The URL can be used to link to this page

Admin Section 4 ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION Estimated FHWA Allocations for Minnesota. Letter from Tom Scott dated January 7, 1992. Letter to Joel Jamnick dated January 14, 1992. Minutes from a Meeting with the Chanhassen Senior Commission and EOS Architecture dated January 6, 1992. Letter to Elliott Ruttland dated January 13, 1992. Notice of Neighborhood Meeting for the Minnewashta Parkway 1 Improvement Project dated January 14, 1992. Letter to Brian Beniek dated January 13, 1992. Letter to Dave Dummer dated January 13, 1992. Letter to Craig Blechta dated January 13, 1992. Letter to Dale Gregory dated January 13, 1992. 1 Letter from Mary Anderson, Metro Council dated December 31, 1991. Letter to Darrel Sudheimer dated January l0 1992. 1 Sample Letter Regarding Sump Pump Installations dated January 14, 1992. 1 Letter to Greg Larson dated January 16, 1992. Letter from Becky Kelso dated January 16, 1992. Letter from the City of Victoria dated January 17, 1992. ' HRA Accounts Payable. Notice of Public Hearing for Lake Riley Hills Area dated January 27, 1992. 1 1 1 1 1 .>. W. :. , N Z/ / 7 2 / hc ee Rot — A/ N t.r� .. 'a ;c.t .:// It... tlK r 11 9r ew 9 .- " e1e .. •"' rPP_ #,p 8k,. ) .�,. e. s E STIMATED FHWA ALLOCATIONS FOR MINNESOTA �l METROPOLITAN PLANNING FY'92 $ 1,646,153 The metropolitan planning provisions of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. feature an enhanced ' role for local governments. The metropolitan planning organization (MPO) is responsible for developing, in cooperation with the State and affected transit a long -range transportation plan and a transportation-improvement program t (TIP) for the area. The TIP must be consistent with this plan and must include all projects in the metropolitan area that are • proposed for funding with either Title 23 or Federal Transit Act ' monies. The planning process must now include additional ' considerations such as land use, intermodal connectivity, methods to enhance transit service, and needs identified through the management systems. INTERSTATE CONSTRUCTION is SUBSTITUTION, FY'92 -97 $ 67,680,000 ' Interstate Constriction FY'92 $ 18,095,914 Interstate Substitute FY'92 $ 30,342 ' $7.2 billion is provided to complete the construction of the Interstate System. The formula is based on an estimate of the cost to complete. $960 million is provided for Interstate Substitute highway projects. Funds are distributed based on an estimate of the cost to complete. • INTERSTATE MAINTENANCE FY'92 -97 $326,861,207 FY'92 $ 43,422,613 Although the Interstate System is a part of the National Highway System, it will retain its separate identity and will receive separate funding. $17 billion is provided to rehabilitate, resotre, and resurface the Interstate System. Reconstruction is also eligible if it does not add capacity. However, high - occupance- vehicle (HOV) and auxiliary lanes can be added. ' The formula is basically the same as in previous law. The factors used are lane miles and vehicle miles travelled. • 1 1 NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM FY'92 - $388,175,982 FY'92 $ 48,873,837 The National Highway System will consist of 155,000 miles (plus or minus 15 percent) of major roads in the United States. Included will be all Interstate routes, a large percentage of urban and rural principal arterials, the defense strategic highway network, and strategic highway connectors. The system, which will be proposed by the Secretary of Transportation, after consultation with the States, must be designated by law by September 30, 1995. In the interim, the NHS will consist of highways classified as principal arterials. The NHS funding level is $21 billion for the 6 years. The formula for distribution is based on each State's FY'1987 -1991 share of total national funding with appropriate adjustment for Interstate Maintenance and Bridge apportionments. A State may choose to transfer 50 percent of the NHS funds to the new STP program; if the Secretary approves, 100 percent may be transferred. i BRIDGE PROGRAM FY'92 -97 $202,256,250 FY'92 $ 25,623,525 The Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program is continued at a total authorization level of $16.1 billion to provide assistance for any bridge on a public road. The program is basically unchanged from previous years in its formula and requirements. However, newly eligible are bridge painting, seismic retrofitting, and calcium magnesium applications. A - timber bridge research and construction discretionary program is established with $50.5 million in funding. Forty percent of a State's bridge funds may be transferred to the National Highway System or the Surface Transportation Program; the transferred amounts are not subject to the STP set - asides and sub -State distribution requirements. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FY'92 -97 $441,781,236 FY'92 $ 64,649,947 The Surface Transportation Program (STP) is a new block 1 grant type program that may be used by the States and localities for any roads (including NHS) that are not functionally classified as local or rural minor collectors. These roads are now collectively referred to as Federal -aid roads. Bridge projects paid for with STP funds are not restricted to Federal - aid roads but may be on any public road. Transit capital. projects are also eligible under this program. The total funding for the STP over the 6 years is $23.9 billion. However, this level may be augmented by the transfer of funds from other programs and by the equity funds (Reimbursement, Hold Harmless, etc.) which may be used as if they were STP funds. 1 1 It The formula for distribution of funds is based on each State's FY'1987 -1991 share of total national funding with appropriate adjustment for Interstate Maintenance and Bridge apportionments. 1 Once the funds are distributed to the States, each State 1 must set aside 10 percent safety construction activities (rail - highway grade crossings and hazard elimination), and 10 percent for transportation enhancements, which encompass a broad range of environmental - related activities. The State must divide 1 50 percent (62.5 percent of remaining 80 percent) of the funds by population between each of its areas over 200,000 and the remaining areas of the State. The remaining 30 percent can be ' used in any area of the State. Areas of 5,000 population or less are guaranteed an amount based on previous Secondary funding. ' CONGESTION MITIGATION & AIR QUALITY FY'92 -97 $ 89,400,000 FY'92 $ 4,138,305 • The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program directs funds toward transportation projects in Clean Air Act non - attainment areas for ozone and carbon monoxide. These ' projects will contribute to meeting the attainment of national ambient area air quality standards. If a State has none of these non- attainment areas, the funds may be used as if they were STP funds. Total funding for the program is $6 billion. The funds are distributed based on each State's share of the population of air 1 ' _quality non - attainment areas weighted by degree of air pollution. A 1/2 percent minimum apportionment is guaranteed to each State. ' APPORTIONMENT ADJUSTMENT FY'92-97 $131,898,353 FY'92 $ 25,629,147 The Act establishes a legislative percentage each State must receive of the Nation's funding annually. The funding programs included in this adjustment process, which includes apportionments and prior year allocations, are: Interstate ' Construction, Interstate Maintenance, National Highway System, Surface Transportation Program, Congestion and Air Quality, Interstate Substitution, Bridge, Minimum Allocation, Federal ' Lands, Reimbursement, and Donor State Bonus. Additions are made to the STP apportionment so that each State's total will achieve the legislative percentage. One -half of Hold Harmless /Apportionment Adjustment funds received is subject to the set - asides and sub -State distribution requirements of the STP. Special projects are not included in this adjustment. 1 1 DISCRETIOPIARY FUNDS !7'92 $31,132,597 Interstate Discretionary $ 7,175,597 (1 -394) Bridge Discretionary $ 23,957,000 (Bloomington Ferry Bridge) 1 SPECIAL PROJECTS FY'92 - $244,896,838 111 FY'92 $ 15,755,200 TITLE I -- Surface Transportation Section 1103. HIGH COST BRIDGE PROJECTS 1 1) Bloomington Ferry Bridge replacement, Shakopee, MN: $22.0 million Section 1106. RURAL AND URBAN ACCESS PROJECTS 2) Construction and reconstruction of Forest Highway 11 connecting Aurora -Hoyt Lakes and Silver Bay, MN: $9.5 million 1 3) 77th Street Reconstruction Project, Richfield, MN: $11.6 million 4) Mankato South Route Improvements, Mankato, MN: $10.0 million x • e p 5) U.S. Trunk Highway 212 improvement project, Eden 1 Prairie /Cologne, MN: $8.7 million Section 1107. INNOVATIVE PROJECTS 1 6) Highway 610 crosstown project, Brooklyn Park, MN: $36.0 million 1 7) Completion of Cross -Range Expressway (Trunk Highway 169): $13.0 million 1 8) Safety and capacity improvements to Trunk Highway 48 and relocation of County Road 134, Hinckley, MN: $2.0 million 9) Trunk Highway 53, Twig to Trunk Highway 37: $9.7 million 10) Trunk Highway 169, Grand Rapids to High City: $9.0 million 1 11) Trunk Highway 61, Schroeder to Grand Marais: $18.0 million 12) Trunk Highway 37 and Hughes Road: $0.5 million 1 1 1 It 13) Hennepin County, Minnesota, Bloomington Ferry Bridge /C.S.A.H. 18 replacement project, Bloomington, MN: i $18.0 million 14) Nicollet County, Minnesota, C.S.A.H. 41 for roadway stabilization and rockfall control, North Mankato, MN: $3.0 million 15) St. Cloud, Minnesota, T.H. 15 bridge across Mississippi River and interchange with T.H. 10: $3.24 million 16) Minnesota Safety Initiative Program ($2 million to demonstrate the safety benefits of retroreflective pavement ' markings and signs, especially for nighttime and older drivers; $1 million to demonstrate the safety and environmental benefits of elastomer modified asphalt in cold ' weather climates: $3.0 million Section 1108. PRIORITY INTERMODAL PROJECTS ' 17) Intermodal Urban connection project, Minneapolis, )IN: $19.9 million ' NOTE: Allocation percentages: 8 percent of the amount allocated for each project authorized shall be available for obligation in fiscal year 1992. 18.4 percent shall be available for obligation in each of fiscal years 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996 and 1997. TITLE VI -- Research ,Section 6024. UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTES ' 18) Institute for Intelligent. Vehicle- Highway Concepts. The Secretary shall make grants to the University of Minnesota, Center for Transportation Studies, to establish and operate a national institute for intelligent vehicle - highway ' concepts: $6 million NOTE: There is authorized to be appropriated $1 million for each 1 of the fiscal years 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996 and 1997. 1 LAN i� i l'i ,i i . i , 1 ' . �; 1 ; F { i ;( :I I P.A. riLE a r'2.: • .. . , JAN 0 8 199;' nn ki S �y my of�`�, �� fir' �`� id - `((,TZ) i ••5(�`�� N I R.,:.:‘, ! . Kt. i! -, •r J.' r A fan ((l'_) 45_-ii5t� t ;,n t � I �,, io A ! e1 99 e t ,1/ I n l `, \. i � % S a, i p ' FIh,ni R. k �wi,I, F r ° osl January 7, 1992 Mr. Scott Schmidt CC At./'{ - Ncla National Casualty Company II Claim Department 8877 North Gainey Center Drive Scottsdale, Arizona 85258 II Re: Our Client: City of Chanhassen Policy No.: PO210013 ' Date of Loss: 04/26/91 II Claimant: Deborah Carpenter -Rand Your Claim No.: 192843 - 63 Dear`Mr. Schmidt: II We are the attorneys for the City of Chanhassen. I You had previously accepted the defense of this matter, subject to a reservation of coverage, and appointed Marshall & Associates to represent the City. II Our client has instructed us to handle the defense of this matter and advise you of that fact. Since we initially answered I the Complaint on behalf of the City and have retained our original files, a substitution of attorneys from Marshall & Associates is not necessary. Your reservation of coverage creates an inherit conflict for II Marshall & Associates as the counsel retained by you to defend the City. We reserve our right to seek reimbursement for cost of I defending this matter. n ,r 1 :('''' S � R�� ,,+E very truly yours, 1 ci' �4' ' ` r � t M . CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT v� � r K f f �� ° & FU HS, P .A. 1 L ,t1 , 5 I /Z� l 44i) v-' By Thomas M. Scott II TMS:bmp cc: Joe Marshall Don Ashworth .. r ' n. 11,1 'HAT • Eagan, MN 55121 1 I f C ITY OF CHANHASUN IL P 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612)937-1900* FAX(612)937-5739 1 January 14, 1992 II Mr. Joel Jamnick Association of Cities I 183 University Avenue E. St. Paul, MN 55101 II Dear Mr. Jamnick: Over the years, Chanhassen has developed a reputation for being an I environmentally conscientious community. We believe this stems, in large part, to our nearly decade old efforts of creating a no net loss wetlands program, tree preservation efforts, and related I programs that have been supported by our City Council, residents, and staff. We are currently involved in a highly innovative program to develop coordinated, comprehensive plans to maintain improved water quality; storm water management; and wetland I protection efforts. This planning effort is funded out of a Surface Water Utility Program wherein our residents will be contributing nearly $1 million over the next five years to reach our environmental goals. I am enclosing a copy of our surface 1 water utility brochure for your review. To support and build on our on -going Surface Water Program, we are I currently asking for a Clean Water Partnership Grant from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. The grant is part of an annual program offered by the PCA where funding is competitively sought I for a variety of projects meeting Clean Water Partnership guidelines. Chanhassen is currently seeking a 50/50 matching grant in the amount of $67,000 to undertake a detailed diagnostic and II feasibility study aimed at improving the water - quality of Lotus Lake. This lake is located in one of the more developed portions of the city, and has seen a slow but steady deterioration of water quality that has been documented by area hydrologists over the past I ten years. The goal of the city is to identify the sources of water quality problems as well as strategies for halting and reversing these trends. A copy of our grant application is I attached for your review. We believe the Lotus Lake program is not only innovative, but will also directly respond to water quality problems on a lake that is 1 of major concern to our community. The lake not only directly Pt 1 %07 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 1 11 January 14, 1992 Page 2 benefits people who live around it, but also serves the larger 11 community through public access. We also note that this lake ultimately discharges into the Minnesota River. As you are probably aware, the state is under some pressure to improve water quality in the Minnesota River and Chanhassen is actively participating with regional agencies on this program. Lastly, we believe the project is ideally suited to serve as a demonstration projection for similar lakes not only in Chanhassen but also elsewhere in the metro area. Our grant application has received letters of support not only from our City Council, but also from the local homeowners association, Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District, Carver County Soil and Water Conservation District, the Chanhassen Chamber of Commerce, staff from the Freshwater Foundation, and from the Department of Natural Resources. The Pollution Control Agency has informed us that the review procedure for the grants not only evaluates technical merit, and our community's ability to demonstrate commitment to follow -up on plan recommendations, but also on community support. We believe we have demonstrated that there is significant support directly from our community and from concerned agencies; however, we are also seeking your support since a portion of the process evaluates input from our legislative delegation and heads of concerned agencies. We would sincerely appreciate having your support for our program relayed directly to the Pollution Control Agency on this matter. •If you are willing, we would appreciate you contacting Kathy Svanda, Chair of MnPCA at 520 Lafayette Road North, St. Paul, MN 55155. I would be happy to respond to any questions you might have on our environmental programs or specifically on this grant application. I would be willing to meet or speak with you at your convenience. Thank you for your assistance on this matter. ' Sincerely, Paul Krauss, AICP Planning Director PK:k Enclosures pc: Chanhassen City Council 1 Surface Water Management Task Force Bonestroo Engineering • 1 Mr. Marcel Jouseau Mr. Greg Larson Mr. Joel Jamnick and Mr. Gary Oberts BWSR Association of Cities Metropolitan Council Southbridge Office Bldg I 183 University Avenue E. Mears Park Centre Suite 104 St. Paul, MN 55101 230 East Fifth Street 155 South Wabasha Street St. Paul, MN 55101 St. Paul, MN 55107 t Mr. Jim Leach Mr. Peter McLeet Mr. John Stine USFWS MnDNR DNR 520 Lafayette Road 500 Lafayette Road Metro Division of Water St. Paul, MN 55155 Box 32 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55155 St. Paul, MN 55106 1 Rep. Becky Kelso Senator Terry Johnston Rep. Jim Ramstad Room 415 Room 151 #152 State Office Building State Office Building 8120 Penn Avenue South St. Paul, MN 55155 St. Paul, MN 55155 Bloomington, MN 55431 Senator Dave Durenberger II Senate Office Building 353 Russell Washington, DC 20510 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 21 \ \ATER STREET EXCELSIOR. MIN\ESOTA 55331 FAX 612-4M-392S Qe Pea eJ 612-1-i-3291 1 MEETING MINUTES 1 A, PROJECT: Chanhassen Senor Center EOS #911 DATE: January 1 6 1992 E gEpRESEN'I'ING ;CHITECTCRE THOSE PRESENT: Selda Heinlein Chanhassen Senior Commission Chanhassen Senior Commission I Bernice Btllison Chanhassen Senior Commission Jane Kubitz Senior Citizen Oscar Anderson Senior Community Services Judy Colby , Ci ty o f Chanhassen ' J Paul Krauss City of Chanhassen Jerry n Rueeme g me r City of Chanhassen Bert Haglund 1 erry Eos Architecture The following minutes reflect our �, yo e ha eang questions commence of the the information discussed at the meeting. Please notify regarding these minutes. To continue discussion of Senior C�ente P� Mies with the 1 PURPOSE: Facilities Committee and explore fans for the City Hall building and site o I A. The short, mid and long term p were discussed. These provide the following opportunities for the Senior Center: unfinished space in 1. Short Term: Development of the existing the City Hall lower level. 2. Mid Term: Possible expansion into the existing library space 1 when a new library is constructed. 3• Long Term: Possible expansion into a future addition to City 1 Hall. B. Senior Center programs and needs were further defined as noted I below. 1. Storage is needed for: 1 a. 50 - 60 chairs, b. (2) 8' and (5) card tables, c. (3) 6'0 "h x 3'6 "w x 2'0 "d cabinets, and I d. dishes to serve 60. 1 EQ1 Al. OPPORTI":In EVP1.(tR 1 Meeting Minutes Chanhassen Senior Center January 6, 1992 �! Page 2 2. The kitchen should have a dishwasher. It should be separate • from the activity room. • 3. The activity room should have vinyl flooring. It should have folding walls so it can be combined with the open area. Eos 4. The open area should have carpeting. I ARCHITECTURE 5. The office doesn't need a table. ' 6. The mini- lounge should have a hot plate for coffee and cookies. ' 7. Seating is needed for 48 overall. 8. When cards are being played, no other activities will be scheduled in the Center. 1 C. A floor plan dated December 30, 1991 (attached) was used as a basis for further discussion of how to best utilize the existing available space for Senior Center programs. This plan isa refinement of the one developed at the December 18, 1991 meeting. ' Having toilets opening directly to the open area is a concern. The cost of removing the existing stair is also a concern. D. Another floor plan was developed that moved the toilets away from the ' open area and left the existing stair in place. It was agreed that this plan will be presented to the Senior Commission at its January 17th meeting. A copy of the plan, as it has been refined and dated January 9, 1992, is attached. E. The next meeting will be with the Senior Commission on January 17, 1992. ftligaliCININ Submitted by: ` 1 Bertil E. Haglund, AIA $ BEH:bh Enclosures cc: All Attendees Don Ashworth, City of Chanhassen • Scott Rudie, Nelson - Rudie & Associates J. Nicholas Ruehl, Eos Architecture 1 1 . ir Ed-----i l `- 71 f ' SToRA6ti GOATS I i ' McGtl. SLG, OFFICE ( 1 H ; li, 1. VEyf. COO + • VItJyL t ■ ■ FoLOti WALL 1-• R6GEPj'lotl .�■ ■�■ � Iql� �r-r -i . , — ) -11 1 . 1:1 • • • w i ( LT D �:��: .U. .E. .E..1 1 . n 2 ID • • • • I 1 7 _l.t6RAR • 112 I • • ■ lam O _ TO1LEr •1• 'i. uI. J--a— D _ • • • - -- ■._ •x —mi nor . ./ ----I — foLVtdL wALL CHANHASSEN SENIOR CENTER • ;, FLOOR PLAN January 9, 1992 Eos ARCHITECTURE MN ■■ Ea — as ■■ ■w r ■■ ■.. ■ ■ ■■ mu a■ a au No Ell 1. • I 1 A %. . ._. r Q t 0 EOS 1 ARCHITECTURE x r I • ---) , z j , // 4i-- is m o us 1 us Y 4) v Js J WE # t in i RR Eitd:1 '2 MI a. 0 , O .r. t < 1 -:, --- rLiT,TD # Ettl: / ,. ri %-- ... %... 1 . .� Y � i F J. O 30 � F 11 1 OS LL C I .1= I Aria] = t.1 • k : . 1... ) . v � 1.- — — r 1 . 1 • 1 CITYOF CHANHASSEN 111101iir 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 II (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 • January 13, 1992 1 Mr. Elliott Ruttland District State Aid Engineer Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District /Golden Valley Office 2055 North Lilac Drive , Golden Valley, MN 55422 Re: 1991 Certification of Mileage File No. PW -033 Dear Mr. Ruttland: Please find enclosed the City of Chanhassen's Certification of Mileage as of December 31, 1991. Attached to the Certification is the City's itemization of Roadway Improvements and Municipal State Aid Street Improvements along with a current tabulation of the State Aid street segments within the City of Chanhassen. As you will note, there are a few minor changes which will be documented accordingly with the forthcoming submittal of the 1992 MSA Needs Study sheet. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. 1 Sincerely, CITY OF CHANHASSEN -_- 1 Charles D. Folch, P.E. City Engineer r CDF:ktm • Attachments: Certification of Mileage Form Itemization of Roadway Improvements c: City Council Administrative Packet (1/27/92) w /attachment Noe PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Mn /DOT 1P 29172 -01 (10 - /9) Municipal Mileage Revisions During Municipal Mileage as of Dec. 31, 19.90 Current Year (t or -) as of Dec. 31, 19 91 ANNUAL CERTIFICATION 1 41 OF MILEAGE //p/1,// 3 I , � , � a 2 e . F4 Fi �f J Jc 1 VI VII VIII IX X • XI XII 1. Trunk Highways 18.43 18.43 ---- _ 18.43 18.43 2. County State -Aid Highways 1.95 8.28 10.23 -.-. 1.95 8.28 1023 3. Co. Municipal State-Aid Streets ---- 4. Municipal State -Aid Streets 3.20* 10.10* 13.30 2.48 +0.91 3.39 5.68 11.01 16.69 5. County Roads 3 .77 3 ,77 .--- 3.77 3.77 6. Other Local Roads and Streets 0.28 74.78 75.061 -0.15 - 1.55 1.40 0.13 76.33 76.46 7. Total Improved Mileage Previous = U5_36 Adjustment as Current = l+ or -1 2.46 Current MAXIMUM STATE -AID MILEAGE COMPUTATIONS • 8. Trunk Highways (Line 1, Column X1). 18.43 • 9. County State -Aid Highways (Line 2, Column XI). 8.28 10. County Municipal State -Aid Streets (Line 3, Column XI). -0- 11. Total Deductions (Total of Lines 8, 9 and 10 above). 26.71 12. Basic Mileage For Computation (Line 7, Column X1, Minus Line 11). 9 13. Percentage Limitation. x .20 14. MAXIMUM MILES ALLOWED FOR M.S.A.S. DESIGNATIONS 18.22 15. Total Municipal State -Aid Street Designations (Column XII - Line 3 Plus Line 4) 16 16. Total Miles of T.H. Turnbacks Included In Line 15 -0- 17. Municipal State -Aid Street Mileage=tiWUnder Maximum Allowed. 1.53 1 hereby certify that the total Improved Street Mileage in the Municipality of _Chanhassen as of December 31, 19 91 is 1 Miles. Signed ._ _ Title City Engineer On iiii 13 ct frilliii90 ifi on 11.I . SlillMill/M acliin111111 19 11111SASIftds iiilly MN Mil IMMI REVISIONS, DURING CURRENT YEAR . • MUNICIPAL STATE -AID STREETS , COUNTY MUNICIPAL STATE -AID STREETS o�tE MILEAGE CHANGE +OR - nEws M ILEAGE CHANGE + OR - Dr ROME owo. ° �E coma EO NII.II N wig EXISTING mA ti Mal pw CHANGE REASON p �„r UN' TOTAL CHANGE REASON g EX QTMq 110-06c 0.10 -0.10 40.10 0.00 0.00 11/91 N34 co in, S.P. 270134 (1H 5;' 1. -- 40.81 40.81 0.81 4/91 * 2. --- 40.68 40.68 0.68 4/91 * 3. -- 40.95 40.95 0.95 4/91 * 4. --- 40.95 40.95 0.95 4/91 * • , i • TOTAL NET CHANGE Z"Z • - COUNTY STATE -AID HIGHWAYS TOTAL NET CHANGE 91 +3.39 3.39 �� TOTAL NET CHANGE 4 _ �� Jan. 1, To Dec. 31, 19 91 MUNICIPALITY Chanhassen 110 tlidird0111111katall RAM Sy s11111111 MNII MI Ell I= .. M. in all ini MIN SIN 1 � - FIGURE 1 12/26/91 Page 1 of 2 CITY OF CHANHASSEN ANNUAL CERTIFICATION OF MILEAGE 1991 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS "Other Local Roads and Streets" Proiect # proiect Nape es 88 -6 Minnewashta Highlands 0.03* 90 -6 Trappers Pass at Near Mountain 4th 0.28 Addition 1 90 -16 Lake Susan Hills West 5th Addition 0.12* 91 -7 Lake Susan Hills West 6th Addition 0.11 91 -9 Lake Susan Hills West 7th Addition 0.50 91 -11 Kurvers Point 2nd Addition 0.13 ' 91 -3 Troendle Addition 0.16 ' 88 -22A Market Boulevard from TH 5 to 0.22 1138' south TOTAL MILES 1.55 1 1991 Total "Improved" Streets: 2,22 miles 1 1991 Total Increase in Local Street Mileage: 2.12 miles 1 Total "Non- Existing" Streets: 0.28 (1990) - 0.15 = 2.22 miles (Zimmerman Farms) 1 *Denotes "Improved" in 1991 but was certified "Non- Existing" in 1990. Therefore, record 1.40 "Improved" miles in 1991 Certification of Mileage. 1 1 1 1 • Page 2 of 2 "MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS" Control Segment Project Name Original Mileage Mileage Total New Section Miles Change Change Non- Mileage Improved Existing 110 050 Dell Road from TH 5 0.10 0.10 -0.10 0.00 to Lake Drive East 1 - -- East -West Connector 0.68 0.68 ** Galpin Boulevard to TH 41 2 - -- Galpin Boulevard 0.81 0.81 ** from TH 5 to approximately 4300 feet north of TH 5 3 - -- East -West Connector 0.95 0.95 ** Galpin Boulevard to TH 41 lying south of TH 5 4 - -- Frontage Road south 0.95 0.95 ** of TH 5 between Audubon Road and Galpin Boulevard TOTAL MILER IMPROVED 0.91 TOTAL MILES NON - EXISTING 2.48 TOTAL NEW MILES 3.39 * *1991 Additions to the Municipal State -Aid Roadway System • M — — • M r 1 OM MI M MO ■O M r ■B I I- II . II FIGURE 2 CITY OF CHANHASSEN STATE AID STREET SYSTEM I/ 1991 (From 1991 MSAS Need Study) CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION SECTION SEGMENT MILEAGE Non - existing Lake Lucy Road 101 010 .61 Improved Lake Lucy Road 101 020 1.22 1 Improved Berber Boulevard 101 030 .81 Improved Berber Boulevard 101 040 .63 Improved Saddlebrook 102 010 .19 II Improved Bluff Creek Drive , 104 010 .72 Improved Bluff Creek Drive 104 020 .60 1 Improved Audubon Road 106 010 .79 Improved Audubon Road 106 020 .73 Improved Lake Drive 107 010 .64 1 Non- existing Lake Drive 107 020 .36 Non - existing Lake Drive West 108 010 .61 Non- existing Pleasant View Rd. 109 010 1.52 II Improved Lake Drive East 110 010 .47 Improved Lake Drive East 110 020 .04 II Improved Lake Drive East 110 030 .39 Improved Lake Drive East 110 040 .24 Improved 1991 Dell Road 110 050 .10 II Improved Minnewashta Pkwy. 111 010 1.30 Improved Lyman Boulevard 112 010 .61 Improved Lake Riley Blvd. 112 020 .40 I Improved West 78th Street 113 010 .32 Non - existing East -west route * 0.68 II between Galpin Blvd. and TH 41 Improved Galpin Blvd. * 0.81 Non - existing East -west route * 0.95 II between Galpin Blvd. and TH 41 lying south of TH 5 1 Non - existing Frontage Road south of TH 5 - Audubon Road to Galpin Blvd. 0.95 II 1991 STATE AID TOTAL MILEAGE 16.69 Non - Existing = 5.68 miles II Improved = 11.01 miles *Denotes new (1991) additions to the MSA system 1 1 1 4 CITYOF 41 -- CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 I f` (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 January 14, 1991 1 1 Re: Notice of Neighborhood Meeting Minnewashta Parkway Roadway, Drainage and Trail Improvements Project No. 90 -15 Dear Property Owner: 1 Notice is hereby given that a neighborhood meeting has been scheduled for public presentation of the Minnewashta Parkway ' Improvement Project No. 90-3.5 on Wednesday, January 22, 1992 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council chambers. The project deals with the reconstruction of Minnewashta Parkway to 1 an urban street section consisting of bituminous surface, concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer and trail improvements. Preliminary plans will be presented for public discussion. 1 • We look forward to discussing this project with you. If you have any questions in the meantime, please call. Sincerely, CITY OF CHANHASSEN 1 ice' .__ . . . . ...... .. . �.. Charles D. Folch, P.. ti b... _ r x mow _ _ 1 City Engineer CDF : ktmµ . r" = � c: Bill Engelhardt, Engelhardt & Associates Don Ashworth, City Manager City Council Administrative Packet (1/7/92) 1 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER t I i CITYOF ,,,,, . 3'' 7 CHANHASSEN 1 ... • '_. o f 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 I January 13, 1992 1 Brian Beniek P.O. Box 374 Chanhassen, MN 55317 I Dear Brian, I CONGRATULATIONS on your appointment as Alternate Chairperson of the Public Safety Commission for 1992! I am looking forward to working with you in this capacity, and invite you to contact me with any questions or suggestions you may have to continue the smooth operation of the Commission. Again, congratulations. 1 Sin ely, ' Scott Harr Public Safety Director II SH:bk I cc: Don Chmiel, Mayor Don Ashworth, City Manager 1 - . __ -. 1 'I 1 e 1 e I ,4 7 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 1 C ITYOF I , '--k. , 44 f ,; t> - o .:: 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147* CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612)937-1900* FAX(612)937-5739 II January 13, 1992 II Dave Dummer 1 417 Santa Fe Trail . Chanhassen, MN 55317 II Dear Dave, CONGRATULATIONS on your appointment as Chairperson of the Public II Safety Commission for 1992! I am looking forward to working with you in this capacity, and invite you to contact me with any questions or suggestions you may have to continue the smooth II operation of the Commission. Again, congratulations. Sincerely, II cs.;* I - Scott Harr Public Safety Director SH:bk II cc: Don Chmiel, Mayor II Don Ashworth, City Manager 1 1 1 II II i 4, PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 1 i CITYOF • - ,• 4:4„ CHANHASSEN • f 690 COULTER DRIVE • • P.O. BOX 147 • • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 ' . (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 January 13, 1992 1 Craig Blechta • 31 Sandy Hook Road Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Craig, ' I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for acting as Public Safety Commission Chairperson for 1991. You certainly provided significant assistance to me in making 1991 a most ' positive year. I look forward to your continuing onothe Commission this year. Again, thanks for your contribution. Sin ely, 1%71' Scott Harr Public Safety Director SH:bk ' cc: Don Chmiel, Mayor Don Ashworth, City Manager 1 1 • 1 1 % sir PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER C ITYOF N. CHANHASSEN I _t", 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 1 January 13, 1992 1 • Dale Gregory 7091 Redman Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Dale, 1 On behalf of the Public Safety Commission and myself, I would like to take this opportunity to formally thank you for the contribution you have made to the City of Chanhassen as Fire Chief for the past four years. Having worked closely with you, I know how much time you have spent in this endeavor ? -and you are certainly commended for the work accomplished. The Public Safety Commission discussed your contributions as Chief, and specifically wanted you to be recognized for your years as Chanhassen Fire Chief. Thanks for a - job well done! Since y, 1 Scott Harr Public Safety Director SH:bk 1 cc: Don Chmiel, Mayor Don Ashworth,* City Manager - , Dave Dummer, Public Safety Commission Chairperson` 1 1 .� 1 1 tai PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, MN 55101:1634 612 291 -6359 FAX 612 291 -6550 771' 612 291 -0904 1 December 31, 1991 • Dear Government Official: The 1989 Minnesota legislature has directed the Metropolitan Council to adopt a water quality plan for the Metropolitan Area. The plan is to include management objectives and target pollution Loads for all watersheds. The purpose of the plan is to meet federal and state water quality standards by cleaning up nonpoint pollution in the runoff from urban and agricultural land uses, and thereby avoid unnecessary ' investments in advanced wastewater treatment. Local governments will have an important role in the planning because of their role in Local water resource and land use planning. As part of the plan development process, the Council is undertaking a number of technical studies. The initial ' focus of these studies is on the Lower Minnesota River basin because of an EPA/MPCA mandate to reduce nonpoint pollution loads in the river by 40 percent by 1996. The Mississippi River and St. Croix basins will be addressed later in the process. The studies include monitoring the quality of streams entering the river, inventorying of land use, modelling of stormwater runoff quality and an evaluation of alternative stormwater management methods /practices. An evaluation of current local water planning and management, including local land use controls, is also one ' of the technical studies. The purpose of the study is to assess the status of current land use controls and other programs in managing the quality of urban and agricultural runoff. A survey is being sent to all local governments, watershed planning organizations and soil and water conservation districts to determine the types of controls and other management programs in effect, the types of pollutants addressed, the standards applied, who is responsible for implementation, and the level of financial resources being allocated to stormwater quality management. Representatives of a limited number of these organizations will be interviewed in the 1 next phase of the project to ensure that the Council has a thorough understanding of the role these local government organizations play in managing the quality of runoff. The enclosed survey is designed to gather information appropriate to each organization's role in water quality planning and management. Watershed management organizations are receiving a slightly different survey than counties, cities and townships because their roles differ. For example, cities and townships play a major role in land use controls in many parts of the Metropolitan Area, whereas most watershed management ' organizations do not. If more than one department or person is involved in water quality planning and management, the survey form or a photocopy should be completed by all appropriate departments before it is returned. In order to complete the survey in a timely manner, the Council asks that you return the survey by January 17, 1992. The more returns, the more accurate the results and the Council's conclusions. ' If there are questions regarding the survey, please call Carl Schenk, Natural Resources and Parks Division at 291 -6410. All completed surveys should be returned to him. • Sincerely, Mary E. Anderson, Chair t RECEIVED ' Enclosure JAW 0 3 1992 CITY U! (��!+Vr'►, 1 1 SURVEY OF LOCAL NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION MANAGEMENT (Questions? Call Carl Schenk at the Metropolitan Council - 291 - 6410). A. Background Data 1. Name of city, county or township: C_ ' 'o. 5 ;eh 1 2. Name(s), telephone number(s) and department(s) of person(s) completing form: 12n LA1 - ra.NSc t ' - 9 t v .i-br C4 ?la el A ors-7- 1 `l0 c7 1 B. Contents of Local Water Management Plan (This is Rot the watershed plan) 1 Once a watershed plan has been adopted, Minnesota statutes require each local government in the watershed to prepare a local water management plan consistent with the watershed plan. (If your community has completed its plan, please include a copy with the completed survey). The following questions apply to this Q other existing plans, for example, ' comprehensive plan and storm drainage plan. 1. Is local water management plan adopted? Yes _ No If not, explain where the community is in the,process. •,-, .. -t , s u I' • - .. - 1- h � tv►V -■u ►. C.Aot•ekf� J+ 1 Oa c {, pia r.1 Q.-nce 5 901s� � i :� vs.,. c Ce h. , tl Q22e.€,, -L, letss 2. Does the plan require the management of stormwater quality to protect lakes, streams and 1 rivers? ./ Yes No Do these policies apply to residential and commercial development? ./ Yes No To agricultural activity? Yes ✓No 3. Does plan require the use of detention ponds to control stormwater quality? +' Yes No State the policy. flA cs e c).4�, b -. a... t-e Q & e &es son\k.� Does he plan specify any pond design criteria? � Yes No State these. S r 4. c t ie`s n.o 4 te- 6 M, 1 . Does the plan require on -site po ding as part of new subdivisions? / Yes No Off -site "regional" ponding? Yes No / Does the local water management plan identify storage areas? ✓ Yes No 4. Does the plan require the control of erosion at construction sites? /Yes No 1 5. Does the plan protect wetlands including filling, draining and dredging? Yes No What type and size of wetlands are protected? C \v se, Ines S c- n© - AC- -w* „ AA^ tA 40.01...f tai 433 Has your community adopted a " nb net lss policy for wetland protection? ✓Yes No 1 1 1 I % 6. Does the plan require the rise of "best management practices" to control stormwater I quality? 4./ Yes No Describe which practices are required, for example, those of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency or a local soil and water conservation district. e i27CaA. 1 7. Does the plan ,recommend the establishment /continuation of surface water quality monitoring? ✓ Yes No Which types of surface water bodies are to be I monitored? G, t-et_ �, t asp How frequently? p ,n h k ., What parameters (for example,'dissolved oxygen)? rA Q ro c es i I 8. Does the local water P�fy lan specify the rate of runoff to be maintained? Yes P No State the rate , ie.... wa.,47.9.0` d , t t 00 to e....) e..,.,f T I- 9. What other plan policies address the control of stormwater quality? (summarize) 1 • I 10. How and when are policies applied by the community, for example, in the review of subdivisions? cc.ol k. I NJ m ' <\Le- el c h t I Which department(s) or unit(s) is responsible for implementing these policies? J ) 1 11. Does the plan address the management of stormwater quality in fully developed areas? A- Yes No Describe the policy. — .}-• d..tq,r ti 41 . +ot - �, t. ,Y (A c,..rre..n -' '- ` h.1 jO cpt:../1r 5 /n.0 S Q • �J J I . ' 1 C. Land Use and Other Controls Zonin Subdivision Controls ( Zoning, vis n Regulations, etc.) for Stormwater Quality Management (Please submit a copy of any land use controls which ur 1 community a ministers to manage stormwater quality). TD aRQ... c�z. o ` 1. Do the current land use controls being administered specify the control of stormwater quality? I Yes / No What ordinance or controls contain these requirements? Specify. k. , v, '- X , . - - ,,t . r s 1 2. Do the requirements apply to agricultural activities? Yes ✓N9 All new subdivision and development (residential and commercial)? ✓ Yes No 1 If not, what is excluded? I 3. When reviewing proposed development projects, does your community evaluate the potential impact on stormwate�r and surface water quality as well as on sewer, transportation and other public services? ✓ Yes No 1 • 2 1 — • 1 4. Which of the following types of requirements are included in local land use and other controls? (Check all those which apply). For those which you have adopted, please submit a cop with the completed survey. / j E rosion control ✓ Detention/retention pond standards Wetland protection oreland management 1 Fertilizer control Best management practices I /Quality of stormwater runoff • eedlot management Pesticide controls Limit the amount of allowable impervious surface for certain land uses. Submittal of a site plan incorporating a stormwater quality management plan for 1 proposed development. 5. Which of the following requirements are specified in your Local land use and other controls? 1 Answer yes or no except where noted. a. Erosion Control / 1 Applies to all development? ✓ Or only to areas acres or larger? Applies to public construction projects? \J pS Requires the submittal of an erosion control plan for proposed development/projects. V Specifies specific standards to be met? y l 'p S 7 4o S I Were the standards developed locally? cz C Do the standards incorporate or reference those of another agency, suc the local soil and water conservation district? Specify which agency or standards. b. Wetland Protection I Do the standards apply to all wetlands? •--(4' 5 If not, specify which types and/or sizes are protected. I Does the ordinance apply to filling? fps Dredging? (Draining ?) YQ Runoff or stormwater discharges? `(eA Does your community allow the direct discharge of stormwater to wetlanas? n 0 Dpes the ordinance allow for mitigation ?2 Explain. C ka A .... 444µL1zz. ‘,..14)11-, ccz '' koo, ,eA. L 1.'o> 0 c., 6.6.4., u...n nzUu17 , 44A 1 fp& r r "v' 1 ' Do the standards allow the restoration or "creation" of wetlands to mitigate for the loss of wetlands? r Has your community incorporated a "no net loss" I requirement? kie c. Fertilizer Control I If a fertilizer control ordinance has been adopted, what .areas of the community are affected? Area -wide IJ (/r Shoreland areas only Does it limit the timing of application? The amount? 1 3 1 1 d. Best Management Practices If the use of "best management practices" is required for development, what practices are specified? Minnesota Pollution Control Agency - Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources - Construction Site Erosion and Sediment Control Standardste Or other (specify) e. Detention Pond Standards 1 If the use of detention ponds is required, what standards are to be followed? National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) . Or other (specify) 0a\k.e r ' Ls on -site ponding required for all proposed development? \( Q S Or are "regional" ponding areas requir or provided to receive the runoff m several development areas? T n w '� �+^c. e_ D. Implementation 1 1. Financing How are the day - to-day costs of administering, maintaining, engineering, planning and o rating stormwater quality management financed? (check one or more) ✓ municipal stormwater utility general operating budget special tax levy part of local utility fees private responsibility such as homeowners association fees other (specify) If your community has adopted a stormwater utility, how many dollars a year does this generate? 4 1 L5 nn e6 ' How are capital improvements fin Aced? (check one or more) impact ✓ as P � ( ) act fees P part of development costs / fee title dedication, for example, detention pond sites special tax levy ✓ municipal stormwater water utility J other (specify) 4 Ss e 5S aw,J5 ►J AL.o 4c4-x N ts.._ ' Are stormwater improvements included in the local capital improvement program? Yes How many dollars does your community spend annually on all stormwater management activities, including operating and capital improvements? SG roll toes +c e (Vs-) Of this, 1 how much is related to stormwater quality concerns (estimate)? $ 2. Administration/Enforcement 1 What department(s), unit(s) or person(s)-for example, building inspector-is responsible for enforcing local codes /ordinances pertaining to stormwater quality management? Tt a n e , ea. / Has this person received any specific training or education in enforcing local stormwater quality management requirements and what to look for on the site? Specify ( c 1 1 4 1 What percent of this person(s) time is spent on enforcing stormwater quality management requirements? ? % What penalties are provided to enforce these requirements? Once a ro'ect is under construction, .when is it inspected to ensure that stormwater P J P� requirements are being met? \. f ps During/after storm events or spring snow melt? AC Does the community stress water quality management concerns with contractors and builders? Y What mechanisms does the community use to inform these groups? ¶? ■; t 4 r..r iv S k-- Gil:, 1 E. Other Local Management Programs (Nonregulatory) 1. Street sweeping? L Yes No Type of sweeper? How many times per year? At what times or seasons? Inc A lc-T• t (rt vte 2. Public education? Z Yes No Indicate what groups or surface water quality problems are targeted, if any such as the use of lawn fertilizers. 6 11 h,.ro.„ 3. Water quality monitoring? /Yes No Do you monitor during or soon after storm events? Yes No 4. Research/special studies of water quality problems � Yes No 5. Maintenance of stormwater ponds ✓ Yes No What administrative unit is responsible? 9 A - a,kA L t�SOrf j 6. Construction or reconstruction/redesign of detention ponds 'Yes No 7. Other(specify) ' F. If you have other local concerns or problems dealing with stormwater and surface water quality that should be addressed by this study, indicate these here. C.eg r•.L b er) e-wr ( 4, Completed survey forms should be returned to: Carl Schenk, Planner Natural Resources and Parks Division Metropolitan Council Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101.1634 THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION! 5 1 i CITYOF .• 414 ... cHANBlissEN 6 90 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 1 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 1 January 10, 1992 1 Mr. Darrel Sudheimer, Treasurer Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition I c/o D & J Furniture 524 South Elm Street Waconia, MN 55387 1 Re: City of Chanhassen 1991 Contribution Commitment to the Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition File No. PW -310 1 Dear Mr. Sudheimer: f f Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $3,750 payable to the Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition I as Chanhassen's 1991 contribution. You will recall that the City of Chanhassen agreed to contribute S10,000 for the 1991 fiscal year. However, in an effort to encourage the City to participate in the 1991 Joint Powers Agreement with an obligation of $6,250, the Coalition has agreed to credit that amount from the original S10,000 commitment, thus leaving the remaining balance of $3,750 as the 1991 commitment to the Coalition. On behalf of the City, I would like to apologize for any inconvenience the Coalition may have incurred due to the delay in receiving this 1991 contribution. It is the City's intent to continue to be an active member of the I Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition and its efforts to improve the transporation facilities of southwestern Minnesota. = a.. 1 Sincerely, i CITY OF CHANHASSEN - / . =z' may1711 . ,. - axles D. Folch, P.E. 1 City Engineer _. �"" CDF:jms A 1 Enc. r c: Tom Chaffee, Data Processing Coordinator I Don Ashworth, City Manager Bob Lindal, Coalition President Gene Ranieri, Coalition Coordinator 111 Council Administrative Section - January 27, 1992 �0 PRIN TED ON RECYCLED PAPER 1 . CITYOF rG, _ 1 i c" , i ,, A l i 1 I ' _ A ...t.,,,,, � , / . = 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 r' �;� ' (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 I / 23,'" 7 , . January 14, 1992 Mk? 6 ‘4 CERTIFIED f e& "tards.....siew74 i v ita M. t j �, j, -/ II 7664 South Shore Drive �4$�� /� �� - Chanhassen, MN 55317 I/0 T. .4/_ /.s �; , „ Dear Mr. illiftareMber, he /, i-o(/iie” .... It has been brought to the attention of the Public Safety Department that you have a sump pump at 7664 South Shore Drive that is being �, discharged directly into the sanitary sewer. This is in violation of city ordinances and state codes and aaust be corrected. II The discharge from the sump pump should be piped to the exterior of the building using minimum 1 1/2 inch pipe. Please schedule an inspection within 14days of receipt of this letter II to verify the necessary corrections have been completed. Inspections may be scheduled by contacting the Building Inspections Division at II City.Hall at 937 -1900, ext. 3..: Your cooperation in resolving this matter would be greatly appreciated. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me II at City Hall. Sincerely, II 6 (14 1 -,c44/c..., . Carl Barke Plumbing Inspector CB:cd II cc: Scott Harr, Public Safety Director Charles Folch, City Engineer• ' I Steve A. Kirchman, Building Official Building File - 7664 South. Shore Drive 1 II %sr PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 1 II II " CITYOF 1 CHANHASSEN t 69000ULTERDRIVE• s P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASS €N, MINNESOTA 55317 (612)937-1900* FAX(612)937-5739 N II January 16, 1992 II II Mr. Greg Larson, Administrator Wetlands Section MN Board of Water & Soil Resources Southbridge Office Building I Suite 104 155 South Wabasha Street St. Paul, MN 55107 M 1 Dear Mr. Larson: In response to your letter of January 14, 1992, I wish to have I myself listed as the official local contact person on the wetland program. Please direct all correspondence to me at the above listed address. In addition, when you establish the Technical II Advisory Committee for the wetland program, I am requesting that either myself or Jo Ann Olsen, Senior Planner on my staff who is highly knowledgeable on wetland . be appointed to the 1 committee if possible. Your assistance in this matter is appreciated. z g We look forward to working with you in the future. II Sincerely, 1 ( 1 4/::. ', , ;- : ,„:1 : ' IV ''Z, -.' ' ': ' " Paul Krauss, AICP Planning Director" I PK:v _.. ; :— I pc: Surface Water Management Task Force Planning Commission 4 : City Council 1 II 4 pr II % PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 1 ' 1w 1 t •a s.( • 1 Min a to ter 0501 January 14, 1992 1 esourceS Aftopoorkork Southbridge Office Building Mr. Paul Krauss, AICP 155 South Wabasha St., Suite 104 Planning Director St. Paul, Minnesota 55107 City of Chanhassen (612) 296 -3767 Fax (612) 297-5615 Fax Coulter Drive PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 Dear Mr. Krauss: 1 Regional Offices • Northwest Region The Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) recentl y received g ived a letter indicating ' 1106 Paul Bunyan Drive, NE Bemidji, MN 56601 your acceptance of responsibility for the interim program provisions of the Wetland 218-755-3963 Conservation Act of 1991. There was, however, no mention of a local contact Northeast Region person. Please provide the name, address and phone number of the contact person 394 South Lake Avenue 1 Room 403 for your local governmental unit to BWSR at the following address: Duluth, MN 55802 218-723-4752 West Central Region The Board of Water and Soil Resources 503 Washington Street 155 South Wabasha Street Brainerd, MN 56401 Suite 104 . 216.828 -2604 South Central Region St. Paul, Minnesota 55107 Box 756 New Ulm, MN 56073 All correspondence will be sent to that person. Thank you. 507 -359 -6074 Southeast Region Friedell Bldg., Room 100 1200 5. Broadway Sincerely, Rochester, MN 55904 507-285-7458 Southwest Region Box 267 • � * 1 Lyon Street Marshall, haa E. ll, MN 56258 507 - 537 -6060 East Central Region Greg Larson, Administrator 1 Southbridge Office Building Wetlands Section 155 South Wabasha St., Suite 104 St. Paul, MN 55107 612- 296-3767 GL/lm • RECEIVED JAN 1 51992 1 An Equal CITY OF UhraircfritilNe Opportunity Employer I c- c A- "9 ' -' Becky Kelso ' --. Minnesota I State Representative - 'l`- House of 1 District 36A "''. Scott and Carver Counties {' .. R Robert Vanasek, Speaker I COMMITTEES: EDUCATION, EDUCATION FINANCE DIVISION; REDISTRICTING; TRANSPORTATION; HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; REGULATED INDUSTRIES RECEIVED I January 16, 1992 JAN 1 7 1992 I CITY Ur Lnnornr►t Mr. Don Ashworth I City Manager City Hall, 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen Minnesota 55317 II Dear Don: Best wishes for 1992! II I appreciate hearing from you throughout the year and certainly count on your expertise when 11 considering City matters before the Legislature. Working within the tight budget constraints we are all faced with in 1992 will again make our jobs even more difficult. II I look forward to hearing from you. II Sincere , Bec y Kelso II State Represe tative 1 . i enc 1 1 - II I 60 South Shannon Drive, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 (612) 445 -6658 State Office Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 House Fax (612) 296 -1563 (612) 296 -1072 t ..45 C ITY OF VICTORIA Wa 0/ gale and tae# 4 / _ 7Cre":".•,../ 4‘ 1R • So GAin January 17, 1992 ee eAtli - Don Ashworth City Manager, City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Don: The Victoria City Council adopted the resolution regarding detachment of Minnewashta Parkway at it's January 16, 1992 meeting. Attached is your copy of the Resolution. Let me know if there's ' anything else we need to do on this matter. With best Regards, , Miriam Porter City Administrator . enclosure ' 1 RECEIVED 1 JAN 211992 CITY Of Lh r►iNr1ASSEW 1 7951 .ode a6A 55 5886 r h'12 1 448 -2868 / 1 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -2 1 CITY OF VICTORIA CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE CONCURRENT DETACHMENT AND ANNEXATION OF LAND WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 414.061 authorizes the concurrent detachment and annexation of land; and WHEREAS, the cities of Chanhassen and Victoria have agreed to the concurrent detachment and annexation of a parcel of property. 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Victoria, Minnesota as follows: 1 1. The following described land shall be detached from the City of Victoria and annexed to the City of Chanhassen: ' That part of the right -of -way for County State Aid Highway No. 15, also known as Minnewashta Parkway, embraced in the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 7, ' Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, and lying northerly of the northerly right -of -way line of State Highway No. 5. 2. This Resolution is contingent upon the City of Chanhassen adopting a similar Resolution approving the aforementioned detachment and annexation and-is further contingent upon the approval of the 1 Minnesota Municipal Board. 3. The City Clerk or City Administrator is directed to forward a copy of this Resolution to the City of Chanhassen. Upon receipt of a similar Resolution from the City of Chanhassen the City Clerk or City Administrator is further directed to forward a copy of this Resolution to the Minnesota Municipal Board. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Victoria this l Are, day of TA,,,,s,r , 199.. CITY OF VICTORIA (SEAL) BY: fA Its Mayor • 1 ATTEST: Its City Administrator /City Clerk 1' - s r r I 1 m 1 1 1- i 1 .1 1 m .l 1 1 CHANHASSEN H.R.A. A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E 01-27 -92 PAGE 1 4. CHECK # A M O U N T C L A I M A N T PURPOSE 1991 EXPENSE 045491 609.77 BARTON AS( -MAN ASSOC. FEES, SERVICE 045492 1,655.58 CAMPBELL, KNUTSON FEES, LEGAL t ` 045493 2,930.58 HOISINGTON GROUP INC FEES, SERVICE • L 045494 280.00 VICTORIA REPAIR PROMOTIONAL EXPENSE 4 5,475.93 CHECKS WRITTEN k • • • W.. CHANHASSEN H.R.A. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 01 -27 -92 PACE 1 4 CHECK # A M O U N T C L A I M A N T PURPOSE 1992 EXPENSE 045535 325.00 MINNEAPOLIS ASSOCIATION PROMOTIONAL EXPENSE 4 1 325.00 CHECKS WRITTEN , 4 • 4 • • t 4 MN W3 MN MN MO NM • NM MN NM MN MN • • MN MI NM M 1 CITYOF t iii t .a t 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 I . l b' (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 January 27, 1992 r • 1 Re: Notice of Public Hearing for Lake Riley Hills Area Trunk Sewer and Watermain - Project No. 90-10 Dear Property Owner: Notice is hereby given that the public hearing on the Lake Riley Hills area feasibility study held on November r 4,1991 has been continued to Monday, February 10, 1992. Some revisions and alternatives for the project have been developed over the past few months. The public bearing will be a part of the regularly scheduled City Council meeting commencing at 7:30 p.m. in the Coin Chambers at 690 Coulter Drive. l' - -, The project deals with the construction of sanitary sewer and watermain to service the proposed Lake Riley Hills subdivision and adjacent area west of Lake Riley, south of Rice Marsh Lake and east of Trunk Highway 101 within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). Said improvements are to be financed by special assessments. The areas adjacent to and including Lake Riley Hills within the study area are proposed for assessment. Total project cost of said improvements is estimated to be S1,015,000. A copy of the feasibility study r "showing the service area and associated costs is available for review at City Hall during regular business hours. • t In addition to the public hearing, an informal neighborhood meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, February 4,1992 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council chamber& The purpose of this meeting is to provide affected property owners # with a presentation to update the elements and alternatives being considered for this project. This also provides the City with the opportunity to acquire input and feedback on this study on an informal basis. I would invite all of you to attend this informal neighborhood meeting. I look forward to discussing this project with you. If you have any questions in the meantime, please call. Sincerely _�. I -� �� n 4. .ixa <rt -. Z�.v..3'xal. +£ Q..'# 4 s'S =P aA'M1 �."•�•.: " <�"�r_" �<' tlsa,s -_ CITY OF � Charles D. Folch, P.E. f fr City Engineer t 1 CDF:ktm • c: Dave Mitchell, OSM 1 City Council Administrative Packet (1/27/92) 1 ilt NOT PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER r /�� % CY,4 CC. PQ.c.lf • M MCP q; o NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE f r te' � Minneapolis SAN Suburban Branch �,y� 1,ao� Sam Taylor NAACP (612) 927-0253 Legal Redress Chairperson P.O. Box 24388 Edina, MN 55424 RECEIVED JAN 2 21992 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 1 t JANUARY 15, 1992 DEAR PUBLIC OFFICIAL: THE LEGAL REDREE S COMMITTEE OF THE MINNESOTA SUBURBAN BRANCH OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED II PEOPLE INVITES YOTJ TO HEAR HOW TO USE AVAILABLE RESOURCES IN MEETING THE CHALLENGE OF CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS IN THE TWIN CITIES METROPOLITAN AREA BY KEY -NOTE SPEAKER MRS. INA BOON, REGIONAL DIRECTOR FOR THE NAACP. ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 29, 1992 AT 6:00 P.M., IN THE THIRD FLOOR LIBRARY OF THE CALHOUN BEACH CLUB, OUR BRANCH WILL HOST "FOUNDATION FOR THE FUTURE, - -A VISION FOR THE SUBURBAN COMMUNITY," FOR OVER 100 LEADERS FROM ALL FACETS OF THE SUBURBAN C WHO WILL GATHER TO HEAR MRS. BOON AND OTHER GUEST Al THIS INFORMA RECEPTION AND DINNER. A DONATION IS REQUESTED OF $50.00 SINGLE AND $75.00 COUPLE, WHICH MAYBE SENT TO THE ADDRESS ABOVE. FREE VALET PARKING I IS AVAILABLE. PLEASE R.S.V.P. IF YOU FIND THAT YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND, WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO SEND A REPRESENTATIVE ON YOUR BEHALF, OR A DONATION TO HELP DEFRAY THE COST OF THE EVENING. YOU MAY R.S.V.P BY CALLING 920 -0973 OR 472 -9476. PLEASE INDICATE THAT YOU ARE RESPONDING TO THIS LETTER FROM SAM TAYLOR, V.P. AND CHAIRPERSON FOR THE LEGAL REDRESS COMMITTEE. S NCERELY tr ) f kVA 4 ' SAMUEL L. TAYLOR, V CHAIRPERSON, LEGAL REDRESS COMMITTEE 11 1 °•� � o MINNESO'A St.c:.nBAN Ni /I!I\ NAACP11\ n NAACP , = =* 1909 P.C. Box 24388 1 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 1 Press Release January 15, 1992 Contact Person: Julie Costa 920 -0973 1 SUBURBAN MINNESOTA NAACP TO HOST BANQUET 1 1 The Suburban Minnesota NAACP will host "Foundations for the Future -A vision for the Suburban Community." On January 29, 1992, leaders from all facets of the suburban area will gather for this informational reception and dinner, at the Calhoun Beach Club in Minneapolis. Ina Boon, the NAACP Regional Director will be the key -note speaker. "That all men are brothers that there is but one universal race, the Human Race" describes what Ms. Boon stands for. She shall discuss guidelines and regulations specific to the 34 suburbs in the branch's jurisdiction. "This is an opportunity for the Suburban Minnesota NAACP and our community leaders to come together in promotion of our common interests," states the branch President, Frank Taylor. Mr. Taylor shall address, among other community concerns, local suburbanites living, shopping and working in hostile environments, and the under utilization of minorities in the school systems, municipalities and police forces. The NAACP Presidential Advisory Council Chairman, Fred McComb shall provide the opening remarks. Local high school and college students will participate in several capacities at the banquet. Student intern Julie Costa, from Saint Mary's College in Winona, Minnesota, coordinated the event and will be a guest speaker. The Park High School Saber Team will greet the guests, and the Woodbury High School Color Guard will open the program by presenting the flags. The University of Minnesota, St. Catherine, Saint Olaf, and Lakewood Community College shall be represented by students from their institutions by providing service at reception tables. 1 1 1 BUBbB UU UU DDDOD GGGGG ELEELEE TTTTTTTT b T a8888 UU UU ODDODD GGGGGGG EEEEEEE ITTITT T LB 88 UU to'b' ( 145 ELLE IT 1111" BP "TrT 88 88 UU UU DU GG GG EE TT 880B 8813 UUUUUUU [LOUD GGGGGGG EEEEEEE TT 886888 LIUUUU DDVDU GGGGG EEEEEEE TT AAA HI Ut -SESBUti- — A A AA NWT h4 RS ES AAAAAAA 1414 NH tiN DD DD AA AA Nti MUM DD DD AA AA Nth N1U DDDUDLI AA AA titi MN DDDDD RRRRRR EIEEitE--vvvy - -vvvv EFEEEEE-- _ EEELL EEELE NWT 44 88 88 EEL-1 i NY Ei LLL 44 1-44-88- -88 RI R N. LEEEEEE V L I NV IV EtEEEEE IA bliuuu88 Et RR RR. LEEEELE _ VVV EEEEEEE Nti tfl UUUUU EEELEEE 11111 all MI MINI MO 1•1111 MIN INK MIN "mu' ____-___-_-___' V[[[iKL� : � Y9I ClTY OF CU4wS5EN . SUMMAKY BUDGET REPORT ••• COMPOSITE DECEMBER 1991 ` (100.00 PERCENT OF YEAR EXPIRED) CITY SUMMAR Y R -I. 'V-.|Y U-:--_ __ - _ - _ --_- __ _____ _--. ___ ___ _ _ _ BUDGETED COLLECTED cOELLCTE0 PERCENT UNCOLLECTED THIS RIVENVE �I3 MONTH ' TO.-LATE ' '~ ^ ' /EK�E| T ° Vw� ° _ _ _ ___ __ �o-$AIE LAST YR BALANCE OPLK�TIik' FUND:: v^bu6,17V l^2*7"+o. '. - ' �V �s' u7u+ - - - - - - ' ^^`` ^"^ '�^ v" 144"01 465v508 o+Ca 100.0V 01^+0 54.3t ° - _ ___�________ 5"17 ' NON F U U C� "00 283) 546.24 o, ----' u�.5 -----� ---- '--'- ---� ----�- - ---- ' -- � ' -_ ~.~`�..~ ° ~ ev542^48e"55Cm 18.52 45.70 __-�_-__�'_-- _-_-_-_- --' *4°83 TPTAL KL4[1l3[ 90686)17000 1^5314 007 , ---- --------- - ----- -'--------- - -'-------- _. -- ^"" m 18469 4,167 °�, ��"�0 9^$oT^o97"5gCm ,.. __- _'_~~~_-�~~~-.� E-X-9-iE-h-D.I T u R -E- -S-------- _ -_- __ - - - _____ _ - - __ _ - _- _ BUM; LT[U En ENDED EXPENDED PERCENT PERCENT UNENCUMBERED .. �XrLN0I3U[ TxI� MnVTU YEAp~To~DxTE ENCUMBRANCES TO-QAT^ '�~^ "` "^°�vn � � LAST YR BALANCE \ -- ---- - -'------ - - ---------- OPERATI#� FU�h: 7,691. 700.00 --- s51v94�"� " -- . '-- -- - - ---- - '- '------'-- --''^ 100.00 40.11 6) 640)490.70 93.64 451^2»9°au 10O � , o~�� +3°u0 ' --'----_-. _' -____ 5.54 *0k�i9LF�TIA� FOND:, .01 8240060.08 W^�9l^�� 71 -- - .„ ' � ^ 15)231,843 /9 a^59l"358 ��* 5*^89 5o"+o ° ' 105"54 TOTAL. CKPENDITi[EJ 7,091) 7000 �^�7w'on�. -'''� - ._ . ° +- 21+°78 8x140v1*3"41CR -- ' - --- ___ ' ___ __ __ ___ _ _ _ ___ __ _ _ _ _ i. -- - _- - -_ - - - _ _--___ --�_- - -_-_'__-_� --_-_'__-_'_'_'__-__--.___'-------___--_-__-___ __� __ - . ^.� - . _ _ -' . _ - - ........ .. ~_mill~= -- DECEMBER :991 CITY OF CHANNASSLU SUMMARY BUDGET REPORT - REVENUE UECEMBEP, 1991 (100.00 PERCENT OF YEAR EXPIRED) C- I_- I_Y__._._ -S U..11 _M A_. F_Y._ CRATING FUNI'S BUDGETED COLLECTED COLLECTED PERCENT PERCENT UNCOLLECTED - - - REVENUE .TIIIS MONTH TO-DATE- _- TO -DATE LAST YR- - BALANCE 467 LCUi:C - -f:IC DEVLL4^{ . UI.:T. 1,C09,375.0c 5430041.03 1,138,365.19 112.78 104.86 128,990.19CR 43.53_._ ._ 11.21 —. -- — — — 27.71 - 700 L TI L ITY FUND 1, 3,3,20 700.00 13,9, 067.79 1,180, 3,3,5.3,5 13.76 - - -- 11.15 - -- _ -._ - - _;�1- .63 - - - -- 88.5 7 93.77 152, 364.65 -- 32 -.73 720 SURFACE LATLR ItiCMT• 145, 000.00 15, 756.07 144, 980.14 99.99 211.07 19.86 -- 1426 - — 1. -43- 800 IIILTORIC PRESERVATION 104,675.0( 27, 655.68 87,575.45 83.66 167.57 17,099.55 — - - - - -- - - - - -... _ 1.08 2.22- .' - -- --- - -- -- - -- - -- -- --- - - - - -- -3.67 -- , ____________ _ . TOTLE OF'ERATII,G FUNDS 9,686,170.00 1,247,461.44 10,151,678.04 104.81 100.79 465,508.04CR r a -- r NM M -- M MI - 011111 a M- , . DECENDik :991 CITY OF COANNA!,: Ett SUMMARY 3UDGET REPORT .-REVENUL DECEMBER 1991 (100.00 PERCENT OF YEAR EXPIRED) OPERATING FUN' 5 BUDGETED COLLECTED COLLECTED PERCENT PERCEt4T UNCOLLECTED .. .. REVENUE THIS MONTH TO-DATE TO-DATE LAST YR - BALANCE . - - - --- 3Y REVENUE SOLACE GEMEKAi,. PaiERT3 ---- - 6,160,275.00 923,717.30 7,0530495.46 114.35 97.76 885,220.46CR I. 1 4 , 66 74.05 69.48 190.16 i 1 C I A17 A --- i SL i4E 1 : T5 15703000( 110102.44 195,978.78 124.59 104.41 38,678.78CR 1 atie f 84 1.93 8.31 BUSIIILSS LIC/PERM 50r 210.00 10120.00 50,220.25 100.02 97.03 10.25CR .52 • 09 .49 lia:86 54350306.06 --- 360642• 61 .-- 5040121.99 ------- ---- - 86.98 96.65 76,178.01 I " 6.04 2.94 5.02 16.36 IT_ FICEi ELAFEIIS 211,800.04, 1,548.40 26,380.80 91.60 93.49 2,419.20 .30 .12 •26 .52 IliTit ( ri_V• 146.227.00 1, 381,50 1870106.15 127.96 180.65 40,879.15CR 1.51 • 11 1.84 8.78 CURRE•T 5 ERVIC L :, 1,606,475400 142,83,4.64 1,441,664.07 79.61 103.42 364,010.93 18.65 11.45 14.20 78.37 .. otiiaCatiiii 559,53300 120,600.55 676,54305 120.91 104.44 117; 015.95C it 5.76 10.31 6.66 25.14 I: nu=ilvENuL 164005000 464.00 11,161.59 6.06 165.75 172,888,41 1.90 .04 .11 37.14 ..- ,,.. ______ ___ • **TUT ALL** - - - 9,606;170.00 1,247,461. - 10,151 s 67 ti. 04 104.81 100.79 465p 508.04CR _ . - . - --. ..-. inn - iiii an las ma NI as or Ns ow as or so as Ng sr am as DLCUENLR 1591 CITY OF CHANIiASSLt4 DETAIL BUDGET REPORT - REVENUE FUND 101 GCI:Er:AL FUI,& DECEMBER 1991 (10 PERCENT OF TEAR EXPIRED) - - BUUGET.LU COLLECTED . RE ETUE L , - - . CCLLLC.TE-D PERCENT- PERCENT -- UNCOLLECTED- - - Tt11. �MUt4TH TO -DATE TO -DATE LAST YR BALANCE - GEttEFAL-_P.RUPERTY TAXES-.__.._._ 1,590, 500.0E _ __. 3010 CURRENT PfiGPEkTY TAX - - - - _ _ 112 11 586,542.24 - 3011 OCL1I;Q1E1:T PI.OI'Ct:TY TAX 70,000.00 99.75 96.53 5 , 3 57. 67 - 304. 1.-_ 1sOLtSTLAL__CP.LUL.L__.__ .00 64,642.33 92.35 87.69 5,357.67 __ -- 416, 800.40C_ 222, 868 92_� _. 438, 8? 4 .00 3090 OTHER PRLPERTY TAXES __.__________ 105.,3.0_. -.- .100.- 3U-- . - -__.. 500.0E .00 .00 22 11]]AL 1,f t {.L'.kAL._! UPI RLY__T_AXLS-_- - -_. 2, 0.77,.8A0 33 6, 4 8 3.35- ...__ -. _2,_D 9.0, 05 9.. 0 7 _ 100.59 -- 9 .7-.11 - -_ BUSIt:LSS L IC/Pt RH -- 12r259.0aCR - -.- 3703 U ►L�K1 E4t4L.L__ � ' SO.. U.0_.. _. _ _ 3204 CICARETTL - - - --� OU - - 137 -00 -�. . - - - 360.00 300.00 604.00 190 - -- - 2 - - --- 3,205 COG OR CkT 2,1/00.x, .00 1,717.25 185.06 145.95 22.75CR _3213___SOLICLTGI. 100.0E .00 85.86 95.96 0 3223 3.0 OFF ,I:D ON ;ALE ______2600 ...0___ - 140,00 08 . 00 �- 3,216 L_ QUUR ON AND C FF SAL L 1r OOO.00 762.00 - - �- - �- - _. - - - 160..00- -_ . -. 44,100.00 . .00 44,300.00 00. 97.00 238.00 _3227_ S. LLB._AND_5UNDAY_.._...___._,____ _._ ._.__1,500.00._____.__. 100.45 97.00 200.0008 3284 RUB ..OU._ ._.-- .----- 1,_500 -.- _ 10 _ - 820.OG .00, _---_ 860.00 86.00 78.75 140.00 _TCIIAL BUS I t:C S S L I C /PE RM... - ----" ° - ---- - - - -__ 50,210.00 .1,120.00 - 50,220,25 10 0.02 - .97.03 -. - -- 10.25E R NC►ry L'UJI14L,rS L1C /PLRti ._ 3, ,O.I__LIII.1DII : b_ _ _ ___ -_ - _ 200, 000.00 12,164.50 179,269.30 3302 PLAt. CHLCI: 130,000.00 7,550.11 -- -89.63 _.95.84__ 20,730.70 3305 HEATING L ;; /C 30s000.00 108,380.10 83.37 93.54 21,619.90 - 330 6__..PLL.MBING. -- .- 45, 000.00 980.00 25i7444.75 97.01 103.06 0 TkLI CHINI �,t 00.00 -- 101.66 - - 103.35 - 746.75CR 337 - 33 TkL 5, 000.00 .00 3, 983.70 79.67 160.35 1,016.30 400.0[ S OU 39�PR ItJKlL __ 1, 003.00 125.38 84.00 203.000 R ._ 2,000,00 47...00. - 3,3;iC GAS PIPIt4� - -- - 1,573.00 10 78.65__.5,03 - 3311 SIGN 2s 6c 5. U0 11,434.10 104.90 188.39 427.00 -.- 000.00 50.00 520.00CR 3316 wI:.PTIC TAU 3a000,OC 300.00- 1,980.00 99.00 96.70 20.00 - 4,335.5p 144.50 185.00 1,335.UOCR • -- Nr - M - I.n ,s - r • a - S - Mill r 111. r , • -• DECEMBER 1991 CITY OF CHANHAS: LN DETAIL BUDGET RLPURT •-REVENUL DECEMBER 1991 I (100.00 PERCENT OF YEAR EXPIRED) lkiD -L0,. (7111k AL FUND 1 . BUDGETED C CLLECT.ED_ COLLECTED _PERCENT _PERCENT-- ---UNCCILLECIED ------- ; 1 1 1 . REVENUE THIS MONTH TO-•DATI TO-DATE LAST YR BALANCE 12 .0.L7.•BU_SINESS L IC LP ERM__ _ , I , r. - .320 4 ..;17.11LE 200.0( .00 220.00 110.00 00.00 20.000 R .320 ET LAND A LTLVAT IUN 200.00 .00 .00 50.33 200.00 -- 1 ,34_9__ CEMOLITILli .1_00.60 .. 00. 175.0_0.__________ _ .. ______1.75.00.__ 127400_____ __75...00C R !" 390 MIS C PERI.ITS 500.00 221.00 726.00 145.20 160.21 226.00C R .............-......--- ------ - r'; L_NO_N_OU.S.I_ML.S.S__L ICif,ERM__ ___ _ 4.29t 7_00.00 _ 23,545._61 3874.929..9_9 _9.0..28_ 97.61- - . _41,170.01.-- l'. '.1, 112, 7.11EZ + 1 ORF ELT S :1! ;401 TRAFFIC ,f ificli., VIOLA1 101). _ _ _25, 000_op -. 4409.65 .21s6Z3...5.2____ _ _ _ _ _ _____ _86...49_ _ _91.48 k404 D00/CAT iMPOLINI.; 3,500.00 138.75 4,375.03 125.00 108.87 875.03C 1405 OTHER FIRES/ PLNALT IES 300.01 • 00 382.25 127.42 176.50 82.25CR _ _ .. .. ........... ., _ . . 'UAL Fl.::ES + I UMFEITS 28.000.00 ..., 548.40 26,380.8C 91.60 93.49 2,419.20 :I.TELGOVIIIIMLNT AL LEV,,,. __ _ _ _ _ - - - - _. - _ _ _ 1502 11.S .A. MKIET • C. CiiiSTIZ -- 13,000.00 1,381.50 13,815.00 106.27 106.27 815.00CR )1509 LTHER SUE:a TAXES 25, NO .00 .00 30,123.94 120.50 110.79 5,12304C R -..-•-•-•.••••.•---••• -- ----- ..........._. _ _ _ ._ _ _ ._ ___ , _ . . .. . TTAL M LRGUVELI L. i i' fiii. • 30,000.08 1,301.56 43,938.94 115.63 109.41 5,9381. 94C g :IERLL_T_U1.0 E S. . _ ______ ____ _ _ 3601 SALL OF DOCUMENTS 1,500.00 70.50 1,347.60 89.84 125.81 152.40 , 3602 TILL t. VALIANCE PERMITS 12,000,00 75.00 12,025.00 100.21 79.74 25.00C R , k)0,3VEZ (MING LEL S _ _ 1,_000,00 .0O_._ _ _ 960.00 .... _ _ _ ___ 96.00- _ _ __ .. _...- 40...00 3664 ASA S.' R6L L :..; CATCH 3.500.00 b05.00 4,620.00 132.00 96.67 .1,120.100C R 3613 1.1; C . - L ENE RAL GOVT. 1,700.00 10.72 1,006.60 106.27 108.43 106.60C R 3614 . ADMIN. FL - CCHST_R. _ __ .00 i.Oo.43 _ _ ._.....00 _ -- 3i615 ADMIT CH - II•F■ • A• 20,000.00 .00 20,000.00 100.00 100.00 .00 3616 ADMIN. CHG • .- ICON. U I V• as 000 .00 • 00 20,000.00 100.00 100.00 .00 3618_ ADM Ili CHL OTHLR FUNDS 2,5,000.00 .00 .00 . - 100.00 25,000.00 - 1 - - • Mil an Illill IIIII NM an Mi 111. OM MN 11111 NM 11111 NM MI all Mil INII all ' • . DEEEHPL E. .991 CITY OF CHANIIAS;I:11 DETAIL BUDGET REPORT .-REVENUE DECEMBER 1991 (100.00 PERCUIT OF YEAR EXPIRED/ 'UltD 10: GLLEP AL FUND 131./0 GETEI) ._ _ COLLICILD- .,____ _ MULCTED- . _PERCENT ..PERCENT - UNCOLLECT-E0- . , RL VENUE THIS MONTI! T1.1.-DATE TO.-DATE LAST YR BALANCE .:URREI1T_A RVICL S . - - -- - - _ - - - ._ ----- _ _ - - - 3619 411VESTMEPT FE ite, 000.0c .00 .00 100.00 48,000.00 3623 A1.1111AL CLLTROL 25,000.00 1,057.00 22,271.1.60 89.11 99.98 2,721.40 , 3_6291211; 4._P_MII.0 _SALMI .1• 1).0 (L. 0 O._ •_00_ _955•00. 9545-0-----152.-50---- - ---------45.00 - 3632 PALL ADIKSSI01( FEES 13,500400 • 00 13,327.96 98.73 91.75 172.04 1 3634 PAPP: FACILITY CS AGL ELL 3,500.00 .00 2,958.49 84.53 541.51 h ' 363,6--SEL F-•.--SU.P-LEIRT-11-11,--P-ROGP-AMS-. - - -45,000.00 523.79-- .45,924.89 1.0847-2- -120.82 -30244-89DR - .. ' 3639 lin C • - PARKS L KEG • 800.00 18.00 752.37 94.05 47.63 114 3649 MI; C PUBLIC W01,1:3 4,000400 - . 00 3,092490 97.32 220.97 107.10 r TOTAL CURRENT 1,TERVICL S 2Z5,.500,0( 3,160.01 153,849.41 68.23 106.47 71,650.59 . , . , _ . IIIILE---kl-VINU L. - - - - -- --------- - -----. - 1801 1LT • ZARNINGS . ... OOP 000.00 14a 834.01 74,400.15 124.13 100.82 14,480.15CR I-- 3802 IAD IPMINT REliTAL & SALE 200.00 • 00 225.60 112.80 100.63 25.60C R ,. 3807 DfiliAILUNL _ _ 4250.400 . _ _4.00_ 2,24540-0 -99428 153.00 -. --5-.00 ---- ---:' _ 3808 INS . RECOVERIES & REIN. 100.00 2,773.00 2,773.00 999.99 103.60 2,673.00CR 3816 SAC RETAILER 1s 700.00 97.50 1,511.00 88.88 87.60 189.00 . 3818_U-TAX LI TA I NER - -. 700.00 - 684.24.----- 723.40 103434 85.23 - -- - - 2-3.40CR 3,02,0 IIII:C. .- LTIILD RIVE 1,3.00.00 15.00 1,363.00 104.85 .30 63.00C R -......-....-...--.. - T.C.TAL-LTOEP-D.EV.ELUE__ _ _ _ 66,250.00 17,787.75 _ 33,321.15 _ ._ _. . -- 125.77 64404 17,07141502 Illi.-.P.EVENUE 3903 --RET-UtiDS/E.L-111BUR-SEMENTS .00- 464.00- ---- 1,537.84 - • - - -------- 1,-537.84CR- 3980 CA:11 OVE1 /41101.T .00 • 00 32.40CR 32.40 IOTAL-taltor-kLALUL. - .00 464.-00- 1,505.44- -- - - - - - - ____ • - - ---- 1,-505.44CR - - -..-..-.-.... TOTAL 101 W.:LUAL FU4D 2.,916,2604.1XL 3.(1.4_490.62 .248374205405 _ _97429 - - 97.94 --__. -79,-0544-95 _ . ---- _._. MB MIMI MN . UN MI NMI OM 1•11 6111 MI OM MI MI In • 111111 MI MI all _ _ . i . . _ ,,_ _ ___ ____ ___ _ __ ___. -_--_______-_-_ ` DEW Bik I99I CITY UF CxAUH4S'At! SUMMARY BUDGET REpuRT •EXPENDITURES DECEMBER 1991 (100°00 PERCENT OF YEAR EXPIRED) C_I_I_I�__-S�_U-L_�-A_K_Y_.- - _- _. ._ _ OPE�4TI*G FVNFS |' BUDGETED EXPENDED [XpENCE0 PERCENT PEKCEmT UNENCUMBERED -_- - _ ______ - [xP LKGJTuu[S THIS -110141 YLum ----- EucuMecAwCaS-----To-oATs- LAST YR 'uALAwCs -- ` BY TYPL UF [XPLt.DITUp[ , ~ - P6&$O01AL S[KVICL% 2^102"105°00 167*934^06 2,094°797°31 96°00 10+°70 87*307°6q .� 30^77 3,0°43, 31°55 19.35 /`' \. -----------------''---- - -- -------- --'------------- ---'--- -- ----- ----- ----' ----'---- MATLKIAL::) + SUE PLIES 377 35,149.95 200^I42°58 76"26 95°+9 89v707°*2 1,, 5.3:: 6,37 4,y4 19°88 � �` � �� ___ �� `� �� __ _ ` CONTEACTUAL SE�VICE3 2/630,17 151v951°22 2^151,374°53 81°e0 86.45 478*800°47 37°09 27.53 32.40 10*^11 ._ _|' CAPITAL EUTLAY 397.470"0( 84r805"95 570"296"39 145.49 157^5* 180v826°39Cn ; 5°60 15.36 8"71 40.08 -- »_ --_-- DEBT SEEN ICE l5*4^lOo°00 111,928"83 1»517^704^09 100°90 93°58 13v604^e9Cm 21°21 20.28 22"86 3"02 _ - ..... MISC. DE, BUKSULHTS .00 175.00 10^175"0$ 99°73 10w175"00CR °03 .15 • 2^26 __- ___ -_ _ _____ _ -- ` _-- ** T 8 T AL 5:** 7»091,70000 551^945^01 606+0,490^70 93.64 100°23 +51,209°30 13 ___________ _ _ ___ _ __ _ • _ _ _ __ ___ _ _ _ _____ _ - - - _______ ___ ______ _ __ _ _ __ _ ____ _ _ __ ____ __ __ _ _ _ - __ . ` ~ ^ DE[[K8L I991 CITY OF CHAnHAS:AV SUMMARY BUDGET REPORT -EXPENDITURES DECEMBER 1991 (100"00 PERCENT OF YEAR EXPIRED/ T Y U A.K Y MON~opERATIN6 FUNDS - --- -- ------- -------- - --------' '---- '-------'---- ----- - BUD( LIED EXPENDED [%PENDED PERCENT PERCENT UNENCUMBERED LArU 1101 -YEAK-TU-DATE ErCuM8RANCES_ TO-.DATE LAST YR -- BALANCE - � BY TYPE [if [XPLI.01TVI, dATEpIALS ----�-' ---- - -- --- - - - --'�� - -' -----'�-------- / + SUPPLIES .00 .00 3x827°48 ---------- a.827~48C R i. °0* ° CUI:Tl TU4L S[I•VlCES .1/0 1151ul ---'-------------------�-------�---- -- ---- ' �-----------' ~-0."l - V 427,15 3.16 999.99 427^153^16ce 13"96 4°97 4.97 |` CAPITAL OUJLAY -'----� ---- --- ---�--' - -------- - '---------------��--- --' "00 422,106428 2"849,309.55 ��--- - - --- - � ----- --'-- 999.99 2°849°309"55CR 5I"22 33.16 33.16 __' _--- _ - DEBT SLP.%ZCE .00 2o�� ^� �a -- ----- --'--'-- - '--- -- -- . '. - "�" 5^311^062•52Cn 34"82 61°82 61.82 _-___ _- -� = ** T i T A L ' �* ---- -----'- ' ----- ---' --- — -----'- - - - ~~~~ ^ .00 e2�,Va0 VV n^59�x�� 7l " " 9e9°99 8x591,352°71Cn •--- - - - ' - -__-_ __-____ ___ _ __- - ___ _ _ '_ — all 1111111111111111111 MINN OM MUM • NM MI NM INN . .. _ OJAI MBL P. 1991 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SUMMARY BUDGET REPORT -EXPENDITURES DECEMBER 1991 (100.00 PERCENT OF YEAR EXPIRED) I 'LCD 101 6Etit 1 AL RIND EXPLNDLD--• --- EXP-ENULD- " - -- - - ---- -PIRCENT .. PERCENT-----.-UNENCUMBERE0--- _ EXP ENE IMRE!, THIS MOUTII TEAR-TO-DATE Eta; UM BRAN C ES TO-DATE LAST YR BALANCE I : i L1.1_ LEGISLATIVE . 90,100.00- - - . 12,048.20 -860125.54 ._. ____ _ 95.59- -81.54- 3,974.46 2.99 5.21 3.15 1.40 L.12____AD-LINIS ILA TO I. OF_ELCI____ ___ _189,3,804,00- -13,191.77-- - --- 181,994.56 ---- •--- ------ ----- - -• 96.10 - - 99-.-61----- - - - 7,385.44---- 6.20 5.70 6.66 2.60 L13___F-I-NANC-1- - -- - - --- ------ ------- --I.-34,600 - ---- ----.6,652.-76 --- ---- 94,696444 •- -70.35- 83.20 39,903-.-56--- - ' 4.46 ' 2.96 3.47 14.06 14 1! L14 LECIAL- 52,000:40U 14,21-7.86- 49,331-.-02- -- -- 94.87 - 120.27 - --- --2,668.98-------- 1.72 6.15 1.81 • 94 1, 1.15------PROP-EATY ASSLS:MCNT --- ---- --- 410200.00 -- --- 403.65 •-• ----- -32,797.80 - 79.61 - - 92-.11 - - - - -8,402.20 --------- 1.37 .17 1.20 2.96 117_____C TT Y HALL 1.53.,3.10•00 . 7*-700.-7-5___. .14-4,-.123.02_ -- -- 94.01- • -- - -92.-86-- - ----9,186.-98----- 5.09 3.33 5.28 3.24 , 118----EIEL•TION: - -- - -- - - - .. . .. .00 -- - --- -8.-16- •---- 33.32- _____ _ -- - 32.00 --33.320-R • 01 121- FOL I-CL 467.705.00 7,715.16 466,874.36 99.82 - 97-.90 --- - -830.64-- - 15.51 3.33 17.10 .29 1.22.----EIRE-P-REVEliTILIN + ADM. --- 224,750.00 15,76.1.09 . - 172,324.37 - - - -- -- .- -. 76.67 934.19- - -52,42-5.63 ---- -- 7.45 6.81 6.31 18.47 L23 PULLIC-SkELTI. LOEHISLION. __ _ 900.00 224.84- 254.33, -28.26 -2Z.63--------- -- 645.67- - .03 .10 .01 .23 125 •----LO-DE-EliFt..1..0EliEN-T - 314,560.00 210965.55-- 306,968.07 -- - -- 97.59 97.16 7,591-6-93 10.42, 9.49 11.24 2.67 -- - _ --- MO an 11111 11111 En aliiiiiiiiiiniiiiiininiiiiiiiiiiaiii.....M.111 .‘. DLECI1BE k 1991 CITY or C NANNASS L N SUMMARY BUDGET REPORT -EXPENDITURES DEC EMBER 1991 (100.00 PERCINT OF YEAR EXPIRED) FI-11:D 1c: GLUE' AL rulo BUDGET_E V . _ EXP Ent D. .EXF!ENDLD_ PERCENT_ PERCENT UNENCUMBERED_ EXPENDITURES THIS MONTH YE AR-T0-DATE ENCUMBRANCES TO LAST YR BALANCE ! ' . , 24AM.I II AL C L' ti TR OL 71, 620000 . 5,619.77 _63.036.72 88.02__ 92.97 .8.583.28-- 2.31 2.43 2.31 3.02 13a LII.G DELP:. OG .1 Q30 945 .- 00477.74_ _980_5_60.19 94_1,131 __93._47 _ _ _ 5,398.81__ _ _ 3.45 2.80 3.61 1.90 .13.2TREI.T. Al A I tiTINAIIC L. _ . 453.460..00 44.172.._33, . 355s-518..62 1 15.0't 19.09 13.02 34.50 1 135 L TR. LI c I I T Ili_G + S IGNA_L_S__ 109,750 cL OC 18, 01104_ 110039_0., 13 _ .100.58 _105.-74_ _____640.13CR_____ 3.64 8.04 4.04 .23 131_ _1T_Y__ciARAL= E 1254.380.00 9,48.67 . 89.89 97434- -- 4.29 4.00 4.26 4.b.i. • 1313 PARK MAII,TENANC L _ 183,...,250 9t,045.76 _ 1b_74_6_48.. 71_ . _91.49 _95.4.8.6____15. - __ , . 6.0b 3.91 6.14 5.50 : 1.41.____CX.M.ita_SLI.V_._(0111.15.S.I0.11_, _ 5, 600.00 -. 406.84 44803.51 85.78- -98.91 --------- -796.49- -- -- ' .19 .18 .18 .28 _102 . 42_10.1.-46----1.-04-4.-29C R - - 1,43 1821 1.62 .37 14. 5_ _ _ _ R Et _REA . 1 I E. I I . P.ROURAMS _ _ ___ 89, 770.00 2C,85_4.38 ___._- _780.036..02_ _. .._ __ ____ _ _ _ .86.93_ --105.55 ,.. ----11.7.33.98.------ 2.9E1 9.01 2.06 4.13 l' 146 a L F S UEE_URT I tILP °CLOS 42,075 .00_ 3, . 106.67_ 108476_ _ _. 2.804.94C R.----.' 1.4C 1.40 1.64 .99 15.1_-__PLAL I a 1{G .C.OM1 _Li ION _. _ 6, 950 .OL 499.42.. - _7..003.16 ._ _. 101.63 96.21. - - 113.16CR- .23, .2. .26 .04 .. , - -- iiMi Ililli an III. iiii iliii iiiii ME aili 11. lall IN. OM Me ii. iiii iiii Mei iiii '-^ DLCLNBLR 1991 CITY OF Ch4UH4SSL// �UMMARY BUDGET REPORT -EXPENDITURES DEC EMBER 1991 ��Vo o4 PEnCLMT OF YEAR EXPIRED, FUN/ 101 GE|�[�AL rump , � _ Bmu�� EXPENDED_ EXPENDED PERCENT---PERCENT UNENCUMBERED �%PEMrlTUoES THIS MONTH YE AR- TO~D4T1 ENCUMBRANCES TO-DATE LAST YK BALANCE 152__ iG. .ADU 2Tu4TIoW 107^370 "00 10x301"73 10+,993°30 - 97=79-- 99"29 - 2,37670 3.5t 4.+5 3"u+ ° .a4 T0IAL_GESERAL...1 - 231x355°40----'~Z=��0^�u�°�m-____-_ - - 9m~57- -283°8e3,60 /`. _ - _-- -__ --- _- - -__ - - _ __. • _ _ _ _ �� ---- - - 111111 all an OM MO 11111 OM MI 111111 MI EN NM 11M11 __ _ . , CitSLI.EIL k 1991 CITY OF CHANHASI: EN , SUMMARY BUDGET REPORT –EXPIND1TURES DECEMBER 1991 (100.00 PERCENT OF YEAR EXPIRED) R 101 GEIiLkAL FUND – _____ 0UDI LIED __EXPENDED. EXP_ENDED. PERCENT__ PERCENT UNENCUMBERED E XPLND I TURLS THIS MONTH YEAR–TO–DATE ENCUMBRANCES TO–DATE LAST YR BALANCE i J 3'( T Y.P_i_. OF EXPLIAl PA - _ ... L . PLk :::1.121/IC LS 1,552.905.00 120,698.00 1,480,082.37 95.31 95.58 72,822.63 .52.17 54•20. MATERIALS + SUP PLIES 248,810.00 29,548.54 203,124.91 81.64 111.25 452685.09 _ 8 sa5 _12.77 ._2. --- . -16409— --- -. : I• CONTRACTUAL SLRVIC LS 1,185.890.01 77o 613.34 120312374.21 86.97 94.89 154,515.79 ”._. _55 37_1.1_7 _ CAPITAL CUTL AY 27,270.00 3,320.92 16,224.91 59.50 100.85 11,045.09 _ _•90 1.44 .59 HISC. DIZ BUR:ArLNTS .00 175.00 175.00 175.0004 .... **T0 T A L ** 3,014.875400 231,3,55.80 2,730,981.40 90.58 96.57 283,893.60 I - , - --- ------ _ NM iiii MEI =I all IIIIII • • MN I= MI OM I= NM • INII MN II•111 MI •