Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Admin section
C ITY OF A4*. CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 / " ' 71! — 41; 4i,/a-' February 13, 1991 / t , � c-cwlv.11' £ / .7`14..• 9•."1*- c.I cr 4 in gt-t ./7 '."r , Mr. - Chet Harrison Howard, Needles, Tammen and Bergendoff 6700 France Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55435 '2//9 /V Re: Engineering Correspondence with the City of Chanhassen ' Dear Mr. Harrison: During this interim period in which the City of Chanhassen is in the abscence of an official City Engineer, I would request that all future engineering correspondence with the Chanhassen Engineering Department be directed or copied to my attention. This will allow information to be desseminated properly and insure that matters of importance are administrated in a timely fashion. When a new City Engineer is on board you will be notified as such. Your cooperation on this matter is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, CITY OF CHANHASSEN 1 Charles D. Folch • • Assistant City Engineer CDF:lap c: Don Ashworth, City Manager Todd Gerhardt, Asst. City Manager • Dave Hempel, Sr. Engineering Technician I I I CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 { : (612) 937-1900 •.FAX (612) 937-5739 February 14, 1991 11 Mr. Thomas J. Larson Refuge Manager ' Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 3815 East 80th Street Bloomington, MN 55425 Dear Mr. Larson: As you will recall, you and I held discussions last month concerning potential expansion of the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge within the City of Chanhassen. I indicated to you ` that a recently adopted Comprehensive Plan for the City illustrates a goal of having all land located south of Highway 169/212 ultimately incorporated into the Refuge. You indicated that -you ' believed the Fish and Wildlife Service may be receptive to this proposal and that you would consider including it in an upcoming funding request. I am pleased to inform you that in discussions held with the Planning Commission and City Council for the City of Chanhassen, the idea of expanding the Refuge to these boundaries received strong support. On behalf of the City of Chanhassen, I look forward to working with you in the development of the Refuge. We also strongly support the development of a trail system that would be of direct benefit to our residents, as well as preservation of the Minnesota River Valley bluff line and other important and sensitive environmental features of this area. ' Sincerel , _ / Paul Krauss, AICP Director of Planning ' PK:k • cc: Mayor and City Council Planning Commission Comprehensive Plan Background File i CITYOF I , : CHANHASSEN td .: d6 . I . 7,-'-. : . . 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 II February 19, 1991 II Mr. Jon Parker Area Wildlife Manager 1 Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources Room 101, 223 Holmes Street .Shakopee, MN 55379 I - Dear Mr. Parker: Last month you and I spoke regarding potential expansions of the I Minnesota River Valley National Wildlife Refuge in the City of Chanhassen. This letter will serve as official confirmation that both my Planning Commission and City Council have reviewed such an II expansion and have asked that I write to both you and Tom Larson at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to request that you both_ undertake to expand the park boundaries up to the south side of II U.S. Highway 212 . The City has promoted preservation of natural environments in the Minnesota River Valley in our recently approved Comprehensive Plan. A copy of that Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map _ is included with this letter. You will note that it shows all land II located on the south side of Highway 212/169 ultimately being incorporated within the Refuge. We understand that such an expansion of the park boundaries would be subject to funding II priorities, but feel that such an expansion is in the long term best interest of the community and, as I stated, we see this as a long term goal. IPlease let me know if there is anything else we can do to promote this concept. We would be happy to work with you or other DNR staff in any possible way to achieve this result. Thank you for IIyour assistance in this matter. Sincerely, l� Paul Krauss, AICP IDirector of Planning cc: Tom Larson, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Refuge IAttachment: Land Use Map 1 • II I OFFICE OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 75- Development Planning Unit I HENNEPIN 822 South Third Street, Suite 310 Minneapolis, MN 55415 I _ L (612) 348-6418 11 II February 7, 1991 II II The accompanying report summarizes the first fifteen years of the II Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program. It traces the history of the program and highlights the objectives and the degree to which they were realized. IIMuch has been accomplished through the cooperation and efforts of many people. II ! ---) -.' ( ( •- , . 1- 1-- - ' ' c i I -t' ..,7 i- 6.-c. I . 7 ,,ci J.,,. ..,C, .....- /6 ;A:57-v - I ,- _.(,-, ,, , e‘!--2 e•.1 ,,,r ,- c --Z (.. -L ‘"t'-' < '.... 'L, , ..... /1. z:„,?..7,,,,.,, ,_„,..?-e: • r, • 1 I (-{ (,, - /1 7 C 4.' (' i V '16C /2. tfiti--714 il- J I I '''' /-L -0.1 'h /, , /. ( 1 77' -,--e= ...;-. .?/ I Q.-- CV-e--, I ( N in he--2-; Ac i'LA!7 it-C (-- -421"7 C-AV-- 11,jts:( ///( -61- ,A /1, 1... A ) ,t9.9a.,i•--e-- RVEIVED I n_iii r‘-') t- (Ic4.1 lc_ "1u ir/721-44 EB 111S-91 i A,,,. z,„ o - 4 11> -)A-e 4 ,-.-.- . et OF ChANHASSFN Ic7c777 el ,./f /,'-171,■06, ?a Sil- /\.'. '" a ci? (-4/724-e--- HENNEPIN COUNTY Ian equal opportunity employer I . i3 its! � frr`f+rr fir' - �., •� •_> -.:.ice -. •t• 77!r�f if 2 - - - ���Fi <i:>$f is ii%%!%%f%!.f/'v +f.: J 4 ::'l•::0. : Y:Yfi; � __ .. �., - ��_�.. ...... .:.:.::.::}:•:...: rrr.;r :.v<;;:.::.;;•:ii#•,;> ; x;}•:•• : y,.a ,� ., _... . -�-,,.. .. _ ... - ....... ..... + -4^ .............. ........ ..:.:: ........... 4 Ff<a- aa-.v ;o}}s}x• .vg4•.v:::;.i•o>:}>::•.::;: {�'}a} - _ -, :_...-, '- . :.. r: ..a.}..:.:::::-.;.;:::::::::::::::::ii::::::::::.::.. rim` I ::::::::... .vim-< ..-.__ - . .... ... .K. :}: ' +•+ {t• ..� v<\.. rff. // ** f.. :Q C` •--.. :.., ...- .'!+_,-.-. ..' ....::..•.• .�.}.max::::•:..;•};i;:;�;: :.::x;:..:n;•:...;..Ck 2- l' - e„,,,..„,...7...,),,,,� i `� Yr}Yr ......... ... . ff�` ' L " : %}fit 0 } Y YS' _fir }'}'r :f �r- ` ` ::rC+ t S! II � Y�f:; - ''1/iF F F! - ?ajF ir''i" -' � 3.r. ,,..„„::: �r•.l•:. ....„........,„.....„.. . F.._..•....•...»•. - - ..:;;;4:•:4:•:;•:•;4;,}.;;.. ::: .::..... .a ha,,,, ,...„.0 ...,;.:. _ .L.S..- - ..V.\\..�♦♦\ f.}�i }`,��..-v __ } 1 f. rf • ...,..,-,..„ r.'tom.��.'a - .4 x :.rh: `xf}: `4 ......... h �r `'d' gHa• ="`va••••••:•:•:„:.„:„.„.".:.".....:.....:.........:„..:::::.::::....„.. iii ::::..hhh...h.v:...:.. K fix, ..title i•:. ` i2 \k`Yx Ci�sYa:•„„.,,,--.,..04.m.g..20&onimb4,?i...,-...•:..,•., % ... ....:....:::::...:%.,....„....„ ::,......:.:::::::::...::::..„.:::.„..:••••::::i ., k:i}}}i;x:lei•}:x::i::a::::;; iia4::2aivvi#:i$i$i .-.. I IThe Urban Hennepin County i Community Development Block Grant . 1 I . Program . The First Fifteen Years .................... i,: ........::;.::;.}}:.i: f /F r /.% fJf i 'F + 4F, r 7S'. •`:��� - - -t,c - kiir•::•i:;i - ..Stix sac. r:A,..w. `''ce•._• r'x !%.,, CCSCKC[(a Y. :caa< Yct<C,.:.. i:::::f:`vii•::::::::::;'x::�::::::::::::::L::::�:::Stt:L:rY::::: :}:t.•' �,... -. ..:::•:::..A,v::1?SW::.:\�?):if�t.L`r'r?::}`.v:"•.`n`xtCv\vJ'}L.:. .. • ::::::::;•:;:::.:::v.... '-. h................ - .;rvvrx.::4:•:^::•:::.+.• .... ................................... ...:::-n:r-C}}}}:-':}i v::::::..: .... :::.:.......nh ::•.•.•• ::..::,:v..:::::::::h.:...::7:71":7;.::;•:::,' :•:::•:;:v;: ::: ::::x;::•::.::•;: •7 i.vw�r}}rw.vv-�x. ........ •:.}}:+ •..:.;x•.::.:•i;.;•:;•:;t t;• :;.};.}•:.'�;•:': :::.:}:•}}}:t:4}:,.:.; ::4:;;.}+:;t;•:;•;::4.:•}:}>. .:.::K.:.:Y`.4<}..t.r..:a.. •:•:.}:;;•:;•:;:;;;•}:+•::..:`'::':::;:.'': ,s u_, ..........:......... �.y _ws^. {:,,h,}}....::.:::::::}::":;•:;::x::xkk:!::':: :':}:5: .}:�' ... ....... .. ;::}.:4:4:4}}}:.•}>}}}}}}::.}•..... ...:..:::4:•:::::}::•::}:::::v}::::v:::v.v.::::::x�:h•?:::;k.'�:' ,4.�.::.,��- ' �„ .� S45a;:;.�., ..X r::::u:; .v:::•::::::.v::;:::::::?::t::::.}v: „->_ - o-. �... �a- +•:. '''''''2'i''''''.1. .,..::•:. .�•. � ....:::..:.:......:. :... :;:....:.:•::::}:•}>:�.};:;.... >ASS! 2-- ............. .......... .. .. .;i:;:}v.}•:•}Y. FSy�./.. 323-:...✓ ... ....... ...... .. -. .. :.: :.: .::.}•::::.:::::v4}:;•}:-}$r:g .J vr::$i'r:}}}}:.}•.}•{:::N;:.;.y::;:•:.}'.}:::.;:.� =:,£*. :yam :. .....:... ...:.. ... ..;;:;;;.;:;:i.;:;;.: .. 4 ...... ......................:.::::.:v;.;.:.. •:::•:i:}:':':':}}}.�'"< .�.r�4: ....:.?'•'•} ':::':}':;':'t:::::':: :i:'r,:;:•Y' iiT.-.• ::��t{�3.r F/lr ....:}::::: ::::: :. •'.} ......:..........:::+.4:v::t4:?::}:•;t4}i}}}:•:•}}}.�•.. ..i FF:+...F.rr?}:: :::}}}}:::}:;':':• ::w .::v::.:.:. •:.•... •:••:::.•.:...: .. : a rr ::..:::..n.: :•:•• ...v:::•:.v:.v:.:: .:•.• }.;t.v}::;:.;r4 fr,:; F:: ;:i3r3}:<;:k::�.: d - ?r: %: `4i % sue..`5. V \\•:?riii:•i::i}xiti:k•::}:••i:4,::'•}:�}: i:;•;T .:::i.:r{;::: >,:::::};:i•t!: }?,:: La }, 4 �c C+M.C•:r -5 v:Y.✓i f:: ::3 }r}Y•L\`�'•' ..akY L. k , ,.,-yam.. :..:.::::. a•xaxx}x.:: } J s ql•.............................................:.v:::;:;:;::. :SSA\ }.,, }�a,,...• ::::::::.v:::;•:•'4:•4•::v}v•}:•}: •}:$;:}%::..:.. .•'�-.�-% - _e-�1� r?jy iiii:.v::.:;:::::::: .�:n..• ::.•::• :..:;v: vhh v h `^-::x;;;::•.::}':.w:tt:;.v':y.:'.y:•:•:•::•:•:Y}:•:•::}};N:Y:+}:•}:}}::•. ^'. : k - ;::;.}}'•::•:.�..;.,}„:..: ... :.: :::•i':••>•:::;};:•}>::: "h; \,.;�, j+. •.• ..nhhn.•a.n..........va..,,n+^ C.',r _z- ,}t .,�� . rcJ �- _ as%:; u. . �{�- +a f� . �.��•,: t `�'�'.t U;�$< _ ,f Y 3' 'is .5-._"S.i�% Y:.. a'.Ti�:�. The Urban Hennepin County iCommunity Development Block Grant Program — The First 15 Years 1 . Introduction Hennepin County has participated in the federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program since Year I, 1975. With the completion of the 15th year of this county-municipal partnership, it is appropriate to briefly step back and assess the objectives and accomplishments of the Urban Hennepin County program. 1 The CDBG program was created by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, and the U.S. Department of Housing and ' Urban Development was charged with its administration. ' The act changed the mode of federal assistance for community development activities from a categorical, project-by-project basis, to a block grant. It also provided that smaller cities in metropolitan areas • could join with their county and create an association that would be assured annual funding. 1 It is as an urban county that Hennepin became an entitlement recipient ' of CDBG funds. Urban Hennepin County was created and is maintained through the execution of a joint cooperation agreement between Hennepin County and each community desiring to be part of the program. Through this association, nearly $48 million has been expended since 1975 on more than 1 ,500 activities. (See Fig. 5) na.r.r=- .. ,.••+• • .:.,+s,4- • Background After passage of the Housing and Community Development Act of ' 1974, Hennepin County and interested cities studied the provision for the creation of "urban counties" as a mechanism to qualify for federal ' community development funding. Urban counties were included in the act as eligible for funding for rather wide range of projects, with apparent local flexibility in their selection and implementation. In order to qualify as an urban county, Hennepin had to demonstrate that it possessed sufficient housing and community development authority to be an effective participant. This authority was obtained I from local communities wishing to participate in the program through execution of a joint powers agreement. page 1 Early in 1975, agreements were signed by Hennepin and 22 communities whose aggregate population exceeded the qualifying threshold of 200,000. This action initiated the Urban Hennepin County CDBG Program for the first year and provided the basis for participation in eacki year that followed. Through the first 15 years, the program has grown to comprise 45 communities including Hennepin County. The combined population of the communities constituting Urban Hennepin County for Year XV exceeds 500,000. The annual entitlement peaked in year VI (1980) at $4,379,000. A ' special appropriation of $ 1 ,051 ,000 from the Jobs Bill of 1983 boosted the year IX grant to $4,803,000, but the added funds were ' programmed separately from the annual entitlement. The least amount, $738,000, was received the first year. The entitlement has leveled off at approximately $2,600,000 since Year XII (1986). Figure 1 (see page 3) traces the award of the annual grant by community. The annual allocation of funds made available to communities is determined by a formula based on population, condition of housing and level of poverty, which is contained in the joint cooperation agreement. 1 I I I I i 1 page 2 -s MI I 1 r r r MI OM MI S - • MI OM OM NM r in (a. C FIGURE I: ANNUAL ENTITLEMENT BY COMMUNITY ALLOCATION URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM,YEAR I-XV (1975-89) COMMUNITY 1/1975 11/1976 111/1977 IV/1978 V/1979 VI/1980 VII/1981 VIII/1982 IX/1983 X/1984 XI/1985 X11/1986 XIII/1987 XIV/1988 XV/1989 TOTAL BROOKLYN CENTER 325,483 346,029 329,145 282,356 332,575 241,592 240,240 203,986 204,682 194,500 202,316 S 2,902,904 BROOKLYN PARK $74,807 154,952 255,708 261,184 279,886 297.534 309,863 270,619 395,374 352,218 354,365 304,552 305,591 293,731 305,531 4,215,915 CHAMPLIN 34,380 56,792 59,680 64,133 68,182 70,990 61,032 47,911 37,765 38,177 33,222 33,334 33,354 34,688 673,640 CHANHASSEN 43.918 38,899 41,832 38,300 38,532 32,896 33,008 32,197 33,488 333,070 CORCORAN 10,096 20.856 34,571 34,140 36,700 39,017 37,199 33,534 39,131 37,765 37,689 32,255 32,365 31,096 32,346 488,760 CRYSTAL 85,534 177,274 292,748 288,942 309,543 329,082 303,826 258,212 202,906 142,759 140,736 118,599 119,003 112,868 117,394 2,999,426 DAYTON 15,642 25,792 25,810 27,433 29,165 27,559 26,157 33,390 29,730 30,020 25,510 25,598 24,613 25,601 372,020 DEEPHAVEN 10,096 20,856 34,297 33,860 36,330 39,017 37,394 30,851 24,948 19,017 19,019 16,161 16,216 15,674 16,303 370,039 EDEN PRAIRIE 19,210 39,919 65,571 66,890 71,918 76,458 78,000 93,225 85.055 69,638 72.350 64,733 64,954 64,853 67,445 1,000,219 EDINA 72,564 151,205 249,397 247,306 268,394 285,336 279,383 233,732 214,049 169,543 167,005 140.971 141,451 133,761 139,118 2.893,215 EXCELSIOR 8,413 17,271 28,535 28.589 30,769 32,712 31,259 26,492 20,558 16,874 16,664 14,034 14,082 13,476 14,018 313,746 GOLDEN VALLEY 42,206 87,823 144,862 139,335 149,767 159,221 147,433 126,088 115,109 86,512 85,379 71,922 72,167 68,532 71,067 1,567,223 GRFENFIEI,D 15,543 15,940 16,947 16,847 15,090 12.116 9,374 9,313 8,032 8,060 7,592 7,897 142,751 GREENWOOD 1,542 3,096 5,213 4,996 5,561 5,912 5,745 5,030 3,337 3,750 3,747 3,223 3,234 3.167 3,293 60,846 HANOVER 3,569 3,886 3,707 3,941 7,206 6,371 7,727 6,696 6,375 5,396 5,414 5,164 5,372 70,824 ' HASSAN 15,365 14,988 16,311 17,341 18.600 16,096 16,169 14,463 14,257 12,191 12,233 11,914 12,393 192321 HOPKINS 113,293 95,544 95.870 91,238 94,906 490,851 INDEPENDENCE 28.589 30,398 32.318 32,135 28,167 16,169 17,945 17,856 15,061 15,113 14,367 14,943 263,061 LONG LAKE 8,230 8,049 8,526 9,065 6,431 40,301 LORETTO 1.052 2,118 3,569 3,886 3,707 3,941 3,993 3,353 3,674 1,875 1,934 1,608 1,614 1,545 1,607 39,476 MAPLE GROVE 18,579 38,453 63,377 66,614 71,547 76,064 89,005 83,164 106,667 95,619 99,961 87,562 87,861 85,814 89,247 1,159,534 MAPLE PLAIN 11323 11,380 11,121 11,824 13,633 11,737 11,779 8,303 8,092 6,966 6,990 6,727 6,997 127,072 to MEDICINELAKE 11,863 12,612 11,686 10,060 3,337 1,875 1,825 1,567 1,573 1,517 1,575 59,490 b MEDINA 16,457 27,162 26,646 28.545 30,347 30,090 26,157 20,896 16,070 16,150 13,840 13,888 13,271 13,803 293,322 W MINNETONKA 76,210 158,048 261,194 261,184 281369 299,130 295,938 238,266 196,490 145,970 146,713 124,938 125,364 120,878 125,713 2,857,405 MINNETONKA BEACH 7,411 7,217 7,785 8,277 8,569 7,712 1,648 1,071 1,017 815 818 776 807 53,923 MINNETRISTA + 19.389 32,098 31,642 34,105 36,259 34,180 30,181 31,027 23,838 23,851 20,276 20,345 19,491 20,275 376,957 MOUND 26,151 53,769 89,445 89.929 97,126 103,257 105,755 89,200 92,822 76,870 76,581 64,957 65,178 62,013 64,507 1,157,560 NEW HOPE 52,162 108,190 178,884 175,973 188,321 200,208 190,183 160,963 183,996 137,670 136,577 115,358 115,751 109,507 113,903 2,167,646 ORONO 33,891 55,698 54,402 58,943 62,664 61,252 51,978 37,442 28,123 27,894 23,825 23,906 23,053 23,976 567,047 OSSEO 24,115 39,783 39,414 42,632 45323 43,042 37,558 28,325 22,766 22,286 18,684 18,748 17,740 18,453 418,869 PLYMOUTH 32,741 68,107 112,489 121,016 129,748 137,939 135,066 125,417 170,826 142,759 148,055 129,296 129,737 128,706 133,854 1,845,756 RICHFIELD 98,855 206,114 338,842 328,076 352,174 374,405 354,950 299,323 288,001 209,450 206,839 174,300 174,894 165,274 171,909 3,743,406 ROBBINSDALE 39,121 81,142 133,890 129,343 139,387 147,792 139,645 119,716 104,978 79,013 77,917 65,586 65,810 62,375 64,879 1,450,594 ROCKFORD 13,925 12,743 19,208 22,766 22,826 19,294 19,359 18,622 19,370 168,113 ROGERS 9,603 9,437 10,380 11,036 10,225 8,719 6,714 8,035 8,083 6,916 6,940 6,678 6,946 109,712 ST.ANTHONY 25,255 41,976 42,189 45,227 48,082 64,271 52,313 46,560 34,819 34,061 26,515 26,605 25,385 26,403 539,661 ST.BONIFACIUS 4,725 7,681 7,494 8,156 8,672 8,277 6,707 7,727 8,303 8,397 7,181 7,204 6,956 7,235 104,715 ST.LOUIS PARK 382,943 407,114 383,288 322,026 324,133 253,644 251,661 213,001 213,727 203,442 211,613 3,166,592 SHOREWOOD 13.181 27,210 44,994 44,132 47,451 50.447 48,300 42,253 29,676 , 23,302 23,380 20,160 20,229 19,802 20.595 475,112 SPRING PARK 4,838 10,493 16,463 17,209 18,535 19,706 17,821 16,096 13,805 11,517 11,430 9,582 9,615 9,188 9.558 195,856 TONKA BAY 5,399 11,243 18,383 18,041 19,648 20,888 18,600 15,761 8,402 6,160 6,200 5,262 5,278 5,074 5,278 169,617 WAYZATA 8,343 17,271 28,535 28,589 31,140 33,106 32,622 26,257 25,286 20356 20,087 16,821 16,878 16,092 16,738 338,121 WOODLAND 4,448 4.730 4,382 3,789 5,025 4,285 4,066 3,402 3,413 3,277 3,409 44,226 HENNEPIN COUNTY 36,900 122,736 271,350 308,400 411,900 437,900 432,800 372,600 375,200 302,600 310,100 264,000 264,900 253,900 264,800 4430,086 GRAND TOTAL 5738,000 1,752000 3,015,000 3,084,000 4,119,000 4,379,000 4,328,000 3,726,000 3,752,000 2,981,000 3,101,000 2,640,000 2,649,000 2,539,000 2,648,000 $45,451,000 tFigure 2 ANNUAL GRANT AND NUMBER OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPANTS URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM, YEARS I-XV (1975-89) I I DOLLAR VOLUMEOF FUNDING: 4,00TEO 0 4,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,00 1,000,000 NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS: 50- 42 42 43 43 43 43 44 44 44 44 45 50 I 40 36 38 R..' 30 .� 40 30- 23 30 20. 20 I 10, 10 YEAR: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 I Figure 2 Fi r g graphically portrays the trend in annual entitlements and the I number of cooperating communities. Since 1989, all communities eligible to participate in the program have done so. Bloomington and Minneapolis have not participated because they qualify as direct Ientitlement communities on the basis of population. :..ti "` 8w�,a� --_ ,°.. ,.,a, ,r ,.;` -•;9�. ws:xa:- rwa.rc- :,� �_T�°r'-5x.,er-:-; IOverview of The overall objectives of the program — as established in h Achievements to: g the act — are I • develop and maintain viable urban communities by providing Idecent housing, a suitable living environment and expanded economic opportunities, principally for low and moderate I income persons; • aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight; • meet other community development needs having a particular Iurgency. I I page 4 To satisfy the national objectives in a manner consistent with local priorities, the Urban Hennepin County program is directed toward the use of funds for housing rehabilitation, public facilities, neighborhood I revitalization, assisted housing, removal of architectural barriers and public services. ' The Urban Hennepin County CDBG Program has demonstrated that a group of rather diverse communities can effectively cooperate to 1 maximize assistance provided by the federal government and accomplish common objectives. Each year the Urban County plans, programs and executes numerous activities to achieve program tobjectives. This process requires the participation and cooperation of 44 local governments in Hennepin County and their citizens. ' A major requirement of the program is that the funds expended J q p 9 p 1 principally benefit low and moderate income persons (those in households whose incomes are less than 80 percent of the area median). Figure 3 PERCENT EXPENDITURE BY BENEFIT CATEGORY 1 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM, YEARS I-XV (1975-89) 20.7% 79.1 % SLUM/BLIGHT LOW/MODERATE INCOME 02% URGENT NEED I I Figure 3 illustrates that low and moderate income persons have substantially benefited from Urban Hennepin County expenditures. page 5 Figure 4 EXPENDITURE BY MAJOR ACTIVITY URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM,YEARS I-XV (1975-89) I 12.2 % I ASSISTED HOUSING 28.5% $5,825,726 HOUSING REHABILITATION :7:,„,.,. _-;�s: 5.3% I $13,645,887 REMOVAL OF ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS ' $2,538,674 17.2 % I NEIGHBORHOOD >: REVITALIZATION r $8,230,262 PUBLIC SERVICES "'f`''"' ` '= $2,026,436 4ri} tS{ <iv {-4,Ynr em oG I{ «S n�:»>Yy Y I 18.0 % PUBLIC FACILITIES . ft kGr147 %• $8,634,469 PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION $7,024,262 I - IFigure 4 summarizes the type and magnitude of activities undertaken through Year XV of the program. I Housing Nearly $ 14 million has been spent on rehabilitating single-family homes IRehabilitation owned and occupied by low and moderate income families. This represents over 28 percent of expenditures and translates into service Ito about 2,500 households. IPublic Nearly $9 million, or 18 percent of expenditures, was used to improve Facilities existing public facilities or assist in the development of new ones. ITargeted primarily to areas and groups of low and moderate income persons with special needs, the following projects are examples of public facility activities: • restoration and improvement of Commons Park, Excelsior I page 6 . I • remodeling, weatherization and kitchen facilities, Seniors Center, Richfield • construction of Senior Center, Dayton • improvements to Home Free, a shelter for victims of domestic abuse, Plymouth • assistance in the construction,of the Crystal Bay sewer system, Orono • I Neighborhood Seventeen percent of program expenditures have been directed to Revitalization maintain, preserve and improve local neighborhoods. Principally used in low and moderate income areas, $8.2 million was spent to make infrastructure improvements and renew redevelopment areas. Examples of such projects include: ' • business area revitalization, Mound t • Bass Lake Road commercial area redevelopment, Crystal 1 • purchase, removal and redevelopment of substandard housing sites, Robbindale 1 - • Valley Square redevelopment, Golden Valley Assisted Expenditures approaching $6 million, more than 12 percent, supported I Housing the development of new housing affordable to low and moderate income households. This helped in providing 82 units specifically for the handicapped, 187 units of family housing and 869 units for the elderly. Both owner and rental housing was provided. Examples of assisted housing supported by the Urban County program include: • Winnetka West, handicapped housing, New Hope • The Sheridan, handicapped housing, Richfield • Cunningham, handicapped housing, Robbinsdale • ,Oak Glen, family housing, Edina page 7 • Hickory Ridge, family housing, Maple Grove • Cedar Hills, family housing, Minnetonka • Woodhaven, elderly housing, Edina • Calvary, elderly housing, Golden Valley • Pleasant Place, elderly housing, Rogers • Walker on Kenzie, elderly housing, St. Anthony IRemoval of Over $2.5 million was used to remove architectural barriers that Architectural restricted the mobility and accessibility of elderly or handicapped IBarriers persons to public buildings, facilities, and public and private housing. Among the projects of this type are: • Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District P 9 i • Community Center, Brooklyn Center • city buildings, Edina • elevator, Hennepin County Government Center • curb cuts, sidewalk ramps, Osseo I Public Up to 15 percent of the Urban County's annual grant can be used for Services public services. More than $2 million was provided for this activity in support of government and nonprofit agency efforts to serve some of the needs of the elderly, handicapped and low and moderate income persons. Public services principally have aided the following projects: • Household and Outdoor Maintenance for the Elderly (H.O.M.E.) I page 8 • senior transportation services I • senior center programs and counseling I • child day care . I • summer youth employment Figure 5 (next page) summarizes the expenditures of each community Ifor each basic type of program,activity. I .. , ILooking The 16th year of the program is continuing from the base established Ahead in the first 15 years. Forty-four communities are participating and share I the $2,552,000 grant for 1990 at essentially the same rate as in recent years. IAs we move into the next three-year period of the program, the City of Plymouth will not be a participant. Plymouth has chosen to join I Bloomington and Minneapolis in receiving a grant directly from HUD. This option was available because Plymouth gained metropolitan city status by attaining a population in excess of 50,000. Although IBrooklyn Park has had the same opportunity since 1988, that city has elected to remain a part of the Urban Hennepin County program. In Ithe future, other communities may be faced with the same option, which could further alter the number of participants and the annual Igrant amount. Annual CDBG funding is determined by appropriations made by the Ifederal government. Funding has stabilized during the last five years, leading to expectations that it will continue essentially unchanged. Like I all national programs, -however, the CDBG program is sensitive to evolving domestic priorities and budgetary constraints. As in the past, we will monitor events and program changes and continue to Imaximize the effective use of available resources in addressing the housing and community development needs of our area. I Ipage 9 , - . .. _ -` - - - - _ .- .- : _.:, ._-.-- - um- -- NE ow me an ilim um I OM MI MI MI r 111111 NM IIIII NM MN Figure 5 -11 ACTIVITY EXPENDITURES BY COMMUNITY 10 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM, YEARS I-XV (1975-89) 1D ASSISTED HANDICAP NEIGIIBORIIOOD PUBLIC PUBLIC PLANNING/ HOUSING VI COMMUNITY ' HOUSING ACCESS REVITALIZATION FACILITIES • SERVICE ADMINISTRATION REIIAB TOTAL* BROOKLYN CENTER $ 0 199,429 1,078,002 50,167 0 97,697 1,274,234 $2,699,529 BROOKLYN PARK 33,889 60,199 2,704,357 866,146 181,305 117,221 426,947 4,390,064 CHAMPLIN 0 0 107,440 175,699 119,003 163,885 323,735 889,762 CIIANIIASSEN 0 7,500 120,130 0 0 64,021 59,711 251,362 CORCORAN 0 12,169 15,696 212,044 0 145,181 81,991 467,081 CRYSTAL 455,797 128,370 736,001 450,142 86,000 102,981 1,106,651 3,065,942 DAYTON 0 0 12,001 152,850 42,918 73,974 98,212 379,955 DEEPIIAVEN 0 15,253 10,316 91,066 2,920 28,600 108,229 256,384 EDEN PRAIRIE 433,155 0 5,000 298,307 82,245 48,675 116,334 983,716 EDINA 758,458 585,754 12,666 573,293 139,940 82,005 402,081 2,554,197 EXCELSIOR 307,429 0 4,375 126,556 19,394 53,707 47,771 559,232 GOLDEN VALLEY 614,977 0 365,932 233,488 77,797 32,342 228,808 1,553,344 GREENFIELD 0 0 0 8,543 0 58,232 30,207 96,982 GREENWOOD 0 0 3,536 26,352 1,707 92 0 31,687 HANOVER 1,856 0 11,162 85,221 0 17,962 3,941 120,142 HASSAN 4,081 0 10,365 10,000 0 82,935 17,225 124,606 HENNEPIN COUNTY 0 625,255 0 219,086 179,788 4,026,577 638,066 5,738,772 HOPKINS 0 0 0 187,444 13,700 19,000 270,707 490,851 INDEPENDENCE 4,490 0 0 92,708 0 87,669 50,783 235,650 LONG LAKE 0 0 2,783 747 0 28,649 0 32,179 LORETTO 0 0 2,978 33,134 0 10,466 0 46,578 w MAPLE GROVE 0 95,025 262,087 386,870 47,258 72,072 47,553 910,865 MAPLE PLAIN 52,526 2,819 615 42,208 0 16,412 22,353 136,933 c MEDICINELAKE 0 3,000 0 0 0 1,575 14,167 18,742 o MEDINA 0 0 7,662 200,544 5,453 24,635 42,853 281,147 MINNETONKA 147,469 156,750 200,660 354,637 27,000 160,585 1,932,787 2,979,888 MINNETONKA BEACH 0 26,722 16,448 7,948 0 8,800 0 59,918 MINNETRISTA 0 9,812 0 5,901 35,008 93,716 138,685 283,122 MOUND 127,551 17,209 180,372 448,209 98,468 127,737 293,997 1,293,543 NEW HOPE 472,072 102,904 857,830 396,147 98,410 180,906 453,327 2,561,596 ORONO 0 18,000 10,520 185,161 0 43,919 289,641 547,241 OSSEO 0 61,538 236,683 238,455 0 88,444 25,255 650,375 PLYMOUTH 607,142 0 129,156 17,898 123,174 220,359 816,614 1,914,343 RICHFIELD 989,044 105,000 75,000 1,135,486 243,144 187,479 1,447,483 4,182,636 ROBBINSDALE 455,807 82,286 489,007 183,653 158,772 153,750 326,247 1,849,522 ROCKFORD 4,000 0 71,862 79,682 0 12,076 0 167,620 ROGERS 37,898 0 0 148,973 ± 0 22,440 0 209,311 SHOREWOOD 0 9,776 103,964 80,960 81,458 40,705 205,836 522,699 SPRING PARK 0 4,841 0 39,127 14,197 40,037 53,234 151,436 ST.ANTHONY 65,302 75 20,160 162,456 37,035 52,690 146,945 484,663 ST.BONIFACIUS 0 2,265 0 113,111 0 3,000 5,000 123,376 ST.LOUIS PARK 50,000 157,933 326,129 394,085 100,000 143,726 2,016,928 3,188,801 TONKA BAY 0 12,932 4,200 43,237 0 24,165 13,039 97,573 WAYZATA 0 35,858 27,323 76,728 10,342 102,445 53,040 305,736 WOODLAND 0 0 7,844 0 0 13,501 15,270 36,615 GRAND TOTAL $5,622,943 2,538,674 8,230,262 8,634,469 2,026,436 7,227,045 13,645,887 $47,925,716 • Includes program income and special appropriations; therefore,total is not consistent with the total grant received recorded in Figure 1. . • I , I Urban Hennepin County Participating Communities: I ;H . I I Aoues i . DArr0N _ v Iiik- NASSAN CNAMPLN .-MANOYEN ._. © .. ......._- I 1 MANE GROVE . 4SEO Mo 0 oELrNPuiE GREEMAELD CORCORAN -- 4 `; .....c4„,..0 ; ; 1l I _.. ... ..... iri. \\.._.._� L Q U lrN 1 t LENTEN " ;LONET/O 133 ® C;;;;; p I. 7� il�`\� tE INDEPENDENCE A PLYMOUTH ..^ MAPLE KAN , 0 a ;s GOLDEN YAW IAEE�,� (, r V • ODONO z WAYZATA 1........... , ,.rsTA � a I q,1 ST.LOINS/ANA ("' vs ;CJ /..IP� MIMKTOMEA', SEV 5-1 \ND►RNES , I BONN Sl. TONAA ...... DEE►NArf' ACA/5 SNOpEWOOO/ULSION O • e~ I�\ IOWA • NKNEKID CNANNASSEN '' a 2i EDEN MAMIE r'd 1 Hennepin County Board of Commissioners Peter McLaughlin, 1st District '/ I Non-Participants Randy Johnson, 2nd District John Keefe, 3rd District I John E. Derus, Chairman, 4th District Tad Jude, 5th District Judy Makowske, 6th District Mark Andrew, 7th District IDale Ackmann, County Administrator 2303 Hennepin County Government Center IMinneapolis, MN 55487 I in Equd Opportunity Housing I I I akw '7 C TYOF CC . CHANHASSEN ' 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147• CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 * FAX(612) 937-5739 I February 12, 1991 Mr. Jay Kronick Lotus Lawn and Garden 78 West 78th Street • Chanhassen, MN 55317 ' Dear Jay: 11 The City has received your submittal for Administrative Site Plan review to display -balled and burlapped trees for sale on the east side of your property. The burlapped root balls will be covered with wood chip mulch and will be contained in an area 115 ' x ' 100 ' . The outside storage area will be setback 25 ' from the front lot line and 5 ' from the east lot line. - ' Staff agrees to the proposal and approves the Administrative Site Plan with the following conditions: 1 . An undulating landscaped berm 2' to 4' in height shall be located in front of the outdoor display area. A grading and landscaping plan shall be submitted for staff approval . 2. The existing berm in front of the building shall be landscaped similar to the new berm so that the ' landscaping and berm are consistent throughout the site. 3 . A Letter of Credit covering the cost of the improve- !' ments and to cover cost of landscaping through one growing season shall be submitted prior to expansion of the site. ' 4 . Pay a $100 fee for Administrative Site Plan approval. I 1 I — No — — — — — — r — on an — OsToo-of- D„PIL `I • 0o,�1.1) rr.ulGLPS) f �4f?) LOC/1Tti� r 6.11,0( (y\,,�1 For a,.i o• 1 (1:11(153�r1pl L'Iwi r,( /rte. - OISPLrnt�t) • 1 y Fes. SALE- Su. . -, r0 6,115io6e_ c 1 G BPS ,cad v,.aL. wow( `l`'P 1 ii,.e,.3vJn1 I"Eexd�.Pn l.�c liltille P. / �"f`, LCSTUS LAv.IN So.l+tS -- y Fawo G/a2DFSV L. i A. Q,,,4„1 a c ::even � w -nit Sr :•:i■, ,.■� 3 I • Mill Q t G14 R*,IAnS5EV 0 91.O1 b iPr�K,��� t L or OUTS DISPLAY I f . PLAk rs • (Ex is4.1;79 0 • . i i . gw 44_1 .. .0 ,------ -,9- '"fir ! 1 1 CITYOF t. CHANHASSEN i ' 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 MEMORANDUM 1 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Paul Krauss, Planning Director 1� DATE: February 12, 1991 SUBJ: Gravel Mining Article - i I have attached an article from the February 7th edition of the Star Tribune that illustrates problems other communities are having with gravel mining operations. As we indicated to you last year, many of these communities are considering or already have adopted stronger regulations. • 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 S -` 1`'- ,.v x"Z'''`''°-. -^°-'`.,.‘r.''x4 a" >' i ''',:k*-' •n-5�,s ' >A F u-YC,.7 ,yam. s r z g t f.} r t—-1, a rtr. , is 1,; Cs y x -,,, ,, \-:,-, 0,:',-,,ti- -177.1 7v1. .I.1:1.1111111111r " '"----7t"" , -Y, Y M r i� 2 •,:. J c { :t s , .£ -. s _ rt "14 -i ss-X" .. s,, ,ri. .,.w ,ky, `e - x >A▪ .�»r°A76; �'� �,•„s ,rW �y • yam.,a.iIJ t „'IA 4K ; ' �yr --.-• - -•�-s = 4ati.:i� ;�i$ t�r�{"'''i- ±° It: -�.,,«..14.7 ji 7."--;,:',. 4-:41.'1, - i '-1 , - d ,c 'xT 1, "�'ry(xq•>. - _5'-";y -:° - - ;a, '�,-~ x - •-- 1 - • "'• ' �"_- : i Q ^ffigz . - .a G4 '--•"$ di"q:2.•.." [.'.,i' "" .+-as•.`..i it r z, ' x_.y^ -a a..✓r s�; sr-- 'i: 4•i,}Ar s;,i.--:tx r ,+x�� - " ` a " f - > , - a° : ? x .vim t - ..b } . y r T t II T r_,.,�`' ,,,,.� . - ->�" �'r'-s rj4 i, .ale,if,-,..,-.-.-- (lift 1 r f° i x ,0- y"s" -_ x yin _ - �`.• - ; • fi s,. �a[- .z-44,-,4,f--,. ` t .F• zy r d s ,+g,'7 y, t .E- -- _ , PrNt • r y *, `' wl r tV.,a;�& .'cti. n' > ' I • ',: ,, -°< • e .-ag lr ' Staff Photo by Charles Bjorgen A number of new homes have been built around Lac Lavon Lake In Apple Valley,which used to be an open-pit gravel-mining sits. Life near a graVel mine is the its v . ContrOls tightened over operations reclamation • I By Dennis Cassano Citizen pressure forced the county tons of gravel and 1.6 billion tons be cut in half.Accompanying the Staff Writer to start paying attention to min- of crushed-rock resources in the final proposal will be a reclama- ing operations,he said. undeveloped portions of the met- lion plan that will show the land- When the glaciers retreated ropolitan area,enough to last 200 soaping when the gravel peters out 10,000 years ago, they deposited In the metropolitan area there are years. There is no need'for local 50 years from now. i rich lodes of gravel in what is now about 100 gravel-mining opera- ordinances or state laws to keep the Twin Cities area dons covering about 10,000 acres. developments from covering up The cities want to ensure that All are open-pit operations. the deposits,the study concluded. they won't be left with a deep, It is the stuff that forms the un- ugly hole when mining operations derpinninga of urban life, from Although there is a huge 2,000- What has developed instead is end.And they want the miners to I the sewers to the pavement to the acre gravel pit in Hennepin Coun- increasing pressure for suburban grade the slopes and plant vegeta- skyscrapers. • ty's Maple Grove that is being communities to toughen rules Lion as they go rather than wait mined by nine companies, the governing the mines that are now - until a mine has been depleted. It also is the stuff that creates bulk of the gravel deposits are in surrounded by pricey homes, headaches for cities and counties, Dakota and Washington counties. even though the vast majority of "It's a constant battle because rec- ' and heartaches for people such as the gravel is used for building [emotion costs money," said According to a study by the Met- Jim and Carol Kart projects in the suburban areas.In Anne Hurlburt, former Cottage ropolitan Council and the Minne- addition to noise and air pollu- Grove city planner who now is a The Kargs built their house on the rota Geological Survey in 1983, tion, pit neighbors are worried planner for the .Metropolitan edge of a lake and a marsh just two great swaths of gravel depos- about the condition in which Council."What we asked them to I south of'Lakeville 10 years ago. its were left by the glaciers, one mined-out pits will be left. do went against the grain of what The area is now filled with from Dakota County to the north- they had been doing for years" $200,000 to $300,000 houses on east through Washington County, The huge Maple Grove pit and several-acre lots. and the other from Dakota Coun- the large one on County Rd.42 in What the cities want in the end is I ty to the northwest through Hen- Apple Valley have been mined something comparable to the half- Soon, perhaps this sprint Ames nepin County. There are some since the 1920s and 1930s. The square-mile in the southwest cor- Construction Inc.is going to open scattered deposits in Scott and Maple Grove pit may last another ner of Apple Valley. Mined for a new gravel pit 650 feet from the Carver counties, primarily along 20 years, but the city and the about 20 years until 1980,the pit Karp'house, the Minnesota River,but little in operators already are starting to was empty for three or four years Ramsey or Anoka counties. plan how the land that now looks until housing development start- !" The noise, dust and scarring of like a moonscape will appear ed in the mid-1980s. scenery by gravel-mining opera- However, more than 90 percent when the gravel is gone. lions have moved local govern- of the deposits in Hennepin and Now there is a lake surrounded menu—including Maple Grove, Ramsey counties have been The Apple Valley pit could close on three sides by slopes and about Apple Valley and Washington paved over or are under parks much sooner,and there are plans 100 houses valued at between I County—to pass new ordinances and wildlife preserves.In the ear- for a golf course and expensive 3125,000 and$225,000,said City increasing controls over the pits. ly 1980s the Metropolitan Coun- housing there. Planner Richard Kelley. cil and the Legislature were con- Although an earlier ordinance in cerned that the spreading suburbs A consortium of mine operators At the west end, over the city, Washington County required per- would cover so many more de- floated a proposal to open a new limits in Burnsville,is the rest of I mits from mine operators, only posits that there would be a short- mine of about 1,400 acres in Ap- the lake.and a park. about four or five of the 20 to 30 age of gravel. plc Valley, on the border with mining operations bothered to oh- Lakeville. But there was a storm tain them,said Dennis O'Donnell But a study in 1985 estimated of protest from Lakeville real- if the planning department. that there are deposits of 3 billion dents, and the project may now 1 Public Works/Engineering Agenda February 14, 1991 Page 2 V. Update from Utility Department: ez.cCep 1,17`6S f / VI. Update from Street Department: ��� � �j � - ���'re , ,5 t/c v�f�r//yvw,1'(s //4 7/?/, ' r /R-w,;2 G�!� //- //�GCJ ,9/7. a�GR ', ' VII. City Council Update: VIII. Public Works/Engineering all Employee Staff Meeting: fa t- a ‘.5-X IX. Public Safety Commission/City Council Meeting on Traffic I Signage: M6//:5 �a2�� /' /9q-/e, 1 X. Other Items for Discussion: 1 e yam 77 i z? - ' XI. 1991 Departmental Goals: (7�a /v/7/ cjon go'o:=r3-o .1 a� e/' 77/ /� q /f1/ 1 XII. Next Meeting Date: Thursday February 28, 1991 ' • 8: 30 a.m. 1 1 N A T I O N A L C A S U A L T Y C O M P A N Y PROPERTY/CASUALTY DIVISION Claims Department 8877 North Gainey Center Drive I Scottsdale,Arizona 85258 Reply to: Telephone I Post Office Box 4120 602-948-0505 Scottsdale,AZ 85261-4120 FAX 602-483-6752 February 15, 1991 ' City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive ' Chanhasses, MN 55317 RE: CLAIM NO: 146810 INSURED: City of Chanhassen POLICY NO: P00120328 CLAIMANT: Moon Valley Aggregate, Inc. Dear Sirs: ' This suit involved a lawsuit entitled Moon Valley Aggregate, Inc. vs City of Chanhasses. The firm of Marshall and Associates was retained to defend the ' case. Per Mr. Knutson's letter of 11-21-90, "the City of Chanhasses is declining coverage in the above matter". The total expense was $727.50. There is a deductible under your policy of $5,000.00, which includes both loss ' and loss adjustment expenses, including legal fees. Therefore, we would appreciate reimbursement in the amount of $727.50 in accordance with the terms of your policy. Please forward your check in the amount of $727.50, made _ payable to National Casualty Company, upon receipt of this letter. Please write ' our claim number on your check and forward to P.O. Box C-4120, Scottsdale, Arizona 85261-4120. If you have any questions pertaining to this letter, please call me at 1-800-423-7675, extension 2512. Your cooperation is appreciated. ours trul /a ' Laura Conway Recovery Department cc: Agent #455024 WF/ap 3013b/p9/320 RICEIVED FF'B191991 fit `.fir ...-.. 1Clt Home Office • Southfield,Michigan umor m — m I — m m mu m m my g - ' I IMO - Mil Mb CHANHASSEN H.R.A. A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E 02-25-91 PAGE 1 CHECK # A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E 0 042870 475.70 BARTON ASCHMAN ASSOC. OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES • 042871 410.00 CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, FEES, LEGAL r 042872 10.00 CARVER COUNTY RECORDER OTHER ACQUISITION COSTS 042873 89.00 CITY BUSINESS SUBSCRIPT. + MEMBERSHIPS 0 042874 4,186.75 HOISINGTON GROUP, INC. FEES, SERVICE i 042875 720.00 MN REAL ESTATE JOURNAL PROMOTIONAL EXPENSE 6 5,891.45 CHECKS WRITTEN I 0 • • c c I I. ' /9/, 7.d,w -e '' 1404.. - /j II ? 4ti � y cc p Pa -7 AGENDA r 1 S; 91 8 _ February 14, 1991 IPUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING STAFF MEETING I. Daily Administration: I .,,'d 44, z l,2r7° PP/'9 ? ,0-' ii A1 �� r/)Y . . car,z s._) III. Current Inhouse Projects: I 1 . City Standard Specs k /e 271,77 ew , ,?d6,,, ,17a &i4ze 2 . Surface Water Utility ar-el6.//,J,9, s�/zzi o/o,& gc ou-/.ter-. i , /, • ham I 3 . Pavement Management /724 O.S/� piv e�m, ° -mod.>-j Ls o.i(. 4 . Annual Brid a Inspection Dai7 e '/� .['d /.�c%%/i �'s�i�j e�� ,���,��. 5 . Telemetry ,' e' .6&,17,9 a�e,b',/,A, �e cam+--/d/h/o it ✓.2..i I 6 . Street Signs and Lights Inventory � //,a6/174, gel ltl�de Sfz2E'fs ..1,S "pi,/ a .7, ,/c/;- Alt ' III . Future Inhouse Projects: 1 . Sewer Televising , -awd .%«j e cerci4h. /74 ,1 44077 -.54-e I2 . Sanitary Sewer Rehab Program 4///// GZv /'4o4ef7z2-7f izllds rie- r,7`-_ IIv. C.I.P. and Private Development Projects: I1 . TH 5 .50,977 s/n a 24,ite da ?2c,74. o' "'"54' . I4ceo it/4' P° �/5. ' 2 . Minnewak /,f/dsht zA, Parway ,ear� j ' ,77, .j, z,i// c y .4.‘,<<.>c/, I 3 . Chan Haven ,Plaza P/4/5 d v7, d, r a' 'G'i1'mod' 4 . Rapid Oil W. 79th Street I Se-4/ ele 1-i•-7 Fes/ .7.c !' ,.. r�'eA2 5 . Lake Riley Hills //t /a 5 p M '7 '4-7/ /eas.;b./r& S,ze ��r' . I6 . Teton Lane 7 . Lone Cedar Lane s�ct/`/i ice /'� f cf r fWG r osf /S 1n� d/"u aJq/ r. y,�7iE1/rc " J. /ga/SfG d ow I 8 . Plans and Specs Well No. 6 `i�-T�'� iyi srfie 9 . Lake Susan Hills 6th I j'i<rf' a97‘4-7//v,7 SPe-s Serfins d/2"7 / ?1/iei✓- 10 . Minnewaspta Highlands I