7. Establish Dev Fee Schedule 1-j
C ITYOF -
I tilijr14 CHANIIASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • B47 • CHANHASS
(61
612) 937 -1900 P.O. OX 1 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 EN, MINNESOTA 55317
I
MEMORANDUM A,,.- 5r CP,� Pittor;g•zsat .
II TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager ..;�
FROM: Paul Krauss, Planning Director I- 10 i
I DATE: January 9, 1991
II SUBJ: Development Fees r_ _
I BACKGROUND
I have been made aware that it has been a period of at least five
years since the City has last re- evaluated it's schedule of
I development fees. This list covers the charges we require for
submittal with applications for development reviews, variances,
planning related actions and planning publications.
'' 1 Re- evaluation of this schedule on a relatively constant basis
should be undertaken to ensure that fees are consistent with those
II being charged by similar communities elsewhere in the Twin Cities.
In addition, due to budgetary constraints that we are all familiar
with, it may behoove the City to consider looking into having new
development pay the full cost of the city review procedure.
I Traditionally, the Planning Department has operated from General
Fund Revenues charging development review fees that are nominal and
do not approach covering the costs in staff time associated with
II review of the proposal. This has been viewed in the past as having
a positive approach towards development in the community which is
certainly a worthy goal. On the other hand, it has resulted in
essentially having existing property owners in the city subsidize
I the cost of reviewing new development. In this time of budgetary
constraints, a number of communities are looking into alternatives
that would result in more accurately reflecting costs of
I development on the applicant. A third reason for reviewing the fee
schedule is that as administrative procedures and ordinances are
refined, there are new actions requiring fees such as the new
II grading and mining ordinance, interim use permit ordinance,
administrative site plan review and involvement of the City
Attorney in filing of plats and other development approvals.
1 Our reviews of the fee structure are predicated upon the goal of
maintaining low cost access to the City for individual homeowners
II
1
Development Review Fee Schedule •
January 9, 1991
Page 2
and small property owners. Consequently, costs associated with
applications such as those which we normally review from these
individuals are proposed to be kept artificially low.
The following constitutes our recommendations for a revised fee
schedule for 1991.
1 ITEM 1 - DEVELOPMENT SIGNS
As the Council may recall, late last summer an ordinance was
' approved requiring the posting of development signs on projects
undergoing rezoning, comprehensive plan amendment, site plan
review, conditional use permits, interim use permits or platting of
more than 3 lots. The purpose of this ordinance change was to
' require the posting of signs that would help in notifying adjoining
property owners of development proposals being reviewed by the
•
city. Towards this end it would supplement the publication of
legal notices and mailings that are already undertaken. The City
Council decided that the signs should be acquired by the city and
rented to the applicant for a fee of $100 with a damage deposit of
an additional $100. Under the approved program, the applicant
would be responsible for obtaining the sign from the city,
installing it and returning it to the city at the completion of
action of the proposal. The Council authorized the acquisition of
11 20 signs to initiate the program. Staff ordered the signs and
related installation materials in December and expects to receive
them shortly. The signs read, "Proposed Development - This Site -
1 Contact the City of Chanhassen for Further Information" and are
white with a background of the City Maple Leaf logo.
The original fee structure was based on the assumption that the
1 signs would cost $200 each. Ultimately, we were able to procure
them for substantially less. The signs and related materials cost
$110 a piece. Therefore, we are recommending that a $50 rental fee
be required along with a $100 damage deposit that will be returned
when the sign is received back in good condition.
ITEM 2 - ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW
Last year the site plan review ordinance was amended to recognize
that staff may sometimes be in a position to approve limited
additions or modifications to site plans. These are extremely
limited in scope and do not represent new development on parcels.
An example of this would be the addition of pollution control
equipment on The Press Building and Instant Web and addition of a
canopy and modified parking currently being reviewed for the
Chanhassen Dinner Theatre. Since this is a new item, no fee
structure has been established for it. Given the relatively small
amount of staff time involved in reviewing these items and
administering them, we believe the fee should be set at $100 per
1
1
Development Review Fee Schedule
January 9, 1991
Page 3
application.
ITEM 3 - GRADING AND MINING '
Last spring, the City adopted a new ordinance regulating all
grading, excavation and mining activities within the city. The
scope of activities covered by this ordinance ranges from a
homeowner who wishes to move more than 50 cubic yards of dirt to a
request to move several hundred thousand yards of clay for the Eden
Prairie Landfill. To undertake this work, staff has been relying
on the fee schedule for these activities specified in the Uniform
Building Code. This has worked rather well except for the fact
that because the fees are not established in the City Fee
Structure, they have only been assessed as a part of an approval
and are not obtained as an up front cost with the submittal of the
application. The UBC fee schedule be established as outlined
below:
TABLE-- NO.70 -B - GRADING PERMIT FEES
50 cubic yards or Tess $15.00
51 to 100 cubic yards $22.50
101 to 1000 cubic yards - $22.50 for the first 100 cubic yards plus $10.50 for each additional 100 cubic yards or fraction
thereof
1001 to 10,000 cubic yards - $117.00 for the first 1,000 cubic yards, plus $9.00 for each additional 1,000 cubic yards or fraction
thereof
10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards - $198.00 for the first 10,000 cubic yards, plus $40.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction
thereof
100,001 cubic yards or more - $562.50 for the first 100,000 cubic yards, plus $22.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction
thereof
Other Inspections and Fees: 1
1. Inspections outside of normal business hours $30.00 per hour
(minimum charge - two hours)
2. Reinspection fees assesed under provisions of Section 305 $30.00 per hour
3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated $30.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one -half hour)
The grading fee schedule works well with applications for more than
100,000 cubic yards that require approval of an interim use permit.
However, staff processes a large number of these applications for
smaller amounts of material such as may be requested by a homeowner
or contractor undertaking a small job. For these we are
recommending that a $50 fee be established since we are not trying
1
1
Development Review Fee Schedule
January 9, 1991
Page 4
' to be punitive but are desiring to be in a position to work with
these individuals so that problems associated with their grading
activities may be avoided.
ITEM 4 - CITY ATTORNEY FEE STRUCTURE FOR FILING PLATS AND OTHER
DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS
1 From time to time in the past, staff has outlined to the City
Council numerous problems that have developed due to our present
' system of relying on the applicant to file plats, easements and
other development approvals. There have been numerous instances
where easements that were required as a part of the approval were
either omitted or incorrectly filed, where outlots that were to be
1 deeded to the city were not properly conveyed, where easements that
were expected were improperly drafted and .did not convey or meet
the city expectations. The city has attempted after the fact to
' have conditions of approval filed against parcels unsuccessfully
only to find out that the property owner is now refusing to
cooperate or to provide the city with the required title
documentation. -Most communities I am familiar with avoid these
1 problems entirely by controlling the process from start to finish.
What these communities do is require that the filing of all
documentation be handled by in -house staff so that reliance on the
' applicant is omitted. A proposal on these lines has been discussed
with the Council and Planning Commission on several occasions and
is a goal that has been established for 1991. Staff has had
1 several meetings with the City Attorney to work out procedures that
would be applied and also to develop a fee schedule that hopefully
shifts the cost burden away from the small property owner or
homeowner as much as possible. The filing costs that are being
proposed in the attached memo from the City Attorney are not
entirely new costs for the applicant since they often have to pay
their own attorney to undertake the same work. We are confident
' that handling matters in this manner will result in a more
efficient approval and documentation process and more effective
management of new development for the city. It should be noted
' that this filing program is based upon the applicants having their
attorneys draft up accurate easement language and providing the
city with the required title documentation. Failure to undertake
these efforts will result in additional work effort by the City
1 Attorney which we anticipate billing back to the applicant.
ITEM 5 - INTERIM USE PERMIT
1 The interim use permit ordinance is a new one that was approved in
1989. As you may recall, it was designed to provide for uses that
1 require special review and considerations such as conditional use
permits traditionally had done but are temporary in nature. For
example, horse stables in the RSF District are allowed as interim
1
1
1
Development Review Fee Schedule
January 9, 1991
Page 5
use permits. There is no commensurate fee structure established
for interim use permits so staff simply started charging an
identical fee with the conditional use permit requirements. We are
recommending that this be the case and whatever fees are charged
for conditional use permits are also charged for interim use
permits since they are quite similar in nature.
ITEM 6 - GENERAL FEE STRUCTURE 1
As was noted in the opening statements of this memo, costs
associated with development review have traditionally been born by
the General Fund and therefore, by existing tax payers in the city.
Costs associated with development reviews include all those
functions of the Planning and Engineering Departments relative to
developing a project, taking it through the approval process and
ensuring that it is properly constructed and maintained. To a
certain extent, some of these costs are offset by excess revenue
generated by the Building Permit Fee Program but this is generally
not taken into consideration. As budgetary constraints grow on
local units of government, they are seeking new and innovative ways
to cover costs.
Chanhassen has generally adopted a policy that new development is
intended to pay it's own way relative to hard capital costs
associated with supplying a development with new utilities and
streets, etc. However, this has not been the case with staff time
associated with project reviews. Staff is aware that other
communities are considering methods to charge these costs back
directly to the applicant for development proposals and undertook
an informal survey of a number of communities that have had similar
experiences. The communities that were contacted generally fall
into two groups. Those who undertake a traditional approach
towards fee structure similar to what is already in place in
Chanhassen and those that have either raised their application fees
to recover costs or who require the escrow of funds by the
applicant which are then drawn down by the city as costs are
incurred. Contacted communities that operate under the traditional
approach include:
1
Apple Valley
Plymouth
Rosemount
Fridley
Burnsville
Of those communities, Burnsville noted that they require payment
for all consultant fees relative to an application. Apple Valley
indicated that they had considered charging developers and thought
it was a worthy idea but that administratively the billing
1
Development Review Fee Schedule
January 9, 1991
Page 6
procedures and verification procedures were too cumbersome.
Plymouth indicated that they had considered such a system in the
past but found it to be too cumbersome and have rather taken the
approach of trying to keep their fee structure current with
inflation. The City of Rosemount indicated that they charge out
for engineering staff and other consultant reviews since
engineering is undertaken by outside consultants in that community.
' However, they also indicated that they are on the verge of
undertaking an increased fee structure to cover costs. Fridley
indicated that only consultant fees are billed to developers.
'
The communities that indicated that they have revised their fee
structure along the guidelines of having new development pay it's
own way include the cities of:
Eagan
Champlin
Bloomington
' Eden Prairie
Woodbury
Cottage Grove
Maple Grove
A summary of these communities' programs follow. Champlin requires
' the deposit of escrow fees in addition to application fees which
are drawn down as costs are incurred. For example, the escrow fee
for a 10 to 50 acre subdivision is $1000 which is in addition to
the $325 plus $10 per lot application fee. Site plan approvals are
$250 application fees plus a $300 escrow. We find that many of the
communities that undertake such fees handle them in a similar
manner. The City of Eagan charges back the costs of plats with an
' escrow fee arrangement and consultant fees as well. Eagan has
considered charging for other types of review such as site plan
reviews and conditional use permits, however, it has not yet
' embarked on a program to raise these fees. It should be noted that
Eagan has had problems with their fee program since their
accounting procedures were not up to the task. They essentially
wound up overspending the escrow deposits and then were unable to
' collect from a number of developers. Since these funds had been
budgeted, the city wound up with a fairly significant shortfall in
revenues that they have thus far been unable to resolve. Eden
Prairie has raised their application fees to cover these costs.
The Community Development Director for the City of Cottage Grove
has indicated that he managed a program in Brooklyn Park in a prior
job that required the escrow of funds to cover costs. In Cottage
Grove they are requiring the escrow of funds for platting as well
as an increase in permit application fees for other planning
functions. Maple Grove requires, for example, a $250 fee plus $5
per lot cash deposit to be applied for staff review expenses
relative to preliminary platting. An escrow for attorney fees and
1 •
1
Development Review Fee Schedule
January 9, 1991
Page 7
engineering expenses is also required. The City of Woodbury has
established a fairly straight forward program where they require
the payment of an initial application fee and then have sliding
formulas for the creation of an escrow fund to cover staff
expenses. Plats, lot divisions, site plans, conditional use
permits and other requests are all charged back to the applicant.
Of the cities that responded positively to this survey, the City of
Bloomington provided the most interesting information. They
indicated that they had investigated the potential of requiring the
escrow of funds but ultimately went with a program of raising
application fees to cover the application process and costs. They
appear to have taken this approach due to the cost and complexity
associated with developing escrow funds and administering them.
They provided a calculation of 1988 department revenues relative to
proposed revenues when the new fee schedule is adopted. They
experienced a 290% increase in fees from $25,000 per year to
$98,000 per year. The Bloomington fee structure, for example,
establishes a $500 charge for conditional use permits, plats cost
$300 plus $50 per lot for single family subdivisions and final
plats being $250 plus $10 per lot, thus the total charge is
1 equivalent of $550 plus $60 per lot. PUD costs are $2,500.
Based upon the foregoing information and my personal discussions
with the planners of these communities, I believe that our fee
structure is in need of being overhauled. The amounts we charge
are apparently low when compared with other communities and do not
even attempt to cover our costs. However, I am reluctant to
suggest a program that relies on the depositing of escrow funds.
Most of the communities that utilize this approach have had
difficulties relative to administering the escrow funds. I know
that having worked with our Accounting Department in Chanhassen
that we are already taxing their time and .capabilities to keep
track of bonds, letter of credits and other financial guarantees
required with applications already and am reluctant to burden them
further. I believe that the Bloomington approach has considerable
merit and have accordingly developed a revised fee structure for
those applications that hopefully reflects costs to a greater
extent then is currently the case. In keeping with prior city
policies, fees for applications that would normally be received
from a homeowner are not proposed to be significantly altered. It
is hoped that by keeping.fees for variances, grading permits for
small amounts of material and small plats to a minimum, the city
can keep these procedures available at moderate costs to our
residents. 1
ITEM 7 - PUBLICATIONS. MAPS AND COPYING
Costs for provision of these materials should be provided in the 1
approved fee structure. In the interest of making this information
1
•
1
Development Review Fee Schedule .
1 January 9, 1991
Page 8
I as available as possible, we are not proposing that the city make
any money for the materials but rather simply attempt to cover our
costs in reproducing the materials.
1 COMPARISON OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE
I EXISTING PROPOSED
Zoning Ordinance
1. Rezoning $250 $500 •
1 2. Planned Unit Development
a. Concept Plan $200 $750 + $50 /acre
for combined application
I b. Preliminary Develop. includes a., b. & c.
Plan $300 + $15 /acre Included in one time fee
I c. Final Develop. Plan $200 Included in one time fee
d. Amendment $300 + $15 /acre a. Minor Amendment - $100
b. Major Amendment - Same As PUD
I Fee Above
3. Variance & Appeal $75 $75
I 4. Conditional Use Permit $150
a. RSF uses a. $75
b. All others b. $400
I 5. Interim Use Permit N/A
a. Residential Districts a. 575
b. All Other Districts b. $400
I 6. Site Plan Review $150 5250 + $10 per 1000 sq.ft. of building
area for commercial and
industrial districts +
I 55 per dwelling unit in
residential districts
7. Administrative Site Plan N/A 5100
I 8. Comprehensive Plan Amendment ' $100 $500/$100 Minor MUSA line for
failing on -site sewers
I 9. Wetland Alteration Permit
a. Single Family Residence 525 $75
I b. All other uses $150 $200
10. Zoning Ordinance Amendment $0 $0
1 11. Sign Permit
a. Temporary $25 535
1
1
•
1
Development Review Fee Schedule
January 9, 1991
I
Page 9
b. Permanent $25 $50 1
12. Sign Plan Review N/A $150
(if separate from site plan)
13. Zoning Appeal $75 $0 *Staff does not believe there should
I
be a charge to appeal our
interpretation
14. Notification Signs N/A $50 rental
$100 damage deposit
Subdivision Ordinance
1. Create less than 3 lots $100 $150 1
2. Create over 3 lots $100 + 5 /lot $400 + $15 /lot
3. Final Plat $100 Included in one time fee
I
4. Metes and Bounds Division $100 $150 + $50 /lot over 3 lots
5. Consolidate Tots $100 $100
I
6. Vacation of ROW /Easements $100 $100
Building and Building Regulations 1
1. Grading Permits N /A* a. Under 50 cubic yards - $0
Use Uniform Building Code fee b. 50 -1000 cubic yards - $50
I
schedule but not fees officially
established c. Over 1000 cubic yards - processed
as IUP -use UBC I
Filing Fees/Attomey Costs
1. Recording Documents N/A $10 + County Fees I
2. Recording Plats & Related Documents
a. 1 -3 lots N/A $100 + County Fee
b. 4-10 lots N/A $125 + County Fee ,
c. 11 -30 lots N/A $200 + County Fee
d. 31 + lots N/A $350 + County Fee
3. Attorney's time to ensure N/A Cost billed back to applicant
I proper drafting & documentation
Consultant Fees
1. Consultants required by the City to
I
review development proposal
including but not limited to traffic
and water management issues N/A Cost based upon prior written
proposal and agreement. Fees
I
placed in escrow.
1
1
1
Development Review Fee Schedule
I January 9, 1991
Page 10
Publications/Documents
1 1. Zoning Ordinance Fees not $20
2. Selected ordinance sections established $ 0
3. Comprehensive Plan Document $35
I 4. Zoning Map $ 3
5. Land Use Plan Map $ 3
6, City Maps $ 3
7. Aerial Topography - Half- section Maps $12.50 /acre
I 8. Photocopies $ .20 /page
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
I Based upon the foregoing discussion, staff recommends that the
City Council adopt the following fee structure.
I Zoning Ordinance
I 1. Rezoning $500
2. Planned Unit Development
a. Concept Plan $750 + $50 /acre for combined application
I includes a., b. & c.
b. Preliminary Develop.
Plan Included in one time fee
I c. Final Develop. Plan Included in one time fee
d. Amendment a. Minor Amendment - $100
b. Major Amendment —Same As PUD
I Fee Above
3. Variance &Appeal $75
4. Conditional Use Permit
I
a. RSF uses a. $75
b. All others b. $400
5. Interim Use Permit
I
a. Residential Districts a. $75
b. All Other Districts b. $400
6. Site Plan Review $250 + $10 per 1000 sq.ft. of building
I
area for commercial and industrial districts +
$5 per dwelling unit in residential districts
7. Administrative Site Plan $100
I 8. Comprehensive Plan Amendment $500/$100 Minor MUSA line for
failing on -site sewers
1
1
,
Development Review Fee Schedule
January 9, 1991 -
Page 11
9. Wetland Alteration Permit
I
a. Single Family Residence $75
b. All other uses $200
10. Zoning Ordinance Amendment $0
1
11. Sign Permit
a. Temporary $35
b. Permanent $50
12. Sign Plan Review $150
(if separate from site plan)
13. Zoning Appeal $0 *Staff does not believe there should
be a charge to appeal our 111 interpretation
14. Notification Signs $50 rental
$100 damage deposit I
Subdivision Ordinance
1. Create less than 3 Tots $150 I
2. Create over 3 lots $400 + $15 /lot
3. Final Plat Included in one time fee - I
4. -- Metes and Bounds Division $150 + $50 /lot over 3 lots
5. Consolidate lots $100
6. Vacation of ROW /Easements $100
Building and Building Regulations
1. Grading Permits a. Under 50 cubic yards - $0 I
b. 50 -1000 cubic yards - $50 1
c. Over 1000 cubic yards - processed
as IUP -use UBC
Filing Fees /Attomey Costs 1
1. Recording Documents $10 + County Fees
2. Recording Plats & Related Documents
I
a. 1-3 lots $100 + County Fee
b. 4-10 lots $125 + County Fee
c. 11 -30 lots $200 + County Fee
d. 31 + lots $350 + County Fee
I
3. Attorney's time to ensure Cot billed back to applicant
proper drafting & documentation
I
1
1
Development Review Fee Schedule
January 9, 1991
Page 12
Consultant Fees
1. Consultants required by the City to
review development proposals
including but not limited to traffic
' and water management issues Cost based upon prior written
proposal and agreement. Fees
placed in escrow.
Publications/Documents
1. Zoning Ordinance $20
2. Selected ordinance sections $ 0
3. Comprehensive Plan Document $35
4. Zoning Map $ 3
5. Land Use Plan Map $ 3
' 6. City Maps $ 3
7. Aerial Topography - Half-section Maps $12.50 /acre
8. Photocopies $ .20 /page
ATTACHMENTS
1. Letter from City Attorney dated December 28, 1990.
2. Returned surveys from communities that attempt to cover
staff costs associated with development review.
3. Returned surveys from communities that do not charge
developers for relatd staff costs.
1
1
1
1 -
1
1
1
1
CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT & FUCHS, P.A.
Attorneys at Law
Thomas J. Campbell
Roger N. Knutson
Thomas M. Scott (612) 456 -9539
Gary G. Fuchs Fax (612) 456 -9542
James R Walston
Elliott B. Knetsch
Gregory D. Lewis December 28, 19 9 0
Dennis J. Unger
Mr. Paul Krauss
Chanhassen City Hall
690 Coulter Drive, Box 147
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 1
RE: Recording Plats and Other Documents
Dear Paul: '
You asked me to summarize our previous correspondence and
discussions regarding our office recording plats and other
documents.
1. Recording Documents. We will record CUP's, variances,
interim use permits, easements, and deeds. Our charge will be
$10.00 per document plus the County's fees. A copy of the
County's current fee schedule is enclosed.
2. Record Plats and Related Documents. We will record
plats and associated documents for the following fee plus the
County's recording fees: '
Number
of Lots Fee
1 3 $ 100.00
4 - 30 $ 125.00
11 - 30 $ 200.00
31+ $ 350.00
The following is the procedure we will follow in conjunction with
the recording of plats:
A. Developer delivers to City:
(1) Mylar signed by everyone except City officials and
County Recorder;
(2) Letter of Credit; � • V. ) II
DEC 31 1990 1
CITY OF CHAN HASS - I.,
Yankee Square Office III • Suite 202 • 3460 Washington Drive • Eagan, MN 55122
1
1 Mr. Paul Krauss
December 28, 1990
Page 2
1
' (3) Off plat easements and deeds to City, if any;
(4) Development Contract signed by everyone except the City;
1 (5) Covenants, if any;
(6) Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, if applicable;
(7) Plat recording fee check made payable to the County
Recorder and /or Registrar of Titles.
B. Our office will conduct a review:
' (1) To determine if conditions of City Council approval have
been met;
' (2) Ensure that all necessary documents are present and
properly signed;
(3) Record plat with the County Recorder;
1 (4) Provide the City with a completed checklist that the =
review has been completed and the plat has been
recorded.
ru y _ s,
' C PBELL KNUI' ON, SCOTT
FUC. , .A.
1
B :
Roger N. Knutson
RNK:srn
Enclosure
11
1
1
1
P
1
FEES .
COUNTY RECORDERS
AND •
REGISTRAR OF TITLES
Pursuant to Chapter 281
1985 Minnesota Sessions Laws '
ABSTRACT DEPARTMENT:
Record any deed or other document ... • $1.00 each page {
I
minimum $10.00
$1.00 each page #
Certified copy of document minimum $3.00 1
Plat Filing - •• •• •• • •••••• ••••$.50 each lot
minimum $30.00
Plat Copies .. • • • • • • • • . • • • $ plus $.50
for certification
. $.50 each apartment 1
Condominium Floor Plans minimum $30.00
Condominium Floor Plans Copies •-.- ' for certification $. i
.
REGISTERED (TORRENS) PROPERTY:
- Original (first issued) certificate of Title .. $20.00 i I
Transfer of fee simple title for which w 1
?; . - -- ; =3r --: _- : : -_ T 7, ' .,=`:. s -. i; ;w -'= 1 = certificate of titles issued • . ..ne . $20.00
. _ . 3 For entry of each new memorial on
14 c of title . • • -- .... $10.00
t I
Issuing Mortgagee's or Lessee's 0.00
T 81
duplicate $10.00
Issuing Residue Certificate - • $1000 for each j I
Exchange Certificates 1
cancelled and
$10.00 for each new
certificate
r Cert shoring condition $10.00
•
_ of the register • • .' - . ' i
_ Certified copies of any instrument $1 pp for each page
:.', ., . _ -:4-„:-.1...- ,, ;_ or writing - • • . .. minimum 83.00
:a< 'ir- _ s , . _ y te �:'? z� ?= r-_t "'i'K'
Plat Filing ..... . ... • • .. $30.00 $30.00
Filing Registered Land Survey
Certified Copy of Registered Land
s ... $
Survey 810.00
p Filing Condominium Floor Plan or
Amendment to it in accordance with $30.00
% Chapter 515 ..... • ...... I
Filing Condominium Floor Plan and
Declaration or Amendment in accordance
with Chapter 515 A ... • • • • $10.00 for each
certificate upon I
which the document
is registered and i
:e $30.00 for the Floor
N Plans or
Amendment
N • = ..::',-77.‘::': . " . - � , - Copy of a Condominium Floor Plan filed $1.00 for each page
if pursuant to Chapters 515 and 515A
of the Floor plan
with a minimum fee 1
of $10.00
i
1
1
_ • • _ . i _ .. -. ��_...
1
1
1
1 RETURNED SURVEYS FROM COMMUNITIES THAT ATTEMPT
TO COVER STAFF COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
CITYOF i
Pr ral
' 12 1990
cHANHAsoss 0KAIVHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 1
. ' + ; (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
1
December 7, 1990
1
Mr. Greg Ingrahm 1
City of Bloomington
2215 W. Old Shakopee Road
Bloomington, MN 55431 1
Dear Greg: -
The City of Chanhassen is considering a variety of ways to increase 1
City revenues and redirect programs to be more oriented towards
user fees. Accordingly, we are considering billing developers for
staff costs associated with reviews of plats, site plans, grading 1
permits, etc. It is my understanding that many of you may already
charge these costs to developers. I would appreciate your taking
the time to answer the following questions.
Yes No 1
1. Do you charge staff time for 1
staff work effort on:
. Plats
N 1
Pe, CO Lot Divisions
l I'/
�('� Site Plans _ 1
Conditional Use
Permits 1
Other requests
2. What costs are allocated: 1
Planning Staff review 1
Engineering Staff review
'Consultant reviews 1
(Engineering /traffic /City Attorney)
1
II
December 7, 1990
Page 2
•
3. Do you require the escrow of fun s to
cover projected costs? — . ctitok«J
' 4. Do your application fees reflect the
S
projected cost of staff time for projects?
Please send a copy of any fee schedules and ordinances requiring
payment of related costs you may use. Any other comments would be
appreciated.
' Sincerely,
401.11" OF
1 . 1 Krauss, AICP
Director of Planning
PK:v
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Revised Final Site and Building Plans
Minor $ 25 $ 75 II
Major 100 250
Comprehensive Plan Amendments $0 $1000 1:
(except when innitiated by
Planning Commission)
` Environmental Review II
Discretionary EAW $0 $ 0
Required EAW 0 1000
II
Required EIS 0 4000
Ordinance Amendment $0 $1000
(except when innitiated by
II
Planning Commission)
1
II
Below is a comparison of the revenue generated by the current fee structure in
1988 to revenue that would have been generated under the proposed fee structure.
II
Type of Application Number 1988 Proposed Percentage
of Items Revenue Revenue Change 1
Conditional Use Permit 23 $2850 6850 140% 1
Temporary Cond Use Permit 63 2200 10500 380
Rezoning 11 5500 16500 200
Final Development Plan 12 200 10200 5000
II
Revised Final Dvlpmnt Plan 11 725 3325 360
Final Site & Building Plans 2 200 500 150
Revised Final Site & Bldg 9 450 1225 170 1
Ordinance Amendment 4 0 4000 N/A
Standard Subdivision 11 2105 4150 100
Administrative Subdivision 27 2075 25900 . 1150
II
Standard Variance 37 4125 7875 90
Administrative Variance 27 540 2700 400
Comp Plan Amendment 4 4000 4000 0
TOTAL $24,970 $97,725 290% 1
1
1
1
1
II
1 AVERAGE COSTS FOR ALL AGENDA ITEMS
1988
1
Staff Costs
Staff Time /Average Cost /Average
Agenda Item Agenda Item
Clerical 12 hours 138
Planning Staff 8 hours 127
Graphics Staff 1 hour 15
Printing Time 1 hour 20
Camera Crew .5 hour 13
' Engineering Staff 4 hours 80
$393
Administrative Costs
' Advertising 20
Sending Notices 90
Supplies 20
$130
Building and Maintenance Costs
Space and Occupancy 43
Maintenance 3
$46
1
TOTAL $569
1
1
1
1
COSTS OF REZONING/ PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGENDA ITEM
1988
1
Staff Costs
Staff Time /Average Cost /Average
Agenda Item Agenda Item
Clerical 20 hours 230
Planning Staff 17 hours 262
Graphics Staff 1 hour 15
Printing Time 1 hour 20
Camera Crew 6 hours 150
Engineering Staff 8 hours 160
$837
Administrative Costs
Advertising 40
Sending Notices 180
Supplies 40
$260
Building and Maintenance Costs 1
Space and Occupancy 43
Maintenance 3
$46
TOTAL $1143
1
1
1
i
1
II COSTS OF ROUTINE AGENDA ITEM
1988
1
Staff Costs
Staff Time /Average Cost /Average
Agenda Item Agenda Item
Clerical 12 hours 138
Planning Staff 8 hours 127
Graphics Staff 1 hour 15
Printing Time 1 hour 20
Camera Crew .5 hour 13
1 Engineering Staff .5 hour 10
$323
Administrative Costs
' Advertising 20
Sending Notices 90
Supplies 20
1 $130
1 Building and Maintenance Costs
Space and Occupancy 43
Maintenance 3
$46
1
1 TOTAL $499
1
1
1
1
1
1
City of Bloomington RECEIVED
Division of City Planning 0 2 1990 1
NOTICE OF FEE INCREASE
Effective January 1, 1991 CfT or ' "'"-. : - ..Li ,
APPLICATION TYPE FEE
PLATS I
Preliminary Plats:
Single and Two Family Lots- -
Basic Fee $ 300.00
Plus Per Lot 50.00
I
Multiple Family, Commercial and Industrial- -
Basic Fee 500.00
Plus Per Lot 100.00 I
Final Plats:
Basic Fee 250.00
Plus Per Lot, Outlot or Excepted Parcel 10.00
Replats for Lot Line Adjustments (No change in number of lots) 100.00
1
WAIVER OF SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS $ 100.00
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS - 1
Principal Uses: -
Two - Family Dwellings $ 250.00 t
All Other Uses 500.00
Accessory and Temporary Uses:
Administratively Approved 25.00
Applications sent directly to the City Council 100.00
I
All other applications- -
First Application 250.00
Renewals 100.00
FINAL SITE AND BUILDING PLANS
Two - Family Dwellings $ 100.00
All other uses 250.00 I
Revisions to Final Site and Building Plans:
Minor Revisions (per Sec. 19.23, City Code) 75.00
Major Revisions 250.00 I
Administrative Approval (When required by Condition of Approval):
Single- or Two - Family Uses 50.00
All other uses 100.00
I
REZONING - Except Planned Developments, or Planning Commission or City Council Initiated $ 1,000.00
PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS
Rezoning to Planned Development (PD) Overlay district
(including Preliminary Development Plan Review) $ 1,500.00
Review of Final Development Plan , 1,000.00
Revised Plans:
Revisions to Preliminary Development Plans 500.00
Revisions to Final Development Plans -- I
Minor Changes - location, placement and height of structures 75.00
Major Changes - rearrangement of lots, blocks or building tracts,
provision of common open space, and all other changes 500.00
1
(See Other Side) 1
1
1 APPUCATION TYPE FEE
I VARIANCES - Per Application 1()0.00
Administrative Variances
Appeal of Denial by Hearing Examiner to Planning Commission 100.00
Variance for Single - Family or Two - Family Dwellings 150.00
1 All Other Variances 300.00
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
I Discretionary Environmental Assessment Worksheet No Fee
Required Environmental Assessment Worksheet 1,000.00
Required Environmental Impact Statement 4,000.00
1 ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - Except those Initiated by the City Council, Planning
Commission or Issuing Authority $ 1,000.00
I ADDITIONAL NOTICES - Applies to all types of applications
Rezoning Applications:
Per Published Notice, in excess one published notices for each of two hearings $ 25.00
I Per Mailed Notice, in excess of 100 notices for each of two hearings 130
All Other Applications
Per Published Notice, in excess one published notice for one hearing 25.00
Per Mailed Notice, in excess of 100 notices for one hearing 1.50
I
PUBUCATIONS
I 6% Minnesota Sales Tax added to all publications sales
Land Development and Zoning Regulations (Includes one zoning map) $ 10.00
Postage and Handling, PAYABLE IN .ADVANCE 2.00
I Zoning Map 2.00
Comprehensive Plan (includes one Land Use Map) 25.00
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map 4.00
I Airport South District Report (Includes one Airport South District Plan Map) 2.50
Airport South District Plan Map 1.00
1
1
1
1
1
1 Adopted by the City Council December 10, 1990
planning\pc \records \fees
RECEW M
k . City of DEC 12 1990 1
Champlin CITY Ur c,r►r,�vF -L S�fy
11955 CHAMPLIN DRIVE CHAMPLIN, MN 55316 -2399 (612) 421 -8100
December 11, 1990
Mr. Paul Krauss
Director of Planning
City of Chanhassen •
690 Coulter Drive
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
Dear Mr. Krauss: 1
Per your inquiry, I have attached the completed survey that you
submitted, a copy of the City's Ordinance that requires all
development escrows to remain at a positive balance. Although the
survey was competed, I thought a more detailed explanation was
necessary. ,
The City of Champlin requires a developer to submit an escrow fee
with the initial application submittal for subdivisions, site
plans, rezonings, etc. This escrow fee is intended to cover all
principal staff time when working on a specific application
(principal staff includes myself, the City Engineer, the City
Administrator, and the Senior Engineering Tech). This escrow fee '
does not, however, cover secretarial time (this is included in the
application fee, as are all the public hearing notification costs) .
Because the application escrow is only an estimate of the review
costs that will be charged to a project, there is a possibility
that the escrow deposit could become deficient, at which time a
developer would be required to submit a second escrow deposit. The
City has adopted an Ordinance that stipulates a project review may
be suspended if a developer's escrow account becomes deficient.
I hope this information is of benefit to your study. If I could
assist you in any way in the future, please contact me at 421 -3055.
Sincerely,
Steven P. Juetten ,
City Planner
Enclosures 1
1
The City of Champlin is an Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer
I CITY _� OF
1 CHANHASSEN
I 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
December 7, 1990 -°
Mr. Larry Lee
I Community Development Director
City of Champlin
11955 Champlin Drive
Champlin, MN 55316
II Dear Mr. Lee:
II The City of Chanhassen is considering a variety of ways to increase
City revenues and redirect programs to be more oriented towards
user fees. Accordingly, we are considering billing developers for
I staff costs associated with reviews of plats, site plans, grading
permits, etc. It is my understanding that many of you may alread
charge these costs to developers. I would appreciate your taking
the time to answer the following questions.
Yes No
I 1. Do you charge staff time for
staff work effort on:
II Plats X
Lot Divisions X
II Site Plans X
Conditional Use
Permits X
Other requests _ _ _
1 2. What costs are allocated:
Planning Staff review - 3Fr A4TTtLit- P ew
Engineering Staff review .ci ►4-rr -E ,
I - Consultant reviews
(Engineering /traffic /City Attorney)
II
11
1
December 7, 1990
Page 2 1
3. Do ou require the escrow of funds to
Y �
cover projected costs? x
4. Do your application fees reflect the
projected cost of staff time for projects? _X_
Please send a copy of any fee schedules and ordinances requiring 1
payment of related costs you may use. Any other comments would be
appreciated.
Sincerely,
;;240F 1
Paul Krauss, AICP
Director of Planning 1
PK:v
1
1
•
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 •
City of
Champlin
f.v„-
I i- y� 3�� = . 11955 CHAMPLIN DRIVE CHAMPLIN, MN 55316 -2399 {612) 421 -8100
1990 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT kEE
SCHED ULE
II Conditional Use Permit:
Agricultural and Residential $ 50
1 Other $ 150
Annual Review $ 25
1 Variance $ 50
1 Subdivision:
Concept Plat $ 100
Preliminary Plat $ 225 + $10 /lot
1 Escrow deposit $ 500 less than 10 acres
(due at preliminary) $1000 10 -50 acres
$1500 50+ acres
II Final Plat $ 100
Planned Unit Development:
1 Concept $ 200 + $500 escrow
Preliminary $ 650 + $20 /acre
Escrow deposit $ 500 less than 10 acres
I (due at preliminary) $1000 10 -50 acres
$1500 50+ acres
Final $ 100
II Site Plan roval 250 +
APP $ $300 escrow $
II Vacation $ 150
1 Rezoning $ 275 + $300 escrow
1 Metes and Bounds Subdivision $ 150 + $300 escrow
II Amendment to Zoning Ordinance Request $ 100
II Waiver of Plat $ 200 + $200 escrow
1 Amendment to Comprehensive Plan $ 300 + $300 escrow
/fees /CDD The City of Champlin is an Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer
11
incurred by the city for engineering, legal or other fees in
connection with making or. completing such improvements. The
cash deposit or letter of credit shall be provided prior to
the issuance of any building permit and shall be valid for a
period of time agreed upon by the City and the developer.
In the event construction of the project is not completed
within the time prescribed by building permits and other
approvals, the city may, at its option, complete the work
required at the expense of the owner and the surety. '
The city may allow an extended period of time for completion
of all landscaping if the delay is due to conditions which
are reasonably beyond the control of the developer.
EXte_nsions which may not exceed nine months, may be granted
due to seasonal or weather conditions. When an extension is
granter:, the city shall require such additional security as
it deenz appropriate.
3. Other SI:?inission Requirements: 1
a. Evidence of ownership or an interest in the property
b. Application signed by applicant and owner of property ,
c. Application fee determined by Resolution of the City
Council from time to time.
The, cash fee in an amount established by the City
Council shall be required to cover City expenses in
raking the necessary studies for plan approval. The
Applicant shall furthermore be responsible for all City
expenses in excess of those covered by the initial
application fee.
If, at any time the cash fee deposited with the City by
the Applicant becomes insufficient to cover City
expenses, the review of such plat shall be suspended.
If an Applicant has additional escrow accounts with the
City of Champlin relating to approval of several plans,
these funds may be intermingled, at the direction of
the City Council, in order to cover City expenses on
all involved plans. Prior to intermingling escrow
funds, the City shall give notice to the Applicant of
the City's intent to intermingle funds and shall afford
the Applicant an opportunity to appear before the City
Council at the next regularly scheduled City Council
meeting after the notice is giver. to the Applicant.
46 1
1
11
1
1
If an escrow account balance is in arrears, the
1 ( Applicant's letter of credit may be drawn upon in the
amount of the deficiency at the direction of the City
Council. Prior to taking any action on the Applicant's
letter of credit, the City shall give thirty days'
notice to the Applicant of the City's intention and
shall afford the Applicant an opportunity to appear
before the City Council after the notice is given to
the Applicant.
13 -108.5 Tenn of Approval.
Construction of the building or initiation of the use
approved under this Ordinance shall begin no later than one
' year following building plan approval. After the expiration
cf such period the approval shall be null and void unless
the City Council grants an extension of time or a building
permit has been issued and substantial work performed on the
' project. Upon request by the applicant, the City Council
ray grant an extension of time fbr a site and building plan
approval following compliance with the notice and public
1 hearing requirements of this section.
13 -108.6 Conditions and Restrictions.
1 The Planning Commission may recommend and the City Council
impose such conditions and restrictions as deemed necessary
to protect the public interest and to secure compliance with
1 requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.
II
1
1
1
1
11 47
1
_ - - :-,
. i9 1990
1507
{? r OF CHANHASSEN
'' city of Cagan 1
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD • THOMAS EGAN
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 -1897 Mayor
PHONE. (612) 454-8100 DAVID K. GUSTAFSON
FAX. (612) 454 -8363 PAMELA McCREA
TIM PAWLENTY
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Members II
December 18, 1990 City TAd HEDGES tr
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
City Clerk
II
MR PAUL KRAUSS
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING II CITY OF CHANHASSEN
•
690 COULTER DRIVE
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 .
Dear Paul: 1
Enclosed is your survey regarding escrow fees and development II costs, Eagan's 1991 fee schedule, a copy of our escrow agreement
(currently in the long overdue process of being updated), and a
recent Ordinance amendment.
While Eagan has been in the process of using these development II
escrow agreements for a few years, there are a number of issues
that we have had to resolve along the way. I would be glad to
II
discuss these with you if you desire. I hope this information
helps.
Merry Christmas!
II
Sincerely,
°
II
Jim Sturm II City Planner
JS/ j s
Attach. I
•
1
1
1
THE LONE OAK TREE...THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
1
Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer
1 CITYOF
f
I i CHANHASSEN
1 ... 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
II v,,/,
December 7, 1990
1
1 Mr. Jim Sturm
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55121
II Dear Jim:
11 The City of Chanhassen is considering a variety of ways to increase
City revenues and redirect programs to be more oriented towards
user fees. Accordingly, we are considering billing developers for
II staff costs associated with reviews of plats, site plans, grading
permits, etc. It is my understanding that many of you may already
charge these costs to developers. I would appreciate your taking
the time to answer the following questions.
II Yes No
I 1. Do you charge staff time for
staff work effort on:
Plats ✓
1
Lot Divisions �' '"t
i
II Site Plans
Conditional Use ✓:
I Permits
Other requests
II 2. What costs are allocated: eive. , , /�(.0.1r-covI
II Planning Staff review
Engineering Staff review
Consultant reviews - -- 't " i'l Vf
(Engineering /traffic /City Attorney) t.,; Vx
P /
t J ■► ,ne-
December 7, 1990 �.
Page 2
3. Do you require the escrow of funds to ✓ (1" r
cover projected costs?
4. Do your application fees reflect the f -rvme, rt./
projected cost of staff time for projects?
Please send a copy of any fee schedules and ordinances requiring(,:
payment of related costs you may use. Any other comments would betf -.L-
appreciated. 414V
Sincerely, r
aul Krauss, AICP
Director of Planning
PK:v r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
1
CITY OF EAGAN
1
DEVELOPMENT ESCROW AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on the day of
, 199_, by and between the CITY OF EAGAN, a
1 municipality of the State of Minnesota, (hereinafter called the
CITY) , and the Developer identified herein.
1 A. The term "Developer" as used herein refers to:
whose address is
WHEREAS, the Developer has applied to the City for approval of
P PP Y PP
the plat or subdivision known as located
within the City; and
WHEREAS, in conjunction with the granting of said approval, the
City is likely to incur certain costs including administrative and
consulting costs involved in the processing of such application, and
the City requires a guaranty that such costs will be paid by the
Developer to avoid unnecessary billings to Developers; and
1 WHEREAS, under authority granted to it, including Minnesota
Statutes Chapters 412 and 462, the City will process the application
' on the condition that the Developer enter into this Development
Escrow Agreement, which agreement defines certain duties and
responsibilities of the Developer, as well as the City, and the
Developer shall provide a bond, letter of credit, or collateral
i agreement in the amount and with conditions satisfactory to the
■ City, providing for the securing to the City the ultimate payment of
11 all such costs incurred by the City; and .
1 1
1
WHEREAS, the City shall account to the Developer
Y p for the
expenditure of the escrow funds on . a periodic basis; ,
NOW THEREFORE, the City and Developer agree as follows:
1. Preliminary Plat Application Escrow. It is understood that ,
the City shall commence to process the preliminary plat application
at such time as this Agreement is executed by all apprbpriate
parties and the escrow required hereunder is posted in a form
acceptable to the City.
2. Final Plat Application /Contract Management Escrow. If at
the time of submission of the application for final plat approval,
the developer has determined to install any public_-street or utility
improvements privately, then the developer shall submit two separate 1
escrows in amounts and with formats satisfactory to the City as
follows:
a. A final plat application escrow relating to processing
final plat applications, review of required submittals and 1
preparation of related agreements, payable at the time the final
plat application is submitted to the City.
b. A contract management escrow shall be paid prior to the
scheduling of a pre - construction meeting for public improvements
installed privately by the Developer or prior to the scheduling of a ,
pre- construction meeting or prior to the issuance of the "permit to
proceed" or prior to the release of the final plat by the City for
recording at Dakota County, whichever occurs first. The contract 1
management escrow is used by the City to cover inspection, agreement
compliance, contract management, and other necessary costs for City 1
approval and /or acceptance of privately installed City improvements,
and other related development requirements.
2 11
1
3. Use of Escrow Funds. The City may draw upon the escrows to
pay its costs necessarily related to the specific purpose for which
the escrow was posted and the City shall determine all of its costs
incurred, including both administrative and consulting services, at
1 the rates normally charged by the City or its consultants,
determined according to City standards. A copy of the current
administrative and consulting rates is attached which rates are
' subject to change by the City Council without notice to the
Developer. (See Exhibit "A ").
4. Conditions of Escrow. The following conditions shall apply
to the subdivision application escrow contemplated under this
Agreement:
' a. City Administrative hourly rates for processing applications
shall be determined at two times the normal hourly rate including
1 all benefits and overhead incurred by the City. (See paragraph 3)
b. Payment shall be made to City consultants, including but not
limited to engineering, legal and planning, in the amounts actually
' billed to the City, according to the customary consulting rates in
effact at that time. (See paragraph 3). Such consulting services or
costs shall reasonably and necessarily relate to the subject matter
of the applications as determined by the City.
c. The City shall determine which escrow accounts shall be
billed in relation to each phase of the application process and any
balances remaining in any particular escrow account may be
' transferred to escrows required for any other applications or
projects being processed through the City by the same developer.
d. The City shall not be responsible for paying any interest on
the escrow accounts contemplated under this Agreement.
3
1
1
e. In the event that there is an inadequate balance in the
escrow account, the City will determine and require additional
deposits to the escrow account to insure continued coverage of costs
required for the completion of the processing of the application.
5. Balances in Escrows. In the event that there are any 1
balances in the escrow accounts upon completion of the development
process, or in the event that an application is withdrawn by the 1
developer, denied by the City or for any reason, is not completed 1
within the time frame required by the City, then the balances shall
be refunded as follows: 1
a. The City shall pay such balances to the applicant /developer
unless written instructions are submitted to the City and signed by 1
the developer and the proposed recipient of the funds, prior to
repayment by the City.
b. In the event that any developer desires to assign its
interest in its escrow, then the developer shall notify the City in
writing of the assignment of its interest. 1
c. In the event that the City fails to refund any balance in an
escrow account contemplated under this Agreement, then the developer
may request payment from the City and the refund shall be made by 1
the City within ninety (90) days of written notice to the City that
the application has been terminated and only after all costs
covering the application or project have been paid in full.
6. Escrow Amounts. The escrow amounts contemplated for each of
the purposes described under this Agreement which may be revised by 1
the City from time to time shall be as follows:
a. Preliminary Plat Application Escrow. A cash escrow at the
4 1
1
1
time of submission of the preliminary plat application in amounts
according to Exhibit "B ".
1 b. Final Plat Application Escrow. A cash final plat
application escrow for privately financed improvements payable at
' the time of submission of the final plat application, in the amounts
provided in Exhibit "B ".
' c. Contract Management Escrow. The contract management escrow
submitted prior to release of the final plat by the City in the
amounts provided in Exhibit "B ". At least one -third of such escrow
shall be in cash with the remaining amounts in such form acceptable
to the City.
7. Reduction of Non -Cash Contract Management Escrow. That
portion of the non -cash contract management escrow contemplated
herein may be reduced upon written request of the developer and upon
' consent of the City, prior to completion of all requirements
contemplated under the preliminary plat escrow provisions of this
' Agreement. It is understood that all amounts contemplated under
this Agreement shall be capable of being converted into cash, and
recoverable on demand by the City, which determination shall be made
' solely within the disctetion of the City.
8. Accounting. The City will provide an accounting of all
expenses charged against each escrow account when requested by a
developer but in no event more often than monthly and also such
accounting will be provided when a request is made by the City to
II replenish the cash portion of any escrow.
9. Terms of Breach. In the event of breach of any terms of
this Agreement by the developer, the City may at its option,
1 5
1
terminate this Agreement and order the developer to cease
P se any
further development or progress under the terms of this Agreement. 1
10. Validity. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence,
clause, paragraph or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held
to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portion of this Agreement.
11. Binding Agreement. The parties mutually recognize and II
agree that all terms and conditions of this Agreement shall run with
the land herein described and shall be binding upon the heirs, II
successors, administrators and assigns of the developers referenced
in this Agreement. 1
12. Amendments. The terms of this Agreement shall not be 1
amended without the written consent of all parties hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals. 1
CITY OF EAGAN
(Date:
By:
Its Mayor
Attest:
Its Clerk
DEVELOPER:
By: / 1
Date
Approved as to Content: Its:
Departm of Public Works And: /
(Date: ) Date
Its: 1
THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY:
MCMENOMY AND SEVERSON, P. A.
Att for the City of Eagan
7300 W 147th Street
Apple Valley, MN 55124
(612) 432 -3136
6 1
1
II
EXHIBIT "A"
1
MCMENOMY AND SEVERSON, P. A.
I City Attorney
1988 .- •
RATE PER HOUR
I General Legal Services $ 120.00
I Paralegal Fees $ 35.00
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES
I 1988
CLASSIFICATION RATE PER HOUR
1 Principal Engineer $ 54.50
I Registered Engineer 49.00
Graduate Engineer & Field Supervisor 39.25
II Senior Draftsman 36.00
Senior Technician 36.25
1 Technician 25.00
I Word Processor 24.25
Clerical 18.50
1 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
Reproduction, Printing, Duplicating • At Invoice Cost
1 Out-of-Pocket Expenses such as Meals, At Actual Cost
Lodging, Stakes, Telephone Calls, etc.
1 Mileage 0.21/mile
1
1
•
1 ........
II
1
Page 2 of 2
URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN, INC. 1
EFFECTIVE 1 -1 -88
STAFF • RATE PER HOUR
•
Principal Planner (1) $ 55.00
Landscape Architect I (2) 38.00
Draftsman 25.00
Secretary 15.50 1
Research Assistant 20.00
Mileage (per mile) .24 1
Materials Cost
1
(1) "Planners -In- Charge" as designated by the State of Minnesota
for 701 Planning and minimum five (5) years experience.
(2) Minnesota Registration by State Board and - minimum five (5)
years experience.
CITY STAFF 1
Director of Public Works $ 57.10 _ 1
Assistant City Engineer 42.72
Engineering Technician 26.92 1
Senior Engineering Technician 34.94
Engineering Intern 16.00
City Planner 48.96
Planner I_ 32.92
Planning Aide 37.72 1
Director of Parks & Recreation 52.86
Landscape Architect 32.92 1
Police Captain 44.40
Maintenance Supervisor 32.92
Maintenance Worker 25.62_
* Employees subject to overtime provisions of FLSA are billed
50% higher when overtime is required.
1
ZXHIBIT "B"
(Developer's Escrow Agreement)
Preliminary Plat Application Escrow (
and
Waiver of Platting Escrow (
$150 per are
' • $1,500 Minimum
$4,800 Maximum
final Plat Application Escrow (
$4,000
1
Contract Management Escrow (1)
1 Xstimated Construction Costs ( Escrow
1 $ 0 - $150,000 8% ($1,000 Minimum)
5150,001 - $500,000 6% ($12,000 Minimum)
5500,001 + 5% ($30,000 Minimum)
1 1
( These are escrow deposits with minimums /maximums, they are not
intended to be actual charges.
( will be verified by City staff and adjusted as necessary to
be comparable to City Projects, thereby insuring armslength
transaction costs.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ORDINANCE NO. ICs 1
CITY OF EAGAN
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA '
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY
CODE CHAPTER 13 ENTITLED "SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (PLATTING)" BY
ADDING SECTION 13.11 REGARDING REQUIREMENTS FOR CITY APPROVAL AND BY
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 13.99.
The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain:
Section 1. Eagan City Code Chapter 13 is hereby amended by adding 1
Section 13.11, to read as follows: '
Subd. 1. City Approval. City approval of a subdivision, rezoning, II conditional use permit, building permit, grading and /or excavation
permit under Section 4.30, or variance shall be granted only if the
applicant and any corporation, partnership, or joint venture in which
the applicant has a twenty -five petcent (25 %) or greater ownership I
interest:
A. Has complied with all relevant statutory and ordinance
requirements.
B. Is in compliance with all ordinance requirements and
conditions of City approval which have been granted to the II
applicant for any matter.
C. Is not more than sixty (60) days delinquent from the date of II
billing in the payment of any fees, charges, special assessments,
and other debts or obligations due the City based upon prior
applications for subdivision, rezoning, conditional use permit,
building permit, grading and /or excavation or variance approval
on any land in the City or resulting development and the
applicant provides sufficient safeguards to assure payment of
existing debts within a reasonable time. '
Subd. 2. Past Delinquent Bills. If an applicant for subdivision,
rezoning, conditional use permit, building permit, grading and /or
excavation or variance approval has a history with the City within _ II
the prior five (5) years of not promptly paying bills within sixty
(60) days from the date of billing in conjunction with such
applications, even though the applicant is not currently delinquent,
the City shall require an escrow equal to 200% of the normal escrow
to guarantee payment of City bills for reviewing the application and
inspecting the development. '
1
t
1
11
Subd. 3. Account Review Board. If any applicant disputes the
11 amount of any outstanding fee, charges, special assessments or other
debt or obligation due the City based on prior applications for
subdivision, rezoning, conditional use permit, building permit,
grading and /or excavation or variance approval on any land in the
City or resulting development, the applicant may request that the
disputed amount be reviewed by the City's Account Review Board.
' The Review Board shall consist of a representative from the following
City departments, Engineering, Finance, Administration and Community
Development.
If after review by the Account Review Board it is determined that the
charges against the applicant's account are correct, all costs
associated with the review will be the responsibility of the
' applicant. If, however, the charges are found to be incorrect, the
costs will be the responsibility of the City.
All undisputed amounts shall be paid prior to Review Board action.
Amounts as determined by the Review Board shall be paid within 30
days of the Review Board determination.
Subd. 4. Waiver. The requirements of this Section may be waived
by the City Council under the following circumstances:
A. The applicant has provided sufficient safeguards to assure
payment of debts or compliance with City requirements within a
reasonable time after the City approval, or
' B. Enforcement of the requirements would result in a significant
hardship to the applicant through no fault of the applicant or
would result in an otherwise unfair situation.
Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including 'Penalty for
'
Violation'" and Section 13.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are
hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated
verbatim.
,Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its
adoption and publication according to law.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Eagan this 10th day of
July, 1990.
' CITY OF EAGAN
Thomas A. Egan, Mayor
1
1
ATTEST:
Qw�Vi
E. Vanoverbeke, City Clerk
Date Ordinance Adopted: July 10, 1990.
Date Ordinance Published in Legal Newspaper: July 19, 1990. 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
SUBDIVISION AND PLATTING
II 1991
FEE TYPE FEE
II Final Plat $100.00 Require Escrow
+$3 /lot Deposits Per
Development
'° Escrow Policy
Preliminary Plat 300.00
II Rezoning 250.00
Planned Dev. 250.00
I PD- Annual Review 25.00
Conditional Use Permit Initial 150.00
Renewal - CUP 25.00
II Variance 75.00
I Waiver of Plat Duplex Lot Splits 50.00
Others (Except Single 150.00 Requires escrow per
Family Zoned Property) development escrow
II policy.
Single Family Zoned Property 300.00 (No Escrow)
Special Permit 50.00
1 Interim Use Permit 75.00
II Grading /Excavation Permits
If Preliminarily Platted 250.00
Not Preliminarily Platted 0 -5 Acres $150.00
II Each Acre Over 5 Acres
$50.00 /Acre
($550 Maximum)
II Renewal 150.00
Utility Permits
I Utility Companies 10.00
Permit For Construction 20.00
in City Right -of -Way (does not
II include residential boulevard
tree planting)
1 Assessment Search 10.00
Vacation Proceedings 300.00
1 Industrial Revenue Bond and
Multifamily Housing Bond
Processing Fee 500.00
II Market Analysis Study 50.00
II 6
II
1
1991
PEE TYPE FEE 1
Zoning Map 5.00
Zoning Regulations (City Code -
Chapter 11) 10.00
Liquor Regulations (City Code -
Chapter 5) 10.00
Subdivision Regulations (City Code- '
Chapter 13) 10.00
Traffic Regulations (City
g ( Y Code-
Chapter 8) 3.00
Parking Regulations (City Code -
Chapter 9) 3.00
Sign Regulations 2.50 '
City Code Each Chapter (All
Chapters Except 5,8,9,11,13) 5.00
Code Book 60.00
Code Book with Binder 75.00 1
City Code Updates 10.00
Street Name Change Application 100.00
Comp. Plan Amendment 300.00 '
Water Quality Management Plan 50.00
Water Quality Classification Map 5.00 1
Comprehensive Storm Water Mgmt. Plan 50.00
Trunk Storm Sewer Drainage Map 2.50
Comp. Water Supply /Distribution Plan 50.00 '
Trunk Water System Map 2.50
Comp Sanitary Sewer Policy /Plan 50.00 1
Trunk Sanitary System Map 2.50
Plans and Specifications 50.00
1
. 1
11 INSPECTION FEES
II 1991
FEE TYPE FEE
I Building Permit Based on Value - See Attached
Building Permit Fee Schedule
I Building Permits for Selected Work at
Existing Residences:
Basement Remodel /Finish • 35.00
II Deck 25.00
Fireplace /Fireplace Stove 25.00
Demolition Permit 15.00
Disposal Permit 10.00
II Electrical Permit See Attached ,Electrical
Inspection Fee Schedule
Heating, Ventilating and Air See Attached Mechanical
1 Conditioning Permit Fee Schedule
Moving Permit 15.00 Plus Cost of
l Repairs and Escrow
Plumbing and Gas Fitting See Attached Plumbing
Permit Fee Schedule
II
Process Piping See Attached Mechanical
Permit Fee Schedule
II Sign Permit 2.50 per square foot
1 Wind Energy, Radio and Based on Value - See
Television Tower Permit Attached Building Permit
Fee
1 Plan Check (Valuation 65% of Building Permit Fee
over $10,000)
I Foundation Permit Based on Value - See Attached
Building Permit Fee Schedule
I Replacement Building Permit
Field Card 5.00
Lot Transfer Fee (Bldg. Permit) 50.00
I Processing Fee on Cancelled Permits One half of Plan
Review Fee
' Duplicate Certificate of Occupancy 5.00
11 8
11
RECEIVE()
C ITY c:: F , v DEC 12 1990 1
? t r ur Lhilvi�ASSEN
i II
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 II
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
1
December 7, 1990
1
Mr. Dave Lindahl II City Planner
City of Eden Prairie
7600 Executive Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344 1
Dear Dave:
The City of Chanhassen is considering a variety of ways to increase 1
City revenues and redirect programs to be more oriented towards
user fees. Accordingly, we are considering billing developers for II staff costs associated with reviews of plats, site plans, grading
permits, etc. It is my understanding that many of you may already
charge these costs to developers. I would appreciate your taking
the time to answer the following questions. 1
Yes No
1. Do you charge staff time for 1
staff work effort on: p1 one-Jiro,
Plats - / V ' r 'When i fiCA
Lot Divisions 0 wrallof
Site Plans V 1
Conditional Use
at Permits 1
Other requests
2. What costs are allocated: 1
Planning Staff review freihMrthit Oaf rrvieur
il
Engineering Staff review 1f' S1 f nLr.l4. reoftr
Consultant reviews ( 1
(Engineering /traffic /City Attorney)
II
II
1
December 7, 1990
Page 2
' 3. Do you require the escrow of funds to
cover projected costs?
4. Do your application fees reflect the
projected cost of staff time for projects?
Please send a copy of any fee schedules and ordinances requiring
payment of related costs you may use. Any other comments would be
appreciated.
Sincisprel ,
' Paul Krauss, AICP
Director of Planning
PK:v
1
1
1
1 •
1
r
1
1
r c-
�- 2.30 SIGNS (Section 11.70)
� U�
Up to 33 square feet in size $12.00
33 square feet through 60 squre feet in size $15.00
61 square feet to 100 square feet in size $18.00
Each additional 100 square feet or portion thereof not 0�
exceeding 300 square feet additional - per year $ 2.00 --
Each additional 100 square feet or portion thereof over
a total of 403 square feet additional $ 2.50
Fees shall not be pro-rated for a period of time less than shown.
The surfaces of double or multi-faced signs shall be combined for
the purpose of determining the amoumt of the fee.
2.31 SEPTIC SYSTEM PUMPING (Section 10.02) $ 5.03
2.32 WATER SOFTENING AND FILTERING (Chapter 10) $ 5"00 11
2"33 WELLS (Section 10.04) $15.[0
Development Fees
2"34 FLA44E} UNIT DEVELCPMENT (P.U.D.) (Section 11.40) ��
--
$500 minimum + $5/acre
�
PLANNED UNIT 41201404T ��� AMB��VT m�
��
$500 minimum + $5/acre -
2.35 ZONING (Section 11.77)
Residential 0�
0-10 units - $300 +$5/unit
11 or more - $400 + $5/unit
Commercial, Industrial, Office, Public
0-3 acres - $3{0+ $25/acre N�
3.1 or more acres - $400 + $25/acre
2"36 FLATTING (Section 12.04)
Residential
0-10 units - $3{O+ $5/unit N�
11 or more - $400 + $5/unit ~~
Commercial Industrial Office, Public
0-3 acres - $300 + $25/acre
3.1 or more acres ~- $400 + $25/acre N�
��
II * ■ SITE FLON REVIEW
.
Multi�family
0-10 units - $3()0 min + $5/unit
11 or more units - $400 min + $5/unit
Commercial, industrial„ Office, Public
@�
0+3 acres - $3{N + $25/acre
3 or more acres- $400+ $25/acre
2.37 CASH PARK FEES (Section 12.40)
Single family unit $ 760"00
All other residential $ 760.00 per unit
Office, commercial, industrial $2690.00/acre
2.38 SHORE]-AND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE PERMITS (11.50)
� Temporary structure in public waters $ 10.00
Change in structure in public waters $ 10.00
Multiple dock or dock in excess of 75' $ 10~00
Variance request for dock in authorized
dock use area $ 10.00
Utility charges (Section 3.02)
2.39 SYSTEM ACCESS CHARGES
� = A. For Metropolitan sanitary sewer: as established by the
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission.
sanitary B. For sanitary sewer - $250 per R.E.C. plus $120"00
-- $500 each Metro SAC for industrial, public, office - plus $120.00
$750 each Metro SAC for commercial - plus $120
m� For water - $490 per R.E.C.
$980 each Metro SAC for industrial, public, office.
$1470 each Metro SAC for commercial.
2.40 USER CHARGES
N� A. Sanitary sewer - $1.90 per 1,{0x} gallons subject to minimum of
4,000 gallcxns per quarter per R.E.C.
N� B. Water - $.95 per 1,000 gallons subject to a minimum of
|�
40{00 gallons per quarter per R.E.C.
C. The minimum monthly use charge for uses other than residential
N� shall be the same as 1 R.E.C.
D. A residential equivalent connection (R.E.C.) is one dwelling unit.
II ( E. In addition to the charges in A., Bop C.!, and D. each R.E.C.
will be billed: $6"25 fixed charae for water and $6.25 fixed
charge for sewer per quarter"
F. U.metemed residential sewer only use charoes are $20.65 per
��
K quarter per R.E.C. plus a $6.25 fixed charge.
G. Penalty for billed charges: 1% per month on account not paid
within 30 days of billing.
2.41 WATER/SEWER CONNECTION FEE (Section 3.07)
v�
A. In addition to applicable charges listed above, a connection
fee of $7400 per single unit is applicable if the property has
not participated in the cost of the utilities by other methods.
SECTION 3. OT}ER FEES, RATES AND CHARGES
3.1 GUIDE P-MN3 CHANGE N�
SLICK) minimum + $5/acre
3.2
ENV I FONivafTAL ASSESSt"EyT W0R1431-÷I�' (E.A.W.) 1
$34N minimum + $5/acre
(
& 3.3 ENGINEE�(ING GEF:VI[ES TO LAND [evE]_[FeFs
For consultations, utility and street plans and specifications,
- general and final inspection of improvements and special N�
assensnent division (collected at time of final plat):
Residential
Per unit $40.00/unit (minimum $250.00) �
Commercial, Industrial, Office and Public
Per acre $100.00 per acre (minimum $250.00)
Plus cost of review by special consultants necessary as determined
by the City Manager. Deposit required.
Administrative Land Division $50.00
3.31 CHA�S FOR F�BLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OR EASB1ENT VACATION FEE ~~
�
Application fee per each transaction for vacating the
City's interest in real property, including right-of-way
and easements (for consultation, review, notice mailing,
publication of notice, and recording). $100.00
3.4 PFTEAL TO BUILDING AND ZONING AFFEPLS $ 20"CK)
1
1
1 � �� ��
���-,
~- �� 3.5 ZONING AMBNJIvE]VT AND ZONING AFFEAL (Appealing to Building Code Board
� of Appeals)
Zoning amendment , $2A0.o0
Variances:
Residential (includes residential zoned properties for
new construction, building additions, decks,
� new construction, porches, garages, accessory
structures, etc.) $ 75.00
Other (includes variances associated with properties
zoned office, industrial, commerical. Variances
associated with platting of property and new
construction within the plot.) $125.00
� Plus cost of review by City Staff and/ol- special consultants necessary
as determined by the City Manager. Deposit Required.
N� 3.6 SPECIAL ASSESSINT SEARCHES
$10.00 per parcel. No charge for Eden Prairie residents on searches of
their homesteaded propertv.
.
3.7 MAPS AND PRINTING
~~~^ $ .50 per square foot for miscellaneous printing"
$3.00 each for small size (2' x 3' or less) City maps.
$5.00 each for large size City maps.
� $12.50/acre for Mark Hurd Co. topography maps previously purchased by
the city, except $5.00/sheet if topo map puchased by other than
City and with original purchaser's permission. New order through
Mark Hurd Co. - their original charge plus $.50/acre.
1�
Duplicating costs: $"50 for the first 5 pages of any file and $.25 for
N� each additional page, plus postage, if any.
$75 annual charge for City Council Minutes (pro-rated)
$50 annual charge for Planning Commission minutes (pro-rated)
3.8 COMMUNITY CBNOEM
A. Ice Arena
Rental - prime-time = $E2"50/hour (with applicable tax)
Non prime-time = $41.25/hour plus tax (3 a.m. to 2 p.m. on days
when school is in session.
School District Educational Classes = $20.C)0/hour
.
School District Hockey Team practice, Hockey Association of Eden
K Prairie, Eden Prairie Figure Skating Club and any other [on-
I oumity Group that bc mo xzks a minim� of 100 hours of ice time: prime-time = $77.50/hour, non prime-time = $38.75/hour.
��
2 G 1990
t City of C! i l yr tdrf„a,n,,;
NIIaple Grove
9401 Fernbrook Lane, Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369 -9790 612- 420 -4000
December 20, 1990
Mr. Paul Krauss, AICP '
Director of Planning
City of Chanhassen
690 Coulter Drive
PO Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Dear Paul: ,
Attached is our response to your survey on cost recovery for various forms of
development review.
Regarding your question on consultant fees, almost all of these fees are relative
to public improvement projects which are always administered by the City.
Consultant fees for feasibility or traffic studies, etc. are allocated to their
appropriate project and assessed accordingly.
Although not much of it is relevant to development fees and charges, I have
attached Chapter 5 of the City code which relates to all city fees, charges, and
rates. The section most pertinent to your survey can be found in Section 550,
Planning and Zoning Fees and Charges.
I hope this information will be helpful. Should you have any questions or need '
further information, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
. //—t°:".P4641/'
Bob Waibel
City Planner
bjr '
11
"Serving Today, Shaping Tomorrow"
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
James Deane David Burtness Charles F. Dehn Donald) Ramstad Donna Ryon
Mayor Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember
Printed on Recycled Paper
.. . 4 v
C I TYOF
� t
ClIANIIASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
December 7, 1990
1
Mr. Bob Waibel, AICP
City of Maple Grove
9104 Fernbrook Lane
Maple Grove, MN 55369
Dear Bob:
The City of Chanhassen is considering a variety of ways to increase
City revenues and redirect programs to be more oriented towards
user fees. Accordingly, we are considering billing developers for
staff costs associated with reviews of plats, site plans, grading
permits, etc. It is my understanding that many of you may already
charge these costs to developers. I would appreciate your taking
the time to answer the following questions.
Yes No
1. , Do you charge staff time for
staff work effort on:
Plats X
Lot Divisions X
Site Plans
X
Conditional Use
Permits X
Other requests
2. What costs are allocated:
Planning Staff review See attached "Final Platting Costs" Sheet.
Engineering Staff review See attached "Final Platting Costs" Sheet
' Consultant reviews See attached "Final Platting Costs" Sheet
(Engineering /traffic /City Attorney)
1
1
1
December 7, 1990
Page 2 1
3. Do you require the escrow of funds to
cover projected costs? X
4. Do your application fees reflect the
projected cost of staff time for projects? X
Please send a copy of any fee schedules and ordinances requiring 1
payment of related costs you may use. Any other comments would be
appreciated. 1
Sinc ely,
Paul Krauss, AICP
Director of Planning 1
PK:v
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1 1
1
1
II FINAL PLATTING.COSTS FOR
1. ASSESSMENT FEE: $
II $3.00 /Lot (x) Lots (x) +1 Levies =
2. STREET SIGNS: $
1 $150. /Sign (x) Street Name Signs = $
$150. /Sign (x) Stop Sign(s) _ $
II $150. /Sign (x) Misc. Sign(s) = $
II 3. ENGINEERING FEE FOR REVIEW OF PLANS, FINAL INSPEC., ETC. $
Survey Monuments and Misc. = $100.00 or $250.00 .
1 - 4. _FINAL PLATTING FEE: $ _
II $7.50 /Lot (x) Lots = $
(or $100.00, whichever is greater, for plats
with more than 3 lots)
II 5. PARK DEDICATION FEE: $
II 6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF TIME $
II 7. STREETLIGHT CHARGE: $
Lights (x) $ /Light /Year = $
SUB- TOTAL: $
1 8. ATTORNEY FEE: Abstract Review $75.00 each $
Surety Review $50.00 each $
1 Developer's Agreement 5300.00 $
Document Filing $
11 TOTAL: $
1 By
II Date
11 ( 7 / l�� pm) /1 Uivri+tsz.
II
Public Improvements 1
1. Feasibility Report 1
a) Escrow b) Consultant Charge Schedule
2. Plans and Specifications 1
a) Consultant Charge Schedule
3. Improvement Cost Surety 1
Residential - 60% of estimated cost - based on feasibility report estimate
Commercial /.Industrial - 40% of estimated cost based on feasibility reoort
estimate
Platting
1. See final platting fees 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
j ka_a re _ 550:00
II (Rev. 1989)
Section 550 - Plannin. and Zonin. F-es and Char.es
(—
11 (Amended, Ord. Nos. 81 -06; 83 -26, Sec. 8, 86 -10, Sec. 1)
Section 550:00. Planning and Zoning Fees Established. Fees and charges for
II Planning and Zoning related matters are hereby established in the amounts set forth
in the Subdivisions which follow:
II Subd. 1. Planning.
Code
Para. No. Section Type of Fee Amount
r (a) 350:12, Preliminary Plat - $250 + $5 per lot cash deposit
Subd. 1 Residential to be applied to Staff review
expenses
(b) 350:12, Preliminary Plat - $250 + $20 per acre cash deposit
Subd. 1 Commercial to be applied to Staff review
II expenses
(c) 350:15, Final Plat $100 + Escrow for Attorney and
I Subd. 2;
350:36, Engineering expenses
Subd. 1
II (d) Lot Split $100
(3 lots or less)
(I
I (e) 350:66, Variance, Appeal $125
Subd. 1
II (f) (Repealed, Ord. No. 89 -32, Sec. 3)
(g) 350 :67 Initial Petition
to Vacate Street
II or Easement $250
Each Additional
II Petition Related to
and Processed with
Initial Petition $100
II (Added, Ord. No. 84 -36, Sec. 2)
(h) Amendment to
II Comprehensive Plan $200
(Amended, Ord. No. 89 -32, Sec. 4)
II
II-
ft Cara -
550:00, Subd. 2
(Rev. 1989)
• C Subd. 2. Zoning.
Code 11
Para. No. Section Type .of fee Amount
(a) 375:36, Sewage Disposal System 1
Subd. 2 Plan Review Fee $ 75
(b) 375:105, Use Permit, Flood
Subd. 8 Plain District $150 II
(c) 375:114, Planned Unit $250 + $20 per acre II Subd. 4 Development, Concept cash deposit to be applied
Plan, Application to Staff review expenses
Development Plan - $200 + $5 per lot cash
Residential deposit to be applied to II
Staff review expenses
II
Development Plan - $200 +
P 52 $20 per acre cash
Commercial deposit to be applied to
Staff review expenses 1
Final Plan Escrow for Attorney and
( Engineering Expenses 1
(Amended, Ord. No. 89 -32, Sec. 5)
(d) 375:117, Site Plan Review $250
II
Subd. 2
(e) 375:120, Conditional Use $200
II
Subd. 1 Permit
(f) 375:120, Zoning Text Amendment $125
Subd. 1
II
(g) 375:123, Variance, Appeal $150
Subd. 2 1
(Amended, Ord. No. 89 -32, Subd. 6)
(h) 375:120, Rezoning 1
Subd. 1
Change from R -A or R -1 $100 + $20 per acre (Maximum
Fee of $500) II
Change from any other $200 + $20 per acre (Maximum
zoning classification Fee of $500) 1
(._ (1) 375:126 Certificate of Occupancy $ 25
II
II
II
CITYOF
1i 1111111111111r 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
RECEIVED
1 DEC 1 21990
December 7, 1990
CIO",
Mr. Dwight Picha
' Community Development Director
City of Woodbury
8301 Valley Creek Road
Woodbury, MN 55125
Dear Mr. Picha:
The City of Chanhassen is considering a variety of ways to increase
City revenues and redirect programs to be more oriented towards
user fees. Accordingly, we are considering billing developers for
staff costs associated with reviews of plats, site plans, grading
permits, etc. It is my understanding that many of you may already"
charge these costs to developers. I would appreciate your taking
the time to answer the following questions.
Yes No
1. Do you charge staff time for
staff work effort on:
Plats
Lot Divisions
Site Plans v
Conditional Use
Permits
Other requests
2. What costs are allocated:
Planning Staff review
Engineering Staff review 7
Consultant reviews
(Engineering /traffic /City Attor ey)
1
1
•
December 7, 1990
Page 2 1
3. Do you require the escrow of funds to
cover projected costs?
4. Do your application fees reflect the
projected cost of staff time for projects?
Please send a copy of any fee schedules and ordina es requiring r
payment of related costs you may use. Any other comments would be
appreciated. r
Since ly
Paul Krauss, AICP
Director of Planning 1
PK:v
1
r
1
r
r
r
r
r
r
1
1
r
II CITY OF WOODBURY, MINNESOTA
II PLANNING FEES
II APPLICATIONS FEE ESCROW
II SPECIAL USE PERMIT
$ 50 Initial Application
II Signs & Miscellaneous $ 40/Year or Accessory
Storage - Home Occupation $ 90 /Year $150
Entertainment $250 /Year Permanent Uses
0 -40 acres $ 750.00
II 41 -80 acres $1,000.00
II REZONING $150.00 1 acre or less 0 -40 acres $ 750.00
$300.00 over 1 acre 41 -80 acres $1,000.00
Over 80 acres $1,250.00
11 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
General Plan $300.00 0 -40 acres $ 750.00
II 41 -80 acres $1,000.00
Final plan $300.00 Over 80 acres $1,250.00
II SUBDIVISION
Minor $ 25.00 per proposed parcel $150.00
II Preliminary Plat $100.00 plus $1.00 per lot 0 -40 acres $ 750.00
41 -80 acres $1,000.00
Final Plat $100.00 Over 80 acres $1,250.00
II SITE PLAN REVIEW -
0 40 acres $ 750.00
Initial Application $100.00 41 -80 acres $1,000.00
II Over 80 acres $1,250.00
Revisions $ 50.00
II VARIANCES
Residential $ 25.00
I Commercial and $ 50.00
Industrial $ 50.00
II
II City Council Approved April 12, 1989
II
1
1
RETURNED SURVEYS FROM COMMUNITIES THAT DO NOT 1
CHARGE DEVELOPERS FOR RELATED STAFF COSTS 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
P
:.._ fi_rr
,ego
t HSS� N
. 0 l ‘ ... 4 ClIANHASSZIT
I 690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 .i
1 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
December 7, 1990
1
Mr. Gregory Konat
I Con+muni ty Development Director
City of Burnsville
100 Civic Center Parkway
1 Burnsville, MN 5,5337
Dear Mr. Konat:
1 The City of Chanhassen is considering a variety of ways to increase
City revenues and redirect programs to be more oriented towards
user fees. Accordingly, we are considering billing developers for
1 staff costs associated with reviews of plats, site plans, grading
permits, etc. It is my understanding that many of you may already
charge these costs to developers. I would appreciate your taking
1 the time to answer the following questions.
Yes No
1 1. Do you charge staff time for
staff work effort on:
I Plats 7
Lot Divisions X
Site Plans )C
1 Conditional Use X
Permits
Other requests X
1 2. What costs are allocated:
I Planning Staff review
Engineering Staff review
I Consultant reviews W-e_ (L( 2- _
(Engineering /traffic /City Attorney) . cam'
•
1
December 7, 1990
Page 2 1
3. Do you require the escrow of funds to
cover projected costs? 1
4. Do your application fees reflect the
projected cost of staff time for projects?
Please send a copy of any fee schedules and ordinances requiring
payment of related costs you may use. Any other comments would be
appreciated.
Sincerely,
aul Kra ss, AICP •
Director of Planning
PK:v
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ADDENDUM TO DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
■ AGREEMENT TO PAY CITY PROFESSIONAL FEES
■
I CASE N0.
APPLICANT NAME
11 ADDRESS OF PROPERTY INVOLVED
I /WE, THE UNDERSIGNED APPLICANT, HEREBY AGREE THAT I /WE WILL
PAY ALL OUTSIDE FEES AND CHARGES THAT MAY BE INCURRED BY THE CITY
FOR PLANNING, ENGINEERING, LEGAL AND ANY OTHER PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES DIRECTLY RELATED TO AND INCURRED BY THE CITY DURING THE
EXAMINATION, REVIEW AND PROCESSING OF THIS APPLICATION, AND
DURING ANY NECESSARY ENFORCEMENT ACTION SUBSEQUENT TO THIS
REQUEST. I /WE UNDERSTAND THAT THE APPLICANT FEE IS ONLY AN
ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGE INTENDED TO DEFRAY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH
CITY STAFF SERVICES AND RESOURCES REQUIRED FOR THE PROCESSING OF
' THIS REQUEST. IF A DETERMINATION IS MADE BY THE CITY THAT
OUTSIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARE NECESSARY FOR THE REVIEW AND
PROCESSING OF THIS APPLICATION, THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR MAY REQUIRE THE APPLICANT TO ENTER INTO A DEVELOPMENT
ESCROW AGREEMENT AND DEPOSIT FUNDS IN ESCROW WITH THE CITY. THE
SUM TO BE DEPOSITED WILL BE BASED UPON THE ANTICIPATED DIRECT
COSTS TO THE CITY. THE CITY WILL ALSO MAKE EVERY REASONABLE
EFFORT POSSIBLE TO KEEP THESE CHARGES TO A MINIMUM, YET STILL
PROVIDE THE NEEDED LEVEL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. IF DIRECT
COSTS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARE IN EXCESS OF FUNDS PLACED IN
ESCROW, THEN ADDITIONAL ESCROW FUNDS MAY BE REQUIRED TO BE
SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FURTHER PROCESSING OF THE REQUEST. OTHERWISE
ANY FEES RESULTING IN CHARGES ABOVE THE ESCROW FUNDS PLACED ON
DEPOSIT WILL BE BILLED AND PROMPTLY PAID BY THE APPLICANT PRIOR
TO THE FINAL DISPOSITION OF THE REQUEST BY THE CITY. IF DIRECT
COSTS TO THE CITY ARE LESS THAN THE SUM PLACED IN ESCROW, THEN
THE BALANCE WILL BE REFUNDED TO THE APPLICANT UPON FINAL
11 DISPOSITION OF THE REQUEST BY THE CITY.
11 SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
DATE
1
i
CITYOF 1
it ti /4 • „: CHANHASSEN i
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 1
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
� 1 ili
December 7, 1990
DEC 10 1990
Mr. Blair Tremere
Community Development Director CITY OF PLYMOUTH 1
City of Plymouth COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447 1
Dear Blair:
The City of Chanhassen is considering a variety of ways to increase 1
City revenues and redirect programs to be more oriented towards
user fees. Accordingly, we are considering billing developers for II staff costs associated with reviews of plats, site plans, grading
permits, etc. It is my understanding that many of you may already
charge these costs to developers. I would appreciate your taking
the time to answer the following questions. 1
Yes No
1. Do you charge staff time for 1
staff work effort on:
Plats y 11
Lot Divisions f/
Site Plans a/ 1
Conditional Use 1
Permits ✓
Other requests ✓
2. What costs are allocate 4. ti+
wow‘ ? II
Planning Staff review 1
Engineering Staff review CC t
RECEIVED Consultant reviews to t5 t
' lo rt 4cc .t c ' 414 S 1
(Engineering /traffic /City Attorney)
DEC 13 1990
CITY OF CHANtio ath, - 1
1
December 7, 1990
1 Page 2
3. Do you require the escrow of funds to ✓
1 cover projected costs?
4. Do your application fees reflect the
projected cost of staff time for projects?
Please send a copy of any fee schedules and or•••-. - requiring
payment of related costs you may use. An • er comments N.uld be
1 appreciated.
Sincerely, ��++
4 m i- se tt tttca o.1
1 A CLlco.t kited A S si^cioN
aul Krauss, AICP
1 Director of Planning
PK:v
1
1
1 SO P k + .
Q 4 rt cu .t1 t eo c w
a SN s }-tw e_ t • 'f" Z sf �i�� 5 ��
1 GtI . 1t. & C e rv.- t t w'• .
1 CD (0- )0041.l,K,rh a(sv ittet on escow
s14
1 0 toll 0.4. 4•44 'GI s fte..... , f
1 htIf e.4-4 tewaL., to Vt4w•d a S
• 1". 4
S '�t - of - 'C�e- �- � ii Aii4 ft
1 �te 5 t��i�c a� ' Gt f/ of k- a"
1 AAL,,44,4. y (k-a 40 ,..P.-744....,).
e . r thy s w4 j 1 tvc.,k
1 � F3 ,Q c,.—�P
�, , F 'M
ai2.4r
430 Q Io +A yr f ttl -e4ty .3 •
1 -t- l.1 rte 4 1f 445 t4.wt -t. "/
4...# Kd ►�r'v cr -s-4 -V c c s eS
�h , Sam 4 ( - ` -t s�Acdm -am c_Itii_ ,e—
1 +-• 5,—....,4 .---oc les 5 F• caAr j .
Illirb PLANNIM AND ZONIKV APPLICATIM FEES
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, M 55447
550-5052 II
ii
II
ZOUSATIM iMS
1
***Conditional Use Permits $ 120.00
Home Occupation $ 90.00
Renewal $ 30.00
** Comprehensive Plan Awendments $ 360.00
**Land Use Guide Plan Anendents $ 360.00
II
Planned Unit Development Plans
**Concept Plan $ 360.00 PLUS appropriate fees per
this schedule for any. variances and any II
Land Use Guide Plan
**Preliminary Plan $ 120.00 PLUS appropriate fees per
1
this schedule for Conditional Use
Permit, any Rezoning, and Preliminary
Plat.
1
Final Plan $ 120.00 PLUS appropriate fees per.
this schedule for Final Plat.
II
Plats, Divisions, Consolidations
**Preliminary Plat $ 250.00 Minimum or, $18.00 per acre
to be platted PLUS $10.00 per lot and
II
outlot.
Final. Plat $ 120.00
1
Lot Division $ 120.00 per each new parcel.
Lot Consolidation $ 60.00
1
** Rezonings
Frum FRD District $ 300.00
II
Fran All Other Districts $ 360.00
Site Plans $ 240.00
*Revised Site Plans $ 120.00 II
Sketch Plans • $1,000.00
II ***Variances
Zoning Variance with Site Plan $ 60.00 per application
All Other Zoning Ordinance and
Subdivision Variances $ 90.00 II
Zoning Ordinance (1..xt Amencknent) $ 120.00
II
1
1
Fee Schedule
Side Sao
1
PA!P: Fees are payable in cash or check to the "City of Plymouth" at the
time of submission of the complete application.
AMENDED PLAN FEES: Whenever a developer, subdivider, or other applicant
1 submits altered or modified plans, other than those directed by the City, as
an ant to a proposal, the full appropriate new application fee shall be
paid before the amendment is referred to the Planning Commission or City
REFUNDS: Fees may not be refunded unless the applicant, in writing, withdraws
the application prior to its submission to the Planning Commission, Board of
' Zoning Adjustment, or City Council.
*PEiI® SIZE PLAN FEES: When plans are submitted after the City Council
1 approval has either expired or has been extended but where no substantive
changes have been made to the plans other than required by Code or Ordinance;
when plans have been submitted proposing minor structural and /or minor site
expansions or modifications, as provided by the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance.
* *SIQ FEE: Additional fee of $150.00 for required signage.
' * **SIGNspa. FEE: Additional fee of $150.00 for required signage a non-
residential site which is within 500 lineal feet of any residential property.
1
1
1
1
1
1
(formns:o >pl /fee.sched /s) 11/89
11
CITY OF
ii
CIIANHASSEN
I
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
0 -
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
Ea •
December 7, 1990 .1
EC t
V i
Mr. Dean Johnson CZC 17 1990
City of Rosemount 1
2875 145th Street W. CITY ur c,r�n ,_
_.,,,.
Rosemount, MN 55068
Dear Dean:
1
The City of Chanhassen is considering a variety of ways to increase
City revenues and redirect programs to be more oriented towards 1
user fees. Accordingly, we are considering billing developers for
staff costs associated with reviews of plats, site plans, grading
permits, etc. It is my understanding that many of you may already
charge these costs to developers. I would appreciate your taking
II
the time to answer the following questions.
Yes No 1
1. Do you charge staff time for
staff work effort on: 1
f%ry a — GA`'t '-'r 1 u • ^ ~ �
r Plats
Lot Divisions I
2,r(D T ,_xl rr, G�� Site Plans _4_
i el roc- c._- 6tic-c
1
� Conditional Use NA
. 4 6 d9v' ` f % Permits
j / , 40.-ic Other requests
X
2. What costs are allocated:
II
Planning Staff review `' �a 70 P a
Engineering Staff review le S J 1 0` 7[ kok.fa eu f `( -P 11 A Li" `� 4V.
Consultant reviews — / i lee,(
(Engineering /traffic /City Attorney) II
II
II
1
December 7, 1990
1 Page 2 w-e_ Q -s- -Q 7
3. Do you require the escrow of funds to Jt,�J e-e-i-v eA. A >.4 cover projected costs?
I 4. Do your application fees reflect the '
projected cost of staff time for projects?
1 Please send a copy of any fee schedules and ordinances requiring
payment of related costs you may use. Any other comments would be
I appreciated.
5inc ly
1 Vi
Paul Krauss, AICP
1 Director of Planning
PK:v
1
__--- j
1
L __12_, -7
Z ) -> i,AAAcv \-- & 12- 7 (-) — f,)--e_..A.-1 c ----
.� \J 2 r;. - .
1 v
I f j\.� i , 1 A ...e ,
I
a_ tz----et--)''-
. .
I .
1( p ,,,.„..,„ C
l trPe
r
.6"_, c ..,}1
1
/-, („ (A,i 1 4 64- , i'q (
1 .. ,or-iitt 6(z tit-a) /
(6 - " --( - 1 if 6.64 " -v ‘ 1411/1 V- l
1 _
1 -19).
.. CITYOF I
4
-,.-
010,,, CI1ANIIASSEN i
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 I
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
1
December 7, 1990 RECEIVED (,),-g-t*
DEC -� / dj ,
1 1 1990
Ms. Barbara Dacy, AICP CITY OF 0 1 /m4rIASSEN
City of Fridley
1 1 ° 1/11 (/(9,--/‘"-- I
6431 University Ave. N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Dear Barbara: L 1
The City of Chanhassen is considering a variety of ways to increase
1
City revenues and redirect programs to be more oriented towards
user fees. Accordingly, we are considering billing developers for
staff costs associated with reviews of plats, site plans, grading
permits, etc. It is my understanding that many of you may already
1
charge these costs to developers. I would appreciate your taking
the time to answer the following questions.
Yes No II
1. Do you charge staff time for
staff work effort on: II
Plats ,_3
Lot Divisions # , ,
Site Plans OAF
Conditional Use X
Permits
C;
Other requests
1
2. What costs are allocated:
Planning Staff review I
Engineering Staff review
Consultant reviews
t a aRk-J
I
(Engineering /traffic /City Attorney) S
n 4A ir k , :Ce j )h44()Ut/
December 7, 1990
Page 2
3. Do you require the escrow of funds to X
cover projected costs? �\
4. Do your application fees reflect the \/
projected cost of staff time for projects? _
Please send a copy of any fee schedules and ordin- es 7- iring
payment of related costs you may use. Any other comments would be
' appreciated.
Sincere y, 1 * 2 10
j �A
2,‹)...e,d Pau Krauss, AICP 5p t_.(e'e_AAA,Y5 zero
Director of Planning
PK : v Vfa,u,,f24 /Z WC C))14.//fr
i
12.earAAAA-- 3
VouLe,-ICAA-S
1
1
CITYOF
cHANHAssEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 I
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
1
December 7, 1990
Mr. Richard Jopke
City of Roseville
2660 Civic Center Drive
Roseville, MN 55113
Dear Rick: _
The City of Chanhassen is considering a variety of ways to increase
City revenues and redirect programs to be more oriented towards
user fees. Accordingly, we are considering billing developers for
staff costs associated with reviews of plats, site plans, grading
permits, etc. It is my understanding that many of you may already
charge these costs to developers. I would appreciate your taking
the time to answer the following questions.
Yes No '
1. Do you charge staff time for
staff work effort on:
1
Plats x
Lot Divisions —4— 1
Site Plans — '
Conditional Use
Permits
Other requests — 1
2. What costs are allocated: 1
Planning Staff review
Engineering Staff review
Consultant reviews
(Engineering /traffic /City Attorney)
1
December 7, 1990
' Page 2
3. Do you require the escrow of funds to
cover projected costs? X
' 4. Do your application fees reflect the
projected cost of staff time for projects? 1�
1 Please send a copy of any fee schedules and ordinances requiring
payment of related costs you may use. Any other comments would be
appreciated.
Sincerely,
aul Krauss, AICP
Director of Planning
PK:v
1
1
1
1
1
1
' RECEIVED
•
DEC 27 1990
' CITY OF CHANHASSEN