , A"'- .r --71-2-714.4 G z -e c� ,. ,40 _e,.. 4 -Aar / ,-v-h ` /771 ,.....)2L4-4---- (' 44 -� 1 `C Q v / � I Data reviewed by Assessor: i y � / � � Z- / ( I n i t i a l & 66 25.1800370 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $104,400 William & Earla Kraus I 8008 Cheyenne Avenue Chanhassen MN 55317 Inspected property 04/22/92; updated field data, recalculated value, II reviewed sales and assessments in neighborhood, reduction in building value of $1,500 is indicated. After discussion, owner agrees with reduction. I RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $1,500 to $102,900. NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended . - ! Adjusted as Noted • • . 1 • I 1 • 1 I 1 (e4 # (Office Use Only) • APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 14/- Name: VV.44 ;c—r i h.1 Address: r X31 4• LPt N T3L V City: P cc z Std 1M Zip: Y 33 i 1 Home Phone: (o J 2 - *7 - ter? f m Work Phone: & /2-' 44 7 Parcel I.D. Number: it 7-S ,e zs eo P3 • I want property reviewed because: r..)0( bp.) NT$ mo t. �P �s 41- s Cev,v -ry ee44/ re- ) 3> t z8 Boa 1 1 1 1 Data reviewed by Assessor: • -a / X1 2 Z F`" (Initial & date/time) 68 25.6930010 & 25.6930020 Ag Hstd 1 1992 EMV (0010) $138,000 (0020) $49,700 Martin Kuder 6831 Galpin Blvd • Excelsior MN 55331 _ Reviewed owner's appraisal, discussed with planning & zoning, acknowledged lack of building eligibility, recalculated values, a I reduction of $27,200 in land value parcel 0020 is indicated. RECOMMENDATION: no change parcel 0010; parcel 0020 EMV reduce $27,200 to $22,000. NOTE: i Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • 1 1 • • # 61 (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: f1 J ;/ / /V' ' \ Lsi Address: , 7 - y c p a� I • City: C` t/ 44 Zip. Home Phone: 9 3 — r 7 Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: 2 . , 3 z c c ,; 6 11 • I want property reviewed because: „ i iLL I p R fi ` 0 e i_ 4.S , e 1.;;S • 000 a vL, /4_c • 1 t 1 • Data reviewed by Assessor: "9 / /.? ° � / 5/ - a - V (Initial & date /time) 69 25.3920050 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $182,900 I Melvin Kurvers 7240 Kurvers Point Road • 1 Chanhassen MN 55317 Reviewed lake land sales with Mr. Kurvers on 04/24/92, discussed land value increases. I RECOMMENDATION: no change. EMI • 1 - Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended 1 Adjusted as Noted 1 1 1 • i l :, 4 ... Y i ,l • # 7 (Office Use Only) II - APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: y .� , • 1 • Address: - �''�� 'T , City: . «eD_ Home Phone: — � Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: e5 • S/ 5 nn 7 © . 1 • I want property reviewed because: /J ' //1/Z- A ......,1111!.• - ,� Y�["�"� ; T'-" � ) i 1 //,,cre).------r6 /44'6ge).— i • 1 1 Data reviewed by Assessor: 4- / i '/ "7 7 2 9 / 5 (Initial & date /time) 70 25.5150070 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $128,500 1 Kenneth J. Lang 2631 Forest Avenue _ Excelsior MN 55331 II Assisted Mr. Lang with comparisons of sales and assessments in his neighborhood; discussed procedure of arriving at market value with Mr. Lang on 04/29/92. Mr. Lang was satisfied. II RECOMMENDATION: no change. NOTE: • 1 Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended . - Adjusted as Noted 1 • • 1 1 1 1 74' - ( o fi ce use only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 ffM q70 y3 y7 11 NAME ADDRESS ! � I Tole" /1, L a.4i b PHONE IA" �l ? '/3cl j 1 c Rd / l Lake 14,L r Y Rd Twn /Cit t7lzN? �c�C SS�� -� / PARCEL ID! A 5 • ` b o1: (7 /�() ' I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: • IF r• •.s 3 • DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR :/ q` ,2 7/ (Initial & date /time) 71 25.1620190 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $149,100 II Todd M Lantto 981 Lake Lucy Road I Chanhassen MN 55317 Inspected property, updated field data, recalculated value, reviewed owner's private appraisal on 04/27/92. Reduction of building value of $10,100 indicated. I RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $10,100 to $139,000. NOTE: owner acknowledged value reduction • ' ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD:_ ap as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 1 April 15, 1992 Mr. Steve Just Carver County Board of Review 600 East 4th Street Box 10 Chaska, Minnesota 55318 RE: 981 Lake Lucy Road Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Parcel # R 25.1620190 Dear Mr. Just: I am writing to you regarding the assessed value of the above- referenced property. According to your Notice of Assessement, this property was valued at $149,100.00. Attached you will find an appraisal by Huntington Cook Appraisal Services. This appraisal has been verified by Goldstar Mortgage Corporation of Chanhassen. Through their review of my drawings and walk - throughs during construction and final completion, they have assessed the value of this property at $139,000.00. The following is a list of features pertaining to the property: 12 story capecod No deck 1 1700 square feet No fireplace Two bedrooms No air conditioning Two bathrooms No trees, sod, shrubs or retaining walls Attached garage No patio Attic storage No fencing Den and sewing room Unfinished basement I believe the Huntington Cook appraisal is more representative of the actual market value of the property. If you require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me(home: 470 -4347 or work: 448 - 9393). , Sincerely, Todd •M. Lantto 1 • � ' Huntington Cook Appraisal Services Conventional - Relocation - Equity Appraisals 1 1 • 1 6 -20 -91 ' Roxanne Goldstar Mortgage Corporation P.O.Box 626 80 W.78th St. • Chanhassen, MN 55317 ' File Number: 91A179 1 In accordance with your request, I have personally inspected and appraised the real property at: 981 Lake Lucy road Chanhassen, MN. 55317 1 The purpose of the appraisal was to estimate the market value of the property, as improved, in fee simple, unencumbered by liens. A legal description of the property will be found herein. ' In my opinion, the estimated market value of the property, as of May 31, 1991 is: One Hundred Thirty Nine Thousand Dollars ($139,000) The attached report contains the description, analysis and supportive data for the conclusions and final estimate of value together with descriptive photographs. 1 Sincerel , Joseph R.H. Cook, IFA 1 JRC/kl 1 1 1 17309 Hutchins Drive, Minnetonka, M14 55317 (612) 470 -1505, Fax (612) 470.1335 ON • EN ' MI NS MI NS M .- - -n !- MI = NM MI MI NM • /00000000000C o c"2 m N cm m < . c N L m a, u ° > I-- .11_1L� 111 0 7 W c W t-mro1 u00I0 v= ° . m c € © © © ©'' ©', ©' ©' ©' © ©' ©[ v °: i w ` m v o olo lol I °o .%i : ■ / © © ■' © © ©i ©/ itl 1 0 1. �' ++ C 1tl 1. X N U U U U .-1 t -. 3 r _Q �' ° � o n "` ` c °° 0 7 c w 3 o © © / /' ©' ■ ■ ■ ■© %M •-4 aci o+ c "• 1 '" u K N N % c. v c .� m v, : 8 �` v `° - > % > O Z O ,� % % c m 7 1. m * 0 c . ? U 3 ._ z< ur1 N 1i O ^1 O O L O w '.+ % W •.•� O OC % L N E U m U U r• 1 w e C' ° .z o U .,-w i Cg W 3 ••. m m ,-. l0 7 • -. m m 5 $ L. m -4 i w „, c yq $ X .$ C a oac. ac c++ ttm v o 2 •.=.1 . � +,0 c al ; u al al • •i . o J o Q w 2 r E o o ---,a() V)FH Qz!+.m y C .,.. m 1. N in 4 c U 8 1 2 g �+ a L T co a ¢ ' u c 8 o. o. r.0-21-.0===. F ' 2 A •. L rw ...... C. 4-3 Z` t� o C b b 2� Yi S N W a w > w o = a. w o u Q 3 1� N N . A u` %. O 2 N 11 c0 (.44 c% m c p S. Z` �i' < 'u •- c x c c s4 "1 O .oassag.B w Ea w. 7� ov mire n , ° r' 3 3:=� S a o , 0/ -4.,.. .J of o s mar. A o c u • L ' o° o E o w a w 00= a " 4. 0 ' c E 11 q e o E s •L E E N C L ° m p c v r rd Z' 2 0 o [� f m -'+ t�' s T IZ g w° 0 = v am w o o.1 < r 'l ,p,2 CL •.+ O e CC < i o . r i '� 3 3 b _ L m w o w w Q n 15 . w w o e w l o. - c a b v o N 'O N c 0 > •. aS m m 3 o U v C o • w u • w i F F C . w o < m w N c w , > .- r > $ o, Y 5 e a u u % U Z w E p C-. Y a e . Z C °. Z m g ° E c>.. Z m d = o c $ r a E _SEX E > c o • W 'w zwU p <cc•Ca. °a[7 < % L . •p ■ .3 o > 3o <. w a. 0 0 <x53 .8 w m 5 ° ° ° o ° m 7 ¢ p G m Sc-.. m V) U t U S .3 iZ U< .i, . i. ° % cc .1 c.- m s gg. e ag e w N 00•-• %% .. ro .0-0.0 ai g N 000MA■■■ ©'©["'g c c a O M M t 2 .8 < aJ 1.. °> O O O O o ` . N E W e m Omits $ 'w °a $ N w °4. a 3 � . m i w.... n z. ,.. c c c 1X _ v .n m 1r. £ w w C N C 7 J L C Y p� .. m 5 w` L 7 7 . 3 m co0cac a g$ ou�.- JCg��- �Y'2NU� v ° . W �t6 !? .. mK.X m m m r u{ w ,4 O 4 O. .o at°=I JJLag N8a6 V OO - 41‘e I :CBE: r zzO -m zzz 0 e = a m U m ^ Y Y�I o 0 a a, G y 'MM. N O O m w •- o c w c d �' a E. < 1 r n O o. 1� S • i� E S 2 -° L Q E m O M w W m me m j v ; • � ° E 4 . �' S ' d / ©' ©' © . © ■■ ■ ©■ L m • N v 14 Z w� 41 O 111 w �- ti L -. +Ka 0 ° � H W � o , n 4 ' E i M W w ?w+ $ o o° E S� ° m m 7 � gg a Y W w W i h •� O ++ > ~ . W X h m _ O g °u o 10 W.� e w F7 1 o e t m t t 3 a U m m '" co . 7 f- c 222 E w u v w m -.-,x, L t _ a .] $ W ry� G C% C w T O c �Z�'a�S Bu'C� =< w + C 3 N u C C c c c� $ 8 , , m E x 7 10 2O m V.No.o, l.. • a3 O L Gm N .,6i O O m 0 U L m 1. 8 .. _ X , - ' m a % m -. % x � 68g>.>! g m u z >.. z u c t1 a G .- m% 0 m . X W - w gil R. 0 04) � m, , O C u a S r % 00 00 ° ' c ©/■ ',CO c g ¢m 00 00 •. -+.S w,. Allg R.0 O � OV. Gc - . y ++,.. ..1 y b . 'Y i e x E 4 .UUV zz N % [. c „,..4...0 .. - , w . X 0 0 4, - • w - �£ �. e u u U w Y w° N 2 =° 3 z� 8 1 3 ° c W m L 3 ,u . l0 l0 G N U 3 F w 6 v "o c u U N ° w m ■ Cv.Y O. i V % E m en N 0 CO N 1 € 6 ZO ° : ° g ' W GO +. a u 6 C u� °3 o$S c u�9 -.0 W $ .� i c � � � � 2 � S. Ec.mc k 0 =..=.'' t � e, xs-wo.c , ciotg ° «8m'% % 4 2 E.0 A. 011 w - :00 . Z . „ 2Q w . (. % 6 -1 % Y u ¢ i ° c = o ' _ $ q o • w ° x UUC�C7UC7 X 4) + SUU T.� ° ~� L 7a'a1,7 i5 �'� 8 0 [. % ... m c " u 8 S °3 .C, \ \ \ \ \\ ■ 'O 2 > 4 O W 83 ,..,•, up3 f a c m . - Ea. i u�a1� c93NN 0 L m m m U o y n +`-- + �n..�.,L 5$ 7 = r° loom - `= 4 . . o ~ ,�'0 0 c g m m w o m G A m O 'O $ O t c��1� a 5 R � 7 cm U. . o i V1 m O 3 .-1 N . 19 ...a w . J • W 0,1‘3 1�I PTO O r4. . Z NO g ~ x e �N tFFL 7 % - G i' 9 ° . N . 0 111°20 O � II $$ .-.O . M - • w w p .fU % w o 'l7 n 4.4= C m m U G •-1 C U U 7 C�'f U C u ,,VN O p ra, Vl-� •° u m•- % $ ., cp ym . EN 0 .mu m C 0'0 a• •p . „ C x C m O m 0 ° . >• i 3 LY E E 1a. . m 7 a o m c it % F.0 gal, ..0 p� ttyy S E E * ■- t a E. >sY Y m .. m , q1 Fy .. % , 3 y1 c e..- ° Um � .�--o g7 m'O O 3i- ° q. U 3 > o°a , O �OVVO C NO w % s W < C u N v. a V O K Z o G .Y•. -� a . - b L 3 w N < o $ � w z D O v' 1. a m c H . l A 8 O z t x m S q/5.Xfgf,V8""ii � .- 1 E 'FS 3 4, 0 g w U m L. .3 3 Z . q< � y e D c .. < + 4 � g u C7 •- ' m' a, •.• , m p X t ° w g $ e 0 1U O !!�a a .-1 > e< c = rz = S E I g w a 8 ;$ w U g 1 .-N < e .� w h 3 o a y Y C g G .-i w o Q ¢ $ c 3 0 o O .i m • � C7 a • w • .. 'c o z -c a. ' x a$ w g �.•• P Y w w * V . 5 a q U °c ._ E '�' C W O h J d J G. V o. in N U > L IO -O d N N S W O ; h N U CJ N .T O W d < W m J .•J LL N$ 3 H m ID O 4 U z° U m ; 0440 ›. 103rens OoOHyooH`JI3N 311s 1 S1N3013AOtldWI 1Sr7HOON .. • 3 • a • • • -o 01•-t I- 0 1 .0 00 0(( 00 0 0 0 - 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 00 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 00 1 0 0 0 0 N O OM (`P)00 - _ 0 00 0 0000 0 0 0 O 0 o 0 00 00 00 O 0 O O O 0 0 o 0 o 0 \ 0 % N OZ o 7 L � O £ o P') a) .- .- N .0 0) - N Z C•) t- ' C) . a = .- . - N 0 OT co 1 -0 O O p T a 0 0 1') 1") e, 4) a 1 + 1+ + 1 1 1 1 7 M 3> 0 fh IL 1 a g o = .4 . > -- 2 ❑ • .5 zi 1 - .- W M Ill a a0 • a o ¢ w m V • N $ .-I W .•. C • % » N .. ° _ - 6 m > '" • « « «S,« » < 0)C Z a o 0 00 � 3N y1s. -I • O 0 « « 41))4 i:4; O O o s=o °i = a. 77 N • - O 0 0 • on' 1 1 0 • f0 x • 3% 0 a s ❑ a •^• % ! C•• 0 (0 L x 41f� .-1 Q • 1- U 01 .- r 0 00 0 o W 01 % 3c ov % m Q JJ +� m 0 0 \U % E U1 4) v0 3 a \ 6., M .-1 _ _ ._ 0 % 0 x U c e •0 \ L. S - 1,. c0 Q 0 41 .0 0) .-1 Z 01 .0 - 0 0 O a • M z =; L •-1 W 4) •-• -. 41 >. 01 •- V) 0 as 0.- 0 d .0 L .r. a •• L(0 1.r. 1.r. m �1 (7 ._ o c > 0 '0 o a V 0 _ ti 1 L. \ 4.• 41 M y I0 I5 = V Y < 3 .E - (0 ° C O. 01 0 0 0 0 T. 0= 0 0 0) Q O • 1%1 )4 1,. o ■ -• 5c +� m o. ,, o 7 _ d - 0 cc 7LN 0 1 0 0 0 10 _3 .°. .0 1> I+. OD (0 1 v y 0) ; 2 - o n Z N N U « A, O 00 S S a O.0.- w 0 0- U 3 N_ U 1-- U co o Q U N J U N N> _ , O g 4. 0+ 0 C 0 • 'S o< j. ? o - I 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 010 1 0 0 d o<5 •. % IA LL LL H LL c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 % 1- O * - A- o . %] i a_ 0 1 1 1 1 I 1 0 1 1 111 I 1 1 0 1 11) 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 O . 10 0 1 - - • - - '-= ° C M 3 >w 3 € O N a 0 = O .0 ; LL K O c ,.• = 0 E C c_ _� .• Ul „ + N 1 1 N (') .- co O O ro 8 ; _> o o m o o Z U z= O� E e B 'E m 2. c a O 1-) •.- Y I .,_ w n N ca ..0 ' .c • cc .E. V) w .. U $ - c >• - m a L N 6 .-1 X •O � 1,w M .. xo•O • 0 .1 w r v - O Y 3 • = > 3 w 2 (0 • O Z% S O � l+. % 0) 3 e • .ti co ° u ._ J= 0. g C > 4 H d c C o _ < •-I C 3 N O c O m ° n b .•4 U a al 0) % ..r f:, Q c 0 0. w '� 0 5 i ° 0 3 0 a •4 0) • Ol 17.-20103 U 0 0 0 0 .•-1 x \ 6 .-I C c o •-• c 5 o . 8 Q W 4. o w a 2 w u Z. - 0 .3 % ',1,, M >, ( 3 L 0 .-I • • % L O 0) = ' w ° H < c • 7:11m = -u • ° a < 2 o c .'. U 0 40 ) % % .0 4-) 4-) C- >. % c N 4. n U 3 % % ` Q c \ 3 e 01 U L 3 1 w y -: 1 O +_ w Ma 2 E - w 0 - V) x U C C +• L a .V) Q o 0) >•N Z '- = 1 11 c. Q 'E '- E 3 Y '_! o. 1 •: 0 E y a e ° e w L .4 W M\ > O V) CO o N 0 (. U +• .O 1. In .4 e o .4 M Y 4, 8 Y Cr7W� %W .44.274 .388a J0. OZ3 _ C.O °> .O >,0 L \ +.+ x M • I uLL 10 %C c 4 r. L' • . m o 10 a 0.. (7) •O o 0 1n o >. 0 .0 0 0 4 a0 0 14 16.00 ) > O y O. o - -- M1 .0 N 0 1 0 0 • 0 10 .e. Ul 1> 1.. 0) 0 ) D o L (0 g M - u% o - 4 • c -- •O U.- "•- U o 7 U U •- U ( .-02)N0 N .- (n CV - 0) U 5 Q Y $ -- 0 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 ° a a• 4. W • 3 C o J 3 � •O ❑ e?°5 0 000000000 0000000000000 0 O v >(... v ~ ¢ '+ y 1 . _ s 0, 111111 O N 1 1 1 1 in 1 1 1 1 0 0 () .0 n 0 •.. 0 - • W 5 . o. Q b 4 0 w i c t" 7 1 ('4 .- N N� • N N c 5 •-•• 0 0 C i. c a ) Y • - e -° .- fc) « + 1 + 1 1 1 M a 1 N +' f %fOp H p ¢ , ° I: Q t . : '"- ° m .-1 w 8 .•1 '0 5 U . 1 4... C i « .. y g em a % a we • 3 v 9 i$ (1) 0 0 ;Cie; .1 M Cb S 0 N g I+. q 41 • O 5 3 % 01 .-4 •.-1 L w 5 ��¢¢ 0 - i; w. < M C 7 g C 0 0) b .1 U C ` 9 . - 1 co Of U, m y cc e $ d 9 : -. - e a. ' N U) 1.1 • •= ., 00 U I-- 0 or4 O 4) •f1 .-1 x 'O S 1 T 1 > > 0 . Le 8 5 _ v . o o i -- ■ 88. ( 0 ga \ > , % Cf . 0 03 0 c 0 3 d •O <I CY % 0 0 O L. ` • ' v i� +_ 1�, c 0 % - a % . UCe\ + L .V) 03Z 0 0).1 Q O y . W 4• n v' 3 00-.0 V) % .- (n0 %Z 4. .O L K ▪ g 0)Z e 5 € O e c O Y > 22 4-1 ' . a .1 > O 0) •O •O •0 > •0 I- •1 L. \ 1 4-1 0 M 0) a •O d 2 ..•) L % Q . u- c 2' F. 3 0 Ntom C0. 1 001110 >,O 3 0 0 > ¢ a0 0 >K t..0 -- 4/ < g g 04� c Y • u . � % C7 L O N O O O I O C O I> t+. 0 1 L O_ Y • 0 E E Y � LL < 0 a 1 - s0 U In w U O.- U U •- U f 1 U .0 0 U M 9S N > 0 z•t u % • e 1 & Z 0 -• v 0 O w 0 N - CO O‘..-.0E , C • .= <I .-I0 • < - 7 N a O u ' w y1 4-• % e 01 •.. .-1 U c f0 u :• Z - - Z. -)C T111eZ 0 a o°, p .1 ¢ ) • - � 01L H C w< 21 c= f 2 > • -_ • - .-- 0) 0 U N Q 0) • .• p❑ .+ 0) x . L . U 0) % .0 N M a \ I') l` - 0 3 0! .0 10 01 fK .J 0) g g 0 • J N w -- W x %% a0 Y >. % .0 0) c Omm S Uy _ '• E N • 'e \ " ') -. 0 1 g�• m i '¢ .� _ . H _ C ...1 L� 0) N F. V) % .- V) 0 07 Z. 4-1 .0 N < w l 0 L O � ~ > - • `�f " - . ( r - •0 •0 •0 0 •O f� 1 L. \ Y 01 0 0) l %� 0) IQ 5 o : o. L• (' w a 6 M e 1 O O O O aD0 >0. % O x O O ❑ 1 0 > c • a n ..e ,M 0 g _ 0)U «NH tnUU�UOU 0.000N2' N Z % S M .000.. < a q li 7.S1 10 E It ri U O u. o = - v < e 3 2 2 • '� y c y o. '• J 1 N f0 a w .. ' 1p ^7 < y � �'' a - - 2 . ). .- '0 Q $ C a 0 /. 2= 3 c <<- 5 U a >1•.".0 w 5 0 I I • a Y 4J o4'.i IL: N J g w o _ <m o iag 8 ' >> g O): .-10) . e r/ U C g a • Y w q e o • f) 2 ...e 6 0 o e' E -.0. 5 3 g o '� . 7 - .1 Y w •°. 2 C71 C7 'J x Ell '.. a= e 1 2 < w h c 3 o c e§ T -' 3 a s d t" • d E °>- F S] OS 'O ° 5 Y , ,;,-.,,r z �"' ° • ' i 0 e o 5 • f \ 7 . o n W •• o c 2 ° O U 7 g ( � o ~o \ w Y a F'' ° . d L• g o 0 3�j L% a E ll W u i -= O a= _ x w Y .� $ ' . s \ .. Y I U c t E n E E a 2 4] < 3 o u w _ % 0 Y (� , y S - 1 Y y < N U Y Y V Z = t. -. O < 1 N a > J ( < g (g C7 m a` S O a tP W {L O Z C O O N M Jr. L •- t o ^� # a E. - }0VO0ddV 1SOO aM�;I811ii1A3 xE I t . , .J .f• • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • - - - - �� - :D (iD 2. .3 �, • #21___ (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: W j- CY"A e b...Y\OL Address: U v l t._) erlf Cat F t ca � � = , t) , : ( City: r ; ,mo t .. :. Zip: 55 • 1 Home Phone: ~ i 3L/ -- Sl Ct k Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: a S . 3u c 0e.1 A d a S - , e ion i „If ) • I I I want property reviewed because: 1 1 Data reviewed by Assessor: / V0 / 3 N° (Initial & date /time) 1 • 72 25.3890010 & 25.3890020 Res Hstd 1992 EMV (0010) $131,800 & (0020) $24,500 Wyck & Lorali Linder 7550 Great Plains Blvd Chanhassen MN 55317 (0010) reviewed 1985 $115,000 sale, current sales data, field data, recalculated value, reduction of the building value $12,800 is indicated. (0020) a recommendation of no change to the estimated market value of $24,500. RECOMMENDATION: reduce (0010) $12,800 to $119,000; (0020) no change. !1 \V1L. i Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended . Adjusted as Noted 1 1 1 . 1 ENT BY ;A M S ; 4 -21 -92 ; 9 :26AM ; FACILITIES 6123681537;# 2/ 3 April 20, 1992 Mr. Steve Just Taxation Board of Review Carver County 600 East 4th Street Box 10 Chaska, MN 55318 Mr. Just: ' Last evening Lori attended the city council meeting in Chanhassen and turned in the attached letter. We have since discovered some errors in our math. We have included some additional information as well. On Parcel #25.38900010, the value went up 32% from 1991 to 1992. Taxes 1 increased on that property by 77 %!I On Parcel #25.38900020, the value went up 100% from 1991 to 1992. Taxes 1 increased on that property by a whopping 165% We have made no improvements to either piece of property since we moved to Chanhassen in 1985. We have never had an assessor review our property. Based on property values of neighboring homes of equivalent size, age, and land size we feel that the home-is overvalued. Neighbors with a home newer than ours, although a little 1 smaller, but with more land, have a valuation of $108,000. Homes on Great Plains Blvd. which are approximately the same age and size, have sold for approximately $103,000. The second parcel of property is a vacant lot next to our home which we own. A 30' x 50' piece of that property was permanently deeded to the city for a sewer lift station by a former owner of our home. We believe the city has overbuilt on that piece of property. We are currently reviewing this situation with the city engineering department. ' Please review our tax situation based on this revised information and let us know of your findings. Sincerely, 1 Wyck Linder and Lorali Linder ' 7550 Great Plains Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 934 -8988 1 SENT BY :A M S ; 4 -21 -92 ; 9:27AM ; FACILITIES 6123681537;# 3/ 3 II 1 1 April 20, 1992 1 1 Mr. Steve Just Taxation Board of Review Carver County 600 East 4th Street Box 10 Chaska, MN 55318 Mr. just: 1 Will you please re- exam'ne the ' • icu' ous t- assessments on the parcels listed below: 1 • On Parcel # - ,3890 ( the ncrease is a whopping 177.5 %11 • On Parcel #2 3890 120, the increase is an even greater 265 %!! We believe the assessed valu- • ' $131,800 for parcel 25.3890010 is not realistic. We base 1 this on a comparison with the homes in the near vicinity. Also, when you consider all of the new construction in Chanhassen, it is hard to believe anyone would pay $131,800 for a forty year old home. 1 We respectfully request that you spend some time re- examining the assessments in order to determine a more realistic valuation. 1 Thank you in advance for your help with this matter. Sincerely, 1 Wyck R. Linder and Lorali G. Linder 7550 Great Plains Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 934 -8988 1 1 1 1 - • • # 7 (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 1 Name: /V& Address: >?0,3 . y. 1 City: Home Phone: 9 1 4-- 6 / Work Phone: • Parcel I.D. Number: N 1/a) q0 • I I want property reviewed because: 1 • • 1 ; • II Data reviewed by Assessor: 4 / (Initial & date/time) • .73 25.1820340 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $91,200 ane H Loos 8030 Erie Avenue • hanhassen MN 55317 ▪ Inspected property, reviewed sales studies, updated field data, • recalculated value on 04/27/92. rECOMMENDATION: no change. OTE: • 11 • Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended . Adjusted as Noted • • • • 1 1 r 1 1 1 17 APRIL 1992 CARVER COUNTY 1 600 EAST 4TH. STREEET BOX 10 1 CHASKA, MN. 55313 Dear Sir or Madame 1 This notice is to inform you that Iam appealing your decision to ' increase my property tax value. Your evaluation of my property value is greatly inflated. My estimation is due to the fact that I recently attempted to sell my property at 1 apraximately the value you state. I was unsuccessful. I am considering too, again, put my home on the market because of the continual escalation with local taxes and declining city service_.. 1 futher•more, I feel you should consider the financial and economic status of these home owner=_., 1 i ke me, whose property tax burden your d i c i •_•ion w i l l now =.ubstanual l y increases u n f a i r l y . Iam of re t_ i er•ment age and a widow. Iam on a very limited and soon to be fixed income. Ta continue to increase my property tax along w i th the escol at i ng cost of u t i l i t i e s , unpr•oport i omal to other areas in Minnesota, will cause me an undue 1 1 hardship. Thank you in advance, for your r•econs.i dent i or of this matter. 1 Sincere -ley , ( 1 i JANE H. LOOS 1 8030 ERIE AVENUE CHANHASSEN , MN. 55317 (612) 934 -6521 1 1 1 1 1 . # 75 (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 1 Name: (4 EC 4 A -4 - R S F 1) <<‘,/ LA C) Address: F5.20 (Y I City: 0) tx ' H /114U zi : SY / Home Phone: c/-341 '757 Work Phone: 3.37 -6 q� 111 Parcel I.D. Number: SEA f - r 2 7- _ t ALA ,✓ Q v 3 . =< I I want property reviewed because: 1 ' i=ok WE &L= 62 - 7 - Es raoic_ 1�� j 1 3 5B /J kl / - 1 1 Data reviewed by Assessor: �& /_ y'- 2 z j (Initial & date /time) 75 25.0134810 Vac Land 1992 EMV $199,200 II Gerald & RoseMary Luebke 8526 Great Plains Blvd I Chanhassen MN 55317 Owner is concerned about the taxes on the parcel. Explanation that 1991 taxes had been based on a parcel that included a homestead credit and I was also at a plat value. 1992 taxes were based on a vacant land rate and market value for the vacant lot. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV N TE: II Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended 1 Adjusted as Noted • 1 1 i ' • # / /4/ (Office Use Only) I - APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: . OitgeeY -./ 1 Address: lid / -� 7 Came- , 1w. 6" City: 1, , . –. 1 c_ & J ' u a.; / , . Zip: - , " I Home Phone: 3 e-' n 9 Work Phone: 7,N2 U - ' ' / / Parcel I.D. Number: ; *,t ,, 3 V ,b oo. / -2-- ?# _S7 T ,r- h (// jx, 1 1 I want property reviewed because: Du) ) .-atf a 2 ` / .�, �' --d -d /-s1•(. r - 7,-•• 1 / ' rK t� -c Q 4 � "- ii/t 1 Cf ! .?. -ezZ4- , W .ce' i i4 �c 5 boo •� /1�c1. 3 ° �i .�� c ��'a�� y 0-2 i2dI .&7 t4d / IL fii ,C•tLfLl.� Ozt'l .44-c�-u� . �.Z :�2 �'.�:�,� V .l!c�'� .z�- �,.:tE >,�pt _ ,�L'� - � 1OA- /I GG2 k)4A ' •ice ' G "tGGh� 4k/.(-1 l f � G�'1.�y ' 4t /0 i z� ' `��? '�/ , 0 //1 ' 4CV' L� . , / , /10 de- 44 ,1 ,to_ki .c,-e .to-e ,,,,,,,a,aqs,, 4,..2. /7_6,e,-, , 17).adi,2_,,p-ari , . /(,) ‘, _ „(...4...' c- - ..,dcp •? , I # .66 e c 6 , .UrLtZ,:_e_ L '_ _IAA. Ai^tt-e t 4//t��r6,_, �, 9 �6. /`z.X• Q %a � 1 U 3, /.�, /L _o_ ati.5r�sio,6r j . .3, 5 Data reviewed by Assessor: .14 / 3 4 ( / /0 % (Initial & date /time) 1 ;76 25.3250010 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $169,300 Richard & Diane Maloney II ;1315 Bluff Creek Drive 1 Chaska MN 55318 Internal instpection done on 05/04/92. Basement finished was fair and some work unfinished in other parts of the home. Recommendation of reducing building value from $117,300 to $93,200. II RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $24,100 to $145,200 • NOTE: II Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted 1 • . 1 1 # '7 7 (Office Use Only) • APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: l ee. # /'1 Address: i // I • City: • t s s o r. Zip / Home Phone: - S Work Phone: 9 3 SI- 5? S/ Parcel I.D. Number: 79 /i?S ?J - I I want property reviewed because: ' \-2 — ..0 . ;1_6 „/ 1 • ! i �O _• Data reviewed by Assessor: - / 9 2 7 / y (Initial & date /time) 77 25.7900160 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $89,800 I Betty Manteuffel 7611 Kiowa Avenue I Chanhassen MN 55317 Reviewed interior of home. - Recalculated based on additional depreciation to home. Home is in fair condition but has a wet basement. I Recommendation of reducing building value from $68,800 to $49,400. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $19,400 to $70,400 . NOTE: . I Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended ' Adjusted as Noted • G I _ • -' - • • # 7 S (Office Use Only) -- -- -- 1 - APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 1 Name: /t - 5 �- / .,� s / I 1 Address: El-- 3/ 7`:- -� l_` .7 0 4, f, 1 City: G�,' `i,�ss �,� Zip: - ' 1 • i Home Phone: 6L7, -527 Work Phone: 93_2-1/-1/7 Parcel I.D. Number: , :;z -5 " s-.0 Fn/. -7,, ' . i I want property reviewed because: / .5.i 1 eG!<.-r ' to < ,7 ,&7' / e • 4- / 7.€- ne'G,srrc" -z •S - tf5 . f . � f , /j t i3e % v "1 ;1r�-"e ,,' , ,3/7/ // -� } �, t ' 9/ % � 7" ) 13i/ 7:41 ��-� �- 2 / '- -/ -' 1 1 i r<j/ ' ?vif -i 3"_? -- o ve A 'a 5i tsf'irte - o -c / /, 52 �h e`,�' (./.• � ' ' -/�i9� �ss�ss�, si r f ,,i i-e rse /& 3e'0 fl ,00 ., e l 4S ?es5m 7' Z4 /oo Ncw b4 D' "v.' # e„.„, y- ., 00a Mew 4 , 34 c, ; ' /Ve.°W A4se S"41 /v a 1 god Data reviewed by Assessor: Ai / y* 1 y� (Initial & date /time) 78 25.8580130 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $262,400 Thomas L Marsh 1 1 430 Trap Line Lane I 1 Chanhassen MN 55317 Reviewed sales in area and recalculation in CAMA making a reduction in 1 basement area finished. A recommendation of reducing building value .from $217,400 to $191,500. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $25,900 to $236,500 ! 1 - NOTE: 1 Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted A • i i1 1 1 • # 7 9 (Office Use Only) 1 APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 1 Name: ■Z Cho d iA..J Address: /A. ' i( City: 'L1 .1A/iA s� .' Zip: 3",3 , ' ' Home Phone: 935/..5/31 Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: /?,_2,1;:2,3 • I want property reviewed because: e) rA/se/ /% „ / fr2ss e / ) ydfal- y 7,e3 cue4-- /A 5 7 7 �F /. s 4'4 / o y s�i e'J 7`a Zec s t e r62� c • 1, Data reviewed by Assessor: is Y / �- � 9 f /� /R (Initial & date/time) 79 25.2300040 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $296,500 II Elwood W McCary 108 Sandy Hook • I Chanhassen MN 55317 Reviewed the interior of property and reviewed sales in area. Recalculated in CAMA. Based on the interior inspection a recommendation of reducing building value from $171,500 to $123,400. I RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $48,100 to $248,400 • NOTE: • Action Taken by Board: y Approved as Recommended . Adjusted as Noted • • 1 1 # g (Office Use Only) I APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 /n C /h y � � J_/ �o� L • /q. $i C E 11..�� L - Name: ! 1 i Address: 9 1/6 a el N ti‘.- 9SS`v ,',f 1 . City: ("' -r M s Zip: 553' '7 i' Home Phone: '/ 3 y — '%53.3 Work Phone: 4' 96 - /,g /,g,„,1..,..5— Parcel I.D. Number: P a.S. 8 OOO9 0 0 1 I want property reviewed because: • �J \ / / fi SSG. GE Vv-Z-4 ce .�.5 �j i �Gf r` ;$ 6k-e_ r-c/ [ �1 sl 1 la /k, i q 27 ";' .�j o,-, v4 1 et) =X 4-Ps 4 7 -ii I r //0 /, "t--v2-T e .-v` 5 ' G iv ;-7 1 0 iv - - i - L L C S C t / - 1 A t,t, "`'� A 14 s A / .5 Y , i /74 J L 4 '. � f • (I'? 4 5 � » e. L xi j� c7 /.9 �S 0) 1 1 N q ` J 2 4 h7 r;L-1, � L� � 1 �..�- f ! f c Or / /'c' � ', /4 ec0 �, , ,e CS 4 T--- - L . e i .Q ..- _/4S [ r. S N L L �`. - �` e � . i 13 ! , P.l 1piAl{!,&'a es Ai S. & -A-,/' oi . . Data reviewed by Assessor: / 'V3 / 023 i (Initial & date /time) ; 1 80 25.8400040 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $175,300 Timothy & Diane McHugh I ' 7450 Chanhassen Road Chanhassen MN 55317 I Reviewed parcel and sales in area. Updated information in CAMA. Recommend reduction of building from $111,300 to $104,000. j RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $7,300 to $168,000 1 NOTE: 1 / Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • 1 • . I i 1 • 1 II April 20, 1992 II Board of Review Carver County II 600 East 4th Street II Chaska, MN 55318 1 11 To Whom It May Concern: II We recently received notice that the property value for our Lotus Lake residence (Parcel # R 25.8400120 lot 14 of Sunset View, Chanhassen) for tax purposes, has been raised from $ 101,300 to $ 146,000 or an increase of 44 %. If that change in value represents an I increase of 44% in property taxes, that is a terrible increase and absolutely uncalled for. This property value increase for our property does not take into account that the city of Chanhassen has built directly adjacent to this property, a public boat launch and park that is uncontrolled and active most of the year. During the summer months, the boat I access is active from 5:30 A.M. Usually until past 11:00 P.M. each day and longer on ,Fridays and Saturdays. There is constant noise. We are often awakened by partiers, high speed outboard motor boats and fisherman. During the Winter months we are often awakened by ice fisherman with their trucks, especially on weekends. The city of Chanhassen promised to regulate the access hours and police its use. They have not. y "When we moved to Chanhassen and purchased the property that we did, it was because of the peace and quiet we were looking for. Since the public park and boat access have been active there has been a constant parade of people, dogs, boats and ice fisherman. There is no peace and quiet ever. II The public park, boat access and large drainage ditch and holding pond next to my property - are unsightly and unhealthy and drain directly to our beach. We are now fearful to swim in what appears to be filthy water. ' Now, because the City of Chanhassen has been inattentive to all the warnings of Eurasian Milfoil, Lotus lake is now infested with the greatest threat to all Minnesota Lakes. • # I (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: ,Sh a �� , _N . Su. �/ 772c Ajz_L L. 1 Address: 73'2/ Jte- r� Cctic.� City: ( Zip: 55 -1 1 Home Phone: 4 1' 26 -/G,.?? Work Phone: (1..94/-4/.?6. Parcel I.D. Number: td, -r kr if tw it ; a5 . 6 ) S - 0 S I want property reviewed because: e' 61.-L h ektat to GL� /'mac GLo c/ Cj a f d..0 cf f�L -2- �l2rcr� 4�c Lf �c h014.,4.4 1:7-1 £/Z/ /Zc.c 9h be -7 heed, Uxr 11.t 1, C/%L2n h G(J/ - .L.7 -1 n b 47 -4 2 rLt • j/ZCA.Z a/Li h (JG(/a el? �ltAY� de4,4,0 ejLa_ A./Le Gi-p_i Cl �G� - - -'re -� A ! 0 = 1 G4 Ab , 14( f A-1 -k/�.D (-07-5 ?v�/ 6;�'FM —ki4i m' bl ?L21 tos, G r i �� ;f�� '-' - C U- 1:.�, G� T 71��G' CXGitiS!v c.t! 138•rrE -e 1! rn,'s v 4 rit€ C'qe 40�.4-�pivT c u•� Lc/ e tTh,f.T1 Vf iegl <<? Data reviewed by Assessor: CT L- / , Zz / /( 3<" (Initial & date /time) ' 81 25.7550590 Res Hstd EMV / 4103,800 Shawn McNeill 7321 Trotters Circle Chanhassen MN 55317 Reviewed neighboring properties with Mrs. McNeill. Reviewed subdivision values and neighboring properties. This property is in line with neighboring properties. The McNeill's purchased this property in 1/90 for $105,000. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted 1 • • . April 20, 1992 1 ' uncontrolled public access The directly adjacent to our property, causing constant noise an n ui s an ce , an the inf of Euras M i l foil ha ve an will ha ve a direct n impact on our property value. It is not right that the City of Chanhassen which has I allowed the uncontrolled activities of the Public Access and allowed Lotus Lake to become infested with Milfoil and drainage from all the development of recent years, stand aside and allow the County to raise the value of our property when the value of our property will be dramatically and negatively affected by what the city has done with the public I access, drainage ditch and what it has not done to protect Lotus lake from Eurasian Milfoil. After the Public Access was constructed, the Carver County Tax Assessor agreed that the Public Access would have a negative impact on our property value and agreed to take these factors into account when establishing the value of our property. It now appears that with I the dramatic increase in property value that the county has chosen to ignore these factors and the new factor of Eurasian Milfoil. You must take these factors into account before establishing new tax criteria for our I property. Sin rely, 4/Low ohm E. Melb Y 40 Hill Street' Chanhassen, MN 55317 612- 934 -7247 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (office use only) • APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME /� . 1 D/ n ' fYJ c II3 y PHONE � ADDRESS 1 � /i7 ii i S'{-fe -Qf Twn /City CA lo-elll SS -P" PARCEL ID/ 0 0,0 (7 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: I (2o6cerned & vL& ir►1 oh Lewd. C II A '4 (. 2 fr ,i -� ' �r c � iy., I I i DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: SJ / `/ %/y "P & date /time) 1 82 25.8400120 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $146,000 John E. Melby 40 Hill Street Chanhassen MN 55317 I Recalculation in CAMA considering .impact of location on parcel. Recommend reduction to land value from $56,900 to $45,500 and building value from $89,100 to $87,100. - RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $13,400 to $132,600 NOTE: i I ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: I I 1 # 0-S (office u ,e only) Thera. TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME 1/. ovgas T era. PHONE //7V- ADDRESS 30-o/ Dmr +rhot•,'1 Twn /City ( PARCEL ID# 2 . /9'o 0/30 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: IF 1 s 1 1 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: 4Y, / / . J/ yP{ (Initial & date /time ) 83 25.1400130 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $288,300 1 Thomas Merz 3201 Dartmouth Drive 1 Excelsior MN 55331 Reviewed sales in area and recalculation in CAMA. Recommendation of reduction to building from $188,300 to $162,000. II RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $26,300 to $262,000 NOTE: 1 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 1 . . . . 1 1 1 1 ' CARVER COUNTY 600 EAST - 4444 -QTR -E ET..:__- _.....1 C'" ! a s k BOX 10 ' v s� P, T c =- _ - CHASKA, MN ` 553'113`• t_ ;i ' - A'1-7-; 3 J - NOTE if AgF �i"39E TA 1 O R 1 2 ; PROPER - T' * E -�° --•- --- � 300 Q!tiN •"j I GREEN ACRE: B0YER'S STERLING ES PROPERTY CLASS PARCEL# R 25.1400130 1 • RES. HS TD THOMAS J MERZ 3201 DARTMOUTH DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 • You may make an appeal by attending in person, by representation or by sending a letter to the Board of R. APRIL 20, 1992 7PM CHANHASSEN CITY HALL I if you disagree with their decision, you may then appeal to the County Board of Equalization 9:30 AM JUNE 221 1992 CARVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE • Please call the County Auditor's office to set un An an.,,,.n *^ ° '' -' 1 :, t 1 1 E Crawford -Merz Construction Company 2316 Fourth Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404 Office (612) 874 -9011 FAX (612) 874 -9015 1 CAVIA)-e)-C— A i-0 fQb o •. if ai ral, E5 ocr‘e s 0574,1--/f) 1 PA-y-6 L, / f 0 51 L{ DO I W - ' 104r`l7,26oPif it r o 1 M`,' - 1 149 -p - 1- 174 `6 2O `�� 7t/ —? c ll d lC-r 1 Jac/ A- PP c( UA fei (~ 4 1 4e..e4,4 )3-eiw-eeiv m.iik■otoor.e_d) 1 i t=2 Mvse -,✓ t4A b k`i s k A-"v c J cu �A �� (A4 1 5 d �.cL A (5k �#�� , �d Pl i-e y N �{� -� �v �t G✓ or c� 1 © r 5 RD 1 t) F 11( y hit5 (5 tux.) rNs i o / Established 1886 / /AD �� GO s � � G��. " �� ' �' otyg # g L [ (Office Use Only) • APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 • Name:_id €772 / WS i til ( ii--e4 S E. n1 N) Address: "2, O G , /- ,)`2/ v F City: Zip: 3/ 7 I Home Phone: 95f y — Z z 7 Z Work Phone: .53. 3 - // 7 Parcel I.D. Number: .2 S . 7 5 / C , .1 • i) -it / `/ ; 7; I want property reviewed because: • 721,S ,441/ L • /1 / G- )7 - itrn 'r C 11,112i /7 47./%-f�' �; i:vif S 41 f % ,1-•- JZ"c • r�. / 2/ kj , 1.4.,•,4 .a 9 .tit i.:S • L.? T,-h �V i !115Lt i%' 4 ' :) .)-"1- '- 2 !' GcJ � /rte i / /•Y t•• S YET 7' E ( »-vi s 4 c• 17 A/ i G' . 7 C-1 /-� v�� ✓9 % 7�' ; . / ,tL. X4 " e' / 77/ TU,1J ,�{ C t f L 1-A ! ice l LyiL[ -/:' G' �i GVZ 11 A - - itri) 4 T S' 3 - // 7 7 . //' . 4= 5 �• T _/ ( �' �`7i! y- , � • ' - 7 Data reviewed by Assessor: A / I/ - ;r7 / / (Initial & date /time) 1 84 25.7510010 Comm 1992 EMV $1,150,000 Metro Lakes West Mini Storage Mark Senn 7800 Park Drive • Chanhassen MN 55317 Reviewed the property and also reviewed the 1992 Income Approach and Cost Approach. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV • ON TE: i Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted ' 1 1 • • `'r j c, ` # 7 (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: Address: 40 ' " /I -' . �" �� , City: Zip: 5�/ 7 Home Phone: 9.� - ,r/,�� Work Phone: % 9 /- f Parcel I.D. Number: I want property reviewed because: 3 % 1 ..z • - s • 1 I Data reviewed by Assessor: . 3 c D � / , / (Initial & date/time) 85 25.8200210 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $106,500 I Howard Meuwissen 406 Highland Drive Chanhassen MN 55317 - Recalculated in CAMA and checked sales in neighborhood. Recommendation of reducing building value from $81,500 to $76,900. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $4,600 to $101,900 NOTE: • Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended . Adjusted as Noted • 1~ 1 . # gte (Office Use Only) 111 APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: S tE.0E° T /bio 4j 1 Address: 6510 Fox ?P.m city: m ►NNG501' A Zip: SS 3/ • Home Phone: 4 -170 - 1 7 G - 7 Work Phone: Fs 'S `1- 736 3 Parcel LD, Number: R 2 S. a o02 5 I want property reviewed because: WF•4cr prob �� )r- �aSc.trcn� Z. 1'41 \ L c S 5Sn , u , c- o11,�Jaic (,1,�1, 1a.ro /(JLC,e{ar 131 «1 S • M ra( - � dcc.,\ (c- "C" Icc. � 1►•. rc_sck. of C-x O 'C F �� O n � L S 1N /b T c. / 9- C A r 92- 2- . Data reviewed by Assessor: (I (n) / -a5 / (Initial & date /time) 86 25.2700250 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $237,700 i Steven J. Midthun 6510 Fox Path Chanhassen MN 55317 Internal inspection done on 04/29/92. Reviewed comparable properties in neighborhood and made adjustment due to wet basement. - Recommendation of reducing land value fr•.om $62,600 to $56,300 and building value from $175,100 to $158,700. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $22,700 to $215,000 Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended . •• • Adjusted as Noted • • • • 1 1 i 1 # Y (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 1 Name: Z , Address: d✓s/o/ PY Lake /) I City: ( /raiV e% -r /),/!/ Zip: , - 575 - 3/7 Home Phone: 95✓9 36 Y2 Work Phone: ,P.54/-3',/,7 Parcel I.D. Number: , R Q S . 9 / 3 e 1 I want property reviewed because: of 06 AV a YaZ e eke , p/ e 0.2v; G:, yk eevir�lic: i�kie LC i ✓ 'e 2/ % ✓' 4 // �Uv ✓ <� X,eit , red V P Z o rar eile /0/ e e Y r/ e.r . / c G� /�✓/�ll:�e /Vie t � �� r lllllil �l vu./'4ksrGfJ• 1 D•/ d iz za, fL /a D � ebraril, - , , s�OvG�I�°'J ,/%7 Ovr r lu/ 41t;i/ P 6v`liGI r: }o / '1 /1�C'P�J'«� -, 71 r J h) ' / -o .'e /ea& ✓al's .� /A 4,4 L >" `t , f p r�•n�f , re, ti jJ pv e /Yrle°s4/ Std Cc�S • e � li, rub : �G /f ✓1 <r ✓. --� ` 1 i r�'.stf i.e. % 4, d -/7 r /2 ' i �f1t/7� iJGCi /C! /fic1 `lzzt'f Cz /e yl/ U rt7y /1!'N I lL< Data reviewed by Assessor: ` / ` f ' / 2 (Initial & date /time) • 87 25.4040130 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $166,100 ' Christopher J Miller 8401 West Lake Drive Chanhassen MN 55317 Explained tax process, reviewed neighbors market values and the recent sale on 06/21/91 for $177,449 on property. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE: 1 Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • 1 1 1 1 # g 5 (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: Address: -7i2.c 1 �-� - T \- c' - • City: 6n his -, Zip: C �S 5 i -7. 1 Home Phone: 9314 - - 7 Z - 5/, Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: 5 / /l , 25, O i . O I want property reviewed because: { l lS t i J 1� uti�} -{-- i - h L +- 1 Lit) �c�r Ui)`f <�+�I 1 �vcrr W C v T 0-- rL; m` 1 S 1 c Vl c Ut f 7� 0 r'_ S 1 S 4,-1_ 1 / 7 . IS no C - TZ, rCi, 1 \6 -4rig 13 (✓lo�'r� s - t o —� mow �c cAS�' oc✓ l ��-�x ; -n Y'e_z �'5 - AI; , i -- 1 � r c C.2 .S s. 1 L E„ -In- frq 1 a • ..i ' 1 Data reviewed by Assessor: / / Z (Initial & date /time) 1 88 25.0123000 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $110,700 Richard T Mingo 7601 Great Plains Blvd Chanhassen MN 55317 Recalculation in CAMA and made an adjustment on the basement finishing. Recommend reducing building value from $86,400 to $76,600. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $9,800 to $100,900. NOTE: • 1 Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended . Adjusted as Noted • ■ 1 1 • • • 1 1 s7 APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 1 Name: Florence Natoli Address: 6251 Teton Lane City: Excelsior Zip: 55331 1 Home Phone: 1 / 2 ? - Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: 25.0021900 I want property reviewed because: House was built in the 50's. Old house. Doesn't have any of the amenities of today. Just a house I with nice 5 rooms and hope to live there rest of our lives if taxes don't go up too much. Assessed increased S11,500. It's only 153% but retired people living on small amount of money. Afraid it can keep going up. Might have to find out what house is really worth and then start doing some I arguing. See if we can sell it. It's just a house. Nothing that would make it in the $200,000. category. 1' Data reviewed by Assessor: / 4 1 - c 2 7 / J c 7h (Initial & date /time) , 11 89 25.0021900 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $85,600 Frank J & F Natole 6251 Teton 1 Excelsior MN 55331 Explained property value trends in the City of Chanhassen. Mrs. Natole will call back if she gets a market analysis that comes in lower.. I RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE: I Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted # g9 (Office Use Only) 1 1 0 (office use only) APP TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME f c`" Jtl y PHONE 49 -4F'6 .e� ADDRESS ro l a;?A\( U k l _�c () F Twn /City 0 ,a 1 PARCEL ID# o2 J 73 m \'7 0 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: 1 j/ ciLe. ' i 1 ex..c-, i S \ 6- 0 .' 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: g L- / 'V -V / // (Initial & date /time ) 90 25.2730590 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $115,600 ' Thomas & Judy Newhouse 6521 Gray Fox Curve Chanhassen MN 55317 Inspected interior and analyzed neighborhood._ ' RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $3,000 to $112,600 NOTE: 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted P as / J noted: 1 # 9 / (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: //J, //o 17 - c / ,x r J O Address: f/ ('. f / e / ' 0 / e Cvur'f- City: ('212.2,, srr7 u Zip: Sz 3 Home Phone: 4/74'- ( 994 7 Work Phone: A-35 Parcel I.D. Number: v 84 L30 • I want property reviewed because: /- ° t/ /u c-a v7- /7 6Z //2 7'w years 4e5 /0/e5 e7' rea_-tor2 , Mesc ar SCFC'itiC r ear,or7s r / A devt r ,Qe• n 7 ? ! roe" 5 C fefr, , d rc ')!AI ne. ,..7 fez!! n - , /dr /7'J2.. Weir s/• /, fd.7a.(ed ,J L //4d1- Od":iv�:',e:1 • v � ✓` /° - G✓� -7�e� si7 and o/Iry /O) ya d5 Trvrc1 H', / o •;, r a .ot: 1 " /1/4/77 o wS O/ r!, �..� -��.�- aver / ,�� ✓ - tho - X;'O I ,vc �r�_c^r �- fv1� 71 5 G Le-Ad ` /15 c coo /sir c. )a-/-1 u; p4 ; / -t e iT 47 t ,mss o. Data reviewed by Assessor: e,,Xi4 (Initial & date /time) '91 25.2080130 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $128,800 William & Sheri Nichols 84 Castle Ridge Court Chanhassen MN 55317 Recalculation in CAMA for no finished basesment and recognized water problem in basement. Recommend reducing building value from $98,800 to $89,600. • RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $9,200 to $119,600 NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • • • 1 . 1 1 ! (office use only) 1 - 1 APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 1Ck NAPE G�t C7'1 PHONE 7 V 3 5 V3 oJ` - ! ADDRESS O /t� �jr p I ogn s a idd Twn /City CA'N PARCEL ID, ; I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: 1 4 tnc(fo.se i� 1 / , yces 1 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: /39, / 0 /f / (Initial & date/time) 92 25.0135300 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $141,000 Richard & Marion Nieland 8510 Great Plains Blvd Chanhassen, MN 55317 Recalculation in CAMA and a comparison to neighborhood properties. ' Recommend reducing building value from $81,000 to $75,600. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $5,400 to $135,600 NOTE: 1 1 • ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as ' noted: 1 April 22, 1992 Carver County Assessor's Office 600 E 4th Street Chaska, MN 55318 ATT: Steve Just RE: Parcel # R 25.0135300 1 • Richard M & M Nieland Gentlemen: ' We wish to enter a complaint regarding our assessed value of the above property. It raised from $93,500 to $141,000 in the course of one year. We have made no structural changes since we bought the property 18 years ago. Our taxes more than doubled. We would appreciate your having someone else re- assess our property. We can't understand how they can justify a raise of $47,500.00 in market value since there have been no changes to 1 the property for 18 years. We will look forward to hearing from you. Yours truly. 2 �. Richard M. Nieland ' )l l l� ■Le dl i 4 Marion R. Nieland 1 8510 Great Plains Blvd Chanhassen MN 55317 1 1 1 1 1 # 9'3 (Office Use Only) 1 • APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 // t ` ,�r Name: l�i ell u i d_ )J � ,7 - coi,- S N e iv) / Address: / 0 y 6C) gI0 - - t om— Ci v c City: Zip: S S . Home Phone: ----- U Work Phone: S��' �i �° • 1 Parcel I.D. Number: P 2 �2- OZ y G I s I want property / reviewed because: u ` / J e J h e" i t f it - rite.' , /9SSerre� ar KG s‘e0, �l L� Sj e clfc4 / ! 1 Os h <<,� �� 1 0 - ". Pcik/ '�� • / y� ti _ r� / ~O d 1 c klc� 1� ___t—Coll e. Grp .0 Gl CS l/i Y o L v, C 1 S IA A, / S cm- CV r �-✓� - „r - The p vel.e.i'l -771a-i-17e)c C( 7 1. k-,.LZ -76-e,1-7-1 ' Il I Data reviewed by Assessor: ,, / � i�" V - I2/ 9 5 7/4- (Initial & date /time) II • 93 25.3320240 Res Hs 1992 EMV $605,600 Richard D & Jane Niemi 1 10460 Bluff Circle Chaska MN 55318 Recalculated in CAMA considering over -built issue of parcel. Recommend I reducing building value from $515,000 to $446,800. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $68,200 to $537,400 NOTE: • I Action Taken by Board: ____ Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • 1 1 1 • # (Office Use Only) ' APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: /5/7(/C'( /7: 4r./1 ! / / Address: < 157 T, .4,) ,4// /±e City: A.� ,o.s•sr �7�1. Zip: s • Home Phone: x/7 Work Phone: "175 ,P9,0.1 (Jva; ) Parcel I.D. Number: &i 43666 ?.'/1. • /7 /GY I want property reviewed because: GacAj , I , 4S w,q5 ,c2.uc 6c-Cre /9f/ /Ilo /1 --1c z jj.4.1 /,v m9 Acioic , ( �S.S5 55• j/ / 1.47'k • ✓CG.1J 664 tC d'ri f ,CS • / / C.q AG( 6/17 at).14cle G.J dci'vc 44-11 /CC �J'JOZ q � c � /)? Afn �� T�iiS 7`ii7( /n ha.E3e S .4 eg /sci . 41/ $ /3S a 4, ,� > � / COO f ir �rss�� <.�i 4;) �c 4 /53, oov /�C 'et /114C / Cy.7e /A-I /77 X%torr 11< %we / ✓�C SXed -c( pct Awe L�.A/uc� A� - o ?�o, 00 0 , / � � /'( �tiric A ,�,� o� 7 x As 2 a . 744c /1 .vo / /770e4 Z Coo W AOUVf /99/ etbG /6 /✓ 74 Chm.yC f�iV1 ��C /W.? 4l7!( '4 ;4(G • Data reviewed by Assessor: «1 - a3 /O . / / (Initial & date/time) 94 25.6300090 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $153,100 Bruce A & Jodi L Nord 551 Indian Hill Road Chanhassen MN 55317 Second story is unfinished, basement has minimal value. Recommend reducing building value from $128,100 to $103,800. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $24,300 to $128,800 NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • 1 1 1 • # 9S (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: an-c - 6 IL. ' Address: /6 7/ ; 1 (. rr .F City: J1 1-i),c. - p- Zip: Home Phone: / 41 Work Phone: .3c� - _ S • 1 Parcel I.D. Number: ,P ' . (r o 7 O 2 06 ) Work want property reviewed because: 1 Gv7 a /o /ti . �/2-e- -act i -A-&- 4.cJ ' " % 'f`? 2 -CSC c_ iii co 'f /9=-9 1, 6 1 � � t,-) c (56- Buz CC axx,) Q� � � z.c z L �� mac c .ti cP ec `� / /cc �`z`2 ' t cI. c3, --,0 X) 3o L'D CL' uz t -( • ) £. `r pcc� E'� g / S L'00 t2.77t7L-- .1u =t D4_ Ce- , ,• ,9�z � i> e�'�'LP �� e •� •'�C� 4/Le f� "fi �� %i72cZ C `Ie`` - e 42_6- - 17 Data reviewed by Assessor: '3 L / 0= /7i5 (Initial & date /time) 95 25.6070200 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $160,000 ' Diane O'Neill 1671 Pintail Circle • Excelsior MN 55331 Checked values of homes in the area. Recommend reducing building value from $130,000 to $118,000. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $12,000 to $148,000 NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended . Adjusted as Noted • • 1• . 1 # ( X , Offi ( ce Use Only) - APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: Andrew K. Olson 1 Address: 8290 West Lake Court City: Chanhassen Zip: 55317 Home Phone: 934 -4878 Work Phone: • Parcel I.D. Number: 25.4060600 I want property reviewed because: Question how land value can rise $10,000. and home value goes down. Gives my property highest percent of increase in dollars for comparing houses in neighborhood, all built about the same time. I They're all 1988 -91 construction in neighborhood. Only improvements to land are a few trees. - Checked with two realtors who say assessment is about where I should be right now. Now assessed value is more than paid for the house. Other neighbors assessed value is less than they originally ' paid. 1 1 Data reviewed by Assessor: A (..J / V a q / (Initial & date /time) 96 25.4060600 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $144,800 Andrew K Olson 8290 West Lake Court Chanhassen MN 55317 Reviewed property records and neighborhood. Recommend reducing land value from $40,000 to $30,000 and increasing the building value from I $104,800 to $107,100. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $7,700 to $137,100 NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted (Office Use Only) 1 !� (office use only) . APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME f tL at I PeKA PHONE ADDRESS 700/ P:04 a► L-d Twn Cit y / PARCEL ID/ 25 202.-0;0 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: 1 PMI C► 34f 1 s '1- 4 r LASS 1 1sswssed. 04, : 1 1 1 30 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: 5 5 / S _ ,. Initial & date /time) 1 97 25.2020450 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $79,400 Michael Peka 11 7001 Pima Lane Chanhassen MN 55317 Purchased property for less than assessed value. Checked other sales in 1 neighborhood. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $4,400 to $75,000 NOTE: 1 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended ad pp recommended/ adjusted as noted: 1 1 .1 i (office use only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NA 4E III r /'t' Pe, S PHONE /7 68y� ADDRESS t.rJt7. _ i.�k wood Cir -cJ€ Twn /City Cvra.S/ PARCEL IDI iZ 5,05 co /�() 1 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: (See- T 1 .3, 1 1 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: J ,/ (-7 / 1 , (Initial & date /time) 98 25.0500160 Vac Land 1992 EMV $17,900 John A Peters 9555 Lakewood Circle Chaska MN 55318 Owners are unable to sell land with current construction on Hwy 101. Zoned Residential which is a poor location for single family dwelling. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $11,900 to $6,000 VOTE: . 1 - - 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 1 - ' - - . - . _ . , . ' • , - - . . .. . . , . ,. . . : • i: -..-.- "' ---'-'--- --.--•-• ',,. - -.- -. ' ' - 1 . . ... . .... . . - . ....• .,. '..- ' • • - ' 'r - .. . - e- › 0 4--'1%C.-- )t-' ,-.0..a..c.., ._ \ z ... _ . . _ _ ... .. . ... .. . zr / 7 i -- d A ... _.. , / . .. -- /If/ . . . , , _...„,z___ .1- . • .. . . I. -„ - ,..„, ,..„.. .,..„...._. / ., cf , I. . - , .,_,, , I ,- ---, ,t2.,.4..),-E,_ .,.....,/ ) -,,.,.„..,, . ,,,,,,,..„....... ,....,._ 1 . . . / -1-- - , 7 .- i , , LI L, - .• _ .. ... • - - . - i - ....- • . . . _ . .. I _ ...• - - - 1,t-S • _ - ----- ) x --/- . i z.. , :a .z.),„..1 , 2____.‘,4, I _ II . .. 4r. . ' . . fs ----. 71...." e:A. ,I., I . . . . CRAJ-10-• > >1 , S.5 . - , . . . . . . . - I III _ . . _ . . .. . 1 - . , . - , .. . . .. . . _ . . .. -_. .. _ - • . , ' . ",. ..'.. . . ' . , ,.,... - . - .._ .. .:' . '... _ . . . I i 1 -.. - "I ' • ' ..... I . • ---,.- -- - - ,...... . _. . ..........__ r 7 /2...-,4 .2..-1111 „ 7 ' , _ • ....„ ,_ ',-: .,. •-....i' ',441...4,— , I • (.7 .. . . I I . ' I. _ .. .. . ... -• .„ . - -•- ; , 74 " irt-4- ( ; .? -- , , t--7/4-.4 cret-A- .e - -- - -- t--. i ";-:-; "- • C:' / • / 4.- ./ ..:''' • , ' ' ----. I .. . . -eitIte. (e 7 e c '?. It. .1 4 ---. — • A 74.- ,r 2 4 . . . , . _ . - . . - . . i 1 ../. . .. it . .' k.. . , . . , . . . , / / 1 ■._...) .•t- 1..1._.)f.4,. -4... 72 -:•••,./- ".... " i „..,... . . . 1 .." ,e_..., ,,,,. ... "-• • ' ' ,.. _ f I...el ... ... l.,..el , . r ..'. .e..,,,,,_. — =- - / ' 1 . - . .. . . fr ,t . „/ it e, I , „,..... 4. r, ,..... r.) ytt .f-e.-/:. - rr.- ie- 7 r . f / - 1 • e., . - . ; , . . A, C__-- ' - ... ...4.--14-1...- ■I'' - f 7 a 4 • • , , , . ! I ... _ - . • 4-144( L4-- ,1 II I I - . -....- - • _ , ? .- - 4 ?"."-- i d / ee-" I • - . . . o . i . . - s o , ..i?.. /..4.1 14,./i.. 1 4,%.4-- . . i 1 - , .. . .. . . - . , . ' . . . , . ' • 1 . 1 Ar‘v cr. t..uus9 t i 9 k-nAilnkt.)..)c14 Li t v erct-s-H• La•uDUU100 minute Hue bury man ma faux raison 1991 S TF FNT n • • n F, 1. ', 1: I f • H .i tt 9 • 1990 • 1991 ( , 1990 1991 Property • * iF...,.. • 1401t—HS ...,l;t,ti:7,....1' e'llvtio. , , . :, . . , oli, ,g Ai, 'toltrl . i !, k lg N,... s1.9... Amount to use in filling out you r prop. tax refund form M-1PR, if eligible t4t, . •1;1/20 t *4' • f ..! , ;. '7%0 .4 ,* qt: '..'„; Ar6 C11814 1 1,1,„4„, r't 9 4kA * 1.?•A . !b' '. ' 4 4 61,1 "; I . 2. Amount to use in filling out Schedule 1, Form M1-PR If eligible • , 4t1' ., ' ' Ar.)' ! ' . ' '1."1'',41:110, .: 3 .4• : i ' . . „.."`' Ak ■,`. ';, ,.;.; . " . ' ,f• it. `•,),' -t ' i,1 9 ;}''. e ' . ,,':, ■ , :: ;;;T,T 4 • ,11 j: I tAtV '', ' . tl ji . t% . t4. '' ' , ' '' v.:441+1, h.:, 4... If this box is checked, you owe delinquent taxes 4 ? .:• ! ! ' ";! , ,7% .:1..4', ,,,';',1%f r"tli.{ . st*:,..7\'''‘''''\'' ' 4 '' ‘"-' '`.:' New Imp- t ... ,).!, ...!,,,,e, i..,.; ; . i'l+ : ; 'i„,., . iii.41.510 , Your Property Tax Eu.uv . — , 5 ,s , ,,,, . ,. : c za. : ,,, „1„.„ 599001 ., .., „ 700 3. Yourproperly tax before reduction by state-paid aids and credits , 4, • ' . 4,5i..: .,* 'i WI,' '41..k 4 :'.. - Property. description tot lex putposes only. 4. Aid paid by state to reduce your property tax ' 3.... rcial4 4 1 I :‘, • ' '' , I, .%';`, . '4;,f,44,,o,,,' 4, , Z c ' ' arli40'4, --- r:r., t ,,.. .tri. , -.■ r i„,,,„..,,,,,,,,,:..•., C 1TY LOTS . 5. Homestead and agricultural credit 'f : ' k J4 '' , / 2 ‘ - ,, 1 4. ,,,, , y. 1. ; t_ LOTS 4 & 5 BLK 2 . 6. Other credits that reduce your tax ..•,. ,`I.: :. - 4,14,itl„ . 1,,.*....", , i..a . - . „,,.,..?•,,,,, • , ..0 'v..1 ,..‘ IR. . ,,- , t 4 7. Your property tax after reduction by state-paid aids and credits '',' ;:..•,..,1.,% ; sie ' mci ti '',., 'in afitti Where Your Property Tax Dollars Go • • )ilh,..1340 ,i il , II County ! v k ti$ 1+ ' ; ■ 'st 1 . 9. City or town j-Diir.: 4 .. . 0 .,,.. ., 2, ,,,,.;... ....., „:,, ...4 -1, kr 4,171,10., pi , - ,...,,,, ,.. ,,,,. .yyk„, s • 4 . ' it . + ., ' ' , ' , ■'.:SCA 1144 4, ;;Ki ', ' I 10 School dist , .. 1, ', - ;',•,„ . rict 1:1:2 , 4bi. ..,'% : 1 ' .:44 . i.).7 ' t) . t4 ' ' t: " . t ., 4 ) f• . *'. • 11. Special taxing'districts ' ' ' • - ' - -.''. : I 1= Tr ire..ri,' " 7..71; f ',' ' ' . A. wTsc ' . - '' p. „I:1..1,u, .!, ,,,, ‘0 ... „:„,....:,,,, . - i ..,, r• , .. r & ;.. ' ,-,,,,,' "1. ? p„ ...4. ., ,., Jr t 4 ." , r , ti , 1 1 1, • 0,4 mn,,,.. );;......,,.! ... , .....-‘ ..:::-,.. , , , . , • , ,,,,-, -. . c. OTHER - ', ' • ;i 4 10,44t e t'. ? .4 I I,: , ...4 4, rr 71,,,,,, - .. - .., i .0 )i.-t. ,, ,t" , ', ,. ;I. 4 ,.;''''`. ; ' '.• , ',F. ' ; 'S, :+ ". 'Ve" , :,, %.•,-,, , d' •'' tiAl. L' ' V ' ' ' '''''..- ''' 4 i ''' 1 r 0.";' ' ^ .‘ '.'..' ',.'.? : ', ; ',. 1,.. •F'; , 12. Total 'property taxes before special assessments . •.. 4 : 3 ! . /1 iL, ' 0 io "*: ' 'o'C 4 /Ii . :4`, ''! , „, .• , ... 4.,,.,,, .. ';. ' , .., 13. Special assessments added to this property tax bill : ' • 1 • 4 1•1" 1"t ki.:4 „ : , .: - ,pfuti! . , 7 r .. ,. .. . ..(., . ' . 0 .. ' . 14. Your total property tax and special assessments , .!euAlf0 . t , .,:. . i ; 11/2 ,,c , % I.'"' '‘ :i . !P - F I soAt: p 'g',. 14. OF D i 41 . , ' . - , . t ' . , ,' ' .1' , i, , 1 . ' - -' ,"--,-,--• ' , JOHN A PETERS ., . , 4 401 iiiiik 4 + :" ''' 4 t44i 04n6irni404;i; :' .. Y' ;#4 9555 LAKEWOOD CR 388.00 '' '388 , • ,., .. CliASKAI MN.. .55318 .. . PENALTY , < '!, ,...; - • • .,,, pENAL • r ,„ , - .. 1 t.i+ , .„ ; 1 PUT CHANGE OF ADDRESS HERE , , ,, ,. . — , .., . , •,i ,k , t,' .1.. T . ..,Y t ' ...:;' 0 . '' :'1 ' TOTAL •.-. • . ,.. TOTAL , ; , la ..• , , , 0 , -., , .., ; .• ,„ ',,,, d :':, ..'., 'r MAKE CHECKS 0 DONALD F. DAHLKE P.O. BOX 69 PAYABLE AND " r , ■ , TAXES OF $50.00 OR LESS MUST BE PAID IN FULL IF YOU PAY 1, FORWARD T9 COUNTY :MEASURER , . MN 55318-0069 I '- YOUR TAXES LATE, YOU WILL BE CHARGED A PENALTY. NO ... , .. .,,, , !. ' ' '' ' i' 0 . !: .• . " RECEIPT SENT UNLESS REQUESTED, YOUR CANCELLED CHECK ' ' ' Aro you eligible for a refund to reduce your tax? i , IS YOUR RECEIPT. SEE REVERSE SIDE AND LETTER ENCLOSED. Road the back of this statement I o learn shout the lanneeote property tax retund(e) • ' • ' • • - , -• , • . , . , • . ' , • , • • • , , 4 , - - ' , - • • . , , ' . , • . , , . , ' ,, , , . . -. • • , . . ,. . • . , • . , • . . • . , . . ' - ' • - , • • . ' ' • . . ' . , . .. , , ' ' ' ' • . 1 , . . ' . ,.. . • , , ; . ' ' • ' , ' • , • . • . . • . . . . , , , ' . • , • . , . • • . ' - * " * . . . . , . , . • . ' • • 11.1 : 1111.1 El 0 II WO IIIII .1111 IIIII INN * . . NM ' 1.111 NM 11.1. MI • IIIII I I . Ell ,111.1 IIIII NM • 1.00 t ILAKVCK t.UUI'I 111 l.11MIVfTHJJCf14 L.1 I 1 r co. 61r GJ.vJLIN1fJLI WW2 =TEAM (1) 1.1.13PMV all PA NM_ E _ _ D #IIM 5 MI IIIMAX•1111..LA 5th — ONIMIL #IM 51M NM 1991 1992 199 : 1 ,:t.: 1992 Property t' " i y r , class. RCS... NON—HS TO .J ,, . ♦'�... '.,, � , �, , . u ' ' 1. Use th us amount on Form M -1 PR to see if you're fora tax ;'' ,: 4 ,•, x:',, # i,; it, , S� ' NQN — HSTD r • k b , -;. "4: 'v -` • File by August 15- If box is checked you owe delinquent taxes and are not eligible..,. f l i �ik t o •r °' f 1 c t "r"K'� ' i 1 At ti ": M ; l ' 6 , , t 2. Use this amount for the special property tax refund on schedule 1 of Form M -1 PR_.., " p r . k ' 441 . w .• y i •,. d ` - Nov Imp. + ',;,+ ;' . YOUR PROPERTY TAX AND HOW IT IS REDUCED BY THE STATE • '' :: ' ;ti y ' ' 1 u ' ' . Est. MV + 13 y 70 ' .r 17 9 9 0 C 3, Your property tax before reduction by state -paid aids and credits 1. , 41,5 a 4, 2 t Q`? .,. t Property description for tax purposes only 4. Aid paid by the State of Minnesota to reduce your property tax • `, . " 6 i , } f 8 ,4. Q • • • C I T Y LOTS 5, A. Homestead and Agricultural credit paid by the State of Minnesota r ' ' • 1 ,, ,,, ' s ' ,„,,,1 r . 1 ", ,_ +i 10 8 L OC K -0 02 B. Other credits paid by the State of Minnesota ' r ' { ` 1 f �'� ' t, : : ' '• ' ti 4. ;+ , + ', r * ,fi A , LOTS 4 E 5 ,,,, n � .. 6, Your property tax atter reduction by state -paid aids and credits , 7 7 i , / a1 f s ca ta '] , ::::At le • , l ' s �� { r' WHERE YOUR PROPERTY TAX DOLLARS GO ? j i t i�i > RI a 15? "^ ' . • . 7. County 2392 ,, •�'`` 4'.. :. 6. City or town 4 i' t' .� ` �< 7'0,4 Iii ,Z. IN; '. 9. School district 11 ' "" t '• i xt0 i, ".w. '"?.• k ' . • ' , 10. Special taxing districts F5 ?"' i X 1 1 " ' �'`F; A' • 1* SPECIAL• ASSESSMENTS•+ ' 4 oic ' " `'CODE' 0.0'1 MO .: , ''' • A. WT S D .f'i » r�g�'«3 Q;� q F •� � 4 7 i ? i ' .. 1.4.( rtp rmm "� d $'�,, R l' 4 r '71,�,� .� '' l '� '{ 5' .f.7 °�, °� , Y4�'..) . ' �k ' a y i ,,,t." rr4'.. �'�`r B. MC ' �""� Z , ' B=f 1 ' �• °�• " -y pt w,; :e : s <; 4 � .* ; ;., :V y g ' u ii �? 51 14 Y". U OTHER y: F �,r ? , , r +. i 1 '..,.'-'";...!;.•• :. ' t r �•.. X,• ,r , 4 , 14 1. ' > ♦ ♦ 5; '1 . ) '; '' n sv o + " i. • J r ; 1 . a 11 Total property taxes before special assessments . ,7 K r� 1, 'O • ' • j",..• �t� iA ♦. 1 j'� "�tyf.?i+. 'I i �;�.�' , � .Y,i , �r 7��, t15!,� . '411t4,191.�' . s �"�,+�A - : +, s„ s , , r y ''' ; ' ,,„ 12. Special assessments added to this property tax bill , +r1 O Q (yy� -• y f 1 I • ' i INT.: ' PRIN.: " ' ' ' ' 13. Your total property tax and special assessment ' ° 776.'0 r1".1. • ‘. • • " • FIRST . 'DUE:` ;''" � ` OUt , :I` fop 1' � JOHN A PETERS MAY'" 15' "•". ;''',. t.`'.' ; 'F'' z ''±' ` . r 'OCTOBERIAr ' ; ' 1 - ]� 9555 LAKEWOOD CR 565.00 565.00 ` CHASKA MN 55318 PENALTY PENALTY PUT CHANGE OF ADDRESS HERE TOTAL TOTAL F CHECK + DONALD F. DAHLKE P.O. BOX 69 TAXES OF $50.00 OR LESS MUST BE PAID IN FULL, IF YOU PAY FORWARD TO 7 COUNTY TREASURER CHASKA, MN 55318 -0069 YOUR TAXES LATE, YOU WILL BE CHARGED A PENALTY. NO RECEIPT SENT UNLESS REQUESTED, YOUR CANCELLED CHECK You maybe eligible for one or even two refunds to reduce your property tax. I IS YOUR RECEIPT. SEE REVERSE SIDE AND LETTER ENCLOSED. Read the back of the statement t0 hind out how to apply. ' , 1 . . ` ' ♦ ' ' , • • t, i I . • • — - • ---- ' I. : a a:. -''' tq * t V isn 3A18C1 3AV -- : oz ap -,o1 \ \ ,- ., ...- .- % :i...i, : : s- t , , iiKILVII Sve \ 1 ::•:: ,'• . 1 IMIt ) .tt i I iolino : 2 Y - ..-..„ , 1 a N i Ii; 14 k ) 0 .0 ' ..-......• ...• -.• .' " ..... ;;5. I • :::i ' 'P's ', i 1 1 N ,.., ,.,40'';:: .• '.:::::... ' t 131 . ... 2 .'4. . . . .'Z':::ii*, .../...: ..--. .. :/'> .. . ... .. .. .. . ..-,' • ,...., ::?.., .. ...:— r . '''''. ... :: .......:2 , ,.;;;::.::':::::.:;;;:::;:::...... • ,... ., .,.. ,... ..•• e• .... ‘., , , . ic:a .,:,. \ „ ,::.. % ..,...,., .::::::C.:.::,::::::: ./..........::::::::::::::::::;..::•:';'' ..,„:::::::':::::i::::::::::;:::.:: "" /7 - l'.• i. 's'i:\\, , %._.. s r„.._... - t . ''... ,,.•. .:::::::.:::::::::::::::s•,? ...,..:.,:•:::::::.:',::::..-- . t 0'440 . 08000 00-' _,,,..0,-.::::.•:•::;.••5:-.-" t . ‘ta r % 1 0 i ''': :;.: ' 3 " - .••• / ,46 ••• ,/ • 30 - - •-":6' .-- . I ::;.."'* 1 . 1 41 *..,::: . ••:,- .: :!: ::.: ,:. ■- ,‘, 1 10: et•-•: apz - . **..-. :: •• '„,ol.f, /// / • / ••••• ti ce , • . .. I / . . • .. • c. .'''':.. I 1: .".' .: N1/4 : , 1 K ..-'. 11■111 ....'// ..■• • ' '... .. '::::. . :: ...° "'"... .. . , • • 1 0' / V...'. ..::::. Ilii ei.. MMEMIIEED ;f,t :, :l.: .: :::;: ': •, .,::.. , :, - • . . . ,. ..- ...... ... . .., : , 1 -___-_-- .. ' 1 k - ' 4 , 0 ,, , '" . itos :. .....,..... •:' '.. ',. / „,,-.4 / s ,/ - ::::. - 1 t .." / ‘ — -7 i .i, ::•:,:%::.:: • ..-: ::::::::. - :: *v : l'• • - .,, ..,. - / sto..:::;: i::: .. ::. 7. „:;:::•;.:•-•'" ' , ''...., ' ..:::*':::-•::: ---.. „,„ ::: .••''',::: ' . 4 . 0 ,0£0 ' , ,e ,.. 0 °co • .. .. .. , 1:'.'. 0 # d e Al . V -0 01.', / • ■•V ° - ts,E 8,gt ::. • , . ,,/ , , . .; ..••!' ," . , ••••00414 / .... d e •':::::;:: / / // / / 121 tog I rtosi 0 • / . • : .7::::: / ./ , 0 sy --)cv f l . , 7 „ , ..... ,e :: / , ..„, .. / . :. :.: ,......: , - • • -.1 1 n -.1 0 ° Zi t • 0 M n x 3:- L 9 S 1 V . • 4y ,/r1 /rc /2 c.) "71 ` # ? (Office Use Only) ' APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 • Name: , o $ Crr1x riTh 1 Adds: Co (1 a-t��; F Cit y L SS C,) `cam - t Zip: -S S 3' 7 Home Phone: 9 ?--1 - Work Phone: y Parcel I.D. Number: K ca 5T 1 5( 0 0 0 5 0 ` 1 want property reviewed because: _ !' A L o)- e F t U 1, 1 0 O S C C 1 5 P91 it- , , C-x[.J ._1.._ ' - NIT ` T� �, W -, S tAk 61-va•.3 E� � K�$ cEU� i E. A �C� t t u N G 1 r■t CfL� C� 111 ti o L'•dv `r.F■ o xic-6 F 0 t Q M PP E -75 Tna Q. Lj f - &S 0 w r A (02- o f nx.�[ E, � TJ I G,2�2 •, �a 'On s N 1 1NO t 1L) T 1Q C-J 0 G j 1�� C�� Cv V• r►a�{ ; M S CSC L I ST72 C.t cu r t U G- Ly� D M' �U � ' k Z 0 'T •0 i y ocx,- 1 S ,p UL `sue E, Yr\ v I\16-1 CcDa 1 it Data reviewed by Assessor: cT / / (Initial & date /time) 99 25.1800050 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $101,100 Robert M & P Peterson 8008 Dakota Avenue Chanhassen MN '55317 Reviewed owners field card and the neighborhood. Mr. Peterson is � • satisfied with the market value of property. Would like to have had a I' gradual increase in market value of years, instead of large increase in •! market value in one year. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV • ' �1OTE : Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended I, Adjusted as Noted 1 ' # /E 0 (Office Use Only) APPEAL/TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 t Name: 0' c ' / \ C - 7c .S N Address: /J•9 City: /7 •ti' : 3 7 Home Phone: Z Work Phone: e,/ . Parcel I.D. Number: z a O z yO 8/ C ' I want property reviewed because: �� c !rlL - /n' , j.) 1 1. • 1 y - Z ° Data reviewed by Assessor: 9 / y / (Initial & date /time) I 100 25.0240810 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $162,100 Robert J Peterson ' 9250 Great Plains Blvd Chanhassen MN 55317 • Recalculation in CAMA of basement value and size adjustment. ' Recommendation of reducing building value from $119,600 to $99,400. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $20,200 to $141,900 NOTE: • ' Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • 1 • I 1 • w komce use only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: 1, /i"�;� :c / r- =;�,c Address: '2 vg '7\ At )4 e<.r 4. / ,a City: / =' cr,i 5/. A zip: 5533 Home Phone: Lr % r Work Phone: - Parcel I.D. Number: s A o 7 6 el I want property reviewed because: " " , o Qa iN cz." Oaci, <E )2 - 7 7 i/AG 24- /A/c.ee s &v z s 3 •/,✓ 4,19 / 7� / /s e /) /4 9 ,Z / A A/ i,vc - ede?-J cJ , 3.. 3 SA ;2,1,4 G- G 1 /,e Q ce.virkC D l� O / ]g 0 �T <• }<J/J�' "/• % r .t��G./g Ci;i ,r/7 O I C 77 ! G y :. •�, y , - p -t _ 2Z 5 roz) 7 l a or- NePffe cs sA/-u C.O , *j � ` Y F'f c7 - r / 9 YJ d rL //A L Lie , ,5"/ova-CF 57/C2- & / 9/24§x 7;6 4am' 7:.o6_ rG/L A v 7 dr~ -41 oco . I'yI i / L t s - 4'7' /J, m / 5 /4) ei ss Tiff (61,79) /S D cvf.4 BG E ,era c v> 66 - rd/ 77/ R t GA r, D /S e. u/LR Eit/i y D N 7/f g s..o r7 u / AE ,?, =• 1:0 l)c, c st 9 T /rS ,' 2 c.z' 4;) 13ee^i F ,9 GA f< A/Lc £� /S 70 751 •• c C S7:7-e i z�ri - THE .w vnvl 2-115 'Az u LA B /f a 71-/ A r.) ' l 33 a o . #d )SG <• /G YIZS Data reviewed by Assessor: / • 5 / 34/ (Initial & date /time) 101 25.5050350 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $167,100 Herbert J Pfeffer 2850 Tanager Lane Excelsior MN 55331 Recalculated in CAMA. Reconsidering the location and building value of this property. Recommendation of reducing land value from $54,000 to $48,000 and reducing building value from $113,100 to $108,600. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $10,500 to $156,600 • NOTE: • • Action Taken by Board: , Approved as Recommended . Adjusted as Noted • • 1 11. # /0 (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 Name: vI,e)2_o a & ' Address: c . City: Zip: ss3 / Home Phone: �/— �2 23 Work Phone: f'/P — 7303 • Parcel I.D. Number: R a S ' • may/ ©o sac • I want property reviewed because: 4 / ,9res .9/2e. freoj pa7Ccd up. /OO l v z ,,',, a y eA ' _ 47y f ope2Y ALS' - 1/.1€ 71 -, ,P‘ f /3/ e 2e' y0 ° a cpE .4S� . A 01 /e �� el/414e 1/41 90 c5' c i3O • 71/e_. ' •'�/�- �C:- -S s/1 o Gt (C! ,v / / a4c ` e o/e le-e / - cle(' Se- � �/a�/ ,nNG�I , x!n!y 9,e✓ /ei , �/ ,/ Cote' es ,j now I4.rSe✓ A�Ce Na � ; e,eense /AN AP•q -/c y �l` f i � e� 4,0// 6 e A-.6 / 74 44 s /# ...■ 7�h . `� • �e ar ,K•, , �l/ GGV a 2v € 4D/77 e-✓ n A'' i l /ti //64/ �1O in ,� U ff GU eS ;1. .A/4,172 . / `!X /zee/9 r „/ /ve 1 ,/,g C / /l if �,� gyp.✓ / ih/J�4 c.7 anJ if oM PS 30 ' i/O Data reviewed by Assessor: / (Initial & date /time) ' • 102 25.8400100 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $131,300 Richard Powers ' 20 Hill Street Chanhassen MN 55317 Mr. Powers has no concern with the value of his proeprty. He would like ' smaller increases from one year to the next. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted 1 1 1 1 # / (Office Use Only) 1 APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: Address: �� City: .�.,� Zip: • • Home Phone: =y , Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: - • - /3 s a 1 I want property reviewed because: j �T , • C 2, j/ 1 n � J 1 C c r —! t� . GAL _L. / �/ i i Data reviewed by Assessor: 6 L / L / � tS (Initial & date /time) • 103 25.4200430 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $201,800 1 Thomas S Randall 125 Choctaw Circle ;1 Chanhassen MN 55317 Talked with Mr. Randall regarding market value of property, Compared property with similar properties and the purchase price in November of III for $220,000. Mr. Randall is satisfied with the market value but is concerned about the increase in market value in one year. • RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • • 1 1 1 4/01-( (office use only) II _ APPEAL, TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME E�G11 da 50 h c h rn �h C1 PHONE II ADDRESS b 3 rex F=0, J' Twn /City Oa t 44 SS C 17 ' PARCEL ID# O'` 5. , V73 0660 937 541'1.2. I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: tj 7 S 1 . 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: 4 07 (Initial & date/time) 104 25.2730660 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $134,000 John & Rhonda Richmond .1 6535 Gray Fox Curve Chanhassen MN 55317 Internal inspection of property on 04/27/92 and correction made to ' property record. Recommendation of reducing building value from $102,000 to $92,100. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $9,900 to $124,100 II NOTE: • 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: • 1 1 Rhonda & John Richmond 6535 Gray Fox Curve 11 Chanhassen, MN 55317 April 15, 1992 Carver County 1 County Accessor Box 10 Chaska, MN 55318 ATTN: Steve Gentlemen: This is an formal appeal of the market value of our house at 6535 Gray Fox Curve, Chanhassen, MN 55317. Parcel# R 25.2730660. In one year that is a $23,000 increase when nothing 1 has changed within the year. It is outrageous what that would mean to our property taxes next year. The basement is not finished, which I believe you have it as finished. I believe even if the basement was finished we would not be able to sell it for the amount you have as the market value. Please consider this an formal appeal. We would like to set up an appointment for the county accessor to come and look at it. Thank you for your cooperation. 1 Sincerely, Rhonda & John Richmond 1 1 1 1 1 • /�'s (Office Use Only) • APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: • ti) • Address: b i, re City: a I rMi !?? tJ Zi K c Home Phone: 4 1- _ '' ¥ ' Work Phone: `► 2 4 - `- 5 G• Parcel I.D. Number: 5. g g C 2 . I . I want property reviewed because: 112 ‘f P le , (4 7 - W .4,1 ritt 44 /2-5 ,4. 1 � '- " Auk" Lee --kr ', 1 • 7 • . 1 Data reviewed by Assessor: A- / 2-fG / (Initial & date /time) ' 105 25- 8810250 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $109,500 1 . Robert Robinett 401 Cimarron Circle 1 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Talked with Mr. Robinett regarding market value. Reviewed property data and sales in • Western Hills. Mr. Robinett stated that the roof is 22 years old and the driveway needs 1 repair. Property is depreciated accordingly. . RECOMMENDATION: No change in EMV NOTE: Board: ; Action Taken by _ Approved as Recommended . 1 Adjusted as Noted • • • 1 1 - 1 #101 (Office Use Only) 1 APP AO TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 1 , Name: 7/./A...ii , to 1 Address: 0 I , i _ _ ►, City: ,.`0.1i/,O: llhl/., _zip: 3 Home Pho . 1 7L. AS 45 Work Phone: 3 - Parcel I.D. Number: o? 5: Ho 0 06 0 1 I want property reviewed because: all 0 / 1 . 11/ z fr � �� dem C 1 , i , ' 1 / i g� 4,‘ ‘ Q 0 1 ' leti,a4.1,./7kri./ 1 . . i ,/ --t e../, ,i, y ku oft, 0.A4} cr-taiv -• , . • �. - /41 90 /licit & t__ pi/ 4_, itura ,j6e..t.e.pc_eialttcp. 44die 4E0 'I 1 .-1.1,i,,, ,= 19 S 2 7 toe t , t ' , Data reviewed by Assessor: 6i--- / Y--2- / //`7 (Initial & date /time) 106 25 .1602060/25.1602070 /25.1602080 Vac Land 1 1992 EMV (2060) $8,000, (2070) $7,000, (2080) $7,000 Margaret D Rossing 1 130 Cygret Place Long Lake MN 55356 Talked with owner regarding market value of properties.- All three 1 vacant lots are currently valued as a buildable site at $22,000. This market value is in line with all other building sites in the area. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV's ROTE: 1 Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended I1 Adjusted as Noted . • 1 • 1 1 1 I c' (Office Use Only) 1 • APP TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: flir he ,1 Address:, f () L4.4) City: u A -.4 ‘1, i Zip: 5 57c I Home Phon : 474 /5 Work Phone: ti SLie, Parcel ID. Number: 4 5 0 0 7 0 • I want property reviewed because: I . 7/CtLiai a l- so 7o 00 ,y),(„Lecti 41-A) taut tu 1 g cro 6 , 4 . • zei way•aiddit). 1 Ad-b, Li 6. At ot, 1,0 A ' ge 71- eita/ti T&4& .644fiza odeLf_i_ Data reviewed by Assesson_______/____/ (Initial & date/time) 1 1 • 1 • I Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • 1 • • 1 • # ' • • • (Office Use Only) • 0,9E64eE-7-- APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1892 Name: ID, pc, S 5 I II1 Address: / 3 0 CV 611)8:7" P L. A C f, 1 City: , G., C� N C, L Ake 1)141 Zip: .6:53a., Home Phone: ¥75 - i5/ (n Work Phone: 7 4 bb 1 Parcel LD. Number: a S'/ l0 0 a 0$ 0 I want property reviewed because: 1 ti e : edi) y 1 yea s xe/n, etivo , attejt, ,p ja, ttAii,„;ffiieo (§Aal:UrX4IttAgfrIC 00 241 cottLejkLak • 1 ji i_4 , 41w , .1). , t . ..,oarua t-- Leopc ,,, e1 1 Data reviewed by Assessor:_ ___/ / (Initial & date /time) 1 • • . 1 1: 1 Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended 1 Adjusted as Noted 1 1 1 c rI el r". "! i (office use only) I _ APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME 44/ 0 PHONE 7 7Y - 6f51/ ' ADDRESS . ? ( 5 Pie-tun-e-r h t) b Twn Cit / y 1 PARCEL ID/ ?S. 166 0030 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: 1 4 • ` DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR:,) /V / 7 (Initial & date /time) ' 107 25.7660030 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $201,600 .' Robert Sathre 365 Pleasant View Road Chanhassen MN 55317 Talked with Mr. Sathre about lake shore values and sales ratios on Lotus Lake. Mr. Sathre will call back if he feels the current assessment is above market. The value was established after the split on the property that Mr. Sathre refers to in his letter. ' RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE:. ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommend pp ed /adjusted as noted: 1 ( y4 1 D r /Q- 1 • _�^ 1 l ICY ROBERT & LINDA SATHRE . ' , • " a � " 1 365 PLEASANT VIEW ROAD ; 1 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 /•` II 4/18/92 I BOARD OF REVIEW, 1 We feel the City of Chanhassen has made an unfair 1 - increase in our 1992 property value. Please review the following information. YEAR VALUE ACREAGE DESCRIPTION 1 1991 170,900 3.51 SINGLE PARCEL 1992 201,000 2.03 HOMESTEAD 1 1992 25,000 .82 LOT 1992 2 .66 DONATED TO CITY We split the property into 2 pieces in 1991, and 1 donated .66 acres to the City of Chanhassen. This should mean we have a lower value for the homestead - portion due to less acreage. We would like to appeal 1 the property value for the homestead portion to the Board of Review at this time. Sincerely, I • t • .. aalt■K-St■ 1 . . , • 1 1 • APR 241992 CITY OF CHANHASSEiv l 1 CARVER COUNTY 600 E ABC :T,A.. J.k .... .K.0 I.,.—.a • BOX 10 cri�sK4 y r;- -.. p IEa DR T u S: r'u:.raW , , • ' CHASKA, MN "I� t �_•:_ -___i . .mss. • � q 5 S�6N A ' r • - � � . NOi • o PROPER. 3 GREEN ACRE: 1 t60 \ Mrau • Qy a, C SATHRE ADDITION 0 PROPERTY CLASS PARCEL# R 25.7660030 ' o• RES. HSTD i $ TO o ROBERT C LINDA SATHRE ,,• o w v '.i mJ o o • 365 PLEASANT VIEW RD • �� r` m ' °0 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 • i ' i T cY m _ o S i 0 F- u\ .E )-- p , . 1. 0 < U1 C F- 4.. W Li .0 v w °i' u 3V) $ You may make an appeal by attending in person, by representation or by sending a letter to the Board of Review on ., a ? �. 8 APRIL 20, 1992 7PM CHANHASSEN CITY HALL . , p n F'- o iu E If you disagree with their decision, you may then appeal to the Count Board of Equalization i I.-1 r `o 0 c E 9:30 AM JUNE 229 1' b► t► �FFIdA144 64.1t4$61.1144IrIFF1106 11dUSE • -+ • . r N u v) ui 7 a o o. Please call the County Auditor's office to set up an appointment for County Board of Equalization rc. o• . w a c m au a O�i CC W to o Z 13 w � _- o * cc a < ex = � `" CARVER COUNTY •' ....I m Z AA.) . u 7 ' 600 E A..Z ,.., i! T13 ...Ili k.T 00 w r n a n r u 0 -o x , � B O X 10 r 'cHksti4 r•; ;,, i ( a F E 2 C HASKA• MN 1 "1363'T0;1 - :.:, ?' w a o. % tal NOTG , '.' i �• E� � E APH 1 9 i' i : r 1 7 iYi' • • ��: I .� 1- s. . Z 4' 1. 0 C O : ;; o l ; A lw o R 1 ' 8 2 i , . 4 c W ;w wn�• • oc P-- c - PRORERT1— VALUE.:—..----2.5 c ; • 2 o ° N '"' 0 ° GREEN ACRE: 9000 � �.ni,,:� ; ri >,a ° a 0. c y- ` in -N- .--' a ....! .. .-4 z J a .-I a Q SATHRE ADDITION + _;. Q u h} aT t w n p PROPERTY CLASS PARCEL# R 25.7660010 :J Z ' • . aF - wI- v) c° 3r� 0 RES. HSTD - F-' 0 -.o^ oc rY x N w .-c a, V) w Z .-4 u w v -� a , ROBERT C LINDA SATHRE z <t•� .-E U 'n.'W0ad • -Y,-. oui �, u .-c ,,C O w t C7 v) i° Y. Si 7- m "' O cY F' ^' at u ' E . o - • 0 365 PLEASANT VIEW RD Y C) X d Z a t9 0 u1 0. rY as a -) O s �� rj z w • E o ' W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 - 4) CO V yr frl 7 >, (1) • You may make an appeal by attending in person, by representation or by sending a letter to the Board of Review on • • APRIL 20, 1992 7PM CHANHASSEN CITY HALL • . If you disagree with their decision, you may then appeal to the County Board of Equalization • 9:30 AM JUNE 229 1iht►$FIdAdN &diitailiti i lldcD►likliItrHduSE • Please call the County Auditor's office to set up an appointment for County Board of E ualization MN 'MI OM OM O —• — M OM OM R — — —• �•� .- . 1 • 1 ii 11 if II • I 1 . , ..- e - ,- , - - •• , . - - , -4 •-..--....--.........-ei .. ' 1) ) ) • I : • ) D I i :I , • . . . I . • - , . ; • 0 • • ) 0 • : r-- ' --- .-- r - - • • --. ---, •- 4 .4) ..._..) I -.---- • C 4 e t-4 -- --- -- ...... ,.__ ,...... ,......., -...., .......4 ,....... .-.._. • 3 1 I!. ....--, e :. • • IN. . ..... -...), i .....-1 en 1 , (1) .., -4- V 1 0 •)— .. /2 ) ...._.... _ ........ - I 11) .,, . a 2 i I iD .J-2 ) 1 --- (p D v' 0; it ------ v -/- il 2 Q._ . . 0 r ..---' - -- - - - -- ---------- ---- -..:-.= 1 S 5 ‘,..T.4, __ .„,...,....._ _. _, „....,,.. •__. ..... • --, 1 11. ... 11 • ( : .. 0 • : .: 0 I : - ' II 0 ' • II D ) I • C . 7 0 .: I/ 0 c . g E z t.. . , _ • 0 -. - ' 0 1 II 1 • I ._. .1 1 • I. • # /og Office Use Only) Y) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: M ► ►tC- �� Lire rp'-t Address: '7 o 4-��i r- s . y S i� /-1 v L City: .0r-- Zip:.s 5 3 I Home Phone: '/2 V 3 G Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: . S 00 sic) • 1 I want property reviewed because: ./ y 4cP (AZ we ,t./T F s ue. )4/ 7:249, C • 1 • • 1. 1 Data reviewed by Assessor: /4—'1 / - .27 I ./ (Initial & date/time) 108 25.6850040 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $100,000 Mike Schmidt 6470 Yosemite Avenue Excelsior MN 55331 Talked with Mr. Schmidt and explained the increase in value of his ' property. $8,700 had been based on sales in the area and $7,500 had been due to new construction of property. He is mainly concerned with taxes and stated he is not sure what his property would sell for. ' • RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE: Action Taken by Board: _ Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • • ( (office use only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME Roy'r <)C [1 r4 V c14._ PHONE t �7 / -V7 7 vZ ADDRESS '34)! &7 a I pi h. Q I t/a . Twn /City (X- PARCEL ID! ,'.OJS08'0Q 1 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: 14 1 1 • 1 - 1 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: / / (Initial & date /time) 109 25.0150800 1992 EMV $131,400 1 Roger & G Schmidt 8301 Galpin Blvd Chanhassen MN 55317 Recalculated in CAMA and explained land value. Owner not sure what' • - property would sell for. • RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $12,400 to $119,000 NOTE: ' .1 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 1 7 — • appAcettc;- /9e) z 4,tohwe 1.. - l'c -fx- 1 • .? C O/ 4 ?PI, .Zer..41 le-ol r.,; c7 eg 14) 7Y 9- //4 /La .9_13 , 1 4t7j 4- .‘G t•.k 1 4 itV' t 741-(74— (714-, ,0.,e t o , t4) 11 . � - , ' )1-c -4046- 1 1 1 1 1 • . 1 1 1 /( (office use only) (10U APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME e v,et,exi PHONE ADDRESS Twn/City / Y PARCEL ID# I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECA SE: C CC-A2 631L. • • DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: (7 / (Initial & date /time) 110 25.0500221 Res NonHstd 1992 EMV $27,900 , Donald Schmieg Box 397 Chanhassen MN 55317 Mrs. Schmieg stated this property is an unbuildable 40 x 65 lot with a garage. Recommendation of reducing land value from $20,000 to $4,000 II and building value from $7,900 to $6,000. 'COMMENDATION: reduce EMV $17,900 to $10,000 approved as recommended/adjusted II TAKEN BY BOARD: a pp d /adjusted as noted: 1 1 1 1 1 _ 4 cp Sac. / "oez . >„;24e, z4e,..edzaeaitiediy, . c 0 F'cCElvEp 'APR 171992 rr aFCwww4ssE,,, 1 1 • f_ # I (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: aCZ r7 , - `- cS • Address: '7 z ' &Sv t �-- City: et-4 k4 :a sc. Zip: ,y — Home Phone: ( ,) q L– Cr0 Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: P , 2 oo I want property reviewed because: A 7 '�� C w∎ c� m t �..tT' — ' -c-� c= b t� L J �+. e frp( �J W 20 ►vt 1 Z, 4. c 7.- ZS el-, goo , , - 01174 y r' i" v cic. r2 1-1 y f3 c?r :..! 4, c) f` — cv- /. G4. 92akl'5 )0.7 ✓.s~ fz T7c� c Tu Lz S / ),7 1/. G c r C - iJz�� L-r z ; ?-- s f �, .✓'c - r c- (3) 2 � : a i4 6 i \i Gl S i j G 0:: Tf 5 o v 4 .4.3 4 1 7 , z_ 7 0 3 - ,pc ,, / j ofE- 6 7 (./e,az, .41 c../ce Data reviewed by Assessor: OLL / '/ 2 2 / / 3-8 (Initial & date /time) 111 25.8230020 Vac Land NonHstd 1992 EMV $24,800 Robert A & C Scholer 7212 Frontier Trail Chanhassen MN 55317 Talked with Mr. Scholer on 04/22/92 regarding taxes on property. Explained tax process and tax rates on vacant land. Mr. Scholer seemed to be comfortable with value but feels taxes are excessive on vacant land. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE: • Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • 1 1 1• # 1(-3 (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: (30,-114f,11 A . • ' Address: 7(■ :3 e-e-((0 r G v-e City: (i Gtr r t' C..44 r k op (Cr n v) / 1 c, , Vak s c Zip:: 15'351 Home Phone: �f ) 4¥ - 4 P Work Phbfie: Parcel I.D. Number: e a a es • I want property reviewed because: 'TA-e_ S -u rju v ft's u Q y, •Co--71 (07 '2 w e s <31- s s 2SS a S c cc 1 r a O °. eQ /'CO "O -L • CI 14-t 4.10a, UJ S 12 6 Q ck. r 1 WO. � , - e r w e J t w o. S tt c 4 r ((e� • 1 Data reviewed by Assessor: / ' " a 1 / (Initial & date /time) y/i, /,> ti: a# Tr Jgc9.;ei; �,;« ys�r bv�tic /sly e* (1 1 113 • Res NonHstd 1992 EMV $189,600 Wendell A Schott 7034 Red Cedar Cove Excelsior MN 55331 Mr. Schott felt property had been valued too high considering the property is only partially completed. Recommend reduction of building value from $89,600 to $51,300. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $38,300 to $151,300 • NOTE: Action Taken by Board: _____ Approved as Recommended . Adjusted as Noted • • • 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 (office use only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME Te re s , 10. °� S r • PHONE 1 7o y/3 , q / �, ADDRESS 6 / .�e La -Cy /� CI Twn /City (wham het..s s PARCEL ID A2 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: N'' O -6 ��. 1 • • • 1 1 1 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR :M-1) / (Initial & date /time) 114 25.1620160 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $178,800 1 Daniel & Teresa Schrempp 1041 Lake Lucy Road Chanhassen, MN 55317 Reviewed property records and the fee appraisal done for financing dated • 10/30/91. Recommend reduction of building value from $148,800 to $131,000. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $17,800 to $161,000 VOTE: • 1 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 1 ,S, /� 0/00 To Carver County Assessors Office From Teresa Schrempp and Daniel Schrempp I/ Re: Appraisal of property 1 ' This letter is in regards to the appraisal of our home in Chanhassen. feel the amount of $178.800.00 is over and above the market value. Given the recent selling prices of comparable homes in the area as will as the appraised value determined when financing our ($160.000.00), we are requesting review of this amount and the lowering of the appraisal 1 determined by the county. We are enclosing a copy of the appraisal by the Homestead Co.. Please contact us if you have further questions. 1 Thank -you, 1 Teresa and Daniel Schrempp 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 idt.R. ..4.4 hora4,4 j rcin, 44444/ .__Oct•kt, dift0 Aprotflot . Av. - ru 06-0/4- - Ito --A.4) /90 Ivo .41.4)-14 1 - wood.d 1 - -11-14 h+r-444c, ha,...s sur,., 1 -UsS Oro. 0 tj'"c-L° 1 ; 1 1 1 1 1 '. # / 15 (Office Use ( Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 I Name: 1- 1-1'I in f Sc- r7 e Address: /7zo 24 ic i City: C N gW) S�.t) '' Home Phone: Zip: « - ��'7 y / E� Work Phone: `( 9` y 57 i Parcel I.D. Number: l L zi , e2 s vc z c ) • • I I want property reviewed b e c a u s e : e-'--d 2 -- /74 b t ;� /.77 i3 % / det‘ac.... ej y irLi /0.212,1 A ji.. leZer C:e4ee 1.,s/z-e, 1::± /7-4: le/ I 1., G� e� JQ d, -- i2er-€ • - � fit' 3 , y � � � .�� ,,,,, E , /9-4,49 (NA. K J / l'j•(S l S 6=4 l cae'� 1 Data reviewed by Assessor: ./ / -/ I 3 6 / (Initial & i 115 25.0500020 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $116,600 II Larry A & K Schroeder 7720 Frontier Trail Chanhassen MN 55317 Internal inspection done on 04/30/92. Reviewed sales in neighborhood I and recalculation of pricing. Recommend reducing building value from $96,600 to $91,200. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $5,400 to $111,200 1 • VOTE: I i Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • I ti (office use only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME ' J l Jr ✓L & rDe A e ✓ PHONE ADDRESS Aa Co.S4 /� Pret Twn /City C - 1, PARCEL ID# mac �, ;oR e7/ 1 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: 44- W pftelher14 ' 2 L 4 J ? ,9 - 1 1 1 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: 4 / 1 ( = .2r/ /O'7A(Initial & date /time ) 116 25.2080120 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $110,800 Albert & Roberta Schroeder 82 Castle Ridge Chanhassen MN 55317 Recalculation in CAMA considering the basement finished value and the , water problems in basement. Recommend reducing building value from + $80,800 to $77,600. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $3,200 to $107,600 NOTE: 1 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 • i l� #.E_ (Office Use Only) 1 APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: Iiiik/4) n //�� n Addre : g City: i ' Zip:,553 Li I Home Phone: .�. Work Phone: �, 3 7`3 Parcel I.D. Number: ,�i S, 0 /We. p • 1 I want property reviewed because: 74 X-5 4 1 1 A i Data reviewed by Assessor: • / 2 (Initial & date /time) I 117 5.0122500 Res R s Hstd 1992 EMV $69,700 Gladys Schueren 204 West 77th Street Chanhassen MN 55317 Talked with owner regarding taxes. Owner stated market value seemed correct but is concerned about the tax increase on property. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE: 1 Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • • I 1 1 • 1 # / (Office Use Only) Y) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: C.tiiV-c3 � C4- �V,E`R� • Address: Co \ k o VIP nU City: 'M iv • Home Phone: 4��t 3C�G c� Zap. S` ' ✓!� W ork Pho ct Parcel I.D. Number: 2 - 2 (0 2 c C� • I want property reviewed because: Ccs a . 1v - %(,Nn.c...e 4 4,_ � \.12, - V. r∎ • Ace, C 7Nr.\ \.* \_ GC2 kcr • • • • Data reviewed by Assessor: (3 L— / f _ 2 > / (Initial & date /time) • 118 25.2630200 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $121,300 • Richard Schuette 6430 Bretton Way - Chanhassen MN 55317 Discussed water problems in backyard and basement. Recommendation of • reducing building value from $91,300 to $86,300. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $5,000 to $116,300 NOTE: • Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended . • Adjusted as Noted • • • • 1 1 • # / (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: / v 1 ✓ ce,/V 744e 1 Address: ././.1.4-• 7 ✓ e v .k. n . City: S 7' P lr 7v1 N Zip: 4 2 0,s' Home Phone: G9 y' " a 9 7 Work Phone: .S� .3z ' 1 Parcel I.D. Number: I want property reviewed because: 3., bVp/r- WO' Lr w; 7/-0 67Zjn L0Ti I 1 77,7--, yy 77x �.f 1 -° tz Gtr e ' (Y v L �/ LGS -Y-; - / „() , 4 o ,_ e , H Data reviewed by Assessor: t / . t- / 2 (mod & date /time) j 119 25.5200010 Vac Land 1992 EMV $33,000 • John Schumacher I ;428 South Minnesota River Blvd St Paul MN 55105 ,Checked lot values in neighborhood and sales data. I RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $3,300 to $29,700 NOTE: 1 • • I i I Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • • 1 /o APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 1 Name: Michael Schwartz Address: 6430 Fox Path I City: Chanhassen Zip: 55317 Home Phone: 939 -1114 Work Phone: 470 -4539 Parcel I.D. Number: 25.2700080 1 I want property reviewed because: Purchased home on January 2, 1992. Understand assessment is based on hypothetical value of home as of January 2nd on any given year. Market value is what a willing buyer will pay a willing seller, neither of whom is compelled to act. 1991 tax was based on an estimated market value of I • $249,800. For 1992 it went up to $271,600. Purchased the home for $219,000. which is $52,600. less than the assessed value. If you truly use 94% of market value, as the Assessor just indicated, assessment should have been at something under $206,000. Property was listed for many months at I $229,850. Purchased in November and closed on January 2, 1992. Had $14,000. worth of work performed on the property to remove a living room wall and to remove a shower. Remove a wall down in the basement so the home actually went from a 6 bedroom home to a 5 bedroom home. I Had a firewood shack removed and fixed some regrading to eliminate a water leakage problem. So the work that was done, which was not included as part of the assessed value, did not add any value to the property but rather took care of some problems with the house that existed at the time. Would suggest that the assessed value be reduced approximately $52,000. to reflect the true market situation. Data reviewed by Assessor: tl) / 2` . 3 / (Initial & date /time) , 120 25.2700080 Res Hstd 199 EMV $211,6uU Michael & Kathryn Schwartz 6430 Fox Path Chanhassen MN 55317 After reviewing sales price of this property and reviewing sales of properties and equalization of neighborhood, recommend reducing the building value from $230,600 to $197,000. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $33,600 to $238,000 NOTE: 1 Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted 1 • r • • # /o / (Office Use Only) 1 • APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: } Z/ • 1 Address: l " .�/ •� ' ' City: i Home Phone: Affi Work Phone: ' Parcel I.D. Number: < 45 7 5 / I want property reviewed because: • 1 / • / 6 / -2. Data reviewed by Assessor:. / « �-? / 6 tifo (Initial & date /time) 121 25. "5050170 Res Hstd 1992. EM • T . 00 Frank & Judith Scott ' 2730 Sandpiper Trail J Excelsior MN 55331 • Checked sales in area and recalculated in CAMA, adjusting the ' depreciation of building. Recommend reducing building value from $69,300 to $59,900. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $9,400 to $84,400 . NOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended . Adjusted as Noted • 1 1 • 1 1 • # / (Office Use Only) t APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: • /oh 2' h - Address: 3 a 1, // -3 z - City: Zip, ST_SL, 7 Home Phone: '3 - . / c7 Work Phone: t ft 2-€ Parcel I.D. Number: c E � cr / / e • I want property reviewed because: • Data reviewed by Assessor: � • / 4 .7 / /0 (Initial & date /time) • 122 25.8400110 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $125,200 John & D Segner 30 Hill Street Chanhassen MN 55317 Recalculated in CAMA making an adjustment to finished basement value and compared with sales in area. Recommendation of reducing building value from $69,000 to $62,400. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $6,600 to'$118,600 nOTE : • Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • • 1 1 • # /a3 (Office Use Only) • APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: 0e r ye n^ w- ..... f S X o r ei a, Address: c . City: „ , • Zip: s 3,7 Home Phone: �r ? 4 - L 4 a.a p• ' Work Phone: � 7 N- y � G 7 Parcel I.D. Number: /2 J. o / 3 3G a a I want property reviewed because: 1 A I C r 1 - mow. x e 9 3 fr ' ' I t Data reviewed by Assessor: J'2_ / 9 / / /�i s (Initial & date /time) 1 • 123 25.0133600 Vac Land 1992 EMV $14,800 George D Shorba Jr & Margaret Shorba 304 Chan View Chanhassen MN 55317 Owner is comfortable with value, feels taxes are excessive due, to vacant land class. Explained tax rates and tax implications for pay 1993 taxes. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV . NOTE: • 1 Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • 1 1 1 1 04( (office use only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 11 NAME ( /;aC7 e. i Sr:r 7CL, PHONE 93Y 7093 ADDRESS 306 Oki V / e /A3 Twn /City Cha liet s c 6 PARCEL ID# . 5 - Y60 1 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: f i Cf � C 1 1 1 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR:/Yid/ « " (Initial & date /time) 124 25.0500400 Res Hstd/Res NonHstd 1992 EMV $116,700 George P Shorba 306 Chan View Chanhassen MN 55317 Internal inspection done on both homes on this parcel on 04/28/92. Recalculation was done due to the condition of the homes. Recommend reducing the #1 building value from $43,100 to $35, Recommend reducing the #2 building value from $33,600 to $20,000. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $21,700 to $95,000 FOTE : .1 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 1 1 4 qZ ( TA-X 5 T Tic. HCN7 C._‘ -1 %-j 1-075 go ii - 6 46 G14 ocA 1- ,L o rs 4-• %- s o}-4 7 f 4 4 ( 7 G YL 3G4 6-4 4uvisq, / /o 1 5Te >91 5 (3,17(ZGaH - 28P r15 w4C TQY- f Eris c of fir, -(4g << " 1 -_ T ,4 t t , ( • 3 4 fi 19 t ( ii'' 342(-3 ✓! E - CRP ST� 4- 4-- 2- F39 Cb ay i L i �� No A .�AfF bi i 5114 t7* Pit p, PAL/ 45 ti1- 64 .� 1 J 1 T T /a-1- TAY .) c )t- 1 K ( 1 7- G .1_4, L 1" A X .- c ft f f f Z— i - L.•C: " 4 2 k 7 5 1 PA i 5 f. o1 .0 i - 1 gg z_ 1 5e0it_ E f? SI 1 2 0A . 1 304. - _ Cc -4 A 1 1,■ 1 C�(14 N411 , ..-(, lYN Lk. r s - 3/7 1 1 - I Pi-Px 5c Ad / "X 1 . 1 1 . . _ ._ 3 ,.. ......._:. �...�s_..:.. _ : w. # /I (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: 0.0"0/9- Ott - - 5 - '42 / Address: (41 ).. - (:(6. - 1 /1 City: e#7/A/i ,) - Zip: Z3)7 Home Phone: C P I - 414 Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: a5— IQ9,o2to I want property reviewed because: /A29.1 Lo2 aur"--1 0? -67 4) ;)? 14/f i f;, 4 4,41 Prp h-11- Igq 1 1,1 , ` . r/-"2'afrr, , i � -S t./ 0 ; 4 '1 /Of 4:et: 1) -L, n a-1344, 4 -L-.L.(1,1„-170 d.., • 4 r1),-;- e-t-,17144,v ' • Data reviewed by Assessor: /•4 9 - 2-41 � / (Initial &date /time) 125 25.1820280 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $121,500 Donald T Smith 8012 Erie Avenue Chanhassen MN 55317 Owner mainly concerned with increase and amount of taxes. Reviewed sale of duplex on Erie Ave at $129,000. Mr. Smith did not dispute value as being "market ". RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV • NOTE: Action Taken by Board: _ Approved as Recommended . ~" Adjusted as Noted • • 1 ..._ ... _ -- - - - -. -- a J d (office use only) 1 /'l � APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 C j ci_ 7/ Z./ (AO I NAME J //� a- r Imo a i dr /-0 /:.-.14// PHONE 91 V - ie2-7 0 ADDRESS 1/3 Jg►17 /74)..,E ieQ" Twn / cit y Ch " la'rfe -+ 1 PARCEL ID# ZS_ ',. 3 8 " °A c/ 1 I WANT MY v PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: / 7— `je / c v-e T/1� /4 /4 C,ss nr 6 7 /v /� -o/�. �! �c 4 . / � 3 S L O , / ,io /J0 /-C /� p ) '* Q � �f l/ s.TP ra � UN �� s ` ! /� s Apr P a - t.. rnt 7`-t la 2 a io a / /23'14'`. 1 c PLk ir ilf-- .�-r► p r e lain, $ 3e°6� 0 e� SSti�• -• 7‘4_,,e, 6'lDIt °-i 1 14001 'h Till / I 4r'It / Cls ti Q'".dP•1 dee c 4 . e'er �c- ,,,...4 , a 3S .A �° a... v 2 a....—t. l o �P s Lio i c 4 ). le J� -e 4-3J✓i4) •_p � /fir t e, a f� U'n Q 7Yl o %� "� a 4-f '� ` / ,4 arr/ 'e 1 w /A / i ' y / 7/f . ? 1 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: 17'" / y -z (Initial & date /time) 1 126 25.2380030 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $399,800 I William & Marjorie Spliethoff 113 Sandy Hook Road Chanhassen MN 55317 I Inspection of lakeshore had been made on 04/22/92. Recommend reducing land value from $179,100 to $140,800. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $38,300 to $361,500 _ 1 VOTE: 1 . 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 1 .. f� / (office use only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME u: sr —iu art / e4 PHONE V' 's 1(-4t ' ADDRESS L it C ( ; � � c � v �,� L Twn /City C 4, _if PARCEL ID# (?'S .\ - 5 I 6 1 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: 1 1 1 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR:cri.— 1, / (Initial & date /time) 127 25.8810350 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $101,700 Clifford & Darcee Spohr 410 Del Rio Drive Chanhassen MN 55317 Purchased property on 11/27/91 for $109,000. After reviewing sale of 1 this property estimated market value is reaffirmed. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV _ NOTE: . ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 1 L „ ■ LI -2 • # /0 (Office Use Only) 1 APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: Denis Stedman I Address: 416 Santa Fe Circle City: Chanhassen Zip: 55317 Home Phone: 293 -1963 Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: a5 f'y000so I want property reviewed because: House assessment went from $80,000. to $ 122,000. Just recently had it appraised and it appraised at $120,000. so if you want to buy it at $122,000, I'll sell it to you. Taxes went up $1,100. in one year and I'm with the rest of them it's a little outrageous. Data reviewed by Assessor: S / / (Initial & date /time) • 1 128 25.8800050 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $121,200 1 Denis P & M Stedman 416 Sante Fe Circle Chanhassen MN 55317 j Recalculated in CAMA. Recommend reducing buitding value from $100,200 to $93,600. 1?Fr nmmrmnalTC T • r.rlrira F , M V SF Ann try S1 1 a tiflfl aken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted 1 APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 • NAME — 1;)lt010 STOCa!'�Rl.�r / PHONE �� 3 5 I ADDRESS Q3O1 Atrou$OP) lOA') Twn /City Ci4.74+ 1 S PARCEL IDI "K 7-5 ,014Oq Oo I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED {� BECAUSE: ��,,�� the the same reasons as zt led last year (� enclosed), I fee! the p.operty is both overvalued and incorrectly classified. Although the letter dated 5/2311991 from the city in response to my contestnent presented to the Board of Equalization and review dated 4/29191 Identified an adjustment in value to $159,300, ft made no response to my Item no. 3 regarding classification. t checked with Steve Just In the Assessors office, and there was no record addressing my classification concerns. I still contend that • until the improvements that I have been substantlatly assessed for are available for my use, R is unjust to classify this property at the same commercial rate as Empak, Victory Envelope, etc. In addition, only approx. 114 of the property is utilized by my landscaping business (definitely at the low end of the commercial use scale). The remainder is Idle farmland, left In the same condition as when it was grazing land for the prevbus owner. I feel the feast that should be done would be to consider dual classmcatbn. ' In addition, the overall value of undeveloped property has bst value in the last year. I feel the appraisal value should be reconsidered. ■ DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR:-a / (Initial & date /time) 1 130 25.0140900 Comm /Ind 1992 EMV $159,300 David Stockdale 1 8301 Audubon Road Chanhassen MN 55317 _ Mr. Stockdale is concerned with the classification of property. Property is classified and Commercial - Industrial. Property is classified appropriately as is zoned Industrial. RECOMMENDATION: no change in classification or EMV ROTE: ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: • RECEIVED 1 • APR 2 01992 CITY ur L. nMivrl #'SEN 1 L L/ 2 .2._ a ?%� (office use only) N A 4 �'S° APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NANAME ✓d/'�'1eS �� er' 44.1. PHONE ,/ - 753/ ADDRESS 730 V cat ,be Tra Twn /city c e2slka 1 PARCEL IDI. c2 , /...262-00a-0 ' I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: Sew Le1k AU Ale- • 1 1 , DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: 4 / -d r/ //%(Initial & date/time) 131 25.1220020 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $144,700 ' James M. Sulerud 730 Vogelsberg Trail Chaska MN 55318 ' Mr. Sulerud had been conerned with market reaction to an unusual design of building. After recalculating in CAMA a recommendation of reducing the building value from $112,500 to $93,600. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $18,900 to $125,800 r1OTE : 1 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as ' noted: 1 1 f . • _ # /3c/3c2 (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: f"fO SS ive a/4 iti . Addr S. :OA4De�`jX, • city: L1 .4 &I ' SSA Zip: 5323 ! Home Phone: 41 ",3 . O — Work Phone: 94- S J(p Parcel I.D. Number. .2 O = - • I want property reviewed because: pt 1 464. 0100moaDC »(C4 6126 ; . i r / 1/ d ��,� a J 06CIO -- . , . „f}e---Li-e-c' .---e--7 ,)//a.e.deid . /bz-0_,,,t-t—L4 ..0-7 , 44 40 .--4,2460-4-a•illA e2J1--_,44-14.3. /C4-6"11 17e,40.9 i ), • i a6,04.,40C.V.,CE, LL)M6‘1 .14 .'C't40..j.e6ett441"e."tY . / // Cir/.74/1/ 6196W AACOZ �; ' Q . a ..,, • r • . Data reviewed by Assessor: / / 4 / (Initial & date /time) 132 25.0800190 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $112,900 Ross Sullivan 7522 Frontier Trail Chanhassen MN 55317 I Internal and external inspection done on structural problems. The current estimated market value reflects a reduction. Additional reduction of $8,000 is recommended. Recommendation of reducing the . building value from $92,900 to 84,900. ' RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $8,000 to $104,900 • VOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended • _____ Adjusted as Noted ' II • 1 ' # X33 (office uLe only APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 WIRE PHONE ADDRESS Twn /City PARCEL ID# I• WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: Al DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR:SL / / (Initial & date /time) 133 25.2550040 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $112,300 ' Bruce & Tauna Swanson 1155 Willow Creek Chanhassen MN 55317 ' Explained increase due to market appreciation. Sale price on 01/29/88 of $129,900. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV VOTE: 1 1 ' ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 1 ii//7/ 1 . . orlo 6 6? sztAze4„, 1 411/..e_ 4.v:a ,4 �u-Q w%e /99afr, 1 #,4 4.C6tA/ - C4t,a C-44-naeLe■La-*%, A- � d, J Gam- ; e I , r Gj,� : RECEIVED C% ' � 6/-)4)24- APR 2 0 1992 1 t; C6-1,1 oeCfrt 7 a 24 91 7 - c .' /: �'�¢.: �»�t��,�.ifc /l kj�� CITY yr L'rigNHASSE�' 1 � i � R asass.o yo 1 1 '�`� C a� $10 co. � . 1 $ 11 a 300, 0 7L-4 et-73Atsti?„4 A a dellet,L 1 . i 1 .1' io, 3 cam, '42, ive.AAL / 1 , ,., . . Z dy-1,44m4.42-Kt Ar at(-t -kentt "Fyi,eaWle -.:. AVA4 ei4-ag4.4.17. ,•41-reriz-LeAclo-Lt_ I .2-7-y,, --I- /1.12.f._ 4 1 .,e.ec,<Li. A>n, 1 1 1 ciriitt,,,r • 4 AL e1/21A2 - 7 uss eit;P�.. -cLes_A_ C,44-yLiet--e4ek 1 K , ,.. e r.k `170-0(.5R 63 -1-t--e_k ( 4.,‘-vv-Lapn't 1 1 v X a.x 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • # / V (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: ,- ./A..r0'/2 Address: e" /" 44 e: city: Zip: ;5e-' ?/ 7 • Home Phone: 93 7 ? 2 g Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: 25 / e 4 D 33 1 I want property reviewed because: Az i r 7'f X 4--'- 4 r P w 4.49 ‘ F r� 5 /e." A:..4 ,'••'e • 1 • 111 • 1 Data reviewed by Assessor: /1 / e/ Z L / (Initial & date /time) 134 25.1800330 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $109,500 Einar Swedberg 8016 Cheyenne Avenue Chanhassen MN 55317 Reviewed sales and property information. Owner was concered with large • tax increase on property. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV MOTE: Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended . ' Adjusted as Noted • • • 1 1 I # 1300 (office use only) * - APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME R b . 1 4 Th 1 -e5 e I h 1 2 I cj e S r PHONE ADDRESS 7 ©A Fi T � f� e r �� 1 Twn /city ( ha i hens s ei / ) ' PARCEL ID# 5 e 8 2 • / 0 15 53Y- 6'1,3 b I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: l, 1 S 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: 6 / 4 / ?Q (Initial & date /time) 136 25.8210150 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $135,600 Robert J & Terese Thielges 7208 Frontier Trail Chanhassen MN 55317 ' Reviewed sales price of property on 04/29/91 and sales of area. Recommendation to reduce value of building value from $107,600 to $92,500. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $15,100 to $120,500 NOTE: 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 Aril p 9, 199 2 1 Board of Review 1 Carver County Assessor 600 East 4th Street Box 10 Chaska, MN 55318 Re: Notice of Assessment for 1992 , Sunrise Hills 2nd Parcel # R 25.8210150 This letter serves as notice of appeal that the assessment of $135,600 for our property is incorrect. We are currently in the process of filing a real property tax appeal with the Carver County District Court for the 1991 assessment, payable in 1992. Our reasons for filing the appeal are as follows, and support our appeal for the 1992, payable in 1993, assessment. We purchased our home in April of 1991 for $119,500. The house had been on the market for nearly six months at $130,000. The price was lowered to $123,000 and the house still did not sell. We purchased the house after it had been on the market for about a month at $119,500. The house was built in 1968. When we purchased the house, nearly every major appliance was, and still is, near the end of its useful life. The water softener, water heater, dishwasher, refrigerator, stove and air conditioning are all at least 10 years old. The exterior of the home, according to neighbors, had not been maintained (painted or stained) since it was built. Every interior surface needed paint or updating. Supports for bay window in the front of the home had failed and the window was falling forward from the wall. The previous owner did reshingle the roof as part of the purchase agreement, but we certainly do not feel we purchased a home worth $135,600. It is our understanding that the previous owner of the home refused to let the county assessor ' inside when he visited to assess the value during the summer of 1990. Following advise of the new assessed value, the previous owner did not appeal until a day after the deadline (which, coincidentally, was our closing date on the purchase of the home). When we filed the deed to our newly purchased property, we were informed of the new assessed value. We were really surprised that the assessed value was $16,000 over what we paid for the home two weeks earlier. It was an oversight on our part not to investigate the new assessed value of the home 1 before we purchased it, however, it never occurred to us that the home would be assessed for so much more than we feel it is worth. We visited with Scott Winter of the Carver County Assessor's Office. He informed us our only 1 course of action was to file a real property tax appeal, which we are now in the process of doing. r 1 1 Board of Review Carver County Assessor ' April 9, 1992 Page 2 We certain) do not object to paying our fair share real object P Y 9 e of eal estate property tax. However, we do feel that an assessed value of $120,500 would be more appropriate. The $120,500 represents 1 the $119,500 we paid for the home plus an additional $1,000 for our share of a new furnace that was installed as part of the purchase agreement. 1 Thank you for your time and consideration. Sinser Iy 1 _- Robert J. Thielges Terese W. Thielges 7208 Frontier Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 #/3 (office use only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME Pd--/ k p rS PHONE ADDRESS /O - 71k; e.5 5 0/4e 0 /City PARCEL ID# O 3/3- 1 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: 1 1 1 1 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR:P"/ / (Initial & date /time) 137 25.3150010 Apt 1992 EMV $3,176,000 Thies & Taile Enterprises, Inc. 470 West 78th Street -Suite 260 Chanhassen MN 55317 Reviewed property on Income Approach to Value and also talked with Mr. Todd Gerhardt from the City of Chanhassen. Recommendation of reducing II building value from $2,922,000 to $1,796,000. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $1,126,000 to $2,050,000 ROTE: 111 . 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 1 /V use only) 1 APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME Adice,ej Qt PHONE ADDRESS Twn /City PARCEL IDi I/ I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: 7(') 41 1 I/ ,1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: 4 / / (Initial & date /time) 138 25.0121900 Comm 1992 EMV $1,702,500 ' Thies & Talle Enterprises, Inc. 470 West 78th Street -Suite 260 Chanhassen MN 55317 ' . As per TIF Agreement a recommendation to reduce the building value from $1,564,700 to $1,312,200. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $252,500 to $1,450,000 VOTE: 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as 1 noted: 1 • ., 4,, ' , x. :\ o l z _� GL v ,,,;; o ., ,,,...,(-1,1 I `fi / ' ,,( THIES &TALLE ENTERPRISES, INC. 3anD IEgIna EilDwagilua@ma I 470 WEST 78TH STREET • SUITE 260 • CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 • (612) 949 -2200 • FAX (612) 949-0331 MAI LING ADDRESS. POST OFFICE BOX 250 • CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 I April 21, 1992 I Mr. Ivan Arnold ; . ; ,.� , Office of Carver County Assessor 600 E. 4th Street . Chaska, MN 55318 1 Dear Mr. Arnold: Thank you for your call yesterday regarding the Board of Review hearing in Chanhassen. I As I mentioned on the telephone, we believe real estate tax valuation on Chanhassen Medical Arts, Parcel # R 25.0121900, is overvalued. t roperty there is an assessment agreement with an agreed minimum value $1,450,000.. e 1991 value for taxes payable in 1992 on the above referenced Parcel and a small adjacent Parcel are $1,737,300. 1 As you are undoubtedly well aware, the current market for office buildings is quite depressed. In speaking with realtors, mortgage bankers and appraisers, the current value I of office buildings constructed in suburban locations in the 1980's is approximately $40 per foot or approximately $800,000 for our building. The major problem in office buildings is the cost of tenant turnover. It is estimated that an owner will spend approximately $30 per I square foot in brokerage fees and leasehold improvement to attract a new tenant. Thus, a significant portion of a tenant's rent is really the amortization of brokerage and leasehold • improvement costs. • I have enclosed for your information the 1991 partnership tax return for Chanhassen Medical Arts Limited Partnership. O fo�8825 gross ren are s wn as $290,,257r 1 Operating expenses are $409,878. Exc u • mg taxes, • epreciation an • mteres net expenses are $93,828. Therefore, the property's pre -real estate tax net operating income is $196,429. Using a ten percent capitalization rate and a 6% real estate tax rate for a total 16% pre -real I estate tax capitalization produces a value of approximately $1,225,000. The difference between this value and what we believe is the fair market value of $800,000 is the fact that I in analyzing the leases, the market attributes a portion of the rent to the amortization of leasehold improvement costs on the term of the leases. We recognize, however, that no matter what the actual fair market value, we have agreed I not to protest the value less than $1,450,000. Accordingly, we respectfully request the value be reduced from the current value of $1,737,300 to the agreed figure in the assessment agreement of $1,450,000. We believe that value is significantly in excess of the fair market 1 ' Mr. Arnold Page 2 1 Thank you very much for the opportunity of presenting this information to you. I look 1 forward to your review and our further discussions. If you have any questions or comments or require any additional information, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, THIES & TALLE ENTERPRISES, INC. 1 ,Kenneth R. Talle ' KRT /ga Enclosure 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • ' # /3 9 (Office Use Only) - APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: ,A Ltl1 N R. 9- sw-e ty..) JQe "IL Address: /8y4 N /'a A Pit. L.tA/' 2) R � srR,ar FoR D t b1 v Wt a a S' ,BGoc% ao City: E tk.1 7.1t4;Rt t slt■ Zip: s's 3WG • Home Phone: 43y - 5'9/ a Work Phone: 9/ G •s t ' o 1 Parcel I.D. Number: PRc t !e 2 S. 8a 4a iso • I want property reviewed because: �S VO4 o 4 00 r la 714_ 1.1 an ridRLI4S -t ' I;• M8 7 K i✓AS /Pod 0'.1 za }ti wAi A 414 7 7; , LA r ' ' y , ' ,, , n R ev 3 d-• = 1 3 it V/ i A AL- Jed s-.a ,�,.z.) AL< 33z 4 1 slit L ai , . F - L , 4- ) 1'1 '. 6,d. 4' 714 y.4, 151 A i %cA , Le R < w ,<,' t yi i dr 2 4 1 .7" - 6'0 AsTS s c cie, 1 0! d ,e A< 4,. S `� �&.- - � o'�'G.t- , 74 044 ke.. / I! S•t.. � r✓ Data reviewed by Assessor: e L f If • z- / 2 3 .> (Initial & date /time) • 139 25.8060150 Vac Land 1992 EMV $65,000 Kevin R & S Tritz 18464 Maple Leaf Drive Eden Prairie MN 55346 Owners main concern was the amount of taxes on vacant land. After explaining vacant land tax the owner seemed satisfied. EMV is in line with other vacant land. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV • NOTE: • Action Taken by Board: _ Approved as Recommended . Adjusted as Noted • • • • • 1 1 N O (office uLe only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME L les t hk-5n P- PHONE `7 ,! 11- 95-0,5 ADDRESS C M/ 4(4,44_60,,, /eel, Twn /City C,h.r∎ ser∎ ' PARCEL ID# g‘. O�7 03 D 0 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: ' S 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: / & date /time) 140 25.0270300 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $102,400 ' Charles Wagner 9401 Audubon Rd Chanhassen MN 55317 ' Owner stated he will get an appraisal on property and will contact the Assessor's office if the appraisal is under assessed value. Checked the sales in the area and recalculation in CAMA. ' RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE: 1 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as ' noted: 1 • Charles Wagner 1 9401 Audubon Road _ Chanhassen, MN 55317 448 -9505 4 -17 -91 City of Chanhassen 1 Assessment Board of Review Parcel# R 25.0270300 • Per my wife Joans phone call of earlier this week, I an appealing the increased property tax assessment for 1992 and have hired an independent appraiser to give his own estimate of my residential property value. He should have it completed in 3 weeks time. When he is finished I will submit a copy of his findings to the city if his estimate agrees with my suspicions. If his estimate is equal or higher than my 1992 assessment, 1 will withdraw my appeal. 1 My concern is that the county assessor claims my lot value was the reason for the increased assessment and I do not feel that my lot in particular could have gone up at all. If anything the traffic problem has been aggravated by increased cars and lawless driving habits. In addition I have heard talk of possible expansion of Audubon Road (county road 17). Mention these things to a perspective house buyer and you can guess what will happen. 1 Thank you, ,�-- 1 Charles Wagner 1 1 1 1 1 1 • # /V/ / (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: thrl L+/i e-cwgz4e -w-r.4 Address: 7e) z 2 bA JI OT,q c Acc e City: Crl�al rle455 n/ -� I Home Phone: '13 7 -) So 6 Work Phone: 9 3') ? m q Parcel I.D. Number: 4 oT z. o (S� c k 1 �2L; . d? ) C7/ .z 0 I want property reviewed because: f�e ,J' I 0 .4- i' A rs ' IG uAc d.a -new #4A/ /0 304 ;s 6e /N ?o NA S 4040 - ' /7, I : c /ioel E /s e= T:-1+E modez. i 1si ?Kt ci.D GoGe Jig 6g. ovt. fanC4 ' J? /vino s . + 4JtE t g eotcucr+eZ.. 444teG,,qGg5 y/46 •1 70-10- P ig,w • f fart 4.i Dee 1 AAA h ' �O ,,u 1 Data reviewed by Assessor: / / V / ‘ (Initial & date /time) - 141 25.2300120 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $198,000 I James Wildermuth • 7022 Dakota Circle Chanhassen MN 55317 Interior inspection done on property 04/30/92. Partial basement, recalculated in CAMA. Recommendation of reducing building value from $153,000 to $128,800. ' RECO MMENDATION: reduce EMV $24,200 to $173,800 Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Y App d Adjusted as Noted • • 1 . - 1 . ' # 1L (Office Use Only) • APPEAL, TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: Address: ' -.../.._/ 2., -4,:,.4,,d X, ... City: !"..-1.4 .......4.# .......4.; ..,:,,,, Zip: --, .55: i 7 • Home Phone: qs1-/- - '1 ?.•!::: X' Work Phone: • Parcel I.D. Number: -2.5- egin 0 tic) • I want property reviewed because: 4 —I4._ei „4„. ia • e-ate/ IiL P . - _?....i2,,,. , ti 4."22 O' e. ', 1 •---/I ..■ ) it8-17/ , 7, s- M,42 17,—.e4 t4-e,4, ---d (...., • . . I Data reviewed by Assessor: 4--(A) / 4" 2`f / (Initial & date/time) 142 25.8810060 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $117,300 Conrad Winkel 505 Highland Drive • Chanhassen MN 55317 Reviewed property data and sales in Western Hills area. laggMENDATIOI_no change in EMV HP-TE-L - . • Action Taken by Board: _ Approved as Recommended . -..... Adjusted as Noted • • • . . . 1 • • /93 (office use only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 1 NAME /4 y t)(aSe_ PHONES •- 4 /?7 0 2_ ADDRESS $ I7.ir Twn /city (/'04,11 4" PARCEL ID# ;ZS• 0/6 49e2(:)° ' I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: - 1.0,xes o� r -d pr ar cie y 1.y11 1 e �-e '' s • r. .. 1 gi 1 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR:) ' /�/ (Initial & date /time) . 143 25.0160200 Res Hstd /Res NonHstd 1992 EMV $176,100 Henry & Edna Wrase 8175 Hazentine Blvd Chanhassen MN 55317 I Two homes are on one parcel, Planning office in City of Chanhassen says properties can not be split at this time. Recommendation of reducing rental value of building value from $56,400 to $48,200 and reducing ' rental value of land from $18,000 to $15,000. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $11,200 to $164,900 ROTE: ' 1 1 ' ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: 1 1 • INN am' as mil EN � � EN um — 2 1= — No ' AIN am as am = ..,, __. p ; "‘ . t) 1140" 8 , 4 . . ‘? i 5 /1 (.. .--1--) -- • c,.. , A.. - b „, ''' i riii ,.,,, l . , 15 :3 , - , .45 4* . ' '• l ' ' .: t 'S _ ?.- 0 Li �' , z ?c .-- . ,o ,„,,411 ..2 "4 j4 . ., ..::, , ....P ''...? , -. --.1 ( 2 --) , 4 05 ' : ....•- . . ‘‘ , . .4-. , u.:06,-,) N ,3 7" , r 4 • • • (‘ 'fr/ '". jr2 C''' ' • '. g . . 1 . _ i ' D I :t 31 0° , ci , ' i 1 • , . 3 g ...v? 0 , . 1 ,„. .., , . . 0, ._ • ,.,,i,, 2 ,,,,...7, ,,-- ,.! , ,;,.., - .4, , ...) 5 ,....- ,,..- , , -7- 64. . , . Al C...?.. 1 - v a te ` V) w. ( - 1 C .--- 6 b\ , r . . , ,..,,i ,...,._ _. , ,.. „0,0(_ , . .--,...t �G o• �r ' ° „.......,x .; !-)) e 4 „.k 6 c ---11) " -- 5 .- -"--- . _ . ...::: c ... 6 ii, ..,7 ..„..„..; 0 , 1 . 9 j . ' , • } i , a ' ,' ' Y , • / (office use only) ' APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME 40(41 S ft; vl Ia.d ys Zkcirl a-sen PHONE ADDRESS 3$ 6 I Red ac to r P t- 1`d - Twn /City f S r n f PARCEL ID/ 5 C3 D g 0 7 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: L e DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR:,, / x'.2 8 (Initial & date /time) 144 25.0080700 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $102,900 ' Louis & Gladys Zakariasen 3861 Red Cedar Point Road Excelsior MN 55331 Reviewed sales and recalculated in CAMA. Recommendation of reduction of building value from $68,300 to $60,400. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $7,900 to $95,000 _ ,. NOTE: 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as ' noted: 11 d , © 1 1 April 7, 1992 Board of Review Carver County 1 We are appealing the increase in our Real Estate tax for 1992. 1 In 1991, our taxes more than doubled (from $806 to $1638 — an increase of $832). In 1992, the tax has increased from $1638 to $1820 an increase of $182. We are retired and on a fixed income — our home is a very modest home. We feel the tax is increasing faster than the value of our horse. 1 Thank you for your consideration. 1 Louis and Gladys Zakariasen 3861 Red Cedar Pt. Rd. Excelsior, MN 55331 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r (office uLe only) //'' APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 NAME I-O c [ 5 e, E, Z aril Ju.44 ot, r <d zain J .fit rl PHONE ADDRESS 7 2506 7 7 sf Twn /City c&/ PARCEL IDi Z5,tD3 5 /000 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: 1 4— — Alb_ • 1 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: 41 / y —)`/ (Initial & date /time) 145 25.0351000 1992 EMV $12,600 ' Louise E Zamjahn c/o David Zamjahn 7506 77th Street Chaska MN 55318 Unbu,idable land, swampy ground. REOOIENDATION: reduce EMV $10,500 R $2,100 NOTE: 1 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as 1 noted: 1 1 II, 1 ' Charles Wagner 9401 Audubon Road Chanhassen, MN 55317 ' (612) 448 -9505 5/8/92 City of Chanhassen Assessment Board of review I RE: Letter dated 4/17/92 parcel # R 25.0270300 Enclosed is a copy of an independent appraisal Just recently 1 completed for my property. As can be seen Mr. Ford Pike has put value at $98,000 due to basement and driveway improvements not lot appreciation as stated by the county assessors office. I still feel Mr. Pikes estimate is about $1,000 too high and would ask that the city place my property tax value at $97,000 which is up $2,000.00 from my current tax base of $95,000 this I would ' consider fair for the lot and dwelling improvements over the last few years. While I am still greatful to the city for allowing me to build on ' this lot I would like to point out that my sole reason for building on this lot was to raise my family on property that has been in my family since the 1850's, If I had not chosen to live here the county would still be receiving somewhere in the neighborhood of $140.00 a year in taxes as a near worthless wooded parcel and now it is paid 10 times that yearly. 111 In the future I would also ask that the county base any further increases solely on improvements as my lot value may even have to be decreased in time due to increased traffic on Audubon Road ' coming from growing industrial and residential developments in the immediate vicinity. Thank You, 1 1 1 I PIKE APPRAISAL 1 • f I ' May 25, 1992 Charles S. Wagner 9401 Audubon Road Chanhassen, Mn., 55317 ' File Number: 2245 1 In accordance with your request, I have personally inspected and appraised the real property at: 9401 Audubon Road Chanhassen, Mn. 55317 t The purpose of the appraisal was to estimate the market value of the property, as improved, in fee simple, unencumbered by liens. A legal description of the property will be found herein. In my opinion, the estimated market value of the property, as of 4 -25, 1992 is: Ninety Eight Thousand Dollars ($98,000) The attached report contains the description, analysis and supportive data for the conclusions and final estimate of value together with descriptive photographs. Sincerly, ' Ford Pike 0 1 1 1 ' Y 4627 GAYWOOD DRIVE, MINNETONKA, MN. 55345 (612) 936 0812 A• j t. • . • J _ _ . . . __. , 11 i UNIFORM RESIDENTIAL APPRAISAL REPORT Fe. *a. 2245 ry Address 9401 Audubon Road Census Tract LENDER DISCRETIONARY USE I - • Chanhassen County Carver slate Mn. np code 55317 Sale Price $ • Legal Description See Attached Addendum. Deb QAaler/Ocurpant Charles S. Wagner Map Reference 46 -2A Mortgage Amount $ Sale Price S N/A Date of Sale Property Rights Appraised Mortgage Type Loan charges /concessions to be paid by seller S 0.00 X Fee Simple Discount Pointe and Other Concessions RE Taxes $ 1,788.00 Tax Year 1992 HOA S/Mo. 0.00 Leasehold Paid by Seller S Lender /Client Charles S. Wa gner Condominium (HUD/VA) _ 9401 Audubon Road Chanhassen, Mn., 55317 De M inimis PhD Source LOCATION Urban X Suburban Rural NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS 000d Arg. fair Poor BUILT UP Oye 75X 25 - 75X Under 25% Employment Stability IQ © ❑ ❑ I GROWTH RATE Read © Stable Slow Convenience to Employment ❑ © ❑ ❑ PROPERTY VALUES increasing Stable Declining Convenience to Shopping ❑ © ❑ ❑ DEMAND/SUPPLY Shortage © in Balance Over Supply Convenience to Schools ❑ © ❑ ❑ 0 MARKETING TIME Under 3 Mlos. X 3 - 6 Mos. Over 6 Mos. Adequacy of Public Transportation ❑ I ^ PRESENT LAND USE x LAND USE CHANGE PREDOMINANT SII 3 E FAMILY HOUSING Recreation Facilities 01300 p Sine Family Not Likely OCCUPANCY PRICE AGE Adequacy of Utilities ID © ❑ x 2 - S Family 0 Likely Owner X 6(000) (yrs) Property Compatibility ❑ © ❑ Multi - family 0 In process a Tenant 70 Low 0 Protection from Detrimental Cond. o © ❑ Commercial 0 To: Vaunt (0-5X) X 150 High 20 Police & Are Protection ❑ © ❑ ❑ i Industrial 0 Vacant (over 5%) Predominant General Appearance of Properties Iii ❑ ❑ Vacant 50 100 - 10 Appeal to Market n (Xl n ❑ Nob: Race or the ma& composition of the neighborhood are not considered reliable appraisal factors. COMMENTS: The subject property is located in Chanhassen in a gradually developing area. Several roads provide access to shopping, I schools and the surrounding metropolitan area. Dimensions 5514.34 +10.68 x 117.93 x 509.35 Topography Sloping to rear Site Area 30017 SF Corner Lot No Size Typical for area I ZoningciassmcetionAgricultural/Residential Zoning Compliance Yes shape Triangular HIGHEST 8 BEST USE Present Use Yes Other Use No Drainage Appears adequate UTILITIES Public Other SITE IMPROVEMENTS Type Public Private View Highway, Power Line: W Electricity !li Street Asphalt X Landscaping Wooded Gas Curb /Griller None Driveway Concrete Water Well Sidewalk None Apparent Easements See Comments Sanitary Sewer Septic StreetUghts None FDA Flood Hazard Yes" NoX Storm Sewer Alley None FEMA• Map/Zone COMMENTS (Apparent adverse easements, encroachments, special assessments, slide areas, etc.): See Attached Addendum. I GENERAL DESCRIPTION EXTERIOR DESCRIPTION FOUNDATION BASEMENT INSULATION Units One Foundation Concrete Slab No Area Sq. Ft 1340 Roof Conc. E co Stories One t xbrior Walls Vinyl Crawl Space No X Finished 18 Ceiling Conc. C: ' i • Type (Det/Att) Detached Roof Surface Asph. Sh. Basement Full Ceiling Suspended we Conc. 0 Design (Style) Rambler Gutters a Dwnspt None sump Pump Yes was DW, Panel Floor Conc . 0 ,;) Existing Yes Window Type Slider Dampness None noted Floor Vinyl,Carc None a Proposed No Storm Sash Yes Settlement None noted outsldeEntiyYes Adequacy Unk. 0 Under Construction NO Screens Yes Intestation None noted Water softner Energy Efficient Items: Age (Yrs.) 4 Manufactured House NO Effective Ace (Mrs.) 3 Minimal ROOMS Foyer Living Dieing Kitchen Den Family Rm. Rec. Rm. Bedroom S Baths Laundry Other Area Sq. Ft 7, Basement 1 Office 24 I o Level 1 1 1 1 3 1.75 1 , 3 a Leval2 o _ Finished area above grade contains: 6 Rooms; 3 Bedroom(•); 1 .75 Bath(s); 1 , 340 Square Feet of Gross Living Arer I SURFACES Materials/Condition HEATING KITCHEN EQUIP. ATTIC IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS ceod Avg F,n Poe Floors Carpet /Good Type FWA Refrigerator II None Quality of Construction ❑ © ❑ 0 Walla Drywall/Good Ant Gas Range /Oven I Stain Condition of Improvements X ❑ ❑ 0 • Trim/Finish Wood /Good Condition Avg. Disposal II Drop Stair 1 Room Sizes/Layout ❑ ❑ [ a Bath Floor Vinyl /Good Adequacy Avg. Dishwasher [4 Scuttle 13 Closets and Storaff O oX [ I Bath Wainse t None COOLING Comps od © Floor 1 Energy Efficient ❑ © ❑ 0 = Doors Wood Panel /Good Central Yes Compactor Heated I♦ Plumbing- Adequacy 8 Condition ❑ i © [ Other None Washer/Dryer I] Finished 1 Electrical- Adequacy & Condition X 2) [ Condition Avg Microwave 1 1 Kitchen Cabinets- Adequacy 8 Cond. X X ❑ 0 Fire. lace a t 0 Ade•ua Av. Intercom 1 1 Compatibility to Neighborhood ❑ 0 n CAR STORAGE Gangs 13 Attached Adequate House Entry © Appeal 8 Mtarkeiabifiy ❑ ❑ 13 0 • No. Cars 2 Carport Detached Inadequate II Outside Entry 13 Estimated Remaining Economic Life 67Yrs. < Condition GOOd None Built-in 1 Electric Door X Basement Entry Estimated Remaining Physical Life N /AYrs. Additional teatures: Patio, living room bay, aluminum fascia & soffit. I N Depreciation ( Physical, functional and external Inadequacies, repairs needed. modernization, etc): The property is well ma i nto ined. There t2 is external depreciation for the highway and high power line locations. No functional II 4 depreciation was noted. 0 U General market conditions and prevalence and Impact in subject/market area regarding loan discounts. Interest buydowns and concessions: The market is stable with sellers typically paying up to 3 points on existing homes and 5 points on new construction. I F wdow Mac Form /0 10/16 n.... w ..emu. 4444444 ,,. .u..ew' Lawry.. Velow. non 114.N.M Fsmue Mae Few 1004 1' .. UNIFORM RESIDENTIAL APPRAISAL REPORT n. ae. 2245 • • se of Appraisal is b estimate Market Value as defined in the Certification & Statement of Limiting Conditions. I • ILDING SKETCH (SHOW GROSS LIVING AREA ABOVE GRADE) ESTIMATED REPRODl1CTION COST-NEW-OF IMPROVEMENTS: I car mead* lase or Fannie Idle. Show only spear. lea calculations and cal approach .0.r..ob in this spore DwetIin 1 , 40 $ . FL S 75, 444 s 3 q 56.004 GLA 24.00 x 52.00: 1 = 1248 Bsmt. 240 Sq.Fte$ 10.00= 2,400 . 24.00 x 2.00 x 1 = 48 Extras Central Air • 1,500 I 22.00 x 2.00 x 1 = 44 ; Total Sq. Ft. = 1340 Special Energy Efficient Items Porches, Patios, etc. Patio 500 Garage/Carport 576 Sq. Ft • S 14.00 = 8,064 o Total Estimated Cost New =3 87,504 I External depreciation of $4,000 each for the highway Physical Functional External < and high power line locations. Less 4% 07. 97. L.') Depreciat 3,500 SO 7,875 -s . - 11,375 t; Depreciated Value of Improvements . . . =S 76,129 Site.imp. "as la' (driveway, landscaping, etc.) =3 3,500 I ESTIMATED SITE VALUE =S 19, 000 (It leasehold. slaw only leasehold value.) INDICATED VALUE BY COST APPROACH =S 98,600 (Not Required by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae) Construction Warranty UYes [1No I Does m - property cordm b applicable HUD/VA property standards? Oyes QNo Name of Warranty Program If No, ex lain: D Warranty Coverage Expires The undersigned has recited three resent sales el properties most similar and proximate to subject and has considered these in the market analysis. The description Includes a dollar adjustment. reflecting market reaction to those items of significant variation between the subject and comparable properties. Ira significant item in the comparable property is superior to or mere favorable than. the subject property a minus ( -) adjustment is made, thus reducing the Indicated value of subject; it a significant item in the comparable is inferior to. I or less favorable than. the Subject property. a Mae (.) adjustment le made, thus Increasing the indicated value of 1h. subject. ITEM SUBJECT COMPARABLE NO. 1 COMPARABLE NO. 2 COMPARABLE NO. 3 9401 Audubon 2240 Audubon Rd. 2702 Shadowwood Ct. 6841 Chaparral Lane Address Chanhassen Chaska Chanhassen Chanhassen Proximity to Subject 1 Mile 1/2 Mile 3 Miles Sales Price I/A S 102,000 $ 93,000 S 103,900 Prig /Gross LN. Area S 0.000 $ 75.89 S 78.68 $ MLS 87.24 Data Source Inspection MLS MLS ADJUSTMENTS DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION •( -) $ Adjustment DESCRIPTION I .0 i Adjwiment DESCRIPTION i .( -) s Adi.ntmenl I Sales or Financing FHA -0- Conventional -0- Conventional - Concessions No Pts. Slr -0- No Pts. Slr -0- No Pts. Slr - Date or Sale/Time N/A 11 -91 -0- 1 -92 -0- 2 -92 -0- Location Suburban/Avg-Suburban/Fair -0- Suburban /Fair -0- Suburban /Avg -4,000 CA Site/View .7 Acre /Poor .55 Acre /Avg -4,000 :36 Acre /Fair -0- .25 Acre /Avg -4,000 Dasign and Appeal Rambler /Avg Rambler /Avg -0- Rambler /Avg -0- Rambler /A -G -2,000 auRyorcortatn,etlon Average Average -0- Average -0- Average -O- Aye 4 years +1- 29 years +6,000 New -2,000 13 years +2,000 Condition Good Good -0- Good -0- Good -0- o , I L1 Above Grade Tow ' Beim ' Bare Taft : edit t Wes ; Bath To ' .s : Bath Total ; Bern ; Beth . < om Ro Count 6 3:1.7! 6 3 1 +1,500 6 3. 1 -0- 7 3 1 +1,500 .500 1,191Sq.Ft. +3,700 OroaalivingAna 1,340S4Ft 1,344Sq.Ft -0- 1,1$2Sq. +4,000 u ul Baaemenl B FlNahed WO 1340 Sq.FtWO Full -0- Full +1,500 Full +1,500 Ir RoomsBeloworade D,0 /240SFF FR,B,K/1000F -4,000 Unfinished +1,500 Unfinished +1,500 i I _, Functional Utility Average Equal -0- Equal -0- Equal -0- Heating/Cooling Gas FWA C/AirGas HW +1,000 Gas FWA +1,500 Gas FWA C /Air -0- Garage /carport 2 Car Garage 2 Car Garage -0- 2 Car Garage -0- 2 Car Garage -0- Porches, Patio - - Pools. etc. Patio Deck -500 None +500 Large deck -1,000 I Special Energy -0- -0- Efficient Items Minimal Minimal -0- Minimal -0- Minimal -0- Fireplace(s) 0 1 -2,000 0 -0- 1 -2,000 Other(e.g.kitchen Well & septicCity Sewer -1,500 City W & S -3,000 City W & S -3,000 I equip.. remodeling) Well U -0- -0 Net Adj. (b41) Iodated Value + Lxl-�s 3,500 lxl. L1-;$ 4,000 Li. Lxl:s 5,800 _ of Subject s 98,500 s 97,000_ s 98,100 Corm enn fxl sale. Gmpert of> Due to the lack of better comparables it was necessary to use comparables I over 1 mile away and having larger adjustments. Comparables 1 and 2 adjoined county road 17 with comparable 2 also having the high power lines at the rear of the site. INDICATED VALUE BY SALES COMPARISON APPROACH S 98,000 IDEATED VALUE BY INCOME APPROACH ( 11Applitable) Estimated Market Rent S N /A/Mo. x Gross Multiplier N /A =s N/A . This appraisal is made (l as la- 0 subject to the repairs, alterations, inspections. or conditions listed below O completion per plans and specifications. cements and Concitiau a Appraisal: A walkout rambler with 2 car attached garage adversely affected by site location problems. • Foulammadaft The sales approach was given .the most weight with the cost approach supporting the value. The income approach lacked sufficient data. I o • This appraisal is based upon the above requirements, the artificatlon, contingent and limiting conditions, and Market Value definition that are stated in u x Fm HUD HA H &/or VA instruction. o Freddie Mac Form 439 (Rev. 7 /86)/Fannie We Form 10048 (Rev. 7/86) filed with client 19 © attached. w I (WE) ESTIMATE THE MARKET VALUE, AS DEFIED, OF TIE SUB,ECT PROPERTY AS OF 4 - 5 Ill 92 to b. $ 98,000 I I (WE) certify that to the beat of my (ow) knowledge and belief. the facts and data used herein are true and correct: than 1(we) personally inspected the subject property, both Inside and out, and have made an exterior 1 ction of all comparable sales cited In this report and that 1 (we) have no undisclosed Interest present or prospective therein. s e ADDrAppraiser(*) =NOW Appraiser 9d1ATUE ❑ CRP ad Qao erl I WE Ford Pike, IFA, (if applicable) 1g1E InapeclProperty _ rdwd. Mac gam yo toias II PIKE APPRAISAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 27, Township 116, Range 23 Carver County, Mn., lying Easterly of County State Aid Highway 17. SITE COMMENTS: A wooded walkout site serviced by well and septic. There are several 1 drawbacks to the site, including the narrow width and triangular shape which when considered with the septic system location and building setbacks appear to eliminate the possibility of future building additions. Also the highway _ view traffic and noise present a problem. In addition, the view of the 1 high power lines located in close proximity to the building and the concern over electromagnetic fields present a further site detriment. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4627 GAYWOOD DRIVE, MINNETONKA, MN. 55345 (612) 936 0312 i t • PIKE APPRAISAL I SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTO ADDENDUM 4627 GAYWOOD DRIVE MINNETONKA, MN. 55345 J (61 Z) 936 0812 / / 1 ... t t' r � �' `� , . ,.. -r.1 VA.; -- ?it j ► . I '. - a 1 !!RTY AT 1 ` 1, ,y � 1 . , _ fspaw : �� ad I - - �_' Chanhassen, Mn. 55317 — • , t r; ` ( —= d Appraised: 4 25, 1992 ( J1 1111 I Appraised Value: $98,000 , . I _f.. .- _ - - - -- �} �� r y o . �,. la < S rig" k 4`` ` = 4!•.,4! - VIEW OF --4..:, , , .: • PPP 17 I i ' * – SUB ECT PROPERTY '"� r ' r 1 ! : - , :; - 7, , ,:,. . , . : . -: -7 ; 17_ ; £ I 1 • • . .. 1 • ..I tt ,mod, ;'Sl.,.� n`s • "0- I .... `;�' 4, f i i STREET SCENE V , 0 i , I Ern:_ ' 1 / // j PIKE APPRAISAL �OJ COMPARABLE SALES PHOTO ADDENDUM 4627 GAYWOOD DRIVE MINNETONKA, MN. 55345 (612) 936 0812 1 ' i "V a te' i -0.• q .. �' ," • f IV ' COMPARABLE SALE N1 2240 Audubon Rd. Chaska ' f Sale Date: 11-91 — �• Sale Price: $102,000 SY 7~ P3 � y .3Y•i J: S .y*: -' +: • • v � , ` {40, Vin. -€3 r c : , : f`• ;- t x ; x? 4 . ., " ,may ' 1 ' 4'44 f '' COMPARABLE SALE #2 1 L { • 2742 Shadowwood Ct. J Chanhassen Sale Date: 1 -92 "N ' ` . '. Sale Price: $93,000 I — __ _ jJ— 1 L s P' . ' _ `i".., ,I , ; - , `�"'' I =; COMPARABLE SALE N3 :. ...trap ' Alit ' 6841 Chaparral Lane f Chanhassen • Sale Date: 2 -92 Sale Price: $103,900 1 - - - -- - - -- oo ` �,.. I \CO ON I tD 4.0 \ 01-1) }tea\ �� • // \ c:\ , ,q4 / \ \ \ 1 \ x;--.\ ' m • co = r r 8Z m • 1 A m <o ° • O .� • In D Ln O N O O 4. r 0 \ G,±1 to vn. \ \ a v y R1 Q i17, m 711 m LLy w O Q \-e, So i W 4 a (.71 \ (6. \ N Z 0 r ta U I L 1. 0 ' 0£ AS A3Aans a3d 'LZ '03S 40 b/I MN 3 I SON 11 'V S3WVr A8 A3Aat1S aid SV ■\ cc. . \_______"__ d0 op MN 3H1 d0 N 31480 1SV3H1a0N I 1111 . 1 ts Il 30V1d NI '14'1'0 0 -- £6211 -- AlNf100 83AaV0 3 „11,81.99 N \ dM1'12 '33S d0 011 MN 3H1 d0 83Na03 1SV3H1a0N £Z '398'911 dML '42 '03S 40 b/I MN 3Hl 40 1 . 1 1 • ' - / p A SEE AP 46A 03 > F ( ii ii — Vi.:4. .. itagra---i 11 " i : 12 1 If 1 ..-x _ 01* • . ; if Ili 111 I cl • -i. It g • -I . &s , , Yr�Y�U I o / I IP* I. a : • 3!j , NIM Eon 4 . 111 P ' \‘' t �I i vrurM • c . 1 Al _ I a � ` s ' e N ti L,,c‘e 1 , 1��1�� gr I r 1 r I ►° i -, , -L,, ... ;?* Yk •- - vr e ;!.. " NAZ 3 ' ..-:".' ' , .: .. , ........._ , ,,, z ... ..), , ,,,..„ ,.11 ... I� , a>. .V Minh kik '. F m ^,. ✓/- illiV.H''''" 0 latell M 7 , illtil !7 Tog V ' ro • [R a�wdn.wn �3 _ - - _ — ^ Otl 01 d i '!b . 1 - - o J- i 1 Z Z 1 . • 1 i 1 111 N z 1 a a 0 r O 2 a i I • l • - DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale. the buyer and seller, each acting prudently, knowledgeably and assuming the price is not affected ' by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby. (1) buyer and seller are typically motivated; (2) both parties are well informed or well advised, and each acting in what he considers his own best interest; (3) a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; (4) payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and (5) the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions* granted by anyone associated with the sale. * Adjustments to the conparables must be made for special or creative financing or sales concessions. No adjustments are necessary for those costs which are normally paid by sellers as a result of tradition or law in a market area these costs are readily identifiable since the seller pays these costs in virtually all sales transactions. Special or creative financing adjustments can be made to the comparable property by comparisons to financing terms offered by a third party institutional lender that is not already involved in the property or transaction. Any adjustment should not be calculated on a mechanical dollar for dollar cost of the financing or concession but the dollar amount of any adjustment should approximate the market's reaction to the financing or concessions based on the appraiser's judgment. CERTIFICATION AND STATEMENT OF UMITING CONDITIONS ' CERTIFICATION: The appraiser certifies and agrees that: 1 The Appraiser has no present or contemplated future interest in the property appraised; and neither the employment to make the appraisal. nor the compensation for it, is contingent upon the appraised value of the property 2. The Appraiser has no personal interest in or bias with respect to the subject matter of the appraisal report or the participants to the sale. The "Estimate of Market Value in the appraisal report is not based in whole or in part upon the race, ' color, or national origin of the prospective owners or occupants of the property appraised. or upon the race, color, or national origin of the present owners or occupants of the properties in the vicinity of the property appraised. 3. The Appraiser has personally inspected the property, both inside and out, and has made an exterior inspection of all comparable sales listed in the report. To the best of the Appraiser's knowledge and belief, all statements and information in this report are true and correct, and the Appraiser has not knowingly withheld any significant information. P4. All contingent and limiting conditions are contained herein (imposed by the terms of the assignment or by the undersigned affecting the analysis, opinions, and conclusions contained in the report). 5. This appraisal report has been made in conformity with and is subject to the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct of the appraisal organizations with which the Appraiser is affiliated. P 6. All conclusions and opinions concerning the real estate that are set forth in the appraisal report were prepared by the Appraiser whose signature appears on the appraisal report, unless indicated as "Review Appraiser" No change of any item in the appraisal report shall be made by anyone other than the Appraiser, and the Appraiser shall have no responsibility for any such unauthorized change. P CONTINGENT AND UMITING CONDITIONS: The certification of the Appraiser appearing in the appraisal report is subject to the following conditions and to such other specific and limiting conditions as are set forth by the Appraiser in the report. 1 The Appraiser assumes no responsibility for matters of a legal nature affecting the property appraised or the title thereto nor does the appraiser render any opinion as to the title, which is assumed to be good and marketable. The property is appraised as though under responsible ownership. 2. Any sketch in the report may show approximate dimensions and is included to assist the reader in visualizing the property The Appraiser has made no survey of the property 3. The Appraiser is not required to give testimony or appear in court because of having made the appraisal with reference to the property in question, unless arrangements have been previously made therefore. P 4. Any distribution of the valuation in the report between land and improvements applies only under the existing program of utilization. The separate valuations for land and building must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if s o used. 5. The Appraiser assumes that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures, which would render it more or less valuable. The Appraiser assumes no responsibility for such conditions, or for engineering which might be P required to discover such factors. 6. Information, estimates, and opinions fumished to the Appraiser, and contained in the report, were obtained from sources considered reliable and believed to be true and correct. However, no responsibility for accuracy of such items fumished the Appraiser can be assumed by the Appraiser. I T Disclosure of the contents of the appraisal report is governed by the Bylaws and Regulations of the professional appraisal organizations with which the Appraiser is affiliated. 8. Neither all, nor any part of the content of the report, or copy thereof (including conclusions as to the property value, the identity of the Appraiser, professional designations, reference to any professional appraisal organizations, or the firm with which the Appraiser is connected), shall be used for any purposes by anyone but the client specified in the report, the borrower it appraisal fee paid by same, the mortgagee or its successors and assigns, mortgage insurers, consultants, professional appraisal organizations, any state or federally approved financial institution, any department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States or any state or the District of Columbia, without the previous written consent of the Appraiser; nor shall it be conveyed by anyone to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media, without the written consent and approval of the Appraiser 9. On all appraisals, subject to satisfactory completion, repairs, or alterations, the appraisal report and value conclusion are 111 contingent upon completion of the improvements in a workmanlike manner. 1 1 Date: 4-2 5e 1 ?9 Appraiser(s) � `' 111 APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 • Name: Don Burchet Address: 225 Pioneer Trail City: Chanhassen Zip: 55317 Home Phone: 445 -2101 Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: 25.0250700 ' I want property reviewed because: How can you raise property value $ 19,000 in one year? With no improvements. Have new houses built around but not improvements to my property. ' _ 1 1 Data reviewed by Assessor: - / S — lp / /1 °% (Initial & date /time) 17 25.0250700 1992 EMV $84,700 I Cc 700 Donald & P Burchett 225 Pioneer Trail Chaska MN 55318 Tried to contact property owner, left a tag on door April 28th. EMV is not out of line with comparable properties. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE: Board Consideration Requested Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted 1 # (Office Use Only) 1 1 1 . rie 11.41, GO Olk leerter14-C- A/ ekort . 7 7iee., Cigt. # , 3 (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 .,4- at Z t L Name: ES n� 'g T /AXE L Address: 7o2O Voje/s W.-a/ / .� City: 41 - ' Zip: _S.3 <•' ? 1 € Home Phone: gRAIHIreArZiglir / Work Phone: IWD 5- . 7 • Parcel I.D. Number: ' 2S. /2Z Do /O t� 1 „I -. a2Gt �. ), , ' !/ j I want property reviewed because: �e /2141 ', ' .1.82.17 to o il 3--.6 ' 4 1 1YLG r SgA4-, °� , /9g7 - e if9/ ‘2, ,fi a 4 , e di . ,ii , a=te f, _,t).. a -%'--7 r, �e 1 tlagaz e jaeP *am ;Z., -.4.& 4e0i,e_e_, 6t moi / / , -..... c l , ,": / '... i . , - , ,pri. t. /9P‘. Weile, a/2e-. 71 4.- __ • AP / if e z o ez_e? w a, , i /Ar , _./ ' ,,, , , / 4,,,,,/ ,-*241M, - Data reviewed by Assessor: 1 L / ( f - .2f / lei 3 v (Initial & date /time) 31 25.1220010 1992 EMV $113,100 James & Janet Dingel 1 720 Vogelsberg Trail Chaska MN 55318 Inspected home, updated data, noted sales information 11 -85 $109,000, 1 recalculated value indicate consistent EMV with neighborhood. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV • NOTE: Board Consideration Requested I Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended t Adjusted as Noted • 1 • 11 1 # ? (- (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 ' Name: 5 te-e e- il/ 44 D Address: i / ' •-I fr) .' /tom d ' City: C h 4 5 ..t-,� � s - � ' : Home Phone: - .z v Work Phone: <4 9' - .3 : p, . Parcel I.D. Number: , 5 o c 0 • I want property reviewed because: ,,_ , D' • t ' Data reviewed by Assessor : 4 / ' J-? / (Initial & date /time) 36 25.0030500 1992 EMV $127,600 ' Steven M Fink 1915 Stoughton Avenue Chaska MN 55318 Inspected property, updated field data, recalculated values indicate a reducing building value $4,500. RECOMMENDATION: reduce EMV $4,500 to $123,100 I NOTE: Unable to contact owner ' Action Taken by Board: roved as Recommended ended Adjusted as Noted 1 • # Office ( Use Only) • APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: h o - ) . 1 I V - 1 1-7cN 1,y n n4 D Q-k- S cr5 - Address: `7 qc`' \j Is o `7, Dr 1 City: _ . Zip: 5"-:"1& Home Phone: /4 -n Work Phone: 1 4 4 4 Parcel I.D. Number: . la 2003 C ) I want property reviewed because: CASSeSS1 Oa, t€ CZO5e a - T c� x � m Noi Q4. o-C au Resal Q S�c6 -(? 41-QA- ckmoukFt- Ect.Re , U2. 1 I nCl\ie dd-Q,RRoRckw • � our Q-a< lob', Rem °\' tea) s eAc. o A I Out rt OuQ home v,� QsS€SS - tt l '±100. Data reviewed by Assessor: / (Initial & date/time) 37 25.1220030 1992 EMV $108,700 Robert S & Debra L Finley 740 Vogelsberg Trail Chaska MN 55318 • Reviewed property data, noting 4 -86 sale $110,000, recalculated value. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV NOTE: Board Consideration Requested Action Taken by Board: _ Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • 1 ' "tS • # __ (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: DO /) ? Al ( Address: 76/ o frc. if 7` ✓L9 r / City: & /, " u ss e ., I Home Phone: Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: • i - yc- I want property reviewed because: • Fro(-7 Q/•i/ VC Lie 1ricr Asa a -h aO <- 1,1 1 1 j p.vo, Jncr�.�� t rt77 y I"(l f er y / e 1 5 U k au7" �� a n 1 Ula 5 2d / f f¢ d 7 ✓I `7 5^ 4 `. • 1. Data reviewed by Assessor: / / (Initial & date /time) 45 25.0124000 1992 EMV $123,100 ' Donald Goetze 7610 Frontier Trail Chanhassen MN 55317 I Unable to contact owner with at least 4 attempt over a weeks' time. A review of the property records and sales in the area indicates no adjustment necessary. RECOMMENDATION: no change in EMV • NOTE: Board Consideration Requested Action Taken by Board: _ Approved as Recommended . __ Adjusted as Noted • • 1 1 # 1. 4' (office use only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW 1992 1 NAME PHONE 1 •i/ I/� ADDRESS Twn /Cit PARCEL ID# 1 I WANT MY PROPERTY REVIEWED BECAUSE: 1 1 1 1 1 1 DATA REVIEWED BY ASSESSOR: 'L / ysz' /, / (3q initial & date /time) 46 25. 2730570 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $$110,50 1 Terry Degner & Deb Gorrill 6517 Gray Fox Curve Chanhassen MN 55317 Explained that the value of the property is comparable to other properties in the subdivision. Den er notasatisfied with the market"' purchase price of $113,100. Mr. g _- value. 1 FECIME TO DNKN: no change in EMV NOTE: Board Consideration Requested 1 ACTION TAKEN BY BOARD: approved as recommended /adjusted as noted: AIMPIPR alt 1 1 Deb Gorrill and Terry Degner 6517 Gray Fox Curve Chanhassen, MN 55317 (612) 949 -2717 April 17, 1992 Board of Review Chanhassen City Hall Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Parcel #25.2730570 1 Board of Review: We would like to appeal our property assessment. We are 1 appealing because the assessment is 15% higher and because after looking at the assessment value of seven homes similar in style and size in our neighborhood we found that ours was the highest. 11 Sincerely, 6 A ' Deb Gorril f erry Degne 1 1 1 # (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: -1 e Address: /s City: Zr - L•r "L Si0it /47N ..c.5-3,3/ Zip: Home Phone: /7o -1 yj 3 Work Phone: 9 z 9 - o y3) Parcel I.D. Number: /Z z .s - z ..CrO cs 2 0 I want property reviewed because: - 4E[ /e! "t' %/!e /rj545" fr . dr Of , y /Xi:" - / $ 1 �/!^ - Z e /JS.f -t e' A1 i S 4e .-7Sdoc 474' /7C17 Se- e" AT TA cof6) ) • • Data reviewed by Assessor: j) L / y - 2 z / % 2-o (Initial & date /time) • 56 25.2540020 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $266,800 Jeffrey J Hovanec 1540 Creek Run Trail Excelsior MN 55331 Reviewed field data, recalculated values, talked with Mr. Hovanec on 04/22/92 and indicated a reduction of $44,000 to the building value. RECOMMENDATION: reduce $44,000 to $222,800. NOTE: The recommended new value is 96% of what owner paid for property on 7/91 for the amount of $232,000. Mr. Hovanec is not satisfied with the reduction. *Board consideration is requested. Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted 1 II 11 q- 4 ;3ubj: Notice of Appeal 1540 Creek Run Trail Chanhassen, MN 55331 II To Whom This May Concern: ' II We. wish to appeal the : of property tax for the property located at 1540 Creek Run Trail, Chanhassen, Minnesota. We bel leve the current assessed property tax is overestimated. After researching the property II' taxes of two other homes used for comparison in the mortgage approval appraisal for our home, we d i.5cove red our home has the lowest market value, yet the high --;t assessed tax value, II An appraisal was performed Ly,,. an independant appraisal ^ompany feat:ii in " our hom as compared with three other comparable homes in the area. We • were able Lo locate two of the hones featured in the appraisal. Tn add: - tion, the tax values were pro2'idF -0 to us hy Carver County Based on this information, we feel our home should be placed into a catxgory the -t :s II more in l ir: with the comparable homes wed in the appraisal. A summary of the applicable information follows: 60 Twin Maple Lane -- ale Price $242,500 ' Market Value Value 240,100 Tax Value I 7251 Kurver Point Road -- Sale Price $227,500 Market Value 235,300 Tax Value 205,000 :i2 _Ir .- 7 c I 1540 Creek Run Trail -- Sale Price Market Value 234,000 Tax Value 266 , 80u -, . . Z'= ` II Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, II Jeffrey: J and Th.-rese L! hovanec . II # 5 7 (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: l / 4 4 c Qs !1u Address: 3900 Ls /ee Cc - ve- City: - : r e Zip: S3 . • Home Phone: If 7 4(0 3 Work Phone: / — dW— 3/ 77 Parcel I.D. Number: R /9 a I want property reviewed because: 0(0 no � 1 e /eve � ht eve 000,49/9_424..4,y iyer, �r ? /o, - /05 00 ler 4 7 /I 60 , 2 O,J e /ea eve kae v4✓a l /' u.-e iviarA l and kavv c'- 2 y zays l ( e! )11 A P (51 Lor Iliad, Q►1 Aed II ' /1 JiJ ao feaa, ao a-4-4 o tv-(e_e red c) -) hnkse_ ifa lwe have na7 be tci & >h a tic/ ‘Q.r e 7 its 4s_reu% i vt.e., 7( / s / 47ro 44 r-t, n e ,Ies 4. 144e assocr / Zy ,7 value hits o(ra ems(, 4 1 Data reviewed by Assessor: / / / 3 / / `f 5 (Initial & date /time) • 57 25.6150190 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $114,600 Charles Hultner 7 3900 Leslee Curve � Excelsior MN 55331 Reviewed area sales data (there have been 4 sales in the. past 18 months in the area and only 1 was lower than the Assessors's EMV), field data, recalculated values; no value adjustment indicated; talked, with Mr. Hultner on 04/23/92. RECOMMENDATION: no change. NOTE: Owner still feels value is too high. Action Taken by Board: APP roved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted • • 1 1 - # 7 (Office Use Only) APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 1 Name: Cecil and Jane Kubitz Address: 7492 Saratoga Drive ' City: Chanhassen Zip: 55317 Home Phone: 934 -0401 Work Phone: Parcel I.D. Number: 25.7600070 — I want property reviewed because: ' Low lot in neighborhood. Have always had water problem. Can't leave house for 24 hours without having someone check on it to make sure sump pump is going so the basement doesn't flood. Have a wood burner besides fireplace built during the energy crisis and had a chimney fire last ' year. Therefore can't use fireplace in family room. Drainage problem resulting from new development built behind the property. Developer assured us that swales would be built across back lot line with drains so wouldn't have water problem. Developer put the swales in the lot's yards so when the people moved in, the people graded them down. Therefore, all the water goes into our property. When house is sold have to declare that there are water problems which will decrease the value of the house. Data reviewed by Assessor: ,29. / 4/ 7 / /02" (Initial & date /time) :1 67 25.7600070 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $100,700. Vg " 1 Cecil & Jane Kubitz 7492 Saratoga Drive Chanhassen MN 55317 Reviewed field data, recalculated value, discussed sales in neighborhood with owner, explained the original $9,000 reduction was because of the additional depreciation of the mositure problems, during discussions on I 04/27/92 Mr. Kubitz indicated he would like the Board to discuss this value. RECOMMENDATION: no change. /. nmr • n^m,A rcrnicc +cA Action Taken by Board: Approved as Recommended Adjusted as Noted 1 1 #. (Office Use Only) 1 1 i # ( Office Use Only) 1 • APPEAL TO BOARD OF REVIEW, 1992 Name: 4/LES / /i(:1E LOR Address: /DO LLy .44 - E i City: z. • ♦ .d: NN - Home Phone: �"�' ee -A9 Zip: � Wo rk Phone: 33 - �" 6'7'3 Parcel I.D. Number: a5; a o a // a • I want property reviewed because: ,¢,v 4.? o o �� 1 l�uR P/r.O/We TAXES w LL 13E 66/A16 uP o 77 VAL UO ti°. ,440A/ D WA /NI. � A Si) tWo n j .2S/.> 6 oD /AO 0 193, 5 - A- 777-4-1_ ef- g/ f /8:19 % /�1 g ' 717 /‘ /} BOAP. n/Affe at! e #R /Viti4- s4¢,("E 40 a s4 7,' 4.tlfiAOSf,I- BAS 7' UN Fit A7/'7 w/{ /e6 /se 7341/4 J 6 ezvs p/b Ta ,v6WL yv� .80/47" we* G05T1it/6 ls 4o Ooh - „3 7 B [r //4-0 ax W/ 7X 7r u5�4yt -//LS t em -44es /*Pied v e rsezvrs - . 1-4(6* 14344/E E A .P E Elr�T /tEL4 FEt/i/vim o v& f1 tr7 s smite we B iiii r rr /Eti r 3. 7W /.s P /eoPt%ry /S .1.4i44.7E #4.41 i z) Sow OF Puez le s• ,e1) DEU hzeray 4,4 /UE • aF Lat e 6,66 FEET DF .�4�ES deft ,I , ve PPRO $- p t,�E� OF apalisas 14464e l€ 1. ee 7, E 14•!N /Nec, /Do P4 ,1i iG(� ,4 /L). • - • • • : _ - ecas.5 � _ i �A'4 7Z cud Nev r/EieN4/4/E. /NSclM,X ' /7" . - • IS. '' Q - /5 Swat44 /� 16 1 tf e Ire.ee. A e. tETzs PfWiC Pft�J ,5i4/141 A445 , 'E4fd /S - r YS v /srrr e.1 4, 7 'iv C%1 7 IA /Au/ 3,, 72) ccSz 7wEP /s<o4.JE F1 nve Al -71A ,e er • wi 0 57- AAt/f`L y ?f&t'4J° r4f 271`£ P4PW5, 7760-5 113010 Ar .5617ZE5 77/ t!sh -026`, �" 1 Data reviewed by Assessor: )3) - / 41 -a3 / 3- (Initial & date /time) 74 25.2600110 Res Hstd 1992 EMV $293,500 Miles & Maxine Lord 1009 Holly Lane Chanhassen MN 55317 Discussed property and value with Priscilla Lord on 04/23/92. Reviewed field data; sales data indicate sales in neighborhood in a range from $375,000 to $500,000. Maxine Lord would like council to consider location of property next to the public access for Christmas Lake. She • will look into getting an appraisal. RECOMMENDATION: no change. NOTE: • Board consideration requested. Action Taken by Board: __ Approved as Recommended . Adjusted as Noted • • • 1 1 1 ' r1 it I. , 0,,,/xe , a,1, 57r-n2/v - /r 5 As 4 J dez/e A/4ebrizr757 _ A , vb 77IC aye4 fr 504 -0,S A4PPd)l. bX 6 F7 , /S/A Dor of % ' is T/1 PPsr t/CAbiN6 4. 44,e6E 62Ey 436 X . 7" >s socae4 /S v y Na /5y' s ;r /3 4.0 4D eL.UNK 4(J b /06/SE . /r VOey 20-ay, /7 /S a J y 8�u r /5"D F 7` ,eof Owe Fitc347 P6 ./-( /mil N/A" CAW S4(Z4 7, 57 1 CH W11041 We' sir air 771e E Po eehe ox «O aow,1 ra 7 'E X uS 70 AN.1.4yg ate 4¢Nd Fes. 7 * cegive u//,yG/f 2/1 vey w /2.4)Au Ly. Dwe A4f PX-iD'r /9 dot �a, RE ' cigE,e r bempep Par-IN FeNce 7D ,k- v/5 /7 5 Oi�F O F ow< /.6710 4e 70 7 012 Xed r2 zai/c/6 exte /¢dusk' ,45 4- Pu,6 7 7 / ' thy I / 4 w J V r m g / ' ' c P . 4 ; z ? 4,4N e i r woieE21 7 / "iWf5V Rtrin/e S AA-0 772 Punip/N4. smresJ . Q Vs/AIX owe VRe- u4' ,Sherazo liffe4 ' QcztJg lb 4/A.t e • . 1• .. . io!'Jflln'•e!Af`Oi-Y:c .! ' � I April 20, 1992 1 l 7 1 County Board of Review �r Benjamin E. Swenson .4 9015 Lake Riley Blvd. Chanhassen, Mn. 55317 I Property Value Assessment 199,11..92 $137,600 Tax $3184.00 ` 1990 93,000 Tax 1678.00 INCREASE • $44,600, $1506.00 1 � ft No additions have been made since house was built No improvements " " II 11 II 11 House is 14 years old and in need of repairs - Will have to borrow money to pay for present increased taxes r' am sell and move of Chanhassen, unless some. Real relief i r i f is considered, a - n QS 0A4-0200 r. pii NI bQkot.x. rectuct.c',ni A. cre Ac Es Is $ 6234.36 ! I ; i i ( I 1