Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
5. Variance Wetland Setback 661 and 641 Conestoga Trail
Y C IT Y O F BOA DATE: S C C D ATE: 1 -14 -91 I CH 7HASSE CASE #: 89 -15 VAR � t ' '` —� By: Olsen /v 1 1 STAFF REPORT il 1 PROPOSAL: Variance to the 75 Foot Wetland Setback for Existing Decks, 661 and 641 Conestoga Trail Iz Q LOCATION: Lots 1 and 3, Block .4, Chanhassen Vista 3rd Addition II () J APPLICANT: Kelly Costa Diane Maas 661 Conestoga Trail 641 Conestoga Trail I CL Q Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 II ' PRESENT ZONING: PUD, Planned Unit Development II ACREAGE: 20,000 s.f. - 641 Conestoga Trail (Maas) 15,000 s.f. - 661 Conestoga Trail (Costa) II DENSITY: ADJACENT ZONING AND 1 LAND USE: N - PUD; single family S - PUD; single family a E - PUD; single family I W - PUD; single family Q WATER AND SEWER: Available 1 W PHYSICAL CHARACTER.: The sites are developed with single family 1.. residences with an existing Class B wetland 1 — in the rear yard. 1 2000 LAND USE PLAN: Low Density Residential II II 1 1 r. O o CyR/ r Q / ' O M N O C°Q�+DE .CAST R // � ► N PIN COUNTY I NTY URT RIDG ' 7 I C ` ,D A SC ADE '. �y - _ "' E � tiortzt CIRCLE fp 1 li% ,...t 1 ,/ -R S\ I:ix wESTA CIRCLE -AP Ni4 c ` • T RAP • awes .._ 9 `n, .1r' EASTTA c`IRCLE il ' n P41 -4`2-- �� GRCLE � 4 . • 9p I t , V . : ' pLYA+pIC CIRCLE it::: °,004k. k"' ,, RIX"' I Wig 4 0--- 1 po n4, - .I : :: a tfrot, - -I ..y...........". witt ; s k 31 if _ F „ X of --..,....,,,,„, rim . Fo,,ohivOL LOW 640 _, e.. y � , ; �/ b i COURT ii V 5�■ 1s'7 RSF i , . : - 401* CI %," � ., I, a il I Vitil* . ___ -_,--_-A, 6600 , 4 06 ' 116114 ■ _ , 0 31� •' 1a Z1 Ito, , RD / st 1 I A , t , c f ��� //�,1 6800 LA 1 pica RY `� � � • 6900 umumi ' „ � �� � ► , F • ° ' ••■ o Ng „ No - 0 � . r . . 7 000 'l// / ` HA p0 *WO _ tIL � - c .7._ WMENE II -/'4 iiviiry AN ( ( .. :p i r fig. I---- �. mil. � . n �� /► � C 4 ' 1 Nraik a _____,-7100 : . ' - : ,- - - -[ - • - - s , ; 1 - :-..>._) * 401 ' \ ' 111 .11 1 0 " t's � + o f3 f / - \ - ..pr s ' i 'ille 11.41.1.1.-pinaip..0 ■ , q i ' Q . _ k r j �7 ,.....,730 � $V I AA i A r Ws at ■ 0 ': \ .% I , 1 »•IIIN -- 7400 INN U ‘V 0 i ii _ ‘ A4411t ;:#16 1 7:- ° 1 LI LI 1, 63 .... O' fir. L' I 3 N a � amyl' -; Al"' i g� figic r� 0 4::1 . .0. ..: Q, _ .' 1 Costa /Maas Variance January 14, 1991 Page 2 BACKGROUND ' In 1986, the City Council approved the PUD for Chanhassen Vista. As part of the subdivision review, staff discovered a Class B wetland located in the northeast portion of the PUD. The applicant was required to adjust the lot configuration to accommodate protection of the Class B wetland and to verify that a house could be located on the adjacent lots while maintaining the required 75 ft. setback. A plan was provided by the applicant showing the wetland edge and showing that a 75 ft. setback could be maintained with the development of single family homes on the lots (Attachment #1). The 8 lots located adjacent to the wetland have since been developed with single family residences. In early 1989, staff was notified by a Council member that grading 1 activity was occurring very close to the wetland as a part of the construction of the single family residence on Lot 5, Block 3, Chanhassen Vista 4th Addition (7251 Sierra Court, Attachment #2). Upon inspection of the site, staff found that the erosion control required to be installed around the edge . of the wetland to protect the wetland was instead installed within the wetland. Over one- half of the wetland was outside of the protection of the erosion control. Staff measured the setback of the house under construction and found it to be approximately 40 ft. from the actual wetland edge. Staff met with the builder of the home (Novak -Fleck Construction) at the site and was told that it was their understanding that the erosion control marked the edge of the wetland. Staff walked around the wetland measuring the other existing homes including additions to the homes such as decks, and found that almost none of the homes met the 75 ft. setback. Staff then reviewed all the building permits for the homes and, found that what was shown on the surveys as the wetland boundary was not the correct wetland boundary, but one much smaller than the existing wetland. The surveys provided by the builder as part of the building permit application did in fact show the homes being 75 ft. from the wetland, but this setback was taken from the incorrect wetland survey. Staff signed off on the permits believing that the wetland setback was being maintained. The wetland boundary that was shown on the survey as a part of the building permit reflects the wetland boundary that was shown on the preliminary and final plat of the PUD. Staff had visited the site with the developer and with a representative from the DNR and the Fish and Wildlife Service to determine the wetland edge and the wetland type. The wetland edge was staked at that time. It was assumed that the applicant would properly reflect the wetland edge on the preliminary and final plat. It is now apparent that the wetland that was being shown on the plat as a part of the review and approval process did not reflect the correct boundary of the wetland. As a result, the homes located on the lots adjacent to 1 1 Costa /Maas Variance ' January 14, 1991 Page 3 the wetland do not meet the 75 ft. setback and, in fact, would not ' have been considered buildable. Staff again met at the site in May, 1989 with the developer, Saul and David Segal, along with a representative from the Fish and Wildlife Service to again mark off the boundary of the wetland. Staff then required the developer to have a new survey made of the property showing the correct edge of the wetland and the existing structures. Attachment #3 is a copy of this survey which shows that the correct edge of the wetland was almost equal to the area covered by the drainage easement. The background shows that there is a much larger problem than the two deck variances. As a result of the incorrect survey, there now exists a situation where the existing single family residences around the wetland do not meet the 75 ft. wetland setback and a new neighborhood standard has been created with setbacks as close as 36 ' ft. to the wetland. The single family structures are now non- conforming and unless variances are granted, they could not be replaced or have improvements /additions made to them. Staff sees the only resolution to this situation is to acknowledge the fact that the non - conformance is a result of an incorrect survey provided by the developer, but that the current property ' owners should not be penalized for this past mistake. Therefore, the City Council should consider a blanket variance for the 8 lots which would make the existing structures conforming. One of the 11 reasons staff would support this is the fact that the wetland has been preserved throughout the process and maintains approximately the same size and quality that existed prior to development. As part of the blanket variance, the city would be able to add ' conditions to further ensure the preservation of the wetland. Staff will contact the affected parties who own other non- conforming parcels around the wetland and bring this item back to the City Council on a future agenda. The two deck variances at 641 and 661 Conestoga Trail are different from the others in that the decks were built illegally without a permit. All the other homes and decks were issued appropriate permits and they were issued based upon the misleading survey. Staff is recommending that the deck variances be included in the blanket variance, but that the City Council require the applicants to receive a building permit, pay the double permit fee and meet any requirements of the Building Department. This is the standard procedure when violations of the Building Code are uncovered. 1 1 Costa /Maas Variance January 14, 1991 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION , The City Code states the City Council may grant a variance to the standards of the wetland ordinance. When the blanket variance 11 comes back for action, staff will bring it in front of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals also for their review. The City Council may wish to request staff to amend the ordinance and require any variance to the wetland standards be acted upon by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. The City Council should direct staff whether to bring the 8 lots in under a joint variance application with the intent to grant a blanket variance. If the City Council chooses to do this, staff would recommend the variance fee be waived since the current property owners were not responsible. If the City Council does not agree with the blanket variances, the Council should direct staff to as to what action to take. The City Council should also require the applicants at 641 and 661 Conestoga Trail to receive a building permit, pay the double permit 1 fee and meet any conditions of the Building Department. ATTACHMENTS _ 1 1. Preliminary plat with incorrect wetland boundary. 2. 7251 Sierra Court. 3. New survey showing correct wetland boundary. 4. Memo from Steve Kirchman dated January 8, 1991. 5. Applications. Note: Since the Chanhassen Vista PUD was approved, the city has improved the process of reviewing developments, establishing wetland boundaries and maintaining setbacks. Today, staff stakes wetland edges and has an elevation established. The wetland edge is tied to this elevation and is recorded by easement with the county against each lot. Staff verifies that lots are buildable with the required setbacks and highlights any lots with restrictions (such as only a 40 ft. deep buildable area) . Staff also reviews building plans at the time of building permit application to check if patio doors for future decks are shown, and if so, verifies there is adequate setback. If there is not adequate setback, staff notes this on the building permit. Ultimately, the new Surface Water Utility District will fund the creation of an official wetland map and revised ordinance that will greatly improve our protective abilities. With these improvements, we believe that another Chanhassen Vista situation will not occur. r i 1 1 1 • - 1 1 "' co 0 M� 1 61 4/ • 1 iQ i . m 1 0 a C N ` y a 6 s 1 .. Y S. ..' •., i5 . 1%, E c r �� J ° a I I I P r I �° m ,� lb I I b o o r• 4. I 1 ' ....1' .� 1 _ •� -� If] o ■ ; )\ I t i F \ ! e e w Z i 2 is 1 ' 1 ,dpl\o\>\ / ,,-.-; LI y / r . -\ t f ., st _ \ .; `7_. j / W . 7 • J c i S I .5 ? 1 L v r . r -....„,...-,... ( f \ ' ' :,„! \ SQZ. 5C. 1.1 t o (��i G'IZ') 03 • I ( s ) s S en i - _ c 4:b6'0)1) S, GO�'ZZ s c� .. ., + Z1, (j•S s • ti) S S C o i ! r\ 4 _ c�s«�L'�� „„,,,)/ i ' 7 \ %6 �n ° £ 7 1 � ° (..,,,, ,,,,„ , ..... ),z � , G, ,�--- poi std .,ti s7, \\ � I .� , 6 L 6 ti ° 0 6\ 8< \ So C C "I - j - 5 001 ' L. I o Ce b Z8, )v.' 1 1 • c';,0,1) S Q lij n O s ° �� 1C Q7 50/ 01 p • v y �\ ,-- y ' Z1) 'Pot , o L �, o I t j P O 'S 40 1 ( y y . ‘( °. CN b1 ( 9 \ oc 47 Z , 01 .5 con' cis 09 5 OOO'Zt 05-‘ scx�'bi (^fit N C 9 g � V , 64.5 0.75'41) �S opd �� (: 6 r SZ N�; �l v' sV\ ( A 5 000 CD 0$ v. S '4. s.0 4 (1 C c_t) 2 .7► c . 5 1 1) 000 ti saoG' �` (mss sI) 9 °1 1 -�i o 4 N cft' S can' z.9 � Q 2 \ c. 1 1 T .Q I 061 e'...- - • 1 Il . AP,. ER TRAIL 1 1110 (R P IL. 01 FT 1 IA , t". L•. .. LL v 6 .ML. 1 - 041611'166 L. •. S' 60 MO- 1 «... i . .a... ,� . 4 lie 1 s � / Uf aty 4 '•. 1,••• � // bra aR —� - k,r�'1'LAf -r7 ,0 70 �e'-- — " o • "10" #,s.0 / ,/ 0 � CMANNASSEN VISTA y E 0E 3A 0 341) AOO /T/O N . 1 •,,,, e,, �� � a Er 0041 P. '` . CNANNASSEN VISTA y.., .n' • • , ws • .�,,� � � ATM ADDITION 1 p re ine9• ease nerd 5 72 3/ o :;o� wild/ , �' s•up ell • , 44 ..., t — y LOCK .s," Gs, \ CGi i C;1.— Np�je G e,. • '� 1 ...... 7 ~e�et a I.f>• (� a`C 4.6.,„,,e) ..w. I t.∎4 -- � `r/ 0 7- j r E,� R,, L. . 7241 1251 Co.._ 'pT i''' J 1 ..EC.ED ,,,,f_ Tw., , •S Mn ..E .... Da UMDEi ,,,,,,,,,•pISIDrN.MP'M.T •••• (BULB .01STEa Eo•.Mo EM..s r.w ,JM.D.M THE LAM OF THE STATE Of McCombs Frank Moos Aat6000lst, Ina. » . I10vED MiMM ..,,,, I11e.. — .• ...2.•. ' .. 16060 As K Engineers elymMith. MN 55447 1 o•TE 5 .or .. ' _... No i 2 ,5 612/476.6010 Smwpn-ILA 7 0•00-1.—....r CITYOF 1! CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 MEMORAN1 ' TO: Jo Ann Olsen, Senior Planner FROM: Steve A. Kirchman, Building Official DATE: January 8, 1991 SUBJ: Wetland setbacks, Sierra Court /Conestoga Trail ' Here is a list of all addresses adjoining the wetland in question. I II have shown all major Building Division involvement for each address chronologically. I have included a copy of all available surveys for the structures and any later improvements. 1. 7190 Frontier Trail 7/27/89 Permit application by Novak - Fleck, Inc. 8/3/89 Permit issued. #3358 ' 10/20/89 Certificate of Occupancy issued. Conditions noted on C.O. Copy of C.O. included. 3/30/90 Permit application for deck by Timothy and Linda Kosir. II 4/2/90 Permit issued for deck. #3759. Plans available. 5/2/90 Final Inspection on deck approved. 2. 631 Conestoga Trail , 8/26/87 Permit application by Novak - Fleck, Inc. 8/26/87 Permit issued. #1949 11/10/87 Certificate of Occupancy issued. ' 4/22/88 Permit application for deck by Jack & Renee Schepers. 4/27/88 Permit issued for deck. #2321. Plans and survey not available. 12/13/90 Final inspection on deck not approved, reinspection required. 3. 641 Conestoga Trail 2/19/88 Permit application by Novak - Fleck, Inc. 2/19/88 Permit issued. #2186 5/24/88 Certificate of Occupancy issued. 11/3/89 Homeowner notified of permit requirements for deck already built. 11/15/89 Warning notice issued due to lack of homeowner response. 11/16/89 Permit application for deck by Richard & Diana Mass. II Permit not issued. Plans available. 11/7/90 Certified letter sent requesting removal of the deck or a variance application for deck and permit application II for fence, both already built. 1 Jo Ann Olsen January 8, 1991 Page 2 11/15/90 Permit application for fence. 11/19/90 Permit issued for fence only. #4269. 11/26/90 Final inspection on fence approved. 4. 651 Conestoga Trail 5/1/88 Permit application by Novak - Fleck, Inc. 5/5/88 Permit issued. #2352. 6/30/88 Certificate of Occupancy issued. 6/12/90 Permit application for deck by Mark Niederluecke. 6/22/90 Permit issued for deck. #4016. Plans available. No final inspection called for yet. ' 5. 661 Conestoga Trail 11/30/87 Permit application by Novak - Fleck, Inc. 12/4/87 Permit issued. #2125. ' 1/25/88 Final inspection not approved. No record of further inspeciton or Certificate of Occupancy issuance. 11/3/89 Homeowner notified of permit requirements for deck already built. 11/15/89 Warning notice issued due to lack of homeowner response. 11/16/89 Permit application for deck by Joel & Kelly Costa. Permit not issued. Plans available. 11/7/90 Certified letter sent requesting removal of deck or application for a variance. 11/29/90 Onsite inspection of deck and setbacks with homeowner ' and Planning Department. 6. 7231 Sierra Court 3/20/88 Permit application by Novak - Fleck, Inc. 3/23/88 Permit issued. #2241 5/27/88 Certificate of Occupancy issued. 5/26/89 Permit application for deck by Joseph & Toni Rausch. ' 6/7/89 Permit issued for deck. #3203. Plans available. 2/15/90 Notice requesting final inspection sent to homeowner. 2/21/90 Final Inspection approved. ' 7. 7241 Sierra Court 3/8/88 Permit application by Novak - Fleck, Inc. 3/11/88 Permit issued. #2225. ' 5/25/88 Certificate of Occupancy issued. 8/14/89 Permit application for deck by Daniel & Elaine Revsbech. 8/16/89 Permit issued for deck. #3392. Plans available. 8/23/89 Final inspection approved. 8. 7251 Sierra Court 4/6/89 Permit application by Novak - Fleck, Inc. 4/21/89 Permit issued. #3036. 6/16/89 Certificate of Occupancy issued. 1 11 "7190 f Pror,4ltr `Craj1 LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. F BONA NO 24886 416-53 LAND SURVEYORS SCALE I° 20' NOVAK FLECK 0- DENOTES IRON REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA q Denotes Wood Hub Set 4601 - 73rd Avenue North 560.3093 For Excavation Qtly I Type of Building - Split Level -.sr- Denotes Sltrface Drianage Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 Walkout Cfp Denotes Proposed Elevaticn Burnryora (Orrin - trate . - .,o.° Denotes Existing Elevation _ r= ' T 11 7 R o C� � / t f' Y� E/ c. Sex —�_ ( ,75. 5 C . �',� 7r \ X 75 7 , �N In ',,\ i s e0 _ N t . O nl . _ _ Q N nl V c — r�l.or — 1-- — N I — yss.s - -_ 960, _ _ 958.2 71s•5 - '75> 7 3 N . / 9' 0- . - U •R I57 33 I V I S Spirt M N °P" s e 31 - re , E = z 4 C :, dent C 755.4 _ - I n - A s /9 N V 95g 7 /3 _ i cn N 4 2 '4 95x,4 ,• c " 2anr 5 .'0 ‘ %op • 95 7.5 - - -. 1 I -- 1 s o Z. 1 0 To of Block - p N LA C 111 t,o,' N 6I I 1 Garage Floor N 6 ci, /, f I r O , X60.2 __ ' r'-se Er sF,,.,-, ..,.. _! i• 7 .a ii Lowest Most Floor �� 1 L - ve iC1.1-- \ - , skr; . .. ' "- 1 .... °-- -. _` 0 `' N O tT I Lot 5, Block 4, \, 1 CHANHASSEN VISTA 3RD 1 1 ADDTTICN \ f ii 1 • __ I 7 5Z.p/ 1 - / 00 •0 0 - The only easements shown are from plats of record or Information provided by client. / /�� We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the ��', / Signed boundaries of the above described land and the location of all buildings and via- Ibis encroachments, It any, from or on said land. ✓. Surveyed by us this 24th day of .fitly 19 R9 R i r ond A. Putsch, Minn. Reg. No. ;743 1 1 {F CITY OF CHANHASSEN 1 11116. 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 1 FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 1 LOCATION: 7190 Frontier Trail BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER: 3358 OWNER: Novak Fleck Incorporated OWNER'S ADDRESS: 8857 Zealand Avenue North, Brooklyn Park, MN OCCUPANT /TENANT: New Home This certifies that I have inspected the building and improve- ments at the above location and legally described as Lot 5, Block ' 4, Chan Vista 3rd Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the Carver County Recorder, Chaska, Minnesota, and find that the premises complies, to the best of my knowledge and belief, with all the requirements of the 11 building and zoning ordinances of the City of Chanhassen and per- mission is hereby given to the owner for the occupancy of the premises, in whole or in part, in the manner and for the purpose herein below specified. 1 1 Premises to be occupied as a single family dwelling CITY OF CHANHASSEN Date: By: ( ). Building Official Date: 1C) "Z.O By: Planning Department 1 a. Cbi-19 flC G * see attachments t. h - VivTLa --r T Z • 1 t2c (ON Cct-It (-61 bh r G• [1-45 ' n t2 t exii ir, r - 1,11 6 i 4 • 5 fr L- c ci .,c'fi Fat- oo - Z6 1 11 9 1 • REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA - - `V - p Denotes Wood Hub Set 7601.73rd Avenue North 560.3093 For Excevaticn Qtly Denotes Surface Drianage Minneapolis, Minnesota 65428 Type of Building - W al k t Level t:alkout Denotes Proposed Elevation eurucgars Oitrt� tat �T ... Denotes Dcisting Elevation 1 � T �� ,� � t fr T I : — 5 -1 _ = z,, �.. e ir ... b 1 Iv in 1 Nt 1, f ? ' a N q N t) �I 'rep Iron h 956'.i 7 5 20 g. 7, 7 o ��6.4 0 2 Z q.. - "1- h- d III ' N /9'D^ S ZO .P J'3 3'. f S - 5phi - — _ M in 42'4•• �•4 �•� "co Q , ot. � `'S. l/ L 7 7s s /Z xi 1 L 7 • I Top of Block N CO .a. n-4 0 1 I — Garage Floor ( N q \` UF, 1, f r f /' 6 t I G _ . tea ECS en ,�,+ f Lowest Most Floor -________ I 1 )ice .ti 1 _ - n i � .'_'_ L' dye 4,,, CO -N 0 0 0 0 +ri 1 Lot 5, Block 4, , I CNANHASSfN VISTA 3RD 1 I ADDTTION ' ( j I \f •- / 00.0 0 - The only easement* shown are from plats of record or Information provided by j client. We hereby certify that this la a true and correct representation of a survey of the� /5///�! boundaries of the above described land and the location of all buildings and vise Signed '� / � '� \ 777//// � ,/ /� Ible encroachments, If any, from or on said land. Z1-4 Surveyed by us this 24th -day of .h + 1y 19 Rq 1 R and A. Preach, Minn. Reg. No.1743 1 1 • I (414 I C itouPS o 1 1.OT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC e F. B. NO 345-47 LAND SURVEYORS SCALE 1" 30' A- DENOTES IRON REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601. Avenue North 680.3093 1 NOVAK FLECK Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 i 1] Denotes Wood Hub Set thrurga's (irritant, , For Excavation Only 1 -..0*-- Denotes Surface Drainage Denotes Proposed Elevation O Denotes Bcisting Elevation �$� Type of Building - Split level / 1 49-P A j/ X V - • �. A O' . 0 1 ‘"/"P'‹(!:9C>. ' \ may, C�T(�\ ' SC CO Q ^ w c 4 ` O / 'SC Q, <� •\ I G a A�� ov o 551' (O CD\ � c 0\ b8 �' 6 • •� / \ p i,' • 0 9 V , / 6\`r' `\ \mo w"' ^ % 0 0 `., o;O, ∎ \ / C.." 3 X ",CP 0 1.0 'h w Y, ,b� ^ ^. \ ZA O \ h \ `, 1 d' \ S L y ^ ° \ �� I s Top of Block 9 ��': ° U- V∎174y e Dra4c\age � _- 7 1 Z, \ \ Easement 959. 3 \ ■ 1 Garage Floor \ weie.: . r1 61ev: ye 1 S c a of WQt ■ .j 1 Lowest Most Floor 955 ' 7 .-..........-.....1., `" ' 9 O ` � - H 1 *v r3 1 CV.; m r g 1 Lot 3, Block 4, CHANHASSEN VISTA 3RD ADDITION I I ,23.41` } . 1 anent The oenly easements a1 own are horn word plats of ord or Infom p rtion odded by I VA hereby certify the this is a hue and correct representation of a surrey of the / boundaries of the above described sore and the location of all buildings and vis• IbM encroachments N any, from or on said land. Signed ■ i _ // j ..j111"/ ` _ _ / Surveyed by us this 18th day of February t9 R8 1 /' eylrtortd A. Preach, Minn. Rog. No. 8743 /v1 6(.1 (,.,e f o2c 7 �.-t 3 g(oak y CC,„1.4asrr.-. u(1 3 A-Who- 7 II T D ,� A I \ 4e h c � of , , , y e) h Per ��� R�Y4er}- -� Li � C �, � ye) 1 APPROVED PLANS, SURVEY 1 AND PERMIT CARD MUST BE ACCESSABLE ON JOB 5..ITE AT ALL TIMES. 1 1 u )_4 ,f, zs, /115 r b� 1 vvt 4S* b( (oc4 @ CT©oc9 s (3,_k "lA Us R-a cP _ o ■ ` 4hcs aX 1c�� L � —L FL„,so 1 I- 5fai24 o� 1 1 A".!OVED SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH CODES AND FIELD INSPECTION CITY OF CHAN • SSEN BUILDING DEPT. 1 ' J 1 ` 1 1 CQ'S) C et"D 5`I.inJ q 1 rh i I LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. I F. V NO. 3452152 798 I LAND SURVEYORS SCALE I" • xn 0— DENOTES IRON . REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601.79rd Avenue North 660.3093 1 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 8urnrgora Qtrrtifiratr K 1 NOVAK FLECK c Denotes Wood Hub Set For Excavation Only 1 Type of Building - Split Level ' Dentoes Surface Drainage , CIM il Denotes Proposed Elevation , 00 Denotes Existing Elevation b ` gsbev ® ? 8 1 \\, 4g 8 Drn, l�P . Top of Block X ' \ I - Garr 6... 959.2 y s , / `c` 'fwZe .., t1Noee Le,1sre. �P e „ �� 6 „ \ • f Et.• 959.0 Garage Floor Elevation • 0�� / /� �/ 5 x / ' ^ " y %f3 % Lowest Most Floor Elevation y / / . / / 0 S \ ` w • 1 9 S •7 . � ,A // ° • `o% t e,* / b . � Y % ...15 v. e k9 y 0 fin, 1 O ` 2 R �y "'�; / coda �• ,',M \ \ \ \' ^o..4, �5 d e'� AS�.1 . s 6 \ nq • ,� , .e • To eSe.o\ � <� S �eck p{ gi ? . o. 1 ...A.., v `' • •Ann \ � / 0, 4, /,{ 411, ' ` e � Oi P /\N \ .. '.. •• / '` Oa ,< ' I-6- Spur E.>r4 , /fie. Llel 7 /9c7 �� C- ` `� T.mb.a .9120. •3 y J' t y o °, 4 \ / \ 1 \• . -- — — 9s.64— — - - 1 Lot 2, Block 4, CHANHASSEN VISTA 3RD ADDITICN 1 1 1 1 The only easements shown are from plats of record or Information provided by client. /� /^ b hereby certify above Is •e and correct representation l survey the / / / ' boundaries s of the above e d escrlbsd land and the location of ail l buildings and Nr / • W . i 1'. /�/ t / / /C // A' I Ibis encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Signed ym Surveyed byus this 1st day of April QEvtCe0 OP¢rl.1.1, VIM 1p 88 •ond A. Prank Minn. Reg. No. 8743 1 LI Z I LOwb'1 Irani, LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. I . 8. CE NO 342 ` i LAND SURVEYORS SCALE I" ' kn. 0— DENOTES IRON I REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 •73rd Avenue North 660.3093 Minneapolis, Minnesota 6b428 1 $urutunre Orrtiftratr i r NONAK FLECK 0 Denotes Wood Hub Set 1 For Excavation Only Type of Building - Split Level -•■•1-- Dentoes Surface Drainage 422 Denotes Proposed Elevation \ I / , o. ° Denotes Existing Elevation v + � L A � �v �,Y'n +� *.e, Top of Block J9O I ^',• / 1 8 S vbrT 6 .+rary C ,S 'tt �� S 95.11 �NO �ea Yr P ti /` � 5 f. o. g. EL. 959.0 Garage Floor Elevation f�o)t, t NP. ,S 6.7 � �' / / ' ti / ° 4t r ° °o Lowest Most Floor Elevation , ° - ° r�• 9 - -, , ,6. . ,a> 1 cfi' •, 2 R GO .e QvQ Ira ' gym \ \ ? ,0 G . �� 4, 4 05 gsi.1 6 1 t..1:...\ 3 Deck � ,^ s4` / t •' mo t- r . x . 9 5ii ., y r 9 \ / ' ° t # Ii -- - \\ tf / \"} • i -s- spur e.,-,,,, / \ �+ c c 1 J.. L b i c � r,' 0 4 1:9.6.6... 466.1 .3 /\ . J g a y •o ' t • / \ 16 i /, 4* \ `• ' -- — — 9 8. b4 — 1 q1 • Lot 2, Block 4, CHANHASSEN VISTA 3RD ADDITICN - -- : II 1 1 The only easements *lawn are from plats of record or information provided by • client. We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of • survey of the boundaries of the above described land and the location of all buildings and vis- ible encroachments, if any, from or on said fond. Signed : ✓! . . , / , f . Surveyed by us this 1st day of April ig 88 (• symortd A. Preach, Minn. Reg. No. 8743 c v eet7 Mali- 2'1, t9P'.b 41) Cav�bs}f•,n ri''P a i \, • LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. INVOICE NO 20682 1 F. B. NO. 357 -34 LAND SURVEYORS SCALE i" 20' 0 — DENOTES 1 RON REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601- 73rd Avenue North 560.3093 1 NOVAK FLECK Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 �r a Denotes Wood Hub Set Eitrutyora QIrrttftratr l� 1 For Excavation Qtly Denotes Surface Drainage / II crcsa Denotes Proposed Elevation -c= PR 0 N 7. yea Denotes Existing Elevation a / o _ .. TAE Ft 1 Type of Building - Split level N \ , , ,e, , T A. NJ O TC ; v \� ` o �Sf3„ / n 1 \ e r v• _) ; Q;'. U° / 2S A tiI• '8 0 I �GQ / Q / V�� n�% ^// R. 6 \\ \ O o u. / 1 a 3 D o • �' L CD, U / q \ 6 \ / / 4, • ' , // � A, m ti G \ r O,' I z Top of Block \ �a� Q Q 9 S 9.2 \ = v .'t N ',..7t � 1 Garage Floor i Q 6 ~ qt 1 Lowest Most Floor c T/ 0.\ > \\ GX ,� 1 'o jI \ �9 Lot 4, Block 4, CHANHASSEN VISTA 3RD ADDITION ./ I 1 . 7, ti n i ; I \ , i / 1 The only easements shown are from plats of record or 4nlomretion provided by a 95o.t I 42701 Client. �Sk1�� We hereby certify that Is true ac n ed end coationto all of il survey the / `� '/2' boundaries of s of the shove e described IaiM and the l e loccation of f all buildings pa aid d via 1 ))J�� 1 Ibis encroachments, If any, iro or on said land. Signed !^-ve7 Surveyed by us this 21st of August 19 87 da y Raymond A. Preach, Minn..Rep. No. 6743 II 1 I !. 1 \J .J r J $ I ..• - — 1 ' - • 1 1 t11 r1 / J 1 1 1 1 - 1 _, •J 1 tJ i V t' ,z 1 - - 9S lbb 3 „10,b l °LON - - 00 0b 88b£Z fl'ZS 86£l 6r 1 N3 W3S tf3 o 3�JtlNlt/aQ 9 Alit Iin .1 v ~\y / + up I ' . / \ � 1 �Y \ \O � ad A O V ”. Q 1 a �� \ °s6 1 I / O � \ crS N fr1 I \ \ ' \ to 1 c l 0 '^ ' I 0) a Y \ �Ag 0 2 4? pi° , °5 6p0 j / Op I .2 a I _ �- • 62Z =1 , o 06 9 s p NZ i � 0 0 cs� /' Ba °��/ / �� 00 e SI i t`� . °�� � , , I- Q h 4 n� a c c 0 s \ 1 C/5 I �ODj 0 ail 4 • N 1 O b to j [ n (0. l \ ! \ �, N $ v/ 1� b s ' 000` L /0 o ^ / b 9 / \ 0��/ ------ 0 0O b � _ /o, m \ / o m 9 /. S / oo 4 /,.o I �' e ' +O2 O rp j , Z I• S" / 2 3 0 �� s ! h g 90, !� °92 1 C��� /p 0 „ O,Oy a / s !� � / I e glN E' p /,l ° fi b 1 � , O1 o N \OO + • , \ \ 002 / I � N. r S\s ! .a O J ti •0 � *a+\ 4 / • / 1.--.... J S2 --Fe O •b O � s o � ° J �/ i / / 0,40 P/ ° 5 25 ° / ../.. i ,I a \ o ° / ,ryti 3 ° 2 �� /N2 \ M J w0 • r \ 10 ��a \ ;J'` ;• e h / '� �'� P� 0 et. v — ----,„. �� . di D �, �. o i �, �o .. 0 l / 6 0u ovj \ r d, c ,oy: i 1 1 /Z FES lnV ` overt /ow p po alevaf,on : 449.5 1 1 1 NB9 °o2 243 69 449.5 LI o� 9495 O o (`/Jor.na/ Wafer Level (Nw L.) E /evo/'on ■ Ise l tl o o c0 4 � . c° nfour of 949.5 wos f e/d surveyed 94 5 E /tYbfion ,s bastd ° n Sf Al NW.L arr� a95+s 94 sewer ouffa // ele vaf.°n. — — z h N ■ ` q , ° — / ��9e \ r N w / ^ y' U f, l � fy e a sen'� e n f V * - 1' 5, \�,) . N O, \ . ' - 3 ` 9S} u b y / �� 1 0. , 1 1 N 1 " / O ` N p *� Z i g ha Se + C kpc 1 2 2 .67 i / yaysE X5_,01 / / a kC2 N ' 1 a s64 / / des M / k • Y a i 1 r q m 1 Exlsr 1 - / HousE _ / 4 p 1 � +ISP! : 5 6° , ,� s9m.. SO. z , fib EXIST 1 • �O NouSE 957.1 •49s)•! 1 957.$ SIERRA • COURT 1 x 957.8 1 . 1 I DESIGNED CHECKED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OA MC UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISiON ANO ED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER T THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DRAWN APPROVED MINNESOTA. TAM 150 II Plyr 672 REMARKS DATE COMM AEG. NO. GATE 47 8 9 REVISIONS 1 7 24 t '3iorr, ribur LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. INVOICE NO F 6, NO. 21560 345 -49 LAND SURVEYORS SCALE I" 20' O- DENOTES IRON REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 _ 73rd Avenue North 660 -3093 _ it NOVAK FLECK Minneapolis, Minnesota 65428 1 G Denotes Wood Hub Set #1inli ors �irrttflratr Type of Building - Split Level �T For Excavation Only 1� Denotes Surface Drainage . :: Denotes Proposed.'Elevation _- 34. 1U ---- 1 — — 0000 Denotes Existing E1ev Q ' - c �"i',� g , * ; 951.0 /.' l 1 lk 1 , ..tai 1(o " R.C.P.�- Ei ev Znve 899.62. 435 i 1 j 1, : Top of Block P 1 1 ,l iral V i rLd Y 4r X t 9 0 . � 6 z 7 r' E R C S' Q i V •, Garage Floor 1 c)59. L w ,' Lowest Most Floor 6:-. �/ � + ;t��y e 9SL Z --\__ / Drgf ^ °� � N E45e..,ent 85).8 / L i Q / CJ lc, a 1 P 5 9 Q e5,. 7 / / g V., 4. N �2U - - 7' / 1 I ' , 'J ... tt) 4 / . r / F'R orEO Go b„ ' A 1 85 a , ,io / e.ft9 / 24 8 • • ,O f i, R�S , o iS� v. 1 ' ` 78584' i /� l \ 956 / / 4 `\` '/ � m \ e i / , 68 ., ° \ e \� IS / ' ® ' q 'n tom ■ � 5 .0. ' W e -re,_ �\ gs'e b TgD2 ill/ i A qg i; „ 06 (v" ' 1 '8 � ( 951Z) .,p S/� DSO` c8sg :�• - ^ "'( 4 0 7 \ � 6)/:.-e,,4 - s' 4 ti 1 ore, ro `` L= 310.1 " / Cu e 56 . 4 y lit I Lot 6, Block 3, CHANHASSEN VISTA 4TIEiADDITION C _vQ 1 The only easements Shawn are from plats of record or Information provided by 1 client. We hereby certify that this to a true and correct representation of a Survey of the boundaries of the above described land and the location of all buildings and vls• Ibis encroachments, If any, from or on said land Surveyed by us this 3rd d of March to 88 Bred - ' - 4...r. ....e, , R • nd A. Print*, Minn. Reg. N • . 6743 1 I II LAND SURVEYORS SCALE I" 0 — DENOTES!, REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 . 73rd Avenue North 660 -3093 11 NOVAK FLECK Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 Denotes Wood Hub Set Ou ar5 Qirr{ Type of Building - Split Leve II For Excavation Only - Denotes Surface Drainage . 1 Denotes Proposeth'Elevation 34 1Q — 1 ' Denotes Existing Elev.: ' ¢ � - i 9 �� - 51.0 / % * l 1 i 1 ` � t...... ?_ i` D Waf 16" R.C.P. �- El ev .Y' I _ =,..v.- E34V1.6L / 85Li,8 1 / // Vat, ‘,,,,, ' , Top of Block p '� � �,� g 96,o . Z 6 \ r Garage Floor 1 r `) 59.7 Lowest Most Floor 1 . / - -�' use orgiv.), � r � E . t - - 85•4 / L to / / '� 1 Q N (> ss,, / a5 �.e 1 ` v z° _ 1 t, rn m / (0 , P bS o „ a . , \ 1 7. 1 1 1 O _ I T �pr / QS �s ` 2 R�Sr0 - 12 % -- --.. 8 1 13%•)-o `��O tt 1 - e .. � SC E 'l so_ �o ' s ■ + i � d J / t i 8 58 4 a � _ a 3,- \ J / tr ■ , .... 4 m �, �� o s sa•! ° z44.. I m \ : `�\ e . c ? / � -` TC �� 8 $/• Q �- T j. r 6 z. �o A o h 8 � • 8' 0 .9 3 " ' / � e �6 - 8 g �� ..— \ I 0512. ) , 9si.4 R a i \ 1 C. 51 .2 \ '4 C el T c .= 30.1 rest 7 i Q teat L.I• LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. F. B. NO NO 21694 4 LAND SURVEYORS SCALE I" • Z °' 0- DENOTES IRON 1 REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601.73rd Avenue North 560 -3093 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 Suraegare Certificate ' NOVAK FLECK a Denotes wood hub set for excavation only oeooDenotes existing elevation 1 III Denotes proposed elevation ...i-- Denotes proposed surface drainage Type of Building - Split level 1 SI 45o 3 N9_ _ -- . - " rr I One /T qss s = _ ; /' # D eASEMENrs /° F OfF r .--46, 7 / �� Ufll fi"7 , i /x `94 / 1 qbt / / 1 M / / ` / 4 6 , / G ti>• y. rO 3 ti 4 � r OF Y e /9sy. 6 -c'r s% Q•� / / � 9 6 lg r k r / 5 e _ t, e / r 1 G7 / (� C' iC N �e r / a /5 PF op eSFD 906 , / T 1 5 r,P r S\ 9t6, .. •.".• 9 S g 6 ev d •, N / N 5. 9s a.3 `' / Ec- 9S 4.1' IA • / 2Z g., 4 SF U i f C rh yT \ s erl • 1 c V tra ' — r n \ 5566 \\ 8 ` j- / a- t au s Tc ''s< B� •/B 4Z " i9S \ /_.tt_.°' O A ' • Z \ o\ Zo ' / T '° Or t ,c- pM`y \ rc'g c / 4 /e' E fto ' i.r o 4 / 9s . /8 g 69 ..$ e ,�-, ' 4 - ) 9 .6 \ ----I :" re qt \' F L - r4 51. I sli Proposed Top of Block 9 Z re ` 9t O U 54 ;c 94 c-) Proposed Garage Floor - 9S - • 7— � 1 Proposed Lowest Floor • `j S G. 7 Lot 7, Block 3, CHANHASSEN VISTA 4Th ADDITION 1 i - The only easements shown are from plats of record or Information provided by / client. 1 J We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the / boundaries of the above described land and the location of all buildings and vie ) + y / / //� / ' / � IBIS encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Signed /, I / �e/ht• ie „f�C � �l a,. „ Surveyed by us thla 18th � o f M arch 19 88 eymond A. Preach, Minn. Reg. No. 6743 e� 1 I . LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. I VVOIC NO F. LAND SURVEYORS SCALE I" ' Zo' 0 - DENOTES IRON REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 1 7601- 73rd Avenue North 560-3093 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 i eururgaru Qirrtiftratr H 1 NOVAK FLECK q Denotes wood hub set for excavation only 00 0 0 Denotes existing elevation Denotes proposed elevation I - Denotes proposed surface drainage Type of Building - Split level 5/ 4s8 -108.107-- - 9508 i - -- - - -� 9sos• / - � - -- in I 958 S _ / 0241.747,E eA SfiMENf s /o FDtF 1 In / 5N-j-r— a--/ 4c 1/ 4 " FC g4gEz 1 / _ / • 0 / 1 f'.1 / s / 4 E ti • n 1 _ /0 3 � ti °FC 4 r 9sye / 1 F '9 bti 'I / o 6 •s /'7 6 •c, i So - � • 15 / 9 / - NJ .ss t /c - �`? 1 / / ms s ^ i / / F. p o P0 5 - 9 sa 6 / r J e 5 ' � . 9sa v > - / E1_ . rt ` 9s �' ° � N v / 8 F <s / 9 584 1_ " 2 44 w 22 g•. 45 ` 4. ' 1. C 4, 7; ,� 't , y T 958 M� C 1 \Q a \o ...---1----"- ySB, j �/ � ` R1 u 4 ti rc 8� 4L g / Ae c.4 v CD, p \� �e r,. , E< <ti 960 te —� 9x e,c 8.69 lea _,\ -93. \ F ti S / ` / 'c4st.g/ r44 l 1 ` e 956 ,/ .9 U` 'Y sv 4 tv rd 9% ill Proposed Top of Block = `,60-1- C e`'`'1_. Q U ",..,4 9 846 Proposed Garage Floor • /5 ").7 '' r 1 Proposed Lowest Floor = `jSG Lot 7, Block 3, CHANHASSEN VISTA 4TH - ADDITION 1 I Z I Si «lac c i . T he only easements shown are from plats of record or Information provided by - / i ___ client. I We hereby certify that this lea true and correct representation of a survey of the / boundaries of the above described land and the location of all buildings and vis- J ` //� IDIa encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Signed / _iVhf le 1/ /t<t` Surveyed by s t is 18th day of March tg 88 / 1 i aymond A, Prank Minn. Reg. No. 6743 Leta 1 C owr . s% �t'rm I 1 LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. INVOICE NO 345 1 LAND SURVEYORS SCALE I' 30' 0- DENOTES IRON REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 • 73rd Avenue North 680.3093 e as Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 NOVAK FLECK eururI1rn QIrrtiftratr . ti Denotes Wood Hub Set 1 For'Excavetion Only Type of Building - Split Level -- Denotes Surface Drainage C ab Denotes Proposed Elevation 1 e o,c Denotes Existing Elevation 1 1 • 1 /4\(2 0 \ 0 \( of / �6u' 6 1 r� jn is / ` �` , 1 k, -. De % / \i �1 (1 c y r G■ . >< / • IA ^� ' 2 ' eti ` c _ u J 8 v /® a2 w�� ti , 0. 29, h p �� i 2 g i .012 N 7 S ..> ,X \ \ ''';9„ '''' i lp I \ ` \ s 4V tea. / I `' 156.t. ro \ . ‘ ' s D.•,�•. _se 50. — St. v \\ 1' - ` � e " _:• 1" 47_• —_ \ 43.32 -- 2 qs ¢ .: 1 ,ss.o / / we • Top of Block , ' Y , Garage Floor Lowest Most Floor p 1 9 /004 1 Lo.2. 9S7 .Z Lot 1, Block 4, QIANHIASSfN VISTA 3RD ADDITION 1 The only esaemenls shown are from plats of record or Information provided by client. 1 We hereby sanity That this 4 • true and correct representation of • survey of the i boundaries oa of the above described land and the location of all buildings and vie i Ibis ble encroachments, If any, from or on said lend. Surveyed by us this 24th dayof November 1B 87 Signed _ . .A.,A f ,, 1 .._. • Dymond A. Pasch, Minn. Reg. No. 6743 Rest. Dee 4, 08'2 �". ' ' � _4 1 INVOICE N0. 21176 .: LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. F. B. N0. 345 -44 [ LAND SURVEYORS SCALE I" 30' $-s _ 0 — DENOTES IRON < >,. REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA ' 7601 • 73rd Avenue North 560.3093 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 NOVAX FLECK - Our Qirrtifirutr • • a Denotes Wood Hub Set ForeExcavation Only Type of Building - Split Level — ^"R -- Denotes Surface Drainage Denotes Proposed Elevation 000,0 Denotes Existing Elevation 1 1 • /6)/ / n /' a 1 • / � (L ' I . 7. / / °// ></ 6 . .,h „� .2K\ u ryJ to 22`0- 0 0 40 ' s' 2 q e v, � \ , . \- 2 Q i 4Q 0 y `` "KZZ"'��� ` Q1 0Q N Z I G ' y r • q D S O \ ti A , ���'N <\ • Cl. by , � `- \ ' II t \ Oi 1 �' ��� \,.1. - o s o.t. .O k ....--- h y,lJi -': p r...� '.' — c mt.., 5 0 0- _ < 1 _� _ _- s ,.. �`1 qSg.\ . .foa . a \43.32— Y 2.1.(4_ in 1 1 '58 0) I 11 Top of Block ' . Garage Floor Lowest Most Floor 1 '1004 1G0.2 9S1 .Z 1 Lot 1, Block 4, QIAHASSEN VISTA 3RD ADDITION IA Lit C ∎1041`H *I The only easements shown are from plots of record or information provided by client. 1 We hereby certify that this le a true end correct representation of s survey of the boundaries of the above described land end the location of ell buildings and vie. Ibis encroachments, If any, from or on said lend. /9 Surveyed by us this 24th day of November 19 87 Signed - . /. A. .r /� i , RcY. Dec 4, 1 '1'961 eymond A. Prasch, Minn. Reg. No. 8743 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (612) 937 -1900 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION APPLICANT: R .4 ) OWNER: 4 01Wie ADDRESS: 641 Co 4C- isto‘A • ADDRESS: C lanhasuh fl n i TELEPHONE (Day time) 4S7611 X12 TELEPHONE: REQUEST 1 ♦ Conditional Use Permit - $150 + Subdivision: 0 Interim Use Permit - $150 Preliminary Plat: ♦ Land Use Plan Amendment - $100 - Sketch Plan - $200 1 ♦ Planned Unit Development: - Create less than 3 lots - $100 - Sketch Plan - $200 - Create more than 3 lots - $100 + $15 acre + $5 per lot - Preliminary Development Plan lot created $300 + $15 acre - Final Plat - $100 - Final Development Plan - $200 - Metes and Bounds - $100 - Amendment to Final Development Plan - $300 + $15 acre - Consolidate Lots - $100 TOTAL PUD TOTAL SUBDIVISION 1 ♦ Site Plan Review - $150 ♦ Wetland Alteration Permit: ♦ Administrative Site Plan - Individual Single Family RP..i ew - $150 Lots - $ 25 ♦ Vacation of Utility or - All Others - $150 1 Street Easement - $100 ♦ Variance - $75 ♦ Rezoning - $250 1 ♦ Zoning Appeal - $75 ♦ Zoning Ordinance Amendment - II No Charge A list of all property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the ll property must be included with the application. Twenty -six full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted. 1 * NOTE - When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. 1 II PROJECT NAME \raYla,neff + ( (1,61. t • ' LOCATION G L combs/mot lam.. 11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lb+ 5 131tx.k chanhaisth Vain 3 Mtim i PRESENT ZONING II REQUESTED ZONING PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION REASON FOR THIS REQUEST Varian -6 IS 7a+ bait cAllindursoc 1 - ,- _.:•IN •TM- .1111%r.T in WL' i 4• • I This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific II ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership II (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. 11 I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the prc)gress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that after the approval or granting of the permit, such permits shall be invalid unless they are recorded against the title to the property for which the approval /permit is granted within 120 days with the Carver County Recorder's Office and the original document returned to City Hall Records. • II Signature of Applicant D to II Signature of Fee Owner Date 1 Application Received on 1 Fee Paid Receipt No. This application will be considered by the Planning Commission /Board of II Adjustments and Appeals on 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CITY OP CHANHASSEN 1 690 COULTER DRIVE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (612) 937 -1900 1 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION L_ APPLICANT: ' � 1 " : ' ) f_, `.4. OWNER: `•+ 0 \n) y 1 ADDRESS: s-' "' , 4 + /` r ADDRESS : a,_ 'J` , t (hr)tr. (r)L3 TELEPHONE (Day time) "" 1 ° I.4 - ; g TELEPHONE: 'rr.- 1 REQUEST • Conditional Use Permit - $150 • Subdivision: 1 • Interim Use Permit - $150 Preliminary Plat: • Land Use Plan Amendment - $100 - Sketch Plan - $200 I • Planned Unit Development: - Create less than 3 lots - $100 II - Sketch Plan - $200 - Create more than 3 lots - $100 + $15 acre + $5 per lot - Preliminary Development Plan lot created I $300 + $15 acre - Final Plat - $100 - Final Development Plan - $200 - Metes and Bounds - $100 I - Amendment to Final Development Plan - $300 + $15 acre - Consolidate Lots - $100 1 TOTAL PUD TOTAL SUBDIVISION • Site Plan Review - $150 • Wetland Alteration Permit: 1 • Administrative Site Plan - Individual Single Family Review $150 Lots - $25 I • Vacation of Utility or - All Others - $150 Street Easement - $100 • Variance - $75 X • Rezoning - $250 • Zoning Appeal - $75 • Zoning Ordinance Amendment - 1 No Charge I A list of all property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the application. 1 Twenty -six full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted. * NOTE - When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall 1 be charged for each application. PROJECT NAME ik-)V °: 1 LOCATION f N _1 - r LEGAL DESCRIPTION, /9 /(9( , 1 PRESENT ZONING REQUESTED ZONING PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION 1 REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION REASON FOR THIS REQUEST ^_. 1 _ _) I _ l / r O: � . , ' C jJQ - 1 CO- 01;,) ar9 t)m P.;- nt.02rra J ? ".j it Al _h.LPI ") ? 3 i / ( I s- , 0a, ;t) !!_) ^ t i ,t . 7 . et_i2AL' ` ' _ %' 7 = / , A A' L P,tg< 1,1' t 1 / " 1 J. i CI.J) ' 7, , ') t /) e; / -t i ". ? L i % 4), c t t O � J tCr+' P ^ `: 0 ) 6 Q ( C n i r / R !D >' 7i -P / 1.97 / - -PC_O -6 1 1,' 0 Cd) a ?7J_ /,./1 111 %r'� / +%t �o o d eoA.L o4 ...0 t /tee Jl2(tQ� �i4 [Cl CO deb This application mudt be comPleted in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by , applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. 1 This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by ■ the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements" ith regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and i the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents ' and information I have, submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that after the approval or granting of the permit, such" permits shall be invalid unless they are recorded against the title to the property for which the approval /permit is granted within 120 days with the , Carver County Recorder's Office and the original document returned to City Hall Records. n . /44°) n SignatureCdf Applicant Date 1 Signature of Fee Owner Date 1 Application Received on Fee Paid Receipt No. II This application will be considered by the Planning Commission /Board of Adjustments and Appeals on 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II v e ! osnr..r rti3 i ■ v, LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. INVOICE 00 F. NO. 21463 LAND SURVEYORS SCALE I" 30' I 0— DENOTES IRON REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601.7&d Avenue North 6604093 NOVAK FLECK Minneapolis, MLnnaofa 65426 1 ❑ Denotes Wood Hub Set Surv,gnr Oirrtifiratr , For Excavation Only . — Denotes Surface Drainage . 1 CD Denotes Proposed Elevation 000,0 Denotes Existing Elevation / 4s Type of Building - Split level / \v cb ,AR q �/ x .He / .e..r h ^° my P Q m R .0'i-^;° C ee., • ,O 'o .. Q� o �0 A, c tih� O� / 4 e e� \ iil i �, s� n 0 0 d \s �0 { o /ee `s \ .c i 3 O o - O i a P:\h a p O Za 4,4s. 1 ` \ 9s Q��h, �,c)4'.4.- h i A \ • \ . Q \ d O • �'y • • \ , � OA \ y., r 1 1 Top of Block '9 aqs• �. )1.?. \\ U+i IP-4 E Dralcsase 94%, ,— Easement •,\_ 959. X v \\ - -- Garage Floor I \ wale • 4. .` rL Elev. p 9331 9 58.1 \ cg`s a °� W e{ Ic.,d , . ` .l Lowest Most Floor o.i.; 1 ... 1 n r er V �9 1 9SS.7 1 0 , -- / ^ t N, r) t Q Lot 3, Block 4, CHANHASSEN VISTA 3RD ADDITION if D• 1 . — I 23.41 1 1 • The only easements sham an from plats of record or information provided by client. Ws hereby artily Mat this Is a taw and correct representation of e survey of the / / boundaries a tM above dssaibed land and the location of ell buildings and vie- ibis encroachments, if any, from or on s kd tend. Signed .. /.1 % / _ Surveyed byus is 18th aye February W 88 1 � A. Pm*, Minn. Rog. No. 873 • 1 e 1 • LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. IN VOICE NO 21176 F . B. NO. 345 -44 LAND SURVEYORS SCALE I" 30' 0— DENOTES IRON r REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 1 7601 - 73rd Avenue North 680.3093 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 NOVAK FLECK -- F►ururllors Trrtittratt 1 n Denotes Wood Hub Set For'Excavation Only Type of Building - Split Level —^¢— Denotes Surface Drainage _ Si il `s/ Denotes Proposed Elevation - 000.e Denotes Existing Elevation 1 • 1 ,.‘r!v /** 0 V i/c,' � ..-- -. 1 C., .1 *' / (?) l9 a ` / Go ‘ p +c'' > / ei / / \ /90 \/, L/ , \ y o Oft ,, \< \ asyY• �� or 6 ,6,- , e..0.. nr' ` 2 g 0 0 0 I 40 22 t7. i d's 5 c` ,�, Et 42 Y' A 75 . I I Gam- .: '- 4‘ ' ..-N t.,\CP \ N! .. '' # ‘. ' • I ' ma •^6 i ..I�>..- ,50 .E � ' EQscmevt - - , ,rl �— s,. v' so, \ </ � l e ' _- tOS4 -- -- \43.32— 21 N 4 ` NS .(, 1 . 3.0 Top of Block , . Garage Floor Lowest Most Floor 1 • 1 /1004 •1 - 9S .2 1 Lot 1, Block 4, CHAMIASSIN VISTA 3RD ADDITION , The only easements strewn are from plats of record or Information provided by client. / We hereby certify that this U • his and correct representation of a survey of the ( % boundaries of the above described land and the location of all buildings and vls- Ible encroachments, If any, from or on said lend. i . Surveyed by us this 24th deyol November 10 87 Signed y/ eymond A. Pasch, Minn. Reg. No. 8143 i2 /. Dec 4, 1 87 1 1