9. Appointments to Hwy 5 Task Force I
C ITYOF ci
...........,
1
1 690 COULTE DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937 1900 •FAX (612) 937 5739 pctton Ci Adn�nistrator
1 MEMORANDUM wi `''f _---
TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager
De.___ ... :.1 _� -9 z-
1 Dix i:',.. '._ v:�r^ission
FROM: Paul Krauss, Planning Director Dete slit ,�-, t� mc;J
I DATE: June 17, 1992 62z -
1 SUBJ: Selection of Residents for the Highway 5 Corridor Study Task Force
I At the end of April, the City Council authorized staff to proceed with phase I of the Highway
5 Corridor Study. To support this study, a task force, similar to the one the city utilizes for
the Surface Water Management Program and on the comprehensive plan, is to be created. At
I the Council meeting, it was agreed that this task force would be comprised of two members
of the Planning Commission, one member from the Park and Recreation Commission, one
member of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, one member from the Public Safety
I Commission, 2 -5 members of the City Council, 4 members from the community at large and
2 members of the business community. The Planning Commission has already nominated
Jeff Farmakes and Steve Emmings, the Park and Recreation Commission will be nominating a
1 member at their next meeting, and a similar request has been made of the Public Safety
Commission.
II As suggested by the Council, an advertisement was placed in the Chanhassen Villager
requesting applications from people who were interested. We received 6 applications for the
4 resident positions. Their application forms are attached for your review and selection.
1 Applicants include:
I James Domholt, 8251 West Lake Court
Brian Wellman, 8450 Ibis Court
Linda Carlson, 6950 Galpin Boulevard
1 Craig Swaggert, 2739 Ches Mar Farm Road
Ann Cathcart, 3895 Lone Cedar Circle
Nancy Mancino, 6620 Galpin Boulevard
1 I have been in contact with Kevin McShane and asked him to select 2 members from the
Chamber of Commerce. Additionally, Tom Workman has indicated to me that Donn Andrus,
1
1 to, PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
1
1 Don Ashworth
June 17, 1992
1 Page 2
who is a member of the Chamber is willing to serve as one of the two business
I representatives.
Staff is working with the consultants to develop phase I materials and we expect to have our
1 kick -off meeting sometime in early July.
RECOMMENDATION
1 Staff recommends that the City Council select 4 resident members for the Highway 5
Corridor Task Force. We further recommend that the City Council accept Donn Andrus and
1 Kevin McShane's nomination as representatives of the business community.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
City Council Meeting - April 29, 1992 1
26. The applicant shall meet the conditions of the Rezoning #92 -2 and the 1
Wetland Alteration Permit #92 -3.
All voted in favor and the motion carried. 1
Councilman Mason: If I could just make a quick comment. I think people who know
me know I tend to not be very pro - development but I would like to thank
Mr. Hagen for his consideration...in trying to come up with plans that were...
REVIEW PROPOSAL FOR HIGHWAY 5 CORRIDOR STUDY AND COMMENT ON HIGHWAY 5 OVERLAY
DISTRICT.
Paul Krauss: We've been talking about a Highway 5 corridor study since about a
year ago and of course I think we made a lot of progress in a lot of areas.
Some areas we haven't. I think tonight's meeting was an interesting one and
showed the kinds of things that a highway corridor study could have done. I mean 11 we could have know, we should have ideally have gone through this process before
Target or anybody else thought about going there and we would have known what
the City's position is and we could have dealt with it effectively. Plus it
would been an ordinance and you would have had another tool in the arsenal to
make these visions happen. We need those tools. We need something to convert
the things that you hear from 8i11 and Barry and from us into the realty. The
last time we met on this you asked me to go back and try to come up with a
proposal to put together that corridor study. Put together those elements and
those elements include a lot of things. They include working with MnDot to
refine the design of the highway. They include designing those arterial, or
sorry. The parallel collector streets in an environmentally sensitive and
effective manner. It includes working with MnDot and the Metro Council to
hopefully procure funding under that Federal Ice Tea Bill. It includes revising
the land use plan as necessary to fit this new vision and it includes getting
ordinances and a plan amendment into our Comp Plan that again we can put on the
table and say, developer. This is the way we want you to do things here. It's
part of our ordinances and still give plenty of flexibility. I think tonight
you saw how much flexibility you can really have but still get a good idea of
what you'd like to achieve. So we started from the concept that those were the
goals we wanted to achieve. We also started from the concept that there is I
think a fair amount of comfort here with Bill and his staff and a desire to keep
them involved. At the same time there's I think a good comfort level with
working with Barton - Aschmann. Barton - Aschmann has a good relationship with
MnDot and the Highway 5 design folks. They've also had a good relationship I
think with the City, with the HRA and designing the streetscape improvements.
The complimentary work in accordance with TH 5. 5o building upon that, we
really needed to add a final element and that was a good planning function.
Somebody who can convert all these things into the reality. And what we came up
with is the firm of Camiros who has a working relationship with Barton - Aschmann.
They've been in the Twin Cities area for a couple years. Their principle office
is in Chicago. I do happen to know their local person. They are working on a 1
number of design projects including Minneapolis' design ordinance. They've got
a number of other projects throughout the State and in the area. They're
working in Sioux City as well and Galena, Illinois and they've done some
interesting work there. I think that's a fairly good fit. What we had them lay
out for you was a flow chart of how this study might work and who would be
21 1
1
II City Council Meeting - April 29, 1992
interacting with whom. I don't have an overhead for it but it's the one in your
packet and there's also a schedule and the schedule attempts to lay out. We're
talking about almost a dual track approach going at the same time. Time is
' really of the essence. Highway 5 is being designed as we speak. The time to
get the gears rolling and the Mayor and I were chatting this morning, to get the
Metro Council on board to support this Ice Tea Funding. To get the MnDot folks
working on it, that's got to proceed very quickly. At the same time we don't
want to let too much time pass until we get the completed documents for the
corridor itself. So we've set this up as a dual track approach. I know cost is
one of your concerns and to be up front, I don't have a great answer for you
' yet. I think that I know what, I mean I've laid out what I think should be in
this study based upon what you've told me. Based upon my experience and what I
think we need. What we've done here is set up a process wherein we would go
' through the organizational steps of the study. Have a corridor issues paper
laid out and a lot of this stuff is already, I mean we're not going to reinvent
the wheel. A lot of this stuff already exists and the stuff that Bill and Barry
have done. Some of it needs to be repackaged. Get together. Set up a, I
' forget what we call it but an Advisory Committee in some sort of structure.
We've suggested a structure for the Council to be able to appoint this Advisory
Committee. That includes Planning Commission, HRA representation, Council
' representation. Plus there's a potential for adding resident participation in
this as well. I think the Surface Water Management task Force is working out
really pretty slick and that is a very similar kind of a make -up. So get that
group together and then hold the public hearing that we really never had. It's
been a concern of mine for a long time that we've come a long way but we haven't
brought the public with us yet. I think we need to invite them in. Have Bill
give his dog and pony show. Say that the slates open here but here's the
issues. How we see them. What do you see and then come back and at that point
finalize what needs to be done in this study and get a formal contract. So the
discussions Don and I thought that we would proceed sort of on an hourly basis
to get to that point. Then we have the information we need to actually lay it
out. Get the hard numbers and go. I guess I'd be a little bit leery suggesting
this kind of approach if we weren't so familiar with most of the actors that are
involved in this. We're not proposing we spend a whole lot of time going out
and soliciting bids. I think for those who were involved in the storm water
process, that took about 6 months I think from start to finish and we really
don't have that kind of time. So what we've proposed for you tonight is to take
a look at this and if you're comfortable with this, hopefully give us the go
ahead to get the ball rolling and we could do that pretty expeditiously. The
second thing that I prepared for you is the, do you want me to stop there?
Mayor Chmiel: Yeah. I never like to give a blank, open check to do anything.
To really feel comfortable with it, we'd have to get some kind of an estimate as
to what this is going to be. And before we say, run. Go.
Don Ashworth: How about the first portion of the work will not exceed $2,500.00
before it goes back to City Council?
Paul Krauss: If that's the case, I mean I'm sure we can probably work with
these folks under that scenario and let them know. So if it's not, I mean that
might be cutting it a little tight but if that's the number we have to work
with, we'll work with that.
22
City Council Meeting - April 29, 1992 ' II
Councilman Workman: Is that coming out of HRA funds? 1
Don Ashworth: For the most part, yes. I need to make sure the HRA knows that.
Councilman Wing: You know I respect the Mayor's position on the dollars. 11 However, this has run so long, been delayed so long. If for but...so long and
with the conservation nature of the Mayor and the City Manager and you Paul, I
don't think we're going to spend any more money than we have to. Have to.
And I'm willing to give you an open check to get this going because you'll only
spend what you have to and it's not going to be exceed $30,000.00. I mean it's
going to cost some money and it would have cost maybe $40,000.00 to $60,000.00
with all these in house things. That's been reduced down to some unknown. It's
got to get done. It doesn't matter if it costs $2,000.00 now or $2,500.00
later.
Mayor Chmiel: We've had a lot of freebee stuff going into it right now.
Paul Krauss: That's true. Morrish is, I'm kind of surprised by it but 8i11 is
putting a whole lot of time basically thus far for free. I mean beyond his
original contract.
Councilman Workman: If it's over $15,000.00, the contract, doesn't it have to
go to a bid process? If we're talking about $30,000.00.
Don Ashworth: This is a fees for service. This is the same way as choosing a
City Attorney.
Councilwoman Dimler: I'm not comfortable with the open check. '
Councilman Workman: I would like to get a handle on that.
Mayor Chmiel: I think we've got that, as Don said...the need for those dollars 1
are there, then we have to get back to it and address it.
Councilman Mason: I think it was made abundantly clear tonight that we need to
grab this and run with it as opposed to be chasing behind what's going on.
Paul Krauss: The second aspect of it was, I felt, I've been feeling since we
got involved with this that everybody. You know people are getting on board.
People are excited by this and then they look at me and say, well go do it and
I'm saying, what am I supposed to do it with? Looking to get a foot in the
door, I came up with the idea of an overlay district that would put people on
notice that while we haven't finished, we do have this visions of the corridor
newsletter that Bill put out. We do have some documentation coming together and
we already have established a preliminary set of goals. And to be able to
overlay property with that and put people on notice that that's the kind of
thing we're starting to look at. And then when we do actually have a plan, you
just adopt it by reference in this overlay district and you're have done with
it. Now, I laid this out for Roger and Roger, being a cautious City Attorney
first told me that he didn't think we could get away with it. And then we
talked about it and massaged it around a little bit and then he said you
probably could. I'm a little leery about the cart before the horse. If we're
actually going ahead, and it sounds like we are, with the study. Maybe this is
23 11
City Council Meeting - April 29, 1992
II something we can lay on the table at the issues meeting because at that point
the educational process has begun and people will know where we're going. At
that point it may be a little more effective to do the overlay.
II Mayor Chmiel: Well, and I think we've had some coverage through the news media
on this so a lot of the people within the community are made aware of this
already. That we've been doing something. We are looking at things. And quite
I frankly every time I pull out that brochure that was put together for us, people
are really impressed to see where we are and where we're going.
' Paul Krauss: So I wanted to lay that on the table for you. I guess I didn't
want to suggest that we should just jump into it right now and blindly do it.
If we were to go ahead with an overlay district, it has to be coupled with an
educational process. The educational process starts with this issues meeting
and that's probably the place to bring it in.
Councilwoman Oimler: I want the public input as soon as possible.
I Paul Krauss: Right. That's the way we've structured this Councilwoman Dimler.
The first thing we're going to do is have a kick off meeting and notify, I mean
I guess on a preliminary basis we'll try and define what the corridor is so we
can start notifying owners of property. Then notify probably developers and
then we have interested parties. Jerome Carlson's wife and I can't recall.
' Councilman Workman: Linda.
Paul Krauss: Linda has several times asked to be on the corridor study group
I and I'm sure there's other people. Probably somebody from Timberwood. Other
people who would like to be involved as well.
iel
Mayor Chmit : last nk what have get we lked bout nd you'e
listed here w Four we members to represent ing ta corrido area it re v at
large and then two members of the business community. Then you're going to have
two members of the City Council, one member HRA, two members of Planning
II Commission. That's fine.
Paul Krauss: Okay. Then if we're going ahead with this and we're fast tracking
it, we probably ought to work on getting this committee assembled as soon as
possible. Would you like us to put a notice in the paper since we have the
still current reporter and editor here?
II Mayor Chmiel: Yes. Indicating what we need. We're going to need 6 people from
the general public. What I'd like to get 2 members of the business community
but I'd also like to work that through the Chamber of Commerce. See if they
II can.
Paul Krauss: Would that be through Joe Scott or who's the chair person?
II Mayor Chmiel: No, Kevin McShane.
' Paul Krauss: Oh Kevin. I'll give him a call.
Councilwoman Oimler: And should there be someone from Public Safety?
24
City Council Meeting - April 29, 1992 1
Paul Krauss: That's a good point. 1
Mayor Chmiel: There's no one from Public Safety and I think pretty much like
those, in fact I was going to suggest that. Like I suggested having this
II
meeting this evening. It would probably be good to have that because if some of
those issues did come up.
Councilwoman Dimler: Park and Rec? 1
Todd Hoffman: Recreational issues. Trails.
Paul Krauss: Actually, we did consider Park and Rec. If I left Park and Rec II
out, I shouldn't have because clearly there's a lot of recreational issues.
Councilwoman Dimler: Yeah, put both of those on. 1
Mayor Chmiel: I don't like to get it too big but I think if you were to get
probably the Chair and Vice -chair or anyone who'd wish to serve off those
I
particular commissions. If they don't have time, have someone else.
Councilman Wing: The only other thing I'd maybe ask Mr. Mayor is that as far as
I
Council involvement. The number. Because there may be.
Mayor Chmiel: Well we may all be in there.
II
Councilman Wing: Because I clearly would want to be part of that.
Mayor Chmiel: I'm going to sit in on one of those things, I know. 1
Councilwoman Dimler: Well two of them are HRA.
Mayor Chmiel: If we're only going to have one member of the HRA, we should 1
really have 2 there.
Paul Krauss: Whichever you prefer. I mean frankly, you can get a group that's 1
too big but more often that not, keeping the ball going, keeping continuity,
especially over the summertime.
Mayor Chmiel: We may have 5 Council members. 1
Councilman Workman: You know how those guys and Mike and I were talking about II let staff just, they get dog eared from all the committees. You know I'm on the
sign committee and we're kind of hacking away and yelling at each other there
and I'm on the schools facilities committee and Paul's at that. And there's a II lot of stuff going on. If I didn't say yes to another thing I'd be happy but I
can show up.
Councilwoman Dimler: That's how I feel too. 1
Councilman Workman: But I do want to have the packet.
Mayor Chmiel: Okay. So you're going to get on a fast track. Get an ad in the 1
paper and request 4 of those members of the community and then when are you
25 1
1
II ' City' Council Meeting - April 29, 1992
contemplating in having your first meeting? Do you have a schedule?
Paul Krauss: I really don't. What we need to do is go back to Barry and Bill.
Mayor Chmiel: How quick do you want those people to respond?
Paul Krauss: Oh, I'd like them to respond in the next 2 weeks or. I'd like to
' have them at the net Council meeting.
Mayor Chmiel: Well that's May 18th so that's a long way from then.
II Paul Krauss: Well that should work fine. Because I think that we can give the
consultants the go ahead on getting this issue stuff together before the
committee gathers.
I Mayor Chmiel: Okay, anything more? If not, I'd entertain a motion to cover the
TH 5 corridor study proposal and discussion for potential TH 5 overlay district.
II Councilman Mason: So moved.
Councilman Workman: Second.
II Councilman Wing: Is that strong enough? That's alright Mr. Mayor.
I Mayor Chmiel: Yeah, that's strong enough.
Councilman Mason moved, Councilman Workman seconded to authorize staff to
advertise for citizens at large and form the Highway 5 Corridor Study Committee
' and direct staff to begin work on the overlay district. All voted in favor and
the motion carried.
CONSIDER CANCELLATION OF THE MAY 4, 1992 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
Councilman Mason moved, Councilwoman Dimler seconded to cancel the May 4, 1992
II regular City Council meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried.
Mayor Chmiel: I'd also like to just get an amendment. I would like to get an
amendment to the agenda for one item that Don has here today that we have to
move on it.
Councilman Mason moved, Councilman Workman seconded to amend the agenda to
include an item by Don Ashworth under Administrative Presentations. All voted
in favor and the motion carried.
' Don Ashworth: So that Lundgren Bros. can file their plat, there was a goof up
in 1989. The Council mistakenly vacated the entire plat instead of vacating the
streets.. This Resolution makes that correction. I verified that it was just
' mis recording. Recommend approval of the resolution.
Resolution $92-58: 58: Councilman Wing moved, Councilwoman Dialer seconded to
approve a resolution correcting the vacation of streets for Lundgren Brothers.
II All voted in favor and the motion carried.
26
1
MEMORANDUM ,
TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager '
FROM: Paul Krauss, Planning Director
DATE: April 22, 1992
SUBJ: Highway 5 Corridor Study Proposal/Discussion of Potential Hwy. 5 Overlay '
District
Highway 5 Corridor Study '
Since last summer's tour of the Hwy. 5 corridor, the city has moved closer to undertaking a
formal corridor study and planning effort for the Hwy. 5 corridor. Excellent ground work has
been laid through the use of Bill Morrish and his staff working with the Chanhassen Task Force
comprised of representatives of the Planning Commission, HRA, City Council and city staff.
This work culminated in the publication "Building Community Across the Corridor" newsletter.
Based upon discussions with the Council, we believe it is now time to move into the second and
more definitive phase of the project. At the Council's request, we have developed a formal
proposal to undertake the required work.
Rather than go through a lengthy and time consuming interview process, staff elected to get a
proposal from Barton Aschman and Associates since we have had a good working relationship
with them on Hwy. 5 issues to date. You are all familiar with the work that Barry Warner has
done with the HRA on urban design pertaining to the major downtown entrances and to the Hwy.
5 corridor in the current construction phase. Barton Aschman is also uniquely positioned to work
with MnDOT since they are also undertaking the MnDOT design contract for both the current
and future phases of Hwy. 5. Joining Barton Aschman and providing the planning support for
the program is the firm of Camiros. Camiros is relatively new to the Twin Cities area, having
had a local office for about a year. Their larger office is based in Chicago and they will be able
to draw on a wealth of urban design planning efforts for their work in Chanhassen. We have
also designed the proposal to keep Bill Morrish and the University actively participating.
1
1
Don Ashworth
April 22, 1992
1 Page 2
1 Work tasks in this program include the following:
1. Refinement of mainline Hwy. 5 design to incorporate features outlined in the "Building
' Across the Corridor" document as well as other environmentally and community sensitive
improvements that are developed through this study.
2. Work to secure funding under the new Highway Transportation Bill for non - traditional
aspects of the plan.
1 3. Define the rights -of -way for parallel collectors described in the "Building Across the
Corridor" document.
1 4. Refine land use plan recommendations for the existing MUSA area and for the 1995
Study Area.
1 5. Accurately define environmentally sensitive areas for protection.
' 6. Develop a corridor design plan and handbook that can be appended to the City
Comprehensive Plan.
' 7. Develop zoning ordinance amendments designed to help facilitate the establishment of the
city's vision.
' 8. Design streetscape improvements along the highway corridor similar to that which has
already been completed in the first phase of Hwy. 5 construction.
' The planning process envisions working with a technical advisory committee in a manner similar
to which the Surface Water Management Plan Task Force is working under. Any plan or
ordinance changes would have to be reviewed by the Planning Commission, and ultimately
approved by the City Council and potentially the HRA. We find that it is useful to establish a
broad spectrum of people to work with consultant and city staff to develop this plan. We would
recommend that the Council consider establishing this technical advisory committee in the
1 following format:
Two members of the Planning Commission
1 One member of the HRA
Two members of the City Council
Four members representing corridor area residents at large
1 Two members of the business community
1
Don Ashworth 1
April 22, 1992
Page 3
1
If you agree with this concept, you could either simply appoint those persons who you feel would
be interested in participating or we could publish a notice in the newspaper and see what kind
of response we have. We would also provide a forum for the developers operating in the
corridor to have input. In addition, there would be numerous public meetings held to solicit input
from residents at large.
1
We realize that cost continues to be a concern of the Council and this is fully understandable.
However, at this point, we are recommending that the Council authorize undertaking the study '
on an hourly basis to get us through the organizational steps, issues, opportunities and constraints
analysis, first public meeting, and drafting of a summary memorandum. At that point, we would
suggest refinement of the work program and negotiate consultant level of effort. Thus, the
Council would have a second opportunity to review the program and authorize expenditures
related to it.
Attached you will find a copy of the proposal from Barton Aschman and Camiros. Staff is
requesting that the City Council authorize staff to proceed on the first phases of the study in the
manner outlined above.
Highway 5 Overlay District
Staff has held several discussions with the Council about the need to expedite Hwy. 5 planning
efforts. Obviously, the city is experiencing a great deal of pressure in offering development in
this corridor and our ability to control and direct it needs to catch up. The idea of a moratorium
was discussed by the Council and was dismissed. Given Minnesota's short construction season
and developers' needs to position projects at optimal times in an economic cycle, we would not
recommend that a moratorium be pursued. We feel that much of the city's goals can be
accomplished through alternative means.
It is along these lines that staff has developed a proposal to adopt a Highway 5 Overlay District.
At this point in time, until the above mentioned planning effort is completed, the overlay district
is necessarily long on intent and short on substance. However, it is hoped that as presently
1
structured, the overlay district, if adopted, would be sufficient for the city to get its foot in the
door by making developers and property owners aware that the city's expectations for this area
are different than other areas of the community. Additionally, when formal ordinances and plans
are developed they could be adopted by reference to the overlay district.
When the Planning Commission reviewed this proposal, they were supportive of it. Based upon
their reaction, staff requesting that the Council review and provide your comments.
Adopting an ordinance at this time engenders some risk. We are essentially put into a position 1
of putting the cart before the horse since the formal plan has not been developed. However, we
believe that the "Building Community Across the Corridor" document gives some credibility to
1
1
Don Ashworth
April 22, 1992
1 Page 4
the overlay district concept. An additional problem is, that while the work on the corridor plan
' to date has received the strong support of the Planning Commission, HRA, and City Council,
there has been no public information program. If an overlay district is to be considered, it would
have to be done with the knowledge that it must run hand in hand with this public information
1 program. Possibly it is something that could be considered at the first public meeting described
in the Barton Aschman proposal. Staff is looking for the City Council's guidance in this matter.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
•
Volunteers Needed for Hwy. 5 Corridor Study
The City of Chanhassen is embarking on a program to undertake a Hwy. 5 Corridor Urban
Design Program. The thrust of the program is to ensure that the new development which is
anticipated can be adequately accommodated within our community. But more importantly,
1
the program is designed to ensure that what does occur utilizes high quality urban design, is
sensitive to the need to protect our community resources and neighborhoods and is sensitive
to environmental protection. The City Council has approved an outline for the program that
1
is based upon establishing the Hwy. 5 Corridor Task Force. In addition to having
representation from the Planning Commission, City Council, Park and Recreation
Commission, and Public Safety Commission, we are seeking representatives from the business
community and interested residents at large to serve. The time commitment is anticipated to
be between 6 and 12 months, with the probability that a monthly meeting would be required.
If you are interested in participating, we would encourage you to contact (City Hall) the
Planning Department at 937 -1900, and request an application. The application deadline is
June 10, 1992. Final selection of task force members will be made by the City Council.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
/ APPLICATION FOR CHANHASSEN COMMISSION
DATE: b/ Q 2
COMMISSION APPLYING FOR: � ,_ _ S 4_,
ALTERNATE:
NAME �`�otw+Q i ► �ow�o I T BIRTHDATE (optional) :
ADDRESS: ' 2- \ W Cur CITY: C Lp,v♦ho.SSQ.M. ZIP: Sv&irt
1 HOME PHONE: Q3.4 -1 l \ 0 WORK PHONE: 55 3
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN A RESIDENT OF CHANHASSEN?: "$,
HIGHEST LEVEL OF EDUCATION ATTAINED, PLUS DEGREES, IF ANY:
CURRENT EMPLOYMENT: (State position, employer & brief description
of duties. If with present employer for only IL short time, list
previous employment as well.) short,
4 0aLr-"1 - MooAcka May-Ice_ �-\ e v el 09 rr.er , ,, 014, —'e var
(\ p rk 1 - e .�en.r c� v �Q�.� 4 relQs t one cL rc� 4 �o oSa�,s 4 ♦ h�
Q P P ► r c ,
ACTIVITIES AND AFFILIATIONS: (Include elective offices, honors and
recognitions received, if any.)
r ( d
�ai-4 ((Ylfs, c-t ` -0.- QS k-RA-E
REASONS FOR SEEKING THIS POSITION AND YOUR QUALIFICATIONS:
er*Nc_eA.„Ac)
( - -
' IN FILING THIS APPLICATION, I UNDERSTAND THAT A COMMITMENT OF MY
TIME, ENERGY, INTEREST AND PARTICIPATION WILL BE INVOLVED, AND I AM
PREPARED TO MAKE SUCH A COMMITMENT IN THE EVENT I AM APPOINTED TO
THE ABOVE COMMISSION.
Crce�
SIGNATURE
RECEIVEC
JU N it 1992
APPLICATION FOR CHANHASSEN COMMISSION CITY :Jr ;
DATE: r,v) % /9%Z
COMMISSION APPLYING FOR: #1 S C riA14 S� .`
ALTERNATE:
NAME: 7? ,� Wianza BIRTHDATE (optional) : /f,4
ADDRESS: BQcD Qb�, c CITY: G ZIP: .5
HOME PHONE: 30 -35 WORK PHONE: 9¢Z - 784¢ ,
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN A RESIDENT OF CHANHASSEN ?: /7e.A4. /Ntod4
HIGHEST LEVEL OF EDUCATION ATTAINED, PLUS DEGREES, IF ANY:
CURRENT EMPLOYMENT: (State position, employer & brief description
of duties. If with presen employer for only a short time, list
previous employment as well. r o D ► •4s_....-
"l'"44 O ,
+.4.4 GH Q.& -D „S > j i .1) r.
ACTIVITIES AND AFFILIATIONS: (Include elective offices, honors and
recognitions received, if any.) 4, k - ,4 ,
REASONS FOR SEEKING THIS POSITION AND YOUR QUALIFICATIONS: ffayu- 1
cetiti/e 4 cvira ..2-447t;v_0-41- /u/t- (f) ag
/ 44, (1), /6 -e 1
,0:74aa.J 60714 j ,¢I2 Q
c44-L, LG4t k 6R if4 764 S At '
1
IN FILING THIS APPLICATION, I UNDERSTAND THAT A COMMITMENT OF MY
TIME, ENERGY, INTEREST AND PARTICIPATION WILL BE INVOLVED, AND I AM
PREPARED TO MAKE SUCH A COMMITMENT IN THE EVENT I AM APPOINTED TO
THE ABOVE COMMISSION.
Wit (7 /I �—
SIGNAT 1
1
I
II APPLICATION FOR CRANHASSEN COMMISSION
DATE: , //�/9 c
COMMISSION APPLYING FOR: 4, 6 NGU 4 S Ce,e/L/ 4 o/Z ST(WAP
I ALTERNATE:
II NAME: A /,JP/? C1 LSO Al BIRTHDATE (optional) :
ADDRESS: I‘ 95 6a /p /h 81 tic/ CITY: EXC-e(Siaar ZIP: 53 3 3
1 HOME PHONE: di 7 6 3 WORK PHONE : ,' a 0 _
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN A RESIDENT OF CHANHASSEN? : /ry
HIGHEST LEVEL OF EDUCATION ATTAINED PLUS DEGREES, IF ANY:
L - UOI #1 ) 'G.77 �9 '
CURRENT EMPLOYMENT: (State position, employer & brief description
of duties. If with present employer for only a short time, list
I previous employment as well .) r
_� - _ ; %��_�� ,� _� _ /,�,_� -, -� „
I
ACTIVITIES AND AFFILIATIONS: (Include elective offices, honors and
1 recognitions received, if any. )8p41,.d - E fej4' ,�
C, 1 a ee- , Q6(..jeei iia . / a7 ,.,J e2 / Aec ,�
d ,6
1 REASONS FOR SEEKING THIS POSITION AND YOUR QUALIFICATIONS: o 9' 0ys-
.e .��e � - c rune g e -
1111 y i -
- el Q 7 eft - -. i /� G� ,� /' u�
iel_e-c--(_ 7 -
, a. o .e /1.e -e.0 ,4 ce7 ,_ i /�.& a
y ,,,,., .
I IN FILING THIS APPLICATION, I UNDERSTAND THAT A COMMITMENT OF MY
TIME, ENERGY, INTEREST AND PARTICIPATION WILL BE INVOLVED, AND I AM
PREPARED TO MAKE SUCH A COMMITMENT IN THE EVENT I AM APPOINTED TO
1 THE ABOVE COMMISSION. /
T AO ,
SI A URE
1 CC / /7 /7; -/ /1-e Ste- "ems j am,
• RECEIVED
APPLICATION FOR CHANHASSEN COMMISSION
•
DATE: - 5 L JUN 1 0 1992
COMMISSION APPLYZNG FOR: LO Y '(� 42 (L t -. STUD Y
G►Tr ur l.rm1vtwist
ALTERNATE:
NAME: Cif:A (o 11A- MIEea" BIRTHDATE (optional) :
ADDRESS: a 1 3 ei C !( S MAR_ f p, (4o hp CITY: L-"k c f Ls 1 I.2 ZIP: SS ? 1
t
HOME PHONE: to /.) -1 70 -1705 WORK PHONE: / - / 70 —r y 3
1
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN A RESIDENT OF CHANHASSEN?: .' /7t J,J7 S AND / Y Q.
HIGHEST LEVEL OF EDUCATION ATTAINED, PLUS DEGREES, IF ANY:
Cb u 0 F. ; +4-m l.i rJF. (.1�)c110Q ITV s r P iji. " •rJ
CURRENT EMPLOYMENT: (State position, employer & brief description
of duties. If with present employer for only a short time, list
previous employment as well.) P y(- - Ti��" sy,k• rzc � ,
Est Pite&' 1) C. ce) mr.ci.rzet0•c, PO'at cx47 GQ4k-LS
A (a`1 C car tCi`CZ( C-f7 C ON, Pf r 'j
ACTIVITIES AND AFFILIATIONS: (Include elective offices, honors and
recognitions received, if any.) ' u - n2 — ci s k
1'h 1 N; 41; St* 0 r- ( - C F4ASI -€ 4435. I'I. P LS . ROAR-1) c ?F
l ,
REASONS FOR SEEKING THIS POSITION AND YOUR QUALIFICATIONS:
7)6s( P-F. - v Rc. Tki'tJeLY >nJ VO'- (/, - >nl 77tF' eilo 4'/1, ;n)
•
CC)'WY) h) 17Y A►,O in/ ?Y1-45 7Z go / 1) UAL 4 W Cis _,FS. !,J 19lL-C- '
5 kT C S v` k,.‘o.,.r Le' GE. 1,1 0 eNt:-1ZQe).k,. P2ti >cks3 , 61 624 c...0 1,4G cbtv,. J l a.
c , A33_ rt. ° • s .ANOPm 1
5,.1.1 R41,3Jr- +J C lamm()A'Tq Ar <il(ST' • (1„.10
AP- 7f V'c &'r t - c‘ NS C ev■-sr ortA
IN FILING THIS APPLICATION, I UNDERSTAND THAT A COMMITMENT OF NY
TIME -, ENERGY, INTEREST AND PARTICIPATION WILL BE INVOLVED, AND I AM
PREPARED TO MAKE SUCH A COMMIT - • I HE EVENT I AM APPOINTED TO
THE ABOVE COMMISSION. 4
.�1
RE
•
•
1
RECEIVED
JUN 1 01992
APPLICATION FOR CHANHASSEN COMMISSION CI E Y OF C .►tNHASSEh
DATE: u l / 9 9.2
I COMMIgS ION APPLYING FOR: ;. & 4_ _t„ _ , , _ 4 . 2
ALTERNATE: N/'1
I NAKE: Ann rat [ c ,-4 BIRTHDATE (optional) :
ADDRESS: ,38y Lorne Cedar Cr- CITY: Chas.'4 ZIP: S'S -3/
1 HOME PHONE: -f 7 II -r' f y WORK PHONE: SRL) u Q z/- 9a ,A3
I HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN A RESIDENT OF CHANHASSEN ?: 5 y !' ,
HIGHEST LEVEL OF EDUCATION ATTAINED, PLUS DEGREES, IF ANY:
1 8hn / f 1n " f Loom, /a), /JPiJP /OpI9u°ni` /7 )
i
CURRENT EMPLOYMENT: (State position, employer & brief description
.1 of duties. If with present employer for only a short time, list
previous employment as well.) Mery Ma/<- e.- r Mothcer a4 1 G✓/atc to
.Soper• soh,PuMr 14,NA 16fece
I ACTIVITIES AND AFFILIATIONS: (Include elective offices,, honors and
recognitions received, if any.) /I44iona-/ 110 n o r - Soo'ei . N0 S,,, // f ,
I 'hair e34 U11 Pit 0r,3 a 1 4ihne4pn /1c CCJ,i A elith. frrCidY4,I'
T�r
1 REASONS FOR SEEKING THIS POSITION AND YOUR QUALIFICATIONS: .X (..,074,
- Z5 t.k. c „.41. ?Q4ea¢.. A , if_ -13, � iAo, . -4 Glh'.� 4 � /,a o
1 �! u.)", c --1 /22) /Yj2,G ` On - i ! ✓ .C�..edte O 4,_ Q eg ' o , r''.r4
/ Y
�7�I4 4 d z 2.4aa -s1 Alf e., 46_ei a ,u,P t o , �-f� -raz
' jJ
..e 2 )i w e y . 4 2 e 1 0 Q j' / d � v o . , a t r . �P Q 4 - Q o!. ,7 4 4ZC'4 �.,el1.P.
I ..0 7'2, & i / 0ii44.51 7.Q I OA4-ej.`1/;4_0 Ci.r. A 0 i Lit 66 ,iery 7 , ../
. .
li/ /. , r. . ....
I . .2 CTY 24 / -- QO M MITM Lys E NT O
JCL F ,. . a ,, - . , _, _,......./ _ ,./ , ,,_.,_,__,
N FILING TH 8 A � Z � C 1�TIO N, j° UNDERBT I THAT � / COME ' F MY
TIME, ENERGY, INTEREST AND PARTICIPATION WILL BE INVOLVED, AND I AM
I PREPARED TO MAKE SUCH A COMMITMENT IN THE EVENT I AM APPOINTED TO
THE ABOVE COMMISSION.
4 LN■,, e--gj aAie
1 SIGNATURE -
1 •
RECEIVED . e 1
JUN 11 1992
• CITY Or CHAIVHASSEN 1
PPLICATION FOR CHANHASSEN COMMISSION
DATE: 4i /b I- /-' COMMIBBIO APPLYING FOR: A . S - -d. _ #-.. •Ac / f_t _ ; - r - ,
1
ALTERNATE:
NAME: • BIRTHDATE (optional): /Pla
II
r
ADDRESS: Lr�'. RO ,,,, c,tl CITY: SIP:, y `• 33
HOME PHONE: 4 09 - 1264 / WORK PHONE: 1 1 7 9`3f6 /
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN A RESIDENT OF CHANHABBEN ?: `7 ff•e•f14.4.."
1
HIGHER LEVEL OF EDUCATION ATTAINED, PLUS DEGREES, IF ANY:
- % / /,. - - _ .- - ..A. _ - i■ % � , / /
1
CURRENT - PLO s - NT ( at • os io T - ..p , _ • es • • ion
of duties. If with present employer for only a short time, list
I
pre ions employmen as well. )
` / /.. .,.../ 1, �.. _ .iii__ - _
/ J /
, kettiea ,,, 4 4s-A-. ' -...... A , .., ,/ _., ,... , 4 A r , ,A r
i RP L , 7t . A / , ' arr /' IF
ACTIVITIES AND AFFI • NS : ( IC V e • e o f ces, ho s o !- - nd /
recognitions received, if any )
CL a`�
- 1
• REASONS FOR REEKING THIS •� =ITION AND YOUR •UALIFICATIONS:
. 1
i /1444/Latt, _,,, , 4,....._. ,2A ‘ Ar .... ., ... •
/.. r alir.M.... I, ._.,,,,__ ,,. _ ,... -
1
/ (
MIIMININVW, „ , 4___ , , _ -... _ . .
/ f ' ift,Vit.c_. — j Licezebt /Jo - 4 ,- -1
(Le,- , , , ./ ' / ,
IN FILING THIS APPLICATION, I UNDERSTAND THAT A COMMITMENT OF MY
TIME, ENERGY, INTEREST AND PARTICIPATION WILL BE INVOLVED, AND I AM
PREPARED TO MAKE SUCH A COMMITMENT IN THE EVENT I AM APPOINTED TO
I
THE ABOVE COMMISSION. ,.....xo 1
SIGNATURE(
• •, i
i��(,�7 / l /�i� / 444)i
.4,74(.44 e.t,
1
tt i
rum